TR-3B nuclear powered flying triangle

There are several black projects that I'm aware of. None that *I* know of for certain would fit exactly the description, but I don't know every
project out there. It's possible that there is one that I haven't found out about.

Thanks for replying I always value your input. Im guessing your siting on fence on this one from what I see. You havent heard anything but would'nt be
surprised if there was something im guessing?

To be honnest I think the abilitys seen by some have been exagerated. If the craft was flying low it could have looked to be traverling faster. The
ones I saw where at a low but normal aircraft height and moved at a fast but normal for military Aircraft speed.

Useing the above theroy that the mach 9 anti grav stuff is just exagerated so would be best try to try and pin it on a similiar black project that
could be confused for it. Hell some of the sighting may just be B-2's.

As for anti grav I did read something intresting that been around for a while: en.wikipedia.org... (Im gunna play around with this at some point)
and the Biefeld–Brown effect.

and also to look up is

Gyroscopic devices and the Barnett effect but this seem pretty unrealible.

All intresting reads. And to be honnest with a USA militray budget of over a trillion dollers and all the alphabet agenceys that have money chucked at
them (I think half you angencys are just shell that recieve funding then tanfer it elsewere) It would be naive to think the USA and its NATO allies
havent been doing some big research into these.

I don't put much stock in the claims of what it has done, just because for a really black project there is a lot "known" about it. But that said, I
know there was a craft developed that flew with the F-117 we don't know much about, as well as a few others, so no I wouldn't be surprised.

I don't put much stock in the claims of what it has done, just because for a really black project there is a lot "known" about it. But that said, I
know there was a craft developed that flew with the F-117 we don't know much about, as well as a few others, so no I wouldn't be surprised.

I 100% agree no one can say what its specs are or what tec it has or even its role. How can we? The airframes classified so its internal working
can only be guessed at. Its all speculation until some one from the government or whatever company makes it spill and tells.

All we can say from eye witnesses (and there is to many to say something isn't out there) is there is a unusual triangular aircraft out there. It
black with some camouflaging abilities. Has 3 lights on each angle and a central light. It has V/STOL like capabilities and runs very quietly.

But that all anyone can say. Hell even the name TR-3A/D is all speculation.

Exactly. But everyone takes it as gospel. The sources I have all agree there is no "TR-3B" and the claims of its capabilities are almost laughable.
As far as there being a triangle craft, that's a different story (not necessarily that its a triangle, as there was something developed at the same
time ass the F-117 as a companion craft).

Most of the fun in this is the bread crumb hunt. It can get frustrating, and not go anywhere for a long time sometimes, and then out of the blue
someone sends you another nugget that seems unrelated to anything, and you have your next clue. Its a hell of a lot of fun.

Fun and frustrating, good observation. How many know that the SR 71 flew for over 20 years before the government disclosed it. I believe that we
got many things that operate today in the air and in/under the sea that would spin our heads. Mach 9, well the record is mach 3.2 so that would be a
leap. But still I want to believe. Maintaining a significant military capability over our potential foes is what keeps the peace. Not talking the
brush wars that are so disturbing but the world wars that could be planet killers.

If a big Nuclear powered plane existed (and its not a far out claim seeing as nuclear planes were a real concept) then it would most likely have the
speeds of Mach 1-2 not mach 9 and rather than being 600m it most likely would be the size of a 747, infact if nuclear that would have to be size to
make room for the reactor.

And I could see the role as being similar as a missile sub plus command and control plan.

As for it running quietly. well I saw a B-2 flying over were I live once ( by the way why did I see one flying over the UK

was back in 2009).
So I dont know what they use to muffle the aircraft sounds but it seemed to glide. It was sureal as all the traffic stoped in the street to look up at
it.

Nuclear powered aircraft have one big problem to them. Shielding. The nuclear powered B-36 could carry enough shielding for the crew to survive
powering up the reactor, but was so heavy it couldn't get airborne. The Soviet nuclear powered bomber (that allegedly ran with the reactor running,
but not powering the plane) cut the shielding to the point where the crew would die of radiation poisoning within a few missions at best. Add in the
potential for an accident contaminating a massive area, and you have something that looks great on paper, not so much in reality.

Fun and frustrating, good observation. How many know that the SR 71 flew for over 20 years before the government disclosed it.

A commonly repeated myth - no-one knows that, because President Johnston went on nationwide TV to admit the existence of the programme before the
SR-71 made a single flight (although after the A-12 & YF-12A predecessors had been flying tests for a year or 2 before then)

this was on 25 July 1964.

The A-12 first flight was 25 April 1962 - TWO years before the broadcast. the YF-12A first flew on 13 August 1963, and the SR-71 on 22 December 1964
- 6 months AFTER the broadcast.

Nuclear powered aircraft have one big problem to them. Shielding. The nuclear powered B-36 could carry enough shielding for the crew to survive
powering up the reactor, but was so heavy it couldn't get airborne. The Soviet nuclear powered bomber (that allegedly ran with the reactor running,
but not powering the plane) cut the shielding to the point where the crew would die of radiation poisoning within a few missions at best. Add in the
potential for an accident contaminating a massive area, and you have something that looks great on paper, not so much in reality.

When was this research done though? Its not impossible to think that better tec MAY have been developed plus as for public hazzard? May be why it is
so secret

Public cant compain if they dont know about it

Again all speculation.

By the way do you have any idea why I saw a B-2 flying over Kent (UK) back in mid 2009 in broad daylight?
I have always wondered......

It was done in the 1960s, but you have the same problem today. There has been a major increase in engine power, but you still have to have a lot of
shielding. A nuclear powered carrier, or sub has quite a bit of shielding around their reactors, and they're pretty small reactors. One on a plane
is still going to be smaller, but you still need quite a bit of shielding around it. Eventually you're going to impact payload, to the point there
is no point in doing it.

As for the B-2 when in 2009 exactly was it? There are several reasons why it might have been in the area. As a random factoid, there is an RAF pilot
that is an MC on the B-2, with a couple more that were supposed to join him.

It was done in the 1960s, but you have the same problem today. There has been a major increase in engine power, but you still have to have a lot of
shielding. A nuclear powered carrier, or sub has quite a bit of shielding around their reactors, and they're pretty small reactors. One on a plane
is still going to be smaller, but you still need quite a bit of shielding around it. Eventually you're going to impact payload, to the point there
is no point in doing it.

As for the B-2 when in 2009 exactly was it? There are several reasons why it might have been in the area. As a random factoid, there is an RAF pilot
that is an MC on the B-2, with a couple more that were supposed to join him.

Vallid points. Well unless the us is sitting on something.

Erm must have been may or june in 2009. Whats a MC? I always thought you yanks wouldnt let anyone near your B-2s.

Mission Commander. You have the Aircraft Commander, who is the pilot, and the Mission Commander who handles everything else.

The US has a long history of exchange programs with foreign military pilots, this was just a natural progression. It's unusual, but it makes
sense.

I believe that there were several airshows in the UK during that time, he was most likely at one of those. They tend to practice flight displays in
the area around the base, if they're going to do one, sometimes at locations away from the airshow location.

Mission Commander. You have the Aircraft Commander, who is the pilot, and the Mission Commander who handles everything else.

The US has a long history of exchange programs with foreign military pilots, this was just a natural progression. It's unusual, but it makes
sense.

I believe that there were several airshows in the UK during that time, he was most likely at one of those. They tend to practice flight displays in
the area around the base, if they're going to do one, sometimes at locations away from the airshow location.

Most likely because of a show at Bigen Hill or Mansen. It certainly made everyone stop and look anyway.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.