Originally posted by schuyler
AB, is your software capable of ANY date and place? I used to have a program much like that a couple of computers ago that's gone now. I used it when
checking up on Graham Hancock's theory that the pyramids aligned with Orion 12,000 years ago. If yours goes back that far I'll dig up the coordinates.
It might provide an interesting cross-check.

I have a different app that goes back to 9999BCE and can do lat and long coordinates. Feel free to U2U the information and I'll see what I can do.
I'm interested in whether or not that theory works too! - AB

By looking at the stars, an Egyptologist claims to have found a new way to date the pyramids of Giza and other ancient sites. According to her
calculations, construction on the Great Pyramid started about 75 years later than the currently accepted date. If she's right, Egyptologists may have
to rewrite their timelines. One of the many mysteries of the pyramids is how and why each was built with a precise north-south alignment. The square
base of the Great Pyramid of Cheops, for instance, is just 3.4 arcminutes off of true north. That's a precision of about 1 millimeter per meter. Some
of the later pyramids, however, deviate more, as if their architects' method for aligning them became less accurate over time. Suspecting that the
heavens might have played a role, Egyptologist Karen Spence of the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, tested whether two stars called Kochab and
Mizar could account for the pyramids' orientation. In the middle of the third millennium B.C., the north celestial pole lay halfway between those two
stars--at least in 2467. Before and after that date, a slow shift in Earth's axis skewed the alignment of the two stars with the celestial pole ever
so slightly. According to Spence, this drift accounts for the change in pyramid orientation over the years. Using the locations of Kochab and Mizar,
she determined the start of construction of the pyramids to within 5 years, she reports in the 16 November issue of Nature. "Egyptologists are now
faced with the challenge of fitting these new dates in their chronologies," says Maarten Raven of the National Museum of Antiquities in Leiden, the
Netherlands. He was surprised by the originality of the idea and is "convinced by its simplicity." But he says that more accurate measurements of
pyramid orientations are needed to confirm the theory.

Philip Coppens was their researcher and he's got a great article with further details:

In 1997, two British authors, Clive Prince and Lynn Picknett, were searching for new material that would hold the promise of a new scoop. Clive
Prince had always been interested in a little-known episode in the history of, yes, what? UFOlogy? Para-psychological research? Government black
budgets? The episode involved the so-called Council of Nine, allegedly a group of nine extraterrestrial beings that claimed to be the original Nine
Creator Gods of Egypt, reporting into the Creator God Atum. Extra-terrestrials posing as gods – or perceived as gods by us, earthlings. This was the
same premise as that of the movie Stargate and hence the title of the publication was called The Stargate Conspiracy. In the end, the authors
concluded that from 1950-ish onwards, a small group of people had been working on an agenda to persuade Western civilisation that the Council of Nine
were genuine extra-terrestrial beings, which had been responsible for the creation of the Egyptian civilisation, and which were still “out there”
now. The goal of this agenda? To cultivate us into believing this “myth”.

At least a de facto Scientologist if he's a "trained" remote viewer as yourself. What a mind-boffing they give to folk, eh?

Puthoff, Price, Swann and several others in the SRI team shared the same explanation for "remote viewing". They were convinced that remote
viewers were leaving their bodies and travelling to the locations they were describing. They held in common a jargon phrase for this -
"exteriorization with full perception". The phrase was originated by a man whom most of the team referred to as the "Source", the "Founder" or
even the "Commodore".

But the Commodore was not a member of the U.S. Navy. He had given himself the title when he formed his own paramilitary "Sea Organization" in 1967.
The Commodore was none other than the creator of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard.

In Scientology, Puthoff and Swann had both navigated through the many levels of "processing" and indoctrination leading to the secret courses which
supposedly convey supernatural powers on adherents. Hubbard promised that graduates of these courses would be able to leave their bodies at will and
perceive remote events. Through the secret levels, Scientologists would be able to use willpower to control events and the minds of other people.

Both Puthoff and Swann have attested completion of the secret level called Operating Thetan section three written by Hubbard.

Curiously, although Scientology claims to be a system for achieving supernatural powers, its controlling agency, the Guardian's Office, did not house
a remote viewing section. The Guardian's Office used more tangible means of surveillance and operational technique. home.snafu.de...

Do you have as much respect for "Commodore" Hubbard as you do Greer? Cut from the same cloth those two...only Greer's a light-weight bamboozler
compared to L. Ron Hubbard.

