On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Trevor Jenkins <
trevor.jenkins at suneidesis.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Jonathan Morgan <jonmmorgan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Other sources of cross-references:
> > The TSK has a fairly rich and detailed set of cross-references, ...
>> Hardly the most rigorous academic source.
>
True indeed, but to be honest I don't care a whole lot about having a
rigorous academic source. To me the advantages of the TSK are:
1. Available right now in a form I use.
2. It is useful. A lot of the cross-references are very good.
It's not perfect, but I am not aware of anything that better meets these two
criteria for me.
Jon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20100817/a621a3f7/attachment-0001.html>