snakeappletree

Tuesday, 6 November 2018

Internet cult of narcissism is the 5th Wave feminism designed to segregate and control by persecuting males. It relies on triggering and embedding paranoid fear responses in females towards males. Remember, humanity and evolution is about communication, comprehension and integration!

Less than basic qualification level psychology training is imprinted onto the masses who re-affirm the paradigm by finding common frame of reference through it. A system to analyze behaviors which so few people question is corrupt and designed to create the results intended by an agenda.

A pattern is presented. Analyze the behavior of the people who you are closest with. Identify whether it conforms to the pattern.

The pattern in it self is inaccurate. Therefore it’s analysis is not
correct. People behaving accordingly, are enacting routines of
destruction, both their own and the closest ones.

Leverage. Where peoples behaviour does not conform to the pattern, to fake it as excuse to react as if it does, creates ongoing cognitive bias, is symptomatic of narcissism [in this context], is manipulation and fabrication. Re-interpretation the observed to conform it to pattern instead of accepting the original intent which does not conform to pattern.

The outcome is used to justify the abusive behaviour. The justification of non-accountability is relied on as it to excuse the perpetrators behavior. By imposing a non-accurate pattern into a situation, just to instil a sensation of control and describe it as empowerment, where the same behaviour outside of the filter of the cults pattern, is abuse.

Females are being targeted, men are being alienated. A part of the corruption embedded into the pattern is any male who attempts to explain all of this to a female, is through the eyes of the pattern, perceived as an abuser. How are males supposed to protect their loved ones when the form that protection takes in their manipulated and brainwashed perceptions, is interpreted as an act of abuse?

Thursday, 1 November 2018

She gets it off her chest.
She bitches about him to all her friends and asks their advice.

He’s not in a relationship with her.
He’s in a relationship with a hive system.
The public terminology describes it as her support network.

The practicality, once we strip it of biased meanings to describe the situation within context of agenda based paradigms, is;
She’s striving to balance between opinions of those who affect her.
He’s having to adapt to all that.

The whoever’s of her community and their issues, objectives, attitudes, agenda’s, beliefs and prejudice, has become a system of leverage affecting both him and the entity of their private relationship, something personal between them as a couple which should exclude everyone else. His argument is that it is not a private relationship, if she’s in tangled with a lot of other people who are affecting it.

He would prefer that if she has any problems, she faced him directly about them so they can work through it together. This should not involve other people who will only distract them from personal intuition necessary to find sustainable harmony.

What she is doing by talking with people who don’t know him, about it, is creating a situation where he does not even know there is a problem, but their relationship is being affected by her attitude changing to conform to however her friends are telling her to behave.

He sees only that other people, outsiders, are playing games, controlling the harmony he is trying to build and which they should both be trying to build together, to the exclusion of external forces. Their energy is dissipating outward to serve a multitude instead of being retained and empowered for them both to thrive. It dooms the relationship which requires sufficient energy to be sustainable.

Thus, he has no authority within their relationship although strangers do.
Its stability is destabilized. Through no fault of his own. So he reconciles; she is unstable.

Her friends will collectively protect themselves by saying he is the element which has destabilized her. She has to weigh between her community and support network, versus her relationship. He does not identify this as monogamy because she is playing and being played by multiple games which he has become entangled because of her.

Society purposefuly-mistakenly regards his opinion about this as “his being dominating and controlling in the relationship.” The label causes her anxiety and she retreats from him, from the relationship, because it is a tag used by the social agenda of causing division and fear instead of healing and harmony. It creates targets for discrimination out of people who are supportive of their relationship partner.

We live in a community where it is more acceptable to sacrifice the relationship than it is to sacrifice the so-called support network, even when it can be identified that they are not being supportive but are playing control games; which is an abuse, from which he is trying to protect her from in society. Society protects its rights to play such control games under the guise of describing it as being supportive.

Most of this is understated to such extent people cannot recognise it as the underlaying dynamic of relationship break-ups. Where he is able to highlight that these are the dynamics and the leverage in play, he is accused of being a complete bastard by everybody who, are intentionally or not (manipulator or zombie), exploiting those levers. They are shaken up by it so they defend themselves and point out that he is now destabilizing their network.

Although not his primary intention, he is by consequence destabilizing it because it is a network built on the accepting of an inhumane condition which he does not accept to be righteous behaviour. Such condition is subversive and covert but no less frightening or abusive than are overt prejudices of racism, sexism, etc. To be party to abusive systems is to be a party to an abuse network. Many people do not recognize this to be a wrong, the same way nobody questioned slavery when it was deemed ‘normal’.

Her support network will protect her from the abusive man by discouraging her from having anything more to do with him. The man is now widely known as being abusive and destabilizing of people, which is the exact opposite of everything he has set out to do, how he has acted and what he believes in.

The above scenario outlines normal life for most men in our communities.

The period during which the couple get together and officially separate, is generally termed ‘the relationship’. These incidents are the tests and trials which relationships go through. “Us against the World” / “Society is not your friend.”

The safe-space between couples only exists when both partners are actively protecting it from and against other people’s opinions and interference. Women who behave that way (as described above), are known amongst men who have experienced this dynamic as being users; are identified as being both abused and abusers.

The so-called friendship network usually do not actually know the guy in question. Some of them may have met him on one on several occasions. Their opinion is prejudiced by the position she puts herself in, of being on one hand uncertain and on the other, attempting to be the compromise between everybody else around her. She positions herself in the centre of her universe, for maximum leverage and attention gain.

This is in contrast with putting an intimate relationship in the centre of a universe, as both partners must do for that relationship to survive. Relationships are about working together, or they are about exploitation. This is true of couples and this is true of social networks, communities.

The most disposable factor here is the penis which she puts into the centre of her root chakra, into her body, and it’s associated electromagnetic system for which we are designed to couple-up and combine; for personal balance and for spiritual evolution.

Feminism encourages women that “strong women” are those who can survive independently of intimate relationships with males. Our biologies are designed such we need that. Humanism is about seeing beyond segregational agenda’s, achieving personal empowerment through natural union. Strong People are those who tell their fake friends to fuck off for splitting up their supportive relationships.

“I have accepted this person as the other part of me, my balance, and it works and it makes us both stronger.”

Divided, we become embroiled in and exploited by covert energy exploitation games. ‘Abuse disguised as support’ relies on brainwashing people into believing natural balance is abuse, into believing that dedicating energy to achieving natural balance is being weak.

You can not harmonise as an equal with someone who seeks only to exploit you and make you feel lucky for it; you can only serve them and their exploitation agendas. Often, people do not know they are agents of those agendas because they conform to political correctness instead of to reality. Do not serve people who seek only to exploit you.

"A
very common aspect of psychological abuse and manipulation is for the
abuser to claim that the victim is being abusive towards them ... the abusers “victim complex” and “gaslighting” ..." Nicholas Clare

Acceptance.
Forgiveness. Letting go of everything (of all contexts) and simply
being. This is stability. Ensure you do this, regularly, at least once a
day preferably at least once an hour until it becomes a continual,
automatic, state of being. Being in harmony.

The
spiritual, practical message as the core of religions goes through many
traditions, though centuries. Osiris said it. Christ said it. Mohammed
said it. Apparently mainstream Humans easily forget it and seldom act on
it unless they have to. As soon as a cultural power base emerges around
this teaching, it becomes corrupted. The message is rejected along with
the corrupt religion.

It is one of the very few things we do have any control over in our lives, and it occurs internally. Anything external to it is a distraction from it yet it affects the external reality because it affects our relationship with it. A balanced center is a very different entity to an imbalanced center.

It is
advice for every individual on how we can be happier and achieve
stability. As an individual and as a community. Be wary of anything
which goes against that.

Do you know what happened
last time women ‘won’ ‘the gender war’ which decent people refuse to
play? Women were killing men and getting away with it, so there was a
social mandate by the ruling power at the time. We are taught that men
persecuted women by killing witches. Have you read the legal documents
they used to assess that? No, most people have not. I did.

It says this,
to summarise: There is Good which is communities striving to work in
harmony and there is Evil manufacture of social illness which is
divisionism. ‘The Good’ was described as ‘God’. That specific Evil was
described as ‘devil’ from French d’evil, the evil. Women who cavorted
with the evil of ill intent and creating dis-harmony in the
communities. It was a time where dis-harmony would result in loss of
crops and cultural stability, therefore death from starvation,
un-hygiene; famine and disease were widespread and rampant.

History
has remembered it as being a masogynist witch cull as an excuse to
persecute women. At the time, the word Witch meant something different
to the reinvented meaning we use today. Back then it meant Bitch. In the
sense we still use the word Bitch for today, not a female dog but a
nasty woman who acts of spite and malice.

This is why the
medieval treatise on identifying Devil worshiping in communities is
called the Malleus Maleficarum (The Black Witch), it is based around the
word ‘malificeum’ which literally means ‘mischief and harmful
workings’. To function from malicious intent, is imbalance. To bring
that into the community, is to summon devils into the community.

That
is all it was originally intended to mean, to do, to be about. The word
‘magic’ historically meant the same thing for which we now use
‘manifestation’. Strip the context of the supernatural distraction and
you see it for what it is, relevant to today.

There are male
witches. It was not a war against females, as contemporary feminists
have us believe to justify their vengeful hate against men. Those
specific trouble-makers bringing spite into our communities and
spreading venom, are the exact same “bitches” who in a more spiritually
focussed time, were literally put to death to cleanse the community so
that the majority of people could achieve and live in the peace and
harmony they strove for. They did not have the convenience culture we
enjoy which is exploiting the ecological harmony beyond breaking point;
they literally had to work the earth with their hands if they wanted to
eat, or they would die, often horribly.

Anybody jeapordizing the
survival of the community was a serious problem for everyone. Compare
it with a body which functions in balance verses a cancer tumor which
needs removing for the organism to survive. The temples of the Orthodox
power of the day is designed around a Human body, specifically the body
of ‘Christ’ (previously ‘Osiris’) which is ‘a human being living in
harmony’ toward which we aspire.

Today, anybody jeapordizing the
survival of the community is a serious problem for their targets but
because it does not directly affect everyone, nobody outside of the
problem wants to get involved, and the malicious person gets away with
it.

In medieval times was foreseen a future where the fall of
the harmony would bring about an age where devils roam freely (which we
have) and the destruction of the natural balance (which we are
witnessing). We do not at this time have widespread famine and disease
in our own convenience based consumerist communities, although both are
extant in the world.

The fall of the church as the dominant
power, from its aspiration of harmony; it’s corruption and demise, has
occurred, is still occurring. The communities still exist. We no longer
have the guidance we once had. We no longer have the harmony we once
had. Today most people reject the church and its spiritual teachings.
Most people who openly consider themselves christians do not know what
the original intent was for, seeing them by their actions and seeing
through the public image facade for which it is used in modern times.
People see the words but not the meanings. What words mean today, is not
what was intended by it before the fall. We live in a different context
where the words are confusions, but the meanings are more relevant than
ever.

Purge ourselves, and the community, of the cancer of
spite and malice, manipulation and corruption. Work actively
optimistically toward the harmony. This is not uniquely a religious
teaching.

“You’re still clearly not. You’re not over your last ex yet, either, from all the times you mentioned your anger and upset about him. I know how humans are and I know you intimately enough to know this, so don’t lie to me about it. You’re putting shields up, thats all. And you’re indoctrinating yourself into routine-responses hoping I will conform to your self-delusion. When we step outside of the world of mind-games, lies and self-delusions, we step into a more real reality. You know that we still ‘have feelings’ about each other. You’re in denial. I do not have to accept your lies as reality. You lie to me about having gotten over me, so I can only assume you’re also lying about our relationship finishing.

Because, simply put: we are both in the world and we are still communicating. The scientists, buddhists, and energy workers alike all say the same thing; nothing ends. It changes but it does not end. Human delusion draws a line and says ‘try to ignore the far side of it’. I do not have to draw that line at all. That is what experiencing Truth is. I do not have to draw that line where other people choose to put it or try to persuade and coerce me to re-affirm their own delusion.

I believe from experience; all delusions are toxic (to varying degrees). The more delusional a person is, the more toxic they are. I do not intend to be toxic, most certainly not to please other people’s toxic attitudes and delusional beliefs. Because I am Human. That is what it is, to be Human.”

“Overload. Too much information. Evidence that you are disfunctional.”

“The worlds of words are confusion. The world of intuition is divine. I am providing you with as a friend and as a Human Being. I am doing my job as a communicator and as a Healer. It is called, encouraging you to think straight. Don’t talk me cheap, I am better than that.

You say it’s over between us, you have a problem and you are using me as a buffer for it. That is not ‘our relationship being over’ at all. You’re lying, I am asking you to stop doing that. Stop lying to yourself and stop lying to other people.”

“You won’t back down.”

“I’m not trying to intimidate you into staying in a relationship with you. I’m being a brilliant boyfriend and teaching you about psychology. You’re a difficult one. Im helping you to overcome that difficulty. If what you mean is, you don’t want to have sex with me - at the moment you are too toxic and low on energy for that to be anything worthwhile apart from some momentary pleasure. You probably do need sexual healing and regularly because most people do, we are designed that way. You’re carrying the mental virus which mixes up sexuality with control, domination, energy games. It’s vampirism. I agree, that part of our relationship is over for today at least. You’d have to be an extremist to say ‘for ever’ because who knows. Apart from us who know how beautiful and brilliant we were together before you changed. You are playing energy-strategies, and i am already putting far more into you than you are putting into me. What comes out of it, for me is clarification and ability to share with others this information. Communicator, healer, doing my job in the community.”

“You talk too much.”

“I need to distract myself, both of us. Im playing your game. We could sit here in silence long enough to face the deeper truths of how we feel, finding a level between us. We both know that contains a lot of sexual energy. You asked me to avoid it, i am. That's why I keep talking.”

“You’re here because you are trying to get over me, because your mind says you should do that. The confusion is that we both enjoy sex and we both recently enjoyed it with each other. Our bodies are both craving one another and we are facing that. The mind says to turn away from accepting it and going forward in that direction to embrace each other. It’s ripping us in half so we are facing down the desire until it becomes easier to do so. To begin with it upset us both to do that, was emotionally painful. We need to care for our bodies, emotions and minds. When sex is good it heals all that. For whatever reason, your top-heavy and your mind is saying to break apart. You created that. My job is to determine if its a permanent split or simply a re-orientation so we can come back at it from a better angle in future, to build on what we already achieved. One of us gets to make the decision for both of us.”

“That will be me. I’m in control.”

“You are battling your left-brain. We both are. Thats where your imbalance is. Previously, you found sexuality to be a very powerful way to shut it off. It is. It is our and other species design blueprint after all.”

“I should go now.”

“It’s very difficult for men in this generation. Traditionally, one person making the decision for both permitted the man to ‘be a man’ and step forward to the challenge, to physically embrace you with a hug which we both need, all people need hugs its natural. To take that further. To enter us into the realm of sensual and sexual healing instead of words and power games. To initiate balance. Thats how basic it has been traditionally and we are hardwired for that from our species social evolution encoded into our dna.

In todays culture it is women who are permitted to be that yang aspect and any man who speaks out against female supremacy is persecuted for being a mysoginist and promotor of rape culture. If, at this time when you are telling me it is over between us, I were to make any attempt to touch you physically in any way, or even simply to say words of encouragement in the direction of our reunion, which in my opinion is preferable than people splitting up, or words testing your resolve; I would be committing a criminal act of sexual coercion or sexual assault, for which you can have me punished through the court system. So I can do none of that stuff without putting myself at risk. You are indeed the one in control. All I can do is write about how men feel as well as I can. I could be writing about exploitation of men in relationships.”

“Write about whatever you want, I won’t ever read it.” And she is thinking, ‘I don’t want a write with a clever brain, I want a simple guy who can fuck me on tap and piss off when I need my own space’.

And he is thinking; ‘I can hear her thoughts and I agree with wanting exactly the same thing, which is exactly what we had before we got confused and started conforming to social normalities (external to our private world, imported in, mind-virus) of not being seen to be in that sort of relationship because public image says it’s wrong where practicality says its successful.'

