This is an attempt to unravel the facts & the many varied & changing claims surrounding the death, abduction or dissapearance of Madeleine McCann aged 3, whilst on holiday with her parents and younger siblings in Portugal, on the night of 07-May-2007, to try to establish the truth.

Sergey Malinka has written a book about his experience as a Madeleine McCann suspect

A Russian computer expert named as a suspect in the Madeleine McCann case is set to reveal the ‘bribing, threatening and blackmailing’ he claims he endured in a new book about the long-running investigation.

Sergey Malinka, 32, was named by Portuguese police as an aguido, or suspect, shortly after Madeleine disappeared in Praia da Luz, in 2007.

He became a person of interest after detectives noted that he had contacted another suspect at 11.30pm on May 3, 2007, around an hour-and-a-half after police were first called over the missing three-year-old.

Malinka was also said to have fitted the description of a man seen close to the hotel where the McCanns were staying.

His apartment was searched and computers seized. Malinka’s car was then firebombed and the word ‘Fala’, meaning ‘speak’ scrawled in red paint outside his apartment.

At the time, Malinka said: ‘The disappearance of a child is always difficult. No parent would want any of that to happen to anyone.

‘So I wish and truly hope that Madeleine will be found and returned to her parents.

‘I have a clear conscience. I have nothing to worry about.’

Then in 2014, Malinka’s name was briefly raised again as a suspect because of an investigation by Scotland Yard detectives.

While he was told he was no longer under suspicion, Malinka claims there has been an impact on his business and personal life from being connected to the investigation.

Madeleine McCann was three-years-old when she went missing in Prai da Luz, Portugal, in 2007 and an age progression image of what she would have looked like on her ninth birthday.

Now a decade on, he has teamed up with British author David S. Jones, the co-creator of popular children’s series, Fireman Sam, and who also lives in Praia da Luz, to write Collateral Damage, a book about his experiences.

Malinka, who is set to become a father, said he wants to clear his name so that his child does not have to grow up in the shadow of suspicion that has hung over him for a decade.

Announcing his intention to publish the book next year via Kickstarter, Malinka said in a video: ‘There was alot of slandering and facts that weren’t checked.

‘Ten years has passed, but every time I think about this it’s very difficult for me.

‘You will find out the most revealing details about my story – the bribing, the threatening, the blackmailing, the defamation and just general aggravation from the public.’

Speaking to the Sunday Express, he added: ‘I was 22 years old when it happened, a young man alone in a foreign country.

Kate and Gerry McCann continue to look for their missing daughter, Maddy, a decade on

‘I have been driven to the point of dejection, being involved in a web of lies, betrayals and threats.

‘The deceits of others have driven me to the edge of despair, sometimes to the point of no return, but time heals even the deepest wounds.’

The search to discover what happened to Madeleine McCann – Operation Grange – is one of the longest, most high-profile and costly police investigations in history.

Launched in May 2011, officers have sifted (and translated) 40,000 documents produced by Portuguese police who conducted the initial investigation, and by the eight teams of private detectives who have worked on the case.

Some 600 ‘persons of interest’ have been examined and ‘sightings’ of Madeleine — in Brazil, India, Morocco and Paraguay, on a German plane and in a New Zealand supermarket — assessed.

Author David S Jones has teamed up with Sergey Malinka to write Collateral Damage

The team have taken 1,338 statements and collected 1,027 exhibits. Officers have probed more than 60 people of interest while the team has considered 650 sex offenders.

In total, there have been 8,685 potential sightings of Madeline across the globe.

Over the past few months, the Grange team — now down to four detectives from a peak of 31 — has been criss-crossing Europe trying to locate a ‘woman in purple’, who is of interest to the investigation.

Their budget had been due to run out in September, but officers are understood to have used the ‘woman in purple’ line of investigation to persuade the Home Office — which is financing the inquiry from central government funds — to grant a six-month extension.

The £154,000 agreed will allow inquiries to continue until March, taking the total spent on Operation Grange near to £12million.

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

See also: ‘Clear grounds for the prosecution of Kate & Gerry McCann’CLICK HERE

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

NSPCC –

Guidelines on when it is acceptable to Leave children at home alone State unequivocally

Babies, toddlers and very young children should never be left alone

Parents and carers can be prosecuted for neglect if it is judged that they placed a child at risk by leaving them at home alone

Do be minded that the 3 McCann babies, and yes I do mean babies as the eldest was Madeleine and she was not yet four and in the eyes of the law she was a baby/toddler left in charge of two much younger babies, they were not even left at home – they were left in a strange appartment in a foreign country, where she could not even speak the language!

What the law says

Strange as it may seem, there’s no set age for leaving children home alone. The law simply says that you shouldn’t leave a child alone if they’ll be at risk.

There’s such a wide variation in the rate that children mature that it would be almost impossible to come up with a “one size fits all” law. Instead, the choice is left to parents. They know their children best and can use their own judgement.

There might not be a specific legal age to leave children alone but it’s safe to say babies, toddlers and young children should never be left alone, even if it’s just while you pop down the road. Even if they’re sleeping peacefully when you leave they could well wake up and get very upset when you’re not there to look after them. They would not be able to protect themselves in an emergency and may even try to leave the property to find you.

NSPCC advice on leaving a child at home

Babies, toddlers and very young children should never be left alone

Children under the age of 12 are rarely mature enough to cope in an emergency and should not be left at home alone for a long period of time

Children under the age of 16 should not be left alone overnight

Parents and carers can be prosecuted for neglect if it is judged that they placed a child at risk by leaving them at home alone

A child should never be left at home alone if they do not feel comfortable with this, regardless of their age

If a child has additional needs, these should be considered when leaving them at home alone or with an older sibling

When leaving a younger child with an older sibling think about what may happen if they were to have a falling out – would they both be safe?

Things to consider before leaving a child home alone

No one knows your child quite as well as you do – so use your knowledge of what they’re really like to answer these questions. This won’t give you a definite answer about whether the time is right to leave your child alone at home, but it’ll certainly give you plenty to think about.

Does your child seem to be responsible and mature for their age and always do what you tell him or her?

Would they be able to fix themselves something to eat and drink and would you be happy with them using the cooker or microwave?

Can you imagine how they’d cope in an emergency like a power cut or a flooded bathroom?

Would they know what to do if the phone rang or someone came to the door?

Would they know how to contact you or another family member or friend if they needed to? Do they have these contact numbers to hand?

How would they feel about being left alone – pleased to be given the responsibility or scared by the thought of it?

But remember, if you or your child are even the teeniest bit unsure about leaving them at home on their own, it’s always best to be on the safe side and arrange some other kind of care for them such as a babysitter or childminder.

There is no doubt or argument which exhonourates Drs. Kate & Gerry McCann for having left their 3 babies alone and unattended in a rented flat in a foreign country where they didn’t even speak the language. Do be minded they were not left alone whilst the parents popped out, which would have put the babies at risk, but whilst the two Doctors left their babies to go out carousing with chums in a tavera some 100 yards away out of sight and sound of the babies.

However often they may claim to have returned to check them merely shoqws they knew clearly they were at risk and the periods between visits were the very cause of the outcome that night when Madeleine allegedly went missing.

Had these 2 Doctors acted responsibly and ensured the 3 babies were not abandoned, either by remaining with them, taking them with them or by ensuring they had an approved baby sitter Madeleine would still be in their care as a teenager now!

See also:

The former child minder said she is still haunted by the image of dad Gerry desperately trying to find their missing daughter while she tried to comfort weeping mum Kate

ByMatthew Young

11:57, 19 APR 2017

Updated11:47, 2 MAY 2017

A nanny who looked after Madeleine McCann has told how the youngster’s parents were plunged into despair and panic when the ­horrifying truth she had vanished sank in.

The former child minder said she is still haunted by the image of dad Gerry desperately trying to find their missing daughter while she tried to comfort weeping mum Kate who cried: “They’ve taken her.”

Breaking her silence after 10 years, the witness also claimed the resort from which Madeleine vanished was considered so unsafe nannies were handed rape alarms and told to not go out alone.

And she slammed the Portuguese police’s handling of the disappearance, insisting their ­blundering scuppered any chances of finding who had snatched three-year-old Madeleine.

Kate and Gerry make emotional appeal after their daughter was abducted while they were at dinner (Photo: Getty)

Madeleine has been missing since 2007 (Photo: PA)

Speaking of that dreadful night in May 2007, the ex-nanny –who looked after the girl several times – said: “A parent came to me and said there was something going on, and said someone’s looking for a child, I didn’t instantly think it was Maddie.

“A couple of minutes later I walked into Kate crying, friends comforting her, Gerry looking under cars, and it just blew up.

“I don’t even think she saw me. I just stood next to her and tried to comfort her.

“She was pacing up and down. The worst possible thing had just happened to her.

“I think I said something like, ‘She’ll be found, these things happen all the time.’

“She was crying, but almost in a catatonic state, and Gerry was very distressed. That’s the one thing I really remember from him, looking under the cars. I can’t forget that.

The Mark Warner resort closed in 2015 (Photo: Daily Mirror)

“We were told to start looking in bins in case her body was in there. It was at that point we realised this was serious.”

Along with other staff, the ex-carer, who worked for travel firm Mark Warner at the the Ocean Club resort, sifted by hand in the dark through industrial-sized bins and piping leading into the sea in their hunt for Madeleine.

They also walked Praia da Luz’s small, winding streets searching for the missing girl until they were told, against their wills at 5am, that it was time for bed.

But the woman, who we are not naming, said she is still furious with local police , who she claimed took 90 minutes to arrive on the scene.

And she told how people were in and out of the apartment where Madeleine vanished from – contaminating a ­potential crime scene.

The former nanny added: “I know I didn’t step into that apartment but pretty much everybody else did. So, evidence gone, nothing. There was nobody there to say, ‘We need to lock this off now.’

“The police didn’t get there for ages, maybe an hour and a half, so we were looking for her.

“And at the end of the day, no matter how much you’ve been trained with ­children, we were children, mainly ­teenagers, we’re not police.

“That’s why police were trying to get everyone’s timelines, because they weren’t there.”

She also told how she was interviewed by officers in the wake of Madeleine’s disappearance and later detectives from ­the Met’s Operation Grange handed her two pages of statements they had retrieved from their Algarve compratiots.

View of the Ocean Club Apartments complex from the street (Photo: Daily Mirror)

Her original statement was four to five pages long, but the one the Portuguese had been working from was only two pages long – missing a number of details from her interview.

The woman claimed “whole chunks of information were missed out”.

Kate McCann speaks during charity fundraiser in midst of court battle

She added: “I think a lot of things should’ve happened differently. ­Unfortunately the effects were catastrophic.”

And the carer told how she was astonished Kate and Gerry were ever deemed suspects in their own child’s ­disappearance.

She is still constantly quizzed by people about the case who ask if “the parents did it”.

She said: “I tell them no, there’s no way at all. A, timings and B, where it was, their r­eactions, the whole thing. Not a chance.”

The woman also told how Madeleine was a favourite among the child minders. Her allocated nanny was Catriona Baker, but others also got the chance to look after her.

The carer added: “I remember her character and ­temperament. She was slightly shy, very sweet. Not loud or precocious.

The nanny said that Madeleine was a helpful, polite child (Photo: PA)

“We obviously give the same care to all the children, but she was a real cutie and a real sweetheart. If you asked her, ‘Can you just pass me that?’ She’d be like, ‘Sure.’

“She was easy for us, and you were happy to sit and help out this pretty little girl who’s really nice.”

While the Ocean Club was clearly popular with British holidaymakers like the McCanns, from Rothley, Leics, the former child minder claimed it was considered an unsafe place for those who worked there.

After she arrived she was stunned when a fellow nanny passed on a message from hotel staff to never venture off the site alone.

She added: “I just couldn’t get over how different it was to other Mark Warner resorts.

“We were told, ‘Here’s a rape whistle, don’t go anywhere by yourself, ever.’ There’d been a girl attacked the year or so before in Praia da Luz. It didn’t sound like a family resort to me.

“I just got the feeling the locals didn’t want us there.”

