In Doubles & Disguises, I wrote about the lengths to which intelligence agencies would go to create a double to impersonate another. In addition to creating elaborate disguises, "OTS specialists would ... alter hair color, apply facial hair, modify jaw lines, improvise dental work, create wrinkles, change complexion, or add glasses and warts to match any photographic documents..." [Wallace, Robert and H. Keith Melton. Spycraft. USA: Dutton, 2008 at 387]

I believe that photo-doctoring has been used to further the illusion that Paul McCartney is "still with us" by making Faul look more like Paul and vice versa. The Italian forensic scientists also detected evidence of photo-tampering:

....And the surprises do not end there because the relentless Gavazzeni, like a boxer who feels close the ko [knockout] of the opponent, not the spring taken on the photo where McCartney, unaware, mentions a somewhat smug 'perplexed: "To the naked eye is known what will be a constant in the photos from that moment on, a couple of photo retouching fairly obvious to an expert eye. There is a gray area that covers the outside corner of left eye. Only for some time not seen before. And going to peep at that point, where for years there was one dark spot, now there is a cross between a scar and a sign of skin stretched like an aesthetic touch. The most immediate explanation is that probably, already in the sixties, has been made for an action on the eyes but it is still something imperfect, that for a long time has gone forward a mask. " Then there is a detail concerning the conformation of the skull: "Indeed, the impression is that the shape of the head was given a 'more rounded', Gavazzeni says:" So in the reduced effective length, by a trick used at the time and realized that being printed. Eff[ectively] change the conformation of the skull of an adult is something impossible. Yet, judging from the photos, is exactly what it shows...

[Please support this blog by clicking on our sponsors' links ~ thanks!]

Often, Paul's face has been stretched. Paul's face was quite round, but the double's is longer & thinner. This comp betrays how Paul's face has been elongated to more closely match Faul's:

Comparing the above picture of Paul to an untampered video still of the August 19, 1966 Memphis interview makes it clear that Paul's face was rounder and fuller than the above comp would lead one to believe (left).

There are also composite pictures of Paul & the double. This example seems to be a 1966 picture of Paul that was recycled in 1967. The mustache looks very suspect, as though it were air-brushed in.

This picture is also a composite. If you look closely at the photo, you should see that there is a vertical line down the middle of the face made by the non-matching skin tones on the two sides of the face. If you must, get a magnifying glass to see the line.

If you split the 2 halves apart, you can see that this photo is a composite of 2 different faces - Paul & some mystery person. You should see that the eyes & eyebrows don't match. A pic of Paul from that day is included as a reference to what he really looked like.

When you mirror each half side by side, you get Paul on the left photo, & someone who is definitely not Paul on the right picture.

Who is that mystery man on the right?

This comp shows Paul on the left from 1964. The two right-most pics are both from Sgt. Pepper. Doesn't the one on the far right look like a composite?

This is a variation on a theme. The two end pictures are Faul from Sgt. Pepper. The one in the middle is Paul from the 1966 "Butcher Album." Does it not look like they combined the first two to create "Paul" on the cover of Sgt. Pepper?

The official White Album picture of "Paul" (far right) seems to be a composite of Faul (left) and Paul (middle). Perhaps photo experts used layers to "blend" images of Paul and Faul together to create an image of the impostor that more closely resembled Paul.

Here is another example of an "official" photo of Paul that has been tampered with. It is from the Aug. 19, 1966 Memphis interview [available for purchase here: http://gallery.pictopia.com/memphiscom/gallery/S591993/photo/395357/]

It looks as though the lower half of Faul's head has been put on Paul's head - it's a composite. Look at the eyebrows - they look like somebody's magic-markered them in. Also, the hair is black w/ no highlights - almost like shoe polish. And note the weird "v" where the line of Paul's cheek-crease has been broken by having Faul's face stuck on top of it. The cheek lines do not match up on either side of the face. You can also see that Paul did not have a stubbly face that day (the left image is a screen shot from that interview).

Here is the Memphis interview that day:

I asked Pictopia for an explanation as to why they were selling a doctored photo of Paul McCartney at the Memphis interview. I never received a response.This appears to be a truer representation of how Paul looked that day in Memphis:This picture also has an abrupt break in the cheek line, revealing that it, too, is a composite:

This obviously doctored photo (left) was recently offered as "proof" that Faul's ears are the "same" as Paul's.

