Condemnation of school romance has led to some spirited support of the rights of children to experience romance and the inevitable sexual relations which are a natural part of this.

The Yahoo! questioner voiced disapproval at youngsters brazen enough to succumb to their natural hormonal drives:

“Aren’t these brats annoying when it comes to romance? I think love for kids in elementary and middle school is too early!

With the age of sexual activity becoming lower it invites sexual diseases and pregnancy. They should be forbidden from love and sex until old enough to marry. Worry about love when you are ready to worry about marriage!”

The children in question soon gave the questioner a piece of their minds:

“Love is necessary for elementary and middle-school children.”

“Age is irrelevant. By dating you can gain expeience which allows you to better understand your partner.”

“Don’t underestimate the capacity of kids for love!”

“You didn’t have any romantic experiences at school did you?”

2ch sums up the opposition to school romance as “the tears of virgins.”

225 Comments

Love is a confused clusterfuck in English, since there is so many different types of love sharing the same word. Love isn’t always sexual, but it can be.

Sexual urges are one of the strongest and most universal urges people have, and is consequently one of the most dangerous. (autoerotic asphyxiation for example) Some people exploit it to look like heroes, and try to vilify any repression of urges they can make a sympathetic case against.

We need some restrictions in place, since sex can get addictive very easily. A libido tends to demand more as it’s fed more. Starting early makes it easier for someone to get “hooked.”

Childhood romance should at least be so pure as shown in anime (except Kodomo no Jikan of course, I think that this manga/anime shows the problems children face when growing up and the increasing numbers of girls who get fertile way too early (and earlier than all those generations before them) is its well portraited main theme (although the situation might change if the borderline is crossed and ends up in an illicit relationship…))). Boys never get eager that early as at an age of 10 to start a relationship with a girl but rather see them as friends/comrades.

The girls however may be able to bear children at that age already and they are eager to get into a relationship with a boy (the eagerness tends to increase in the following years) leading to unintended sexual relationships although the most boys won’t be able to impregnate a girl before the age of 12/13(you guys know what I’m talking about
ㅇㅜㅇ > ㅇㅗㅇ xD)
Still,maybe children should be seperated at that age to prevent unwanted pregnancies by splitting them into boys schools and girls schools,that would be the easiest solution to the problem.

Well, considering there’s full-grown adults who can’t handle a romantic relationship, elementary kids shouldn’t be trying for that kind of relationship so early. Sure, there’s like the little puppy love that’s going to happen whether you want it or not, but it would be better for children to find out about that stuff later when they’ve gotten at least some kind of life experience behind them.

It’s not like they’re going to suddenly lose their desire/ability to have a romantic relationship at 16.

But then again, love and sex… Two different things. And heck no to lolis and shotas getting it on. Seriously wrong wrong wrong.

Whether parents or the government like it or not, sex is a natural urge and instinct, and they WILL be having it, with or without knowledge of consequences.

Parents should be responsible and teach their kids the facts about sexuality, safe sex, and its responsibility.

It is their right to be sexual and to express themselves that way. Their bodies are ready and programmed to fuck. It is no one’s business what an individual does with their own body of their own free will.

Yes, we don’t want STDs and unwanted pregnancies. That’s why you tell them to always use a condom. Telling them to abstain will not work.

Everyone’s missing the point. We shouldn’t worry about kids the same age together. Good education will solve any problems that could arise. We need to worry about kids in relationships outside the parameters of Romeo and Juliet laws.

….somehow I get the feeling a lolicon would say that. I like how they don’t emphasize who should love said elementary and middle schoolers. Of course, it’s implied people of their own age, but knowing the internet….

I just dont get it? I’m gonna tell my kid what sex is, how it is important NOT to cum inside girls vagoo (asshole is alright) and how to use condoms, as soon as he shows the first slightest sign of interest in sex. Why every parents wont do that? Seriously, I just dont get it. It’s your children, for fucks sake! Are you ashamed of even them? Sad people.

Hey I take offense to that ‘tears of virgins’ thing. Plenty of us virgins aren’t haters. I am totally envious of the whole childhood romance thing I didn’t get much of but we don’t all get embittered and try to deny others happiness because of it!

