An 87-year-old woman died after a nurse at a retirement facility with a "no CPR" policy refused to perform CPR. What do people on Twitter think of the policy? Comments are edited for clarity and grammar:

If the facility says up front it does not do CPR, then it's your choice if you can live with that. If not, get a different apartment.

— @ATPJudge

CPR is one of the most basic things that can be done to prevent death and damage to organs. Not doing it is negligent.

— @Mamaschquigs

Glimpse the future of health care in America. Facilities shouldn't be able to commit negligence by fine print, but here we go.

— @JulieZug

CPR exists to save people, not to be prohibited from a paranoia of getting sued.

— @cortezishere

I think they are trying to make knowledge of CPR a requirement for high school graduation in Oregon. It absolutely should be required in retirement facilities.

— @darlakrusee

If these facilities do not administer medications, they should not have to maintain the ability to give CPR.

— @54Fleetwood

I would rather stay at a place without CPR, if I'm 87 years old, and in bad shape.

— @TodMirage

Have you seen the elderly get CPR? It can be pretty violent and breaks ribs. The results are mixed.