Deep State Goes to War with President-Elect, Using Unverified Claims, as Democrats Cheer

In January 1961, Dwight Eisenhower delivered his farewell address after serving two terms as U.S. president; the five-star general chose to warn Americans of this specific threat to democracy: “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” That warning was issued prior to the decadelong escalation of the Vietnam War, three more decades of Cold War mania, and the post-9/11 era, all of which radically expanded that unelected faction’s power even further.

This is the faction that is now engaged in open warfare against the duly elected and already widely disliked president-elect, Donald Trump. They are using classic Cold War dirty tactics and the defining ingredients of what has until recently been denounced as “Fake News.”

Their most valuable instrument is the U.S. media, much of which reflexively reveres, serves, believes, and sides with hidden intelligence officials. And Democrats, still reeling from their unexpected and traumatic election loss, as well as a systemic collapse of their party, seemingly divorced further and further from reason with each passing day, are willing — eager — to embrace any claim, cheer any tactic, align with any villain, regardless of how unsupported, tawdry, and damaging those behaviors might be.

The serious dangers posed by a Trump presidency are numerous and manifest. There is a wide array of legitimate and effective tactics for combating those threats: from bipartisan congressional coalitions and constitutional legal challenges to citizen uprisings and sustained and aggressive civil disobedience. All of those strategies have periodically proven themselves effective in times of political crisis or authoritarian overreach.

But cheering for the CIA and its shadowy allies to unilaterally subvert the U.S. election and impose its own policy dictates on the elected president is both warped and self-destructive. Empowering the very entities that have produced the most shameful atrocities and systemic deceit over the last six decades is desperation of the worst kind. Demanding that evidence-free, anonymous assertions be instantly venerated as Truth — despite emanating from the very precincts designed to propagandize and lie — is an assault on journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality. And casually branding domestic adversaries who refuse to go along as traitors and disloyal foreign operatives is morally bankrupt and certain to backfire on those doing it.

Beyond all that, there is no bigger favor that Trump opponents can do for him than attacking him with such lowly, shabby, obvious shams, recruiting large media outlets to lead the way. When it comes time to expose actual Trump corruption and criminality, who is going to believe the people and institutions who have demonstrated they are willing to endorse any assertions no matter how factually baseless, who deploy any journalistic tactic no matter how unreliable and removed from basic means of ensuring accuracy?

All of these toxic ingredients were on full display yesterday as the Deep State unleashed its tawdriest and most aggressive assault yet on Trump: vesting credibility in and then causing the public disclosure of a completely unvetted and unverified document, compiled by a paid, anonymous operative while he was working for both GOP and Democratic opponents of Trump, accusing Trump of a wide range of crimes, corrupt acts, and salacious private conduct. The reaction to all of this illustrates that while the Trump presidency poses grave dangers, so, too, do those who are increasingly unhinged in their flailing, slapdash, and destructive attempts to undermine it.

For months, the CIA, with unprecedented clarity, overtly threw its weight behind Hillary Clinton’s candidacy and sought to defeat Donald Trump. In August, former acting CIA Director Michael Morell announced his endorsement of Clinton in the New York Times and claimed that “Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” The CIA and NSA director under George W. Bush, Gen. Michael Hayden, also endorsed Clinton and went to the Washington Post to warn, in the week before the election, that “Donald Trump really does sound a lot like Vladimir Putin,” adding that Trump is “the useful fool, some naif, manipulated by Moscow, secretly held in contempt, but whose blind support is happily accepted and exploited.”

It is not hard to understand why the CIA preferred Clinton over Trump. Clinton was critical of Obama for restraining the CIA’s proxy war in Syria and was eager to expand that war, while Trump denounced it. Clinton clearly wanted a harder line than Obama took against the CIA’s long-standing foes in Moscow, while Trump wanted improved relations and greater cooperation. In general, Clinton defended and intended to extend the decadeslong international military order on which the CIA and Pentagon’s preeminence depends, while Trump — through a still-uncertain mix of instability and extremist conviction — posed a threat to it.

Whatever one’s views are on those debates, it is the democratic framework — the presidential election, the confirmation process, congressional leaders, judicial proceedings, citizen activism and protest, civil disobedience — that should determine how they are resolved. All of those policy disputes were debated out in the open; the public heard them; and Trump won. Nobody should crave the rule of Deep State overlords.

Yet craving Deep State rule is exactly what prominent Democratic operatives and media figures are doing. Any doubt about that is now dispelled. Just last week, Chuck Schumer issued a warning to Trump, telling Rachel Maddow that Trump was being “really dumb” by challenging the unelected intelligence community because of all the ways they possess to destroy those who dare to stand up to them:

And last night, many Democrats openly embraced and celebrated what was, so plainly, an attempt by the Deep State to sabotage an elected official who had defied it: ironically, its own form of blackmail.

