INTRODUCTORY
The City Council of the City of Columbia, Missouri met for
a regular meeting at 7:00 p.m., on Monday, February 5, 2001, in the Council Chamber
of the City of Columbia, Missouri. The roll was taken with the following results:
Council Members CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON and CROCKETT were present.
Councilperson JANKU was absent. The City Manager, City Counselor, City Clerk,
and various Department Heads were also present.
Mayor Hindman welcomed Boy Scout Troop 702 from Broadway Christian
Church and their Scout Leader, Chris Graham.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of January 16, 2001, were
approved unanimously by voice vote on a motion made by Mr. Campbell and a second
by Mr. John.

APPROVAL AND ADJUSTMENT OF AGENDA INCLUDING CONSENT AGENDA
Upon her request, Mr. Coffman made the motion that Mrs. Crockett
be allowed to abstain from voting on B27-01. The motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell
and approved unanimously by voice vote.
The agenda, including the Consent Agenda, was approved unanimously
by voice vote on a motion made by Mr. Campbell and a second by Mrs. Crockett.

SPECIAL ITEMS
None.

SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTSBen Orzeske - Residential Parking Permit Ordinance and Results of ECNA
Parking Survey.
Ben Orzeske, 507 High Street, spoke on behalf of the East
Campus Neighborhood Association. He reported that 208 residents in this neighborhood
had been contacted in regards to a residential parking permit program. He explained
the results of the survey, which was distributed to the Council. He noted that
almost 80% of the respondents felt the speed limit in the East Campus neighborhood
should be reduced to 20 mph. Mr. Orzeske believed this neighborhood is unique
in that there is no other area within the City that has such a large concentration
of residences without adequate off-street parking. He pointed out that many of
the single family homes have been split up into apartments and rooming houses,
which increases the number of vehicles per residence. Mr. Orzeske did not think
that on-street parking is necessarily a problem, although it becomes frustrating
when those spaces have been taken up by non-residents (employees of both the
University and Boone Hospital). He was hopeful staff could study what other cities
are doing to resolve these types of problems.
Mayor Hindman noted that he had attended sessions at national
meetings that focused on college communities. He believed Mr. Orzeske's concerns
represent a very familiar issue other cities have had to solve as well.
Mr. Coffman commented that this is not the first time the
Council has addressed the parking issue in the East Campus area. Realizing the
complexity of the issue and the variables to be considered, he was hopeful the
City could move forward some type of program to remedy this problem.

PUBLIC HEARINGSB25-01Approving the City of Columbia
Fire Station No. 8 PUD Site Plan.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Dudark displayed an overhead of the site map and explained
the proposed building would be located to the west of the property the City owns.
He reported that about 70% of the site would be left in open space. Mr. Dudark
stated that the proposal was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mayor Hindman voiced concern about the amount of lighting
planned for this fire station due to its location in a residential neighborhood.
Mr. Dudark explained as the lights were reduced in height, the number of the
poles had been increased accordingly. He said no light will spill off of the
property.
Mr. Beck noted that he had asked staff and the architect to
design the structure so that it might be used for additional purposes, such as
a police substation. He reported that other cities are also following this concept.
Mr. Beck believed that could be a major factor in regards to lighting.
Mr. Coffman indicated that he had received some negative comments
in regards to the lighting planned for the fire station.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Eric Miller, Project Manager and architect with Peckham and
Wright, explained there were many reasons for the lighting levels being proposed.
He reported the original light standards on the residential side of the property
had been modified to12-foot poles with baffles on the fixtures. Mr. Miller noted
that security was a primary issue for the amount of lighting in regards to the
police substation and employee shift changes.
Karl Skala, 5201 Gasconade, a member of the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the Energy and Environment Commission, was pleased there would
be baffles on the lighting fixtures. In addition to the light poles shown on
the plan, he pointed out that there are three mast arm high pressure sodium lamps
already present on the site -- two on the east side and one on the west. Mr.
Skala said security could also be effective with bollard lamps which would not
cause a nuisance for the residential area.
Alyce Turner, 2194 E. Bearfield, indicated she lives nearby
the tract in question. She thought the amount of lighting proposed was overkill.
Ms. Turner commented that dusk to dawn lights can cause a lot of glare on the
road.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mr. John noted numerous modifications had been made to this
plan and he did not think the amount of lighting being proposed would be excessive.
He noted that because the lights will be lowered and baffled, an increase in
the number of poles becomes necessary to provide adequate lighting. Mr. John
thought the plan was appropriate and suggested that the Council support it.
B25-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B26-01Amending the Keene Street C-P
Development Plan.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that the Wingate Hotel is located on the
west side of Keene Street, south of Berrywood Drive. The revision calls for adding
two 76 square foot wall signs and a 20 square foot canopy sign. Both staff and
the Planning and Zoning Commission support the request.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Rod Stevens, an attorney with offices at 11 N. Seventh Street,
spoke on behalf of Wingate Inn. He passed around photos of Wingate Inn as well
as photos of the Holiday Inn beside it. He explained that this revision is being
proposed because it is difficult for guests to identify where the hotel is from
Keene Street. The proposal calls for a 76 square foot sign on the east side of
the hotel, another sign of the same size on the front of the building, and a
20-foot sign on the canopy. Mr. Stevens indicated that should the Council approve
this request, the total signage for Wingate Inn will be similar to that of neighboring
businesses.
Mayor Hindman asked why Wingate has a problem with signage
that the Holiday Inn has managed to avoid. Mr. Stevens explained that Holiday
Inn has a very large pole sign as well as another sign that faces Keene Street.
He guessed when this plan was originally submitted to the City, Wingate Inn failed
to include these three signs.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
B26-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B27-01Approving the Daniel Boone Little
League C-P Development Plan; granting variances.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Dudark displayed a site location map. He explained the
property to be just west of Scott Boulevard and south of Chapel Hill Road extended.
He showed where the two additional fields are proposed to be developed as well
as a concession stand, maintenance building and a parking lot. Access to the
site in the interim will be from the existing entrance at the rear of the property.
When Chapel Hill is extended, Mr. Dudark reported the applicant will be allowed
to have a driveway off of the new road.
Mr. Dudark indicated the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the plan subject to three conditions. One condition was
that all the right-of-way the League owns to the west and the east (on the north
side of Chapel Hill Road extended) be dedicated to the City to facilitate the
construction of the roadway in lieu of participating in a cash contribution.
The second condition is that the hours of night time operation be limited to
10:30 p.m., except from July 15 to August 15 when it would be extended to 11:30
p.m. during the League's tournament period. The last condition was that the field
lighting be in accordance with the description of Musco brand lighting.
Mr. Dudark summarized the two variance requests accompanying
the application. The first variance is to delay the sidewalk requirement along
Chapel Hill Road until the time the road is extended. The Commission recommended
denial of this request. The second request was to waive the requirement for perimeter
landscape screening. Mr. Dudark noted that this tract will be used as open space.
He pointed out the substantial amount of buffering to the west and the east of
the site in the form of existing trees and drainage ways. Due to the existing
natural conditions, the Commission supported the variance to the landscaping
requirement.
Mr. Beck stated that Mr. Janku had asked for a report outlining
the potential for park space in this area. He indicated a response to this request
was included in the Council packet.
Mr. Campbell asked if the location of the easement for the
extension of Chapel Hill has been established so the League can develop their
ballfields around it. Mr. Dudark responded staff does not have a survey that
would identify the exact location of the off-site right-of-way. He estimated
it would be to the west on the north half of the 80 foot right-of-way, and also
to the east on the north 40 feet of the 80 foot right-of-way. Mr. Campbell noted
a rendering of the Chapel Hill extension was included in the Council packets
and it was not shown as a straight street, but rather with a bow in it. Mr. Dudark
reported there is a creek that comes down through the area and runs under Scott
Boulevard. He thought the street had been off-set a little to accommodate the
existing terrain. Mr. Campbell asked if the road would still be within the right-of-way.
Mr. Dudark replied that it would be.
Mayor Hindman asked what the League would be required to do
if the Council denied the sidewalk variance. Mr. Beck indicated the applicant
would have to build a sidewalk or escrow money. Mr. John remarked the League
could also come back with a plan for an alternative sidewalk within the three
year period.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Bruce Beckett, an attorney at 1103 E. Broadway, spoke on behalf
of the Daniel Boone Little League. He said the League understood that the plan
line for Chapel Hill Road, both east and west of their property, has not been
pinned down with any degree of precision. He commented that it is also the League's
understanding that the road would be an arterial street, and no money has been
set aside to build it at this point. It appeared to them that the request for
a variance to delay the sidewalk requirement should be granted to the extent
that the League would not be obligated for such until such time the street is
built. Mr. Beckett explained that money is a big issue for the Little League.
Mr. Beckett said as the City does not know precisely where
the additional right-of-way for Chapel Hill Road will be located, the League
believed they would be writing a blank check by with that condition. As the applicant
understands it, the City believes this would be quid pro quo as the League would
be relieved of any responsibility for participating in the cost of the road's
construction. Mr. Beckett thought that was probably a fair deal, assuming the
Chapel Hill alignment does not go through or interfere with any of the existing
ballfields. He said the League would cooperate with this condition if it does
not interfere with their existing facilities. However, Mr. Beckett maintained
the fact of the matter is that the City does not know where the right-of-way
is or how much land would be needed.
Mr. Campbell indicated that Mr. Dudark had said that the road
would be built within the right-of-way. Mr. Beckett stated if the condition were
to read 40 feet of the applicant's land, that would be acceptable. He reported
that the League's property includes fields that are northeast, north and northwest
of this particular site. Mr. Patterson commented that to the east, the City has
half the width of Chapel Hill on the south side of the property line. He believed
it was safe to say that the League's responsibility to the east of this site
would not be more than that half width (40 feet). To the west, Mr. Patterson
believed it would be the same situation because there are definitely limitations
on being able to go further north. He thought it seemed possible that it could
be even slightly south of that. Mr. Patterson stated he was comfortable with
a half width right-of-way responsibility at which time the Council deems it would
be appropriate to have it dedicated. Mr. Beckett said the applicant could accept
that.
Mr. John asked about granting temporary variances and the
legality of such. Mr. Boeckmann explained this is a strange situation in terms
of the timing because the City is requesting right-of-way for a street that is
not built, nor is there any financing in place for it. In addition, the City
is asking the League to dedicate this right-of-way and it is not known exactly
where it is supposed to be -- which has to be done before the applicant can obtain
a building permit.
Mr. Beckett suggested that the language in the performance
contract could be modified so that a sidewalk would not have to constructed within
36 months. He proposed that the appropriate language be inserted in place of
this condition so that a sidewalk will be required when the Chapel Hill Road
extension is constructed.
Mr. Boeckmann suggested deleting the language granting a variance
from the sidewalk requirement from this bill. Then in the performance contract
(which is attached to B28-01 on the Consent Agenda), the Council could authorize
him to work out something with Mr. Beckett so that the League will not have to
build a sidewalk until the street is constructed. In Section 5, Subsection 1,
pertaining to the dedication of right-of-way, Mr. Boeckmann suggested amending
the language to read "occupancy permit" rather than "building permit".
Mr. Campbell made the motion to amend per Mr. Boeckmann's
suggestion. The motion was seconded by Mayor Hindman.
B27-01, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSTAINING: CROCKETT. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:

B31-01Amending Chapter 20 of the City
Code as it relates to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that there are a number of provisions in
the Code pertaining to the Planning and Zoning Commission that do not reflect
current practices. He listed the changes as outlined in the report.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comments, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
B31-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B32-01Approving the "Metro 2020: A
Planning Guide for Columbia's Future".
The bill was giving second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Dudark explained that the Metro 2020 Plan has been in
the works for a couple of years now. In July of last year, the Council held a
public hearing whereby several members of the public raised concerns about certain
aspects of the Plan. He reported that staff reviewed these comments and met with
the Council in November. Out of that work session, Mr. Dudark explained that
a number of modifications were made to the document. He displayed a summary of
the modifications. He noted that the revised pages of the Plan document were
distributed to interested parties on December 11, 2000. In addition, the revisions
as well as the full document were placed on the City's web site. Mr. Dudark noted
a provision in the last section of the ordinance that indicated the Plan shall
serve as a general guide to public and private actions in the development of
the City -- it is only advisory and not regulatory. The Plan does not control
the use of private property, nor does it limit the Council's discretion in enacting
land use regulations.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Joe Engle, 2407 Topaz, Science Advisor to the Director of
the Department of Natural Resources, spoke on behalf of the Department. He explained
their concern pertaining to lack of protection of the community's natural resources,
in particular, the Rock Bridge Memorial State Park area. He assumed the Plan's
default position is that residential homes can be built on property adjacent
to the park. Mr. Engle remarked there are no areas that have been identified
as being unsuitable for development. The DNR believed there are tracts in the
Metro 2020 Plan that probably are not suitable for dense development, and may
not be suitable in some cases for any development. Mr. Engle indicated DNR would
prefer that the south end of Rock Quarry Road be closed. He offered the help
of the department in any way needed.
Winifred Colwill, 1417 Countryshire Drive, spoke for the Columbia-Boone
County League of Women Voters. She said that League members have spoken before
on this issue and were pleased to see that some of their concerns had been addressed.
Ms. Colwill said although the overall plan has much to be commended, they
felt that changing the title from plan to guide raised a basic question --
whether the plan will be implemented. In order to curb sprawl development,
the League believed the most vital key to be City-County cooperation. Ms.
Colwill indicated the group agreed that the City and County should develop
a comprehensive plan for the area surrounding Columbia. The League feels
that until a joint plan is complete, approval of any annexation or land use
designation for the area would be premature. Ms. Colwill reported they suggested
adopting a distance based development fee which would reflect the increased
cost of providing municipal services to new development on the City's fringe.
It was thought such a policy would likely stimulate in-fill development.
The group is also in full support of adopting a parkland acquisition policy.
Ms. Colwill also reasserted the League's belief that energy efficiency and
renewable energy deserves more emphasis in the Plan.
John Blakemore, 4807 Bearfield, spoke on behalf of the Clear
Creek Neighborhood Association and in support of the comments made by the representative
from the Department of Natural Resources. Mr. Blakemore reported the Clear Creek
Association believes there is a glaring inconsistency relating to the designation
of the Phillip's property as being commercial, office and residential. Given
the issues that prompted the Council to demarcate this as an environmentally
sensitive area, Mr. Blakemore said it seemed highly incongruous to allow commercial
and even residential development without any green space. The Association asked
that the Plan be amended to designate the Phillip's tract as open space until
the EPA standard research is done. Mr. Blakemore indicated that the group also
suggests that the Council revisit a meeting that the City, the County, DNR, MDC,
several neighborhood associations and the Greenbelt Coalition had in 1996 when
the needs of all of those organizations were reviewed to determine whether there
is enough common ground on which they can now all act. Mr. Blakemore volunteered
to head a task force created for that purpose.
Jane Addison, 2407 Shepard, spoke on behalf of the Greenbelt
Coalition. She noted that several of their suggestions made at the last hearing
were not incorporated in this new version of the Metro 2020 Plan. Ms. Addison
indicated the Coalition was pleased that area creeks had been given greenbelt/open
space status. She said the Coalition was also delighted that the Perche Creek
open space area had been enlarged. The group encouraged City administration to
continue to map out a possible greenbelt route on the west side of the CATSO
area in conjunction with Perche Creek. Ms. Addison stated the Coalition found
the map misleading in that the default land use appears to be residential judging
by the large amount of yellow. She noted that LeMone Industrial Boulevard continues
to be shown as extending up to Stadium Boulevard, and that Stadium is still extended
northeast. She reported both of these roads cross or run alongside water course
areas. If and when these roads come to pass, the City must prevent any damage
to riparian health, water quality and open space. Ms. Addison remarked the Coalition
believes there are at least two areas that should be pro-actively designated
as open space/greenbelt. One area is the 50-acre Phillip's lake estate, and the
other is the area surrounding Rock Bridge State Park.
Norman Lenhardt, 1118 St. Christopher, commented that the
City is not encouraging solar energy in the 2020 Plan. He noted the Plan also
encourages cooperation with the School District to reserve property for future
schools. Without a way to recoup infrastructure costs, he said the School Board
does not have the money to do that. Mr. Lenhardt did not think the City would
have the money to do it either.
Susan Bingaman, 2179 E. Bearfield, stated that designating
outlying areas such as the Phillips tract for eventual commercial and industrial
office development is an indication of a pre-existing prejudice towards that
type of growth. The Council would be ignoring the need for additional development
within the existing boundaries of the City itself to promote revitalization of
areas that are currently dying.
Paul Land, 2005 Robin Terrace , spoke as a member of the Columbia
Board of Realtors Legislative Committee. Mr. Land was appreciative that some
of their concerns voiced at an earlier meeting were corrected in the latest version,
but the revised plan still has remaining inconsistencies in specific parameters
which the Board of Realtors finds objectionable. He circulated a document that
listed their concerns. Chief among those were contradictory text statements about
the Plan's goals to work within the framework of existing ordinances and subdivision
regulations, and its quoted objective contained on Page 7, Paragraph 5. Mr. Land
urged the Council to review the material he passed out and asked that they incorporate
the suggested Section 1.5 into the Plan. The suggestion read as follows: "Wherever
the Metro 2020 Plan is in conflict with existing zoning and/or subdivision ordinances,
then the existing ordinances shall prevail."
Tom Moran, 413 W. Walnut, spoke on behalf of the Osage Group
of the Sierra Club. He indicated that they were not sure the Plan as proposed
could effectively deal with its stated objectives and issues, especially objectives
one and five in the section relating to land use planning. Mr. Moran noted the
City has embraced the ideals promoted by PedNet, which is appreciated by the
group. He urged the Council to follow the Plan's recommendation which encouraged
development to be in harmony with the natural environment. He noted that there
was no mention in the objectives concerning recovery of infrastructure costs
or the preservation of agricultural lands. Mr Moran explained that the proposed
expansion of the metro area into surrounding, undeveloped agricultural lands
is of very serious concern to the residents of both the City and the County,
and is rather contrary to the stated goals of this document.
Becky Sterling, a realtor with Re/MAX Boone Realty and Chair
of the Women's Network Governmental Affairs Committee, commented that their overriding
concern is the affordability issue of housing in Columbia. She was appreciative
that affordable housing has become a goal of the Metro 2020 Plan, and encouraged
the Council to establish a task force to ensure that Columbia continues to be
a great place to live.
Maura Browning, 11H Broadway Village Drive, the Government
Affairs Director for the Columbia Chamber of Commerce, explained that she has
lived in Columbia for less than six months, but she understands the Plan to be
a hotly debated issue that a lot of time and effort has gone into. She was appreciative
of Section 4 contained within the ordinance that stipulates the Plan should serve
as a general guide in an advisory capacity, not regulatory. However, she said
most residents of Columbia are not going to look at the ordinance before they
look at the Plan. She suggested including this language in the Metro 2020 guide
itself. Ms. Browning noted that the Chamber had recently sent letters in regards
to this issue, and they hoped these had been considered by the Council.
Karl Skala, 5201 Gasconade, recommended that the Council delay
approval and seek greater community understanding of the document by soliciting
further participation in its creation.
Sharon Hansen, 1307 Dunbar, read a letter regarding traffic
and growth. She commented that extending Forum Boulevard to Old Plank Road would
mean the removal of on street parking, which will not accommodate the increasing
crowds that frequent Wilson's Pool in the summer. She believed it would also
cause more flooding for the residents living along Old Plank Road. Ms. Hansen
said that more Columbian's would benefit if tax money was spent on the basic
needs.
Molly Duprey, 1501 Rosemary, spoke of her concern about recent
sprawl. She remarked on her disappointment that the City has not become more
bicycle and pedestrian friendly over the past five years that she has lived in
Columbia.
William Woodward, 200A Unity, spoke in support of the comments
made by Ms. Duprey and Mr. Skala.
Alyce Turner, 2194 E. Bearfield, explained that she resides
within the urban fringe of Columbia. She spoke about the need for preserving
green spaces and protecting environmentally sensitive areas. Ms. Turner suggested
that the County should be involved in this planning process as well.
Eleanore Wickersham, 4920 Forum, spoke in favor of preserving
greenbelt areas and open spaces. She thought there was a consensus among the
residents that the Plan does not give enough attention to such. She also believed
it is important to expand and preserve our regional parks. Ms. Wickersham encouraged
the Council to designate the Phillips area as a regional park, not a commercial
area. She expressed concern about the plans for the Gans Creek and Rock Bridge
State Park areas and the potential for negative impact to this fragile environment.
Linda Rootes, 807 N. Eighth, President of the North Central
Columbia Neighborhood Association, explained that this area is a mixed use, downtown
neighborhood. She was appreciative of the fact that the Metro 2020 Plan defines
a city center -- the walkability, the built-to-the-curb, no on-site parking --
the amenities that make a neighborhood dense and walkable so public transportation
can be available. Ms. Rootes appreciated the differences in the various City
neighborhoods was being recognized.
John Clark, 403 N. Ninth, reported that he had attended most
of the meetings and public hearings held on this issue. He thought there needs
to be a much broader knowledge and a more substantial consensus in the community
about the overall wisdom of the Plan. He suggested the Community Structure Plan
designation be retained. Mr. Clark was concerned about the inadequacy of the
first objective in the Transportation Objective section. He noted that it refers
to a street system and not a transportation system. He offered substitute language.
Mr. Clark suggested that the vote on this Plan be delayed, and that the issue
be sent back to Planning and Zoning for further review.
Davika Thomas, 1506 Wilson, noted a number of people are present
who do not feel the commercial and employment district on the map to be appropriate.
She asked them to stand. Approximately five dozen people stood. Ms. Thomas also
passed out an article from the Missouri Conservationist on karst
groundwater.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mr. Coffman stated that he is concerned about the area around
the Phillips tract being designated as commercial since the Council has officially
recognized this as a sensitive storm water area. He would be willing to entertain
some sort of compromise if the majority of the Council is not willing to designate
it as an open space.
Mr. Campbell remarked that a storm water management ordinance
will be enacted before too long. He said this legislation will address several
of the issues raised concerning the protection of watersheds. Mr. Campbell explained
that one of the main objectives of the Council has been to try and reduce travel
time and the number of vehicles on the roads. He believed one way to do that
is to spread out services, both commercial and work areas. However, Mr. Campbell
commented that development should still be done in an environmentally sensitive
manner. He did not find it strange to be designating some commercial and work
areas for the Phillips tract. Mr. Campbell indicated that he would find it strange
if the development did not meet the environmental concerns that will come as
a result of the storm water management plan.
Ms. Crayton remarked that as development occurs in the outer
boundaries of the City, transportation infrastructure has not been moving with
it. She stated the City needs to ensure that all businesses in the community
remain accessible to those who rely on public transportation.
Mr. John noted that the City is working to implement a watershed
protection ordinance, and the Council has already designated a higher development
standard to the Gans Creek, Clear Creek, and Rock Bridge State Park areas. He
was appreciative of DNR's concern, but was hopeful their pockets are bigger than
the City's. Mr. John agreed that the Plan is very broad, but he believed it should
not be too specific. He stated not everyone's wish or desire can be included
in this document. However, the Plan will be continually updated. Mr. John commented
that the Metro 2020 Plan will serve as a guide for future, long-term development
of the City. He also pointed out that the Planning Department has agreed to put
the ordinance approving the document inside the Plan itself.
Mr. Campbell noted that urban sprawl is not something the
City can stop from occurring. He added, however, that property owners do have
land use rights. He said those must either be acknowledged or paid for. Mr. Campbell
thought the plan was very innovative as it integrates many areas. He said the
document will be updated periodically as needs arise, and he planned to support
its adoption.
Mr. Coffman agreed that the document contains many forward-looking
concepts, mostly those that allow for flexibility. He reiterated his concern
with the Phillips tract. Mr. Coffman was hopeful the map could be modified to
designate significant green area to this property.
Mayor Hindman indicated that he had wrestled with the use
designation for the Phillips tract himself. He stated whenever a green space
is opened up, eventual development ends up elsewhere. Mayor Hindman commented
that most everyone prefers a more compact and efficient city, but if space is
not provided for development, it will go further and further out. He reported
that although the map does not show it, when the storm water ordinance is completed,
more green space will be provided to this area because of runoff requirements.
Mayor Hindman preferred leaving the map as is.
Mrs. Crockett agreed that the Council should move ahead with
the Plan.
Mr. Coffman motioned that the land use map portion of the
Plan be delayed until the next meeting in order to work out a mixed designation
in the Phillips area. The motion died for the lack of a second.
B32-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

