Blast/Past I: Porkulus was the GOPâ€™s Alamo â€“ and the Democrats’ Asculum

[Periodically I will be bringing out some of my writings from former days – unedited, with mistakes, typos, and silly predictions included. Â It is interesting to look back at what we were all thinking at points in history, before events played out. Â On this one, I humbly submit that I got alot more right than wrong. This was originally posted about Â February 2009. The Dems had just gotten their 60-40 Senate, 257-178 Â in the House, and Barack was now sitting in the Big Chair. Â They wasted no time jamming Porkulus down our throats, but already you could see that conservatives and Republicans had, for the first time perhaps in generations, started to fight back. PS – many thanks to Â Steph C ]

There is a kind of victory called aÂ Pyrrhic Victory. It is a victory in battle that is so costly for the victor that it leads to his undoing in the larger war. Itâ€™s not a perfect analogy (Obama-Reid-Pelosi are witless buffoons in comparison with King Pyrrhus, for starters), but history is instructive. So let me introduce you, if youâ€™re unacquainted, to King Pyrrhus.

Asculum

This is the short and grossly oversimplified version, to be sure. He was neither fool nor idiot, and in fact was a great field general possessed of considerable courage and creativity. He was king of Epirus in NW Greece, and landed in southern Italy in 280 BC ostensibly to free the Greek colony of Tarentum there from Roman tyranny.

He brought with him 20,000 infantry, 3,000 cavalry, and 30 elephants (this is before Hannibal, btw). The Tarentine colonists had promised him theyâ€™d have 350,000 infantry and 20,000 cavalry waiting for him â€“ a large enough army to completely topple Rome. In reality they provided no more than 20,000 total (details are sketchy and in conflict). The Romans had no less than 60,000 soldiers available, and could raise many more on short notice.

The first major battle of Pyrrhusâ€™ campaign was fought in Heraclea in 280 BC, a decisive win for Pyrrhus. The ongoing campaign showed his forces able to take territory but not hold it, in the face of superior Roman numbers. The Romans, as one might expect, were meanwhile raising a much larger army from their armed and capable citizenry. The second and final major battle was at Asculum, a 2-day battle in 279 BC, again won decisively by Pyrrhus, thanks to some brilliant tactics in terrain disadvantageous to him. But his losses were steep, and included many of his finest officers.

Upon being congratulated for this victory, he is said to have repliedÂ â€œIf we defeat the Romans in one more such battle, we shall be completely ruined.â€ While the Romans could continually raise more troops, he could not. All they had to do was outlast him. Which they did. And there you have a Pyrrhic Victory.

Alamo

I donâ€™t think I need to say all that much about the Alamo. In February, 1836, About 200 defenders were dug in against about 2000-3000 soldiers under Santa Anna, hoping in vain to last until reinforcements came. They were wiped out after an 12-day siege, but took about 500 of the enemy with them.

Santa Anna continued his rampage, but 6 weeks later, at San Jacinto, Texicans shoutingRemember the Alamo surprised and demolished Santa Annaâ€™s army in 18 minutes, inflicting 800 casualties and capturing 700, while losing only 9 men. The next day they captured Santa Anna himself, and soon forced the agreement that won Texas its independence.

The Democratsâ€™ Asculum

I won â€” indeed they did. They got their fat payoffs to all their backers and wholly owned subsidiaries like the unions and ACORN, they got a large foothold on socialized medicine, they got more tax credits for those who pay little or no taxes.

Support base is wide but not deep â€” as the economy goes, so goes their fortunes. The race card is wearing thin, and people have noticed that Little Lord Fauntleroy is not all that glib and charming once the teleprompter is off.

They already spent most of their capital â€” by forcing Porkulus through with no debate, GOP shut out of the conference report, no time to read the bill before passing it, under the banner of â€œemergency!!!â€ â€œnow!â€ â€œthe world is collapsing, we must act now, now NOW!!!!â€â€“ yet Obama waited 4 days to sign it while his husband dragged him off to Chicago for a Valentinesâ€™ date. Everybody noticed it â€“ and the GOP near-shutoutfinally gave Americans a chance to notice the difference between Republicans and Democrats. The polls should disturb the Dems.

