Environmentalists, the Green movement, and various other groups dedicated to protecting and preserving the earth and its inhabitants, was, initially begun as a result of the plunder and destruction resulting from the willingness of governments around the world to allow the decimation of the environment for corporate profits. The environmentalist movement has been virtually taken over. What it represents now in many areas is the facilitation of the decimation of our rural communities and is the UN Agenda 21 plan for seizing all lands, water and food production to be owned and operated by the corporate state.

While those involved in this movement believe they are working to protect the earth, the environment and its wildlife, the catalyst behind the movement has become Agenda 21 from the UN. This Agenda specifically sites land ownership as a source of wealth and one that should be held only by the state. The rationale for this is that land ownership signifies wealth of some level, and this level can vary radically from one individual to the next and that is, for some reason, not fair……so the state should own everything and that way no one but the state has any wealth. One of the cleverest and most successful coup’s ever implemented was the co-opting of true environmentalists into the “sustainability/Smart growth” Agenda 21 program.

While I do believe that we should take care of our environment, our wildlife and our waterways; handing these assets over to the government to sell off to corporations to plunder and abuse while simultaneously and falsely claiming they are protecting the environment, will produce nothing but devastation. All across our country we can see the rapid deterioration of land under government control now exploited and plundered; the water systems polluted beyond reclamation from endless strip mining, gas and oil drilling and rendered unfit for any further use.

The surest way of impoverishing a nation is to take away property rights, especially those that are held for agriculture. Every effort has been made by successive congresses and administrations for the last twenty years, to reduce the full rights and enjoyment of private property ownership or to eradicate or make it impossible for our farmers and ranchers to continue in their businesses. To facilitate this theft of agricultural lands and use, the USDA and the FDA have been invaluable. These two agencies, both privately held corporations, are not public service agencies as we are supposed to believe. The job of both agencies is to implement Agenda 21, including the infamous Codex Alimentarius through the construction of barriers to trade, business and arbitrary regulations and rules that have been shown time and again to be constructed for no other reason than to make the continuance of independent agriculture, impossible, while at the same time making the industrialization of agriculture ever more possible through various programs, special provisions and exemptions from burdensome regulations that are aimed at eliminating as competition in the markets.

On the issue of trade, I find it rather strange that the incessant bleating from corporate America regarding free trade never includes the right to free trade within the agricultural community unless that trade is plied as an industrialized corporate operation. For the family or independent producer, the right to trade freely has been made virtually illegal.

Premises ID and the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) both have their origins in Agenda 21. Both of these schemes are intended for no other purpose than to swindle agricultural and livestock producers not only out of their land, but also to the rightful ownership of their livestock; all of it to now be owned and controlled by agencies on behalf of the federal government and in compliance with agenda 21. After all, what is the point of stealing someone’s land if you can’t also steal the benefits and produce from it?

Anytime anything arrives at your door with “Best practices” on it; that is Agenda 21/Codex. Best farming practices? Best land management practices? These practices are far from the “best”. They are a reduction in known standards for healthy and safe food sources; this reduction in standards and methods in agriculture is for no other purpose than to set the lowest standard possible to make industrialization of agriculture more easily accomplished and more profitable for corporate raiders.

The idea behind the “Best Practices” barrage is to end the knowledge that has been passed from one generation to the next about how to manage lands, crops and animals and/or how to harvest, store and preserve food supplies. This is a collective knowledge, the possession of which is invaluable if we are to survive. Our farmers and ranchers know far better how to manage their land, crops and animals than some desk jockey in the UN or in Washington D.C.. Every effort is made by USDA and the FDA along with other agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency to disparage and condemn and to cast into a negative light the farming and ranching practices that have sustained this country over time. For some reason if the government isn’t telling ranchers and farmers how to manage and care for their lands, crops and animals, the food system might not be safe. The fact is, under the constant dictating by government of land, crop and animals, our food system has become so toxic little of it is fit to eat.

Our farmers and ranchers here in the US know their business. They have had to acquire knowledge about soil, crops, livestock, harvesting, storage and this has been a knowledge base that did not need government interference. These people know how to care for the land and their animals.

Historically we know that no nation can survive economically without a strong and independent agricultural sector and yet we see every effort by our government over decades to destroy that sector. The Russian Holocaust (The Holodomor) of the 1920’s wherein an estimated 20 million people starved to death at the hands of their own government, while grain stores were burned and all food produced was controlled and owned by the government and exported while the locals starved to death and some even turned to cannibalism, has become a very real possibility, worldwide.

