Because we have three pictures all taken at roughly the same time of the same person, and they all look radically different. For Esquire UK, we have Bloated Zombie Daniel Craig; for GQ, we have Classic Daniel Craig; and for Esquire Singapore, we have Hungry Emo Daniel Craig.

Agreed. He has looked better- much, much better- than all of these. Hungry emo Craig at least has the eyes really popping, but that’s as good as it gets.

gorghast

I think he’s sexy, but his face looks like a bulldog’s with a Siberian husky’s eyes.

greymain

and the problem with that is?????

mshesterp

GQ from the neck down, but he’s not really doing it for me from the head up in any of them, and I don’t know quite why…

Spicytomato1

None of the above. Sorry.

The emo version cracks me up, though, and that’s probably not the reaction they were going for.

ecallaw1977

Whenever I really look at him I think he looks like he got hit in the face with a shovel. And yet I still think he’s sexy. Those eyes and that jawline go a long way.

Maine1ac

Gotta be hungry emo.

Winter_White

For me DC is one of those actors who looks better on film, moving around and speaking, than in stills. Love the way he fills out his tux as Bond.

TieDye64

Same here.

Pennymac

This!

Catiline

To me he is in the same category as Jeremy Renner – sexy in films, kind of a gargoyle in still pictures.

HazellC

Agreed. He doesn’t photograph well.

http://twitter.com/PhDKnitter marlie

Classic Daniel Craig (GQ) all the way!

Trisha26

GQ. (Why not ask the boys what they think too?!)

http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TH56FXRFTLCQNTN3JNFIYM7JPY Pattie knitter

Am I the only one who, at a fast, first glance, thought the title of this post was “Lover Boy, Daniel Craig”? I’ll take all three.

Eclectic Mayhem

Are we absolutely sure that the Esquire cover isn’t a shot from about 10 years ago?!

Judy_S

Which Esquire, top or bottom? The top one strikes me as a shot from about 10 years from now.

Eclectic Mayhem

Whoops – sorry! I meant the bottom ‘hungry emo’ one. The top one looks like it’s the result of dodgy flat lighting… it wasn’t that ghastly Terry Richardson was it? Whereas his hair in the bottom one looks the way it did for Elizabeth (1998)

e jerry powell

I’m having a four-way with Daniel Craig!

granddelusion

What the hell is he doing with his hands?! It looks like he’s masturbating in the UK.

LOL this is hilarious. Did they think we wouldn’t notice the difference in pictures

Le_Sigh

Damn. It never occurred to me until now, but if they ever do a bio-pic about Vladimir Putin, he’d be perfect for it.

Isadora Paiva

I’ve always thought that, I’m glad I’m not alone!

Magatha

I’m glad I read this far into the comments before screaming “OMG Putin!” You are so right. Take his shirt off, put him on a horse, and the bio-pic writes itself. I’m gonna have nightmares.

mjude

GQ for sure. but the bloated zombie….LMFAO

Leonardo Alves

hahaha the first one looks so bizarre! He’s like Benjamin Button!

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=726520540 Ingrid Cruz

Hungry emo FTW.

piecesofconfetti

The top Esquire is brutal – zombie is right, and it makes his torso look squished. I didn’t know it was possible to make Daniel Craig look bad.

However, I love the GQ image (certainly not his best, but it is classic Daniel Craig, and I’ll take it). I’m also feeling the Singapore Esquire. He looks a little scruffy/scrawny, and I guess I can get behind that vulnerability?

BUT – none of these covers capitalizes on his bright blue eyes enough.

http://twitter.com/MajorBedhead MajorBedhead

Definitely GQ. The Singapore edition makes him look like a zombie.

littlemac8

Esquire Singapore FTW! OMG, I gasped at the thumbnail. Those piercing blue eyes are staring right into my soul! I’m putty in his hands!

lalahartma

Classic.

http://www.facebook.com/bozofish Nancy Robinson

Hungry Emo, of course. Just the look I’d expect to see once GQ Classic slips into something more comfortable…

littlemac8

Pocket pool, anyone???

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1084733830 Kate Andrews

Emo! Emo!

http://profiles.google.com/marteani Barbara Guttman

None of these photos do much for me, though Hungry Emo comes the closest and I think I’ve figured out why. Aside from being the only one that isn’t “Man In Suit Pose,” it’s the only photo where he’s got some visible eyebrows going on.

