"In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell, Author
.....
"All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First: It Is Ridiculed, Second: It Is Violently Opposed, And Third: It Is
Accepted As Self-Evident" – Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher

Friday, December 31, 2010

The criminal state of Israel absolutely does not want peace with the Palestinian people. And they definitely do NOT want any Palestinian state to be formed or the Palestinian people to unilaterally declare their independence! They want territory! And I do mean ALL of the territory of Palestine for themselves as part of their long stated Zionist dream of a Jewish only state. Under such a scenario, there is absolutely no place at all for the real Semites in the region, the Palestinian people themselves, and therefore the Palestinians will have to fight for their rights, or be permanently subjugated by the Israelis or permanently become refugees!

But with the world realizing that the Israelis are stalling any "peace" negotiations while they speed up their illegal settlement building in the occupied West Bank, so that there is no chance of any Palestinian state, the criminal Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, has now come forward and said that it is the Palestinians that are evading peace negotiations with the state of Israel! This is absolutely ludicrous, but here is an article from Haaretz at www.haaretz.com that backs up this absolutely ridiculous claim:

Published 21:37 30.12.10

Netanyahu: Palestinians evading negotiations with Israel

Prime minister blames PA for impasse in peace talks, says Israeli government, under his leadership, is striving for peace.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that the Palestinians are responsible for the deadlock in peace talks, saying they have been evading negotiations while Israel is striving for peace.

Speaking at a conference of Foreign Ministry representatives, Netanyahu referred to the comments made by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman this week, who said the Palestinian Authority is illegitimate and that Israel should not reach an agreement with them.

"The government, in my leadership, is striving to achieve peace. This is our target and objective – to reach an agreement in negotiations with the Palestinians," Netanyahu said Thursday. "Unfortunately, the Palestinians have thus far been evading negotiations."

On Sunday, Lieberman attacked the Palestinian Authority as well as Netanyahu's promises for peace, saying the Palestinians will never sign a peace deal with Israel and that Netanyahu was unrealistic in his attempts to achieve a peace agreement with the PA within a year.

"Even if we offer the Palestinians Tel Aviv and a retreat to 1947 borders, they will find a reason not to sign a peace agreement with us," Lieberman told Israeli diplomats at a conference on Sunday.

In response to Lieberman's comment, Netanyahu issued a statement Sunday saying that only the prime minister decides Israeli polices, and that every government minister is entitled to his own opinions.

On Monday, Netanyahu said in an interview with Channel 10 that talks with the Palestinians could result in an interim peace agreement.

"There could well be a situation that if we enter into talks with the Palestinians and we hit a wall on the issues of Jerusalem and refugees, the result would be an interim agreement," Netanyahu said. "That is certainly a possibility."

NTS Notes: As I have already stated, these criminals do not want any peace deal with the Palestinians, because that would delay the inevetable, which is the swallowing up of all of Palestine by the state of Israel!

We have seen over this last year the absolute madness of Netanyahu and his totally outlandish and insane statements. This criminal has the audacity to make such statements and think that the world actually believes this garbage?

The proud people of Palestine deserve the right to decide their own future and to no longer live under the evil brutality of the Israeli occupation. Lets make the year 2011 a time when the world actually stands up and takes notice of their plight and pushes for their rights and their own state!

Thursday, December 30, 2010

It is almost the new year, and at this time, I wish to bid all of my readers a safe, happy, and prosperous New Year!

Thank you to all of my readers for their support of this blog, and others in the real truth movement, during 2010. I hope that you have found this blog and others that tell the real truth to be factual, honest, and informative!

It truly has been a difficult year, with the prospects of financial turmoil on the horizon. However, armed with the truth about exactly who is responsible for any turmoil that may occur, we can turn the tables on these criminals, and bring about sweeping changes for the better for ourselves, our families, and our futures!

It has been a while since my last article about the lost war in Afghanistan. As I have said before, and for new readers, I will state it here clearly: The war in Afghanistan is a lost cause, and we the people must demand that the US and NATO start to withdraw the troops from that country immediately!

But it seems that the US and NATO, rather than do the right thing and withdraw, will actually escalate the war in 2011! I want to present that fact courtesy of this article from AntiWar at www.antiwar.com, entitled: "NATO General: Afghan War To Escalate In 2011" right here for my own readers to view. I have some more comments to follow:

On the other hand, the German general insisted that NATO was finally moving into the “hold” phase of its clear and hold strategy, at least in some parts of the country. This did not, however, appear to mean anything in terms of violence.

The comments are the clearest indication yet that the official claims of “progress,” already coming under serious criticism from a number of fronts, doesn’t come with even the pretense that violence is going to be on the decline, and appears to be completely disconnected from the realities of the war on the surface.

2010 was the deadliest year yet for NATO in Afghanistan, with over 700 troops slain. With 2011 just around the corner it is of particular concern that, once again, the situation is expected to trend worse.

The fact is clear, readers: This war is about Opium and to ensure that the drugs flow out of that country to markets around the world. This most evil cause has already cost the lives of thousands of dead soldiers, and has cost the US alone somewhere in the vicinity of 1 TRILLION dollars. The Taliban are winning the conflict both on the ground and most important in the minds and hearts of the Afghan people themselves! It is definitely time to get out and stay out!

