This kind of behavior, this failure of government to regulate, this collapse in our government's duty to protect us, is symptomatic of the progress of UN Agenda 21. A collapsed economy in a developed nation furthers the goals of UN Agenda 21 to create dependence on government subsidies and mega-corporations. Private property ownership was turned upside down. Small businesses were destroyed. Pensions were lost. Jobs were lost. Homes were lost. Families were lost. THIS IS THE PLAN.

Read this and then talk about UN Agenda 21 with your friends, family, colleagues---YOU CAN DO IT. REFUSE TO BE MANIPULATED. FREEZE THIS MOMENT IN YOUR MIND AND LEARN.THIS IS WHAT UN AGENDA 21 LOOKS LIKE.

From our friend Debbie Bacigalupi---she traveled to Atlanta and got a photo of Ted Turner's portrait in the lobby of his office building. It's a revealing look at the mind of a globalist. We've searched the internet and haven't found this anywhere.

Here's Debbie's comment:Painting of Depopulation Terrible Ted Turner in the lobby of his Captain Planet, Turner Foundation, Ted Restaurant, Turner Building with his residence at the top looking at CNN Center (another Ted Turner property).

Location: 133 LUCKIE Street Atlanta. UNLUCKY if you ask me.

Below is my FB post ... but I see I missed some detail... like how his backside is reddish...like burning....and the UN flag pole goes straight to his brain. Is his green jacket supposed to represent the Amazon...is there a monkey in his sleeve just below the sailboat in his chest? It's hard to tell. On his shoulder, is that some kind of military symbol? See how the sail boat kind of makes a tie for his chest? Why does his hand look so funny? What else is there?

Facebook post:

THIS PICTURE SAYS IT ALL and I've never seen it before!! The way the security guard treated me for taking it also says it all!! Check out the details:

+You can see the UN and Global Governance is clearly at the center of Ted's eye.+Ted obviously views himself as some god-like figure over the world.+Ted sees himself as presidential at the same time.+In his face in the clouds, you can see on the right hand side the outline of North America and South America to represent earth, the globe.+Ted obviously believes in merging the nations as the flags overlap.+In the palm of his hand, the UN and US flagpoles rest … separated but at the top, where he seems omnipresent, the flags merge.+Are those chem trails or vapor trails ???+He's wearing green.

Do you see anything else?

I'm so bummed I didn't get a better shot…The security guard got HOTLANTA mad at me when I took this photo with my cell phone. This photo was in the lobby of his building. At the top of his building, where he lives, are three flags. The one on the far right is a faded United Nations flag.

He is dubbed the largest land owner in America…but he doesn't believe in private property for you and me. Global Governance is clearly at the center of Ted's eye.

#Agenda21

ATLANTA … home of Ted Turner and his conglomerate (CNN, HLN, TBS, Turner Foundation, Captain Planet, Turner University, Turner Athletic Club, one of his many Ted's Restaurants (where he can serve meat and it's not considered global warming) and more).

Blind adherence to a party or an ideology in the face of evidence that it is furthering a suicidal future is madness. So, yes, I am a liberal; Yes, I am a registered Democrat (since 1974); Yes, I realize that parties are a manipulation and distraction; and NO, I do not support President Obama's purported plan to violate the constitution.

In 1992 at the UN Earth Summit in Rio there were two treaties up for ratification: the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Framework Convention on Climate Change. The United States Senate did not approve the Convention on Biological Diversity after seeing that it would restrict human beings into islands of human habitation. Of course that is slowly happening anyway as a result of ICLEI members curcumventing the treaty process. The Framework Convention on Climate Change was signed by G.H.W. Bush and was approved by the Senate in October 1992, but it is considered 'not legally binding' because it does not set emission limits or have enforcement powers in place. There are no 'legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty" that the US agreed to--it simply doesn't exist. Who will be 'compelled' to reduce emissions? The US did not agree to the Kyoto Protocols, which were the follow-up to the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change. Will this 'legal and political magic' ensnare us in a treaty to which we did not agree?

Did the New York Times get it wrong? What's going on? How can the US 'update' an existing treaty? What is the legality of 'updating' a treaty which would effectively change the document to something that had not been agreed to previously? This is an extremely important question that goes far beyond the panic of Climate Change (we must avert disaster, no time to ask questions, you denier, you). Can any President of the United States change any document, amend any agreement, agree to something that requires the consent of Congress without going to Congress? The Congress is YOU.

