EoP Axis RF Licensing

The EoP Axis Legal Licensing is a suggested first EoP Truth and Reconciliation step towards ending the Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za]; for the EoP Axis Officials and Citizens — to agree to by submitting their EoP Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za]; and/or object to by submitting their constructive criticism — towards ending the Cold War by means of responsible freedom legal licensing; i.e. requiring all the lawyers and mediators in their nations to sign their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oaths; the original to be submitted to their Supreme / Constitutional Court; in order to keep their lawyer licenses, and continue to practice law in such impending EoP Axis nation.

Notice Re: EoP Axis Responsible Freedom Legal Licensing.

Even though democracy is here in Slovakia, it has to live inside everyone of us because with democracy comes responsibility. Michal Kravcik galvanized support to halt a dam planned during the Communist era by proposing effective democratic alternatives, including smaller dams, decentralized water management, and restored farmlands. Kravcik not only voiced opposition against the proposed dam, he also presented an alternative plan in 1994. The “Blue Alternative” and provided means to obtain the same amount of drinking water for approximately 20 percent of the cost of the proposed dam, while minimizing the destructive impacts on the environment. One of its key components was that resources were to be managed by a local association of villages, requiring de-centralization of power, a challenge to the old style of government. … Although only a small portion of the planned scope of the Programme has been implemented so far, Slovakia has demonstrated an example of a fundamental solution in combating climate change, ecosystem degradation, flooding and drought risks. Kravcik’s village for the Third Millenium embraces historical low tech agrarian sustainable farming & self-sufficient living traditions. – Michal Kravcik; The Flow Partnership: People and Water: A Distributed democratic alternative to large-scale engineering works. Goldman Environmental Prize: Michal Kravcik.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Jan: Cyril Ramaphosa: Bolivia & RSA Gov Re: Water Wars & Land Reform: Notice Re: EoP Axis Responsible Freedom Legal Licensing.

We need some sort of relationship like that between Washington and Beijing today, I think. And I do not mean in any way that we should rule the world together. What I mean is the [ecological & economic collapse consequences of WiP ‘right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ intnl law] challenges like we’re going to confront in the 21st century, challenges that could be [species ending] existential, challenges like climate change, challenges like enough water to drink, enough food to eat, and so forth — I’ve seen some projections that say — by climatologists whose views I respect, that say by the end of this century we could have only arable land and water enough for some half-billion people. What do we do with the other 9 billion? Where do we bury them? How do we deal with that kind of massive change in human relationships with this planet? So these are huge challenges. So what I’m saying is you need this kind of great-power relationship, this great-state relationship to begin to lead the [EoP truth and reconciliationresponsible freedom] way for others to follow. — [EoP Amended] Lawrence Wilkerson: The Real News: Reality Asserts Itself with Paul Jay: Lawrence Wilkerson: Who Makes Foreign Policy? 01:02; If We Remain Predators; the Planet Will Cast us off: 03. [SS Copy]
» EoP Leg Sub: EoP TRC: Abel & Kane Cold War.

McVeigh Wilson Make Earth Great and Men Garden of Eden Honourable Again

What is “masculinity”…what does it mean to be a “man”…what is “courage”…what is “honor”…what is a “tribe”…who is “we”…who is a “brother?” All of these questions, all of these “words” matter. If you say that brotherhood matters to you, why is your brotherhood so cheap? Why is it given so freely? Do you ask nothing in return for your brotherhood? What does your brotherhood offer? – Jack Donovan: We are not Brothers.

We cried and prayed for many years, and received no ansa; so now we gonna pray with our Bulworth Ego/Eco Literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] brains: The homeboy asked us one time ‘how come we can’t wake the ‘niggas, crackers’ up?’ Hmm. We knew what he was talking about and we didn’t have an ansa for him at the time. Then after a while it just hit us. You know what it is your sovereign right as a person to be ignorant as hell. I’m talking about turned up till you burned up homey. Pop bottles, pop Mollie. Shoot up the club, drink till you puke. Man if you are a woman just fit as many pain instances into all the orifices of your body, if you can get em to do it, hell have a ball. Have two, right? It is also your right to stick your penis in a lightsocket. It is your right to stick your breast in a blender. It is your right to put your head on some train tracks. It is your sovereign right as a human person to fail as a responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] human being. Can I ask a favour of you though? If you a nigga, cracker, spick, wetback, kike, jap, chink, towelhead, etc get your nuts snipped. If you a bitch, get your tubes tied. Cause under EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law, only responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] men and women shall be allowed to reproduce. … You see it is your right to destroy your life and your life alone. – EoP Amended: Theo Wilson & Timothy McVeigh; Tej Fury: Garden of Gaiah; Why “N*ggaz” Can’t Be Awakened. MSNBC: The 11th Hour: France’s Emmanuel Macron To America: ‘Make Our Planet Great Again’. Bulworth: Obscenity. NY Daily News: Omar Mateen appeared in a documentary about BP oil spill six years before Orlando shooting.
» IG: 17-12-21_mcveighwilson-rf-mega; EoP Leg Sub: 21 Dec: Duterte Sison EoP TRC: Make Earth Responsible Freedom Great Again?.

All these technological devices are only mastery of the universe out there, not the one in here. And so that is all IQ, not EQ. That’s a dangerous imbalance. Where do you get the emotional intelligence, the character development, the virtues of patience, forbearance, compassion, you know the things that make sure that these devices, however advanced become a blessing and not a curse? It seems to me that humanity itself needs an upgrade. That’s a big task, understandably, but I don’t believe in any kind of unbeatable monster. There was no giant out there without perhaps a simple Achilles heel. And what if I told you that one of the best ways to actually overcome this is to have courageous conversations with difficult people, people who do not see the world the same way that you see the world? Oh yes folks, conversations may be indeed the key to that upgrade, because remember, language was the first form of virtual reality. It is literally a symbolic representation of the physical world, and through this device we change the physical world. Keep in mind, conversations stop violence, start countries, they build bridges, and when the chips are down, conversations are the last tools that humans use before they pick up their guns. ….. It is time that we stop trying to hack our way around the human experience. There is no way out of each other. Stop trying to find one. We have to understand something. Human beings all want the same things and we have to go through each other to get these things. These courageous conversations are the way that these bridges are built. It is time that we start seeing people as people and not simply as the ideas that we project onto them or react to. Human beings are not the barriers but the gateways to the very things that we want. This is a collective and conscious evolution. My journey began with a terribly popular cell phone video and a fallen friend. Your journey begins right now. – Theo EJ Wilson; TED: Theo EJ Wilson: A black man goes undercover in the alt-right.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Dec: EoP re: TW: Awakening N*ggaz; WoaW: Conscious Clapback; MD Gandhi’s Pencil.

.

On 11 Jan 2018 EoP MILED Clerk notified Russian President Vladimir Putin, American President Donald Trump, European Union President Claude Juncker and Chinese President Xi Jinping – as published at EoP Leg Sub: 11 Jan: EoP Axis: Notice of Court Filing EoP TRC Termination of Cold War Negotiations: Draft: Legal Licensing – that she shall open an EoP Truth and Reconciliation of Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] Negotiations application with the George Magistrates Civil Court, with their Ambassadors in Pretoria as respondents; to enable EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] Nations to clarify their level of support or objection for resolving the Cold War via EoP TRC [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.

The suggested first EoP Truth and Reconciliation step for the EoP Axis Officials to agree and/or object to; towards ending the Cold War shall be legal licensing; i.e. requiring all the lawyers and mediators in their nations to sign their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oaths; the original to be submitted to their Supreme / Constitutional Court; in order to keep their lawyer licenses, and continue to practice law in such impending EoP Axis nation.