The ability of a nation to feed its own people from its own food stocks produced by its own farmers and ranchers, is an indicator of a strong and viable economy in which every individual benefits. Every dollar spent in agriculture generates upwards of seven dollars in the economy.

The CAFO farms and industrialized agriculture based on administration of chemicals, pesticides, herbicides, hormones, vaccines, antibiotics and the utter inhumane treatment of animals for a quick profit not only harms the environment, but also the overall health of the consumers of these products and is not indicative of a strong agricultural sector. This is corporate industrialized farming and ranching and returns little benefit on any level either to the consumer or to the economy as revenues of these operations are off-shored to various corporate coffers in far away places. All this is done for the “greater good” of course; the greater good actually being the greater accumulation of wealth for those who take ownership and control of the lands; those individuals and corporations at the top.

Sustainability? Smart Growth? Nothing more than the Agenda 21 plan for ending private property ownership across all nations, and a method of systematically working towards that end by adopting “international standards” not at all conducive to the maintaining of private property rights. How many groups and organizations jumped on the sustainability band wagon either not realizing it was meant to end private land ownership, or not caring that it was intended to do so?

The purging of rural communities using land stewardship programs, conservation programs, wildlife preservation programs, wildlife corridors programs, international property codes, rezoning efforts, or the attempts to construct a fictionalized difference between a newly created “rural lifestyle” and a farm; all based on some arbitrary line of financial division. This construct is based on the amount of sales generated from the land. Not generating enough sales from your agricultural property can result in your property being determined to be a “rural lifestyle” as opposed to an agricultural based business. Under this new redefinition of your small farm as simply a chosen “rural lifestyle”, new rules, taxes, codes, statutes and regulations are written, redefined, constructed, implemented and enforced with no other intention than to make your continued occupation of your land untenable.

Another method of land theft, and one that has proven invaluable to government as was recently evidenced in the leaked memo from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), is to redefine lands intended for government theft to be designated, “National Monuments”. Another aspect of this lucrative plan is the expansion of national forests, national parks, wildlife preservation areas; all of these redefinitions of “public lands” will culminate in the theft of an additional 13 million acres from private land owners in eleven of the Western states. This additional 13 million acre land theft when added to the land already claimed as owned by the BLM or managed by it, in those same states, expands the areas controlled by the federal government via its privately owned corporate agencies, significantly.

I find it not at all coincidental that these enlargements of, claimed lands creates a map of federal land ownership that is nearly identical to the UN Biodiversity Zones map. The UN map is comprised of the areas marked for non-human habitat and the designation of sequestered population centers where the population is to be herded into and held captive.

It seems we are at a crossroads here in the US. We are going to either be sucked further into the abyss that is Agenda 21 and forfeit our land, food and water to a greater “global purpose”, or, we will stand up and push back against the planned forfeiture of all these things meant only to profit multi-national corporations while being sold a bill of goods about what is supposedly good for us. We know what is good for us; and it doesn’t come from some UN corporate plan for controlling the world’s populations.

Logged

“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it's an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Patrick Henry

Another method of land theft, and one that has proven invaluable to government as was recently evidenced in the leaked memo from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), is to redefine lands intended for government theft to be designated, “National Monuments”.

Another aspect of this lucrative plan is the expansion of national forests, national parks, wildlife preservation areas; all of these redefinitions of “public lands” will culminate in the theft of an additional 13 million acres from private land owners in eleven of the Western states. This additional 13 million acre land theft when added to the land already claimed as owned by the BLM or managed by it, in those same states, expands the areas controlled by the federal government via its privately owned corporate agencies, significantly.

The Pinchot's held the countries largest Timber forests and Paper mills back in the 1900's.

To create a monopoly they needed the government's help. In the name of environmentalism.

His wife ran against McFadden in the 30's (and lost) before he was "poisoned".

Mrs. Hoover and Mrs. Pinchot do not speak when they pass each other on Washington's streets. Yet last week the unusual spectacle was presented of Mrs. Pinchot leaping to political arms in defense of President Hoover.

Representative Louis T. McFadden's bitter attack on President Hoover and the Moratorium last fortnight (TIME, Dec. 28) kindled indignation no less hot in his own 15th Pennsylvania District than elsewhere. ...Mrs. Pinchot, whose Milford home is in the rural 15th, was announcing that she would attempt to wrest the McFadden seat in the House away from its present plump occupant. In the April primaries she would be a candidate for the Republican Congressional nomination. Long ambitious to sit in the House, she unhesitatingly seized the McFadden outburst as a springboard for her campaign. Said she: "Every one must resent an unsubstantiated accusation of treason against the President."

