Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March the 4th 2009.

I always advise
newcomers to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can download lots of previous talks
I've given. I say this every night, because there are people who call me up and
ask me questions about certain things and if they'd listened to my previous
talks, or went into the archives, they would generally have found that I'd
covered the topic. So, you can download to your heart's content.

Also, look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks, which you can print up and pass round
to your friends. They're written in the various languages of Europe.

For those that want
to buy my material and keep me going, because it is up to you, you can find it
at www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com You can also donate, if you want to as
well, there's buttons on the website.

Everyone's been
watching the pantomimes; I call them pantomimes, when visitors from other
countries, the presidents and prime ministers meet together, with all the pomp
and circumstance of kings and queens of bygone days. Nothing much changes, it
wouldn't matter if Rome was literally burning, they'd have to have a party and
lay it on, as they congratulate each other. It's like the Oscars, that's what
I'd really compare them to, with prime ministers and presidents and standing
ovations and all the rest of it; it's very much like the Oscars. It makes you
wonder if they live in a different fantasy than the rest of us; and we are in a
fantasy, it's been designed for us. What kind of fantasy do these people live
in to preside over and sink the countries and further sink the countries with
further plans to do just that? Then
they have a massive gala, basically, to applaud and congratulate themselves;
it's rather astonishing. And I'll be touching on that later in the
show.

It all falls in, as
I say, with the psychopathic personalities that get picked by higher
authorities - and not the people, of course - to become the prime ministers and
presidents. It's odd that Mr. Brown, of Britain, was the Chancellor of the
Exchequer for about 9 years, a career politician; and he was supposed to be in
charge of watching over the major banks of London. He said, apparently, that
he's unrepentant for anything that he's done. He probably has no repentance
because it was all planned this way, that's why there's no repentance; but
they've got big plans for us, very big plans.

You know, this
winter has been one of the harshest winters all over in many years; and, I've
said before, it doesn't matter about the evidence pointing to cooling, the
agenda will go forward, regardless if we're up to our necks in snow, they'll
still say it's global warming, because this is the big stick to get us all to
live in a new system. It's an excuse, in a sense, but it's also a way to get
the global taxes coming into the United Nations. They've talked about this for
years, with their carbon taxes and all the rest of it and they hope to highly
profit from the whole thing; and then start dictating to the peoples of the
world. That's what the United Nations is really set up to do eventually, to
dictate to all the different peoples of the world, on every aspect of their
lives; and if you want to know what aspects I'm talking about, look into the
different departments at the United Nations, they have an equivalent department
for every one that you have in your federal government and more.

I'll be back with
more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and just before the break there, I was
mentioning the fact that this winter has been one of the most severe winters
across a good part of the Western hemisphere, for an awful long time, an awful
long time. Just last Friday, here where I am, there was about 12 inches - 14
inches of snow overnight, with 5 foot drifts, that covered everything, cars and
everything; and there's more snow to come and this is March. But, regardless of
the facts, as I say, this agenda will go on and it will be led by the
cheerleaders, the ones I just mentioned that go to these big international
galas and give themselves sort of political Oscar awards, because that's the
agenda and they don't change their agenda, regardless of the facts. Here's an article, exposing some of this and
it's good to see websites going up to do with exposing the global warming and
other ones as well that are going up to cover the aerial spraying we've had,
constantly, since 1998, at least in Canada, although they were testing long
before that. This is from The Hot Joints (January 28th 2009) it’s
called:

Global Warming Alarmist James Hansen’s Former NASA Supervisor Calls Him
An “Embarrassment”

The guy who really kick started the fraudulent global warming panic
around the world is Dr. James Hansen. He’s Dr. Al Gore’s closest ally and
deputy fear monger. Hansen is the chief climate scientist at the NASA Goddard
Institute for Space Studies (GISS).

Hansen’s former boss at NASA is now speaking out and says Hansen’s
global warming alarmism is an embarrassment to NASA based on fraudulent
science.

Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist, Dr. John S. Theon, the former
supervisor of James Hansen, NASA’s vocal man-made global warming fear
soothsayer, has now publicly declared himself a skeptic and declared that
Hansen “embarrassed NASA” with his alarming climate claims and said Hansen was
“was never muzzled.”

Well, of course
not, because he's been given the go ahead to keep howling.

Theon joins the rapidly growing ranks of international scientists
abandoning the promotion of man-made global warming fears. “I appreciate the
opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man
made,” Theon wrote to the Minority Office at the Environment and Public Works
Committee on January 15, 2009. “I was, in effect, Hansen’s supervisor because I
had to justify his funding, allocate his resources, and evaluate his results,”
Theon, the former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA
Headquarters and former Chief of the Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation
Branch explained.

“Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency
position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast
climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by
coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before
Congress,” Theon wrote. [Note: NASA scientist James Hansen has created
worldwide media frenzy with his dire climate warning, his call for trials
against those who dissent against man-made global warming fear,

Can you believe
that this guy actually wants people tried like Holocaust denial, if you deny
there's a warming going on caused by man.

and his claims that he was allegedly muzzled by the Bush administration
despite doing 1,400 on-the-job media interviews!

Well, some muzzling
that was, wasn't it?!

Theon is in good company when it comes to his scepticism on global
warming. Contrary to what Al Gore is telling the congress on Capital Hill this
very day, the scientific community is in no way in agreement about global
warming. In fact, every single day more scientists come forward and join the
chorus of those who know Gore and Hansen are liars engaged in one of the
biggest cons of all time.

“As Chief of several of NASA Headquarters’ programs (1982-94), an SES
position, I was responsible for all weather and climate research in the entire
agency, including the research work by James Hansen, Roy Spencer, Joanne
Simpson, and several hundred other scientists at NASA field centers, in
academia, and in the private sector who worked on climate research,” Theon
wrote of his career. “This required a thorough understanding of the state of
the science.

I have kept up with climate science since retiring by reading books and
journal articles,” Theon added. Theon also co-authored the book “Advances in
Remote Sensing Retrieval Methods.”

It says here; but
anyway, actually, I'll put the link up a the end of the show, it's so huge, all
the different people he mentions that he's worked with, all the different
scientists and physicists etc over his span in NASA. There you go, there's another one come out at the top decrying it
and decrying those who are crying wolf; but, then again, as I say, facts won't
matter because there's a bigger-bigger agenda in the works and it wouldn't
matter, as I say, if you were up to your neck in snow, they're going to keep on
about global warming, because it's a must-be, it's a must-be. Planned long ago,
remember the Club of Rome wrote about it, the founders of the Club of Rome
wrote a book called the First Global Revolution; and their job was to dream up
ways to unite the whole planet against a common enemy and they dreamed up and
put it in their book, after looking at all the possibilities, the idea of
global warming "that would fit the bill", that's what they said in
their book.

This is from
Harper's Magazine, it's called:

George W. Bush’s Disposable Constitution

March the 3rd 2009, by Scott Horton

Yesterday the Obama Administration released a series of nine previously
secret legal opinions crafted by the Office of Legal Counsel to enhance the
presidential powers of George W. Bush. Perhaps the most astonishing of these
memos was one crafted by University of California at Berkeley law professor
John Yoo.

Well, he's been
mentioned before in the Patriot circles because we're always way ahead of
everybody else anyway.

He concluded that in wartime, the President was freed from the
constraints of the Bill of Rights with respect to anything he chose to label as
a counterterrorism operations inside the United States.

