Friday, 1 February 2013

Monkeys In Business

“Where? What?” said I looking at
myself to see If I he’d put on a piece of clothing with some sort of pattern
that appeared like that animal...

“The monkey business you talked about yesterday.”

“Oh, yes I remembernow, I did say I was going to tell you all
about that scientific experiment.”

“Scientific experiment? You mean
some sort of clutter influenced the outcome of that war that you talked about
yesterday?”

“No, dear, I’m talking about a real scientific
experimentation… well I don’t know if it ever took place really as it’s more
sort of a story, but even if it didn’t it could, as you’ll see.”

“So do tell…”

“The story goes like this:

There was this a group of scientists
studying behavioural patterns and they put 4 monkeys,
A, B, C and D inside a cage.

The cage had a wooden ladder that went up to a single wooden
platform. The floor of the cage was metal and wired up to a switch.

The scientists put a banana dangling above the platform.
Clearly visible that it was only one banana. Mind you, the monkeys had to eat
where they were but on that wooden platform only was one banana.

The quickest of the monkeys raced up the ladder for it.

The moment he was on the ladder, the scientists hit the
switch causing a mild but painful electric shock to
the other 3 monkeys that remained on the floor.

This process was repeated as many times as was necessary for the
monkeys to make the connections between the shocks they were getting with the
fact that one of them was going up the ladder for the banana.

Once that was clear, what do you think was the monkeys’
reaction when the next banana was put in place?”

“Be the first to get it? That’s what I would do! Let the
others get shocked, plus have the banana for myself!!”

“Yes, but that would leave 3 very unhappy monkeys waiting for
you…”

“That’s life, pals…”

“Yes, now you wouldn’t always be the fastest one up the
ladder would you?”

“No…”

“So what would you do?”

“Well, I would make sure that if I didn’t get it no other
would! If anyone as so much tried to touch that ladder I’d clobber him
down!”

“Exactly! And that was what the monkeys
did. They no longer cared about the banana but focused on stopping any other to
even as so much as touch the ladder!

The monkeys quickly understood that whenever a banana was put
up on that platform the only way they weren’t shocked was if no monkey went up
the ladder.

This meant that if one tried to go for the banana the other
three would jump and not allow him to go up the ladder.”

“Clever monkeys!”

“So the experiment reached a point when a banana was put up
the reaction of the monkeys would be just to look at it without even the
slightest attempt of going for it.

Once this was achieved, they took out monkey A and put in
monkey E.

Monkey E, unaware of the consequences of going up the ladder
had the natural reaction of going for the banana when it was put there.

He was stopped every single time because monkeys B, C and D
jumped on him.

Soon monkey E realized that all his attempts to go up that
ladder would be abruptly stopped by the other 3 monkeys, so he stopped trying.
Whenever a banana was put up he just looked at it like all other 3.

Notice that his stimulus was completely different from the
other three. He associated the reaction of the fellow monkeys to the ladder and
not the banana. For him it was the ladder that was forbidden territory. And he
came to that conclusion without being shocked!

Then they took out monkey B and put in monkey F. Monkey F as
soon as they put up the banana did what monkey E had done and went for the
ladder and the same as monkey E monkey F was stopped by the other three, which
included monkey E.

Monkeys C and D stopped monkey F for a completely different
reason than monkey E. He helped stop monkey F because, as I said, he had
assimilated that the use of that ladder was prohibited. So whenever F tried E
was there with the rest of the gang to stop him.

Monkey F became like the other monkeys that just looked up to
the dangling banana up on the platform.

Time to change monkeys. Out came C,
in went G. And when G tried, D, E and F stopped him until G became also a
“banana onlooker”.

Change the monkeys again. Out comes D, in goes H. H goes for
the ladder and E, F and G don’t give him a chance. H becomes an onlooker
too.

And this process was repeated until you had four monkeys W,
X, Y and Z in a cage with a banana and none would make an attempt to eat it.

They would just look at the banana. None of them ever went up
the ladder.

Notice that out of all the monkeys put in that cage, ONLY monkeys
A, B, C and D had suffered electric shocks. All others from then on simply
didn’t go up the ladder because all the rest of the monkeys in the cage would
stop him to do it.”

“So the experiment proves that we do things in a certain way
without questioning as to why just because we see other people doing that thing
that way, is that the conclusion?”

“That’s right, and that is the normal conclusion that is made
out of this experiment, but there’s another, and a much more relevant one.”

“And it is?”

“Will tell you in a minute.”

“Why won’t you tell me now?!?”

“Because I want you to understand
completely its importance! Imagine that I’m drawing you a Treasure Map. I
have to first fill in all the details before marking the X. If I just marked the
X on a blank piece of paper and tell you to go and dig up the gold would you be
able to do it?”