Faul's ears do not look like Paul's. That photo above has simply photo-shopped Paul's ear onto Faul's head. Please see Faul's false ears to see examples of what Faul's ears really looked like.

On the "Let It Be" album cover, the images were compressed from top to bottom to make Faul's face look rounder. The beard Faul was sporting also made his face look rounder.

There also appears to be some composite of Paul and Faul on the "Let it Be" cover photo:

Here is an example of someone "faulsifying" Paul to make him more closely resemble Faul. The picture of Paul with the 1960 caption has had the face elongated, and has had other facial features tampered with. The picture to the far right is from 1966 and is a more accurate representation of how Paul really looked.

eatles - Paperback Writer - HQ -

Why would anyone do such a thing as tamper with photos of Paul? It's part of the cover-up. They (whoever "they" may be) are trying to confuse the issue about what Paul really looked like. They are training people to see some other guy as Paul.

This picture of "Paul" on the right was the result of wiping Paul's face out and superimposing Faul's face on it. Paul is on the left.

One can see that Faul's face has been added:

PIA'er Light_man/Dakudo admitted to doctoring the photo. One can only speculate as to his motive for flooding the Internet with faulsified photos of "Paul." Personally, I think it is a strategy to confuse the issue as to what Paul really looked like.Here is another picture in which Faul's face has been pasted on to what was probably a picture of Paul. The face on the left has also obviously been elongated.

This picture on the right purports to be of a young Paul, but it has obviously been Faulsified:

The Illuminati can pull the wool over people's eyes because many people don't have a great eye for detail, and aren't paying attention, anyway. Don't be duped by the double!

47 comments:

here"s another clue for you all" paul did have arounded face also big ears and if you see some picturs of him with a big nose not slim.it's hard to imagin the beatles ever playing together since 1966 look at rolling stones still playing to this day still rolling.thier"s something strange in all that.suddenly am not half the man I used to be. think

hello another clue for you all back in 67? the bee gees song holiday jn one vers they say this Millions of eyes can see yet why am I so blind when that someone else is me it"s unkind it"s unkind.check it out.

hello macca it"s mp? another clue for you all, is back.if people would listen to a taste of honey paul states I will return yes I will return L"ll come back for the honey and you.and one day you'll look to see I"ve gone I"ll follow the sun.he was destin to return perhaps like jesus?//was paul crucifed for you.

just another clue. in the begging the album covers showed the beatles together allways showing their face"es on the album covers. then their covers changed like st peppers a grave. then it was a mistery tour.and their wearing masks' the 3 candles cover.theirs still another one i cant remember. and the white album. and only let it be showed their heads.and of course paul has a bloody back ground.and also the back of the albums did"nt show much.

yes plastic macca yes it is its true.their's a big message in that song. for instance the vers where john sings. I would remember all the things we planed understand it"s true. everybody knows it's true yes it is.their songs in the begging were about someone returning,

thanks macca for posting my comments another clue for you all.the song happy just to dance with you.check the vers/ if somebody try's to take my place lets pretend we just can't see his face. see their are messages in their eary songs. check out at the end of back in the USSR you here they say pauls back.

Plastic macca hears another song take and i love her.I know this love of mine will never die. his spirit.his soul would never die.he has reason to believe that he was destin to return. so I think they may have had something to do with what ever really happen to JPM?

hello PLASTIC MACCA thanks again.for posting everything.check beatles 65 take a look at paul sitting on the stool. he is the only one with his feet of the ground.and he's on the second spindle not the frist. is he trying to tell us something like I"ll be back or I"LL follow the sun.check walls and bridges cover something strange looks like john and yoko as natives on horses john has a gun in the middle of some face looks like the photo of bill in the white album.was jpm shot while he was driving his car?

good morning plastic macca. PS Ilove you. paul said I love you.check the vers.I'll be coming home again to you love.you said you would love me if I have to go.ask me why the chours I can't believe it's happen to me.and now the time has come and so my love I must go.and though I lose a friend in the end you will know.

one more it's been a long time now am coming {back} HOME. I've been away now oh how Ive been alone.I feel as thow you aut to knoww that Ive been good as good as I can be. and if you do I'll trust in you .I know that you will wait for ME.

hi tina it's MP sorry been kind of busy.take a look at the end of help. put it in slow motion and see what they are showing, their left eyes and paul looking left to right check it out in slow motion their something there. /////

sorry forgot something look at the cover and in the end of the movie ,their faces are shaded dark on the right side.look when they go into paul and george they switch 5 times their faces then another 5 times, then 6 times then ends with the back of georges head.

