$40 billion (this is a substantial compromise from President Trump’s recent estimated value in excess of $3.5 trillion from just 22 organizations, all of whom use and benefit from Claimant’s property.) [2]

Forward-Looking After-Tax Fee Claim:

Government to collect $184 billion per year Fee (pre-tax) from bond holders on 7.7 billion people @ $2/month who use Claimant’s property as users of mobile, user-generated social, school, federal, state and local employees. Claimant to receive after-tax balance of the Fee during the life of the intellectual properties, including derivative works. Source: U.S. Census Bureau.

PAYMENTS, CREDITS AND OFFSETS:

$ 0.00

BALANCE UNPAID, AND AMOUNT OF CLAIM:

$40 billion (one-time) (as of Effective Date) (Compromise proposed. Does not reflect the full historical value of Claimant’s property used.)[3]

Net After-Tax Fee on $184 billion per year, collected by the government from bond holders for annual forward-looking license Fee for use of Claimant’s property for the full life of the properties, incl. derivative works.

DATE SERVICE LAST FURNISHED:

Benefits accrue continuously to Original Contractor and bond holders.

THE PROPERTY AND/OR PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE CLAIM:

Claimant’s property is “social networking” and related software intellectual property operating continuously on computers and servers in literally billions of locations in the United States and offshore.

Claimant’s original Tier I Miller Act Notice was received by the White House on July 28, 2017 at 4:09 am. Claimant investors began sending in their individual Tier II notices subsequently. This document is Claimant’s FIRST AMENDED MILLER ACT NOTICE FOR FEDERAL WORKS PROJECTS 40 USC §3131 ET SEQ that contains material new corroborating evidence.

Citizen Property Rights Must Be Protected From Abuses Of Government Power

America’s Founders knew that a vibrant economy must protect and incentivize real inventors and writers to grow. The U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 (“[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”) protects patents and copyrights and is the only property right actually written in the Constitution.

The Founders also forbade the government in Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 from issuing a contract, then quashing it later under the color of law. These fundamental principles of property protection have been reaffirmed numerous times.

For example, James Madison said in Federalist No. 44: “Patent rights receive protection pursuant to public contracts between inventors and the federal government, acting on behalf of the people.” Chief Justice John Marshall affirmed in Fletcher v. Peck. 10 US 87 (1810) that the government cannot rescind a contract once awarded. Subsequent Patent Office manuals reinforced this fundamental Constitutional principle: “A Patent is a Contract.” Manual of Patent Law (1874), A Summary of the Law of Patents (1883). Courts, especially since The America Invents Act (September 16, 2012), have suspiciously avoided having to acknowledge Fletcher’s protection of patent contracts when confiscating patents for the military-industrial shadow government.

Nonetheless, the protections of Fletcher are not even needed here since the confiscation of Leader’s inventions occurred while they were protected trade secrets in February 2000.

In short, this First Amended Miller Act Notice is a contract claim, not a patent claim. The patent claims only further reinforce the validity and value of the contract. In this case, the government believed Leader’s innovations were so valuable that the government stole them in February 2000, almost seven years before issuing a first patent for them—U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761—on Nov. 21, 2006.[4]

Therefore, the damages accrue to Leader from the first moment of disclosure to James P. Chandler, III (“Chandler”). Chandler was then a White House Advisor. He was also a Principal of The Highlands Group within the DoD Office of Net Assessment. He also became Leader Technologies’ intellectual property attorney. Any argument against Leader’s claims here using the convolutions of the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement trial (District of Delaware, July 2010, see fn. 21) are a smokescreen to deflect attention away from the actual date of the theft, which was their theft by Chandler as trade secrets ten years earlier in February 2000.

Hindsight shows that Facebook was just one of many co-conspirators with Chandler, the United States Defense Department’s Highlands Group, Andrew W. Marshall, Director, within the Office Net Assessment and IBM, among others.

Claimant’s valuable trade secrets were stolen starting in February 2000. The value and benefits of this intellectual property have been affirmed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office who has issued multiple patent contracts subsequently. The federal government used and distributed these inventions to countless billions of individuals and organizations without compensating Claimant.

In early 2000, Claimant and his investors sought out a highly-regarded Washington, D.C. patent legal counsel in law professor James P. Chandler, III.[5] Claimant relied on his legal advice after sharing Claimant’s innovations with Chandler. Claimant paid substantial fees to protect its trade secrets and subsequently filed copyrights and trademarks as well as patents, most of which were eventually awarded by the government.

However, Chandler failed to disclose his material conflict of interest before agreeing to be Claimant’s intellectual property attorney. Chandler failed to disclose to Claimant at the time of their first meeting in February 2000 that he was a principal in an “exceedingly powerful”[6] clandestine shadow government organization operating within the Senior Executive Service (SES) named the U.S. Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment. This office was directed by Andrew W. Marshall and Richard P. O’Neill, along with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) directed by Anthony J. Tether.

Marshall has been paid by the Senior Executive Services (SES) within the DoD Office of Net Assessment since the inception of the SES on Oct. 13, 1978.[7]

The Office of Net Assessment has employed Richard P. O’Neill as its CEO in a secret organization named “The Highlands Group” that hosted regular no-notes think tank “forums” comprised of senior military, defense contractors, banking, finance, healthcare, technology and academic insiders to evaluate promising new technologies that could be weaponized.[8] Chandler participated in these meetings with O’Neill, Marshall and Tether, and actually led some of them.[9]

An eyewitness to the leadership of Chandler in the shadowy Highlands Group / Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment has come forward. This person attended numerous meetings of the Highlands Group led by Chandler, Marshall, O’Neill and Tether from 1981 to January 2005.[10] Notably, in one October 1991 meeting, Chandler’s belligerence and abuse of the participants drove over half of the 47 participants, including senior military officers and defense contractors, to leave the all-day meeting at noon.[11] Those who know Chandler recognize this highly abusive character trait born of intellectual haughtiness and an air of invincibility.

Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a former senior psychologist at the U.S. State Department and C.I.A., said recently that Chandler’s Highlands Group / Office of Net Assessment colleague Andrew W. Marshall wrote unremarkable papers for the Rand Corporation (Tr. 3:30) and that he was “a Machiavellian individual” (Tr. 4:1) who “fellated everybody above him so he could get into power” (Tr. 4:1-2). Pieczenik said Marshall was “deeply involved with Mossad” (Tr. 3:12-13) (treason) and the author of the neoconservative strategy for continuous war promoted by Henry Kissinger (Tr, 3:18).[12]

In this evidently lawless shadow government context, Chandler essentially treated Claimant not as an American inventor with Constitutional rights to his inventions, but as an enemy combatant whose intellectual property the government had some superior right to confiscate without compensation—much in the same way that President Roosevelt confiscated over 50,000 patents in World War II, and much in the same way we see the British company SERCO overseeing (stealing) patents at the U.S. Patent Office today.[13]

Chandler gave Claimant’s property of social networking to a group of “public-private” Highlands Group co-conspirators with whom Chandler, Marshall, O’Neill and Tether were associated within the shadow government. They did this without any notice, approval or compensation to Claimant. Evidence shows that these Highlands Group contracts were noncompetitive and therefore illegal since they represented a fascist approach to vendor selection.

In February 2000, the Hiring Party, James P. Chandler, III entered into contracts with Claimant to provide legal, director and other services[14] that resulted in, among other things, the registering of trademarks, copyrights and the award of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,139,761,[15] 7,925,246[16] and 8,195,714.[17] Chandler was also then a senior national security advisor to the White House, Congress, Judiciary, IBM and intelligence community (e.g., FBI, NSA, CIA, DoD, DOJ, DoE, NRO, DHS, IBM), the Office of Net Assessment and the Highlands Group, among others.

At a minimum, the above-mentioned individuals, organizations and their principals should be excused from involvement in any investigations and decision making about Claimant’s claim and compensation because of the appearance of impropriety. Further citations will be supplied upon request. Claimant reserves the right to supplement this list of names and entities.

Chandler to Leader (2000): “You have over 60 patentable inventions”

Chandler received detailed proprietary information about Claimant’s invention properties for which he initially estimated that there were “over 60 patentable inventions.” The industry now calls Claimant’s inventions “social networking.”

Chandler failed to disclose to Claimant his conflicts of interest and his material involvement with a “shadow government”[29] to which he was/is a key advisor and principal.

Notably, just one day earlier, on Aug. 28, 2002, Chandler had met with Montgomery County, Maryland development officials on behalf of himself, IBM, the Patent Office and classified intelligence agencies (he specifically mentioned the CIA)[33] about acquiring a 30,000 sf. facility for their plans that his notes described as “coup.” David J. Kappos was then chief inside intellectual property counsel at IBM and an advisor to Chandler. (In 2009, Kappos was appointed director of the Patent Office by President Barack Obama.) Claimant had no knowledge of this attorney-client and directorial misconduct. This evidence emerged from attorney notes that Chandler had misplaced.

IBM aided and abetted the Chandler theft with a $40 million “donation”

The IBM Eclipse Foundation was formed on Nov. 29, 2001 with a $40 million “donation” from IBM.[34] Through Eclipse’s members, Claimant’s property was distributed to and adopted widely by the bond holders under the moniker of “The Internet of Things.”[35] Indeed, the genesis of this plan was the Highlands Group and the DoD Office of Net Assessment where Chandler was a principal. His material involvement has been long suspected and was recently confirmed by whistleblowers cited herein.

Chandler’s reference to a “coup” in his notes is prescient given the recently-released Mueller Report showing that members of the State Department, Department of Justice, C.I.A., NSA, Obama White House, FBI, mainstream propaganda media, Privy Council, GCHQ, SERCO, MI-6 were actively engaged in a coup d’état against Donald Trump even before he announced his candidacy. Evidence shows that the same shadow government actors, supported by Chandler, relied on Claimant’s social networking invention to press their seditious plans.[36]

U.S. State Department Egregious Abuses of Claimant’s Property Rights

On or before Sep. 26, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entered into a secret agreement with Facebook and its Russian executive Dmitry Shevelenko to build a “template for winning elections.” This was the first of many subsequent secret GSA contracts.[37] This occurred during the pendency of the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement trial and was evidently obstructing justice in Claimant’s efforts to protect its intellectual property rights and values. In addition, the State Department began promoting use of Facebook worldwide making it impossible for Claimant to operate without government interference.[38]

The Original Contractor’s use of Claimant’s property is ongoing and global in scope. The Hiring Party facilitated use of Claimant’s property throughout a multitude of government agencies and private organizations, including but not limited to:

Suppliers to Executive Orders 13130 (July 14, 1999) National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC), 13231 (October 16, 2001) National Infrastructure Advisor Council (NIAC) and their progeny, up to and including Executive Order 13708 (September 30, 2015) which expires on September 30, 2017 (unless renewed by the Executive), among others. These orders give the Executive full authority to satisfy this claim. The Hiring Party had material influence and control over the execution of these executive orders, directly and through surrogates.In fact, the NIAC uses the “Government’s procurement power to encourage information technology suppliers to develop cybersecurity framework-compliant hardware and software.”[39] In other words, the Executives, namely Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, with the assistance of the Hiring Party, forced broad use of Claimant’s property by the bond holders. See also Endnotes [i] and [ii] Individual and Organization beneficiaries of Claimant’s property; [iii] for sources.

