All Game A's should rake in at least one unit. All Game B's should get half a unit and cover all the losses.

+8 units from Game A's + (.5 x 4) units from Game B's - 1.2 units on the NYR loss = + 8.8 units during the first 2 weeks of the season.

I was wrong!

+8 units from Game A's + (.5 x 3) units from Game B's - 1.2 units on the NYR loss = + 8.3 units during the first 2 weeks of the season. This is also assuming 1 unit = the "to win" amount as juice fluctuates heavily. If your one unit equals the "Stake amount" then the computation of winning units is much different.

Disclaimer: I've only started following this on Oct. 14. I traced the lines, the results, etc. to come up with this stat. :)

It appears Yahoo! Sports sucks. The NY Rangers play on October 15 wasn't supposed to be a play at all; it was part of an ongoing road trip that started on October 6. Y! listed they had a home game before that but now they updated the sched. Here is the correct update on the system. The 3rd week is bad. Juice kills.

Update on this system (2011-2012 season, first three weeks)

WIN = outright win ; Cover = covering the PL

Game A

Oct. 6 Pittsburgh @ Vancouver +1.5 -240 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 7 NY Rangers @ Los Angeles +1.5 -280 (COVER 2-3)

Oct. 7 Nashville @ Columbus +1.5 -300 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 7 Tampa Bay @ Carolina +1.5 -305 (WIN 5-1)

Oct. 10 Colorado @ Boston +1.5 -160 (WIN 1-0)

Oct. 10 Vancouver @ Columbus ML -130 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 14 Carolina @ Buffalo +1.5 -200 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 15 Buffalo @ Pittsburgh +1.5 -310 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 18 Dallas @ Columbus +1.5 -310 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 21 San Jose @ New Jersey ML -120 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 22 St. Louis @ Philadelphia +1.5 -180 (WIN 4-2)

Oct. 8 Phoenix @ San Jose + 1.5 -187 (LOSS 3-6)

Oct. 10 Calgary @ St. Louis +1.5 -250 (LOSS 2-5)

Oct. 13 St. Louis @ Dallas ML -120 (LOSS 2-3)

Oct. 17 Nashville @ Edmonton ML -125 (LOSS 1-3)

Oct. 20 Toronto @ Boston +1.5 -200 (LOSS 2-6)

Oct. 22 October 22 New Jersey @ Pittsburgh -180 (LOSS 1-4)

Game B

Oct. 10 Phoenix @ Dallas +1.5 -257 (COVER 1-2)

Oct. 13 Calgary @ Montreal +1.5 -260 (WIN 4-1)

Oct. 15 St. Louis @ San Jose +1.5 -210 (WIN 4-2)

Oct. 22 Toronto @ Montreal +1.5 -290 (WIN 5-4)

Oct. 20 Nashville @ Vancouver+1.5 -200 (LOSS 1-5)

GAME C

Oct. 20 Nashville @ Calgary r+1.5 -250 (WIN 2-0)

All Game A's should rake in at least one unit. All Game B's should get half a unit and cover all the losses. You lose money on Game C as you only bet to recover one unit.

It appears Yahoo! Sports sucks. The NY Rangers play on October 15 wasn't supposed to be a play at all; it was part of an ongoing road trip that started on October 6. Y! listed they had a home game before that but now they updated the sched. Here is the correct update on the system. The 3rd week is bad. Juice kills.

Update on this system (2011-2012 season, first three weeks)

WIN = outright win ; Cover = covering the PL

Game A

Oct. 6 Pittsburgh @ Vancouver +1.5 -240 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 7 NY Rangers @ Los Angeles +1.5 -280 (COVER 2-3)

Oct. 7 Nashville @ Columbus +1.5 -300 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 7 Tampa Bay @ Carolina +1.5 -305 (WIN 5-1)

Oct. 10 Colorado @ Boston +1.5 -160 (WIN 1-0)

Oct. 10 Vancouver @ Columbus ML -130 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 14 Carolina @ Buffalo +1.5 -200 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 15 Buffalo @ Pittsburgh +1.5 -310 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 18 Dallas @ Columbus +1.5 -310 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 21 San Jose @ New Jersey ML -120 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 22 St. Louis @ Philadelphia +1.5 -180 (WIN 4-2)