And he is also thinking: "I will write about whatever I want regardless of your opinion. You don't own my creative outlet."

So he says, not for the first time; “Human Evolution is always going to be the path of convenience.” This time he adds; “Regression is the path of pain. A great spiritual teacher, Vasseius taught us; ‘The pain which we feel is the Love we with-hold.’ He came a long way to remind us that specific thing. It’s the advice we need to hear.”

Political correctness is a creed. When you live by a creed, you obey its discipline.

It tells you how to behave. You are an agent of its philosophy.

Political correctness is the asserting that’s your opinion and beliefs are whatever suits the society that day. With a change of political orientation, top down from the governor, the agents of political correctness unquestioningly change their asserted opinions and believes in accordance with the new regime.

This principle, they are zombies. What they use and act on as personal beliefs are not personal believes founded from experience and thinking for yourself. Political correctness is when the governor programs the robots how to think and act. That is how insects behave in a hive.

I do not have to be politically correct because I am not an insect being; I am a human being. I be human. It is a verb. My own personal opinions and believes are built on the reality of experience through a mind which thinks for it self. I do not have to concord with the malleable, programmed, beliefs and opinions of others.

Why do people submit to political correctness?

Because they are trying to fit in and be normal. They do not wish to stand out and rock the boat. Whatever their own natural, inmate personality might otherwise be, must be repressed so that they can conform to the factory production line static model of “normality”.

George Orwell wrote a book called 1984 explaining that in a totalitarian state, the majority of people are brainwashed through many aspects of the dominator society to become politically correct in their minds; which is to say, they become zombies, unquestioningly performing activities and running subroutines indoctrinated into them by the control state.

Not only this, their brains are corrupted in such away they will defensively protect their rights to be politically correct with a superior attitude, discriminating against anything outside of it. A faculty of self-righteous left-brain extremism, which is unbalanced despite being described by the society as reasonable. Reasonable means ‘for a reason’, which is agenda. It does not mean in balance and preferable which most people assume it to because of their social conditioning.

I was deconditioned and trained to decondition other people. I am a human survivor. Deprogramming people of the brainwashed cult is my purpose in the human community. It is not an easy position because the zombies are programmed to take me down through whatever means necessary, usually by manipulation and lies.

What does political correctness do to the mind?

Any questioning conformity to a public image means that the individual knows they are different from the public image they are seeking to project out to the world. Immediately, there is no authenticity in their activities. [see my blog on modernism] “She is a fake, but she does not know she is a fake!” Breakfast At Tiffany’s.

In short, political correctness is social conditioning. It exists not to help the species to adapt, thrive and survive but to enslave the species to function as an insect colony supporting the overlords.

Example. Political correctness has led to the situation where the governments media propaganda machine, the BBC [223 see blog on the skull&bones society] will no longer employ people based on their ability to do the job best, they will employ them to tick the boxes that they have fair representation of gender and skin color, because gender and skin colour are two '-ism issues' highlighted to be tackled by political correctness. If Einstein or Edison applied there, they would not be employed.

The second criteria is people willing to lie to support the state societies smokescreen, all those people wiling to conform to the paradigm of politically correctness, are willing to change their attitudes and beliefs as soon as the governor changes the goalposts. Funding goes to those categories primarily.

Increasingly a 10% minority group (official government statistics from the office of national statistics UK and equivalent USA source), the LGBT community has a loud enough voice that 'discrimination against pan-sexuality' now includes the offense of saying 'no' to those people at all.

The same agenda of anti-racism, feminism and any other segregationist movement which specifies one group vs mainstream, where simply ‘the people’ should suffice, non-specificially. Segregation is created by controlling the context of policies regarding specified minorities. As soon as a group is specified, segregation has occurred.

As a result, everybody who wishes to work with the BBC must pretend to be bisexual and/or loudly approve of open bisexuality, whether they are or not; because within that environment, bisexuality is political correctness. Employment of agents for promotion of an agenda outweighs the necessary ability to do the job well.

Certainly there are (pc-category:bisexuals) who can do the job well. Government statistics are there are nine times more (pc-category:non-bisexual) people able to do the job at least that well.

I personally have no problems at all with people being bisexual or with bisexual people working within the media industries. That is actually my own cultural background. It is why I used this example: I know it to be true from experience.

The point being made here is; anybody working with in that environment, must pretend to be that thing in order to fit in. Immediately, the creation of a cognitive dissonance as the mainstream culture. That is the purpose of political correctness.

Cognitive dissonance is disbelief syndrome. When people are having to pretend to be a certain way to survive, which is different from how they actually, naturally are in order to survive, every individual secretly believes there is something wrong with them. Because they are different from the commonly excepted normality.

In the example above, the target arena is sexuality. The context is controlled by what ever the target arena is. All discourse occurs through that context. All conclusions are biased by that contextual process.

When an individual exists for a prolonged period or in many cases even for a very brief time, within an environment where they have to pretend to be something they’re not, that individual feels fake. That individual is encouraged to believe that feeling fake is normal and right. The individual aspires toward feeling fake before they expire towards being genuine. Any individual who aspires towards being genuine with in such a community, is alienated and prejudiced against.

Fake = Normal. Real = Sinister.

The quest for authenticity has become recognized as a psychiatric disorder, by the people with the psychiatric disorder who intend everybody to suffer similar psychiatric disorder.

The only solution is to step out of that paradigm, and to see it for what it is. That is the purpose of this blog.

