Researcher Judith Reisman, author of multiple books
about sex activist Alfred Kinsey, including "The Kinsey
Corruption," "Kinsey: Crime & Consequences" and "Sexual Sabotage,"
says America can blame the "father of the sexual revolution" for the
current "Fifty Shades of Grey" mania.

The explicit sex movie, which set a record by collecting nearly $95
million from audiences over the Valentine's Day weekend, is a direct
result of the degradation of values that started with Kinsey's claim
that nearly every member of the "Greatest Generation" engaged in sexual
hijinks, she said.

And it now is time, she told WND in an interview, for Congress to
begin an investigation of Kinsey, his research methods, his results and
his impact on the nation's morality.

Reisman, Ph.D., is a consultant, scientific adviser to the
California Protective Parents Association, former president of the
Institute for Media Education and has consulted for four U.S.
Department of Justice administrations. She also has worked with the
U.S. Department of Education as well as the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services and has seen her work translated into many languages.

Her research focuses on Kinsey, whose books "Sexual Behavior in the
Human Male," in 1948, and "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female," in
1953, shocked the nation.

Reisman alleges Kinsey engaged in child sex assaults and used
"research data" from child molesters to compile his information. Her
works allege Kinsey's claims emitted "erototoxic radioactivity" into
subsequent generations.

"During World War II and the decades that followed, Kinsey and his
Indiana cohorts sabotaged our nation by entering our libraries and
schools as 'sex educators' - ridiculing marriage, fidelity and
chastity," she explained. "They preached widespread sexual
experimentation, succeeded in nationwide fraud campaigns and gutted the
tough laws that kept pornography and predators at bay."

Regarding the movie "Fifty Shades," she said other essentially
pornographic movies have pushed the edge of acceptability, such as
"Lolita," but what is concerning now is the widespread acceptance of
portrayals of sexual violence.

"Apparently if you're naked it's sadomasochism, if you're not naked,
it's just violence," she told WND.

She said in real life, sexual assaults on children are up, including
assaults on infants. Activists constantly are trying to lower the age
of consent, she said, and very often, a pedophile is "your next-door
neighbor."

"It's bad news, very bad," she said. "It's gotten to be we have been
so conditioned [to accept porn]."

The solution to what she called the "mommy porn" movement is
something that's beyond the realm of psychologists or psychiatrists. It
would require a massive revival across the nation, with churches
"behaving like churches," and people returning to them.

But she also wants to see a congressional investigation.

"One of the main things would be for us have a congressional
investigation of Kinsey, to see where people were so completely lied
to, how this began," she said.

There have been previous, unsuccessful attempts at such
investigations, she said.

The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University is getting millions of
tax dollars, she said, at minimum $21 million in recent years.

Noting audiences used to line up for family fare such as "The Sound
of Music," she said, the future of America appears to be dark.

"Fifty Shades of Grey," she said, "is a perfectly good example of
what you get when a nation has stopped using its brains, and it's not
connected spiritually."

In a new
video
about
her
work, she speaks of how Chinese youth are in the
middle of their own "sexual revolution," and her books will soon be
distributed in the communist nation.

It was Kinsey's claims that children are sexual from birth that has
caused the most difficulty for Reisman. She points out that Kinsey's
own research data claims that children as young as a few months old
were sexual beings.

The obvious question, she said, is how could it not be considered
sexual assault for a "researcher" to perform sexual acts on a child?

Society's wide acceptance of Kinsey's claims, she contends, has
contributed to a degradation in morality, teaching sex in schools and
the expansion of pornography,

Kinsey's two books, known as the "Kinsey
Reports," Reisman has explained, "was based on a nonrepresentative
group of Americans - including hundreds of sex offenders, prostitutes,
prison inmates and exhibitionists."

The Croatian radio host noted there was an event at the Stone Gate
in Croatia where an initiative called "Don't Touch the Children!" was
read in five languages. A letter with those details was dispatched "to
the addresses of 193 presidents of the U.N. member states."

"The letter contains the resolution as well as evidence material
proving horrible, illegal and monstrous acts Kinsey and his co-workers
did with children, on behalf of the so-called 'scientific data," the
radio host explained.

"The resolution's aim is raising the awareness of the world leaders
about the criminal act of pedophilia on which the Kinsey Institute
bases their view on children sexuality."

British filmmaker Timothy Tate said he was astonished, as a
journalist, when he learned how Kinsey's research was done.

"It's absolutely crystal clear in his own words, he was using
pedophiles to sexually assault children," he said.

He noted that even today, Kinsey's claims are the basis for much of
sex education around the world.

See Tate talk about Kinsey:

"Yet here was this appalling record of the sexual assault and I
think in some cases you could call it torture of children masquerading
as science," Tate said.

He said Kinsey should be considered "complicit" in the assaults on
children because of the ongoing relationship he had with the offenders.

Reisman has lectured at Princeton, Notre Dame, Georgetown,
Pepperdine, Johns Hopkins, the FBI, the U.S. Air Force Academy, the
University of Jerusalem, the University of Haifa and Tel Aviv
University. She has been cited by the London Times, Time, Newsweek, the
New York Times and the Washington Post. She has appeared on
"Entertainment Tonight," "Larry King Live," "Donahue," the"Today" show
and "Crossfire."

