Friday, April 30, 2010

At the conference in Bangalore last week, Jeremy Levy (U. Pittsburgh) gave a fascinating talk about a significant new discovery that allows one to fabricate nanoscale electronic circuits at the interface between two transition metal oxide materials. (as described in this Science paper)

There were several things that were circumstantial about this discovery.

* Jeremy had tickets to the 2006 World Cup Final in Germany. This led to a visit to Augsburg that stimulated the original ideas.

* As a kid, Jeremy had played with

Etch A Sketch and understanding how it works inspired the basic idea on how to "write" the circuit onto the interface.

* The original fabrication was not done under vacuum but in air. It turned out that the water vapour present was essential to inducing charge carriers into the interface.

When I started writing this post I thought the discovery involved serendipity, but that involves more when one is looking for something different.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

This follows an earlier post about how spinons and gauge fields emerge in quantum antiferromagnets. It closely follows a review article by Subir Sachdev. Red font highlights important comments.

The magnetic moment for a system with ordering wavevector K [which is incommensurate with the reciprocal lattice] can be written as

One introduces a spinor w, which parameterizes N1,2 by w to

The Z2 gauge transformation

where (r,)=1. This Z2gauge invariance plays an important role in stabilising a spin liquid. [Compare this to a commensurate antiferromagnetic where there is a U(1) symmetry associated with the Schwinger bosons].

The idea is to use the Higgs mechanism to reduce the unbroken gauge invariance from U(1) to a discrete gauge group, Z2, and so reduce the strength of the gauge-flux fluctuations. [This is key because U(1) gauge theories are confining in 2+1 dimensions, whereas Z2 can have a deconfined phase]. To break U(1) down to Z2, we need a Higgs scalar, , that carries U(1) charge 2, so that e2iunder the transformation in equation (4). Then a phase with would break the U(1) symmetry, in the same manner that the superconducting order parameter breaks electromagnetic gauge invariance. However, a gauge transformation with =, while acting non-trivially on the z, would leave invariant: thus, there is a residual Z2 gauge invariance that constrains the structure of the theory in the Higgs phase.

What is the physical interpretation of the field ?

We see below it desribes deviations of the local magnetic order from the commensurate Neel order.

How does its presence characterize the resulting quantum state, that is, what are the features of this Z2 RVB liquid that distinguish it from other quantum states? The effective action for , constrained only by symmetry and gauge invariance, including its couplings to z, where we expand the theory to , is

The crucial term is the last one coupling a and z: it indicates that is a molecular state of a pair of spinons in a spin-singlet state; this pair state has a 'p-wave' structure, as indicated by the spatial gradient a.

The mean-field phase diagram of , as a function of the two 'masses' s and . We have two possible condensates, and hence four possible phases.

(1) s<0,>: this state has and =0. We may ignore the gapped modes, and this is just the Néel state

(2) s>0, : this state has z=0 and =0. Again, we may ignore the gapped modes, and this is a VBS

(3) s<0,>: this state has and . Because of the z condensate, this state breaks spin-rotation invariance, and we determine the spin configuration by finding the lowest-energy z mode in the background of a non-zero in equation (15), which is

with w being a constant spinor. Inserting equation (16) into equation (3), we find that is space dependent so that Si obeys equation (6) with N1,2 given by equation (7) and the wavevector K=(,)+2. Thus, this state is a coplanar spin-ordered state. The Z2 gauge transformation in equation (8) is the same as the Z2 = transformation.

(4) s>0, : this state has z=0 and . This is the Z2 spin-liquid (or Higgs) state we are after. Spin-rotation invariance is preserved.

Subscribe To

About Me

I have fun at work trying to use quantum many-body theory to understand electronic properties of complex materials.
I am married to the lovely Robin and have two adult children and a dog, Priya (in the photo). I also write an even more personal blog Soli Deo Gloria [thoughts on theology, science, and culture]

Followers

Disclaimer

Although I am employed by the University of Queensland and funded by the Australian Research Council all views expressed on this blog are solely my own. They do not reflect the views of any present or past employers, funding agencies, colleagues, organisations, family members, churches, insurance companies, or lawyers I currently have or in the past have had some affiliation with.

I make no money from this blog. Any book or product endorsements will be based solely on my enthusiasm for the product. If I am reviewing a copy of a book and I have received a complimentary copy from the publisher I will state that in the review.