Excellent point. Thanks for that back-up reference.
Sincerely,
John
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: re:
Well said, John. I always like to back up these things by jewish admissions
themselves. If the Cain-Jewish connection is a fabrication, then why did the
well known Jewish writer Dr. Abba Hillel Silver write about the newly
created state of Israel by declaring: "For the curse of Cain, the curse of
being an outcast and a wanderer over the face of the earth has been
removed...", Liberal Judaism, January, 1949.
John Knight wrote:
"Eve was deceived by "Nachash", who was a person, not a snake. The
description of this person as a snake was a figure of speech then just as it
is today: i.e., "he's a real snake".
Gen 3:13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast
done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
Gen 3:13 And the LORD3068 God430 said559 unto the woman,802 What4100 is
this2063 that thou hast done?6213 And the woman802 said,559 The serpent5175
beguiled5377 me, and I did eat.398
H5175
na^cha^sh
naw-khawsh'
>From H5172; a snake (from its hiss): - serpent.
H5172
na^chash
naw-khash'
A primitive root; properly to hiss, that is, whisper a (magic) spell;
generally to prognosticate: - X certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) X
enchantment, learn by experience, X indeed, diligently observe.
Nachash's deception was to convince Eve that he was "the LORD".
Gen 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bore Cain, and
said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
Gen 4:2 And she again bore his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of
sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
Gen 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bore a son, and called his
name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of
Abel, whom Cain slew.
Note the very important difference between the way the conception of Cain
and the conceptions of Abel and Seth are described.
Cain was from "the LORD", and thus never appears in Adam's genealogy. Both
Abel and Seth were conceived by Adam and do appear in his genealogy.
Who is "the LORD"? Certainly not God, who is always referred to as "the
LORD God". These are two different entities.
The jews claim to be descendants of the Canaanites, and they claim that the
Canaanites are descendants of Cain, which would mean that jews are direct
descendants of Nachash.
Not all races of the world are descendants of Adam. Only the White Race is.
The completely different race called "jews" must have had radically
different ancestors, so maybe their claims about Nachash are true. Noah is
also their ancestor, because the Holy Bible describes the Canaanites as
being descendants of Ham, a son of Noah, as well as the Cushites, who are
now the Negroid jews in Ethiopia. The key point here is that descendants of
Adam are not descendants of Nachash, descendants of Seth [read: the Hebrews
and Israelites] are not descendants of Ham, Canaan, Cush, nor Ashkenaz, and
that any children of any Israelite who ever married any of these
non-Israelites were never considered to be Israelites, by Israelite law.
It's impossible [read: illegal] for any "jew" to have ever been an
Israelite. The race called "jews" did have Israelite ancestors, but that
doesn't change the Israelite law. It just means that they're the mongrel
offspring of Israelites who married jews. Mordecai is an example of a
mongrel, because he was a "jew", even though one of his 4 great-grandfathers
was an Israelite (Kish, a Benjamite, Esther 2:5). In order to be a jew, at
least one of his other ancestors had to have been a jew, otherwise he
wouldn't have been a jew under jewish law. And if "Dr. Laura" is correct
that his mother had to be a jew in order for Mordecai to be a jew, then his
jewish ancestors had to be on the maternal side of his family.
Is there any way that Abraham could be a "jewish patriarch", as the jews
claim? No. The genetic link to Abraham of the less 2% of the jews in the
world who MAY be descendants of Abraham is now down to less than one part in
10^40, and the other 98% of the jews aren't genetically linked to Abraham at
all.
Could Moses be a "jewish patriarch". Utterly impossible. Their genetic
link to Moses is even weaker than the one to Abraham.
Why don't the jews get their own patriarchs instead of stealing them from
the Israelites? For the same reason they claim that the wealth created and
temples and cities built by Israelites belong to them. They're a blood
sucking race whose Talmud is nothing but a cookbook for how to better suck
the blood out of successful Israelite and Muslim societies. If this White
Christian Israelite nation were to cut the money pipeline to "Israel", the
"jews" there would be a greasy spot in the sand the next day.
The "jews" have never been able to develop a sustainable society, and every
place they go implodes within 2 centuries, unless their host culture wises
up and tosses them out (which 86 nations before us have succeeded in doing).
Within two centuries of converting to "Judaism", the Khazars were such a
distant memory that most Americans never even heard of them, even though
their empire was once bigger than the US. Even with all the blood money
flowing into Israel from Israelite nations like the US and Germany, they're
still bankrupt: morally, financially, and ethically. The "jews" in "Israel"
can't even get along with 12 year old Palestinian neighbor boys, much less
pay us back for the hundreds of billions of dollars they've "borrowed" from
us. Conversely, many Arab countries right down the street from them have
higher standards of living than we do, don't need our "foreign aid", and
actually provide a return on our investments, all of which makes Arabs a
billion times better "allies" than the "jews" could ever hope to be."