Cite this

Cruse H. Biological and psychomotor hypotheses are not logical alternatives - They use different languages to describe the same system. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition. 1987;7(2):156-158.

Cruse, H. (1987). Biological and psychomotor hypotheses are not logical alternatives - They use different languages to describe the same system. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition, 7(2), 156-158.

Cruse, H. (1987). Biological and psychomotor hypotheses are not logical alternatives - They use different languages to describe the same system. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition 7, 156-158.

Cruse, H., 1987. Biological and psychomotor hypotheses are not logical alternatives - They use different languages to describe the same system. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition, 7(2), p 156-158.

H. Cruse, “Biological and psychomotor hypotheses are not logical alternatives - They use different languages to describe the same system”, Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition, vol. 7, 1987, pp. 156-158.

Cruse, H.: Biological and psychomotor hypotheses are not logical alternatives - They use different languages to describe the same system. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition. 7, 156-158 (1987).

Cruse, Holk. “Biological and psychomotor hypotheses are not logical alternatives - They use different languages to describe the same system”. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition 7.2 (1987): 156-158.