If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Our defensive backs are all on their rookie contracts. That's the biggest issue. Zero veteran leadership in the secondary. More draft picks won't make it better. We need Rodney Harrison in FA, again.

The LBs suck at coverage. Not one of them has a damn clue in coverage. Spikes is a good coverage guy, but he can't run with anyone. Hightower has the same issue. Mayo just hasn't grasped how to cover ****.

Mayo is the most frustrating of the three. He could have picked off that TD pass late to win the game. All he had to do was have a small amount of confidence in his DL and jump the route that he slid over to cover. He just didn't even try to stop that pass. Totally zone unaware.

The interior DL gets zero push in the passing game. Love and Wilfork (though, mostly Love) can't rush the passer, at all. Cunningham is decent 1-1 and so is Ninkovich. Obviously, Chandler Jones is beastly.

The LBs suck at coverage. Not one of them has a damn clue in coverage. Spikes is a good coverage guy, but he can't run with anyone. Hightower has the same issue. Mayo just hasn't grasped how to cover ****.

Mayo is the most frustrating of the three. He could have picked off that TD pass late to win the game. All he had to do was have a small amount of confidence in his DL and jump the route that he slid over to cover. He just didn't even try to stop that pass. Totally zone unaware.

I strongly disagree about this. They're all pretty good an coverage, and Mayo is actually the best one IMO. He's just so disciplined and never plays out of the scheme. He doesn't react to his instincts, but to what the scheme dictates. It's frustrating to watch, but it's better than having someone out there freelancing and blowing coverages *cough*Meriwhether*cough*

Originally posted by ElectricEye

I'm a whiny little kunt. Feel sorry for me as I go masturbate to a picture of my mom dressed as a teletubby.

Comment

I strongly disagree about this. They're all pretty good an coverage, and Mayo is actually the best one IMO. He's just so disciplined and never plays out of the scheme. He doesn't react to his instincts, but to what the scheme dictates. It's frustrating to watch, but it's better than having someone out there freelancing and blowing coverages *cough*Meriwhether*cough*

They're all technically sound, but Spikes and Hightower can't turn and run with anyone.

Mayo does what he should, except make the plays on the ball. His instincts are very over-rated. He's a guy that executes what the coaches want, but he also misses out on a lot of plays.

The Jets TD that Sanchez threw between Mayo and a trailing DB on an in-breaking route should have been picked by Mayo. It was like 5 seconds after the ball was snapped and Sanchez had clearly gone to his next progression. There was no one in Mayo's zone, so when he slid to his right (Sanchez's left), it should have gone off in his head that the ball needs to come out.

Mayo does this regularly. It's frustrating, because it's one of the reasons why he just isn't a play maker. He's a disciplined guy and does a lot of good things (makes tackles, doesn't blow coverages), but he just isn't that impact player. If Spikes had his athleticism, he'd be the best LB in the NFL (or at least top 3).

**** her in da *****!

Comment

It's easy for us fans demanding an impact player, but I don't want that. Neither does BB I think. Of course we all want players to make big plays, but what I want and what I think BB wants is players that play within the scheme. If all players do their jobs the scheme should do the rest. At least in theory. We all know this isn't true since QBs alter the play at the LOS, but I digress. What I'm trying to say is that I like having a disciplined player like Mayo. It gives me confidence that Ray Rice doesn't take the ball for 83 yards in the first play of the game or that a screen doesn't turn into a huge play. I love our linebackers right now. The upside of the group is tremendous. It allows us to put our safeties back deep and (try to) cover. Our front seven is vastly underrated because of our porous secondary.

EDIT: When we speak of our linebackers we can't forget Rob Ninkovich. I think he's developed into a very solid player for us.

Comment

Playing a certain scheme worked when you had guys like Teddy and Vrabel there but they're gone and not walking through that door any time soon.

This is all still revisionist history though and can be used for Brooks Reed, Conor Barwin etc

These guys where all players who could have made a difference to the Pats at the time, however let's not all say they were these sure fire, can't miss prospects since they all went within the 25-40 range in the draft.

Also remember that the Pats got killed for passing on Dez Bryant, but that one turned out ok.

Added to that, the issue with the Pats isn't in the front 7 or on offense, it's the secondary. But they have used picks on the secondary. Clay Matthews doesn't make this defense much better than it is because the guys on the back end can't cover.