But it does seem that the US is definitely committed to this war, that is now longer than the Vietnam War itself in terms of duration. The result sadly will be just as bad as what resulted from the Vietnam War, with the US pouring Billions more taxpayer money into this lost cause, and soldiers coming home defeated and broken....

And one other note: I have been informed by many comments and have researched it myself about the fact that starting in 2012, the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline is to begin construction, with a completion date slated for sometime in 2014. Yes...This is one of the long term plans for Afghanistan by the US, but the primary reason for the invasion in 2001 was still to get the Opium Poppy Fields back into full production for the drug lords based primarily in Europe!

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Almost 9 and 1/2 years after the Israeli Mossad attack on the World Trade Center Complex, the perpetrators of this heinous crime have still escaped true justice. Most Americans are still under the illusion that the attack was carried out by "19 A-rabs using box cutters" who are part of the totally fraudulent and fictional group called "Al Qaeda"! It is so sickening to see how the Zionist Jewish controlled media has continued with the lies of 9-11 to this very day!

It has been a while since I put up any article from Christopher Bollyn, and for this entry in my own blog, the following article is indeed dynamite! I want to present the following article from Christopher Bollyn, (www.bollyn.com) entitled: "Who Destroyed The 9-11 Evidence?" right here in its entirety. The facts presented speak for themselves:

Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence?

Updated December 25, 2010

During the past few months I have been researching the Rothschild/Mossad network behind the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. I have found that the network that arranged for the destruction of the steel - critical evidence from the crime scene - was actually organized by Israel's Mossad and their Zionist agents, the real culprits behind the false-flag terrorism that changed the world. This article will be the final and conclusive chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World.

On Saturday, December 18, I discussed my research about the destruction of the steel of the World Trade Center with Kevin Barrett on his radio show. The following day, a blogger called "Gretavo" posted the following comment on his website, WTCDemolition.com:

some of what smells fishy to me...
Submitted by gretavo on Sun, 2010-12-19 11:21.

Christopher Bollyn re-appears with very convoluted series of connections that he claims prove a Mossad connection to the destruction of steel. And also to "military applications of thin coatings" -- as if painted on nanothermite were conclusively proven to have been used.

Who is Gretavo Verdadero? is a question that has been taken up by others. Why would a person interested in 9/11 truth use an utterly fake name that means "greatest truther" in Spanish? Gretavo is evidently Gustavo A. Espada, a Puerto Rican whose father, Luis Espada-Platet, works for the U.S. State Department and who has served in numerous high-level positions representing the U.S. government in Nicaragua, Portugal, Mexico, etc., according to this article in the Harvard Crimson.

In 2004, a posting suggested that Espada worked undercover for the C.I.A. at Harvard:

Posted by: Rebel at Sep 27, 2004 20:04

If I remember clearly, Gustavo Espada was raised in US Embassies in Columbia, Brazil and Nicaragua where he had much contact with and was protected by the CIA.

I also seem to remember Gustavo Espada filming activists in Cambridge, MA and providing the film to the very operation the article is about: KOBE. That film was used to harass activists, including DeVoy.

Gustavo Espada's father currently works in the US Embassy in Nicaragua (Consul General). Evidence supports the belief that he works for the CIA undercover at Harvard University."

Gustavo Espada was the webmaster of KOBE, an anti-Muslim website. Reportedly, "Gustavo Espada of KOBE infiltrated an anarchist group in Harvard Square and assisted authorities in attempting to frame Boston activists in various crimes. Pretending to be a member of the anarchist group, he took advantage of their trust to videotape them and then provide doctored photos to hate organizations for the purposes of harassment and defamation."

If the Israeli Mossad connections to the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center sound convoluted it is only because I have not been clear enough in my explanations. (Gretavo apparently also fails to understand the very clear evidence presented in Dr. Steven E. Jones' scientific paper on the discovery of super-Thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center.) The following two points are the basis of the Mossad connection to the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center:

1. Two orthodox Zionist Jews from Belgium, Jehuda Saar and Nathan Fruchter, worked with senior Mossadnik Marc Rich (another Israeli/Belgian Jew) since the mid-1990s in Stamford, Connecticut, in the trading of metals and other materials. In January 1999, Rich sent these two traders to create and manage an international trading division at Hugo Neu, the scrap metal dealer of New Jersey who handled much of the steel (evidence from the crime scene) from the World Trade Center. Marc Rich has long worked for the Mossad and with the Bush family. The Marc Rich foundations are managed by a high-level Mossad agent named Avner Azulay. The Saar-Fruchter international trading division at Hugo Neu was the Mossad network through which the 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center were "recycled" in Asian steel mills. The steel was cut up into small pieces about two meters long before being sent to Chinese and Indian steel mills, which means that the steel evidence from the Twin Towers was being destroyed in the scrap yard of Hugo Neu before it was loaded onto ships bound for China.

