Before you laugh, he can't be ridiculously worse defensively than Carlos Santana there (IMO). Or LaPorta for that matter. Or Brantley...or....

If you want offense he's still a viable offensive player (though clearly on the down side) but last year in ~600ABs he hit .261/.326/.418 with 16Hrs, 75RBI and 20SBs and 110 OPS+.

All those numbers exceed LaPorta's. All of them.

You want offense he's an option. And he's played a wee bit of 1B in the past w/o looking like a pitcher trying to hit.

Just a thought. He can probably be had for what cash you have left and he (and Vlad) are still unsigned. I happen to think Damon is a better athlete at this point than Vlad or I might even consider Vlad there too.

Going off of last years stats alone, Damon would be a nice upgrade. This is a scary thing to say since Damon is a full decade+ older than LaPorta. But the fact remains that Damon put in a full season last year with some pretty solid numbers. Throw in the fact that he's a straight up ballplayer with a real passion for the game, and you've got me sold from the hitting perspective.

But how would he be at first? 1)He's got some experience. 2)I hate Santana at first.

I don't like the concept of bringing in old players, but in this case, a 1 year deal doesn't sound that bad at all to me. Bottom line - don't see it happening, but I think it would be a good play considering the market at 1B right now.

I get that Derrick Lee isn't thrilled about playing in Cleveland. But certainly he has to realize there isn't a better opportunity for him in terms of playing time, need for his specific skills (1B, RH bat with pop), leadership and, unlike last year in Pittsburgh where he was supposedly so happy, the hint of a chance at contending, particularly if he has anything left. Guess he's still hoping for a Yankees/Red Sox bench role to fall out of the sky.

Nothing wrong with Damon at all. Or Vlad. Or Kotchman. Or Lee if he wouldn't rather retire than play in Cleveland. Any of them would be better than LaPorta, who after 1,000 (one thousand!) major league at-bats hasn't shown any ability to ever hit like a league average first baseman(*). A guy in his upper 30s transitioning to first base isn't ideal, but it's not an overwhelming problem.

I still like Kotchman on the basis of age. Even if last year as a career-year, there's less chance of a total breakdown. But any of them would be an upgrade, and both Laporta and Russ not-Branyan are still there as replacement level options in case of injury / marked decline.

I wrote when someone brought up Vlad at first that there was no way this team built around ground-ball pitchers would even consider putting him there. I think Vlad would be horrible at first base. Damon, I don't think would be as bad. But I still doubt that the Indians brass will consider putting a guy at first who never played there before. Even though they don't mind doing it with catchers.

peeker643 wrote:Suck it up and deal with it is fine were it not for the fact they won't. That's the issue. I'd be thrilled if they just sucked it up and dealt with it that way.

So would Lee be your next choice, Adam? Because he's better defensively?

Yeah, Lee would be my next choice. Right handed stick, little bit of pop, can still field it pretty well. Again, another risk as he's an older guy. Difference is that Lee has plenty of 1B experience while Damon has little.

Kotchman's been #1 in the AL in fielding percentage each of the last four seasons. I hope we're just waiting for his price to come down.

If it comes down to desperation, I can deal with Damon. I'd just rather have a guy with a lot more innings played at first base. Damon's only got 12 innings over there. You know the Indians, who are very statistical in their evaluations, want a top notch defense because they'll consider it their trump card over the Tigers.

A God Damn dead man would understand that if a minor league bus in any city took a real sharp right turn, a Zack McCalister would likely fall out. - Lead Pipe

If Lee is retiring and they don't like Kotchman, offer $3M to each and see if either takes it first.

And Kotchmann made about $5m last season and is looking to cash in but what neighborhood is he ultimately living in?

I've got no idea. GM me thinks that Kotch @ $5M > either Damon or Vlad @ $3M, but either Damon or Vlad @ $3M > then Kotch @ (say) $8M. If Damon or Vlad hold the line at $5M, then offer Kotch around $6M and see what happens...if he holds out for (say) $8M, and the others hold at $5M, well, I still take Kotch, but it's not my money.

There's really no news on Kotchman, and it seems like most people think last year was a fluke. Any one of them is a gamble, and I think you generally want to gamble on the younger player...plus, you don't have to worry about Kotch needing to learn a new position.

I wonder if the hang-up is that Kotchman has been looking for a multiyear deal from somebody, but nobody is willing to do that based just on last year.

Jumbo wrote:There's really no news on Kotchman, and it seems like most people think last year was a fluke. Any one of them is a gamble, and I think you generally want to gamble on the younger player...plus, you don't have to worry about Kotch needing to learn a new position.

I wonder if the hang-up is that Kotchman has been looking for a multiyear deal from somebody, but nobody is willing to do that based just on last year.