The issue, IMO, isn't about more talent or more playmakers. McCourty was a great playmaker in his rookie year. Chung has made big plays etc. This is all on the scheme. I don't think Revis, Earl Thomas, Ed Reed and Cromartie would look as good as they do if in the Pats scheme. It asks the DBs to do too much. The secondary is a reactive place to play. When you spend more time thinking of what you shuld be doing instead of just doing it then you get beat. To me right now it's that simple. Let the guys they have go out and play straight up man coverage with a deep safety and they can be successful. However that's simply not Belichick's MO. Right now he is trying to be too clever and innovative and is allowing the back end to get gashed on a weekly basis

BoneKrusher killing it with the sig

Comment

Overall, this is a poorly managed team from top to bottom. A timeout in the first ******* quarter by the PUNT TEAM at midfield?? Even a highschooler should know that situation makes a 5 yard delay penalty completely irrelevant. This from a coach who has always preached situational football. There are too many mental mistakes not only on the field but from the coaches. This is very disheartening, as it looks like a sign of poor preparation.

Comment

This is all still revisionist history though and can be used for Brooks Reed, Conor Barwin etc

These guys where all players who could have made a difference to the Pats at the time, however let's not all say they were these sure fire, can't miss prospects since they all went within the 25-40 range in the draft.

Also remember that the Pats got killed for passing on Dez Bryant, but that one turned out ok.

Added to that, the issue with the Pats isn't in the front 7 or on offense, it's the secondary. But they have used picks on the secondary. Clay Matthews doesn't make this defense much better than it is because the guys on the back end can't cover.

The issue, IMO, isn't about more talent or more playmakers. McCourty was a great playmaker in his rookie year. Chung has made big plays etc. This is all on the scheme. I don't think Revis, Earl Thomas, Ed Reed and Cromartie would look as good as they do if in the Pats scheme. It asks the DBs to do too much. The secondary is a reactive place to play. When you spend more time thinking of what you shuld be doing instead of just doing it then you get beat. To me right now it's that simple. Let the guys they have go out and play straight up man coverage with a deep safety and they can be successful. However that's simply not Belichick's MO. Right now he is trying to be too clever and innovative and is allowing the back end to get gashed on a weekly basis

I just think that is a lazy argument. We've tried to do conventional man coverage with a deep safety. The corners played poorly so we blamed the safeties. Now, we're playing loose zone and we're blaming the scheme, before when the zone didn't work we blamed the pass rush. The corners aren't good enough. It's tough to admit it after so much investment in that position, but at this point it's basically fact. McCourty, Arrington, and Moore aren't quality man corners, and the jury is still out on Dennard and Dowling. Plenty of teams run cover 2 and mixed zone looks effectively, but it's especially challenging for us because our linebackers aren't athletic enough to take deep enough drops to let our safeties commit to breaking on the outside receivers.

We can run zone better if we get more athletic linebackers and pressure in the middle of the d-line. We can run man better if we get man corners and actually have the stones to blitz our linebackers, but as of right now we don't have the personnel to do either. So we're stuck with mixed looks in a conventional base or nickel package with a mediocre pass rush, slow linebackers being beaten over the top, corners who have no instincts or aggressiveness, and safeties that have too much responsibility and are always a step late.

Comment

Disagree. I think it's the easy option to blame the players. It's not simply a coincidence that anyone the Pats draft in the secondary have't been good players.

The Pats LBs are big by design. Their size is a massive part of the scheme. You can't blame Hightower because he's 270lbs. BB basically wants to use his front 7 to stop the run. How often do you see Chung or Gregory or Wilson etc make the run stuff up the middle? Virtually never. The job of the safeties is to play zones waiting for the pass. Not often do they play a simple cover 2 shell. The DBs play so many different types of defense. Cover 1, 2, 3, robber, man etc. They don't have a true FS. Patrick Chung playing 30 yards of the line of scrimmage is a fault in the scheme, it is not Chung's fault. Yet often times he rotates deep while Gregory or Wilson come up to an intermediate zone.

The Pats don't have the defensive talent to line up in one defense and say to the offense "this is what we got, what have you got?" but in saying that very few teams do. However BB has gone too far to counteract this. Every DB has so many responsibilities for so many different possible outcomes. It is what BB such a respected coach so many years ago but he has possibly gone too far. Some times you just have to say go out and play and see what we have.

As for the question scheme or players, does anyone really think Sterling Moore or Kyle Arrington are better players than Ras-I Dowling? Because they aren't but Dowling is simply not good in zone