"No"

"So be patient. I want you to understand its importance and for you the be able to do that you have to first understand what
happened in the first the 34 months of the GMW, between September 2007 and July
2010."

“What happened in those 34 months?”

“1,000 days, that’s what happened.”

“Yes, if I did a quick calculation in my head I would get
there… what happened in that period, then?”

“Those first 1,000 days of the GMW were crucially important
and the BHs just didn’t win it basically because of
the second conclusion that can be taken from the monkey experiment.

Let me just tell you what, in our opinion, were the FIVE most
relevant things happened in that period.

The FIRST thing was that those hundreds of thousands very
quickly became “only” tens of thousands and those tens of thousands dwindled as
quickly to the thousands and the figure just kept on decreasing to the point it
became a problem to the BHs.”

“What problem? It seems to me that is what they wanted, or so
you said yourself!”

“The problem was the 90/10 Murphy’s Law.”

“Huh?”

“The 90/10 Murphy’s Law says that the completion of 90% of any task
takes only 10% of the time and the remainder 10% to be completed will take up
the other 90% of the time.

The BHshad been able to smother
the enormous tidal McCann wave into the size of a common one and by making it
“common” they made Maddie become just one amongst other trillion topics being
discussed on the internet.

They did away with “90%” of the people quickly but it came to
the point when the “mere” thousands just wouldn’t go away.

What the BHs had done with the
success to drive the majority away had a secondary effect and that was to fortify the thousands that stayed. They
took the vitriolic not as off-putting but rather as further reason to fight for
justice. It made them more resolute. It made them cry for justice even louder!

They not only wouldn’t go away as it seemed that they were
there to stay and put up a fight every step of the way when it came to Maddie.
The more heinous the BHs were the more determined
these people seemed to become!

The only way to get these people off Maddie's internet highways, and rid of them, was to distract them away from the McCann apple on to another issue.

This was done through vitriolic and senseless internal “cat-fights”. "Pretendy" fights between people who "were" on the "good" side of the fence.

Awfully off-putting and extremely effective as it forced people to take sides, a very uncomfortable thing to do.

So, at around about the 1,000 day period what was being discussed
was all the intra-fighting raging on the “Pro” camp. The McCann themes became
nothing but background music.

So the first thing that happened during the 1,000 days was
that the topics discussed had basically strayed away from its central topic to
pure homemade BH clutter between less than 10,000 people or not even half of
that.”

“Right.”

“The SECOND thing that happened was the second and most
important conclusion that one can take from the monkey experiment I just spoke
of.”

“Ah, finally!”

“See, you didn’t have to wait that long. Impatience is a
thing the BHs explore a lot and that’s one, among so
many reasons, they’re afraid of our blog. They know that patience is our family's middle
name.

Anyway, when do you think that particular experiment was
considered a success by the scientists?”

“When all the monkeys that had been shocked were out of the
cage, so when monkeys A, B, C and D were out and monkeys E, F, G and H stopped
trying to go for the banana?”

“Not totally right, but almost there. I would say that it was
when monkey I stopped trying”

“Why a monkey later?”

“It’s the monkey that confirms the results. Although monkey H
was the first to be stopped by 3 “unshocked” monkeys,
it is monkey I that confirms success. You weren’t far off as you can see.

So when monkey I stopped trying, what happened?”

“I don’t know! Maybe the scientists went to nearest pub to
celebrate or each one went home…”

“You’re absolutely right!”

“I am?”

“Yes, you are! And by your expression I can see that you
don’t know why you’re right.

You’re right because there was a power shift.”

“Huh?”

“What stopped the first monkeys, A, B, C and D going for the
banana was the switch the scientist had in his hand and which he activated
whenever a monkey went up the ladder, right?”

“Right.”

“So until the monkeys were “educated” otherwise, the power
was in the scientist’s hand.

When the monkeys took upon themselves, unwittingly, the task
of stopping other monkeys going up the ladder, the power to “save” the banana
was no longer with the scientist but with the monkeys!

That’s why the scientists could go home and celebrate.”

“Oh, I get it! And how is that applicable to the GMW?”

“Well, if initially you had a set of controlling players, the
"scientists", after 1,000 days of conflict the power had shifted long ago to the
“monkeys”.

And these "scientists" were pretty much satisfied with the
“monkeys”.”

“How’s that?”

“They had been able to contain with success the unexpected
Summer Offensive of 08.”

“Summer Offensive of 08?
Unexpected?”

”Yes, the public release of the PJ Files and Amaral’s book!