One of the early experiments, lauded by proponents as having improved the methodology of remote viewing testing and as raising future experimental
standards, was criticized as leaking information to the participants by inadvertently leaving clues. Some later experiments had negative results when
these clues were eliminated… en.wikipedia.org...

Not to change the subject -- but c'mon people let's get off the "ancient astronaut" CIA bandwagon.

Not to change the subject, which you did in spades, but we're not ON any ancient astronaut CIA bandwagon. One wonders why you would use such rhetoric
anyway. Hancock himself does not invoke ancient astronauts in his writings, and he certainly does not invoke the CIA. Why would you possible bring
either phrase up? It's nonsensical.

We're talking about calibrating a technique and, if anything, checking up on claims, Hancock's as well. We're doing this precisely because we're
interested in checking up and corroborating evidence and not just accepting something at face value just because someone says it's true.

Meanwhile, I'm interested in this type of software and I don't really care two hoots about Hancock. If you want to diss on Hancock, go start a thread
on him. This thread is about Greer. Thanks, AB, for your work on the issue.

Ah c'mon people -- you were referencing ancient aliens and the star alignment of the pyramids. Graham Hancock promotes that theory. I gave numerous
vids outing the promotion of that theory as CIA propaganda. Of course Hancock doesn't discuss the CIA -- that's the whole point!

Peter Levenda has a great talk here on more of the "behind the scene" spooks behind the ufology scene but also tied into secret society esoteric
philosophy and conspiracies.

So yeah this is a thread about Greer -- but Greer is part of this old "extraterrestrial invasion" meme that is promoted by the CIA as
disinformation.

So I'm just pointing out that people can be against Greer's cult without realizing it's just the symptom of a larger structural issue -- the CIA
Freemasonic creation of ufology's extraterrestivial invasion - ancient astronaut lies.

So yeah this is a thread about Greer -- but Greer is part of this old "extraterrestrial invasion" meme that is promoted by the CIA as
disinformation. So I'm just pointing out that people can be against Greer's cult without realizing it's just the symptom of a larger structural
issue -- the CIA Freemasonic creation of ufology's extraterrestivial invasion - ancient astronaut lies.

Greer is the mouthpiece, a frontman, a puppet for the Freemasonic infiltrated CIA?

Schwaller de Lubicz, the Godfather of Egyptology (Graham Hancock, etc.), a subject key to Puharich’s Council of Nine and the Freemasonic
“music logarithmic spiral,” was also a leader in the synarchist movement. “One of Schwaller de Lubicz's 'Watchers' was Vivien Postel du Mas,
the man who wrote the Synarchist Pact of the 1930s. Through du Mas, Schwaller de Lubicz had a particular influence on Hitler's Deputy, the tormented
and complex Rudolf Hess.”332 As Prince and Picknett note the S.R.I., tied to the CIA and Freemasonry, was a main funder of Egyptology.

332 “Against Synarchy - The Rise of the Rough Beast,” Adapted from a lecture by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince
at the Saunière Society Symposium, Conway Hall, London on 19 September 1999.

“In 1975, despite NASA’s apparent indifference, Hurtak predicted that further finds of similar structures, including a Sphinx-like monument,
would be made on Mars and that they would all prove to be connected in a great cosmic blueprint to the Giza monuments in Egypt.”336 Hurtak is the
top disciple of Dr.
Andrija Puharich.

336 Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind
(Random House, Inc., 1997)

Hurtak's real agenda has been exposed in the article by Carol S. Matthews, “The Master Race and the Family of Light: Conflict, Spiritual
Purification and Bio-Political Agendas in JJ Hurtak's 'Book of Knowledge',” – anti-Muslism racism repackaged as the extraterrestrial “dark
forces” in the New Age community. 338

I actually met Graham Hancock in 1997-98 at a Fortean conference and he gave a talk stating we should use a nuclear weapon to stop a comet from
hitting Earth! I pointed out that if the nuclear weapon detonated near our atmosphere the radiation would give every one on Earth deadly cancer. I
mean I didn't spell it out but I said -- wasn't that defeating the purpose?

I'm citing myself by the way -- I have a free online book that I link in my Devil's Chord thread.

I'm not saying Greer works for the CIA -- if you look at my earlier posts in this thread I give the links to the solid proof that the CIA has
promoted the e.t. invasion. I'm just saying Greer has "rode the wave" so to speak -- he's been a part of this CIA disinformation because the CIA
controls the media and so clears the path so to speak for this bogus mind control e.t. invasion ancient alien fascist propaganda.

Of course Greer claims he's a victim of the CIA but has tried to contact them but then the CIA director got assassinated because of Greer making
contact and various other b.s. that people eat up like ice cream. haha.

