I am a dealer, specialising in Russian Area Philately. You can contact me at
patemantrevor@gmail.com
You can find material from my specialised stock in the regular online auction at www.filateliapalvelu.com and also in the auctions of heinrich-koehler.de which are held in Wiesbaden.
The 500+ posts on this Blog are being edited into book format. Go to the Blog post for 1 February 2020 to find out more.

Search This Blog

Thursday, 13 April 2017

Review: Jay Caplan, Postal Culture in Europe 1500 - 1800

Click on Image to Magnify

Jay Caplan is a
Professor of French at Amherst College in the USA with a special interest in eighteenth century literary
history. Struck by the constant references to the workings of the post in
French writers like Voltaire and Rousseau, he became interested in the
development and organisation of the postal service itself and this short book
is the result. It is clearly written, lively and accessible to a non-specialist
reader though the text does sometimes lose the battle with the footnotes; the solution
is to ignore the footnotes.

Except in Venice, it is
only from the sixteenth century on that “the public” began to get access to
what previously had been the private courier and messenger services of kings
and princes. Opening up and expanding the post proved a significant source of
revenue for those kings and princes and, in addition, made it possible to spy
on those who made use of the expanded postal services. The development of the post goes hand in hand with the
development of secret offices dedicated to opening people’s letters, especially
the letters of dissidents like Voltaire and Rousseau. Caplan devotes a chapter
to the “Black Cabinets” which did the work of opening and reading letters and
tries to assemble what is known about how (specifically in France) they worked.
Many aspects of their operations remain unclear.

He focusses on the
posts of Thurn and Taxis, France and Great Britain, noting in passing in the
case of the latter how Queen Elizabeth the First opted to discourage the
development of communication among her subjects, opposing herself to better
roads and posts. He looks at how the posts were managed, how they were
supervised, how work was divided between those who accepted and delivered
letters and those who transported them from post to post – the horse relays
which allowed the mails to speed along at a few kilometers per hour. He notes
that it was the posts between big cities across the continent of Europe which
developed first, the city and town posts for local correspondence - things like
la petite poste in Paris and Dockwra
in London - coming later. Governments were generally keen to preserve postal
monopolies, even if they sold leases to operate services to “farmers”.

Caplan points out
several features of the dominant practice of requiring the recipient to pay for
a letter, not the sender. For example, it gave an incentive to these for-profit
postal services to actually deliver the mail because only then did they get
paid. I had never thought of that before! But for someone like Voltaire or
Rousseau, receiving sackfuls of fan mail, the fact that the recipient paid for
the fan mail was a financial disaster and both Voltaire and Rousseau ended up
posting public notices that they would only accept mail from correspondents
know to them. It didn’t solve the problem.

Caplan does not mention
the interesting practice which allowed poor servant girls or apprentice boys
living far from home to send empty letters to their parents who would then refuse to pay for
the letter, but would know from the fact of it being sent that their children
were at least alive.

The postal service and
letter writing develop in symbiotic relationship and, at first, being able to
write to someone a long way away was as novel as was being able to telephone
them or Skype them was at later dates. Caplan quotes very interesting passages from
Madame de Sevigné which indicate how the development of a frequent and reliable
letter service altered daily life, habits and expectations so that something
like impatience became most clearly
illustrated by the feeling one had waiting for a letter. An etiquette to
letter-writing developed, even written out in Handbooks of how to do it, and
covered such things as when to use a single sheet (what we now call entire letters) for both correspondence
and address, and when to wrap the letter sheet in a separate sheet, the enveloppe.

Conventions developed about
folding the paper and tucking in flaps. It was not until the 19th
century that the technology for machine folding envelopes was perfected.
Sealing was also an important matter and there was some obvious etiquette, like
black seals for mourning letters. Interestingly, the spies who opened letters
had to deal with the problem of repairing the broken wax seal and it occurred
to me reading Caplan that we probably don’t look out for censor-repaired or
replaced wax seals in the same way as we look out for other signs of later perlustration.

This is a book which
will have considerable interest for collectors of pre-philatelic letters. Unfortunately,
the 210 page paperback is priced at £60