Organization
for the Reconstruction of the Communist Party of Greece

Welcome
to our page. We are a Marxist political party of Greece under
the name OAKKE (Organization for the Reconstruction of the Communist
Party of Greece). OAKKE was established in 1985. We support
that Russian imperialism is today the main threat for all humanity,
just like Hitler was in the ‘30s-‘40s. Our objective is to reconstruct
the Communist Party on the base of the proletariat’s revolutionary
experience.

From
1985 we have participated in all national elections and euro-elections
and we fight against the red-brown political current.

LEAFLET OF OAKKE

(Organization for the Reconstruction of the Communist
Party of Greece)

IT IS RUSSIA THROUGH HER AGENTS THAT
SUBJUGATES GREECE AND BRINGS ABOUT HUNGER AND FASCISM

THE TRUE IS TODAY THE
OPPOSITE OF THE OBVIOUS

THOSE WHO APPEAR TO BE THE ARCH-PATRIOTS ARE THE
WORST TRAITORS

THOSE WHO APPEAR TO BE THE GREATEST REVOLUTIONARIES
ARE THE MOST PRO-REGIME REACTIONARIES

THOSE WHO APPEAR TO BE THE SAVIORS OF THE PEOPLE ARE
THEIR EXECUTIONERS

The absolute lie is nowadays
what is considered to be the obvious. This happens because everyone
conceives as true what the basic Greek parties agree to. Everybody thinks
that, as they all struggle for power against each other and nevertheless
agree in some points, the truth must lay in there. However, as they are all
parties of deception, it is the biggest lies that lay in that convergence
points, which the media make “national”.

Two lies that appear to be
the truth

The first national lie is
that we’ve gone bankrupt due to theft.

Indeed, many crafty people
with connections, numerous impudent tax evaders, a lot of corrupt
bureaucrats and the political expressors of the above have looted the
country...

OAKKE (Organization for the
Reconstruction of the Communist Party of Greece) supports the protest march
of EGAM against racism, anti-Semitism and neo-nazism and will participate to
it. The democrats in Greece, in Europe and all over the world must unite and
demolish the first parliamentary, openly nazi party in the planet, after
World War II.

Article that was published at oakke.blogspot.com on
February 1, 2012

THE THEORY THAT UNDER-CONSUMPTION BECAUSE OF EU MEASURES
HAS CAUSED THE GREEK CRISIS IS THE THEORY OF THE SABOTEURS1

The regime’s alreadywide-spread
interpretationof
bankruptcyistheone presented by
Samaras-Tsipras-Kouvelis2andtheirpseudo-Keynesian
“economists”. Whoever liberal
bourgeois wants to politically survive or keep his/her job at the
media has actually adhered to the position of the above, saying that we may
at first have got the country into huge debt but the great damage, the great
internal ravage, unemployment and poverty, that is the uncontrollable heavy
indebtedness and bankruptcy, have been caused by the EU itself through its
various memorandums and its medium-term programs. This thesis is summarized
as follows: it wasn’t the bankruptcy that has brought about the memorandum
but the memorandum that has caused bankruptcy.

An article about recent developments in Greece first published at the blog
of OAKKE “oakke.blogspot.com” on November 2, 2011

A FIRST
APPRAISAL OF THE ARBITRARY DEVELOPMENTS

Greece on the
path of political irregularity so that the EU be subjugated to the
Russo-Chinese axis

Down with the
pseudo-dilemmas

With the evidence at our disposal so far, we may present the following
appraisal of the developments that have followed the provocateur PM’s
announcement that would hold a referendum.

Everything indicates that G. Papandreou has in a different way followed the
same arbitrary movement that the neo-black shirts bullies of the pseudo-CPG
and SYN parties along with the classic nazis and fascists of all kinds
triggered off on October 28 national anniversary. By halting the central
military parade and half-destroying all the others while keeping untouched
only the one in Alexandroupoli where a force of the Russian army paraded,
that is their...

22 years from the heroic uprising of the Chinese people in
Tien An Men

Circulate below message

We support and we post here the appeal of the human rights
activist Jens Galschiot in co-operation with the Democracy Movement in Hong
Kong against the ban of Chinese

State
of any reference to Tien An Men massacre. We stand in solidarity with the
Chinese democrats who fight against the brutal fascist regime of their
country and we honour the 22nd anniversary of the heroic
democratic uprising of Tien An Men square. We call
upon democrats to cancel the attempt of the Chinese regime to impose a wall
of silence over the Tien An Men uprising.

Appeal to the press, artists, working places, libraries,
universities, and other institutions of education

Give the Chinese students their history back!

Help mark the 22nd
anniversary of the

Tiananmen massacre.
In 1989 the Chinese students occupied the Tiananmen Square in Beijing for
months in an attempt to press the Chinese government to take steps towards
democracy and to fight against corruption. But on 4th June 1989
the regime threw in the army against the unarmed students...

Article published at OAKKE’s
blog “oakke.blogspot.com” and at the web page “www.oakke.gr” in the Greek
language on March 23, 2011

THE DIRTY U.N. ATTACK ON
LIBYA

A
TREMENDOUS BLOW TO BOTH LIBYA AND EUROPE

WESTERN IMPERIALISTS
“SHAKE THE OLIVE TREE”

WHILE NEONAZI RUSSIA AND
CHINA “PICK THE FRUIT”

The military attack on Libya by order of the UN Security Council is a
qualitative leap, a blatant violation of the basic principle of peaceful
coexistence, which means the non-intervention of a state on the internal
affairs of another, that is the non-deprivation of its right to choose its
government and the way of its governing. If the reasoning of this
intervention were to be accepted, then every internal struggle within a
country of a bloody character would enable the 5 permanent members of the
Security Council to impose governing and share power according to the
strength of each one of them. If this is combined with the fact that the 3
dominant out of those 5 states are the over-interventionist and arrogant US,
the annexationist neo-hitlerian Russia, and the economically greedy China,
one may surmise the era of savagery on international affairs that the
intervention on Libya is setting off.

This
is the full text of the poster of the Iranian refugees in Greece translated
in English:

NOT
BACK TO IRAN

NOT BACK
TO OUR HANGMEN

We
are political refugees from Iran in Greece. Many of us have passed through
jails and torture because we

defended
democracy and we resisted the inhuman dictatorship of the islamic régime
of Iran.

ASYLUM
FOR THE IRANIAN POLITICAL REFUGEES IN GREECE

In
the 1st of September we began a peacuful protest in Propylaia (ATHENS, GREECE)
so as to be granted political asylum, just like it is granted to the Iranian
political prisoners in all the European countries. But in Greece, the governements
don’t grant us the asylum, but a card to last only for six months, indicating
only that we have filed an application for political asylum. These applications
meet no official answer. We want to stay
in Greece. But if we were told in written form « no » , we could
go to a European embassy in Athens and be granted the political asylum from
another country.

Instead,
they don’t give an answer, « yes » or « no », but only a temporary renewal
of the card for six months, and six months on etc. Thus, we are trapped here
even for years, with children that were born here and know only of greek as
a language, but we are living with the nightmare of being deported depending
on the diplomatic relations between the Greek government and the government
of Iran.

After 45
days of protesting in Propylaia, we sadly noted a barrier of indiferrence
from the part of the government, but also a barrier of silence as far as the
mass media are concerned.

