Saturday, February 25, 2017

Belgian police arrested Martina Johnson in Ghent on September 17, 2014. She is charged with war crimes
and crimes against humanity committed during the First Liberian
Civil War (1989-1997). The arrest resulted from a 2012 complaint – which
focused heavily on Operation Octopus – made against Johnson filed in Belgium by
Liberian victims.

Included in these crimes specifically those
which occurred on October 20 and 23 during the 120-day long “Operation Octopus”

Martina Johnson was identifiedas one of the leaders of Operation Octopus, launched on October 15, 1992 by the National Patriotic Front of
Liberia (NPFL) headed by ex-president Charles Ghankay Taylor, “a brutal battle
for Liberia’s capital city, Monrovia, in 1992 that killed thousands and saw
extensive rapes and looting by the NPFL’s Small Boys Unit.”

According to Barbie Latza Nadeau, of The Daily Beast, “The
nuns were allegedly murdered under the sinister direction of Martina Johnson,
one of Taylor’s only female artillery chiefs and a frontline commander who
allegedly carried out many of his hits during Operation Octopus.”

Among the war crimes were the assassinations of five American
nuns which took place October 20 and 23, 1992:

Oct. 20, 1992 – “Sister Barbara Muttra and Sister Mary Joel
Kolmer were shot in their vehicles along with a Liberian colleague and two
relief workers, apparently as part of the Operation’s agenda to rid Liberia of
whites and those who worked with them.”

Oct. 23, 1992 – “fighters came to the convent where the
remaining sisters lived and first attacked Sister Kathleen McGuire when she was
summoned to unlock the gate by a killer identified as Mosquito, who shot her
first and then shot the other two before mutilating their bodies with a
machete.”

The bodies of the murdered nuns were only discovered a month
later, after the fighting had lulled.

She is only the second person to be charged for crimes
relating to the country’s two civil wars that spanned 14 years. In 2012 Charles
Taylor, at the age of 64, was convicted some of the “most heinous and brutal
crimes in human history” and sentenced to 50 years in prison.

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Rodolfo Infante
Jímenez (born 1963 in San Benito, Texas, United States) and Ana María Ruíz Villeda (born 1971 in
San Luis Potosí, Mexico) beat, robbed, raped and murdered at least eight girls
and young women between the ages of 15 to 23 from August through October 1991
in Matamoros area of Tamaulipas state, Mexico. They strangled the victims
throwing their bodies into the Rio Grande or in irrigation ditches, and in one
case was discarded close to the residence of the killers.

The couple lured their victims, who were mostly from rural
areas, from downtown Matamoros with offers of a job at work at El Ebanito, a
communal farm 10-20 miles from the city. Two of the girls an offer to assist
with learning English and getting a U. S. work visa was offered.

The investigation was prompted
when on the morning of October 16, 1991 Alma Lilia Rostro, 17, ran off from the
farm after discovering the door had been left unlocked. She ran to matamoros
and reported to police that her friend Marina Hernandez Lopez, 14, was missing.
Josefina had seen one victim of beatings and repeated rapes, later found
dead, and escaped the farm shack where she had been placed and went to the
Matamoros police. The girl had been captive on the farm for ten days, always
kept locked in a shack when the couple were not there to watch her, before her
escape.

The killer couple was arrested on October 16, 1991. The pair
confessed to all eight killings, but later they changed their story, each
blaming the other. Ana depicted herself as a passive victim of a bullying
boyfriend. Yet Alma Lilia described how, before she had the slightest suspecion
about the couple, Anna had wrapped a sheet around her neck and started
tightening it. At the time the girl wrote off this behavior as merely a
peculiar sense of humor.

Each faced to 30-40 years in prison, the maximum allowable
sentence in the state of Tamaulipas. At present, no news reports on the actual
sentencing have been located.

