2 Other Background Information Certified Public Accountant (1980) (licensed in North Dakota) Bar Memberships (partial list): Wyoming, Missouri, North Dakota, and Montana bars; Oglala Sioux Tribal Bar; Albany County Bar Association; Eighth Circuit; U.S. Supreme Court National Awards: Pound Civil Justice Institute Richard S. Jacobson Award for Excellence in Teaching Trial Advocacy (2006); Who=s Who in America (starting with 60th ed. 2006); American Inns of Court First Annual Warren E. Burger Prize (for blind judged national writing contest on attorney professionalism and civility) (2004) University of Missouri Awards: Kemper Fellowship (awarded by the university for outstanding teaching) (2006); Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP Excellence in Research Award (awarded annually by the law school to the faculty member who publishes the law review article deemed the most excellent) (2003); Board of Advocates Faculty Achievement Award (2003 & 2006); Excellence in Education Award (2002); Golden Chalk Award (2002) Other Awards: Rhodes Scholarship finalist; Stanford Law School Hilmer Ohlmann Award (for outstanding research and writing); Dickinson State commencement speaker, AYoung Award, and Alumni Fellow; Minnesota State Community College Board Outstanding Alumni Award; Northland Community College Alumnus of the Year; North Dakota Peace Officers= Association Distinguished Service Award; other awards from law enforcement agencies and crime victims groups Teaching and Learning Innovations Creation of Famous Trials Course Created a new course for Honors College seniors and Law School students to study the policy implications and practical lessons from historically significant trials. Classroom Voting Instituted mandatory voting by students on issues being discussed (such as whether an attorney should be disciplined, in Professional Responsibility, or whether evidence should be suppressed, in Criminal Procedure), to encourage active learning by the entire class rather than only the one or two students participating in class discussion. Point/Counterpoint Applied the real world forum of disciplinary hearings to Professional Responsibility classes, by assigning two students to present the case for disciplining an attorney and two other students to defend the same attorney, then allowed and encouraged students to use creative alternative formats such as videos, game shows, and melodramas. Attorney Day Adopted the student presentation format to Evidence class, by assigning students to argue for and against in the admission of disputed evidence as if objecting and responding in trial. Senior Partner Consultation Required students making presentations in some classes to meet with the instructor to discuss these presentations in advance, because some

3 students are quite reluctant to meet with instructors unless they are required to do so. Video Trial Files for Trial Practice Created a video trial file (with plans for more in the future) whereby witnesses are allowed to watch the events in question via DVD, to create a more realistic trial experience (with witnesses struggling with their own gaps in observation and recollection) than that resulting from the traditional injection of a fictional memory into the witness s brain via review of paper instructions outlining their recollections. Presented lecture about this innovation at University of Missouri Teaching Renewal Conference. Technology Adopted assorted technology into teaching, including some innovations (like being one of the first to use PowerPoint slides and making extensive use of video) that have now become commonplace. Historical Trials Invention of what has become an annual law school event, the historical trial, wherein outstanding trial advocacy students are paired with experienced trial attorneys (including professors) as attorneys in trials based upon historical events, as outlined in trial files written by students under editorial supervision (including the trial of Meriwether Lewis for allegedly stealing a canoe from the Clatsop Tribe (2007), the trial of Governor Thomas Crittenden for allegedly hiring a hit man to kill Jesse James (2008), and the trial of Al Capone for allegedly ordering or approving the Valentine s Day Massacre (2009)). Founding of Inn of Court Initiated and organized the creation of the Elwood Thomas Inn of Court, headquartered at the University of Missouri School of Law, with law students, young and experienced attorneys, and judges from Boone and Cole Counties. Service at University of Wyoming College of Law Creator and organizer of Summer Trial Institute (boot camp version of trial advocacy class using volunteer trial attorney faculty members); member of Athletics Planning Committee (NCAA mandated faculty committee); coach of mock trial team; co-director of summer program for students researching energy, environment, and natural resources issues; coordinator of Natural Resources Law and Policy Institute; volunteer attorney for Pro Bono program; officiant for students wedding; Volunteer Income Tax Assistance faculty supervisor; coordinator of student, faculty, staff, and alumni fundraising events; Liberty Day teacher (of fifth grade civics class); We the People judge; high school mock trial keynote speaker and judge; speaker at Naturalization Ceremony, U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming (2010); judge for numerous moot court and mock trial competitions and clinic practice sessions; coach for regional mock trial team. Service at University of Missouri Law School Student Advising Faculty advisor and for several student teams representing the law school in regional and national competitions, including the Regional Trial Competition team, the National Criminal Trial Competition team, and the Regional and National Client Counseling Competition team (which won the regional competition in both 2002 and 2003 and won the 3

