Not "similarly", but if you are claiming that all Reals which have finite decimal expansions can be listed, this is correct.

> the list of computable reals contain every digit of ALL possible infinite > sequences (3)

No. You cannot form a list of all computable Reals. If you could do this, then you could use a diagonal argument to construct a computable Real not in the list.

>> OK does everyone get (1) (2) and (3).>

No. (3) is not true, as it is based on a false premise (that the computable Reals can be listed).

> There's no need for bullying (George), it's just a maths theory. Address > the statements and questions and add your own.>> Herc> -- > If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the > phrase> "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson