You are here

DEUTSCHE WELLE, GERMANY'S INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC BROADCASTER, was founded in 1953 with the mission to convey Germany as a “liberal, democratic state based on the rule of law.” In this capacity, it commonly puts out false and/or misleading statements when covering the subject of the “Holocaust.”

It's latest online article on Ursula Haverbeck (right, appearing in court in 2017) is a good case to study. Titled “Appeal postponed again in 'Nazi Grandma' Holocaust denial case,” the article contains several errors or falsehoods that can be imputed to DW policy. The first is this sentence:

Under German law, denial of the Holocaust — in which 6 million Jews were murdered by the Nazis — constitutes incitement of racial hatred.

In truth, it has never been proven that 6 million Jews were murdered by the Nazis. In fact, it has been shown that this could not possibly have been the case. The 6 million number comes from the Soviets at the International Military Tribunals held as “war crimes” trials in Nuremberg, Germany immediately after the war. The normal Anglo-American judicial rules of evidence were suspended to accommodate the Russians who had already worked out the story they wanted to establish. So the Six Million is a myth that continues to be perpetuated and the Federal Republic of Germany is legally committed to it by it's founding and subsequent agreements.

In addition, it has not been proven that even one Jew was intentionally “murdered” by the Nazis as opposed to dying from disease, assorted stresses or even neglect. Being killed or even executed for cause in the line of battle is not murder. Hearsay and so-called survivor tales are not proof.

As far as real evidence ever existing for this myth—it doesn't. Yet notice the sentence I quoted said “the Holocaust” is something [a story] which holds that 6 million Jews were murdered, and under German law it is considered “incitement” to deny that story and therefore a crime. It doesn't actually hold that it has to be true, but only that this is German law. This is where the saying actually spoken in court by a German jurist comes: Truth is No Defense. It is why arguments based on evidence or lack thereof can be dis-allowed in court; they are irrelevant to the law.

I knew that Frau Haverbeck is too knowlegeable to say that Auschwitz was not a concentration camp. What she actually said in her letter was that "Auschwitz was nothing more than a labor camp", in opposition to the official claim that it was an extermination camp, or a “death camp.” DW totally misrepresents her by implying that by saying it was only a labor camp, she denied it was a concentration camp. She did not.

In August, she was sentenced to two years in prison as a consequence. At the trial, she spoke of an "Auschwitz lie," claiming it was not an extermination camp, but merely a labor camp.

But on Nov. 23 they botched it again, I think on purpose:

Haverbeck fell foul of the law in the German capital by speaking at a public event in January 2016, when she claimed that gas chambers and the Auschwitz concentration camp "were not real."

Unfortunately, DW doesn't allow for comments to their articles—not very democratic of them. They don't want their egregious substitution of “extermination” with “concentration,” done to make the highly intelligent Haverbeck seem like a mad old lady, to be brought to the public's notice.

This article was accompanied with a picture slide show by (((Max Zander & Ille Simon))) that was also filled with errors. I will point them out:

Image 1 of the Wannsee House - ... on January 20, 1942 to plan what became known as the "Final Solution," the deportation and extermination of all Jews in German-occupied territory.

Even in the forged minutes of this meeting, 'extermination' was not mentioned, only deportation. The words 'Final Solution' were also not spoken.

Image 2 of Dachau - … Just a few weeks after Adolf Hitler came to power, [Dauchau concentration camp] was used by the paramilitary SS "Schutzstaffel" to imprison, torture and kill political opponents to the regime.

An outright lie. Major political opponents were put in Dachau to keep them from making mischief in society. They were not tortured or killed, but were well-treated and were released at various times, some not until 1945. The same was done in Britain and the USA – and notoriously in the USSR.

Image 4 of Bergen-Belsen - One of the 50,000 killedhere was Anne Frank …

Anne Frank was not killed, she died from a typhus epidemic, as did the others, and I really don't think it was a toll of 50,000 either. Bergen-Belsen was a high-level camp until it became overcrowded with camp inmates transferred from the East in 1945 and the infrastructure was destroyed by Allied bombing.

Image 6 of Hadamar Euthanasia Center - From 1941 people with physical and mental disabilities were killed at a psychiatric hospital in Hadamar in Hesse. Declared "undesirables" by the Nazis, some 15,000 people were murdered here …

This is mixed-up language about a complex subject in which words are attributed wrongly on purpose. Anyone who was euthanized had far more severe problems than a simple “disability,” nor could they simply be declared “undesirable.” There is no proof at all that “15,000 were murdered there,” it is speculation. There is no link between Eugenics and Euthanasia. The image shown has no connection to a euthanasia program.

Image 8 - ... the thousands of homosexuals persecuted by the Nazis between 1933 and 1945.

Homosexuality in itself was not illegal. It was discouraged but only public exhibitionism was against the law. Homosexuals were not bothered if they did not draw attention to themselves. Today in Germany, homosexuality is celebrated and we are expected to accept it as normal and natural.

Image 9 - ... the 500,000 Sinti and Roma people killed by the Nazi regime.

The number who died during that time, of mainly natural causes, was around 20,000, but the Roma themselves, inspired by the Jews, have tried to claim as much as 2 million.

So we see how DW scrambles the facts in order to deceive the public and deny the truth about the "Jewish Holocaust." It is assisting the Jews, both in its own country and in Israel, in the theft of German resources, including even their own land. This deeply entrenched deceit must be studied carefully and exposed. DW is part of the big globalization scheme, and that should not be forgotten.

Comments

There is vid on Youtube titled "Heidentum und Christentum"(Paganism and Christianity) presented by Mr Bernhard Schaub where Frau Haverbeck appears for a few minutes. Basically they lash out at Christianity showcasing its incompatibility with Germanism.