She's been listed in "The World's Who's Who of Women."

]]>20External Articles2015-02-22T23:01:09+00:00This Year's Most Popular Genre of Porn is Pretty Messed Uphttp://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2015/01/this_years_most.html
Fight
the
New Drug, January 27, 2015

The world of internet porn is more vast and varied than just
about anything else that can be found online. For all you seasoned
online meme viewers and social media browsers, it is no secret that the
unfortunate (and unsettling) fact of the internet, known infamously as
"Rule 34″, is definitely true.

In case you've never heard it, Rule 34 of the internet simply
states, "If it exists, there is porn of it."

Not cool.

To further prove this point, according to mega-giant porn site
Pornhub and their 2014 "year in review" statistics, the most popular
search term on their site is one that is super disturbing as well.

Check it out:

That's right. The most popular porn genre on a site that got 18
billion visits last year is the "teen" category. AKA a category
entirely dedicated to girls who look (and may very well be for all
anyone knows) younger than 18 years old, below the age of consent for
sex.

Woah. Really not cool.

And not surprisingly, Pornhub seemingly takes pride in its users'
deviant tastes, saying in their annual report: "If Pornhub
users all over the world are thirsty for one thing in particular, it's
teen-themed porn, as 'teen' was the most searched term in the world
both this year and last."

Now, after seeing this data, here is what we want people to think
about: if millions and millions of people across the
globe are constantly searching and viewing this genre of
porn involving teens, what do you think that is doing to the sexual
tastes of those viewing it? Is it fair to assume that this massive
viewing and demand for the "teen" genre is making the porn user think
that sex with teens is okay? Or that the younger the girl looks, the
easier it is to have sex with her? Or how about the fact that there are
actually fathers out there who are trying to find porn of teenage girls
that are the same age as their daughters.

Well, due to the science and research on porn's effects on
rearranging and rewiring people's sexual template, we can tell you that
this is exactly what is happening.

Unfortunately, porn has become a powerful and common version of sex
education for many people. And what's dangerous is that this form
of education is being delivered in a way perfectly tailored to how
our brains learn. Here's how:

Studies have shown that images are an especially powerful teacher,
since they can pack in a whole lot of information that the viewer can
understand very quickly. And while words are often interpreted as
opinions, our brains are more likely to interpret images as facts;
after all, it's a lot harder to argue with something you're seeing
happen right in front of you. Now here's the kicker: research has shown that our brains learn
better when they're sexually aroused. When you add in the focused
concentration of searching through pornographic images to find exactly
what the user is looking for, and reinforcing what's being taught with
the reward of sexual climax, it creates the perfect conditions for
wiring what porn teaches into the brain.

As a result, consistent porn users wire their sexuality based on the
virtual images that are stimulating to their body and brain. In this
case: teens. Porn users are literally training their brain to seek
after images of teens being used and abused as young, little play
things.

"It's sad," said Dr. Gary Brooks, a renowned psychologist at Texas
A&M who specializes in studies on porn's effect on men. "Boys who
are initiated in sex through these images become indoctrinated in a way
that can potentially stay with them for the rest of their lives."

Well there you have it. Society is literally cultivating a
generation of people who find teens to be the most sought after object
for sexual satisfaction. For two years running, "teen" is the most
searched term on the world's most popular porn site.

Sound like a world you want to live in?

What YOU Can Do

We're not cool with this. If you aren't either, SHARE
this article and help spread the word about the harmful effects of
porn. Society needs to know that what porn is teaching about love and
sex is the furthest thing from the truth. Take a stand and fight the
new drug.

Ontario's lesbian Premier, Kathleen Wynne, has specifically
requested that the proposed sex-education curriculum slated for all
schools next fall include a component teaching kids about giving sexual
"consent" from "the very earliest stages."

Wynne asked the Ministry of Education to "finalize a new health and
physical education curriculum that gets at some of the root causes of
gender inequality, and starts at the very earliest stages to develop an
understanding of healthy relationships and consent," according to a
communication obtained by The Star.

The curriculum was first revealed in 2010 by the then-McGuinty
government and immediately buried after a province-wide uprising of
concerned parents. The curriculum would have taught children to
question their male/female identity, about oral and anal sex,
masturbation, and experimental family structures.

Critics said the curriculum, which was developed during the time
Wynne served as education minister, contained an explicit homosexual
agenda that normalized homosexual activity and relationships. Their
concerns about the explicit program were bolstered when the province's
former deputy minister of education Dr. Ben Levin -- who oversaw the
development of the sex-ed curriculum -- was arrested in 2013 in the wake
of an international child pornography and child exploitation sting.
Levin was charged with making and distributing child pornography as
well as arranging for a sexual offense with a child.

Gwen Landolt, national vice-president of REAL Women of Canada, told
LifeSiteNews that teaching children about giving consent "presupposes
that sexual activity even at the 'earliest ages' is alright, providing
that you consent."