And from the New
York Times summary, Neil Lewis said this about the same thing:-

“The law has recognized that force (including deadly force) may be
legitimately used in self-defense,” Mr. Yoo and Mr. Delahunty wrote to Mr.
Gonzales. Therefore any objections based on the Fourth Amendment’s ban on
unreasonable searches are swept away, they said, since any possible privacy
offense resulting from such a search is a lesser matter than any injury from
deadly force. The Oct. 23 memorandum also said that “First Amendment speech and
press rights may also be subordinated to the overriding need to wage war
successfully.”

In other words:
media is to be used for full propaganda purposes, which it always is
anyway.

It added that “the current campaign against terrorism may require even
broader exercises of federal power domestically.”

It's funny that
this is the mainstream media putting this out; but, as I say, there are other
articles I and other people have read, a few years ago, talking about Mr. Yoo,
who drafted up this whole deal.

John Yoo’s Constitution is unlike any other I have ever seen. It seems
to consist of one clause: appointing the President as commander-in-chief. The
rest of the Constitution was apparently printed in disappearing
ink.

This is from
Harper's Magazine.

We need to know how the memo was used. Bradbury suggests it was not much
relied upon; I don’t believe that for a second. Moreover Bradbury’s decision to
wait to the very end before repealing it suggests that someone in the Bush
hierarchy was keen on having it.

Quite something
isn't it? I'll also put this link up on the site too, at the end of the
show.

Getting back to pageantry
and how the little psychopaths down through the ages love their triumphs and
their parades and red carpets and - red carpet, remember too, is a symbol of
the sun, the sun's path, as it goes across the sky. So, those 'holy' ones, the
ones who are equal with the sun, tread on the red carpet; that's what it's all
about. Very-very ancient you know and they're still doing it, right in front of
our eyes, as they collapse the economy, probably a brand-new carpet as well,
paid for by the tax payer.

This is from the
Mail Online, to do with Gordon Brown matching Tony Blair's standing ovations
from Congress, as he urges U.S. to halt hurricane of recession, by Benedict
Brogan, March 4th, today.

Brown showered praise on America, describing it as an 'inspiration'. He
called on the world to work together to create a 'new deal'

Remember the New
Deal that FDR brought in, in the depression? We should take - a New Deal,
literally is a new system. It means any other constitution is going to be
overthrown here and he's saying the 'new deal' is supposedly:

for global prosperity.

For
whom?

The PM confirmed that Senator Ted Kennedy will receive an honorary
knighthood.

Isn't that nice?
Isn't that awful nice? It's in the constitution they're not supposed to take any
knighthoods from any foreign powers; but who cares about that eh? They've been
doing it for the last 30 years.

He also urged world leaders to come together to combat climate
change,

Here you go:

poverty and extremism

Climate change,
poverty and extremism. I think their whole climate thing is rather extreme
myself, maybe that should be combated, the whole idea of it. And they've had
wars on poverty, for as long as I can remember; and the money that's supposed
to go to poverty, especially abroad, just never seems to arrive at its intended
destination. Or, let's rephrase that: maybe it does arrive, but it's always in
the pre-determined destinations, someone's pocket, or some big international
corporation, that's generally how it stands. And I'll be back with more on this
farce of the political Oscars, as I come back - after the break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I'm Alan
Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing Mr. Brown's visit to
the US and his speech before Congress and members of the Senate. It says
here:

He also urged world leaders to come together to combat climate change,
poverty and extremism. Congress gave Brown 19 standing ovations during half
hour speech.

Boy, that's
something, 19 standing ovations in half an hour; that's the most exercise
they've had in years.

Gordon Brown called on the U.S. yesterday to shoulder its historic
responsibilities by using its vast wealth

Hmm.

to help stem the 'hurricane' recession battering the world.

This is a guy, as I
said before, who was Chancellor of the Exchequer of Britain's Treasury,
Chancellor of the Exchequer, for 9 years, right up until he was made Prime
Minister. The guy who was watching the big banks in the City of London, is over
here, over in America: to tell us all what to do, and to give more wealth away.
He says:

Gordon Brown called on the U.S. to shoulder its historic
responsibilities by using its vast wealth to help stem the 'hurricane'
recession battering the world. Mr Brown urged the planet's only superpower to
'share its prosperity' with poorer countries, as he pleaded with Congress to
back his plans for a global 'new deal' for economic recovery.