The first was so unexpected that I bet that
most of those who “helped” in the cover-up wouldn’t have done so or, at least, have their names in it, if they even
suspected that the public would be able to see what they had done and said. An
elderly lady comes to mind… but not only her. So many others.”

The second, the book, no one expected the man to have had the
courage to have done what he did!

Both these actions greatly hindered the BH cause and the
defensive campaign to maintain the focus on the McCanns and only the McCanns
proved to be highly successful. No one talked about the “apple tree” although
she was all over the PJ Files as we’ve proven time and time again.

So the scientists were happy to leave the monkeys to do the
business and went on with their lives, thus completing the power shift
cycle.

In the eyes of the “deciders” the “monkeys” were doing a good
job so all they basically did after that was to turn their heads on the
Maddie case and give it a glance from time to time, progressively at bigger and bigger intervals.

Look at the tabloids as an example. During “The McCann
Hunting party 07” they were mere enablers and nothing more than that. They received
instructions and executed them. They helped, a lot, to get the message across,
but weren’t in the centres of decision.

During the first months of the GMW, they maintained that
status but with time began acting more and more alone much to the pleasure of
their “trainers” who witnessed a “job” being well done.

Soon the “trainers” felt comfortable enough to “go home or
celebrate”. They were completely sure that the “banana” would still be there the
next morning.

This meant that the tabloids stopped being enablers to become
real players of the game with power to decide because the “deciders” left the
“manning” up to them.

And we had a clear indication how much their role changed by
the way they treated Brown before, during and after the 2010 elections:

In Brown’s time they were dedicated helpers but with Cameron
they became deciders.”

“Yes, but Brown and Cameron are far too big to be involved in
the Maddie Affair, at least directly!”

“Yes, not only will I not dispute that, as I’ll agree with
you. I’m just trying to reinforce the fact that after 1,000 days the BHs’
“Centres of Decision” were populated by different
people from those in the beginning of the conflict.

Both by the comfort felt by the “initial team” that things
were being done well as in the fact that the tabloid media gained another
relevance that it didn’t have with the former government.

And that’s the third thing that happened.”

“What thing?”

“The THIRD thing that happened was there was there was a
change of Government in the UK. Brown out,
Cameron in.

This had two consequences. The first is that it changed all
the links and connections of the Dark Cloud “Guests’ Nepotistic Network”.

Mind you, these links and connections didn’t change because
of the Maddie case. The case was but one of many “board games” that were being
played then and are being played as we speak and will be played in the
future.

Nepotism adapts to the circumstances quickly, so the change
of any government in any country means a rapid adaptation of all ongoing
nepotistic networks.”

“Logic”

“The second consequence is that all thosewithin the British Government who had handled this
subject when it was really HOT were now replaced.

Those who had direct interest in the issue when they had
worked so hard to contain it and had put their names at risk, were now being replaced by those "just" inheriting a problem, and not directly involved in it, so although the interest
was maintained the engagement wasn't the same. Besides, the Maddie issue was dwindling away as "planned"

With the change of the nepotistic connections to the new government so also changed, in the GMW, the connections to the "monkeys" in control of operations. Not for the better, nor for the worse. They just changed.

For example, a "monkey" A, who used to connect with person B on
a certain subject in the beginning of the conflict, began now to connect about the same issue with person C.

"Monkey" A
stopped connecting with decider B but started to connect with decider C."

“Continuing to be logical.”

“The FOURTH thing that happened in those 1,000 days was the
effects that the intangible value of the McCann “logo” had on the BH camp.

“The what?”

“Not talking about the logo of the good marketing ploy that
exploited Maddie’s non-existent coloboma. I’m speaking about the McCann name itself.

It became a true household name.”

“Yes, it did… but that meant what?”

“It meant that the all 9 people that made up the "T9" were quickly incorporated into
the single “the McCanns” term.

If one is to speak about Maddie to anyone, the McCann name will
pop up but if one is to ask with whom they spent their holidays the best answer
one will get will be a vague “their friends” or maybe a “their doctor friends” if the
person is more versed in the subject. They won’t be able to tell how many
friends there were and much less any of their names.

The consequence of this concentration on the McCanns was that
it provoked a natural bitterness from the other members of the group. If in
those first months the T9 had very little to say about their own fate, the T7
had even less.

We know that all that friendly patting on the McCann’s back
were more like daggers than anything else, but to ignorant eyes they were meant
to appear as heartfelt tokens of friendship.

And the T7 were as ignorant as the rest of us about the BHs intent.

And bitterness why? Because they saw that the McCanns were getting protected and they
weren’t. That the McCanns had very expensive legal help and they had none. That
the McCanns were the “Teacher’s pet” and they were left to play alone in the
schoolyard.

