Faith Freedom International

This section of the forum is NOT for discussions. It is a database of documents, websites, books and other resources, to provide skeptics with the materials to compose their articles refuting Islam. Please place your links in the appropriate thread. If your material needs a new thread, please advise me first. We do not want to clutter this DB with too many threads that may be similar. Do not copy and paste. Give full references and make sure the source is reliable. If you want to rebut any of the documents posted here, use another thread in other sections of the forum.

I come from an Islamic country, Egypt. Once it was on the top of the then world in every aspect, until the evil Islam invaded this amazing beautiful country. As it is obviously observed around the world, when Islam take over a country this country is finished.

Why is this unrelated opening statement?

I just want to give some back ground of me. Under Islam there is no civilized or humane law. This is well documented in the Koran (Shariha law).

I immigrated legally to the US for the most important value, the American people enjoy and take for granted FREEDOM.However, when I noticed the beginning of the Islamic invasion I was extremely disturbed. It started with 9/11 attack. I thought then that this will wake up the American populous. It di, but sadly only for a very short time. Then, the election of the fanatic Muslim Obama zeft to the Highest osition in the US ‘president’ this was a huge disgrace and dangerous.

NOW, the nomination of judge Brett Kasaneau to the supreme court. An outstanding true American man. The HORRIBLE fake attack against his character orchestrated by the so called democrats is a demonstration of what this once a great country is headed. I agree and support of ‘due process’. But, not to the point of breaking the law right and left. The democrats are utterly chocked by their defeat in the 2016 election, which brought a true sincere American man to the presidency. Mr. Trump is capable of cleaning all the diabolical changes to our values and solid democratic system.

Yet, they fight him all the way even in issues they are previously supported. They jus want to obstruct any thing he is doing.

But, to play such dirty game with Judge Kavaneau is unforgivable. The open statement by the Judge was very very emotional.﻿

In short, following what is happening, I felt that I am in Italy at the time of the mafia, but this is on a very high level. Which makes it extremely disgraceful, to say the least.

Ahlan woo-sahlan habibi.While I can appreciate your right-leaning political views - I am much surprised to your stand "I-win-you-lose" adapted by those narrow minded zealous Americans - like Mitch McConnell. This attitude is practiced in totalitarian countries - not in democratic ones.

Sahbi (friend in Arabic), you claim to have escape Egypt and came to US because of the Freedom it provides to each citizen - YET, by bashing Liberals - otherwise anyone who does not share your conservative values with their right & freedom to express their views and practices. (Obama being a Muslim)Which is which?

That attitude smacks directly into the heart of Democracy which based & predicated on compromised and respect to those who disagree with you.

Now to Kavanaugh & why Liberal so oppose to his nominations:

a) You can appreciate that, last year McConnell deprived them of their nominee (Judge Garland) to SC & they are not happy about it. He refused to have any hearing. Now wish to feed him his own medicine - delay vote on Brett's nomination.

b) in his 1,000,000 page - including in those 100,000 page legal opinions, he opined that Presidents while serving are above the law and can not be indicted. This is a profound opinion for a future Justice in SC to express.

c) Unlike others - Brett has made his disdain to Liberals & what they stand for mighty clear. Therefore, Democrats feel when they bring their cases in front of him in the SC - he will rule against them - no matter how right they are.

d) Even many moderate Republicans had expressed concern about his ill temper which would disqualify any judge from serving in the highest court in the land.

e) trump had nominated him - knowing well if and when his presidency is brought to the SC, BK as swing voter will rule in trump's favor - despite clear evidence of trump's wrong doing.

As for trump himself. I praise him for his stand against Iran, the Palestinians and his recognition of Jerusalem as the eternal city of Israel - more power to him. I disagree with him on his one-man show his demonizing attitude toward women. and by god I am tired of his lies - period.

A fight for power goes by all means and Democrats play their usual bunch of dirty tricks. First create a lot of fuzz, then the candidate becomes controversial etc. Something Republicans have mastered as well of course. But for the Democrats there's a lot at stake; if Kavanaugh gets appointed their only source of power and influence remaining is the federal bureaucracy. \

So Kavanaugh is now overloaded with pseudo-scandals.

Propaganda is to some scholars as a carrot on a stick to donkeys. Karen Armstrong being the prime example on how it can induce a desired behavior.

By sheer fact that - almost in each case, those candidates appointed by Republican presidents - barely squeeze in through slim majority speak loud of the country's real sentiment about extremists - right of left.

... and nobody minds honest opposition out of conviction. But the methods we see these days are reminiscent of what Roman emperors did to rid themselves of unwanted people. Sure "he eats human flesh and sacrifices children" (Nero's reason to persecute Christians) would today not be very effective as people would think it mad....

But unproven allegations of sexual misconduct do the same job. They generate mass hysteria and demonise people. Did you see all the "me too" women with placards? I would like to know what this man did to them exactly, and when. I am certain that pretty much none of them ever even spent a minute in the same building with him.

I can respect someone who makes a case why he should not be appointed because of his track record or his views perhaps, because of the "balance" of the court even. But this way? It is merely exhibiting a level of corruption most people were not even aware of before. It is because the political elite behaving in this way that Trump was elected in the first place.

Hombre wrote:By sheer fact that - almost in each case, those candidates appointed by Republican presidents - barely squeeze in through slim majority speak loud of the country's real sentiment about extremists - right of left.