(A)Construction of sanitary sewers
in Sewer District No. 155 (Marion and Medavista Drive area).
Item A was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Patterson explained that this involves construction of
sanitary sewers between Medavista Drive and Marion Drive and contains 10 parcels
of land. The project's estimated cost of $60,000 will divided equally between
the sewer utility and participating property owners via tax bills. The maximum
tax bill for this project has been established at twenty-six cents per square
foot of property in the sewer district. Mr. Patterson reported the project consists
of approximately 560 lineal feet of 8-inch line that will be replaced with new
material and manholes. The project is necessitated by an existing stoppage problem
to the substandard line from tree roots causing sewer overflows. After this sanitary
sewer project is finished, a public hearing will be held in order for the Council
to authorize tax bill assessments. Mr. Patterson listed the benefits accrued
that might be considered at that time as follows: the replacement sewer line
will prevent further stoppages, which in turn will eliminate potential health
hazards and the potential liability to property owners from those health hazards,
as well as the financial liability they currently have for maintaining the sewer
line. Mr. Patterson noted that meetings have been conducted with the affected
property owners at which time they were told there would be disruptions to backyards.
He indicated that staff thought property owners understood what the project will
consist of and the majority of residents are in support of the sewer district.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comments, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that staff be directed to proceed
with final plans and specifications. The motion was seconded by Mr. John and
approved unanimously by voice vote.