Landolt called the sex-ed 'consent' add-on "very worrisome" since it
could eventually lead to adults having "access to children, providing
the children give their consent."

"You have the question about the exploitation of adults and young
children. You also have the question about homosexuals, namely will
this allow them to have access to children, providing the children give
their consent?" she said.

Some homosexual activist organizations have worked to lower
the
legal age whereby a person can give sexual consent as well as normalize
adult-child
sex. What the average citizen calls pedophilia is
called in some homosexual circles an "intergenerational romance" for
"minor-attracted adults."

At a 2011 U.S. conference organized by homosexual group B4U-ACT,
activists asserted
that "children are not inherently unable to consent" to sex with an
adult, that "minor-attracted persons" are "unfairly stigmatized and
demonized" by society, and that an adult's desire to have sex with
children is "normative."

Dr. Judith Reisman, a professor at Liberty University School of Law,
told LifeSiteNews that "pedosadists" within the homosexual movement are
moving to "lower the age of consent and to teach children that it is OK
for them to consent to having sex with adults."

"The whole issue is to make children available for sex earlier. The
younger the child can give consent, the quicker you can have sex with
them that is legal," she said.

Reisman said Wynne's sex-ed proposals should be named the "Ben Levin
program of sex-education."

The Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (Ophea), which
partners with homosexual organizations such as Queer Ontario and Jer's
Vision, said it was pleased to hear of the adding of a "consent"
component to the proposed sex-ed. Ophea executive director Chris
Markham told The Star that his group had been "asking for the ministry
to look at consent as part of the revision process."

LifeSiteNews contacted Minister of Education Liz Sandals asking what
the ministry envisions by teaching children about how to give sexual
consent, but received only a generalized, pre-written response.

A draft of the sex-ed is scheduled to be released in the next two
months, The Star reported.

]]>20External Articles2015-01-13T20:36:46+00:00"Christmas with Hef" and Other Fairy Taleshttp://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2014/12/christmas_with.html
By Cliff KincaidAccuracy
in Media, December 23, 2014

Various news organizations have
run articles quoting
Hugh
Hefner, aka "Hef," as saying he is shocked--shocked--by
allegations that Bill Cosby molested
a
15-year-old girl at his Playboy mansion. Hefner says, "Bill Cosby
has been a good friend for many years and the mere thought of these
allegations is truly saddening. I would never tolerate this kind of
behavior, regardless of who was involved."

Former Playboy Playmate Miki Garcia testified before the Attorney
General's Commission on Pornography in 1985* and said that Hefner
encouraged Playmates to come to his mansion and "partake of the
activities," including orgies and bisexual escapades. She said
Playmates were forced to engage in sex acts with Hefner`s associates
through "peer pressure." As director of Playmate Promotions from 1976
to 1982, she
said she was told by models "about rapes, mental and physical
abuse, attempted murder, drug addiction, attempted suicide and
prostitution."

Our media have conveniently "forgotten" this testimony as the
accusations against Cosby have snowballed. One reason for that, as we
have reported, is that Hefner gives major figures in the liberal media
"Hugh Hefner" awards for the work or articles they do.

Regarding Playboy's role in the controversy over sexual assaults,
Dr. Judith Reisman notes
that Playboy ran an online "So Right, It's Wrong" campaign in 2009 to
"hate rape" ten conservative women, providing a gallery with their
names, photos and videos. The story was supposed to be funny.

Conservative columnist Michelle Malkin, who was one of those
mentioned on the list, commented
at the time that publications such as Politico made light of the
Playboy attack, while misrepresenting the vicious nature of what
Playboy was advocating, and "whitewashing all the vulgarity" out of it.

So rapes of conservative women are something worth laughing about.

Meanwhile, according to the most recent allegations, Cosby, Hefner
and their buddies were engaging in sexual escapades with Playboy models
and "bunnies" at the mansion, the Playboy Clubs, or various hotels.
Several of those accusing Cosby of sexual misconduct have a Playboy
connection. P.J. Masten, one of the two ex-bunnies who have publicly
accused Cosby of sexual assault, told
CNN's
Alisyn Camerota that "[There are] 12 former bunnies that I
know of that are ashamed to come forward, frightened to come forward,
married with families [and] don't want to come forward. But they were
also drugged and raped by Bill Cosby."

Russell Miller's book, Bunny: The Real Story of Playboy,
noted the presence at the Playboy Mansion of "Lila," described as a
17-year-old high school student "whose startling sexual precocity made
her a popular participant at orgies."

If our media have been paying attention to what was really going on
in the Playboy mansion, rather than just attending parties with "Hef,"
they might have uncovered some of Cosby's alleged sordid activities.
Instead, as
we
have noted, reporters and media celebrities such as Bill Maher
have been going to the parties in the mansion and smoking pot, among
other things.

Dr. Reisman conducted the 1989 study for the Department of Justice
on "Images
of
Children, Crime, and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler
Magazines." It found that Playboy had run numerous images, and even
cartoons, depicting children as sexual objects or enjoying themselves
as sexual partners of adults. For example, Playboy's December 1977
issue showed actress Jodie Foster, then only 14, in the nude,
describing her as "talented" and "sophisticated beyond her years."

