Does the Book of Mormon contradict the Bible?

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (or “Mormons”) claim that, along with the Bible, the Book of Mormon1 is a revelation from God. However, the Book of Mormon fails the tests that the Bible gives to identify genuine revelations from God; e.g.:

Deut. 13:1-3
If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and … says, ‘Let us go after other gods,’ which you have not known, ‘and let us serve them,’ you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams. For the Lord your God is testing you, to know whether you love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.

Isa. 8:19-20
when they say to you, “Inquire of the mediums and the necromancers who chirp and mutter,” should not a people inquire of their God? … To the teaching and to the testimony! If they will not speak according to this word, it is because they have no dawn.

Someone might claim a revelation has come from God, but if that “revelation” contradicts what God has said before then the “revelation” is false, it is not from God. This is true of the Book of Mormon (and the other Mormon texts): they contradict the Bible so they are not from God.

Examples of the Book of Mormon contradicting the Bible.

There are various “minor” contradictions between the Book of Mormon and the Bible; e.g.:

Book of Mormon

The Bible

1Nephi 4:2 (also 17:26)
…Moses…spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and they divided…

Ex.14:21
…Moses stretched out his hand over the sea…and the waters were divided.

Mosiah 18:5,17
…in Mormon…they were called the church of God, or the church of Christ, from that time forward… [c. 148—145 B.C]

Mat.16:18
And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church… [1stC AD]

Alma 46:13-16
{15} …all those who were true believers in Christ took upon them, gladly, the name of Christ, or Christians as they were called… [c. 73-72 B.C]

Acts 11:26
…For a whole year they met with the church and taught a great many people. And in Antioch the disciples were first called Christians. [1stC AD]

Alma 7:9-10
…the Son of God…shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem…

Mat. 2:1
…Jesus was born in Bethlehem…

Helaman 14:20
…in that day that he [Jesus] shall suffer death the sun shall be darkened and refuse to give his blight unto you; and also the moon and the stars; and there shall be no light upon the face of this land, even from the time that he shall suffer death, for the space of three days, to the time that he shall rise again from the dead

Luke 23:44
It was now about the sixth hour, and there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour. [i.e. 3 hours of darkness]

These “minor” contradictions aren’t so minor when we realise that even they mean that the Book of Mormon contradicts the Bible, and therefore the Book of Mormon isn’t a revelation from God.

There are more serious contradictions, too, between the Book of Mormon and the Bible. For example:

the Book of Mormon says the devil is a “fallen angel” (2Nephi 2:17-18),

These are major contradictions with what the Bible teaches, which shows that the Book of Mormon is not a revelation from God (Deut. 13:1-3; Isa. 8:19-20).

These contradictions are all we need to see the Book of Mormon isn’t from God. However, there is other evidence, too. One further example of this evidence follows (for more, see Further reading):

Weakness of Mormonism’s foundation “vision”

The basis of the Mormon faith is a vision that a man called Joseph Smith claimed to receive in 1820.2 This authority is weak when you compare the various accounts of Joseph Smith’s first vision — the accounts differ vastly. For a full comparison of the various “First Vision” accounts see Comparison of Mormon First Vision accounts; a summary is given below:

Smith’s official account of 1838 contradicts his earlier, first recorded written account of the “First Vision” (1832) in regard to how he discovered that all Christian denominations were astray from Jesus Christ and from the gospel:

In the official 1838 account, Smith says that before his “First Vision” he didn’t know all denominations were wrong (it had ‘never enter my heart that all were wrong’ — v18). In fact, it was impossible for him to know, he says (v8), and the information was revealed to him for the first time during the “First Vision” (also see v10);3

But, contrary to this, in his first written record of the “First Vision” (1832) Smith says that he discovered before the “First Vision” that all denominations were astray from the gospel — he discovered it by studying the Bible, he says.4 This contradiction between the two accounts makes the authenticity of Joseph Smith’s “First Vision” highly questionable.

Smith’s official account of 1838 also contradicts his own earlier accounts (Nov. 9th & 14th, 1835) in regard to who appeared to him in the “First Vision”: –

In the official 1838 account, Smith says that two personages appeared to him: One of the personages identified the Other personage as His own Son – the Father and Son here appearing to Joseph themselves (v17);3

But contrary to this, in the 1835 accounts it is angels who appear to Smith, not the Father and the Son.4 This contradiction between the two accounts makes the authenticity of Joseph Smith’s “First Vision” account highly questionable.

Joseph Smith’s own accounts of his “First Vision” contradict each other. At best, this shows that Smith’s words and writings are unreliable and cannot be relied upon for accuracy. At worst, this shows that Smith fabricated the “First Vision” altogether and he cannot be trusted. Either way, the foundation “experience” of Mormonism is unstable, which brings the rest of the religion into question.

