nmm 22 4500ICPSR35169MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35169MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2013 (Restricted Use)
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2014-08-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35169NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2013 is a collection of interview and bioassay data provided by over 3000 arrestees from five county sites within the United States. Under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), the ADAM II program monitors drug use and related behaviors (treatment experiences, housing stability, drug market activity, age at first use, employment, etc.) in a probability based sample of male adult arrestees within 48 hours of their arrest. The five ADAM II sites for 2013 were: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County and the City of Atlanta); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); and Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County). The 2013 survey represents the seventh year of ADAM II and includes data from 1,900 interviews and 1,681 urine tests that were conducted at the five ADAM II sites over a 21-day period, between May 5, 2013 and July 28, 2013. ADAM II data include official records, arrestee responses from a 20-minute face-to-face interview, and results from voluntary urine samples which tested for the presence of nine different drugs. Identifying information on the arrestees was not retained or shared with law enforcement. Demographic variables include age, gender, race, citizenship, marital status, arrest date and time, county of arrest, number and type(s) of offense(s), education, work status, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35169.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrest recordsicpsrarrestsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrimprisonmenticpsrjailsicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35169Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35169.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25821MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25821MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2007
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2010-01-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25821NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, the ONDCP and Abt Associates have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. A total of 8,296 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2007. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2
ADAM/DUF Programicpsraddictionicpsralcoholismicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug useicpsrheroinicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25821Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27221MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27221MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2008
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2010-03-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27221NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc. have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implements two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collects data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Data collection has been conducted across two back-to-back quarters in each of 10 counties from a county-based representative sample of 250 male arrestees per quarter for a total of 500 arrestees annually per site or a total of 5,000 arrestees across sites annually. A total of 7,717 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2008. Collection occurs in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Additional data collection periods were optioned by ONDCP, and subsequent cycles of back-to-back data collection (not yet available) began April 1, 2008. Participation is voluntary and confidential, and the procedures include a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1
addictionicpsralcoholismicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug useicpsrheroinicpsrmarijuanaicpsrADAM/DUF ProgramicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeHunt, DanaRhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27221Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30061MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30061MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2011-02-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30061NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, Dana Rhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30061Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32321MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2011-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeHunt, DanaRhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04278MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04278MiAaIMiAaI
Assessing Trends and Best Practices of Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Programs in the United States, 2003
[electronic resource]
Patrick Curtin
,
David Thomas
,
Daniel Felker
,
Eric Weingart
2007-09-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4278NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This trends and best practices evaluation geared toward
motor vehicle theft prevention with a particular focus on the Watch
Your Car (WYC) program was conducted between October 2002 and March
2004. On-site and telephone interviews were conducted with
administrators from 11 of 13 WYC member states. Surveys were mailed to
the administrators of auto theft prevention programs in 36 non-WYC
states and the 10 cities with the highest motor vehicle theft rates.
Completed surveys were returned from 16 non-WYC states and five of the
high auto theft rate cities. Part 1, the survey for Watch Your Car
(WYC) program members, includes questions about how respondents
learned about the WYC program, their WYC related program activities,
the outcomes of their program, ways in which they might have done
things differently if given the opportunity, and summary questions
that asked WYC program administrators for their opinions about various
aspects of the overall WYC program. The survey for the nonmember
states, Part 2, and cities, Part 3, collected information about motor
vehicle theft prevention within the respondent's state or city and
asked questions about the respondent's knowledge of, and opinions
about, the Watch Your Car program.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1
auto thefticpsrcrime control programsicpsrcrime preventionicpsrcrime reductionicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstolen propertyicpsrstolen vehiclesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD I. Attitude SurveysCurtin, PatrickThomas, DavidFelker, DanielWeingart, EricInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4278Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08159MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08159MiAaIMiAaI
Basic Geographic and Historic Data for Interfacing ICPSR Data Sets, 1620-1983 [United States]
[electronic resource]
Robert P. Sechrist
2012-11-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8159NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains the basic information about
all counties in the coterminous United States needed for mapping
county-based data. It provides an interface between ICPSR datasets and
the mapping programs SAS/GRAPH, SURFACE II, and SYMAP. Cloropleth and
isopleth maps can be produced by match-merging this dataset with any
other dataset (special facilities exist for ICPSR datasets) and
running the merged data against a cartographic program. Isopleth
mapping programs, using the latitude and longitude coordinates provided
for each county seat, can produce maps of ICPSR data. Cloropleth
mapping of county-level data can be accomplished after merging by
running the merged dataset through SAS/GRAPH. The variables
provide state Federal Information Processing (FIPS) codes, county FIPS
codes, county names/county seat names, the month, day, and year in which each county was created, the latitude and longitude of county seats, as well as the ICPSR state and county codes.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08159.v2
countiesicpsrFIPSicpsrFIPS codesicpsrgeographic information systemsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksSechrist, Robert P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8159Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08159.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34085MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34085MiAaIMiAaI
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2013-08-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34085NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is a state-based system of health surveys that collects information on health risk behaviors, preventive health practices, and health care access primarily related to chronic disease and injury. For many states, the BRFSS is the only available source of timely, accurate data on health-related behaviors. BRFSS was established in 1984 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); currently data are collected monthly in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, and Guam. More than 350,000 adults are interviewed each year, making the BRFSS the largest telephone health survey in the world. States use BRFSS data to identify emerging health problems, establish and track health objectives, and develop and evaluate public health policies and programs. The BRFSS is a cross-sectional telephone survey conducted by state health departments with technical and methodologic assistance provided by CDC. States conduct monthly telephone surveillance using a standardized questionnaire to determine the distribution of risk behaviors and health practices among adults. Responses are forwarded to CDC, where the monthly data are aggregated for each state, returned with standard tabulations, and published at the year's end by each state. The BRFSS questionnaire was developed jointly by CDC's Behavioral Surveillance Branch (BSB) and the states. When combined with mortality and morbidity statistics, these data enable public health officials to establish policies and priorities and to initiate and assess health promotion strategies.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34085.v1
health insuranceicpsrhealth policyicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrillnessicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicineicpsrmental healthicpsrpatient careicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrpublic healthicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsmokingicpsrtreatmenticpsreating habitsicpsrexerciseicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth educationicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrchronic illnessesicpsrcommunity healthicpsrdiseaseicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34085Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34085.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08185MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08185MiAaIMiAaI
Calling the Police
[electronic resource] Citizen Reporting of Serious Crime, 1979
William Spelman
,
Dale K. Brown
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8185NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset replicates the citizen reporting component of
POLICE RESPONSE TIME ANALYSIS, 1975 (ICPSR 7760). Information is
included on 4,095 reported incidents of aggravated assault, auto
theft, burglary, larceny/theft offenses, forcible rape, and
robbery. The data cover citizen calls to police between April 21 and
December 7, 1979. There are four files in this collection, one each
for Jacksonville, Florida, Peoria, Illinois, Rochester, New York, and
San Diego, California. The data are taken from police dispatch records
and police interviews of citizens who requested police assistance.
Variables taken from the dispatch records include the dispatch time,
call priority, police travel time, age, sex, and race of the caller,
response code, number of suspects, and area of the city in which the
call originated. Variables taken from the citizen interviews include
respondent's role in the incident (victim, caller, victim-caller,
witness-caller), incident location, relationship of caller to victim,
number of victims, identification of suspect, and interaction with
police.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1
assaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcitizen crime reportingicpsrlarcenyicpsroffensesicpsrpolice citizen interactionsicpsrpolice protectionicpsrpolice reportsicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrvictimsicpsrwitnessesicpsrNACJD IX. PoliceICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSpelman, WilliamBrown, Dale K.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8185Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25801MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25801MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Finance in Local Elections
[electronic resource]An Eleven City Study, 1989-2007 [United States]
Brian Adams
2010-06-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25801NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains campaign finance data for candidates in local elections held from 1989 to 2007 in the following cities: New York City (NY), Los Angeles (CA), Chicago (IL), San Francisco (CA), Seattle (WA), Miami (FL), Tampa (FL), Lexington (KY), Louisville (KY), Sacramento (CA), and Long Beach (CA). Data were also collected for the counties Hillsborough County/Tampa (FL) and Miami-Dade (FL). The study includes data on funds raised and spent, as well as candidate data and election returns, and both mayoral and city council races. Information was also collected on the size of the population of the candidates jurisdiction, the amount of political contributions and committee expenditures, whether the election was held in a publicly-funded city, and the outcome of the election. Demographic variables include candidate's sex, race, political party, education, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25801.v1
campaign financeicpsrcandidatesicpsrcity councilsicpsrelectionsicpsrexpendituresicpsrlocal electionsicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsAdams, BrianInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25801Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25801.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02929MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02929MiAaIMiAaI
Case Tracking and Mapping System Developed for the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, 1997-1998
[electronic resource]
Colin Reilly
,
Victor Goldsmith
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2929NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection grew out of a prototype case tracking and
crime mapping application that was developed for the United States
Attorney's Office (USAO), Southern District of New York (SDNY). The
purpose of creating the application was to move from the traditionally
episodic way of handling cases to a comprehensive and strategic method
of collecting case information and linking it to specific geographic
locations, and collecting information either not handled at all or not
handled with sufficient enough detail by SDNY's existing case
management system. The result was an end-user application designed to
be run largely by SDNY's nontechnical staff. It consisted of two
components, a database to capture case tracking information and a
mapping component to link case and geographic data. The case tracking
data were contained in a Microsoft Access database and the client
application contained all of the forms, queries, reports, macros,
table links, and code necessary to enter, navigate through, and query
the data. The mapping application was developed using Environmental
Systems Research Institute's (ESRI) ArcView 3.0a GIS. This collection
shows how the user-interface of the database and the mapping component
were customized to allow the staff to perform spatial queries without
having to be geographic information systems (GIS) experts. Part 1 of
this collection contains the Visual Basic script used to customize the
user-interface of the Microsoft Access database. Part 2 contains the
Avenue script used to customize ArcView to link the data maintained in
the server databases, to automate the office's most common queries,
and to run simple analyses.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02929.v1
case managementicpsrcase processingicpsrcrime mappingicpsrdatabasesicpsrgeographic information systemsicpsrNACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional PackagesICPSR X.B. Instructional Packages and Computer Programs, Computer ProgramsReilly, ColinGoldsmith, VictorInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2929Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02929.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04625MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04625MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #2, September 2006
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2007-07-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4625NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded September 24-27, 2006, is part of a
continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on
the current presidency and on a range of other political and social
issues. Despite being termed a monthly poll, this poll's specific
focus was on the opinions and judgments of people currently living in
the state of New York. Respondents were asked to give their opinions
on the upcoming 2006 election for the New York governor, specifically
their opinions about gubernatorial candidates, Eliot Spitzer and John
Faso. Subjects were also asked about the upcoming New York senatorial
election and their opinions about that race's candidates, Hillary
Clinton and John Spencer. Respondents were also asked about the
upcoming election for state attorney general and their opinions about
candidates Andrew Cuomo and Jeanine Pirro. Respondents were asked to
give their opinions about several politicians: President George Bush,
Governor George Pataki, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Hillary
Clinton, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Respondents were asked how they
thought the New York legislature in Albany was handling its job, and
of the problems facing New York State, what they wanted the next
governor to concentrate on most. Respondents were also asked to rate
the state of the New York economy. Respondents were then asked to give
their opinion on sentencing for people convicted of murder and
terrorism. Other major issues such as gay marriage and the war in Iraq
were also covered, along with additional topics specific to New York
such as balancing the budget, future terrorist attacks, education,
taxes, and which candidate for senator would help improve on these
areas. Additionally respondents were asked which candidate for Senator
cared most for people in different areas of New York: New York City,
the suburbs, and upstate New York. Respondents were also asked how
they thought the candidates for governor would handle issues such as
taxes, terrorism, and the economy. Additional questions asked
respondents how they would categorize the political attitudes of the
candidates for governor and senator. Their opinions were sought on
Hillary Clinton's job as senator, whether she had become a true New
Yorker, and the prospect of her running for president, and whether
Rudolph Giuliani, Michael Bloomberg, or George Pataki should run for
president in 2008. Respondents were asked their views on Andrew Cuomo
and Jeanine Pirro, including information about their campaign
practices and their experience level. Lastly, they were asked if they
would want the Mets or the Yankees to win if there were a subway World
Series that year. Demographic variables include race, sex, age, level
of education, financial situation, income, voter registration, voting
activity, status, political ideology, party affiliation, marital
status, religious affiliation, and number of years living in their
current community.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04625.v1
terrorist threaticpsrUnited States Senateicpsrvoter behavioricpsrbaseballicpsrBloomberg, MichaelicpsrbudgetsicpsrBush, George W.icpsrcapital punishmenticpsrClinton, Hillaryicpsreconomic issuesicpsreducationicpsrGiuliani, Rudolphicpsrgovernorsicpsrgubernatorial electionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrIraq WaricpsrPataki, Georgeicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsame-sex marriageicpsrSchumer, Charlesicpsrstate electionsicpsrstate legislaturesicpsrsuburbsicpsrtaxesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4625Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04625.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03235MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03235MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #4, November 2000
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2009-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3235NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll is part of a continuing series of
monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and a
range of other political and social issues. The study was conducted in
part to assess respondents' interest in and opinions about the 2002
elections in the state of New York. Residents of that state were asked
to give their opinions of Governor George Pataki and his handling of the
governorship, the economy of New York State, his response to the attacks
on the World Trade Center, and his participation in the recovery efforts
following the terrorist attacks, as well as their views of Senators
Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles Schumer, state comptroller H. Carl
McCall, and New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg. Those queried were
asked whether they intended to vote in the November 5, 2002, elections.
Respondents were asked for whom they would vote if the election for
governor were held that day, given a choice between George Pataki
(Republican Party), H. Carl McCall (Democratic Party), and Tom Golisano
(Independent Party). Respondents were asked which candidate cared more
about the needs of people like the respondent, residents of New York
City, residents of the suburbs, and residents of upstate New York.
Those queried were asked to specify which candidate would be more likely
to raise taxes, improve the state of the New York economy, help all
people of New York, and help only special interest groups. Respondents
were also asked if Pataki and McCall were spending more time during the
campaign attacking each other or explaining what they would do if
elected. Respondents were asked to consider whether Pataki had made
progress in the following areas during his eight years in office:
improving public school education, reducing New York State's taxes,
improving the state's economy, creating jobs in New York State,
protecting the environment, and reducing the state's debt. They were
asked for whom they would vote if the election for state comptroller
were held that day, given a choice between John Faso (Republican Party)
and Alan Hevesi (Democratic Party). Likely voters were asked whether a
candidate's stance on keeping open the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant,
located in Westchester, New York, would influence their vote. Additional
questions probed respondent views on the Rockefeller laws requiring
mandatory sentences for drug offenses, environmental protection, the
quality of New York State public schools, the influence of Blacks and
Catholics in how the state of New York was run, whether employees who
worked in New York City and lived elsewhere should be charged a commuter
tax, whether state financial aid to New York City was adequate, and the
preferred solution to the state's budget concerns. Those queried were
asked for their views on Bloomberg's tenure as mayor, specifically his
record on crime compared to that of his predecessor Rudolph Giuliani.
Background information on respondents includes age, gender, political
party, political orientation, voter registration and participation
history, education, religion, marital status, Hispanic descent, race,
years in community, household income, and whether they watched or
listened to the October 13, 2000, gubernatorial debate.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03235.v3
Pataki, Georgeicpsrpolitical campaigningicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpresidencyicpsrattitudesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrSchumer, Charlesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrstate electionsicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrvoting behavioricpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrGiuliani, Rudolphicpsrgubernatorial electionsicpsrnuclear energyicpsrTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3235Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03235.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08168MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08168MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times Election Day Surveys, 1982
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8168NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Interviews were conducted with
respondents as they left their polling places on Election Day,
November 7, 1982. Data include respondent's vote for governor,
questions specific to the gubernatorial race in each state, and the
respondent's rating of Ronald Reagan as president. The 31 datasets
consist of 27 state and four regional files. The four regional
datasets (Parts 28-31), taken together, make up the national
poll. Demographic information on respondents, such as sex, age, race,
political affiliation, income, financial state as compared to previous
year, and employment status of head of household, were also
collected.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08168.v2
congressional electionsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic issuesicpsrgubernatorial electionsicpsrincomeicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrReagan, RonaldicpsrReaganomicsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8168Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08168.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07812MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07812MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times Election Surveys, 1980
[electronic resource]
CBS News/The New York Times
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7812NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The New York Times and CBS News were equal partners in a
series of election surveys covering the 1980 election year. The
content of this data collection generally concerns the presidential
preference of respondents, their reasons for choosing a particular
candidate, and their reactions to political and social issues of
the campaign. There are 28 datasets in the collection, which fall into
three categories: national monthly surveys, primary day surveys, and
the election day survey. Parts 1-12 contain national monthly surveys
that were conducted by telephone, with approximately 1,500 randomly
selected adults in each. Surveys were conducted in January, February,
March, April, June, August, September, and October. Two telephone
surveys were conducted in September, a pre-debate survey and a
post-debate survey. Also, two surveys were conducted in October. A
post-election survey was conducted in the days following the
election. For the post-election survey, the respondents in Part 11,
October Pre-Election National Interviews, were reinterviewed. The
post-election survey is released as a panel file and incorporates Part
11 responses as well. Parts 13-27 contain primary day surveys that
were conducted in 11 states on the day of the primary at the
polling place among a random sample of people who had just voted in
either the Democratic or Republican presidential primaries. The
questionnaires were self-administered. Surveys were conducted in the
following states: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Florida, Illinois, New
York, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, California, New Jersey, and Ohio. There
are separate data files for the Democratic and Republican primaries
in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Illinois, Wisconsin, and
Pennsylvania. Demographic information including age, sex, income,
race, ethnicity, and occupation is provided for all respondents in
Parts 1-27. Part 28 contains a survey conducted on the day of the
presidential election. A national sample of voters was administered a
questionnaire similar to those given on primary day. Selected voters
were asked for whom they had voted and why. Information on time of
voting and respondent's sex and race was filled out by the
interviewer.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07812.v1
campaign issuesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential debatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS News/The New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7812Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07812.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09493MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09493MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York City Mayoral Election Exit Poll, November 1989
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2011-05-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9493NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection consists of responses to a survey of
voters in the New York City mayoral election. Respondents were asked
which mayoral candidate they voted for, how much they liked that
candidate, when they decided on that candidate, which issues and
factors most affected their vote, if TV ads influenced their vote, how
reports of David Dinkins' personal financial affairs affected their
vote, if campaign activities of various governmental leaders affected
their vote, if race was a factor in voting, and if they had been
recently contacted about voting. Respondents also evaluated Ed Koch's
job performance, indicated if they would have voted for Koch had he
been on the ballot, expressed opinions of each candidate, and
speculated on the performance of David Dinkins and Rudolph Giuliani
should one of them be elected. Other items include the city budget
deficit, respondent's vote in the 1989 Democratic mayoral primary and
in elections involving municipal offices and ballot proposals, and
optimism/pessimism regarding the future of the city. Demographic
information includes sex, race, age, party preference, political
orientation, education, family income, ethnicity, and union membership.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09493.v2
Dinkins, DavidicpsrGiuliani, RudolphicpsrKoch, Edicpsrmayoral candidatesicpsrmayorsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9493Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09493.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09490MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09490MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York City Mayoral Primary Exit Polls, September 1989
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2012-06-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9490NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection, fielded on September 12, 1989, consists of responses to a survey of
voters in the New York City Democratic and Republican mayoral
primaries. Respondents were asked which mayoral candidate they voted
for, how much they liked that candidate, when they decided on that
candidate, which issues and factors most affected their vote, how the
Bensonhurst incident influenced their vote, if race was a factor in
voting, and if they had been contacted by phone on election day about
voting. Respondents also evaluated Ed Koch's job performance, expressed
favorable/unfavorable opinions of each candidate, speculated on David
Dinkins' performance should he be elected mayor, and indicated who they
would favor in a runoff between Koch and Dinkins in the general
election. Additional items include how respondents voted in the 1988
Democratic presidential primary and in the 1989 primary for municipal
offices. Demographic information includes sex, race, age, political
orientation, education, family income, union membership, employment,
birthplace, housing situation, parental status, subway usage, and sexual
orientation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09490.v2
Democratic Party (USA)icpsrDinkins, DavidicpsrKoch, Edicpsrmayoral candidatesicpsrmayorsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9490Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09490.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34633MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34633MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York City Poll, August #1, 2012
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2013-05-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34633NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, the first of two fielded August 2012, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked their opinion of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's job performance, his amendment of mayor term limits, and whether they approved his handling of crime in the city. Data were collected on general aspects of respondents' lives in New York City, including opinions on their long range view of the city's livability, the city's economy, the city's most important issue, whether they had plans to relocate, whether they held a good or bad image of the city, and who they voted for mayor in 2009. Further opinions were solicited on the state of New York City police and law enforcement, including views on the "stop and frisk" tactic, ethnic group targeting, and whether they approved of Ray Kelly's job performance as New York City Police Commissioner. Questions were also raised on the bicycle lane, bike sharing program and respondents' bicycle riding frequency. Furthermore, respondents were asked about the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, whether they favored the new arena, and how frequently they would attend games. They were also queried on their eating habits, including frequency of dinner in restaurants, the cost at the restaurant, and how often they ate street food. Additional topics included soda preference and the soda ban, opinions of Anthony Weiner, and the noise problem in New York City. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, employment status, household income, religious preference, political party affiliation, political philosophy, voting behavior, borough of residence, and whether respondents were registered to vote.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34633.v1
Bloomberg, Michaelicpsrcrimeicpsreating habitsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrethnic discriminationicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrhealthicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrnoise pollutionicpsrpolicyicpsrprofessional sportsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrracial attitudesicpsrrelocationicpsrshoppingicpsrterm limitsicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoter registrationicpsrWeiner, AnthonyicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesICPSR XIV.C. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political MattersCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34633Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34633.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34468MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34468MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York City Poll, August #2, 2011
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2012-12-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34468NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded August 2011, and the second of four, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on a range of political and social issues. This particular poll surveyed respondents living in New York City. Respondents were asked their opinion on Mayor Michael Bloomberg's job performance and whether they approved of his handling of the public school system. Respondents were also queried on general aspects of their lives in New York City, including opinions on their long range view of the city's livability, opinions on the city's economy, whether they had plans to relocate, and whether they held a good or bad image of the city. Respondents were also asked to provide opinions on the state of New York City public schools, including views on the New York City teachers union and charter schools, assessments of the overall quality of public education, whether quality had improved under Mayor Bloomberg, and whether they approved of Dennis Walcott's job performance as school system Chancellor. The poll also features several questions related to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001. Respondents were asked whether security initiatives implemented following the terrorist attacks had enhanced public safety at New York City airports, bridges, tunnels, subways and nuclear power plants in the region. Further opinions were solicited on whether respondents felt New Yorkers had recovered economically and emotionally from the attacks, whether first responders and families of victims had been treated fairly, and whether the killing of Osama bin Laden had provided a sense of closure and increased safety. Furthermore, respondents were asked to gauge the likelihood of another attack within the upcoming months, whether they felt safe or endangered living in New York City, and whether they perceived the threat of terrorism to be higher in New York City when compared to other United States cities. Further information was collected regarding respondents feelings toward Muslims following the September 11th attacks, whether respondents believed Muslims are unfairly singled out, and whether they believed Muslims and Arab Americans are more sympathetic to terrorists than other American citizens. Additional topics included the possible opening of Wal-Mart stores within New York City, the planned redevelopment of the site at Ground Zero, and the proposed mosque and Islamic community center two blocks from Ground Zero. Demographic information included sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, religious preference, political party affiliation, political philosophy, and voter registration status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34468.v1
governmenticpsrgovernment performanceicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmosquesicpsrMuslimsicpsrnational prideicpsrnational securityicpsrnational unityicpsrneighborsicpsrpatriotismicpsrpolitical philosophyicpsrpublic imageicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrracial discriminationicpsrsecurityicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrterrorist threaticpsrvoter registrationicpsrairport securityicpsrArab Americansicpsrbin Laden, OsamaicpsrBloomberg, Michaelicpsrcharter schoolsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic recoveryicpsreducationicpsreducational changeicpsremergency preparednessicpsremotional disturbancesicpsrethnic discriminationicpsrGiuliani, RudolphicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesICPSR XIV. Mass Political Behavior and AttitudesICPSR II.A.1. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, United StatesTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34468Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34468.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03697MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03697MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York City Poll, June 2002
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2009-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3697NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, conducted June 4-8, was undertaken
to assess respondents' opinions of Michael Bloomberg and his
performance as mayor of New York City, the recovery efforts following
the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, and the long-range
view for New York City. Respondents were asked to comment on the
following: Mayor Michael Bloomberg's performance and priorities
compared to those of former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, the effectiveness
of Cardinal Edward Michael Egan and Bishop Thomas Daily in light of
sex abuse scandals in the Catholic Church, the health of the New York
City economy, and everyday life in New York City including public
schools and transportation. Additional questions addressed the
September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and how they
impacted respondents' sleep cycles and levels of anxiety, as well as
transportation security, law enforcement tactics, and the economy.