It emerged in 2014 that 11 years earlier a 10-year-old British girl had been sexually assaulted “in the heart” of Praia da Luz.

The tapas bar where Kate and Gerry were when Madeleine was snatched (Photo: Daily Mirror)

The victim came forward three years ago after a Scotland Yard appeal revealed a string of potentially linked sex assaults on young UK girls across the Algarve between 2004 and 2006.

Mark Warner, which operates in resorts all over the world, quit Praia da Luz in 2015.

Madeleine vanished as her parents ate with friends at a tapas bar just 40 yards from where she slept next to twin siblings, Amelie and Sean.

But the former nanny, who couldn’t face child minding again after the Algarve horror, said dining while kids were in the apartments was “really normal” in such resorts.

And she insisted there was no evidence Kate and Gerry would ever neglect their kids.

She said: “I remember thinking, even before I knew them, how they were the picture perfect family.”

The tapas bar was not far from the family’s apartment (Photo: The People)

Asked if she thinks Madeleine is still alive, the woman said: “Think possibly is the wrong word, but hope. I hope she is still alive.

“It’s probably very naive, but the best case scenario of a very horrible situation, is that she was procured and taken for a rich person who didn’t have children.

“I can’t go anywhere else in my head. I can read it about other people and know how horrible that seedy world is where children are sold. But my brain won’t go there with her. I just switch off.

“But I think the only person who knows exactly what happened is Madeleine. Can I believe it’s 10 years on? Yes and no.

A still from a video showing the re-enaction of Madeleine’s abduction (Photo: PA)

She was taken from the Mark Warner Ocean Club resort (Photo: Daily Mirror)

Crimewatch – Madeleine McCann Reconstruction

No because 10 years seems like a really long time, she’d be nearly 14.

“And yes, because sometimes, when I talk about it, it feels like I’m right back there again.

“I wonder if she’s alive. Does she even remember? Does she remember her parents?

“I’m probably less harrowed by it now, but that’s just because, although it’s awful, it’s become accepted.

“‘It’s Madeleine, she’s gone missing but it would just be the best day ever if I could be told that she’s been found.”

Operation Grange, which was last month given £85,000 of Home Office funding to extend its probe until September, still speaks to witnesses.

many 1,000s of gullible donors paid in hard earned money to help fund a search for Madeleine McCann, yet it seems the McCanns have spent that money on much else and now it seems that includes their lost case to try and suppress the evidence and opinions put forward by the Lead Police Enquiry Officer covering the case, in Portugal.

I presume their actions against Tony Bennett, who gave his opinion and drafted a long list of questions for the McCanns to answer, was funded from this same source!

I believe that it is legitimate to question the morality of collecting money for one cause and then seeing it spent on seeking to impress and bully others with conflicting views into silence, is potentially fraud or the outright embezelling of the fund, but although I believe I am correct and clearly it is morally wrong, whether it is criminally wrong is a matter for the police!!

NEVER GIVING UP

Maddie McCann’s parents ‘plough £500,000 into investment fund’ as they try to keep hunt for missing daughter up ten years since she disappeared

A source said it made sense for the money raised for the Find Madeleine Fund to go as far as possible

By Brittany Vonow

11th March 2017,9:59 pm

Updated: 12th March 2017,2:04 am

KATE and Gerry McCann have poured almost half a million pounds into a string of investments as the search for their daughter Madeleine nears almost a decade.

I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK

I am NOT a WARMIST

I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming

I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES

I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies

I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion

I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern

I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support

I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.

I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.

I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.

I do NOT trust or believe in armed police

I do NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence

I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

Comments:

Comments posted on this web site are moderated.

I regret the need to moderate the comments however ALL comments received will be posted other than those submitted anonymously, those which are ad hominem attacks, those containing gratuitous obscenity or offensive profanity and those which are palpably and provably dishonest in content or intent.
Naturally advertising spam and the like will also be deleted.

