Even before eugenics could be begun and then, years later,
have an appreciable effect, merely the identification of traits and the
consequences of those traits which is the necessary science before the
application would itself have the effect of increasing the number of people
who notice that right now a conspiracy network of moral inferiors are ruling
the undifferentiated masses such as we are.

I think the science that must exist before the application
called eugenics can be effected would have a positive effect of allowing
us to see that the sociopathic inferior who is actuated by envy, pit-bull
combativeness -- bred by Jews among their own tribe -- you see we have
eugenics but it is a Jewish monopoly and "jew" not "eu"
is its maximand. The balance of mankind -- even the short legged socially
inept losers like me -- need a science of gene pool characteristics to
discriminate good and bad. Which leads to another thought: Not only do
we need a science of inherited behavioral propensities affecting the functioning
of a culture -- but prior to or complementary to that, we need simply a
science of the effects of conduct on the well-being of the larger society
-- something like criminology -- but broader, broad enough to encompass
the effects of non-criminal every-day individual practice on the culture,
that is how this or that character trait or good habit or typical practice
affects the whole.

That being said -- I oppose eugenics, because I have
never met an Ivy League eastern establishment elitist who did not have
people like me in mind when thinking of the advantages of culling traits
from some people of the human race. Invariably the eugenicist combines
the notion of the division of labor and specialization into his thinking
-- and then eugenics becomes discriminating according to class -- and breeding
some for work and breeding other for "higher social functions"
and higher sensitivities to the "finer" things for the elite,
which would be counter-productive in the masses.

Real Americans hate eugenics and view it is presumption
-- the hubris that can only result in a tragic fall. We don't like genetically
modified vegetables, then why would we want some asshole from Harvard telling
parents that their gene pool endowment is being proscribed by government
which knows best.

Remember, the Rockefellers are eugenics true-believers
and they above all others have been behind the dumb-down movement in education--
the arts, letters and sciences.

The British value breeding -- the breeding the dominant
with strong tribal/class/party conformity -- which always requires the
breeding of an inferior foil -- the denigrated and dumbed-down helots against
whom the self-breeding ruling organized minority contrast themselves --
for how can someone feel superior unless there are inferiors acknowledging
their betters.

In the USA we are behaviorists -- (think John Locke)
-- we take a man as we find him and supply the best environmental conditions
(talking about the teaching environment -- education and social reinforcement
of conduct benefiting others -- rewarding the good and no rewarding the
anti-social -- with coercive restraint as a last resort for those who harm
others to have their way. Revolution against deviant elites would be an
example of being pushed to extremities where no other remedy is possible.

I do not have to bred a new race of people to get someone
on the side of a better society -- all I need is their ear for a long
enough interval to lay out some facts to them. Information and wise counsel
is that people need, not extinction of their lines and replacement with
angels who do not need cultural conditioning to be perfect.

Eugenics is to the science I say we need

as "Environmentalism" is to Ecology.

Eugenics is like racism. If we were all one race, those
who are racists would become eugenicists. Which statement of course goes
to far and is unfair. I guess I prefer to leave eugenics to education
that contributes to the individual in choosing a mate.

Way before I would devote resources to a eugenics program
-- although I favor the science which eugenics would base its recommendations
-- I would prefer so see the family institution strengthened and restored
-- social technology that seems to be vanishing, but which the Mormons
in particular seem to successfully maintain. I put way the hell more confidence
in economics and sociology for a better society than I do in a science
to breed supermen. Human beings as they are new are pretty amazing and
wonderful -- if only we can free them from rule of the worst -- the worst
having gotten power through flaws in our economic system that gives the
usurer the means of taking over all of society and constraining everyone
to accept the rule of the usurers with the Zionist rule by the Chosen they
would impose.

I am against self-defined "superiors" choosing
who can mate and who cannot and which sorts of people can and which sorts
cannot come into the world.

I was once a psychologist at a state facility for the
severe profound mentally retarded -- many hugely deformed and confined
to wheelchairs - but although their lives seem uninteresting to us, they
enjoyed the things they enjoyed just like we do -- and the people who worked
with them -- not talking about the bureaucratic elite who never worked
with the clients -- I am talking about the people who cared for them and
"interacted" with them and kept them company -- showing such
love and patience and respect for their humanity - and some of the doctors
and professional staff -- the christians -- not the eliteists who enjoyed
choosing who lives and who should be allowed to die by withholding &
deliberately overlooking the steps that would keep someone alive -- when
I argued that I found that a drug was leading to a severe deteriroation
of performance and gathered data proving the case -- I was told by the
aged female doctor that that particular resident was not one of her "favorites"
and that I should stay our of it. Some day I will tell the tragic story
that showed me the evil of the elite professionals in the public social
services. One could spend a lifetime trying to reform a system corrupted
by evil people posing as humanitarians, as, in fact, reformers. I view
the American eugenicist as this type of monster.

Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent
and exterminated millions in his quest for a so-called Master Race.

But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master
Nordic race didn't originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United
States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power.
California eugenicists played an important, although little-known, role
in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing.

Eugenics was the pseudoscience aimed at "improving"
the human race. In its extreme, racist form, this meant wiping away all
human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conformed
to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national
policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage
restrictions, enacted in 27 states. In 1909, California became the third
state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively
sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly
segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers
in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive
sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state
accounted for a third of all such surgeries.

California was considered an epicenter of the American
eugenics movement. During the 20th century's first decades, California's
eugenicists included potent but little-known race scientists, such as Army
venereal disease specialist Dr. Paul Popenoe, citrus magnate Paul Gosney,
Sacramento banker Charles Goethe, as well as members of the California
state Board of Charities and Corrections and the University of California
Board of Regents.

Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk
had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically
the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad
fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected
scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard
and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science,
and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims.

Stanford President David Starr Jordan originated the
notion of "race and blood" in his 1902 racial epistle "Blood
of a Nation," in which the university scholar declared that human
qualities and conditions such as talent and poverty were passed through
the blood.

In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory
complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island that stockpiled millions of
index cards on ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the
removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples. From Cold Spring Harbor,
eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as
the nation's social service agencies and associations.

The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, such
as the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration, to seek out Jewish,
Italian and other immigrants in New York and other crowded cities and subject
them to deportation, confinement or forced sterilization.

The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics
program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before
he went to Auschwitz.

Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation
for the American eugenics movement came from California's quasi-autonomous
eugenic societies, such as Pasadena's Human Betterment Foundation and the
California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much
of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island. These
organizations -- which functioned as part of a closely-knit network --
published racist eugenic newsletters and pseudoscientific journals, such
as Eugenical News and Eugenics, and propagandized for the Nazis.

Eugenics was born as a scientific curiosity in the Victorian
age. In 1863, Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, theorized
that if talented people married only other talented people, the result
would be measurably better offspring. At the turn of the last century,
Galton's ideas were imported to the United States just as Gregor Mendel's
principles of heredity were rediscovered. American eugenics advocates believed
with religious fervor that the same Mendelian concepts determining the
color and size of peas, corn and cattle also governed the social and intellectual
character of man.

In a United States demographically reeling from immigration
upheaval and torn by post-Reconstruction chaos, race conflict was everywhere
in the early 20th century. Elitists, utopians and so-called progressives
fused their smoldering race fears and class bias with their desire to make
a better world. They reinvented Galton's eugenics into a repressive and
racist ideology. The intent: Populate the Earth with vastly more of their
own socioeconomic and biological kind -- and less or none of everyone else.

The superior species the eugenics movement sought was
populated not merely by tall, strong, talented people. Eugenicists craved
blond, blue-eyed Nordic types. This group alone, they believed, was fit
to inherit the Earth. In the process, the movement intended to subtract
emancipated Negroes, immigrant Asian laborers, Indians, Hispanics, East
Europeans, Jews, dark- haired hill folk, poor people, the infirm and anyone
classified outside the gentrified genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists.

How? By identifying so-called defective family trees
and subjecting them to lifelong segregation and sterilization programs
to kill their bloodlines. The grand plan was to literally wipe away the
reproductive capability of those deemed weak and inferior -- the so-called
unfit. The eugenicists hoped to neutralize the viability of 10 percent
of the population at a sweep, until none were left except themselves.

Eighteen solutions were explored in a Carnegie-supported
1911 "Preliminary Report of the Committee of the Eugenic Section of
the American Breeder's Association to Study and to Report on the Best Practical
Means for Cutting Off the Defective Germ-Plasm in the Human Population."
Point No. 8 was euthanasia.

The most commonly suggested method of eugenicide in the
United States was a "lethal chamber" or public, locally operated
gas chambers. In 1918, Popenoe, the Army venereal disease specialist during
World War I, co-wrote the widely used textbook, "Applied Eugenics,"
which argued, "From an historical point of view, the first method
which presents itself is execution . . . Its value in keeping up the standard
of the race should not be underestimated." "Applied Eugenics"
also devoted a chapter to "Lethal Selection," which operated
"through the destruction of the individual by some adverse feature
of the environment, such as excessive cold, or bacteria, or by bodily deficiency."

