MSNBC's Carlson corrected falsehood documented by Media Matters

Tucker Carlson corrected his false claim -- first documented by Media Matters for America -- that the American Civil Liberties Union did not "stand[] up for" Rush Limbaugh while he was being investigated for allegations that he illegally obtained prescription painkillers.

Loading the player leg...

On the May 3 edition of MSNBC's The Situation, host Tucker Carlson corrected his false claim -- first documented by Media Matters for America -- that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) did not "stand[] up for" right-wing radio host Rush Limbaugh while he was being investigated for allegations that he illegally obtained prescription painkillers. As Media Matters noted, in January 2004, the ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Limbaugh's case protesting the state of Florida's seizure of Limbaugh's medical records as a violation of his right to privacy.

In correcting his falsehood, Carlson acknowledged that the ACLU had "repeatedly" defended Limbaugh, citing the group's court brief and press releases issued in Limbaugh's defense. Carlson added that "[o]ver the years, I've spent a fair amount of time beating up on the ACLU, and I assume that tradition will continue in earnest." But he admitted that, "in this case, I was wrong; they were right. Good for the ACLU."

From the May 3 edition of MSNBC's The Situation with Tucker Carlson:

CARLSON: Well, earlier this week, we did a segment on the Rush Limbaugh drug case. Limbaugh spent years and untold millions fighting charges that he bought too many prescription painkillers.

I made the point on the show that the case never should have been brought against him in the first place. He didn't steal. He didn't sell drugs. He didn't hurt anyone but himself in any way. Where, I wondered out loud, was the ACLU in all of this? Why weren't they defending Rush Limbaugh?

Well, it turns out they were defending Rush Limbaugh, repeatedly. The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief on Limbaugh's behalf and issued a series of press releases supporting his right to keep his medical records confidential.

Over the years, I've spent a fair amount of time beating up on the ACLU, and I assume that tradition will continue in earnest. But in this case, I was wrong; they were right. Good for the ACLU.

At least we admit it -- always and everywhere. If you think we've been wrong, tell us. If you disagree, don't bother.

ABOUT OUR RESEARCH

Our research section features in-depth media analysis, original reports illustrating skewed or inadequate coverage of important issues, thorough debunking of conservative falsehoods that find their way into coverage and other special projects from Media Matters' research department.

LATEST ›››

Media outlets are holding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to a higher standard by scandalizing her use of personal email while at the State Department, claiming the practice raises questions about her "transparency." In reality, other public officials -- including former Florida Governor Jeb Bush (R), who is attacking Clinton over the emails, and former Secretary of State Colin Powell -- have exclusively used personal email.

The New York Times accused Hillary Clinton of potentially violating federal law pertaining to the preservation of e-mail records while acting as Secretary of State, but requirements to maintain such records did not exist during her tenure.

The Washington Post's Glenn Kessler claimed that President Obama "appears to be purposely ignoring" the U.S. State Department's conclusions on whether most of the refined oil products from the Keystone XL pipeline would be exported. However, the State Department did not find that the majority of the refined oil products from Keystone XL would be consumed in the U.S., as Kessler suggested, and groups opposing Keystone XL note that the coastal refineries Keystone XL would service currently ship more than half of their refined oil products overseas.