No idle threat against Congressman McFadden was Mrs. Pinchot's candidacy. Great-granddaughter of the late great Peter Cooper, Manhattan philanthropist and manufacturer of the first U. S. steam locomotive,* daughter of the late Congressman, editor and diplomat, Lloyd Stephens Bryce, auburn-haired Cornelia Pinchot is a consummate politician. Bluntspoken, quick-witted, shrewd, she is quite the peer of her husband on the stump.

Outdoorish in her interests, she has landscaped the Pinchot estate, holds a permit to carry a gun (kidnapping threats have been made against her only son, Gifford Jr., 16), goes exploring in khaki shorts. In 1928 she ran against Congressman McFadden, lost the Republican nomination by 2,000 votes. This year she counts on his misbehavior in the House to help bring her victory. Her intelligence and capability would be considerably above the average of the other six women now in the House.

Gifford Pinchot (August 11, 1865 – October 4, 1946) was the first Chief of the United States Forest Service (1905–1910) and the 28th Governor of Pennsylvania (1923–1927, 1931–1935). He was a Republican and Progressive (and Yale S&B).

Pinchot is known for reforming the management and development of forests in the United States and for advocating the conservation of the nation's reserves by planned use and renewal. He called it "the art of producing from the forest whatever it can yield for the service of man."

Pinchot coined the term conservation ethic as applied to natural resources

In 1926, Governor Pinchot proposed his quasi-public "Giant Power" scheme for the state of Pennsylvania - which was very similar to Charles Steinmetz's plan to transmit electricity by high-voltage lines from power plants located adjacent to Pennsylvania coal mines - critics dismissed it as socialism.[13] Under President Franklin D. Roosevelt such a scheme materialized in the shape of the Tennessee Valley Authority(TVA).

Gifford Pinchot (S&B 1889) invented the aristocrats' ``conservation'' movement. He was President Theodore Roosevelt's chief forester, substituting federal land-control in place of Abraham Lincoln's free-land-to-families farm creation program. Pinchot's British Empire activitism included the Psychical Research Society and his vice-presidency of the first International Eugenics Congress in 1912.

Helping Pinchot initiate this century's racialist environmentalism were his cohorts George W. Woodruff (S&B 1889), Teddy Roosevelt's Assistant Attorney General and Acting Interior Secretary; and Henry Solon Graves (S&B 1892), chief U.S. forester 1910-20. Frederick E. Weyerhauser (S&B 1896), owner of vast tracts of American forest, was a follower of Pinchot's movement, while the Weyerhauser family were active collaborators of British-South African super-racist Cecil Rhodes. This family's friendship with President George Bush is a vital factor in the present environmentalist movement.

With Henry L. Stimson (S&B 1888) we come to the Eastern Liberal Establishment which has ruled America during the twentieth century. Stimson was President Taft's Secretary of War (1911-13), and President Herbert Hoover's Secretary of State (1929-33). As Secretary of War (1940-45), this time under President Harry Truman, Stimson pressed Truman to drop the atomic bomb on the Japanese. This decision involved much more than merely ``pragmatic'' military considerations. These Anglophiles, up through George Bush, have opposed the American republic's tradition of alliance with national aspirations in Asia; and they worried that the invention of nuclear energy would too powerfully unsettle the world's toleration for poverty and misery. Both the U.S. and the Atom had better be dreaded, they thought.

Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Robert Edward "Ted" Turner III (born November 19, 1938)[2] is an American media mogul and philanthropist. As a businessman, he is known as founder of the cable news network CNN, the first dedicated 24-hour cable news channel. In addition, he founded WTBS, which pioneered the superstation concept in cable television. As a philanthropist, he is known for his $1 billion gift to support UN causes, which created the United Nations Foundation, a public charity to broaden support for the UN. Turner serves as Chairman of the United Nations Foundation board of directors.[3]

Turner has also devoted his assets to environmental causes. He owns more land than any other American.

In 1991, Turner became the first media figure to be named Bilderberg's Time magazine's Man of the Year. (remember TIME-AOL deal? ) ...Through Turner Enterprises, he owns 15 ranches in Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.[26] Totaling 1,910,000 acres (7,700 km2), his US land-holdings make Turner the largest individual landowner in North America (by acreage).[

Logged

Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

One of the cleverest and most successful coup’s ever implemented was the co-opting of true environmentalists into the “sustainability/Smart growth” Agenda 21 program.

I'm a "true environmentalist" and f**king hate Agenda 21.