When the US agrees to a treaty it overrides existing US law.The US Constitution on the subject of treaties:

"Article II: [The President] shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.

"Article VI: This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

Before you get on your high horse about saving the planet look at what is behind the green mask. This is not a left / right issue. This is GLOBALIZATION.

HERE ARE SOME RECENT COMMENTS FROM YOUR ALLIES ACROSS THE WORLD. YOU ARE NOT ALONE. THE RESISTANCE IS GROWING:

MEXICOI want to let you know that here in Loreto, BCS Mexico, where we have a UNESCO marine park, we are about to be merged in a "Sister Park" program with Channel Islands National Park. The environmental organization that I resigned from in disgust almost four years ago is facilitating this and setting the stage for our endgame. Our way of life as a fishing village is at risk now. Yesterday a member of the NGO (eco alianza de Loreto) phoned me in a panic because he has been a big donor and now understands the manipulation. He called me to warn me what's in store for us in the fishing industry here so that I may warn my compañeros. Unfortunately there is very little information in Español available to the people and these treaties and agreements are being made in a language that is NOT spanish. Everything legally binding in Mexico MUST be in spanish, its the law. Here is the link for what I am talking about and after that I am adding the link in español. Notice how the español version is totally lacking information and that most of the pdf that is linked off the spanish page, is in English! http://ecoalianzaloreto.org/newsroom.htmlspanish http://ecoalianzaloreto.org/espanol/noticias.html Right now I am busy working but this afternoon I will bring in one very well respected fisherman and I'll show him what I see from my computer display. He is my neighbor. Then tomorrow I will do the same with another fisherman who is equally well respected. I will give both the translated version of the "delphi method" document (I translated from your website, thank you!). and then we'll take it from there. Thank you for your information and for continuing to fight the fight!

CANADAI am in Calgary Alberta. After I read your book I realized how deep the City of Calgary as well as the small cities and towns surrounding Calgary are involved and already implementing UN Agenda 21. What amazes me is the level of ignorance there is understanding the consequences of its implementation.

ALASKAHello from Alaska, I've read the book cover to cover. The information has inspired me to do more. My recent information gathering and ground work has stirred up growing interest in my good neighbors. They are wanting to do more "now" as group. I've been encouraging them to do as I, and research (gather survey and easement documentation) and be proactive themselves, as to educate themselves prior to engaging anyone out side of our small coffee group. Our rural community has been overwhelmed by ski, bike, and real-estate d groups developing state land and implementing their agenda of smart growth while trying to eradicate our rights to the same state lands. The neighborhood doesn't like it but the community has embraced it? The community council is in the final stages of adopting a "comprehensive plan" developed by the guidance of the Fishook community council board and the Mat-su borough personnel.

CALIFORNIAThis A21 mess is EVERYWHERE! Here in Dublin, they've ripped out the last flat parking areas at our Dublin BART Station and are preparing to slam in more stack and pack housing! There was a TV ad on our cable the other day (all expensive animation) that showed the future of Dublin with stack and pack low rise buildings lining Dublin Blvd as far as you can see. Who paid for that ad? I also met a School Teacher yesterday who teaches in the east bay. The first thing I ask any teacher is how do you like common core. This person rolled their eyes and then said how much they hated it. I then asked if they knew about Agenda 21. They said they'd never heard of it... I told them to get on the internet and get up to speed. I shared your book and info with a friend up in Oregon. They said they'd already "Dieted" their downtown roads for millions of dollars. When they started the project, studies had documented only an average of 10 bicyclists on the inner city roads, a day! At our kids school, one of our teachers told me I was the only parent aware of the origins of CCSS and the poison it was to the future generation of US citizens. (If we're still a country when they graduate) Thank you for all your efforts to stop the A21, and One Bay Area train wreck!

CALIFORNIAWho can I contact in Los Angeles County about attending the Agenda 21 Delphi meetings and working against Agenda 21 in my county? I live in Los Angeles.