Respondents gave their opinions on the likelihood of another terrorist
attack, the effectiveness and likelihood of federal aid, and proposed
plans for the World Trade Center site. Background variables include
age, ethnicity, education, household income, sex, voter registration
status, participation in religion, marital status, 2001 mayoral
election participation, political orientation, the lack or presence of
children, the type of school children in the household attend, and the
number of phone lines in the home.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03697.v3
Bloomberg, Michaelicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrtransportationicpsrCatholic ChurchicpsrCatholic priestsicpsrGiuliani, Rudolphicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmayorsicpsrnational economyicpsrpersonal securityicpsrpublic opinionicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)CBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3697Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03697.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33184MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33184MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York City Survey Monthly Poll #5, October 2010
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2012-03-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33184NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded October 26-28, 2010, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way Michael Bloomberg was handling his job as mayor, whether they thought New York City was safer from crime than it was a year ago, and how they would rate the job the police in New York City were doing. Respondents were also asked whether they or anyone in their family had been the victim of a crime in New York City in the past year or any time since 2002, whether they reported this crime or not, and whether the police accepted the report or they were discouraged by the police from filing a report. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, and voter registration status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33184.v1
attitudesicpsrBloomberg, Michaelicpsrcrimeicpsrcrime reportingicpsrpolice performanceicpsrpolice reportsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrvictimsicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33184Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33184.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02927MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02927MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York State Poll #2, February 2000
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2008-12-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2927NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, fielded February 24-27, 2000, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and a range of other political and social issues. The focus of this data collection was on the upcoming March 7, 2000, presidential primary in New York State. Residents of New York State were asked about the way Governor George Pataki was handling his job and the single most important issue for the federal government to address in the coming year. Those who were registered to vote were asked to give their opinions of President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore, Texas Governor George W. Bush, former New Jersey Senator Bill Bradley, and Arizona Senator John McCain. Respondents were asked whether they were paying attention to the presidential campaign, the likelihood that they would vote in the upcoming presidential primary and for which party, which candidate they were leaning toward, and why. Registered Republicans were asked whether Governor Pataki's support of George W. Bush would affect their vote in the Republican primary and which Republican candidate was more likely to defeat the eventual Democratic presidential nominee. A series of questions queried respondents on whether participation in party primaries should be restricted to registered members of the party, what motives Democrats and Independents might have in voting in the New York State Republican primary, and on George W. Bush's recent speech at Bob Jones University. In addition, all respondents in the poll were asked about the recent outcome of the Amadou Diallo shooting case. Demographic information includes age, sex, race, education level, marital status, household income, religious preference, political party affiliation, political philosophy, and voter registration and participation history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02927.v2
attitudesicpsrPataki, Georgeicpsrpolice use of deadly forceicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoter registrationicpsrBradley, Billicpsrvoting behavioricpsrBush, George W.icpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrClinton, BillicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrGore, AlicpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrnational electionsicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2927Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02927.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33182MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33182MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times New York State Survey Monthly Poll #3, October 2010
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2012-03-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33182NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded October 10-15, 2010, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked how much attention they paid to the 2010 election campaigns in New York, how likely it was that they would vote in the 2010 election in November, whether they had a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Andrew Cuomo, Carl Paladino, Charles Schumer, Jay Townsend, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Joe DioGuardi, who they would vote for in the 2010 gubernatorial and Senate elections, and whether they would vote for the Democratic or Republican candidate in the 2010 House of Representatives election. Respondents were queried on whether they approved of the way Barack Obama was handling his job as president, David Paterson as governor, Schumer and Gillibrand as senators, Cuomo as State Attorney General, and Michael Bloomberg as mayor of New York City. Respondents were also asked whether they approved of the way the New York state Legislature in Albany was handling its job, how they would rate the condition of the New York state economy, what they were most angry about, whether they thought police should have the power to request proof of citizenship in order to deal with the problem of illegal immigration, what their view was on abortion and same-sex marriage, how common they thought corruption was in the New York state government, whether they thought the Democratic party has too much power in the state government and whether they had a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the Tea Party movement. Information was collected on how serious of a problem respondents thought the current budget of New York state was, who they thought was mostly to blame for the current budget problems, what steps they thought should be taken to balance the budget, what state funded services they thought should be cut, and whether they thought it would be a good idea to layoff state employees. Respondents were asked if Cuomo or Paladino were elected governor whether they thought the economy would get better or worse, whether they thought that they would raise taxes or lower taxes, whether they thought they have the right kind of experience to be an effective governor, whether they thought they had the right temperament and personality to be a good governor, whether they thought of them as Albany insiders, and how they thought the media was treating them. Additionally respondents were asked whether they thought that New York City was more safe from crime than it was a year ago, how they would rate the job the police in New York City were doing, whether they or any member of their immediate family had been the victim of a crime in New York City, how concerned they were that they or someone in their household might lose their job, whether their family's financial situation was better or worse than it was four years ago, and whether they supported the Tea Party movement. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, social class, employment status, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, and voter registration status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33182.v1
abortionicpsrattitudesicpsrbalanced budgeticpsrbudgetsicpsrcity governmenticpsrcongressional electionsicpsrcorruptionicpsrcrime reportingicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrgubernatorial electionsicpsrillegal immigrantsicpsrlayoffsicpsrnews mediaicpsrObama, Barackicpsrpensionsicpsrpolice performanceicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrsame-sex marriageicpsrSchumer, Charlesicpsrsenatorial electionsicpsrsocial classesicpsrstate legislatorsicpsrtax increasesicpsrtaxesicpsrTea Party movementicpsrunemploymenticpsrvoter historyicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33182Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33182.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08398MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08398MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times Primary Election Day Exit Polls, 1984
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2011-02-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8398NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of exit
polls. CBS News and The New York Times interviewed voters in 1984 as
they left the polls on primary election day in Alabama, California,
Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Voters were asked about
their choice of candidates in the presidential primary and to describe
candidate characteristics and issues that helped in their
selection. Voters were also asked for their political party preference
and liberal/conservative attitudes, and to evaluate President Ronald
Reagan's job performance. Demographic information, including sex, age,
race, educational attainment, and income, is included for each
respondent. There is one data file for each state.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08398.v2
candidatesicpsrexit pollsicpsrforeign policyicpsrpolitical party preferenceicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimary electionsicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8398Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08398.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32504MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32504MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/Vanity Fair Monthly Poll #3, August 2010
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
Vanity Fair
2012-03-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR32504NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded August 27-31, 2010, solicited New York City residents' opinion on Michael Bloomberg's job as mayor, the most important problem facing New York City, David Paterson's handling of his job as governor, and whether they approved or disapproved of the way Barack Obama was handling his job as president. They were also queried on whether they heard about the plan to build a mosque and Islamic community center two blocks from Ground Zero of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center, whether they favored or opposed the building of the mosque, whether they thought people should have the right to build a house of worship near Ground Zero, and whether they thought people should have the right to build a mosque near Ground Zero. Opinions were sought on New York Congressman Charles Rangel, whether they were familiar with the accusations associated with Rangel, how much truth there were to these accusations, what they thought Rangel should do going forward, and whether Rangel had higher or lower ethical standards compared to others in the Congress. They were asked whether they thought Arab Americans, Muslims, and immigrants from the Middle East were being singled out unfairly by people in this country, whether people they know had negative feelings towards Muslims because of the attack on the World Trade Center, whether respondents had any negative feelings towards Muslims because of the attack on the World Trade Center, whether they thought Muslim Americans are more sympathetic to terrorists, and whether they ever visited a mosque. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, education level, household income, marital status, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, religiosity, whether participant was living in New York City on September 11, 2001, how long they have lived in New York City, where they are getting most of their information pertaining to the planned mosque and Islamic community center, and voter registration status and participation history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32504.v1
Arab AmericansicpsrattitudesicpsrBloomberg, MichaelicpsrdiscriminationicpsrIslamicpsrmedia useicpsrmosquesicpsrMuslimsicpsrObama Administration (2009- )icpsrObama, Barackicpsrpublic opinionicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterroristsicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV. Mass Political Behavior and AttitudesICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32504Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32504.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09099MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09099MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/WCBS-TV New York City Poll, January 1988
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
WCBS-TV
2011-10-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9099NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is a general survey of social issues in
New York City. Topics covered include opinions on political leaders and
public figures, the new school chancellor, race relations, the Howard
Beach incident, and treatment of individuals by the courts and police.
Background information on respondents includes political party
affiliation, age, income, sex, religious preference, education, and
race.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09099.v2
police community relationsicpsrpublic figuresicpsrpublic opinionicpsrrace relationsicpsrsocial issuesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsWCBS-TVInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9099Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09099.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08004MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08004MiAaIMiAaI
Census Data for Planning and Service Areas, 1980
[electronic resource] United States and Puerto Rico
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
,
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8004NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This file contains 1980 Census data for the 679 Planning
and Service Areas (PSAs) in the United States and Puerto Rico. Data
for all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and for each
of the approximately 4,000 counties and county equivalents in the
United States and Puerto Rico were subsetted from the 1980 Census of
Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 1 (STF 1) and aggregated to
the PSA level. The file contains 312 substantive data variables
organized in the form of 53 "tables", as well as geographic codes
for region, state code, PSA, and land area. The remaining STF 1
geographic codes and the six tables representing median values are not
included. Data for each PSA include ethnicity and age of residents,
housing units, and units rented.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08004.v1
census dataicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing unitsicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulationicpsrrural areasicpsrStandard Metropolitan Statistical Areasicpsrstates (USA)icpsrurban areasicpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social ResearchUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8004Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08004.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27541MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27541MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-02-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27541NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27541Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04673MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04673MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR4673NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4673Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04674MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04674MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1999 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR4674NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1999, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4674Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04670MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04670MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2001 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR4670NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2001, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4670Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23480MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23480MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2003 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR23480NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2003, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1
juvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23480Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24300MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24300MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2006 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR24300NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2006, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24300Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34401MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34401MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2007 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34401NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1
property crimesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34401Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34448MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34448MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34448NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1
property crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34448Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27543MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27543MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27543NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2
educational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrperson offensesicpsrpregnancyicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrvaccinesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27543Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27544MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27544MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27544NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2
status offensesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrperson offensesicpsrpregnancyicpsrproperty crimesicpsrvaccinesicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27544Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27545MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27545MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27545NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrperson offensesicpsrpregnancyicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrvaccinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27545Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08236MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08236MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population, 1940 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8236NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1940 Census Public Use Microdata Sample Project was
assembled through a collaborative effort between the United States
Bureau of the Census and the Center for Demography and Ecology at the
University of Wisconsin. The collection contains a stratified
1-percent sample of households, with separate records for each
household, for each "sample line" respondent, and for each person in
the household. These records were encoded from microfilm copies of
original handwritten enumeration schedules from the 1940 Census of
Population. Geographic identification of the location of the sampled
households includes Census regions and divisions, states (except
Alaska and Hawaii), standard metropolitan areas (SMAs), and state
economic areas (SEAs). Accompanying the data collection is a codebook
that includes an abstract, descriptions of sample design, processing
procedures and file structure, a data dictionary (record layout),
category code lists, and a glossary. Also included is a procedural
history of the 1940 Census. Each of the 20 subsamples contains three
record types: household, sample line, and person. Household variables
describe the location and condition of the household. The sample line
records contain variables describing demographic characteristics such
as nativity, marital status, number of children, veteran status, wage
deductions for Social Security, and occupation. Person records also
contain variables describing demographic characteristics including
nativity, marital status, family membership, education, employment
status, income, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08236.v1
census dataicpsrcensus divisionsicpsrcensus regionsicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmarriageicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrmilitary serviceicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvital statisticsicpsrworkicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8236Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08236.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08251MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08251MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population, 1950 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8251NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains a stratified 1-percent sample
of households, with separate records for each household, each "sample
line" respondent, and each person in the household. These records were
encoded from microfilm copies of original handwritten enumeration
schedules from the 1950 Census of Population. Geographic
identification of the location of the sampled households includes
Census regions and divisions, states (except Alaska and Hawaii),
Standard Metropolitan Areas (SMAs), and State Economic Areas
(SEAs). The data collection was constructed from and consists of 20
independently-drawn subsamples stored in 20 discrete physical
files. The 1950 Census had both a complete-count and a sample
component. Individuals selected for the sample component were asked a
set of additional questions. Only households with a sample line person
were included in the 1950 Public Use Microdata Sample. The collection
also contains records of group quarters members who were also on the
Census sample line. Each household record contains variables
describing the location and composition of the household. The sample
line records contain variables describing demographic characteristics
such as nativity, marital status, number of children, veteran status,
education, income, and occupation. The person records contain
demographic variables such as nativity, marital status, family
membership, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08251.v1
census dataicpsrcensus divisionsicpsrcensus regionsicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmarriageicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrmilitary serviceicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvital statisticsicpsrworkicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8251Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08251.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09026MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09026MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Equal Employment Opportunity Special File
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR9026NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census Bureau has created a special subset file from
the 1980 Census of Population and Housing data designed to meet the
needs of Equal Employment Opportunity and affirmative action
planning. It contains detailed 1980 Census data dealing with
occupation and educational attainment for the civilian labor force,
various race groups, and the Hispanic population. The collection
contains two tabulations of the United States civilian labor force:
one offering detailed occupation data and the other, data on years of
school completed. The occupation tabulation includes information for
514 occupation categories organized by sex and race (including
Hispanic origin). The second tabulation, years of school completed, is
organized by age, sex, and race (including Hispanic origin). This
collection contains 51 separate files, one for each state and the
District of Columbia. Each state file contains statistics for the
state, each county, standard metropolitan statistical area (SMSA), and
place with a population of 50,000 or more within that state. If an
SMSA crosses state lines, each state file containing a part of the
SMSA will have totals for the entire SMSA. The 51 files in the
collection include a total of 48,168 data records. Each of the data
records contains 1,098 "substantive" variables, as well as
geographic identifiers. A CENSPAC-compatible database dictionary,
Part 90, is also included with this collection.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09026.v1
Affirmative Actionicpsrcensus dataicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducational backgroundicpsremploymenticpsrEqual Employment Opportunityicpsrethnic groupsicpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9026Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09026.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07756MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07756MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1960 Public Use Sample
[electronic resource]One-in-One-Hundred Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7756NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains individual-level and 1-percent
national sample data from the 1960 Census of Population and Housing
conducted by the Census Bureau. It consists of a representative
sample of the records from the 1960 sample questionnaires. The data
are stored in 30 separate files, containing in total over two million
records, organized by state. Some files contain the sampled records
of several states while other files contain all or part of the
sample for a single state. There are two types of records stored
in the data files: one for households and one for persons. Each
household record is followed by a variable number of person records,
one for each of the household members. Data items in this collection
include the individual responses to the basic social, demographic,
and economic questions asked of the population in the 1960 Census
of Population and Housing. Data are provided on household
characteristics and features such as the number of persons in
household, number of rooms and bedrooms, and the availability of
hot and cold piped water, flush toilet, bathtub or shower, sewage
disposal, and plumbing facilities. Additional information is
provided on tenure, gross rent, year the housing structure was
built, and value and location of the structure, as well as the
presence of air conditioners, radio, telephone, and television in
the house, and ownership of an automobile. Other demographic
variables provide information on age, sex, marital status, race,
place of birth, nationality, education, occupation, employment
status, income, and veteran status. The data files were obtained
by ICPSR from the Center for Social Analysis, Columbia University.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07756.v1
ageicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrgendericpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarital statusicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrnational identityicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationsicpsrraceicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7756Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07756.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00018MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00018MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1970 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Samples
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR18NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains 132 Public Use Microdata
Samples (PUMS) files from the 1970 Census of Population and
Housing. Information is provided in these files on the housing
unit, such as occupancy and vacancy status of house, tenure,
value of property, commercial use, year structure was built,
number of rooms, availability of plumbing facilities, sewage
disposal, bathtub or shower, complete kitchen facilities,
flush toilet, water, telephone, and air conditioning. Data
are also provided on household characteristics such as
the number of persons aged 18 years and younger in the
household, the presence of roomers, boarders, or lodgers,
the presence of other nonrelative and of relative other
than wife or child of head of household, the number of
persons per room, the rent paid for unit, and the number
of persons with Spanish surnames. Other demographic
variables provide information on age, race, marital status,
place of birth, state of birth, Puerto Rican heritage,
citizenship, education, occupation, employment status,
size of family, farm earnings, and family income. This
hierarchical data collection contains approximately 214
variables for the 15-percent sample, 227 variables for the
5-percent sample, and 117 variables for the neighborhood
characteristics sample.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00018.v1
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsroccupational statusicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.b. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1970 CensusNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)18Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00018.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08122MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08122MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1970 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Statistic File 1B [First Count]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8122NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data from the "100 percent" items in the 1970 Census
comprise population and housing characteristics such as age, race, sex,
marital status, occupancy/vacancy status of housing units, housing tenure,
number of housing units in structure, number of rooms in housing units,
value of housing, contract rent, and the presence of telephones, plumbing,
and complete kitchen facilities. These characteristics are reported for
states, counties, Minor Civil Divisions or Census County Divisions, places,
and Congressional Districts. The data are in DUALabs, Inc. compressed
format and require the use of special software.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08122.v1
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsroccupational statusicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrICPSR I.A.1.b. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1970 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8122Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08122.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08129MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08129MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1970 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Statistic File 4C -- Housing [Fourth Count]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR8129NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are from the 20-, 15-, and 5-percent samples of
the 1970 United States Census of Population and Housing, and contain
tabulations of housing characteristics such as housing value, number
of housing units in structure, number of rooms in housing unit, year
structure was built, occupancy/vacancy status, tenure, rent, type of
heating fuel, source of water, and presence of an air conditioner and
other home appliances. Twenty selected summary areas -- including
states, counties, standard metropolitan statistical areas, urbanized
areas, and places -- constitute the units of observation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08129.v1
census dataicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrurban areasicpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.A.1.b. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1970 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8129Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08129.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08107MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08107MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1970 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Statistic File 4C -- Population [Fourth Count]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8107NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are from the 20-, 15-, and 5-percent samples of the 1970 United States Census of Population and Housing, and contain tabulations of population characteristics such as education, occupation, income, citizenship, and vocational training. Twenty selected geographic summary areas -- including states, counties, standard metropolitan statistical areas, urbanized areas, and places -- constitute the units of observation. Separate tallies are shown for whites, Blacks, Hispanic American (referred to as Spanish Americans in the 1970 Census), and the total population.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08107.v2
metropolitan statistical areasicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrurban areasicpsrvocational educationicpsrcensus dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcountiesicpsreducationicpsrincomeicpsrICPSR I.A.1.b. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1970 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8107Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08107.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08126MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08126MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1970 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Statistic File 4A -- Housing [Fourth Count]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR8126NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are from the 20-, 15-, and 5-percent samples of
the 1970 United States Census of Population and Housing, and contain
tabulations of housing characteristics such as housing value, number
of housing units in structure, number of rooms in housing unit, year
structure was built, occupancy/vacancy status, tenure, rent, type of
heating fuel, source of water, and presence of an air conditioner and
other home appliances. The unit of observation for these data files is
the census tract. There is one file for each of 48 states and the
District of Columbia. The Census Bureau did not issue data for Vermont
and Wyoming because these two states were not tracted in 1970.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08126.v1
housing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing costsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.A.1.b. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1970 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8126Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08126.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09014MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09014MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1970 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Statistic File 4A -- Population [Fourth Count]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR9014NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are from the 20-, 15-, and 5-percent samples of
the 1970 United States Census of Population and Housing, and contain
population characteristics such as education, occupation, income,
citizenship, and vocational training. Separate tallies are shown for
whites, Blacks, Hispanic Americans (referred to as Spanish Americans
in the 1970 Census), and the total population. The unit of observation
for these data files is the census tract. There is one file for each
of 48 states and the District of Columbia. The Census Bureau did not
issue data for Vermont and Wyoming because these two states were
untracted in 1970.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09014.v2
census tract levelicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsrethnicityicpsrincomeicpsroccupational statusicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvocational trainingicpsrICPSR I.A.1.b. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1970 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9014Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09014.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08039MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08039MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Master Area Reference File (MARF)
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8039NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This file is an extract of Summary Tape File 1A from the
1980 Census. It contains numeric codes and names of geographic areas
plus selected complete-count population, provisional population counts
by race and Hispanic origin, the number of families, and the number
of persons in group quarters. Also included are the number of
one-person households, the total number of housing units, the number
of occupied housing units, and the number of owner-occupied housing
units. There are 51 files, one for each state and the District of
Columbia. The format for each of the files is identical. The number of
records varies by state.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08039.v1
census dataicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnic groupsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing unitsicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8039Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08039.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08258MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08258MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Master Area Reference File (MARF) 2
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8258NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
MARF is the 1980 Census counterpart of the Master
Enumeration District List (MEDList) prepared for the 1970 census. It
links state or state equivalent, county or county equivalent, minor
civil division (MCD)/census county division (CCD), and place names
with their respective geographic codes. It is also an abbreviated
summary file containing selected population and housing unit
counts. MARF 2 has the same geographic coverage as the first MARF and
includes the following additional information: FIPS place codes,
latitude and longitude coordinates for geographic areas down to the
BG/ED level, land area in square miles for geographic areas down to
the level of places or minor civil divisions (for 11 selected states)
with a population of 2,500 or more, total population and housing count
estimates based on sample returns, and per capital income for all
geographic areas included in the file. There are 51 files, one for
each state and the District of Columbia.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08258.v1
census dataicpsrcountiesicpsrFIPS codesicpsrhousingicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8258Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08258.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08405MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08405MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Master Area Reference File (MARF) 3
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8405NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Master Area Reference Files (MARFs) link geographic areas
with their respective numeric codes. This data collection is a school
district equivalency file created for the 1980 Census of Population
and Housing. The data contain geographic items from Summary Tape Files
1A and 3A as well as total population and housing unit counts. In
addition to providing the standard MARF geographic data, the
collection associates school district identification numbers with the
lowest available levels of census geography. Flags are provided where
a geographic area is split between districts. The data are contained
in 51 hierarchical files, one for each state and for the District of
Columbia.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08405.v1
census dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulationicpsrschool districtsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8405Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08405.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07854MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07854MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] P.L. 94-171 Population Counts
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7854NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data files provide population counts for racial
and ethnic groups living in all the jurisdictions of the states in
the United States in 1980. These data were produced as part of the
Census Bureau's commitment under Public Law 94-171 to aid states'
legislatures in the redistricting process. Public Law 171 of the
94th Congress was passed in 1975 to help facilitate the
one-man-one-vote concept enunciated in 1963. It specifies
procedures for conducting the decennial census for those states
wishing to participate and makes improvements for reporting
the findings as well. As a result of this law, the Census Bureau
was authorized to prepare for each state a data file that contains
population counts for racial and ethnic groups living in all the
jurisdictions of the state. Each of these files contains summary
statistics for seven population groups/types: Whites, Blacks,
American Indians, Eskimos and Aleuts, Asians and Pacific Islanders,
Spanish-Hispanics, total population, and population of other races.