Here, David Payne becomes a pivotal character. Irrelevant of
what happened in the early evening of May 3rd. The subject we’re discussing here and now
is the GMW and not about what happened on that day."

“Right. Go on.”

“You must take into account that the McCanns were
newcomers to this sort of event but other T7, namely the Paynes, weren’t. We make this assumption based on the fact that it was Payne who organized the
"tennis" holiday.

Making a judo analogy, imagine that all those who
participated in the event in PdL were ranked according
to their “swinging-belt".

The colour of that belt wasn’t
obviously attributed in accordance with the number of times one participated in
these sort of events but of an accumulation of social relevance, participation and
trustworthiness.

This meant that if you didn’t have the required social
status, the best that you could ever ascend to would be to brown swinging-belt. The
black swinging-belts and the black swinging-belts with “dans” were
reserved to those who were significantly important.

Gerry's"F-Off, we're not here to have fun"rant suggests that they weren't exactly off to a holiday but either to work or to some initiation rite.

PdL's Ocean Club has shown that it had the most diverse facets of entertainment and otherwise such as tennis, various watersports and even visits to water parks, but although having the most sought after poolside bar in the world we're still to hear anything about having conference rooms or any other facilities where collective working meetings could take place.

If it had, I imagine that the use of PdL's Church wouldn't have been the one we all witnessed that particular Summer.

So with the "not here to have fun" we can safely assume the McCanns didn't go on a work trip but the rant is consistent with the anxiety felt by those being "initiated" into something. We believe it to be intoa very restricted upper-class swinging group.

This means that the McCanns were just white-swinging belts, at least in an event with the "importance" as the one that took place at PdL, while the
Paynes’ swinging-belts were already blue or even brown.

We have no idea what colour to
attribute to the swinging-belts of the other T4. What’s important to remember is that with the Paynes’ unhappiness, other blue/brownswinging-belts present within
the Guests also became unhappy.

This will be important when I’ll speak about the Black Hat
Gangs.”

“What Gangs?!?”

“With time the BHs disaggregated
between themselves but I’ll talk about this another time. Not today, another
time, ok?”

“Ok”

“Back to our “swinging/judo”. The first thing that happened the moment Maddie died was that the swinging-belts stopped to being swinging-belts."

"They did?"

"Yes, because from that moment on, the swinging stopped being the alternative lifestyle being practiced to become the secret to be hidden.

So all the belts stopped being swinging-belts to become BH-belts.

This change also happened because very soon people who had nothing to do with swinging were summoned to help solve the problem. These people, who were relevant deciders in the process, were BH but not swingers.

Whatcolourdo you think were the
BH-belts “worn” by those who made up the initial “BH Decision Centre”?"

“The highest ranking ones, obviously... black with the highest
number of “dans” ?”

“Exactly. And it was maintained that
way during the first crisisdaysof May 07. As the Guests’ Nepotistic Network Dark Cloud grew
in size so it grew with the number of "dans" of the BH-belts of the deciders who incorporated it.

If in the beginning you had 1st and 2nd “dan” black BH-belts, when “The McCann Hunting Party 07” was
recalled you had more of the sort of 6th “dan” and up
only in the BH “Decision Centre”

That doesn’t mean thatallthewhite / yellow / orange / green / brown and
black BH-belts didn’t remain active. They and their families were the
first concerned that the PdL Secret remained exactly
that, a secret.

So they populated the various blogs and forums with various nicknames
where, keep in mind, ONLY the characters INSIDE the nice and neat
white picket fence were to be discussed.

That's why you had that surprising high number of people who seemed to support the McCanns no matter how evident the evidence was against them!

It was at this level, the “low status-coloured-BH-belts” that things started to desegregate
between the BHs.

To the Payne "resentment" one has to add the public humiliation
that Jane Tanner was subjected to in the Mockumentaryby "Billy-the-Kid" himself, or as he’s known, Gerry McCann.

The intra-fights between the BHs
weren’t public like the “pretendy” “WH” cat-fights.
But they existed. And were fierce and ruthless.

With the “monkeys” taking over daily operations, so did the importance of “low
status-coloured-swinging-belts”grow in the various
blogs and forums.

You had an almost victorious BH “Army” that was highly fractured on the
inside. The BHs were far from being as united after
1,000 days as they had been at the beginning of the conflict."

"See your point."

The FIFTH thing that happened was theme-saturation."

"I'll wait for the explanation..."

"Inthese 1,000 days the Maddie issue became really cumbersome to Britain. It became a non-grata topic to be absolutely avoided in any conversation.

The embarrassment could physically be felt whenever a Brit had to strike up a conversation with a non-Brit. The silence about it was terribly patronizing.