BRAZILRosa, I'm watching you on Open Mind Conference in 2013 Denmark, and I must say, you have to come to Brazil, just for a cup of coffee. Everything you say about Agenda 21 explains so much of what I feel here - I live in "nowhere" by the way, outside São Paulo, an hour away - and it is invisible, as Agenda 21 must be. I asked the owner of a local store, here at nowhere, about some seeds he had for sale - where do they come from? Are they Monsanto seeds? Etc, and he said just "Gee, I don't know, we buy them from Agroceres I guess, don't know". No one knows anything and yet everything you say sounds incredibly"Brazilian", or "Neo-Brazilian". No one knows Agenda 21 exists, no one has a clue - and no one cares, but I smell it everywhere. So I wanted to ask you if you know about Agenda 21 in Brazil, at least where I could find real info about it. All I see is "how wonderfull sustainable development is". Imagine, a Brazilian asking an American about information on Brazil. Well, this is typically Brazilian. Brazil, I am quite sure, is the most Agenda 21 obedient country on Earth. I can't prove it but I'm sure of that. This must be the model country - maybe that's why this monstrosity was signed in Rio, no less. I'm a musician and I even did a record called "Agenda 21", a jazz record, but somehow it was put aside by the people at the studio, probably because you know, these conspircay things, not good. Self censorship, auto-indoctrination, obedience, alienation, illusion, fake, common good, you will find all that and much more here in abundance. In fact, every "conspiracy" video I watch and see how much Americans are becoming outraged by what is going on in the US (the police state etc), to me it sounds like "duh, this is how Brazil works since I was born". Which, incidentally, was 1964, not an insignificant year in Brazil's history. Ok, I just felt I had to say something and ask you about Brazil. If you have time, of course. Many many many congratulations on your work, it's truly hero stuff. Bravo. And thank you. In the 80s-90s I started smelling something very wrong happening, some "change", something "new". Working with music for advertising I suddenly had to do "new" stuff, modern, cool, something was changing, people's expressions, new looks, something was in the air, globalization etc, but of course I was only called paranoid and negative. You helped me understand finally what this "change" has been, or at least an important part of it, these global changes that were picked up by my intuition, so thank you very much.

MASSACHUSETTSI'm in Massachusetts probably hopeless down here but any advice or information might be helpful, people look at me like I have two heads when I talk about it

WASHINGTONFirst of all, thank you. I recently joined the city planning commission of my small hometown in the Pacific Northwest. Agenda 21 is alive and voraciously enticing and brainwashing my fellow Americans. I now understand thanks to your book the grand journey I will be undertaking by thwarting the plans of globalist funded, unelected, "regional councils". I hope to be in contact with you in the future and look forward to a bright future.

﻿NEW YORK﻿First of all, let me say thank you for all that you have done, and continue to do to educate people about Agenda 21! I have bought and handed out numerous copies of your book, "Behind the Green Mask."

I live in Wyoming County of western New York State which, unfortuantely, is now home to 308 industrial wind turbines. We were able to stop them from putting up the 2,000+ wind turbines that they originally intended to blanket the entire County with, but it's been a decade long battle! As you well know - useless, sprawling wind factories are part and parcel of Agenda 21 - just a huge land grab geared at driving people out of the countrysides!

I just wanted to update you on what Governor Cuomo is now doing. NY Gov. Cuomo's $Billion Dollar ratepayer-funded 'sun initiative' is in addition to the $Billion Dollar "Green Bank" he already instituted. And all of this following the passage of his "Power NY Act 2011," which removed New York State municipalities long-hel "Home Rule" regarding the siting of energy facilities over 25 MW (obviously designed to aid & abet the siting of sprawling wind factories.) Unfortunately, most politicians are completely energy-illiterate and buy into the "green" BS.

When you're reading these 5 questions and imagining what the 'answers' would be (if anyone answers you) be sure to stretch this to fit situations where you're in the Planning Department of your city, or in a Visioning meeting about changes to the center of your town, or at a Climate Action Plan meeting. Standardization is being blanketed across all elements of our interaction with local government. The following post does not just apply to education and control of students. Continuous assessment of behavior and use applies to energy, law enforcement, business management, land use, government projects, and health care.

In 1996 Anita Hoge devised and distributed widely the following useful tool for parents’ groups to use in testimony before state legislatures and local school boards. The questions reveal the disturbing psychological aspect of assessment testing and curriculum being given to children. It is alarming when one considers that the State has defined the criteria upon which these affective standards will be scored, and assigned a passing or fail grade, and will prescribe remediation in order to get the child to measure up to State-defined par.