The
masses in Greece know nothing of us. Despite this, people passing by in
front of us in Propylaia have already supported us with 10,000 signatures.
Finally, so as for the Media to understand the urgency and the size of our
problem, and for the greek people to be informed we decided to begin a
hunger strike. At the same time, we made the same thing the Iranian freedom
fighters do in prison to show to their torturers that they are never going
to speak. We sewd our lips with needle and thread. We did not do so to
indicate that we are not going to speak, but instead to show that we were
talking but we were not heard. Most of all, we did it to say openly that we
do not want to go back to Iran at any cost, because that will be equivalent
to our death.

That’s
why we ask for the Greek people’s support so as to be given political asylum.

THE DECEMBER 2008 ARSON OF ATHENS, PART OF A POLITICAL COUP.
SIMULTANEOUS UNDERMINING OF THE MOVEMENT AGAINST FASCISTIZATION OF THE POLICE

At the beginning of the incidents there was youth’s rage against the police.
Every youngster has at least once been the victim of brutal and humiliating
behavior, especially by the Special Guards body, which Alexis’ murderer
belongs to. They’ ve been...

Poster
of the Organization for the Reconstruction of the Communist Party of Greece
(OAKKE), August 28, 2008.

RUSSIAN HITLERS GET OUT OF GEORGIA

Russia’s invasion
into Georgia and the occupation of a part of its territory has been the
most overt hitleric action since World War II. This is not the first time
that an imperialist country invades another independent country. Russian
social-imperialism acted this way against Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan,
as USSR, and so did American imperialism against Afghanistan, Iraq, and
Serbia (Kossovo) as head of broader inter-state alliances.

There are
however two elements that distinguish this specific invasion from any previous
one:

1st, The invading
imperialist country de facto annexes to itself a part of
the invaded country.

2nd, A police-type
state-monopolistic fascist dictatorship with anti-semitic characteristics
is being excercized in the interior of the invading country. Its
brutality has been proved by the genocide of the Chechen people and the
murders of Russian democratic journalists.

The previous
time where those two factors were combined was at the invasion of Hitler’s
Germany to Czechoslovakia. Hitler had claimed then that in this way he protected
the German national minority of that country. Now Putin claims that he is
protecting the national minorities of Ossetians and Abkhazians, who have
been living inside Georgia having the right of territorial
autonomy. The difference is the following: As these populations are not
Russians, Putin’s regime provided them with Russian passports so that he
could then “protect” them as Russian citizens! The democrats of the whole
world must resist the Georgian “Czechoslovakia of 2008” if they do not want
to see Europe being swallowed up piece-by-piece by the new Hitlers.

New Hitlers
are more dangerous than the old ones, because:

1st German
Hitlers developed their might within a few years aiming to a surprise military
attack against Europe. Opposite to that, the Russian Hitlers implement a
long-range policy of infiltration by which they gain political bases everywhere
in the world in order to encircle Europe and then launch a war for its subjugation.
For that reason they have developed the typical method of Czarism to infiltrate
with agents in foreign governments (as Marx had observed), adding to that
the trotskyite-style penetration in all the political parties of a certain
country, especially the “leftist” ones.

2nd The Third
Reich was deprived of economic pressure weapons against its victims. On
the contrary, Putin’s neo-hitlerian regime has formed a wide world front
of control over the energy sources of Europe.

3rd The old
Hitlers were confronted worldwide by the left, which was the heart of every
democratic resistance. The new Hitlers on the contrary, having emerged in
the world history as underminers and traitors of the revolutionary socialism,
deconstructed the organized left from the inside and have frequently transformed
the once greatest antibody against nazism into a pro-nazi virus.

That’s why
the left, which would be expected to support Georgia, has been nowadays
immobilized by its hidden-fascist leaders using the allegation that it isn’t
Georgia that stands up against Russia, but American imperialism. So, these
fascists who are dressed up in a left costume claim that there is not such
thing as a Georgian sovereign country and there are not any Georgian people
under attack by an imperialism. They claim that there is only a Georgian
government eager to join NATO and for this reason this government is so
much alienated from Georgia as are the Russian occupying troops. Therefore,
it makes no difference for them that this government was elected by the
people of the specific country. Actually, the anti-Americanism of these
fascists is ostensible, as was Hitler’s anti-Anglism with which he had tried
to slander his adversaries and drag the colonial world behind him.

In fact, the
Western imperialists do not turn Georgia against Russia. They press Georgia
to submit to Russia, as expected from those who often trample upon the sovereignty
of the weak states in order to preserve stability for their stock-markets.
Especially the Western-Europeans sacrifice Georgia so that Russia won’t
cut off the energy supply for them. They will actually react only when Hitler
marches against them.

So, in this
phase, the only real answer to Russian neonazism is a new democratic
and patriotic anti-fascist front, basically of the peoples and
of the non imperialist states being threatened by Russia. Through that process
a new truly internationalist left will emerge as a leading
antifascist power.

The Greek democrats
and patriots have a special duty to resist the new Hitlerians, as there
is great danger that our country will be found on their side, because the
leaders of the 5 parliamentary parties promote the Russian interests in
all major issues. When some of the 5 parties declare that they are against
the recognition of the secession of South Ossetia from Russia, they just
pretend. This is shown from the following facts: 1) They support that they
are not comfortable with the Russian recognition for the reason that it
is one-sided, meaning that they are not comfortable with
the fact that Russia does not have yet at its disposal a puppet government
in Georgia willing to consent to the partition. 2) They constantly reproduce
the Russian allegation that Georgia attacked South Ossetia,
thus putting the blame on Georgia for the secession. Yet, it was Russia
that through its Ossetian lackeys provoked Georgia for months attacking
Georgian targets. Besides, and in any case, a war launched by a country
in order to restore its territorial integrity can not be aggressive. 3)
and the most important: All 5 parties have not
denounced the Russian invasion into Georgia neither
the occupation of Georgia’s territory outside South Ossetia
and Abkhazia from the Russian army. The fact that the 5 leaderships do not
openly support the partition of Georgia is due to their unwillingness to
be exposed as de facto promoters of Cyprus partition also.

Furthermore
we should not forget that Kremlin’s trustees, Andreas Papandreou being the
first, never protested when Russia herself as USSR was the first to pose
the issue of Cyprus partition by proposing a two-zone federation in 1965
or when Russia alone praised the Turkish invasion in the island in 1974
as “restoration of constitutional order”, through TASS agency. What the
agents really want is only their boss’ well-being. Our duty is to put an
end to it as long as there is time.
Athens, 8/20/2008

Neo-nazi Russia get out of Georgia!

All the peoples and states of the
world must aid Georgia to repel the invaders

From Friday, August 8 onwards, the army of neo-nazi Russia
has openly invaded the Republic of Georgia, while its bombers have been leveling
down cities and military bases across the whole Georgian territory. The first
direct objective of this attack is the complete annexation of South Ossetia – a
Georgian autonomous region – by Russia, and its second one, the complete
annexation of Abkhazia – another autonomous region within Georgia – as well. The
overall strategic objective of the invasion is the total political and, finally,
military subjugation of the whole Georgia to Putin’s Russia, and afterwards, not
in the remote future, the political, military and energy control of the whole
Caucasus.