Caveat:

I appreciate that as a result of exposing the criminality, corruption or abuse of others and/or providing a venue to enable others to do likewise – many who feel threatened by my actions will seek to discredit me in any way they can and will invent or distort facts about me. I accept that is a risk, to which I expose myself, however I am well aware that my friends know the truth, others with integrity can check the facts by contacting me and the corrupt, dishonest and gullible who promote or believe the lies published about me must answer to their own shame in the long run! Frankly I care not a jot what such people’s opinion of me is as their willingness to lie about me or accept or promote the lies about me speaks volumes of them and very little about me and affects me not one jot.

There is never a wrong time to do the right thing – or to help those less fortunate than oneself, even if there is personal risk.

Kate and Gerry McCann have been dealt another cruel blow as a Portuguese court failed to put them in the clear over the disappearance of daughter Madeleine.

The couple were ruled out as formal suspects, or “arguidos”, back in 2008 – but in newly released court papers, judges have specified that this does not equate to a ruling of ­innocence.

It will add to the McCanns’ torment, after the same judges ruled against the couple last week in a legal battle with the police officer who led the hunt for their daughter.

The couple sued ex-police chief Goncalo Amaral after he wrote a book claiming they were responsible for Madeleine’s “death” in May 2007.

But he fought the case and Portugal’s Supreme Court sided with him.

Madeleine McCann has been missing since 2008 (Photo: PA)

In the 76-page ruling on the case – made public – they also said the archiving in 2008 of the criminal case into Madeline’s ­disappearance does not prove the McCanns are innocent.

They wrote: “It should not be said that the appellants were cleared via the ruling announcing the archiving of the criminal case.”

While the judges said it would be wrong to draw any inferences about the couple’s guilt or innocence from the decision, they noted that the case was not shelved because prosecutors believed that Kate and Gerry, from Rothley, Leics, were innocent – but due to a lack of evidence.

The court sided with Goncalo Amaral (Photo: Mirrorpix)

They wrote: “That ruling was not made in virtue of Portugal’s Public Prosecution Service having acquired the conviction that the appellants hadn’t committed a crime.

“The archiving of the case was determined by the fact that public prosecutors hadn’t managed to obtain sufficient evidence of the practice of crimes by the appellants.

The court concluded that the archiving of the case should not be seen as proof the McCanns are not guilty, stating: “It doesn’t therefore seem acceptable that the ruling, based on the insufficiency of evidence, should be equated to proof of innocence.”

How the Daily Mirror reported the court case

The damming document means suspicion still hangs over the heads of the McCanns, who have always claimed their innocence.

It was released after the court decided Amaral’s “right to freedom of expression” was worthy of greater protection than the couple’s “right to honour”.

Amaral, 57, was ordered to pay the couple £360,000 in damages in 2015 for claims he made in The Truth Of The Lie.

He said the McCanns faked Madeline’s abduction after she “died” in their holiday apartment. Amaral claimed his work was based on publicly available police and court files on the case. Kate described the book as “devastating and distressing”.

Amaral successfully overturned the ruling against him last April and the McCanns lodged a Supreme Court appeal.

But judges decided Amaral’s claims were “within admissible limits in a democratic and open society”. It means Kate and Gerry, both 48, face having to pay Amaral’s legal bills and could even be sued by him.

Kate and Gerry McCann outside court (Photo: Daily Mirror)

The McCanns may take the case to the European courts, but legal experts say they must prove they have a valid reason of appeal before any hearing would be even considered.

Madeline vanished from an apartment in Praia da Luz as her parents ate at a nearby restaurant. Detectives are said to be working on a theory that she was kidnapped by a European trafficking gang.

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

there is no apparent reason why this article is less accurate than when it was first published which was a number of years ago – on a brief read through I can find none of the 100 reasons put forward that I can recall having been proven unsound.