Claimant reserves the right to update this Notice based upon new information obtained, most especially secret, stonewalled and redacted information regarding the full scope of the Executive’s use of Claimant’s property.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE ABOVE-IDENTIFIED AND UNDERSIGNED CLAIMANT HAS NOT BEEN PAID IN FULL, AND INTENDS TO ENFORCE ITS RIGHTS UNDER THE MILLER ACT, 40 U.S.C. §§ 3131 ET SEQ. THE UNDERSIGNED CLAIMANT HAS FURNISHED LABOR, SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, AND/OR MATERIAL OF THE GENERAL DESCRIPTION ABOVE PROVIDED AND IDENTIFIED AS “SERVICES.” SERVICES WERE FURNISHED FOR THE BUILDING, STRUCTURE, OR OTHER WORK OF IMPROVEMENT LOCATED AT THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED PROPERTY. THE PERSON OR FIRM WHO REQUESTED SUCH SERVICES IS ABOVE-IDENTIFIED AS THE HIRING PARTY. THE VALUE OF THE WORK, THE PAYMENT OFFSETS AND CREDITS, AND THE UNPAID BALANCE AND AMOUNT OF THIS CLAIM IS ABOVE-IDENTIFIED AS THE AMOUNT OF CLAIM. THE DATE ON WHICH THE SERVICES WERE LAST FURNISHED IS ABOVE-IDENTIFIED AS THE DATE SERVICES LAST FURNISHED.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Claimant hereby requests a copy of each payment bond of each surety provider, including their contact information, to each and every public-private beneficiary used by the subcontractors to the Original Contractor to distribute Claimant’s property identified in this notice. This request is made pursuant to 40 U.S.C. §3133. Please forward a copy to the Hiring Party and the Surety Parties identified above.

The United States Chief Executive Donald J. Trump, and his predecessors William J. Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack H. Obama (the “Executive”)

My name is Michael T. McKibben, and I am of legal age, sound mind and otherwise competent to make this affidavit. At all times herein, I live in Columbus, Ohio and now work in Lewis Center, Ohio. I have personal, direct knowledge of each of the facts set forth in this affidavit and believe them to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and ability. Errors and omissions are inadvertent.

DESCRIPTION OF LABOR, MATERIALS, SERVICES, ETC. PROVIDED TO THE PROPERTY BY THE CLAIMANT (“SERVICES”):

Claimant’s property is “social networking” and related software intellectual property operating continuously on computers and servers in literally billions of locations in the United States and offshore.

Claimant’s original Tier I Miller Act Notice was received by the White House on July 28, 2017 at 4:09 am. Claimant investors began sending in their individual Tier II notices subsequently. This document is Claimant’s FIRST AMENDED MILLER ACT NOTICE FOR FEDERAL WORKS PROJECTS 40 USC §3131 ET SEQ that contains material new corroborating evidence.

Citizen Property Rights Must Be Protected From Abuses Of Government Power

America’s Founders knew that a vibrant economy must protect and incentivize real inventors and writers to grow. The U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 (“[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”) protects patents and copyrights and is the only property right actually written in the Constitution.

The Founders also forbade the government in Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 from issuing a contract, then quashing it later under the color of law. These fundamental principles of property protection have been reaffirmed numerous times.

For example, James Madison said in Federalist No. 44: “Patent rights receive protection pursuant to public contracts between inventors and the federal government, acting on behalf of the people.” Chief Justice John Marshall affirmed in Fletcher v. Peck. 10 US 87 (1810) that the government cannot rescind a contract once awarded. Subsequent Patent Office manuals reinforced this fundamental Constitutional principle: “A Patent is a Contract.” Manual of Patent Law (1874), A Summary of the Law of Patents (1883). Courts, especially since The America Invents Act (September 16, 2012), have suspiciously avoided having to acknowledge Fletcher’s protection of patent contracts when confiscating patents for the military-industrial shadow government.

Nonetheless, the protections of Fletcher are not even needed here since the confiscation of Leader’s inventions occurred while they were protected trade secrets in February 2000.