The issue is not the segregation issue, the situational issue is the issue. Why has (specified minority group agenda) even come into it?

You do not have to be politically correct either.

People with cognitive bias cannot think clearly. People with cognitive bias cannot think straight. They can obey orders provided that the instructions are within the context of the programming. They are computers. They are robots.

What is lost in political correctness is genuine people. Attempting to streamline the community so that everybody function with a better attitude towards life, the result is that everybody within that community can no longer think clearly because, their contexts have been perverted.

Your understanding of the meanings of words is not what those words mean when you read a dictionary. It is what those words mean according to the community within which you live. That is what Orwell warned us about happening.

In the lifelong search for authentic, genuine people who do not agree to compromise themselves, the only way we can get through to the zombies why we are the way we are and why it is important, is to explain it in the language they understand. They regard it to be a spiritual mission and the quest for living truthfully is regarded as religion. It conveniently becomes ‘the other’ which it is permissible to scorn because religious people are not politically correct.

The bias is that they have put everything into one box and labeled it ‘outside of pc’ instead of actively developing of the capacity to see that context process is not what is happening in the minds of the genuine people.

You do not have to be politically correct. You could get real.

PC in the community.

Political correctness is top down. As soon as misinformation enters the domain, PC people will conform to the paradigm found it on that misinformation. A lie and servants of the lie.

Adhering to political correctness gives individuals the excuse that they were not personally responsible for anything which goes wrong. Because they are not acting on their own true nature which they believe subconsciously to be a problem and a natural because it does not innately conform to the pc. It is about accountability.

“I am not accountable for my own actions because my own actions were based on what I have to do to conform to my community, not on but I would have done had I been able to do it my own way. As a result, I am innocent of the consequence of my actions.”

This philosophy is polarized against what previous generations have throughout history regarded as maturity to be responsible for one’s own actions.

The falseness of this argument was proved at the Nuremberg Trials where war criminals were held accountable for their own individual actions while ‘just following orders’.

The questioning of hierarchical authority is necessary to avoid abuses. Every step of the way. So, the hierarchy protects itself by actively discouraging that. Political correctness is to not question the authority of the higher tier. Insects know their place. As a result, hierarchy systems are rife with many forms of corruption which gets swept under the carpet. Occasionally someone higher up will you someone lower down as a scapegoat, sending a shockwave through the communities.

It is not only the media industry. It is all across the board in every state hierarchy system. It is the nature of corporate infrastructure. The hierarchy is the hive.

I am in no way encouraging anyone to be anti-social. Having said that, it is appropriate to mention this blog is dedicated to the staff of Dog Behavior Wales who inspired it and who do not pay people for cash-in-hand work.

Sunday, 21 October 2018

The problem with clinically. The problem with clinically is that when you say the word into a voice-to-text software, in a proper Welsh pronunciation, it interprets it as the word ‘clinically’. This observation is not the original purpose of my making this post.

The problem with Llanelli is it is so backward here the people need everything to be black and white simple. Anything complicated is universally repressed as being wrong.

At the same time, the intricacies of the control and domination games played by most of the sub-cultural groups, are far from being black and white simple and obvious.

I grew up in BDSM culture from a young age. I get it. By the age of eight I understood naturally the differences between gay and bisexual - without that necessarily making me either. Even today a lot of Welsh people have difficulty with it because of mainstream social prejudice (conformity and ignorance).

What they now call LGBT too, back in the eighties and nineties which for Wales is equivalent to the fifties and sixties, didn’t yet exist so it was all an offshoot of what back then used to be called BDM.

Reference to the Sadism element was discretely added a decade or so later after the scene and its terminology was established in the region, when it became more acceptable to explore such dark places.

There four major sub-groups within BDSM categories. I self-identify as Switch and I have unfortunately a lot of experience with Brats, despite not wanting to.

I came to Llanelli and people here, are black and white. They see Sub or Dom. That’s it, you get pigeon-holed into one category or the other. They call it Top or Bottom. No between. They laugh at the idea there can even be an in-between.

So because I’m Switch and not overtly Dom, the wannabe Doms catagorize me as a Sub. I’m not a Sub, I’m Switch.

“No,” says the Doms, “you’re not a Dom because I am a Dom and I’m telling you that you are a Sub.”

It’s all power games.

I’ve known professional dominatrix and most Llanelli Doms aren’t. They’re people playing power games. There’s a big difference, the major one being consent. Throughout the professional industry and the history and development of bdsm culture, consent is the major critical. For extreme example its why we use safe words. Even within CNC (consensual non-consent, which is the nice name for rape-play) consent is the critical mutually shared understanding.

Without consent, it is abuse.

There is a big difference between consenting to extreme sports (including physical pain, punishment, etc), and actual criminal abuse which causes lasting psychological and emotional damage.

Abuse from narcissistic games is not welcome in BDSM communities. Narcissists of course are attracted to such positions of empowerment because it enables them to abuse. Narcissists assume domination over their targets life using whatever overt and covert means necessary, without consent and even despite formal non-consent. That is not the same thing as dominatrix within BDSM culture.

With proper Dom training the importance of recognizing the Doms role to include being a carer and instructor, toward the end result of healing the subject through whatever activities the subject has consented to, or consented to trust the Dom to inflict upon them.

Being a sub in that context is to trust the Dom to create spaces in which to explore emotional and psychological planes, as much as physical pleasure-pain relations. It is all about personal development.