Also, is he sticking his hand down his pants in that first one?! O.o

MissMariRose

Classic Craig all the way

librarygrrl64

Emo, but only because I think that hair length and style work better on him.

mamafitz

hmm, i can’t decide between classic or hungry emo…i’ll just have to take both.

MzzPants

Hungry Emo. I like ’em dark and dirty.

carpediva

Hel-LO, Emo!

QuincyTKatz

I’ll have the Esquire Singapore Hungry Emo Daniel Craig.

http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WKSM57KFWUGRMKPDUW4SPL3GDM Kathryn

emo

quiltrx

That top one is freaking SCARY. Badly-made Cyborg Daniel.

I’ll take hungry emo Daniel, please. But suit Daniel is fine, too.

http://profiles.google.com/gillianholroyd gillian holroyd

Jeezus, someone should be fired over that top Esquire photo. That should never have been allowed on press.

GQ Daniel Craig is the clear winner. But, I am kind of liking the Emo Daniel Craig. That would be an awesome promo shot for some Daniel Craig film which is not James Bond.

guest2visits

All the above.

Nonmercisansfacon

Classic Daniel please. Preferably nude.

crash1212

Hungry Emo – FTW.

ojosazules

Singapore Craig.
He looks stoned in the first shot.

ri_dic

Just. Don’t. Get. The DanielCraigLove. He does not one thing for me.

poggi

I like the suit on classic Craig, the smirk of bloated Craig, and Emo Craig’s eyes. I am torn. I will just have to take all three.

http://www.twitter.com/allforusophia AllForUSophia

I want to say Esquire Singapore… GQ is a close second, but Esquire UK is just freaky.

Zippypie

GQ does it right. Bloated Craig is creeping me out and EMO Craig just looks silly at his age.

nancy

Classic Craig for me, please. Actually, I wouldn’t kick any of the three out…

jabes

Esquire Singapore is my favorite, but I read it as “Hungry Elmo” not “Hungry Emo” so I was a bit confused for a while, thinking that was maybe a toy from last Christmas that I wasn’t aware of and I couldn’t see the resemblance between Elmo and Daniel Craig!

http://pulse.yahoo.com/_F73LIJ3SJGI5AJQMXMWXCKILHI Pamela

Any and all of them. I so want to bite that lower lip.

fragileindustries

Craig’s dark charisma shows best with the moving camera, not still. Even better when he’s wearing as little as possible. Of all three, I’d rather go back to my well-worn copies of Love is the Devil and Casino Royale. You know which scenes … sigh.

MrsJulien

He’s not empirically attractive; however, he is Sex.

Emily Roach

HUNGRY EMO!!!!

maggiemaybe

Hungry Emo Daniel Craig for the win!

SapphoPoet

I can’t choose.

dulcian

Enh… I think I’ll have a Kevin McKidd instead.

zbkat

If he weren’t an actor (and I think he’s a fine actor) I wouldn’t look twice…or even once at him. Granted, his physique is stellar, but the face…what’s the big whoop? He’s rather ugly, I think.

another_laura

What the hell with that Esquire cover? I had no idea he had such a Charlie Beown head….. GQ for the win.

http://vhanna26.typepad.com Vera

Emo Craig!

http://twitter.com/BrienneCalmer Brienne Calmer

Emo Craig wins for the blue blue blue eyes. Also, the change in the hair took 15 years and 20 pounds of aloofness off him.

http://twitter.com/BrienneCalmer Brienne Calmer

And because I’m mildly faceblind, I initially thought #1 was Vladimir Putin and #2 was some British politician whose name I cannot now remember. So Emo!Craig wins there too.

PhillipWilde

GQ, bien sûr!

http://twitter.com/jalae Janey

I’ll take a hungry emo Daniel Craig thanks

RzYoung

Hungry Emo is my fave, I just love that jumper he’s wearing!

BerlinerNYC

Jesus, I’ll just take whatever’s left over.

bellafigura1

All!! All!

Jessica O’Connell

Classic on GQ BY FAR. The other two kind of freak me out…especially Emo Daniel Craig…ick