Overreaching â€” They crammed through Porkulus with no debate. They have displayed an epic amount of hubris by nominating a Thugâ€™s Row of dirty cabinet secretaries. They have openly signaled that Labor rules, and business will be trampled at every opportunity. People are noticing.

They want much more â€” They are already drawing up Porkulus 2. They want card check, they absolutely will let the Bush tax cuts expire, and they want government-run health care. If they were a bit more subtle and made this all an 8-year plan, they might pull it off. But their insatiable appetite has gotten attention.

Blago-Burris leaves an unsightly stain â€” Rahm Emanuelâ€™s contacts with Blago are well-established. Burris is turning into a great big â€œoopsâ€. Ayers has dedicated his book to Sirhan Sirhan. The whole Chicago Machine is getting exposure, and operations like that work much better in the dark than they do in the sunshine. But the bottom line here is that the public is starting to fill in the blanks on who Obama is and where he came from.

They are incompetent at managing a nation â€” I think they are pretty good at operating according to the Saul Alinsky playbook. They probably have a pretty effective plan for turning the US into Cuba. But in the meantime there is a nation to govern.With Porkulus, the economy becomesÂ their economy. Funding ACORN, empowering unions, and shutting down conservative talk radio might be great campaign strategy, but it wonâ€™t make the trains run on time, so to speak. And the trains are starting already not to run on time. Kentucky ice storm, anyone?

They are incompetent at managing our place in the world â€” Meanwhile, our nation has powerful and deadly enemies, and some of them â€“ Russia, China, Iran, the Islamist terrorists, and Western Europe â€“ are getting restless, and we will to a moral certainly be sorely â€œtestedâ€. And this administration seems to have not a single clue how to deal with other nations. Witness the little â€œBuy Americanâ€ flap. When Russia invades Georgia, and China invades Taiwan, Obama will sit on his hands â€“ not because he wants to, but because heâ€™s a babe in the woods â€“ this moron could not find his ass with both hands, a map, a GPS and a snow shovel. And his staff is stupider than he is.

In short, the Dems have used up their political capital. In getting their Porkulus victory, they guaranteed their defeat in the long war. Their knavery is no longer secret, nor is it appreciated. They are done. There will be no Fairness Doctrine (including the on-the-sly version they are planning). There will be no Porkulus 2. There will be no socialized medicine. There will be no statistical sampling (aka â€œcheatingâ€) on the 2010 census. And they will get MASSACRED in 2010, with an economy bordering on depression and the Demsâ€™ socialist vision for America both exposed and rejected. Obamaâ€™s last two years will be useless.

The Republicansâ€™ Alamo

Porkulus could not be stopped â€” The Democratsâ€™ electoral successes in 2006 and 2008, coupled with a substantial squish element of the Republican Party â€“ plus the Republicansâ€™ notorious inability to properly conduct decent back-alley knifings â€“ assured Porkulus had no chance to be stopped. This was a suicide mission from the beginning.

Republicans were stomped into the ground â€” In both houses, they were completely locked out of debate, locked out of meetings, locked out of the conference report. They never were able to wrest even modest changes out of the Democrats.

We fought to the last man, save the 3 who surrendered â€” Our effort was magnificent. The House GOP pitched two shut outs â€” and even scored some Dem crossovers, making Oppo-Porkulus a bipartisan effort. Nobody expected it, not really. The Senate GOP, famous for compromise, weaseling, folding like cheap tents â€“ instead formed a wall of defense, with the noted 3 exceptions.

But in defeat, we found clarity â€” After 8 years of Dem-Lite fiscal policy and spending, 8 years of â€˜letâ€™s make a dealâ€™, endless McCain-[fill in Dem name here] deals, 8 years of playing nice and not calling a spade a spade â€“ finally we grew fangs, and claws. Democrats were publicly called liars and cheats. And not only that, we found our own conservative souls.

Conservatism, the Constitution, and free-market capitalism are cool againâ€” Once the Repubs decided to fight back, suddenly all of these guys are talking like Madison, Adams, Burke, Friedman, Hayek, and Goldwater. Instead of offering watered-down compromises, finally we offer â€œscrew off, Democratsâ€, â€œlet them go bankruptâ€, and â€œget government out of the wayâ€.