The pretext Russia poses for the attack is the preservation
of security for Russian citizens living in Ossetia and who are allegedly
threatened with genocide by the Georgian government. Only a modern Goebels could
distort reality to such a degree. For what is really happening right now is
basically that the Russian troops and the subservient to them paramilitary units
of South Ossetia are perpetrating ethnic cleansing against the Georgian
population of South Ossetia. They do so because the latter is the basic
stronghold against the annexation of this Georgian territory by Russia. Russia’s
attack on South Ossetia has started in July and escalated in early August, with
the aim of destroying every sort of Georgian political and administrative rule
in South Ossetia, the 1/3 of which was till yesterday administered by Georgia.
This attack started in July with attempted murders against Georgia’s leading
state cadres in Ossetia and escalated from 2 to 6 and 7 of August with murders
of Georgian policemen, with bloody raids by the pro-Russian and Russian
heavily-armed paramilitary forces into the Georgian villages of Ossetia, with
the overall destruction of the Georgian mobile phone antennas, and finally with
attacks on Georgia’s military forces stationed in South Ossetia. The government
of Georgia responded to those successive and escalated provocations at August 7
by sending regular military forces to South Ossetia, after having first called
upon the pro-russian Ossetian side to suspend the hostilities only to be
confronted with an escalation of hostilities. Russia condemned Georgia’s
defending its state sovereignty as an invasion (!) of Georgia in South Ossetia,
and engaged herself to prevent it by her own real, brute and illegal invasion on
the Georgian soil at August 8. In fact, the escalation of Russian aggression
against Georgia during the last months was planned in order to provoke Georgia
and blame her for the outbreak of war.

However, one has no need to know every fact of the invasion
in detail to take a stand on which side is the unjust one in this war. The
unjust side is the one whose army stays on the soil of a foreign country, and at
that without being threatened at all by that country. It isn’t the Georgian army
that stays on Russian soil, but the Russian army that stays on the Georgian one.
The theory that South Ossetia is not a Georgian territory because its people
doesn’t want to, such as the theory that this people consists of Russian
citizens who invited Russia for protection, theories that Russia formally or
informally presents, are the same ones Hitler’s Germany presented to invade the
indepentant Czechoslovakia by pretending to protect the Sudeten Germans who were
oppressed by the Czechoslovak state and whose pro-hitler leaders suddenly
decided that the region where they lived should be annexed by Germany. Even more
audacious than their Hitleric teachers, the Russian neo-Hitlers are now annexing
South Ossetia without the precondition that the population is Russian. It is
only enough that the members of this special national minority, with no
practical or legal international right for state independence, are owners of
Russian passports. Putin’s Russia generously gave them these passports a few
years ago so that she can now call them “Russian citizens” and declare that she
had the obligation to protect them, which practically means to annex the
territory they live on to Russia. The right of breaking away, of independence
and of unification with other states deserves to nations and states within a
federation, not to national minorities and to the autonomous regions of states
where those minorities live together with other nationalities. Whenever in
modern world an autonomous multi-national region of a sovereign national or
multinational state wanted to break away from that state, the result has always
been the same: ethnic cleansing in the interior of that region and annexation of
its soil by another agressive state, that is expansion of that aggressive state
at the expense of the other.

That’s why the democratic people of the whole world must side
with small Georgia and by every way aid her to resist the Russian invaders. All
states in the world ought to do the same. If the Russian invasion and Georgia’s
mutilation succeed, this would be a resolute step towards the strengthening of
the Russian fascist-state monopoly, that is a big step towards a new world war.
Putin’s Russia is about to launch this war in alliance with the Chinese
fascist-state monopolists, and the Iranian regional bullies. The domination of
Russia over the whole Caucasus region is just a step towards the energy
suffocation of Europe and her military encirclement. Unfortunately in this
phase, the peoples of Europe cannot anticipate that their governments, or the US
government, substantially resist to Russian invasion. And this happens because
those governments are under the political and financial hegemony of the
financial monopolists, especially the US monopolists who on the one hand have
chosen to cooperate economically and become reconciled with the war axis while
on the other they economically, and often politically and militarily, juxtapose
the third world countries. In such a period, the resistence to Hitler is above
all a matter of the democratic and anti-imperialist movements in each country.

Athens,
9-8-2008

POSTER
OF OAKKE FOR THE DISPUTE OF THE NAME BETWEEN GREECE AND THE REPUBLIC
OF MACEDONIA ISSUED IN ATHENS,
MARCH 6, 2008

THE
BIG DECEPTION BEHIND THE NAME

Though it is monstrous for a country to forcefully change
the name of another, the five parties leaderships make this demand
upon the neighboring country so as to push it into neo-Hitler Russia’s
clutches

Almost
the entire population of our country believes that we must force
another country to change its name. This relative unanimity seems
to many as a proof that this demand is fair.

However,
in the cases of national disputes, the national unanimity has nothing
to do with right or wrong. Especially at the present era of the
all-powerful “national” TV and the much weaker internationalist
left, the national unanimity in the wrong is quite easy. For instance:
Almost every Albanian believes that Kosovo was right to secede from
Serbia. Besides, though all Serbs consider this partition as wrong,
they almost unanimously believe that their country was right to
partition another country, Bosnia, by perpetrating ethnic-cleansing.

In
such cases, one can discover who is right and who is wrong only
by relying on the democratic principles touching inter-state relations,
principles clearly established after the painful experience of the
2nd world anti-fascist war. The most fundamental of these principles
is the respect for territorial integrity and state sovereignty of
every country. Serbia, Albania, and Greece have violated that principle
by denying the states having formed the federal Yugoslavia the
right of dissociation from her, as well as of total state sovereignty
and territorial integrity of each one of them. This right was achieved
by the peoples and nations of Yugoslavia that resisted Hitler’s
occupation and the trans-national massacre it had incited. The state
borders between them were drawn according to this anti-fascist and
voluntary rationale.

Serbia
was the first one to deny the independence of Republic of Bosnia-Erzegovina
and de facto partitioned her by perpetrating ethnic-cleansing of
Hitler’s type. At the same time, Greece denied Republic of Macedonia
the right to use her state name she already had for half a century,
and her population the right to nationally determine itself as Macedonians,
as all the other peoples of Yugoslavia had accepted. In the third
place, Albania, having this aim for a long time, incited and achieved
the partition of Serbia, encouraged by the relative success of the
revisional policy of Serbia and Greece. All these three
countries evoked historical arguments from other times in order
to deny the democratic settlements that arose from the world anti-fascist
war, and against it. These were the first revisions of
the post-war European political map, and this explains why in all
three countries it is the most fascist forces that have played a
leading part in them.

The
question is why did all Greek parties suddenly
decide to change the name of the neighboring country, and why do
they continue to insist after nearly the whole planet has accepted
it? They claim that if they don’t change it, then the whoever expansionists
of that country will some day be able to take Salonica. Apart from
the ridiculousness of this claim – that a very small and weak country
is capable of extracting the second capital city of a much larger
and stronger one – no expansionist policy in history was
ever prevented by the names of the victims of that policy.
Besides, our neighboring country has practically presented no territorial
claim against Greece, not even when she was backed by the much stronger
Yugoslavia of Tito, who was wrongly accused of having named that
country after her current name for expansionst purposes.