The handling of the Maddie issue was harming seriously UK's image externally. Even if not mentioned, as it wasn't, the subject was there, in the background, an omnipresent shadow of institutional shamelessness.

So, with the entrance of the new government, led by David Cameron, there was a true hope among the general public that it would end this Maddie scandal once and for all, and the McCanns would finally face the music!

So the FIVE things to remember that happened in the first
1,000 days are:

ONE, the topics discussed, by around only 5,000 people, had
basically strayed away from the McCanns to “WH” intra-fighting;

TWO, there was a power shift, from the “scientists” to the
“monkeys” so that those in the BH Centres of Decision
weren’t the same people who were there at the beginning of the conflict;

THREE, a change of Government in the UK meant that
the Nepotistic Network had to adapt quickly and the connections between the
BHs and the politicians changed or were in process of
changing;

FOUR, the BH Camp was crumbling from the inside with bitter
fighting between the various factions;

FIVE, Britain was tired of the Maddie issue and was really looking forward for it to end.

40 comments:

The meeting center for strategies and perhaps phone calls and sms was the Church. Not forgetting Father H. who knows a lot, very probably .In the silence of the PdL Church also thinks in silence ... and with this silence private we have 6 years of stories.

The Thy assumptions point to a exhaustion of this case but only at the summits.

Well done, once again.I don't know from where you keep coming up with this but Maddie must be very grateful to have the fortune of someone like you picking up the issue. She's finally getting the respect they took from her.You say something that I found particularly interesting and have to agree with you: the Tabloids.The were created to put out trashy news. When it came to Maddie they became the front-line for the first time in history about a global subject. They way they treated had a counterproductive effect. They treated like they did with all other news they were used to report. With basic language, sometimes insulting, for basic people to read. Only this time there weren't basic people on the other side. There were people that took offense. I think the miscalculated consequences on the part of the tabloids are responsible for this all to end the way Justice meant it to end. I'm not an SY hopeful because I've understood they dragged the Met into the scam. But I think that they have little to where to run. Truth, I believe, will soon be known.

Again a very intelligent post touching the "mouche". The 1000 who remain fighting for Maddies rights were so resilient and made of so high quality that they become the most feared enemy for Mccann's and BHs. They will never have money enough to hire suficient lawyers to stop the Internet highway. Their source of money will drie before the 1000 resistents go away. What a condemnation....having to live under that shadow and knowing exactely what will be the consequence of having that 1000 resistents- the return of the millions who went away feared by the electrical shocks they never experienced but got scared because of the megapropaganda created by some tabloids who sold the Mccann's and their helpers as untouchable.

Tex, this is one post hard to savour. But like any well prepared gourmet dish, after being savoured one only wishes there was more.Look forward to where you're leading us.I thought you set yourself the bar way too high but you haven't failed yet and I hope you don't.I doubt that there are many blogs who are as "dense" as this one and have a constant stream of visitors like you have.

One of the best examples to show how scientists work to control the monkeys- Mccann's V Tony Bennett

How many lawyers working for Carter-Ruck in a single case? How much money spent in salaries in a single case? Now emerged that a queen Counsul was also appointed to help Carter- Ruck defend the parents of a little girl, who don't want the crime of their daughter discussed/ investigated on any way, and send to prison a pensioner, who just refuses to follow other monkeys and keep his mouth closed.

This could be funny, if we are on the cartoons world. The complete unbalanced money and legal experts on each side, made history and show another side of that game which per si could strenght the power of the monkeys- the Mccann's are desperate and the BHs as well. Joana Morais blog is being assaultad by some BHs, who are not confident anymore on their way to condemn GA and TB but still condemning them and defending the couple and their strategies on the ground that they cannot be charged because nothing can be proved. Some question JW as a witness and the Smiths sight.Some monkeys have done a good job, not easy to chip the monkeys brain only with propaganda and the shadow of a legal libel. Monkeys have brains and need to be convinced to believe. Even with all that lawyers and money, they fail to convince the monkeys.I hope TB won the case and contributes to the end of Carter-Ruck and their nonsense clients.Who is paying all that? Could not be the Fund only?

This Blog demonstrates autonomy and a huge difference. The Blog is very objective, based on the files and content analyzes of about what the press seeks instill to the public. . The blog seeks to reflect and deduce from the real facts and objectives. So, in my opinion, this team takes us further away.The posts are written but along with the comments, the reader can almost be in the presence of the authors. And is the "talk" that people will understand to exchange ideas or questions.

I often read the news of possible at the newsstand Newspapers. A news piece about a person caught my attention. I was able to do research in a given journal, and appeared to me a graph on the most fertile period in which this person appeared in more news. The peak of "popularity" coincides with the period outstanding this post .