During an appearance on Dutch television in 1994, Dr. Reisman
essentially accused Playboy of producing child pornography based on her
study of three decades of its publications. Playboy sued, but
ultimately lost the lawsuit.

Some of the examples include:

An August 1967 cartoon shows a Girl Scout being let into an
apartment by an adult male as she says, "We'll have to stop meeting
like this. I'm running out of cookies."

A November 1972 cartoon shows a small girl with a bow in her hair
telling a man offering her a candy cane, "No, thank you, nice man, I
don't want to go for a ride in your car. Why don't we just go up to my
place and b-?"

A March 1973 cartoon shows a little girl, with a ribbon in her
hair and her breasts exposed, sitting next to her teddy bear on the bed
while an adult father figure lowers his pants. The caption has the
little girl saying, "But first of all, we have to ask Teddy's
permission, and that costs $40."

But the media convey a different impression of "Hef" and his
magazine. "By his own lights, having purged himself of the shame and
hypocrisy that is part of most Americans' sexual baggage, he leads a
life that is exceptionally honest and moral," reported
The New York Times in 2011.

On December 23, 2006, reporter Rita Cosby, then with MSNBC, described
a Christmas party at the Playboy mansion that included Disney
characters and sounded family-friendly. She introduced three more of
Hefner's "gorgeous girlfriends," who "were nice enough to give me my
own personal tour of their posh pad right before Christmas."

Here was some of the dialogue:

Cosby: How does it feel to celebrate Christmas at
the Playboy mansion?

Female: It's wonderful. Everything is so beautiful,
like the food on Christmas. Everything's just so cool.

Cosby: Who did the tree?

Female: I did the tree. I wanted to decorate the
tree. Hef used to have just staff do it, and it was kind of generic
looking. And I always wanted to have a Disney tree, so I have all my
little Disney characters and everything.

We reported
back in 2001 that the CBS Early Show with Bryant Gumbel assigned a
female correspondent, Hattie Kaufman, to go to Hefner's Playboy mansion
and do a feature about him. Kaufman called the mansion "a Pleasure dome
for singles and celebrities," and referred to him as "Hef." He was in
his bathrobe with his Playmates, bunnies and centerfolds, smiling and
describing how he had liberated America from its Puritanism.

The Washington Post reported
with glee that the Marijuana Policy Project had resumed Playboy mansion
fundraising parties in 2011 after its founder/director Rob Kampia
"acknowledged having slept with an underling and took a medical leave
of three months to get therapy for his attitudes towards women." Kampia
said, "I just think I'm hypersexualized."

The MPP's board is rather
"diverse" and includes Maher, host of HBO's "Real Time with Bill
Maher," and Richard Brookhiser, senior editor of National Review,

Speaking of being "hypersexualized," the 1980 memoir of pornography
star Linda Lovelace remembers a side of "Hef" that many have not been
exposed to. Her book, Ordeal, describes the Playboy founder
and major contributor to the Democratic Party as "a collector of
eight-millimeter movies." That is a reference to the underworld of
hardcore pornography, not the "coffee-table pornography" symbolized by
Playboy.

Lovelace, who says Hefner sodomized her in the Playboy mansion in
Los Angeles, writes, "He supposedly has the second largest collection
in the world, second only to someone in Singapore. His eight-millimeter
movies go back to the first ones ever made, and they include some with
actors and actresses who were to go on and become very famous. He
seemed especially interested in his animal films; pigs, chickens,
donkeys, horses--he had them all."

The old joke is that men read Playboy for the articles or
interviews, rather than to look at the pictures.

But writing articles for or granting an interview to Playboy gives
the publication respectability as a "serious" outlet for news and
information.

After Sean Hannity of Fox News gave Playboy an
interview last year, Dr. Reisman told us, "Hannity has just become
another 'inadvertent sponsor' of the oldest pioneering child
pornography publication in history." She said he became a "foolish
pawn" of the "sordid, illicit Playboy enterprise."

But Hannity isn't alone. Bill O'Reilly of Fox News, Lawrence
O'Donnell of MSNBC, Jon
Stewart and Stephen
Colbert all gave interviews to Playboy.

No wonder Bill Cosby is under attack while "Hef" successfully
maintains his distance from the scandal. Hefner has made himself and
his publication "respectable" across the political spectrum.

Playboy ingratiates itself, especially with the "progressive"
community, by promoting what it calls in a Securities and Exchange
(SEC) filing
"social justice." The magazine has celebrated the use of illegal drugs
such as LSD and cocaine, and Playboy money has gone into the movements
for abortion rights, homosexual rights and legalized drugs, as well as
to the Democratic Party.

This is why Hefner is portrayed as a cultural icon and not the dirty
old man he truly is.

Kenneth Jackson is developing The Perfect
Crimes, a
narrative story (with actors, not a documentary) that tells the true
story of one woman's struggle to expose evidence of sexual experiments
conducted on children, in the name of scientific research.