Since the end of the war Germany has been mostly ruled by Merkel's party, the conservativy Christian Democratic Union, which has been doing an excellent job of genociding the Germans and Europeans in general. It was the CDU that invented the "concept" of guestworkers to start flooding Germany with foreigners.

During Nazi rule Christianity was fading away and would eventually disappear. After Germany's defeat the nation-wrecking Christians knew their hour had come and since then they have almost reached their ultimate goal of irreversibly mongrelising Germany.

Deutsche Welle has a feedback page. I wrote an angry email calling Deutsche Welle out on its falsehoods against Ursula Haverbeck and the article itself, thanks to your detailed, incisive article, Carolyn.

It's incredible, "Holocaust denier" became a new "crime", and one of the worst !!.
The holocaust fable was, is, and will still be a formidable tool for the zionists, both economically and politically
The sad truth is that Germany is NOT a free country since they lost WW2, and I wonder when it will be again...

Thank you for your valuable education about the destructive Holocaust blame cult. I am German and must shut up like all other "Holocaust deniers" in the colorful BRD (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) if I do not want to suffer a fate like Ursula Haverbeck or Horst Mahler, who sitting in jail (again) because of "wrong thoughts".

Especially in Germany it is not possible to talk freely about the "Holocaust", which is why every critical article dealing with the "obvious fact" is a ray of light.Therefore, I intend to first translate your current article about Ursula Haverbeck into German and maybe even more.

I'm very happy to hear from someone like you and thus make more people aware if how the German people are suffering. There needs to be more concern among other White folk (and certainly among people of German heritage around the world) for the terrible censorship enforced in Germany. We could all let our consulates and embassies around the world know that we don't approve of it.

A German court in Detmold has sentenced Holocaust denier Ursula Haverbeck to 14 months in prison, after the 89-year-old woman lost her appeal to a prior conviction on Tuesday. However, four months were shaved off her original conviction of 18 months. Prosecutors wanted the sentence upheld, Haverbeck's lawyers were seeking exoneration.

The Detmold court had initially sentenced Haverbeck to eight months imprisonment in September 2016, after she sent a letter to the town's mayor, Rainer Heller, claiming that Auschwitz was not a concentration camp. (There's that mistake/lie/disinformation again! UH never said such a thing; she said it was not an extermination camp.)

Carolyn,
You are wrong (besides being an idiot). Anne Frank was KILLED even if she died of typhus. If you were to abduct people and lock them in a camp, and feed them contaminated water, it would still be a crime. So get your imbecilic ideas right and get your act together - she was KILLED. The fact that you fail to see that, and see your messed-up logic, shows what a vitriolic and a hateful nazi sympathizer you remain. You are a freaking idiot.

It's too bad you can't disagree with what I've written without calling me names and showing your ugly side.

Anne Frank DIED at Bergen-Belsen of illness. And furthermore:

1. Her father was a criminal who knew the German police were looking to question and probably arrest him for his very real white collar crimes against Germany. So he made his whole family hide out with him in an attic in Amsterdam, making them all law-breakers.

2. When they were discovered, the whole family was deported to Auschwitz, a TRANSIT and Labor camp. They were not "ABDUCTED" but legally arrested for criminal behaviior. None of them were killed! or put in a gas chamber!! while at Auschwitz. Instead, Anne and her sister were sent to the camp for special people where good care had been given. BUT ... because the Jews wanted the Allies to bomb that camp and all the transportation coming and going all over Germany, this very good camp quickly deteriorated, due also to overcrowding from incoming inmates from the East. "Contaminated water" occured because of broken water mains from the bombing and no parts, etc. to fix them.

3. A typhus outbreak took place and Anne succumbed to the disease. This was NOT the intention of the "National-Socialists" or the camp authorities. This was due to the Allied war policy of indiscriminate carpet bombing.

Your 'argument' that the Frank family was "abducted and locked away" doesn't match the facts. The person ultimately responsible for Anne Frank's death is her father Otto, who survived his imprisonment at Auschwitz in a hospital! ... the only one to survive of the family he put in harm's way.

Your responses show what an idiot you are, disconnected from reality. You create your own history books, based on deceit, lies, and nazi propaganda that you should be ashamed of. Anne Frank was murdered, and any suggestion from you that claims otherwise, is a perversion and a disgusting violation of even the basic concepts of human decency. The fact that you claim that Otto Frank was to blame for her death, clearly shows what an idiotic defender of nazism you have become. You cannot distinguish right from wrong any longer, Carolyn, and this is the time when people should seek professional help to have their cognition and mental capabilities checked. I strongly recommend that you do that, because you appear deranged, badly. Shame on you, jerk!

Also, Auschwitz was not a "TRANSIT" camp as you idiotically claim. It was a mass murder machine where so many people died. The fact that you defend crime, does not mean that it did not happen. It just makes you a complicit and defender of genocide. That's who you are. A defender of nazi genocide. I need to gargle with Listerine after writing you, because you make me vomit.

Moishele doesn't know how to discuss the facts or "evidence" of the holocaust in order to defend his views. He doesn't think he needs to defend them ... just saying something is so is enough.

He's only capable of spewing insults. I really think the time of the primacy of the "Holocaust" is coming to an end. And all those White leaders (whom I have named here on my website) who caved in to the Jews and the Allied war propaganda, self-serving narrative will have egg on their face, and mud on their names.

The insults and desperation of Moishele (oh, what a name!) at defending his or her stance about the holohoax are the kind of reactions one could expect from these people who are possesed by the lies they have been fed all of their lives, it is easier to make people believe a lie, no matter how outrageous the lie may be, than to convince them that they've been lied to.
Good job, Carolyn, hugs all the way from Argentina.