If among many others Alliance for World Scientists predictions [aws17-ecowarning.tygae.org.za] of ecological collapse are conservatively accurate, there is very little time to abolish the ‘right to breed/consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of international law root causes of all overpopulation and overconsumption causes of impending ecological and economic failed state collapse, and subsequent racial, religious and class resource conflict; and implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation.

Erich Fromm: Definition of Religion: Group-Shared System of Thought and Action that Offers the Individual a Frame of Orientation and an Object of Devotion:

“To clarify, “religion” as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols or even to a system perceived as religion, but to any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not having religion.

This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it.

.. A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct. Often however, individuals are not even aware of the real objects of their personal devotion and mistake their “official” beliefs for their real, though secret religion. If, for instance, a man worships power while professing a religion of love, the religion of power is his secret religion, while his so-called official religion, for example Christianity, is only an ideology.” – Erich Fromm, To Have or to Be, pp.135-136
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Oct: Vox … Thinking in Public; 09 Dec: Liberty Blitzkreig: Media: Ecology of Peace or Masonic War is Peace Rules.

Brad Blanton: Radical Honesty: 99% of conflict is a dispute about interpretations of reality.
I did allot of work with couples, in the Radical Honesty workshops. I guarantee you that 99% of all conflict between couples has nothing to do with reality. It has to do with other people’s interpretation of reality. You have to buy my interpretation of reality, and we’ll be okay. I’ll love you as long as you meet the conditions of my interpretations of reality. Usually one of the couples comes in and gives me their story and tries to be as convincing as they can; then the other member comes in and tries to be as convincing as they can. And they say: ‘Well okay, what do you think?’ Like I am the judge who is supposed to know which one is right. And I say I think you are both full of shit. Then basically they unify against me and they are together again. – Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty Channel: Radical Honesty 01.02.03.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Nov: Timothy J McVeigh: Formal Apology: Re: Fraud of Radical Honesty Cult.

Generally How Would EoP Scientific and Cultural International Law Work?:

Once EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] is implemented as National and/or International Law: the sentencing/punishment for citizens who are found negligently and/or intentionally guilty of Breeding, Consumption and/or Deception Crimes of Aggression are detailed at Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]:

Breeding, Consumption & Deception Crimes of Aggression:

Breeding & Consumption Crimes of Aggression:

“Any individual who is found guilty of advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – ‘scarcity combatant’ social contract; which enables or advocates on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources that transgress ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.”

Crimes of Aggression Acts of War Convictions & Sentencing:

Consumption Violation Sentences:

Individuals found negligently guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish their excess consumed products; and provide community service labour; to the extent of the infraction.

Individuals found intentionally guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.

Procreation Violation Sentences:

Individuals found guilty of negligently violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to be permanently sterilized.

Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish said child for adoption – if wanted to be adopted by a family – and be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed; (b) if no adoptive family is found; parents and child are to be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed.

Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression:

Fully Informed Consensual Relating Violation Sentences:

Individuals found guilty of negligently violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ aka ego-literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be required to attend and graduate from a Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ communication values aka ego-literacy class; where they would learn how to communicate their preferences and relate to others in accordance to Fully Informed Consenting Communication values aka ego-literacy; and sign a Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration to graduate.

Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to their loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.
– EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za].

As the legal enforcement of EoP Scientific and Cultural [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] breeding/consumption international law occurs; more research will be done on carrying capacity footprint limits for the different eco-regions; as part of the legal evidentiary truthseeking process. Each eco-region’s footprint will determine the size of a responsible freedom citizen in that eco-regions property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za]. For example: All nations will have a Consumption Footprint database, and there shall be an international consumption global footprint database. The national footprint database will include consumption footprint info for all the eco-regions in that nation; adjusted to the global eco-footprint average property ration: 7.2 gha at a population of 1 billion, or 72 gha at population of 100 million as per suggested EoP Scientific: eco-footprint carrying capacity international law.

