"But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal Government." Andrew Jackson

• Allegations of homosexual relationships with at least four members of Wright’s church (Young, Bland, Spencer, Sinclair), two of whom were shot execution style during 2007 campaign season, one who died in 2007 of HIV complications, and one who was arrested by Biden’s son Beau after a news conference (the charges being dropped).

• Abusing the word, “crisis” and the phrase, “at this defining moment” and “let me be clear,” and “um... um... um”

• Picking moron gaffe machine Joe Biden for Vice President and all the other fools in your admin. not the least of which is Hillary “Hillarycare” “Cattle futures” “Carpetbagger” “Soros puppet” “Vince Foster ‘friend’” Clinton.

• Failing to secure the border, even going after the sovereign state of Arizona for trying.

• Lying on CNN about earmarks not being in stimulus bill.

• Threatening to close Guantanamo Bay, and demonizing those involved, and then keeping it open.

• Lying about getting rid of earmarks.

• Lying about father’s service in WW2

• Lying about not having lobbyists serve in your admin then appointing William Lynn of Raytheon for deputy secretary of defense.

• Lying about “barely knowing Tony Rezco.”

• “57 States with one left to go”

• Calling Cinco de Mayo “Cinco de Cuatro”

• Giving Prime Minister Gordon Brown American DVD’s that don’t work on British players.

• Saying Otto Raddatz was not insured and died. He was insured and lived for four more years.

• Saying his own mother was denied healthcare for a preexisting condition when was not, she was only denied disability.

• Saying Jared Monti lived, when he, in fact, died and received Medal of Honor.

• Saying Hillary Clinton did better in Kentucky and West Virginia because Arkansas is closer than Illinois, when Illinois is closer to both.

• Saying during primaries “Iran is tiny, they don’t pose a serious threat to us” one day, and the very next day saying “Iran is a grave threat.”

• Saying he was born because of Selma, AL marches brought his parents together, when he was born in ’61, and the marches weren’t until ’64.

• Saying George W. Bush’s Iraq policies were responsible for Hugo Chavez, when Chavez was elected in ’98.

• Saying uncle helped at Auschwitz, when it was a great-uncle at Buchenwald

• Giving a toast to the Queen during England’s national anthem while she stood at attention and ignored him.

• Calling an inhaler for asthma sufferers a “breathalyzer.”

• Saying all the translators for Afghanistan were in Iraq [different languages].

• Lying about a Life Magazine picture and article in “Dreams from My Father” that the publisher says never existed.

• Saying: “The president does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” Then breaking the War Powers Act for Libya.

• Inviting “Common” to White House: whose lyrics bash a previous president, speak of armed violence against cops, as well as phrases like: “Them dick boys got a lot of cock in them...I wanna bone Jada Pinkett and that hoe Patra... but I still like Tootie cause she got big titties” etc. etc.

• Granting waivers to failing schools that receive federal aid so they don’t have to comply with NCLB requirements.

• 82% of public schools being failures under Obama.

• Using the death of 30 service members as a photo-op despite the families’ wishes that no photos be taken or distributed via media.

• Aiding your fundraiser SONY in the making and releasing “Bin Laden” movie in October of next election.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

I am pleased that you are working diligently toward better government. I am part of a team that is working the website http://www.mtlaws.com/ . This is a site to provide our reps. with support in evaluating bills, bill reviews, public information and direction how to be involved, and to coordinate various and disparate groups and individuals. We also hope to educate the lawmakers by providing principles for evaluating bills.

However, there is a VERY BIG PROBLEM in the whole process. I see it in nearly every bill that I evaluate.

Our elected representatives do not know the proper role of government, as laid down in our founding documents and our western, English common law heritage. We have become functionally illiterate in the American Civic Creed.

We have effectively forsaken common law, and have taken up Roman, civil law, which is political law. This is law according to the whim of men; law by whomever can get enough votes to implement the agenda they have chosen. It is all based on gaining political power. But political power is the power to be exempt from the restraints which apply to all people who are not in government. We are also ruled by commercial law, and have been tricked into signing away our common law, constitutional rights. We are now commercial persons, subject to commercial law, with government supervision and regulation of all our human endeavors.