In short, this First Amended Miller Act Notice is a contract claim, not a patent claim. The patent claims only further reinforce the validity and value of the contract. In this case, the government believed Leader’s innovations were so valuable that the government stole them in February 2000, almost seven years before issuing a first patent for them—U.S. Patent No. 7, 139,761—on Nov. 21, 2006.[41]

Therefore, the damages accrue to Leader from the first moment of disclosure to James P. Chandler, III (“Chandler”). Chandler was then a White House Advisor. He was also a Principal of The Highlands Group within the DoD Office of Net Assessment. He also became Leader Technologies’ intellectual property attorney. Any argument against Leader’s claims here using the convolutions of the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement trial (District of Delaware, July 2010, see fn. 21) are a smokescreen to deflect attention away from the actual date of the theft, which was their theft by Chandler as trade secrets ten years earlier in February 2000.

Hindsight shows that Facebook was just one of many co-conspirators with Chandler, the United States Defense Department’s Highlands Group, Andrew W. Marshall, Director, within the Office Net Assessment and IBM, among others.

Claimant’s valuable trade secrets were stolen starting in February 2000. The value and benefits of this intellectual property have been affirmed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office who has issued multiple patent contracts subsequently. The federal government used and distributed these inventions to countless billions of individuals and organizations without compensating Claimant.

In early 2000, Claimant and his investors sought out a highly-regarded Washington, D.C. patent legal counsel in law professor James P. Chandler, III.[42] Claimant relied on his legal advice after sharing Claimant’s innovations with Chandler. Claimant paid substantial fees to protect its trade secrets and subsequently filed copyrights and trademarks as well as patents, most of which were eventually awarded by the government.

However, Chandler failed to disclose his material conflict of interest before agreeing to be Leader’s intellectual property attorney. Chandler failed to disclose to Claimant at the time of their first meeting in February 2000 that he was a principal in an “exceedingly powerful”[43] clandestine shadow government organization operating within the Senior Executive Service (SES) named the U.S. Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment. This office was directed by Andrew W. Marshall and Richard P. O’Neill, along with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) directed by Anthony J. Tether.

Marshall has been paid by the Senior Executive Services (SES) within the DoD Office of Net Assessment since the inception of the SES on Oct. 13, 1978.[44]

The Office of Net Assessment has employed Richard P. O’Neill as its CEO in a secret organization named “The Highlands Group” that hosted regular no-notes think tank “forums” comprised of senior military, defense contractors, banking, finance, healthcare, technology and academic insiders to evaluate promising new technologies that could be weaponized.[45] Chandler participated in these meetings with O’Neill, Marshall and Tether, and actually led some of them.[46]

An eyewitness to the leadership of Chandler in the shadowy Highlands Group / Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment has come forward. This person attended numerous meetings of the Highlands Group led by Chandler, Marshall, O’Neill and Tether from 1981 to January 2005.[47] Notably, in one October 1991 meeting, Chandler’s belligerence and abuse of the participants drove over half of the 47 participants, including senior military officers and defense contractors, to leave the all-day meeting at noon.[48] Those who know Chandler recognize this highly abusive character trait born of intellectual haughtiness and an air of invincibility.

Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a former senior psychologist at the U.S. State Department and C.I.A., said recently that Chandler’s Highlands Group / Office of Net Assessment colleague Andrew W. Marshall wrote unremarkable papers for the Rand Corporation (Tr. 3:30) and that he was “a Machiavellian individual” (Tr. 4:1) who “fellated everybody above him so he could get into power” (Tr. 4:1-2). Pieczenik said Marshall was “deeply involved with Mossad” (Tr. 3:12-13) (treason) and the author of the neoconservative strategy for continuous war promoted by Henry Kissinger (Tr, 3:18).[49]

