The crux of Tom Bearden's published work, ultimately,
is to reveal that the current 'energy' system is and has been deliberately
flawed and curtailed preventing the acquisition of using 'free and abundant'
sources of energy freely from the 'vacuum of space-time.' Most people presume
that 'energy' is 'created' by the power companies and then transferred
along a grid line directly into your homes and places of business. Nothing
could be further from the truth, and, because it is true, has been deliberately
hidden from the general public, academia, and our current electrical engineering
schools.

Tom Bearden explains: The real problem is, of all things,
the sadly flawed old electrical engineering model. That horrible model
used today was put together by Oliver Heaviside and others in the 1880s
after James Clerk Maxwell was already dead (in 1879). Today it is actually
Heaviside's highly reduced vector equations, further severely reduced by
Lorentz in 1892 and in 1900. Most EE's have never even seen Maxwell's actual
theory (in quaternion-like mathematics) of 20 equations in 20 unknowns.
They are lied to and told they are studying "Maxwell's theory",
which actually is not taught in any of our universities.

[Maxwell's theory is in J. C. Maxwell, "A Dynamical
Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," Royal Society Transactions,
Vol. CLV, 1865, p 459. Read Dec. 8, 1864. Also in The Scientific Papers
of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols. bound as one, edited by W. D. Niven, Dover,
New York, 1952, Vol. 1, p. 526-597. In this later papers collection, two
errata are given on the unnumbered page prior to page 1 of Vol. 1. In
this paper, Maxwell presents his seminal theory of electromagnetism, containing
20 equations in 20 unknowns. His general equations of the electromagnetic
field are given in Part III, General Equations of the Electromagnetic Field,
p. 554-564. On p. 561, he lists his 20 variables. On p. 562, he summarizes
the different subjects of the 20 equations, being three equations each
for magnetic force, electric currents, electromotive force, electric elasticity,
electric resistance, total currents; and one equation each for free electricity
and continuity. In the paper, Maxwell adopts the approach of first arriving
at the laws of induction and then deducing the mechanical attractions and
repulsions.]

http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/103001.htm

http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Fact_Sheets/Fact%

20Sheet%20-%20Source%20Charge%20Problem10.doc

The suppression of Nikola Tesla - who, among other things,
planned to give free "energy from space" to the world - began
in earnest in the 1890s, being directed by some of the most powerful men
and organizations on earth at the time. And as J. P. Morgan remarked, "You
can't put a meter on that!" (Tesla's free EM energy from space). Thus
Tesla had to go. He was fairly easily suppressed by simply cutting down,
and then cutting off, his funding. As is known, Tesla did in fact later
power an automobile directly with "energy from space". His nephew
who rode in the car with him, was still alive the last time I checked.

Any system freely taking and using excess EM "energy
from space" to power itself or to produce more power in the loads
than the operator himself inputs and pays for, is an asymmetric

Maxwellian system a priori. As is known today since 1957,
any dipole is a broken symmetry - and that means that "something formerly
nonobservable (virtual) becomes observable". Any charge is also a
dipole, since it polarizes its surrounding virtual state vacuum with opposite
charge. Then it takes (absorbs) virtual state EM energy from that seething
virtual state vacuum medium, and re-emits it as real, observable EM energy
(real photons) in all directions."

Borrowing work previously done by Lorenz (without the
"t"), Lorentz (with the "t") further symmetrized the
already sharply curtailed Heaviside vector equations in 1892, thereby arbitrarily
discarding all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems. Nature did not and does
not discard them. Lorentz did, and all EE departments, professors, and
textbooks still blindly discard them to this very day by continuing to
teach only the symmetrize Heaviside-Lorentz equations.

So that symmetrization neatly discards all those Maxwellian
systems that could be built, and that would freely take excess energy from
the vacuum and use it to power or help power the loads. In short, it discards
all the COP>1.0 EFTV Maxwellian systems. Our electrical engineers are
taught to think, conceive, design, build, and deploy only symmetrical systems
that deliberately kill their own source of freely flowing EM energy from
the vacuum, faster than they can use a bit of that energy to power the
loads.