Example: Advocacy in violation of Consumption/Procreation Limits:

Jeremy, a facebook friend of Richard noticed that Richard posted a facebook status advocating on behalf of overconsumption/population. Jeremy informs Richard that advocating on behalf of overconsumption/population is illegal, and advises Richard to remove the post advocating on behalf of overconsumption/population and apologize. Richard (a) agrees that his post was negligently advocating on behalf of overconsumption/population, removes it and apologizes; or (b) disagrees that his post was advocating on behalf of overconsumption; and so Jeremy and Richard go to civil court. The court finds Richard (i) innocent; Jeremy apologizes to Richard for her sincere but incorrect overconsumption/population interpretation; (ii) negligently guilty: Richard is required to go to ego & eco-literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] consumption/procreation classes to learn about what kind of behaviours are overconsumption/procreation behaviours; (iii) intentionally guilty of consumption crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]: the penalty for which is honourable death: Richard is allowed to remove his gene’s from the genepool by means of her preferred assisted suicide preference, by a certain date.

Example: Engaging in physical violation of Procreation Limits:

The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple—limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child—not one child for the male and one child for the female.

These limitations would be applied to every single human being without regard to race, religion, national origin or anything else and it would be absolute, no exceptions. It would be applied without regard for wealth, or the lack of wealth, and it would be applied without regard for the country of birth or residence of either the male or female. It would be applied without regard to intelligence, or the lack thereof, and without regard of the ability of the male or female to function in society. (At a later date when a method was agreed upon relating to dividing human beings into two groups, the ability to function in society would be considered in relation to who could or could not reproduce.) The right to either father a child or for a female to give birth could not be sold or transferred; it would be personal to the individual. If a live child were born with a birth defect or with some other disability it would not permit either the father or mother to produce another child. Each couple would have the right to have all appropriate pre-natal tests to determine if the child in the womb would be born with a birth or genetic defect and if the chance existed that the child would be born with such a defect to have an abortion.

Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced.

Since the birth of a child is very hard to hide, there must be communal responsibility and accountability for any attempt to do so. Those who knowingly failed to report the birth of a second or any higher number of children would themselves be subject to the very same severe punishment that would be meted out to the parents of the second or higher numbered child—no religious, cultural or ethnic exemptions would obtain. Humanity cannot consider the evasion of the single child rule a game to be played with a minor penalty, if caught. No group or individual could be permitted any evasion of the one child rule a that would lead to a disparity among groups and among individuals causing irreparable harm to the entire system established to reduce population. Should this sanction seem barbaric or draconian, it is surely less draconian in its effects than the merciless verdict of nature upon a species that refuses to contain its expansion.

In order for this proposal to be fair, equitable and workable, society and governments would be required to take action today to provide the means for every human being to control his or her fertility, to give everyone on the face of the earth the ability to limit birth to a single child. Governments would be required to devote a whatever portion of their Gross Domestic Product is necessary to the provision of artificial birth control devices of any and all types including sterilization, at low or no cost as appropriate, to their citizens, no matter the age of the citizens once a citizen reaches the age he/she can physically reproduce. This would also include instruction as how to use the devices. This would also include education of both males and females that the birth of a second child would result in the execution of the father and mother as well as the child. Governments would be required to provide safe, as much as any medical procedure can be safe, and low cost or free access to abortion. If any person, either male or female, had more than two failures of birth control devices, it would be conclusively presumed that the person was unable to use birth control devices and the person would be physically and permanently sterilized.

If poor nations were unable to devote the necessary funds to accomplish the one child rule in five years, the rich nations of the world would be required to assist the poor nations, after an evaluation that the poor nations were doing the best they could under some reasonable standard. Since survival of our species depends on reducing population below the current 6.7 billion humans now alive, the necessary funds to establish the system to control population must be made available. It should be emphasized that a “One-Child-Per-Family” (OCPF) law that is almost completely effective will not suffice. It must be totally and universally effective. After a five year preparation period, the rule must be enforced. The reduction in population would continue under the one child rule until all of humanity agreed upon the method and criteria necessary to implement the two group solution described herein. Population would continue to be reduced pursuant to the method and criteria of the two group solution until it reached 300 million or some other lower number agreed upon by humanity. The number finally agreed upon would be based on the ability of the earth to provide resources for humanity to maintain an acceptable standard of living for a minimum of 25,000 years. And 25,000 years is infinitely small when compared to the 160 million years the dinosaurs ruled the earth.

