(Warning: The following contains disturbing information of a sexual nature.)

My strength is as the strength of ten, because my heart is pure. ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson

My dear friend and colleague Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting law professor at Liberty University School of Law, recently guest lectured during “Sexual Behavior and the Law,” a course I teach. Dr. Reisman’s lecture was filmed by CSPAN and will be airing soon.

In past years, Dr. Reisman has served as scientific consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). She is a world renowned expert on the discredited research of bug doctor turned “sexologist,” Alfred Kinsey.

Kinsey, though married to a woman who took part in his many filmed “scientific” orgies, was a promiscuous homosexual and sadomasochist. He managed to completely upend and twist the world’s perception of human sexuality in the 1950s and ’60s with his world famous “Kinsey Reports.”

Even today, most are completely unaware that during his tenure at Indiana University, Kinsey facilitated, with stopwatches and ledgers, the systematic sexual abuse of hundreds, if not thousands, of children and infants – all in the name of science.

Among other things, Kinsey asserted that children are “sexual from birth.” He further concluded, based upon experiments he directed and documented in his infamous Table 34, that adult-child sex is harmless, even beneficial, and described child “orgasm” as “culminating in extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting. …” Many children suffered “excruciating pain,” he observed, “and [would] scream if movement [was] continued.” Some “[would] fight away from the [adult] partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive[d] definite pleasure from the situation.”

Yeah. Sounds like it.

It’s little wonder that Dr. Reisman identifies Kinsey as a “sexual psychopath.” These children were as young as 2 months old.

Disturbing though that may be, what’s equally disturbing is that nearly all of today’s liberal “comprehensive sex education” curricula – such as that pushed by groups like the National Education Association (NEA), PlannedParenthood and the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) – is derived entirely from the criminally fraudulent research of Alfred Kinsey.

But even more troubling is a recent discovery by Dr. Reisman. She found that the Obama administration, which fully embraces the debunked Kinsey sex-education model, has begun pushing a curriculum that, in many ways, eerily mirrors the “FBI Molester Grooming Paradigm.”

In short, she found that both Obama’s HHS and many public sex-education programs are doing to children, constructively, what pedophiles do to “groom” them for sex:

According to the FBI, child molesters:

Demonstrate sex acts to children. Offenders commonly use pornography to teach or give instructions to naïve children about how to masturbate, perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual intercourse.

Lower the sexual inhibitions of children. Some children naturally fear sexual activities. Some offenders show pictures of other children engaging in sexual activities to overcome these fears, indicating to their intended victims that it is all right to have sex with an adult because lots of other boys and girls do the same thing.

Desensitize children to sex. Offenders commonly show child pornography to their intended victims to expose them to sexual acts before they are naturally curious about such activities.

Sexually arouse children. Offenders commonly use pornographic images of other children to arouse victims, particularly those in adolescence.

During her lecture, Dr. Reisman shocked the 50-plus in attendance by illustrating that today’s Kinseyan-based sex education – as promoted by Obama’s HHS – does much of what the FBI describes above.

Graphic sexual images and explicit “values neutral” talk of sex and sexuality are rampant throughout classrooms across America, effectively desensitizing children and numbing their natural inhibitions. These inhibitions help protect children from potential predators.

According to Dr. Reisman, “the brain data fully support [the] finding” that such “sex education” literally changes the neural pathways of a child’s brain. There is mounting scientific evidence to support this hypothesis.

Whatever its motive, the Obama administration is guilty of employing these grooming techniques on children.

Consider, for instance, that just last year, the Department of Health and Human Services’ “Questions and Answers About Sex” website provided a “Quick Guide to Healthy Living” section which, like Kinsey, outrageously claimed that “Children are human beings and therefore sexual beings … which is healthy and normal.”

Get the implication? And what do “sexual beings” do? Well, they have sex, of course. “It’s hard for parents to acknowledge this,” admitted the page.

You think?