B34-01Amending Chapter 22 of the City
Code to increase the monthly charge for solid waste residentialcustomers.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Patterson reported the proposed materials recovery facility
will be located on the existing landfill site immediately south of the entrance
road at the scales. The first phase of the project would involve construction
of the facility which consists of a 125 by 250 foot pre-engineered building,
site grading and pavement for traffic flow in and out of the area. Mr. Patterson
indicated the facility would be equipped with a single conveyor system to begin
recovery processing, bailing and marketing of materials recovered by the City
through the blue bag and drop-off programs, as well as providing opportunities
for expansion to the current recycling program itself. He explained staff prefers
to bid this project through the Purchasing Department in order to expedite the
facility's construction so it can be done in conjunction with the expansion of
the landfill planned for this summer.
In order to accomplish the goal of constructing the materials
recovery facility, Mr. Patterson explained staff is proposing a solid waste rate
increase. Initially, this legislation would authorize a forty-five cent per month
increase for residential units beginning with the first billing cycle after the
ordinance is passed. To ascertain that the City's rates would still be competitive,
Mr. Patterson reported that staff conducted a fairly comprehensive survey comparing
rates and services with those of other communities. It was found that our current
rates are already very competitive, and will still be comparable after the proposed
increases. He noted the rate increase tonight would be the first of three to
be implemented. The second increase would take place next year and the third
the following year.
Mr. Patterson said the variables for the increases would depend
on the success of the recycling program. Any changes to revenues could reduce,
eliminate or defer one or both of the planned increases. He believed that is
the advantage to phasing the rate increases as the program progresses.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
William Woodward, 200A Unity, was interested in the cartage
tonnage weight and whether these rates would be increased. He believed those
outside of the City should pay their fair share accordingly. Mr. Woodward asked
if any grant funds would be used to pay for the new facility.
Mr. Beck explained that part of the City's recycling program,
particularly the drop-off portion, is paid for partially from the landfill tipping
fee which is assessed to both residents and nonresidents. Mr. Beck verified that
staff will be pursuing all grants for which the City might be eligible for.
Regarding the tipping fee, Mr. Patterson explained that the
utility is an enterprise fund and charges are made on the basis of the cost of
service. He pointed out that the tipping fee at the landfill is a separate charge
which is built into the rates. Mr. Patterson stated the residential rate includes
a landfill charge. He noted the increases would be used for materials recovery
operating and materials recovery debt retirement -- specifically residential
uses in the recycling program. Mr. Patterson reiterated that the rate increase
being recommended for recycling has nothing to do with the landfill tipping fees.
Tipping fees are separate and self-supporting.
Henry Lane, 1816 E. Broadway, was concerned that in a few
years, the total rate increase would amount to $1.30. He pointed out that Springfield
has commercial garbage collectors and does not have a city-owned operation to
his knowledge, which allows for cheaper rates. Mr. Lane wondered why the same
could not be done in Columbia to keep our rates lower.
Mr. Campbell pointed out a comparison on the overhead showing
Springfield's rates at $12 to $15. Mr. Patterson explained that Springfield's
rates vary because they utilize different private contractors. He said the figures
shown on the overhead were compiled from a survey done just last week. Mr. Lane
asked if those figures included total garbage collection. Mr. Patterson said
it was residential only. Mr. Beck noted that DNR had done a statewide study which
showed the average of $16 per residential household unit per month. In addition,
he reported many of those cities are not providing bags, curbside collection
or drop-off. Mr. Beck reiterated that the City's drop-off units are partly subsidized
by the landfill tipping fee so that both residents and nonresidents are paying
a portion of the cost.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
B34-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

(B)Construction of improvements at
the landfill to implement a materials recovery system for the recyclingprogram.
Item B was read by the Clerk.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comments, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mrs. Crockett made the motion that the staff be directed to
proceed with construction of a building at the landfill for the purpose of implementing
a materials recovery system. The motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell and approved
unanimously by voice vote.