It must be noted that there are various inconsistencies in
the various available sources. The following detailed article with interviews
with relatives seems to be the most reliable: Maggie Rivas, “Border nightmare:
Couple held in 8 Matamoroas slayings blame each other,” The Arizona Daily Star
(Phoenix, Az.), Oct. 20, 1991, p. C-2.

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Novokuznetsk,
Siberia – Lyudmila Spesivtseva, an employee of a Soviet government school, was
sentenced to life in prison (or 13 years according to some accounts) for luring
teenage girls for the pleasure of her son,so that he could rape, torture and
dismember them. Mom and son lived together. Lyudmila took the body parts of
the girls she procured for her boy and in her kitchen whipped up some creative
meals for the little household. Lyudmila was convicted for her part in four
murders. The some was sentenced to death, but was found insane (and presumably
is not to be executed).

Police discovered an apartment with walls covered with blood
and in the kitchen bowls containing human body parts. In the bathtub they found
a mutilated, headless body. One victim, Olga Galtseva, was still alive, though
severely mutilated. Before she died in hospital 17 hours later, the girl gave her
account of the tortures she to which was subjected to a prosecutor. Of the other three victims whose remains could
be identified in the blood-drenched apartment of horrors, it was learned that the son had killed one girl and forced the other two girls to cut her
into pieces in the bathtub. Another girl had been killed by the family pet, a
Doberman. A diary was found that documented the murders of 19 girls. The pair were
suspected in a total of at least 32 murders.

There is abundant
information as well as many photos available for the son, Alexander
"Sasha" Spesivtsev, 26 when arrested, but no photos of mom have been
found by this reporter to date.

Jun. 22,
2013 – tried to return to her apartment on Pioneer 53, where she was with her
daughter, Nadezhda, who knew what her had been brother was doing.

Jun. 2016 –
A social network group “Lynch Lyudmila Yakovlevna Spesivtseva,” is gaining
popularity; founded beginning of June 2016. The creators of the community are
closely watching the mother of a serial killer from Novokuznetsk, maniac
cannibal Alexander Spesivtseva. The group members believe she did not pay
adequately for her unspeakable crimes. Now she lives in one of the villages
near the town of Osinniki, the lynch group reported.

Thursday, February 9, 2017

In August 2016 a married mother called by the pseudonym
Maria by the press came forth and admitted to a BBC journalist on videotape
that she was a contract assassin who had murdered six persons in Manila as a
covert agent for President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drug cartels. She said she
received orders and payments of £330 from a police officer. She was recruited
into the killer-for-hire business by her husband, who is also a hired killer.
She said she belonged to a team of three hitwomen.

Maria explained that female killers were especially “valued
because they were able to get close to targets that men could not.” She
confessed to a reporter that “If it was up to me, I really don't want to do it
any longer. But my boss told us that if one of us tries to leave, we would be
killed.”

On September 3rd Senior Supt. Dionardo Carlos of the Philippine National
Police issued an official statement that the story was unverified. “PNP Chief
Director General Ronald dela Rosa said during Thursday’s Senate hearing on the
spate of “drug killings” that as of Aug. 31, the PNP has officially tallied 929
suspects killed in police antinarcotics operations since July 1. But the tally
for drugs suspects killed by unidentified gunmen – usually marked by cardboard
signages identifying them as drugs personalities – tend to be more indeterminate,
precisely because the perpetrators and their motives are officially unknown.”
[PDI, Sep. 3, 2016]

During Duterte’s campaign for president he promised to kill 100,000
criminals in his first six months in office.

