Most resist the idea of a creator...simply because religion has attached judgment and condemnation, as traits of this creator or creators or spirits or superior beings...

"Many" rather than "most" would read truer, and so would "because indoctrination" rather than "religion") has attached.. etc...

Mostly...because.. a person can...for example, "religiously" brush their teeth, or "religiously" drink two cups of coffee each day, neither of which "ritual" will have perpetuated any sort of religious "indoctrination" upon them.

Play-Doh - Who Invented Play-DohPlay-Doh was originally designed as a wallpaper cleaner.

Play Doh - What is it?:Play Doh is a modelling compound especially meant for kids. Play Doh comes in various colors including primary colors like blue, red and yellow. Play Doh comes in sealed cans, and is pliable to the touch. It's similarity to clay without the mess makes it a perfect modelling toy for the children. Play Doh is non toxic, and can be washed off with soapy water. Once Play Doh is exposed to air, it hardens.

neutral observer wrote:A monotheistic god would be neither male nor female. For it to be one requires that gods of the other gender also exist. Unless you are polytheistic...Cybele wrote:The anthropomorphic God of the Bible is obviously a maleThe Christian Scientists call their god the Father-Mother God.The founder of their church was a woman.

TR the humans that are far beyond the "Bible Babble" and realize the entities and forces that created all life on this planet .....STOP! Humans are a primitive species.....to understand the truth would be asking to much from a mind stuck in the A>D.And, contact is out of the question. Proof........forget it!Just be a good little godbot and go pray.......

Your right...nor is logical deduction. But when you have cultures that have had no contact with one another that also are separated by time and space, come up with basic intuitional knowledge that correlates to a idea that science adheres to...( the Observer Effect)then you have something that should be considered...

<quoted text>Your right...nor is logical deduction. But when you have cultures that have had no contact with one another that also are separated by time and space, come up with basic intuitional knowledge that correlates to a idea that science adheres to...( the Observer Effect)then you have something that should be considered...

Noncorporeal aliens inhabit the bodies of Enterprise crew members to study how the crew reacts to a lethal virus infection that has afflicted Trip and Hoshi. "The Observer Affect" (StarTrek) lol.

“If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?”~ George Berkeley

Fundamental to contemporary Quantum Theory is the notion that there is no phenomenon until it is observed. This effect is known as the ‘Observer Effect’.

"The Observer Affect" Flow"Psychology" on a cherry blossom web page with a guy that looks like Teli Savalis.

The "Observer Affect" in Science-Rational Example:a standard mercury-in-glass thermometer must absorb some thermal energy to record a temperature, and therefore changes the temperature of the body which it is measuring.

A common lay misuse of the term refers to quantum mechanics, where, if the outcome of an event has not been observed, it exists in a state of 'superposition', which is akin to being in all possible states at once. In the famous thought experiment known as Schrödinger's cat the cat is supposedly neither alive nor dead until observed — until that time, the cat is both alive and dead (technically half-alive and half-dead in probability terms). However, most quantum physicists, in resolving Schrödinger's seeming paradox, now understand that the acts of 'observation' and 'measurement' must also be defined in quantum terms **BEFORE the question makes sense.

Instance A: See "studying rats under a microscope after injecting a live germ of black plague"...while watching StarTrek reruns.

Instance B: See perceived ability to "mind read" lol.

Instance C: When not convoluted or misconstrued, could aptly be a term used in formulating Scientific hypothesis, when applied correctly. See: Lucy McFaddens observation on gas and dust comas of the comet Tempel 1 -->(analysis of the gas and dust coma images reveals asymmetric distributions of water, CN, C2 and dust. The C2 is enhanced in the sunward direction suggesting either a temperature dependence or a compositional asymmetry in the composition of the nucleus.)

<quoted text>Nor is there any evidence of life coming out of inordinate matter...Inordinate lifeless elements cannot ever, will not ever, produce life...get over it...It has no reason to...dust will remain dust for trillions of years, until a master, intellegent chemist entity, comes along and arranges the chemicals in a way that can produce life...

Wrong.

Would you like to learn the current state of abiogenesis? Or do you want to remain in a state of denial?

<quoted text>Noncorporeal aliens inhabit the bodies of Enterprise crew members to study how the crew reacts to a lethal virus infection that has afflicted Trip and Hoshi. "The Observer Affect" (StarTrek) lol.“If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?”~ George BerkeleyFundamental to contemporary Quantum Theory is the notion that there is no phenomenon until it is observed. This effect is known as the ‘Observer Effect’."The Observer Affect" Flow"Psychology" on a cherry blossom web page with a guy that looks like Teli Savalis.The "Observer Affect" in Science-Rational Example:a standard mercury-in-glass thermometer must absorb some thermal energy to record a temperature, and therefore changes the temperature of the body which it is measuring.A common lay misuse of the term refers to quantum mechanics, where, if the outcome of an event has not been observed, it exists in a state of 'superposition', which is akin to being in all possible states at once. In the famous thought experiment known as Schrödinger's cat the cat is supposedly neither alive nor dead until observed — until that time, the cat is both alive and dead (technically half-alive and half-dead in probability terms). However, most quantum physicists, in resolving Schrödinger's seeming paradox, now understand that the acts of 'observation' and 'measurement' must also be defined in quantum terms **BEFORE the question makes sense.Instance A: See "studying rats under a microscope after injecting a live germ of black plague"...while watching StarTrek reruns.Instance B: See perceived ability to "mind read" lol.Instance C: When not convoluted or misconstrued, could aptly be a term used in formulating Scientific hypothesis, when applied correctly. See: Lucy McFaddens observation on gas and dust comas of the comet Tempel 1 -->(analysis of the gas and dust coma images reveals asymmetric distributions of water, CN, C2 and dust. The C2 is enhanced in the sunward direction suggesting either a temperature dependence or a compositional asymmetry in the composition of the nucleus.)The "Observer Afffect" lol

“If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?”

My point isn't the point. THE point is the epiphany of knowing when you're pointing a gun at your own head.If you want a tip, accept that perfection is not strength. Adaptability is strength.(Getting back on topic, one way or another!) If you're interested in progress, you'll need to start asking the right questions. The truth will come racing at you faster than you'll like it, once others see you walking a straight line, rather than swimming around like the other mindless thralls. Thralls adapt, but they don't know perfection. Perfectionists don't adapt, but they waste their time controlling the uncontrollable.And so, the moral of the story..Me? I answer a question with another question. YOU!...don't know the truth, and so you don't get the truth, or at least not enough of it to make a difference. You have to choose to ask the right questions, which first means you have to stop living in denial. So, let's end this Cheshire cat dialog, and you can decide who you are and what you really want.I?...live in the moment. Every time you react, you've already slipped into the past.When you can dissect this quaint monolog existentially, you'll have a clue!:)

Oh, I've got a clue. My clue is that you like to engage in long, rambling, pointless posts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.