U.S. Court Dismisses Space X Lawsuit Against Boeing, Lockheed Martin

A U.S. federal district court dismissed Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX)’s anti-trust lawsuit seeking to halt the proposed launch partnership proposed by Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin Corp., saying that SpaceX does not yet have legal standing to sue the two aerospace giants.

Instead, Judge Florence-Marie Cooper of the Central District of California wrote in her ruling of Feb. 15 that "SpaceX’s argument is utterly devoid of any concrete factual allegations regarding any type of actual injury suffered".

Space X is headed by multimillionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who seeks to revolutionize the space launch industry by offering access to orbit for a fraction of today’s costs. Musk brought the suit against Boeing and Lockheed Martin in October, claiming the two companies "engaged in an unlawful conspiracy to eliminate competition in, and ultimately to monopolize, the government space launch business" by the planned merger of their respective Delta 4 and Atlas 5 launch services under the United Launch Initiative (ULA).

However, Cooper stated, SpaceX, by its own pronouncements, "is not yet ready to compete" against Boeing and Lockheed Martin to win government launch contracts under the U.S. Air Force‘s Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program. Musk’s EELV-class Falcon 9 rocket is not slated for its maiden launch until late 2007, so it does not yet have a launch vehicle capable of competing against the Atlas 5 and Delta 4, making any claims of injury speculative, said Cooper.

"Because it lacks such readiness, its speculative claims regarding future harm are not ripe," Cooper wrote. Accordingly, she granted Boeing’s and Lockheed Martin’s request to dismiss the claims.

SpaceX has 20 days from the entry of the ruling into the court record Feb. 17 to amend its suit. However, noted Cooper: "It does not appear to the court that SpaceX will, at this time, be able to overcome the constitutional deficiencies that plague its claims."

Lockheed Martin spokesman Thomas Greer said his company welcomed the decision. "The ruling affirms our view," he said. "As we see the EELV program today, the Air Force needs assured access to space. SpaceX is not yet in that category."

The U.S. government is still mulling the merits of the ULA merger, which Boeing and Lockheed Martin say would save the government about $150 million annually when fully implemented.

As of Feb. 21, the U.S. Department of Defense is still formulating its recommendation to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which will approve or reject the deal.

Intertwined with the ULA issue are the Air Force’s plans to award the next series of more than 20 EELV launches, known as Buy-3. While the Air Force originally intended to compete the Buy-3 launches solely between the Atlas 5 and Delta 4 programs, SpaceX hopes to make inroads into the market with the Falcon 9.

"What we are really after is that the Air Force Buy-3 be opened up for free competition," Musk, who serves as the company’s CEO and chief technology officer, told sister publication Defense Daily Feb. 17 prior to the court ruling. "We aren’t fundamentally opposed to the United Launch Alliance. What we are opposed to is anything that would create an artificial barrier to entry to compete with that monopoly. It is about free and fair competition — truly free and fair and not something which is, in fact, a very tilted playing field."

Congress has offered some help in that regard. Lawmakers added language to the conference report accompanying the fiscal year 2006 defense appropriations act that mandates that "launch service contracts provide an annual opportunity for companies to present their qualifications to meet objective criteria for reliability, mission assurance, oversight, and cost credibility, and compete based on their ability to meet these criteria."

Congress further directed "the elimination of multi-year ‘allocations,’ ‘pre-awards’ and ‘block buys’ from Buy-3 and future EELV launch services contracts."

Accordingly, the Air Force says it now will allow additional bidders. "Other companies can compete," Air Force spokeswoman Maj. Regina Winchester said Feb. 21. "But they still have to be a certified EELV provider — meaning they have to be able to meet the requirements set out by the EELV program."

Related Stories

[Via Satellite 03-03-2015] Rocket Lab, developer of the dedicated small satellite launch vehicle Electron, has closed its Series B funding round, which the company expects will complete the Electron launch system, enabling commercial operations in 2016. Bessemer Venture Partners (BVP) along with previous investors Khosla Ventures and K1W1 supported the round, and Lockheed Martin has [...]

[Via Satellite 03-02-2015] At 10:50 p.m. EST March 1, SpaceX launched a Falcon 9 rocket carrying the ABS 3A satellite for Asia Broadcast Satellite (ABS) and the Eutelsat 115 West B satellite for Eutelsat. The two Boeing-built, all-electric spacecraft launched as a conjoined stack, mark the first part of a four satellite, two launch, multi-party [...]

[Via Satellite 02-25-2015] SES has awarded launches for two of its three recently announced satellites to SpaceX. Of the recently announced SES, 14, 15 and 16/GovSat, SES 14 and 16 will liftoff on Falcon 9 missions in 2017. The contracts further tighten the satellite operator’s relationship with SpaceX, whose ability to launch to Geostationary Transfer [...]

[Via Satellite 02-25-2015] Swedish Space Corporation (SSC) has launched a Cryofenix sounding rocket from the Esrange Space Center in Sweden filled with liquid hydrogen to study the propellant’s behavior in microgravity. The French space agency CNES and partner Air Liquide Advanced Technologies conducted the experiment and will use the data to validate and refine simulation [...]

[Via Satellite 02-18-2015] Swiss Space Systems (S3) has inaugurated a new subsidiary in Croatia, where the company hopes to build a spaceport as well as a facility for manufacturing the upper stage of the SOAR launch vehicle. S3’s suborbital SOAR shuttle is a reusable small satellite launch vehicle currently in Research and Development (R&D). The [...]