Şikâyet Metni:FAO UEFA Officer,Below is a telephone conversation between Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his son proves the involvement of UEFA's vice president Senes Erzik's in protecting match fixers.

Coversation regarding Senes Erzik

On 02.03.2014 a voice record of Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayip Erdoğan was released that includes his conversation with his son Bilal
Erdoğan.

They talk about Fenerbahçe SK congress and during this
conversation he mentions his talks with Mr. Şenes Erzik and Mr. Michel Platini
and how he managed to save Fenerbahçe SK from relegation.

You can find exact translation of relevant parts with the
times of these conversation in the voice record below.

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
: RTE

His son Bilal Erdoğan
: BE

Starting at 1.26
Ending at 4.50

RTE : He says (
By he, RTE means Fenerbahçe SK president Aziz Yıldırım - Aziz Yıldırım makes a
speach regarging meeting between RTE, Şenes Erzik, Mehmet Ali Aydınlar ( former
president of Turkish Footbal federation ( also run for precidency of Fenerbahçe
SK against Aziz Yıldırım at last election and Göksel Gümüşdağ- Former President
of İstanbul BB FC )

RTE continues to
speak : He ( aziz Yıldırım) says to Mehmet Ali Aydınlar ; What did you speak
about at Prime Minister’s Office? There was Göksel with us there too. There
were 3 of us. He tells him to explain this conversation. This is an immoral
attitude. Mehmet Ali Aydınlar would not tell you what we spoke about
naturally.I would not think Şenes Erzik would say either. It would not be
possible for Göksel to say either.

BE : Who else is
left?

RTE : No one else
is left. You are not in our agenda. ( by you he means Aziz Yıldırım ) The
subject that Fenerbahçe was involved ( he means Fenerbahçe SK’ match fixing
scandal ) and its situation at UEFA, the attitude of Turkish Football
Federation against this insident ( he means what he want Turkish Football
Federation to do in Fenerbahçe SK case ). This is all…

What was in the agenda? Fenerbahçe SK was going to be
relegated and they were not be able to attend European competitions and also
National team might be affected. If you remember there were going to be a
congress of UEFA too. ( he means UEFA’s congress in Istanbul which was held
March 2012 ) At that congress I gave a speech and said if there is going to be
a punishment you should punish people not clubs. I said UEFA should correct
this. People might do wrong, but clubs, which has millions members, should not
be punished. Platini said to me that I was right, but he could not agree with
me as they have decision on this ( by decision he means rules, he misuses the
word). This is how I look at to parties ( he means political parties and he
means parties should not be punished either ) . I said I always talk about
this, this is how I look at football clubs too. I told Şenes Erzik to work on
this too ( He means Şenes he told Şenes Erzik to work inside UEFA not to punish
Fenerbahçe SK, but to punish individuals only). You see where this case is at
the moment ( by case he means Fenerbahçe SK’s match fixing case ). Fenerbahçe
SK was banned for two years ( he means the ban from European competitions), but
neither Turkish Football Federation nor UEFA
had Fenerbahçe SK relegated. This is what Mehmet Ali Aydınlar talk about
at the congress…

The coversation continues and they talk about Mehmet Ali
Aydınlar and congress.

On 6.16 minute RTE says his son : Ask Şenes Erzik ( he means
Aziz Yıldırım to ask Şenes Erzik ) to explain what they spoke about at the
meeting. ( He means that Şenes Erzik would approve RTE too that the
conversation was as he says )

List of Complaints:1) Turkish Football Federation protected match fixers by not relegating them as stated in its disciplinary regulations.2) According to Turkish Prime Minister, Şenes Erzik, vice president of UEFA, played a key role between Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Mr. Michel Platini, which took the pressure of UEFA off the Turkish Football Federation.3) According to CAS award regarding Fenerbahce case, UEFA protected match fixers by not penalising them for match fixing. ( See Clauses 575,576,577 below)4) Although UEFA announced that the sanctions of individuals in this case were going to be announced as soon as possible over a year ago, UEFA is yet to announce this decision.5) TFF signed a resolution about fighting against match fixing with UEFA in Astana, but failed to apply this aggreement on match fixers. ( See Clauses 5f, 5g and 10 for more info on sanctions must be applied to match fixers)Regards,

UEFA must apply relevant regulations and disciplinary procedures to all teams involved in Turkish match fixing scandal to prove that they are not part of this corruption too.

Millions in Turkey and all over the world are focused on the 17th of July and if UEFA will continue to protect match fixers as it is stated in CAS Award, there will be more effective protests against UEFA than mails, faxes and telephone calls.