***

Sources:

[Corey
Charlton, “Female Assassin: Meet
the ruthless hitwoman hired to execute drug dealers for the Filipino president
at £330 a time in his bloody crime crackdown,” The Sun (London), Aug. 26, 2016]

Monday, February 6, 2017

“The Devil Woman” (La Diabla), regarded as the most dangerous woman in
Columbia, is suspected of 14 murders, half of the victims being police
officers. Yuri Patricia Sánchez, 22, was arrested Monteria, in Cordoba province
on June 5, 2016 and accused of carrying out contract killings,
collecting and providing information to extort victims, and hiding weapons used
in crimes. She
is believed to have been working for the powerful Usuga Clan (also known as Los
Urabenos), a
gang with 3,000 members and tentacles in neighboring countries. Sanchez
attracted the cartel’s attention by participating in street fights, a form of
entertainment for cartel bosses.She
was recruited for the Two Cobras gang, part of Usuga Clan. [Robert St. Estephe]

There have been three female Mexican cartel assassins
(sicarias) nicknamed La Flaca (or La Flaka), a moniker associated with the
Santeria figure, Santa Muerte, a female spirit of death popular with cartels.

Joselyn Alejandra Niño is the third sicaria (assassin) to be
known by the nickname La Flaca (The Skinny One), the others being Veronica
Mireya Moreno Carreon of San Nicolas de los Garza and Nancy Manriquez Quintanar
of Ecatepec.

Police believe Joselyn Alejandra Niño belonged to a faction of the Gulf Cartel called Los Ciclones.

In April 2015 her dismembered remains were found in a beer
cooler stowed in an abandoned truck left in a parking lot in Lauro Villar,
Matamoros. Two other bodies were in the truck. The killers posted a photo of
the corpses on Twitter with the warning: "It will happen to all the filthy
who want to support Cyclones.”

Andrew Chesnut, professor of religious studies at Virginia
Commonwealth University, and author of a book on the cult of Santa Muerte and
its link to drug cartels, has stated that:

“Since 2007, when former president Felipe Calderón escalated
the drug war, there has been a phenomenal growth in female assassins or
‘sicarias’, who can often operate more stealthily than their male counterparts.
Many, like Joselyn, are recruited by the cartels for their girlish good looks.
The idea being that rival syndicates and law enforcement wouldn't imagine that
a waifish 'skinny girl' would be a contract killer.

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

The case of Belle
Gunness (“The Female
Bluebeard,” “Hell’s Belle”) is at the same time one of the most
horrible criminal cases in US history as well as one of the nation’s greatest
crime mysteries. It is still unresolved whether she died in the fire of April
28, 1908 or made an escape. Mrs. Gunness had been investigated as a probable
murderess by private detectives hired by families of missing men for some time
preceding the fire that drew attention to what was soon called her “murder farm.” She lured prospective husbands with personal ads
in newspapers. Although the remains of only 13 victims were located on the
murder farm, the murder death toll is often estimated to be more than 40. In
earlier years she was a baby farmer and it is quite likely that she, like so
many other baby farmers, committed a large number of murders of children while
conducting that enterprise.

***

Not only is “Mrs. Gunness, the Female Bluebeard” (1908) the
first movie about a serial killer, but it is problably the first move in the
contemporary true crime genre.

Mrs. Gunness in Moving Pictures – Crowds in St. Louis See
Film That Shows Laporte Widow “Operating Her Farm” –Meeting Suitors at Station, Giving Them
Poison and Burying Bodies Thrillingly Depicted –Then a Hired Man Sets Fire to the House and
the Audience Cheers

***

FULL TEXT: THE enterprise with which manufacturers of moving
picture films ransack the four corners of the earth with which to amuse the
insatiable public, is shown by the portrayal of the adventures of Mrs. Belle
Gunness, the female Bluebeard of LaPorte, Ind., at a St. Louis dimeodeon, this
week. Her career is exhibited on a half-mile of celluloid film, containing
upwards of 35,000 separate photographs.

As the succeeding episodes of the story were flashed on the
screen at the new Gem Theater (which is said to be one of the largest and most
pretentious moving pictures showhouse in the world) an audience of 2000 persons
applauded with all the enthusiasm with which the public has devoured the
history of the crimes of the arch-murderess of the world.

The first scene represents Andrew H. Hegelein, Mrs. Gunness’
most conspicuous victim, reading a matrimonial advertisement, inserted in a
newspaper by Mrs. Gunness. The advertisement read as follows:

Hegelein’s mimic is made up in close imitation of his
published photographs, even to the features and bald head. Enamored by the
advertisement, he draws all his money from the bank, against the protests of
his relatives and friends, who warn him that there is a design against his
fortune, and perhaps his life.

