The defendant is
charged [in count __] with promoting prostitution in the
second degree. The statute defining this offense reads in
pertinent part as follows:

a person is
guilty of promoting prostitution in the second degree when
(he/she) knowingly (advances / profits from) prostitution by
(managing / supervising / controlling / owning), either alone
or in association with others, (a house of prostitution / a
prostitution business or enterprise) involving prostitution
activity by two or more prostitutes.

For you to find the
defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the
following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 -
Knowingly advanced or profited from prostitutionThe first element
is that the defendant knowingly (advanced / profited from)
prostitution. A person acts "knowingly"
with respect to conduct or to a circumstance when (he/she) is
aware that (his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such
circumstance exists. <See
Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-3.>

<Insert one of
the following:>

A person "advances
prostitution" when, acting other than as a prostitute or
as a patron thereof, (he/she) knowingly causes or aids a
person to commit or engage in prostitution, procures or
solicits patrons for prostitution, provides persons or
premises for prostitution purposes, operates or assists in the
operation of a house of prostitution or a prostitution
enterprise, or engages in any other conduct designed to
institute, aid or facilitate an act or enterprise of
prostitution.

A person "profits
from prostitution" when, acting other than as a prostitute
receiving compensation for personally rendered prostitution
services, (he/she) accepts or receives money or other property
pursuant to an agreement or understanding with any person
whereby (he/she) participates or is to participate in the
proceeds of prostitution activity.

Element 2 -
As a business enterpriseThe second element
is that the defendant knowingly (advanced / profited from)
prostitution by (managing / supervising / controlling /
owning), either alone or in association with others, (a house
of prostitution / a prostitution business or enterprise)
involving prostitution activity by two or more prostitutes.
These words have their ordinary meanings.

Conclusion

In summary, the
state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the
defendant (advanced / profited from) prostitution, and 2)
(he/she) did so by means of (managing / supervising /
controlling / owning), either alone or in association with
others, (a house of prostitution / a prostitution business or
enterprise) involving prostitution activity by two or more
prostitutes.

If you unanimously
find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each
of the elements of the crime of promoting prostitution in the
second degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On
the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has
failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements,
you shall then find the defendant not guilty.