9 Temmuz 2014 Çarşamba

After reading the CAS award regarding Fenerbahce SK case, millions in Turkey have no doubt that UEFA is part of this corruption too. UEFA, not only protected Fenerbahce SK from heavier sanction by not judging them from match fixing offence, but also prevented CAS to inrease the sanction by not filing in an idependent apeal against the Appealed Decision. (See CAS Award below for details)

CAS AWARD:

575. In practise, this spectrum would mean that a "standard" match-fixing offence would, in principle, have to be sanctioned with a two-year period of ineligibility. In case of particularly serious match-fixing offences a higher sanction would have to be imposed and in case of mitigating circumstances the standard two-year period of ineligibility would have to be reduced.

576. In light of this spectrum of sanctions and considering that the match-fixing attempts initiated by Fenerbahce's officials were particularly serious in comparison with previous match-fixing cases, the Panel has no doubt to determine that a sanction from the higher region of this spectrum is warranted. The Panel thereby specifically considers the fact that Fenerbahce officials attempted to fix four matches, that multiple high-ranked Fenerbahce officials were involved in the match-fixing scheme and that the match-fixing operations were conducted and orchestrated from the top administrative level of the club.

577. However, as UEFA did not file an independent appeal against the Appealed Decision, the Panel finds that it is limited in its discretion to sanction Fenerbahce as it deems fit because it cannot go beyond the sanction imposed by the UEFA Appeals Body. This would constitute a ruling ultra petita. As such, the Panel cannot impose a higher sanction than a two-year period of ineligibility (in addition to the period of ineligibility already served through the equivalent of the "administrative measure") in the present appeals arbitration proceedings.

On the other hand UEFA accepted Fenerbahce SK's complaint regarding Trabzonspor straight after lauching an investigation on Fenerbahce SK even though Trabzonspor was cleared off all charges at court, at Ethical Committee reports and at Professional Discipline Committee trials… An application from a convicted match fixing criminal, such as Fenerbahce SK, should had been declined by UEFA, but UEFA chose to take this appliction in to account, probably to justify their wrong doings in penalising Fenerbahce SK with minimum sanction, rather than a heavier one as CAS stated in its award.We see this as a threat to Trabzonspor for defendeing their rights.

In the light of this threat, we would like to inform UEFA officails once more that, we are aware of the relations and the talks between Turkish Prime Minister, UEFA’s president Mr. Michel Platini and UEFA vice-president Şenes Erzik, which changed Mr. Platini’s approach to the case dramatically. Sponsorship of Fenerbahce vice-president’s bank to UEFA during the process and meeting took place in Cyprus between Platini and people from Fenerbahce SK board are other key factors that changed Platini’s, hence UEFA’s approach to this case too…

Another milestone to this case was the meeting between former presidents of Turkish Football Federation (TFF) and Mr. Platini took place in Cyprus. Mehmet Ali Aydınlar, former TFF president, told press that he had a chance to convince Mr. Platini for point deduction rather than relegation at this meeting.

UEFA also helped Turkish Authorities keep match fixers in football by not revealing sanctions of individuals. It has been over a year and UEFA is yet to reach a verdict regarding individuals, where UEFA declared that the verdicts were to be announced as soon as possible over a year ago.

With UEFA's help Turkish Authorities kept Aziz Yıldırım outside the prision and with Turkish PM's order a speacially picked court decided for a re-trial with no grounds. It was no surprise for Turkish people that a retrial was decided by the new assigned court, as Turkish PM promised a retrial to Aziz Yıldırım on the 22nd of January 2014, straight after Supreme Court certified his penalty on the 17th of January 2014.

Before expressing the expectations of millions in Turkey and all over the world fron UEFA on the 17th of July 2014 to be announced, let’s have a look at some clauses of the Resolution signed between UEFA and the National Federations in Astana in 27.03.2014. which will give us an indication for our request;

Article - 5. Pursuant to their own Regulations and practice and subject to the application of national law, to:

f) Ensure that, in addition to individuals, clubs are also held responsible and sanctioned in circumstances where those with authority to act on behalf of the club are involved in match-ﬁxing, attempted match-ﬁxing, or any other form of corruption linked to match-ﬁxing;

g) Exclude match-ﬁxing, attempted match-ﬁxing, and any other form of corruption linked to match-ﬁxing from any kind of statute of limitations.

Article - 10. All member associations of UEFA re-afﬁrm that match-ﬁxing, attempted match-ﬁxing or other forms of corruption linked to match-ﬁxing must be met with strong and sporting sanctions, such as the possibility of lifetime bans for ofﬁcials, players, coaches or referees, and measures such as the deduction of points and/or relegation and/or exclusion from competition for clubs.

Therefore; it is fair to say that all teams involved in match fixing must be relegated and all individuals involved in match fixing must be banned from football up to life time in order to maintain the integrity of the game and make sure fair play is obtained.

According to Swiss Law, UEFA Board Members and UEFA Appeals Body Members are committing a crime by misusing their duties and we reserve the right to take this issue to Swiss Courts in further due.