If someone you know is passionate about human trafficking
issues, or
issues involving the abuse of children, or they want to get back at the
porn industry for the damage it does in so many people's lives, here's
a tangible way to make a difference. Tax deductible donations towards
the making of the movie, The Perfect Crimes can be made at: Mission Enablers International
(credit card/debit card/PayPal) or directly through PayPal:
meigiving@gmail.com, Account #J3370, Kenny Jackson.

Kenneth Jackson is Team Leader at CoreLife,
University of the Nations Kona, Hawaii.

]]>60Broadcast2014-11-20T22:06:19+00:00Reisman Awarded Medal by City of Zagrebhttp://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2014/10/reisman_awarded.html
By Henry Makowhenrymakow.com,
February
19,
2013

Reisman
visited Croatia was to give
support to HTV journalist Carolina Kristo Vidovic , whose show canceled
due to views on sexual education based on "Kinsey's Paedophiles, Secret
History."

"If you introduce sex education in
this school I promise you, you'll have a rise in sexually transmitted
diseases, the rate of teenage pregnancies, abortions and promiscuous
behavior because children mimic what they see. You will pay a high
price for it." Judith Reisman told a meeting.

ZAGREB - Dr. Judith Reisman spoke at a round table in
Parliament called by the HDZ who was one of the fiercest critics of the
proposed introduction of sex education in schools.

HDZ members apologized for the rude reception she experienced the
past
few days in Croatia, especially at the Faculty of Political Science.

"I wish to
express regret for these attacks, especially because of false
accusations of anti-Semitism. You were exposed to a frightening
campaign, verbal attacks and primitivism. But there's a different,
tolerant and prosperous Croatia, which may not be with you but will
listen. While you spoke in Congress, some fake liberals wanted to
forbid to speak in the Croatian Parliament. But freedom of speech won-
said Stier who apparently initiated the idea that the HDZ is one of the
hosts of the controversial Reisman.

Reiner apologized for intolerant Croatians who want to impose their
views to others, with their defamatory attacks and hate speech."Anthony
Kulušić called Reisman's Lecture in Parliament as "a source of pride."

Jandrokovic however said that such harsh reactions to the debate on
Sexuality Education come from leftist radicals and so-called democrats.
"We showed that we will not allow a secret plan that they want to amend
the Croatian society."

In her speech, Reisman called Kinsey the "pedophile who has changed
the
world," based on his research on children.

- It also stems from the Kinsey that we are all sexual, says
Resiman. On almost any question HDZ MPs such as what kind of
public debate in the United States conducted before the introduction of
sex education, what is our fourth module relative to that in other
European countries, and if he knows anything about the American groups
that advocate refraining from sex until marriage, did not give specific
answers. But that is why the issue of Ante Babic responded:

- There are ideological reasons. He wants to destroy the family to
take
a control over the children, and Society. The target of the family and
the Church. Reisman again reiterated that she came to Croatia to
support journalist Carolina Vidovic Kristo.

"I sent an open letter to the Minister of Education and Leadership
HRT
and requested the meeting to discuss with the political powers that be
about what happened to one of the key reporter who was punished because
she was researching the work of Kinsey," she explained.

And her assistant, a British journalist Timothy Tate , even accused
the
Prime Minister Milanovic being involved in the suspension Vidovic
Kristo. - In the UK Prime Minister would never interfere as yours has.

On July 26, 2014, the Anti-Zensur-Koaltion, a Swiss coalition
against censorship led by Ivo Sasek & co, makers of the 2011
documentary
Originators
of
Early
Sexualization, held its 10th conference, featuring an
interview by Mathias Ebert
with Judith Reisman.

The interview starts 13 minutes into the video and is also in the
German
language.

]]>70Events2014-09-15T19:23:19+00:00What Can Parents And Concerned Citizens Do?http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2014/09/what_can_parent.html
What
Can Parents And Concerned Citizens Do? (opens
new window)]]>20External Articles2014-09-09T20:01:26+00:00Judge Richard Posner is Wrong on Marriagehttp://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2014/08/judge_richard_p.html
Liberty
Counsel, August 29, 2014

Washington, DC - Judge Richard Posner of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals has become a superstar to the homosexual rights movement
after Tuesday's appeals court hearing on Indiana and Wisconsin's
natural marriage amendments.

The positions of this Reagan-appointed judge are influenced by
sexual deviant Alfred Kinsey, widely considered the father of the
sexual revolution, whose research transformed America's morals and sex
laws. Kinsey's practices were shoddy, at best, and shockingly deviant
and criminal at worst, as he participated in or encouraged the sexual
molestation of hundreds of children to gather "research data."

"Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute have perpetrated a massive fraud on
the United States and the world," said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman
of Liberty Counsel. There are shocking reports from victims who were
molested as children, in which deviant molesters timed their "sexual
responses" and reported the results to Alfred Kinsey. Kinsey's 1948 and
1953 books on human sexual behavior contain tables of information about
sexual responses in children as young as 2 months old, Staver points
out. A quick read of Table 35 in his book, Sexuality in the Human
Male, leaves little doubt that Kinsey participated in criminal and
disgusting behavior. Several tables record how long the children needed
to be stimulated to achieve "orgasm," and others record how many
"orgasms" the children achieved in given periods of time.

