Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique
Products & Services On Earth!

The Auschwitz 'Gas
Chamber' Illusion

By Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD

5-8-8

As surprising as it may sound, the only intentional mass
extermination program in the concentration camps of WW2 was targeted at
Germans. From April, 1945 five million Germans were rounded up after surrendering,
and deliberately starved until well over one million had died, in French
and American-run concentration camps[1] - an event soon erased from the
history books. There was, in contrast, never a centrally-coordinated Nazi
program of exterminating Jews in Germany. Lethal gas chambers did not function
in German labour-camps, that's just an illusion. The traditional Holocaust
story has developed out of rumours, misunderstandings, and wartime propaganda.
From stories pre-dating the Second World War to the Nuremberg Trials which
gave official sanction to the notion, to subsequent trials, books and films,
we have had it imprinted on our collective psyche. In most of Europe now,
it is a thoughtcrime to believe what you have just read, punishable by
imprisonment, so think carefully before deciding to read on.

The real experts on this subject are - in jail, so maybe
you will put up with hearing my view instead? Europe needs, more than anything
else, a truth and reconciliation forum to get to the bottom of these matters,
and to try and exorcise the demonic hate-images. Ever more nations are
passing laws that prohibit citizens from expressing doubt - Germany, France,
Austria, Poland, Romania, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada, Australia and New
Zealand. Collectively, we need to work trough our despair, rage, and ideas
of blame, to try and access the real historical record.

Cyanide at Auschwitz

Zyklon-B was used at Auschwitz, as an insecticide. It
was vital in attempting to maintain hygiene that mattresses be deloused.
Cyanide gas was adsorbed onto clay-type granules, designed to make the
deadly gas as 'safe' as it could be. If you go to Auschwitz today, you
can't see any authentic gas chambers. You see stone huts, and experts have
testified that they could not have been used to gas people, owing to problems
in sealing them up (Zyklon-B released its cyanide gas rather slowly[2]).

In 1988 the scientific team of Fred Leuchter (a US execution-expert
'Mr Death' in gas-chamber technology) visited Poland, and concluded that
the Auschwitz 'gas chambers' could not possibly have functioned in the
alleged manner - i.e., they were not gas chambers[3]. In the following
years, others would confirm the accuracy of his seminal, 'Leuchter Report'.
The German chemist Germar Rudolf, who worked at the Max Plank institute
for Solid State Physics, is now in jail, because he likewise measured the
high levels of the cyanide in the walls of the de-lousing chambers. It
happens that this gas bonds permanently with iron, and iron is present
in all the cement etc of stone walls. Whereas, he found none in the walls
of what were supposed to be the 'gas chambers' which were mainly shower
units. He thereby confirmed the work of Leuchter who likewise only found
remains of the cyanide gas-insecticide in the delousing chambers.[4]

After Rudolf's report was published in 1993, he lost
his job and was prevented from completing his doctorate, then a few years
later he was given a jail sentence. He is now in a high-security prison
near Stuttgart, for the crime of not finding cyanide in the 'gas chambers[5],'
echoing Leuchter's cyanide residue investigations. [6] When a chemist is
put in jail, for replicating the result of another - in Germany of all
places, the nation which invented chemical procedure ­ then the farce
cannot continue for much longer[7] (The gas chambers were conveniently
located east of Germany behind the Iron Curtain to make them inaccessible
to westerners, which helped the myth to flourish).

The Leuchter results were almost too good to be true,
with a three orders of magnitude difference between the cyanide levels
in the delousing chamber walls (about one part per thousand) and those
in the washing chambers (aka 'gas chambers'), around one part per million.
They are not published in any peer-reviewed chemistry journal, for obvious
reasons. The only way to hold a debate on this subject appears to be in
a courtroom, while being prosecuted! It is hard to reach the calm condition
necessary for replication of chemical measurements. Nonetheless people
have replicated the fundamental result[8], and even folk with no interest
in chemistry can appreciate the pretty blue colour on the outside of the
de-lousing chamber (where the Ferro cyanide has seeped right through the
wall) and its complete absence around the so-called 'gas chambers.' Let's
face it, the case is established: the cyanide poison was used where the
German records state that it was used ­ for delousing mattresses, clothing
etc - whereas it was not used where the US and UK (at Nuremberg) alleged.

