The Max Planck Institute has done a scholarly review of 700 decisions. Their study appears genuine. Their study does not appear be by biased in any way.

Yes, there are bad UDRP decisions, I agree. Banco.com and Barcelona.com are two horrible decisions. But, on the whole, the majority of UDRP decisions are correct. The UDRP is a valid process. Squatters would have no right to use trademarks in the "real world", so the ACPA and UDRP is just helping to enforce trademark rights in the cyber world.

I think that there is little else that can be said to dissuade you from returning with more repetitious comments. You keep bringing up how posters "use spin" and "ignore the truth." Truth is that you can't register a domain name without being subject to the UDRP. The UDRP is a valid process, the "powers that be" like it, and it seems to work pretty well.