Plus like, a lot of people who aren’t virgins can get embittered about sex, like maybe they had a bad experience, or maybe they had good ones but are sad because they can’t get any lately?

Even if you tell kids not to do it, they are gonna do it in secret anyway.They’ve been doin’ it for years since forever anyway so why care.We’ve all kissed someone as a kid and never told our parents.Why care…

Yeah man, kisses.
This is more like ” hey Timmy, its ok to have sex with Sally her mother said its fine so go ahead and have fun, kids should be kids what can a father do?”.
More amputated penises hurray.

No, it is always possible to become pregnant when you have everything for it in your body which is also the reason why the youngest mother ever recorded was only 5 years old when she gave birth to her child. Also the youngest mother of the year is every year somewhat 6-8 years old.

Actually there was already a gen found that makes immune against HIV but it takes ages to make a medical solution out of it besides if childs have sex with eachother they sure don't get aids because they have none.

Just no. At elementary school, a kid doesn’t need to be worried about if they love sumone. Thats just wrong. Imagine a kid going for a check up, and the doctor telling the parents he/she got aids from another kid. 😐

Don’t keep your hopes up. The only chance for you to have loli-sex without fear of the consequences was years ago. It was a once-in-a-lifetime chance and if you didn’t do it back then, you will never be able to do it in your life.

my friends parents pay me and him to take a number of loli’s into the city so they can meet up with friends and such and i can tell you now none of them are the slightest bit interested and the ones that are actuary know what they are doing.

worst case scenario is two of them do fall in love and simply become friends until high school were they learn how shit real life really is. and no one is going to have sex >.>

i never had sex in high school because no one was interested in it then despite how slutty 13yo’s can be.

Basically, those are more likely comments made by some narrow minded adults or moral fagging parents who always to avoid their kids from watching romance movies and sitcoms fearing that those are going to badly influence them.

The smart and educated kids (yes, even at pre-pubescent ages!) will know the risks of sex, the stupid and ignorant ones will not.

So guess what we’re gonna get more of?

When I was nine, I was madly in love with a classmate, and she with me. Yeah, I wanted to bone her, but downsides were far too great, and I knew that.

* Living near the small farming town of “Hickville”, USA, if I had attempted to purchase a condom, the clerk would have phoned my parents straight away.

* I had no money for an abortion, nor did she.

* If I’d gotten her pregnant, I would have married her (I wanted to anyway, pregnancy or no), but our parents would have disowned us and put us out in the street.

* Nine-year-olds don’t get “good” jobs. You had to be fourteen to get a work permit for general labor. That would have left me berry-picking jobs in the summer (oddly, you didn’t need a work permit for that) as the only legal option. The other nine months of the year it would have been illegal stuff (theft); I didn’t know any fences, and likely would have been quickly caught and jailed.

That was forty years ago. I think most of of you can’t imagine the religious farmers’ attitudes of those days.

Thats part of the point. If they make children having relationships into a fiasco, they’ll just keep doing it. If you let them, they won’t think of love and sex as the most important thing in the universe. It’s not “if you think it’s bad they should too.” It’s “if you focus on it they will too.”

Honestly, relationships were pretty much one of the most important things in school for the popular caste of the class in the 7th and 8th grades here, so I’m really not surprised. High school proved no different.

Hah! Remember the movie “Fight Club”? The love interest said “I haven’t been fucked that hard since Grade School!”

Yeah, it’s right out of 1984, a growing “Anti-Sex” league where all love is seen as a liability or something that can ruin a career or a crime. Japan’s worried about it’s “Otakus” now, why not eliminate any and every chance of any social or romantic or even “Free” interaction between people, starting at a young age? Instead of people who choose fantasy because they didn’t like RL that much, the whole populace will be forced to resort to fantasy because nothing else is left.

Don’t you think that story is just a little false? Lets take a look at it.

A 4 year old finds his dads porn, jerks his meat, then it has to be cut off because it’s bleeding.