4 100+ law school national competition in 2003) Faculty advisor (with other advisors) for the Board of Advocates (including assisting the students who organized the 2003 Regional Trial Competition) Faculty advisor for the Black Law Students Association, the Historical and Theatrical Trials Society, and other student organizations Academic advisor for approximately six students from each law school class (including special luncheons with first year students to discuss law school exam taking techniques) Sponsor of independent research projects and law review writing projects (usually about five students each year) Informal career advisor for many students and former students (particularly those interested in or practicing in small law firms, criminal justice careers, or public service, due primarily to fifteen years of experience in these endeavors) Pro bono advisor on professional responsibility issues for students and former students facing these issues in the law school=s clinics, particularly the Domestic Violence Clinic, and in their public interest and other work outside the law school Advisor for struggling students (as guest lecturer on Outlining and Criminal Law) in Legal Reasoning classes and in informal meetings with students Other Law School Service Member (selected by blind vote of colleagues) of Law School Policy Committee Chair, Student-Faculty Relations Committee Chair, Student-Faculty Honor Committee (responsible for directing a study of takehome exam and other cheating concerns, 2003, and for rewriting the Honor Code, 2005) Member, Board of Advocates, Standards and Readmission, Strategic Opportunities, Courtroom Technology, and Clinical and Skills Committees Judge for several Board of Advocates competitions, including the first year moot court competition, the regional moot court competition practice round for our regional qualifiers, the negotiation competition, the mediation competition, and the Jessup international moot court competition and practice rounds for our team Speaker for Open Houses for Prospective Law Students, Law School Family Days, Law School Roberts Scholars/Honors College Days, Law School Orientations (for First Year Students), and other recruiting events Law School speaker for Missouri Scholars Academy 4

5 Fellow, Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution Commencement speaker, Fall, 2004 Member of teaching team for Damages course Presentation to first year students on Outlining Guest lecturer for Assistant Dean Pavlick=s Career Explorations: Exploring the Law undergraduate Honors College class Discussion moderator for Professionalism Lunch for First Year Students Presenter (with Prof. Tracey George) of Career Services Office program for students entitled AThings We Wish We Had Known Before Our First Law Creator of computer slide presentation including Law School and University history, trivia, and anecdotes for Family Day and Law Day Organizer of golf tournament and auctioneer for the Women=s Law Association charitable auction University Service Member, University of Wyoming Athletics Planning Committee Member, University of Wyoming WICHE ICE Review Committee Volunteer (i.e., no compensation or reduction of regular law school teaching and research load) teacher of (In)Famous Trials: An Introduction to the American Criminal Justice System for undergraduate Honors College students Member, University Grievance Hearing Panel Member, Curators Teaching Professorship Application Review Committee Member, Student Fee Capital Improvements Committee Alternate, Campus Committee on Tenure Presenter of AMy Last for Newman Center Last Lecture series (jointly sponsored by the Law School) University News Bureau source consulted, quoted, or featured by several news media outlets regarding legal issues, including NPR=s All Things Considered, the Saint Paul Pioneer Press, the Austin American Statesman, the Raleigh News & Observer, the Columbia 5

6 Missourian, the Columbia Daily Tribune, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Springfield News- Leader, the Joplin Globe, the Kansas City Star, KRFU radio, KMIZ television, and KOMU television Coordinator of trial for University Club=s summer camp Legal Profession Service Member, Wyoming State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct Review Committee Member, Wyoming Supreme Court Rule 1 Study Group Member of Wyoming Component Drafting Committee (drafter of Wyoming-specific material regarding Evidence Law and Professional Responsibility for mandatory course for new bar admittees) Chair, Merit Selection Panel for Full-Time Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming Member, Missouri Supreme Court Committee on Procedure in Criminal Cases (also known as the Criminal Instructions Committee) Member, Awards Committee, National Association of Former United States Attorneys Faculty Member, Missouri Organization of Defense Lawyers Trial Academy Continuing legal education lecturer, National Association of Former United States Attorneys Member of panel moderated by Harvard Law School Professor Arthur Miller on The Gatekeeping Role of Judges as a Result of the Daubert Decision (1998 Five-State Judicial Conference (Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming)) Numerous other presentations to bar groups Member of the Board of Directors of the North Dakota Bar Foundation Member of the North Dakota Attorney Standards Committee/Joint Commission on Lawyer Discipline and Admissions Member of the State Bar of North Dakota Ethics Committee Co-Chair (with North Dakota Attorney General) of the North Dakota Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee Member of North Dakota Civil Justice Reform Act Committee Member of the North Dakota Federal Practice Committee 6

