Indeed, it is all opinion. I still think Berg would have turned into a good choice had he been given longer, he was systematcically making changes to the team, we never got to see what he was working towards as he only got ten games and didn't even have the opportunity to fill the holes in the squad. I understand City sacking Mancini more: no matter what his results record was, he was an arse causing flashpoints with talented players rather than man-managing them to get the best out of them. Not a recipe for long-term success.

As for who should get it now, people talk about experience all the time, and Bowyer actually has experience of working with the players and getting them to perform at a satisfactory level. There's no guarantees with anyone, but there's little logic in expecting the one option already doing the job well to suddenly fail rather than carry on as he's started.

Rover the Top wrote:Indeed, it is all opinion. I still think Berg would have turned into a good choice had he been given longer, he was systematcically making changes to the team, we never got to see what he was working towards as he only got ten games and didn't even have the opportunity to fill the holes in the squad

Agreed, the more I think about Berg's appointment the more I think that within a couple of fine margins he'd have gone on the be a reasonable success. Namely the matches away at Huddersfield and at home to Birmingham and Millwall.