Think about it: circuits and current flow were deliberately
designed to 'kill the flow of energy' period, necessitating, the continuous
use of 'power generation' instead of relying upon the actual source of
all 'energy.' The truth of the matter is, that, 'energy can neither be
created or destroyed,' all that really takes place is the 'change in form
of energy.' What the so-called 'power generator' does is to create a 'dipole'
(- and +) enabling the flow of energy to commence from its source the 'vacuum
of space-time.'

Tom Bearden explains: So we have to keep cranking the
shaft of the generator - not to power the loads, but to keep restoring
the source dipole inside the generator itself. Cranking the generator shaft
has nothing to do with furnishing the EM energy flow pouring from the generator
terminals and out into space along the conductors of the external circuit.
That out-flowing EM energy comes from the broken symmetry of the opposite
charges inside the generator - the

asymmetry of the source dipole - once the charges are
forced apart. The so-called "static" field or potential from
any dipolarity is comprised of a steady flow of real photons, whose energy
has been directly extracted from the seething virtual state vacuum by the
asymmetry of that dipole. Lee and Yang got the Nobel Prize in 1957 for
predicting broken symmetry - which was a giant revolution in physics. And,
quoting Nobelist Lee:

".the discoveries made in 1957 established not only
right-left asymmetry, but also the asymmetry between the positive and negative
signs of electric charge." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction
to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New York, and London,
1981, p. 184].

Think about it: What T. D. Lee discovered was that real
'energy' was asymmetric and thus 'virtual' and therefore nonobservable
in form and substance. Energy only becomes symmetric and thus observable
in our dimension when it becomes 'observable' as 'charge.' Again, quoting
Tom Bearden, " Any charge is also a dipole, since it polarizes its
surrounding virtual state vacuum with opposite charge. Then it takes (absorbs)
virtual state EM energy from that seething virtual state vacuum medium,
and re-emits it as real, observable EM energy (real photons) in all directions."

Again, T. D. Lee explains: "Since nonobservables
imply symmetry, any discovery of asymmetry must imply some observable.
The experiment of Wu, Ambler, Hayward, Hoppes and Hudson. established the
asymmetry between the positive and negative signs of electricity."
[T. D. Lee, Symmetries, Asymmetries, and the World of Particles, U. Wash.
Press, Seattle, 1988, p. 11]. And also clarifies: ".the violation
of symmetry arises whenever what was thought to be a non-observable turns
out to be [now] actually an observable." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics
and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New
York, and London, 1981, p. 181].

Thus we now know that, the vacuum can indeed be "engineered"
to form energy structures and dynamics, by forming those energy structures
as dynamic forces in matter, then removing the interacting matter.

In the 50 years since the discovery of broken symmetry
and the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang for having predicted this
great revolution in physics, the implications of broken symmetry of the
source dipolarity inside the electrical power generator has not made it
across the university campus from the physics department to the EE department.
Most EEs still do not understand the difference between symmetry and asymmetry.
As Nobelist Lee points out, when you have a broken symmetry you have the
case where something virtual has become observable. In short, the broken
symmetry of the source dipole (separated opposite charges) inside every
generator and battery already freely absorbs virtual energy from the seething
vacuum, integrates it coherently to quantum level, and remits the energy
as real, observable EM energy. So any "source" dipolarity - including
any "isolated" charge and its associated vacuum polarization
- unceasingly pours out real, usable EM energy in the form of observable
photons.

And it extracts all that energy directly from its virtual
state vacuum interaction. All charges and dipoles in the universe do this,
and they have done it since their creation some 14 or so billion years
ago. Once formed, if the source dipole is left alone and intact, and not
destroyed, it will continue to pour out real, free, usable EM energy till
the end of time.

The reality is that, there is no "energy" crisis
and there never has been. There is an "energy from fuel" crisis
because our electrical engineers deliberately use only symmetrical interception
and collection circuits that destroy their source dipoles (and their free
flow of energy from the vacuum) faster than they use some of it to power
the loads. So we have to keep consuming fuel etc., in order to keep restoring
the dipole (- and +). There is a fuel crisis hence there is an "energy
from fuel" crisis!

That is why we have to keep cranking the shaft of the
generator - not to power the grid and the loads, but to keep restoring
the source dipolarity (- and +) inside the generator, that the completely
inane symmetrical systems built by our EEs continually destroy faster than
they power their loads.