INTENDED AUDIENCE
This educational activity is intended to educate urologists, primary care physicians, endocrinologists, cardiologists, specialists, and other healthcare providers interested in the management and treatment of hypogonadism and related comorbidities.

STATEMENT OF NEED
Men presenting with erectile dysfunction (ED) should be screened for benign prostatic hyperplasia-associated lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS) and vice versa. Medical treatments for BPH/LUTS appear to be equally effective—producing improvement in 75% to 80% of patients—but their adverse effect (AE) profiles differ. The patient and his partner should be informed about the impact of medication and surgery on sexual health, and sexual function should be assessed both when choosing the appropriate management strategy for BPH/LUTS and when evaluating the patient's response to treatment.

Given the close associations between BPH/LUTS, hypogonadism, and ED, treatment algorithms are needed for the concomitant management of LUTS and hypogonadism as well as associated conditions, such as sexual dysfunction and ED. An effective management strategy would incorporate agents that are efficacious and tolerable, cause minimal AEs, and can be used either as monotherapy or in a combination regimen as appropriate. Physicians should take into account individual health factors, efficacy, tolerability, treatment-related AEs (eg, retrograde ejaculation, diminished libido, and ED), cost, and patient preference. As evidence accumulates, considering how daily phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy that improves erectile function and BPH/LUTS and how treatment of hypogonadism with testosterone therapy affects LUTS and ED may open new research avenues and shift the current treatment paradigm.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
At the conclusion of this activity, participants should be better able to:

Recognize the importance of keeping the partner involved throughout the treatment continuum when treating men's health concerns

Examine with patients the adverse effect profile of each therapy when deciding the appropriate management strategy for BPH/LUTS, hypogonadism, or ED, and carefully monitor the patient's treatment response

Integrate BPH/LUTS, hypogonadism, and ED treatment goals to improve quality of life and optimize health outcomes

ACCREDITATION AND CERTIFICATION
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Dannemiller and CogniMed Inc. Dannemiller is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Dannemiller designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

There is no charge for this activity. Statements of Credit will be provided by e-mail following activity participation and upon completion and electronic submission of the posttest and evaluation to Dannemiller. A link to the evaluation form is provided upon completion of the activity. If you have any questions about your certificate, please e-mail cme@dannemiller.com.

CONTENT REVIEW STATEMENT
To resolve identified/potential conflicts of interest, the educational content was fully reviewed by a physician member of the Dannemiller Clinical Content Review Committee who have no financial relationships with commercial interests. The resulting certified activity was found to provide educational content that is current, evidence based and commercially balanced.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
It is the policy of Dannemiller to ensure fair balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all programming. All faculty participating in sponsored programs are expected to identify and reference off-label product use and disclose any significant relationships with those supporting the activity or any others whose products or services are discussed. The faculty for this activity have disclosed that there will be discussion about the use of products for non–FDA-approved indications.

In accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education standards, parallel documents from other accrediting bodies, and Dannemiller policy, the following disclosures have been made:

Faculty
Culley C. Carson III, MD, receives research support from, is a consultant for, and serves on the speakers bureaus of American Medical Systems; Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; and GlaxoSmithKline.

Kevin T. McVary, MD, receives research support from, is a consultant for, and/or serves on the speakers bureaus of Allergan, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; GlaxoSmithKline; the National Cancer Institute; the National Institutes of Health; and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Martin M. Miner, MD, receives research support from Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. He is a consultant for Merck & Co., Inc.

The ideas and opinions presented in this educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dannemiller and/or its agents. As in all educational activities, we encourage the practitioners to use their own judgment in treating and addressing the needs of each individual patient, taking into account that patient's unique clinical situation. Dannemiller disclaims all liability and cannot be held responsible for any problems that may arise from participating in this activity or following treatment recommendations presented.

Sponsored by CogniMed Inc.

This activity is supported by an independent educational grant provided by Lilly USA, LLC.

This activity is an enduring material and consists of online videos. Successful completion is achieved by viewing the material, reflecting on its implications in your practice, and completing the assessment component.

The estimated time to complete this activity is 1.5 hours.

This activity was originally released November 30, 2012, and is eligible for credit through November 30, 2013.

These videos were reviewed by an impartial content reviewer and by faculty members. Faculty have final editorial control over the piece.