Interesting theory. You may be right.

If that's the case, the Indians should come in with 2 years, 8.5M with a team option for a third year. It's not like we've got a first baseman in waiting and it's not like the market ever gives us a chance at any of the four corner positions in free agency.

If you give Kotchman the security of a second year, you probably lessen his asking price a little. I'd go as high as 2/10, but with the second year a team option at 5.5M. That way, if he blows and 2011 was a fluke, you can easily decline the option, with, say, a 1M buyout.

I don't think he's going to find a starting spot on too many teams other than us. Could give us a leg up and a chance to get a lower price.

A God Damn dead man would understand that if a minor league bus in any city took a real sharp right turn, a Zack McCalister would likely fall out. - Lead Pipe

Got our excellent fielder at 1B. Hopefully he hits around .280. I don't expect .300 or a .380 OBP again, but .280 and .360 work for me. I'd write a Gold Glove bonus into his contract if I was his agent. Dude should lead the league in total chances.

Just gotta see the money amount.

Hoping for one more piece this offseason, but I think we're close to done. Perhaps a couple more minor league deals with invites to ST.

They are reporting that we signed Kotchman. WTF! Another left handed bat! They should have signed Vladdy and begged him to play first. At least that guy can really hit. Kotchman has one good year and our GM buys. Guy is going to hit .260 with 8 homeruns.

We are pleased to announce that we have agreed to sign first baseman Casey Kotchman to a one year contract....Casey will provide needed stability at first base and a strong on-base presence in our lineup. Solidifying our production at first base was a priority entering the off-season, and we are pleased to be able to do so with a player of Casey’s caliber.

CTtribefan wrote:They are reporting that we signed Kotchman. WTF! Another left handed bat! They should have signed Vladdy and begged him to play first. At least that guy can really hit. Kotchman has one good year and our GM buys. Guy is going to hit .260 with 8 homeruns.

Yep. Going to lead the league in ground ball outs so we'll give first base to a guy who has never played it and has been a full-time DH for the last two years.

A God Damn dead man would understand that if a minor league bus in any city took a real sharp right turn, a Zack McCalister would likely fall out. - Lead Pipe

We are pleased to announce that we have agreed to sign first baseman Casey Kotchman to a one year contract....Casey will provide needed stability at first base and a strong on-base presence in our lineup. Solidifying our production at first base was a priority entering the off-season, and we are pleased to be able to do so with a player of Casey’s caliber.

What's that from? A media release?

A God Damn dead man would understand that if a minor league bus in any city took a real sharp right turn, a Zack McCalister would likely fall out. - Lead Pipe

We are pleased to announce that we have agreed to sign first baseman Casey Kotchman to a one year contract....Casey will provide needed stability at first base and a strong on-base presence in our lineup. Solidifying our production at first base was a priority entering the off-season, and we are pleased to be able to do so with a player of Casey’s caliber.

RBIs are not meaningless. They are overrated. It's very hard to drive in 100 runs if guys aren't on base for you. At the same time it's hard to drive in 100 runs if you aren't hitting for power. While I won't base everything on RBIs, there is something to a lousy hitter with 200 fewer PAs driving in more runs than a better hitter in a better offense.

The Browns' code word is playmakers. The Indians' is run-producers. Signing Kotchman is like when the Browns brought in Chansi Stuckey. Stuckey led the Browns WRs in receptions, but wasn't really any better than Massaquoi.

GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:RBIs are not meaningless. They are overrated. It's very hard to drive in 100 runs if guys aren't on base for you. At the same time it's hard to drive in 100 runs if you aren't hitting for power. While I won't base everything on RBIs, there is something to a lousy hitter with 200 fewer PAs driving in more runs than a better hitter in a better offense.

The Browns' code word is playmakers. The Indians' is run-producers. Signing Kotchman is like when the Browns brought in Chansi Stuckey. Stuckey led the Browns WRs in receptions, but wasn't really any better than Massaquoi.

Ok, RBIs aren't meaningless in the sense that no stat is entirely meaningless. There is information to be gleaned from any stat.

How about we just call it the most meaningless stat that is a stat. Because it is.

peeker643 wrote:Anyone arguing for LaPorta at 1B needs to watch LaPorta's ABs on a loop. That kind of torture would be commensurate with arguing on his behalf.

He fucking blows and he's had 1,000 MLB at bats to prove it.

I don't know what, if any, value Kotchman will add. I am quite sure that even if it's none it's no worse than what LaPorta brings.

Truer words may never be spoken in this forum.

Agreed.

Funny side story. I dropped him back in July in my fantasy dynasty league, and another owner picked him up. I told the guy over the winter break that LaPorta sucks, and he said people said the same thing about Alex Gordon .