News:

http://FreeFromFuel.com HHO DVD reduced to only 29.90 Euros. Get it now..Please also make sure you have a valid email Adress over here in your profile, because we need to send out an important Newsletter in Mid of February and you might miss it then...Stay tuned !

We may be surrounded by ambient energy. But, hydro, solar, wind, and other current "free energy" sources, are anything but free. A solar system to be able to turn on my electric hot water heater (5000w) on, to take a hot shower would cost thousands of dollars. My current grid costs per month is $25. As a comparison. I would be dead, before a solar system would be paid off.

Appearances are generally always deceiving, for instance your electric hot water heater is actually a solar water heater. The energy which created the fossil fuels which were burned in a boiler to generate steam and turn the turbine to generate power which was transformed and then finally dissipated in the resistance of your water heater was solar energy. To make matters worse the combined total efficiency considering every element in the system for your "electric" water heater is probably less than 5%. It would have been magnitudes more efficient and cheaper in the long term to just heat the water with Sunlight and store it in a tank. What you have with an electric water heater is in fact the worst case scenario possible in terms of efficiency.

Quote

You're also forgetting that batteries will need replacing in a few years, and are going up in price, not down. And the price of the controllers, wiring, is also going up, not to mentioned installation cost. The solar panels themselves are still at best about a buck a watt, or higher. Not anything like the price you stated, by a long shot. Therefore, solar is still a big rip off, and has not really become economical, for most people today. And some of us, like myself, don't have enough sun light, wind, or a constant water source to draw on, for hydro, wind turbins, etz...

The Edison cell or Nickel/Iron battery which can be homemade can last 100 years or more and the price of controllers is not going up it is going down. Bulk solar panels are at $0.50/watt and transformer-less grid tie inverters $0.30/watt and all falling in price.

My point is everything you have ever known, most all the energy we will ever know relates to solar energy ie. relating to or finding it's roots in the Sun. In fact it is not really a Sun but a star not unlike any other star you see in the night sky. Which means it is not all Solar Energy but more so Cosmic Energy ie. relating to energy from every star which exists in the Cosmos or the Universe. Wind, Hydro, Solar, fossil fuels, wood, biofuels etc. are simply different manifestations of solar energy. You see we have to get past all the ambiguous terminology and false beliefs to see things as they are not simply what we have been told.Imagine that... every morning we wake up to see a star, a huge freaking star in all it's glory cross the sky before our eyes and yet somehow it has become routine, mundane, insignificant. That if nothing else should give us an indication of the delusion we suffer when such wondrous things fail to have meaning.

Quote

Building a self running device, oneself can be very cheap, sometimes even free.I figure the cost of this one, below, Is less than $100 to DIY. 4000w output. Of course, IF it's true.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrvAvp_dmlU

The question just begging to be answered and in fact the only relevant one is, where do you think the energy from this device comes from?. Where could it come from?, well we already know the answer to this question and it must be Solar/Cosmic energy as that is the only energy present. So when you say Solar energy doesn't work and I want a free energy device like this one which is simply a different manifestation of Solar energy through field interactions it seems confusing.

Kapanadze, Ruslan, Akula and others may have working devices through years of hands on experiments. However all pale in comparison to Tesla because he was seeking the origin of the Energy in question, all Energy, and I believe he found it.

The small and simple self runner in the video above should help to resolve the question, and be able tell us just where the energy is coming from. And it should be easy to replicate at less that $10. If true.

My thoughts, which I aim to prove to myself are that any extra energy or OU should be coming from the surrounding ambient, the Aether. Cosmic energy, not sunlight. It is present everywhere, even in the darkness of deep space, where there's no sunlight. The video is a small example, that may help open the door to our understanding, exploration, and verification of the theme.

Good luck with your solar systems. I'll continue with the self runner ideas, replication, and improvements. In my own way...

My thoughts, which I aim to prove to myself are that any extra energy or OU should be coming from the surrounding ambient, the Aether. Cosmic energy, not sunlight. It is present everywhere, even in the darkness of deep space, where there's no sunlight.