So we try to send representatives to Helena, and to DC, who will write "better laws", and try to write into law more freedoms, so the corporate workers can have more liberty. But it cannot work, because we are too ignorant of the tricks that have already put us in bondage. We do not know who we are, our status as free people with God given, inalienable rights. We have all signed away our status by contracting for social security, federal benefits, driver licenses, permits, and many other things that contract us into status as federal employees and servants.

So many of our representatives act and talk more like fascists, or statists, than constitutionalists. While they ought to be repealing LARGE portions of the state codes, and eliminating government agencies, they revise, tweak, amend and alter the codes, and make the situation more confusing, more burdensome and hardly improved.

THIS APPROACH IS ALL WRONG.

We need a shift in the paradigm. We need an educated citizenry, who know common law, know how the judicial system ought to be constituted, and how a free society is ordered.

Then we need to elect our best men to go to the legislature and put these principles into practice. Now our candidates are poorly vetted, poorly read, and poorly prepared. So the broken system is perpetuated, and we make NO REAL PROGRESS TOWARD FREEDOM.

The proper role of government is to PROTECT OUR RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND PROPERTY. The role is negative, not positive. It is to protect from infringement, not to provide or supervise. Nor is it to so regulate our every action so we do not cause some potential harm. (This is the justification for nearly every regulation and law: to make sure someone does not cause some potential harm).

The only system that can work in a truly free society is to base all laws on 2 principles, on which every society can agree:

1. Do all you have agreed to do. This is the basis for all contract law and business dealings.

2. Do not encroach on any person or their property. This is the basis for tort law, and the interpersonal actions among people.

The summary of all this is the common law principle: If there is no victim, there is no crime. (NO harm, NO foul.)

No one would want to live in a society where these two principles are not the law. But the only civilizations that ever had any measure of freedom are the ones that have been based on these two laws. Most of the world has never had any concept of these laws, and so will never have any freedom. In proportion to our loss of these principles, we have lost our freedom. We will not regain it in the current direction.

So the pressing need is to relearn the American Civic creed, and to learn our proper status as free people. We need to renounce our corporate entanglements, and start to live as free people who know our place and status.
Until we do this, we are playing a rigged game which we will never win.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

This morning on Voices of Montana Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer stated that tons of bills coming before the legislature are so "unconstitutional" and he is going to do his best to Veto them. Has ordinary Common Sense has been LOST ? The audacity of The Governor needs to realize WHO he is working for, the people of Montana, or the Federal Government??

Governor Schweitzer can't be referring to bills that secure liberty and freedom, sovereignty and security like SB 117, SB 114, and SB 116.

Has Governor Schweitzer read the Constitution with any understanding? Article I Section 8 [enumerated powers] and 10th Amendment "The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States [that's plural], are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." and our own Montana State Constitution Article II Sec. 1, Sec. 2, Sec. 3, Sec. 8.

State and personal Sovereignty is written into the US Constitution, Limited Government is written into the US Constitution, Local Control is written into the US Constitution. Too bad the rewrite of the Montana Constitution failed this time around because the document produced in 1972 begs refinement.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

The Sanders County Commissioners sent a letter to Lynda Moss, Vice Chair, MT Senate Local Government Committee, urging opposition to the "Coordination" bill (SB-117) now before the Senate. signed by Commissioner Greg Magera , Commissioner Tony Cox, Commissioner Carol Brooker, Sanders County Treasurer Carol Turk, and Clerk Recorder Jennine Robbins.

This is two years after two of the same Commissioners agreed to write a letter urging coordination, but never wrote it, and/or never sent the letter they PROMISED to send. Does this make them liars?

And now they are using specious arguments about potential litigation as reason to oppose the bill, citing their "good working relationship" with local National Forests. Then, they show how empty that lie is by asking, rhetorically, paraphrasing, "Can any proponents of coordination show any example of it working to open the forests for lumbering?"

If the Commissioners have such a fine working relation with the Federal government, you'd think the forests would not be closed to lumbering, and coordination thus would not be necessary. Apparently, they don't know the meaning of the process, or are stooges of the same NGO's which have, for two decades, used "coordination-like"

litigation and threats of litigation to close off one Federal parcel after another. So much for "good working relations" with the Federal land barons.
Can the Commissioners point to any un-coordinated efforts made by them specifically in cooperation with the local forests, through their "good working relations" that have opened any Federal forests to logging?
We breathlessly await their reply.
Lark Chadwick and Jim Greaves