Please log in

or

Register now for free

or

Choose your profile *

Email *

A valid e-mail address. All e-mails from the system will be sent to this address. The e-mail address is not made public and will only be used if you wish to receive a new password or wish to receive certain news or notifications by e-mail.

Password

Username *

Newsletters

Higher education updates from the THE editorial team

World University Rankings news

If you do not wish to be contacted about offers, products or services from THE/TES Global then please check this box

Threats damage this university

US academic George Martin is backing the boycott of London Metropolitan
University and fears for its reputation.

Through the academic grapevine, I recently learnt that the management of London
Metropolitan University is attempting to impose a new staff contract. Word of
this attempted fiat reached me in May before I left the US and, since taking up
my summer visiting professor position at Surrey University, I have learnt more
about it. London Met has now threatened to dismiss 387 lecturers. The scale of
this threat is without precedent and puts great doubt in my mind that the
managers have serious intent to negotiate a contract.

I am quite concerned about the situation and have decided to support a boycott
of London Met. I believe that this offers the greatest possibility of
encouraging the administration to negotiate with staff in good faith.

In the past year, I have been exploring the possibility of furthering my
informal links with London Met academics. What I had hoped to do was to mount
collaborative work with an international comparative perspective in my field of
research, urban social ecology. The research would focus specifically on London
and New York City. I am putting the formalisation of my links on hold until a
contract is successfully negotiated. I am dismayed about this, but I am not, in
good conscience, able to develop a professional relationship with London Met
until this impasse is resolved to the satisfaction of my colleagues.

To my mind, the point of a contract is that consenting parties enter into a
binding agreement. There can be no consent without mutual agreement, which
flows from consultation and negotiation. Certainly, threatening to fire staff
is not an appropriate negotiating tactic.

As word of management's intransigence reached me in the US, it was apparent
that the news was spreading beyond the UK. Among academics such as myself the
situation reflects badly upon management and, unfortunately, upon the
reputation of London Met. Perhaps management does not recognise the full
consequences of its present course of action.

I hope my rather modest boycott action will add to the voices of reason calling
on management to rescind its threat of mass redundancies, and to negotiate in
good faith a fair and equitable end to this corrosive dispute.

George Martin is professor of sociology at Montclair State University, New
Jersey, US, a senior research fellow at the University of California, Santa
Cruz, US, and a visiting professor at Surrey University, Guildford.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus: