Tagging a picture of Thipsay with former Congress president Rahul Gandhi, Patra said, “Here in India Rahul Gandhi questions the central government over Nirav Modi. On the other hand, Rahul’s close aide and Congress leader Abhay Thipsay (former judge) becomes a witness in favour of Nirav Modi. What is it that Rahul does not want Nirav to return India? What transaction took place between Rahul and Nirav at that party?”

India’s is seeking Modi’s extradition for his alleged role in siphoning off Rs 13,500 crore from the PNB coffers through fraudulent issuance of letters of undertaking and letters of credit, along with his uncle Mehul Choksi. Investigations by CBI and ED have found that Modi diverted a large part of these funds to family members and for personal purposes.

The five-day hearing began against Modi on May 11, following the Indian government’s extradition request certified by the UK government last year. The 49-year-old has been lodged at Wandsworth Prison in south-west London since his arrest last year.

Meanwhile, the CBI submitted a video before the UK court in which “dummy directors” associated with companies linked to Modi alleged they were threatened with life.

A group of six Indian men can be heard in the video with each of them making allegations of being forced to leave Dubai and come to Cairo, Egypt, where their passports were confiscated and were allegedly made to sign dubious documents against their will by Modi’s brother, Nehal Modi.

“My name is Ashish Kumar Mohanbhai Lad, I am the namesake owner of Sunshine Gems Limited, Hong Kong, and Unity Trading Fze, Dubai,” says one of the men on the recording from June 2018.

“Nirav Modi phoned me and told me that he would implicate me for theft. He used the worst expletives and told me that he would get me killed… he did so much to us,” he says in Hindi.

These witnesses relate to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) discovery that dummy directors/owners/managers were appointed in a number of shell companies in Hong Kong and Dubai, which however remained under the direct control of Modi.

According to Indian goverment’s case, a number of PNB staff conspired with Modi to ensure LoUs were issued to these companies without ensuring they were subject to the required credit check, without recording the issuance of the LoUs and without charging the required commission upon the transactions. This resulted in a fraud amounting to nearly $2 billion.