Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Pentagon Investigates Doctored "Intelligence" on ISIS

Living in an area with a heavy military population, I and others are supportive of our nation's military and not just in terms of the lip service so prevalent among Republicans who talk about supporting the military even as they cut veterans benefits and send our troops to war without property equipment. All of this said, I remain highly suspicious of senior commanding military personnel who whether it be in the Vietnam era or now in the Middle East fiasco ALWAYS claim to be making better progress than is the reality and who ALWAYS claim that with more time, men and money they can do the impossible regardless of objective reality and/or that local military personnel in countries such as Iraq are capable of defending themselves. The result is that bad decisions are made and American lives and treasure are wasted. Now, the Pentagon is investigating doctored intelligence reports that sought to hide the military's failed "success" with fighting ISIS. Here are highlights from the New York Times:

When Islamic State fighters overran a string of Iraqi cities last year,
analysts at United States Central Command wrote classified assessments
for military intelligence officials and policy makers that documented
the humiliating retreat of the Iraqi Army. But before the assessments
were final, former intelligence officials said, the analysts’ superiors
made significant changes.

In the revised documents, the Iraqi Army had not retreated at all. The soldiers had simply “redeployed.”

Such
changes are at the heart of an expanding internal Pentagon
investigation of Centcom, as Central Command is known, where analysts
say that supervisors revised conclusions to mask some of the American
military’s failures in training Iraqi troops and beating back the
Islamic State. The analysts say supervisors were particularly eager to
paint a more optimistic picture of America’s role in the conflict than
was warranted.

In recent weeks, the Pentagon inspector general seized a large trove of
emails and documents from military servers as it examines the claims,
and has added more investigators to the inquiry.

The electronic files seized in the Pentagon investigation tell the
story of the group’s [ISIS] rise, as seen through the eyes of Centcom, which
oversees military operations across the Middle East.

The
exact content of those documents is unclear and may not become public
because so much of the information is classified. But military officials
have told Congress that some of those emails and documents may have
been deleted before they had to be turned over to investigators,
according to a senior congressional official, who requested anonymity to
speak about the ongoing inquiry. Current and former officials have
separately made similar claims, on condition of anonymity, to The New
York Times.

The committee is not just examining reports about Iraq, Syria and the
Islamic State, but also about Afghanistan and other areas under
Centcom’s purview. The insurrection inside Centcom is an important
chapter in the story of how the United States responded to the growing
threat from the Islamic State. This past summer, a group of Centcom
analysts took concerns about their superiors to the inspector general,
saying they had evidence that senior officials had changed intelligence
assessments to overstate the progress of American airstrikes against the
Islamic State, also known as ISIS.

The analysts said problems in Iraq were rooted in deep political and
religious divides that could not easily be solved with a military
campaign, current and former officials have said. Yet Centcom’s official
posture remained generally upbeat.

It is not clear whether the Centcom assessments significantly changed
the Obama administration’s views about ISIS. While Centcom was largely
positive about American gains, other agencies have been more
pessimistic. The White House has generally been measured in its
assessments.

[T]he prospect that senior officials intentionally skewed intelligence
conclusions has raised questions about how much Mr. Obama, Congress and
the public can believe the military’s assessments.

On Thursday, Foreign Policy reported that a group of Republican
lawmakers will be focusing on whether Centcom also skewed intelligence
assessments about Afghanistan.

In addition to determining whether changes were made to intelligence
reports — and if so, who ordered them — the investigators, like the
staff members of the House intelligence committee, are studying reports
from other intelligence agencies produced at the time to determine what
was actually occurring in Iraq and Syria when the reports were written.

Sadly, senior military commanders never seem to be held to a level of accountability that is warranted given their ability to throw away the lives of our troops. If reports were falsified, people need to lose their jobs - and their retirement packages.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

PLU Top Gay Blogs

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.