Staver concluded, "It takes this kind of absurdity to say, as Judge
Posner did on Tuesday, that marriage as one man and one woman derives
from 'a tradition of hate...and savage discrimination' of homosexuals."

Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation,
education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious
freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989, by providing
pro bono assistance and representation on these and related topics.

]]>40Laws2014-08-31T12:58:17+00:00Alfred Kinsey was a pervert and a sex criminalhttp://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2014/08/alfred_kinsey_w.html
By Jonathon van MarenLifeSiteNews.com,
August
25,
2014

He is known as "The Father of the Sexual Revolution," and if you've
ever taken a university course on 20th century history,
you'll have heard his name: Alfred Kinsey.

Kinsey was not only the "father" of the Sexual Revolution, he set
the stage for the massive social and cultural upheaval of the '60s,
'70s and '80s with his 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
and his 1953 Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.

These books revealed to a shocked and somewhat titillated population
things they had never known about themselves: That between 30-45% of
men had affairs, 85% of men had had sex prior to marriage, that a
staggering 70% of men had slept with prostitutes, and that between 10
and 37% of men had engaged in homosexual behavior.

Much less talked about were his other disturbing "findings"--an
in-depth study on the "sexual behavior" of children, as well as claims
that nearly 10% of men had performed sex acts with animals (as well as
3.6% of women), and that this number rose to between 40-50% based on
proximity to farms.

Got that? The Father of
the Sexual Revolution was a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who
facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children.

Kinsey's research portrayed people as amoral and sex-driven, and is
credited as fundamentally changing the way our culture views sex.

But was he right?

To begin with, the integrity of much of his work has long since been
called into question: among his questionable practices, Kinsey
encouraged those he was working with to engage in all types of sexual
activity as a form of research, misrepresented single people as
married, and hugely over represented incarcerated sex criminals and
prostitutes in his data.

But beyond this is the simple fact that Kinsey himself was a pervert
and a sex criminal.

For example, where did he get all of his data on the "sexual
behavior of children"? The answer is nothing short of chilling. Dr.
Judith Reisman (whose research has since been confirmed time and time
again) explained in her ground-breaking work Sex, Lies and Kinsey
that Kinsey facilitated brutal sexual abuse to get his so-called
research:

Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to
sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged
data on normal "child sexuality." Many of the crimes against children
(oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed
for Kinsey's research are quantified in his own graphs and charts.

For example, "Table 34" on page 180 of Kinsey's "Sexual Behavior
in the Human Male" claims to be a "scientific" record of "multiple
orgasm in pre-adolescent males." Here, infants as young as five months
were timed with a stopwatch for "orgasm" by Kinsey's "technically
trained" aides, with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for
an alleged 26 "orgasms." Sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates
commonly quote these child "data" to prove children's need for
homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via "safe-sex"
education. These data are also regularly used to "prove" children are
sexual from birth.

The man heralded with enthusiasm by mainstream publications such as Time
and Life Magazine was nothing less than a monstrous
facilitator of child-rape. In fact, he even went so far as to record
children shrieking and thrashing in pain, passing out and convulsing as
the result of the hellish abuse he was putting them through, as
evidence of "orgasm"--especially for children who could not yet speak.

Kinsey's so-called research was simply a quest to justify the fact
that he himself was a deeply disturbed man. Dr. Reisman writes, "Both
of Kinsey's most recent admiring biographers confessed he was a
sadistic bi/homosexual, who seduced his male students and coerced his
wife, his staff and the staff's wives to perform for and with him in
illegal pornographic films made in the family attic. Kinsey and his
mates, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul Gebhard, had 'front'
Marriages that concealed their strategies to supplant what they say as
a narrow pro-creational Judeo-Christian era with a promiscuous
'anything goes' bi/gay pedophile paradise."

Got that? The Father of the Sexual Revolution was a sado-masochistic
bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants
and children. His goal was not just to engage in scientific research in
order to see where the data took him, but rather, as one of his
prominent biographers Michael Jones notes, to launch a crusade to
undermine traditional sexual morality. He did so to wild
success--Kinsey's influence on sex education and law in the Western
world is absolutely staggering.

Some have claimed that even though Kinsey may have been disturbed
and engaged in immoral behavior, his fundamental conclusions and his
data still remain accurate. This, too, proves blatantly false.
According to Dr. Reisman:

1. [Dr. Kinsey's team] 'forced' subjects to give the desired
answers to their sex questions, 2. Secretly trashed three quarters of
their research data, and 3. Based their claims about normal males on a
roughly 86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual
psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners, male
prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals. Moreover, so few normal women
would talk to them that the Kinsey team labeled women who lived over a
year with a man 'married,' reclassifying data on prostitutes and other
unconventional women as "Susie Homemaker."