In this evidently lawless shadow government context, Chandler essentially treated Claimant not as an American inventor with Constitutional rights to his inventions, but as an enemy combatant whose intellectual property the government had some superior right to confiscate without compensation—much in the same way that President Roosevelt confiscated over 50,000 patents in World War II, and much in the same way we see the British company SERCO overseeing (stealing) patents at the U.S. Patent Office today.[50]

Chandler gave Claimant’s property of social networking to a group of “public-private” Highlands Group co-conspirators with whom Chandler, Marshall, O’Neill and Tether were associated within the shadow government. They did this without any notice, approval or compensation to Claimant. Evidence shows that these Highlands Group contracts were noncompetitive and therefore illegal since they represented a fascist approach to vendor selection.

In February 2000, the Hiring Party, James P. Chandler, III entered into contracts with Claimant to provide legal, director and other services[51] that resulted in, among other things, the registering of trademarks, copyrights and the award of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,139,761,[52] 7,925,246[53] and 8,195,714.[54] Chandler was also then a senior national security advisor to the White House, Congress, Judiciary, IBM and intelligence community (e.g., FBI, NSA, CIA, DoD, DOJ, DoE, NRO, DHS, IBM), the Office of Net Assessment and the Highlands Group, among others.

At a minimum, the above-mentioned individuals, organizations and their principals should be excused from involvement in any investigations and decision making about Claimant’s claim and compensation because of the appearance of impropriety. Further citations will be supplied upon request. Claimant reserves the right to supplement this list of names and entities.

Chandler to Leader (2000): “You have over 60 patentable inventions”

Chandler received detailed proprietary information about Claimant’s invention properties for which he initially estimated that there were “over 60 patentable inventions.” The industry now calls Claimant’s inventions “social networking.”

Chandler failed to disclose to Claimant his conflicts of interest and his material involvement with a “shadow government”[66] to which he was/is a key advisor and principal.

Notably, just one day earlier, on Aug. 28, 2002, Chandler had met with Montgomery County, Maryland development officials on behalf of himself, IBM, the Patent Office and classified intelligence agencies (he specifically mentioned the CIA)[70] about acquiring a 30,000 sf. facility for their plans that his notes described as “coup.” David J. Kappos was then chief inside intellectual property counsel at IBM and an advisor to Chandler. (In 2009, Kappos was appointed director of the Patent Office by President Barack Obama.) Claimant had no knowledge of this attorney-client and directorial misconduct. This evidence emerged from attorney notes that Chandler had misplaced.

IBM aided and abetted the Chandler theft with a $40 million “donation”

The IBM Eclipse Foundation was formed on Nov. 29, 2001 with a $40 million “donation” from IBM.[71] Through Eclipse’s members, Claimant’s property was distributed to and adopted widely by the bond holders under the moniker of “The Internet of Things.”[72] Indeed, the genesis of this plan was the Highlands Group and the DoD Office of Net Assessment where Chandler was a principal. His material involvement has been long suspected and was recently confirmed by whistleblowers cited herein.

Chandler’s reference to a “coup” in his notes is prescient given the recently-released Mueller Report showing that members of the State Department, Department of Justice, C.I.A., NSA, Obama White House, FBI, mainstream propaganda media, Privy Council, GCHQ, SERCO, MI-6 were actively engaged in a coup d’état against Donald Trump even before he announced his candidacy. Evidence shows that the same shadow government actors, supported by Chandler, relied on Claimant’s social networking invention to press their seditious plans.[73]

U.S. State Department Egregious Abuses of Claimant’s Property Rights

On or before Sep. 26, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entered into a secret agreement with Facebook and its Russian executive Dmitry Shevelenko to build a “template for winning elections.” This was the first of many subsequent secret contracts.[74] This occurred during the pendency of the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement trial and was evidently obstructing justice in Claimant’s efforts to protect its intellectual property rights and values. In addition, the State Department began promoting use of Facebook worldwide making it impossible for Claimant to operate without government interference.[75]

BEFORE ME, undersigned authority, personally came and appeared Michael T. McKibben, who did declare under oath the following:

A. That he is an authorized and disclosed agent of the above-identified Party Providing Work, the Claimant. As the authorized and disclosed agent of the Claimant, he has been provided with the facts related to this Affidavit and Request for Bond, and to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, the facts set forth herein are true and correct. He is competent and authorized to make this Affidavit.