Eugenic breeders believed American society was not ready
to implement an organized lethal solution. But many mental institutions
and doctors practiced improvised medical lethality and passive euthanasia
on their own. One institution in Lincoln, Ill., fed its incoming patients
milk from tubercular cows believing a eugenically strong individual would
be immune. Thirty to 40 percent annual death rates resulted at Lincoln.
Some doctors practiced passive eugenicide one newborn infant at a time.
Others doctors at mental institutions engaged in lethal neglect.

Nonetheless, with eugenicide marginalized, the main solution
for eugenicists was the rapid expansion of forced segregation and sterilization,
as well as more marriage restrictions. California led the nation, performing
nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its
first 25 years of eugenics legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals,
mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed
as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward."
At the Sonoma State Home, some women were sterilized because of what was
deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.

In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations
were performed, 700 on women. The state's two leading sterilization mills
in 1933 were Sonoma State Home with 388 operations and Patton State Hospital
with 363 operations. Other sterilization centers included Agnews, Mendocino,
Napa, Norwalk, Stockton and Pacific Colony state hospitals.

Even the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics.
In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
wrote, "It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute
degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility,
society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their
kind . . . Three generations of imbeciles are enough." This decision
opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise
persecuted as subhuman. Years later, the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials
quoted Holmes' words in their own defense.

Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States
was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through
the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing
sterilization and circulated them to German officials and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize
his anti- Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable
pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers
among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. Hitler's
race hatred sprung from his own mind, but the intellectual outlines of
the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.

During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists
cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's
fascist eugenicists. In "Mein Kampf," published in 1924, Hitler
quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge
of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler,
"in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception (of
immigration) are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic,
but the United States."

Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he
followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied
with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several
American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny
would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial
stock."

Hitler even wrote a fan letter to American eugenics leader
Madison Grant, calling his race-based eugenics book, "The Passing
of the Great Race," his "bible."

Now, the American term "Nordic" was freely
exchanged with "Germanic" or "Aryan." Race science,
racial purity and racial dominance became the driving force behind Hitler's
Nazism. Nazi eugenics would ultimately dictate who would be persecuted
in a Reich-dominated Europe, how people would live, and how they would
die. Nazi doctors would become the unseen generals in Hitler's war against
the Jews and other Europeans deemed inferior. Doctors would create the
science, devise the eugenic formulas, and hand-select the victims for sterilization,
euthanasia and mass extermination.

During the Reich's early years, eugenicists across America
welcomed Hitler's plans as the logical fulfillment of their own decades
of research and effort. California eugenicists republished Nazi propaganda
for American consumption. They also arranged for Nazi scientific exhibits,
such as an August 1934 display at the L.A. County Museum, for the annual
meeting of the American Public Health Association.

In 1934, as Germany's sterilizations were accelerating
beyond 5,000 per month, the California eugenics leader C. M. Goethe, upon
returning from Germany, ebulliently bragged to a colleague, "You will
be interested to know that your work has played a powerful part in shaping
the opinions of the group of intellectuals who are behind Hitler in this
epoch-making program. Everywhere I sensed that their opinions have been
tremendously stimulated by American thought . . . I want you, my dear friend,
to carry this thought with you for the rest of your life, that you have
really jolted into action a great government of 60 million people."

That same year, 10 years after Virginia passed its sterilization
act, Joseph DeJarnette, superintendent of Virginia's Western State Hospital,
observed in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, "The Germans are beating
us at our own game."

More than just providing the scientific roadmap, America
funded Germany's eugenic institutions.

By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 -- almost
$4 million in today's money -- to hundreds of German researchers. In May
1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 toward creation of the Kaiser Wilhelm
Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German
Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually
an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.

Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's complex of
eugenics institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915,
it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller
money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the institute to construct
a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The institute
received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next
several years. Leading the institute, once again, was Hitler's medical
henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director
and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on
Jews, Gypsies and others.

Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old
age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically
gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed.

Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics
Society, declared of Nazism, "While we were pussy-footing around ...
the Germans were calling a spade a spade."

A special recipient of Rockefeller funding was the Kaiser
Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin.
For decades, American eugenicists had craved twins to advance their
research into heredity.

The Institute was now prepared to undertake such research
on an unprecedented level. On May 13, 1932, the Rockefeller Foundation
in New York dispatched a radiogram to its Paris office: JUNE MEETING EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE NINE THOUSAND

DOLLARS OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD TO KWG INSTITUTE ANTHROPOLOGY
FOR RESEARCH ON TWINS AND EFFECTS ON LATER GENERATIONS OF SUBSTANCES
TOXIC FOR GERM PLASM.

At the time of Rockefeller's endowment, Otmar Freiherr
von Verschuer, a hero in American eugenics circles, functioned as a head
of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. Rockefeller
funding of that institute continued both directly and through other research
conduits during Verschuer's early tenure. In 1935, Verschuer left the institute
to form a rival eugenics facility in Frankfurt that was much heralded in
the American eugenics press. Research on twins in the Third Reich exploded,
backed by government decrees. Verschuer wrote in Der Erbarzt, a eugenics
doctor's journal he edited, that Germany's war would yield a "total
solution to the Jewish problem."

Verschuer had a longtime assistant. His name was Josef
Mengele.

On May 30, 1943, Mengele arrived at Auschwitz. Verschuer
notified the German Research Society, "My assistant, Dr. Josef Mengele
(M.D., Ph.D.) joined me in this branch of research. He is presently employed
as Hauptsturmführer (captain) and camp physician in the Auschwitz
concentration camp. Anthropological testing of the most diverse racial
groups in this concentration camp is being carried out with permission
of the SS Reichsführer (Himmler)."

Mengele began searching the boxcar arrivals for twins.
When he found them, he performed beastly experiments, scrupulously
wrote up the reports and sent the paperwork back to Verschuer's institute
for evaluation. Often, cadavers, eyes and other body parts were also dispatched
to Berlin's eugenic institutes.

Rockefeller executives never knew of Mengele. With few
exceptions, the foundation had ceased all eugenics studies in Nazi-occupied
Europe before the war erupted in 1939. But by that time the die had been
cast. The talented men Rockefeller and Carnegie financed, the great institutions
they helped found, and the science they helped create took on a scientific
momentum of their own.

After the war, eugenics was declared a crime against
humanity -- an act of genocide. Germans were tried and they cited the California
statutes in their defense -- to no avail. They were found guilty.

However, Mengele's boss Verschuer escaped prosecution.
Verschuer re- established his connections with California eugenicists who
had gone underground and renamed their crusade "human genetics."
Typical was an exchange July 25, 1946, when Popenoe wrote Verschuer, "It
was indeed a pleasure to hear from you again. I have been very anxious
about my colleagues in Germany . . . I suppose sterilization has been discontinued
in Germany?" Popenoe offered tidbits about various American eugenics
luminaries and then sent various eugenics publications. In a separate package,
Popenoe sent some cocoa, coffee and other goodies.

Verschuer wrote back, "Your very friendly letter
of 7/25 gave me a great deal of pleasure and you have my heartfelt thanks
for it. The letter builds another bridge between your and my scientific
work; I hope that this bridge will never again collapse but rather make
possible valuable mutual enrichment and stimulation."

Soon, Verschuer again became a respected scientist in
Germany and around the world. In 1949, he became a corresponding member
of the newly formed American Society of Human Genetics, organized by American
eugenicists and geneticists.

In the fall of 1950, the University of Münster offered
Verschuer a position at its new Institute of Human Genetics, where he later
became a dean. In the early and mid-1950s, Verschuer became an honorary
member of numerous prestigious societies, including the Italian Society
of Genetics, the Anthropological Society of Vienna, and the Japanese Society
for Human Genetics.

Human genetics' genocidal roots in eugenics were ignored
by a victorious generation that refused to link itself to the crimes of
Nazism and by succeeding generations that never knew the truth of the years
leading up to war. Now governors of five states, including California,
have issued public apologies to their citizens, past and present, for sterilization
and other abuses spawned by the eugenics movement.

Human genetics became an enlightened endeavor in the
late 20th century. Hard-working, devoted scientists finally cracked the
human code through the Human Genome Project. Now, every individual can
be biologically identified and classified by trait and ancestry. Yet even
now, some leading voices in the genetic world are calling for a cleansing
of the unwanted among us, and even a master human species.

There is understandable wariness about more ordinary
forms of abuse, for example, in denying insurance or employment based on
genetic tests. On Oct. 14, the United States' first genetic anti-discrimination
legislation passed the Senate by unanimous vote. Yet because genetics research
is global, no single nation's law can stop the threats.

Edwin Black is author of the award-winning "IBM
and the Holocaust" and the recently released "War Against the
Weak" (published by Four Walls Eight Windows), from which this article
is adapted.

Dr. Henry Kissinger, who wrote: "Depopulation should
be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World."

Research on population control, preventing future births,
is now being carried out secretly by biotech companies. Dr. Ignacio Chapela,
a University of California microbiologist, discovered that wild corn in
remote parts of Mexico is contaminated with lab altered DNA. That discovery
made him a threat to the biotech industry.