(C)Construction of the Upper Hinkson
Creek Outfall Relief Sewer Project.
Item C was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Patterson explained that this project consists of replacing
the Upper Hinkson line with a relief sewer line. The current line is about 24-inches
in diameter in most cases, and the capacity required for this section would require
a 48-inch line. The project has been designed by Crawford, Murphy and Tilly.
Financing is being proposed to come from the bonding capacity of the last ballot
issue and the State Revolving Loan Fund Program for the financing mechanism Mr.
Patterson said there would be about 4,500 feet of 48-inch line being constructed.
He reported the project would eliminate an air lift pump station at the Country
Club property that has been the source of considerable complaints in the neighborhood
because of odor problems. In addition, it will also eliminate three inverted
syphon crossings which overflow during heavy usage and in rainy seasons causing
illegal discharge into Hinkson Creek. The project will be constructed deep enough
to allow for gravity flow crossings for its entire length. The total cost of
this sewer project has been estimated to be $2.8 million. The next cycle for
the State Revolving Loan Fund is April, and Mr. Patterson was hopeful the construction
plans could be completed to get in on the April bonding set by the state.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Maxine Thomas, 2514 Brookside, explained that she lives immediately
adjacent to the Hinkson Creek and is well-acquainted with all of its problems.
She noted the City has been most helpful in assisting with the sewer problems
that have occurred. Ms. Thomas knew the project was necessary, but she is hopeful
the fruit trees on her property could be saved in the process.
Dee Dokken, 208 Sanford, felt badly that the Thomas' yard
would be disrupted, but appreciated the City is proposing this project because
of the sewage she has seen running into the creek. She hoped the construction
would disrupt the creek as little as possible. Ms. Dokken asked if disturbed
riparian and native grasses could be replanted in native grass instead of fescue.
Phoenix Conway, 213 Sanford, reiterated Ms. Dokken's comments.
She thought the long-term goals for the project were good.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mr. Coffman asked about the native plant life being used for
the project. Mr. Patterson explained that generally fescue is used because it
is quick growing. He added that he knew of no reason why something different
could not be considered. He indicated staff could look into it.
Mrs. Crockett made the motion that staff be directed to complete
final plans and specifications. The motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell and approved
unanimously by voice vote.

OLD BUSINESSB20-01Authorizing agreements with Ameren
Energy Development Company for development of a gas turbineproject
at the Bolstad Substation site.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that the Council has been briefed on this
project at an earlier work session.
Mr. Malon explained that several months ago, the City Council
authorized a letter of intent with Ameren Energy Development Company for a gas
turbine project at the Bolstad Substation. He noted that this company is an unregulated
subsidiary of Ameren Corporation -- not the local gas utility. Mr. Malon reported
this agreement would allow for a public/private partnership between the City
and Ameren, with the City providing the site, and the project would be designed,
financed and constructed by Ameren.
Mr. Malon noted the turbine would be connected to the City's
transmission system to give access to the outside world. He said the City will
have the opportunity to buy capacity from the site and an option for ownership.
Ameren will also be selling the output to other entities. Mr. Malon displayed
a layout of the plan on the overhead. He also showed the highlights of the project
on the overhead. Approval of the agreement will provide the basic framework for
construction of the facility and for the City's participation in it. The project
will also provide economical peaking capacity and system reserves for future
growth for the Columbia utility system. In addition, Mr. Malon reported the turbines
will provide reliability for the area with "black start" capability on the Columbia
system. The City could begin buying 20 Mw of capacity beginning in June of this
year and it would be increased to 36 Mw by June 1, 2003. There is no increase
in electric rates anticipated in connection with this project.
Mr. Malon explained that the agreement has been somewhat modified
since the original introduction, but said the terms and the conditions remain
the same. The document has been reviewed by the Water and Light Advisory Board
twice, and both times the Board has recommended approval of the project. Mr.
Malon indicated that both the staff and the Board believe the arrangement should
be a good one for the City and Ameren.
Bob Porter and Nick Lombardi, representatives of Ameren Corporation,
offered to answer any questions.
William Woodward, 200A Unity, spoke in favor of the project.
He questioned the black start capability.
Mr. Malon explained that, depending upon the time of the year,
the units can generate approximately 144 megawatts. He reported the City's power
plant can generate another 86 megawatts, which when combined with the turbine,
will reach over 200 megawatts. If a blackout were to occur today, he said there
was no question that we could carry the entire city. At peak time during the
summer, Mr. Malon indicated that probably would not be possible. He explained
it just depends on the time of year and what actually happened. Mr. Malon explained
that the units are tied to a bus on a major substation in the city. He remarked
there would not be so much a series of addresses that would be involved, but
the first step would try to get the City's plant started and then maybe try to
bring the University up.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that B20-01 be amended per the
amendment sheet. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Crockett and approved unanimously
by voice vote.
B20-01, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B29-01Approving the final plat of
Bolstad Subdivision; granting variances to the Subdivision Regulations.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Dudark explained that this is the property Mr. Malon just
spoke about in connection with the gas turbine project. He described it as 69
acres of city-owned property with Peabody Road bisecting it. He noted the plat
creates two lots. Mr. Dudark reported there are two requests for variances; one
for sidewalk construction and one to have the plat drawn at a scale different
that what the Subdivision Regulations call for. He pointed out that there are
no existing sidewalks in this area of the community as the road leads to the
sanitary landfill. The request for the different scale is because of the size
of the property.
Mayor Hindman agreed that there would be no one walking in
the area, but stated this is a City project. Mrs. Crockett saw no need for a
sidewalk. Mr. John agreed, but he thought the Council should realize there will
be cases where walks will not be needed in other places as well.
David Rogers, an attorney with offices at 813 E. Walnut Street,
voiced concern about waiving the requirement of sidewalks entirely. He believed
this is an area, particularly on the north and east side of the road, possibly
down as far as the substation, where some thought should be given to the need
for a sidewalk. Eliminating the sidewalks and making no requirement of improving
the road to industrial grade standards would guarantee that the area will always
be shabby. Mr. Rogers reported that his client owns all of the ground surrounding
the City property. He indicated that this individual plans to develop an industrial
park on his property.
Mayor Hindman asked to what standards the road will be built.
Mr. Beck explained that Peabody Road had recently been resurfaced to be a very
wide, well-built road. He noted there are no curbs and gutters along it and he
did not anticipate any in the future. Mayor Hindman asked whether an industrial
development will be located on either side of the subject tract. Mr. Rogers commented
this is an area where an asphalt plant and things of that sort belong.
Mr. Campbell thought that because Peabody is an unimproved
street, the City should not build the walks until there is a need for them. He
remarked if ever the street is improved with curbs and gutters, that would be
the appropriate time to construct the sidewalks.
There was a discussion about how the Council would handle
this situation if it had been a private developer. Mr. Dudark reported that if
a variance was not approved, the remaining options would be to either build an
alternate walkway or supply payment in lieu of construction. There was a discussion
about the City having the responsibility of providing a sidewalk if development
occurs in the area. Mayor Hindman thought the City should, in some way, accept
the responsibility that a sidewalk should be constructed at the appropriate time.
Mr. Patterson explained that if this were a private developer
who wished to avoid future responsibility for the sidewalk, this individual would
have to contribute funding, by agreement, into the City Sidewalk Fund and the
plat would reflect that they no longer had any responsibility for a sidewalk.
Mr. Beck had indicated to Mr. Malon earlier this evening that
there was the possibility that he would need to escrow Water & Light funds
into the general sidewalk fund.
Mayor Hindman preferred that the variance be denied and then
follow the procedure outlined by Mr. Patterson.
Mr. Rogers suggested that the Council could state that the
variance is granted subject to the condition that the City will install the sidewalks
at such time there are walks in the area. He pointed out that his client would
be in a position to enforce it if it was done that way.
Mayor Hindman reiterated his point that he thought the City
should be in the same position as anybody else. Whatever method satisfactorily
puts the City in that position, would suit him.
Mayor Hindman made the motion that the variance be granted
with the stipulation that the plat will read that the City will be responsible
for constructing sidewalks when the road is improved or when other walkways are
provided in the area. The motion was seconded by Mr. John and approved unanimously
by voice vote.
B29-01, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B30-01Approving the final plat of
Water Tower Place Subdivision, Plat 2; granting variances to theSubdivision
Regulations.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that staff supports the construction of
a telecommunications tower on the site which would produce some revenues for
the City. In order to issue a building permit, the property must be platted.
Mr. Dudark described the property as a 1.4 acre tract acquired
by deed in 1975. He noted there is no street frontage and access is by a private
easement to the water tower. He explained that the Subdivision Regulations require
street access, thus the reason for the first variance request. The second request
is related to the fact there are no utilities on site because there are no buildings
to be occupied. The request is that no sewer line be required. Mr. Dudark pointed
out that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval based on the
fact that there are no occupied buildings.
B30-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B36-01Authorizing an agreement to
purchase Stephens Lake property.B37-01Authorizing a contract for lease
with option to purchase Stephens Lake property.
The bills were given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained the first agreement deals with the financing
procedure and the second with some conditions in the purchasing agreement. He
noted one of the conditions pertains to the naming of the property and it is
stipulated that the City will agree to include the Stephens name when that process
is initiated. The second condition involves granting the College exclusive use
of portions of the property twice a year for the alumni student weekends. Mr.
Beck commented that the College would have to give 12 months advance notice to
reserve the facilities, and they would be expected to pay the customary charge
for the reservation. The next condition allowed the College priority for scheduling
soccer games on the property with six months advance notice and payment of customary
fees. Mr. Beck pointed out that Stephens has not asked for any special treatment.
He said these are the same types of provisions administered for anyone else wanting
to use the property. Another condition was that the College would be allowed
to dump leaves and horse manure on the property until March 16, 2001, as well
as continue to store their equipment until June 1, 2001. Mr. Beck reported the
College would be responsible for any environmental clean-up in the next three
years.
Karl Skala, 5201 Gasconade, commented that he was under the
impression that the uses for the Stephens Lake property had not been determined
in regards to the soccer fields.
Mayor Hindman explained that the use of the property has not
yet been established. He said as there are soccer fields currently on the property,
the College would be allowed to use these unless they are taken. Mr. Boeckmann
said the soccer provisions are contingent on the City having soccer fields there.
It does not require the City to keep the fields.
Mr. Coffman made the motion that both B36-01 and B37-01 be
amended per the amendment sheets. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously
by voice vote.
B36-01, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B37-01, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B38-01Appropriating local parks sales
tax revenue; amending the FY2001 budget to add three positions tothe
Parks & Recreation Department.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck indicated with the passage of the parks sales tax,
an amendment needs to be made to the FY 2001 budget to allow for additional personnel
(Management Support Specialist, Groundskeeper II, and Parks Planner) to the Parks
and Recreation Department. He reported the ordinance also provides for the replacement
of some existing equipment, which was likewise discussed during the budget process.
He noted another budget amendment pertaining to the Recreation Services Fund
which is separate from the regular Parks budget. This would provide for the funding
of lease payments, environmental survey and site development costs for the Stephens
property. It would also provide for maintenance of the property during the summer
months.
William Woodward, 200A Unity, asked the Council to exempt
food purchases from this sales tax.
B38-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