The trust relationship between a Dom and the sub is also a factor, wherein the sub is enabling the Dom to explore that space within themself. Again, this is why we have safe words.

The role of a Switch is somebody who can and needs to alternate between sometimes being a Dom and sometimes being a sub. Switch get on best with another switch. The classical roles form a framework to orientate, communicate shared activities and discuss those things explored and experienced together with an intimate trust partner.

In most places, most people are Switches. Not in Llanelli. A handful of narcissists has declared everybody else to be subs upon whom they inflict all types of cruel emotional and psychological games, without consent. These narcissists recognize one another as such, and describe one another as the social Doms to reinforce their authority consensus.

Most people in Llanelli who use the BDSM framework do not know what a Switch is. Much less what Brats are. They are not taught BDSM, they are taught narcissistic abuse networks using select terminology and concepts taken from that community.

Bondage is powerful. It is not limited to dressing up in leather of pvc and tying people up. It affects whole being and other areas of life. It’s about relationships and establishing groundwork an operational framework from which to explore from. This is not merely physical. It is mental and emotional, it is instinctual and energetic. It is about building and maintaining shared worlds.

Searching online sex toy shops for category bondage, it’s appalling how limited the range is when comparing what it’s all about with the focus of what stuff is available. In twenty five years I’ve required very little of that stuff at all and don’t know why people would get into most of it.

BDSM isn’t primarily about different flogging tools. The whole purpose is opening mental and emotional spaces safely to face and deal with darker aspects of self we probably wouldn’t openly wear in public.

Bondage games are about relationships, nurturing them as they develop. About the individuals involved. The understanding that a relationship is a pure thing, is a trust between consenting individuals. Most of that is about helping each other grow in understanding and toward being better, stronger, more wholesome individuals. Independently choosing to grow together to become independent, choosing to remain together. A relationship is a luxury. Bondage is about exploring those ties which bind, communicating about them, enjoying them.

Break-ups leave loose ends, minds and emotions flailing painfully, bodies physically craving routine addiction. The best partners are those who protect their partner in event of that outcome while simultaneously providing stability for that not to happen. The method is from mutual respect, which exists only because of consent. Avoiding routine becoming addiction is what keeps partnership fresh.

You grew up in a religious cult except they did not call it a religious cult. The whole of your society was and still is. There are exceptions although they generally tend to be outcasts from the society/cult. The mainstream is designed to persecute anybody who sees through and beyond the mainstream and into reality outside of the cults tenets.

Principal among these tenants, and that which keeps people trapped inside the cult is a mind control technique of encouraging people to think a specific, particular way. This is reinforced both positively and negatively in most aspects of life. To describe it succinctly, we use the terminology: left brain dominant.

This is an imbalance of mind and an imbalance of a functional human organism. Nevertheless it is strategically reinforced by mainstream culture to be the only correct perception permitted. Those adhering to it are defined as sane and those outside of it are defined as unsanitary.

“A problem cannot be solved with the same type of thinking which created it.” Albert Einstein.

The nature of left brain dominance is that it does not recognize itself to be a problem. It recognizes itself to be superior.

Left brain regards those things supporting it to be so obvious as not to need mention, much less contemplation. Then upon critical analysis it cannot accept those things supporting it as being equally or more important than itself.

Examples:

-The importance of right brained thinking as equally valid to left brained thought.

-Harmony of spheres between both hemispheres of the brain.

-Intuition and instinct as being senses subconsciously connected with macrocosmic nature.

-The heart as the center of self.

-That materialist laws explore only materialism.*

*So far as materialist laws define the conscious observer; materialist law states ‘no form of energy ceases, it transmutes’. On analysis to assimilate this is to accept the conscious observer is a form of energy which does not cease upon physical death of the body, but transmutes. Ergo, experience of death does not negate consciousness. Despite this, the vast majority of left brain dominant individuals collectively deny transmigration as scientifically valid. This is a reason why the mainstream ‘normality’ is defined as a cult.

That spiritual laws exist and are valid within human experience. That it is valid to base cognitive decisions upon them to experience more cohesive, fulfilling and wholistic understandings of the macrocosmic natural world of living being.

Becoming aware of this situation helps enable and empower individuals and communities to function in a harmonious and balanced way, to leave the mainstream cult and begin experience reality for what it actually is, as opposed to witnessing a limited, delusional version projected upon it by socially reinforced programmed perception filters.

Monday, 15 October 2018

Age of information is the age of misinformation, to teach us how to discern.

The age of many controllers playing mind games whether or not they realize it.

It is the age of mental slavery, and robot zombies being controlled by agendas we barely comprehend and to have been programmed to reject recognizing.

It is the age of manipulation. With so much Information available to us, objectivity and clarity are survival traits.

Therefore, it indicates a successful lifestyle is one wherein time is continually made to reassess our attitudes and activities.

I am I doing the right thing?

Am I on the right path?

Am I going about this the right way?

These questions are not paranoia.

Attacking and assaulting the individual and the collective’s ability to function objectively is a key factor relied on by manipulators. An abusers control is enabled by your dysfunctionality and disability to think and function with clarity.

Extremist conditioning to function solely from constraints of super-ego pattern within paradigm of enforced socio-cultural idiom is occurring continually in contemporary communities influenced by corporate agenda.

Two

Absolute certainty is a faculty of left brain thinking. The dominant function of the mind in imbalanced individuals. It resents and rejects left brain thinking. Those caught up in this, feel a need to fit into the society reinforcing it, and therefore will make face value claim to accept left brain thinking in its place, although at the same time rejecting it.

