Hybrid View

Would you pay more $$ for a ticket if it meant reducing capacity?

With the discussion of how crowded Coachella was this year, it's obvious that most people that have gone to Coachella before this year would like the crowds to reduce. To me, to only way Goldenvoice does this is if they have a way to recoup some of the money they would lose by reducing capacity.

So what if they come out and say, "OK, we are reducing capacity to 60k per day, but we have to charge more for festival passes."

Are you ok with paying more money for a ticket if it means the crowd shrinks?

Originally Posted by guedita

And to be fair to fikus, violent strangulation is one of his better qualities.

Originally Posted by malcolmjamalawesome

Being dead is literally the only way anyone on the planet could give less of a shit about you. You look like Farrah Fawcett's melted corpse.

Re: Would you pay more $$ for a ticket if it meant reducing capacity?

Would we have noticed the over-crowding as much if they would've done a better job booking groups/artists to the appropriate stage/tent?

There were so many artists at the outdoor that should've been in the main. There were a a few in the Gobi that should've been in a much bigger tent. I almost wonder if next year the Gobi will just be a 2nd Mojave... I mean there won't be a tent that small anymore if there's the same attendance.

If y'all fresh to death, then I'm deceased... -Kanye West
Jamiroquai 2016 please.

Originally Posted by miscorrections

How is any of that ironic? On this board I absolutely expect terrible people to call other people terrible.