Author of New Book About Trump Seems to Support Some Policy Shifts – Academic

US President Donald Trump has dubbed the new book "Fear: Trump in the White House" by investigative journalist Bob Woodward as yet another "assault" against him. Speaking to Radio Sputnik, Robert E Gutsche Jr, senior lecturer in critical digital media practice at Lancaster University, shared his views on the opus and the phenomenon of Trump.

Sputnik: The book is slated to come out tomorrow, but I know that it has been pre-released and we've seen a lot of press coverage with excerpts from the book itself. What do you think of the book "Fear: Trump in the White House"?

Robert Gutsche Jr: Well, the book is one of multiple volumes that have been coming out in the last couple of years that have a lot of salacious details of the inner workings of the White House and potentially Donald Trump's mind. And one of the questions is: Is this the type of journalism that we need, if journalists feel that there is something that needs to be combated with the Trump presidency? It's a lot of details that we've heard before so it really confirms a lot of things that people think, but it's not getting to the heart of why Trump is popular, for journalists as well as for other voters.

Robert Gutsche Jr: Well, they do make quite a bit of money off of this; I mean they've become a lot more important. Journalism schools have been seeing a lot more interest in their programs, ratings are high at news stations, newspapers are becoming legitimate places again where people go get information, share opinions, have discussions. And that was something that wasn't really happening before 2016 — there was a lot of conversation about the death of journalism. Now we are starting to see journalists using this opportunities, for right or wrong, to say: "Look we are legitimate again, media is something that's important, turn your social media to us and let us tell you what's going on in the White House."

Sputnik: Do you think the situation with journalism as a whole is undergoing some kind of revelation or is it just Trump being so unique?

Robert Gutsche Jr: Maybe a little bit of both, right. It's journalism going through economic hardship, fragmented audiences wanting to go to lots of different places for opinion-based information, or quirky information, the rise of click-bait, the rise of all these different things that we've been playing with. The rise of Facebook, for instance, has been a place to put real news and fake news and opinions and pictures of kitties. And the audiences, I think, are really confused because journalists for a long time have not been providing the resources that a lot of mainstream Americans want and need. There aren't really stories coming from the heartland anymore, there aren't stories from the inner cities that are telling stories of injustice that speak to people living there. Then there is Trump, who has made being a spectacle for most of his career into a real brand for him. So we know what we are going to get as journalists if we were to call up one of his advisers or ask Trump himself at a press conference. We know we are going to get something hot and a good sound bite.

Sputnik: There are a lot of things in this book that actually sound quite frightening. There are people working on the inside of the White House to keep Trump from doing terrible things. How does that affect his work, his reputation, the work of the White House staff when this kind of thing is written? Was this a responsible thing to do or was this not a responsible thing to do to write this kind of book?

Robert Gutsche Jr: I'm not saying that some of things coming out aren't frightening, I think they certainly are. But I think some of these base supporters are a lot smarter than people give them credit [for], in the sense that they do take a lot of these things tongue-in-cheek, they don't really think we are talking about keeping Trump's finger off the nuclear buttons. These kinds of things they kind of take tongue-in-cheek. And that's a problem. But that's on the one hand. The writing of the editorial, what was really interesting about that, was it's saying yes, we are doing things in the White House to curtail some of these crazy moments, but at the end of the day, the writer still supports a lot of the policy shifts, it seems, that have been happening in the White House. Possibly with the immigration policies they we've seen enacted and the warehousing of children and immigrants. That may, to the writer, have been a success. There are a couple of phrases in there that say "we want this administration to succeed."

The views and opinions expressed by the speaker do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

Hello,
!

We are committed to protecting your personal information and we have updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a new EU regulation that went into effect on May 25, 2018.

Please review our Privacy Policy. It contains details about the types of data we collect, how we use it, and your data protection rights.

Since you already shared your personal data with us when you created your personal account, to continue using it, please check the box below:

I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

If you do not want us to continue processing your data, please click here to delete your account.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.