We have reduced support for legacy browsers.

What does this mean for me? You will always be able to play your favorite games on Kongregate. However, certain site features may suddenly stop working and leave you with a severely degraded experience.

What should I do? We strongly urge all our users to upgrade to modern browsers for a better experience and improved security.

procrastination
page 3

> *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=2#posts-1713646):***
>
> “I have never heard of books, so they must not be that important”
> EDIT:
>
> The link is completely relevant.
A sick-out is/is not a strike because . . .
Advertisements (music videos, etc.) are/are not works of art because . . .
History is/is not a science because . . .
Single parents (or gay couples, etc.) are/are not families because . . .
Lies include things that you don’t say because . . .
Frozen yogurt is/is not ice cream because . . .
these examples have nothing to do with anything discussed. if i look up advertisement in the dictionary, it says what it is. the unchangeable definition which can’t be misinterpreted because it’s set in stone.

> *Originally posted by **[Agentius100](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1713749):***
> > *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=2#posts-1713646):***
> >
> > “I have never heard of books, so they must not be that important”
> >
> > EDIT:
> >
> > The link is completely relevant.
>
> A sick-out is/is not a strike because . . .
> Advertisements (music videos, etc.) are/are not works of art because . . .
> History is/is not a science because . . .
> Single parents (or gay couples, etc.) are/are not families because . . .
> Lies include things that you don’t say because . . .
> Frozen yogurt is/is not ice cream because . . .
>
> these examples have nothing to do with anything discussed. if i look up advertisement in the dictionary, it says what it is. the unchangeable definition which can’t be misinterpreted because it’s set in stone.
And there was more than one definition, right? And different dictionaries had different definitions, right? An the definition of words necer changes, right?
> LOL
Read th forum rules, just posting lol is spam.

> *Originally posted by **[Jabor](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714135):***
> > how bout you define it?
>
> Whatever my definition, there are people who disagree with it.
>
> Which was the whole point of using it as an example.
no there is only one definition, any other is slang

> *Originally posted by **[Agentius100](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=2#posts-1713625):***
> > *Originally posted by **[blood18](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=2#posts-1713029):***
> > > words have concrete definitions. there is no interpretation
> >
> > That is completely untrue. Have you never heard of an a [definitional argument](http://www.kean.edu/~cnelson/classes/documents/definition.html)?
>
> no i havent so it must not have much of a bearing on anything
>
> and it really has nothing to do with the definition of words, what did you think, that i wouldnt bother to read you stupid F\*%#`) link you %$`#%G #%\*%
Wait wait so because I pointed out a huge flaw in your argument with something that you have never heard of it is some how invalid. Wow.

> *Originally posted by **[Jabor](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714299):***
> > why should i state it? you know what it is
>
> I might know what it is. How do I know that my definition is the same as yours?
>
> Also:
>
> > And who decides what it is?
this is why you’re you and i’m glad i’m not

> *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714349):***
>
> Are you going to actually address the comment or not? Because what you said makes me think you are giving up.
not giving up
just tired of ignorance

> *Originally posted by **[Jabor](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714335):***
>
> Stop trying to dodge the question.> *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714349):***
>
> Are you going to actually address the comment or not? Because what you said makes me think you are giving up.
i guess this really isn’t ignorance

> *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714472):***
>
> It isn’t. It is asking why you dodged a question, as you continually do. In fact, define ignorance.
you and jabor are trying to bait into answering a loaded question by calling me ignorant.
you’r not worth anymore of the time it takes to type

> *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714472):***
>
> It isn’t. It is asking why you dodged a question, as you continually do. In fact, define ignorance.
![](http://www.arnizachariassen.com/ithinkibelieve/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ignorance-is-bliss.jpg)
Ignorance is the inability to comprehend what other people are telling you, nor make any effort to understand.
“Pertokeyo is in a state of ‘ignorance’ because he/she has not bothered to look at any of the posts in this thread, nor is able to understand what the current argument is.”
However ignorance should not be used as a method of classing somebody as unintelligent, it is simply a state of being unaware.

> *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714524):***
>
> You were not asked any loaded questions, and it was you that called us ignorant.
>
> Explain to me how “define X” is a loaded question
your a real bright guy
i’d love to meet you in real life

> *Originally posted by **[Agentius100](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714448):***
> > *Originally posted by **[Jabor](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714335):***
> >
> > Stop trying to dodge the question.> *Originally posted by **[JohnRulz](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=3#posts-1714349):***
> >
> > Are you going to actually address the comment or not? Because what you said makes me think you are giving up.
>
> i guess this really isn’t ignorance
I think he was referring to this comment
> *Originally posted by **[Agentius100](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=2#posts-1713625):***
> > *Originally posted by **[blood18](/forums/9/topics/75897?page=2#posts-1713029):***
> > > words have concrete definitions. there is no interpretation
> >
> > That is completely untrue. Have you never heard of an a [definitional argument](http://www.kean.edu/~cnelson/classes/documents/definition.html)?
>
> no i havent so it must not have much of a bearing on anything
>
> and it really has nothing to do with the definition of words, what did you think, that i wouldnt bother to read you stupid F\*%#`) link you %$`#%G #%\*%