Avner Azulay of the Mossad...

manages the Marc Rich foundations

2. The Hugo Neu scrap metal company (created by the German Jew, Hugo Neu, a Rothschild agent in 1947) is a major investor in an Israeli venture capital fund called the Aqua Agro fund. The Aqua Agro fund is headed by Nir Belzer, who also heads an Israeli fund called the MMT fund. The MMT fund is primarily invested in nanotechnology projects that create materials precisely like the nanocomposite form of Thermite that destroyed the World Trade Center. Oren Gafri, one of the three managers of the MMT fund, is a specialist in creating such coatings and has worked and trained at Ben Gurion University and Israel's nuclear lab in the Negev Desert where energetic nano-composite coatings are developed. The chips of the bi-layered coating found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center are solid evidence of the extremely high-energy coating that destroyed the Twin Towers. Energetic coatings of super-Thermite are developed at Ben Gurion University and Israel's nuclear lab in the Negev. This is Oren Gafri's field of specialization.

On 19 November 2010 I sent photographs of Jehuda Saar and Nathan Fruchter, two orthodox Zionist Belgian Jews and two of the main people involved in the Mossad "recycling" of the 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center, to Roy Tov, the Christian Israeli author of The Cross of Bethlehem.

Jehuda Saar taking out the garbage before he moved to Israel from Teaneck, New Jersey in 2006. Saar "trashed" 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center for the Mossad...

along with his Israeli-Belgian buddy, Nathan K. Fruchter.

I sent these photos of the culprits behind the criminal destruction of the steel to Tov because he is very knowledgable about the Mossad, having been pursued and targeted by Israeli assassins around the world. This is what Roy Tov wrote back to me on November 21:

Thanks Christopher,

If the pictures are real, then there is little doubt regarding their allies and employers. The chances they'll answer in such case are slim, or it will be in the form of an attack (lawyers or violent) against you.

In September, when I began my research into the Zionist network behind the destruction of the steel, I called the Hugo Neu company, which was one of the two New Jersey scrapyards that "recycled" the steel. Hugo Neu was a German Jewish immigrant from Fürth (like Henry Kissinger, another Rothschild agent) who came to America and worked as a bank clerk with Seligman & Co. before becoming the head of Associated Metals and Minerals Corporation (AMMC) in New York in the 1930s with his German Jewish fellows, Meno Lissauer and Walter M. Rothschild, the company's president. Lissauer's wife, Meta, was also Walter Rothschild's sister. Hugo Neu started his own scrap metal company in 1945. The company is now run by his son, John, and has very close business ties to the state of Israel and is invested in a Mossad-linked Israeli venture fund.

Since 2001, the two companies involved in the destruction of the steel, Sims Metal Management and Hugo Neu, have merged into one company. I called and asked to speak with Alan Ratner, the former head of Metal Management in New Jersey, Daniel Dienst, or Robert Kelman, since these were the key executives involved in the 9/11 steel recycling. I got through to Ratner's secretary, who gave me his email, but instead of letting me speak to any of these men, I was connected to company's spokesman, Daniel Strechay.

Daniel Strechay is the corporate gatekeeper who speaks for the company who profited from the illegal destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center.

Strechay was completely unwilling to answer any questions. I told him that the destruction of the steel is a matter of great historic importance and that in the interest of fairness and accuracy I wanted to speak directly with the people involved. Strechay refused, saying "It's all a matter of public record. Read the Wall Street Journal."

He then said that the company is very proud of how it handled the steel from the Twin Towers, but was adamant in his refusal to let me speak with any of the men who were actually involved in the operation, and hung up the phone. Later, I got through to Alan Ratner by email and he wrote back, so I sent him a few questions, but he has yet to respond. Clearly, these men do not want to discuss their roles in the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.

I called Kenneth Holden at his home in Scarsdale, New York, on October 16, to ask him some questions about his role in the clean-up of the debris at the World Trade Center. Holden is the former head of New York City's Department of Design and Construction (DDC), and was the official who oversaw the removal of the steel. As Mayor Bloomberg said about Commissioner Holden, when he was reappointed as head of the DDC in January 2002:

New Yorkers are fortunate to have Commissioner Holden agree to remain as Commissioner of DDC," said Mayor Bloomberg. "Over the last four months he has done a terrific job managing the clean up of the World Trade Center and so that the reconstruction process for Lower Manhattan can begin. By coordinating the movement of millions of tons of steel and rubble, excavating one of the most dangerous work sites in the world all seemingly ahead of schedule, under budget and without a fatality, Kenneth Holden has been the unsung hero of this enormous task."

Kenneth Holden - Mayor Bloomberg's "Unsung Hero" of the 9/11 Clean-Up

THE "UNSUNG HERO" WON'T SING

When Holden gave his statement to the 9/11 Commission on April 1, 2003, he said he had received "verbal permission" to remove the steel to New Jersey scrapyards, but failed to give the name of the person who had authorized the destruction of the evidence. Oddly, nobody asked Holden who gave him permission to send the steel to the Zionist-controlled scrapyards who destroyed the evidence:

Steel and debris from the site was sent to Fresh Kills where it was examined and sifted. As the Department of Sanitation could no longer handle the steel with their equipment, and our engineers thought the steel would destabilize the landfill, DDC received verbal permission to ship the steel to New Jersey. (From whom? CB) By the end of June 2002, an astounding total of over 1.6 million tons of steel and other debris were removed from the site.