There are some good ideas within Agenda 21 such as eliminating the automobile dominance of the transportation system, and suggesting local communities becoming more bicycle/pedestrian friendly; but stealing existing farmlands to "re-wild" them, and herding all humans into prison-like communes built with products from a mega-corporate monopoly is pure evil.

worcesteradam

In this version of the program, bicycles are kept either at volunteer-run hubs or at self-service terminals throughout the city. Individuals registered with the program identify themselves with their membership card (or a smart card, via cell phone, etc.) at any of the hubs to check out a bicycle for a short period of time, usually less than two hours. In many schemes the first half hour is free. The individual is responsible for the bike until it is returned to another hub.

Logged

worcesteradam

London's long-awaited cycle-hire scheme is launched this week. While there's no doubt it's a valuable addition to the capital's public transport options, it strikes yet another blow to the idea of London as a dignified city. First of all, there's the name. Paris has the Velib, Montreal has the Bixi; what does London get? Barclays Cycle Hire. Clearly the good people at Barclays marketing thought long and hard about that one.

Maybe it's not worth getting too wound up about the name – selling the rights to popular institutions is unlikely to make anyone who watches, say, the Barclays Premier League or the Npower Championship even blink. What is new, however, is the prospect of more than a hundred kilometres of the capital's road surface being branded with corporate livery. The city's new dedicated cycle lanes – two of which recently opened, with another ten to come before the Olympics – are called "Barclays Cycle Superhighways" and painted Barclays blue.

London can now claim the dubious honour of hosting what is surely the largest piece of corporate branding in existence. It's not just the scale, the mind-blowing square footage, that is shocking about this – it's the principle. We're not talking about some supersized billboard here: we're talking about the mayor selling off the very road beneath our wheels – one of the few parts of a city that counts indisputably as public space. Whether they realise it or not, whether or not they even care, from now on thousands of cyclists are doomed to commute on a giant Barclays ad.

The sponsorship deal, worth £25m, has been presented as a coup for Boris Johnson. It has enabled him to recover some of the £140m Transport for London spent on the cycle-hire scheme and has even been presented as "payback" for the mayor's support of the banks during the credit crunch. Surely, however, £25m is a small price to pay for such an invasive piece of branding? If a city of the global stature of London can't afford to provide rental bikes without turning its urban fabric into a massive endorsement, we're in trouble.

This is the Agenda 21 form of "Delphi" planning.They will declare debates in which they control the discussion and steer the outcome. They will declare that "we all agree" and declare the conclusion that guns must be blah blah blah.Feinstien already has the legislation written.

I recently had the opportunity to attend a California Air Resources Board hearing on the agency’s plans to spend revenue from a proposed cap and trade auction. This auction will cost Californians billions of dollars, but when citizens showed up at CARB to express their opposition, CARB Chairman Mary Nichols abruptly shut down public comments, announcing she was “disappointed” after she “invited” audience members to the hearing, they would have the audacity to criticize her plans.

Her announcement was met with dismay by the audience, many members of which had driven long distances for the chance to share their opinion. Citizen energy consumers and concerned small business owners are disappointed that CARB goes through the motions of holding hearings and soliciting citizen input without truly considering the input of people who worry about lost jobs and higher prices for food and other essential goods and services.

At the cap and trade hearing, representatives of organizations supportive of CARB’s proposal were allowed to go to the front of the line because according to Chairman Nichols, they needed to leave early. In fact, the first half hour of public comment was exclusively from people supporting the proposal who “needed to leave early.” Public comment was only shut down when critical comments began to be expressed later

Online videos featuring the California Air Resources Board often achieve fewer than 100 views on YouTube. However, Chairman Nichols’ behavior at this recent hearing showed such a disregard for the Californians who will have to pay the bill for CARB’s new energy tax that a short clip of her shutting down public comment before a dismayed audience has been viewed over 5,000 times.

While CARB members do not have to stand for election and therefore do not need to worry too much about public sentiment, the Governor and Legislature should take action to stop a plan that will drive businesses away and kill even more jobs.

The hidden energy tax the agency proposes is not necessary to achieve the carbon reductions required under AB 32. The auction is just another way to raise money for CARB to spend on programs and subsidies (like the Federal government’s Solyndra disaster for example) with no accountability as to their cost effectiveness or environmental benefit. International financial firms would manage the auction and profit on the backs of California businesses, consumers and ratepayers.

That’s why a new partnership called Friends for Saving California Jobs will be holding a rally against cap and trade on the Steps of the State Capitol on August 15th, the same day CARB will be testing their new trading system. At the rally, we will call for job creation and economic growth instead of costly new energy taxes.

Watch the video of CARB Chairman Nichols cutting off public comment here.

(Eric Eisenhammer is Founder of the Coalition of Energy Users and a Board Member ofFriends for Saving California Jobs. Originally posted on Fox & Hounds.)