Back in October, a political operative and former employee of the British intelligence agency MI6 was being paid by Democrats to dig up dirt on Trump (before that, he was paid by anti-Trump Republicans). He tried to convince countless media outlets to publish a long memo he had written filled with explosive accusations about Trump’s treason, business corruption, and sexual escapades, with the overarching theme that Trump was in servitude to Moscow because they were blackmailing and bribing him.

Despite how many had it, no media outlets published it. That was because these were anonymous claims unaccompanied by any evidence at all, and even in this more permissive new media environment, nobody was willing to be journalistically associated with it. As the New York Times’ Executive Editor Dean Baquet put it last night, he would not publish these “totally unsubstantiated” allegations because “we, like others, investigated the allegations and haven’t corroborated them, and we felt we’re not in the business of publishing things we can’t stand by.”

The closest this operative got to success was convincing Mother Jones’s David Corn to publish an October 31 article reporting that “a former senior intelligence officer for a Western country” claims that “he provided the [FBI] with memos, based on his recent interactions with Russian sources, contending the Russian government has for years tried to co-opt and assist Trump.”

But because this was just an anonymous claim unaccompanied by any evidence or any specifics (which Corn withheld), it made very little impact. All of that changed yesterday. Why?

What changed was the intelligence community’s resolution to cause this all to become public and to be viewed as credible. In December, John McCain provided a copy of this report to the FBI and demanded they take it seriously.

At some point last week, the chiefs of the intelligence agencies decided to declare that this ex-British intelligence operative was “credible” enough that his allegations warranted briefing both Trump and Obama about them, thus stamping some sort of vague, indirect, and deniable official approval on these accusations. Someone — by all appearances, numerous officials — then went to CNN to tell the network they had done this, causing CNN to go on air and, in the gravest of tones, announce the “Breaking News” that “the nation’s top intelligence officials” briefed Obama and Trump that Russia had compiled information that “compromised President-elect Trump.”

CNN refused to specify what these allegations were on the ground that it could not “verify” them. But with this document in the hands of multiple media outlets, it was only a matter of time — a small amount of time — before someone would step up and publish the whole thing. BuzzFeed quickly obliged, airing all of the unvetted, anonymous claims about Trump. Its editor-in-chief, Ben Smith, published a memo explaining that decision, saying that — although there was “serious reason to doubt the allegations” — BuzzFeed in general “errs on the side of publication” and “Americans can make up their own minds about the allegations.” Publishing this document predictably produced massive traffic (and thus profit) for the site, with millions of people viewing the article and presumably reading the “dossier.”

One can certainly object to BuzzFeed’s decision and, as the New York Times noted this morning, many journalists are doing so. It’s almost impossible to imagine a scenario where it’s justifiable for a news outlet to publish a totally anonymous, unverified, unvetted document filled with scurrilous and inflammatory allegations about which its own editor-in-chief says there “is serious reason to doubt the allegations,” on the ground that they want to leave it to the public to decide whether to believe it.

But even if one believes there is no such case where that is justified, yesterday’s circumstances presented the most compelling scenario possible for doing this. Once CNN strongly hinted at these allegations, it left it to the public imagination to conjure up the dirt Russia allegedly had to blackmail and control Trump. By publishing these accusations, BuzzFeed ended that speculation. More importantly, it allowed everyone to see how dubious this document is, one the CIA and CNN had elevated into some sort of grave national security threat. Almost immediately after it was published, the farcical nature of the “dossier” manifested. Not only was its author anonymous, but he was paid by Democrats (and, before that, by Trump’s GOP adversaries) to dig up dirt on Trump. Worse, he himself cited no evidence of any kind but instead relied on a string of other anonymous people in Russia he claims told him these things. Worse still, the document was filled with amateur errors.

