Hi,
> No problem. I looked at it today. And will keep at it until self works
> properly again.
Great :D
Well, since the form is quite easy to detect, it doesn't actually matter
if the `ann.self` works. Something semantically equivalent will do.
> Hmm... I think it actaully annotates the Singleton class. Yet this is
> one of those things I've debated and have never felt 100% settled. The
> other viable option is to annotate the object itself.
I think it would be nice to have obj.ann annotate the object but I might
miss something. It would remove an extra keyword to remember (annotate)
and 'unify' the interface to annotations.
Another question, what does the `Annotator` class do?
> No worries. I welcome critque as it helps me work out the kinks. The
> dog poo inference stunk though as poo tends to do ;-)
^^;
Jo
--
Feel the love
http://pinkjuice.com/pics/ruby.png