Today, the BlueGreen Alliance unites 14 of our country’s largest unions and environmental organizations. Acting together, through more than 15 million members and supporters, we are a powerful voice for building a cleaner, fairer and more competitive American economy.

The BlueGreen Alliance advocates the growth in the number and quality of jobs in the clean economy by expanding a broad range of industries, including renewable energy, energy efficiency, the substitution of safer, cleaner chemicals, modern transportation systems and advanced vehicle technology, domestic manufacturing, high-speed Internet and a smart, efficient electrical grid, green schools and other public buildings, improving our nation’s water infrastructure, recycling, and sustainable agriculture.

Our staff design public policies, perform research, and run advocacy and public education campaigns in support of our mission.

Greenbelt Alliance is a coalition member of Smart Growth America, which advocates for people who want to live and work in great neighborhoods. We believe smart growth solutions support businesses and jobs, provide more options for how people get around and make it more affordable to live near work and the grocery store. Our coalition works with communities to fight sprawl and save money. We are making America’s neighborhoods great together.

Greenbelt Alliance is a founding member of the Great Communities Collaborative, is a group of organizations dedicated to ensuring that the San Francisco Bay Area is made up of healthy, thriving neighborhoods that are affordable to all and linked to regional opportunities by a premier transit network. We connect local residents with the tools and resources they need to influence decision making, forge diverse partnerships to craft lasting strategies and harness the means to help move visions to reality.

The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, or Assembly Bill (AB) 32, is a California State Law that fights climate change by establishing a comprehensive program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from all sources throughout the state.

AB 32 was authored by then-Assemblymember Fran Pavley and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez (D-Los Angeles) and signed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on September 27, 2006.

AB 32 requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB or ARB) to develop regulations and market mechanisms to reduce California's greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, representing a 25% reduction statewide, with mandatory caps beginning in 2012 for significant emissions sources. The bill provides the Governor the ability to suspend the emissions caps for up to one year in the case of an emergency or significant economic harm.

The State of California leads the nation in energy efficiency standards and plays a lead role in environmental protection, but is also the 12th largest emitter of carbon worldwide.[1] Greenhouse gas emissions are defined in the bill to include all of the following: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur hexaflouride, hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons.[2] These are the same greenhouse gases listed in Annex A of the Kyoto Protocol.

On September 27, 2006, Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Núñez, Chapter488, Statutes of 2006) was signed into law. AB 32 established a first-in-the-world comprehensive program ofregulatory and market mechanisms to achieve real, quantifiable, and cost-effective reductions of greenhousegas (GHG) emissions to reach 1990 levels by 2020. AB 32 also authorized the Air Resources Board (Board)to adopt a schedule of fees to be paid by sources of GHG emissions. Money collected from these fees will beused to fund the State’s costs of implementing AB 32.

Who pays?· Large natural gas distributors and large users of natural gas· Refineries· Suppliers and importers of gasoline and diesel fuel· Electricity importers and in-state generating facilities· Facilities that combust coal and petroleum coke· Cement manufacturers

How many facilities pay? There will be approximately 285 fee payers

How much revenue do the fees generate?Based on the 2010 Budget Act, the total required revenue is $62.1 million. This total includes both AB 32implementation expenses for the fiscal year 2010-2011 of $35.2 million and $26.9 million of repayment onprogram start-up loans to be repaid by the fees.

Which agencies receive funds?Meeting California’s AB 32 goals will require the combined efforts of many agencies. The funding is allocatedamong the seven State agencies listed below; the list of agencies may change from year-to-year through thecontinuing budget process.· Air Resources Board· Environmental Protection Agency· Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery· Department of Public Health· State Water Resources Control Board· Department of Water Resources· Department of Housing and Community Development

What Does This Mean for California Consumers?The effect on a typical household is expected to be an increase of expenses of less than one dollar per year inutility bills (natural gas and electricity) and approximately one dollar per year in fuel expenses for an averagecar.

...ARB must develop a Scoping Plan outlining the State’s strategy to achieve the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions limit. This Scoping Plan, developed by ARB in coordination with the Climate Action Team (CAT), proposes a comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions in California, improve our environment, reduce our dependence on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhancepublic health....

By reducing economic activity and/or reducing the population, they can meet their Carbon Reduction Goals ... which is the same as Agenda 21

Logged

Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Watch Out: UN Agenda 21 Means The Snitchers Are On Patrol Near You Too!

1. They walk the neighborhoods "looking." How do you think they see those batteries that fell out of the toys in the back yard? Gee, isn't that nice to have some self-servicing, bloated ego spying around your home?

