Saturday, 5 January 2013

The pity of this performance is that there are quite a lot of talented actresses on the stage. Some of them, most notably Harriet Walter as Brutus, manage, often for long stretches, to transcend the ineffective concept of a production in which they are stranded. But in the end, Phyllida Lloyd's new production is a classic case of the arrogant director who having thrown out the original setting has nothing to put in its place.

Lloyd's concept appears to be that the play is being put on by a theatre group in a women's prison. I say appears to be because for much of the time we are simply in a pretty bare, empty environment. After the prisoners are marched in at the beginning, Lloyd appears to forget about where she's set the piece for two thirds of the play. The main consequence of this is that although there is some sterling delivery of text going on from some of the performers, much of it falls flat because the environmental context has been removed and replaced with, well, nothing very clear. Would that this had persisted to the end of the evening. Unfortunately, at about the two thirds mark Lloyd suddenly seems to remember that she's imposed this concept on the show and obviously feels that she better do something to justify it. First a minor Citizen Prisoner is summoned by the guard to take her meds. She is replaced by another unidentified prisoner (outside of their parts in the play there is almost no sense that they any of them have separate characters as prisoners) who reads the next scene from the script. Then in the big Cassius and Brutus reconciliation scene, some prisoners start giggling giving Walter the opportunity to deploy a few choice swear words in their direction. Having duly reminded us, in this baffling fashion, of her concept, the thing once again subsides from view.

Two other consequences of this concept need to be mentioned here. First, the normal Stalls benches have been replaced by grey plastic chairs which are increasingly hard on the back in a two hour sit. Secondly, the interval has been dispensed with. Given how half baked the concept is, I do not think either decision is justified.
All of this is rather a pity since, as already mentioned, there is some fine acting labouring under these conditions, and on that basis it is an excellent advertisement for all-female Shakespeare. Harriet Walter's Brutus is superb. She persistently lifts things outside of Lloyd's concept and almost convinced me that there was something more than the prison over which everybody was fighting. She has stillness, delivery, nuance in spades, which makes it the more irritating that the production does so little to reinforce what she's doing. Also very good is Jenny Jules's Cassius. Her delivery is a bit too much at one level in places, but she too has great presence, and the Brutus/Cassius scene towards the close is compelling stuff (again making the interjection above mentioned the more idiotic). Ishia Bennison gives a nice turn as Casca. About Frances Barber's Caesar I was rather less sure, but I think she is especially a victim of the staging. The opening is incoherent, her scenes of power played in such a way as to make her almost ridiculous, and the stabbing was particularly unconvincing. Oddly, she becomes a compelling presence only as a ghost. Cush Jumbo's Antony also suffers in this regard – goodness knows who thought up all the movement, weird choral singing and grunting that goes on during the Brutus/Antony funeral speeches but it is successful, as others have observed, at making that crucial moment go for nothing.

In the end, despite the best efforts of the actors it's impossible for the evening to get past the fundamental problem. This is that Lloyd, having thrown out classical buildings and sandy battlefields, hasn't put sufficient in their place. And that makes for a sadly empty evening.

Charles Mackerras (1925-2010)

Subscribe to where's Runnicles

About us

Welcome to where's Runnicles, a blog founded by brothers Tam and Finn while sharing a flat in Edinburgh (Finn is now based in Lincoln). Our purpose: to talk about the arts in general, classical music and the Edinburgh Festival in particular. (And, of course, Donald Runnicles.)

Contributors

Freebies & Press Stuff

If you're a press officer, or arts organisation, or artist, or anything, and are wondering if we'd like to review something you're doing, you're welcome to get in touch with us (we may have no idea about it or we may be coming already). Please do feel free to add us to your mailing lists for press releases or invite us to season launches and the like.

We do not accept free tickets or review CDs not available to the general public. See here for more detail as to why.

Where's Runnicles Awards

Every now and again, usually towards the end of one of my reviews, I suggest that an artist has done something so remarkable, they deserve an award. So I give them an elaborately named one. A full list, and fuller explanation can be found here.

Interestingly, to date James Lowe is the only person to have won two. Well, actually, we've now given three to Donald Runnicles (but they were all for the same thing). Astonishingly, Charles Mackerras has yet to gain even one. There's time yet, though....

Shameless Plugs

Below is a list of artistic endeavours to which we have a connection (usually either because friends or relatives are involved). Sometimes the Shameless Plugs tag will appear on reviews, denoting the fact that such a group is being reviewed and hence the potential conflict of interest involved.

Followers

Runnicles in the News

Loading...

EIF News

Loading...

The views expressed here are our own, except where explicitly stated. We have no official link to Donald Runnicles, or his management, and so it should not be assumed that our opinions coincide with theirs.

Of course, should the eponymous Maestro Runnicles, or his management, object to our paying tribute to an artist we very much admire, we are happy to rethink the name.

You are welcome to quote from our reviews, should you wish. However, please note that all quotes must be attributed and, if on a website, we request you include a link back to the original post. We would also ask that quotes be kept to a reasonable length (e.g. not more than a paragraph or so).