A functional individual and community operates with harmony between left and right faculties, and remembers that the heart is the center of consciousness with intuition as the center of decision making processes.

Those who deny this, and do not function this way are examples of brainwashed zombies responding robotically because of their programming.

It is a symptom of cognitive bias and cognitive dissonance that any individual suffering it does not recognize they are suffering it. Left brained centric dogma does this. It results in a society of exploitation.

It’s servants do not even recognize how the way of thinking they defend, promote and are reliant on is a symptom of an illness. This is because they have been told repeatedly that it is superior. There in balanced brains augment it.

That is what artificial intelligence is!

Assimilating this so as to evolve and the condition oneself is necessary as a major first step toward deconditioning the community. Exploitation society is engineered against that. It is a constant uphill struggle at this time in history.

Three

Many are in the age of Maya. Once cognition has been cleansed and the organism functions harmoniously, by addressing and detaching from the left brain dominance, then it becomes possible to step outside of the age of Maya as Illusion and into the age of Maya as manifest dreaming.

Frank Herbert establishes with this as a premis in the Dune sextet. Philip K Dick explores it without that stranglehold.

Anne Lively is from the movie interpretation of Minority Report (PKD).

It's all encoded in there into that one line from Transvision Vamp's Hanging Out With Halo Jones.

Once the mind has made the connection, it is impossible to un-make it.

Even if the data relating cause with effect is wrong, the connection is still a valid dimensional universe within the infinity. The
complexity of the observers mind establishes how much data can be
assimilated to make accurate interpretation of otherwise unrelated and
randomly chaotic data. This is a basic mentat awareness (Herbets Dune).

Friday, 8 June 2018

Dictionary definition of the word delusional. It means two things. It means confused and it also means purposefully being manipulative. In general in society we all use it to mean the first of these. It is equally as valid to knowingly use the other meaning. A person who is a trickster, is delusional. A person who has been tricked and operating on a false premise, is delusional. The both are delusional, although the incentive is different in each case.

From my experience with this, it has become apparent that people with a cognitive disability or other form of mental impairment react in one of two ways when accused of being delusional. There are two stages in both cases. In both cases, the first stage is to react with hostility. If a person is consciously tricking other people, they will then attack as their second stage. A confident and adept manipulator will often use another person who they have deluded already, to do the attack. This is called proxy. In the case of the delusional person not realising they have been tricked, their second stage is to re-evaluate the situation. Both of these must be compared to a person who if accused of being delusional, does not attack because they are not delusional.

In modern jargon, the second type; the tricked (as opposed to trickster) is known as a flying monkey, from the movie the Wizard of Oz.

The attack of a trickster is likely, within the framework of contemporary culture, to be an allegation that the person exposing their manipulation, is bullying them.

The narcissist will play the victim role in attempt to convince and recruit onlookers (flying monkeys) that they are innocent and that their narrative is the accurate version of events. It creates a smokescreen, disempowering the person exposing them from being able to do so.

The only successful way of dealing with the situation is to detach and take neither side. Although there is no need for sides because this division plays into the hands of the trickster and their paradigm instead of maintaining objective clarity to see the situation as a whole for what it is. Only by stepping back from the situation to analyse it from both points of view can the observer remain positive and non-biased. An objective person hears all sides and questions all, to positively determine equity.

So we have here a problem that the trickster is either recruiting new flying monkeys to protect them and to persecute those who would expose them, or that nobody wants to get involved, has the effect of isolating whoever is exposing the trickster. In either case, the trickster has won their game. This is not to say the exposer wants to play any games.

For the purpose of being able to step back and analyse a situation for what it is, without being drawn into taking sides, it has become necessary to develop a simple framework to help with analysis.

For the purpose of being able to step back and analyse a situation for what it is, without being drawn into taking sides, it has become necessary to develop a simple framework to help with analysis.

The following blueprint has only six steps, which outlines a strategy. Many variants exist. We are calling this The Llanelli Strategy although it is also called “Changing the Goalposts”

1 Establish situation.
2 Agreement. An accord.
3 Second party acts on that accord.
4 First party removes and/or changes the accord. This has the effect of changing the context of 3 the actions.
5 Second party has a human reaction of the ground being whisked out from under their feet and is destabilised.
6 Having been manipulated, second party is now socially persecuted both for having been duped ergo inferior and/or for behaving (see 3) in the wrong way in accordance with the framework of the new context. That the second party has not agreed to the new accord is irrelevant to those who are in agreement with it (flying monkeys).

I have personally witnessed this occur in all levels of society from and including but not exhaustively: single mothers, social workers, school teachers, family counselors, job centre, private enterprise, police, solicitors, mental health functionaries, GPs, nurses, &etc; in all cases the strategy is employed for the purposes of manipulating individuals so as to take from them.

Dealing with this situation has only two possibilities. The winning strategy is not to play it at all, which is impossible. The game is about ‘being played by’ narcissists and their support/abuse network.

There are three aspects of this, correlating to stages of the 6 step strategy;
2 Do not agree. Solipsism in the community is impossible. Aloofness is.
5 Distangle.
6 Expose. This requires indisputable proof (actual evidence which is actual evidence).

Remember: onlookers will enter the situation at step 4 and will be using the new dominant narrative as their operating framework, which is pitched against the target. The flying monkeys rarely know that they are being manipulated. They believe they are the good guys, although by their actions (they are step 2 and 3 in a game while the target is at 5 and 6 in a different game) they are in effect persecuting somebody who has been selected by an abuser who they believe to be a hero. They are also targets being manipulated as part of a larger game.