The biggest WTF here is the part where he somehow hurts his penis bad enough for it to be cut off. Kids stop when something hurts. It makes you wonder what he was doing to cause is penis to be destroyed that he couldn’t stop.

Another thing is the reasoning that jacking off at that age somehow hurt him. As a horny bastard, I can tell you that jacking it at four does not hurt you. I did it, and yes, I do remember it. I use to rub up against this huge-ass toy I had until I “came”.

The last thing is, with today’s science and technology, you know it had to be HORRIBLE for his penis not to be saved. I’m talking chewed by a dog horrible. There has to be something here that we don’t know. I’d say it wasn’t caused by simple masturbation, but something was done to this child that was totally fucked up.

Anyway, this has already been proven to be a fake story. Maybe if you loved yourself more as a child, you’d know that. :p

too bad they won’t teach that in sex-ed, because parents flip the fuck out about it eventhough they probably are using drugs and other shit to keep their sex life hot. Yet when somebody gets pregnant they go pointing fingers, throwing guilt and blame. When its their own fault for not preparing the kids or even easier letting the school handle it. They think because kids know how to do it they’ll do it right off the bat like a fucking orgy is gonna break out in the class room. It’s so easy to teach sex-ed but its these hypocritical people they have like 3-4 kids and are saying sex is bad for our kids yet we can always fuck because we make money and all that shit.

I wonder how many times your mother missed [i]her[/i] chance to improve the IQ and temperament of the human species by weeding [i]you[/i] out? o_O

Abortion is a denial of the Gift of Life, but it’s a [i]personal choice[/i], and not an easy one necessarily, for the woman or girl who has to make it. So quit fighting over it. It makes any of you doing that look even more retarded than you might otherwise actually [b]be[/b].

yay Abortions! Pro-Choice rules and it’s non religious! and I have to say Fuck Pro-Life They’re a bunch of religious nutjobs that believe god & jesus to have kids and after they’re born the Pro-Life people don’t give a shit. Plus Abortions + Stem Cell Research = Finding a Cure to a serious disease.

It’s called RISKY! Abortion can actually be a dangerous process to one’s reproductive organs. I don’t know if they would heal better because they are younger, but would you be willing to risk the chance to have a child later in life because you couldn’t control your hormones around the sandbox?

You need to work on your English skills. I’m saying you shouldn’t be having sex if you can’t take the responsibility of having a child. There is no excuse for killing a child just because you wanted to be fucked. Have the child, put it up for adoption, get on with your miserable whore-life.

There are too many ways to keep from getting pregnant, the morning after pill you spoke of is a good example, for you go to taking a life because you can’t keep your legs shut.

Geez, guess why in japan 9 year old girls get already the anti-baby pill and in the most other countries with 12 but it can kill because of the hormones in it too…
Besides that, everything can kill you. Saying having no sex because you may need a abortion is as saying not crossing the street because you may get hit by a car.

Who said it was fun? Not having sex won’t kill anyone, an abortion will. Need something in you and you’re not man or woman enough to take the consequences? Buy a dildo or a big dog, don’t kill your unborn child because you’re a stupid whore who can’t pass up someones dick.

I can understand medical resons for abortions, but I can not understand using abortion as a form of birth control.

Sorry, you got it wrong here. Public opinion and morals mean nothing to me as long as it doesn’t concern my wallet.
But surely I don’t wanna see my kids get into sexual relationship when they are at suck young ages, physically it’s not healthy and it’s harm my wallet if it’s lead to pregnancy and abortion. Not to mention that I don’t wanna be a young grandfather.
Kids are free to love for all I care, I may give em some advice if they want, as long as they don’t stand in my way I don’t interfere. But for the “sex” path, if they overdo it (with is most likely they will) or didn’t use a condom, should you feel trouble if your are their parents ??? If those kids can carry their own weigh, they can love and f*ck for their heart contest, just take response for their own action.