B. That Claimant, the Party Providing Work, has provided the above-identified Services to the above-described Project, and payment for the work provided has not been made.

Notice is hereby provided to the Public Authority to furnish to the Claimant, the Party Providing Work, a certified copy of the payment bond(s) and the contract(s) for the Project, as per any applicable statutes, or as per applicable Public Records Acts. These materials should be sent to:

The United States Chief Executive Donald J. Trump, and his predecessors William J. Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack H. Obama (the “Executive”)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Michael T. McKibben, hereby certify that a copy of the FIRST AMENDED MILLER ACT NOTICE FOR FEDERAL WORKS PROJECTS 40 USC §3131 ET SEQ was served on the Executive, President Donald J. Trump, at The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20500 by Express Mail on April 25, 2019, electronically, and through the good offices over the coming weeks of Congressional representatives.

[1] Notices: Any errors and omissions are inadvertent. Claimant reserves the right to amend this Notice and the Claim(s). No claims are made to third party rights. All footnotes and endnotes are incorporated as if fully written herein.

[9] See ———-redacted NAME———- Affidavit dated Apr. 23, 2019—Interactions with Andrew W. Marshall, James P. Chandler, III, Richard P. O’Neill, Anthony J. Tether, DoD Office of Net Assessment, The Highlands Group, Senior Executive Services (SES) and DARPA with Affiant’s employers including Rockwell, Raytheon, USAF, Martin Marietta, General Dynamics, Liedos, SAIC and Eaton Corp. This affidavit shall be provided under a seal of confidentiality and privacy to a bona fide, trustworthy third party for a no-copies verification review. This reviewer shall have no relationship to the conspiring parties identified herein.

[10]Id., Secs. 5, 6, 23 (“From 1981-2005, I was a participant in numerous meetings of a group that called itself “The Highlands Group” that sponsored “The Highlands Forums” which was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). These meetings in which I was in attendance were overseen by one or more of the following people: James P. Chandler, III, Andrew W. Marshall, Richard P. O’Neill and Anthony J. Tether . . . O’Neill introduced Chandler who then facilitated the meeting the rest of the day, Marshall was silent the whole day. O’Neill was also silent after introducing Chandler . . .”

[14] James P. Chandler, The Chandler Law Firm Chartered, Leader Technologies Director Services and Engagement Letters, Apr. 6, 2000, May 5, 2000, Mar. 01, 2001, May 25, 2001; Chandler signed a Leader Directors Services Agreement on May 5, 2000 in which he specifically committed to the Business Judgment Rule duties of diligence, loyalty, obedience, accountability, disinterestedness, due care, good faith, no abuse of discretion, e.g., “prohibited from using their position of trust and confidence to further their private interests” and “may not engage in undisclosed personal transactions of a material nature.” Sec. 1(2), 1(2)(d).

[33] Kelley E. Clements. (Aug. 30, 2002). Chandler Executive Assistant Clements’ stenographer’s minutes from meetings and events surrounding meeting among James P. Chandler and Montgomery County, Maryland development officers Dave Edgerley (Director), Janis Peters and May Webster (with the knowledge of Doug Duncan, County Executive) to negotiate use of $500-1,000,000 in federal budget support for a 40,000 sf. office space facility to be used by his organization NIPLI (National Intellectual Property Law Institute), the U.S. Patent Office archives, classified material (mentions CIA) and IBM, says no involvement of Congress and even used the phrase “(kind of a ‘coup’ of sorts).”