The defence is to open their eyes to that they are deluded and to objectivity (to change their minds thus recruit them to persecute the abuser instead of the abuse victim). It is all about Context Control.

Unfortunately, the targets context is the one perceived as being abusive; so nobody wants to see things that way. The target is calling for people to question their own actions, which nobody likes to do because it is too close to feeling destabilized for comfort. Spiritual disciples do that by default, which is in part why they are targets by those seeking to dominate others through context control.

The fundamentalist and dogmatic part of the mind which we rely on for stability, is commonly called the Ego (not what Freud and Jung used the word to mean). Narcissists rely on that.

Monday, 4 June 2018

In real life, Celtic shamen. Developing imagination is crucial to that purpose. Hence, a group of role players. We shared many experiences as many people through many worlds. My own heart however returns always to a place it calls home: Werewolf the apocalypse.

We recognised how strongly the Fianna tribe had been influenced, not by authentic Celtic culture and beliefs, but by its postChristian reinvention and the modern official groups claiming expertise while simultaneously entirely missing the point.

We discovered that the Uktena tribe more closely accurate to authentic Celtic culture.

There is a lot in Fianna which is inspired also by well-documented Irish mythology. The umbrella term Celtic includes that however the majority regard Irish tradition has its own unique thing. European counts in their various waves, have much in common with Norse. Therefore for these purposes we are including Norse also within the umbrella term Celtic. Academically and historically this might be in accurate however the cross cultural influence between all of these groups during times of war and trade, peace and integration, exploration and generation after generation of conquest and spiritual development, which has gone undocumented in the material world, Yet which showman are very well aware off. These are seldom to be found associating with those theatrically ritualistic actors officially claiming to be the so-called experts.

As a result of this, we had to make a choice. Do we change the Canon material so that the Celtic form of Uktena tribe rains in Europe, or should we alter the Fianna tribe so that it accords more with our desire for authenticity?

My group did not fully answer this question. We did however attempt to explore it, At first by using our version of the Viana tribe, and secondly by using a European version of the Oktana tribe.

Following this, we decided to try a completely different approach to the game and create characters from the other tribes. As a result, my first characters were versions of the same thing drawn through different parts of the canon character creation rules, the intent of which really was that it was the same character. My second character, a different persona Is more closely based upon myself. It is a lot of fun to do this.

My group eventually split because emigration after numerous travels, journeys of discovery.

Genis; that which follows from its own creation, from where we get the words genius, genesis and journeys. See: Get. From Ge, earth; which relates to age.

All that has gone; we are on the new page. It is a fresh day. The world of now is renewed. The harmonic is unique.

As I earth myself; As I write these words;

A golden-red, copper colour flying insect, fire in flight, landed on the camera eyepiece of the iPhone into which I am narrating. As a GlassWalker, I cannot ignore the symbol and the spirit of the Weaver.

The wounds do heal in time but they leave a taint in the blood and it keeps.

I did not want to settle here: I had to.

Against instinct, against wisdom: for duty and for responsibility.

I was sent here because I’m a lone wolf and I’d trod on paws.

To prowl, to scout the place, find out the score.

Something is ill here, something behind the skin.

A scent on the air when the wind changes.

It’s a coastal town, a bay.

A tin town where ore from the hills was brought down by rail and processed in the factories.

All that has gone now, faded away, not even a memory these generations later.

The big smelting works which poisoned the bay the same way sewage outlets do now, has been torn down and replaced by a coastal walk, pretty for people. Its canker still washes upon the shore, light black rock like meteor.

Like everyone here, she wears a mask and I hoped so much for its truth that I could not see through it, not until later. Sometimes the Wyrm has mysteries beyond comprehension.

We share a cub, born of Human to Garou.

It transpired after, not Human at all. A cunning cadaver, ancient from the gypsy folk of Europe, having fled the industrial and social revolutions of the great wars a century ago.

So I became tainted. I let her to live for the cub’s sake. A boy needs a mother, even such as she.

He’s not yet of age to tell what he is but I watch his rage and I know well when the time comes he’s going to need me as I’m going to need the pack with whom I seldom moot, because we are so far and so few in number in South Wales, off the beaten track.

Out here I study virtual reality environments, digital dreamtime, the cyber realms a blessing of company in my loneliness. I design urban architecture which investors build in distant cities.

And I roam. And I hunt. Rural Wales is easy for one so long in the tooth as I.

Because it is so difficult for those who are not; and for those unknowning of its ways and of its wylds.

There was a swarm of flies in town this week and I need to find out why.

about

snakeappletree is not the real life person upon whom the caricature is loosely based. It is a collaborative allegory legitimately created by an authorized design team. The moniker snakeappletree and alternym’s xeno-heart-feather/blade, including other-level translations of hieroglyphic cartouche, are intellectual property of Ordo Octopia. All Rights Reserved.

"Accreditation is everything." snakeappletree

SNAKE-APPLE-TREE ONLINE

quote quota

“Imagination does not breed insanity. Exactly what does breed insanity is reason. Poets do not go mad; but chess-players do. Mathematicians go mad, and cashiers; but creative artists very seldom. I am not, as will be seen, in any sense attacking logic: I only say that this danger does lie in logic, not in imagination.”

G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy

"There’s an unwritten compact between you and the reader. If someone enters a bookstore and sets down hard earned money(energy) for your book, you owe that person some entertainment and as much more as you can give."