Struggling Auto Industry Swept Up in Tumultuous Times

A U.S. economic slowdown is anticipated and jittery world markets are bracing for a domino effect.

Commentary

There must be mornings when automotive captains of industry wonder if it’s worth getting out of bed.

Supplier bankruptcies and the encroachment of private-equity deals aside, Detroit’s Big Three saw their combined U.S. market share slip below 50% in July for an historic low as foreign-based auto makers tighten their grip on North America and the year’s annual sales forecast grows dimmer by the day.

No surprise that sales incentives are back in force, as vehicle demand thins and inventories fatten. Sluggish August sales will keep the seasonally adjusted annual rate in negative territory, at 15.2 million units, well short of last year’s 16.1 million, a Ward’s sales forecast shows.

Meanwhile, the housing industry has not just cooled but frozen, as subprime mortgage lenders fall off a cliff and harsher loan terms are expected by credit-card and other companies, accompanied by soaring home foreclosures and stock-market turmoil.

With tighter credit and less liquidity (we’re all in a cash crunch), a U.S. economic slowdown is anticipated and jittery world markets are bracing for a domino effect. Already the value of many overseas currencies is falling, lessoning the advantage of the weak dollar.

Threaded throughout the fabric of these troubling times is the U.S. Congressional debate over stricter fuel-economy requirements.

Auto workers, business leaders and elected officials recently held demonstrations in Chicago and St. Louis in support of a bill from Rep. Baron P. Hill (D-IN) and Rep. Lee Terry (R-NE) that calls for a corporate average fuel economy standard of 35 mpg (6.7 L/100 km) for passenger cars and at least 32 mpg (7.4 L/100 km) for light trucks by 2022.

Hill-Terry faces opposition from an energy bill passed earlier this summer by the Senate, which includes a CAFE proposal directing the National Highway Traffic Safety Admin. to set standards for each class of vehicles that, combined, would reach a 35-mpg average by 2020.

This represents an increase of 40% over current CAFE standards, albeit the bill allows NHTSA to declare the goal too costly, if “clear and convincing” evidence exists.

A United Auto Workers union group at the Chicago rally warns the Senate bill would radically reduce consumers’ vehicle choices and raise sticker prices by thousands of dollars.

Supporters of Hill-Terry also say the Senate bill does not go far enough in separating cars from light trucks. Citing a recent study by the Lehman Brothers investment firm, they say the energy legislation would cut the production of large pickups and SUVs 60%.

A recent study from the U.S. Department of Transportation says by not separating car and light-truck categories, the Senate bill would negatively affect the economy by $114 million. Some industry estimates peg the cost per vehicle at upwards of $7,000.

“The biggest problem is that many of the proposals being discussed have one single standard for cars and trucks,” says a spokesman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a Washington lobby group representing U.S. auto makers that back Hill-Terry.

“There are very different attributes besides wheelbase and track width that are important to a vehicle’s characteristics,” he says. “And anything that makes vehicles more expensive or limits their capabilities could be devastating to not only manufacturers but also consumers who rely on those vehicles for their way of life.”

Such restrictions couldn’t come at a worse time, as the Detroit Three, still mightily dependent on light trucks and SUVs, struggle to turn around their loss-making U.S. operations.

Perhaps the only good reason for automotive chieftains to face another day is the knowledge that, ultimately, a lot more than Detroit’s future is at stake.

Related Resources

Editor's PIcks

The classic image of a V-8 is big and thirsty. Engineers set out to dispel that notion by making the small-block Gen V engines extremely efficient. Along the way, some dynamometers also got toasted....More

The plan includes redesigned versions of the S80, V70, XC60, S60 and V60, as well as new V40 and XC40 for the U.S. By the time Volvo’s product offensive is complete four years from now, no vehicle in the lineup will be more than four years old....More

WardsAuto Blogs

Singling out shareholders for a big payday is not being fair or responsible. The “old GM” spent billions buying back shares and kept doing so almost until it went bankrupt. Look how well that worked....More

A key issue in the aluminum-vs.-steel standoff is strength. Each side is playing the military and, by extension, the patriotism card. The message is that if it’s strong enough to protect soldiers in combat, then it’s strong enough, and safe enough, for you and everybody in your truck....More

During outgoing Honda President Ito's reign, the automaker made some major missteps, from the underwhelming '12 Civic, to the '10 Insight. He also failed to boost the volume and prestige of the Acura brand....More

Hot Topic

The announcement follows a 6-month government review that considered the best and safest ways to test automated vehicles that allow an individual to take control of the car if necessary. It also looked further ahead to the legal implications....More

Today’s auto-industry executives must connect Silicon Valley and Detroit, as well as address entirely new dimensions of safety concerns, such as how to protect their customers’ privacy and data....More

The supplier envisions connected vehicles carrying on never-ending digital conversations with IBM’s computer servers in Dallas about more than just the weather. Forgive my inability to process the vast implications....More

Fully automated driving can be expected in the decade after 2020. But Bosch already offers driver-assistance functions which represent important first steps, Bosch Americas chief Werner Struth says....More