In the next scene, Mrs. Gunness, represented as a
prepossessing woman of middle age, is shown gloating over the answer which the
luckless South Dakota farmer has written to her advertisement. She follows the
lines with her finger, pausing exultingly on the statement of Helgelein’s
fortune, and the prophecy of his fate written on her grimacing face, causes the
audience to shudder.

Immediately Mrs. Gunness, attractively gowned in the black
befitting a widow, is shown pacing the platform of the railway station at
LaPorte, impatiently awaiting the arrival of her suitor. When the train puffs
in and he dismounts, she hastens to meet him and grasps his hand in effusive
welcome. She leads him to a handsome rig, with a spirited horse. They enter,
and Helgelein drives off, laughing, to his doom.

Soon afterwards, they are seen together on the lawn of Mrs.
Gunness’ home, with the solid comfort of which the farmer seems deeply
impressed. She coyly resists the love making of the infatuated Helgelein, until
he draws a bag full of gold and silver from his pocket and shows it to her.
Behind his back, she casts rapacious glances at the money and menacing ones at
its possessor. Then she gives himm the kiss of Judas.

Offering him some refreshments, she hands him a poisoned
cup, which he drains and instantly falls dead at her feet. She stands a minute
in triumph over her victim.

The film tactfully omits the scene in which the murderess
dismembers the body of Helglein in her “Chamber of Horrors,” and passes to a
night scene in which Mrs. Gunness appears laboring across a moonlight field
with a sack of ominous shape and size in her arms. This she casts into a grave,
and with ruthless toil, buries it under big shovelfuls of earth.

Then another suitor visits her, and receives her treacherous
welcome. He, too, goes the way of Helgelein. Now, for the first time, enters her
hired man.

Mrs. Gunness and her employe are shown staggering across the
farm to a plot where two sinister holes yawn. The man and woman each carry a
bulk in sacks. There are thrown into the graves, and the two should begin
shoveling the earth.

SETTING THE TORCH.

Then, suddenly, a quarrel starts. The hired man shakes his
big clenched first in his mistress’s face, and he retorts with high words. He
threatens to betray her. She weakens and appeals to him, laying her hand
imploringly on his shoulder. He will not relent, and tramps across the field in
a rage, she slowly following.

She reaches home and enters, and immediately reappears at
the window of her room, wringing her hands in dread of her employe. She has
scarcely retired before the furtive figure of a man, armed with a blazing
faggot, sneaks up to the house. He steals to the window, looks in and turns
with a grimace of satisfaction as he sees the woman sleeping.

Then, leaping about, he touches the torch to as heap of
rubbish in the corner and to the vines trailing up the weatherboarding, and
darting down into the cellar, soon bursts out, followed by a cloud of smoke,
streaked with flames. The fire envelopes the house, and the murderess is
consumed in the flames.

As one scene succeeds another the audience sit spellbound.
Only when the career of the female monster was brought to a fiery end did cheers
break forth.

The films had told graphically a story abbreviated from that
published in the newspapers. It brought home the monstrous life of Mrs. Gunness
and the terrible reparation she paid, far more vividly than writing could do.

The manager of the Wagner Film Amusement Co. of St. Louis,
by whom the Gunness film is rented, was asked as to the means by which it was
produced.

“In the first place, some expert,” he said, “similar to a
newspaper’s city editor, picked from the newspapers the story of Mrs. Gunness
as one susceptible of vitascope exposition. Another man, a sort of playwright,
chose the most important and most thrilling incidents of the female Bluebeard’s
life, and developed them into a pantomimic drama.

MAXSON LECTURE OF GUNNESS.

“Dialogue was
provided for the use of the actors, who perform their parts more vividly if
they speak as they act, and for those theaters whose moving pictures are
accompanied by speeches on phonographs or from the lips of living speakers
behind the scenes.

