>>>anyone had a look to http://www.jamendo.com ?
>>>***
>>>Philippe
>>>
>>>
>
>I have.
>
>
>
>>Looks very promising!
>>It looks like they already have that infrastructure
>>set up?
>>I'd never heard of that site - thanks for the link!
>>Looks like they're using the 'tags' idea already.
>>
>>
>
>>From their page titled, Our rules;
>http://www.jamendo.com/us/static/engagements/>"We are committed to exclude all "explicit" content
>(sex, racism, â€¦) both in the music and in the
>advertisements."
>
>A predominant theme behind this conversation has been
>Freedom. Yes or no? The statement from the Jamendo
>rules is not something that anyone who values freedom
>would ever enforce upon anyone. Unless that person is
>just to ignorant or naive to get it. To the defense of
>the Jamendo organizers maybe they are just dumbasses
>and not nazi's, fascists or fucking pigs of whatever
>flavor is in favor. And that's about the best defense
>they deserve.
>
>There is no integrity in censorship. The Jamendo crew
>can kiss my American ass.
>
>ron
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com>
>
>
>
So you're telling us that you can value freedom and be a racist or a
sexist at the same time?

And you really believe that if you want you can administer a service
like jamendo avoiding any kind of censorship without considering any
legality issue?