Each record in each of the files is a type of census reporting area
arranged in hierarchical order. There are 51 data files, one for each
of the states plus one for Washington, DC. Each of the files has the
same format of 156-character logical records with characters 1-100
containing identification data and the alphabetic name of the record
and characters 101-156 containing the data for the seven population
groups/types. Data are provided for states or state equivalent,
counties or county equivalent, minor civil divisions (MCDs) or census
county divisions (CCDs), incorporated places, election precincts or
their equivalent (if any), census tracts or block numbering areas (BNAs)
(if any), and block groups and blocks in blocked areas, or enumeration
districts in nonblock-numbered areas. The Census Bureau has produced a
file, User Note No.#2 (Part 90), to accompany the PL94-171 series that
documents a problem encountered in all but nine states in the series.
The nine states NOT affected are Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
The file contains a list of places split across counties or MCD/CCDs
that have two partial records but do not have a "part" indicator on
either record. Because of the omission of this part indicator, it is
not possible to connect the two parts of the same record (place) for
analysis purposes without the User Note No.#2 that allows researchers
to identify these places and use the data for them more easily. There
are 5,971 records (split places) in the file, each with a logical record
length of 48.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07854.v1
census dataicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhousingicpsrlegislative districtsicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrminority affairsicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrstates (USA)icpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7854Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07854.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08170MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08170MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (B Sample): 1-Percent Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8170NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) contain person- and
household-level information from the "long-form" questionnaires
distributed to a sample of the population enumerated in the 1980
Census. The B Sample containing 1-percent data, consists of a file for
each state and an additional file for households and persons residing
in metropolitan areas that are too small to be separately identified
and/or that cross state boundaries. The B Sample defines Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs) and county groups differently
than in the A Sample [CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 [UNITED
STATES]: PUBLIC USE MICRODATA SAMPLE (A SAMPLE): 5-PERCENT SAMPLE
(ICPSR 8101)]. Most states cannot be identified in their entirety.
Household-level variables include housing tenure, year structure was
built, number and types of rooms in dwelling, plumbing facilities,
heating equipment, taxes and mortgage costs, number of children, and
household and family income. The person record, in addition to
containing demographic items such as sex, age, marital status, race,
Spanish origin, income, occupation, transportation to work, and
education.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08170.v1
census dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing unitsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8170Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08170.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08114MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08114MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (C Sample): 1-Percent Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8114NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) contain person- and
household-level information from the "long-form" questionnaires
distributed to a sample of the population enumerated in the 1980
Census. The C Sample, containing 1 percent data, identifies census
regions, divisions, 27 individual states, and the District of Columbia.
Four types of areas are shown: inside central cities, urban fringe,
other urban, and rural. The C Sample separately identifies every
urbanized area with a total population over 800,000, and roughly half
of the urbanized areas between 200,000 and 800,000. Household-level
variables include housing tenure, year structure was built, number and
types of rooms in dwelling, plumbing facilities, heating equipment,
taxes and mortgage costs, number of children, and household and family
income. Person-level variables include sex, age, marital status, race,
Spanish origin, income, occupation, transportation to work, and
education.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08114.v1
census dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing unitsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8114Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08114.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08101MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08101MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (A Sample): 5-Percent Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8101NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) contain person- and
household-level information from the "long-form" questionnaires
distributed to a sample of the population enumerated in the 1980
Census. This data collection, containing 5-percent data, identifies
every state, county groups, and most individual counties with 100,000
or more inhabitants (350 in all). In many cases, individual cities or
groups of places with 100,000 or more inhabitants are also identified.
Household-level variables include housing tenure, year structure was
built, number and types of rooms in dwelling, plumbing facilities,
heating equipment, taxes and mortgage costs, number of children, and
household and family income. The person record contains demographic
items such as sex, age, marital status, race, Spanish origin, income,
occupation, transportation to work, and education.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08101.v2
census dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing unitsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8101Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08101.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07941MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07941MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 1A
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2002-09-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7941NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File (STF) 1 consists of four sets of
computer-readable data files containing detailed tabulations of the
nation's population and housing characteristics produced from the 1980
Census. This series is comprised of STF 1A, STF 1B, STF 1C, and STF
1D. All files in the STF 1 series are identical, containing 321
substantive data variables organized in the form of 59 "tables," as
well as standard geographic identification variables. All of the data
items contained in the STF 1 files were tabulated from the "complete
count" or "100-percent" questions included on the 1980 Census
questionnaire. All four groups of files within the STF 1 series have
identical record formats and technical characteristics and differ only
in the types of geographical areas for which the summarized data items
are presented. STF 1A provides summaries for state or state equivalent,
county or county equivalent, minor civil division/census
county division (MCD/CCD), place or place segment within MCD/CCD or
remainder of MCD/CCD, census tract or block numbering area (BNA) or
untracted segment within place, place segment or remainder or MCD/CCD,
and block group (BG) or BG segment or enumeration district (ED). This
file contains 57 data files, one for each state, the District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico, and the United States possessions, which include American
Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust Territory of the
Pacific Islands, and the Virgin Islands. The information on the United
States possessions is similar but not identical to the other data and
is documented in a separate codebook. Puerto Rico is also documented
by a separate codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07941.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulationicpsrcensus dataicpsrcountiesicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7941Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07941.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07975MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07975MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 1B
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2012-01-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7975NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File (STF) 1 consists of four sets of
computer-readable data files containing detailed tabulations of the
nation's population and housing characteristics produced from the 1980
Census. This series is comprised of STF 1A, STF 1B, STF 1C, and STF
1D. All files in the STF 1 series are identical, containing 321
substantive data variables organized in the form of 59 "tables," as
well as standard geographic identification variables. All of the data
items contained in the STF 1 files were tabulated from the "complete
count" or "100-percent" questions included on the 1980 Census
questionnaire. All four groups of files within the STF 1 series have
identical record formats and technical characteristics and differ only
in the types of geographical areas for which the summarized data items
are presented. STF 1B contains summaries for states, standard metropolitan statistical areas (portions within states), counties, minor civil divisions (available for 20 states), places, census tracts or block numbering areas, and blocks or enumeration districts. There are
52 data files, one for each state, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico. Housing items tabulated include occupancy/vacancy status,
tenure, contract rent, value, condominium status, number of rooms, and
plumbing facilities. Population items include demographic information
such as age, sex, race, marital status, Spanish origin, household
relationship, and household type. Selected aggregates, means, and
medians are also provided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07975.v1
census county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus regionsicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrconsolidated metropolitan statistical areasicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrurban areasicpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7975Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07975.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08091MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08091MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 1C
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2003-03-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8091NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File (STF) 1 consists of four sets of
computer-readable data files containing detailed tabulations of the
nation's population and housing characteristics produced from the 1980
Census. This series is comprised of STF 1A, STF 1B, STF 1C, and STF
1D. All files in the STF 1 series are identical, containing 321
substantive data variables organized in the form of 59 "tables," as
well as standard geographic identification variables. All of the data
items contained in the STF 1 files were tabulated from the "complete
count" or "100-percent" questions included on the 1980 Census
questionnaire. All four groups of files within the STF 1 series have
identical record formats and technical characteristics and differ only
in the types of geographical areas for which the summarized data items
are presented. STF 1C contains summaries for the United States as a
whole, regions, divisions, state or state equivalents, standard
consolidated statistical areas (SCSAs), standard metropolitan
statistical areas (SMSAs), urbanized areas, county or county
equivalents, places of 10,000 or more people, minor civil divisions of
10,000 or more, and congressional districts. The number of data
records in each file varies by state. Housing items tabulated include
occupancy/vacancy status, tenure, contract rent, value, condominium
status, number of rooms, and plumbing facilities. Population items
include demographic information such as age, sex, race, marital
status, Spanish origin, household relationship, and household
type.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08091.v1
census county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus regionsicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrconsolidated metropolitan statistical areasicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrurban areasicpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8091Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08091.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08093MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08093MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 1D
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2003-02-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8093NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File (STF) 1 consists of four sets of
computer-readable data files containing detailed tabulations of the
nation's population and housing characteristics produced from the 1980
Census. This series is comprised of STF 1A, STF 1B, STF 1C, and STF
1D. All files in the STF 1 series are identical, containing 321
substantive data variables organized in the form of 59 "tables," as
well as standard geographic identification variables. All of the data
items contained in the STF 1 files were tabulated from the "complete
count" or "100-percent" questions included on the 1980 Census
questionnaire. All four groups of files within the STF 1 series have
identical record formats and technical characteristics and differ only
in the types of geographical areas for which the summarized data items
are presented. STF 1D provides summaries for state or state
equivalent, congressional district (as constituted for the 98th
Congress), county or county equivalent, places of 10,000 or more
people, and minor civil divisions (MCD) or census county divisions
(CCD). Housing items tabulated include occupancy/vacancy status,
tenure, contract rent, value, condominium status, number of rooms, and
plumbing facilities. Population items include demographic information
such as age, sex, race, marital status, Spanish origin, household
relationship, and household type. Selected aggregates, means, and
medians are also provided. See the related collection, CENSUS OF
POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 [UNITED STATES]: SUMMARY TAPE FILE 1H
(ICPSR 8401).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08093.v1
census county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus regionsicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrconsolidated metropolitan statistical areasicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrurban areasicpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8093Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08093.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08401MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1986 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08401MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 1H
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1986ICPSR8401NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
A supplement to Summary Tape File 1D (ICPSR 8093), this
collection contains data for the ten states that were redistricted for
the 99th Congress. The congressional districts are those in effect for
the November 1984 election to the United States House of
Representatives. Complete-count data from the 1980 census are included.
Demographic data such as age, race, sex, marital status, Spanish
origin, and household type are provided, along with such housing
information as occupancy status, property value, rent, number of rooms,
and plumbing facilities. Selected aggregates, means, and medians are
also given.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08401.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrMetropolitan Statistical Areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8401Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08401.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08036MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08036MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 2A
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8036NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File 2 (STF 2) files contain detailed
complete-count tabulations for all persons and housing units in the
United States. The STF 2A files contain summaries for standard
metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs) and for these components:
counties or county equivalents, places of 10,000 or more inhabitants,
census tracts, and totals for census tracts split by county
components. A summary is also provided for the tracted area outside of
SMSAs within each state. The data are presented in two types of
records, each containing different tables. The first, record A, is
presented once for each geographic area and summarizes total
population and all housing units. The second, record B, is presented
for the total population in each area and repeated for each race and
Hispanic group in the area that meets nonsuppression criteria. Record
B is presented for a maximum of six racial/Hispanic groups. If too few
persons or housing units fall into an ethnic category in a census
area, the data for that category are suppressed. There are 51 files,
one for each state and the District of Columbia.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08036.v1
census county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnic groupsicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing unitsicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8036Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08036.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08037MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08037MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 2B
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8037NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File 2 (STF 2) files contain detailed
complete-count tabulations for all persons and housing units in the
United States. The STF 2B files provide summaries for states or state
equivalents, state components, standard consolidated statistical areas
(SCSAs) and the urban and rural portions of the SCSAs, standard
metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs) and the urban and rural
portions of the SMSAs, urbanized areas, counties or county equivalents
and the rural portion of the counties, minor civil divisions or Census
county divisions, places of 1,000 people or more and the urban
portions of any places that have been split into urban and rural
components, American Indian reservations and their county portions,
and Alaska Native villages. Population (or demographic) and housing
items are contained in each type of file. The data are presented in
two types of records. The first, record A, is presented once for each
geographic area and summarizes total population and all housing
units. The second, record B, is presented for the total population in
each area and repeated for each race and Hispanic group in the area
that meets nonsuppression criteria. Record B is presented for a
maximum of 26 racial/Hispanic groups. If too few persons or housing
units fall into an ethnic category in a census area, the data for that
category are suppressed. There are 51 data files, one file for each
state and the District of Columbia.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08037.v1
census dataicpsrcensus divisionsicpsrcensus regionsicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8037Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08037.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08071MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08071MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 3A
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-01-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8071NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is a component of Summary Tape File 3,
which consists of four sets of data containing detailed tabulations
of the nation's population and housing characteristics produced from
the 1980 Census. The STF 3 files contain sample data inflated to
represent the total United States population. The files also contain
100-percent counts and unweighted sample counts of persons and
housing units. All files in the STF 3 series are identical,
containing 321 substantive data variables organized in the form of
150 "tables," as well as standard geographic identification
variables. Population items tabulated for each person include
demographic data and information on schooling, ethnicity, labor force
status, and children, as well as details on occupation and income.
Housing items include size and condition of the housing unit as well
as information on value, age, water, sewage and heating, vehicles,
and monthly owner costs. Each dataset provides different geographic
coverage. STF 3A provides summaries for the states or state
equivalents, counties or county equivalents, minor civil divisions
(MCDs) or census county divisions (CCDs), places or place segments
within MCD/CCDs and remainders of MCD/CCDs, census tracts or block
numbering areas and block groups or, for areas that are not block
numbered, enumeration districts, places, and congressional districts.
There are 52 files, one for each state, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico. The information in the file for Puerto Rico is similar
to but not identical to the data for the 50 states and the District
of Columbia. Thus, this file is documented in a separate codebook.
The Census Bureau's machine-readable data dictionary for STF 3 is
also available through CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 [UNITED
STATES]: CENSUS SOFTWARE PACKAGE (CENSPAC) VERSION 3.2 WITH STF4 DATA
DICTIONARIES (ICPSR 7789), the software package designed specifically
by the Census Bureau for use with the 1980 Census data files.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08071.v1
automobilesicpsrchildrenicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrlabor forceicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrworkicpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8071Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08071.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08318MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08318MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 3B
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census.
2008-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8318NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is a component of Summary Tape File
(STF) 3, which consists of four sets of data files containing
detailed tabulations of the nation's population and housing
characteristics produced from the 1980 Census. The STF 3 files
contain sample data inflated to represent the total United States
population. The files also contain 100-percent counts and unweighted
sample counts of persons and housing units. All files in the STF 3
series are identical, containing 321 substantive data variables
organized in the form of 150 "tables," as well as standard geographic
identification variables. Population items tabulated for each person
include demographic data and information on schooling, Spanish
origin, language spoken at home and ability to speak English, labor
force status in 1979, residency in 1975, number of children ever
born, means of transportation to work, current occupation, industry,
and 1979 details on occupation, hours worked, and income. Housing
items include size and condition of the housing unit as well as
information on value, age, water, sewage and heating, number of
vehicles, and monthly owner costs (e.g., sum of payments for real
estate taxes, property insurance, utilities, and regular mortgage
payments). Selected aggregates and medians are also provided. Each
dataset in STF 3 provides different geographic coverage. Summary Tape
File 3B provides summaries for each 5-digit ZIP-code area within a
state, and for 5-digit ZIP-code areas within states that were
contained within Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs),
portions of SMSAs, or within counties, county portions, or county
equivalents. All persons and housing units in the United States were
sampled. Population and housing items include household relationship,
sex, race, age, marital status, Hispanic origin, number of units at
address, complete plumbing facilities, number of rooms, whether owned
or rented, vacancy status, and value for noncondominiums. The Census
Bureau's machine-readable data dictionary for STF 3 is also available
through CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 [UNITED STATES]:
CENSUS SOFTWARE PACKAGE (CENSPAC) VERSION 3.2 WITH STF4 DATA
DICTIONARIES (ICPSR 7789), the software package designed specifically
by the Census Bureau for use with the 1980 Census data files.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08318.v1
population migrationicpsrproperty valuesicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrstates (USA)icpsrtransportationicpsrworking hoursicpsrzip code areasicpsrautomobile ownershipicpsrcensus dataicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrlanguageicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8318Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08318.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08038MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08038MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 3C
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2007-12-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8038NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is a component of Summary Tape File
(STF) 3, which consists of four sets of data containing detailed
tabulations of the nation's population and housing characteristics
produced from the 1980 Census. The STF 3 files contain sample data
inflated to represent the total United States population. The files
also contain 100-percent counts and unweighted sample counts of
persons and housing units. All files in the STF 3 series are
identical, containing 321 substantive data variables organized in the
form of 150 "tables," as well as standard geographic identification
variables. Population items tabulated for each person include
demographic data and information on schooling, ethnicity, labor force
status, and children, as well as details on occupation and income.
Housing items include size and condition of the housing unit as well
as information on value, age, water, sewage and heating, vehicles,
and monthly owner costs. Each dataset provides different geographic
coverage. STF 3C consists of one nationwide data file containing
information about all states. It contains summaries for the United
States, census regions, census divisions, states, standard
consolidated statistical areas (SCSAs), standard metropolitan
statistical areas (SMSAs), urbanized areas, counties, places of
10,000 or more, congressional districts, and minor civil divisions
(MCDs) of 10,000 or more in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin. The Census Bureau's machine-readable
data dictionary for STF 3 is also available through CENSUS OF
POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 [UNITED STATES]: CENSUS SOFTWARE PACKAGE
(CENSPAC) VERSION 3.2 WITH STF4 DATA DICTIONARIES (ICPSR 7789), the
software package designed specifically by the Census Bureau for use
with the 1980 Census data files.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08038.v1
household compositionicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrnative languageicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrproperty valuesicpsrstates (USA)icpsrtransportationicpsrurban areasicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus regionsicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrconsolidated metropolitan statistical areasicpsrcountiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamily historyicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8038Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08038.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08157MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08157MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 3D
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-02-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8157NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is a component of Summary Tape File
(STF) 3, which consists of four sets of computer-readable data file
containing detailed tabulations of the nation's population and
housing characteristics produced from the 1980 Census. The STF 3
files contain sample data inflated to represent the total United
States population. The files also contain 100-percent counts and
unweighted sample counts of persons and housing units. All files in
the STF 3 series are identical, containing 321 substantive data
variables organized in the form of 150 "tables," as well as standard
geographic identification variables. Population items tabulated for
each person include demographic data and information on schooling,
ethnicity, labor force status, and number of children, as well as
details on occupation and income. Housing items include size and
condition of the housing unit as well as information on value, age,
water, sewage and heating, vehicles, and monthly owner costs. Each
dataset provides different geographic coverage. STF 3D provides
summaries for state or state equivalent, congressional district (as
constituted for the 98th Congress), county or county equivalent,
places of 10,000 or more people, and minor civil division/census
county division. There are 51 separate files, one for each state and
the District of Columbia. The Census Bureau's machine-readable data
dictionary for STF 3 is also available through CENSUS OF POPULATION
AND HOUSING, 1980 [UNITED STATES]: CENSUS SOFTWARE PACKAGE (CENSPAC)
VERSION 3.2 WITH STF4 DATA DICTIONARIES (ICPSR 7789), the software
package designed specifically by the Census Bureau for use with the
1980 Census data files.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08157.v1
automobile expensesicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus regionsicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamily historyicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrnative languageicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrproperty valuesicpsrreal estateicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8157Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08157.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08402MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1986 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08402MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 3H
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-01-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1986ICPSR8402NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This supplement to Summary Tape File 3D (ICPSR 8157)
contains census data for the ten states that were redistricted for
the 99th Congress. Complete-count data are included for demographic
data such as age, race, sex, marital status, and Spanish origin, and
for housing information such as occupancy status, property value,
rent, number of rooms, and plumbing facilities. Sample data inflated
to represent the total population are provided for other topics:
education, language, ancestry, employment, transportation, and
income, plus detailed information on housing characteristics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08402.v1
congressional districtsicpsrcountiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamily historyicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrnative languageicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus regionsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrproperty valuesicpsrreal estateicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8402Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08402.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08282MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 4A
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2002-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains tables from the 1980 Census
of Population and Housing, which were tabulated for Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs), tracted portions of states
outside SMSAs, and the following SMSA components: counties, places
with 10,000 or more inhabitants, and census tracts. The tables
primarily contain sample data inflated to represent the total
population, plus 100-percent counts and unweighted sample counts of
persons and housing units. Tabulated population items include
household relationship, sex, race, age, marital status, Spanish
origin, education, nativity, citizenship, language spoken at home,
ancestry, children, place of residence in 1975, veteran status, work
disability status, labor force status, travel time to work, means of
transportation to work, industry, occupation, class of worker, income,
and poverty status. Tables of housing variables cover number of units
at address, presence of complete plumbing facilities, number of rooms,
tenure (whether owned or rented), vacancy status, housing unit value,
contract rent, units in structure, stories in structure and presence
of a passenger elevator, year structure was built, year householder
moved into unit, acreage, source of water, sewage disposal, heating
equipment, house heating fuel, water heating fuel, cooking fuel,
kitchen facilities, number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms, telephone
in housing unit, air conditioning, number of automobiles, vans, and
light trucks, and selected monthly owner costs (real estate taxes,
property insurance, utilities, and mortgage payments). Two series of
population and housing tables, A and B, are shown for each geographic
unit. The A tables are tabulated once for the total population, while
the B tables are repeated for the total population and up to six
different race and Spanish origin groups: (1) white, (2) Black, (3)
American Indian, Eskimo and Aleut, (4) Asian and Pacific Islander, (5)
other race, and (6) Spanish origin. The data for each state are
contained in a separate file. Altogether, 34 states and the District
of Columbia are represented in the collection.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08282.v4
African Americansicpsrautomobile ownershipicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrproperty valuesicpsrraceicpsrreal estateicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08282.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08229MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08229MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 4B Extract
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8229NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File 4 consists of three sets of
computer-readable data files containing highly detailed tabulations of
the nation's population and housing characteristics produced from the
1980 Census. The files contain sample data inflated to represent the
total United States population. The files also contain 100-percent
counts and unweighted sample counts of persons and housing units. This
series is comprised of STF 4A, STF 4B, and STF 4C. All three series
have identical tables and format. Population items tabulated for each
area include demographic data and information on schooling, ethnicity,
labor force status, children, and details about occupation and
income. Housing items include data on size and condition of the
housing unit as well as information on value, age, water, sewage and
heating, vehicles, and monthly owner costs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08229.v2
African Americansicpsrautomobilesicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrchildrenicpsrconsolidated metropolitan statistical areasicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrproperty valuesicpsrreal estateicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8229Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08229.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09929MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09929MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1990 [United States]
[electronic resource] Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) File
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9929NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This file, the 1990 counterpart to the CENSUS OF POPULATION,
1980 [UNITED STATES]: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY SPECIAL FILE (ICPSR
9026), is based on civilian labor force data from the 1990 Decennial
Census and provides occupational and educational attainment data to
support affirmative action planning for equal employment opportunity.