7 Member of the Local Rules Committee of the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota Guest lecturer (on trial advocacy and professional responsibility) and advocacy competition judge at University of North Dakota School of Law Special Assistant Attorney General in North Dakota and volunteer Special Assistant Attorney General in Missouri Member of (and Counselor, i.e., program organizer for) Bruce M. Van Sickle Inn of Court in Bismarck, North Dakota Author (as law school student) of paper and bill (ultimately introduced by state senator who also served as a law professor, passed by the legislature, and signed into law) regarding California income tax treatment of parents with joint custody Community Service (partial list) Liberty Day grade school teacher for Wyoming State Bar We the People judge for Wyoming high school civics competition Douglass Little League baseball coach and speaker to elementary, junior high, and high school classes regarding the Bill of Rights and trials Member of the Board of Directors for the Abused Adult Resource Center Member of the Board of Directors of the Dickinson State University Foundation Vice President (and Acting President) of the Federal Executives Association Fundraiser/participant in Trail to A Cure AIDS fundraising Ride/Walk/Run and MS 150 cycling event; faculty fundraiser for It s My Mizzou campaign; annual participant in Tim Heinsz memorial 5K Run/Walk; initiator of Hun s Hundred event to honor faculty colleague with 50 years of teaching experience with an endowed scholarship in his name Publications and Presentations Books PROBLEMS, CASES AND MATERIALS IN PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (3d ed. 2004, with JAMES R. DEVINE, WILLIAM B. FISCH & ROBERT H. ARONSON, and 4th ed. 2013, with JAMES R. DEVINE & WILLIAM B. FISCH) and related Teacher=s Manual and PowerPoint slides MATERIALS IN TRIAL ADVOCACY: PROBLEMS & CASES (7th ed. 2011, with THOMAS A. 7

9 Everybody Knows It, But Is It True? A Challenge to the Conventional Wisdom that the War on Drugs Is Ineffective, 14 FED. SENTENCING REP. 132 ( ) Can We Talk?: Removing Counterproductive Ethical Restraints Upon Ex Parte Communication Between Attorneys and Adverse Expert Witnesses, 76 IND. L.J. 647 (2001), reprinted in 51 DEF. L.J. 1 (2002) Ammunition for the Shoot-Out with the Hired Gun=s Hired Gun: A Proposal for Full Expert Witness Disclosure, 32 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 465 (2000), reprinted in 50 DEF. L.J. 421 (2001) The Truth About Ethics and Ethics About the Truth: An Open Letter to Trial Attorneys, 33 GONZ. L. REV. 463 (1997/1998) AYer Outta A Framework for Analyzing the Potential Exclusion of Expert Testimony Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, 32 U. RICH. L. REV. 1 (1998) Whose Life Is It Anyway?: A Proposal to Redistribute Some of the Economic Benefits of Cameras in the Courtroom from Broadcasters to Crime Victims, 49 S.C. L. REV. 1 (1997) No Pay, No Play: Trial Broadcast Fees Are Constitutional, 49 S.C. L. REV. 73 (1997) Lessons Learned the Hard Way from O.J. and AThe Dream [review essay re: CHRISTOPHER A. DARDEN, IN CONTEMPT], 32 TULSA L.J. 707 (1997) Native American Crime Victims Deserve Justice: A Response to Jensen and Rosenquist, 69 N.D. L. REV. 939 (1993) Note, Doe Defendants and Other State Relation Back Doctrines in Federal Diversity Cases, 35 STAN. L. REV. 297 (1983) Chapters in Multi-Author Books Foreword and Chapter Introductions for THE IRVING YOUNGER COLLECTION: WISDOM & WIT FROM THE MASTER OF TRIAL ADVOCACY (ABA Litigation Section 2010). Questions To Ask Yourself Before Objecting, in ALI-ABA=S PRACTICE CHECKLIST MANUAL ON TRIAL ADVOCACY (2001); originally published in THE PRACTICAL LITIGATOR, Sept., 1998, at 19; also reprinted in IOWA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION ON LITIGATION, THE LITIGATION NEWSLETTER, 2001 (1st ed.), at 9, and ALI-ABA CLE REVIEW, Dec. 25, 1998, at 5 A Defense Attorney=s Guide to Building Strong Relationships with Jurors, in DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, WINNING THE DEFENSE VERDICT (1999), at 45 Destroying the Credibility of a Professional Products Expert, in DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEFENSE PRACTICE NOTEBOOK (1996), at 139; originally published in FOR THE DEFENSE: THE MAGAZINE FOR DEFENSE, INSURANCE, AND CORPORATE COUNSEL, Oct (Products Liability Annual Issue), at 27 9