Interesting comments I’ve read about this post on MMF. As they don’t see fit to come here and express their opinions, I think appropriate for me to express my opinion about them here:

Opening comment:“Is it just me or did anyone else lose the will to live? (ProfessorPlum)

“I'm not sure if I've ever understood anything from Textusa!The sheer length of it makes it very difficult to absorb. An orange at Christmas for anyone who can summarise the content of the blog in one paragraph! “(Not Born Yesterday)

“It made me decide that I had urgent shopping to do! “(AnnaEsse)

“Many years back I had the privilege of being educated by a very wise sociology lecturer.Here's what he said about writing essays, reports etc:1) Say what you're going to say.2) Say it.3) Say what you've said.Good advice - remembered to this very day. “(almostgothic)

“Sorry but i think some of these bloggers have become consumed by their own prose and are gradually disappearing up their own backsides.May as well just call it 50 shades of Maddie. “(Lioned)

“I agree. (with Lioned) She/he had some good post, like the driving out from PDL, and then it got all very strange when it started: all people working in Mark Warner (and half of PDL?) were involved in cover up..that was the point I gave up.(weissnicht)

Lioned must be speaking about himself. To make a comparison between Textusa’s words with EL James who has sold millions worldwide is paying her a BIG compliment, not insulting her. Not realizing that is to already have disappeared up a backside, quoting Lioned’s elevated words.People who complain about Textusa’s posts lengths (we know why you do that…) make me wonder how they can discuss anything about Maddie. I mean, the PJ Files are not an easy piece to read! Take the Tapas rogatories for example. They say they’ve read the PJ Files but when it comes to Textusa it’s a “oh, no it’s too long! Please summarize!”I think Textusa is quite succinct. She tackles many issues in a single post and interlinks them in such a way that it all becomes perceptible.But there are some who can read at MMF:

“I posted and my post went whoooooosh I have read this piece 3 times and imo it is an excellent piece and I urge you all to take a deep breathe and try, even the monkey business. The part about the swinging is something that has been discussed previously but on this latest piece it makes a lot of sense. “(Bobsy)

“Long winded for sure, but very, very true, think it is a good piece!Fred

I remember reading there a poster say that when s/he reads Textusa her/his eyes would start to bleed after the first paragraph!Common tactic to steer away people.To almostgothic the "privilege of being educated by a very wise sociology lecturer" apparently didn't produce results. Teacher's fault?

Anon 12.I went onto the forum that day and read exactly that.It was after reading Textusa and then the comments against her that made me realise there is only one blog on the subject I am going to visit in future. Not even check into any others out of idle speculation or hope for a miracle.

It is so easy for the monkey mind to take hold and for all objectivity to be lost and we would be left floundering in a sea of toxic wash.I am going to go back to the beginning of this blog. To the very first posting you made and follow it till where we find ourselves.

I don't know who you are Textusa and sisters but I am completely in awe of your intellectual prowess, powers of observation and refusal to get called into the marquee of speculation and titbits.

I agree with an above poster who wrote that Maddie was very lucky to have you put your attention to her story and its sudden ending.

With these last two posts of yours, something within me has lifted. The manipulation has passed its sell by date. It is all coming to light.

The latest spin from the Black Hats.If you haven't read it yet, please take a seat because it will blow all the wind out of you:"Carter Ruck have insurance that would pay out if they lost."Yes, read it again. You read it right!I'm sure that Jose Mourinho and Sir Alex Ferguson must have the same insurance for every time Real Madrid and Manchester United lost!!They could play as badly as they wanted and still make money!Any court action has a possibility of being lost. It's such a stupid notion to say otherwise and anyone stating it is just making such a fool of themselves.Damage control for forthcoming loss?

When reading our earlier postings please take into account that there are some things, fortunately not many, that we no longer believe in.

We were no different from the majority in being intoxicated by a brilliantly managed propaganda.

We could delete some posts but opted not to do such because only leaving things as they were written, with the conviction in which they were written, can it be evaluated how the blog evolved through these troubled times.

“It really is a ridiculous piece of writing. All I understood was the Monkeys bit, don't know if I am right but I saw it as the Press. the 1st Monkey...the Express got a shock because the Tapas 9 won their libel case and were awarded almost £1 million between them. . This acted as a deterrent to the rest of the Press until they were so subdued they only wrote good things about the McCanns.”(Panda)

“You got further than I, Panda.Impenetrable.”(End Is Nigh)

“Totally agree. (with Lioned) Why not state the point and leave it at that?” (ProfessorPlum)

“I think Textusa is with the Fairies to be honest TEIN, her writing never used to be like that and her members will drift away if she doesn't realise how ridiculous her posts are. BTW, I do occasionally get flashes of intelligence even though I'm as thick as two planks when it comes to understanding how a Computer works.”(Panda)

Oh, Panda, how you wish for your ridiculous prophecy would happen: “her members will drift away if she doesn't realise how ridiculous her posts are”!!!

