I did make and edit, precisely because I knew that could be taken out of context. Luckily, it was included in your reply.

Many people spoke at KKK rallies and it is not indicative of a racist agenda.

Sanger was more concerned about the perfect human, and race was not a central part of that from what I understand.

*cough*

Excuse me ... so Dylan Roof is not racist? You basically just said that association with the KKK is not racist.

If a GOP candidate spoke there, you know you wouldn't be saying that, but somehow Margaret Sanger is held to a different standard. Do you honestly
think she was there preaching to the men in sheets about the virtues of women's health?

Are they babies or lumps of cells? Is there proof that there is electrical activity in the brain at the time of EVERY abortion? Majority of abortions
are NOT late-term.

If there is no electrical activity in the brain, no one's home. There's no "soul" inside.

How is this any different than unplugging a brain dead person on a ventilator? There's no brain activity there, there's "no one home" upstairs.

People who are anti-abortion don't seem to have a problem signing DNR (do not resuscitate) living wills. If like is precious, why not keep these
people alive forever, taking up bed space in hospitals and costing families fortunes?

I'm simply trying to point out the hypocrisy.

Maybe because a living will pre-supposes that the person in question made their own choice not to be resuscitated, but in the case of abortion, no one
can ask the baby what it would prefer?

Fair enough. Is paying for it your main objection, or is it a morality issue? Would you stop pushing against abortion if PP was not involved, or would
that only pass the buck to the organization doing the abortions?

originally posted by: Kali74
They are not selling tissue or organs. Money discussed relates directly to cost of using different methods to better preserve tissues, lab costs,
storage costs, shipping costs.

Why is this so hard to understand?

Oh, so that's why they talk about being able to find intact organs ... like kidneys and brains ... and how finding them in that state is more
valuable.

They aren't though that is my point. The tissue and organs are not priced. The cost for storage, shipping etc... isn't very high at all 30-100$ per
sample. If they are offered more than that why should they decline it when they can put that money to use in the program? That's not profiting.

People can rationalize anything. I agree with Carly Fiorina when she called this an "abomination," and no I'm not trying to make this about a
political candidate. I just happen to agree with her views and she expresses them very well.

No way should Planned Parenthood get government funding after this. Just bizarre.

I didn't insult anyone because of their answer. I'm insulted that people cannot even recognize that it was a fricken question. I wanted to know how
and why it would matter and this is how you responded:

Pardon..........

Im pro choice and I find this horrific.........so its not just people against abortion

Did I ask if you thought it was horrific? No, I did not.

I asked how separating abortion from PP would matter to those against abortion.

If you find that insulting, sorry. I can't help if it people do not understand what a ? is.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.