The HHS link then suggested that youth “may also experiment with sexual experiences, including those with members of the same sex, during the years they are exploring their own sexuality.”

Sound familiar? Remember, the FBI indicates that pedophiles will “teach or give instructions to naïve children about how to masturbate, perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual intercourse.”

Who needs pedophiles when we have today’s “comprehensive sex education”? It does all that and more.

Speaking of masturbation and other “sort of ‘sexual’ behavior … young kids exhibit,” the HHS is right there to help. The link says “Parents should only be concerned about masturbation if a child seems preoccupied with it to the exclusion of other activities.”

During the 2008 presidential campaign, a then-Sen. Barack Obama spoke about teaching “comprehensive sex education” to kindergartners: “It’s the right thing to do … to provide age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools,” he said.

And by “science-based,” of course, he meant “Kinsey-based.”

So, what is age appropriate, science-based sex education? Well, we know what Alfred Kinsey thought was “age appropriate.” We know what he considered “science-based.”

I’d expect such “educational” grooming tactics and opinions from Alfred Kinsey or Jerry Sandusky, but not from public educators – not from the U.S. government.

And most certainly, not from the president of the United States.

Matt Barber is Director of Cultural Affairs with both Liberty Counsel and Liberty Alliance Action. He also co-hosts the nationally syndicated “Liberty Live” talk radio program on AFR Talk.

This is a disgraceful article and CL should be ashamed of itself. The writer and those responsible for putting it in this forum show a lack of common decency and integrity.

http://www.reflectionsofaparalytic.com Chelsea Zimmerman

The only disgrace I see here is the fact that this immoral filth is being taught to our children in the first place (and most parents aren’t even aware of it!). Many thanks to Mr. Barber for bringing this important issue to light!

Sean from Down Under

But are the contents of the article true? It is disgraceful to low, but not to speak the truth.

Sean from Down Under

That was meant to be lie, not low. Whoops!

GuitarGramma

Noel — I must respectfully disagree with you. Every allegation in the article is true. What’s worse, these things are taught in virtually every public school in America. If the subjects discussed in the article “show a lack of common decency and integrity,” then they ought to be banned from public schools. Since, however, these things are taught, we must discuss them. Then we must fight to have them removed from the eyes of our children.
I have fought against these things being taught in my local high school. It was a long, difficult battle that I ultimately lost. But I applaud Mr. Barber for shining the light of truth on these things. Perhaps someone else will be motivated to protect the children of their school district.

noelfitz

I am grateful to CL for publishing my critical comment, and to Sean from DU and GG.
I consider the contents of the article are not true.

GG I am grateful for your respectful comments. I hope I have always been respectful in CL.

Mary Kochan

Don’t choke on the sand…

GuitarGramma

Noel — You and I often have different opinions, but you have always treated me with great respect. I appreciate this immensely.

In your most recent comment you said, “I consider the contents of the article are not true.” Oh, Noel, I wish you were right. But I have files full of egregious examples of what is taught in sex education; the article only begins to scratch the surface of the sexual indoctrination which takes place in the name of “education.”
I’ll give you one example. A course I reviewed — and which was almost adopted by my local school district — defined breast feeding as sexual activity between mother and child. Unbelievable, I know. But the point of the curriculum was to teach students that there are all sorts of “sexual activity” and that they merely needed to choose the ones in which they would participate.

I wish that every parent in America would experience the distate you felt when they review their students’ sex ed materials. I know for a fact, however, that very few even bother to glance at modern sex ed curricula. Those of us who do, and who in turn try to raise public awareness, are branded as repressive religious fanatics, and worse. I still carry the wounds from the very public insults I was dealt when I took on the “sex ed” battle.

Mind boggled

GuitarGramma, you poor poor thing. Such a lost little lamb you are. None of what you rail against actually occurs in our classrooms. I have been both an elementary and a high school nurse and never have nurses in schools been given the directive to teach breast feeding as a sexual act. You need your mind washed out with soap. Your neural pathways seem to have become disconnected from reality.