Again, that's the
new deal I was talking about, it's very important you understand these are
legal terms they're using to the public. These are announcements; they're
setting the precedent for a new deal, a new type of law system and
Constitution.

America should seize the day by throwing its weight behind a renewed
effort to prevent climate change.

Prevent climate
change? Preventing the weather changing?

And stop countries falling back into protectionism.

And you see his
photograph there, giving his Masonic 'help the window's son' gesture, and them
all applauding him at the back. It says:

Mr Brown followed in the footsteps of Winston Churchill, Clement Attlee,
Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair to become the fifth Prime Minister honoured
with an invitation to address a joint session of the Senate and House of
Representatives.

It seems to be
becoming a routine though, isn't it? We're forgetting too though that the
United Americas is supposed to join with the united Europe and the prime
minister of Canada even mentioned that, a while back, I read it on the air what
was published in the newspapers at the time, because we've got this old
alliance, this old "special relationship", as Margaret Thatcher coyly
referred to it.

The assembled senators and congressmen rewarded him with a total of 19
standing ovations, matching the number won by Mr Blair.

It's like a tennis
match, isn't it? As I say, this is the Oscars right here, how many points they
got, how many standing ovations they got.

matching the number won by Tony Blair in July 2003, when he addressed
the Congress, after the invasion of Iraq.

Speaking under the iconic dome on Capital Hill, he won repeat standing
ovations with an emotive appeal for America to demonstrate its 'faith in the
future' by helping rebuild the global economy with a partnership for
prosperity.

Well, isn't that
what we've got with the American Union? They call it partnership for
prosperity. It is for a few, mind you.

He used his speech to senators and congressmen to issue a rallying cry
for international cooperation in the face of accelerating world
downturn.

It's a depression,
it's a depression, if the world downturns any further, we’ll be spinning off
through the solar system somewhere else.

Mr Brown endorsed Mr Obama's £500billion economic recovery plan and
called for matching pledges from other countries at next month's crucial G20
summit in London.

That's where
they're going to have the riots, which is all part of the game, isn't it? It's
all arranged; but, it's quite amazing, as I say, it's quite amazing to see
them, literally, have these Oscars, Oscars for politicians, so they can all
applaud themselves and give each other awards and knighthoods and things like
that. It's all very pleasant at the top isn't it?

This is from the
Globe and Mail, their report on the same thing, Canada, from their report from
the business section, it says:

Brown urges U.S. to lead world out of ‘economic hurricane'

By DESMOND BUTLER March 4, 2009

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Wednesday an “economic
hurricane” has swept the world and U.S. leaders shouldn't view the crisis as
limited to America's borders. In a formal address to a Joint Meeting of
Congress, Mr. Brown said that U.S.-European relations were at an all-time
high

Did you know that?
The relations were at an all-time high. You know the people in Britain and
America are never asked their opinion on anything to do with this. They love to
use these sorts of terms, 'Britain has agreed' and 'America has agreed' and all
that kind of stuff. So, we're at an all time high in our relations.

He warned that protectionism ultimately makes every nation vulnerable
because “a bad bank

This is the guy
that was in charge overseeing banks!

"a bad bank anywhere is a threat to good banks everywhere.”

This is the guy who
said he was unrepentant for his time as Chancellor of the Exchequer when he
didn't see any of this coming.

“No matter where it starts, an economic crisis does not stop at the
water's edge,”

Now, this is their
best scriptwriter, who's written this speech here, that's the guy who should be
getting the Oscar, this award here, maybe he'll get an knighthood for this
one? "The crisis doesn't stop at
the water's edge", isn't that very poetic?

he said told lawmakers gathered in the cavernous

I should put
carnivorous House chamber but it says “cavernous” here!

