Their arguments against the item's authenticity actually lend weight to its credibility. Firstly, they name it as a "Czarist forgery", while failing to mention that the Czar was murdered by Jews, along with some 30 million or more White Christians under the rule of Jewish bolsheviks. Secondly, they cite "mainstream" academics as refuting its authenticity, failing to note that the Protocols would establish inauthentic academics, along with inauthentic news sources, as the mainstream. Indeed, even accusations of anti-semitism are covered in the Protocols.

Macierewicz said: “I read it, it is very interesting, some say it is authentic, some say it’s not, I am not a specialist. Experience shows that there are such groups in Jewish circles.”

Similarly, great American, Henry Ford, noted ""The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.""