These questions are still current and pertinent to Common Core, etc. They serve as an excellent educational tool to equip parents with the right questions they can ask the next time disturbing things begin to happen to their children and their schools. The text of the pamphlet is reproduced below in its entirety:

FIVE MAGIC QUESTIONS ENABLE PARENTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUES

Education regulations or laws state which standards or outcomes your child needs to meet to graduate. Many of the outcomes are vague and subjective. Look at the verbs. This shows why these outcomes are impossible to measure objectively. An example under a category like “Citizenship” states, “All students will negotiate and cooperate with others.” The Five Magic Questions parents can use to win the debate when outcomes reflect subjective or vague areas are:

1. How do you measure that outcome?If an outcome states that “all children must have ethical judgment, honesty, or integrity,” what exactly is going to be measured? How do you measure a bias in a child in order for him to graduate? Must children be diagnosed? Will they be graded by observation or pencil or paper tests? How will performance or behavior be addressed?

2. How is that outcome scored or what is the standard?What behavior is “Appropriate” and to what degree? For example, how much self-esteem is too much or not enough to graduate? Can government score the attitudes and values of its citizens?

3. Who decides what that standard will be? The state has extended their mandated graduation requirements or exit outcomes down to the individual child. This bypasses all local autonomy. What about locally elected school directors? Will they become obsolete? Are we talking about a state or government diploma?

4. How will my child be remediated? What are you going to do to my children to change them from here to there in their attitudes and values in order to graduate? How do you remediate ethical judgment, decision-making, interpersonal skills, environmental attitudes? What techniques will be used? What risks are involved? What justification does the state have to change my children’s attitudes?

5. What if parent and state disagree on the standard or how it is measured in the classroom? Who has the ultimate authority over the child? What about privacy? Can parents opt out of a graduation requirement of the state?

All children must meet the same fixed standard of “future citizen” or not graduate, go to college, or get a job. Your child is human capital. This is why the state wants control of the graduation requirement—and that is why local school boards must create policy to stop the state from exerting power over elected officials. Ask this question: Do you want equity in opportunity, or do you want equity in standards?

Fortune Magazine (Fortune 500/Time, Inc.) published an article yesterday highlighting me and our fight against UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. The article is a nuanced manipulation that lies by omission and half-truths, and slimes by intent. David Morris, the author, brings in ICLEI public relations and the Southern Poverty Law Center to 'balance' the article, and then concludes that Agenda 21 is necessary to save the planet---it 'requires some sacrifices, not all of them made entirely willingly'. The following quote is from our interview; David Morris asked me if I had anything to add.

I guess what I want to ask you, David, is 'How committed you are to representing a particular point of view that's going to marginalize what I've told you?' I'm hoping that you're going to write an article that is genuine and fair...We have something serious going on in our country and around the world and it needs to be dealt with in a serious manner. If the major corporations which own the media are controlling that information we will not be able to get that information out to the people so that they can make these decisions for themselves. So I'm hoping--you have an opportunity here--and I'm really hoping that you're going to use it.

Watch the interview here on YouTube and read the article (click). Judge for yourself how the media operates to manipulate public opinion and block the truth.

The 'guardians of the future' is a mighty important position---one that most of us are unaware of, and to which we don't recall electing anyone from the APA.

"PLANNING IS ABOUT LEADING, INNOVATING AND INSPIRING THE NEXT GENERATION."

A profession that has such a high opinion of itself should be committed to following an ethical road but you'll see that the American Planning Association encourages planners to manipulate outcomes to---what?---protect the plan! They want your info, but only so they can use it to fight you.

"Reach out to groups likely to oppose

Request a meeting with them to listen to concerns and ideas

Do not try to change their minds--collect their input

Encourage them to provide you with materials (books, websites, etc.)

Research local activist websites"

The planners who work in your local planning department or are the consultants hired to craft your local plan (or the 'regional' plan) are members of the American Planning Association. You are paying them. Those who work for your local government are civil servants who expect long term employment with a pension at the end of their term. These planners are advising your local elected officials; your mayor, the planning commissioners, the council people, the county supervisors etc. Most of those elected officials will be in and out of office while the staff stay on for twenty years or more. The staff (the planners) was trained by and uses American Planning Association materials. Staff lives in your town usually. Here's what the APA advises them to do when we come out to tell the truth about their plans:

Build up your base.