It was Saturday morning when I reached Holden at his home. I told him I was working on an article about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center and wanted to ask him a few questions. He bawked a bit at first, saying that he was no longer giving interviews on the subject, so I repeated what he told the commission and asked the most important question first: Who gave you the verbal permission to ship the steel to New Jersey scrapyards? I was able to repeat the question twice very clearly. After a short pause Holden said, "As I said, I'm not giving interviews on this subject." Then he silently ended the call.

I thought for a minute and called Holden right back. He picked up the phone and I immediately asked, "Was it Chertoff? Was it Michael Chertoff who gave you the verbal permission?" Holden was silent on the other end of the line, then he ended the call as he had done before.

"Silence is agreement" is an old Estonian saying that comes to mind. The logic is that Holden could not deny that Chertoff had given him the verbal permission, so he remained silent. Common sense would suggest that the permission must have come from Chertoff, who as Assistant Attorney General of the United States was the top dog responsible for the federal (FBI) investigation of 9/11.

Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff was "top dog" at the FBI during the "non-investigation" of 9/11, in which the crucial steel evidence was destroyed in Asian smelters before being examined by engineers. Chertoff's Israeli mother, Livia Eisen, was one of the first Mossad agents. An Israeli by birth, Michael spent much of his childhood in Israel.

To understand the essence of the crime, I recommend reading the short article "Selling Out the Investigation" by Bill Manning of Fire Engineering. Manning's piece was published on January 1, 2002. The destruction of the steel was a crucial part of the 9/11 hoax. A hoax cannot succeed if there is evidence that reveals the truth -- and 9/11 is a global hoax.

The towers were well built structures that used more steel than today's skyscrapers. The debris contained about 300,000 tons of steel that was hastily dispatched by a New York City official to two Zionist-controlled scrapyards in New Jersey - before it could even be inspected by engineers. These Jewish-owned scrapyards then shipped the steel - hard evidence from the crime scene - to Asian smelters where it was melted down far from the prying eyes of U.S. investigators. Why was this allowed and who was behind it?

An organization called the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) is calling for the public to demand that the district attorney of New York County investigate and prosecute those responsible for the destruction of the evidence from the crime scene. This is from their open letter/petition of June 23, 2010 to the district attorney's office:

Cy Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York County
Thomas Wornom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau

Dear Sirs:

Over the last three weeks you have been informed about the overwhelming evidence that World Trade Center Building 7 was demolished with explosives. I trust that you understand the serious implications of this crime and that you are resolved to prosecute the guilty parties. To provide a critical steppingstone in your investigation, I would like to bring to your attention the widely documented – and widely protested – destruction of physical evidence (structural steel) at the crime scene, which I contend is prosecutable pursuant to Article 205 of the New York Penal Code, § 205.50 Hindering Prosecution.

“[A] person ‘renders criminal assistance’ when, with intent to prevent, hinder or delay the discovery or apprehension of…a person he knows or believes has committed a crime…he...suppresses, by any act of concealment, alteration or destruction, any physical evidence which might aid in the discovery or apprehension of such person or in the lodging of a criminal charge against him;”

I will present publicly available information on the destruction of physical evidence from the World Trade Center site, below my signature, in four sections entitled:

1. Official acknowledgement of the destruction of physical evidence from the WTC.
2. Control of the WTC cleanup.
3. The decision to destroy the physical evidence.
4. The continued destruction of evidence despite public outcry

The supporting documentation provided in this letter/petition from NYC CAN includes the following:

“In the month that lapsed between the terrorist attacks and the deployment of the [FEMA Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT Team)], a significant amount of steel debris—including most of the steel from the upper floors—was removed from the rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at the recycling plant or shipped out of the U.S. Some of the critical pieces of steel—including the suspension trusses from the top of the towers and the internal support columns—were gone before the first BPAT team member ever reached the site. Fortunately, an NSF-funded independent researcher, recognizing that valuable evidence was being destroyed, attempted to intervene with the City of New York to save the valuable artifacts, but the city was unwilling to suspend the recycling contract.”
- Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, March 6, 2002

“[T]here is so much that has been lost in these last six months that we can never go back and retrieve. And that is not only unfortunate, it is borderline criminal.”
- Joseph Crowley, U.S. Congressman, 7th District, New York

“[O]n September 28, the New York Times learned that the city was recycling the steel. When the Times contacted Kenneth R. Holden, commissioner of the Department of Design and Construction, he said that no one from the investigative team had asked him to keep or inspect the steel. The ASCE, it turned out, had faxed a request, but to the wrong fax machine. Late that afternoon, after reporters shuttled the correct fax number to the ASCE, Holden said that a request had finally reached him."

Commissioner Kenneth R. Holden and his wife Frances McGuire. Holden was given an award in 2002 by the AIA New York Chapter after he had overseen the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. Why was he being awarded when he should have been arrested?

By September 28, the DDC is publicly known to have been aware of the BPAT’s request for the steel to be saved, however, the decision to recycle the steel stood.

Of course, Mayor Giuliani – previously a U.S. Attorney – and the DDC had to be fully aware of the illegality of destroying the physical evidence prior to their decision to recycle the steel. Their refusal to desist from recycling the steel when asked by the investigative team to do so – still less than three weeks into the cleanup effort, with hundreds of thousands of tons of steel still salvageable, and relatively negligible revenue from selling the steel not an issue because there was virtually unlimited federal funding for the cleanup effort – strongly suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a crime they knew had taken place...