The file consists of two sets of crosstabulations for the United States
civilian labor force. The first set of tables provides data for 512
occupational categories by sex, race, and Hispanic origin. The second
set presents educational attainment data for seven age groups by sex,
race, and Hispanic origin. Both sets of tables are summarized
geographically for the United States, all states and the District of
Columbia, all counties and statistically equivalent entities, all
Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical
Areas, and Primary Metropolitan Statistical Areas, all places with
populations of 50,000 or more, and all minor civil divisions with
populations of 50,000 or more in 12 states.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09929.v1
Equal Employment OpportunityicpsrethnicityicpsrgendericpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrlabor forceicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrstates (USA)icpsrAffirmative Actionicpsrcensus dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducational backgroundicpsremploymenticpsrICPSR I.A.1.d. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1990 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9929Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09929.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09782MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09782MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1990 [United States]
[electronic resource] Summary Tape File 3A
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9782NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File 3A contains sample data weighted to
represent the total population. The collection also contains
100-percent counts and unweighted sample counts for total persons and
total housing units. Additional population and housing variables
include age, ancestry, disability, citizenship, education, income,
marital status, race, sex, travel time to work, rent, tenure, value of
housing unit, number of vehicles, and monthly owner costs. The data
for the states include 178 population tables and 99 housing
tables. The information for Puerto Rico includes 149 population tables
and 101 housing tables. Data are provided for states and Puerto Rico
and their subareas in hierarchical sequence down to the block group
level.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09782.v1
automobile expensesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdisabilitiesicpsreducationicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily historyicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrmarital statusicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.d. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1990 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9782Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09782.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06012MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06012MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 1990 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary Tape File 3D
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR6012NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Summary Tape File 3D provides data by state for the
congressional districts of the 103rd Congress. The collection contains
sample data weighted to represent the total population and also
contains 100-percent counts and unweighted sample counts for total
persons and total housing units. Additional population and housing
variables include age, ancestry, disability, citizenship, education,
income, marital status, race, sex, travel time to work, rent, tenure,
value of housing unit, number of vehicles, and monthly owner costs. The
collection provides 178 population tables and 99 housing tables. The
geographical hierarchy includes the following levels: state,
congressional district, county (or part), county subdivision with
10,000 or more persons (or part) for 12 states, place with 10,000 or
more persons (or part), consolidated city with 10,000 or more persons
(or part), American Indian reservation/Alaska Native area (or part),
and Alaska Native Regional Corporation (or part).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06012.v1
automobile expensesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdisabilitiesicpsreducationicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily historyicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrlegislative districtsicpsrmarital statusicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.d. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1990 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6012Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06012.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13571MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13571MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]108th Congressional District Summary File, 100-percent
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-01-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR13571NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information compiled from
the questions asked of all people and every housing unit enumerated in
Census 2000. The questions cover sex, age, race, Hispanic or Latino
origin, type of living quarters (household/group quarters), household
relationship, housing unit vacancy status, and housing unit tenure
(owner/renter). With subject content identical to that provided in
Summary File 1, the information is presented in 286 tables that are
tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the data. There is
one variable per table cell, plus additional variables with geographic
information. The data cover 15 geographic levels of observation (known
as "summary levels" in the Census Bureau's nomenclature) based on the
108th Congressional Districts, e.g., the 108th Congressional Districts
themselves, Census tracts within the 108th Congressional Districts,
and county subdivisions within the 108th Congressional Districts.
There are 40 data files for each state, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico.
The collection is supplied in 54 ZIP archives.
There is a separate ZIP file for each state, the District of Columbia,
and Puerto Rico, and, for the convenience of those who need all of the
data, a separate ZIP archive with all 2,080 data files. The codebook
and other documentation are located in the last ZIP archive.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13571.v1
census dataicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrNative AmericansicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13571Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13571.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21742MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21742MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]108th Congressional District Summary File, Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-02-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21742NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information compiled from
the questions asked of a sample of persons and housing units
enumerated in Census 2000. Population items include sex, age, race,
Hispanic or Latino origin, type of living quarters (household/group
quarters), urban/rural status, household relationship, marital status,
grandparents as caregivers, language and ability to speak English,
ancestry, place of birth, citizenship status and year of entry into
the United States, migration, place of work, journey to work
(commuting), school enrollment and educational attainment, veteran
status, disability, employment status, occupation and industry, class
of worker, income, and poverty status. Housing items include vacancy
status, tenure (owner/renter), number of rooms, number of bedrooms,
year moved into unit, household size, occupants per room, number of
units in structure, year structure was built, heating fuel, telephone
service, plumbing and kitchen facilities, vehicles available, value of
home, and monthly rent. With subject content identical to that
provided in Summary File 3, the information is presented in 813 tables
that are tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the
data. There is one variable per table cell, plus additional variables
with geographic information. The data cover more than a dozen
geographic levels of observation (known as "summary levels" in the
Census Bureau's nomenclature) based on the 108th Congressional
Districts, e.g., the 108th Congressional Districts, themselves, Census
tracts within the 108th Congressional Districts, and county
subdivisions within the 108th Congressional Districts. There are 77
data files for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto
Rico.
The collection is supplied in 54 ZIP archives. There is a
separate ZIP file for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto
Rico, and for the convenience of those who need all of the data, a
separate ZIP archive with all 4,004 data files. The codebook and other
documentation are located in the last ZIP archive.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21742.v1
census dataicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrNative AmericansicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21742Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21742.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21760MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21760MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]109th Congressional District Summary File, 100-percent
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-02-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21760NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information compiled from
the questions asked of all people and every housing unit enumerated in
Census 2000. The questions cover sex, age, race, Hispanic or Latino
origin, type of living quarters (household/group quarters), household
relationship, housing unit vacancy status, and housing unit tenure
(owner/renter). With subject content identical to that provided in
Summary File 1, the information is presented in 286 tables that are
tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the data. There is
one variable per table cell, plus additional variables with geographic
information. The data cover more than a dozen geographic levels of
observation (known as "summary levels" in the Census Bureau's
nomenclature) based on the 109th Congressional Districts, e.g., the
109th Congressional Districts themselves, Census tracts within the
109th Congressional Districts, and county subdivisions within the
109th Congressional Districts. There are 40 data files for each state,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
The collection is
supplied in 54 ZIP archives. There is a separate ZIP file for each
state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, and, for the
convenience of those who need all of the data, a separate ZIP archive
with all 2,080 data files. The codebook and other documentation
constitute the last ZIP archive.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21760.v1
census dataicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrNative AmericansicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21760Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21760.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21761MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21761MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]109th Congressional District Summary File, Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-02-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21761NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information compiled from
the questions asked of a sample of persons and housing units
enumerated in Census 2000. Population items include sex, age, race,
Hispanic or Latino origin, type of living quarters (household/group
quarters), urban/rural status, household relationship, marital status,
grandparents as caregivers, language and ability to speak English,
ancestry, place of birth, citizenship status and year of entry into
the United States, migration, place of work, journey to work
(commuting), school enrollment and educational attainment, veteran
status, disability, employment status, occupation and industry, class
of worker, income, and poverty status. Housing items include vacancy
status, tenure (owner/renter), number of rooms, number of bedrooms,
year moved into unit, household size, occupants per room, number of
units in structure, year structure was built, heating fuel, telephone
service, plumbing and kitchen facilities, vehicles available, value of
home, and monthly rent. With subject content identical to that
provided in Summary File 3, the information is presented in 813 tables
that are tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the
data. There is one variable per table cell, plus additional variables
with geographic information. The data cover more than a dozen
geographic levels of observation (known as "summary levels" in the
Census Bureau's nomenclature) based on the 109th Congressional
Districts, e.g., the 109th Congressional Districts, themselves, Census
tracts within the 109th Congressional Districts, and county
subdivisions within the 109th Congressional Districts. There are 77
data files for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto
Rico.
The collection is supplied in 54 ZIP archives. There is a separate
ZIP file for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico,
and for the convenience of those who need all of the data, a separate
ZIP archive with all 4,004 data files. The codebook and other
documentation are located in the last ZIP archive.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21761.v1
housing conditionsicpsrNative Americansicpsrpopulationicpsrcensus dataicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrraceicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21761Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21761.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21800MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21800MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]110th Congressional District Summary File, 100-percent
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-02-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21800NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information compiled from
the questions asked of all people and every housing unit enumerated in
Census 2000. The questions cover sex, age, race, Hispanic or Latino
origin, type of living quarters (household/group quarters), household
relationship, housing unit vacancy status, and housing unit tenure
(owner/renter). With subject content identical to that provided in
Summary File 1, the information is presented in 286 tables that are
tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the data. There is
one variable per table cell, plus additional variables with geographic
information. The data cover more than a dozen geographic levels of
observation (known as "summary levels" in the Census Bureau's
nomenclature) based on the 110th Congressional Districts, e.g., the
110th Congressional Districts themselves, census tracts within the
110th Congressional Districts, and county subdivisions within the
110th Congressional Districts. There are 40 data files for each state,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
The collection is supplied in 54 ZIP archives. There is a separate
ZIP file for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico,
and, for the convenience of those who need all of the data, a separate
ZIP archive with all 2,080 data files. The codebook and other
documentation constitute the last ZIP archive.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21800.v1
ethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrNative Americansicpsrpopulationicpsrcensus dataicpsrraceicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21800Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21800.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21803MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21803MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]110th Congressional District Summary File, Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-02-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21803NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information compiled from
the questions asked of a sample of persons and housing units
enumerated in Census 2000. Population items include sex, age, race,
Hispanic or Latino origin, type of living quarters (household/group
quarters), urban/rural status, household relationship, marital status,
grandparents as caregivers, language and ability to speak English,
ancestry, place of birth, citizenship status and year of entry into
the United States, migration, place of work, journey to work
(commuting), school enrollment and educational attainment, veteran
status, disability, employment status, occupation and industry, class
of worker, income, and poverty status. Housing items include vacancy
status, tenure (owner/renter), number of rooms, number of bedrooms,
year moved into unit, household size, occupants per room, number of
units in structure, year structure was built, heating fuel, telephone
service, plumbing and kitchen facilities, vehicles available, value of
home, and monthly rent. With subject content identical to that
provided in Summary File 3, the information is presented in 813 tables
that are tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the
data. There is one variable per table cell, plus additional variables
with geographic information. The data cover more than a dozen
geographic levels of observation (known as "summary levels" in the
Census Bureau's nomenclature) based on the 110th Congressional
Districts, e.g., the 110th Congressional Districts, themselves, Census
tracts within the 110th Congressional Districts, and county
subdivisions within the 110th Congressional Districts. There are 77
data files for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto
Rico.
The collection is supplied in 54 ZIP archives. There is a separate
ZIP file for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico,
and for the convenience of those who need all of the data, a separate
ZIP archive with all 4,004 data files. The codebook and other
documentation are located in the last ZIP archive.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21803.v1
census dataicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrNative AmericansicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21803Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21803.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04204MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04204MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]5-Percent Public Use Microdata Sample: Elderly Households Extract
National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging
2005-07-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4204NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This is a special extract of the 2000 Census 5-Percent
Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) created by the National Archive of
Computerized Data on Aging (NACDA). The file combines the individual
5-percent state files for all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico as released by the United States Census Bureau into a
single analysis file. The file contains information on all households
that contain at least one person aged 65 years or more in residence as
of the 2000 Census enumeration. The file contains individual records
on all persons aged 65 and older living in households as well as
individual records for all other members residing in each of these
households. Consequently, this file can be used to examine both the
characteristics of the elderly in the United States as well as the
characteristics of individuals who co-reside with persons aged 65 and
older as of the year 2000. All household variables from the
household-specific "Household record" of the 2000 PUMS are appended to
the end of each individual level record. This file is not a special
product of the Census Bureau and is not a resample of the PUMS data
specific to the elderly population. While it is comparable to the 1990
release CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1990: [UNITED STATES]:
PUBLIC USE MICRODATA SAMPLE: 3-PERCENT ELDERLY SAMPLE (ICPSR 6219),
the sampling procedures and weights for the 2000 file reflect the
methodology that applies to the 5-percent PUMS release CENSUS OF
POPULATION AND HOUSING, 2000 [UNITED STATES]: PUBLIC USE MICRODATA
SAMPLE: 5-PERCENT SAMPLE (ICPSR 13568). Person variables cover age,
sex, relationship to householder, educational attainment, school
enrollment, race, Hispanic origin, ancestry, language spoken at home,
citizenship, place of birth, year of immigration, place of residence
in 1985, marital status, number of children ever born, military
service, mobility and personal care limitation, work limitation
status, employment status, occupation, industry, class of worker,
hours worked last week, weeks worked in 1989, usual hours worked per
week, temporary absence from work, place of work, time of departure
for work, travel time to work, means of transportation to work, total
earnings, total income, wages and salary income, farm and nonfarm
self-employment income, Social Security income, public assistance
income, retirement income, and rent, dividends, and net rental
income. Housing variables include area type, state and area of
residence, farm/nonfarm status, type of structure, year structure was
built, vacancy and boarded-up status, number of rooms and bedrooms,
presence or absence of a telephone, presence or absence of complete
kitchen and plumbing facilities, type of sewage facilities, type of
water source, type of heating fuel used, property value, tenure, year
moved into house/apartment, type of household/family, type of group
quarters, household language, number of persons in the household,
number of persons and workers in the family, status of mortgage,
second mortgage, and home equity loan, number of vehicles available,
household income, sales of agricultural products, payments for rent,
mortgage and property tax, condominium fees, mobile home costs, and
cost of electricity, water, heating fuel, and flood/fire/hazard
insurance.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04204.v2
ageicpsrcensus dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsroccupationsicpsrolder adultsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrunemploymenticpsrwages and salariesicpsrworking hoursicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsNational Archive of Computerized Data on AgingInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4204Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04204.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13287MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13287MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]Census Tract Relationship Files (CTRF)
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR13287NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Part of the Census 2000 geographic product series, Census
Tract Relationship Files (CTRF) show how 1990 census tracts relate to
2000 census tracts. The files consist of one record for each 1990
census tract/2000 census tract spatial set. A spatial census tract set
is defined as the area that is uniquely shared between a 1990 census
tract and a 2000 census tract. The CTRF consist of sets of four files
for each of the United States and territories. The purpose of these
files is to assist users in determining the relationships between 1990
and 2000 census tracts. Two of these files are state-level
entity-based census tract relationship files, one providing a
measurement of change based on population, the second measures change
using street-side mileage. The other two files specifically list
census tracts that have experienced significant change (2.5 percent or
greater): one from the perspective of 1990 census tracts, the other
from the perspective of Census 2000. A set of files for the United
States as a whole is also provided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13287.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrhousingicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation trendsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13287Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13287.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13569MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13569MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]County-to-County Migration Flow Files
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2007-03-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR13569NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These migration data come from the Census 2000 long-form
questions about residence in 1995 and provide the number of people who
moved between counties. There are two files, one for inflows from
every county in the United States and another re-sorted by outflows to
every county. Each file contains data for all 50 states and the
District of Columbia, sorted by FIPS state and county codes.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13569.v1
census dataicpsrplace of residenceicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13569Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13569.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13405MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13405MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource] County-to-County Worker Flow Files
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR13405NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These files were compiled from Census 2000 responses to the
long-form (sample) questions about where people worked. The files
present data at the county level for residents of the 50 states and
the District of Columbia. The residence file shows the number of
people who live in a county and the work destinations for the people
who live in each county. The work file shows the origins of the people
who work in each county.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13405.v1
populationicpsrworkersicpsrcensus dataicpsremploymenticpsrworkplacesicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13405Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13405.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13286MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13286MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]Demographic Profile: 100-percent and Sample Data
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-05-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR13286NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains four tables derived from the
Census 2000 100-percent and sample data:
Table DP-1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics
Table DP-2. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics
Table DP-3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics
Table DP-4. Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics
The 100-percent data were obtained from the questions asked of
every person and housing unit enumerated in Census 2000, while the
sample data were taken from the questions asked of a sample of persons
and housing units. Tabulated from the 100- percent data, Table DP-1
shows population counts by sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, and
relationship to householder, plus the group-quarters population,
households by type, housing occupancy and tenure, and average
household size. Tables P-2, DP-3, and DP-4 were derived from the
sample data. Table DP-2 covers school enrollment, educational
attainment, marital status, grandparents as caregivers, veteran
status, disability status, residence in 1995, nativity and place of
birth, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Next, Table DP-3 covers
employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of
worker, and income and poverty status in 1999. The last table, DP-4,
shows the number of housing units by type of structure and number of
rooms in unit, year structure was built, year householder moved into
unit, number of vehicles available, type of house heating fuel,
occupants per room, value of owner-occupied units, gross rent, and
mortgage status and selected monthly owner costs, as well as the
number of homes without complete plumbing facilities, complete kitchen
facilities, or telephone service.
Supplied in a national file and separate state files including the
District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, the data cover more than a dozen
geographic levels of observation known as "summary levels" in the
Census Bureau's nomenclature. The national file comprises eight
summary levels: United States, regions, divisions, Metropolitan
Statistical Areas/Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Primary
Metropolitan Statistical Areas, American Indian Areas/Alaska Native
Areas/Hawaiian Home Lands, states, and the 106th Congressional
Districts. Ten summary levels are reported in the state files: state,
counties, county subdivisions, places, consolidated cities,
Metropolitan Statistical Areas/Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical
Areas, Primary Metropolitan Statistical Areas, American Indian
Areas/Alaska Native Areas/Hawaiian Home Lands, Alaska Native Regional
Corporations, and the 106th Congressional Districts.
The data are provided in 53 ZIP archives: one for each state and
one with the national file. Each of these archives comprises four
comma-delimited ASCII data files (one per table) and a ZIP archive
with the tables in PDF format. The embedded ZIP archive contains a
separate PDF file for each iteration of every summary level, an HTML
file with an index and links to the PDF files, and a folder with
Graphic Interchange Format (GIF) image files which are used by the
HTML document.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13286.v1
educationicpsrgendericpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousingicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrpovertyicpsrraceicpsrageicpsrcensus dataicpsrdisabled personsicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13286Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13286.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13572MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13572MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource] Minor Civil Division/County-to-Minor Civil Division/County Worker Flow Files
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR13572NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These files were compiled from Census 2000 responses to the
long-form (sample) questions about where people worked. The files
present data at the county subdivision or minor civil division (MCD)
level for residents of 12 states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin. The MCDs in these states serve as
general-purpose local governments and perfrom many governmental
functions. For the other 38 states and the District of Columbia data are
presented at the county level. Data are also provided for Puerto Rico,
where the county equivalent is the municipio.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13572.v1
census dataicpsremploymenticpsrpopulationicpsrworkersicpsrworkplacesicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13572Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13572.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03192MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03192MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource] Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3192NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics data
are released as individual files for each of the 50 states, the
District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, as well as for
all 50 states combined (Part 61) and for the entire United States
(Part 60). The files contain the 100-percent data, which is the
information compiled from questions asked of all people and about
every housing unit. The population items include sex, age, race,
Hispanic or Latino, household relationship, household type, group
quarters population, housing occupancy, and housing tenure. The
profiles include a total of 71 population and 25 housing data items.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03192.v1
census dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrgroup homesicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3192Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03192.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13400MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13400MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource] Public Law (P.L.) 94-171 Adjusted Data
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2013-05-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR13400NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The numbers contained in this study are released pursuant
to the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit in Carter v. Department of Commerce, 307 F.3d 1084. These
numbers are not official Census 2000 counts. These numbers are
estimates of the population based on a statistical adjustment method,
utilizing sampling and modeling, applied to the official Census 2000
figures. The estimates utilized the results of the Accuracy and
Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.), a sample survey intended to measure net
over- and undercounts in the census results. The Census Bureau has
determined that the A.C.E. estimates dramatically overstate the level
of undercoverage in Census 2000, and that the adjusted Census 2000
data are, therefore, not more accurate than the unadjusted data. On
March 6, 2001, the Secretary of Commerce decided that unadjusted data
from Census 2000 should be used to tabulate population counts reported
to states and localities pursuant to 13 U.S.C. 141(c) (see 66 FR
14520, March 13, 2001). The Secretary's decision endorsed the
unanimous recommendation of the Executive Steering Committee for
A.C.E. Policy (ESCAP), a group of 12 senior career professionals
within the Census Bureau. The ESCAP, in its recommendation against the
use of the statistically adjusted estimates, had noted serious
reservations regarding their accuracy. In order to inform the Census
Bureau's planned October 2001 decision regarding the potential use of
the adjusted estimates for non-redistricting purposes, the agency
conducted extensive analyses throughout the summer of 2001. These
extensive analyses confirmed the serious concerns the agency had noted
earlier regarding the accuracy of the A.C.E. estimates. Specifically,
the adjusted estimates were determined to be so severely flawed that
all potential uses of these data would be inappropriate. Accordingly,
the Department of Commerce deems that these estimates should not be
used for any purpose that legally requires use of data from the
decennial census and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the
data for any purpose whatsoever. The Department, including the
U.S. Census Bureau, will provide no assistance in the interpretation
or use of these numbers. The collection contains four tables: (1) a
count of all persons by race (Table PL1), (2) a count of Hispanic or
Latino and a count of not Hispanic or Latino by race of all persons
(Table PL2), (3) a count of the population 18 years and older by race
(Table PL3), and (4) a count of Hispanic or Latino and a count of not
Hispanic or Latino by race for the population 18 years and older
(Table PL4).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13400.v3
census dataicpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13400Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13400.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03144MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03144MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource] Public Law (P.L.) 94-171 Data
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2013-05-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3144NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Public Law 94-171, enacted in 1975, directs the United
States Census Bureau to make special preparations to provide
redistricting data needed by the 50 states. It specifies that within
one year following the Census Day (i.e., for Census 2000 by April 1,
2001), the Census Bureau must send the governor and legislature in
each state the data they need to redraw districts for the United
States Congress and state legislatures. These files provide data in a
hierarchical sequence down to the block level (state, county, voting
district/remainder, county subdivision, place/remainder, census tract,
block group, block). The collection contains four tables: (1) a count
of all persons by race (Table PL1), (2) a count of Hispanic or Latino
and a count of not Hispanic or Latino by race of all persons (Table
PL2), (3) a count of the population 18 years and older by race (Table
PL3), and (4) a count of Hispanic or Latino and a count of not Hispanic
or Latino by race for the population 18 years and older (Table PL4).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03144.v3
census divisionsicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrredistrictingicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3144Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03144.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21804MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21804MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]Summary File 2 Supplement, States
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-02-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21804NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Derived from the Census 2000 100-percent data, this
file contains Table PCT37 (household population by sex and age), which
is tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the data. PCT37
looks identical to Table PCT5 in Census 2000 Summary File 2. The only
difference between PCT37 and PCT5 is that PCT37 was tallied according
to the race, Hispanic or Latino origin, or American Indian or Alaska
Native tribe of the person, whereas PCT5 was tallied according to the
race, Hispanic or Latino origin, or American Indian or Alaska Native
tribe of the householder. The data contain one variable for each cell
in PCT37 and additional variables with geographic information, and
they cover the geographic levels of observation (known as "summary
levels" in the Census Bureau's nomenclature) shown in Summary File
2. Within each summary level, PCT37 can be iterated for 250 population
groups: the total population, 132 race groups, 78 American Indian and
Alaska Native tribe categories (reflecting 39 individual tribes), and
39 Hispanic or Latino groups. However, the presentation of PCT37 for
any of the 250 population groups is subject to a population threshold
of 100 or more people. That is, if there are fewer than 100 people in
a specific population group in a specific geographic area, then PCT37
is not iterated for the group in that area. A separate data file is
supplied for each of the 76-239 population groups shown in each state,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
The collection is supplied in 54 ZIP archives. There is a separate
ZIP file for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico,
and for the convenience of those who need all of the data, a separate
ZIP archive with all 7,841 data files. The codebook and other
documentation constitute the last ZIP archive.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21804.v1
census dataicpsrethnicityicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrNative AmericansicpsrpopulationicpsrraceicpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21804Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21804.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02537MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02537MiAaIMiAaI
Census of School Districts, 1980
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2003-05-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR2537NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The tables included in this collection present school
district summaries of data obtained in the 1980 Census of Population
and Housing by the Bureau of the Census. These summaries were prepared
for the U.S. Department of Education, National Center For Education
Statistics by the Bureau of the Census with the cooperation of the
Council of Chief State School Officers and the individual state
superintendents and commissioners of education. Data include
information on population, income, employment, family, household, and
housing unit characteristics for the school districts. This study does
not include data from Hawaii, Indiana, Maine, New Jersey, and the
District of Columbia.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02537.v1
census dataicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrpopulationicpsrschool districtsicpsrICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2537Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02537.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02930MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02930MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1940
[electronic resource]Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2930NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1940 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02930.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2930Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02930.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02931MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02931MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1950
[electronic resource]Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2931NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1950 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02931.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2931Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02931.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02932MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02932MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1960
[electronic resource] Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2932NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1960 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02932.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2932Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02932.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02933MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02933MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1970
[electronic resource] Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2933NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1970 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02933.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR I.A. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United StatesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2933Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02933.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07552MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07552MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract-Level Data, 1960
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2007-12-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7552NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains selected variables at the
tract level from the 1960 Census of Population and Housing.