It is crucially important that people become aware of the truth
behind the Kinsey Reports.

Today's pornified sex educators, legal experts, academics, and more
disturbingly, pedophile groups such as NAMBLA pushing
"inter-generational intimacy," all use Kinsey's work to
justify their agendas and lend their causes scientific credibility.

Most people have no idea who Alfred Kinsey really was and how his
so-called research was actually performed. I myself first heard of
Alfred Kinsey in the first year of my history degree at university,
where my professor announced that there "was no Sexual Revolution at
all"--because the Kinsey Reports proved that people had been engaging in
all sorts of bizarre and criminal sexual behaviors all along.

The real story is horrifying. It is stomach-churning. But it is also
crucial that we know how, exactly, we got to this place in our culture
of such sexual nihilism.

Several years ago, I was rummaging about a used furniture store in
Antigonish, a college town in Nova Scotia. It was September, I was on
sabbatical, and yet the urge to teach got the better of me when three
young men entered the store, obviously looking for a few cheap things
for their dormitory. They were freshmen, all Canadians, though one of
them had gone to high school in Washington, D. C.

I could not resist. "I'd like to know a little about what they teach
and what they don't teach in school these days," I said. "I'm going to
name a few famous writers. You tell me if you recognize the names. You
don't have to tell me anything about them. I just want to know if
you've ever heard of them." They were up for the game, so I started
naming English poets.

Milton? Nobody. Keats? Nobody. Tennyson? Nobody. Wordsworth? Nobody.

I tried Dante. "Dante's Inferno?" asked one of the boys. "All right,
that's something," I said. "Do you know anything else about him?" No,
he said; it was just that Dante's Inferno was a video game.

I tried Homer. "He was Greek, wasn't he?" asked the same boy. "I
don't know anything else, though. But literature isn't really my strong
suit," he said. He was going to be a biogeneticist, and in fact he and
his friends seemed to be pretty bright. Their brains weren't the
problem. They had just never had an education.

"I'm more interested in history," he said.

So I named a prominent historical figure. "Hannibal?"

No recognition.

I've since tried the same experiment with my own college freshmen,
with similar results - except that students who have been homeschooled
or who have gone to more traditional Catholic schools fare much better
than the rest. I am now regularly meeting students who have never heard
of Chaucer.

They tell me that they spent very little time on poetry in school,
sometimes only a "unit," usually taken up with contemporary political
doggerel. For this, I have to open one of my veins every year and bleed
five thousand dollars into the local school district, not to mention
the additional pounds of flesh I have to cut and toss to the state and
federal piranhas of miseducation.

In my
last
essay I said that the exodus of sane people and their children
from our public schools, and from all schools that follow their lead,
is long overdue. It isn't just that I don't trust Mr. Pornogogue to
teach children about sexuality. I don't trust Mr. Pornogogue to teach
anything at all, nor do I trust the people who would hire him, or who
establish curricula to his liking. I don't graft healthy slips onto a
rotten stock.

But it occurs to me that Mr. Pornogogue has a dreadful weakness. If
we are rightly disgusted by his using his position as a teacher to
recommend sodomy in the sunshine to impressionable children, or to bend
their "genders" into pretzels, we should understand that there are
things that repel him too, that he will do all he can to avoid; or to
make of them as little as possible, to flatten them, or pervert them
beyond recognition. One of those things - and there are many others -
is great poetry.

Suppose you have the diseased mind of Mr. Pornogogue. Perhaps you
are like the imbecile feminist professor at a state college in my
country, who gives extra credit to female students who do not shave
their armpits, or to male students who shave off all their hair below
the neck. Perhaps you are like the creepy fellow in a formerly Moravian
university, whose "project" was to get his male students to dress in
drag. The last thing you really want to do is to bring real beauty and
wisdom to their consciousness. You aren't interested in that stuff,
just as a man in the grip of a beastlike vice has to shy away from the
beauty of youthful chastity, or snort at it in contempt. He has to
betake his amphibious form down into a dark wet hole, there to dwell in
the muddy grip of his compulsions.

So it is no wonder that schools run by the Pornogogues have no use
for Milton or Keats or Tennyson. These are our allies even
when they are not explicitly religious; they are our allies
because they love beauty, and they are human.

I am thinking of the final stanza of what may be the loveliest lyric
poem in English, Keats' "Ode to Autumn":

Where are the songs of Spring? Ay, where are they?
Think not of them, thou hast thy music too, -While barred clouds bloom the soft-dying day
And touch the stubble-plains with rosy hue;
Then in a wailful choir the small gnats mourn
Among the river sallows, borne aloft
Or sinking as the light wind lives or dies;
And full-grown lambs loud bleat from hilly bourn;
Hedge-crickets sing, and now with treble soft
The redbreast whistles from a garden-croft;
And gathering swallows twitter in the skies.