“Next, the pictures of Mrs. Gunness, Hegelein and a servant
were studied, so that the actors in these parts might ‘make up’ in as close an
imitation of the original as possible.

“Then actors and actresses were drilled in the parts
rehearsed until they were perfect. A mistake on the part of one of the actors
performing before the lens of the moving picture camera might spoil a mile of
film.

“Finally, the playlet was acted before the camera, and the
long string of photographs reproduced on films for distribution throughout the
civilized world.”

The popularity of the Gunness story is shown by the fact
that Joseph Maxson, once an employe of Mrs. Gunness and an eyewitness of the
fire in which the authorities claim the murderess perished, has recently been
lecturing throughout Central Gunness Mystery,” with large financial profit to
himself. In country schoolhouses, at fairs and in the cities he has been
describing to thrilled audiences the character of the fiendish woman as she
appeared to one who knew her closely, and the conflagration which destroyed
her “murder fence.” He is said to have reaped a harvest.

IF THE PICTURES WERE REAL

The moving pictures pf persons plaing the parts of Mrs. Gunness and Lamphere
are thrilling, it is true, but imagine how the portrayal of the actual scenes
in the Gunness house of murder and mystery would stir the feelings if they
could be reproduced!

Lamphere, the hired man at the Gunness home, told that the
night Helgelein was murdered he was watching through an auger hole he had
secretly bored in the door casing of his room.

But suppose it had been the eye of a photographic apparatus
instead of the eye of Lamphere that was applied to the secret auger hole that
night of untold horrors, and suppose that all the scenes enacted behind that
locked and barred door had been faithful, recorded on the sensitive film and
that it, the actual reproduction of the very crime itself, instead of a mimic
reproduction, should be shown, enlarged to life size, upon the canvas screen.

It is more than likely that the terror of it would shock the
soul of even the most morbid. But it would be an interesting study for the
psychologist and the criminologist.

No actual photograph has ever been taken of a murderer in
the very act of his crime. Those expressions of passion have never been caught
and preserved by the camera. And so, after all, perhaps our ideals of them are
wrong, and it may be that no artist has ever reproduced the real horror of it.

And so, as a contribution to science and art, the moving
pictures of actual scenes in the Gunness home would be of great value could
they have been taken.

One can only imagine the look on the face of this arch murderess
with sleeves rolled to the elbows, a rough apron protecting her dress from
blood stains, a knife clutched in her hand, she bent over her victim and after
he was dead, dragged the body to the secret chamber to dismember it.

Lamphere has only hinted to intimate friends what he saw. He
has never openly told of it. When asked about it he bowed his head, covered his
face with his hands and his whole body shook as with an ague.

“I daren’t think of it,” he is reported to have said.

*** MRS. GUNNESS IN ST. LOUIS? ***

Is Mrs. Gunness alive, and if so is she somewhere in the
South-west? This question, which people have been asking all through the seven
months since th8is woman of mystery disappeared, has become more pertinent
since the beginning of the trial in LaPorte, Ind.

Three witnesses of undoubted good repute have sworn
positively at the trial that they saw Mrs. Gunness peering and prodding amid
the ruins of her burned home since that house of many murders went up in smoke.

Two other witnesses have sworn that while the house was
burning they saw an automobile with a woman, darkly wrapped and with muffled
face, leaving the flaming house.

A woman who bore a marked resemblance to this modern
bluebeard passed through St. Louis on a train bound for the Southwest shortly
after her disappearance from Laporte.

In a small town in Texas a woman who looked like Mrs.
Gunness was seen, but she disappeared before the belief that it was she had
crystallized into a sentiment strong enough to cause her detention.

A woman thought to have been Mrs. Gunness was reported in
St. Louis more than once, and in other places of the Southwest persons declare
that she has been seen.

[NOTE: The rest of the article discusses film other than the
Gunness one.]

MOST POPULAR FILMS.