Calls to halt the recycling fell on deaf ears. According to Times reporters Glanz and Lipton:

“Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written and oral requests for comment over a three-day period about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation. ‘The city considered it reasonable to have recovered structural steel recycled,’ said Matthew G. Monahan, a spokesman for the city's Department of Design and Construction, which is in charge of debris removal at the site”

Why didn’t the city simply stop recycling the steel? Again, the outright refusal of city officials to desist from recycling the steel strongly suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a crime they knew had taken place.

I strongly support the NYC CAN petition to prosecute those behind the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. My forthcoming article will reveal the key people involved in the terror network behind this crime.

In the meantime, I recommend visiting the website of NYC CAN to understand the basis of their appeal for justice and the extent of the criminal destruction of evidence from the World Trade Center: http://www.nyccan.org/join.php

Radio Show on Destruction of 9/11 Steel

December 20, 2010

The December 18 radio show about the destruction of the steel evidence of 9/11 can be heard by clicking on:

I was on Kevin Barrett's radio show on Saturday, December 18. Kevin invited me to discuss my latest 9/11 research which exposes the Zionist criminal network behind the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. Some of the key people involved in this crucial aspect of the false-flag terror operation are discussed in my article entitled "WikiLeaks and the 9/11 Crime Gang".

There were about 300,000 tons of construction steel that remained in the rubble of the World Trade Center. An international network was in place to remove this crucial evidence and send it to steel mills in Asia where it was destroyed - far from the eyes of engineers and investigators.

The destruction of the steel was an essential part of the false-flag terror atrocity and was planned long in advance. Identifying the criminal network involved in the destruction of the evidence reveals the architect-level people behind 9/11. This is the subject of the final and conclusive chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World. This chapter should be ready in the beginning of 2011.

Thank you for your excellent work and research on 9/11. It's hard to imagine such evil snakes remain at large and unpunished for these crimes. My nephew, (name withheld), worked in the south tower, and was murdered that day. No amount of money would give me the satisfaction of beheading these criminals with an axe!

NTS Notes: The answer to the question is obvious. The evil Israeli Mossad worked closely with its Sayanim and other agents in America to make sure that the metal from the Twin Tower destruction was quickly disposed of, quite obviously to prevent any investigation discovering the truth that the towers were felled by explosives!

It is truly sickening to see that these criminals, including Michael Chertoff, have gotten away with this mass murder of American citizens, and the US Government has done absolutely nothing to this date in terms of having them arrested for murder, or interfering with the crime scene. Rapidly removing the 300000 tons of metal from the twin towers and then having the audacity in selling the metal as scrap to China shows the outright boldness of these murderers!

The time will come when America finally awakens to the truth about who did the attacks of 9-11, and when that time comes, a sleeping angry giant will be finally awakened.... That time truly cannot come soon enough.

I have put up many articles in this blog that deal with a wide spectrum of important issues. Every issue that is presented here is based on factual evidence that is truthful, factual, and can easily be researched by readers. Usually, each article that I present encompasses some real factual articles obtained from other media sources, or come from other real truth seeking blogs. It is the purpose of this blog to present straight forward truthful information to readers, and not that BS crap that they usually see and hear through their controlled media outlets. For example: One absolutely important subject that this blog covers is important Health related issues that you will never find in the Mainstream media!

For this article, I want to present a very disturbing finding that I just came across from the Wall Street Journal website itself, at www.wsj.com, entitled: "So Young, And So Many Pills". This Wall Street Journal article is both shocking and very disturbing, and deals with a very frightening report that some 25% of American youth today are on Prescription Drugs! Here is that article, and I have some important notes to follow:

So Young and So Many Pills

More than 25% of Kids and Teens in the U.S.

Take Prescriptions on a Regular Basis

By ANNA WILDE MATHEWS

Gage Martindale, who is 8 years old, has been taking a blood-pressure drug since he was a toddler. "I want to be healthy, and I don't want things in my heart to go wrong," he says.

And, of course, his mom is always there to check Gage's blood pressure regularly with home monitor, and to make sure the second-grader doesn't skip a dose of his once-a-day enalapril.

These days, the medicine cabinet is truly a family affair. More than a quarter of U.S. kids and teens are taking a medication on a chronic basis, according to Medco Health Solutions Inc., the biggest U.S. pharmacy-benefit manager with around 65 million members. Nearly 7% are on two or more such drugs, based on the company's database figures for 2009.

Doctors and parents warn that prescribing medications to children can be problematic. There is limited research available about many drugs' effects in kids. And health-care providers and families need to be vigilant to assess the medicines' impact, both intended and not. Although the effects of some medications, like cholesterol-lowering statins, have been extensively researched in adults, the consequences of using such drugs for the bulk of a patient's lifespan are little understood.

Many medications kids take on a regular basis are well known, including treatments for asthma and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

But children and teens are also taking a wide variety of other medications once considered only to be for adults, from statins to diabetes pills and sleep drugs, according to figures provided to The Wall Street Journal by IMS Health, a research firm. Prescriptions for antihypertensives in people age 19 and younger could hit 5.5 million this year if the trend though September continues, according to IMS. That would be up 17% from 2007, the earliest year available.