While many of the claims are inherently unverified, some can be confirmed. One such claim — that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen secretly traveled to Prague in August to meet with Russian officials — was strongly denied by Cohen, who insisted he had never been to Prague in his life (Prague is the same place that foreign intelligence officials claimed, in 2001, was the site of a nonexistent meeting between Iraqi officials and 9/11 hijackers, which contributed to 70 percent of Americans believing, as late as the fall of 2003, that Saddam personally planned the 9/11 attack). This morning, the Wall Street Journal reported that “the FBI has found no evidence that [Cohen] traveled to the Czech Republic.” None of this stopped Democratic operatives and prominent media figures from treating these totally unverified and unvetted allegations as grave revelations. From Vox’s Zack Beauchamp:

BuzzFeed’s Borzou Daragahi posted a long series of tweets discussing the profound consequences of these revelations, only occasionally remembering to insert the rather important journalistic caveat “if true” in his meditations:

While some Democrats sounded notes of caution — party loyalist Josh Marshall commendably urged: “I would say in reviewing raw, extremely raw ‘intel,’ people should retain their skepticism even if they rightly think Trump is the worst” — the overwhelming reaction was the same as all the other instances where the CIA and its allies released unverified claims about Trump and Russia: instant embrace of the evidence-free assertions as Truth, combined with proclamations that they demonstrated Trump’s status as a traitor (with anyone expressing skepticism designated a Kremlin agent or stooge).

There is a real danger here that this maneuver could harshly backfire, to the great benefit of Trump and to the great detriment of those who want to oppose him. If any of the significant claims in this “dossier” turn out to be provably false — such as Cohen’s trip to Prague — many people will conclude, with Trump’s encouragement, that large media outlets (CNN and BuzzFeed) and anti-Trump factions inside the government (CIA) are deploying “Fake News” to destroy him. In the eyes of many people, that will forever discredit — render impotent — future journalistic exposés that are based on actual, corroborated wrongdoing.

Beyond that, the threat posed by submitting ourselves to the CIA and empowering it to reign supreme outside of the democratic process is — as Eisenhower warned — an even more severe danger. The threat of being ruled by unaccountable and unelected entities is self-evident and grave. That’s especially true when the entity behind which so many are rallying is one with a long and deliberate history of lying, propaganda, war crimes, torture, and the worst atrocities imaginable.

All of the claims about Russia’s interference in U.S. elections and ties to Trump should be fully investigated by a credible body, and the evidence publicly disclosed to the fullest extent possible. As my colleague Sam Biddle argued last week after disclosure of the farcical intelligence community report on Russian hacking — one that even Putin’s foes mocked as a bad joke — the utter lack of evidence for these allegations means “we need an independent, resolute inquiry.” But until then, assertions that are unaccompanied by evidence and disseminated anonymously should be treated with the utmost skepticism — not lavished with convenience-driven gullibility.

Most important of all, the legitimate and effective tactics for opposing Trump are being utterly drowned by these irrational, desperate, ad hoc crusades that have no cogent strategy and make his opponents appear increasingly devoid of reason and gravity. Right now, Trump’s opponents are behaving as media critic Adam Johnson described: as ideological jellyfish, floating around aimlessly and lost, desperately latching on to whatever barge randomly passes by.

There are solutions to Trump. They involve reasoned strategizing and patient focus on issues people actually care about. Whatever those solutions are, venerating the intelligence community, begging for its intervention, and equating its dark and dirty assertions as Truth are most certainly not among them. Doing that cannot possibly achieve any good and is already doing much harm.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Comments

This may be a little off the subject, but it is relevant to the overall conversation. Is it possible that the CIA will walk into yet another trap set for them by Trump? I suspect that those CIA agents involved in the seditious actions will soon all be identified and arrested for treason. This rouge agency has been given free reign for decades. Unrestrained by the rule of law or the constitution they’ve evolved into one of the worst and most powerful criminal enterprises on the planet. God has began shining a light on their dark misdeeds, following will be a time of reckoning.

If according to his executive assessment the corruption within the intelligence agency involves too many subversives the president elect has the authority to immediately shut down the entire CIA as a matter of national security. He can have those he has appointed and trusts in the CIA point out all those behind or participating in the seditious anti-Trump campaign. Trump can then have the Department of Justice/FBI arrest every member of the CIA involved. The FBI hates the CIA and will be most accommodating in this regard.

Reestablishing the agency isn’t really necessary as the CIA currently subcontracts most intelligence work to private companies anyway. With the NSA scheming on everyone everywhere the only thing the CIA is good for is arming terrorist, false flag operations, conspiring with the Nazi George Soros, overthrowing legitimate governments, smuggling drugs and selling weapons to terrorists. It is a criminal organization not a government entity.

The CIA has proven itself a destructive force that too often plots against the nation it is supposed to protect, it is in no way an asset. It should be noted that the intelligence the CIA provides is seldom if ever accurate. Their intelligence is gathered and distributed more often to manipulate American officials and populace. It’s high time we ended this criminal enterprise. Let’s all hope ending the CIA without further delay is what President Trump has in mind. I suspect based on what’s unfolding this is the plan, but we will all see soon enough!