Here
is the biggest proof that the five parties don’t believe what they
say: while they almost unanimously decided, 15 years ago,
that only if they removed the term Macedonia from the neighboring
country we could be safe and wouldn’t lose our soul, now they tell
us, again almost unanimously, that we could preserve both security
and soul provided a geographical term is set before the name Macedonia.

The
reason why the 5 leaderships constantly change the name
they want to impose, is that they always seek for a pretext
for preventing the neighboring country to unite with the West, that
is with the EU and NATO. In the long run, they want to make her
refuse her state unity so that the Albanian chauvinism be able to
partition her, and the rest part be absorbed as slavonic and
orhtodox by social-imperialist Russia. This happens
because the leaders of all five parliamentary parties in Greece
are servants of Putin’s Russia. Of course Russia makes her Greek
friends play the bad guys while she herself plays the “good” one
by recognizing that country with its name, though for reasons mentioned
above she doesn’t recognize her national status. So that’s why for
half a century the name Macedonia of the neighboring country hadn’t
annoyed the Greek pro-Western governments. That’s why they conceal
such facts as, for example, that Pavlos Melas recognized a Macedonian
language, or that an official alphabet book of the Macedonian language
was issued during El. Venizelos’ leadership, or that the old true
Communist Party of Greece recognized the existence of the Macedonian
nation contrary to the modern pro-Russian pseudoCPG. That’s why
our “patriots” make a lot of fuss andraise
a veto only when the EU and USA are about to incorporate the neighboring
country into their structures, while they didn’t utter a word when
Russia and her ally China first recognized the neighboring country
with her name. Finally, that’s why though they had accepted the
interim agreement, which enabled the Republic of Macedonia to enter
international organizations with the name of FYROM, they now refuse
to abide by this agreement. The FYROM name is proper for them before
the UN but not before NATO and EU!

In
fact, all their supposed patriotism is merely subservience. That’s
why although they sided with Serbia in the case of Bosnia’s genocidal
partition incited by Russia, they are now against the Albanian-incited
secession of Kosovo, that is backed by the American imperialism.
(Nevertheless, it was the Russian imperialism that backed it first
through the Albanian chauvinists and its friendly Clinton presidency).

The
OAKKE calls upon every democratic person, every friend of peace,
every true patriot to hold an anti-imperialist stance of principles
at all fronts of the big disputes that flare up in the Balkan region.
Especially it calls them to soberly study the details of the “war
for the name” and to consciously resist the provocative policy of
the five political leaderships, that wish to make not only the neighboring
country but also Greece itself to break off with the European democratic
path, so as to chain it to the biggest modern fascism feverishly
preparing to butcher the whole planet.

Athens,
6/3/2008

POSTER
ISSUED ON AUGUST 6, 2006 EXPLAINING IN SHORT THE POSITION OF ÏÁÊÊÅ
ON THE ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH WAR IN LEBANON
(Both in relation with the international aspect of this issue and
with the stand of the Greek political forces and public opinion
where the first paragraph mainly refers)

SO IT IS
THAT ISRAEL IS IN THE RIGHT THIS TIME

The fascist Hezbollah provoked this war with the
purpose of subjugating Lebanon to Syria and making Russia the regulator
in the Middle East issue

Nearly
the whole nation has sided with the fascist Hezbollah against Israel,
as it had done similarly a few years ago when it sided with the
Serb perpetrators of ethnic cleansing against the peoples of Yugoslavia.
As then, the pseudo-leftists, the far-rightists and the neo-nazis
are once again in the lead of this “national line”. Each one of
them holds his own arguments but they all agree that the right is
always in opposing the side supported by the USA. Foremost, they
use the Palestinian liberation struggle as a means of demonizing
the State of Israel. However, as there are two sides to everything,
so it is with the Israeli issue.
The first side, and the most important, is that this state was born
in order to shelter the Jews from the czar’s pogroms and the large-scale
Nazi genocide. This was the basic reason it was
recognized by the anti-fascist camp of the Second World War against
Arab reaction and with the persistence of the then
socialist USSR. It was only after Suslov, Khrushchev and Brezhnev,
all great-Russian and anti-Semites, had seized power and turned
the USSR into an imperialistic-fascist country that the latter sided
with the Arab chauvinists and the pan-Islamists, and poisoned the
labor and the anti-imperialistic movements all over the world with
a new type of anti-Semitism concealed under the cover of “anti-Zionism”.
Since then, both classical and pseudo-leftist anti-Semites pursue,
directly or indirectly, the goal of the destruction of the Israeli
state.
On the other hand however, Israel, a nation of oppressed people
when formed, became in turn an oppressor, following in the pattern
of nearly every bourgeois state during the first phase of its formation.
Hence, its most chauvinistic tendency adopted a policy of expansion
and regional hegemony mainly at the expense of the Palestinians;
a policy that was soon set in the service of the then rising US
imperialism. The fascist regimes of Syria and Iran backed up by
the Kremlin exploited this policy in order to set up within the
Palestinian and the Lebanese liberation movements their agents,
the organizations Hamas and Hezbollah, that have as their declared
objective the elimination of the Jews of Israel. These organizations
became popular through the monetary aid coming from the Iranian
oil-revenues, which they used to bribe the poor population by establishing
“charity” networks. At this point Russia and Syria coordinated their
efforts with the Israeli chauvinists and the now declining US imperialists,
in order to oust the national bourgeoisie of Palestine (Fatah-Arafat)
from the leadership of the Palestinian struggle and to bring Hamas
to power. In Lebanon also, Russia and Syria exploited the Israeli
military intervention of 1978-2000, as well as the mistakes of Fatah,
and managed to gain the political and military hegemony in this
country through Hezbollah.

However,
recently, the patriotic anti-Syrian front in Lebanon, after having
ousted the Syrian army, began demanding the Hezbollah’s disarmament,
while in the Palestinian territories the Fatah began challenging
the new dictatorial power of Hamas. It was at this exact
moment that Hamas and Hezbollah launched their coordinated
attack against Israel, so that the Israeli armed forces would
retaliate; then the patriotic forces of Palestine and Lebanon
would be forced to stand behind these two organizations forming
an anti-Israeli front, which is a successfully tested tactic in
the past. Characteristically, Hezbollah and Hamas had already
attacked Israel 6 years after it had unconditionally withdrawn
from Lebanon and again lately after it had unconditionally
withdrawn from Gaza despite intense conflict with the
Israeli settlers. Israel was in fact attacked while retreating,
clearly demonstrating that the intention of Hezbollah and Hamas
was not to push it back but strategically to destroy it as a state
and tactically to provoke it.
Therefore it is not the Palestinian national-democratic movement
nor the Lebanese patriotic movement that have risen up against
Israel now, but the agents of Syria and Iran that have no desire
for an independent Palestinian state beside the state of Israel,
nor for an independent Lebanon.
The Hezbollah claims that they are not the aggressors and that
it was Israel that attacked Lebanon under the pretext
of the abduction of two Israeli soldiers. They omit the fact that
this act was accompanied by the immediate murder of another eight
soldiers and by the launching of rockets against Israel, while
Hezbollah has been launching hundreds of rockets against
Israel for the past 6 years victimizing civilians. Which
country in the world would allow on its borders the undisturbed
existence of such an army slaughtering civilians and openly declaring
as its target the intent to wipe that country off the map?

