Snoop Dogg Says Colin Kaepernick 'Hypocritical' for Praising Castro

Says he should choose to focus on being a football player or a "revolutionary."

Snoop Dogg suggested San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick should choose between football and "being a revolutionary," saying he appreciated that Kaepernick "brought something to America's attention that needed to be brought to their attention," namely police brutality's effect on minorities, but that there were too many things to deal with to focus on that and being a football player at the same time.

The rapper, appearing on Fox Sports' Undisputed, was also critical of Kaepernick's positive comments about Fidel Castro. Co-host Shannon Sharpe pointed out that the Castro regime killed people and that people died trying to escape Cuba. "As bad as things are in the U.S.," Sharpe noted, "people aren't dying to leave."

"He's kind of hypocritical in so many words," Snoop Dogg responded, "because he's pushing this, but at the same time he's giving credit for this, and it's the same abuse they've been taking."

After Castro's death, Kaepernick sought to defend his praise, saying he was only praising Castro for "investment" in education, "free universal healthcare," and "helping end apartheid" in South Africa.

"Trying to push the false narrative that I was a supporter of the oppressive things he did is just not true," said Kaepernick, who just last month explained that he didn't vote in the elections because it would be providing implicit support for an oppressive system. In that case, providing explicit praise to a murderous dictator would suggest providing at least implicit support for his oppressive system.

"And I don't even understand the Cuban thing so let me not speak on something I'm not really aware of, because now I look bad when I say something that I think I'm representing positive, but the whole community is really mad at me now for saying something I didn't even have no knowledge about," Snoop suggested of Kaepernick's comments on Castro, which came shortly before his death.

"That's why I say he doesn't have a team," Snoop Dogg explained. "If he had a team, they would tell him, you can't say this, this is what you need to say, it's preparation."

"When you want to be a revolutionary you have to be supported by a team, he didn't have a team supporting him," Snoop Dogg suggested toward the beginning of the interview. "He never had a team with structure, with protocol, what are we doing? Why are we addressing this situation? How are we going to handle it? What's the solution? He just brought it up, and it just was in the air, then everybody looked at him for answers, and he had no answers. He just was bringing it to people that this was a situation that we have to pay attention to."

Kaepernick's decision to take a knee during the national anthem to protest police brutality and other injustices in the U.S., like the fact that Hillary Clinton broke the law with her email but wasn't in prison, came in the summer of 2016. "So what is this country really standing for?" Kaepernick asked at his first press conference after beginning his protest.

The Clinton angle wasn't really picked up by the media, who focused instead on the bulk of Kaepernick's statements, about police brutality. Police brutality has been an issue that has animated activists and communities for decades. The militarized response to protests in Ferguson over a police shooting propelled the issue of police brutality into the national spotlight. Many people, like Snoop Dogg and the hosts of Undisputed, insist Kaepernick brought attention to the issue, but I haven't seen any polling to suggest Kaepernick had reached an audience that was unaware of the issue of police brutality before. Naturally, no matter how unproductive, or even counterproductive, Kaepernick's protest may be, he has a what ought to be unbounded right to self-expression, a First Amendment guarantee.

Nevertheless, Kaepernick's decision to focus on the problem and his protest of it, and not on solutions Black Lives Matter activists released more than a year and a half ago that have largely been ignored by the very people who insist they care deeply about the issue of police violence is a counterproductive one. Perhaps I've missed it, but I have not heard Kaepernick or any other celebrity glomming on to the issue of police violence mention Black Lives Matters' Campaign Zero initiative a single time.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

Kaepernick has the right to make whatever statements he likes. It’s just weird how people are giving him credit for it, as if he did something brave or notable. He seems like more of a follower.

I’d respect him if he had something to say. But he went on Good Morning America, which is clearly a case where his celebrity gave him a platform to highlight things. But his whole interview amounted to “Man, things are bad and stuff, and nobody ever does anything about all the bad stuff.” It was vague and rambling, and it told me that Kaepernick is just repeating things he’s heard instead of working to become informed.

One guy made $100M rapping getting high. The other guy got $12M in one year to sit on a bench or lose football games. I’m not saying intelligence plays in either of those, but I’ll wait until I’m doing quite so well to cast aspersions.

Nevertheless, Kaepernick’s decision to focus on the problem and his protest of it, and not on solutions Black Lives Matter activists released more than a year and a half ago that have largely been ignored by the very people who insist they care deeply about the issue of police violence.

I have not heard Kaepernick or any other celebrity glomming on to the issue of police violence mention Black Lives Matters’ Campaign Zero initiative a single time

To be fair, many supportive celebrities haven’t mentioned Black Lives Matter’s batshit stuff either. If they ignore the good stuff as well, you can’t blame them. Most of them aren’t in it for anything more than PR. which i’d think you’d have grokked by this point.

“Hey guys, all I’m doing is praising Hitler for his investment in infrastructure, pension programs, and helping end Soviet domination of the Ukraine, what’s the big deal?”

“helping end apartheid”

By sending troops to Angola, and engaging in “liberation” of the locals:

“The Cuban soldiers came and locked people into huts ? burned them alive, others?their arms and legs were cut off. They ripped away my baby out of my arms and swinging her by the legs smashed her head against a tree. . .I was pushed into a lorry with other women. Later I was raped by ten Cubans. Those who resisted were stabbed by bayonets.” -Severina Chilombo

“When the Communists came, all the older men were killed, the boys were taken to the army, the young women to prison. The pre gnant were cut open with bayonets.” -Veronica Kahali

Well, we’ve learned that while Kaepernick has a First Amendment right to speak, and that he gets a lot of attention when he speaks (because of his sports celebrity), his opinions just may be as stupid and undeveloped as the average Joe’s. Damn! Now I’m going to have to start thinking for myself instead of waiting for sports and entertainment celebrities to tell me what to think.