Thank you for visiting our forum. As a guest, you have limited access to view some discussion and articles. By joining our free community, you will be able to view all discussions and articles, post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos, participate in Pick'Em contests and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today!!

So just because a stadium is bigger that makes it better? I'm not saying that Brice isn't better, but it ain't by much.

No. I don't like the layout of Razorback stadium compared to Williams Brice. Not a fan of the open endzone even though you have a great videoboard. I also favor the ramps at the Brice to the zig zag zteps at Arkansas. I'm not saying the Arkansas stadium is bad. I'm just defending the idea that Arkansas is light years ahead of Carolina. I'm not saying the stadium is all of the facilities but it is part of it and in my opinion a big and important part.

No. I don't like the layout of Razorback stadium compared to Williams Brice. Not a fan of the open endzone even though you have a great videoboard. I also favor the ramps at the Brice to the zig zag zteps at Arkansas. I'm not saying the Arkansas stadium is bad. I'm just defending the idea that Arkansas is light years ahead of Carolina. I'm not saying the stadium is all of the facilities but it is part of it and in my opinion a big and important part.

Then you should say, "I don't like Razorback stadium, I like Brice better". In your best unbiased voice of course.

They're not my team. 30 years ago? They played in a BCS bowl in 2010 and finished #5 in the country last year. They won 10 games in 06. Yes, they have a ton of money in Northwest Arkansas, Wal Mart, Tyson, JB Hunt, Dillards, Jim Lindsey, Jerry Jones, forbes listed them as the 8th most valuable program in college football last year. Do your homework, and please keep up.

$8 million difference, but factor in that Arkansas has the benefit of that BCS bowl appearance (although I think much of that money is shared with conference) and several wealthy billionaire boosters...I think the fact that USC is not that far off is remarkable.

They're not my team. 30 years ago? They played in a BCS bowl in 2010 and finished #5 in the country last year. They won 10 games in 06. Yes, they have a ton of money in Northwest Arkansas, Wal Mart, Tyson, JB Hunt, Dillards, Jim Lindsey, Jerry Jones, forbes listed them as the 8th most valuable program in college football last year. Do your homework, and please keep up.

still not telling me about this awesome hog history in football........ USC and Arky have been pretty even in the 2000's. UT is one of the most winning teams in history(it pains me to say it). that is a rich football history. Arky is not(sorry Hog, I like you though bud). having money and how you spend it are two different things. please try and keep up.

Here is the crap you are talking about from forbes:
The biggest change since 2009 belongs to eighth-ranked University of Arkansas, whose football program climbed 59% in value over the past two years. Several key factors influenced this growth. The first is that Arkansas played in the Sugar Bowl last year, securing the SEC an $18 million payout. Arkansas also added another revenue stream in the form of the “Southwest Classic” rivalry game with Texas A&M. The century-old rivalry was reintroduced two seasons ago after an 18-year hiatus and has generated additional revenue for both teams. Finally, Arkansas increased ticket prices by $10 for SEC games and introduced a new seating equity plan that increased contribution levels for premium seating. The new seating plan is reported to have brought in an additional $6.5 million.

the year before that, Arky actually generated less then SC in football money........ again, please try and keep up. Just because there are companies in those areas, it dosent mean they are giving to football......

still not telling me about this awesome hog history in football........ USC and Arky have been pretty even in the 2000's. UT is one of the most winning teams in history(it pains me to say it). that is a rich football history. Arky is not(sorry Hog, I like you though bud). having money and how you spend it are two different things. please try and keep up.

Here is the crap you are talking about from forbes:
The biggest change since 2009 belongs to eighth-ranked University of Arkansas, whose football program climbed 59% in value over the past two years. Several key factors influenced this growth. The first is that Arkansas played in the Sugar Bowl last year, securing the SEC an $18 million payout. Arkansas also added another revenue stream in the form of the “Southwest Classic” rivalry game with Texas A&M. The century-old rivalry was reintroduced two seasons ago after an 18-year hiatus and has generated additional revenue for both teams. Finally, Arkansas increased ticket prices by $10 for SEC games and introduced a new seating equity plan that increased contribution levels for premium seating. The new seating plan is reported to have brought in an additional $6.5 million.

the year before that, Arky actually generated less then SC in football money........ again, please try and keep up. Just because there are companies in those areas, it dosent mean they are giving to football......

They are all significant contributors. It's obvious that they started winning and money started funneling in. IF, big if, but if they can replace Petrino adequately then they are one of the richest programs in the country. If their AD doesn't well then they'll probably still be in the top 25. They are a top 25 winning program in the history of college football, Carolina on the other hand just got above .500 for their programs history. It's really not even debatable about who has the better program guys. I do believe and I could be wrong but they just put together a 300 million plus in renovations that are currently taking place.

Don't know what team you cheer for but it's obvious you have a ridiculous bias against USC.

I don't have a ridiculous bias against Carolina. I just know football. You not being able to face facts says that you're the one with the garnet glasses on. I follow several football teams across the country Carolina, Arkansas, Clemson, OU, Oklahoma State, aTm, just to name a few. I like them all and love none of them.