Saturday, 29 May 2010

OBAMA and Israel hypocritical about Nuclear vs Iran

Iran not mentioned at all by UN???What a crazy and lying statement. Iran is now under embargo despiteall its nuclear faciliites being inspected.Similar to Iraq and yet, UN is still not satisfied that Iraq didn'tdevelop any nuclear weapon. Even to the point of invading and killingmillions of Iraqi, and yet not a single nuclear weapon in sight.

Similarly for Iran.

And yet, NOT A SINGLE INSPECTION on Israel, despite all the CLEARevidences from witnesses, that Israel already have NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

Now Israel wants Indian and Pakistan to be inspected. Didn't Indianand Pakistan all declare that they have nuclear weapons. Similarly forNorth Korea.

Israel never declare that it has any nuclear weapon, the same as Iran.And yet Iran is heavily inspected, and yet NEVER satisfied, that Iranis nuclear free or has no intention of developing any nuclear weaponat all.

In my opinion, there is nothing wrong for Iran to have its own nuclearweapon. It is the fundamental right of any free nation to develop anyweapon for its defence. If Iran were to relent, like Iraq, and let itssites to be thoroughly inspected, it will be bombed to kingdom come,just like Iraq. These inspections are just excuses for precisionbombing of Iranian infrastructures, just like Iraq.

Jerusalem sources wonder why Israel only state mentioned in Non-Proliferation Treaty conference, which called for inspection of itsnuclear facilities. Iran pleased with decision, says US must toe linein backing it

AFPPublished: 05.29.10, 12:33 / Israel News

Sources in Jerusalem on Saturday criticized as "hypocritical" theNuclear Non-Proliferation conference that ended with a declarationplacing Israel under obligation to have its nuclear facilitiesinspected by the UN's watchdog.

"The conference mentioned only Israel and not other countries thathold nuclear weapons, such as India, Pakistan, and North Korea. Muchworse is its silence on Iran, which is trying to obtain such weapons,"one official said.

He added that the fact that Iran was not mentioned was suspicious,especially in light of recent findings by the International AtomicEnergy Agency regarding the Islamic Republic's progress towardsacquiring nuclear power.

Meanwhile Iran's representative to the IAEA on Saturday hailed thedeclaration, and said the US must go along with it.

The accord, reached on Friday at the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) review conference and agreed by the NPT's 189 members, commitsto holding a regional gathering in 2012 to create a Middle East freeof nuclear weapons.

It also calls on Israel to sign the treaty, mentioning "the importanceof Israel's accession to the treaty and the placement of all itsnuclear facilities under comprehensive IAEA (International AtomicEnergy Agency) safeguards."

Iran's IAEA representative Ali Asghar Soltanieh, who attended theconference at the United Nations, welcomed the move. Soltanieh toldIRNA that the United States, despite opposing the NPT text on Israel,will have to fall in line with other countries.

"The US reservation is symbolic and it is obliged to go along with theworld's request, which is that Israel must join the NPT and open itsinstallations to IAEA inspectors," he said.

Earlier US President Barack Obama welcomed the accord but "strongly"opposed singling Israel out over talks on a nuclear weapons-freeMiddle East while making no mention of Iran.

"The greatest threat to proliferation in the Middle East, and to theNPT, is Iran's failure to live up to its NPT obligations," Obama said.

But Soltanieh dismissed the US stance. "Of course this was to beexpected, since (US Secretary of State) Hillary Clinton made suchduring the inaugural session (of the NPT meeting) and several timeslater," he said.

"The Americans are isolating themselves since Iran's nuclear file isan (IAEA) agency issue. This conference was about the NPT and itsfuture."