B39-01Authorizing the conveyance of
a ½ interest in real property at the Walton Building site to the
Chamberof
Commerce.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck noted an amendment sheet was prepared for this bill.
He explained that the City and the Chamber joined together in 1985 to build the
Walton Building as part of a property arrangement worked out with the University.
At that time, the City provided a financing plan for both the property and the
building. The cost was financed under the Convention & Visitors Bureau's
budget through the City. The agreement stipulated that the City and the Chamber
would jointly own the property and the building. Mr. Beck explained that the
Chamber recently purchased their one-half interest in the building, and in accordance
with the agreement, they can purchase their portion of the building which amounts
to $148,744. Mr. Beck noted that the funds would be put back in the Convention & Visitor's
Bureau capital fund account.
Don Laird, President of the Columbia Chamber, commented that
the Chamber has enjoyed a long-standing, good relationship with the City. As
they continue to look at their space needs and other various options, Mr. Laird
felt the arrangement would continue to be a good one. He reported the Chamber
is prepared to write the check.
Waldo Palmer, 414 Alexander, was concerned that one of the
parties may want to sell their half of the property to another entity. Mayor
Hindman explained that should either party decide to sell their half, the other
one would have the first right of refusal.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that B39-01 be amended per the
amendment sheet. The motion was seconded by Mr. John and approved unanimously
by voice vote.
B39-01, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

CONSENT AGENDA
The following bills were given second reading and the resolutions
were read by the Clerk.

B21-01Accepting easements for water
utility purposes.B22-01Vacation of a utility easement
located on the west side of South Providence Road, north of StewartRoad.B23-01Vacation of easements located
within Boone Hospital Medical Park; accepting an easement for electricand
water purposes.B24-01Vacation of a portion of street
right-of-way located within Bolstad Subdivision.B28-01Approving the final plat of the
Daniel Boone Little League Subdivision; authorizing a performancecontract.B33-01Approving a right of use permit
with Roger and Shirley Berg for the construction of a sewer line throughthe
Grindstone Nature Area.B35-01Confirming the contract with
C.L. Richardson Construction Company for reconstruction of theintersection
of St. Charles Road and Keene Street.R14-01Setting a public hearing: construction
of water main serving Vanderveen Crossing, Plat 6.R15-01Setting a public hearing: construction
of pedestrian bridge at Providence Road and I-70.R16-01Setting a public hearing: construction
of sanitary sewers in Sewer District No. 152 (Spring ValleyRoad
and West Broadway area).R17-01Setting a public hearing: construction
of Rollins Road from Rothwell Heights to Colonial Gardens.R18-01Setting a public hearing: considering
an amendment to the FY 2001 CDBG and HOME Action Plan.R19-01Authorizing Supplement No. 5
to the Master Site Lease for property leased from the Federal AviationAdministration
at Columbia Regional Airport.R20-01Authorizing Amendment #3 to the
contract with the Missouri Department of Health for HIV Preventionand
Counseling Services.R21-01Authorizing agreements with the
Boone County Historical Society for caretaking services for facilitiesin
Nifong Park.R22-01Authorizing an agreement with
the Boone County Historical Society for maintaining and makingimprovements
to the Maplewood Home.R23-01Authorizing a social service
contract with Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri.

The bills were given third reading and the resolutions
were read with the vote recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN,
COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bills
declared enacted and resolutions declared adopted, reading as follows:

NEW BUSINESSR24-01Authorizing a lease to place
a trash compactor on private property off the alley south of Broadwayand
between Eighth Street and Ninth Street.
The resolution was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Patterson reminded the Council that a trash compactor
had been placed in the alley between Eighth and Ninth Streets in 1997 for the
purpose of trying to eliminate several dumpsters. After the project proved to
be successful, there was a desire to permanently locate the compactor off the
main thoroughfare at which time the staff came back with a request for authorization
to acquire the privately owned alley. Mr. Beck reported this is in conjunction
with an ongoing plan with the downtown business community to clean up dumpsters
and improve the accessability of alleys to make them more available for pedestrian
amenities.
Mr. Patterson indicated that during negotiations for the purchase
of the alley, the owner was reluctant to sell the property, but was willing to
enter into a lease agreement. This agreement is based on negotiated values of
loss of benefit to the property owner in the form of parking spaces for tenants
and access for deliveries. Staff recommends proceeding with the execution of
the lease in order to get the compactor out of the alley and begin cleaning the
area up.
The vote on R24-01 was recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL,
JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU.
Resolution declared adopted, reading as follows:

R25-01Authorizing an agreement with
Cerini Investments, Inc. for operation of a passenger shuttle servicebetween
Columbia and the Columbia Regional Airport.
The resolution was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Patterson explained that this would authorize a contract
for continued passenger shuttle service at the airport. Last fall, Cerini notified
the City in accordance with their existing contract of their intent to not renew.
The reason cited at that time was the inability to increase the fares and the
corresponding loss of revenues. Negotiations with Cerini have resulted in this
agreement that would allow them a fare increase from $17 to $20 for one-way,
single passenger fares between the airport and Columbia. Mr. Patterson explained
the agreement would also authorize the City Manager to approve any subsequent
increases felt necessary in order to keep the shuttle viable. He said the shuttle
is not a large revenue generator for the airport, but it does provide an essential
service. It is believed that the fare level will seek its own sense of equity
in that if the fare gets too high and becomes profitable, there will be competition
which would be allowed to also provide service at the airport.
The vote on R25-01 was recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL,
JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU.
Resolution declared adopted, reading as follows:

R26-01Declaring the intent to reimburse
the Shelter Insurance Generator Equipment Project with proceedsof
bonds.
The resolution was read by the Clerk.
Ms. Fleming explained the City is required to provide this
resolution of intent for IRS purposes. She indicated staff tried to negotiate
a lease-purchase agreement, but those details could not be worked out on a tax
exempt basis. Ms. Fleming reported that a little more time is needed to work
out those financing arrangements. She stated this agreement will allow staff
to proceed with the project, and then when the financing arrangements are worked
out, the funds will be replenished back into the Water and Light budget.
The vote on R26-01 was recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL,
JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: JANKU.
Resolution declared adopted reading as follows:

B55-01Removing Adelphia Telecommunications
franchise from the April ballot.
The bill was given first and second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that Adelphia asked to have their franchise
request removed from the ballot. Because of the timing, an emergency ordinance
is necessary.
B55-01 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows:
VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, CRAYTON, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: JANKU. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:

The following bills were introduced by the Mayor, unless
otherwise indicated, and all were given first reading:

B40-01Amending Chapter 23 of the City
Code relating to sign regulations.B41-01Amending Chapter 29 of the City
Code relating to parking and screening requirements.B42-01Approving a replat of a portion
of Lot 1 of Garth's Subdivision; authorizing a performance contract.B43-01Approving a replat of Lot 8 Sedona
Villas Plat 1.B44-01Authorizing an amendment to the
agreement with Con-Agg; appropriating funds.B45-01Confirming the contract of Curtiss-Manes-Schulte,
Inc. for the construction of the Columbia CommunityRecreation
Center.B46-01Vacating a sanitary sewer easement
within Columbia Mall; accepting a grant of easement for sewerpurposes.B47-01 Accepting easements for water utility
purposes.B48-01Authorizing an agreement with
R/S Electric Corporation for the lease of generator equipment forShelter
Insurance project; appropriating funds.B49-01Appropriating funds for the repair
of economizer #6 at the Municipal Power Plant.B50-01Authorizing construction of water
main serving Vanderveen Crossing, Plat 6; authorizing payment ofdifferential
costs.B51-01Confirming the contract of Wisch
and Vaughan Construction Company for the construction of FireStation
No. 8; appropriating funds.B52-01Accepting easements for drainage,
sewer, utility and street purposes.B53-01Confirming the contract with
N-J Wilson Contracting, Inc. for the construction of water main alongsunflower
Street from Route E to Mayberry Drive.B54-01Authorizing an agreement with
Boone County for JCIC clerical services.B56-01 Amending the FY 2001 Budget.

(B)Street Closure Request
Mr. Beck explained that this request to close Walnut Street,
from Seventh to Eighth Street, on April 26, 2001, was received from Columbia
Public Schools in relation to their activities for Partners in Education Week.
The request is to close the street from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that the request be approved
as submitted. The motion was seconded by Mr. John and approved unanimously by
voice vote.

(C)Report of City of Columbia Volunteer
Hours
Ms. Nutter pointed out in fiscal year 2000, there was a 20%
increase in volunteer hours over the previous fiscal year of approximately 46,000
hours. She said the increase is the result from a variety of efforts by City
staff trying to utilize more volunteers. Ms. Nutter was hopeful the City would
continue to see increases in volunteer hours over the coming year.
Mayor Hindman commented that he was glad to see the program
doing so well and complimented Ms. Nutter on a fine job.

(D)Request by the East Campus Neighborhood
Association to establish an Urban Conservation (U-C) OverlayDistrict
Mr. Dudark noted that the neighborhood has been working on
this issue for some time. He reported staff provided a summary report to the
Council on the process. He said if the Council is in agreement to begin the actions
necessary to establish an urban conservation overlay district in the East Campus
area, staff will proceed with the procedure for scheduling a meeting. Mr. Dudark
indicated a report will come back for further review before any action is taken.
Mr. Coffman believed this neighborhood to be the perfect place
for the urban conservation overlay. He is constantly reminded by the residents
that there never has been a good, comprehensive plan relating to the development
of the neighborhood. Because of an almost even mix of single family homes and
dense student housing, he thought extremely complex and unique problems have
been created that perhaps an overlay could address.
Mr. Coffman made the motion that the staff proceed with necessary
actions. The motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell.
Mr. John noted there are two methods for starting the overlay
process. One method is to obtain support from at least 50% of the property owners
in the neighborhood. The other is to get the City Council to override that rule
and give authorization to proceed with such without contacting 50% of the people.
Mr. John noted that the neighborhood association in this case had said they wanted
diverse groups involved in the process, yet those representatives have not really
tried to initiate any involvement because a petition has never been circulated.
He thought the Benton Stephens District was the result of a very small group
that planned, organized and orchestrated the complete urban conservation overlay
district without having the majority, or even a close proximity, of the property
owners in the district agreeing to it.
Mr. John believed the neighborhood should start the process
by getting residents to agree to it. If there is some problem with that, then
the group could come to the Council and discuss it. Mr. John indicated he could
not support this request.
Mayor Hindman pointed out that the Association is asking for
staff to bring back an ordinance, which may or may not be passed after it has
been reviewed.
Mr. Coffman asserted residents had been collaborating with
landlords in the neighborhood in various ways on other issues, and he did not
think it would be hard to contact the appropriate residents, except maybe for
some absentee landlords that are difficult to notify. With such a flexible tool
as the overlay, he said specific points must be brought forward before a resident
can really decide to support it or not. Mr. Coffman did not see a problem getting
people together. He said the Benton Stephens overlay was worked on over a series
of years and residents were aware of the process.
As a landowner in the Benton Stephens area, Mr. John reported
he never was notified of a meeting. He knew a meeting had been scheduled, but
only until the Planning Department published notification of the public hearing.
He said at that point, he thought the overlay designation was a done deal. Mr.
John was sure there were other property owners that were not given the opportunity
to comment as well.
Mr. Dudark remarked that if the Council makes a motion to
begin the process, staff would prepare a draft ordinance and a boundary report.
He noted the Council would review this information first and then if they wanted
to proceed, they would need to direct the Planning and Zoning Commission to hold
a hearing.
Mr. John remarked that the neighborhood would not have been
given an opportunity to make the initial decision as to whether they wanted this
process to begin. Mr. Dudark responded the Council would have the authority to
stop the proceedings if they opt not to support the draft ordinance. If the Council
chooses to approve the proposal, they would direct the Commission to schedule
to a formal public hearing on it.
In drafting such an ordinance, Mr. Campbell asked how much
staff time would be needed. Mr. Dudark replied staff could review the Benton
Stephens overlay and determine to what extent it can be modified to fit the situation
in the East Campus area. Then staff would meet with the neighborhood association
to discuss those findings. Mr. Dudark could not estimate how many times staff
would need to meet with residents in order to work out any changes they might
request. He thought it would be at least 60 to 90 days. Mr. Campbell asked if
that would take considerable staff time. Mr. Dudark agreed that would be part
of it.
Mrs. Crockett thought it would be best to find out how many
property owners would really be interested in establishing an overlay district.
She did not want to see staff time spent if only 15% would be interested. Mrs.
Crockett reported that she attended the meetings when the Benton Stephens overlay
district was considered, and basically the same eight to ten people showed up.
She did not believe everyone in the neighborhood was contacted, and she thought
they should be.
Mr. John said if there was a step anywhere after this, where
the property owners got to vote on the plan, he would support the request. He
remarked as the situation stands now, this is only the step where the property
owners get to vote on whether or not they want an overlay district -- which is
the step the Council will be overriding.
Mr. Coffman argued that the Council does not know what the
specifics are yet. He thought it would be more meaningful if the Council had
a draft to look at and discuss. He did not think the district would look much
like the Benton Stephens ordinance because the issues are different.
Mr. John felt the neighbors needed to agree to begin the process.
He said the Council would be overriding the only chance for the property owners
to vote. Mr. John agreed there will be a couple of meetings, but probably only
20 people at the most will show up. He wondered how many property owners there
are in the neighborhood.
Mr. Coffman said there would be the Planning and Zoning Commission,
the Council and probably two or three rounds of hearings. He felt it incumbent
on the Council to initiate it and get it started. Mr. Coffman said people will
not know what is involved until there are meetings. He remarked one of the City's
top priorities is supposed to be helping the older neighborhoods, but it seems
that we never get around to doing much for them. Mr. Coffman agreed that everything
possible should be done to notify all of the parcel owners in the area.
Because of inertia, Mr. Campbell said it was difficult to
get a neighborhood motivated to look at planning. He noted that may be a valid
reason for suggesting there should be some type of step to get there. He was
not sure what kind of petition someone would be asked to sign as there would
be nothing to reflect on. Mr. Campbell indicated he would support Mr. Coffman's
motion because he did not think the other way would work.
The vote on Mr. Coffman's motion, seconded by Mr. Campbell,
was approved by voice vote.