House chamber. “It ripples across the world,”

It ripples you see,
this water's edge and rippling, this is very poetic isn't it? Sort of runs off
you, like, well, water. Back with more - after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I'm Alan
Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and just going over the heads of state
love-in that they're having in Washington DC, to do with the Prime Minister of
Britain talking to the US Congress and members of the Senate. Although he's
just reading a script, as I say, I'd like to know the script writer, he should
get the award, because he's better than most actually. To continue this last
little bit, before I go to callers. He says:

His remarks come as he is looking for a boost to his own political
fortunes.

I think he's made
enough of a fortune.

In hard political times at home, he hopes to benefit from Britons' high
regard for President Barack Obama

They don't even
know the man, except for what they say in the glossy magazines.

and to demonstrate British leadership at a time of economic
uncertainty.

No kidding. As I
say, a guy who didn't know there was going to be crash coming, overseeing the
banks and dealing with the British Treasury, for nine years; does that give you
any confidence, at all?

Mr. Brown repeatedly spoke of Americans' optimism in the face of tough
times with nods to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and President Ronald Reagan,
as well as Mr. Obama. He referenced President George W. Bush once, briefly
referring to Bush's work on Middle East peace talks.

As I say, it's
really interesting to read these little articles here about what they're up to
and what they're doing and they have these little love-ins amongst
themselves. What's also interesting
too, and someone wrote me this today, it says here, it's an email I got:

It can't be by chance that Prime Minister Gordon Brown's address to the
US Congress today just happens to be the 76th anniversary of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt's first inaugural address on March the 4th 1933. FDR's address essentially
announced the bankruptcy of the US, a declaration of war against the economic
emergency and the beginning of FDR's virtual dictatorship under war and
emergency powers.

And it's true
enough, they love to have these sequences and these dates you know. It's ritual
with them; it's also their little joke on the public I'm sure.

Now, we'll go to
Mike from New York on the phone, are you there Mike?

Mike: Good evening
Alan.

Alan: Hello.

Mike: Alan, it is
quite astounding how Gordon Brown can think he's the least bit qualified to
lecture the world on how to extricate itself from global economic morass, given
that the country, the UK, that he is responsible for is going to hell in an
economic basket, and is also the poster boy for the cosy relationship between
corrupt banks and government agencies, which was instrumental in bringing about
the crises in the first place.

Alan: That's right,
I mean Brown worked with the big banking boys for nine years and FDR was the
same, he was put in by the banking boys for that depression.

Mike: I mean, all
UK banks are, basically, insolvent in no short measure, due to his policies, as
you say: as Chancellor of the Exchequer for nine or ten years. That's the
Secretary of the Treasury in the US. And I mean, not to put too fine a point on
it, but this is like the local arsonist pretending he's an authority on fire
safety.

Alan: Exactly, I
know.

Mike: Also, not to
mention the fact that as Chancellor of the Exchequer, he sold off Britain's
gold reserve, to his pals no doubt, because nobody knows who received that at
the bottom of the gold market for $200 and change and it's now about four times
that.

Alan: That's right,
that's quite right. The thing is too, in the British system, and the
Commonwealth system too, you have Crown corporations and no one can figure out
what they are, because they won't tell us, except that a few people are allowed
shares in them but they're never advertised to the public.

Mike: Exactly, and
the City of London is an independent entity, right?

Alan: That's right,
it's a sovereign entity.

Mike: So, you know,
it's like the Vatican in the UK, so, you know, you have no idea what
machinations are going on there anyway.
Alan, a final point about this 'new deal' - he talks about a 'new deal'
sort of implicitly assuming of course that the original new deal, that
extricated the US at least out of the depression, which is very highly
questionable, to say the least. This
guy is completely full of you know what.

Alan: Yes, but what
the 'new deal' really is that we're all international and the advising
think-tanks to Mr. Brown have told him that, he's got to keep pushing this
international global system.

