Comments

Maybe the Parks Board can use all the money the appropriated from the community centers to ensure that this advisory group ( ie cronies and developer friends) live the good life while they are contemplating our future

The city shouldn’t tear down the via ducts until after the new hospital is built.
We can then see what road structure is needed to facilitate safe and effective movement of emergency vehicle traffic within DT and West End. It’s not cost effective to design and implement something only to redesign/remodel various aspects a few years after it’s built.

Like, you know…maybe like Sarah-Kirby Yung can ask if we can have like a nature path thing to the closest point for delivery trucks at Cassiar Tunnel so like we can walk out to like pick up our beans and alfalfa and grains and you know.

An other ‘done deal’ for Canacord one of city hall’s big time donors to increase crowding with more high rises.

BTW what did ever happened to that PARK Canacord was supposed to create about THIRTY YEARS ago and still there’s no sight of it? and a biased APPOINTED judge, most likely former corporate lawyer ruled there’s no hurry to have Canacord to have that park created. Dragging things out and eventually there WILL BE NO PARK but more high rises bringing even more billion dollars profit to developers, as usual.

Developers got to have more land for high rises so that’s why them viaducts got to go?

The excuse that those viaducts don’t look ‘pretty’ or architecturally eyesores, to the average onlooker them skytrain pylons or under bridges things look exactly the SAME, don’t they? Who are those city hall clowns kidding?

Them viaducts serve a useful purpose, something can’t be said for current mayor and some of his followers or many unelected city hall employees hell bent to wreck things that WORK.