Will Dutton survive Labor’s attempts on him this week?

Our journalism usually sits behind a paywall, but we believe this is the time to make more of our content freely available to as many readers as possible. For more free coverage, sign up to COVID-19 Watch.

Home Affairs Minster Peter Dutton has, in the past few weeks, been caught in a imbroglio custom-designed for words only journalists use: he’s embattled, under fire, beleaguered by a furore that could see him bundled out of parliament. There’s the simmering au pair-gate and, rippling out from that the accusations he misled parliament and the public stoush with former Border Force head Roman Quaedvlieg. Not to mention questions about his eligibility to even sit in parliament. And this week, it is all about to get worse.

Labor will attempt to refer Dutton to the High Court over his eligibility to sit, having commissioned new legal advice, which suggests that thousands of his decisions after 2016 could be subject to legal challenges. Dutton is also potentially facing a vote of no confidence in the house. Adding to Dutton’s woes is former PM Malcolm Turnbull’s retirement following his axing, leaving the government with the fairly perilous number of 74 out of 149 members of the House of Representatives. However, Labor have agreed to provide a pair for Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, who will be absent for Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish new year, at least removing that headache.

Thanks for signing up!

Independent journalism is an essential service.

Sign up here to get our free, daily newsletter: COVID-19 Watch.

Please enter your email address

What is a no-confidence motion?

A motion of no confidence can be aimed at the government in general, the prime minister in particular (the most common) or an individual minister. Standing orders provide that a motion of censure of, or no confidence in, the government “shall have priority of all other business if it is accepted by a minister as a censure or no confidence motion”, but a motion of censure of, or no confidence in, a minister is generally treated in the same way as any other private member’s motion.

A successful vote against the prime minister is a big deal; convention dictates that, having lost the support of the majority of the House of Representatives, the ministry as a whole should resign. But a successful vote of censure of, or no confidence in, an individual minister (though this has only ever happened against prime ministers) is far less conclusive — it would most likely come down to what new Prime Minister Scott Morrison decides to do. According to the parliament website:

If a motion of no confidence in, or censure of, a minister were successful and its grounds were directly related to government policy, the question of the Minister or the Government continuing to hold office would be one for the prime minister to decide. If the grounds related to the minister’s administration of his or her department or fitness otherwise to hold ministerial office, the government would not necessarily accept full responsibility for the matter, leaving the question of resignation to the particular minister or to the prime minister.

The Greens and Labor are pushing the no-confidence motion and already have one crossbencher, Andrew Wilkie, on board. Negotiations are apparently continuing with independent Cathy McGowan and the Centre Alliance’s Rebekha Sharkie. However, if everyone on the crossbench was swayed, this would result in a tie, which is no good to Labor, the motion would be defeated.

What about the High Court referral?

The same maths applies for Dutton’s High Court referral: Labor and the Greens need all the crossbench on side and then a Coalition MP to cross the floor, abstain, or be absent for the vote. While the chaos of 2016 (where the government, with several MPs absent, lost three votes) may not be repeated, at the very least, this week will be a interesting test of just how independent Kevin Hogan is.

This crisis will cut hard and deep but one day it will be over.

What will be left? What do you want to be left?

I know what I want to see: I want to see a thriving, independent and robust Australian-owned news media. I want to see governments, authorities and those with power held to account. I want to see the media held to account too.

Demand for what we do is running high. Thank you. You can help us even more by encouraging others to subscribe — or by subscribing yourself if you haven’t already done so.

Share

About the Author

Charlie writes chiefly about industrial relations, politics, culture and social services. Prior to Crikey he worked in various roles across government and unions and was a researcher for RN's the Daily Planet. He hosted the Alternative History on Triple R radio, and is a regular guest and occasional host on Breakfasters. He spent the 2019 election in Warringah, covering the fight for Tony Abbott''s seat.

7 thoughts on “Will Dutton survive Labor’s attempts on him this week?”

Arky

“While speaker Tony Smith has previously taken the impartiality of his role seriously”

Not to anyone who’s actually watched Question Time, or as it is under Smith (like Bishop before him), Rants That Don’t Answer The Question And Blame Labor Time.

But yeah, there’s no way the Morrison government will flirt with further disaster by declaring war on Dutton and allowing him to be referred to the HC or forcing his resignation over the au pairs. Only if further info gets out (like discovering a bunch more of the visitor visas in which Dutton used his ministerial intervention were for mates bringing in ai pairs) will he have to go over the au pairs.

Marcus Hicks

klewso

At least Voldemort has Dobby Henderson on his side?
On Insiders :- the citing of that instance when Dobby’s wife (Anne) asked this Minister to intervene in the deportation of an African family = “some sort of ‘defence’ + a sign of what a compassionate bloke he was (the lengths he’d go, usinghis office, to do a fan a favour?)”, was a classic?

AR

The Peter Principle has been shown to be far too generous as the Gestapotato – raised by Talcum as a shit magnet in the certain knowledge that he’d blow it – was already well above his level of incompetence as a Qld walloper.
Who knew that his then salary was sufficient to amass a property portfolio!