The enterprise of the moving picture film manufacturers
continually surprises those who are regular attendants on the pleasures of the
nickelodeon. One dealer in St. Louis has now in his safe a series of pictures
representing President Roosevelt hunting lions in Africa, “held for release”
until the President actually arrives on the Dark Continent.

The chief actor is made up to resemble Mr. Roosevelt, and in
making the film a real lion was slain after it was the last scene the
“President” is shown sitting triumphantly on the body of the king of beasts,
which he has just slaughtered.

When the Thaw trial was the absorbing event in the American
news, the moving picture men were not behind-hand. The main incidents in the
series of events which ended in the tragic end of Stanford White were produced
by actors and actresses clad and “made up” resemble the originals.

A few weeks after the American fleet received its historic
welcome in the ports of Australia, the moving picture men of St. Louis were
showing the entrance of Uncle Sam’s battleships into Sydney’s harbor, their
reception by our cousins in the antipodes, and the pranks which the jackies
[sailors] played ashore.

How the film makers keep apace with the latest developments
in science is shown in a playlet now being exhibited in St. Louis under the
title, “Airship Thieves.” A pair of burglars in an aeroplane are shown. It
glides over a wealthy home, hovers at a window while one of the riders enters
and obtains his loot, and then darts away without leaving a clew as to how
entrance was gained in an upper story.

HOW THEY ARE MADE.

Another series, called “Burglary by Motor,” shows how
thieves in several large cities have recently availed themselves of the swift
automobile in order to defy pursuit.

Historical scenes, highly educational, are favorites with
the film manufacturers. One house is advertising the “Midnight Ride of Paul
Revere,” showing the Revolutionary hero as he sees the lanterns hung in the
belfry of the Boston church and gallops off along the road to Lexington to
arouse the farmers.

“Patrick Henry” declaims (by means of the bloscope and
phonograph) his “Give me liberty or give me death,” in another St. Louis
theater. In another, George Washington threads his way through the ice of
Delaware River and falls upon the carousing Hessians on the other side.

One of the most popular films ever exhibited her reproduced
the life of Abraham Lincoln and required an hour to finish. The emancipator was
first seen when a boy in Kentucky, fleeing with his family from the Indians.
Then a gaunt, lanky actor, remarkably like the early pictures of Lincoln,
strenuously splits rails, and, going home at night, forgot to eat in his zeal
to devour a new book.

His career as a lawyer was epitomized by a court scene in
which he won a difficult case, after which he wrestled with the village bully
and easily flung him to earth. The Lincoln-Douglass debates were represented,
the “Little Giant” being extremely lifelike.

Lincoln’s toils as President during the war and the rapid
development of his character under the strain of responsibility were cleverly
presented, and human interest was introduced by a scene sentenced to death at
the entreaty of his little sister.

The scene in Ford’s Theater, where Lincoln was assassinated,
was one of the triumphs of the film maker’s ingenuity, who showed a playhouse
thronged with fashionable people, all cheering the grave figure of the
President in his box. Then Booth stole behind him, thrust a pistol against the
back of his head, fired and leaped to the stage, falling and crippling himself
on the folds of a flag, but making his escape while the crowd sat benumbed with
horror. Many persons left the theater with moist eyes after beholding these
pictures.

It is getting common for nickelodeons to present the dramas
of Shakespeare, with the lines declaimed by a phonograph. “Macbeth” is a
favorite, as is also “Romeo and Juliette.”

Perhaps the most popular of the moving picture man’s
triumphs are his scenes of life in foreign countries. In no other way, save by
travel itself, can one obtain so graphic an idea of alien customs and pursuits.
With a little exertion of the imagination, one can believe himself really in
India, when the throngs of brown-skinned natives parade before him and great
elephants writhe their trunks and tread ponderously across the screen.

The most beautiful effect of the vitascope is its
reproduction of water in action. “Niagara Falls” is a scene watching which one
can almost hear the roaring of the falling torrents.