Sam Houstonâ€™s army is locked, cocked, and ready to rock. â€” the 100-1 (or higher) ratio of calls into Democrat congressmen, the open rejection of the majority mediaâ€™s message, the CMEâ€™s Chicago Tea Party talk. My friends, the bomb is ticking. The Republican grassroots are now fully charged, chomping at the bit to go to battle. Making phone calls. Locating primary opponents for squishes. Looking at a 50-state strategy. Taking shots across the bow in reference to the Fairness Doctrine. We were dead on Nov 5. Porkulus spawned this.

â€œRemember the Alamoâ€ â€” Porkulus will turn out to have been the turning point. Trust EPU on that one.

Share this:

Like this:

Related

The weapons had evolved, but our orders remained the same: Hunt them down and kill them off, one by one. A most successful campaign. Perhaps too successful. For those like me, a Death Dealer, this signaled the end of an era. Like the weapons of the previous century, we, too, would become obsolete.

1

Leave a Reply

When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.

DisagreeAgree

1Comment threads

0Thread replies

0Followers

Most reacted comment

Hottest comment thread

1Comment authors

Recent comment authors

Connect with

I allow to create an account

When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.

Hot Takes

The Rifle as Phallic Symbol You may be too young to remember, but in the 60s certain cars were considered phallic symbols, for men short on other attributes. They produced 1000’s of gag lines in film. These semi-auto rifles that look like he-man weapons came from the same wannabe he-men of the 90s. And those he-men generally arose from the video game culture beginning in the 90s and generally agreed to have been a major cause of the Columbine shooting in ’97.Read More

Fixing the System to Fix the Problem The Left believes that the more people they cause to be killed with guns will grow their argument that only theirgovernment should have guns legally. So look for there to be more shootings until they can grab that power. The one thing they aren’t short of are those lab rats they produce to pull the triggers. You see, almost every mass shooting for the past 25 years had been carried out by people who should have been in the system, and on paper, that “system” has already professed to have the authority and ability to deal with them, for fifty years. Not. Only people with common sense will know where to turn first. And how.Read More

I was recently told that before the Civil War Americans spoke of the United States in the plural, “the United States are”, then after the Civil War, it became mentioned in the singular, “the United States is…” I was also told that what changed was Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. Give that some thought.Read More

David French expects there to be some sort of mutual tolerance, and that it would be real tolerance. But the left adheres to the Marcusean redefinition of tolerance, as a one-way process that accepts every moral judgment or act that comes from a leftist and rudely, violently rejects every moral judgment or act from anyone not of the left. Their tolerance is not tolerance. Without people using the same words with the same definitions, there can never be comity. That’s the point of the story of the Tower of Babel! Harsh words that offend David French and other anti-Trumpers must be spoken. Legal means must be exercised. Politics must lead to winning, and winning must lead to making changes through legislation and policy, even against grand guignol level protests. It’s going to be nasty. It’s going to be unpleasant. But traditionalists did not choose this “war.” It was thrust on us. And we must not give up the civilization that made the greatest strides in the history of humankind towards establishing harmony and peace among humans.Read More

The EU stands astride Europe, the second, more successful German attempt to install a thousand year reich in the last hundred years. At the moment of German triumph over the continent, Germany’s subject colonies suddenly awaken to the fact of their stealth conquest by a hostile foreign power and begin to break away. Each awakening to the virtues of self-rule should inspire us with hope.Read More

Flashback 2011: 13 Mexican nationals illegally in the USA, all dressed in USMC uniforms emblazoned with the name “Perez”, were arrested in California, riding in a white van equipped with a stolen military tag. Two American citizens drove the van to smuggle the border crossers deep into California. Do you remember hearing about this? I sure don’t.Read More

h/t: Ray Kasey “Subject: 319 Square Miles”In their infinite wisdom, the United States’ Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.Do share this. It needs to be widely known and understood.There are 3,141 counties in the United States.Trump won 3,084 of them.Clinton won 57.There are 62 counties in New York State.Trump won 46 of them.Clinton won 16.Clinton won the NY popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.TheseRead More