[35] Executive Order 13718. (Feb. 09, 2016). Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity, Sec. 3(a)(ii). Barack Obama (“(ii) ensuring that cybersecurity is a core element of the technologies associated with the Internet of Things and cloud computing, and that the policy and legal foundation for cybersecurity in the context of the Internet of Things is stable and adaptable.”).

[36] Robert S. Mueller, III. (Apr. 24, 2019). Vols. I and II combined Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election, Mar. 2019. U.S. Department of Justice.

[46] See ———-redacted NAME———- Affidavit dated Apr. 23, 2019—Interactions with Andrew W. Marshall, James P. Chandler, III, Richard P. O’Neill, Anthony J. Tether, DoD Office of Net Assessment, The Highlands Group, Senior Executive Services (SES) and DARPA with Affiant’s employers including Rockwell, Raytheon, USAF, Martin Marietta, General Dynamics, Liedos, SAIC and Eaton Corp. This affidavit shall be provided under a seal of confidentiality and privacy to a bona fide, trustworthy third party for a no-copies verification review. This reviewer shall have no relationship to the conspiring parties identified herein.

[47]Id., Secs. 5, 6, 23 (“From 1981-2005, I was a participant in numerous meetings of a group that called itself “The Highlands Group” that sponsored “The Highlands Forums” which was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). These meetings in which I was in attendance were overseen by one or more of the following people: James P. Chandler, III, Andrew W. Marshall, Richard P. O’Neill and Anthony J. Tether . . . O’Neill introduced Chandler who then facilitated the meeting the rest of the day, Marshall was silent the whole day. O’Neill was also silent after introducing Chandler . . .”

[51] James P. Chandler, The Chandler Law Firm Chartered, Leader Technologies Director Services and Engagement Letters, Apr. 6, 2000, May 5, 2000, Mar. 01, 2001, May 25, 2001; Chandler signed a Leader Directors Services Agreement on May 5, 2000 in which he specifically committed to the Business Judgment Rule duties of diligence, loyalty, obedience, accountability, disinterestedness, due care, good faith, no abuse of discretion, e.g., “prohibited from using their position of trust and confidence to further their private interests” and “may not engage in undisclosed personal transactions of a material nature.” Sec. 1(2), 1(2)(d).

[70] Kelley E. Clements. (Aug. 30, 2002). Chandler Executive Assistant Clements’ stenographer’s minutes from meetings and events surrounding meeting among James P. Chandler and Montgomery County, Maryland development officers Dave Edgerley (Director), Janis Peters and May Webster (with the knowledge of Doug Duncan, County Executive) to negotiate use of $500-1,000,000 in federal budget support for a 40,000 sf. office space facility to be used by his organization NIPLI (National Intellectual Property Law Institute), the U.S. Patent Office archives, classified material (mentions CIA) and IBM, says no involvement of Congress and even used the phrase “(kind of a ‘coup’ of sorts).”

[72] Executive Order 13718. (Feb. 09, 2016). Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity, Sec. 3(a)(ii). Barack Obama (“(ii) ensuring that cybersecurity is a core element of the technologies associated with the Internet of Things and cloud computing, and that the policy and legal foundation for cybersecurity in the context of the Internet of Things is stable and adaptable.”).

[73] Robert S. Mueller, III. (Apr. 24, 2019). Vols. I and II combined Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election, Mar. 2019. U.S. Department of Justice.

The government needs to pay. Leader is not asking Zuckerberg to pay. A government agent – James P. Chandler – stole Leader inventions and then made the codes available to all the thugs we see today in Silicon Valley.

This was a Clinton administration act of Treason and monetary gain and then used as a weapon against the American people. The Clinton Cabal is responsible and not the American Taxpayers. I, for one, am sick and tired of being held responsible for the actions of government elected and appointed officials as well as the Military Industrial Complex. Let the crime fit the criminals for once and hold “them” responsible.