Tourists, thirty million of them, have filed through
'Krema 1' at Auschwitz, with its piteous piles of shoes, etc of the dead.
This was reconstructed after the war in 1946[9], a fact revealed 1992 by
Dr. Franciszek Piper, the Senior Curator and Director of Archives of the
Auschwitz State Museum. The historic remains from the camp are such things
as shower-unit huts, a swimming pool and a morgue. There was a camp orchestra,
and quite a collection of pictures from the camp art-classes,[10] although
these cannot be shown in Germany or Poland, on account of laws prohibiting
the doubting of the Holocaust. Anne Frank of 'Diary' fame came to the camp
in 1944 with her father who was ill. He was put into the hospital there,
and recovered, suggesting that he was decently looked after.[11]

The 'gas chambers' at Auschwitz had water pipes in their
ceilings, indicating that they were designed as shower units. They generally
lacked tight-seal doors, which would have been essential, even though these
were easy to install ­ the Leuchter report cited the absence of such
seals as one reason why the alleged 'gas chambers' would never have functioned.

The Arithmetic of Annihilation

The primary argument put forward by Professor Arthur
Butz in his classic text, The Hoax of the 20th Century was demographic:
the Jews of Europe were still there after the war and therefore had not
been exterminated. They had generally moved eastwards, and once the Iron
curtain came down in 1948 it became difficult to count them. Some two million
emigrated from Europe, both to Palestine and America. Between 3 12 and
4 million Jews had lived in all the lands controlled by Adolf Hitler[12],
of which an upper limit of one million died in WW2: the figure of a million
dead, 'while possible, seems rather high to me', concluded Butz[13],[14]
- a figure to be contrasted with ten million Germans who died during and
just after that war[15]. If somewhere around fifty million people died
during WW2, that Jewish mortality comprised some 2% of this total: which
is about the average for Europe, i.e. no great excess of Jews died in WW2.
Almost half a million Jews dwelt in Germany around 1930 (around 1% of the
population), and by 1939 many had emigrated, some 270,000 remaining[16].

The figure of six million dead is given in the 'Holocaust'
section in Wikipedia, with three million having died in Poland. Its high
'extermination' figures are given in counties well to the East of Germany.
East Europe was then the epicentre of world Jewry, and in the years around
WWII a vast diaspora of Jews took place, mainly into what became the Soviet
Union, but also Palestine and America. Poland had 10% of its total population
Jewish in the 1930s and the Polish premier had 'stated repeatedly that
there were a million too many Jews in Poland'[17] ­so the pressure
on them to emigrate was not solely due to German policies. British rule
in Palestine disintegrated in 1938, which meant that its strict immigration
quotas ceased to apply. A very careful estimate of East Europe's Jewish
population ascertained that there were 2.6 million in Poland at the outbreak
of the war - less than the total Polish 'deaths' given by Wikipedia. It
put total worldwide mortality of Jews through WWII at 1 14 million, of
which most was due to 'Soviet barbarism' rather than German labour-camps[18].
That seems quite comparable to the figure given above. Within the Nazi
labour-camps, around four hundred and fifty thousand Jews died.[19]

Around 500,000 prisoners were registered in the labour-camps
of Auschwitz in Poland, of which some 130,000 died[20]. Bodies were there
disposed of by individual cremation, and the records for coke fuel consumption
over the period February 1942 ­ October 1943 for the cremation ovens
indicate that around five thousand bodies were then burnt. That accords
with the number of registered, deceased inmates, viz those who had died
from natural causes[21], who had to be cremated rather than buried because
of the great typhoid epidemics. This demonstrates that no mass-incineration
of bodies took place. Josef Kramer, a supervisor at the Auschwitz camp,
gave a statement after the war which is recommended by Professor Butz as
probably genuine: it had 350-500 deaths per week happening over May-November
1944, all from natural causes, a very high figure because sick prisoners
were sent there, and the dead were all cremated. He believed the camp held
up to 100,000 prisoners, mainly Poles and Prussians.[22]

