Isn't Chris Chan older than most of us? I understand he's not emotionally or mentally mature, but I feel like he's mature ENOUGH to be either committed as a raving lunatic or told to tone his shit the fuck down.

Isn't Chris Chan older than most of us? I understand he's not emotionally or mentally mature, but I feel like he's mature ENOUGH to be either committed as a raving lunatic or told to tone his shit the fuck down.

You can't be committed unless you're a serious danger to yourself or others, though.

That would allow him to show on your mentions and feed, I think. Better safe than sorry, lest Chris decides to tweet a pic of his taint again.

Why would Chris Chan of all people pop up on your feed if you don't follow him? It's basically like a subscription, isn't it?

As someone who got their account block botted, I can tell you that part of the reason people block you is so you can't see or talk to them.

I bet he was spamming @ various twitter people and they blocked him so he couldn't follow them around anymore, see what they were posting or see his posts. When someone @s you, you get a notification for it.

There's also a symbolic element (to blocking people online) for many SJW types. Maybe they're trans people who were tired of the way he abuses his (FAKE) transsexuality to be a shitty person.

Isn't Chris Chan older than most of us? I understand he's not emotionally or mentally mature, but I feel like he's mature ENOUGH to be either committed as a raving lunatic or told to tone his shit the fuck down.

You can't be committed unless you're a serious danger to yourself or others, though.

Edit: Chris Chan is 36. He's older than most of us here on DHI. He's as old as DSP and only slightly more autistic. But DSP is too much of a coward to harm others physically, whereas Chris has no concept of other people as beings that exist outside of his control and for reasons other than his fulfillment.