There in lies the problem, space is deep and dark and there appears to be nothing there. Yet you can see the Sun, a star, and you can see all the other stars as well. If you can see the light from stars a billion miles away then I would guess the light traveled from that star and every deep dark space in between until it reached your eyes... yet you could not see any light out there. Why do you think that is?, if you can see all those stars then shouldn't the darkness of space actually be full of light in translation from those stars to your eyes or do you think it just disappeared somewhere in between?.

In reality all space is full of sunlight or starlight depending on how we look at it however we have never actually seen sunlight. We can only see the reflection of sunlight after it has struck matter or tangible things of sufficient size or if it strikes our eyes directly. Sunlight is a small part of the spectrum of energy which fills all space, we call it the ElectroMagnetic spectrum.

We cannot have it both ways, either we believe energy must occupy every space from point A to point B to arrive at B or we must believe it has magically disappeared some place in between. I will let you decide which sounds more reasonable.

The error that we are still being taught in school is, that light travels from the Sun to the Earth. No such thing. There is NO LIGHT in deep space, and it's really really cold out there, also. There is neither heat nor light coming to us from the Sun, or any other stars. Yet, the material and non material worlds are always being surrounded by the energy called Aether. NASA knows this, but is keeping it a secret for as long as possible. The question is why. The reason is because if we thought that we can produce our own light and power, the gig would be over for the oil and power companies. Which still control this planet, it's governments, and it's people. I'll repeat it again: There is no light nor heat in deep space, nor is it "traveling" to get here. Light and heat are being produced right here on Earth, and any other light bearing planet, Sun, or nebula. We are being talk error for fact and continue to be lied to, for a reason. You can believe it or not, but remember that NASA is only a false front, for what is really going on in space. Solar panels don't even work in deep space, either. Nuclear fuel is what drive the satelites to other planets in our solar system, like to Saturn, or Pluto, and beyond. Soon you'll see that what I'm talking about, is correct. No need to argue with me, as I've heard it all before. I'm only suggesting that you look into, and don't simply buy their lies.

The lie that we are still being taught in school is, that light travels from the Sun to the Earth. No such thing. There is NO LIGHT in deep space, and it's really really cold out there, also. There is neither heat nor light coming to us from the Sun, or any other stars. NASA knows this, but is keeping it a secret for as long as possible. The question is why. The reason is because if we thought that we can produce our own light, the gig is over for the oil and power companies. I'll repeat it again: There is no light nor heat in deep space, nor is it "traveling" to get here. Light and heat are being produced right here on Earth, and any other light bearing planet, Sun, or nebula. We are being talk error for fact and continue to be lied to, for a reason.

There is another theory, have you ever pointed a bright flashlight upward on a calm clear night?. I have thousands of times and I observed that the beam is very visible in dusty or smoky conditions but invisible when the air is perfectly clear. It would seem to me we can only see light when it is reflected or scattered off of dust and other material things in our direction. In every other case when light is travelling away or at an angle to us we simply cannot see it...fascinating stuff don't you think?.

Now when we consider that outer space is a vacuum very much devoid of matter things start to make more sense. You see we cannot see the light in translation because there is nothing to reflect off of in space and the majority of all light is always at an angle to us never directly towards us. Space is dark then we throw up a satellite and wala the satellite is illuminated because it is reflecting the light which was always present which we could not see, a beacon in the dark.

As well space is really cold because there are no material things out there in the vacuum of space to absorb the energy from all that light. However it is a well known fact that the illuminated side does get very hot while the non-illuminated side stays very cold. You are cold in the shadow of your house then you go around the corner into the sunlight and wala you now start getting hot.

I find the fact you and most other adults think there is no light in space very strange simply because the answer seems obvious and is so easy to understand. In fact I have found a majority of adults understand almost nothing about the natural world and how it works. I ask 100 intelligent, reasonable and responsible adults even the most basic questions about nature and natural phenomena all around them and 99% fail miserably... why do you think that is?. I think they lack curiosity and are so preoccupied with their own little world they have created for themselves that they have failed to see everything else happening all around them.

As I mentioned, what we are being told are lies, on purpose. As well as what is being taught in our schools concerning space. Light production is not due to the presence of dust. It's due to the photosphere of the planet on the side facing the sun. A space craft flying towards the sun at midday would be in complete darkness in no time at all. Most everything that NASA has told us are lies. If you shown a strong laser light from a craft in deep space, (dust-free space), What would happen. No light? Light, what?