Unfortunately for you and your mates Textusa’s ratings are having a tendency to grow right before your eyes. It’s seems people enjoy her “ridiculousness”.

By the way, read the Great Maddie War post. It wasn’t “almost £1 million”. It was £375,000.

I think lawyers/solicitors can be insured against their clients not paying their fees, I would imagine that would apply win or lose. They don’t insure against losing the case.For a lawyer/solicitor it's a safer option to defend themselves against the possibility their client doesn't have any savings to pay them.This means if CR are insured, that insurance is to guarantee that they get paid by the McCanns.It’s getting so ridiculous the rubbish they are trying to heap on Mr. Bennett to make him crack but it seems to be having the opposite effect and supporters are coming out of nowhere to offer words of support. Mcs are not able to ask for a suspension of the hearing as that would confirm they have completely backed down. This is like Custer’s last stand. There is nothing else on the horizon to silence dissenters with. Do CR feel foolish yet? Probably not, it’s mega bucks for them whatever happens although it may not do their reputation, perceived as invincible, any good. Still it wouldn’t be difficult to spin that one.

If Mcs lose, they could be made to pay costs, including court fee and opposing lawyers charges. They could take out the insurance premium, paid by them or lawyer. It covers them, not lawyer, who would bear the cost of losing the case.This is my interpretation, so I may not be right.

A friend of a friend has told me that Panda is now good friends with the friend of Mrs Fenn’s friend. You know that friend that Panda made on a flight who just happened to be the friend of Mrs Fenn’s friend. I believe in my friend as much as he believes in his friend, you know, the friend of my friend that told her, my friend and not Panda's new friend who was the friend of Mrs Fenn's friend, all about Panda’s friendship with the friend of Mrs Fenn’s friend. After all who would tell a friend a lie? It’s a fact the friend of my friend is a friend of my friend! And lying to my friend wouldn’t be very friendly, would it?

I love to read Textusa. We Portuguese have a saying “Só faz falta quem cá está” which means “Only those who are here are missed”.If you find Textusa too hard to read, don’t try, just don’t blame your inability on others. The ignorance resides in you, not Textusa.If she says something you don’t understand, ask, don’t call her ridiculous.If she says something that you don’t agree with, discuss it, and you’ll see that Textusa will respond. You may not agree with the answer but that’s called discussion.If you just stay in your own make-belief world sulking because what she writes is a problem to you that you can’t logically counter it, then don’t come here. Or comment about it elsewhere. If you continue to come here just to go to some kind of “Insane’s blog” to detract Textusa it can only be because the cap, or Black Hat, fits you.When I read Textusa I have this feeling that I’m infiltrating deep into enemy’s lines. Whenever Textusa posts it’s like she’s guiding us behind the enemy and we’re stealing their “clutter ammo”!

Who asked in a previous post, why Textusa is not mentionned in other places? Seems not very well informed.... Based on the posts from anon 12 & 18, looks like MMF changed the main subject of their worries from Madeleine to Textusa.They complaint about the lenght of the posts, about the complication of the language. Will come the day they will assume or pass the message they are completely "def" to avoid understand the obvious.You are on the right track Textusa, since long ago.A sign of the new time.... looks like Marinho Pinto is ready to leave the lawyers Bar.

The talks in Portugal in McCanns v Amaral - Carter-Ruck's version of events Jill Havern Forum

(available at Mccannfiles)

Eh! Eh! We can see the strategy. They can't surprise us anymore. Assuming that was ID and the Mccann's who proposed the deal? NEVER, NEVER.... So ridiculous.If was not ID and the Mccann's, who could be? A witch directly from the dark world, under the supervision of the clairvoyant MAC. Carter- Ruck falling, falling.... Trapped on their ridiculous strategies.

Can't you just feel by his/her words the sheer terror that the Feb 2 10:28 person must be living seeing his hideout being progressively exposed and waiting for truth come knocking on his/her door exposing him/her for the hypocrite s/he is?

In fact I overlooked that it wasn’t your theory but your persistence in trying to shove it down our throats seems more like it was your own, or at least that you have a very close proximity to its author.

General Kurt Gebhard Adolf Philipp Freiherr once said:

“I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers.

Usually two characteristics are combined.

Some are clever and diligent -- their place is the General Staff.

The next lot are stupid and lazy -- they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties.

Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the intellectual clarity and the composure necessary for difficult decisions.

One must beware of anyone who is stupid and diligent -- he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always cause only mischief.”