No doubt any proposal that would recommend capital punishment for transgressors of the One-Child-Per-Family law presently evokes immediate revulsion and rejection. Outside the context of an imminent die-off, given our heritage of moral, religious and cultural programming, I would be surprised if it didn’t. An example which shows that morality changes when circumstances change follows. Any Londoner who proposed in August 1938 that the Royal Air Force should one day bomb German cites with women and children in them would be summarily dismissed as a callous barbarian. But just two years later Londoners were clamoring for that action. Reality has a way of effecting abrupt ethical changes. What is not presently comprehended by almost all of humanity is that we are now in an emergency. Our species is on the brink of an unparalleled catastrophe—our destruction and the destruction of our civilization. It is a matter of complete indifference to me that many, if not all, readers will find the execution of anyone having a second child to be horrible and against every moral precept they learned or understood was applicable to humanity. The problem is not that my prescriptions are immoral or horrible. Rather the problem is that the situation humanity finds itself in is horrible. I will now remind the readers that under the law I propose every individual would be well aware of the consequences of flouting the law. Which of the two evils is worse— a) executing anyone who knowingly violates the one child rule; or b) not reducing population such that the vast majority or probably all of humanity is destroyed? Under this system fertility drugs would not be permitted or if they were permitted and used, only one child would be permitted to be born alive or the rest would be destroyed at birth, if more than one were born alive. If a women gave birth to more than one child and fertility drugs or any other actions to increase fertility or the number of children born were not the cause, those children would be permitted to live. Each individual will have a very clear choice—execution or birth control or sterilization or abortion or abstinence.
– SQSwans: Humans: An Endangered Species V: A Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce; by Judge Jason Brent.
» EoP Leg Sub: EoP v WiP DeIndustrialization and Depopulation.

Example: Engaging in physical violation of Consumption Limits:

Julian is accused by Thomas of overconsumption in London, UK. Julian and Thomas go to the London library to input Julian’s consumption footprint data into the library’s consumption footprint calculator database. Julian and Thomas still disagree about the accuracy of their input data or the output results; and so they decide to go to London Footprint court. Julian and Thomas provide the Clerk of the Court with their Julian consumption data; a Footprint police investigator checks it for accuracy; and the consumption data is submitted into the Court footprint calculator. Julian is found (a) innocent; Thomas apologizes in writing for his sincere but mistaken allegation and goes to a consumption footprint course to learn to accurately measure consumption footprint inputs; (b) negligently guilty: Julian apologizes in writing and goes to a consumption footprint course to learn to accurately measure consumption footprint inputs; (c) negligently and/or intentionally guilty: Julian disputes (i) the accuracy of one or more consumption factors measured in the Footprint calculator’s sustainability accuracy; and/or (ii) the finding of his deliberate intentional violation: so the matter goes to court for Julian to provide the court with his evidence in support of the IPAT factors inaccuracy; and/or mitigation of deliberate intentional violation. If the Judge considers some of Julian’s evidence indicating that particular consumption factors for the eco-region are inaccurate to be reasonable; the Judge can recommend a truthseeking enquiry investigation of those factors, or make a ruling in support of a change of that consumption factor for that eco-region in the footprint calculator database. If Julian is found intentionally guilty of consumption crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]: the penalty for which is honourable death: Julian is allowed to remove his gene’s from the genepool by means of his preferred assisted suicide preference, by a certain date.

As noted and updated at EoP Axis Legal Licensing [eop-axis-leglic.tygae.org.za]; the current deadline for EoP Policy Statements and/or Objections is postponed: date unknown.