Researchers attribute the wide usage in part to doctors and parents becoming more aware of drugs as an option for kids. Unhealthy diets and lack of exercise among children, which lead to too much weight gain and obesity, also fuel the use of some treatments, such as those for hypertension. And some conditions are likely caught and treated earlier as screening and diagnosis efforts improve.

Gage, who isn't overweight, has been on hypertension drugs since he had surgery to fix a heart defect as a toddler, says his mother, Stefanie Martindale, a Conway, Ark., marketing-company manager.

Most medications that could be prescribed to children on a chronic basis haven't been tested specifically in kids, says Danny Benjamin, a Duke University pediatrics professor. And older drugs rarely get examined, since pharmaceutical firms have little incentive to test medicines once they are no longer under patent protection.

Still, a growing number of studies have been done under a Food and Drug Administration program that rewards drug companies for testing medications in children. In more than a third of these studies, there have been surprising side effects, or results that suggested a smaller or larger dose was needed than had been expected, Dr. Benjamin says. Those findings underscore that children's reactions to medicines can be very different than those of adults. Long-term effects of drugs in kids are almost never known, since pediatric studies, like those in adults, tend to be relatively short.

"We know we're making errors in dosing and safety," says Dr. Benjamin, who is leading a new National Institutes of Health initiative to study drugs in children. He suggests that parents should do as much research as they can to understand the evidence for the medicine, confirm the diagnosis, and identify side effects. Among the places to check: drug labels and other resources on the FDA's website, published research at www.pubmed.gov, and clinical guidelines from groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics.

When a child psychiatrist diagnosed their then 8-year-old daughter with bipolar disorder four years ago, Ken and Joy Lewis, of Chapel Hill, N.C., sought a second opinion from another child psychiatrist.

They also worked with a psychologist. Dr. Lewis, who leads a company that does early-stage drug studies, reads all the available research on each medication suggested for the girl, now 12, who has taken antipsychotics and other psychiatric medications including Risperdal and Haldol.

"If your child has a chronic problem, then you have to invest the time as a parent," he says.

Parents and doctors also say nondrug alternatives should be explored where possible. Tom Wells, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences who sees patients at Arkansas Children's Hospital in Little Rock, frequently pushes diet and exercise changes before drugs for hypertensive kids. "Obesity is really the biggest cause I see for high blood pressure in adolescents," he says. But only about 10% of families adhere to his diet and exercise recommendations, he says.

Beverly Pizzano, a psychologist who lives in Palm Harbor, Fla., spent years struggling with behavioral therapies for her son Steven, 10, who showed symptoms of ADHD at a young age. She worked with a counselor on a system of rewards for good behavior, and even had a research team watch him and suggest interventions. But she turned to medications after he struggled in kindergarten. "We tried everything before I would get to that," she says.

After a drug is prescribed, children must be closely monitored, doctors say. They may not recognize or communicate a possible side effect, or whether their symptoms are improving. They also don't always follow prescription instructions.

Robert Lemanske, a professor at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, says patients at his pediatric asthma clinic are checked regularly for side effects such as slowed rates of growth. He quizzes parents and young patients on details like where they keep their inhalers to make sure they're taking their prescribed medicine.

Nichole Ramsey, a preschool teacher whose 9-year-old son Antwone is a patient at the clinic, watches her son's basketball practices so she can head off any wheezing or other symptoms. She also makes sure she's around when he gets his regular Advair dose. If Antwone stays at a friend's house overnight, she asks the parents to watch that he takes steps like rinsing out his mouth to avoid a fungal infection that can be a side effect of the inhaled drug.

"You're still the best monitor of what's going on with them," she says of a parent's role.

Ms. Ramsey is particularly concerned about Advair, which has been tied to rare instances of asthma-related death, but says it works better than a previous drug he was using. Before he started the medications, Antwone was hospitalized several times for asthma attacks.

As children's bodies change and grow, they often need different drugs or doses, says Greg Kearns, chairman of medical research at Children's Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, Mo.

Jennifer Flory, a homemaker in Baldwin City, Kan., says that after her daughter Cassandra, now 16, started taking a higher dose of the asthma drug Singulair a few years ago, she became more moody and sad. Ms. Flory didn't connect the change to the drug, but when she eventually mentioned it to a nurse practitioner at the girl's asthma clinic, the nurse suggested stopping Singulair, which currently has a precaution in its label about possible psychiatric side effects. Cassandra, who continued taking Advair, became far more cheerful and didn't have any increase in asthma symptoms, Ms. Flory says.

A spokesman for Merck & Co., which makes Singulair, said in a statement that the company is "confident in the efficacy and safety of Singulair," which is "an important treatment option for appropriate patients."

NTS Notes: Ok... I do have absolutely serious issues with this idea that so many youth are hooked on Prescription Drugs. Back when I was a child, this idea that 25% of all children were hooked on these poisons was absolutely unheard of! So, the question becomes: What the HELL is going on here????