As an example of what I'm saying, if you 'click' on the 'Web address above, and in the 3rd row from the top, right in the middle of the row, you'll see a center PVC tube with 3 more such such tubes having enamel copper-colored magnet wire wrapped around them. What I'm implying is that any number of such tubes can be placed in close proximity to each other, and thusly, generate as much power as you want. Mere experimentation on your part should give you the particular parameters of your system, as you have it set up.

I tried such experiments, but can not say that I got overunity.If only two coils near (transmitter and receiving), the device behaves quite complicated. If you are changing the distance between the coils voltages on the receiver behave nonlinear (caused by a standing wave). With more coil around, each coil affects the other. The behavior is very complex and it is difficult to set the best parameters.

But, if L3 receives more energy than was provided to L1. How can you tell? It looks like L3 in not lighting the 100w bulb to anywhere close to the same lumin levels as a normal 100w bulb connected to the grid. What is the input voltage/wattage? I always found lousy conduction through the air from a normal Tesla coil, to anything further than a few feet away. Not very efficient as far as use able light is concerned, either.

I also don't see the connection between these table top types of Tesla coils trying to light a nearby bulb, as compared to what Tesla was trying to do. As a light bulb lit by wireless only a few feet away from its source, is not the same as powering the world by wireless, through the earth's ground conduction.

Here is my latest video. On lighting a 100w bulb, through just a Kacher circuit. It was what I can do, so far. But, the Kacher's output is not meant for that. It's meant to provide the 2000+ voltage impulse to the induction circuit for heterodyning both circuits towards producing a self runner. I'm not there yet.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpS7noQZ7DQ

The error that we are still being taught in school is, that light travels from the Sun to the Earth. No such thing. There is NO LIGHT in deep space, and it's really really cold out there, also. There is neither heat nor light coming to us from the Sun, or any other stars. Yet, the material and non material worlds are always being surrounded by the energy called Aether. NASA knows this, but is keeping it a secret for as long as possible. The question is why. The reason is because if we thought that we can produce our own light and power, the gig would be over for the oil and power companies. Which still control this planet, it's governments, and it's people. I'll repeat it again: There is no light nor heat in deep space, nor is it "traveling" to get here. Light and heat are being produced right here on Earth, and any other light bearing planet, Sun, or nebula. We are being talk error for fact and continue to be lied to, for a reason. You can believe it or not, but remember that NASA is only a false front, for what is really going on in space. Solar panels don't even work in deep space, either. Nuclear fuel is what drive the satelites to other planets in our solar system, like to Saturn, or Pluto, and beyond. Soon you'll see that what I'm talking about, is correct. No need to argue with me, as I've heard it all before. I'm only suggesting that you look into, and don't simply buy their lies.

So, you think that there is light in space. But, not in deep space, as is being shown below in dark black shading.

So your saying that because a cheesy internet diagram shows deep space is black this means you believe there is no light in deep space in reality?. You know I once saw a picture of a shark swallowing an oil tanker on the internet but I'm not sure I believe it... it was a really big oil tanker.

Quote

Nor is there any light nor heat coming from the Sun to Earth, as they would like you to believe.

I believe you just used a double nor which is a neither/neither naughty and the booleans take great offence to this. As well I do not believe them whoever they are any more than I believe you and rationalize things for myself because I can. The question is...if no light or heat came to the Earth from the Sun then how exactly do you think it got here and from where?.

It didn't. But, I wont' bore you with the details. I can see that I'm wasting my breath, on you. Believe what you will...

Why would you think you would bore me with details?, the devil is always in the details Nick. I'm pretty easy to understand, I'm willing to hear what anyone has to say but that does not mean I'm willing to believe anything anyone has to say unless they have a credible argument to back it up. This is not for their benefit but mine so I can keep an open mind and learn new things. So if you have a believable argument to my question I would like to hear it.

But, if L3 receives more energy than was provided to L1. How can you tell? It looks like L3 in not lighting the 100w bulb to anywhere close to the same lumin levels as a normal 100w bulb connected to the grid. What is the input voltage/wattage? I always found lousy conduction through the air from a normal Tesla coil, to anything further than a few feet away. Not very efficient as far as use able light is concerned, either.