2. Many people in our community of less than 1000 have woodstoves to help with the heating. Everyone knows that when first firing one up, the chimney may smoke and even burn. People simply watch this and when all is well, continue on.

Well, a gleeful neighborhood busy-body snitch saw our chimney smoking and called the Fire Department. When asked why she did that, she said "...I wasn't sure if anyone was home..." My response to her was "... How about a knock on the door like you just did?..."

Now I love the Fire Department like we all do. Doing their job in making sure all is safe and fire-free is fine in my opinion. However, during their inspections inside our home, I noticed they would look intently into corners that didn't matter, as if "something" might be there.

They also used a device that looks through walls.

Then, the fire chief, under the guise of wanting to "see my beautiful home," wanted to see rooms and areas that weren't seen before, when the firemen came inside.

Point being. A scenario was mocked-up by a neighborhood-walking snitcher for entry into my home for an "informal" inspection. This was done with a look of sucking glee watching us react and standing there watching the volunteer firetruck and 6 firemen.

Watch out. They are not only looking for batteries in the backyard, they are looking to get the authorities into your home.

__________________________________________________________

I'm pursuing information that UN Agenda 21 people are here in our small community trying to convince people to move into the cities...

In 2050+-2030, Europeans are forced to adopt "green" lifestyle habits– for example, via bans on non-essential individual long distance travel. By this stage, air travel has long been too expensive for the majority of people.The state controls or heavily influences all available channels of education, media and marketing to spread this message to continually reinforce its adoption and mould perceptions of "sustainability".Civil society also plays a role in selling the message of green lifestyles as a means to achieving "green" growth. Excessive resource consumption and energy use is no longer seen as socially acceptable.

Read more in the PDF. This is the green death many have warned us about, including Lyndon Larouche. This is the exact opposite of human advancement - for the enslaved masses, that is.

You are bad.No travel for you.No meat for you.No independent information sources for you.Regulated "maximum" of electricity and water you can use.You will be as controlled and restrained as we can make you, and you will love it, because its for the Earth.

The message is pretty much this: JUST ROLLOVER AND DIE, WE ARE TAKING OVER! *chicken neck power-tripping authoritarians laughing*

Anyways, the evil contained in this document is hard to descriped as anything else than satanic.

And its just like the Cypress bank accounts.. first it was 10%, than 20%, than 40%, now its about 80% to 100%, depending on how you look at it.

By the way, how long untill some sort of 1984 style "anti-sexual leauge" is created, something in the sense of "dont date people who dont worship Agenda 21"?

Or did that already happen? They are programming "sustainability" like crazy on TV shows for woman who are alone at home (the air time is before noon, cooking time)..

You know how this works.. Get the woman, than you get the man and the children will follow.

Its so disgusting and diabolical. The worst part is that I have seen "anti-estabilishment" groups lured into this BS trap, to lesser or greater extent. I think that they have been pretty much neutralized and co-opted, and have become part of the controlled paradigm.

Taking care of this earth did begin with good intentions, so did the USA. No list of lost casues, there is not enough space nor time to list organizations of all forms that can be used by the elites, any force that influences the masses, physically , mentally, spiritualy, will be infiltrated by the blood suckers. That's it, end rant.

* Incredible shots offer a glimpse into the reality of living in one of the most densely populated areas of the world* Hong Kong is home to a population of seven million crammed into an area of just 424 square miles* Claustrophobic nature of Hong Kong high-rises captured by German photographer Michael Wolf

nARCHITECTS, who’ve been building living spaces in New York for more than a decade, designed the units to be a bit like a cabin on a ship--full of hidden details. Each unit is divided into a "toolbox," which packs a bathroom, kitchen,and fold-down table into a compact box, and a "canvas," the window-facing tabula rasa that can function as a bedroom, living room, or study.

"Obama’s plans for a second-term plans includes an initiative to systematically redistribute the wealth of America’s suburbs and rural areas to the inner cities. It’s a transformative communist idea and it is one that is already underway as these words are being written."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Logged

St. Augustine: “The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."

Absolutely illogical. These numbers work out to 1,688 sq. ft. per person. Total. If you had a year round growing season, around 1,600 sq. ft. per person is an arguable scientific minimum for a high-tech survival garden.

The food, water, indeed clean air must come in from somewhere else, and the waste, including valuable fertilizer in the form of un-contaminated urine & feces, needs to be shipped out.

Man, that first picture! Absolute fire hazard, disaster waiting to happen. Of course, mass death is what they're shooting for. The last pic will be more like what we get to live in if they ever carry out their plans. The mayor of my city has his nose in the Agenda 21 butt, he imagines himself as a regional "prince".