The fact is that today's American children are being fed a wide array of poisons in their daily diets. They are subjected to dangerous chemicals like Fluoride, Aspartame, Sucralose, MSG, and High Fructose Corn Syrup. Each of these chemicals are absolutely dangerous to humans, and do serious damage to the human body. Logically, The effects would be more pronounced and concentrated in children due to their smaller bodies!

The fact is that each of these dangerous chemicals listed does serious harm to children. High Fructose Corn Syrup for example is the major cause of childhood obesity, and its dangerous side effects can explain many of the neurological and mental disorders that afflict children to the point that they are given dangerous and poisonous prescription drugs. Aspartame and Sucralose also are toxic poisons, and their side effects in children are most definitely also responsible for wrong diagnosis of mental disorders!

The solution is obvious: Get the children off of these poisons that they ingest daily, and guaranteed they will not need prescription drugs! The fact is that the food industries in America are doing absolutely nothing to remove these poisons or put up health warnings about their effects on children! AND as stated in this article, the Prescription drug companies are absolutely not wanting to do anything to help America's children because they are looking at childhood prescription drugs as a way of increasing their profits! It is truly sickening to see....

Wake up, America! Get off of your poisonous chemical diets, and do something to save your children!

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

I have stated many times that the United States Government is totally controlled by the criminal state of Israel. I have not seen or received any information that has run counter to that statement to this date. It is a fact that the US Government answers first and foremost to their masters in Tel Aviv, and puts their constituents that actually vote them into power as secondary. It is a sad statement about the United States itself!

Exactly how much the US Government is firmly under Israeli control can be shown by the power of the Israeli Lobby in Washington DC, and especially the criminal group, AIPAC. Right now, I want to present an amazing article by Phillip Giraldi, from the website: The Muslim Observer, at www.muslimmedianetwork.com, entitled: "Passing US Secrets To Israel Routine" for the Israel Lobby, and it contains some very disturbing facts showing how these "lobby" groups are nothing more than massive spy operations for the criminal state of Israel! Here is that article:

“Passing US Secrets to Israel Routine” for the Israel Lobby

Former top AIPAC official claims to have “about 180” documents that demonstrate that classified information was regularly collected by AIPAC and given to the Israeli Embassy with full knowledge of the organization’s Director Kohr and other senior officials

Philip Giraldi – Reports of surfing porn sites and frequenting prostitutes is not what one expects to read regarding the leadership of Washington’s most powerful foreign policy lobby.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is embroiled in a court battle with its former Director of Foreign Policy Issues Steven Rosen, who is claiming that AIPAC first unfairly fired then slandered and libeled him, publicly denouncing him for not exhibiting “the conduct that AIPAC expects from its employees.” He is seeking total damages of $20 million…

Defeat for AIPAC could have major consequences beyond a sudden shortage of donors, including increasing demands for the group to register as a foreign lobby and even criminal charges relating to the passage of classified information to Israel, an offense under the Espionage Act. Some have even predicted that the trial could spin out of control, with proliferating charges and counter-charges leading to the effective dismantling of AIPAC…

…Rosen and his AIPAC colleague Keith Weissman were charged under the Espionage Act in 2003, after the FBI made the case that they had obtained classified information from Pentagon employee Larry Franklin and passed it on to Israeli diplomats and to journalist Glenn Kessler of The Washington Post.

In 2005, the two men were fired by AIPAC in spite of initial pledges of support. The trial, sometimes referred to as AIPACgate, dragged on until May 1, 2009, when it was finally dismissed after the government could not make its case due to adverse decisions by the presiding Judge T. S. Ellis, possibly acting under pressure from the White House to end the proceedings.

At the time, as the centerpiece of his defense, Rosen claimed somewhat ominously that passing classified information obtained from government contacts was business as usual in Washington. He asked that high level witnesses including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley, former Defense Department officials Paul D. Wolfowitz and Douglas J. Feith, and Richard L. Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state all be called on to testify that confidential information was frequently given to AIPAC for discreet passage to the Israeli Embassy.

Rosen’s lawyers also demanded access to numerous government documents to assist them in making their case. Many of those documents would have themselves been classified, eventually leading government prosecutors to abandon their attempts at a conviction in the belief that more damage would be done by proceeding than in dropping the case.

Rosen and Weissman were not, however, either exonerated or acquitted, an indication that the government lawyers believed the prosecution to be a sound one.

Dismissing Rosen was a bad move by AIPAC as he has since worked hard to get his revenge.

Recent moves and countermoves by Rosen and AIPAC have included a 260-page motion by AIPAC filed on November 8th that interestingly makes the case in some detail that Rosen engaged in espionage while distancing AIPAC itself from any involvement. The intention is clearly to demonstrate that Rosen and Weissman were a rogue operation, not sanctioned by their employer.

The motion also incorporates a lengthy deposition of Rosen in which he describes his own sexual “experimentations” with both men and women, some of whom were discovered on Craigslist. Rosen also recounts how pornography was regularly viewed and even saved on AIPAC computers by a number of senior employees, including Director Howard Kohr and his secretary, and there were visits to prostitutes by AIPAC officials.

Rosen is expected to counter the AIPAC November filing with his own motion later this month and there will be an obligatory mediation session with the presiding judge in mid January. The cycle of attacks and rebuttals has not done much to help AIPAC’s reputation, already tarnished by the long running Rosen-Weissman trial that led to the lawsuit and there are reports that donations have declined by 15%, with a number of major contributors like Haim Saban having opted instead to help Rosen financially.