You all are such hypocrites. Disinformation, “fake news”, and unverified wikileaks were fine for you as long as they sabotaged Clinton’s campaign. But once they do the same to your candidate, you suddenly become constipated and whine like cry babies that there’s a conspiracy to subvert Trump and rush to the conclusion that the leaks must be fake. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.

And you pulled the same $hit when it came to discussing the topic of corruption in the electoral system. Things were fine and dandy for you—along with your candidate Trump—when it looked like he was winning and ahead in the polls. But during the times Clinton was ahead and it looked like she was going to win, you ranted about how the system was rigged and the elections results were going to be corrupt.
Personally, I didn’t have a stake in who won either way; I didn’t vote for either of the corrupt candidates of the false dichotomy. But your hypocrisy just makes you look like ignorant buffoons, and lack of consistency concerning topics like these seems to be a hallmark among the commenters on this site.

Fake news for Clinton? She DIDN’T set up a server completely illegally that was hacked by 5 nations at least? She didn’t steal $2billion of relief funds from Haiti? She didn’t sell 20% of uranium to dreaded Russia? She didn’t blame her Benghazi failure on a youtube video that had 300 views then ruin that guy’s life? She didn’t put a 12 year old rape victim on the stand telling her she wanted it and deserved it? She didn’t destroy the lives of all her husband’s infidelities? I could go on for PAGES, and you dumb f’ing idiots on the left are BLIND to the fact that she should be in prison for treason on over a dozen accounts. Look up what Special Access Programs are then explain to me how in the hell they ended up on her PC. You all are sore bitter losers. Here’s where I am LAUGHING at your point. The Fuhrer ran the office like a dictator through executive orders and unelected czars in order to ruin this country. Now, WE can undo everything he did with executive orders, and you all apparently LOVE having unelected czars with unlimited authority to run this country. Thatnks for setting up damn near a decade of precedent that YOU CAN’T COMPLAIN ABOUT TRAITOR

Big difference there in character….kiddo. Clinton is labeled the most corrupt via documented evidence and too many murders to count. Along with secret service that detested working around her. Trump because he is wanting to drain the swamp has many creating lying stories to defy him. They are doing to him what Trump did to Cruz….lie thru their teeth. So your theory is mute.

And just how is he “draining the swamp”? By selecting Goldman Sachs executives to run the economy, corporate billionaires and oil tycoons to run our foreign policy, and neocon warmongers to run the defense department? It sounds like you’re regurgitating the Trump campaign’s PR talking-points instead of paying attention to what he’s actually doing.

No one is buying the fact you don’t have skin in the game. You disninformation Soros bots always try to come across as impartial side viewers when nothing could be further from the truth. And none complained about the electoral system other than California is allowed to count illegal aliens as part of their population total to give them 55 electoral votes. Care to justify that?

YEAH! AND what about NYC? They bus people to polling stations and give them names of deceased people so they can keep voting. It’s one of the reasons HRC got elected; but you wont hear her talking about election reform.

Hey, ya know, too bad! Now ya know how we felt when a F-ing community organizer (nobody) with less experience than Sarah Palin attained the presidency…for 8 YEARS. It’s far LESS baffling that someone like TRUMP gets into office than OBAMA. Obama, the most murderous president in the history of the USA and his supporters think he walks on water; the NOBEL laureate. And then there’s HRC who’s just a warmongering C*nt. I defy you to find a public figure with so many corpses littering her past. The number of dead bodies in the wake of that bitch is staggering. That POS bought her way all the way to the top. Only someone “Protected from up on high by the Prince of Darkness himself” could get as far as she did. She’s a GD phony and You Know IT! AND the TRUTH of it all is that NO ONE ACTUALLY LIKES HER; not even her own kind. SO, you’ll excuse me if I don’t want to see HER as the first female POTUS. F-her, F-her family & F-her dog! The only position she should hold should say, “(Whatever)….of the Ninth Circle of Hell”

I’m not disagreeing with any of your points, and made it clear that I didn’t support either of the candidates because both were the worst and most corrupt possible choices I think we’ve had in our nation’s history. Nor did I indicate I was an Obama fan. It honestly doesn’t matter what party is in office at this point; it’s more a question of which train you want to take to hell. Both parties are part of a false dichotomy that are taking a wrecking ball to the nation in equal measure.

Oh, and speaking of whining. The amount of gushing, hand ringing and sobbing because Poor Hillary didn’t get what…..she….DESERVES is nauseating. Hillary doesn’t deserve an GD thing. What more could that b*tch need? The real true question is what do YOU need as a citizen? What do YOU deserve? I can tell you this: MUCH MORE & MUCH BETTER.