>01 feb 2001, www-style, jyasskin@hotmail.com
>why a new Selectors version and not XPath which is a REC ? In chronological
order, Selectors were a REC
>long time before the birth of XPath. It is just an improvement.
Furthermore, other specs than CSS want to
>use the CSS selecting mechanism and not XPath.
That's not quite what I suggested. W3C Selectors are great for the current
version of CSS. I was asking if it is reasonable to migrate to XPath in
future versions of CSS.
Jeffrey Yasskin, MCSD
-----Original Message-----
From: glazman@netscape.com [mailto:glazman@netscape.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:08 AM
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: Answers to comments on W3C Selectors Last Call WD
The attached document contains all the comments related to W3C Selectors
Last Call WD and the corresponding answers.
Thanks _a lot_ to all reviewers, your help is priceless.
Note: FranÃ§ois Yergeau sent me a mail with a long list of specific
comments about the french version of the document. Mostly typos and
translation problems. All integrated in that version.
</Daniel>