The Final Solution ­ An Export Program

The 'Final Solution' of Adolf Hitler retained a single
meaning right through WW2, central to the program of 'National socialism,'
and signified the deportation of Jews, generally eastwards to Poland and
Russia[23]. This program did not change at any point, e.g. the Wannsee
conference of 1942,[24] to signify deliberate extermination. If that practice
ever happened, it was not a centrally-directed policy and did not involve
gas chambers: many tons of documentation of 'third Reich' policies remains,
and no-one has been able to find therein any hint of such a meaning ­
of intentional genocide. The historical record fails to show any central
decision to exterminate Jews by Nazi Germany.

The Gestapo and Zionists were collaborating in the late
30s because they had in this respect similar aims.[25] But, a German Foreign
Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937 stated that: 'In view of the
anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that
the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development
of the nations of the world'.[26] International Jewish organisations twice
declared war on Germany, in 1933 then again in 1939[27]. As the 'final
solution' policy[28] was thwarted by the Allies, the camps became places
of hard labour; then under the impact of Allied terror-bombing ravages
of disease and famine took place.

No Documents!

At the Auschwitz trial held at Frankfurt in the mid-sixties,
the court had to conclude that it lacked 'almost all the means or evidence
available in a normal murder trial' including 'the bodies of the victim,
autopsy reports, expert reports on the cause of death, evidence as to the
criminals, murder weapons, etc[29].' Far from leading to doubt, this gave
to the mythic gas chambers a metaphysical status, doubt of which was forbidden.
'No documents have survived, perhaps none ever existed,' concluded the
Holocaust historian Léon Poliakov.[30]

'In the case of the rush to impute to the Nazis a programme
for the extermination of millions of people which has implausibly left
no material traces, all the normal rules of historiography seem not only
to have been suspended, but to have been violated over and over again.
Historians routinely cite documents from secondary works like Raul Hilberg's
The Destruction of the European Jews (1961) or from printed collections
of documents, such as Robert Wolfe's Holocaust: The Documentary Evidence
- but they never cite original documents.[31]

The nearest we have to primary-source documents concerning
what went on within the camps, comes from the bulky, three-volume International
Red Cross Report published in 1948. This and especially Volume III describes
the couple of thousand regular, routine inspection-visits that its doctors
made through the war years to the Polish labour-camps. Their report never
hints at any gas-chamber, nor any mass-cremations. While maintaining a
politically neutral position[32], it confirms that mortality in the camps
was to a large extent caused by the allied terror-bombing.[33] Likewise
Winston Churchill's bulky, six-volume account of the War gives no allusion
to the subject, especially volume Six, Triumph and Tragedy where one would
expect to have some allusion if he believed it had happened.[34]

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a
directive dated Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration
camps. It sharply criticised the high death rate of inmates due to disease,
and ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal
to significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps." Furthermore,
it ordered: "The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the
past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration,
submit improvement recommendations to the camp commandants ... The camp
doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labor
places are improved as much as possible." The directive stressed that
"the Reichsfuhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler] has ordered that the death
rate absolutely must be reduced."[35] A further letter to all concentration
camp commanders dated 20th January, 1943, reaffirmed that 'every means
must be used to lower the death rate.' By September 1943 Auschwitz still
had mortality peaking at 80/day, viewed as 'catastrophic' by the SS administration.
Thus, from authentic documents concerning the need to reduce fatalities
at the Auschwitz camp, the world has moved to a belief in genocide, with
not a single authentic, supporting document[36]. The Auschwitz camp was
set up as an industrial plant using the giant coalfields of Poland, and
located at the confluence of rivers; it was essential to the war-effort
- it would have made no sense to start exterminating its inmates.