I got a kick out of the on-the-street interviews that team did a couple months back about 200 square foot living quarters. I thought the reason the two young girls liked the ideas was but because they could afford. Actually back in the late 1970s I lived in a 200 square foot studio apartment and it wasn't bad at all and of course very affordable. But if you are a family it wouldn't work very well. When I bought a house in 2000 I would have preferred a bungalow but those got snapped up often before they hit the real estate market by word of mouth. Now they're talking about building them again. One thing about having plenty of space is you tend to fill it up often with junk you don't need.

I got a kick out of the on-the-street interviews that team did a couple months back about 200 square foot living quarters. I thought the reason the two young girls liked the ideas was but because they could afford. Actually back in the late 1970s I lived in a 200 square foot studio apartment and it wasn't bad at all and of course very affordable. But if you are a family it wouldn't work very well. When I bought a house in 2000 I would have preferred a bungalow but those got snapped up often before they hit the real estate market by word of mouth. Now they're talking about building them again. One thing about having plenty of space is you tend to fill it up often with junk you don't need.

Sure there are some people who like this sort of living and I say more power to 'em. However, there are people like me who are very private and who have a real need for peace and quiet. The noise alone in the city would drive me crazy, plus I'd feel like a lab rat in a box.

Sure there are some people who like this sort of living and I say more power to 'em. However, there are people like me who are very private and who have a real need for peace and quiet. The noise alone in the city would drive me crazy, plus I'd feel like a lab rat in a box.

Agenda 21 policy calls for dramatically increasing urbanization and forcing indigenous populations out of rural areas and into densely populated stack and pack micro apartments controlled by technocrats with the ability to control every aspect of one’s life. When completed, this lifestyle will be a hell on earth.

In Part One, I detailed how the Chinese government, under the direction of global corporations like Goldman Sachs, is instituting a mass relocation of its population from rural to urban. At the point of a gun, the Chinese military is forcibly removing one million Chinese farmers per month from their rural homes and forcing them into the massive ghost cities from which China has spent nearly $3 trillion to construct.

... and talking about China's "Ghost Cities" - fromback in 2010 or so when the "mystery" of these desertedcities began to be reported, this 'real estate bubble' hadtalking head economists from around the world scratchingtheir collective head.

If you live in the suburbs, you might be wise to advise your children on how to live, work and survive in America’s inner cities because that is where they are likely to be living in the near future in a Warsaw ghetto type of scenario.

The mass migration from the suburbs back into densely populated urban areas is not a next week thing, or a next month thing or even next year proposition, but the groundwork is happening right now. If you are not a Baby Boomer, you will not likely be retiring in the suburbs. ......

The real brains behind the coming Agenda 21-inspired mass migration from the suburbs to the inner cities is Mike Krulig and his new group of community advisers, Building One America. Most of you have never heard of Krulig or Building One America and there is a good reason for their anonymity. If a majority of the American people ever discovered Krulig’s true intentions for suburban dwelling Americans, they would chase him down the street and string he and his people up from the nearest light poles.

The secretive agenda of Building One America has been mostly achieved by Obama’s appointment of like-minded community activists to his staff. In fact, Krulig was one of Obama’s original community organizing mentors from the President’s Chicago Southside days. The word stealth applies because a damning photo depicting Krulig and Obama meeting at the Whitehouse in 2011 which appeared on the Building One America website.

However, this type of publicity would not have been good for the swing voters living in America’s suburbs in the 2012 election. Obama’s people had the video scrubbed as well as the search engine links. However, the Breitbart people retained a copy of the picture. This begs the question, if the Building One America plan is so good for America, then why would the Obama people conceal his affiliation with Krulig and his group of Agenda 21 social engineers?

Kruglik’s Agenda 21 Building One America group proposes the creation of a regional tax-base sharing revenues in which suburban tax money is directly redistributed to nearby cities and economically depressed concentric zones of inner-ring suburbs. Building One America also seeks to move the poor out of cities by imposing mandatory low-income-housing quotas for middle-class suburban developments.

Quote

"Most people mistakenly believe that the reality of the megacities concept in which we are all herded into the stack and pack cities is decades down the road. On the contrary, as you have seen, the program is being beta tested in two large metropolitan areas and many of Building One America’s collectivist city management principles are presently being implemented right beneath our noses.