Information is provided on population characteristics such as urban
and rural residency, number of White and nonwhite population, persons
aged 5, 14, 25, and older, nonwhite females aged 14 and older,
married women in the labor force, persons in the experienced civilian
labor force, and persons with Puerto Rican or Spanish birth or
parentage, including the age and marital status of those with a
Puerto Rican or Spanish surname. Information is also provided on
housing characteristics such as occupancy and vacancy status of
house, contract rent and gross rent, quality and value of housing,
basement facilities, plumbing, heating equipment, source of water,
sewage disposal, bathrooms and rooms, persons per room, household
structure, units in structure, and persons in household unit, as well
as household relationships. Other demographic variables provide
information on age, race, sex, marital status, residence, years of
schooling, occupation, employment status, place of work, and family
income. The data were obtained from DUALabs, Inc.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07552.v1
ageicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarital statusicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationsicpsrraceicpsrrental housingicpsrrural areasicpsrurban areasicpsrWhite AmericansicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7552Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07552.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09670MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09670MiAaIMiAaI
Changing Patterns of Drug Abuse and Criminality Among Crack Cocaine Users in New York City, 1988-1989
[electronic resource]
Jeffrey Fagan
,
Steven Belenko
,
Bruce D. Johnson
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9670NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection examines the characteristics of users and
sellers of crack cocaine and the impact of users and sellers on the
criminal justice system and on drug treatment and community programs.
Information was also collected concerning users of drugs other than
crack cocaine and the attributes of those users. Topics covered
include initiation into substance use and sales, expenses for drug
use, involvement with crime, sources of income, and primary substance
of abuse. Demographic information includes subject's race, educational
level, living area, social setting, employment status, occupation,
marital status, number of children, place of birth, and date of
birth. Information was also collected about the subject's parents:
education level, occupation, and place of birth.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09670.v2
crack cocaineicpsrcriminalityicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemFagan, JeffreyBelenko, StevenJohnson, Bruce D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9670Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09670.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09790MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09790MiAaIMiAaI
Changing Patterns of Drug Abuse and Criminality Among Crack Cocaine Users in New York City
[electronic resource]Criminal Histories and Criminal Justice System Processing, 1983-1984, 1986
Jeffrey Fagan
,
Steven Belenko
,
Bruce D. Johnson
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9790NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection compares a sample of persons arrested
for offenses related to crack cocaine with a sample arrested for
offenses related to powdered cocaine. The collection is one of two
parts of a study designed to examine the characteristics of crack
users and sellers, the impact of large numbers of crack-related
offenders on the criminal justice system, and their effects on drug
treatment and community programs. Official arrest records and
supplementary data bases are used to analyze the official arrest,
conviction, and incarceration histories of powdered cocaine and crack
defendants. Questions addressed by the collection include: (1) How
are defendants charged with crack-related offenses different from
defendants charged with offenses related to powdered cocaine? (2) Is
there a difference between the ways the criminal justice system
handles crack offenders and powdered cocaine offenders in pretrial
detention, charges filed, case dispositions, and sentencing? (3) How
do the criminal careers of crack offenders compare with the criminal
careers of powdered cocaine offenders, especially in terms of total
arrest rates, frequencies of nondrug crimes, and frequencies of
violent crimes? (4) Is violence more strongly associated with crack
dealing than with powdered cocaine dealing? and (5) How does the
developmental history of powdered cocaine sales and possession compare
with the history of crack sales and possession? Variables include
demographic information such as gender, residence, and race, arrest,
conviction, and incarceration histories, prior criminal record,
community ties, and court outcomes of the arrests.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1
imprisonmenticpsrarrest recordsicpsrcase processingicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrcriminalityicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeFagan, JeffreyBelenko, StevenJohnson, Bruce D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9790Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03205MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03205MiAaIMiAaI
Classifying Inmates for Strategic Programming in the New York Department of Corrections, 1997-1998
[electronic resource]
Eileen Sullivan
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3205NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The main goal of this study was to construct and test a
statistically based system of classifying inmates for one or more
types of Substance Abuse Intervention Division (SAID) sponsored
treatment programs within the New York Department of Corrections (DOC)
system. The sample used for the prediction models was a sample of
recent jail inmates identified as eligible for admission to SAID. DOC
provided data from its Inmate Information System (IIS) database on
each of the cases. Researchers collected two sets of data: one that
employed only DOC data (Part 1) and another that included
supplementary data from the Division of Criminal Justice Services
(DCJS) and the New York City Criminal Justice Agency (CJA) (Part 2).
The DOC data (Part 1) fall into four main categories: demographic
characteristics, information on the current case, prior criminal
record information, and SAID eligibility information. Part 2, DOC and
Supplementary Data, includes all the DOC items from Part 1 along with
other data collected from DCJS and the New York City CJA.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03205.v1
inmate classificationicpsrinmate programsicpsrjail inmatesicpsrprison inmatesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSullivan, EileenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3205Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03205.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35163MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35163MiAaIMiAaI
Collaborative Multi-racial Post-election Survey (CMPS), 2008
[electronic resource]
Matt Barreto
,
Lorrie Frasure-Yokley
,
Ange-Marie Hancock
,
Sylvia Manzano
,
Karthick Ramakrishnan
,
Ricardo Ramirez
,
Gabe Sanchez
,
Janelle Wong
2014-08-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35163NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2008 Collaborative Multi-racial Post-election Survey (CMPS) is a national telephone survey of registered voters, with comparably large samples of African Americans, Asian Americans, Latinos, and Whites. The telephone survey, conducted between November 9, 2008 and January 5, 2009, is the first multiracial and multilingual survey of registered voters across multiple states and regions in a presidential election. In contrast to the 2008 American National Election Study (ANES) which oversampled Black and Latino voters, and was available in Spanish, the CMPS was available in six languages and contains robust samples of the four largest racial/ethnic groups: Whites, Latinos, Blacks, Asians. The CMPS contains 4,563 respondents who registered to vote in the November 2008 election and who self-identified as Asian, Black, Latino, and White. The survey was available in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, Korean, Vietnamese and respondents were offered the opportunity to interview in their language of choice. The six states that were sampled to produced robust samples of all four major racial groups include California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, and New Jersey, and the statewide samples range from 243 to 669 cases. In order to arrive at more nationally representative samples of each minority group, the study added two supplemental states per racial group, including Arizona and New Mexico (Latinos), North Carolina and Georgia (Blacks), Hawaii and Washington (Asians). Of these 12 states, 3 were considered political battlegrounds in the 2008 Presidential electorate -- New Mexico, Florida, and North Carolina. In order to examine multi-racial politics in competitive and non-competitive environments, the study supplemented the sample with six additional diverse battleground states: Colorado, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. As of the 2008 election, two-thirds of the national electorate was concentrated in these 18 states. For Latinos, 92 percent of all registered voters reside in these states; 87 percent of Asian Americans; and 66 percent of Blacks, and 61 percent of Whites. The November 2008 CMPS provides estimates of the registered voter population by race, age, gender, and education level which was applied to the sample, by racial group, so that the distributions match those of the Census on these important demographic categories. In the study, there are 51 items dealing with sociopolitical attitudes, mobilization and political activity. Additionally, there are 21 items that capture demographic information, including: age, ancestry, birthplace, education, ethnicity, marital status, number in the household, religiosity, gender, media usage and residential context.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35163.v1
advertisingicpsrBiden, JoeicpsrBush, George W.icpsrcampaign issuesicpsrClinton, Hillaryicpsreconomic issuesicpsrelectionsicpsrhealth policyicpsrimmigration policyicpsrissuesicpsrJindal, BobbyicpsrlanguageicpsrMcCain, JohnicpsrObama, BarackicpsrPalin, Sarahicpsrparty identificationicpsrpolitical activismicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrraceicpsrreligionicpsrRice, CondoleezzaicpsrRichardson, Billicpsrtax policyicpsrvice-presidential candidatesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race RelationsRCMD IX.B. AfricanICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesRCMD IX.E. LatinoRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsRCMD X. Political ParticipationRCMD IX.C. AsianRCMD IX.A. African AmericanBarreto, MattFrasure-Yokley, LorrieHancock, Ange-MarieManzano, SylviaRamakrishnan, KarthickRamirez, RicardoSanchez, GabeWong, JanelleInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35163Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35163.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34672MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34672MiAaIMiAaI
Collaborative National Network Examining Comparative Effectiveness Trials (CoNNECT) in 12 U.S. States, August 2010-July 2012
[electronic resource]
Benjamin F. Miller
2013-09-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34672NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Purpose.
The CoNNECT Project enables comparative effectiveness research on mental health, behavioral health, and substance use in primary care. CoNNECT tracked two main elements: (1) the number of patients identified with a comorbid mental health and physical health diagnosis; (2) the number of patients who initiate treatment secondary to a mental health diagnosis. CoNNECT created the capacity to build a base for mental health in primary care comparative effectiveness research using electronic connectivity to generate retrospective and in time prospective clinical data.
Data Access.
CoNNECT data are not available from ICPSR. The data from this study are hosted at DARTNet.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34672.v1
anxietyicpsrasthmaicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrchronic illnessesicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdiabetesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth careicpsrhypertensionicpsrmental healthicpsrobesityicpsrpatientsicpsrprimary careicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatmenticpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsAHRQMCC II. AHRQMCC Supported StudiesMiller, Benjamin F.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34672Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34672.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08002MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08002MiAaIMiAaI
Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1972-1975 [United States]
[electronic resource]Cities Sample
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8002NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Crime Surveys, of which these Commercial
Victimization Surveys are a part, were conducted to obtain current and
reliable measures of serious crime in the United States. The
Commercial Victimization Surveys are restricted to coverage of
burglary and robbery incidents. They include all types of commercial
establishments as well as political, cultural, and religious
organizations. The survey includes a series of questions about the
business, e.g., type and size, form of ownership, insurance, security,
and break-in and robbery characteristics. Time and place, weapon,
injury, entry evidence, offender characteristics, and stolen property
data were collected for each of the incidents. Data on both victimized
and nonvictimized establishments in 26 different cities were collected
during 1972, 1973, and 1974. In the 1975 survey, data from the 13
cities surveyed during 1972 and 1973 were collected again.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2
armed robberyicpsrburglaryicpsrbusinessesicpsrcitiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrlarcenyicpsrnational crime statistics (USA)icpsroffendersicpsrorganizationsicpsrrobberyicpsrsecurity systemsicpsrurban crimeicpsrvictimizationicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8002Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08003MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08003MiAaIMiAaI
Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1973-1977 [United States]
[electronic resource]National Sample
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8003NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These Commercial Victimization Surveys were collected as
part of the National Crime Surveys. They document burglary and robbery
incidents for all types of commercial establishments, as well as
political, cultural, and religious organizations. Business
characteristics gathered include form of ownership and operation, size
and type of business, and security measures. Information regarding the
reported incidents includes time and place, weapon involvement,
offender and entry characteristics, injuries and deaths, and type and
value of stolen property. Data were collected by calendar quarter for
four quarters in 1973-1976 and for two quarters in 1977, while the
actual incidents reported in the files reflect those occurring six
months prior to the interview date.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2
larcenyicpsrnational crime statistics (USA)icpsroffendersicpsrorganizationsicpsrrobberyicpsrsecurity systemsicpsrurban crimeicpsrvictimizationicpsrarmed robberyicpsrburglaryicpsrcitiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8003Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27181MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27181MiAaIMiAaI
Community Partnerships for Older Adults (CPFOA) Program Survey of Older Adults, 2008 [United States]
[electronic resource]
Jung Kim
,
Judy Cannon
,
Valerie Cheh
,
Nancy Duda
,
John Hall
2010-08-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27181NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This is the second round of the Community Partnerships for Older Adults (CPFOA) Program Survey of Older Adults. Like the first round, which was fielded in 2002 and released as ICPSR 4301 (Community Partnerships for Older Adults (CPOA) Program Survey of Older Adults, 2002), the second round was conducted as part of the evaluation of the CPFOA Program, an initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) aimed at promoting improvements in the organization and delivery of long-term care and supportive services for older adults through local public-private partnerships. The 2002 survey was conducted in the 13 communities in which partnerships received development grants from RWJF, and, in 2008, the survey was repeated in the eight of them in which partnerships received implementation grants from the Foundation. The goal of the survey was to improve understanding of the characteristics of older adults, their knowledge and perceptions about issues related to long-term care, and their use of long-term care services and support. In addition, the data collected by the survey enabled the communities to target the partnership's activities in the most effective way.
The second round was based on the 2002 survey instrument. Changes to the instrument were minimized so that the data from the 2002 and 2008 rounds would be comparable. The instrument was modified to delete questions that had low item response in 2002, to add questions requested by the partnerships, to add questions for decision-makers, or to modify questions that were outdated. As in 2002, the 2008 survey interviewed respondents about supportive and long-term care services for older adults in their communities, including the availability, use of, and quality of the services and sources of information about them. Respondents were asked if they expected to stay in their community, if their homes needed repairs or modifications to improve their ability to live in them, how important it was to be able to live in their own home as they grew older, the age at which they thought they would need help to continue living in their own home, and the age at which they thought they could no longer live at home because of health problems. The survey also collected information on health status, problems with activities of everyday life, health insurance coverage and long-term care insurance, hospital stays, living arrangements, social activities, support from family and friends, access to transportation, and demographic characteristics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27181.v1
adult care servicesicpsraging populationicpsrassisted livingicpsrcommunitiesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrlong term careicpsrlong term care insuranceicpsrmeal programsicpsrolder adultsicpsrsupportive servicesicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleHMCA II. Cost/Access to Health CareKim, JungCannon, JudyCheh, ValerieDuda, NancyHall, JohnInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27181Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27181.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04301MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04301MiAaIMiAaI
Community Partnerships for Older Adults (CPOA) Program Survey of Older Adults, 2002 [United States]
[electronic resource]
Randall Brown
,
William Black
2005-10-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4301NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey is one component of the evaluation of the
Community Partnerships for Older Adults (CPOA) Program, an initiative
of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation aimed at promoting improvements
in the organization and delivery of long-term care and supportive
services for older adults through local public-private community
partnerships. The survey interviewed a representative sample of older
adults aged 50 and over in 13 communities that were awarded
development grants by the program. Designed to obtain baseline data
about each community's population and to provide information to target
the CPOA's activities in the most effective way, the survey
interviewed respondents about supportive and long-term care services
for older adults in their communities, including the availability, use
of, and quality of the services and sources of information about them.
Respondents were asked if they expected to stay in their community, if
their homes needed repairs or modifications to improve their ability
to live in them, how important it was to be able to live in their own
home as they grew older, the age at which they thought they would need
help to continue living in their own home, and the age at which they
thought they could no longer live at home because of health
problems. The survey also collected information on health status,
problems with activities of everyday life, health insurance coverage
and long-term care insurance, hospital stays, living arrangements,
social activities, support from family and friends, access to
transportation, and demographic characteristics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04301.v1
adult care servicesicpsraging populationicpsrassisted livingicpsrcommunitiesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrlong term careicpsrlong term care insuranceicpsrmeal programsicpsrolder adultsicpsrsupportive servicesicpsrAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsHMCA II. Cost/Access to Health CareICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleBrown, RandallBlack, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4301Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04301.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07508MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07508MiAaIMiAaI
Comparative State Elections Project, 1968
[electronic resource]
David M. Kovenock
,
James W. Prothro
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7508NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information gathered in a
study that explored political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors within
and among states and regions, and across the United States as a whole,
in 1968, just after the presidential, gubernatorial, and United States
senatorial elections. To facilitate comparisons within and among
states, separate surveys were conducted in 13 states, chosen to
represent the largest states and a variety of regions: Alabama,
California, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota,
New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and
Texas. The other 35 contiguous states and the District of Columbia
were represented by an additional sample. Respondents were asked about
their national and state party identification, political ideology, and
perceptions of the ideological positions of the presidential
candidates and the Democratic and Republican parties. Perceptions of
existing problems, citizen duties, and political efficacy were also
explored, along with levels of confidence in the federal and state
governments. Respondents rated the potential "excellence as President"
of a dozen 1968 presidential contenders, and they rated the job
performance of the United States Congress, state legislatures,
President Lyndon Johnson, state governors, and the major political
parties. Respondents' positive and negative images of the 1968
gubernatorial and senatorial candidates, past voting behavior,
participation and party contact in the 1968 election campaign, and
1968 voting behavior (from president down the ballot, including
candidate choice in gubernatorial and senatorial primaries) were also
elicited. Demographic data include age, sex, race, level of education,
religion, church attendance, marital status, employment status,
occupation, and family income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07508.v1
congressional elections (US Senate)icpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgubernatorial electionsicpsrJohnson, Lyndonicpsrnational electionsicpsrnational politicsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical ideologiesicpsrpolitical perceptionsicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrsocial problemsicpsrstate electionsicpsrstate legislaturesicpsrstate politicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesKovenock, David M.Prothro, James W.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7508Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07508.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00025MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00025MiAaIMiAaI
Comparative Study of Community Decision-Making
[electronic resource]
Terry N. Clark
2008-03-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR25NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data for 51 communities with
populations of 50,000-750,000 in 22 states of the United States
on the characteristics of community leadership, decision-making,
and patterns of influence, as well as political, economic, and
demographic composition of the communities and per capita
expenditures for various common community functions. Information
regarding general political and public policy issues, specific
municipal problems, and their solutions was obtained from
interviews with eight prominent individuals in each city,
such as the Chamber of Commerce president, a labor leader,
a leading newspaper editor or publisher, the chairmen of the
Democratic and Republican parties, the president of the largest
bank, and the mayor. Data are also provided on the characteristics
of the cities, including composite indexes created from the
interview data as well as data from other sources. The study is
composed of three files: a Merged Aggregate and Individual file
(Part 1), an Aggregate file (Part 2), and an Individual file (Part 3).
The Merged Aggregate and Individual file (Part 1) contains
the responses of the individuals interviewed and information on
the characteristics of each respondent's city from other sources.
Items include education, health, culture, welfare, and total
expenditures of the city. The Aggregate file (Part 2) contains
information on the population characteristics of each city, as well
as information on the structure, income, and expenditures of the city
government. Demographic indices describe age and income distribution
of the population, racial composition, level of educational attainment,
and the size, income and occupational distribution of the labor force.
