If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

OK, so Nicole isn't female. Albeit that Nicole looks more like a girl than most of these cases. Now what? ALl of this is happening because one old man complained that Nicole was using the girls room. Apparently no one else cared, and why should they?

But, how exactly is forcing Nicole to use the boys room a solution? Are you telling me that the same old man wouldn't complain that there was a boy dressed as a girl (or probably simply "a gol darned prevert!") using the boys room? <snipped>

Look at you...unable to use pronouns in your reply. Don't be afraid, the dude is not a girl, he is a boy, you can acknowledge it.

And I like your argument about one old man complaining...be sure you use the same logic next time some atheist in Wisconsin sues to have a cross removed from a roadside memorial in Maine because they find it offensive. My allah man, do you ever tire of the fail? You must be used to it.

And I like your argument about one old man complaining...be sure you use the same logic next time some atheist in Wisconsin sues to have a cross removed from a roadside memorial in Maine because they find it offensive. My allah man, do you ever tire of the fail? You must be used to it.

The American Left: Where everything is politics and politics is everything.

And I like your argument about one old man complaining...be sure you use the same logic next time some atheist in Wisconsin sues to have a cross removed from a roadside memorial in Maine because they find it offensive.

To the best of my knowledge, bathroom assignments are not covered in the Constitution. A religionist is completely entitled to put a religious monument on any piece of property that he owns as long as it's not a hazard to navigation.

To the best of my knowledge, bathroom assignments are not covered in the Constitution. A religionist is completely entitled to put a religious monument on any piece of property that he owns as long as it's not a hazard to navigation.

Not according to your fellow Atheists who have made it a very successful industry of having religious symbols taken down all over the country for no other reason than THEY can't stand the sight of them.

Not according to your fellow Atheists who have made it a very successful industry of having religious symbols taken down all over the country for no other reason than THEY can't stand the sight of them.

To the best of my knowledge, bathroom assignments are not covered in the Constitution. A religionist is completely entitled to put a religious monument on any piece of property that he owns as long as it's not a hazard to navigation.

Dude, you went with the one person complaining argument. Stick with it:

ALl of this is happening because one old man complained that Nicole was using the girls room

All I'm saying is that when one atheist complains about a roadside cross, make sure you tell them to go fuck themself. The cross stays.

Same with the Ten Commandments outside a courthouse. If an atheist complains, fuck off.