Oct. 8 Phoenix @ San Jose + 1.5 -187 (LOSS 3-6)

Oct. 10 Calgary @ St. Louis +1.5 -250 (LOSS 2-5)

Oct. 13 St. Louis @ Dallas ML -120 (LOSS 2-3)

Oct. 17 Nashville @ Edmonton ML -125 (LOSS 1-3)

Oct. 20 Toronto @ Boston +1.5 -200 (LOSS 2-6)

Oct. 22 New Jersey @ Pittsburgh -180 (LOSS 1-4)

Game B

Oct. 10 Phoenix @ Dallas +1.5 -257 (COVER 1-2)

Oct. 13 Calgary @ Montreal +1.5 -260 (WIN 4-1)

Oct. 15 St. Louis @ San Jose +1.5 -210 (WIN 4-2)

Oct. 22 Toronto @ Montreal +1.5 -290 (WIN 5-4)

Oct. 20 Nashville @ Vancouver+1.5 -200 (LOSS 1-5)

GAME C

Oct. 22 Nashville @ Calgary +1.5 -250 (WIN 2-0)

All Game A's should rake in at least one unit. All Game B's should get half a unit and cover all the losses. You lose money on Game C as you only bet to recover one unit.

It appears Yahoo! Sports sucks. The NY Rangers play on October 15 wasn't supposed to be a play at all; it was part of an ongoing road trip that started on October 6. Y! listed they had a home game before that but now they updated the sched. Here is the correct update on the system. The 3rd week is bad. Juice kills.

Update on this system (2011-2012 season, first three weeks)

WIN = outright win ; Cover = covering the PL

Game A

Oct. 6 Pittsburgh @ Vancouver +1.5 -240 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 7 NY Rangers @ Los Angeles +1.5 -280 (COVER 2-3)

Oct. 7 Nashville @ Columbus +1.5 -300 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 7 Tampa Bay @ Carolina +1.5 -305 (WIN 5-1)

Oct. 10 Colorado @ Boston +1.5 -160 (WIN 1-0)

Oct. 10 Vancouver @ Columbus ML -130 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 14 Carolina @ Buffalo +1.5 -200 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 15 Buffalo @ Pittsburgh +1.5 -310 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 18 Dallas @ Columbus +1.5 -310 (WIN 3-2)

Oct. 21 San Jose @ New Jersey ML -120 (WIN 4-3)

Oct. 22 St. Louis @ Philadelphia +1.5 -180 (WIN 4-2)

Oct. 8 Phoenix @ San Jose + 1.5 -187 (LOSS 3-6)

Oct. 10 Calgary @ St. Louis +1.5 -250 (LOSS 2-5)

Oct. 13 St. Louis @ Dallas ML -120 (LOSS 2-3)

Oct. 17 Nashville @ Edmonton ML -125 (LOSS 1-3)

Oct. 20 Toronto @ Boston +1.5 -200 (LOSS 2-6)

Oct. 22 New Jersey @ Pittsburgh -180 (LOSS 1-4)

Game B

Oct. 10 Phoenix @ Dallas +1.5 -257 (COVER 1-2)

Oct. 13 Calgary @ Montreal +1.5 -260 (WIN 4-1)

Oct. 15 St. Louis @ San Jose +1.5 -210 (WIN 4-2)

Oct. 22 Toronto @ Montreal +1.5 -290 (WIN 5-4)

Oct. 20 Nashville @ Vancouver+1.5 -200 (LOSS 1-5)

GAME C

Oct. 22 Nashville @ Calgary +1.5 -250 (WIN 2-0)

All Game A's should rake in at least one unit. All Game B's should get half a unit and cover all the losses. You lose money on Game C as you only bet to recover one unit.

Activities offered by advertising links to other sites may be deemed an illegal activity in certain jurisdictions. Viewers are specifically warned that they should inquire into the legality of participating in any games and/or activities offered by such other sites. The owner of this website assumes no responsibility for the actions by and makes no representation or endorsement of any of these games and/or activities offered by the advertiser. As a condition of viewing this website viewers agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from the viewer’s participation in any of the games and/or activities offered by the advertiser.