Then there’s the question of how all those fickle Lib Dem switchers Labour is relying on will react when the report finds fault – as surely it will – in the case made for war and its subsequent prosecution.

Before the last election, the timing of Lord Justice Saville’s inquiry into the Bloody Sunday killings was a cause of similar consternation after officials in the Northern Ireland Office realised that his mammoth report would have to be stored while Parliament was prorogued during the election campaign.

The families of the victims were not happy at the thought of ministers or officials having access to it during the interregnum, preparing their defences or leaking extracts to the newspapers.

In the end, the matter was resolved, but Saville was fiercely protective of his independence, (as, it seems, is Sir John Chilcot) making him difficult to predict. Officials in the Northern Ireland Office used to ask, only half-jokingly, whether Saville actually existed as no-one seemed to have any day-to-day contact with him.

Yet there are apparently those in his entourage who spy a chance for Ed Miliband to use a damning verdict as an opportunity to ‘disown’ the Blair/Brown era. Yeah, right. You hang together in this game.

Anyway, apprehension in Labour HQ may be misplaced. The issue of contention with Chilcot appears to be a reluctance by the Cabinet Office to sanction the release of classified information, including communications between Tony Blair and George Bush. Whitehall has countless bags of sand it can pour into the gear-box.

Then there’s the so-called “Maxwellisation” process to get through, with key witnesses like Tony Blair and Jack Straw not yet having had the chance to review the parts of the report referring to them.

Who would bet against the final report sailing blissfully beyond May 2015?

This entry was posted
on Monday, April 14th, 2014 at 3:50 pm and is filed under Uncut.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

3 Responses to “Chilcot will wag a long bony finger at Labour, but his report may miss the general election”

It makes little difference. The fact that Blair is still a member of the Labour Party despite standing before Parliament and deliberately lying, along with the fact that Labour ore considering taking a very large donation from Blair means that Labour have still not shown any remorse and not made any effort to distance themselves from what he did and what it caused and led to.

You can judge a man by the company he keeps also applies as you can judge a party by the company it keeps.