100 reasons why Madeleine McCann was not abducted

Compiled by ‘Truestepper’ on Sky Discussions:“It reminds me of a quote from the FBI:”“Taken alone, each piece of evidence might be argued, but together, enough pebbles become a block of evidentiary granite.”PHYSICAL / APARTMENT / ENTRY

1. All five markers in a sample found under the tiles, behind the sofa (exactly where Eddie, the EVRD [Cadaver] dog and Keela, the CSI [Human Blood] dog, both indicated), are 100% compatible with Madeleine’s DNA profile

2. Fifteen of the markers, in a sample found under the luggage liner of the McCann’s Scenic (hired 24 days later), are 100% compatible with Madeleine’s DNA profile

3. Shutters were not jemmied or forced, as claimed by the parents

4. No signs of forced entry anywhere in the apartment

5. No physical evidence of anyone having entered or left via the window, including:

The only perceived evidence of abduction, being the sighting by Jane Tanner at around 21.15 is riddled with inconsistencies and conflicting testimonies, being the fact that

24. None of the scent tracking Search & Rescue dogs followed that trail, and in fact followed another trail completely

25. Jeremy Wilkins (independent witness) failed to spot the ?abductor?, despite being only yards away, while chatting to Gerry

26. Jeremy Wilkins (independent witness) failed to see Jane Tanner walking by, despite being on the same narrow sidewalk at the same time

27. Gerry himself failed to spot the abductor, despite being only yards away, while chatting to Jeremy

28. Gerry contradicted Jeremy by stating that their chat was on the opposite side of the road from that as described, and drawn on a map, by Mr Wilkins

29. Gerry also contradicted Tanner, by stating that his chat with Jeremy was on the opposite side of the road from that mentioned by Jane

30. Jane failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine’s bedroom while walking to her apartment at 21.15

31. Jane failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine?s bedroom while walking from her apartment at 21.20

32. Jane never bumped into Jeremy Wilkins (who had walked back to his apartment after the chat with Gerry) while walking back from her apartment at 21.20

33. Russell O’Brien failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine’s bedroom while walking to his apartment at 21.30

34. Matthew Oldfield failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine’s bedroom while walking to his apartment, which was right next door, at 21.30

35. Matthew failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains while checking on Madeleine and the twins

36. Matthew failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine’s bedroom while walking from his apartment back to the Tapas at around 21.35

37. Jane failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine’s bedroom while walking to her apartment at 21.45

38. Russell failed to spot the open window and shutters and blowing curtains coming from Madeleine’s bedroom while walking back from his apartment at 21.50

39. Tanner’s description has changed several times

40. It makes no sense, especially if (as the McCann’s claim) that this was a well planned abduction, that the abductor walks across the very road used by the parents to check on their children

41… The abductor failed to hear either Tanner, Gerry or Wilkins, and continued on the path that would put him in the full vision of all three

42… If the abductor had lifted Madeleine out of the bed, then he would be carrying with her head to his right hand side, not on the left as in Tanner’s claimed sighting

SMITH SIGHTING

43. The Smith family (independent witnesses) sighting has, with the exception of one brief mention two years later, been completely ignored by the McCann’s and their private detectives from day one (no e-fit / press conference / media onslaught) despite the fact that?

44. There was huge publicity given to the Tanner sighting, including the pressure put on the Portuguese authorities to get the details out there

45. The Smith family descriptions have never changed

46. The sighting was only minutes before the ‘alarm’ was raised

47. The sighting was only 250 metres from the apartment

48. This sighting would have explained many of the inconsistencies of the Tanner sighting as mentioned above

49. There were several members of the family who witnessed this man carrying a child

50. The general area and timing of the sighting made by the family can be corroborated by a restaurant receipt for that evening

51. The general description of the man could fit Gerry McCann

52. The description of the child matches Madeleine

53. The type of trousers match those possessed by Gerry

54. Trousers match in terms of colour

55. Trousers even match in terms of the visible buttons as mentioned by one of the family

56. Martin and his wife later identified the carrier, through the distinctive carrying style, as being Gerry McCann

Given much of the above, the remarkable coincidence that?

57. The pressure put on the PJ to highlight the Tanner sighting came at exactly the same time as the Smith family were being brought back to Portugal to go over the sighting in more detail

58. The sighting was in a different part of town from the Tanner sighting

59. It was also heading in a completely different direction

60. The carrying style was completely different to that of the Tanner sighting

61. And yet the McCann’s deliberately altered the Smith sighting carrying style so as to match that of the Tanner sighting, during the only ever significant mention of the sighting, in a McCann made reconstruction aired only a few days after Amaral’s (in which he included the Smith sighting)

62. They also tried to morph the carrier into the same man as seen by Tanner, despite significant differences in descriptions

BEHAVIOURAL

There are many instances of strange behaviour from the McCann’s, not being consistent with parents of a child abducted by paedophiles, including (but not limited to)?

