Friday, September 06, 2013

Immorality according to Kant: When a government set a different standard for themselves than for the rest of humanity /Free interpretation of Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, 1785

This
is an analysis of events around the recent visit of President Obama to
Sweden, 4-5 September 2013. A particular focus is devoted to commenting
inconsequent geopolitical statements done by both President Obama and
the Swedish rulers during his visit. The series comprises four chapters
(see summary below): I) Introduction – "Welcome to Little U.S., Mr.
President". Reviewing the parody. II) Assange, Snowden and the
whistleblowing events as main factor in Obama's decision to visit
Sweden. III) Chemical warfare and double standards. Barack Obama VS.
Emmanuel Kant. IV) Swedish rulers’ joint homage of Raoul
Wallenberg contradicts their current stances on ethnic issues in
Sweden's contemporary society, as well Sweden’s secret Nazi
collaboration during WW II.

SUMMARY:

I. Introduction: Viewed
in a historical perspective, the Swedish elites' reception of Obama was
also an outstanding tribute to hypocrisy. The "second-generation
immigrant" Barack Obama was greeted by a set of right-wing rulers which
have praised the achievements and fate of "ethnic Swedes" in comparison
with "immigrants", amidst the highly discriminating labour-market of
Sweden – and where the "second-generation immigrant" stigma is
paramount. The suicide rate of foreign-born immigrants in Sweden
increased 10,3 per cent in 2012 and was well over three times that of
native Swedes. Equally astonishingly was the misconception of the US
President about efficacy and equality in the administration of the
nowadays-decrepit Swedish welfare. Sweden is reported being the EU
country in which socioeconomic differences increased most in later
years. The one and only myth about Sweden that Obama did not recall
during his visit was "Neutrality".

Chapter II:In
spite of unequivocal declarations done by the White House – prior and
after the asylum of Edward Snowden in Russia was known –, the Swedish
rulers and MSM have given deceitful information about the reasons of
Obama’s trip-rescheduling of 4-5 September (Stockholm instead of Moscow,
on Obama´s way to the G20 Summit in Saint Petersburg). Professorsblogg
examined a variety of speeches & remarks, press briefings,
statements & releases, press conferences, etc., where the White
House has treated the issues of Snowden, Assange, WikiLeaks and the
Swedish option. In fact, the main factor explaining Obama’s
reschedule-decision was the asylum given by Russia to Edward Snowden –
the American whistleblower that could evade US capture thanks to the
help of Julian Assange’s organization WikiLeaks. The chapter also assays
possible rationale for this diversion by Carl BIldt's office, on the
true reasons of Obama’s visit.

Chapter III:
I point out the ethical contradiction offered by President Obama in
Stockholm. While praising international treaties prohibiting chemical
war in order to legitimize his aggression plans in Syria, Obama has
failed in explaining the multiple using of chemical weaponry by US
military or its allies, particularly against Muslim populations.
Professors blogg provide a list of such episodes - known in public
record - with involvement of U.S. military.

Chapter IV:
This human-rights analysis touch upon the so far unsolved historical
contradiction of the Swedish rulers, proclaiming today - together with
President Obama - shelter for the Jewish, paying symbolic tribute to
Raoul Wallenberg in a Stockholm synagogue, while never apologized for
the selling and transporting of raw materials to Hitler, to be used –
among other weaponry and machinery – for the holocaust of Jews. Did
Sweden indirectly contributed to the Nazi "weapons of Jews destruction"?
New research published 2013 provides further light about who really was
Raoul Wallenberg, earlier accused of also being German spy.

Swedish
rulers' servile reception of Obama showed not only disrespect for the
dignity of the Swedish people. It also revealed marked contradictions in
the authorities' ethical stances

Julian
Assange described once Sweden (this is not a quote, but his meaning to
the best of my recall) as an small society, which, by means of speaking
an incomprehensible language that no one else in the world understand,
have managed to remain exempted of outer control and real insight on its
institutions. At this point I cannot tell what of the above is strictly
Assange's or if I may have added some. The meaning remains the same.

What
really, or accurate, the "outer world" knows about this small country
is hard to evaluate. I guess is not much. UK journalists still would
write that Assange has no reason to fear extradition from Sweden to U.S.
because "everybody knows" that Sweden is a "neutral" country and "it
has been so since WW-II" (For instance, Clarie Harvey article on the
case Assange in the Daily Telegraph
bases such assumption in that Sweden is a “proudly independent nation
that remained neutral even during World War II”). When I was Research
Fellow at Harvard (Boston, U.S.) and I said I was from the Karolinska
Institute (KI), very few among my very many fellow "officers" (so were
categorized the academics in general to distinguish from "staff"), and
which I met in different faculties, could identify KI as a Swedish
Medical University. Worst, when I was a lecturer for postdocs at Harvard
Medical School (Social Medicine) , most of the non-American postdocs
believed that Sweden was Switzerland, and no one new that the Nobel
Prize in Medicine was given by KI in Stockholm.

No
matter how well informed a President of a big nation as the U.S. may be
about this small country, it was obvious in the speeches I listened at,
that Obama has an idyllic, mythic notion of the Swedish social or
socioeconomic panorama. And this includes his praise for the Heath-Care
system availability. It was as he was referring to Olof Palme's Sweden
of the 70's.

In
fact, in contemporary Sweden "second-generation immigrant" Barack Obama
is greeted by a set of right-wing rulers which have praised the
achievements and fate of "ethnic Swedes" in comparison with
"immigrants", amidst the highly discriminating labour-market of Sweden –
and where the "second-generation immigrant" stigma is paramount. The
suicide rate of foreign-born immigrants in Sweden increased 10,3 per
cent in 2012 and was well over three times that of native Swedes.
Equally astonishingly was the misconception of the US President about
efficacy and equality in the administration of the nowadays-decrepit
Swedish welfare. Sweden is reported the EU country in which
socioeconomic differences increased most in later years. The one and
only myth about Sweden that Obama did not recall during his visit was
"Neutrality".

When Obama praised, word after word, speech after speech, what he
imagined was the avant-garde role of Sweden in integrating social
equality in a free economy model, he most certain ignores that for
instance young immigrants in Sweden have 70 % higher unemployment.

And the smiling political elites that surrounded the U.S. President certainly did not told him that only 1,6 percent
of all the complains received by the Authority "Diskriminerings
Ombudsman", DO (government appointed) on the base of ethnic
discrimination at working places, are further processed by the DO
authority. In other words (literally translated): The authority avoids systematically to investigate ethnic discrimination.

The
welcome texts of Sweden's cultural elites

The
welcome text of Sweden's leading newspaper DN is a self-portrait on how
the Swedish establishment (politically, culturally and militarily wise)
view themselves, and wishes to be regarded upon: Sweden as an appendix
of U.S. and its interests. For the U.S. instead, Sweden is only a
friend, or close friend, or partner (as discretely described in the White House "Statement by the Press Secretary on the President’s Travel to Sweden" of 7 Aug 2013).

In
Sweden's DN, the concept of Sweden as an independent, sovereign state
is wiped out from the readers' understanding. Expressions as the above
are in my opinion under the dignity of the average Swedish citizen.

And
I would believe that the Americans do not feel so comfortable with that
over-adulation. Partly because one wishes friends to have our same
sense of dignity and self-respect, and partly because such public
declarations of cultural subjugation from satellites countries would
contribute cementing a new emerging notion that America rejects: U.S. as
cultural imperialism.

For
cultural imperialism would be only one step of the fascist ideology of
cultural dominance über-alles, sustained by economic exploitation of
other peoples' natural resources. And forced by militarily threat or
intervention.

Believe me that have nothing personal against Obama,
and - as left libertarian - I do praise the civil values the U.S.
proclaims to defend, and as long the political behaviours called to
representing those principles would truly follow a) Jefferson's
Constitution, b) the UN Chart on Human Rights, and c) at least the
principal of Emmanuel Kant’s categorical imperatives. For I sincerely
hope the US government shall desist from doing against other
governments, those things they would condemn if done against themselves.

To listen at Barack Obama (at the nation-wide televised press conference in Stockholm) deploying his argumentation around the
chemical-warfare attacks was very interesting. And I tried
simultaneously to twitter out his reasoning as he was developing,
without commenting. For instance his rhetoric passage on "whose credibility is on the line"(the exact wording used by Barack Obama is to be found in "Remarks by President Obama and Prime Minister Reinfeldt of Sweden in Joint Press Conference"):

I
had to explain shortly afterwards to sceptic followers of
@professorsblogg that I was only reporting from Sweden on what Obama
did actually say, beyond my critical commenting on his stance in view of
the engagements in chemical attacks which the U.S. military have
incurred in the past (matter analysed in Part III, "Chemical warfare
double standards. Barack Obama VS. Emmanuel Kant").

Is not that am
affirming that Obama would have done the same than Bush when US
military engaged in the use of phosphorus attacks in Iraq, or that
Fredrik Reinfeldt would have done the same than the Sweden's coalition
government that authorized the selling of weaponry-vital minerals to
Hitler. What I am saying is that the honest and educated Swedish people
that saw and heard Obama condemning the use of chemical warfare, and saw
Obama AND Reinfeldt visiting the Stockholm Grand Synagogue to honour
the anti-Nazi deeds of Wallenberg, would have expect at least a
retraction of Obama, respective Reinfeldt, on the deeds perpetrated by
their political ancestors in the same office about the same crimes.

President Barack Obama and PM Fredrik Reinfeldt in the Stockholm press conference, 4 Sept 2013. Photo, The White House

Believe
me that I was elated with the view of "second-generation immigrant"
Barack Obama, standing proudly as US President, in the not seldom
cultural-racist screen of Sweden's nationwide and State-owned TV. This
is an outlet otherwise quite impermeable to the fate and misery of the
Kingdom’s immigrant population (a group of lives comprising the 27 per
cent of the census).

But
became perhaps the ultimate amidst the contrast showed in the visit of
President Obama to Sweden, it was the view of a (Democratic Party)
president of a republican country, paying a visit to the conservative,
anti-republican, immigrant-phobic and insensitive “Swedish royal house” –
kind of comically in the context – also exhibiting foreign-born roots;
foreign-born queen not to mention.

Democratic-Party President of a federal republic nation, meets the ultra anti-republican foreign-born Swedish royal house:

In these pictures of President Obama
visiting the royal house it can be seen in the background a coloured
young-man in uniform, doing salute. This “show” from the part of the
Swedish royal house has never been witnessed (or pictured before – check
out here
by yourself). Is the exception which confirm the rule, a rule which in
real life represents a staunch discrimination against Non-white,
non-European immigrants.

Photo above: REUTERS/Anders Wiklund/Scanpix Sweden

Continues:

Chapter II:In
spite of unequivocal declarations done by the White House – prior and
after the asylum of Edward Snowden in Russia was known –, the Swedish
rulers and MSM have given deceitful information about the reasons of
Obama’s trip-rescheduling of 4-5 September (Stockholm instead of Moscow,
on Obama´s way to the G20 Summit in Saint Petersburg). Professorsblogg
examined a variety of speeches & remarks, press briefings,
statements & releases, press conferences, etc., where the White
House has treated the issues of Snowden, Assange, WikiLeaks and the
Swedish option. In fact, the main factor explaining Obama’s
reschedule-decision was the asylum given by Russia to Edward Snowden –
the American whistleblower that could evade US capture thanks to the
help of Julian Assange’s organization WikiLeaks. The chapter also assays
possible rationale for this diversion by Carl BIldt's office, on the
true reasons of Obama’s visit.

Chapter III:
I point out the ethical contradiction offered by President Obama in
Stockholm, while praising international treaties prohibiting chemical
war in order to legitimize his aggression plans in Syria, have failed in
explain the multiple using of chemical weaponry by US military or its
allies, particularly against Muslim populations. Professors blogg
provide a list of such episodes - known in public record - with
involvement of U.S. military.

Chapter IV:
This human-rights analysis touch upon the so far unsolved historical
contradiction of the Swedish rulers, proclaiming today - together with
President Obama - shelter for the Jewish, paying symbolic tribute to
Raoul Wallenberg in a Stockholm synagogue, while never apologized for
the selling and transporting of raw materials to Hitler, to be used –
among other weaponry and machinery – for the holocaust of Jews. Did
Sweden indirectly contributed to the Nazi "weapons of Jews destruction"?
New research published 2013 provides further light about who really was
Raoul Wallenberg, earlier accused of also being German spy.

That means: You are free to copy, distribute, display, the above-referred materials, under the following conditions

Attribution. You must attribute the work (full text, text excerpts, or artwork as indicated above) in this specified manner: Author’s name and hyperlink of the article or artwork in the Professors blog

Any of these conditions may be waived by seeking permission from Professors blogg. For contact email fdenoli@gmail.com