The Hamburg judge Wilhelm Staeglich had been positioned
near Auschwitz during the war and had on various occasions dropped into
the camps around there. The conditions seemed fairly tolerable, he recalled,
and certainly nothing resembling an extermination program existed. In particular,
he had discerned no fear of mistreatment amongst the inmates. He published
a testimony to this effect in 1973, and in return for his shocking news
a German inquisition forced him to resign his job, stripped him of his
doctoral degree, and banned his book. He was then subjected to police raids.
His book, translated into English, is an essential text.[37]

German military radio messages were successfully decrypted
at Bletchley Park using the 'enigma' codebreaker. Concerning the labour
camps, over the period Spring 1942-February '43, the following information
was obtained: 'The return from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with
20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included
references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts
to gassings.'[38] That seems clear enough - though no-one took any notice
of it at Nuremberg.

No Photos!

Not only is there no trace of 'Third Reich' documentation[39]
for what is alleged, but no photographs exist showing anything resembling
such a group-gassing procedure. Do you believe that Jews both male and
female stripped then marched into the gas chambers, then were hauled out
in piles? If so, are you willing to believe that neither the very-thorough
Germans nor the clever Jews wanted or were able to get a single picture
of this ultimate horror? Go to Google and search ­ you'll find rows
of emaciated bodies, dead of typhus, will that do? I don't think so.

US air-photographs taken in 1944 (released in 1978) when
the 'program' was supposed to be in full swing do not show any huge crematoria
burning corpses nor queues entering the 'gas chambers: 'The few air photos
of Auschwitz-Birkenau known to date from the period of December 1943 to
February 1945 show no signs of fuel depots, smoke from chimneys or open
fires, burning pits or pyres. The photos were altered: Zyklon B input hatches,
groups of inmates, and walls around crematoria were retouched onto the
photo negatives To this day there is no air photo evidence to support
the alleged mass murder of the Jews at any location in Europe occupied
by the Germans during World War Two.That the photos in western hands were
altered in order to incriminate Germany, and were first published by the
CIA, is also very significant indeed.'[40]

The Fabrication of Untruth

Let's hear a couple of testimonies concerning the dreaded
gas-chambers. An Austrian woman, Maria Van Herwaarden, testified about
her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988, as she
had been interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy woman
told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz. Upon
arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into
a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women
were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water
came out of the shower heads. Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed,
and she witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly
typhus, and quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all
of mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program.[41] A Jewish
woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in
July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily.
She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of
"gas chambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard
the gassing stories only later.[42]

The Allied carpet-bombing destroyed the supply lines
for the Camps, and so the death-toll mounted from famine and disease. Leaflets
were dropped from the air, alleging that at Auschwitz a 'final solution'/extermination
of Jews policy was being conducted, using gas. [43] That was the genesis
of the story, as those Allied-propaganda leaflets were believed. Greeted
by the sight, of rows of famished Jews who had died of e.g. typhoid, it
was not hard to see its confirmation. 'Far from it being common knowledge
in Germany that people were being gassed the vast majority of Germans
were horrified by the United Nations accusations and they protested that
they had never heard of such acts until after the cessation of hostilities
when they had begun listening to United Nations broadcasts . Since the
British Broadcasting Corporation had been broadcasting these accusations
regularly for many months before the end of the war, those Germans who
had "common knowledge" of the gassing before the war's end most
likely got this "knowledge" from the BBC!'[44] The gas-chamber
legend was born in December 1941, when the German author Thomas Mann declared
on the BBC that, in German hospitals, the severely wounded, the old and
the feeble were culled with poison gas. This was the 'first appearance
of gas chambers in propaganda.'[45]