10 The Door to Open Government in North Dakota, in REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, TAPPING OFFICIALS= SECRETS (1989 and with Jon Sanstead, 1997) Bar Journal Articles Bimonthly column (re University of Wyoming College of Law) in WYOMING LAWYER, 2010-present A Lesson from Oz, STUDENT LAWYER (an ABA publication), December 2006, at 19 Book Review of THOMAS A MAUET, TRIALS: STRATEGY, SKILLS, AND THE NEW POWER OF PERSUASION, THE FEDERAL LAWYER, July 2006, at 52 Award-Winning Advice, STUDENT LAWYER, May 2006, at 33 Give Back (Because You Can and You Should), LAW PRACTICE, Sept. 2005, at 30 Get a Life! Advice for Living an Honorable and Reasonably Happy Life as an Attorney, THE BENCHERBTHE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN INNS OF COURT, Mar./Apr. 2005, at 16, reprinted in MISSOURI LAWYERS WEEKLY, March 6, 2006, at 17, 20 M.L.W. 241 Everything Your Fact Witnesses Need To Know, But Were Afraid To Ask, TRIAL LAWYER=S GUIDE, Spring 1999, at 81 Cashing in Your Credibility During Final Argument, FED. LAW., Mar./Apr. 1999, at 30 Building Strong Relationships with Jurors, 21 THE TRIAL LAWYERBJOURNAL OF STRATEGY, TECHNIQUE & CASE MANAGEMENT 290 (1998) The Power of the Truth: An Attorney=s Guide to Winning Jury Trials in a Dishonest World, WASHINGTON STATE BAR NEWS, Oct., 1998, at 20; also published in INSTITUTE OF CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION AND THE LITIGATION SECTION OF THE STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN, MASTERS IN LITIGATION SERIES: WINNING AT THE MASTER=S LEVEL: NEW TECHNIQUES AND NEW THINKING FOR A NEW AGE (2001), BAR JOURNAL [OF THE STATE BAR OF NEW MEXICO], Fall, 1998, at 38, TEXAS BAR JOURNAL, March, 1999, at 234, and NEW HAMPSHIRE BAR JOURNAL, June, 1999, at 26, and cyberpublished in OREGON LAW JOURNAL, May 2001, < The Seven Deadly Sins of Trial Attorneys, TRIAL, Oct. 1998, at 92 A Guide to the Care and Feeding of Judges, THE PROSECUTOR, July/Aug.,1997, at 36 Dynamite Use of Experts in Product Liability Trials, PRODUCT SAFETY & LIABILITY REPORTER, Feb. 14, 1997, at 164 Truth in Trial: Overcoming Jurors= Mistrust, BENCH & BAR OF MINNESOTA, Oct. 1996, at 10

14 The Use of Historic Trials in Legal Education, Mid-America Association of Law Librarians, Columbia, Missouri (October 15, 2009) Neuroimaging, Pain, and the Law, Stanford University Center for Law and the Biosciences, Stanford Law School (December 4, 2008) American Constitution Society Supreme Court Series: Criminal Procedure (2008 debate/discussion at the University of Missouri School of Law with Professor Rod Uphoff regarding U.S. Supreme Court decisions concerning criminal procedure and implications for defendants constitutional right to a jury trial) Panel Discussion on The Joys and Pitfalls of Book Publishing (2008 University of Missouri School of Law) The Wisdom (or Lack Thereof) of the Despised: Life Lessons from America=s Most Hated Profession, Kemper Lecture Series (November, 2006), University of Missouri Student Presentations (2006 Gonzaga University Institute for Law School Teaching, Illinois Institute of Technology: Chicago-Kent College of Law, Chicago) Debate participant (with Professor Rod Uphoff) for American Constitution Society forum on Judicial Nomination and the Criminal Justice System (November 16, 2005) My Last Lecture (presentation of lecture described in 2004 South Carolina Law Review article listed above) (2007 Polsinelli Law Firm; 2005 National Association of Former United States Attorneys; 2005 University of Missouri School of Law and Newman Center) Panelist on Taking Simulations Further (2005 Sixth International Conference on Clinical Legal Education and Scholarship sponsored by UCLA School of Law and the University of London Institute of Advanced Legal Studies) Panelist on American Constitution Society Panel Discussion on Federal Sentencing after U.S. v. Booker (2005 University of Missouri School of Law) Controlling an Expert or Other Obstreperous Witness on Cross-Examination (2010 Wyoming Federal Public Defender s Meeting, Black Hawk, Colorado; 2009 Albany County Bar Association; 2006 National Association of Former United States Attorneys, Chicago; 2004 Shook, Hardy & Bacon Law Firm, on behalf of the University of Missouri School of Law; 2004 Boone Country Bar Association) Competing Philosophical Justifications for Criminal Punishment (2003 University of Missouri Newman Center Faculty Group) Don=t Press Your Luck: Ethical Obligations for the Young Attorney (2003 Rocky Mountain Young Lawyers Regional Conference) Panelist for Is the Drug War De-Escalating? (Criminal Justice Section panel discussion 14

15 at 2002 Association of American Law Schools national convention) The Real Rules of Evidence: The Things Your Evidence Professor Forgot To Tell You (1998 Defense Research Institute Trial Techniques seminar) Injuries in the WorkplaceBExamining the Workers= Compensation Process (1997 National Business Institute North Dakota Labor and Employment Law seminar) The Real World Rules of Evidence (Trial Tactics and Techniques Committee Meeting at 1997 Defense Research Institute National Meeting) Turning the Tide in Jury Trials: Overcoming Sympathy for Injured Plaintiffs (1997 Defense Research Institute Trial Techniques Seminar) Federal Evidence Law (1996 National Association of Former United States Attorneys Annual Meeting) Federal Sentencing Law (1992 Attorney General=s Advocacy Institute and 1992 United States Attorneys= National Seminar on Sentencing) Attorney Reporting of Attorney Misconduct (1991 UND Law School panel discussion) Sentencing Guidelines (1991 North Dakota Federal Practice Seminar) The Role of the United States Attorneys= Office (1990 Seven-State Indian Conference) Health Care Fraud and Abuse (1990 HHS Regional Conference in Fargo, ND) Selected Writing Outside Professional Publications The Triple Golf Challenge-- Plus Two: Family Finds Links on North Dakota Greens, N.D. HORIZONS, Summer 2009, at 14 THAT Is Why We Love Sports, THE BOOTLEG MAGAZINE (2004) (re Stanford basketball) North by Northwest in North Dakota, N. D. HORIZONS, Summer 2003, at 8 (with Nathaniel Easton) (re cycling and camping trip with son) My Two Cents Worth: A Fan s Perspective from Omaha, THE BOOTLEG MAGAZINE (2003) (re College World Series) Got Game?, STANFORD MAGAZINE, Nov./Dec. 2002, at 124 (re sports fandom) The Little Team that Couldn t, MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE SUNDAY MAGAZINE, Dec. 8, 1985 (re junior college football team) Fewer Lawyers? Try Getting Your Day in Court, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, Nov. 27, 15

16 1984, at 30 (re comparison of Japanese and U.S. concentrations of lawyers) Four compensated op-ed columns in USA TODAY Other op-ed and sports articles in the ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION, the GRAND FORKS HERALD (covering a light heavyweight championship fight in Las Vegas), and other newspapers Winner (with co-author) of 1997 Monterey (CA) County Film Commission screenwriting contest, which drew over 300 entries, for SHUT OUT (a screenplay about Satchel Paige) Litigation Experience Appeals Hust v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, Civil No , 574 N.W.2d 808 (N.D. 1998) On behalf of the Bureau, I argued (as a Special Assistant Attorney General) that the claimant s injuries resulted from alcohol impairment due to his voluntary consumption of alcohol. The administrative law judge, the district court judge, and the North Dakota Supreme Court agreed. United States v. Desormeaux, Nos & , 4 F.3d 628 (8th Cir. 1993) In an earlier appeal, the Eighth Circuit had held that the trial court had erred in departing downward from the Sentencing Guidelines in sentencing the defendant. On remand, the trial court again departed downward. Because the trial court and the United States Attorney s Office were clearly in conflict on this case, I believed it was important for the United States Attorney (rather than an Assistant United States Attorney) to handle this appeal, so that the trial court would know that any wrath directed to the Office should be directed to the United States Attorney (who was insisting upon adherence with the law as stated in the Sentencing Guidelines), not to an Assistant (who was merely following the orders of his supervisor, which were in turn based upon the policies of the Department of Justice). On appeal, the Eighth Circuit again held that the trial court had erred in departing downward and once again remanded to the district court for resentencing. Id. at 631. United States v. Lester, No , 992 F.2d 174 (8th Cir. 1993) On behalf of the government, I successfully argued that double jeopardy did not apply because the tribe and the federal government are separate sovereigns and that the Department of Justice s Petite policy, requiring Department of Justice approval of a federal prosecution after a state prosecution, does not create enforceable rights for the defendant and does not apply to a tribal (as opposed to a state) prosecution. The Eighth Circuit reversed the trial court s dismissal of the federal prosecution. United States v. Yankton, Nos & , 986 F.2d 1225 (8th Cir. 1993) (see below for description of trial) At the district court level, I had argued that the rape victim s pregnancy either (a) could be considered a bodily injury that justified a two-level increase in the Sentencing Guidelines offense level or, if it could not be so considered, (b) 16

17 it could be the basis for an upward departure (i.e., greater sentence) from the Guidelines range. After the trial court rejected both arguments, the Eighth Circuit affirmed it on issue (a), but held the trial court could consider departing upward due to the victim s pregnancy. [On remand, the trial court did indeed increase the defendant s sentence, by a year (if my recollection is correct).] United States v. Yagow, No , 953 F.2d 423 (8th Cir. 1992) (see below for description of trial) After his conviction, the defendant appealed on sufficiency of evidence grounds. The Eighth Circuit affirmed his conviction after finding that the evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant acted corruptly. Trials (partial/representative list) In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Larry Benboom, Circuit Court of Boone County, Missouri, Probate Division, Case No. 08B7-PR00260 (August 5 to 7, 2009) In this sexually violent predator case, I served as co-counsel, with a former student, for the plaintiff/petitioner (the State of Missouri) as a volunteer Special Assistant Attorney General. In so doing, I became perhaps the only current dean of a law school to try a jury trial while serving as dean. My trial work included voir dire, a lengthy cross-examination of the respondent (who had been diagnosed as a psychopath and, therefore, a pathological liar), and final argument. The jury returned a verdict finding that Benboom was a sexually violent predator. In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Matthew King, Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, Probate Division, Case No. 08BU-PR00012 (June 9 to 13, 2008) In this sexually violent predator case, I served as lead counsel for the plaintiff/petitioner (the State of Missouri) as a volunteer Special Assistant Attorney General. The Missouri State Public Defender s Office called two psychologists to the stand a Department of Mental Health expert appointed by the court and a psychologist retained by the Public Defender s Office on behalf of the respondent. Both testified that they did not believe King qualified as a sexually violent predator under Missouri law. The State had only one witness, a retained expert who testified that he believed King was a sexually violent predator under the Missouri statute. The jury returned a verdict finding that King was a sexually violent predator. Yeoman v. General Motors Corporation, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Civil No. C (February 13 to 27, 1995) In this product liability crashworthiness case, the plaintiff alleged that the seat belt system in his car was defectively designed, because the belt system allegedly allowed the inadvertent introduction of excess slack that increased the force with which his torso hit the belt during a one car accident that he admitted was entirely his fault. Along with co-counsel, I represented General Motors, which asserted that the plaintiff was not wearing the seat belt. I cross-examined the plaintiff s impressively credentialed bioengineering/accident reconstruction expert, a football coach expert, and other plaintiff s witnesses. In response to the first interrogatory on the special verdict form, the jury found that the plaintiff was not wearing his seat belt. 17

18 Cooperative Power Association v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Civil No. A (October 18 to 22, 1993) In this commercial litigation case, I served as lead trial counsel for Westinghouse, particularly on technical issues (though another attorney in our firm was lead counsel for this client for matters before and after trial). A power cooperative sued Westinghouse, claiming that the electrical transformer that Westinghouse sold breached its warranty and caused several million dollars worth of damage to its power plant. In its verdict, the jury found that the transformer was not defective. Other claims were dismissed via post-trial motions, and the Eighth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the case against Westinghouse. See Cooperative Power Association v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 60 F.3d 1336 (8th Cir. 1995). United States v. Alonzo, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Criminal No. C (March 4 to 8, 1993) In this narcotics prosecution, I served as cocounsel for the government, with an Assistant U.S. Attorney. Following a trial that included expert chemical testimony, the jury found the defendant guilty of all three counts of distribution of marijuana and related conspiracies. United States v. Doll, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Criminal No. C (February 3 to 12, 1992) In this trial, I served as co-counsel for the government, with an Assistant U.S. Attorney. Despite the absence of any actual drugs to introduce as evidence and the court s ruling allowing the defendant to introduce problematic polygraph test results concerning the key prosecution fact witness, the jury returned guilty verdicts on drug trafficking, money laundering, and tax charges. Our case was based primarily upon accounting expert testimony regarding increases in the defendant s net worth. United States v. Yankton, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Criminal No. C (November 18 to 21, 1991) (see discussion of appeal above) In this acquaintance rape case, I served as co-counsel for the government with an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The jury found the defendant guilty despite the teenage victim s testimony admitting that she had been drinking and smoking marijuana with the defendant, that she had voluntarily entered the defendant s vehicle, and that she had initially lied to police about the extent of these activities. I cross-examined the defendant, who presented a consent defense. United States v. Chapman, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Criminal No. C (May 20 to 22, 1991) In this homicide trial, I served as lead counsel for the government, with help from an Assistant U.S. Attorney. After consultation with a nationally known hypnosis expert and cross-examination of a defense psychologist who hypnotized the defendant to enhance her memory, we persuaded the judge to exclude the expert s testimony about the defendant s (allegedly) hypnotically enhanced memory. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the voluntary manslaughter charge. United States v. Yagow, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Criminal No. C (April 2 to 4, 1991) (see discussion of appeal above) In this case, I served as co-counsel with an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The jury found the defendant, a tax protester who filed IRS forms falsely claiming payments to government officials and 18