I found another bad Faul photo to put in your photobucket collection. This one actually came at the right time because there has recently been an onslaught of published books with "recently discovered" photos showing horribly doctored instances of Paul. Heck, some of them even look like Faul's head pasted onto Paul's.

Has anyone ever done a forensic age progression on Paul using pre-1966 pure images? It would be interesting to see the results of this in comparision to the Faul today. I remember seeing an image online of Paul and his dad in which he was kneeling down next to his father who was sitting in a lawn chair and reading. Both of their faces were downturned and the similarities were obvious. In viewing this image the thought crossed my mind that Paul would look much like his father at an advanced age. It would be interesting to compare an age progression on Paul to the present day Faul.

Good points and well done. I agree about the poster who said if you're a globalist you're in. They were always saying peace and love world wide of course that I thought was to have a greater audience, but maybe it's deeper then that. I always thought it was weird that they did that. Major talent doesn't dilute into generalizations and accept mediocrity. If they did they wouldn't be who they were.

The Beatles really aged fast; I thought it was from making it on their own which they did, but it could be more from dealing with very adult situations and being asked to work with a foreign situation and all that entails. They sure got awful serious in a very short period of time and aged quickly in that short period of time. Course women like that anyway, it's not like our stars today who look like they haven't even reached puberty.

I really like the observation that they went back and put a beak on Pauls nose through time, etc. The original Paul was such a classic in so many ways including that beautiful nose. Wow, amazing what they did; they sure fooled alot of people.

Check out the movie; Paul McCartney Really is Dead, The Last Testament of George Harrison? http://paulreallyisdead.com/ This will answer a LOT of questions. In it there is an interview with Harrison in 1988 where he says "Faul" instead of Paul FOUR times. Crazy man.

"Paul McCartney Really is Dead, The Last Testament of George Harrison" is (IMO) a disinfo hit piece meant to discredit PID. It is based largely on the 60IF document that has been floating around for years. Grain of salt.

Grain of salt? A fistful, more like. ;)If anybody can, go to your local library and photocopy all the pages in the recently issued People magazine salute to the alleged Paul McCartney. Then, search out the actual photos taken and compare them. I only needed to see the ones they printed and could see the doctoring - I've been blessed with a very keen eye for such things as airbrushing, retouching, cropping and cut & pasting - and the article in magazine I refer to in full of nothing but.

The skull geometry is vastly different between the two. Here is when Faul had just come on the scene and probably hadn't had many surgeries yet to better match the real Paul...

http://i48.tinypic.com/296jitt.gif

It's rather obvious that this isn't the same person...just look at the nose alone...completely different (Faul's is longer and more beakish). A slightly altered camera angle or lens distortion will not cause something like that.

@Anonymous nice try. Tell those MI5 you work for that I am back despite their best efforts. Manson destroyed my body last time before it could be born, thinking that a double-reincarnation would surely wipe all memory of who I was in 1966, knowing what I stood for, and what it meant for their insidious plans. IT DID NOT WORK. I come now with a flaming Sword for them. Watch, now, as this entire system is destroyed. This is about more than a pop group and covering up someones death; the Luciferians have been trying to prevent my birth for centuries. I am Paul. I have always been Paul, and I will always be Paul. I am the One. And SO are YOU.

No wonder so many comments to this posting. The doctoring of old photos of Paul completes the presence of Faul in the attempt to completely eliminate Paul. Paul had a round face and the imposter(s) have an elongated face. So many of us have had the intuition that something was always wrong with Faul, so great that we have talented and focused people that have never forgotten this modern day sorcery perpetrated upon the masses. Thanks to all.

Wow, no wonder I had such a tough time of it once I finally began comparing Paul's photos with 'f'aul's! I guess I really need to get up to speed on exactly how advanced the chicanery has become before ever thinking I'm looking at a real photo of Paul! Thank you for posting the link for this page over on Facebook.

I don't think you mentioned that in the picture with the sunglasses and the seam down the middle they also made his eyes about as assymetrical in height as those of Jason Voorhees and Sloth from The Goonies.

Its interesting to see the way the Economist magazine uses the Sgt Pepper album as a template with symbols etc here is a link to the 2016.. what are they telling us here,,, or 2015,,,, makes one think!I got the picture from google,, i havent read the included article,, just using the pic as an example https://seeker401.wordpress.com/2015/11/24/the-economist-magazine-2016-front-cover/