I try to show that Richard Rorty, although is not a moral philosopher like
Kant, nerveless, has moral philosophy that must be taken seriously. Rorty was
not engaged with moral philosophy in the systematic manner common among
leading modern and contemporary moral philosophers. This paper has two
parts: first part, in brief, is concerned with principles of his philosophy such
as anti-essentialism, Darwinism, Freudism, and historicism. Second part
which be long and detailed, considers many moral themes in Rorty's thought
such as critique of Kantian morality, solidarity, moral progress, cruelty and
concept of other, etc. Subsequently, I will try to answer the research question
of the article namely, has Rorty a moral philosophy?