By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in About Cookies

Notice:

Wiley Online Library is migrating to a new platform powered by Atypon, the leading provider of scholarly publishing platforms. The new Wiley Online Library will be migrated over the weekend of February 24 & 25 and will be live on February 26, 2018. For more information, please visit our migration page: http://www.wileyactual.com/WOLMigration/

We thank Kaori Karasawa for her assistance with the structural equation analysis. This research was supported by Grant #DBS 9211982 from the National Science Foundation to Bernard Weiner.

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Gail Sahar Zucker, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024.

Abstract

Attribution theory was used to relate causal explanations for poverty to affect and behavioral intentions. In Experiment 1, student subjects rated 13 causes of poverty on importance, the attribution of controllability, blame, affects of pity and anger, and judgments of help-giving (personal help and welfare). Two individual differences, conservatism and the belief in a just world, were also assessed. A principal components analysis categorized the causes into three types: individualistic, societal, and fatalistic. Conservatism correlated positively with a belief in the importance of individualistic causes, controllability, blame, and anger, and it correlated negatively with perceptions of the importance of societal causes, pity, and intentions to help. No systematic effects of the belief in a just world emerged. A structural equation analysis revealed that personal help is emotionally determined, whereas welfare judgments are directly related to attributions of responsibility and political ideology. Experiment 2 revealed a similar pattern of results using a nonstudent sample.

Article Information

DOI

Format Available

Publication History

Related content

Articles related to the one you are viewing

Please enable Javascript to view the related content of this article.

Citing Literature

Number of times cited: 154

1Onurcan Yilmaz, Hasan G Bahçekapili, Mehmet Harma, Different types of religiosity and lay intuitions about free will/determinism in Turkey, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2018CrossRef

9Allison Harell, Stuart Soroka, Shanto Iyengar, Locus of Control and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom, Political Psychology, 2017, 38, 2, 245Wiley Online Library

10Erin A. Cech, Rugged Meritocratists: The Role of Overt Bias and the Meritocratic Ideology in Trump Supporters’ Opposition to Social Justice Efforts, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2017, 3, 237802311771239CrossRef

11Lihi Lahat, The Effects of Knowledge about Poverty, Exposure to Poverty and Trust on Policymakers’ Perceptions about Poverty, Social Policy & Administration, 2017Wiley Online Library