simonshack wrote:Thanks, Seneca. However, you might have to back up this statistical verification of yours with a series of media articles, just as I did.

You are welcome. But I do not see the point of giving a series of articles. Even if I look them up and I find more than you have found this doesn't prove anything, only that I have more time to spend.Here is one: Trashman gives 15000 women/Girls hiv aids virus? - YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeuAgvKCwO0I assume that a decent percentage of the other 6.989.999 are also good examples.

So I agree with you that most of the stories are probably made up (because of what I know about AIDS) but am not convinced about the hoaxers having a preference for 11.000.

“Vaccines contain the same antigens (or parts of antigens) that cause diseases. For example, measles vaccine contains measles virus. But the antigens in vaccines are either killed, or weakened to the point that they don’t cause disease. However, they are strong enough to make the immune system produce antibodies that lead to immunity. In other words, a vaccine is a safer substitute for a child’s first exposure to a disease. The child gets protection without having to get sick. Through vaccination, children can develop immunity without suffering from the actual diseases that vaccines prevent.” - http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/howvpd.htm

Antigens/viruses are killed, weakened and preserved with toxic - immune suppressing - adjuvants. One of the many ‘side’ effects of vaccines is cancer. Virologists in pursuit of the ‘mystery cancer virus’ synthesized AZT in 1964 as a potential ‘treatment’ but shelved it due to its high toxicity. http://www.tig.org.za/pdf-files/inventing_azt.pdf

As for the viral load/PCR test:“Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize in Science for inventing the PCR, is thoroughly convinced that HIV is not the cause of "AIDS". With regard to the viral load tests, which attempt to use PCR for counting viruses, Mullis has stated: "Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron." PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/jlprotease.htm

Soon, cleverly planted, rumors of a breakthrough drug being suppressed by the government began to promulgate. As a result (and as intended) people demanded its release. The FDA approved, without clinical trials, AZT for HIV treatment. AZT – a highly toxic DNA chain terminator - caused AIDS-like symptoms & deaths. Generous public/private funding brought about ‘treatments’ incrementally reduced in toxicity. As a result, the disease poisoning has become more manageable. Meanwhile HIV vaccine research continues and clinical trials using genetically modified HIV & measles viruses for cancer ‘treatment’ are ‘showing great promise.’ Things have come full circle!

Our cells communicate by exchanging & reconfiguring exosomes. Exosome is another word for virus. The biggest threat, health-wise, is maintaining blind faith in the medical establishment. Most illnesses are due to pharmaceutical drugs, vaccines and nutritional deficiencies:

That article pretty much spells it all out but you guys have covered it all and then some.

I later purchased a video tape titled "AIDS: The Fabricated Epidemic" by Bryan Ellison which I copied and passed around to people.

One of the main points that stood out for me was how HIV simply failed to meet Koch's Postulates. I would have thought that that fact alone would be cause enough for "doctors" to pay attention but one doctor that I tried to inform about it just went glassy eyed on me. I later brought him a copy of Ellison's tape... no idea if he ever watched it.

Quote:3.3.1. Virus Hypothesis Fails to Meet Koch's Postulates

Koch's postulates may be summarized as follows: (i) the agent occurs in each case of a disease and in amounts sufficient to cause pathological effects; (ii) the agent is not found in other diseases; and (iii) after isolation and propagation in culture, the agent can induce the disease anew (Merriam-Webster, 1965; Weiss and Jaffe, 1990).

(i) HIV is certainly not present in all AIDS patients, and even antibody against HIV is not found in all patients who have AIDS-defining diseases.

(ii) HIV does not meet Koch's second postulate, because it is found not just in one, but in 25 distinct diseases, many as unrelated to each other as dementia and diarrhea, or Kaposi's sarcoma and pneumonia (Table 1, Section 2.1.2).

(iii) HIV also fails Koch's third postulate, because it fails to cause AIDS when experimentally inoculated into chimpanzees which make antibodies against HIV just like their human cousins. HIV also fails to cause AIDS when accidentally introduced into humans (Duesberg, 1989c, 1991a).

2:26Patrice O’Neal: How the fuck could I be too mean after all this shit? I can’t believe it. I’m dying of diabetes & you motherfuckers are like, ‘Oh that evil, fat, motha-ff…’ you know.

[Patrice died on 11-29-2011. RIP!]

3:41Patrice O’Neal to Seth MacFarlane: No straight man writes that many show tunes. That’s a fact!

[A fact’s a fact!]

6:25Patrice O’Neal to Charlie Sheen: But I, I wanted to say it to your eyes, man, I…love that you stood up to what you thought was wrong and I’m impressed by you. And I just wanted to say that, so thank you man… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrUHxeVdbqI

A few years back, both Charlie Sheen and Patrice O’Neal began to publicly question the official 9/11 myth. They also appeared on the Alex ‘Prison Planet’ Jones show. I may be wrong but I believe Patrice O’Neal was a genuine yet misinformed skeptic. Anyhow, shortly thereafter Patrice died of ‘diabetes.’ His untimely death was most likely due to a poor diet and diabetes medications (pure speculation on my part).

As for Charlie, he began to have problems with his show massa’. Things got heated between them and as Seth MacFarlane put it, “The firing of Charlie Sheen tells you all you really need to know about Hollywood: You can abuse drugs. You can abuse your spouse. You can trash hotel rooms. You can solicit prostitutes. But don’t you ever, EVER call a Jewish guy by his actual Jewish name.”

Anyhow, Charlie became a media clown (porn stars, cocaine, tiger blood (?), comedy tour, etc..). Long story short, he went from highest paid actor on TV to 9/11 skeptic to crazy crackhead to HIV vicsim. Just based on instinct I think Charlie either voluntarily joined or was persuaded to join the “Magic Club.” Every celebrity of note must eventually endorse a ‘cause’ against a ‘disease.’ They either supposedly suffer from the disease or lost a loved one to it...

Not all celebrities are in on the scam. They don’t have to be if they trust the medical establishment. IMO, Charlie (like Magic Johnson) is in on it. His off-screen ‘character arc’ seems a bit too contrived to me.

P.S.

The following book is one of many which thoroughly eviscerate the “Germ Theory.”