The books did the apostolic fathers and apologists
quotedA conservative,
bible believing perspective!

God's providence gave us the 27
book New Testament Canon, not the church. God, not men decided the canon. This
providence does not mean that church leaders were inspired in their selecting
the canon, only that God had his eye on the scriptures the whole time and
brought about His will to form the Bible we see today!

Although
the apostolic fathers and apologists were not inspired, they do give us a
windows into which books of the Bible they considered to be part of the
Canon.

Like
preachers today, they used many historical books as references that they
knew were not inspired.

"He [Graham
N. Stanton, The Fourfold Gospel, p 322] points to a significant passage,
often ignored in the literature, which shows that Justin
must have reckoned with at least four gospels. In Dialogue 103.8 he
refers to "memoirs" composed by Jesus' apostles and by those who
followed them." As noted above, this remark corresponds to the
evidence that the early church thought that two gospels were written by
apostles (Matthew and John), and two by followers of apostles (Mark as the
interpreter of Peter, as per the Papias fragment, and Luke as the
companion of Paul). Stanton also argues that 1 Apol. 61.4 and Dial. 88.7
show that, apart from the Synoptics, Justin also knew John's Gospel,
because the former draws on John 3:3-5 and the latter on John l:19-20.
(Lee Martin McDonald, James A. Sanders, Editors: The Canon Debate; Peter
Balla, Evidence for an Early Christian Canon: Second and Third Century, p
380, 2002)

The first
author who clearly asserts that the church has no
more and no less than four authoritative gospels is Irenaeus. (Lee
Martin McDonald, James A. Sanders, Editors: The Canon Debate; Peter Balla,
Evidence for an Early Christian Canon: Second and Third Century, p 380,
2002)

Graham
Stanton has rightly argued that it is a good method to point to the source
that is most explicit, and "to work back from
the full flowering of a concept or a development to its earlier roots."
If we find no sign of a major change in the view of the great church
reflected in the previous sources, it can be argued that the situation
clearly expressed around 180 C.E. by Irenaeus
applies to earlier decades as well. Irenaeus employs analogies from
both nature and scripture (e.g., the four winds and the four-faced
cherubim of Ezek l; Haer. 3.11.8) to show that the church has to have no more
and no less than four gospels. Additionally,
"he reckons to `scripture' . . . Acts and the thirteen letters of
Paul. 1 Peter and the two Johannine letters (l and 2) are appraised like
the Pauline letters, while James and Hebrews are probably not so highly
esteemed" (see, e.g., Haer. l.9.4; 2.26.l-2; 3.l.1). (Lee
Martin McDonald, James A. Sanders, Editors: The Canon Debate; Peter Balla,
Evidence for an Early Christian Canon: Second and Third Century, p 380,
2002)

II. Which books did the apostolic fathers refer to?

Book

Clement
of Rome

Justin
Martyr

Polycarp

Didache

Papias

Barnabas

Hermas

Aristides

Murat-orian
Fragment

Athena-goras

Lyons

Clement
of
Alexan-dria

Irenaeus

Hippolytus

Tertu-llian

Tatian

Theo-philus

Origen

Cyprian

Ignatius

Eusebius

Book

Date
AD

95

100

110

125

130

140

150

175

175

177

177

180

180

200

200

200

200

230

250

250

275

Date
AD

Mt

Mt

Mk

Mk

Lk

Lk

Jn

Jn

Act

Act

Rom

Rom

1Co

1Co

2Co

2Co

Gal

Gal

Eph

Eph

Phi

Phi

Col

Col

1Th

1Th

2Th

2Th

1Ti

1Ti

2Ti

2Ti

Tit

Tit

Phl

Phl

Heb

Heb

Jas

Jas

1Pe

1Pe

2Pe

2Pe

1Jn

1Jn

2Jn

2Jn

3Jn

3Jn

Jud

Jud

Rev

Rev

Date
AD

95

100

110

125

130

140

150

175

175

177

177

180

180

200

200

200

200

230

250

250

275

Date
AD

Book

Clement
of Rome

Justin
Martyr

Polycarp

Didache

Papias

Barnabas

Hermas

Aristides

Murat-orian
Fragment

Athena-goras

Lyons

Clement
of
Alexan-dria

Irenaeus

Hippolytus

Tertu-llian

Tatian

Theo-philus

Origen

Cyprian

Ignatius

Eusebius

Book

III. Notes:

1.We take the view that all 15 letters of Ignatius are forgeries
written about 250 AD. They are important, only in that they document 250 AD. If
you look at the books Ignatius quoted from, only Hebrews is of any value
because it was one of the disputed books. Otherwise, Ignatius is an
insignificant witness in the Canon discussion.

2.Regarding the date of the Muratorian Fragment: The majority of
conservative scholars still believe the evidence best supports the date of 175
AD.

IV. Bibliography:

1.The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and
Significance, Bruce Metzger, 1987