You claim that you know that Hillary took money from foreign agents. You’ve stated previously that you don’t have any evidence of that and
you’ve also said that you’ve never claimed that Clinton is guilty of anything.

I believe that if there is evidence of illegal dealings with Russia, Clinton should be investigated. Now, since there is overwhelming evidence that
members of Trump's campaign have not only had illegal contacts with Russia, they have attempted to cover them up, don't you agree that it is a good
thing for the security and well being of the United States and its citizens that these connections be thoroughly investigated and any wrongdoing
exposed and prosecuted?

There is an investigation into trumps team and Russia.

I do want to see it through.

My gut says that at least manafort was doing very shady things.

I am one of the only trump supporters on here that has been saying I want Mueller to continue.

I don't think what we know now about someone like trump Jr. wild be enough to arrest him. At least no more than Hillary people and many others that
failed to intially disclose foreign meeting or contributions.

But if more evidence comes to ligyt, they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

I have been very consistent on this.

I also said, which Gryphon think a is something to call out, that although I think there is enough evidence on this uranium one deal to investigate
hillary, I am not going to call her guilty before the investigation.

I admit that like all humans I have some bias, but I am really trying to limit it.

My stance is that if dealings with Russian agents is good enough to investigate one side, it should be good enough for the other.

Some people want to say the goal posts should change to favor their team. I disagree.

You claim that you know that Hillary took money from foreign agents. You’ve stated previously that you don’t have any evidence of that and
you’ve also said that you’ve never claimed that Clinton is guilty of anything.

In your copied comment you say the opposite.

Which time were you lying?

Doess taking money from foreign agents make you guilty of a crime automatically?

You claim that you know that Hillary took money from foreign agents. You’ve stated previously that you don’t have any evidence of that and
you’ve also said that you’ve never claimed that Clinton is guilty of anything.

In your copied comment you say the opposite.

Which time were you lying?

Doess taking money from foreign agents make you guilty of a crime automatically?

If it doesn’t what are you worried about? Why should there be an investigation if you don’t think there’s a crime involved?

You claim that you know that Hillary took money from foreign agents. You’ve stated previously that you don’t have any evidence of that and
you’ve also said that you’ve never claimed that Clinton is guilty of anything.

In your copied comment you say the opposite.

Which time were you lying?

Doess taking money from foreign agents make you guilty of a crime automatically?

If it doesn’t what are you worried about? Why should there be an investigation if you don’t think there’s a crime involved?

Because it could be a crime.

Wow, I can't believe I have to explain this to you.

And never said I didn't think a crime occured. I said until an investigation is done there isnt proof of it.

You claim that you know that Hillary took money from foreign agents. You’ve stated previously that you don’t have any evidence of that and
you’ve also said that you’ve never claimed that Clinton is guilty of anything.

In your copied comment you say the opposite.

Which time were you lying?

Doess taking money from foreign agents make you guilty of a crime automatically?

If it doesn’t what are you worried about? Why should there be an investigation if you don’t think there’s a crime involved?

Because it could be a crime.

Wow, I can't believe I have to explain this to you.

It is not a crime for a non-profit organization to receive funds from foreign nationals.

You claim that you know that Hillary took money from foreign agents. You’ve stated previously that you don’t have any evidence of that and
you’ve also said that you’ve never claimed that Clinton is guilty of anything.

In your copied comment you say the opposite.

Which time were you lying?

Doess taking money from foreign agents make you guilty of a crime automatically?

If it doesn’t what are you worried about? Why should there be an investigation if you don’t think there’s a crime involved?

Because it could be a crime.

Wow, I can't believe I have to explain this to you.

It is not a crime for a non-profit organization to receive funds from foreign nationals.

The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) is helping biotech run the latest war in Ukraine. Make no mistake that what is happening in the
Ukraine now is deeply tied to the interests of Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, and other big players in the poison food game. Monsanto has an office in Ukraine.
While this does not shout ‘culpability’ from every corner, it is no different than the US military’s habit to place bases in places that they
want to gain political control. The opening of this office coincided with land grabs with loans from the IMF and World Bank to one of the world’s
most hated corporations – all in support of their biotech takeover. Previously, there was a ban on private sector land ownership in the country –
but it was lifted ‘just in time’ for Monsanto to have its way with the Ukraine. In fact, a bit of political maneuvering by the IMF gave the
Ukraine a $

You were very clear as to wh6 trumps team needed investigated, meetings with foreign agents.

Yes, foreign agents of the Russian government, one of whom is accused of being a Russian spy. Those meetings were undisclosed.

We are clear that you change that criteria when it comes to Hillary.

No need to reexplain

When did anyone on Hillary's team meet with foreign agents tied to the Russian government, whom are being accused of being a spy, and not
disclosed?

'

Now you move the goal post again; it isn't just a foreign agent, its meeting undisclosed with spies. So I assume Bill meeting with Puting doesn't
count, because Putin isnt a spy.

Or how about manafort working with the Podestas? Or how about the foundation not disclosing donations from rusains involved in the uranium one
deal.

Or how about paying a foreign agent who was a spy, Steele, to then collude with Russians to get dirt on Trump.

Or how about hillary team meeting with Ukrainian officials undisclosed?

Nope, none of that matters. even though here we have proof of money changing hands, even though we have proof it was for the expressed purpose of
getting dirt on their opponent, it doesn't meet your initial critieria of meeting with foreign agents.

I look forward to seeing how you will move the goal post next.

Why don't you just cut to the chase and say Trump and his team are always bad, Hillary and hers are always good.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.