You are not logged in

When defining a rectangle, one can choose the positionning that needs to be used.
The default positionning reference is relative (as in 'relative to the page'), the alternate is axis

However, while the 'xPos' and 'yPos' settings can be interpreted in 'axis' coordinates, the 'width' and 'height' settings seem stucked to 'relative' coordinate.

While this not, stricly speaking, a bug (nothing in reference suggest width and height should change behavior with the 'positionning coordinate'), Would it not make more sense to have the 'width' and 'height' measure change when changing the positionning system ?

Copyright (C) 2004-2006, the Gna! people. Posted items are owned by whoever posted them.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.