Devoid of solid arguments, the Hezbollah and its friends accuse
the Israelis of resembling Hitler in implementing the policy of
collective punishment by bombarding civilians. It is not the first
time that anti-Semites pose the matter of the death of civilians
as their basic argument. For decades pro-Nazi historians have been
accusing the allied forces as being equally or even more brutal
than Hitler’s because of the bombings of German cities. On the other
hand, ironically none of these friends of the Hezbollah seem to
have been touched by the 200.000 dead civilians of Bosnia which
were victims of targeted ethnic cleansing, nor
by the 20.000 dead civilians of Grozny from the genocidal
Russian bombardments, nor have they ever uttered a word against
Assad when he levelled with bombardments the Syrian
city of Hama in 1982 and slaughtered 20.000 civilians in order to
exterminate the “Muslim Brothers”.

In this particular instance the Israeli army had no reason whatsoever
to provoke its own international political isolation by targeting
civilians. On the contrary civilians are targeted by Hezbollah’s
army that drops its missiles and gloats over the number of dead,
in the same way that Hamas takes pride in the murder of the 1.700
civilians, victims of its suicide-bombers, in Israel. In
fact, most of the deaths in Lebanon are the direct result of the
provocative war that Hezbollah has been conducting. This organization
purposely launches rockets against Israel from sites based in Lebanese
cities and villages and deliberately uses civilian buildings, even
hospitals, as military headquarters and ammunition storage areas.
The aim is to win the sympathy of world public opinion through a
vast number of casualties. The friends of Hezbollah argue
that only a fascist army would bomb residential areas when they
harbor guerilla warfare. However in this case, there are no partisans
firing against an occupational army. What we have here is an unprovoked
missile attack, launched from within heavily populated cities against
the civilians of a neighboring country.
Any way you look at it, today Hitler is siding with the Hezbollah-Hamas
front, or to pose it differently, with the Syrian-Iranian-Russian
front. We will see this more clearly when it becomes apparent that
this provocative attack by Hezbollah will have resulted in the strengthening
of the position of Putin’s neo-nazi Russia in the Middle East.

Athens,
6/8/2006

THE MASSACRE
IN OSSETIA:
RUSSIAN PROVOCATION
It sets the scene for the attack on Georgia

When a massacre with enormous political consequences
happens and nobody assumes responsibility, one must firstly trace
the perpetrator among those who are likely to politically benefit
from it. Putin claims that the perpetrator is the Chechen resistance
that tries, by this way, to drag Russia into negotiations. On the
contrary, the Chechen resistance claims that this crime favors the
Russian occupation and that it was planned by the Russian security
services, as were a series of former massacres. We believe that the
second position is the only one that is persuasive and connected to
the facts.
To begin with, it is Putin's Russia that propagandistically benefits
from the massacre. Until recently she had been isolated, having exterminated
the 1/5 of Chechnya's population by leveling towns and villages to
the ground, and continuing to kidnap, torture, rape, and mutilate
men and women, a hell that humankind has never seen since Hitler.
Now, because of the massacre in Beslan, the Chechen resistance appears
more monstrous than the occupying forces, as the victims' cries in
Chechnya never reach the cameras, while the massacre in Beslan and
the relatives' lament happened in front of the eyes of the whole world.
Secondly, it was Putin's leadership that rushed at once into the manipulation
of the massacre on global political ground, by announcing that Russia
has the right to crash the terrorists everywhere on earth, that is
to attack on every country that hosts Chechens. More specifically,
this massacre enables Russia to attack Georgia, a country that she
has accused many times for sheltering Chechen rebels in the Pankisi
gorge.
Georgia is a key-country in the global geopolitics as the only channel
for the Caspian oil to the outside world that is not under control
of the Moscow-Beijing-Teheran axis. The fact that the slaughter was
done in Northern Ossetia rather than anywhere else also helps Russia
to attack Georgia, as Northern Ossetia claims a part of Georgia called
Southern Ossetia.
More at that, Russia profits by the so-called Islamic participation
in the kidnappers' team. For Georgia has turned towards the US in
order to resist Russia, and the US by turn has supported Georgia in
order to have access to the Baku- Cheihan oil channel through Georgia.
However, the appearance of Al Kaeda-type Islamists in the ranks of
the Chechens objectively brings the US more closely to Russia, as
the Islamic terrorism is the chief enemy to the US. So, this massacre
makes the US, despite their current objections, more inclined to finally
accept a Moscow's attack against Chechens of Georgia.
By the same way, Russia was also benefited by the former massacres
of civilians. More typical was the block-of-flats blowing up in Moscow
in 1999 causing the death of 300, which gave Putin the pretext for
the second invasion in Chechnya.
That's why so strange things happen in each of those slaughters: The
authorities intervention in a way that maximizes the victims (toxic
gas in the theater of Moscow), the aggressors' cadres are never arrested
(in the theater they were all shot dead with a bullet in the head
while being unconscious by the gas, while now in Beslan no photos
of the dead terrorists have been published), the independent investigation
is prevented and the press is censored. The head of the commission
set up to investigate the block-of flats' blowing up and the theater
in Moscow cases, the deputy Sergei Yusenkov, was murdered. In the
case of Beslan, the two most prominent dissident journalists, Politkovskaja
and Babinski, were deterred from approaching the place of the kidnapping.
The first was poisoned in the airplane while the latter was arrested
on a charge of hooliganism.
The mass slaughter of civilians and the kidnappings everywhere serve
the Russian diplomacy. This does not have to do with the subjective
political motives of the individual participants, who are often Chechens
taking revenge for the suffering and murder of their relatives. It
is an easy task for KGB to place ''rats'' amongst them (one example
is the kidnapper Terkibaev whose role in the Moscow theater was revealed
by Politkovskaja-Zakaev, and was murdered right after this revelation).
The KGB has her man inside the resistance, that is Bassaev, and tries
desperately to tie up resistance with violence against civilians and
with Islamic-fascism.
Al Kaeda itself serves the Russian diplomacy, too. So, because of
the US interventions triggered off by the Twin Towers' massacre, Iran
has now politically the upper hand in Iraq (through the shiites Sistani
and Sadr), while the pro-Russian Northern Alliance rules Afghanistan.
In both cases the US are sinking in a bloody, catastrophic deadlock.
Even more typical of this is the Madrid massacre, which, within one
night, caused the downfall of pro-American Aznar and the rise to power
of the new member of Chirac's-Schroders-Putin's cooperation team,
J. Zapatero.
It is nothing but determinism. The provocative terrorism against civilians
(e.g. nazi bombs in pre-war Austria) is used by the most aggressive
imperialistic pole. As the latter arrives late at the table of world
sharing, it needs its violent re-sharing. The rising Russian-Chinese
pole in political and military terms, is today in the position that
the Hitleric axis had, surrounding and dividing the dominant in economic
terms US-EU-Japan pole in order to crush it through a new world war.

Athens, September 9, 2004.

USA GET OUT FROM IRAQ

NO TO THE HYENAS OF THE UN

No unity with the neo-hitleric
slaughterers of Chechnya

The powerful resistance of Iraq to the
American invaders proves that peoples do not accept any liberation with
force. How
and when they will be released from the dictators of their countries, it is
their own affair. It is also their own affair how they will isolate and
shatter in each country the neo-nazi gangs that murder American civilians.
It is now proved, once more, how deeply founded in the needs of modern
international life is the principle of no intervention in the internal
affairs of the countries, a principle that imperialism unanimously infringes
now in Iraq.

Because what appears in the eyes of many people is
only the invasion of USA, and not the fact that this invasion has been
prepared by the common decision 1441 of the UN which required and
requires the disarmament of Iraq.. This disarmament, and the inspectors
that would impose it, meant a permanent and humiliating intervention on Iraq
that could be effective only under the direct threat of American
invasion. The whole conflict within the UN during all these months, was
about if it would be USA and England or Russia, China and France that would
impose this disarmament. Russian social-imperialists were on the head of the
international demonstrations in favor of peace only in order to take the
hegemony from USA in the battle for the fall of Saddam and in order to
inherit this regime themselves. Thus, these demonstrations praised the UN
and never adopted the claim: “the inspectors must get out from Iraq”.
Now, in the fifth day of the war the “friends of peace” in the UN
revealed themselves because they did not even ask from the Security
Council to condemn as such the invasion of USA. Moreover, what the
“friends of peace” did in the UN as did also in the EU, and first of all
the double-faced Simitis, was to start talking about the “day after”,
that is to say in which way the splitting up will be made, after the
defeat of Iraq, and to require from USA not to walk alone without the UN.
This is why, after the invasion instead of the deepening of the gap among
the European countries, suddenly there was approach between them. Now
Russia and France in order to become even more powerful in the interior of
Iraq raise the question of the “humanitarian help to civilians” and they
ask this help to be delivered from the UN and not USA alone.. Speaking
shortly they want: USA to make the dirty
work, that is to say fight in order to overthrow Saddam, and themselves to
make the “peaceful’” and popular work, that is to say deliver food in
besieged cities and intermediate between the belligerents. Because until now
USA denies to assign the UN with this winning intermediary role, Russia
threatens to condemn them in the Security Council.

For the first time, nevertheless, Iraq (statements
of Ramadan, 22 March) denounced the dirty game of the UN. For years Iraq
succumbs systematically to the claims of Russia, in order to avoid the
USA’s attack.

The democrats and anti-imperialists should not let
themselves be tricked from these “peace friendly” games of the neo-nazi
axis of Russia - China and their agents in the whole world. They should
denounce decisively the American invasion, but they should not accept to
demonstrate under the banners of those who never had a word to say against
the perpetrators of genocide and the torturers of the heroic Chechnya, of
those that supported energetically the Serb fascists in order to make their
genocide in Bosnia, and of those who were pleased with the big slaughter of
thousands civilians in the Twin Towers.

Athens, 25/03/2003

(poster that was circulated in Athens, Piraeus and
others cities of Greece in late March)

Either with the UN,
or with Iraq

NO TO THE DIRTY
WAR

OF THE “FRIENDS
OF PEACE”

Millions of people on
February 15 went to demonstrate in favor of peace. Independently
from their will however they demonstrated in favor of war. Because
those who are at the head of these demonstrations and coordinate
them in world scale propound a demand of war: That Iraq must be
disarmed from the UN. The disarmament is an action that suppresses
the sovereignty of a country and it is possible only with the
exercise of violence on this country or with the threat of violence
to be exercised on the country. The disarmament of Iraq, even
from conventional arms that the UN imposes to it today via
UN’s inspectors, is “peaceful” only because USA and England
immediately threaten Iraq with invasion. If those that now push
forward the process of the UN, that is to say Russia and China and
at second place France, wanted peace they would demand the immediate
withdrawal of the American army from the Persian Gulf. But then how
could inspectors disarm Iraq “peacefully”? The
method of the UN is that USA presses the revolver on the head of
Iraq, in order that Iraq accepts to disarm. It is the variant of
“armed robbery without murder”.

The difference between USA
and Russia is the following: USA want the invasion in order to
reverse the whole Iraqi regime, while Russia wants the
inspections in order to split up the Iraqi regime, that is to
say to remove the heads and become the heir of the rest. It is
characteristic that thanks to the pressure of inspectors, Russia
achieved to have the, formerly almighty, Minister of Oil A. Raheed
who confronted Russia, replaced with Al-Naijm, former ambassador of
Baghdad in Moscow (January 7), and to make new agreements for the
control of petroleum layers of Iraq (January 16). Also, it was the
envoy of Putin, Primakov that “convinced” Saddam to accept the
destruction of conventional missiles. The
objective of the disarmament of Iraq even from conventional arms, as
well as the objective of interrogations of Iraqi scientists from the
inspectors, is to humiliate the current leadership of Iraq
completely, and also to open ways and cracks within this leadership,
in order that finally Saddam is forced to resign or to fall with a
coup d’etat.

If Saddam falls in this way
his successors will obligatorily be Russia and the remaining
“peace-loving” surgeons, that thanks to their double-faced
policy have already obtained privileged petroleum agreements, and,
most of all, important political positions not only inside Iraq, but
all around the Third World. If again Saddam does not succumb to the
“surgeons”, they, turning their look away, will allow USA to
shoot him. But in this case USA will have been so much hated
worldwide that after they do the dirty business, they will be
finally forced to deliver Iraq to the “peace-loving surgeons”.

That’s why false
“demonstrations for peace” are organized precisely when Russia
asks for a new extension in the UN in order to continue raping her
victim, while USA don’t shoot, that’s why at the head of these
demonstrations are the pro-Russian politicians such as Paparriga,
Konstantopoulos and Laliotis (in Greece), that’s why one cannot
find a banner reading: “Down with the war of the UN”, and
specifically: “The American fleet must leave the Gulf. The
inspectors must leave Iraq”, but, on the contrary, the UN is
asked to insist on the “peace” road, that’s why at the end
these demonstrations are also supported by the fascists worldwide.

It is at least naive to
expect that Russian and Chinese neonazis, that are full with nuclear
and biological weapons, will bring peace by exterminating a lower
middle third world bully as Saddam, who after all was punished in
1991, while they, as well as the American superpower, were never
punished accordingly.

Athens, March 3, 2003

(poster that was circulated in early March
in Athens, Piraeus and other cities of Greece)

THE
DEMONSTRATION OF FEBRUARY 15th IN FAVOR OF WAR

The
demonstration of Saturday supported by the government and all of the
political parties is a demonstration in favor of war.

It is a war that has already been declared with the decision No 1441 of UN
and it is carried out by the permanent members of the Security Council of
UN, and basically from the two superpowers as follows: The USA hold their
revolver against the head of Saddam, and Russia, on the base of this threat,
exhausts and blackmails the Saddam regime in order to make petroleum
contracts (jointly with France) and, thus, achieves a deep political
infiltration in the Iraqi regime aiming at the fall of Saddam and her
dominance. The disagreement between the two superpowers is found as follows:
Russia wants this type of war to be continued, the war of inspectors, while
the USA wants to shatter completely the Iraqi regime and finally to have
control in the after - Saddam era over Iraq and the whole Gulf. Russia wants
the American fleet in the Gulf and constant extensions of inspections
through the Security Council. The USA wants halt of inspections, general
attack now and fall of Saddam.

The tomorrow's coordinated international wave of demonstrations against
the potential war of the USA and not against the on going war of the UN and
the decision 1441 offers help only to a new extension in the Security
Council, that is to say help to the Russian war at the expense of the
American one, but by no means help to Iraq and to peace. It is not
accidental that the previous international wave of demonstrations was
coordinated in late January before the new extension of inspections that was
decided by the Security Council. In the mid-time the demonstrations stop, as
happens each time that the inspectors should be left to concentrate in the
work of blackmails, deterioration of Iraqi regime and humiliation of Iraq.
Is there, really, greatest hypocrisy than to claim that wanting peace in
Iraq means to ask Iraq's disarmament as the organizers of tomorrow's
government supported and simultaneously pro-Russian international
demonstration does? The Iraqi regime is fascist, but its overthrow, as long
as it does not attack anyone, is an affair of Iraqi people. In any case as
long as the imperialists have nuclear weapons, and in particular as long as
the greatest today's fascist regimes, that is to say Russian and Chinese,
have volumes of nuclear weapons, the Iraqi regime also has the same right.

NO
TO THE DIRTY WAR OF USA-RUSSIA AGAINST IRAQ

Already an injustice imperialistic war has begun
against Iraq that aims to the control of the oils of the Gulf as a
strategic goal and, as an immediate political goal, to the change of
the government of this country and its partition on national and
religious basis.

This war is very likely to develop to a warm one, however
currently it 's a diplomatic war that is carried out in the name
of UN with the help of unbreakable military pressure. It is
mainly the two superpowers, USA and Russia, that carry out this
war.The difference
between these two forces is the following: the entire planet sees
and accuses for the war the first one, but it is the second that will
profit finally from this war and the one that guides it actually.

The same game has taken part again in Serbia and in
Afghanistan as follows: America shoots the prey, wound it, without
killing it, and Russia, disguised as his friend carries it in her
nest.Or differently, USA shakes the tree and Russia gathers the
fruit. In Serbia, USA bombarded and threw the Milosevic regime,
but the real power, that is to say, the hegemony in the army, was
taken over by pro-Russian Kostunitsa and his allies, the Serbs
who committed genocide. In Afghanistan, USA bombarded and shattered
the hostile for Russia Taliban 's regime, but Kabul was occupied by
the pro-Russian Northern Alliance headed by an old chief of Russia's
intelligence and current powerful minister of defense, Fahim.
Everywhere the same thing happens: Nationalists dictators and local
thugs with weak popular basis, become targets of USA because they are
against the West and simultaneously targets of Russia, because as
nationalists they deny to become subjects to Russia.While however America strikesa country openly
and externally, Russia strikes her also but covered and from
the inside and finally it prevails, because it is not exposed as
an enemy in the eyes of the population of this country. Russia often
reprimands USA, at the same hour that USA opens the road for her.

In the case of Iraq, Russia achieved the amazing
decision 1441 of UN, that allows her to encourage USA to
prepare the war, and at the same time to retain, or even accuse USA
for the same reason.This decision is formulated deliberately
with ambiguous way so that it allows USA to attack Iraq on the one
hand and, on the other hand, it allows Russia to keep her distance
from this attack by presenting her own opposite interpretation, (in
collaboration with the Chinese fascists and the sordid European
opportunists).

It is not accidental that thanks to the embargo
imposed for many years in Iraq, proposed always in the UN from USA and
signed from, the supposedly unwilling, Russia, the last one already
has ensured powerful bases in Iraq and controls completely the exports
of Iraqi oil. Now Russia tries to force Saddam's resignation,
using the Committee of UN inspectors (UNSCOM) which is under her
control. If Saddam resigns, USA will not make the war and very easily
Russia will gain Iraq. But because the resignation of Saddam
presupposes the enormous military pressure of USA, Russia does not
protest for this. If again Saddam does not resign, then Russia will
let USA to shatter militarily Saddam, while simultaneously her
“communists” agents will organize demonstrations all over the
world only against USA, as it happened with the war in Afghanistan.
And in this case again, it is Russia that will gain Iraq.

The democrats should condemn the dirty decision 1441
of the UN Security Council and the imperialistic logic of nuclear
disarmament of small countries that is found in its base. Even more
the democrats should condemn the beastly and cruel intervention of
Russia and USA for the overthrow of Iraqi government and the
installation of another one, intervention which violates the principle
that only the people of one country has the right to change its
government and its regime, peacefully or armed. Already Russia
functioning in the backstages managed to impose the pro-Iranian and so
pro-Russian Shiites of southern Iraq in the process of shaping the
government after Saddam (Meeting of London in December).

Before any armed American attack in Iraq begins, the Russian diplomacy has
already gathered half the fruit.

Athens,
January 12 2003

(poster that was circulated
at mid January in Athens, Piraeus and other cities of Greece)

DOWN
WITH SHARON

DOWN
WITH HAMAS

Independent
Palestine.

Safe
Israel

Down
with modern anti-Semitism

The real profound antagonism in the Palestinian issue is not a clash
between the Israelis and the Palestinians but, actually, between the Arab
and Israeli fascists on the one hand and the Arab and Israeli people on the
other. The Arab and
Israeli fascists work as provocateurs and help one another.

The Arab fascists, agents of Syria and Iran, unprovokedly
massacre Israeli civilians, especially whenever both peoples go near
coexistence, by
using Hamas. In this way, Israel’s peaceful forces are reduced while the
Israeli fascists strengthen. The latter, basically expressed by Sharon, don’t
attack Hamas but the more moderate and, at the same time, more consistent
national representatives of the Palestinian people expressed by Fatahstepping on the terror that the Islamic-fascists strike into the Israeli
population, they destroy the infrastructure of their weak state power, they
humiliate them and terrorize the whole population. In this way, the national
Palestinian fractions are reduced and the Islamic-fascists strengthen.

So, finally, both nations follow the worst forces in the interior.
The Palestinians’ national bourgeoisie follow Hamas and the most
progressive fractions of the Israeli bourgeoisie follow Sharon. Thus, both
nations are split deeper and bleed more and more.

No peace will ever emerge in the region unless the provocateurs’
strategy is crushed.

The Israeli
fascists’ strategy
is the occupation and the parceling out of the Palestinian territory with
the ultimate mopping-up objective of driving the Palestinian people out of
the occupied territories. Their general tactic lies in the establishment of
new Jewish settlements in the occupied territories.

The Arab fascists’
strategyis
the elimination of the Israeli state as well as the genocidal extermination
of the Jewish people. With the view to subduing every peaceful settlement,
they promptly demand that all Palestinian refugees be settled in the state
of Israel in order to socially and politically destroy it.

The response to the provocateurs can only be the mutual practical
recognition of both states which, as
concerns Israeli side, implies
the abolition of most Jewish settlements and, as
to the Palestinian side, the
abandonment from the claim for all refugees’ return in Israel.

These are principal positions for every democrat on earth. However,
in countries such as ours that politically side with the most reactionary
aspects of the Arab and Muslim world, the main problem the democrats face is
the regime’s unilateral denouncement of Israel and the justification of
the Islamic-fascists’ genocidal policy. This is modern anti-Semitism. We must not forget that the recognition of the State of Israel, in 1948,
was the unanimous response of the victorious anti-fascist front (USSR and
Western forces) in World War II to the genocide of Jews by Hitler. The
extermination, today, of civilian Jews is not an answer to the Israeli
suppression, but an aggressive, programmatically established principle of
Hamas. The Palestinian issue doesn’t only indicate the question of a small
people claiming for its own liberation but, all the more so, is the vehicle
of a new global anti-Jewish campaign where the neo-nazi Russia-China-Iran
axis is about to take over from the old Hitler’s axis, on the pretext of
this people’s struggle.

Athens, April 24
2002

(poster that was circulated at late April in Athens, Piraeus
and other cities of Greece)

The Russian social-imperialism
subjugates Asia and infiltrates in the West

The content of a successful provocation is generally of the following
type: the instigator strikes the victim such a heavy blow that disorientates him, that is
makes him turn against a third part instead of against the provocateur himself. The
provocation is estimated as excellent when the third part happens to be the provocateur?s
great enemy. The provocation is evaluated as masterly when the instigator manages to
present himself before both victims? eyes, that is before his enemies? eyes, as their
best friend or even a secondary enemy.

The above advanced type of provocation demands a professional
provocateur and a couple of unaware of the common enemy?s nature and full of internal
problems victims.

Today, all these preconditions exist and are compressed into the Afghan
war that has just broken out.

The professional provocateur, which is the Russian social-imperialism,
is benefit from the conflict both victims, the U.S. and Afghanistan, have plunged
themselves into, and feverishly attempts to reap the fruits of his labor.

Russia?s strategic enemies, her rival imperialism and an extreme,
typical Third World opponent, have plunged themselves into virulent war. At the same time,
appears, before both fatal enemies? eyes, to be either a great friend (before American
eyes) or an intermediary force or even a secondary enemy (before the Taliban?s eyes).

This is not an achievement confined in the Afghanistan or Pakistan
region. It is also a strategic goal concerning the formation of a more and more
competitive intercourse between the U.S. and Third World, in favor of the Russo-Chinese
axis. The axis is now capable of presenting itself as a pro-U.S., pro-European, and a less
hostile towards the Third World imperialistic force.

THE PRIME
SUSPECT AND THE STRAGETIC CONSEQUENCES OF MANHATTAN LARGE MASSACREHere, the perpetrator, after having given a colossal war-like strike, wants
in whatsoever way to conceal,
or more accurately to obscure the political source of that strike. In such a case, it is
not the police investigation or the technical examination, but mainly the political
analysis that can first reveal the source of the strike. The police investigation and the
technical analysis could, at most, point at the physical perpetrator but could hardly lead
to the instigator, that is the political source of the
strike. In those cases, the political analysis surely directs the police and technical
examination and not vice versa.
The first question that the political analysis must raise is the following: who benefits
politically from such a large-scale strike? The answer to this question is given, mostly,
by examining its consequences...

One cannot trace the perpetrator of the Manhattan towers strike, unless he tracks down
whoever benefits by the result of this strike.
The specific result is the war in Afghanistan. Three factors basically participate in it:
directly the U.S. and the Taliban, and indirectly Russia via Northern Alliance. Russia
took control of Northern Alliance two days before the strike in Manhattan. Then Massoud,
its independent leader, was murdered and replaced by Fahim, the formerly head of the
Russian occupation forces security police...(poster that we put up in many places in
Athens and Piraeus)

This is the text of a poster issued by our organization in order to reveal the
political character of Putin’s visit to Greece and call Greek people to attend our
political rally held in Athens at the Hotel Titania on December 7, 2001, one day after the
arrival of Putin. The following text has been formed with necessary supplementary notes
for those that are not well aaquainted with Greek political situation.

PRESS RELEASE

The entrance of Northern Alliance in Kabul proves that Russia is
the winner of the large-scale massacre in Manhattan. The head of the new power, thanks to
American bombardments, is Fahim, the formerly head of the Russian occupation forces’
security police, and right hand of the subordinate to Russians, Nadjibulah, during the
eighties.

Athens, November 15, 2001

THE MASSACRE IN MANHATTAN PRIME SUSPECT:
RUSSIA

Some people claim that the massacre of thousands of civilians
in Manhattan is a kind of revenge coming from the Third World oppressed peoples. In fact,
the oppressed peoples do not slaughter other peoples; they fight against armies and
regimes. There are certainly innocent people killed in such wars, but those who massively
and intentionally slaughter thousands of innocent citizens are Hitler-like fascists, they
are monsters.

Fascists step on peoples’ oppression by
imperialism, but they are not product of this oppression. Fascists themselves are
imperialists, and the most brutal and rapacious at that. Hitler was not a product of
British oppression on the German people, but the product of the German monopoly’s mania
for global dominance.

The question raised today is one: Where Hitler lies nowadays?
Hitler lies where lies the international center of every organization or state that
systematically kills unarmed citizens in the name of class and national struggle. Forces
of such type are Hizballah and Hamas, and behind them, guiding them, Syria and Iran. ETA
is of this type, too. Such is Serbia that has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of unarmed
people in Bosnia. The international center of all these forces is Russia who has murdered
and savagely tortured hundreds of thousands of citizens in Chechnya.

Putin’s and Zyuganov’s Russia is the country with the poorest
people, the most advanced weaponry and the most rapacious and wealthy oligarchy. The Greek
people know hardly anything about Russia's crimes or the crimes of its friends because the
leaderships of all political parties here are pro-Russian. The Russian imperialism today,
such as the German one in the ‘40s, lacks the financial power to conquer the world by
political means. Thus, it tries to achieve the same by means of war, that is, through a
world war. The struggle of Russia, and of the states that follow Russia, against the
American imperialism is not of democratic type, it is of fascist type, such as Hitler’s
struggle against Britain in the ‘40s.

Therefore, only such a superpower, which can furthermore pretend
to have fallen into a decline, has the ability to guide the organizing of such a
large-scale massacre in the heart of the U.S., to manipulate its political consequences,
and, at the same time, to cover itself.

Only this superpower will be benefited by provoking an
American attack on the sole anti-Russian government of the Muslim world, the mullah's
government of Afghanistan that is reactionary from any other aspect, with the purpose of
conquering this state by itself. The great dream of the old czars and of the new ones has
always been to find passage to the Indian Ocean. If the U.S. bombard Afghanistan, then the
Afghan opposition will, finally, seize power in Kabul. The opposition, named
‘’alliance of the North’’, is now under Russian hegemony as, not long time before
the attack on Manhattan, its only leader who could resist Russian schemes, the hero of
Afghan resistance Massoud, was murdered.

Only a state that has buried hundreds of its citizens in the
rubble of two block-of-flats, in an effort to establish an alibi for attacking Chechnya,
can perpetrate such giant provocations. Russia of the new czars is the greatest
provocateur of all times.

Regardlessof who the physical perpetrators of the
Manhattan massacre are, in political terms and taking its organizing complexity into
account, it is improbable that the Russian superpower was not involved in it.

September 16, 2001

PRESS RELEASE

The peoples of the world and the governments have not only the
right but also the obligation to exercise violence and to destroy the nazi preacher of
genocide bin Laden and his armed gangs. But this violence must first find
support by the countries and the peoples of the Third World, second not be
exercised in alliance with the greatest slaughterers of civilians and the ideological
leaders of every modern anti-Semitic and nationalistic-religious racist current in the
world, that is, the Russian imperialists. The American tactic strengthens the gap between
the Third World and the West and offers Afghanistan to Russia and its provocateur bin
Laden.