Cool, find, and a solid explanation. When I first read it, I thought it was reaching since the angle of the boom was wrong. Then I remembered that
tiny little factoid in space -- there is no up or down.

I'm surprised it took so long to confirm this and that there has been so little mention of this that I've seen on ATS before NASA cleared up what it
was.

Thanks for that enthuziazm
I hadn't even seen that UFO image before.
Interesting that NASA would even take the time to analyze something like this. Kudos to the people involved in researching the footage and images to
form a reasonable conclusion.

Originally posted by enthuziazm
I read it a while back, and just kind of ran into it again. I couldn't remember seeing it on here. It's a very good explanation on NASA's part.
I think that ufo can be laid to rest.

Sure... Ufo mystery finally is resolved. No more kiss kiss and bang bang guys. Actually I suggest to the owners of the site to close this subforum
since Ufo's don't represent anymore a mystery

Originally posted by enthuziazm
I read it a while back, and just kind of ran into it again. I couldn't remember seeing it on here. It's a very good explanation on NASA's part.
I think that ufo can be laid to rest.

Great find and it makes sense, but also note the wording of their article.

I want to see their explanation for the UFO seen on Apollo 11 that was shadowing the craft when they were outside earth orbit. They didnt want to say
they saw a UFO over open channels decided to ask Houston how far away was the S-IVB. ...even though they knew it wasnt SIVB which was some 6000 miles
away at the time.

This artice is only explaining that one single piece of footage. There are numerous pieces of NASA ufo footage that hasn't been properly
explained.
I just thought it was interesting that NASA had investigated and come up with a reasonable explanation for that one incident.

I've seen that article already, and I thought how convenient it was for NASA to explain that little one away. Well it's obvious what it is in the
first place. They think by explaining one anomaly that it will be enough to deter people from looking into the rest.

After all that footage from the transmissions they pick the easiest of the lot. Lame...on NASA's part.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.