I also don't see the connection between these table top types of Tesla coils trying to light a nearby bulb, as compared to what Tesla was trying to do. As a light bulb lit by wireless only a few feet away from its source, is not the same as powering the world by wireless, through the earth's ground conduction.

Here is my latest video. On lighting a 100w bulb, through just a Kacher circuit. It was what I can do, so far. But, the Kacher's output is not meant for that. It's meant to provide the 2000+ voltage impulse to the induction circuit for heterodyning both circuits towards producing a self runner. I'm not there yet.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpS7noQZ7DQ

I've looked at your videos and I'm impressed with the device and your research in this area.

My research direction is to start from the basic elements with the aim of understanding of the principles of work elements and their mutual interaction. At the same time I try to examine the validity of some established interpretations.

Based on experience with these experiments find that there is a possibility that a portion of the energy coming from the outside. This can happen under the right conditions that have to establish exactly.I'm currently working on a new device with which to prove it.

Tesla did not immediately began to build a system for wireless transmission of energy, but for many years explored near field effects. This knowledge enabled him to further research for the world's energy transmission, as well as some new areas - to the evident from his statements.

Some of Tesla's patents for wireless transmission of energy are known. However it is not known know-how and experience that is necessary to adjust such devices to give desired results. I think that's the most important Tesla's secret.

I agree with you - if someone makes a self running device then the whole story about the wireless transmission is not required.

Regarding the measurement of power - just now finishing a video:Basic Tesla's Experiments (Part 4) - Measuring Power Consumption (300W motor and Wireless Power)

SPG: Thanks for your comments. I hope that you have some success in what you are trying to do. I see no free energy in wireless, or single wire replications, as yet. Nor are they even comparable to the output of a wired connection. All I've seen are guys lighting up a bulb a couple feet away. And talking about Tesla... but not showing what Tesla had in mind. Nor have I ever seen anything other than that, to prove the point. I'm still waiting...

allcanadian: I've already explain to you what I see. No light, and no heat coming from the Sun to the Earth. Sunlight is produced on planets with an atmosphere, only, like the Earth. Nothing to do with dust, but with photospheres, instead. And, there is no "traveling" of light, such as the "speed" of light. Light does not travel in space from point A to point B. Nor from a Sun to it's planets. Although there is nothing traveling, but light "polarizes" at the speed science has called the speed of light", instead, with out any movement of anything, like electrons, photon, or anything else. Yet, what lights this planet is the produced Earthlight, on the side facing the Sun. What is your proof to the contrary... like prove that there is any light or any heat outside of this planet's master vortex, which extends to just past the moons orbit. And that both light and heat are coming to Earth from the Sun, and lighting it and keeping it warm, as is being claimed. NASA knows now, that is not the case. All false errors, still being taught as fact. On purpose.

Although there is nothing traveling, but light "polarizes" at the speed science has called the speed of light", instead, with out any movement of anything, like electrons, photon, or anything else

Here is an interesting video--http://www.wimp.com/the-camera-that-can-capture-light-at-one-trillion-frames-per-second/

The boys at MIT built a camera that captures 1 Trillion frames per second which amounts to 20 seconds of video per nanosecond. You can literally see light travelling in super slow motion... pretty cool stuff.

The fact remains, if change at point A (the Sun) appears at point B (the Earth) then any credible theory must explain how the change occurred at point B (the Earth). You say light polarizes with out any movement of anything, nothing travelling, if nothing moved then how could anything be polarized?. It would seem you have already proven something does move when you used the term "polarized" which is an action. Something was polarized which polarized something else this change moving sequentially through a space over a distance.

Which leaves us with a question, if light is a polarization of something and not something tangible physically moving something is still moving through the space which is Energy. We already know this because light is defined as an Electromagnetic wave covering a narrow region of the EM spectrum. So yes light does travel because the EM energy which polarized the space through which it traveled also polarized the matter it struck when it ceased travelling. What many find very confusing is the concept of Energy however it is actually quite easy to understand.

Think of it this way, the Sun jiggles a bunch of particles on the Sun at a frequency of X, this jiggling creates Electro-Magnetic waves at frequency X which travel through space to Earth causing matter to also jiggle at frequency X. The jiggling is Energy and when things jiggle at a frequency of X we see this as light. The jiggling at frequency X is light and it is not so much something as a condition of something which is of course matter.