Mike: But how this
guy can lecture the world with a straight face is quite astonishing.

Alan: It is
astonishing, these guys, literally, are psychopathic in nature, they could get
caught red-handed doing something and they wouldn't even blink at the
camera.

Mike: Well, he's
been caught red-handed wrecking the economy of the UK and now he has the
temerity to lecture, ha-ha! I mean, you know.

Alan: It is, it
leaves you speechless doesn't it?

Mike: This guy is
not in the least bit qualified, he's been a hack politician all his life, he's
never had a real job and now he, somehow, thinks he can dictate to the world on
a solution.

Alan: Oh, power
goes to their heads very quickly.

Mike: It's
unbelievable, ok Alan, thank you sir. Bye.

Alan: Thanks for
calling. Now, we've got Anthony there?

Anthony: Yes, how
you doing Alan?

Alan: I’m hanging
in here!

Anthony: Hey man,
I'm 24 years old, a young black male from Hartford, Connecticut, pretty much
grew up in suburbia all my life and I just got to say, man, compared to you
guys and Alex Jones, you guys are the only ones that are bringing the truth out
there so I really appreciate that.

Alan: Well I
appreciate you for saying so; you do know they're putting Bills forward though,
on talk radio to curtail certain types of speech.

Anthony: Yes,
and it's very scary, that's why I'm donating coming up this Friday to try and
get your books to try and be as knowledgeable as possible about what's really
going on, because, you know, I just remember growing up in school and they had
the normal indoctrination and went along with television and I grew up in one
of those liberal towns where it was a predominantly Jewish society but they
always tried to keep the open side of everyone's opinion going but it was
pretty straight line you know, support the Jewish-related industries in America
and stuff like that. But I had one specific question for you sir: I have
a friend that is like awake, for all intents and purposes, but he's kind of
enveloped in this whole Jewish conspiracy; what would you say would be the best
way to try and get him off of that? Even with the things that I'm telling him
that you explained about, you know, the esoteric and the Rockefellers and all
those JP Morgan guys, he still, somehow, just reduces it to “Jew, Jew,
Jew”.

Alan: It's so easy
to get an obvious target and they do put a lot of, there's no doubt about it, I
would say too many of a minority group at the top of politics in the US and
some other countries, but they're put there on purpose to take the heat and of
course you get the impression they're all running the country. They still do
what they're told, by a hierarchy above them. When you go into the writings of
Professor Carroll Quigley, he will trace it back in the Anglo-American
Establishment, and go back a few hundred years, to show you that the very-very
wealthy people in Britain, who ran the Empire, basically still run it today and
very few of them, very few, a tiny minority, are actually Jewish in
origin.

Anthony: And I just
want to ask one last question: in terms of eugenics, does that play a role
with, even if it's a nation with say Moorish people, Black people? For
instance, John Hanson [?] was one of the first presidents of the United States.
Do you think eugenics would play a role in even though they're Black or Asian,
that they would have good genes to join the so-called elite hereditary?

Alan: They have a
very odd system, it's based on incredible genealogies and, at one time too, the
higher lodges all had brothels attached to them. I don't know if people realise
that. You’ll find it in Masonic writings and I mentioned the other night about
Benjamin Franklin belonging to the Hell Fire Club of Dashwood and it wasn't
just an ordinary brothel, the women there were of particular noble type birth,
they were carriers of these genes. The greatest reward they could have was to
mate with them, in the hope they'd have an offspring that would be superior.
Therefore, you, the male gaining honours, in life and stature, would breed with
a woman who was a carrier of a certain type of gene and the offspring therefore
was what was sort after; and that is a thing that's been practised down through
the ages. It doesn't matter what colour
you are at all; in fact, Galton Darwin and others talked about this, so did
H.G. Wells. They said that the existing hierarchies in all nations, that
includes Japan and China, have proven, those dynasties have proven their worth
to survive, in survival of the fittest, because they're still running their
countries, they still have the majority of the wealth. They haven't lost it
through bad offspring squandering it; therefore they've proven the right to go
on into the new system.