Rosen contends that his betrayal by AIPAC was motivated by a desire to avoid criminal charges against its executives…

On February 16, 2005, AIPAC’s counsel said that the lead federal prosecutor `is fighting with the FBI to limit the investigation to Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman and to avoid expanding it.’ This warning implied that AIPAC’s Executive Director and the AIPAC organization as a whole could become targets.”

And there is a much bigger story lurking in the background, though no one is quite sure who holds the cards and how it might play out, involving the regular provision of top level classified information from AIPAC to the Israeli government and to the media.

The November AIPAC motion and the Rosen deposition inadvertently demonstrate the close ties between AIPAC and the Israeli Embassy in Washington, recording as they do the details of numerous meetings with diplomats and intelligence officers in which secret information was passed. For AIPAC to win its war of words with Rosen it must demonstrate that he was indeed guilty of espionage with “a foreign country” while distancing itself from his activities and also at the same time keeping Israel out of the story insofar as possible.

Rosen must turn the tables on AIPAC by proving that it was completely collaborative in the collection and delivery of intelligence material to foreigners. He intends to replay his planned defense in the Espionage Act trial, asserting that passing classified information was a regular and accepted feature of life in Washington, particularly for those who worked to advance Israel’s interests.

Rosen claims to have “about 180” documents that demonstrate that classified information was regularly collected by AIPAC and given to the Israeli Embassy with full knowledge of the organization’s Director Kohr and other senior officials, something that they have denied under oath.

He also claims that depositions of FBI agents who questioned AIPAC officials will demonstrate that the collection and use of classified information was routine, generally known, and widely accepted within AIPAC. Rosen also has given signs that he might broaden the inquiry.

In September 2009, he filed a list of 48 prospective witnesses that might be called to testify that included: Douglas Bloomfield, Morris Amitay, Thomas Dine, Elliott Abrams, John Bolton, Martin Indyk, David Satterfield, Kenneth Pollack, Malcolm Hoenlein, and Abraham Foxman. All are major figures in the Israel Lobby. The intent would appear to be to demonstrate that passing secrets to the Israeli government was standard operating procedure for many groups and individuals linked to the Lobby, not just AIPAC.

It will also motivate the groups that the men represent to put pressure on AIPAC to settle the case with Rosen, at whatever cost.

What is ultimately at stake is AIPAC’s powerful mystique, derived from its status as a foreign lobby posing as a domestic lobby that is so untouchable that it does not have to register with the Justice Department or play by anyone’s rules but its own. The charge of trading in US government classified information, even if the Barack Obama administration predictably opts not to prosecute the criminal activity, would render disingenuous the argument that AIPAC should not have to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) because it only operates domestically and its focus is educational. It could also lose its completely bogus non-profit tax exempt status.

But those who see a dark future for AIPAC fail to reckon with the strengths of the organization, to include an endowment fund of $50 million that can be tapped in emergencies.

It continues to be extremely powerful at all levels within the Barack Obama Administration and with congress. AIPAC has resources deep within the Justice Department, which will make sure that it is advised of every impending move against it and that will do everything they can to impede any investigation that might lead to criminal charges or to registration under FARA. And then there is the media role or rather the lack of one.

The mainstream media assiduously avoided the story of the Rosen-Weissman trial and it has not reported on the Rosen AIPAC lawsuit apart from few brave souls like Jeff Stein in his Spy Talk at The Washington Post. If the federal government prefers not to investigate or prosecute a clear violation of the law and if the media does not report the failure to do so the public will once again be kept in the dark. It could mean that those who long for the death of AIPAC might well be disappointed.

Philip Giraldi is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest. This article is published in full in an upcoming issue of American Conservative magazine. Original title: “The End of AIPAC?”

NTS Notes: When the heck will the American people finally wake up and put an end to this?

As far as I am concerned, every single member of the criminal group, AIPAC, should be arrested and thrown in jail! AND all members of the US Congress and Senate that swear their undying allegiance to this criminal group and the state of Israel first, above the United States itself, should be charged with treason!

Again, this shows how much the United States has fallen under total Israeli control. Americans need leadership that answers to its citizens first, and foremost!

The Best Sites Exposing The Truth About Israel's 9:11 Attacks On America

Best Sites For Exposing The Apollo Moon Landings Hoax!

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Notice

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

About Myself

Canadian male, age 57..(Hard to believe I am that old..)
Sickened by the lies of history, and how our education system has ruined and failed our childrens' minds, I decided it was time to take a stand and put up real articles of truthful information.
Willing to fight to see truth come out, and to have the true criminals on our planet exposed for their crimes against humanity.
I am in this for the truth and where ever the truth leads me!
********************************************************
Northerntruthseeker is fully responsible for all content in this blog. If any errors or omissions are deemed necessary for correction of material, it will be placed into the articles affected, and notice will be put up for all readers. Northerntruthseeker will never accept money, personal gifts, or any threats, given for any material posted in this blog.
The information articles in this blog are free for everyone to take and spread to others.
In these times of uncertainty, people deserve the truth no matter how harsh it may be!