Chapela was denied tenure at UC Berkeley when he reported
this to the scientific community, despite the embarrassing discovery that
UC Chancellor Berdahl, who was denying him tenure, was getting large cash
payments - $40,000 per year - from the LAM Research Corp. in Plano, Texas.

Berdahl served as president of Texas A&M University
before coming to Berkeley. During a presentation about his case, Chapela
revealed that a spermicidal corn developed by a U.S. company is now being
tested in Mexico. Males who unknowingly eat the corn produce non-viable
sperm and are unable to reproduce.

Depopulation, also known as eugenics, is quite another
thing and was proposed under the Nazis during World War II. It is the deliberate
killing off of large segments of living populations and was proposed for
Third World countries under President Carter's administration by the National
Security Council's Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy.

National Security Memo 200, dated April 24, 1974, and
titled "Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security
& overseas interests," says:

"Dr. Henry Kissinger proposed in his memorandum
to the NSC that "depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S.
foreign policy towards the Third World." He quoted reasons of national
security, and because `(t)he U.S. economy will require large and increasing
amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries
... Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such
stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and
to the economic interests of U.S.

Depopulation policy became the top priority under the
NSC agenda, Club of Rome and U.S. policymakers like Gen. Alexander Haig,
Cyrus Vance, Ed Muskie and Kissinger. According to an NSC spokesman at
the time, the United States shared the view of former World Bank President
Robert McNamara that the "population crisis" is a greater threat
to U.S. national security interests than nuclear annihilation.In 1975,
Henry Kissinger established a policy-planning group in the U.S. State Department's
Office of Population Affairs. The depopulation "GLOBAL 2000"
document for President Jimmy Carter was prepared.

It is no surprise that this policy was established under
President Carter with help from Kissinger and Brzezinski - all with ties
to David Rockefeller. The Bush family, the Harriman family - the Wall Street
business partners of Bush in financing Hitler - and the Rockefeller family
are the elite of the American eugenics movement. Even Prince Philip of
Britain, a member of the Bilderberg Group, is in favor of depopulation:

"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned
to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels" (Prince
Philip Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund, quoted in
"Are You Ready for Our New Age Future?" Insiders Report, American
Policy Center, December 1995).

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has been proposing,
funding and building Bio-Weapons Level 3 and Level 4 labs at many places
around the U.S. even on university campuses and in densely populated urban
locations. In a Bio-Weapons Level 4 facility, a single bacteria or virus
is lethal. Bio-Weapons Level 4 is the highest level legally allowed in
the continental U.S.

For what purpose are these labs being developed, and
who will make the decisions on where bio-weapons created in these facilities
will be used and on whom? More than 20 world-class microbiologists have
been murdered since 2002, mostly in the U.S. and the UK. Nearly all were
working on development of ethnic-specific bio-weapons (see Smart Dust,
Roboflies &).

Citizens around the U.S. are frantically filing lawsuits
to stop these labs on campuses and in communities where they live. Despite
the opposition of residents living near UC Davis, where a Bio-Weapons Level
4 lab was planned, it had the support of the towns mayor.

She suddenly reversed her position after a monkey escaped
from a high security primate facility on the campus where the bio-weapons
lab was proposed. Residents claimed that if UC Davis could not keep monkeys
from escaping from their cages, they certainly could not guarantee that
a single virus or bacteria would not escape from a test tube. The AWOL
monkey killed the project (see Smart Dust, Roboflies&).

Population is a political problem. The extreme secrecy
surrounding the takeover of nuclear weapons, NASA and the space program
and the development of numerous bio-weapons labs is a threat to civil society,
especially in the hands of the military and corporations.

The fascist application of all three of these programs
can be used to achieve established U.S. government depopulation policy
goals, which may eliminate 2 billion of the worlds existing population
through war, famine, disease and any other methods necessary.

Two excellent examples of existing U.S. depopulation
policy are, first, the long-term impact on the civilian population from
Agent Orange in Vietnam, where the Rockefellers built oil refineries and
aluminum plants during the Vietnam War. The second is the permanent contamination
of the Middle East and Central Asia with depleted uranium, which, unfortunately,
will destroy the genetic future of the populations living in those regions
and will also have a global effect already reflected in increases in infant
mortality reported in the U.S., Europe, and the UK.

Why does eugenics have such a bad name? Is it because
corrupt ruling elites could not survive intelligent masses? Is not the
original dumbing-down form of eugenics the burning at the stake of anyone
who questioned the myth of 'Creation' (nowadays punished by the ostracism
of anyone who questions 'Big Bang')? Is the same dumbing-down style eugenics
not practiced right now in modern Germany and other European countries?
After all, how exactly is Germar Rudolf going to procreate at the present
time?