As to how the stories got going, here is a remark by
Faurisson: 'The Foreign Office saw the new rumors of the Second World War
only as Jewish inventions, and many in American circles shared that conviction[46].
Edward Benes, President of Czechoslovakia (in exile in London), announced
in November 1942, after inquiry by his staff, that the Germans, contrary
to what had been reported to him, were not exterminating the Jews. The
American Jew, Felix Frankfurter, a Supreme Court judge, stated to Jan Karski
on the subject: "I can't believe you." In August of 1943, Cordell
Hull, Secretary of State, warned the U.S. ambassador in Moscow by telegram
that in planning a joint Allied statement on "the German crimes in
Poland", it would be advisable to eliminate any mention of the gas
chambers, since, as the British pointed out, there was "insufficient
evidence" in the matter[47]

The Hoax of Nuremberg

A modern inquiry needs to start from the data-fabrication
at Nuremberg by the US/UK, using systematic assassination and torture of
witnesses. The Nuremberg trials started in 1946 with the image of six million
dead as firmly established.[48] This did not emerge as a conclusion from
the trials, but in its immensity it was presented to the tortured and/or
beaten[49] Nazis as a fact, and would they confess their part in it? All
the main defendants at Nuremberg insisted that prior to the trial they
had not known of any mass murder of Jews: except that Rudolf Höss,
the former Commandant of Auschwitz, signed on March 15, 1946, a document
averring that he had overseen the slaughter of two and a half million Jews,
and this was read out on 15th April at Nurnberg. That day signified the
birth of Auschwitz's horror-myth. Two weeks earlier, Höss had remarked:

Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and
half million Jews. I could just as well have said it was five million Jews.
There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether
it is true or not."[50]

Decades later, an account was published of how Höss
had been tortured for three days and nights without sleep by a British
army team in order to extract that statement.[51] In a letter to his wife,
Höss apologised for his 'confessions' and explains that they had been
extracted from him under torture[52]. The victorious Allies could not have
their 'truth' come out at Nuremberg, without the assistance of torture.
In 2001, Patricia Meehan discussed the network of secret "Direct Interrogation
Centres" the British had set up in their occupational zone of Germany[53]
- torture chambers, to prepare 'evidence' for the upcoming trials. A Zionist
influence was noted at the Nuremberg trials,[54] not least concerning the
figure of six million.[55]

Weighty books are in print as memorials to 'the Holocaust',
but, let's hear a sceptical view from Down Under:

"Yet in the case of the Holocaust, the dearth of
material evidence for the existence of large-scale extermination programme
is not perceived as significant. It is assumed that the Nazis destroyed
their vast death machinery so thoroughly as to preclude all possibility
of post-war detection. It is not permissible to express doubts as to whether
the Nazis could really have eliminated all material evidence so completely,
including making the ashes of six million people vanish from the locations
at which they must have been interred. To think such doubts is to engage
in thought crime.

'The reality, therefore, is that the bulk of the 'evidence'
for the Holocaust derives from a corpus of documents that was expressly
manufactured by the OSS and OCC in 1945-46 for the purpose of incriminating
the leaders of the former German government at Nuremberg. The procedure
went roughly along these lines: the Documentation Division in Paris created
'copies' (in English only), certified them as true, and sent them to the
prosecution in Nuremberg, while the original documents (if they ever existed)
were never seen or heard of again. German translations of the original
English texts were then prepared and sent to the defense in Nuremberg,
where they arrived as late as possible so that the defense had insufficient
time to worry about such matters as their authenticity.

'Starting in May 1945 with the alleged suicides of SS-General
Hans-Adolf Prützmann, SS head Heinrich Himmler and SS-General Odilo
Globocnik while in British captivity, there followed a bizarre string of
murders of individuals associated with the Auschwitz concentration camp.
(These were perpetrated by a Jewish hit squad known as the DIN.) As Joseph
Bellinger, author of a new book on Himmler's murder, points out, within
six months or so of the war's end practically any one who could have shed
light on the Jewish policy of the Third Reich was murdered!' This, it must
be said, was extremely convenient for the prosecution at Nuremberg.[56]

At Nuremberg, the German war-generals as well as being
tortured had their wives arrested, to dissuade them from making inappropriate
remarks in court. They were kept in solitary confinement to prevent their
comparing notes, as each was presented with the Great Untruth and asked
to believe it. Finally, most of them were hanged, by a court which felt
free to invent new laws, and to act as prosecutor, judge, lawyer and executioner:
American justice!