Reach out to fans of planning and trusted messengers

Cultivate and prepare key champions and messengers

Educate them about the nature of these attacks

Enlist them to help and respond: Public forums and testimony. Online, social and traditional media

Provide support to elected officials and educate the media

Cultivate influentials who can 'push back' when needed

Coach your elected officials

Innoculate elected officials

And now for the conclusion!

﻿"Planning needs to be reframed as something pivotal to the return of American prosperity and economic strength."﻿

Yes, the APA wants you to know that if it were not for those planners overlaying transit oriented zoning all over your town we'd be doomed to crushing economic collapse forever...as we may well be if they keep overlaying transit oriented zoning all over our towns. And the APA wants us to believe that if we don't think REGIONALLY we're doomed. And the APA wants us to believe that if we don't go along with 'planned future' we'll die.

Now, instead of "planning" go back to the sections in blue and replace the word 'PLANNING' with ... the name of a religion that you might not agree with....and read it again. Do you believe? You need to have faith in Planning. You must trust that the planners are making great communities happen through their collective strength and superior vision. Planners are the leaders of the next generation---they told you so.

Are the planners the holy priests? The guardians of our future? The creators of the grand utopia that we are too stupid to accept without a struggle? The holy seers who redesign our lives and fight us when we foolishly object?BOW DOWN

Are you making charitable contributions? volunteering? Take a look at some of ICLEI's funders and then think about their links to other groups that you may be funding or participating in. Withdraw your support from those who are working against you. If you listen to National Public Radio or watch PBS you'll recognize many of these groups. Ask yourself why the US Department of State and US EPA are funding ICLEI with your taxes? What will you do about it? AT LEAST REFUSE TO GO ALONG.

ICLEI--International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives: FundersFrom the website: iclei.org"Generous Giving. Sustained GrowthICLEI is able to provide best-in-class service to our members and elevate local climate action and sustainability to remarkable levels only through the generous support of the following private foundations, federal agencies and other entities:

It's gone out of fashion to label yourself or others these days, and no wonder. It can be hard to know what your political affiliation is when progressives are socialists, libertarians come in all flavors across the spectrum, and independents try to find their way out of the maze without stepping in anything.

Now you'll get your choice of a Bush or a Clinton again as the game continues. Whoopee, we get to vote for a woman. As a feminist in the 80's I lost my enthusiasm for gender-based voting when Margaret Thatcher took over the UK. Genitalia doesn't guarantee a viewpoint. In fact, voting on that basis is a fool's game. When Hilary ran the last time I said "Who better than a woman to take our rights away?" Well, we saw the answer to that with Obama. The illusion of concern for your rights is all that's necessary when the regime has a 'show Congress' and a fascist game plan. That game plan includes green energy and climate action plans regardless of political party or gender when you're playing 'The Price is Right' with our lives.

Putting on a green mask and promising the green new deal is a sure way to enrich the tech/energy companies and drain ratepayers and taxpayers while ensuring big campaign contributions. Yes, it's loan guarantees for solar farms and wind farms, huge cash grants through production tax credits (over $8 billion dollars by 2012), and over $15 billion in treasury grants for wind. The new green deal stinks like festering slime in an algae encrusted pool.

You're about to see carbon credits used as the new medium of exchange on a personal level---use more than your water allotment? Go to the local water exchange to buy enough credits for your vegetable garden. Meanwhile the huge corporate farms will be making 'donations' to Congress and the environmental groups that are pushing these new green requirements for your future poverty. Artificial scarcity. Loss of independence. Pay more for that power than ever before while using less. Ahh, the joys of the Smart Grid.

What happens while your government partners with the power generators and the huge corporations and the environmental foundations? Your credits can be cut, your allotments can be reduced, your debt will be increased, your options narrowed. Going green. When you're promised something for nothing you'd better do your research and ask the hard questions.

The green mask looks good---that's why it's so appealing. When you look behind it, it doesn't pass the smell test. You'll be up to your ankles in the green pool while holding a live wire. Zap.

IT DOESN'T COME WITH FLASHING LIGHTS AND IT WON'T BE CALLED UN AGENDA 21. BUT IT IS.