Anthony: Well, I
just got to say: everybody please donate to Alan Watt. If you are into Alex
Jones and it's too much for you, Alan Watt can bring you back down to earth.
And you know, I'm 24 years old sir and I got to say, you know, from most people
of my generation, they got to learn how to read.

Alan: Yes, you're
right.

Anthony: and
understand the legalise, before even trying to comprehend somebody like you
but, you know, I try my best with my friends, using your work, specifically
your work and Alex Jones work. So, just thank you very much and keep going
man.

Alan: Thanks for
calling.

It is amazing, as I
say, some people will pick certain targets and stick to it; other ones’
literally think it's just the Catholic Church and so on and so on; but you have
to go into the history books to get a bigger story, you also need to read books
and speeches made by famous people like Einstein, to understand what he meant by
Zionism, because he does explain it. It was to be a world system, based
exactly, as Aldous Huxley and his brother Julian Huxley said: a world system,
based with scientists at the top and logic ruling the world but that,
literally, the enemy would be emotion; that would be their enemy. That still holds true today, there's
different meanings of words and you have to go to the higher meanings and the
only way you'll find it is to go into some of the big players. Einstein, for
instance gave more political speeches than he did about science, it was all to
do with world politics, especially right after and during World War II,
very-very open about it.

Now, is Ralph from
the UK still there?

Ralph: Alan.

Alan: Ok, go
ahead.

Ralph: Well, first,
I really appreciate your insights and the way you're reading out [inaudible]
was fantastic. I'm quite solution-focused, so I've got three questions,
[inaudible] answering them. First, I was interested in what you thought of G.
Edward Griffin's Freedom Force.

Alan: I haven't
looked into his Freedom Force, but I know of him.

Ralph: I'm
talking about people with leadership capabilities, networking and
cross-disseminating ideas between other groups, it’s quite interesting. What
about, as opposed to a debt-based monetary system, a credit based system
[inaudible].

Alan: I tell you,
to be honest with you, it wouldn't matter, in a money system, unless the people
themselves. For instance, this is what Jackson, the president of the US once
wanted; he wanted a civilian oversight committee that would be drawn from
amongst the ordinary people that would not have lifetime jobs over-seeing.
They'd be there for maybe two or three years, watching and taking notes and
making them available to the public everything that was going on to do with
money. If you don't have that, I don't care who gets in, the psychos get in
there and they'll rob you blind; and they bring their lawyers in too, to
complicate things until the average person can't understand it. Money is very
simple and unless something is made to be very simply understood by everybody
on the planet, then it's a con that's going on. It's like your tax return, you
shouldn't have to take your tax return to an expert; it should be very-very
simple. In fact, you shouldn't be doing it in the first place because taxation
is slavery.

Ralph: Yes, why
should we have to obey laws we can't understand?

Alan: Exactly. I
mean, the governments say that they're there to serve us but that's never been
the case at all. They're there to serve themselves and those in power, those
who are the elite. I noticed that the major contracts in the UK and across
Europe, right now, for the most advanced cameras is all by the
military-industrial complex. They're now looking at a world, a post-war world,
when they've got their global system in place and so therefore all their
technologies will be transferred into watching the public and monitoring the
public.

Ralph: I agree,
what I term the prison-industrial complex.

Alan: Yes, it's
incredible, it's one of the biggest growth industries; and, again, it's a
slavery system, because they make them work to produce items that are then sold
outside the prisons. It's no different than China; but, then again, China,
remember, under the United Nations, and I've quoted it before, they said that
is the model state for the world.