Coming of the Truthseekers

In the post-war years, anyone claiming to have a personal
memory of the German gas-chambers would be liable to have Paul Rassinier
turn up on their doorstep. Having himself experience the hell of the Buchenwald
camp he was far from being a fan of the Nazis; but, neither was he prepared
to endure fabricated stories on the subject. He spent years travelling
about Europe with his tape-recorder and questions, but always he found
that the witnesses came out with 'evasions or palpable lies,' and his published
report concluded:

With regard to the gas chambers, the almost endless procession
of false witnesses and of falsified documents to which I have drawn the
reader's attention during this long study, proves, nevertheless, one thing:
never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich
intend to order - or in fact order ­ the extermination of the Jews
in this or any other manner.[57]

That bold conclusion (for which he was, naturally, jailed)
kick-started the 'revisionist' movement! We may here note that the money
which the FRG keeps paying out to 'holocaust survivors' does enormous damage
here, in stimulating 'memories' and generating such averred cases.

Revisionist Pioneers: David Irving, Ernst Zündel,
and Germar Rudolf

Robert Faurisson investigated the configuration of the
alleged Auschwitz 'gas chambers,' then Zundel[58] got to hear of this.
At a historic 1985 trial in Toronto, witnesses were grilled for the first
time ever over the existence of the alleged 'gas chambers,' and it was
found that no such testimony would stand up. Faurisson was an advisor to
Zundel in this trial, and a subsequent one, and this duo just kept on winning
the arguments. The prosecution could come up with no credible witnesses
for a gas-chamber's existence:

" in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst
Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any recourse
to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the lesson of
the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the existence and
operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'. Little by little, every other country
in the world has learned this same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie
in France, in 1987, there was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz
but no one produced any witnesses who could properly speak about them.
All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish witnesses
sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them testified before
the court as to having seen one or having participated in a homicidal gassing
by hauling bodies out of the 'gas chambers'.

"Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves
extremely scarce and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has
revealed how much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed
to the suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively
questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented themselves
as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz", showing
me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to look me in
the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that inevitably they retorted:
"How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes
I would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been gassed
also.""[59] (Faurisson)

The study of history cannot exist without dissenting
views, and who would want to read a history journal that did not allow
this? One fails to understand why 'revisionism' should be reprehensible,
and Jews especially should be relieved to discover that their ancestors
were never subject to such a horror. Bestselling author David Irving, who
has written over a dozen books on WWII, was recently jailed[60]. His definitive,
700- page blockbuster Hitler's War gave no hint that the Fuhrer ever got
to hear of a gas chamber, or gave any extermination command! Irving is
known for the care with which he checks out his primary-source material.
In 1991 his publisher, Macmillan, destroyed all their copies of his books.
Irving has paid quite a price for the truth he discovered.

In November 1991 Fred Leuchter was about to speak at
Chelsea Town Hall (invited by David Irving), when he was arrested onstage
by the police at the request of the Board of Deputies of British Jews,
and deported back to the United States. So much for freedom of speech.
When his trailblazing 'Leuchter Report' was first published in 1989, the
House of Commons denounced it as 'Nazi propaganda' and a 'fascist publication'
(on July 20th, with 100 MPs voting). Even the House of Commons, however,
cannot alter the laws of chemistry: the durability of the ferrocyanide
ion is now pivotal to the Holocaust debate!