The Individual file (Part 3) provides information received from
respondents on decision-making pertaining to issues of urban
renewal, mayoral elections, air pollution control, race relations,
health, education, industrial and economic development, and
anti-poverty programs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00025.v1
citiesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommunity decision makingicpsrcommunity elitesicpsrcommunity leadersicpsrcommunity participationicpsrleadershipicpsrlocal politicsicpsrmunicipalitiesicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic policyicpsrICPSR II.A.1. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, United StatesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsClark, Terry N.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00025.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09278MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09278MiAaIMiAaI
County and BEA Economic Area Employment Estimates for 1974 and 1985
[electronic resource] [United States]
William B. Beyers
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9278NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study provides employment estimates for a number of
different fields. Using Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
designations and an aggregate of the SIC codes, data are presented by
county and Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) economic regions, which
are aggregates of counties. The BEA economic regions data files are
categorized further by Metropolitan Statistical Areas and
non-Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Industrial categories covered
include agricultural services, eating and drinking places, and health
services.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09278.v1
agricultural servicesicpsrcensus regionsicpsrcountiesicpsremploymenticpsrhealth servicesicpsrlabor marketsicpsrMetropolitan Statistical AreasicpsrrestaurantsicpsrICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsBeyers, William B.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9278Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09278.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03549MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03549MiAaIMiAaI
County Business Patterns, 1967 and 1969 [United States]
[electronic resource] State and County Data
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3549NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These County Business Patterns files contain data from
counties across the United States in 1967 and 1969. Variables include
state, county, total employees, and total wages. Also provided are data
on the number of establishments by employment-size class.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03549.v1
agricultural servicesicpsrbusiness conditionsicpsrbusinessesicpsrconstruction industryicpsrcountiesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrfinanceicpsrmanufacturing industryicpsrmining industryicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrreal estateicpsrretail industryicpsrservice industryicpsrtradeicpsrtransportationicpsrwages and salariesicpsrICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3549Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03549.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03439MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03439MiAaIMiAaI
County Business Patterns, 1999 [United States]
[electronic resource]U.S. Summary, State, and County Data
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3439NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The total number of business establishments, mid-March
employment figures, and first quarter and annual payrolls are supplied
in this data collection at the county, state, and national
levels. Also provided are data on the number of establishments by
employment-size class. Data are provided for most divisions of the
economy, including agricultural services, mining, construction,
manufacturing, transportation, public utilities, wholesale trade,
retail trade, finance, insurance, real estate, and services. However,
data are not included for agriculture production, railroad,
government, or household employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03439.v1
agricultural servicesicpsrbusiness conditionsicpsrbusinessesicpsrconstruction industryicpsrcountiesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrfinanceicpsrmanufacturing industryicpsrmining industryicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrreal estateicpsrretail industryicpsrservice industryicpsrtradeicpsrtransportationicpsrICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3439Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03439.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07955MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07955MiAaIMiAaI
County-Level Estimates of the Population Aged Sixty Years and Over by Age, Sex, and Race, 1977-1980
[electronic resource]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7955NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Preparation of this data collection was funded by grant
#90-A-1279 from the United States Department of Health and Human
Services, Administration on Aging. Estimates of the population of
persons 60 years old and older were received from the Census Bureau in
printed form and were made machine-readable by staff at ICPSR. Other
variables contained in this dataset were merged from existing
machine-readable census files. The data concerning racial composition
of counties were taken from the CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980
[UNITED STATES]: P.L. 94-171 POPULATION COUNTS (ICPSR 7854). The
figures concerning per capita income were taken from the Bureau of the
Census, GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, 1978 POPULATION ESTIMATES (ICPSR
7840). Variables include Federal Information Processing Standard
(FIPS) state and county codes, 1978 per capita income of county, and
total population of county broken down by sex, race, and age (in
four-year increments with a category for persons 75 years old and
older).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07955.v1
agingicpsraging populationicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrgendericpsrolder adultsicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrraceicpsrstates (USA)icpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksInter-university Consortium for Political and Social ResearchInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7955Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07955.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08314MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08314MiAaIMiAaI
County Statistics File 1 (CO-STAT)
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8314NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Data gathered from a variety of federal agencies and private
organizations are contained in this collection which provides county
statistics. Included in CO_STAT 1 are all data for counties published
in the 1983 County and City Data Book and the 1982 State and
Metropolitan Area Data Book, as well as a number of statistics not
previously published. There are several levels of data (e.g., persons,
housing units, and local governments). The collection supplies
information on the following general areas: agriculture, banking,
crime, education, elections, government, households, health, housing,
labor, land area, manufactures, money income, personal income,
population, poverty, retail trade, service industries, social insurance
and human services, savings and loan associations, veterans, vital
statistics, wholesale trade, and journey to work. Records are included
for each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia as well as
3,137 counties or county equivalents.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08314.v1
retail industryicpsrsavings and loans associationsicpsrservice industryicpsrstates (USA)icpsrtradeicpsrveteransicpsrvital statisticsicpsrwelfare servicesicpsragricultureicpsrbankingicpsrcensus dataicpsrcrimeicpsreducationicpsrelectionsicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment agenciesicpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrhealthicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhuman servicesicpsrincomeicpsrlabor forceicpsrmanufacturing industryicpsrmortality ratesicpsrpopulationicpsrpovertyicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8314Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08314.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08662MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1987 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08662MiAaIMiAaI
County Statistics File 2 (CO-STAT 2)
[electronic resource] [United States]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1987ICPSR8662NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This compilation of data, which was gathered from a variety
of federal agencies and private organizations, provides information for
the United States as a whole, the 50 states and the District of
Columbia, and all 3,139 counties and county equivalents (defined as of
January 1, 1983). Data are included for the following general areas:
age, ancestry, agriculture, banking, business, construction, crime,
education, elections, government, health, households, housing, labor,
land area, manufactures, money income, personal income, population,
poverty, retail trade, service industries, social insurance and human
services, veterans, vital statistics, wholesale trade, and journey to
work.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08662.v1
mortality ratesicpsrpopulationicpsrpovertyicpsrretail industryicpsrservice industryicpsrstates (USA)icpsrconstruction industryicpsrcrimeicpsreducationicpsrelectionsicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrhealthicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrlabor forceicpsrmanufacturing industryicpsrtradeicpsrveteransicpsrvital statisticsicpsrwelfare servicesicpsragricultureicpsrbankingicpsrcensus dataicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8662Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08662.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02564MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02564MiAaIMiAaI
Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin
[electronic resource] Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six Cities in the United States, 1995-1996
K. Jack Riley
2012-08-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2564NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was designed to address the practical and policy
implications of various drug market participation patterns. In 1995,
the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and the National
Institute of Justice (NIJ) collaborated on a project called the
Procurement Study. This study was executed as an addendum to NIJ's
Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES
IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]) with the goal of
extending previous research in which heroin users were interviewed on
various aspects of drug market activity. The present study sought to
explore additional features of drug market participation and use, both
within and across drug types and cities, and included two additional
drugs -- powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Data were collected from
recently arrested users of powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin
in six DUF cities (Chicago, New York, Portland, San Diego, San
Antonio, and Washington, DC). Each of the three files in this
collection, Crack Data (Part 1), Heroin Data (Part 2), and Powder
Cocaine Data (Part 3), is comprised of data from a procurement
interview, urine test variables, and a DUF interview. During the
procurement interview, information was collected on purchase and use
patterns for specific drugs. Variables from the procurement interview
include the respondent's method of using the drug, the term used to
refer to the drug, whether the respondent bought the drug in the
neighborhood, the number of different dealers the respondent bought
the drug from, how the respondent made the connection with the dealer
(i.e., street, house, phone, beeper, business/store, or friends),
their main drug source, whether the respondent went to someone else if
the source was not available, how the respondent coped with not being
able to find drugs to buy, whether the respondent got the drug for
free, the means by which the respondent obtained money, the quantity
and packaging of the drug, and the number of minutes spent searching
for, traveling to, and waiting for their last purchase. Urine tests
screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates,
cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone,
propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test
results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Data
from the DUF interview provide detailed information about each
arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type,
arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at
which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within
the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the
past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the
drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the
interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included
alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees
had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs
when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data
also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an
emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had
had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Demographic data include the
age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment
status, and living circumstances of each respondent.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrestsicpsrcocaineicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrheroinicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRiley, K. JackInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2564Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09986MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09986MiAaIMiAaI
Criminal Careers of Juveniles in New York City, 1977-1983
[electronic resource]
Laura A. Winterfield
1999-03-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9986NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This longitudinal study of juvenile offenders traces the
criminal histories of a sample of juveniles, including those who were
"dropouts" (juvenile offenders who did not go on to become adult
criminal offenders) and those who continued to be arrested, ranging
from those with only one subsequent arrest to "persisters"
(juveniles who did become career criminal offenders). The data are
intended to address the following questions: (1) Are serious juvenile
offenders more likely than nonserious juvenile offenders to become
adult offenders? (2) Are offenders who begin at a younger age more
likely to have more serious criminal careers than those who begin when
they are older? (3) As a criminal career progresses, will the offender
become more skilled at one type of offense and commit that type of
crime more frequently, while decreasing the frequency of other types
of crimes? (4) As a criminal career continues, will the offender
commit progressively more serious offenses? (5) How well can it be
predicted who will become a high-rate offender? Part 1 of this study,
Juvenile Case File, contains data on a subsample of 14- and
15-year-olds who were brought to Probation Intake in the New York City
Family Court for delinquency offenses. Included are variables for the
date and type of arrest, disposition and sentence of the offender, and
sex and race of the offender, as well as questions concerning the
offender's home environment and highest school grade completed. Part
2, Arrest and Incarceration Event File, includes information on prior
delinquency arrests, including the date of arrest, the charge and
severity, and the disposition and sentence, as well as similar
information on subsequent offenses that occurred up to six years after
the original delinquency offense. Included for each incarceration is
the status of the offender (juvenile or adult), the date of admission
to a facility, and the length of time incarcerated.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09986.v2
recidivism predictionicpsrcareer criminalsicpsrcriminality predictionicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrex-offendersicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenile recidivistsicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemWinterfield, Laura A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9986Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09986.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31621MiAaIMiAaI
Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS)
[electronic resource]Transitional Care Management (TCM), Increasing Aftercare Participation for Parolees, 2004-2008 [United States]
Michael Prendergast
2014-03-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In an effort to increase participation in community aftercare treatment for substance-abusing offenders who have paroled from prison, the Transitional Case Management (TCM) intervention tested a model of strengths-based case management consisting of (1) completion by the inmate of a strengths and goals assessment as part of discharge planning, (2) a telephone conference call that included the inmate and people central to the inmate's aftercare plan (including the parole officer), and (3) strengths case management for 12 weeks in the community to promote treatment participation and increase the client's access to needed services. (For a more detailed description, see Prendergast Law and Cartier, 2008). With four CJ-DATS Research Centers participating, the study randomized 812 prison treatment clients to the Transitional Case Management condition or to the Standard Referral condition. Detailed assessments occurred at baseline and at three and nine months following release to parole. Data from treatment and criminal justice records, including costs, were also collected. Treatment and criminal justice staff completed surveys on agency collaboration and cooperation.
Respondents were asked questions regarding the barriers to treatment/recovery, education/job training, relationships, finance, living arrangement/housing, health and documentation. They were also asked question related to whether they needed or received certain services.
Other variables included socio-demographic and family background, peer relation and criminal history, health and psychological status, drug and treatment history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31621.v2
case managementicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug related crimesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfinancial supporticpsrhealthicpsrinterventionicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental healthicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemPrendergast, MichaelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31621.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02743MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02743MiAaIMiAaI
Criminal Victimization and Perceptions of Community Safety in 12 United States Cities, 1998
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2743NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection presents survey data from 12 cities in the
United States regarding criminal victimization, perceptions of
community safety, and satisfaction with local police. Participating
cities included Chicago, IL, Kansas City, MO, Knoxville, TN, Los
Angeles, CA, Madison, WI, New York, NY, San Diego, CA, Savannah, GA,
Spokane, WA, Springfield, MA, Tucson, AZ, and Washington, DC. The
survey used the current National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
questionnaire with a series of supplemental questions measuring the
attitudes in each city. Respondents were asked about incidents that
occurred within the past 12 months. Information on the following
crimes was collected: violent crimes of rape, robbery, aggravated
assault, and simple assault, personal crimes of theft, and household
crimes of burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft.
Part 1, Household-Level Data, covers the number of household
respondents, their ages, type of housing, size of residence, number of
telephone lines and numbers, and language spoken in the household.
Part 2, Person-Level Data, includes information on respondents' sex,
relationship to householder, age, marital status, education, race,
time spent in the housing unit, personal crime and victimization
experiences, perceptions of neighborhood crime, job and professional
demographics, and experience and satisfaction with local police.
Variables in Part 3, Incident-Level Data, concern the details of
crimes in which the respondents were involved, and the police response
to the crimes.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02743.v1
assaulticpsrattitudesicpsrburglaryicpsrfear of crimeicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrperceptionsicpsrpetty thefticpsrpolice performanceicpsrpublic safetyicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrvictimizationicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2743Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02743.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30321MiAaIMiAaI
Custody Evaluations When There Are Allegations of Domestic Violence
[electronic resource]Practices, Beliefs and Recommendations of Professional Evaluators in New York City, 1997-2009
Michael S. Davis
,
Chris S. O'Sullivan
,
Kim Susser
,
Marjory D. Fields
2013-01-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR30321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the beliefs and investigative practices of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers who had been appointed by a court to evaluate families in disputed custody cases when there were allegations of domestic violence. The research team conducted a Case Review study (Part 1) and administered an Evaluator Survey to corresponding case evaluators (Part 2) between August 2007 and December 2009. The case review study was implemented through four private non-profit legal services agencies in New York City that provide free legal representation to domestic violence victims in civil proceedings including custody and visitation litigation. A total of 69 cases involving custody or visitation issues that were litigated and resolved between 1997 and 2007 were identified for inclusion in the study. The case review study involved the development of a Coding Scale for Custody Evaluations with Domestic Violence (DV) Allegations in order to rate the characteristics of the custody evaluations and the court outcomes. Raters coded each of the 69 cases in the case review sample with the Evaluation Coding Scale. The research team administered the Evaluator Survey (Part 2) to 14 custody evaluators who had completed evaluation reports for the cases in the Part 1 case review study.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1
abuseicpsrchild custodyicpsrchild custody hearingsicpsrcourtsicpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic assaulticpsrdomestic violenceicpsrevaluationicpsrfamily courtsicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily violenceicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrlegal aidicpsrparentsicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrsocial servicesicpsrsocial workicpsrspouse abuseicpsrviolenceicpsrNACJD V. CourtsNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDavis, Michael S.O'Sullivan, Chris S.Susser, KimFields, Marjory D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09255MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09255MiAaIMiAaI
Debtor-Creditor Laws, Amendments, and Revised Statutes
[electronic resource] New York State, 1785-1860
Mary Ann Romano
1992-02-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9255NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information on New York State
debtor-creditor laws, amendments, and revised statutes for the years
1785 through 1860. Designed to explain the changing patterns of growth
in debtor-creditor laws over time on the basis of content analysis,
this data collection focuses on the following major areas of
investigation: imprisonment for debt, bankruptcy, insolvency,
usury/interest of money/circulation, distress for rent, estates in
trust, recovery of debts and demands, relief, fraudulent debtors,
partners and joint debtors, and other miscellaneous categories.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09255.v1
bankruptcyicpsrdebticpsrdebtor-creditor lawsicpsrICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsRomano, Mary AnnInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9255Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09255.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09324MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09324MiAaIMiAaI
Deterrent Effects of the New York Juvenile Offender Law, 1974-1984
[electronic resource]
Simon I. Singer
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9324NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection was designed to assess the effects of
the New York Juvenile Offender Law on the rate of violent crime
committed by juveniles. The data were collected to estimate the
deterrent effects of the law and to permit the use of an interrupted
time-series model to gauge the effects of intervention. The deterrent
effects of the law are assessed on five types of violent offenses over
a post-intervention period of 75 months using two comparison time
series to control for temporal and geographical characteristics. One
time series pertains to the monthly juvenile arrests of 16- to
19-year-olds in New York City, and the other covers monthly arrests of
juveniles aged 13 to 15 years in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the
control jurisdiction. Included in the collection are variables
concerning the monthly rates of violent juvenile arrests for homicide,
rape, assault, arson, and robbery for the two juvenile cohorts. These
time series data were compiled from records of individual police
jurisdictions that reported monthly arrests to the Uniform Crime
Reporting Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09324.v1
juvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrviolent crimeicpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrcrime ratesicpsrdeterrenceicpsrhomicideicpsrinterventionicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSinger, Simon I.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9324Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09324.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21184MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21184MiAaIMiAaI
Developing and Validating a Brief Jail Mental Health Screen in Maryland and New York, 2005-2006
[electronic resource]
Henry J. Steadman
2008-09-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21184NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of this research project was to develop an efficient mental health screen that would aid in the early identification of severe mental illnesses and other acute psychiatric problems during the jail intake process. The researchers sought to validate the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) as such a tool. Participants in the study included male and female jail detainees admitted to one of four county jails, two in Maryland and two in New York, from November 2005 to June 2006. A total of 10,562 jail detainees were screened using the BJMHS-R (Part 1). The screening data were used to identify a sub-sample of detainees who were systematically sampled for a detailed clinical assessment, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), which was conducted by a trained research interviewer in order to validate the screen. A subset of 464 jail detainees completed the SCID interviews (Part 2). Part 1, Tracking Data, contains 54 variables, including items and scores from the BJMHS-R, that were used to used to identify and generate a list of potential detainee participants for the SCID interview. Part 2, Interview Data, contains 326 variables, including items and scores from both the BJMHS-R and the SCID interviews, that were used to validate the screen.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21184.v1
emotional statesicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrwomenicpsrfemale inmatesicpsrfemale offendersicpsrjail inmatesicpsrjailsicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrpsychiatric servicesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSteadman, Henry J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21184Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21184.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04545MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04545MiAaIMiAaI
Development of Crime Forecasting and Mapping Systems for Use by Police in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Rochester, New York, 1990-2001
[electronic resource]
Jacqueline Cohen
,
Wilpen L. Gorr
2006-08-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4545NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was designed to develop crime forecasting as an
application area for police in support of tactical deployment of
resources. Data on crime offense reports and computer aided dispatch
(CAD) drug calls and shots fired calls were collected from the
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Bureau of Police for the years 1990 through
2001. Data on crime offense reports were collected from the Rochester,
New York Police Department from January 1991 through December 2001.
The Rochester CAD drug calls and shots fired calls were collected from
January 1993 through May 2001. A total of 1,643,828 records (769,293
crime offense and 874,535 CAD) were collected from Pittsburgh, while
538,893 records (530,050 crime offense and 8,843 CAD) were collected
from Rochester. ArcView 3.3 and GDT Dynamap 2000 Street centerline
maps were used to address match the data, with some of the Pittsburgh
data being cleaned to fix obvious errors and increase address match
percentages. A SAS program was used to eliminate duplicate CAD calls
based on time and location of the calls. For the 1990 through 1999
Pittsburgh crime offense data, the address match rate was 91 percent.
The match rate for the 2000 through 2001 Pittsburgh crime offense data
was 72 percent. The Pittsburgh CAD data address match rate for 1990
through 1999 was 85 percent, while for 2000 through 2001 the match
rate was 100 percent because the new CAD system supplied incident
coordinates. The address match rates for the Rochester crime offenses
data was 96 percent, and 95 percent for the CAD data. Spatial overlay
in ArcView was used to add geographic area identifiers for each data
point: precinct, car beat, car beat plus, and 1990 Census tract. The
crimes included for both Pittsburgh and Rochester were aggravated
assault, arson, burglary, criminal mischief, misconduct, family
violence, gambling, larceny, liquor law violations, motor vehicle
theft, murder/manslaughter, prostitution, public drunkenness, rape,
robbery, simple assaults, trespassing, vandalism, weapons, CAD drugs,
and CAD shots fired.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04545.v1
aggravated assaulticpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrburglaryicpsrcrime mappingicpsrcrime patternsicpsrcrime predictionicpsrdriving under the influenceicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrfraudicpsrgeographic information systemsicpsrhomicideicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrtrend analysisicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyCohen, JacquelineGorr, Wilpen L.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4545Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04545.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00066MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00066MiAaIMiAaI
Diffusion of Public Policy Innovation Among the American States
[electronic resource]
Jack L. Walker
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR66NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data on the diffusion of innovative
legislation and public programs among the 48 continental states of the
United States during the 19th and 20th centuries. Information is
provided for the year in which each state initiated each of 85
innovative programs and for the date when the state became a
territory. Variables provide information on the programs enacted and
on the innovative score, which was calculated for each state on each
issue. Based on the number of years that elapsed between the first and
the last legislative enactment of a program, each state received a
score corresponding to the percentage of time that elapsed between the
first adoption of the program and the state's own acceptance of the
program.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00066.v1
legislative processicpsrmodernizationicpsrnineteenth centuryicpsrpolicy analysisicpsrpolicy makingicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrpublic policyicpsrstate governmenticpsrstate politicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrtwentieth centuryicpsrinnovationicpsrinnovation diffusionicpsrlegislationicpsrICPSR VIII.B.1. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, United StatesWalker, Jack L.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)66Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00066.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09325MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09325MiAaIMiAaI
Disturbed Violent Offenders in New York, 1985
[electronic resource]
Hans Toch
,
Kenneth Adams
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9325NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection was designed to investigate the
relationship between mental illness and violent involvement over an
offender's criminal career and to develop a typology of violent
offenders that takes into account both mental health history and
substance use history. The collection is organized so that data for the
violent offender cohort can be matched with records of offender mental
health history, substance abuse history, and criminal career history.
The offenders were convicted of statutorily-defined "violent
offenses." Included in the collection are variables concerning
conviction offenses, intoxication status, victim-offender relationship,
injury result, type of violence, employment, marital status, gender,
and race. The criminal history file contains variables on dates of
arrest or juvenile contacts. The mental history file includes dates of
entry and types of mental health services received.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09325.v2
career criminalsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsroffendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrviolenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyToch, HansAdams, KennethInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9325Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09325.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04307MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04307MiAaIMiAaI
Domestic Violence Experiment in King's County (Brooklyn), New York, 1995-1997
[electronic resource]
Robert C. Davis
,
Bruce G. Taylor
,
Christopher D. Maxwell
2006-08-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4307NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The researchers sought to add to the incipient literature
on randomized studies of batterer treatment, by conducting an
experimental study that compared batterers assigned to treatment to
batterers assigned to a community service program irrelevant to the
problem of violence. The study was conducted using a true experimental
design and consisted of 376 spousal assault cases drawn from the Kings
County (New York) Criminal Court which were adjudicated between
February 19, 1995, and March 1, 1996. Batterers were mandated to
attend a 40-hour batterer treatment program or to complete 40 hours of
community service. The random assignment was made at sentencing, after
all parties (judge, prosecutor, and defense) had agreed that batterer
treatment was appropriate, the defendant agreed to treatment and was
accepted by the Alternatives to Violence (ATV) program, and the
program was available based on the random assignment process.
Interviews were also conducted with both the batterer and the victim
at sentencing as well as 6 months post-sentence and 12 months
post-sentence. These interviews collected data in areas regarding
demographics (first interview only), recidivism, beliefs about
domestic violence, conflict management strategies, locus of control,
and for victims, self esteem. Administrative records were also used to
obtain data regarding any new crimes committed.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04307.v1
domestic assaulticpsrdomestic violenceicpsroffendersicpsrrecidivismicpsrtreatmenticpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrviolence against womenicpsrNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDavis, Robert C.Taylor, Bruce G.Maxwell, Christopher D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4307Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04307.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09326MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09326MiAaIMiAaI
Downtown Safety, Security, and Development in New York City, 1984
[electronic resource]
N. David Milder
1992-02-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9326NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection was designed to address problems of
crime as a barrier to the economic health of three outlying commercial
centers of New York City: Brooklyn, Fordham Road in the Bronx, and
Jamaica Center in Queens. Included in the survey are variables
concerning the respondent's age, race, gender, family income, length of
residence, and personal victimization experience. Also included are
variables pertaining to perceptions of safety, physical disorder in the
area, and source of information about crime in the commercial center.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09326.v1
commercial districtsicpsrcrimeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrNACJD II. Community StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMilder, N. DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9326Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09326.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09979MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09979MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Abuse as a Predictor of Rearrest or Failure to Appear in Court in New York City, 1984
[electronic resource]
Eric D. Wish
2000-04-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9979NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection was undertaken to estimate the
prevalence of drug use/drug use trends among booked arrestees in New
York City and to analyze the relationship between drug use and crime.