Ralph: The
third question: you seem to have quite a rich life with interesting
experiences; and you've mentioned something along these lines before. I'd be
interested to know if you could reminisce about what experience you have that
most demonstrates that there is something beyond what's generally taught in our
philosophy if you like, beyond physics, beyond [inaudible].

Alan: Yes, I always
say to people that you have to go back into your own life and most people will
find it, if they can remember when they were youngsters, it's more than
synchronicity when you start talking about the same things at exactly the same
time, or you start singing the songs at the same time. These are simple
demonstrations of a kind of communication between people. We sort of grow out
of it or it’s drummed out of us as we get older. As to the higher things, I
think, to be honest with you, you have to become so sick of the world, at some
point, so sick of it that you're looking for something beyond all of this. You
can see plenty evil around you in the world, but you see very little good, you
know, on a large scale that is. There's a lot of good happening on an
individual scale, people helping people, that kind of thing, but really, evil
runs the world, so you have to, as I say, almost retreat from the world for a
while to find yourself. I think that's when you get the experiences. Back in a
moment - after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, this is
Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we've got Ryan from Maine on
the line, are you there Ryan?

Ryan: How you doing
tonight Alan?

Alan: Not so
bad.

Ryan: Pleasure to
speak with you. I had a question concerning, I've listened to a lot of your
radio broadcasts and you've kind of alluded to the fact that there's been a few
people who have fought against the powers of evil, like the elite in the past,
who have really kind of brought people to the fore against them and helped
conquer evil and I was wondering if you could maybe touch on the subject, maybe
mention possibly a few people who are maybe aren't as well known or are well
known who have had a big influence against this?

Alan: Well, there's
no doubt you'll find people often who, like Ghandi, for instance, who did it
for India, although Ghandi himself went to Oxford, I often wonder if he was
actually helping Britain who wanted to unify the country or if he was actually
helping his people. It's a toss-up in the air. What you do have is a history, mainly
in the US. Outside the US, I can't say because Europe is too old, the system is
too old, it's too perfect and they don't tolerate dissenters, they get rid of
them very easily, very quickly over there. However, in the US, you've had a few
presidents who have been bumped off, basically, not always in public view, for
doing something against the system. As I say, even Jackson had a man pull two
pistols on him, when he tried to abolish the bank, the Second American Bank
and, luckily, both of them misfired, and they didn't go off. You've had quite a few assassinations there;
and it's generally because the people were either so naive they didn't know
that there was a higher power above them, running the whole show, and they
thought they really were President, or else they did know what was going on and
they tried to stop it. These are the
few instances really that you have. You also have instances too of even the
early Labour Union leaders, in countries like Britain, I don't know if people
realise they were still hanging them up until World War I, publicly executing
them, hanging them for trying to get unions established. These were not
communists, they were just trying to get a living wage for the people, who were
kept in poverty; so they basically gave their lives for that kind of stuff.
You'll find many instances of this, down through history, but the problem is,
when it comes to the financial system that runs the entire planet, we don't
even get near it, to do anything about it, it's so multi-layered, so complex.
Most people don't even know that private bankers run what they think of as
their central banks and, as I say, how can you fight that kind of thing, unless
you abolish it altogether and start from scratch? That's the only way,
literally, you could do anything positive about it. For instance, the service
economy was discussed in Britain, in the 1980s, when they said if Britain goes
into a service economy, if it unites with Europe, then it's like a dog paddling
in swimming pond until it runs out of steam, it eventually drowns, because
you're producing nothing and all money basically, all wealth, comes from the
products that you create. A service economy passes it around. Well, North
America now is under the same system of a service economy and that's why it's
plummeting now, they don't have the manufacturing for simple things that
everyone needs. It's all done in China. This take-down is planned this way and
we have to change the system entirely, but not to the one that they will guide
us into; and they do have one ready for us to go into.

Well, that's it for
tonight; I hear the music coming in. So, from Hamish and myself, in Ontario
Canada: it's goodnight and may your God - or your gods - go with you.