Article Title

Authors

Abstract

Most educators, parents, and students seem to agree that computers and information technology should play an increasingly important role in education. As schools continue to add hardware and software, there has been concern about equity. One fear has been that students in rural schools may be at a disadvantage compared to students in urban or suburban school districts. A major problem in interpreting the small, existing body of research comparing the use of information technology in urban and rural schools is the variety of ways that the term rural is defined by researchers. This study developed two matrices (Appendix A and B) and used them to categorize rural districts as either frontier (extremely isolated) or other rural and compared computing resources. The study determined that frontier schools have a higher quantity and quality of information technology resources per student and per classroom while rural schools tend to have faster and higher quality Internet connections.

6. Ivers, K. (2002), Changing teachers' perceptions and use of technology in the classroom, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 1-5) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467095).

10. Yaghi, H. (1997), "The role of the computer in the school as perceived by computer using teachers and school administrators," Journal of Educational Computing Research 15(1): 137-155.

11. Yildirim, S. (2000, "Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use," Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32(4): 479-495.

16. Lauman, D. J. (2000), "Student home computer use: A review of the literature," Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33(2): 196-203.

17. Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion (2000). Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce, Economic and Statistics Administration, & National Telecommunications and Information Administration.

18. Katsinas, S. G., and P. Moeck (2002), "The digital divide and rural community colleges: Problems and prospects," Community College Journal of Research and Practice 26(3): 207-224.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/106689202317245419

20. Staihr, B., and K. Sheaff (2001), The success of the "E-Rate" in rural America. The main street economist: Commentary on the rural economy, Kansas City, MO: Center for the Study of Rural America, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

23. Bolinger, R. (1999), "Technology: Front and center in school reform," High School Magazine 7(3): 22-26.

24. Katsinas, S. G., and P. Moeck (2002), "The digital divide and rural community colleges: Problems and prospects," Community College Journal of Research and Practice 26(3): 207-224.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/106689202317245419

27. Staihr, B., and K. Sheaff (2001), The success of the "E-Rate" in rural America. The main street economist: Commentary on the rural economy, Kansas City, MO: Center for the Study of Rural America, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.