The data, which were collected over a six-month period, were generated
from volunteer interviews with male arrestees, the analyses of their
urine specimens, police and court records of prior criminal behavior
and experience with the criminal justice system, and records of each
arrestee's current case, including court warrants, rearrests, failures
to appear, and court dispositions. Demographic variables include age,
education, vocational training, marital status, residence, and
employment. Items relating to prior and current drug use and drug
dependency are provided, along with results from urinalysis tests for
opiates, cocaine, PCP, and methadone. The collection also contains
arrest data for index crimes and subsequent court records pertaining
to those arrests (number of court warrants issued, number of pretrial
rearrests, types of rearrests, failure to appear in court, and court
dispositions), and prior criminal records (number of times arrested
and convicted for certain offenses).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09979.v1
drug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrpolice recordsicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrurinalysisicpsrarrest recordsicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrdrug abuseicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemWish, Eric D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9979Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09979.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06628MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06628MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Offender Treatment in Local Corrections in California and New York, 1991-1993
[electronic resource]
Sandra Tunis
,
James Austin
,
Mark Morris
,
Patricia Hardyman
,
Melissa Bolyard
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6628NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this multisite program evaluation project
was to provide detailed and systematic descriptions of participants
and treatment program components for a sample of five drug treatment
programs in local jails. Three of the programs were located in
California: Jail Education and Treatment (JET), Deciding, Educating,
Understanding, Counseling, and Evaluation (DEUCE), and Rebuilding,
Educating, Awareness, Counseling, and Hope (REACH). Two programs were
in New York State: Substance Abuse Intervention Division (SAID) and
New Beginnings. The project was aimed at assessing program completion
rates as well as 12-month post-release recidivism for program
participants versus matched controls. Background information obtained
about the participating offenders includes sex, race, age, education,
marital status, and employment status, as well as history of drug use,
previous drug treatment, mental illness, inpatient/outpatient
episodes, and offenses and sentencing. Additional data cover program
location, dates of release from the program and from jail, type of
program termination, type of residence upon release, and anticipated
post-custody treatment. Information on each conviction/disposition was
obtained through state criminal information systems, and state-level
criminal history data (rap sheets) were collected for both the
treatment and comparison groups. The unit of analysis is arrest
events.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06628.v1
drug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrtreatment complianceicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeTunis, SandraAustin, JamesMorris, MarkHardyman, PatriciaBolyard, MelissaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6628Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06628.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06501MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1996 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06501MiAaIMiAaI
Dynamics of Change in the Criminal Case Plea Bargaining System
[electronic resource] New York City, 1800-1890
Chester L. Mirsky
,
Edelle Ortese
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1996ICPSR6501NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study analyzes the ascendancy of a single form of
dispute processing--the guilty plea--in New York City's principal
indictment court, and its connection to law enforcement, judges, and
lawyers. A major component of the study is a statistical analysis of
data presented in the Minute Book of Court of General Sessions and
maintained at the New York City Archives. A second data source is the
New York City district attorney's case files, also maintained at the
New York City Archives. Part 1, District Attorney Case File Data,
contains a sample of cases throughout the century taken from the
district attorney's files. Variables cover charge filed, method of
arrest, nature of testimony, presence of the lawyers, role of police,
private prosecutor, and magistrate, and demographic information about
the defendant and victim. Part 2, Lawyer Data, records the frequency of
the appearance of individual lawyers, the charges in the cases in which
they appeared, the lawyering activities they undertook, and the method
of case disposition. Part 3, Minute Book Data, reflects the workday of
the Court of General Sessions, including the number of cases processed
in court on any given day, the number of defendants tried, the details
of charges, joinder, witness examinations, outcome and sentence, and
the number pleading guilty. Part 4, Cases Tried Data, not only records
cases tried but also includes the top count, legal representation,
result, and sentence, and for cases pleading guilty contains the top
count charged, top count accepted, and sentence imposed. District
Attorney Reference Data, Part 5, contains cases in which copies of the
district attorney's papers were not found. These cases occurred on the
same day as cases for which copies of the district attorney's papers
were recorded. This data served as a control group for the District
Attorney Case File Data.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06501.v1
attorneysicpsrcase processingicpsrcourtsicpsrguilty pleasicpsrjudgesicpsrindictmentsicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrplea negotiationsicpsrtestimonyicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingMirsky, Chester L.Ortese, EdelleInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6501Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06501.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29821MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29821MiAaIMiAaI
Dynamics of Retail Methamphetamine Markets in New York City, 2007-2009
[electronic resource]
Travis Wendel
,
Ric Curtis
,
Bilal Khan
,
Kirk Dombrowski
2014-01-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR29821NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was conducted to provide information about markets for, distribution of, and use of methamphetamine in New York City, both inside and outside of the MSM (men who have sex with men)/gay community. The study used Respondent Driven Sampling to recruit 132 methamphetamine market participants. Each respondent participated in a one to two hour structured interview combining both qualitative and quantitative responses. Each respondent was invited to recruit three additional eligible participants. Data collected included demographics, social network data, the respondent's market participation in obtaining and providing methamphetamine, consumption of methamphetamine, and experience with the criminal justice system and crime associated with participation in methamphetamine markets.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29821.v1
drug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug useicpsrgay communityicpsrgays and lesbiansicpsrlifestylesicpsrmale offendersicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial networksicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyWendel, TravisCurtis, RicKhan, BilalDombrowski, KirkInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29821Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29821.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34710MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34710MiAaIMiAaI
The Economic Progress of African Americans in Urban Areas
[electronic resource]A Tale of 14 Cities
Dan A. Black
,
Natalia A. Kolesnikova
,
Lowell J. Taylor
2013-06-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34710NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
How significant was the economic progress of African Americans in the United States between 1970 and 2000? In this paper the authors examine this issue for Black men 25 to 55 years of age who live in 14 large United States metropolitan areas. They present evidence that significant racial disparities remain in education and labor market outcomes of Black and White men, and they discuss changes in industrial composition, migration, and demography that might have contributed to the stagnation of economic progress of Black men between 1970 and 2000.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34710.v1
African Americansicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrlabor marketsicpsrurban areasicpsrICPSR XVIII. Replication DatasetsBlack, Dan A.Kolesnikova, Natalia A.Taylor, Lowell J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34710Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34710.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03130MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03130MiAaIMiAaI
Effectiveness of a Joint Police and Social Services Response to Elder Abuse in Manhattan [New York City], New York, 1996-1997
[electronic resource]
Robert C. Davis
,
Juan Medina
,
Nancy Avitabile
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3130NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This project consisted of an evaluation of an elder abuse
program run by the New York Police Department and Victim Services
Research. The focus of the study was domestic elder abuse, which
generally refers to any of several forms of maltreatment, physical
abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, neglect, and/or financial
exploitation of an older person. The program, conducted in New York
City public housing, had two complementary parts. First, public
housing projects in Manhattan were assigned to one of two levels of
public education (i.e., to receive or not to receive educational
materials about elder abuse). Once the public education treatment had
been implemented, 403 older adult residents of the housing projects
who reported elder abuse to the police during the next ten months were
assigned to one of two levels of follow-up to the initial police
response (i.e., to receive or not to receive a home visit) as the
second part of the project. The home visit intervention consisted of a
strong law enforcement response designed to prevent repeat incidents
of elder abuse. A team from the Domestic Violence Intervention and
Education Program (DVIEP), consisting of a police officer and a social
worker, followed up on domestic violence complaints with a home visit
within a few days of the initial patrol response. Victims were
interviewed about new victimizations following the intervention on
three occasions: six weeks after the trigger incident, six months
after the trigger incident, and twelve months after the trigger
incident. Interviews at the three time points were identical except
for the omission of background information on the second and third
interviews. Demographic data collected during the first interview
included age, gender, ethnicity, education, employment, income, legal
relationship with abuser, living situation, number of people in the
household, and health. For each time point, data provide measures of
physical, psychological, and financial abuse, knowledge of elder
abuse, knowledge and use of social services, satisfaction with the
police, assessment of service delivery, and self-esteem and
well-being. The DVIEP databases maintained on households at each of
the three participating Police Service Areas (PSAs) were searched to
identify new police reports of elder abuse for households in the
sample within 12 months following the trigger incident. Variables from
the DVIEP databases include age, race, ethnicity, and sex of the
victim and the perpetrator, relationship of perpetrator to victim,
type of abuse reported, charge, whether an arrest was made, if an
order of protection had been obtained, if the order of protection was
violated, use of weapons, if the victim had been injured, and if the
victim was taken to the hospital. Several time lapse variables between
different time points are also provided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03130.v1
abuseicpsrcrime reportingicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrelder abuseicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinterventionicpsrolder adultsicpsrpolice responseicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrvictim servicesicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationDavis, Robert C.Medina, JuanAvitabile, NancyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3130Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03130.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27841MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27841MiAaIMiAaI
Effectiveness of Prisoner Reentry Services as Crime Control for Inmates Released in New York, 2000-2005
[electronic resource]
Douglas McDonald
,
Christina Dyous
,
Kenneth Carlson
2010-08-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27841NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
identifier.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27841.v1
criminal justice programsicpsrex-offendersicpsrhomelessnessicpsrinmate release plansicpsrparoleicpsrparole servicesicpsrpostrelease programsicpsrprisoner reentryicpsrprobationicpsrrecidivismicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMcDonald, DouglasDyous, ChristinaCarlson, KennethInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27841Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27841.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04578MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04578MiAaIMiAaI
Effects of Incarceration on Criminal Trajectories in the United States, 1994
[electronic resource]
Avinash Singh Bhati
2007-02-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4578NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Using data from RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994:
[UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 3355), this study developed an analytical
approach to utilize detailed dated criminal arrest history information
in order to investigate whether, and to what extent, incarceration is
able to deter offenders from future offending. This data collection
consists of the syntax for a SAS macro used to estimate individual
specific offending micro-trajectories, project counterfactual
trajectories, and to assess the actual post-release offending patterns
against the backdrop of these counterfactuals. The arrest records of
individuals were clustered in chronological order and were truncated
after the first post-release re-arrest event. The key independent
variables used in estimating the pre-release criminal history
accumulation process included the arrest number, the age at first
arrest, whether or not the individual was confined as a result of the
previous arrest event, and a measure of the number of years taken to
reach each arrest event cumulated through the last arrest event. The
same set of basic variables were used to model first re-arrest after
release (recidivism).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1
arrest recordsicpsrconviction recordsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrrecidivismicpsrNACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional PackagesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemBhati, Avinash SinghInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4578Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07861MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07861MiAaIMiAaI
Electoral Returns for Statewide Offices in the United States, 1874-1952
[electronic resource]
Paul Kleppner
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR7861NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection incorporates county-level election
returns from 15 states for various statewide offices in the period
1874-1952. Included are votes cast for party candidates contesting
a variety of offices such as lieutenant governor, attorney general,
secretary of state, treasurer, and auditor. Data are stored in
separate files for the 15 states at the following time periods:
California (1882-1950), Colorado (1892-1952), Indiana (1876-1948),
Minnesota (1890-1948), Missouri (1882-1948), Montana (1889-1948),
Nebraska (1884-1950), New York (1878-1946), North Dakota (1889-1948),
Ohio (1886-1948), Oregon (1878-1948), Pennsylvania (1874-1948),
South Dakota (1889-1950), West Virginia (1904-1948), and
Wisconsin (1884-1950).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07861.v1
candidatesicpsrcountiesicpsrelection returnsicpsrelectionsicpsrhistorical dataicpsrstate politicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Returns, United StatesKleppner, PaulInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7861Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07861.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07203MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07203MiAaIMiAaI
Elmira Community Study, 1948
[electronic resource]
Paul F. Lazarsfeld
,
Bernard R. Berelson
,
William N. McPhee
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7203NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This four-wave data collection contains information on
the social and psychological aspects of political behavior among
voters in Elmira, New York, in 1948. In order to probe voting
behavior among the electorate, information was gathered about
labor unions and community organizations, social and ethnic
differences, perceptions of group voting trends, the influence
of family and friends, polarization between social groups, and
effects of political campaigns on social groups. Respondents
were asked about their party choice, voting intentions,
perceived best Republican and Democratic presidential
candidates, the two major electoral issues facing the
country, effects of the elected president on the relations
between the United States and Russia, and their voting
behaviors. Other items probed respondents' feelings about price
controls, big corporations, labor unions, the economy, cost
of living, relations between labor and management, their
community, their job, war prospects, and the Middle East crisis.
Additional items queried respondents on exposure to and use of
the news media, recreational and reading habits, the role of
mass media in transmitting political information, and the
effects of specific campaign events on voters. Demographic
items specify age, education, sex, marital status, religion,
occupation, social class, club memberships, family's choice of
presidential candidate, veteran status, length of residence in
neighborhood, and nationality.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07203.v1
campaign issuesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommunity organizationsicpsrdecision makingicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrnews mediaicpsrorganizationsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial influencesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral ProcessesLazarsfeld, Paul F.Berelson, Bernard R.McPhee, William N.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7203Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07203.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33181MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33181MiAaIMiAaI
Employment Retention and Advancement Project, 2000-2007 [United States]
[electronic resource]
Gayle Hamilton
2012-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33181NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project was designed to fill the gap in knowledge about employment retention and advancement strategies that might be effective. The goal of ERA was to identify and rigorously test a diverse set of innovative models designed to promote employment stability and wage or earnings progression among current or former welfare recipients or other low-income groups. As part of ERA, over a dozen different program models have been evaluated over the past 10 years using random assignment research designs. These models embodied states' and localities' choices of program goals, target populations, and program features, and the programs were largely paid for through existing funding streams. The programs were thus "real-world" interventions initiated by practitioners and not programs set up and funded solely for research purposes. The diversity of the models presents an opportunity to explore the effectiveness of a variety of strategies implemented for different populations in order to identify what might work. This collection includes seven datasets, four classified as Core/Final Report Sites and three from Harder to Employ Sites. Almost all of the ERA programs targeted current or former recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), the cash welfare program that mainly serves single mothers and their children. The programs differed, however, in terms of when services were first provided and to whom. The Harder to Employ Sites files focus on the three ERA models that served harder to employ populations; (1) Tier 2 program in Minnesota: unemployed welfare-to-work participants who were in welfare-to-work services for a year or longer and hadn't been employed in the previous three months were given welfare-to-work services aimed at addressing barriers to employment which took into account their employment limitations. The Tier 2 program focused on assessing barriers to employment and addressing those barriers through referrals to appropriate services and close monitoring and follow-up. (2) New York City PRIDE: welfare recipients who were deemed "employable with limitations" were required to take part in welfare-to-work activities -- which emphasized unpaid work experience, education, and job placement assistance -- however, the program took into account their employment limitations when placing them in activities. The PRIDE program began with an in-depth assessment of participants' work and education history and their medical conditions. (3) New York City Substance Abuse Case Management (SACM): public assistance applicants and recipients who screened positive for signs of substance abuse were given a mandatory appointment to assess the level of substance abuse treatment needed. Depending on the outcome of the assessment, clients were referred to treatment, employment services, or a combination of both. Noncompliance at any stage resulted in sanctions and loss of public assistance benefits. Information was collected on respondents' employment status, job training, pay rate and benefits, occupation sector, health care, childcare, transportation, and a variety of job related topics. Demographic variables included household income, housing arrangements, number of people living in household, and respondent health status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33181.v1
child careicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcompaniesicpsreducationicpsremployee benefitsicpsremploymenticpsremployment servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrincomeicpsrjob searchicpsrMedicaidicpsrorganizational changeicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrrecordsicpsrvocational educationicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrICPSR XV.A. Organizational Behavior, United StatesHamilton, GayleInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33181Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33181.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33783MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33783MiAaIMiAaI
Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO), New York City
[electronic resource]
Cindy Redcross
2012-10-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33783NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
hey saw their children, and the type of relationship they had with their children. Demographic information includes age, race, marital status, education, employment status, and home ownership status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33783.v1
child supporticpsrconviction recordsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsremployment servicesicpsrex-offender employmenticpsrex-offendersicpsrhealthicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrimprisonmenticpsrincomeicpsrinmatesicpsrjob placementicpsrjob searchicpsrparoleesicpsrpostrelease programsicpsrprisoner reentryicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrrecidivismicpsrunemploymenticpsrRCMD IV. EmploymentRCMD XI. Poverty and IncomeICPSR XV.A. Organizational Behavior, United StatesRedcross, CindyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33783Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33783.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07528MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07528MiAaIMiAaI
Estimates of Eligible Voters in Counties of the United States, 1972
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7528NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Census data on the number of eligible voters in the United
States in 1972 as well as the number and percentage of citizens who
voted for president in 1972 are presented in this data
collection. Both county-level and state-level records are provided,
with a unique numeric identification number assigned to each county or
independent city within each state. Individual state information is
presented in regional group order,(i.e., New England, Middle Atlantic,
East North Central, West North Central, Solid South, Border States,
Mountain States, Pacific States, and External States).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07528.v1
census dataicpsrcountiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvoter turnouticpsrvotersicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7528Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07528.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04299MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04299MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Adolescent Portable Therapy (APT) Program [New York City], 2001-2004
[electronic resource]
James Parsons
,
Tim Ross
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4299NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data collected for an evaluation of the
Adolescent Portable Therapy (APT) Program, which provided family-based
drug treatment services to adolescents involved with the New York City
juvenile justice system on charges of Persons In Need of Supervision
(PINS) or delinquency. The program aimed to improve five core areas of
the young peoples' lives: substance use, mental health, schooling,
family functioning, and recidivism. Recruitment for the study occurred
at juvenile detention facilities in New York City. Intake staff
conducted screening interviews with the detainees. Those who reported
using substances at least 30 times in the previous 30 days, or who met
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition
(DSM IV) criteria for substance abuse or dependence were eligible for
selection. After the respondents and their families consented to
participate, the respondents were randomly assigned to treatment and
control groups. The treatment group went on to receive services from
APT, while control group subjects received no APT services but had
access to all other standard facilities and community based
services. The evaluation participants were interviewed at four time
points: at intake into the study in the juvenile detention facilities
(baseline), three months after release from detention (T1), nine
months after release from detention (T2), and 15 months after release
from detention (T3). Whenever subjects were interviewed outside of a
detention facility for T1, T2, and T3, study staff attempted to
collect urine samples which were tested for marijuana, cocaine,
amphetamines, phencyclidine (PCP), and opiates. Topics covered by the
interviews included substance use and treatment, physical health, risk
behaviors and disease prevention, mental and emotional health, living
situation and environment, crime and legal issues, school, work,
income, and demographic characteristics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04299.v1
substance abuse treatmenticpsryouthful offendersicpsralcohol abuseicpsrcorrectional facilities (juveniles)icpsrdrug abuseicpsrjuvenile inmatesicpsrjuvenile justiceicpsrmarijuanaicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramParsons, JamesRoss, TimInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4299Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04299.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04114MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04114MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Mental Health Court Initiative at Seven Sites in the United States, 2003-2004
[electronic resource]
Henry J. Steadman
2005-03-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4114NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study evaluated seven mental health courts that were
partially funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. Data were
collected on 285 formal referrals to the seven courts between November
1, 2003, and January 31, 2004. For every referral, court staff completed
a one-page questionnaire that covered (1) identification of the
referring agent, (2) characteristics of the referred person, including
age, gender, race, criminal charges, and type of mental disorder, and
(3) the disposition decision.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04114.v1
courtsicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSteadman, Henry J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4114Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04114.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03978MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03978MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Health Link Program [New York City]
[electronic resource] The Community Reintegration Model to Reduce Substance Abuse Among Jail Inmates, 1997-2002
John Burghardt
,
Karen Needels
2004-08-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3978NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This evaluation study, funded by The Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation, was designed to provide a rigorous assessment of the
effects of making Health Link's community-based services available to
former inmates of New York City's jail system at Rikers Island. The
goal of the Health Link Project was to promote healthy reintegration
of persons leaving Rikers into their communities by (1) providing
direct services to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated clients, (2)
assisting community organizations that served this population, (3)
establishing linkages between organizations, and (4) strengthening
linkages between them and public agencies. The signature component of
Health Link was case management in the community. Meeting with clients
after their release from jail, caseworkers provided a support
structure, made referrals to services, offered crisis intervention and
counseling, and served as advocates for clients. Only adult females
and adolescent males were included in the study. Eligible inmates who
volunteered for the evaluation study were assigned to one of two
groups: the Jail-and-Community Services group (JC group) or the Jail
Services Only group (J group). JC group members were eligible for
Health Link's intensive discharge planning and community case
management services, while J group members were eligible for less
intensive discharge planning services and ineligible for Health Link's
community case management services. Evaluation subjects initially
completed an intake questionnaire, which collected information on age,
race, Hispanic origin, ethnicity, place and type of residence, family
relations, criminal background, employment and education, substance
abuse, health and medical history, sexual at-risk behavior and
reproductive health, and history of trauma. Follow-up interviews were
conducted, on average, about 15 months after release from jail, a
sufficient time to observe the 12-month period for which clients were
eligible for community-based services. Topics covered in the follow-up
12 Month Questionnaire included involvement in the criminal justice
system, criminal activity, substance abuse, participation in substance
abuse treatment programs, education and employment outcomes, health
status, access to and utilization of health care services, sexual
activity and HIV risk, housing, and involvement with family and
community. Subjects who were not incarcerated at the time of their
follow-up interview were asked to voluntarily provide hair samples,
which were tested for metabolites of cocaine, opiates, PCP,
methamphetamine, and marijuana.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03978.v1
social reintegrationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrwomenicpsryouthful offendersicpsrcase managementicpsrcommunity service programsicpsrfemale offendersicpsrHIVicpsrjail inmatesicpsrpostrelease programsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemBurghardt, JohnNeedels, KarenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3978Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03978.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30441MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30441MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Healthy Families New York Home Visiting Program, Age Seven Follow Up, 2007-2009
[electronic resource]
Kimberly DuMont
,
Monica L. Rodriguez
,
Kristen Kirkland
,
Susan Mitchell-Herzfeld
,
Susan Ehrhard-Dietzel
,
Eunju Lee
,
China Layne
,
Rose Greene
2012-04-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR30441NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Healthy Families New York (HFNY), which was based on the Healthy Families America (HFA) model, was established as a strengths-based, intensive home visitation program with the explicit goals of promoting positive parenting skills and parent-child interaction; preventing child abuse and neglect; supporting optimal prenatal care, and child health and development; and improving parent's self-sufficiency.
In 2000, a randomized controlled trial was initiated at three sites with the HFNY home visiting program. Families eligible for HFNY at each site were randomly assigned to either an intervention group that was offered HFNY services or to a control group that was given information on and referral to appropriate services other than home visiting. Baseline interviews were conducted with 1,173 of the eligible women (intervention, n=579; control, n=594), and follow up interviews at Years 1, 2, and 3. In addition to data gathered during the follow up interviews, information regarding study participants' involvement in reports of child maltreatment was also extracted and coded from Child Protection Services records.
