7IM’s Justin Urquhart Stewart – market view – friday 10 October

“So will it work? The truthful answer is that it has to. There is no “plan B”. The rescue package was certainly bold and the internationally coordinated interest rate cut a welcome surprise, but will it be enough to start to clear the log jam?The banking system is supposed to be a fast flowing river of financial liquidity, capable of providing enough resources for all to draw their water from, whether for direct investment or just day to day financing and cash flow its uses are various and vital. Now this river has changed. It hasn’t dried up, as there is still lots of money and finance around, but it has been jammed and dammed by the detritus of financial losses and loans acting just as much as a barrier as any real logjam. So as the river can’t flow, its users cannot draw from it and function properly and when that happens, all will suffer.By the start of last week, there were already real fears of banks running out of cash even for such mundane requirements as salary payments and other short term requirements. So action to try to bust the log jam moved from being a necessary action to a vital need. Hence then our dear Chancellor’s package being presented, with no doubt the more knowledgeable and experienced hand of Mervyn King being involved. The measure of this logjam can be seen with the LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) which is set each day and gives an indication of what a group of bankers think that the prevailing lending rates are. Normally, this rate hovers around the base rate, but more recently it has been over 1.25% higher which is an indication that in effect, the interbank lending market has become stagnant.The mission thus for Darling and King was clear – blow the logjam with “whatever it takes” (Darling’s and Brown’s phrase) with some financial dynamite to get it moving again. In effect the dynamite consisted of three bundles of explosives the first of which is to inject new capital into the banks; the second is to allow banks to swap poor quality assets for cash and finally, guaranteeing all bank liabilities.Certainly a bold plan, with some considerable strength behind it – and certainly a welcome action after the ineptitude of the European authorities at being unable to proffer any form of coordinated response to Hank Paulson’s request following his own proposals. Frankly we saw all the coordinated behaviour by the European central bankers of fighting cats in a sack. Political naivety and parochialism of the worst kind – and especially at such a potentially dangerous and sensitive moment.So now it has been announced, the fuse has been lit and we can hear it fizzing as it burns towards the explosives; however, only time will tell whether it will go off like a damp squib, or blast the logs apart. Personally, I think it might be more British to behave like a Barnes Wallis dam busting bouncing bomb and slowly weaken the dam such that it breaks under its own weight.

The coordinated action on interest rates was also welcome, but the fixation with a half percent around the globe seems a little too simple to me. After all half a percent off the US rate at 2% is proportionately a lot more than half a percent of our 5% equivalent. Frankly a whole 1% would have had a more dramatic impact not just on markets, but on hard pressed consumers and the business world. It would not have recreated a boom, but could at least have provided a more tangible benefit for all suffering the rising costs of utility bills, especially as we move into winter. Perhaps they could revisit that one please.So why after all these efforts did the markets just “blow a raspberry and wave two fingers” at all this initiative and endeavour? Well firstly the markets will believe it when it sees it – in a bear market, remember the worst is believed until the opposite is finally proven. Also, there is the other key matter of the slowing global economy, and the dark and depressing report from the IMF about the threat of a global recession was enough to dampen any limp enthusiasm. So the markets fell away – not unknown in October. Friday has seen a further lurch down as investors seem to get closer to that somewhat overused term of “capitulation”. However with the US Dow down some 40% from its all time high last year, you can understand their attitude. So this year we won’t have to hunt for Red October – it found us.Perhaps I can hold out a glimmer of light, the sooner we get through the falls then the sooner we can find a base and maybe start a recovery. On a five year view there will be a good time to buy back in – in fact good discipline means that we should all carry on our “pound cost averaging” – but across all key asset classes and not just on a shivering equity market.

And finally…you may recall that a clever individual invented a clock to count the total US debt in order to highlight its level and to hopefully embarrass the political leaders into forcing them to reduce it and have the clock count it down. It started in 1989 and showed the outstanding debt at being $2.7 trillion. Unfortunately, they have had a slight technical hitch. As the debt has not reduced but in fact increased, the clock now doesn’t have enough digits so that it has had to be rebuilt in order to reach such an appallingly high level of number and debt. What could the number be now ? How about $11 trillion. Never did like digital clocks.”

Those with decent-length memories will recall that in the 2014 Budget statement George Osborne announced the new (and entirely unexpected) pension freedoms. The new rules come fully into force in less than two weeks.

Newsletter

Latest from Money Marketing

Studies have found funds can be too big or too small to outperform, suggesting size does matter The assessment of whether to invest in a certain fund is a tricky business. Bearing in mind roughly 90 per cent of active funds do not beat their benchmarks over periods longer than 10 years, the odds are […]

The following sorry verse embodies procrastination on a whole new level: “Hello there, my name’s Phil; I rap like a small bear writing a will [diligently]; Estate-planning, ninja-whooping IHT; Shame I’m not as bizzie [urban affectation] with the RLP.” These words were penned in response to my father’s short verse sent to me, after the […]

Ahead of speaking at Money Marketing Interactive in May, LEBC public policy director Kay Ingram talks about the importance of putting the client at the centre of the advice process and Have advisers reached a point of true professionalism yet? In the 38 years I have worked in our industry, IFAs have seen a monumental shift from […]