(E)Dakota Avenue Parking Restrictions
Mr. Beck explained that a business on the north side of Dakota
Avenue has been experiencing problems with accessing their property. He said
that Public Works looked at the area and identified a 160 foot length along the
north side of the street where they recommend that parking be removed between
the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
Mr. John made the motion that staff be directed to prepare
the necessary legislation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell and approved
unanimously by voice vote.

(F)Utility Check-Off
Mr. Beck reported this issue had been discussed in detail
at the pre-Council dinner meeting. During budget discussions, he had suggested
looking at innovative ways of trying to find some alternative resources for the
City. Mr. Beck explained this proposal would expand the current check-off program.
He noted six areas have been identified as a starting point. Those include public
art, community beautification, youth recreation scholarships, public health,
fire prevention and education equipment and materials, as well as crime prevention
equipment for the police department. Mr. Beck said the program would be administered
by the Office of Volunteer Services and coordinated with the Finance Department.
He remarked separate funds would be established for all of the check-off's under
the City's Community Trust Program.
Mr. Coffman asked if the H.E.L.P. Progam would be listed along
side the others. Mr. Beck said each program would have a separate check-off.
Mr. Coffman expressed concern about how this proposal might potentially hurt
an existing program.
Mayor Hindman made the motion than an ordinance be prepared
for introduction. The motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell and approved unanimously
by voice vote.

BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Mayor Hindman appointed the following individual to the Mayor's Committee
on Physical Fitness and Health:
Hessler, Richard M., 411 Westmount, Ward 4

COMMENTS OF COUNCIL, STAFF, AND PUBLIC
Mr. Campbell corrected an error he made in an editorial that
was printed in Sunday's paper. He had said that Mr. Thelan was a political scientist
when he should have said he was an historian.
Mr. Campbell suggested the Council should meet with the County
on a regular basis as they do with the School Board. He has been asked by the
Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission whether staff could be asked to set-up
some kind of system whereby the City's Commission could meet with the County's
Planning and Zoning Commission on a regular basis.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that the staff be directed to
draft a plan to coordinate the activities between the City and County Planning
and Zoning Commissions. The motion was secondedby Mrs. Crockett and approved
unanimously by voice vote.
Mr. John noted that comments have been made about affordability
in terms of housing. He remarked that HUD has defined such and have established
all kinds of affordability ratios that is tracked city by city. Mr. John commented
that many of the actions the Council takes affects the cost of housing. He thought
perhaps a group could be created to review the City's requirements for street
frontage, depth, width and setbacks. He believed amending some of these requirements
might help in relation to the affordability issues. Mr. John suggested that a
Housing Affordability Study Group be appointed to reassess building requirements.
Mayor Hindman believed there were other things that could
be looked at as well that are affecting the cost of living in Columbia.
Mr. Coffman asked if Mr. John was interested in whether housing
is affordable for a particular income group or if he was talking about making
housing across the entire spectrum more affordable. Mr. John said that HUD tracks
housing affordability for first-time home buyers. He indicated that would be
the particular group he would want to focus on.
Mr. John spoke about Ms. Crayton's comments regarding some
CDC homes that have been "sitting" for a long time. He noted the whole housing
market has been sitting for a long time now, partially because the interest rates
spiked up over 8.5%. Mr. John informed her that two of the houses are under contract
right now, but have not closed yet. With current interest rates being closer
to 7%, people who previously could not qualify for loans are able to now.
Mr. Coffman made the motion that staff be directed to look
at the residential parking permit program again and come back with a draft based
on some other models that have been used. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Crockett
and approved unanimously by voice vote.
Mr. Coffman asked about the budget billing and if there was
anything new to report on it. He assumed if someone was having a great deal of
difficulty paying their utility bills they could contact the City.
Ms. Crayton relayed an incident reported to her by two older
ladies in regards to prostitution occurring in the vicinity of Banks Avenue.
She reported the ladies have asked that a representative from the City attend
a meeting this Sunday at 4:00 p.m. at the Progressive Missionary Baptist Church
to discuss the condition of the neighborhood.
Mayor Hindman understood there was an effort going on among
some of the neighborhoods to develop a nuisance ordinance. He thought part of
the problem was due process.
Mr. Boeckmann said if it has been determined that someone
is committing a crime, the police can make an arrest.
Mayor Hindman reported that the Justice Department has a program
where they bring in specialists who know how to deal with these specific neighborhood
issues. He suggested looking into that. Mayor Hindman explained these individuals
will work with and train the neighborhoods as to how to work towards solving
their problems. He indicated that he would forward this information to the City
Manager.
Waldo Palmer, 414 Alexander, presented Mr. Beck with a plaque.
William Woodward, 200A Unity, spoke about the windfall franchise
tax on utility bills being set aside to fund energy assistance programs. He said
the Council should funnel these monies through the Health Department in order
to distribute these monies to the working poor. Mr. Woodward also expressed concern
about utilities being shut off for non-payment. He asked the City to assist in
getting a bill passed that would make it illegal to shut off utilities from October
1 to March 1.
Karl Skala, 5201 Gasconade, observed property owners will
have as much influence, if not more, than a neighborhood association in regards
to the initiation of an overlay district. Regarding the earlier lighting issue,
Mr. Skala said the commercial lighting subcommittee submitted a draft proposal
last June concerning the EEC report on proposed lighting regulations. This information
was based on International Engineering Society of North America Guidelines. He
indicated the proposal emphasized three things; safety, economy, and aesthetics.
Mr. Skala noted that was what he was trying to stress during the earlier hearing
pertaining to lighting for the proposed Fire Station.
The meeting adjourned at 12:05 p.m.