mathnetnumerics Reviews Rss Feedhttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspxmathnetnumerics Reviews Rss DescriptionReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v3.4.0 (Jun 09, 2015)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/574320#ReviewBy-kalugvasyRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Just use..no problem..kalugvasyTue, 09 Jun 2015 14:31:02 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v3.4.0 (Jun 09, 2015) 20150609023102PReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.4.0 (may 16, 2015)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/101319#ReviewBy-hanskin1908Rated 4 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - mjbnbvjhjhgjhgjhgjhghjgjhanskin1908Sat, 16 May 2015 15:35:42 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.4.0 (may 16, 2015) 20150516033542PReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Jun 04, 2014)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/110750#ReviewBy-EricOuelletRated 4 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Good library but has a bug of interfacing with it...&#10;For example&#58; if a user want to modify a ContinousUniform, he will have to create a new instance setting both parameters at the same time. Otherwise, he can&#39;t be sure what will be the result if he does not know the code &#40;the bad behavior of rejecting values if they don&#39;t fit with previous one&#41;. For a ContinuousUniform there is 2 interdependent input but they can&#39;t be entered at the same time. That is very very bad. But although it would have been possible, to set both values at the same time, I personally thing that it would have been a mistake too, to not just let the user enter whatever value he want, in any order, and verify only on calculation. On bad validation, then it could either throw an error, but only at this time. That would force a major changes in code. It would also require, an IsValid&#40;&#41; function or property, to be able to know if the provided values are fine. The &#34;IsValid&#40;&#41;&#34; could also be used by the &#34;Calc&#34; function. Actually, we are forced to create a new instance each time the user make any changes which sounds to me a bad design. It required very twisted code&#33;&#33;&#33;EricOuelletWed, 04 Jun 2014 21:51:46 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Jun 04, 2014) 20140604095146PReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Jun 04, 2014)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/110750#ReviewBy-EricOuelletRated 1 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - This library probably works as intended but it has a very major bug of interfacing with it...&#10;For example&#58; if a user want to modify a ContinousUniform, he will have to create a new instance setting both parameters at the same time. Otherwise, he can&#39;t be sure what will be the result if he does not know the code &#40;the bad behavior of rejecting values if they don&#39;t fit with previous one&#41;. For a ContinuousUniform there is 2 interdependent input but they can&#39;t be entered at the same time. That is very very bad. But although it would have been possible, to set both values at the same time, I personally thing that it would have been a mistake too, to not just let the user enter whatever value he want, in any order, and verify only on calculation. On bad validation, then it could either throw an error, but only at this time. That would force a major changes in code. It would also require, an IsValid&#40;&#41; function or property, to be able to know if the provided values are fine. The &#34;IsValid&#40;&#41;&#34; could also be used by the &#34;Calc&#34; function. Actually, we are forced to create a new instance each time the user make any changes which sounds to me a very bad design. It required very twisted code&#33;&#33;&#33;EricOuelletWed, 04 Jun 2014 19:53:45 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Jun 04, 2014) 20140604075345PReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Jun 01, 2014)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/110750#ReviewBy-MatthewRyanDavisRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Very fast matrix operations when using the MKL provider.&#10;Excellent support on the discussion forum.&#10;The best solution I&#39;ve found for linear algebra in Visual Basic.&#10;Using this I was able to program a neural-network in VB more simply than the examples I&#39;ve seen using NumPy for python.MatthewRyanDavisMon, 02 Jun 2014 02:41:05 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Jun 01, 2014) 20140602024105AReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Mar 25, 2014)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/110750#ReviewBy-evolvedmicrobeRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Excellent collection of RNGs&#33;evolvedmicrobeTue, 25 Mar 2014 13:51:21 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Mar 25, 2014) 20140325015121PReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Mar 18, 2014)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/110750#ReviewBy-BillKratRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Very appreciated project&#33;BillKratTue, 18 Mar 2014 19:43:29 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (Mar 18, 2014) 20140318074329PReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (十月 16, 2013)https://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/110750#ReviewBy-MapoetRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - WebOperatorMapoetWed, 16 Oct 2013 15:12:25 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.6.1 (Bug Fix) (十月 16, 2013) 20131016031225PReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.3.0 (Jan 14, 2013)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/98245#ReviewBy-drewnoakesRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - A fantastic open source project that fills a void for .NET with a variety of options. Documentation is a bit too light, but it seems that the project is currently quite active.drewnoakesMon, 14 Jan 2013 15:36:35 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.3.0 (Jan 14, 2013) 20130114033635PReviewed: Beta 2 (Aug 07, 2012)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-ahellwigRated 2 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Homepage, download page, documentation... everything seems to be so outdated and unmaintainedahellwigTue, 07 Aug 2012 12:32:42 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Aug 07, 2012) 20120807123242PReviewed: Beta 2 (Mar 11, 2012)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-nrollandRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - I can&#39;t rate it before I download it so dont pop up that freaking window now, morons.nrollandSun, 11 Mar 2012 13:31:29 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Mar 11, 2012) 20120311013129PReviewed: Beta 2 (Dec 11, 2011)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-FabioRavanelliRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Great job&#33; Thanks guys&#33;FabioRavanelliSun, 11 Dec 2011 15:03:05 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Dec 11, 2011) 20111211030305PReviewed: Beta 2 (Apr 18, 2011)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-lcdosRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Congratulations, on the Beta 2. Great work indeed. Yet we may need more instructions on how to build the native wrappers.lcdosMon, 18 Apr 2011 12:55:52 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Apr 18, 2011) 20110418125552PReviewed: Beta 2 (Apr 18, 2011)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-lcdosRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Congratulations, on the Beta 2. Great work indeed.lcdosMon, 18 Apr 2011 12:26:28 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Apr 18, 2011) 20110418122628PReviewed: Beta 1 (Apr 06, 2011)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-dondestasmanuRated 4 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - I am particularly impressed by the reactivity of the developers to explain their choices in implementation and fix identified issues. The only reason I&#39;m not giving it a 5 star is the current lack of documentation, which I&#39;m sure will be addressed in the future. Thumbs up&#33;dondestasmanuWed, 06 Apr 2011 15:53:41 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (Apr 06, 2011) 20110406035341PReviewed: Beta 1 (janv. 30, 2011)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-EntraX666Rated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Good job guys &#33;EntraX666Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:47:56 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (janv. 30, 2011) 20110130044756PReviewed: Beta 1 (дек 22, 2010)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-rememberRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Ok, very wellrememberWed, 22 Dec 2010 08:10:26 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (дек 22, 2010) 20101222081026AReviewed: Beta 1 (дек 22, 2010)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-rememberRated 4 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Ok, very wellrememberWed, 22 Dec 2010 08:09:56 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (дек 22, 2010) 20101222080956AReviewed: Beta 1 (Nov 29, 2010)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-lcdosRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Congratulations, and you guys ROCK&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;lcdosMon, 29 Nov 2010 14:44:57 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (Nov 29, 2010) 20101129024457PReviewed: Beta 1 (十一月 26, 2010)http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-isklRated 5 Stars &#40;out of 5&#41; - Glad to hear the release news,wish Math.NET Numerics to be another masterpieceisklFri, 26 Nov 2010 14:32:24 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (十一月 26, 2010) 20101126023224P