We are not likely to get important insights unless the
'thoughtcrime' penalty is lifted from the German people, and they are allowed
to review their own past. The definitive modern textbook, Dissecting the
Holocaust has chapters by some twenty different authors over six hundred
pages.[61] In 1995 the German Government demanded that all copies be confiscated
and burnt![62] Edited by Germar Rudolf, it draws its inspiration from the
pioneer labours of Ernst Zundel. While in Tennessee and publishing 'revisionist'
material, he was seized by the police and thrown into solitary confinement
in a Canadian jail[63]. After two years he was transferred to Germany,
where his trial now progresses. He recently (October 2006) read to the
court an open letter from the Iranian president to Germany's chancellor
- to the judge's fury. The letter said, in effect, that Germany had been
on its knees before Zion for fifty years and it was time to get up[64].

Here are conclusions which Professor Robert Faurisson
(University of Lyon) has drawn:: [65]

that there was neither an order, nor a plan, nor a budget
for the alleged genocide of the Jews;

that 'Wannsee' was at best only a "silly story";

that there existed no specialist's report on the weapon
of the crime concluding that 'the building (whether intact, "reconstructed",
or in ruins) served as a homicidal gas chamber';

that there is no autopsy that would allow us to conclude:
'This is the corpse of a deportee killed by poison gas'[66]

that the confession of Rudolf Höß was no longer
of any value ("Höß was always a very weak and confused
witness");

that their alleged witnesses had probably never seen
gas chambers or gassings inasmuch as the best of them, the famous Rudolf
Vrba, in 1985, had been obliged to admit before a Canadian judge and jury
that in his famous book on the subject he had made use of "poetic
licence" or "licentia poetarum";

that the "Jewish soap" had never existed;

that the figure of four million victims at Auschwitz
was only a fiction;

and that from 1942 to 1945, certainly at Auschwitz, but
probably overall, more Jews were killed by so-called 'natural' causes [starvation,
disease, sickness and overwork] than by 'unnatural' ones.

At the recent Tehran conference, Faurisson summed up
his case more succinctly ­

· They cannot invoke a single document proving
the crime.

· They are unable to provide the least representation
of the crime weapon.

· They do not possess any proof nor even any evidence.

· They cannot name a single truthful witness[67]

Forbidden Doubt and Fictional Horror

Doubt anything in our modern world, scoff at sacred texts,
no-one will care - except that one kind of doubt is forbidden to you, which
will land you in jail ­ in ten different nations! You can read the
Hammer-horror account in, e.g., Auschwitz by Lawrence Rees (2005): every
hour or so, a thousand naked Jews were marched (somehow) into a room with
space for maybe one or two hundred, the doors are locked, then the Zyklon-B
is poured down special chutes or holes in the ceiling (which did not exist
in the war, they were added later), then after the screaming stops 'powerful
fans' remove the poison gas. In your dreams, Mr Rees. There were no such
powerful fans. But, then what? The mass of bodies will be mixed up with
the Zyklon-B, and that is specifically designed to keep emitting the cyanide
gas slowly. How is anyone supposed to shovel out this tortured mass of
corpses mixed up with poison powder? Remember there are only ordinary-sized
doors, mostly opening inwards. Its an unthinkable nightmare that could
not possibly have worked, and would certainly have gassed any workers trying
to operate it. It is the 'safe' design of this insecticide material, which
would have prevented it from functioning in this deliriously-imagined manner.

No German government existed after the war, that was
the 'unconditional surrender' which the Allies demanded. By losing both
its senior military staff and government, Germany was in effect decapitated
- necessary for the illusory version of events to be perpetrated. The verdicts
of Nuremberg were made final and binding for the post-war FRG. Germany
has since paid a hundred billion Deutschmarks to Israel by way of Holocaust-compensation
­ clearly, that needs to be refunded. Germany should take the advice
of Iranian leader Ahmadinajad and stop paying it, because that funding
provides undue motivation for holocaust 'memories.' Germany is helping
to maintain the holocaust legend,[68] by thus aiding the state of Israel.[69]

The United Nations has now established its annual Holocaust
Remembrance Day on 27 January, as of 2006. On this anniversary, we all
need to mull over the faking of history and the Greatest Lie Ever Told.
As Perseus gazed at the Medusa only via a mirror, to avoid being petrified,
to too we need calm reflection and the power of Truth to avoid our collective
destruction.