Every student in every school in every English speaking land should
hear these words, and almost none of them will. They say nothing about
politics. There is nothing lurid or lewd about them. They are not
pretty; they are beyond that. They are sublime. And yet their sublimity
is quiet, as it were hidden in the art of the poet and in the
simplicity of the things he describes. We have the level clouds in the
west as the sun sets, just shading with rose the warm brown of the
field of stubble after the reaping; we have the low hum of the simple
gnats down by the weedy river, rising or falling with the wind; the
lambs on the hillside; crickets still in the hedges, the redbreast
still here to sing, and the swallows, still here but probably on their
way south, just before the chill of winter to come.

Keats has said nothing about death, but it is there, like a shadow,
a gentle one, not to be feared. His ode is sweet and sad, a companion
for life. You cannot do anything political with it. You cannot do
anything
at all with it, no more than you can do anything
with a sunset, or the warm pressure of a friendly hand. It brings
beauty that clears the mind of what is merely ugly or crass or squalid.
It is fresh air, God-sent.

A true school is one in which the teacher's second-highest aim will
be to raise students whose hearts beat warmly to the impulse of such
beauty.

What does this have to do with cherishing human life? Still more to
come.

With every new technology comes a way to use that technology for
sex. Porn dominated the early Internet. Smartphones became the mailing
service for scandalous selfies. Google Glass has already
been
used to make (and watch) an immersive XXX film starring that
James Deen. So, it's not surprising that when academics get together to
talk about robots, their potential erotic use comes up. Rosie won't
just be doing the Jetsons' housework,
wrote a business professor and a futurist a couple years back,
she'll be working the corner as a robot prostitute. They argued robot
sex workers would eliminate human exploitation, ensure a disease-free
experience (as long as the robots were hosed down after), and could be
enjoyed in places where prostitution is illegal. It may sound weird,
but think about the intimate relationship you have with your iPhone.
You've taken it to bed multiple times already; imagine if Siri could
actually massage you.

"We've had sex toys for as long as mankind, and womankind, have been
around," said Ron Arkin, Georgia Tech's Mobile Robot Lab director,
while speaking on a
robot ethics panel at Berkeley on Friday. "But how will we deal
with robot intimacy? Will we consider it beastiality? Could we use it
to treat sex offenders?" Once we start creating sex-robots, what will
be the limits we put on them? It's not a human being so you should
theoretically be able to rock your human-like Rumba however you want,
but there may be some situations that create moral panics even if the
Cylon-victim involved is just a bundle of algorithms and plastic. I
asked the panel how society would deal ethically and legally with a
hypothetical company that starts producing child sex-robots to satisfy
deviant sexual desires.

Arkin said that while he doesn't approve of child sex bots for
recreational use, he'd like to see them used for research purposes.
"Child-like robots could be used for pedophiles the way methadone is
used to treat drug addicts," said Arkin. He said research should be
done to test the effectiveness of such a treatment. "There are no
presumptions that this will assuredly yield positive results - I only
believe it is worth investigating in a controlled way to possibly
provide better protection to society from recidivism in sex offenders,"
he said. "If we can save some children, I think it's a worthwhile
project."

He added that he did worry about the possible creation of a black
market that would offer the robots outside of a clinical setting. This
isn't the first time Arkin has broached the indelicate subject. After
he made a comment about it in the press years ago, he says he got a
call from a clinician who works with sex offenders who wanted to do the
research. However, prepubescent sex bots don't exist yet (at least that
we know about). There are bot-like babies: People in the "reborner
movement" buy incredibly human-looking baby dolls for as much as
$4,000 -- sometimes outfitted with heartbeats and chests that rise and
fall -- though they want the babies to protect and nurture, not to
exploit sexually. If an entrepreneur started up KidSexBots-R-Us,
would it be legal?

Ryan Calo, a law professor at the University
of
Washington, thinks it might be, based on the Supreme Court's
treatment of child pornography. "What appears to be child porn, but
isn't, is not illegal," said Calo. Making or possessing child
pornography results in severe legal penalties; those who watch child
porn sometimes get longer sentences than people convicted of actually
molesting children. However, in 2002, the
Supreme
Court drew a line between child porn and "virtual child
porn" where the "child" is actually a young-looking adult or a
computer-rendered image. It said images that are wholly faked, no
matter how realistic they were, are legal. So the law might see
sex with a "virtual child" the same way. At least in the U.S.

If you're a Canadian, the hypothetical KidSexBots-R-Us could get you
in trouble. Last year, a 48-year-old Canadian man ordered a 4-foot,
2-inch school-uniform-wearing sex doll made of "foam-like material."
For some reason, it was
intercepted
and unboxed by Canada Border Services agents at Toronto
airport. They arrested the doll fan and charged him with child
pornography. According to local media, child sex dolls are illegal in
Canada, which doesn't bode well for child sex bots in the Great White
North. The man has pleaded
not
guilty and faces a trial this month. It will be a test case for
virtual sexual freedom.

We likely have quite a few years before an autonomous robot that
looks and acts like a child will be on the scene. But I'm sure that
many people would be horrified at the idea of that robot being molested
and do their best to shut down such a company even if the law embraces
it. "It's a decision for society to make," said robot expert Noel
Sharkey, adding that people could circumvent the question by saying
their sex robots were just "short adult robots."