I'm not saying Greer works for the CIA -- if you look at my earlier posts in this thread I give the links to the solid proof that the CIA has
promoted the e.t. invasion. I'm just saying Greer has "rode the wave" so to speak -- he's been a part of this CIA disinformation because the CIA
controls the media and so clears the path so to speak for this bogus mind control e.t. invasion ancient alien fascist propaganda.

Of course Greer claims he's a victim of the CIA but has tried to contact them but then the CIA director got assassinated because of Greer making
contact and various other b.s. that people eat up like ice cream. haha.

I'm not saying Greer works for the CIA -- if you look at my earlier posts in this thread I give the links to the solid proof that the CIA has
promoted the e.t. invasion. I'm just saying Greer has "rode the wave" so to speak -- he's been a part of this CIA disinformation because the CIA
controls the media and so clears the path so to speak for this bogus mind control e.t. invasion ancient alien fascist propaganda.

I read "Greer fronts for the CIA"; appreciate you clearing this matter. For argument's sake, not that I buy into the theory, Greer could very well
work for an intelligence agency (American) but my spec would not be the CIA.

What you consider proof that the CIA has backofficed the ET invasion lore is for you to determine. Again, I read your statement to mean the CIA solely
initiated, promoted, harvested and control(led) the ET invasion situation dates past and present. Frankly, I find this difficult to digest.

Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Of course Greer claims he's a victim of the CIA but has tried to contact them but then the CIA director got assassinated because of Greer making
contact and various other b.s. that people eat up like ice cream. haha.

Ha ha what? Greer has an opinion, you have one, why is his less important than yours?

I actually met Graham Hancock in 1997-98 at a Fortean conference and he gave a talk stating we should use a nuclear weapon to stop a comet from
hitting Earth! I pointed out that if the nuclear weapon detonated near our atmosphere the radiation would give every one on Earth deadly cancer. I
mean I didn't spell it out but I said -- wasn't that defeating the purpose?

Isn't it perfectly debatable whether the strike or the fallout is the worst case scenario?

Ah c'mon people -- you were referencing ancient aliens and the star alignment of the pyramids.

No, we weren't. We were referencing computer software's ability to help in a contemporary investigation.

So yeah this is a thread about Greer -- but Greer is part of this old "extraterrestrial invasion" meme that is promoted by the CIA as
disinformation. So I'm just pointing out that people can be against Greer's cult without realizing it's just the symptom of a larger structural issue
-- the CIA Freemasonic creation of ufology's extraterrestivial invasion - ancient astronaut lies.

Actually Greer is completely against this meme. He maintains the CIA is, indeed, setting up an invasion scenario--with the help of Hollywood--to
brainwash the masses (having conveniently forgotten "aliens are fuzzy" films like ET and Close Encounters) and basically makes the same accusations
you do.

Greer is completely New Age when it comes to aliens and the future. All aliens are peaceful (or we wouldn't be around to debate it) and we're about to
enter 500,000 year period of peace and prosperity and free energy if only we could get rid of the nefarious Shadow Government.

I actually met Graham Hancock in 1997-98 at a Fortean conference and he gave a talk stating we should use a nuclear weapon to stop a comet from
hitting Earth! I pointed out that if the nuclear weapon detonated near our atmosphere the radiation would give every one on Earth deadly cancer. I
mean I didn't spell it out but I said -- wasn't that defeating the purpose?

I'm citing myself by the way -- I have a free online book that I link in my Devil's Chord thread.

You seem fixated on Hancock. Why not strart a thread about all your great work, then? Why do you insist on crashing this thread with your Hancock
stuff? It's irrelevant and off topic.

And you're citing yourself. How convenient. Isn't there something in T&C against self-promotion?

Schwaller de Lubicz, the Godfather of Egyptology (Graham Hancock, etc.), a subject key to Puharich’s Council of Nine and the Freemasonic
“music logarithmic spiral,” was also a leader in the synarchist movement. “One of Schwaller de Lubicz's 'Watchers' was Vivien Postel du Mas,
the man who wrote the Synarchist Pact of the 1930s. Through du Mas, Schwaller de Lubicz had a particular influence on Hitler's Deputy, the tormented
and complex Rudolf Hess.”332 As Prince and Picknett note the S.R.I., tied to the CIA and Freemasonry, was a main funder of Egyptology.

Interesting take on Hancock.

Do I read this accurately, that Hancock is aligned with common Egyptology?
Recently finished a Prince and Hancock Stench Of Truth vid/audio FYI

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.