Associates For Biblical Research - Not So Fast!: "Brother of Jesus" Might Be Authentic, But Not "James, The Son of Joseph"Current Eventshttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/
http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specificationBlogEngine.NET 1.6.1.6en-UShttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/opml.axdAssociates for Biblical ResearchAssociates For Biblical Research0.0000000.000000G.M. Grena on Not So Fast!: "Brother of Jesus" Might Be Authentic, But Not "James, The Son of Joseph"Wait, so everyone agrees that &quot;brother of&quot; is fake? I find it hard to believe no one confirmed that not a single molecule of ancient patina exists on the first part of the inscription.
(P.S. Typo: &quot;...the trail witnesses...&quot;)
https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_0dd5cf60-2afa-4f4c-a707-549f50be1c8b
G.M. Grenahttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_0dd5cf60-2afa-4f4c-a707-549f50be1c8bFri, 29 Jun 2012 01:03:55 -0500G.M. Grenahttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/pingback.axdhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_0dd5cf60-2afa-4f4c-a707-549f50be1c8bhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_0dd5cf60-2afa-4f4c-a707-549f50be1c8b#commenthttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/syndication.axd?post=0dd5cf60-2afa-4f4c-a707-549f50be1c8bJayleigh on Not So Fast!: "Brother of Jesus" Might Be Authentic, But Not "James, The Son of Joseph"But &quot;Joshua&quot; (Jesus) was a very common name in Israel, as was &quot;Jacob&quot; so finding those together would not indicate that meant Messiah Jesus. In fact, i find it surprising that an ossuary of containing the bones of a man as poor as the family of Joseph and Mary were would have been found in a Jerusalem burial vault - especially since it was not considered to be the likely family tomb of Joseph of Arimathea who provided the burial tomb for Jesus. i watched the film on the initial finding of that burial chamber and it made me more of a skeptic because the writing seemed to have been chiseled in not in a straight line but as though it had been done at two separate times. Thanks for this good follow-up article. i thought at the time the chamber was found and the whole newspaper hoopla about it that there was something not quite kosher about it all. i stand by my original thought on that ossuary. https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_8b85e889-fffe-4059-8c92-06a146f69021
Jayleighhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_8b85e889-fffe-4059-8c92-06a146f69021Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:31:34 -0500Jayleighhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/pingback.axdhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_8b85e889-fffe-4059-8c92-06a146f69021https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_8b85e889-fffe-4059-8c92-06a146f69021#commenthttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/syndication.axd?post=8b85e889-fffe-4059-8c92-06a146f69021Chip on Not So Fast!: "Brother of Jesus" Might Be Authentic, But Not "James, The Son of Joseph"Somehow this conclusion does not seem logical to me because it would seem odd to have an ossuary that just says &quot;Brother of Jesus&quot;. Wouldn't it seem logical that there should be some name, the name of the person who was actually buried in the ossuary, included before &quot;brother of Jesus&quot;? https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_f4fb93b6-eaf2-4d6b-aaf5-1aabc2ecb154
Chiphttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_f4fb93b6-eaf2-4d6b-aaf5-1aabc2ecb154Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:40:15 -0500Chiphttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/pingback.axdhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_f4fb93b6-eaf2-4d6b-aaf5-1aabc2ecb154https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_f4fb93b6-eaf2-4d6b-aaf5-1aabc2ecb154#commenthttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/syndication.axd?post=f4fb93b6-eaf2-4d6b-aaf5-1aabc2ecb154Jayleigh on Not So Fast!: "Brother of Jesus" Might Be Authentic, But Not "James, The Son of Joseph"But, even so, how many &quot;Joshuas&quot; and &quot;Jacobs&quot; were there in Jerusalem at that time? If you watched either of the films, you see that there were many. Miriam (Mary) was also a very common name in those times. It seems to me the point of the whole thing was to try to prove that this was the family tomb of Jesus of Nazareth and that the Mary whose name was found was Mary of Magdala and thus, she was Jesus' wife and there was supposedly another ossuary naming a &quot;son&quot; of Jesus and Mary of Magdala proving, under that theory that Jesus was married to Mary of Magdala. It's a boondoggle and it just doesn't ring true. i think this article clearly explained the patina issue, as well. https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_920ef45c-836a-4a6d-8d9f-2963b27f093a
Jayleighhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_920ef45c-836a-4a6d-8d9f-2963b27f093aWed, 18 Jul 2012 20:18:26 -0500Jayleighhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/pingback.axdhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_920ef45c-836a-4a6d-8d9f-2963b27f093ahttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_920ef45c-836a-4a6d-8d9f-2963b27f093a#commenthttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/syndication.axd?post=920ef45c-836a-4a6d-8d9f-2963b27f093aChip on Not So Fast!: "Brother of Jesus" Might Be Authentic, But Not "James, The Son of Joseph"I think there is some major confusion here... the above article is about the James ossuary - not the ossuaries found in the supposed &quot;Family Tomb of Jesus&quot;. The James ossuary contains an inscription that reads &quot;James son of Joseph brother of Jesus&quot;. This ossuary is NOT connected with the Jesus Tomb documentary. Two of the comments above are comments about ossuaries examined in the &quot;Famly Tomb of Jesus&quot; documentary. The James ossuary was NOT found in that tomb. These are two totally different topics. If you want to see a GREAT rebuttal of the supposed &quot;Jesus Tomb&quot; you can order it from Source Flix, it is titled - &quot;The Jesus Tomb Unmasked&quot;. This rebuttal completely exposes the false claims associated with the &quot;Jesus Tomb&quot;. https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_e9f165f4-89c6-47b3-80d3-d682347a0750
Chiphttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_e9f165f4-89c6-47b3-80d3-d682347a0750Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:07:37 -0500Chiphttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/pingback.axdhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_e9f165f4-89c6-47b3-80d3-d682347a0750https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_e9f165f4-89c6-47b3-80d3-d682347a0750#commenthttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/syndication.axd?post=e9f165f4-89c6-47b3-80d3-d682347a0750ABR on Not So Fast!: "Brother of Jesus" Might Be Authentic, But Not "James, The Son of Joseph"The ABR ministry carries &quot;The Jesus Tomb Unmasked&quot; here in our online bookstore:
<a href="http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2009/03/29/The-Jesus-Tomb-Unmasked.aspx" rel="nofollow">www.biblearchaeology.org/.../...Tomb-Unmasked.aspx</a>
Blessings,
ABRhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_2dc1fa53-3fb8-406c-bedb-aade0400215a
ABRhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_2dc1fa53-3fb8-406c-bedb-aade0400215aThu, 19 Jul 2012 10:16:35 -0500ABRhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/pingback.axdhttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_2dc1fa53-3fb8-406c-bedb-aade0400215ahttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2012/06/28/Not-So-Fast!-Brother-of-Jesus-Might-Be-Authentic-But-Not-James-The-Son-of-Joseph.aspx#id_2dc1fa53-3fb8-406c-bedb-aade0400215a#commenthttps://www.biblearchaeology.org/syndication.axd?post=2dc1fa53-3fb8-406c-bedb-aade0400215a