Tribes, Organizations or Families are requested to have their Ecology of Peace statements signed before a Commissioner of Oaths. Once so done, a scanned copy converted to PDF format / printed copy is to be submitted per email / landmail to:

This War Crimes aka Crimes of Aggression correspondence; is on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za]; whose preferences are available at Eco & Ego Literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] related to EoP v WiP [eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za] DeIndustrialization & Depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za] Negotiations: Military Ethics Degeneracy Q [eop-v-wip-mil.tygae.org.za]: Who Should the Military Kill?.

The ‘Whom Should the Military Kill’ military strategic and tactical discussions – following on from EoP US Army Ft Bragg – are different and similar; to (a) South Africa’s Ending Apartheid negotiations between the ANC and the National Party, held between Thabo Mbeki and Willie Esterhuize, as depicted in the movie: Endgame: Trailer, based on Robert Harvey’s book The Fall of Apartheid. The negotiations were brokered by Michael Young, a British businessman who worked for Consolidated Gold Fields, and held at Mells Park House, a country house near Frome in Somerset, then owned by Consolidated Gold Fields; and (b) the Nazi Party’s Wannsee Conference, chaired by Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich, held in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee on 20 January 1942, the purpose of which was to clearly legally define ‘Who is and is not a Jew’, in order to formalize plans for the Final Solution to the Jewish Question—the deportation and genocide of all Jews in German-occupied Europe; as depicted in the movies: Conspiracy and Wannsee Konference.
» EoP Leg Sub: 27 Jul: Earth/Animal Liberation, Whistleblowers & Hackers: EoP TRC Responsible Freedom Path to Sustainable Future; EoP v WiP Military.

The carrying capacity of the earth is not only finite (and not infinite), but also decreasing every second of every day as humanity is using the finite and limited resources of the earth which are necessary for civilization to exist. At some point of time in the future the human population will grow until it exceeds the carrying capacity of the earth and civilization will collapse in a ball of fire caused by the failure to use the best and most modern means of birth control and abortion, caused by the failure to murder potential human beings before birth. Those that oppose abortion and/or modern birth control believe they are protecting the sanctity of life. They are not protecting the sanctity of life. They are merely delaying the time when the murders will happen from before birth to after birth; they are merely changing the description of those who will be murdered from an egg, a sperm and a fetus to a living, breathing human being; they are causing the pain of those that are murdered to increase dramatically (an egg feels no pain when it is not fertilized, a sperm fells no pain when it does not fertilize an egg; and we can debate how much pain a fetus feels when it is aborted early in the gestation process—-wars cause large amounts of pain to those who are raped, starved, injured, tortured, or killed).
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Dec: Brent Jason: Abortion, Birth Control and Murder; 14 Dec: Victory Girls Blog: A Planned Parenthood Merry Christmas.

All EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] Legal Submissions are essentially Truth & Reconciliation [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] submissions; which (a) clearly and simply clarify the – ‘right to breed/consume’ clauses of intnl law – root causes of all racial, religious, etc resource conflict; and (b) provide those guilty – plausibly due to lack of ego or ecological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] character – of scarcity combatant crimes of aggression contributions to resource conflict; the opportunity to take responsibility for their breeding/consumption transgressions [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; by cooperating [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to implement an EoP New World Order Social Contract that shall require all citizens of all nations, races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

More specifically: EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] TRC process advocate’s the implementation of an EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law social contract that shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; (b) nationalizes all property [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za] and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizens a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

Furthermore: if or when EoP intl law is implemented; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law shall allow (a) groups with subjective racial, religious& gender culture-conflict identities; who are willing to adopt responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] procreation, consumption and informed consent lifestyle changes, with cultural law territorial self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za], enabling a higher degree of orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation.cooperation through the sharing of sub-cultural lifestyle values; in such self rule communities; (b) EoP Axis cooperating nations to ban all WiP immigration.