Our most recent Cohen Report discussed Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback’s new state government contracting policy that might squelch public policy advocacy by nonprofit grant and contract recipients (if you didn’t read it, we recommend that you check it out here before continuing on). Our report also noted an additional story out of Kansas that raises questions about exactly what the Brownback administration is trying to do.

Brownback’s new policy (which we believe adds a layer of vague and confusing restrictions to state government contracts with nonprofits) is meant, if you can take the administration’s explanation at face value, to make sure that nonprofits don’t misuse state or federal grant funds for legislative lobbying—a practice that is already clearly prohibited by federal and state law. But Brownback wants to go a step further with an additional set of constrictions, with the implication, one presumes, that the state government would monitor and enforce the new regulations—that is, if it can.

However, the enforcement track record from the Kansas attorney general’s office regarding actual complaints against allegedly wayward nonprofits appears lackluster. The Journal-World reports that the Kansas AG completed investigations into 17 complaints against nonprofits in 2011, but with minimal action to rectify the situations. For instance, the Journal-World found several examples that appear to be unresolved by the AG’s investigations:

“The American Handicapped and Disadvantaged Workers…was soliciting donations in Kansas, though it is not registered in the state as required by state law, nor is it registered with the IRS. The organization also does not appear to have a website or contact information.”

A “complaint alleged that [the Kansas Veterans Relief Agency]…[was] collecting money for gift baskets for troops, but there was a lack of contact information on the group’s website. The organization is part of a larger nonprofit group, Common Ground Charities, based out of Indianapolis. Common Ground has been sued by the Indiana Attorney General’s Office twice because of deceptive solicitation practices. … The number for Kansas Veterans Relief Foundation is disconnected, and it has no contact information on its website.”

“[A] person was soliciting donations for a nonprofit [called Three Feathers]… However, there isn’t such an organization registered with the state or the IRS.”

Although these three cases look like worthwhile arenas for AG action, the AG’s office didn’t pursue these matters. If the allegations cited by the Journal-World are true, these instances would be examples where consumer protection is needed or else charitable donors might be likely to see their charitable dollars misused. The cases above contain the red flags of situations where individual donors’ contributions could be filched by people whose interests might not be charitable in any way, shape, or form, but the AG is reportedly sitting on the sidelines.

Yet despite this reported lack of action from the AG’s office, in a move that could squelch the free speech rights of nonprofits, the Brownback administration is adding vague, broad, and arguably unenforceable contract provisions to state contract language that the state would presumably try to enforce anyhow. When it comes to nonprofit enforcement, is the Brownback administration putting the emphasis on the wrong syllable?—Rick Cohen

Rick joined NPQ in 2006, after almost eight years as the executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). Before that he played various roles as a community worker and advisor to others doing community work. He also worked in government. Cohen pursued investigative and analytical articles, advocated for increased philanthropic giving and access for disenfranchised constituencies, and promoted increased philanthropic and nonprofit accountability.