"i know you dont make loli, but a set with a flat chestet girl would be awesome. Like nearly no breast at all."

A request: Many small- and flat-chested girls are represented by microscopic nipples and non-existent or very pale areola.

Please make her nipples pointy and noticeable (not overly large, but nicely suckable), and also the areola about the size of a good-sized coin, nearly perfectly round (not artificially CGI but nicely round), and noticeably darker than the skin. That would be lovely.

"All these details can be modified, the key is to make them look coherent and nice looking. Although I may appreciate a toned body I wont really like it if it is overly muscular."

Actually, I agree. Not a huge fan of the steroid-laden ladies, but was suggesting (as you say) a nicely toned slenderness. If flabby is 0 and Schwarzenegger-esque is 10, I'm thinking a 6-7.

Some might prefer an 8. (That would be about my max for appeal.) On the scale in the center-right there could be a fit-and-super-slender-but-muscle-toned (skinny and super-fit) rather than anorexic (skinny but flabby).

As to the modifications, that makes sense. Would love to see the petite models with narrower hips. And still a nice gap. Also, a more protruding "V" pussy would be great. V for Victory. Or Vaesark.

I agree with V Fan on the muscles. Around 6 is perfect for me. I don't understand the appeal of a girl with zero bodily topography. The human body is a natural wonder of geometry, especially the female figure. I mean, that's why so many of the greatest works of classical art are depictions of beautiful women. The appeal of CG art like the stuff Vaesark makes is that it allows us to create our wildest fantasies while maintaining a believable image. The reason I'm not interested in seeing a set featuring girls who look like paper cutouts is the same reason I'm not interested in viewing a set featuring girls with tits the size of a literal mountain. There has to be limits or it stops being hot. I've been a huge fan of Vaesark's work for so long because he understands that people's tastes differ and caters to a decently wide variety of fetishes but doesn't go insane with any of them. On that note, I think that's also why his recent set featuring Elina wasn't very popular. Lots of his fans like preggo sex, but it was taken a bit too far. Does that all make sense?

"The human body is a natural wonder of geometry, especially the female figure. I mean, that's why so many of the greatest works of classical art are depictions of beautiful women. The appeal of CG art like the stuff Vaesark makes is that it allows us to create our wildest fantasies while maintaining a believable image. The reason I'm not interested in seeing a set featuring girls who look like paper cutouts is the same reason I'm not interested in viewing a set featuring girls with tits the size of a literal mountain. There has to be limits or it stops being hot."

This. Jacob nails it.

The amazing nature of CG art is in being able to draw anything, but if it goes too far, the brain breaks the connection from "hot" to "silly."

Thus, taking it right to the edge is hotter than taking it over that edge.

This has been discussed before, and am and will remain a V fan, but the uber-huge phalluses are, for me, a turn-off. Larger than life is super-hot. Telephone pole, not so much.

One exception: Not impalement, but the one or two scenes with a telephone-pole-sized tool and the girl's face. Very hot. (But only with a human- or dog-type head tip.)

V, you've made some awesome scenes, so no complaints as to what other's might like. A vote for at least 1-2 BJ scenes when you do do super-huge guys. The women's faces are hottest still. (Also, their upturned kissing of the beasts.)

One scene had the woman with her fingers in the massive guy's tip. Now THAT was hot. Add precum, and hotter still. I could see 60 scenes with just that.

So can you give a basic description of what the pirate girl would look like? You usually add some sort of unique clothing or accessories in the preview pictures but most of the girls are totally naked for most of the set. Would we be able to look at the girl stark naked with no prior knowledge and think "huh, pirate." or is it just an outfit thing? Follow-up question: Will she be completely stripped in the main set or will part(s) of the outfit remain on?

I'm still working on that, so you have time to offer suggestions if you want. I don't think that there is any significant stuff that you can add to the girl's body that would scream "pirate!" unless you are taking about giving her a crystal eye and a wooden leg... but that's not something that I'm interested in adding. So yeah, it will be mostly the outfits that give the girls the pirate look.

Earrings, maybe a small scar or two? I don't want you to give her a pegleg, either. A bandanna over the hair might be a nice touch you could add to one of the girls. Also, tans. No one who spends months at sea has the Vitamin D Deficiency-white skin tone you often use. Those are my suggestions. Thoughts?