GOP senator alleges White House cover-up on Libya attack

WASHINGTON — A senior Republican senator on Sunday accused President Barack Obama’s aides of deliberately covering up the details of the Sept. 11 attack in Libya that killed a U.S. ambassador so that voters wouldn’t question Obama’s handling of the war on terror.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a long-time point man for the GOP on national security issues, said he believes the administration knew within 24 hours of the assault that it was a coordinated militia attack and was not tied to other anti-U.S. protests across the Middle East. According to Graham, the administration suggested otherwise so voters wouldn’t think al-Qaida remained a threat.

“They’re trying to sell a narrative, quite frankly, that (the) wars are receding and that al-Qaida has been dismantled,” said Graham, a member of the Senate Armed Services emerging threats and capabilities subcommittee, in an interview on CBS “Face the Nation.”

“And to admit that our embassy was attacked by al-Qaida operatives ... I think undercuts that narrative,” he added.

It was an exceptionally pointed allegation on what has become a major campaign issue. The attack on a U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, which killed four Americans including Ambassador Chris Stevens, has raised questions about whether the State Department denied its embassy staff adequate security to save money and why the White House was slow to label the assault a “terrorist attack.”

Democrats shrugged off the allegations.

“This conspiracy stuff is kind of ridiculous to be honest with you, and I’ve been kind of surprised that they’ve gone to these lengths. But you know that’s what they do,” said Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which is investigating the incident.

The White House declined Sunday to comment on Graham’s allegations. It has said previously that the investigation continues and that officials have relied on information about the attack as it became available.

Five days after the attack, Susan Rice, the US. Ambassador to the United Nations, described the violence as spontaneous and said the administration believed extremists had “hijacked” an anti-U.S. protest over an American-made video ridiculing Islam. Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton also had given credence to the notion that the attack was related to protests.

A CIA memo obtained by The Associated Press cited initial intelligence that supported the assertion. But during last week’s congressional hearing on the matter, the State Department said it had never concluded that the consulate attack stemmed from protests, prompting lawmakers to question why the administration used the explanation for more than a week.

Graham said Sunday that he had been told by intelligence officials in Libya that “within 24 hours they communicated up to Washington that this was a terrorist attack.” Graham did not specify whether that message was relayed to the White House or the State Department, or if that information was kept within the intelligence community.

“Either they’re misleading the American people or incredibly incompetent,” Graham said of the Obama administration. “There was no way with anybody looking at all that you could believe five days after the attack it was based on a riot that never occurred.”

Obama’s senior campaign adviser, David Axelrod, on Sunday refuted allegations that Rice or any other administration deliberately tried to mislead the American public.

“Anyone would have said what she said, because that’s the intelligence we were receiving,” Axelrod said.

The Benghazi attack also has raised questions about whether the State Department had provided adequate security to embassy staff. Democrats blame Republicans for cutting more than $300 million in diplomatic security funds worldwide. Republicans say the State Department could have relied on other discretionary spending accounts to cover costs.

Lawmakers on both sides said Sunday that a supplemental spending measure is being considered. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said he is planning to lead a congressional delegation to various hotspots around the world to ask U.S. diplomatic staff what security concerns they have.

Bloomberg News reported Sunday that Ambassador Stevens’ father said he believes his son’s death is being investigated adequately and that it would be “abhorrent to make this into a campaign issue.”

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for
following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and
comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are
automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some
comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules,
click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.

It's becoming old now. No matter what happens where - here it comes - Obama did something wrong - covered up - he's not 'one of us' - he lies.

Meanwhile the republican congress has the lowest approval rating in history - because they have done NOTHING except complain and obstruct.

At this point they have lost credibility. In their zeal to take back the white house, their tedious accusations are never ending - they refuse to work together for the good of our country.

For every accusation against Obama, an equal accusation of deceipt and shady behavior can be aimed towards republicans. When will it stop?

Obama almost lost my support because he conceded to republicans SO OFTEN when he first took office that he seemed more republican than democrat. Did any of you give him credit THEN for giving the republicans their way? The health care bill was watered down in deference to republicans - THEN the republicans accused him of putting a watered-down bill on the table. Can NONE of you SEE that?

I can SEE when the candidate I support does something of which I don't approve - what IS this puppy-like slobbering loyalty??? Did you give birth to your candidate? If he screws up do you have to save face or something?

Republicans accuse the president of things THEY themselves are doing and people buy into it like it's gospel - and when Obama DOES do something his supporters don't like, instead of adult compromise there's just more of the same - another accusation fest.

There's nothing level-headed or beneficial that can come of this, because IT'S DESIGNED TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER - and God help us, it's working.

......we do have four people dead due to obama's lack of doing his job. The blood is on his hands and it's quite obvious he wanted to sweep it under the rug so no one would realize that all the boasting he's done about "beating back" al Qaeda is all bullcrap. Once more he has failed.

obama NEVER conceded to the Republicans and he didn't "water down" obamacare either. His first two years in office he did whatever he wanted and none of it was good.

The time-line of what information the white house released fits the things that were said. I was absolutely amazed when Romney came out with Obama accusations which were unfounded - even as the crisis was unfolding - before he knew what was going on he turned a national security incident into a campaign speech. Where is the sensitivity in that? What kind of person DOES that?

And still today - by virtue of the fact that there is top secret information of which NONE of us can possibly know - any accusations are still unfounded. Again - did we KNOW the SEALS were on the Obama mission BEFORE the fact? As info becomes unclassified, more information will be released - come on - you KNOW that.

You will never hear me accuse or blame Bush for not containing Al Quaeda - nobody can contain Al Quaeda. Any organization whose members are willing to blow themselves up for their cause is really unstoppable. Any president - democrat or republican - should never be judged in ANY way based on Al Quadea activity.

I think if there had been more security in Libya - the result would only have been more deaths.

It is ok to not make a statement. As a matter of fact, they would have been better to not say anything. The point is they tried to spin it for re-election purposes. That is why it is sickening.
Rice, Clinton and Obama all look ridiculous now. Gibbs & Axelrod trying to spin it all weekend is just making it worse.