Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the judge committed reversible error in accepting the defendant's guilty plea, where Mr. Hamilton did not enter his guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily because the plea colloquy did not comport with Rule 11(b)(1) in substantially
advising him of his rights.
II. Whether the court committed reversible error in accepting the defendant's guilty plea, where no factual basis was admitted to under the terms of Rule 11(b)(3).

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the district court committed obvious error when the Defendant was substantially advised his rights and the district court complied with Rule 11 of the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure prior to accepting his plea of guilty?