Tuesday, March 22, 2016

To celebrate the launch of The Battle for Rome in Australia, HNSA is delighted to welcome Ian Ross, author of the Twilight of Empire series, to educate us on how to talk like a Roman! Ian was born in England, and studied painting before
turning to writing fiction. He has travelled widely, and after a year in Italy
teaching English and exploring the ruins of empire reawakened his early love
for ancient history, he returned to the UK with growing fascination for the
period known as late antiquity. He now lives in Bath and has been researching
and writing about the later Roman world and its army for over a decade.

How to talk like a Roman

How did ancient Romans speak? The obvious answer is that
they spoke in Latin; everybody knows that. True enough, Latin was the principal
language of the empire for nearly a thousand years, the language of government,
the army and the law. But the majority of the population in the eastern half of
the empire continued to speak Greek, even to write in Greek and to carve their
grave inscriptions in that language. There were other tongues too: Syriac and
Aramaic, and the older languages of the Italian peninsula, North Africa, and
the Celtic and Germanic peoples of the north. All them coexisted beneath the
surface of Latin unity.

Even within Latin there were accents and dialects. The
population of the old Carthaginian territories of North Africa continued to
speak with a Punic accent, which sounded rather slurred to Roman ears. The
emperor Septimius Severus, who came from that land, apparently had a strong
Punic accent even after years in Rome. He would probably have pronounced his
own name as Sheptimiush Sheverush. We could almost imagine that inhabitants of
different ends of the empire having trouble understanding each other, both
speaking their own version of Latin.

But beyond different languages and dialects, there were
other sorts of speech in the Roman world. Soldiers, for example, had their own particular
language, the sermo militaris. Only a few words of this ‘soldier talk’ have
survived, so we don’t know much about it. Was it something the troops
themselves devised, like the ‘jack speak’ of the 18th century Royal Navy, or
the ‘thieves’ cant’ supposedly spoken by criminals of the Georgian underworld,
to avoid detection by honest folk? Something deliberate and exclusive, in other
words, a private code for initiates only? Or was it just a basic form of Latin
used by those in command, to communicate orders to recruits who may have come
from different cultures, and spoken different languages?

Whatever it involved, this ‘barracks Latin’ was probably
rather rough and barbaric to the educated Roman ear. But so was the speech of
the common people more generally, who had their own way of talking too: the sermo
vulgaris. We can get some idea of this, at least, from the graffiti remaining
on the walls of Pompeii. Roman society, of course, was extremely patriarchal,
and Roman culture was suffused with what we might call machismo. Pompeian
graffiti often features violently graphic sexual slurs and boasts. But this is
hardly surprising, when even high-class metropolitan poets like Catullus, whose
audience included Julius Caesar himself, made sexual jokes so offensive to
modern tastes that until fairly recently they could not be translated into
English for fear of obscenity.

It’s often amusing, therefore, when readers today complain
of historical novelists putting ‘bad language’ into the mouths of their
fictional Romans. Often, writers are more likely to tone down their portrayals.
Romans, most probably, spoke much the same as we do, with all of our
differences and dialects, our crudity and politeness. But just as we
‘translate’ the Latin of our characters into various forms of modern English
(the older habit of using ‘archaic’ speech in historical novels seems,
thankfully, to have died out), so we translate their thought processes, their
reactions and their ideologies into forms recognisable to a contemporary
readership. This, of course, is inevitable. I have yet to read a historical
novel that manages completely to eradicate all trace of a modern consciousness.
Perhaps I would not want to.

Many thanks for the great post, Ian!

You can learn more about Ian and his books on
his website and he
would love to connect with you via Facebook and Twitter.
Take a look at his Journal for more great posts on the Roman world.

The Roman Empire is on the brink of civil war. Only
Maxentius, tyrant of Rome, stands between the emperor Constantine and supreme
power in the west. Aurelius Castus, promoted from the ranks for valour and loyalty,
is now a tribune in Constantine's army. But great honour brings new challenges:
Castus is tormented by suspicions that his aristocratic wife, the mother of his
child, has been unfaithful. And as Constantine becomes increasingly devoted to
Christianity, Castus is forced to ask himself whether he is backing the wrong
man. All know that the coming war will decide the fate of empire. But Castus's
own battle will carry him much further - into the shadowy realms of treachery
at the heart of Rome itself. The third book in the brilliant Twilight of
Empire.

Historical Novel Society Australasia celebrates writers and readers of historical fiction. Sign up to our newsletter to be the first to hear news of our conference in Melbourne in 2017.

Elisabeth Storrs is the author of the Tales of Rome saga. Head over to her blog Triclinium for the chance to win a set of the Twilight of Rome series.

VISIT OUR WEBSITE

HNS AUSTRALASIA

Welcome to the Historical Novel Society Australasia. We are open to all enthusiasts of the historical fiction genre world wide. Join our FACEBOOK GROUP for discussions on history, writing, reading, and publishing historical fiction. We look forward to connecting with you at www.hnsa.org.au Contact us at contact@hnsa.org.au

JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP

CLICK THE ENVELOPE TO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER FOR NEWS, INTERVIEWS & REVIEWS!