The conventional progressive wisdom is that the Trump Administration will be bad for cities and for transit users. But in recent decades, a unified Republican government has been better for public transit than a divided government.

An efficient and equitable transport system must be diverse to serve diverse travel demands. Planners need better tools to quantify and communicate the benefits of walking, cycling and public transit to sometimes skeptical decision makers.

As part of Salon's "Dream City" feature, Will Doig looks at how North American cities' mass transit schemes often get bogged down in bureaucracy, politics, financial woes and mismanagement, to the point where it's not unreasonable for people to wonder if they'll still be alive when the line in their city is expected to be completed. He writes,

"It only takes one politician to gum up a world-class transit plan...Voters want a subway stop on their block, so their elected officials fight for it, whether or not it really makes sense from an urban planning perspective. Or they don't want the subway coming near them. Or they want light rail but not a bus. Or they want an airport link, but they want it to go around their neighborhood rather than through it.

Good public transit is a cherished ideal of many progressives. Ironically, progressive values can end up making transit construction take longer. Part of the reason we don't build as fast as China does is because we have workers' unions, ADA compliance rules, and environmental concerns that require time-consuming impact studies...Good, affordable transit is a human rights issue too, though, and in many ways the common link in our desire for healthier, less wasteful cities that serve everyone equally."

Planning: A professional practice and an academic study focused on the future of built environments and connected natural environments—from the smallest towns to the largest cities and everything in between.

Planetizen: The independent resource for people passionate about planning and related fields.