As you seem to have some difficulty in understanding my words let me try and be absolutely clear. this blog will not sponsor in any way someone diligently working on something stupid.

So, I reiterate that you please take your or your friend’s theory to a blog which would welcome it or publish it on your own.

My congratulations Tex, you are really getting under the skin and near the truth and its showing. Your detractors cannot string a coherent argument together, so as usual resort to personal abuse on other sites.

Russian Doll has been trying (Feb 1st) desperately trying to make us believe the Macs were very safety conscious stating they waited for car seats at Faro Airport, only trouble is, read Dianne Webster's statement.

"I don't think we did manage to get all the children a seat in the end, so we just sort of risked it and drove from Faro to P d Luz".

Have no fear there are those of us who greatly enjoy your site, don't necessarily agree with all of your conclusions, but love the mental challenge. You must be close, for them to attack the way they do.

The mystery is solved. The person you kept telling them to post is Russiandoll who has really vented her spleen on JH.

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t6353-textusa-the-great-maddie-war

This is what I wrote is on the GMW post "There’s an ongoing discussion on twitter between evident clutterers that states that M died in Portugal early and they got another guest to use his daughter as a substitute!!"(Jan 28, 2013, 7:44:00 PM)

There's more but that is the essence of the comment. I maintain every single word I wrote. If the person contacting you was trying to only to " but I am criticised for defending his right to his conclusion !" it's very strange to defend the honour of someone she doesn't know so fiercely with at least of a dozen attempts here. And then go whine over at JH!

Let me just ask Russiandoll this? If I work hard on a theory that the world is only 2000 years old, would a scientific journal publish it just because I worked hard on it? I'll answer for her: no.

Of course the same set vultures/hyenas came out of nowhere to detract how long and unreadable your posts are and that LATELY (wonder why?) you've gone bonkers and stopped making sense!!!

Please continue! You have them running around in circles to find out how to counter you, and they can't!!

My question to Russiandoll is a rhetorical one. I've read all I need from the character.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Total Pageviews

As of Jan 19 2019 we're waiting for Jules to own the blog.

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCanndied in the early evening of May 3rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday (which we believe took place in various locations in and around Praia da Luz - from Lagos to Sagres) in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence"that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

PJ Files

Anonymity

A MAJOR MINORITY

TRUTH is Self-Sustained

Think for yourself

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Child Catcher

Algarve - THE REGION OF THE DAMNED

“Algarve – Where Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’s Child Catcher found it ideal to roam the streets with his GYPSY-wagon:“There are children here somewhere. I can smell them. Come along, kiddie-winkies!”Algarve, the REGION OF THE DAMNED.”

Please Reconstruct I:

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

The Anne Guedes Transcriptions

Permanent Suggested Reading

Quote

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain

Revelations

"For the righteous, a revelation is a joyous event, the realization of a divine truth but for the wicked, revelations can be far more terrifying, when dark secrets are exposed and sinners are punished for their trespasses." Quote from the TV Series "Revenge" (T2 - Ep9)

Truth

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.Arthur Schopenhauer

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.Winston Churchill

The Revolution

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.George Orwell

The Revolution Goes Viral

"Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation"The Guardian (04Jan12)

We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts Winston Churchill

PRECIOUS, SO TRUE, WORDS

“One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.”

Kate McCann

(in MADELEINE, by Kate McCann, published in 2011 by Bantam Press, pg. 328)

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Legal Disclaimer

This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and of opinions, between WHITE HATS, so is not responsible for the use, misuse or any form of interpretation (mainly misinterpretation) of its content, as although it uses a public medium, as is the internet, it's of PRIVATE nature, very much like any other conversation that takes place in a restaurant, pub or any other public location, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised.

Sound Explanation for Viciousness

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

Out of the Blue (or... Black?)

Hey textusa How are you? well I hope,just thought I would tell you that there are videos about you on youtube, claiming you are an internet predator who stole her daughters identity and prowls the forums for young boys, they say you are welsh!! I think its a case of mistaken identity because are you not portuguese and male? Anyway great blog. keep it up.(Anon., Nov 13th, 05:43)

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

BLACK BUT TRUE WORDS

“Because no-one is more vicious in their search for payback that those who realise they have allowed themselves to be taken for a fool” (A "boomerang" comment left by an Anonymous (Insane?) at Sep 22, 2012 2:06:00 PM)

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

:)

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane the Entrepeneur?

"I'd love to stay, but I have a report to write, and it won't do itself, will it?" (Nov 29, 2012 8:14:00 PM)Insane the Disruptor, a new profession shown inNew Career Opportunities

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

Kate's Round Table

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself."unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope?“Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access”(Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)