SEBI judiciary-2 | Total 49 Posts

Price Waterhouse & Co. Bangalore LLP Vs SEBI (Securities Appellate Tribunal) 1. By this Miscellaneous Application Applicants / Original Appellants seek extension of the period of interim relief granted by this Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 15.02.2018. By the said order Applicants /Appellants were allowed to continue with the aud...

The Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which held that only if there is market impact on account of sham transactions, could there be violation of the Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Regulations. ...

As no amount has been deposited by the contemnor, we are inclined to go ahead with auction for the Aamby Valley City near Lonavala, Maharashtra. Let the matter be listed at 2 p.m. on 27th April, 2017, on which day, the contemnor, Mr. Subrata Roy Sahara, shall remain personally present before this Court. ...

Going by the facts narrated by Noticee No. 1, liquidation of 5 % stake was decided. The same had to be done in an orderly manner. There was no outer time fixed for liquidation. Being guided by the analysts reports and the price trends of the scrip, Noticee No. 1 decided to start the sale in November 2007....

In one of the recent rulings of the SAT, Mumbai, the interim order passed by SEBI in the matter of Neesa Technologies Limited(Company) has been quashed qua one of the directors i.e. Mr. Nimain Charan Biswal who had joined and resigned from the directorship of the Company before the issuance of Non-convertible Debentures (NCDs),the subject...

In the matter of trading in the shares of Palred Technologies Limited (Securities and Exchange Board of India) -

In this case observed that having mutual friends on Facebook will form the basis of determination and to establish connection between the parties who have committed Insider Trading in Violation of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015. ...

Broker and sub-broker would be liable to face proceedings under FUTP regulations due to their deliberate ignorance of constant suspicious trading transactions executed on the behalf of clients. In the present case, the brokers executed transaction on behalf of their clients in illiquid scrip in short span of time that too for a long perio...