Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America'sNewspaper of Record

Monday, December 9, 2013

The Competitive Compassion Morality Athletes At The New York Times Publish A Gargantuan, Above-The-Fold Front-Page Feature Piece On An Inner City Ghetto Fambly Of Ten (!) That Leaves The Innocent Reader Wondering How The Times Could Possibly Glorify Such Abject Social Dysfunction

Monday 9 December MMXIII

"Girl In The Shadows: Dasani's Homeless Life", by Times' communist Andrea Elliot (email her!), is such a monstrosity of disingenuous white liberals attempting to uplift ghetto blacks, that it simply cannot pass without scrutiny from COTT or elsewhere.

The front page photo that announced this article was one of the biggest front page photos I have ever seen in the New York Times.

Published as it was on the heels of Saint Mandela's death, and a mere one day after the NYT did a front-page story in their Sunday magazine on the Lost Boy Who Couldn't (pass the Atlanta Police Academy basic training test), I assumed that this story on li'l "Dasani" had to have something to do with Mandela. I mean, in all my years of reading and criticizing the NYT, never repeat NEVER have I seen a feature story take up a full 55% or more of the Monday front page.

But then, this is the New York Times we're talking about: Chutzpah is the name of the game for these vermin.

"Girl in the Shadows" is part of a two-part series that the New York Times has the balls to subtitle as "Invisible Child," apparently without a hint of irony or even the tiniest bit of self-awareness of how stupid and disingenuous that makes them sound, after the "Kony 2012" Invisible Children campaign kind of cued everyone with a heartbeat to the racket that is the SWPL slobbering over dysfunctional, assisted African children far and wide.

Even South Park did an episode on disgraced "Invisible Children" idiot Jason Russell; maybe they should do a similar show on the New York Times' Andrea Elliot's "Invisible Child" campaign, because this sickening ghetto sympathiser really takes the cake.

From Elliot's mega-article, which tells the story of criminal heroin addicts "Chanel" and "Supreme," and their EIGHT children living in a homeless shelter for famblies in Brooklyn :

"Suddenly, Supreme leaps into the air. His monthly benefits have
arrived, announced by a recording on his prepaid welfare phone. He sets
off to reclaim his gold teeth from the pawnshop and buy new boots for
the children at Cookie’s, a favored discount store in Fulton Mall. The
money will be gone by week’s end.

Supreme and Chanel have been scolded about their lack of
financial discipline in countless meetings with the city agencies that
monitor the family.

But when that monthly check arrives, Supreme and Chanel do not
think about abstractions like “responsibility” and “self-reliance.” They
lose themselves in the delirium that a round of ice creams brings. They
feel the sudden, exquisite release born of wearing those gold fronts
again — of appearing like a person who has rather than a person who
lacks."

Here, it's like the vermin at the NYT are saying: "how dare you judge these poor black welfare recipients with their gold teeth, you shitty, hateful white privilege person? We at the NYT are so down with the ghetto folk, that we keeping it real. And we don't care what you think."

In a sane society, the national newspaper of record would be questioning the wisdom of public policy encouraging at worst, and not preventing at best - a pair of junky criminals breeding eight children that they cannot care for.

The whole thing becomes even a lot more obvious toward the end of Elliot's article. Her and the seething hatred for white people is barely concealed when a few lines from the end of this epic-long article, Ellito writes this :

A man by the calling of Nathan Zakheim, who resides in Los Angeles, California, and works as an art collector, has a very sordid dark history involved in numerous cult activities. He has also engaged in crime in this regard, as well as violence and extremism.

He also openly supports a group of child molesting criminals called The Hare Krishna Cult.

He apparently runs his art collection/restoration business with his wife and two children.

This message is a warning to all present or future business associates/partners of Nathan Zakheim. I want you to be aware of his sordid past history and what a sick and dangerous individual this man is.