Actually, I used to work as a custodian in the school district where I live. Including one of the middle schools and a good number of the elementary schools. Middle schoolers having sexual relations I [i]do[/i] believe is happening, but elementary? Give me a fucking break. >_<

You can learn a lot by just observing how the kids act towards their classmates in the cafeteria and hallways. Plus how they react to you while you're working doing your job in their area. So to answer your question in a roundabout way… yes, yes I [i]have[/i] been in elementary and middle schools recently.

I was 9 when I had my first girlfriend (she was 11). We never talked about sex or anything like that, but there was certainly chemistry going on. She got picked on a lot, and I stood up for her. ^^

Until about 7th grade is when I started going through puberty, and suddenly was looking at the girls with a lot less indifference and a [i]lot[/i] more interest. That was also about the time when I started taking matters well in hand….. so, yeah. <__>

To be honest, kids in elementary school might have the curiosity to explore their bodies, but they [b]won’t[/b] be able to do very much with that knowledge until their bodies catch up to their precocious notions.

My opinion? I think the 2channers might have had the right idea. I doubt it’s [i]elementary school kids[/i] saying those things on Yahoo Chat. ‘Tears of Virgins’, indeed! XD It’s probably [s]depraved[/s] deprived [i]guys[/i] (or the rarer ladies) whining about the age of consent where they are.

I will add to these string of posts and attest to the veracity of their claims. Being a teacher myself I understand perfectly well that children feel curious about their sexuality [they teach that at Teacher’s school] and sometimes actively explore it, but they do so out of a genuine curiosity rather than the sexual desire displayed by adults.

I have noticed that when one child’s interest or knowledge about sex as practiced by adults is unusually abundant to be closely linked to an older person providing such information when the child asks. It can be an older sibling, friend or cousin, for instance, who doesn’t fully understand what exposing the child to such content means, therefore providing only information without guidance.

Another common situation is when a child finds porn, usually belonging to someone older close to the child, but knows to keep it secret and continues to browse the contents contained therein as long as the child has access to it.

All in all, it is usually by way of olders that children find about sex as practiced by adults. And it is later on [usually puberty], when they feel comfortable to talk about it with an adult, that they receive guidance and find about the moral stigmas of them finding about sexuality so early in their lives.

I totally believe you. Mine was about Kokonoe’s age. She liked to wear dresses and have her undergarments go “missing” then try snuggling on me. I had a talk with her mother and she, I shit you not, thought it was cute. I had to explain to her in detail what her princess was trying to do, yet she just laughed it off. I didn’t know if I should of been embarrassed or looking for Chris Hansen.

To this day, I have no ideal WTF was up with that woman and I’m about 200% sure that the kid is now a whore. Instead of helping her kid with her feelings, she just laughed it off. Not cool… I was a kid like that too, just not as brave, and my parents worked with me and now I’m a well adjusted, abit a little too horny, adult.

Ok, apparantly 女中 あゆ missunderstod what i was trying to say i was saying if we follow what “k” says
“Primary (6 – 12): Friendship
Secondary (13 – 18): Relationship
University (19 – 22): Engagement
Working (23 – 29): Marriage
Rich (30+): Reproduction”
If we can follow the list above, the world will be perfect, everyone kids will have happy family, no drugs abuse.”
That what i said at 00:19 05/11/2009 would happen,I’m saying ppl should get a child early, I’m totaly fine whit ppl having a child earlyer then that too, and not get a child after 30+

oh, and then again sorry 女中 あゆ for typing like I were a mental disabled person

I should people get shizophrenia just because they get a child early? Your post doesn't makes any sense and only a metal disabled person writes shit like you did. Nature made us abel to get childs already on a "early age" for a reason.

But k, if we follow what you say we are risking to increes the chances for the child to get schizophrenia and 1 more mental disorder, althou don’t remember wich one the other is, because males should have children when there around 21-22, after thet the chances for the child to get schizophrenia increses and the female should have children in there 18-20 other wise the chances for the other mental disorder increses. But if we’re fine whit more mental disordered ppl, i guess what you’r saying is fine. Althou the ones that get schizophrenia might abuse drugs or alcohol, so the abuse will still be there. Oh and the female fertility often declines after 30.
But hey we’re alredy overpopulated on this planet.
Sorry for all the misspeling and strange gramar.