As long as Americans pay their taxes and abide some reasonable community standards, shouldn’t we all be free to live where we choose? Most reasonable people would answer yes, we should be free to choose where we live. However, this is not in the Obama agenda. As will be revealed in subsequent parts of this series, Obama was made President to usher in cap and trade and the deindustrialization of the United State. America is truly learning the meaning of fundamentally transforming America and unless we are able to wake up our fellow citizen, things are about to get a whole lot worse.

In the first three parts of this series, we have witnessed the ongoing depopulation of both America’s rural and suburban areas. However, there is a much more dire scenario brewing. It is becoming clear that the globalists are planning to dramatically and rapidly depopulate an entire region of the country which will impact tens of millions of people and that plan is already well underway and this will be the subject of the fourth part in this series."

When Barack Obama told “Joe the Plumber” that he wanted to “spread the wealth around,” he wasn’t just using a figure of speech.

Since the 2008 campaign, Stanley Kurtz has established himself as one of Barack Obama’s most effective and well-informed critics. He was the first to expose the extent of Obama’s ties to radicals such as Bill Ayers and ACORN.

Now Kurtz reveals new evidence that the administration’s talk about helping the middle class is essentially a smoke screen. Behind the scenes, plans are under way for a serious push toward wealth redistribution, with the suburban middle class—not the so-called one percent—bearing the brunt of it.

Why haven’t we heard more about policies that will lead to redistribution? In part, of course, because controversies over Obamacare, unemployment, and the exploding budget deficit have taken the media spot­light. But the main reason, according to Kurtz, is that Obama doesn’t want to tip his hand about his second term. He knows that his plans will alienate the moderate swing voters who hold the key to his reelection.

Drawing on previously overlooked sources, Kurtz cuts through that smoke screen to reveal what’s really going on. Radicals from outside the administration—including key Obama allies from his early community organizing days—have been quietly influ­encing policy, in areas ranging from edu­cation to stimulus spending. Their goal: to increase the influence of America’s cities over their suburban neighbors so that even­tually suburban independence will vanish.

In the eyes of Obama’s former mentors—fol­lowers of leftist radical Saul Alinsky—suburbs are breeding grounds for bigotry and greed. The classic American dream of a suburban house and high quality, locally controlled schools strikes them as selfishness, a waste of resources that should be redirected to the urban poor.

The regulatory groundwork laid so far is just a prelude to what’s to come: substantial redistribution of tax dollars. Over time, cities would effectively swallow up their surround­ing municipalities, with merged school dis­tricts and forced redistribution of public spending killing the appeal of the suburbs. The result would be a profound transforma­tion of American society.

Kurtz shows the unbroken line of continuity from Obama’s community organizing roots to his presidency. And he reveals why his plan to undermine the suburbs means so much to him personally.

Kurtz’s revelations are sure to be hotly dis­puted. But they are essential to helping vot­ers make an informed choice about whether to reward the president with a second term.

Logged

St. Augustine: “The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."

Over time, cities would effectively swallow up their surround­ing municipalities, with merged school dis­tricts and forced redistribution of public spending killing the appeal of the suburbs. The result would be a profound transforma­tion of American society.

There has been a massive migration from Atlanta's inner city to the northern suburbs.

Farm WarsWe have entered a world where education is no longer relevant. Where learning is subject to the whim of the state, and the corporation is king. Where children grow up as resources to be used by and disposed of by the corporations that employ them. Where up is down, down is up, and higher education is a threat to sustainability.Look, the sign post up ahead. Pay close attention, because we have just entered the Common Core Zone.

Our daughter is a teacher and her mom and me proud of her. She was complaining that the kids are just not learning, we have send her info upon info on how the government wants all kids dumb trying to tell her it is not in her power, but sadly she sees no farther then the end of her pencil. Poor girl just refuses to wake up in her choice of a career, does wonderful with the foods, understands some on the chemtrails but just wants to remain blind that the government would do that to the children. Its frustrating but we will keep sending her the truth hoping she awakens.

Logged

Rev21:4And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

Our daughter is a teacher and her mom and me proud of her. She was complaining that the kids are just not learning, we have send her info upon info on how the government wants all kids dumb trying to tell her it is not in her power, but sadly she sees no farther then the end of her pencil. Poor girl just refuses to wake up in her choice of a career, does wonderful with the foods, understands some on the chemtrails but just wants to remain blind that the government would do that to the children. Its frustrating but we will keep sending her the truth hoping she awakens.

You should send her a link to this video.

This video is not just one of the best video presentations I have ever watched on the US eduction system but, it's equally a powerful video where our society is at the moment and headed toward a dark future, if we continue to educate children with these curriculums.

Even if you don't have children this is a VERY WELL DOCUMENTED eye popping, connect the dots video. I'm very impressed by the lecturer.