19 other individuals and entities, guilty of all counts, including fraud and corrupt interference with internal revenue laws. The trial featured testimony from a handwriting expert. United States v. Littleghost, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Criminal No. C (December 17 to 20, 1990) In this vehicular manslaughter case, I served as lead counsel for the government. Three days before trial, the defendant served a copy of a report from an accident reconstruction expert who concluded that the decedent, not the defendant, was the driver of the vehicle. Given the lateness of this disclosure, we were forced to rely solely upon cross-examination of this mechanical engineering Ph.D. and upon the contrary conclusions of a highway patrol officer. Following one hour of deliberation, the jury returned a guilty verdict. United States v. Moffit, Strehl, Groppe, and Cummings, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, Criminal No. C (September 21 to 24, 1990) I served as lead counsel for the government in this bank robbery trial. Moffit and Strehl, two Canadian males with substantial criminal records, pleaded guilty to armed bank robbery and possession of an unregistered firearm. When these males left the vehicle to rob the bank, the two females they had met a few days earlier, Groppe and Cummings, remained in the back seat. Following over twelve hours of deliberation, the jury retuned not guilty verdicts on the aiding and abetting charges against Groppe and Cummings. Nelson v. Hogue, South Central Judicial District Court, McLean County, North Dakota, Civil No (May 16 to 24, 1988) I served as lead trial counsel for the defendant Hogue, with the assistance of an associate from our law firm, in this case arising out of a crash between two trucks on a rural gravel road. After a seven-day trial that featured accident reconstruction and other expert testimony where the key issue was whether the point of impact in the accident was on the plaintiff s or the defendant s half of the road, the jury returned a verdict assigning 60% of the fault for the accident to the plaintiff and 40% to the defendant. Under North Dakota s modified comparative fault system, this was a defense verdict. Cummins Diesel v. Cash Hill Ranch v. Cummins Engine Co., Southeast Judicial District Court, Stark County, North Dakota, Case No. 62CV85 (May 8, 1987) I represented the third party defendant in this commercial litigation case. Following a bench trial, the court ruled that the third party defendant s warranty limited recovery and excluded the Uniform Commercial Code s implied warranty of merchantability. The court further ruled that the defendant/third party plaintiff could not recover consequential damages from my client, the third party defendant. Kavon v. Hoburka, Northwest Judicial District Court, Williams County, North Dakota, Civil No. 17,080 (November 18 to 20, 1985) This was my first jury trial as lead (in this case, solo) counsel. I was hired by an insurance company to represent the driver employed by the insured small business. The defendant driver, who was intoxicated at the time of the accident, crossed the center line of a highway and struck the plaintiff s vehicle head-on. We admitted liability, so the only trial issue was damages. The contested issues involved the extent of damage to the plaintiff s custom designed mechanic s truck and the extent of plaintiff s Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome. The jury returned a verdict of $24,

20 American Family Insurance v. Polensky v. Anfinson s Inc., Stark County Court, North Dakota, Case No. CV (December 13, 1984) This bench trial was my first as lead (in this case, solo) counsel. The case originated as a subrogation case where an insurance company sued a driver to recover the amount it paid under a comprehensive policy to compensate an insured driver for damages to her vehicle in an automobile crash. The defendant in the original subrogation case brought a third party complaint against my client, Anfinson s, which repaired her vehicle. She claimed that Anfinson s had done a poor job of repairing her brakes. The judge found that the defendant was 95% responsible for the accident, the plaintiff was 5% responsible, and my client was not responsible. This list is representative, not exhaustive, as I have tried other bench and jury trials. [Each of the cases I have excluded had a successful result for my client. In fairness, I thought my list of representative trials should include both of the trials I would classify as losses, U.S. v. Groppe/Cummings, and Kavon v. Hoburka.] In addition to the cases that went to trial, I handled many other cases, first as second chair (early in my career) and later as lead (or solo) counsel. I often represented the defendant in civil cases and the government in criminal cases, but I also represented plaintiffs in personal injury and other civil cases (including some pro bono matters) and, on fewer occasions, the defendant in criminal cases. Administrative Hearings I also handled about two dozen (if my recollection is correct) administrative law judge hearings in Workers Compensation cases from about 1995 to 1998, as a Special Assistant Attorney General representing the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau. The vast majority of these hearings were one day proceedings where the claimant and the Bureau contested one or more factual issues, such as the work (v. nonwork) cause of the claimant s condition, the extent of the claimant s injuries, the claimant s rehabilitation efforts, etc. The results were mixed. [My best recollection is that we won about two thirds of these hearings.] 20