Our groups, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21, and Post Sustainability Institute, and I have been label as 'extremists' by the Southern Poverty Law Center for the second year in a row. They have written a report entitled﻿﻿Agenda 21: The UN, Sustainability, and Right-wing Conspiracy Theor﻿y.﻿ Aside from the fact that the SPLC is using the tactics they accuse others of using in order to supplement their huge financials assets (over $250 million) and elicit reactions from those on the left who don't do their own homework, it is important to note that they offer 'briefings' to law enforcement personnel and are members of the American Bar Association. The ethics of labeling a group of law-abiding citizens who are exercising their First Amendment rights as 'extremists' who are 'not necessarily advocating violence' are in serious question here. This is not a 'report,' this is a smear designed to chill our civil rights. WE WILL NOT BE SILENT.

WE ARE LOSING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND YOU MUST ACT TO FIGHT FOR IT. STAND UP NOW. SPEAK OUT NOW. EDUCATE YOURSELF AND OTHERS.

IT IS YOUR DUTY AS A FREE MAN OR WOMAN TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS. NO ONE WILL DO THIS FOR YOU. DO IT NOW, BY REFUSING THE LIES. DO IT BY DIRECTING PEOPLE TO THE TRUTH. DO IT BY HAVING THE COURAGE TO SPEAK OUT. MAKE FLYERS, SPREAD THE TRUTH.

In Nevada, the federal snipers and Bureau of Land Management personnel pulled out when faced with hundreds of armed constitutionalists and many more on the way.

In both cases the dominant government forces have been repelled by the people. In both cases soldiers did not fire on their own people. How long will that last? Regardless of where you come down on these issues, one thing is clear. It won't be a cakewalk. The people will resist.

Regime Change is UN Agenda 21. Anything to destroy the equilibrium of the status quo. Whether it's Arab Spring or Ukraine or the United States, the goal is to gain control of power and direct it to a more technologically controllable outcome. Restricting our access to land, rights to water, property ownership, free speech, assembly, privacy--all is UN Agenda 21.

The Intelligence Project identified 1,096 anti-government “Patriot” groups that were active in 2013.

Generally, Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the “New World Order,” engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing, or advocate or adhere to extreme antigovernment doctrines. Listing here does not imply that the groups themselves advocate or engage in violence or other criminal activities, or are racist.

The list was compiled from field reports, Patriot publications, the Internet, law enforcement sources and news reports."

Democrats Against UN Agenda 21 and the Post Sustainability Institute are, again, on the Southern Poverty Law Center's list of Patriot groups. The criteria for making this list are quite interesting. The SPLC purports to identify hate groups and to advocate for those who are being discriminated against or targeted for violence. The SPLC mainly focuses on skinhead groups and anti-gay groups but they're branching out and including us in their scope. Why?

If you look at what they say above, the criteria for list selection include opposing the New World Order (does SPLC support it?), 'groundless' conspiracy theorizing (SPLC refuses to acknowledge objective reality), and advocating or adhering to 'extreme anti-government doctrines' (like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?).

There was a time in the past when, as gay people, we might have donated to SPLC. About 25% of their website is devoted to fundraising for themselves. They engage in spreading misinformation about UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development and are themselves representing the New World Order by targeting groups who would re-erect the guarantees of the US Constitution. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness extends beyond racial and social lines. Our government exists to protect the individual. Our rights to free speech, to our property, to our privacy---guaranteed by the Constitution. The term 'Patriots,' according to the SPLC, is now under suspicion, and those who question government tactics and object to subversion, manipulation, privacy invasion, and 'transformation' are targeted on their list.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a fraud and a sham. Although they have a disclaimer that they don't imply that we advocate or engage in violence or other criminal activities, or are racist they are fully aware that targeting us on their list may serve to chill our civil rights or turn people against us. They are engaging in their own brand of hate speech. It might help their fundraising but it also shines a light on their bias and willingness to go along to get along with liberty-destroying regimes. The Southern Poverty Law Center purports to have some familiarity with Nazi tactics. Perhaps too much.

And the winner is...

Winners and losers. Guess which one we'll be? Need a hint? 1984. Two wars still going on after over 10 years...Your energy consumption will be controlled until you can't farm, can't manufacture, can't travel, can't fish, can't use your land. Productivity and businesses are limited now.

You've heard that story about Tony Blair asking Angela Merkel how Germany could have such a high GDP when it was such a small country. Merkel snapped at him: We still make things in Germany, Mr. Blair.

NOTE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Articles may be republished as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact. 2010-2015 COPYRIGHT ROSA KOIRE