I’m not gonna get into the whether-it’s-spam-or-not discussion here. I’m sure there will be plenty of comments under that post with opinions on this.

There are two other facets of the “problem” that I’d like to discuss in my today’s post:

1. Not all social media users are the same

It would be just to point out that different social media users want/expect different things from their social media usage. For example, it is obvious that the 70,000+ people that follow @FatWalletDeals on Twitter expect very different type of content than the 70,000 Twitter followers of David Meerman Scott. Both groups are quite focused. Both Twitter users have built up tremendous social capital. Yet, for one it would be appropriate to actively “share” deals, discounts and affiliate links (in fact, it would be expected by their followers), while for another the situation is very different.

2. Affiliate managers do have a challenge to deal with

Circling back to Priest’s tweet that we’ve started with, there is a challenge that affiliate program managers have to deal with here. There are at least 4 questions every affiliate manager should answer:

Do/should you accept such services/platforms as affiliates?

If you do, how do you then control how exactly your brand will be “marketed”?

Is if-you-tweet-junk-then-people-will-unfollow-you a good enough of a filtering/policing mechanism for affiliate managers to rely on?

What about disclosures? FTC is clear that “if a significant number of” your readers/followers don’t know you’re “being paid to endorse” a product/service a disclosure is needed; and #PaidAd hashtag would be appropriate [more here]

While one may, certainly, discuss the “burning” all of your “social capital” it took “a lifetime to build up” [as the opening lines of the above-referenced article say], we shouldn’t lose sight of how much there is at stake for the merchant/advertiser here (e.g.: risks of brand damage, deceptive advertising investigations, etc). Both advertisers themselves, and the managers at the helm of their affiliate programs, must carefully choose their marketing partners here.

13 thoughts on “Affiliate Links on Social Media Platforms: My Opinion on Subject”

Interesting article Geno. As I run an offline business locally here where I do a lot of social marketing I have to say from that stand point that I don’t like direct selling through the social sites I use nor would I want my marketing partners doing the same either. Social is for engagement and discussion, to bring like minded customers together to talk and debate. Not to ram a product down their throat.

Hey Geno yes been busy with lots of offline stuff so been a little less active online, better for my eyes and fingers too 🙂

Certainly social can help sell, I 100% agree with that and with out social group I will high light new products every now and again but generally I am watching for customers to start discussions on new products that I can join in.

Our FB group is pretty small but because we’re about the engagement and discussion and not pointless brand pumping we get a heck of a lot more discussion than FB groups a lot larger than ours, quality over quantity any day of the week.

Good write up – I’ve been barraged with approaches from a lot of these “ecommerce discovery” affiliate networks and sub-networks and have decided to pass. I see this whole arena as really dangerous as it pertains to FTC disclosure and brand protection. It’s bad enough policing affiliates as is, let alone once you start letting anyone with a Twitter or FB account in through their relationship with one of these providers without the ability to review them or have much visibility/transparency into their activities.

Priest, thank you for bringing it up on Twitter earlier than my Google Alerts alerted me (maybe it’s time for me to switch my affiliate marketing-related alerts from “once a day” to “as-it-happens”).

Yes the water does become “extremely murky” unless we, as affiliate managers, are simultaneously equipped with the tools/opportunities to effectively police these things. And, as far as I’m aware, we are still lacking good tools to police affiliate website’s compliance with FTC’s rules regarding endorsements and testimonials (wouldn’t it be great if affiliate networks provided such tools? AvantLink? ShareASale? the first network that starts equipping advertisers with a tool like this is going to have a tremendous competitive advantage in affiliate managers’ eyes!), not to mention what’s going on social media.

Posting anonymously because networks have too much power over my income and tend to favor with merchants when issues are brought up

The US affiliate industry hasn’t done anything in at least 4 years, aside from PPCall – and even then it hasn’t been the affiliate networks, but Ring Revenue directly. From 2005 – 2008, advances by networks were encouraging, although not exciting. Since then, just pitiful.

To wait for a network to be proactive on FTC regulations is a waste of time. The only hope to see this will be a third party figuring out a way to make a buck off of it.

I imagine the next affiliate network enhancement we’ll see will be related to “Do Not Track” browser settings, when the network sees a hit to their bottom line from untracked transactions.

Interesting thoughts (and I certainly appreciate the necessity for saying “anonymous” here). Now, as an affiliate, what in your mind are the top 3 things (you’ve mentioned the do-not-track issue; but what would be the other 2) that you’d like to see affiliate networks to implement (look into) a.s.a.p.?