CAROL BOYLES ANDERSON EDUCATION: DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Juris Doctor, 1980 DUKE UNIVERSITY B. A. in English, cum laude, 1975 UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILL CAROLINA SCHOOL OF BROADCASTING

DANA KEITH COLE The University of Akron School of Law Office: (330) 972-7960 Akron, Ohio 44325 2901 Mobile phone: (937) 609-4169 Email: dkc@uakron.edu LAW SCHOOL TEACHING EXPERIENCE 1997 to present THE

LEGAL EXPERIENCE Barton Child Law and Policy Center, Emory University School of Law August 2007 Present Clinical Instructor / Director of Policy and Advocacy (appointed January 2010) Initially hired as

Gina Maisto Smith Gina Maisto Smith is a partner in the White Collar Litigation and Investigations Practice Group of Pepper Hamilton LLP, resident in the Philadelphia office. Ms. Smith chairs a national

CURRICULUM VITAE OF JAMES H. VOYLES *************** DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH: PRACTICE: January 3, 1943 Indianapolis, Indiana Practice consists of defending major felony cases, at both the State and Federal

Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds

Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia Transition Into Prosecution Program Office: Name of Beginning Lawyer: Bar No. Name of Mentor: Bar No. MODEL MENTORING PLAN OF ACTIVITIES AND EXPERIENCES FOR STATE

ROBERT J. BRASS, Esq. ALOIA LAW FIRM LLC 2 Broad Street, Suite 407 Bloomfield, NJ 07003 (973)337-6626 rbrass@aloialawfirm.com RESUME ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THE BAR OF THE UNITED

Janet Moore University of Cincinnati College of Law POB 210040 Cincinnati Ohio 45221-0040 Telephone: 513.600.4757 Email: janet.moore@uc.edu Experience University of Cincinnati College of Law, Cincinnati,

Information About Filing a Case in the United States Tax Court Attached are the forms to use in filing your case in the United States Tax Court. It is very important that you take time to carefully read

Curriculum Vitae BARBARA R. SNYDER ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 2007-present President Case Western Reserve University 2004-2007 Executive Vice President and Provost The Ohio State University Office of Academic

Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!) Understanding the Federal Courts There are three levels of Federal courts that hear tax cases. At the bottom of the hierarchy,

EDUCATION University of Buffalo: B.A. (History), 1965 Brandeis School of Law: J.D., 1968 Journal of Family Law (law review) 1967-1969 TEACHING POSITIONS National College of Advocacy (at Harvard and USC)

CORINNA BARRETT LAIN CURRICULUM VITA University of Richmond School of Law 804-289-8738 (phone) 28 Westhampton Way 804-289-8992 (fax) Richmond, Virginia 23173 clain@richmond.edu EXPERIENCE University of

TEACHING EXPERIENCE HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLINIC, Hempstead, N.Y. June 2000 through Present Clinical Instructor. Directly supervise law students in all phases of representation

THOMAS W. WILLIAMSON, JR. Tom is a graduate of Virginia Military Institute and from T. C. Williams School of Law, University of Richmond and a member of the law firm of Williamson Law LC, Richmond, Virginia.

CLAIRE DONOHUE CURRICULUM VITAE Practitioner in Residence Director, Domestic Violence Clinic The Washington College of Law at American University cdonohue@wcl.american.edu EDUCATION THE GEORGE WASHINGTON

Lloyd M. Cueto is a 2007 graduate of St. Louis University School of Law. Mr. Cueto is a sole practitioner in Belleville, Illinois and maintains admissions to the Illinois and Missouri state bars as well

VICTORIA A. VULETICH Attorney At Law CAREER PROFILE Creative, innovative attorney and teacher with extensive and unique experience in the law of lawyering. Expert in the changing nature of the legal profession

General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance

Statement of Introduction on the Nomination of John B. Owens to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Senator Dianne Feinstein Senate Judiciary Committee October 30, 2013 I will now introduce

Robert A. Bauerschmidt graduated cum laude from The University of Illinois College of Law in May, 1990 and received his Bachelor of Arts Degree from The University of Michigan in May, 1987. In 1990, he