For the current study, mothers in both the intervention and control groups were re-interviewed at the time of the target child's seventh birthday. Interviews (Dataset 1: Mother Interview Data, n=942) included information about parenting, the child, earnings, and household composition. Interviewers also completed face-to-face assessments (Dataset 2: Target Child Interview Data) with 800 of the children who were born and reached the age of 7 at the time of interview. The target child interviews assessed children's receptive vocabulary skills, emotional health, self-regulatory abilities, and problem behaviors. The research team also extracted or obtained administrative data pertaining to Child Protective Service reports, foster care placements, federal and state supported benefits, and programs services and costs (Datasets 3-8).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30441.v1
behavior problemsicpsrchild abuseicpsrchild developmenticpsrchild rearingicpsrchild welfareicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrinterventionicpsroutreach programsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparenting skillsicpsrschool age childrenicpsrservice providersicpsrsocial servicesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyDuMont, KimberlyRodriguez, Monica L.Kirkland, KristenMitchell-Herzfeld, SusanEhrhard-Dietzel, SusanLee, EunjuLayne, ChinaGreene, RoseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30441Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30441.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03689MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03689MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of Hung Juries in Bronx County, New York, Los Angeles County, California, Maricopa County, Arizona, and Washington, DC, 2000-2001
[electronic resource]
Paula L. Hannaford-Agor
,
Valerie P. Hans
,
Nicole L. Mott
,
G. Thomas Munsterman
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3689NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was undertaken for the purpose of providing an
empirical picture of hung juries. Researchers were able to secure the
cooperation of four courts: (1) Bronx County Supreme Court in New
York, (2) Los Angeles County Superior Court in California, (3)
Maricopa County Superior Court in Arizona, and (4) District of
Columbia Superior Court in Washington, DC. The four sites were
responsible for distributing and collecting questionnaire packets to
all courtrooms hearing non-capital felony jury cases. Each packet
contained a case data form requesting information about case
characteristics (Part 1) and outcomes (Part 2), as well as survey
questionnaires for the judges (Part 3), attorneys (Part 4), and jurors
(Part 5). The case data form requested type of charge, sentence range,
jury's decision, demographic information about the defendant(s) and
the victim(s), voir dire (jury selection process), trial evidence and
procedures, and jury deliberations. The judge questionnaire probed
for evaluation of the evidence, case complexity, attorney skill,
likelihood that the jury would hang, reaction to the verdict, opinions
regarding the hung jury rate in the jurisdiction, and experience on
the bench. The attorney questionnaire requested information assessing
the voir dire, case complexity, attorney skill, evaluation of the
evidence, reaction to the verdict, opinions regarding the hung jury
rate in the jurisdiction, and experience in legal practice. If the
jury hung, attorneys also provided their views about why the jury was
unable to reach a verdict. Finally, the juror questionnaire requested
responses regarding case complexity, attorney skill, evaluation of the
evidence, formation of opinions, dynamics of the deliberations
including the first and final votes, juror participation, conflict,
reaction to the verdict, opinions about applicable law, assessment of
criminal justice in the community, and demographic information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03689.v1
verdictsicpsrcourtsicpsrfelony offensesicpsrhung juriesicpsrjury deliberationsicpsrjury instructionsicpsrjury selectionicpsrmistrialsicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHannaford-Agor, Paula L.Hans, Valerie P.Mott, Nicole L.Munsterman, G. ThomasInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3689Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03689.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02311MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02311MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Midtown Community Court in New York City, 1992-1994
[electronic resource]
David Rottman
,
Brian Ostrom
,
Michele Sviridoff
,
Richard Curtis
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2311NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In October 1993, the Midtown Community Court opened as a
three-year demonstration project designed to forge links with the
community in developing a problem-solving approach to quality-of-life
offenses. The problems that this community-based courthouse sought to
address were specific to the court's midtown New York City location:
high concentration of quality-of-life crimes, broad community
dissatisfaction with court outcomes, visible signs of disorder, and
clusters of persistent high-rate offenders with serious problems,
including addiction and homelessness. This study was conducted to
evaluate how well the new court was able to dispense justice locally
and whether the establishment of the Midtown Community Court made a
difference in misdemeanor case processing. Data were collected at two
time periods for a comparative analysis. First, a baseline dataset
(Part 1, Baseline Data) was constructed from administrative records,
consisting of a ten-percent random sample of all nonfelony
arraignments in Manhattan during the 12 months prior to the opening of
the Midtown Community Court. Second, comparable administrative data
(Part 2, Comparison Data) were collected from all cases arraigned at
the Midtown Court during its first 12 months of operation, as well as
from a random sample of all downtown nonfelony arraignments held
during this same time period. Both files contain variables on precinct
of arrest, arraignment type, charges, bonds, dispositions, sentences,
total number of court appearances, and total number of warrants
issued, as well as prior felony and misdemeanor
convictions. Demographic variables include age, sex, and race of
offender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02311.v1
addictionicpsrcase processingicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcourtsicpsrhomelessnessicpsrmisdemeanor offensesicpsroffendersicpsrquality of lifeicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRottman, DavidOstrom, BrianSviridoff, MicheleCurtis, RichardInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2311Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02311.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02652MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02652MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the New York City Department of Probation's Drug Treatment Initiative, 1991-1994
[electronic resource]
Gregory P. Falkin
,
Shiela Straus
,
Timothy Bohen
,
Douglas Young
,
Laura Winterfield
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2652NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the New York City
Department of Probation's initiative to place clients in specialized
Substance Abuse Verification and Enforcement (SAVE) units for
treatment and management. The main analytical strategy of this study
was to determine whether clients who were appropriately matched to
outpatient drug treatment were less likely to recidivate after
treatment in this modality. The focus of the research was not so much
on developing powerful prediction models, but rather on determining
whether outpatient drug treatment was appropriate and effective for
certain types of probationers. The evaluation research involved an
in-depth analysis of a sample of 1,860 probationers who were sentenced
between September 1991-September 1992 and referred to contracting
outpatient drug treatment programs one or more times as of December
31, 1993. The following types of data were collected: (1) the New
York City Department of Probation's demographic and drug use
information, obtained during the presentence investigation and at
intake to probation, (2) the Department of Probation's Central
Placement Unit (CPU) database records for each referral made through
the CPU, as well as monthly progress reports filled out by the
treatment programs on each probationer admitted to drug treatment, (3)
the New York State Department of Criminal Justice Statistics' data on
criminal histories, and (4) probation officers' reports on whether
clients were referred to treatment, the kind of treatment modality to
which they were referred, and the dates of admission and
discharge. Demographic and socioeconomic variables include age at
first arrest and sentencing, gender, race or ethnicity, marital
status, family composition, educational attainment, and employment
status. Other variables include drug use history (e.g., age at which
drugs were first used, if the client's family members used drugs, if
the client was actively using heroin, cocaine, or alcohol at time of
intake into treatment), criminal history (e.g., age at first arrest,
number of arrests, types of crimes, prior convictions, and prior
probation and jail sentences), and drug treatment history (e.g.,
number and types of prior times in drug treatment, months since last
treatment program, number of admissions to a CPU program, and number
of AIDS education programs attended).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02652.v1
criminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrfamily historyicpsrprobation servicesicpsrprobationersicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrtreatment outcomesicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemFalkin, Gregory P.Straus, ShielaBohen, TimothyYoung, DouglasWinterfield, LauraInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2652Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02652.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09980MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1995 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09980MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the New York City Police Cadet Corps, 1986-1989
[electronic resource]
Antony Pate
,
Edwin E. Hamilton
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1995ICPSR9980NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether the
Police Cadet Corps program in New York City had achieved its goal of
improving the police force through additional training of applicants
with higher education. The evaluation of the program was designed to
answer questions such as (1) How was the program recruitment
implemented, and with what success? (2) What were the role-related
perceptions and attitudes of the cadets and how did they differ, if at
all, among different types of cadets and from those of the members of
the latest recruit class? (3) How, if at all, did the program
experience affect the cadets' perceptions and attitudes? and (4) How
did the attitudes and perceptions of cadets compare to non-cadet
recruits with and without some college education in the same academy
class? Four cohorts of cadets were asked to complete several different
questionnaires throughout the course of the program, which culminated
in graduation from the police academy. Two sets of non-cadet recruits
from the academy were also included in the research. Major variables
in the data collection detail reasons for entry into the police
department, opinions regarding police, and perceptions and attitudes
toward the police cadet program. Some questionnaires also provided
information on demographic characteristics of the cadets (race, sex,
marital status, military service and branch, highest level of
education, family income, and year of birth). The unit of observation
is the New York City police cadet.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09980.v1
attitudesicpsreducational backgroundicpsrleadershipicpsrpolice cadetsicpsrpolice recruitsicpsrpolice trainingicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IX. PolicePate, AntonyHamilton, Edwin E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9980Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09980.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02466MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02466MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Partnership for Long-Term Care (PLTC) [California, Connecticut, Indiana, and New York]
[electronic resource]Surveys of PLTC/non-PLTC Insurers, Purchasers/Nonpurchasers of PLTC Insurance, and Purchasers of non-PLTC Insurance, 1995-1996
Nelda McCall
2008-04-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2466NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These surveys were conducted to evaluate the Partnership
for Long-Term Care (PLTC), a project in which the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation awarded grants to four states -- California, Connecticut,
Indiana, and New York -- to work with private insurers to create
long-term care insurance policies that were more affordable and
provided better protection against impoverishment than those generally
available. PLTC policies combine private long-term care insurance with
special Medicaid eligibility standards that protect assets of the
insured once private insurance benefits are exhausted. Four parts
constitute this collection. Parts 1 and 2 consist of data from a
survey of PLTC insurers and of non-PLTC insurers, respectively. Both
of these surveys gathered information on marketing methods,
underwriting procedures, case management, sales, views on the PLTC,
and reasons for participating or not participating in the PLTC. Part 3
comprises data from a survey of purchasers and nonpurchasers of PLTC
policies, which included questions about health status, insurance
coverage, opinions on long-term care insurance, financial planning for
long-term care, income, assets, and demographic and social
characteristics, such as sex, date of birth, education, race, Hispanic
origin, marital status, household size, number of living children, and
employment. Part 4 contains data from a survey of Californians who
purchased non-PLTC long-term care insurance before and after the
implementation of the PLTC in California. This survey covered the same
topics as the survey of purchasers/nonpurchasers of PLTC insurance.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02466.v1
insurance coverageicpsrlong term careicpsrlong term care insuranceicpsrpersonal financesicpsrprogramsicpsrgrantsicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesHMCA II. Cost/Access to Health CareMcCall, NeldaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2466Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02466.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28044MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28044MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Target Corporation's Safe City Initiative in Chula Vista, California, and Cincinnati, Ohio, 2004-2008
[electronic resource]
Nancy LaVigne
2010-09-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR28044NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
he specified type of crime in the displacement area, the cost of the specified type of crime in a matched comparison area, the city, and the crime type. The Safe City Business Survey Data (Part 3) contain 132 variables relating to perceptions of safety, contact with local police, experience and reporting of crime, impact of crime, crime prevention, community connections, and business/employee information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28044.v1
crime patternsicpsrcrime preventionicpsrcrime reportingicpsrevaluationicpsrpolice citizen interactionsicpsrpolice community relationsicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrreactions to crimeicpsrretail industryicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcost effectivenessicpsrcrime controlicpsrcrime control programsicpsrcrime costsicpsrcrime impacticpsrNACJD II. Community StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemLaVigne, NancyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28044Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28044.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02704MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02704MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of Violence Prevention Programs in Four New York City Middle Schools, 1993-1994
[electronic resource]
Tanya Bannister
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2704NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This research project sought to evaluate the impact of
broad-based multifaceted violence prevention programs versus programs
that have a more limited focus. Two specific programs were evaluated
in four New York City middle schools. The more limited program used
Project S.T.O.P.(Students Teaching Options for Peace), a conflict
resolution and peer mediation training program. The full
multi-faceted program combined Project S.T.O.P. with Safe Harbor, a
program that provided victimization counseling and taught violence
prevention. The effects of this combined program, offered in three of
the middle schools, were compared to those of just the Project
S.T.O.P. program alone in one middle school. To study the program
models, researchers used a quasi-experimental pre-post design, with
nonequivalent comparison groups. Questionnaires were given to students
to assess the impact of the two programs. Students were asked about
their knowledge and use of prevention programs in their schools. Data
were also collected on students' history of victimization, such as
whether they were ever attacked at school, stolen from, mugged, or
threatened with a weapon. Students were also asked about their
attitudes toward verbal abuse, victims of violence, and conditions
when revenge is acceptable, and their exposure to violence, including
whether they knew anyone who was sexually abused, beaten, or attacked
because of race, gender, or sexual orientation. Additional questions
covered students' use of aggressive behaviors, such as whether they
had threatened someone with a weapon or had beaten, slapped, hit, or
kicked someone. Data were also gathered on the accessibility of
alcohol, various drugs, weapons, and stolen property. Demographic
variables include students' school grade, class, sex, number of
brothers and sisters, and household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02704.v1
conflict resolutionicpsrcrime in schoolsicpsrcrime preventionicpsrmediationicpsrmiddle schoolsicpsrpeer groupsicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrvictimizationicpsrviolenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyBannister, TanyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2704Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02704.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32901MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32901MiAaIMiAaI
Experimental Evaluation of a Youth Dating Violence Prevention Program in New York City Middle Schools, 2009-2010
[electronic resource]
Bruce Taylor
,
Nan D. Stein
,
Dan Woods
,
Elizabeth Mumford
2012-05-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR32901NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study sought to measure knowledge about laws related to domestic violence and harassment, resources for help, rape myths, and skills such as conflict resolution; attitudes about the acceptability of violent, abusive, and harassing behaviors; behavioral intentions to avoid committing violent acts in the future as well as intentions to intervene when in the position of a bystander; behavioral measures about peer and dating partner physical and sexual violence experienced as a victim or perpetrator, and sexual harassment experienced as a victim or perpetrator; and other items covering a demographic profile of the students and questions on prior attendance at an educational program about sexual assault, harassment, or violence, and prior history of dating.
Researchers randomly assigned a school-based intervention to 6th and 7th grade classes (over 2,500 students) in 30 public middle schools in New York City to one of four conditions: (1) a classroom-based intervention; (2) a school-wide intervention; (3) interventions that included both classroom and school-wide components; or (4) a (no treatment) control group. The classroom based intervention was delivered through a six session curriculum that emphasized the consquences for perpetrators of domestic violence and harassment, state laws and penalties for domestic violence and harassment, the construction of gender roles, and healthy relationships. The school-wide intervention included the development and use of temporary school-based restraining orders, higher levels of faculty and security presence in areas identified by students and school personnel as unsafe "hot spots", and the use of posters to increase awareness and reporting of domestic violence and harassment to school personnel. Pencil and paper surveys were distributed to students at three different times: (1) immediately before the assignment to one of the four study conditions, (2) immediately after the treatment (or control condition) was completed, and (3) between five and six months after assignment to one of the four study conditions. The surveys took about 40 minutes to complete and were completed in the classroom during one class period.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32901.v1
childrenicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic violenceicpsrmiddle schoolsicpsrschool age childrenicpsrsexual harassmenticpsrsocial interactionicpsrsocial lifeicpsrstudentsicpsryouthsicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD I. Attitude SurveysICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorTaylor, BruceStein, Nan D.Woods, DanMumford, ElizabethInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32901Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32901.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03490MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03490MiAaIMiAaI
Families As a Resource in Recovery From Drug Abuse in New York City, 1999-2001
[electronic resource]
Eileen Sullivan
2005-01-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR3490NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examined La Bodega de la Familia, an
experimental program for drug-abusing offenders and their families in
New York City. The study evaluated the outcomes of substance abusers
and their families who participated in La Bodega's family case
management by comparing them to a group of similar families that did
not participate in the program. Data were collected on 93 La Bodega
participants and 88 comparison subjects. Data were gathered through
structured interviews conducted when subjects entered the study and
six months later. The first round of interviews was conducted from
January 1999 through August 2000, and the second round was conducted
between August 1999 and January 2001. The interviews were based on a
standardized instrument that assessed self-reported physical and
mental health, family functioning, and social support.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03490.v1
case managementicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealthicpsroffendersicpsrsocial supporticpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSullivan, EileenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3490Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03490.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35005MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35005MiAaIMiAaI
Families of Newtown, New York, 1642-1790
[electronic resource]
Jessica Kross
2014-03-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35005NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset focuses on economic, social, and geographic mobility of town residents, and life events (marriage, birth and mortality). Church records supplemented with genealogies, wills, inventories, probate records, cemetery data, town books, court books, censuses, and tax lists were used to reconstitute families along the lines of previous French and English work (e.g. Fleury, M. and L. Henry,
Nouveau manuel de dépouillement et d'exploitation de l'état civil ancient
(1965) and Wrigley, E.A, "Family Reconstitution" in E.A. Wrigley, ed.
An Introduction to English Historical Demography
(1966). Family reconstitution is a method for studying demographic behavior in the absence of modern censuses and vital registration, providing for both observation of demographic events, as well as the population and time at risk. This dataset includes information about 202 couples and their 1094 children. The data on couples focus on demographic details for mothers and fathers, including birth, baptism, marriage and death dates, residence and religion. The data on children includes demographic information for the child, as well as marriage age and residence. Not all families have complete information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35005.v1
birthicpsrchildrenicpsrdeathicpsrdemographyicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily historiesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfertilityicpsrmarriageicpsrparentsicpsrDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR II. MortalityICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderKross, JessicaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35005Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35005.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08240MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08240MiAaIMiAaI
Family Time Use
[electronic resource] An Eleven-state Urban/Rural Comparison, 1978
Robert O. Sinclair
,
B.A. Lewis
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8240NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collaborative research project, established in 1977,
consisted of a team of scientists from 11 states representing each
region of the United States. The project served three overall
purposes: (1) to establish a data bank for urban and rural families on
time use for household, paid and volunteer work, and nonwork
activities, (2) to compare time use among urban and rural populations
in various geographic areas in the United States, and (3) to determine
changes in family time use over the past decade. Those interested in
measurement and valuation of nonmarket work use time as a factor in
their models. Allocations of time between obligations and leisure are
reflected in the time use of family members, as are the effects of
role-sharing in dual-career families. At the micro level, a better
picture of the quality of life can be seen if time use of all family
members is analyzed. This approach allows the study of distribution of
workloads, interaction of household members, and trade-offs that can
be made in a family household unit. A total of 2,100 families
participated in this survey through the use of questionnaires and time
use charts. Of these, half were classified as urban families and half
were classified as rural families. Variables in this dataset include
the activities of family members (i.e., food preparation, dishwashing,
shopping, maintenance of home, paid work, social and recreational
activities) and the amount of time they spent on each activity. The
data also record the condition and type of appliances and household
equipment, the activities of the family seven days before the study,
and information about the employment of the adults and children in the
household.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08240.v1
dual career familiesicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily work relationshipicpsrhouseholdsicpsrleisureicpsrrecreationicpsrrural areasicpsrrural populationicpsrtime utilizationicpsrurban populationicpsrworkicpsrICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and BehaviorSinclair, Robert O.Lewis, B.A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8240Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08240.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08346MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08346MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 55, [1984]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2011-07-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8346NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Each geographic entity listed in this collection is
identified by a unique two-character state code and a five-character
numeric place code. Areas of the United States covered are the 50
states, the District of Columbia, and all outlying territories with
significant self-administration (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern
Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands,
and the Virgin Islands). An exhaustive list is included of
incorporated places, census designated places (CDPs), primary county
divisions, recognized Indian reservations, and Alaska Native villages
and counties. The listing also includes unincorporated places,
military bases, national parks, airports, and ground transportation
points. The two-character class code distinguishes over 70 entity
types. Each entity is identified by the county or counties in which it
is located. All categories and military bases are identified by
congressional district and, in most cases, by standard metropolitan
statistical areas (SMSAs). Incorporated places, CDPs, and Indian and
Alaska Native areas are cross-referenced to United States Bureau of
the Census files. In addition, ZIP codes are provided for all post
offices.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08346.v2
census county divisionsicpsrCensus Designated Placesicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrFIPSicpsrFIPS codesicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrstates (USA)icpsrzip code areasicpsrICPSR VII. Geography and EnvironmentUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8346Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08346.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08082MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08082MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Outlays, County and City Master Files, Fiscal Year 1980
[electronic resource]
Office of Economic Opportunity
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8082NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains detailed information about 1980
fiscal outlays of the United States federal government to counties and
cities. There are two separate files for this fiscal year: a county
master file and a city master file. The county file lists each United
States county by state and includes appropriations, programs, type of
assistance, type of transaction, outlays in dollars, beneficiaries,
and state control of federal outlays. The city file follows the same
format as the county file, with data for all cities with populations
of 25,000 or more. Both the county and city files are arranged by
state, with the state summaries preceding the county or city
breakdowns.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08082.v1
beneficiariesicpsrcitiesicpsrcountiesicpsrfederal aidicpsrfederal governmenticpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrgovernment programsicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrincomeicpsrlocal governmenticpsrstate governmenticpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR VIII.C. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Statistics on Government OperationsOffice of Economic OpportunityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8082Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08082.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07841MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07841MiAaIMiAaI
Federal-State Cooperative Program
[electronic resource] 1975-1976 Population Estimates
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7841NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains estimates of the total
population residing in all counties and county equivalents in the
United States for July 1, 1975, and July 1, 1976. Also included are
estimates of the components of population change (births, deaths, and
net migration) from April 1970 through December 1975. The data were
compiled by the Census Bureau with the assistance of designated state
agencies in the Federal-State Cooperative Program for Population
Estimates. The objective of the program was to develop and publish
estimates of the population of counties using standard procedures for
data input and methodology. The information included in this dataset
was published for each county or county equivalent (e.g., parishes in
Louisiana, census divisions in Alaska, and independent cities in
Virginia and Missouri) by the Census Bureau.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07841.v1
birth ratesicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcountiesicpsrmortality ratesicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7841Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07841.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07842MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07842MiAaIMiAaI
Federal-State Cooperative Program
[electronic resource]1976-1977 Population Estimates
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7842NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains estimates of the total
population residing in all counties and county equivalents in the
United States for July 1, 1976, and July 1, 1977. Also included are
estimates of the components of population change (births, deaths, and
net migration) from April 1970 through December 1976. The data were
compiled by the Census Bureau with the assistance of designated state
agencies in the Federal-State Cooperative Program for Population
Estimates. The objective of the program was to develop and publish
estimates of the population of counties using standard procedures for
data input and methodology. The information included in this dataset
was published for each county or county equivalent (e.g., parishes in
Louisiana, census divisions in Alaska, and independent cities in
Virginia and Missouri) by the Census Bureau.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07842.v1
birth ratesicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcountiesicpsrmortality ratesicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7842Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07842.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07843MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07843MiAaIMiAaI
Federal-State Cooperative Program
[electronic resource]1977-1978 Population Estimates
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7843NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains estimates of the
total population residing in all counties and county equivalents in
the United States for July 1, 1977, and July 1, 1978. Also included
are estimates of the components of population change (births, deaths,
and net migration) from April 1970 through June 1977. The data were
compiled by the Census Bureau with the assistance of designated state
agencies in the Federal-State Cooperative Program for Population
Estimates. The objective of the program was to develop and publish
estimates of the population of counties using standard procedures for
data input and methodology. The information included in this dataset
was published for each county or county equivalent (e.g., parishes in
Louisiana, census divisions in Alaska, and independent cities in
Virginia and Missouri) by the Census Bureau.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07843.v1
birth ratesicpsrcensus county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcountiesicpsrmortality ratesicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7843Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07843.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31622MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31622MiAaIMiAaI
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study [Public Use Data]
[electronic resource]
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
,
Irwin Garfinkel
,
Sara S. McLanahan
,
Christina Paxson
2011-12-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR31622NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study follows a cohort of new parents and their children and provides previously unavailable information about the conditions and capabilities of new unwed parents and the well-being of their children. Mothers and fathers were interviewed in the hospital shortly after the birth of their children. The baseline questionnaires for mothers and fathers include information on (1) prenatal care, (2) mother-father relationships, (3) expectations about fathers' rights and responsibilities, (4) attitudes toward marriage, (5) parents' health, (6) social support and extended kin, (7) knowledge about local policies and community resources, and (8) education, employment, and income. Follow-up interviews gather additional information including (1) access to and use of healthcare and childcare services, (2) experiences with local welfare and child support agencies, (3) parental conflict and domestic violence, and (4) child health and well-being.
The first four waves of this study (1997-2003) have been archived and are available for download at ICPSR-DSDR. Nine-Year Follow Up (Wave 5) data can be found through the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study page on Princeton's website.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31622.v1
domestic responsibilitiesicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfathersicpsrmarital statusicpsrmarriageicpsrparentsicpsrunwed mothersicpsrchild careicpsrchild healthicpsrchild rearingicpsrchild welfareicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderHMCA V. OtherDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityBrooks-Gunn, JeanneGarfinkel, IrwinMcLanahan, Sara S.Paxson, ChristinaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31622Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31622.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07495MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07495MiAaIMiAaI
Gambling in the United States, 1975
[electronic resource]
Maureen Kallick
,
Daniel Suits Suits
,
Theodore Dielman
,
Judith Hybels
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7495NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains interviews conducted with a national
sample (Part 1) and a sample of Nevada residents (Part 2) on gambling
activities and attitudes toward both legal and illegal gambling. The
study attempted to determine the extent of gambling activities in the
United States, examine the social consequences of changes in gambling
laws, and estimate government revenues available from legal
gambling. Questions were asked about leisure time activities, gambling
patterns, amount of money bet, and types of gambling practiced by
respondents. Specially designed questions on "off-track betting" were
asked of residents of the greater New York City area -- the only area
besides Nevada where this kind of gambling had been legalized. New
Jersey residents were queried on another type of gambling, "Pickit",
the only legal numbers game that existed in the United States at the
time the study was conducted. Demographic data include age, sex, race,
marital status, level of education, religious preference and church
attendance, number of children, employment status, occupation, and
income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07495.v1
casinosicpsrsocial problemsicpsrsocial valuesicpsrgamblingicpsrgovernment revenuesicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlegalized gamblingicpsrleisureicpsrrecreationicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial changeicpsrICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesKallick, MaureenSuits, Daniel SuitsDielman, TheodoreHybels, JudithInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7495Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07495.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07844MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07844MiAaIMiAaI
General Revenue Sharing, 1976 Population Estimates
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7844NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains current population estimates
and per capita money income for counties and minor civil divisions in
each state. These estimates were developed to provide updates of the
data elements in Federal Revenue Sharing allocations under the state
and local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972. Population estimates recorded
in the dataset are for July 1, 1976, while per capita income estimates
are for 1975. The units recorded in the data collection include
counties, incorporated places, certain towns in New England, New York,
and Wisconsin, and townships in other states. Certain Midwestern
states may have active minor civil divisions in some counties, but not
in others. In additional to these estimates, April 1, 1970, population
and 1969 and 1975 per capita money income are included for each
area. POPULATION AND INCOME ESTIMATES FOR THE UNITED STATES, 1969-1973
(ICPSR 0078) and POPULATION AND PER CAPITA INCOME ESTIMATES, 1969-1975
(ICPSR 7577) contain similar data for earlier years.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07844.v1
census county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfederal revenue sharingicpsrgovernment revenuesicpsrincomeicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrstatesicpsrtax revenuesicpsrtownshipsicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7844Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07844.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07840MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07840MiAaIMiAaI
General Revenue Sharing, 1978 Population Estimates
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7840NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains current population estimates
and per capita money income for counties and minor civil divisions in
each state. These estimates were developed to provide updates of the
data elements in Federal Revenue Sharing allocations under the state
and local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972. Population estimates recorded
in the dataset are for July 1, 1978, while per capita income estimates
are for 1969 and 1977. The units recorded in the data collection
include counties, incorporated places, certain towns in New England,
New York, and Wisconsin, and townships in other states. Certain
Midwestern states may have active minor civil divisions in some
counties, but not in others. In addition to these estimates, April 1,
1970, population and 1969 and 1975 per capita money income are
included for each area. POPULATION AND INCOME ESTIMATES FOR THE UNITED
STATES, 1969-1973 (ICPSR 0078) and POPULATION AND PER CAPITA INCOME
ESTIMATES, 1969-1975 (ICPSR 7577) contain similar data for earlier
years.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07840.v1
census county divisionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfederal revenue sharingicpsrgovernment revenuesicpsrincomeicpsrminor civil divisionsicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrstates (USA)icpsrtax revenuesicpsrtownshipsicpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.I