And other Mormon texts, e.g. Doctrine and Covenants and The Pearl of Great Price.

‘The truthfulness of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints rests on the truthfulness of the First Vision and the other revelations the Lord gave to the Prophet Joseph.’ Gospel Topic: Joseph Smith (accessed 17/11/09)

Related

21 Responses to Does the Book of Mormon contradict the Bible?

“the Bible says that Jesus, the son of God, came into being when he was conceived in Mary’s womb”

How, then, can Jesus claim “Before Abraham was, I am” if he didn’t exist before he was born to Mary? How can the New Testament so repeatedly claim that God created the world through Jesus, if Jesus didn’t even exist until ages after the world had already been created?

Jesus christ stepped down from Heaven in the Flesh as son of man and Son of God Genesis 1 1 in the beginning the Word (Jesus)was with God all things created he…read between the lines PRAY in the name of Jesus Christ amen

as for saying that satan is a fallen angel, angel can just be used a synonym to a spirit, thus not contradicting that part. also the angels can’t sin comment has no scripture reference to it making it sound uncredible

and most important i noticed that none of you BoM scriptures don’t have links as oppose to the bible ones so that proves that you have been taking these scriptures out of context or something.
i am going to get my mormon information on an un-biased website.

if jesus isn’t jehovah, than who is. why is he not mentioned in the new testament. in the bible it shows that jehovah isn’t god and it makes perfect sense that it would be jesus. i’m not a mormon but i already believed that jehovah was jesus so some of your “bible references” contradict other and more major bible scriptures.
i hope that no one else reads this page made by this person who went completely went out of his way just to attempt to make another religion look bad.

we’re all christian here, but in romans 2:1 it says not to judge but i don’t see anything else here than a biased man trying to spread false feelings about another religion. hitler did the same thing and there is not a sane soul in the world who thinks that hitler was a good person. how is this any different? just because hitler massacred hundreds of jews does not mean that anyone else would do that to mormons if they were able too. luke, just let people believe what they want and don’t blame them for it.

Not a criticism, just an observation. I was kind of shocked because some of what was said here not only conflicts with what I was taught, it conflicts with some of the basic ideas that Christianity has taught for over 1,000 years. If anything, I applaud your willingess to challlenge your own dogma. To be honest, I am not a Christian (I was raised so, but have a far more complex religious system now). No offense has been intended, of course.

All these points are erroneous. You are trying to confuse people by showing half truths and misinterpretations of both the book of mormon and the bible. But to say that Jesus didn’t exist before his birth to mary takes a lot of guts so instead of rebuking you for your ignorance I should commend you for your creativity

I’ve been studying Mormon doctrine for a while as a non-denominational Christian, so I expected to agree with this article, but alas some of these listed contradictions show great ignorance of the Word of God.

Satan is a fallen angel (other commenters have provided evidence of this),

Jesus was the only one who existed with the Father because He is the Father,

and people do have spirits in the afterlife (but the memory of past life is gone because we have better things to focus on).

I admire your effort to equip others with some knowledge to evangelize at their best, but please read your bible first (with a commentary if you so need). These points would make a Mormon laugh at you, if you brought them up (and they are some of the most polite people on the planet with an uncanny ability to suppress rude laughter at ignorance). Many bigger contradictions exist between the Book of Mormon and the Bible than these. Don’t waste your time focusing on piddly things when you’re speaking to a lost soul; get to the heart of the matter: do they believe Jesus is God as He claimed to be? If not, list reasons for them to understand why they need to believe Jesus is God to get into heaven (for example, one of the reasons they don’t believe in Jesus as God is because they think the bible is corrupt and we can’t trust everything Jesus said in it). Point out why this is a false idea 1. Proof of bible authenticity 2. Pagan sources that declared Jesus existence 3. Even non-theists such as Dr. Bart Ehrman can’t argue that Jesus didn’t exist- the argument lies in His deity 4. 40 authors over 3 continents in 3 languages over thousands of years wrote a consistent story- you can’t get that kind of consistency even between three authors (cough cough Joseph Smith, Brigham, any other Living Prophet- stories always change).

To say that Christ did not exist before his birth is to deny his eternalness and divinity. That is closer in theology to Mormonism than Christianity. To be anything other than part of God is to be a part of creation. The bible says that by him all things were created. Created by him for him and though him. John 1:1 says that the Word was with God. Greek meaning he was together with the father face to face like a mirror image. Greek “pros ton theon”. He himself said before Abraham I was. The Pharases ask if he is the son of God and he responds “I Am”. Why do you think they rip thier clothes and gnash thier teeth. He is given names that are reserved for God in the Old Testament, he is given all judgement. Hebrews says he co pairs to Moses like a house compares to it’s the builder. The great Malkizadec (sp) is only shadow of Him…..and on and on and on.