END NOTES

[1] 'Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and
the French Army casually annihilated about one million men, most of them
in the American camps,' a part of the US-UK-Russia plan 'to destroy Germany
as a world power once and for all' James Bacque Other Losses London 1989
p.xix.

[12]Did Six Million Really die? (Richard Harwood, Historical
Review Press, 1975: a 30-page monograph) pp.6, 28. An official German source
of June 1940 put the figure at 3 14 million Jews 'in all the territories
now under German control' (i.e. it excludes Russia). W. Staeglich, Auschwitz
­ a Judge Looks at the Evidence' IHR 1986, p.29.

[22] There were a network of labour camps around the
small town of Auchwitz and this figure would be their total population.
The gas-chamber allegations centred on the Birkenau (Auchwitz II) camp.
British-intelligence estimate of 20,000 population (ref. 37) must have
been for just one camp. Kramer's statement alluded to the gassing stories:
'All I can say is that it is untrue from beginning to end.' Butz (ref 12),
p.265.

[23] In the German endlosung, 'end' signifies 'goal'
and 'aim', at least as much as 'final.'

[24] The minutes of the Wannsee Conference (Berlin, 20th
January 1942) provide 'unambiguous documentary evidence that no extermination
program existed:' Butz, p.212;. For its text, see Staeglich (ref 12), Appendix
I.

[25] Butz p.233.

[26] Quoted by Zundel, www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/022_jam.html

[27] 24 March 1933: www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm,
http://k0nsl.com/k0nsl/detox/Judea1.html Daily Express headline, 'Judea
declares war on Germany;' then again, on 5th Sept 1939 (8th Sept, Jewish
Chronicle) "The Israeli people around the world declare economic and
financial war against Germany holy war against Hitler's people" declared
by Chain Weizmann, Zionist leader: Six Million (ref 12) p.4; , For Those
Who Cannot Speak M. McLaughlin, Historical Review Press 1979 p.17. Staeglich,
p.57.

[28] On June 17th 1942, Hitler remarked: 'One could found
a state of Israel in Madagascar,' (Six Million, p.5) suggesting that the
National-Socialist 'final solution' was then still viewed as feasible.
Many 'Zionists' for whom Palestine was unfeasible looked at Madagascar.

[33] Report of the International Committee of the Red
Cross WW2, 1948, Vol.3.

www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735

[34] General Eisenhower may have alluded to the subject,
in one paragraph: after the war he visited a 'horror camp' near Gotha,
where he saw evidence of 'Nazi brutality'. D. Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe,
1948, p.408.

[43] In the Anne Frank 'Diary', she gets to hear in October
1942 about Jews going to gas-chambers, solely via the 'English radio: The
Diary of Anne Frank, Pan 1989, pp.43, 130; Felderer (ref. 11), p.13.

[44] www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p261_Lindsey.html. The story
appears in a 1944 War Refugee Board report German Extermination Camps:
Auschwitz and Birkenau, Washington, Executive office of the President,
the WRB being 'an instrument of the World Jewish congress:' Butz p.66-7;
Staglich p.93-8.

[45] Butz, p.174.

[46] "The whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz
abroad was initiated by us with the help of our Polish comrades It is no
exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda,
which was spread at that time all over the world, was written by ourselves
in the camp." Bruno Baum, communist' (Dissecting, p.115).

[47] www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndfaurpref.html

[48] David Irving, Nuremberg the Last battle (1996):
US judge Robert Jackson was initially advised of the 'six million' figure
by influential Jews: 'Chapter 4, The Origin of six Million.'

[49] 'All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg],
in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond
repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:'
23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref.
27), p.21.