After
reading the CAS award regarding Fenerbahce SK case, millions in Turkey have no
doubt that UEFA is part of this corruption too. UEFA, not only protected
Fenerbahce SK from heavier sanction by not judging them from match fixing
offence, but also prevented CAS to inrease the sanction by not filing in an
idependent apeal against the Appealed Decision. (See CAS Award below for details)

CAS AWARD:

575. In practise, this spectrum would mean that a
"standard" match-fixing offence would, in principle, have to be
sanctioned with a two-year period of ineligibility. In case of particularly
serious match-fixing offences a higher sanction would have to be imposed and in
case of mitigating circumstances the standard two-year period of ineligibility
would have to be reduced.

576. In light of this spectrum of sanctions and considering
that the match-fixing attempts initiated by Fenerbahce's officials were
particularly serious in comparison with previous match-fixing cases, the Panel
has no doubt to determine that a sanction from the higher region of this
spectrum is warranted. The Panel thereby specifically considers the fact that
Fenerbahce officials attempted to fix four matches, that multiple high-ranked
Fenerbahce officials were involved in the match-fixing scheme and that the
match-fixing operations were conducted and orchestrated from the top
administrative level of the club.

577. However, as UEFA did not file an independent appeal against
the Appealed Decision, the Panel finds that it is limited in its discretion to
sanction Fenerbahce as it deems fit because it cannot go beyond the sanction
imposed by the UEFA Appeals Body. This would constitute a ruling ultra petita.
As such, the Panel cannot impose a higher sanction than a two-year period of ineligibility
(in addition to the period of ineligibility already served through the
equivalent of the "administrative measure") in the present appeals
arbitration proceedings.

On the
other hand UEFA accepted Fenerbahce SK's complaint regarding Trabzonspor
straight after lauching an investigation on Fenerbahce SK even
though Trabzonspor was cleared off all charges at court, at Ethical
Committee reports and at Professional Discipline Committee trials… An
application from a convicted match fixing criminal, such as Fenerbahce SK,
should had been declined by UEFA, but UEFA chose to take this appliction in to
account, probably to justify their wrong doings in penalising Fenerbahce SK
with minimum sanction, rather than a heavier one as CAS stated in its award.We see this
as a threat to Trabzonspor for defendeing their rights.

In the
light of this threat, we would like to inform UEFA officails once more that, we
are aware of the relations and the talks between Turkish Prime Minister, UEFA’s
president Mr. Michel Platini and UEFA vice-president Şenes Erzik, which changed
Mr. Platini’s approach to the case dramatically. Sponsorship of Fenerbahce
vice-president’s bank to UEFA during the process and meeting took place in
Cyprus between Platini and people from Fenerbahce SK board are other key
factors that changed Platini’s, hence UEFA’s approach to this case too…

Another milestone to this case was the meeting between former presidents of
Turkish Football Federation (TFF) and Mr. Platini took place in Cyprus. Mehmet
Ali Aydınlar, former TFF president, told press that he had a chance to convince
Mr. Platini for point deduction rather than relegation at this meeting.

UEFA also
helped Turkish Authorities keep match fixers in football by not revealing
sanctions of individuals. It has been over a year and UEFA is yet to reach a
verdict regarding individuals, where UEFA declared that the verdicts were to be
announced as soon as possible over a year ago.

With UEFA's
help Turkish Authorities kept Aziz Yıldırım outside the prision and with
Turkish PM's order a speacially picked court decided for a re-trial with no
grounds. It was no surprise for Turkish people that a retrial was decided by
the new assigned court, as Turkish PM promised a retrial to Aziz Yıldırım on
the 22nd of January 2014, straight after Supreme Court certified his penalty on
the 17th of January 2014.

Before expressing
the expectations of millions in Turkey and all over the world fron UEFA on the
17th of July 2014 to be announced, let’s have a look at some clauses
of the Resolution signed between UEFA and the National Federations in Astana in
27.03.2014. which will give us an indication for our request;

Article -
5. Pursuant to their own Regulations and
practice and subject to the application of national law, to:

f)
Ensure that, in addition to individuals, clubs are also held responsible and
sanctioned in circumstances where those with authority to act on behalf of the
club are involved in match-ﬁxing, attempted match-ﬁxing, or any other form of
corruption linked to match-ﬁxing;

g)
Exclude match-ﬁxing, attempted match-ﬁxing, and any other form of corruption
linked to match-ﬁxing from any kind of statute of limitations.

Article -
10. All member associations of UEFA re-afﬁrm that
match-ﬁxing, attempted match-ﬁxing or other forms of corruption linked to
match-ﬁxing must be met with strong and sporting sanctions, such as the
possibility of lifetime bans for ofﬁcials, players, coaches or referees, and
measures such as the deduction of points and/or relegation and/or exclusion
from competition for clubs.

According to Swiss
Law, UEFA Board Members and UEFA Appeals Body Members are committing a crime by
misusing their duties and we reserve the right to take this issue to Swiss Courts
in further due.