Of course Claes have followers who do understand his writings. This is the most brilliant blog of all, and I do hope Claes is not detracted by those who do not share his personal views and consequently can not see the merits of his reasoning.

Claes, I am aware that you have produced lots of cited papers in your own field, I'm referring to the kind of stuff you bring up on this blog like your skepticism to relativity, quantum mechanics and thermodynamics. And anonymous admirers like Dan doesn't count.

Well, if you have discovered new truths in one field, there is a chance you can do it also in a nearby field. To say what everybody else says as unreflected consensus, is not so interesting, to me at least. My blog gives me a chance to reflect about new things. You don't have to read it if you don't like it.

Well Thomas, we have met before and I really think you would benefit from listening to what Claes has to say and maybe even learn something. Sometimes the other guy is right, you know. Don't be so afraid of breaking any consensus, that is what science is all about. It's like a ladder, one step at a time will get you to the top. Doing it in one stride is impossible.

Thomas, we have met on other blogs and never agreed on anything. I was hoping the comments on this blog would be about ideas and not about stating what is right and what is wrong. I cannot claim to know if Claes's ideas are correct or incorrect. However, he writes about things that interest me, such as Theory of Flight and Relativity. We all have problems with understanding these subjects and Claes's work touches on my own way of handling the difficulties. Re. Relativity, I think Einstein said that the finest outcome of his theory would be if it was the basis of another, more encompassing theory. I think it is time for that now. Maybe the difficult parts of relativity is not something to spend a lifetime understanding, but in fact are flaws that need to be adressed.

Dan, earlier you said "Of course Claes have followers who do understand his writings", but from what you say now you aren't one of them as you cannot claim to know if Claes is right or wrong. So who are these followers who understand and agree?

While no one thinks general relativity is some kind of final theory (since it's incompatible with quantum mechanics) I'm afraid that any more complete theory will be even more complex.

Cleas, what does climategate has to do with the credibility of peer review?