63. Kate complaining about the speed of a police vehicle while being take to look into a new lead at PJ HQ (sighting caught on CCTV)

64. Gerry laughing and joking and sucking lollipops while one of the most significant abduction leads came to a climax

65. Very little mention of the huge award available over the last three years

66. Despite raising millions through their fund, and spending thousands on media monitoring, they continue to charge for travel kits and for printing off posters designed to help find their daughter

69. Hiring cowboy private detectives with no expertise or experience in finding children

70. Gerry smirking when asked by a Sky News presenter how he feels when someone comes forward who is certain that they have seen Madeleine

71. When up to 14 possible sightings of Madeleine emerged in Malta, resulting in a huge police operation including Interpol, the McCann’s hot footed it to Germany for more TV plugs

72. When the most promising sighting of all was made in Belgium, a 110% certain sighting by a child therapist, considered so credible by authorities that they despatched a forensics team, the McCanns went looking in Huelva, Spain

73. Gerry’s initial claim, as overheard by another holidaymaker, within minutes of the alarm being raised, that Madeleine had been taken by paedophiles. How did he know that?

74. Gerry caught on Camera laughing his head off only a few days after his daughter had been abducted by paedophiles as claimed by the parents

75. Despite refuting the claims of the dogs / Scenic findings, the McCann’s continued to submit ridiculous reasoning for them, including Sea bass, sweat, dirty nappies, rubbish en-route to dump, rotten meat, and attending to 6 bodies before the holiday, amongst others

76. Kate refusing to answer 48 police questions

77. The McCann’s and their holiday friends all refusing to attend a police reconstruction

78. Despite the Madeleine’s disappearance looking like an inside job from the outset, the McCann’s and their friends were happy enough returning their children to the MW creche just hours later, despite not knowing if any of the staff were involved

79. When Kate raised the alarm, she ran back to the table, leaving the twins in the apartment while not knowing whether the abductor(s) were still onsite

80. Kate shouting They’ve taken her!?, not distinguishing between Madeleine and her sister Amelie

STATEMENT INCONSISTENCIES

90. When describing Madeleine sleeping that night, Kate said she was under the covers where as Gerry mentioned that his daughter slept without the covers, as was normal

91. Matthew Oldfield initially claimed that Kate and the children were at the tennis courts when he arrived there at 18.30 where as the rest of the Tapas 9 claim otherwise

92. David Payne’s 18.30 / 18.40 check on Kate (last person out with the parents to see Madeleine) : According to Kate the sliding door was closed, and that David didn’t actually enter the apartment, remaining at the door. But according to David, the door was open and he definitely entered the apartment.

93. Matt Oldfield chivvying up the Payne’s at 21.00 : Matt claims he passed them near the top of the road, but David claims to have passed him by the swimming pool, Fiona claims to have passed him outside 5A, and Dianne Webster initially claimed that Matthew wasn’t even there.

94. Prior to the PJ arriving at 12:40/12:50 Russell O’Brien has written the timeline for them all, including, Jane tanner sees stranger walking carrying child. He does this while Gerry McCann sits at the same table. However, according to Jane Tanner it’s three o’ clock in the morning when she informs Gerry McCann for the first time

100. This same friend calls the Metropolitan Police Crime Specialist Director (a number which is also used as the out of hours contact for the Met’s Child Abuse Investigation Team) 24 hours after the alarm

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

Abandoning A Child Is A Criminal Offence & 105 parents have been arrested for the crime in the last 3 months.

Hi,

minded that a Freedom of Information request has provided the information that in the last 3 months over 100 parents have been arrested for leaving their children home alone (reckless abandonment defines the crime more than adequately!) and:

Chris Cloke, from the NSPCC, said:“Although there is no legal minimum age for leaving children at home alone, no-one should leave a child unattended if they think they’ll be at risk.

“And it’s never acceptable to leave babies and very young children on their own for any length of time.”

Perhaps someone can explain why when such arrests take place when no harm has come to the children, based purely on the risk, just why when Kate & Gerry McCann abandoned their three babies, the oldest was Madeleine at 3.1/2, and then went out carousing with a group of friends in a local Tapas bar, in a foreign country – NO PROSECUTION took place.

To compound the injustice Madeleine went missing that night and may well have died by accidental causes.

Seven years later this small child has never been seen since and there is every probability that she died that fateful night, despite unsubstantiated claims of abduction and other obfuscating claims then and since – seven years later Kate & Gerry McCann have not only grossed 100s of 1,000s of Pounds even perhaps £Millions in donations and what seem to spurious damages claims as they have been compensated for their apparent criminal negligence by people who voiced detailed concerns and speculations as febrile as those constructed by the McCanns themselves, about what could possibly have happened to the small child that night.

Just why have these two not been arrested and treated like criminals as have been the 105 arrested for lesser offences in the last 3 months?

Whilst the police have prosecuted many of those who they arrested most of the balance have received official cautions, yet Kate and Gerry McCann have drifted from sofa to sofa giving well practiced interviews and have become celebrities in their own right; celebrities seemingly not only thus enriched but also protected from due process of law for their undeniably criminal behaviour.

Further as both Kate & Gerry McCann are qualified medical Doctors they were clearly even more aware of the risk they were taking with their babies wellbeing and possibly lives, than most, when they took the premeditated decision to abandon them to go out for the evening for their own gratification.

Prosecutions of parents who abandon their children or otherwise neglect them frequently call in Doctors as medical experts for the prosecution! It may even be possible that at some time either or both of them may themselves have been called upon as medical experts in such circumstances – yet they have not been prosecuted for the crime!

There is a maxim in British law that states that not only should justice be done but justice should be seen to be done – why has this not been upheld?

There is also an understanding that no one should be permitted to profit from their criminality, yet Kate & Gerry McCann would seem to have greatly profitted both financially and in public status amongst some who astonishingly condone and defend their irresponsible behaviour and its tragic outcome for Madeleine.

Why was not Madeleine as a mere baby protected by the law as there would seem to be absolutely no justice granted the child for its death, which after 7 years can surely be assumed and were a responsible application by the guardian, who in this case is the Court, it is more than probable that a Coroners Court would find that she was legally dead as there has been absolutely zero evidence led to lead any sane individual to believe she might be alive nor any sustainable evidence that she was even abducted in the first place – merely uncorroborated speculation.

When will Madeleine McCann receive the justice she deserves?

Essex parents arrested for leaving children home alone

First published Friday 27 March 2015 in News

Last updated 16:18 Friday 27 March 2015

FIVE parents in Essex were arrested on suspicion of leaving their children home alone in the space of just three months.

The figures, which were released by Essex Police as part of a Freedom of Information request, date back to October, November and December 2014.

Police forces in West Yorkshire, Kent, Derbyshire, and Thames Valley were the only authorities to make more arrests than Essex.

The law does not specify at what age parents can leave their children alone, but those who chose to do so can be arrested and prosecuted for cruelty and neglect if it puts the youngsters at risk.

A total of 105 mothers and fathers across the country faced criminal charges during the three month period, with cases involving children aged from just a few weeks to 14-years-old.

Thirty of those arrested were released without further action, 24 accepted a police caution and 19 were charged.

Other cases are ongoing.

Chris Cloke, from the NSPCC, said: “Although there is no legal minimum age for leaving children at home alone, no-one should leave a child unattended if they think they’ll be at risk.

“And it’s never acceptable to leave babies and very young children on their own for any length of time.”

I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to meI do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBookI DO have a Voice Mail Message System
I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back UK Land Line Messages
I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
I AM opposed to British membership of The EUI AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English IndependenceI am NOT a WARMISTI do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global WarmingI AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technology eg. WIND TURBINESI AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technology
I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or ModernI value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle supportI believe in a DEATH PENALTY for violent rape, mass or for pleasure murder , child abuse etc.
I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms