Have you read this sentence before? Perhaps it feels strangely familiar? The experience of déjà vu is a common one, but in rare cases, it can become a disorder. In a fascinating new Cortex paper, French psychologists Julie Bertrand and colleagues discuss the phenomenon of pathological déjà vu.

Bertrand et al. present an English translation of what is probably the first description of the condition, published in 1896 in French by the psychiatrist Francois-Léon Arnaud (1858-1927).

Arnaud described a patient called Louis, a French army officer who had served in Tonkin (in Vietnam) but who had been sent home suffering from ‘ague’ (probably malaria) and symptoms of amnesia, possibly as a result of cerebral malaria.

In January 1893, 18 months after his ague, characteristic symptoms of déjà vu were observed: Louis reported recognising as having read previously some newspaper articles, and even said that he wrote some of them… Shortly after, he typically had striking delusions concerning his relatives. While attending his brother’s wedding, he claimed suddenly that he was certain that he attended the wedding the year before, in identical circumstances, and that he could recognise each detail – and he did not understand why they were doing it again.

Louis’s delusions of déjà vu worsened and he also developed paranoia. He went to the Vanves psychiatric hospital, where he met Arnaud. It was their first meeting, but Louis claimed to recognize the psychiatrist:

As soon as he arrived at the institution, he recognised successively everything he saw: the yard, the lounge with the sofa and curtains, the gardens in all their detail, the people who welcomed him made the same gestures, said the same things, and he gave the same answers. He said that it was last year at a similar time that he came to the Institute and like last year, he wanted to leave…

When I first met him, here is exactly what happened: He responded to my greeting in an appropriate manner for someone who is with someone he does not know. Several words were exchanged and his physiognomy changed and he said to me with a smile: “I recognise you now, doctor! It was you who greeted me last year at exactly the same time in the same lounge. You asked me the same questions and I gave the same answers. Everything is very clear to me. You act surprised very well, but you can stop now.” Despite my energetic disagreement, Louis maintained his conviction…

Not only does he see again, he hears again, he does the same things again “day-after-day”, but he also experiences the “same feelings”, he goes through the “same moods”, he has the “same dreams”; which is summarised with a clear and concise expression: “I’m living two parallel lives”

The full translation of Arnaud’s case report is well worth a read, as it contains many other details about Louis’s strange condition. Nonetheless, Bertrand et al. conclude that Louis was not in fact suffering from true déjà vu, because in déjà vu there is a feeling of familiarity combined with the knowledge that the familiarity is false. Louis lacked this knowledge, and believed that he really had lived his life before; in other words Louis was suffering from a delusion not déjà vu per se.

Either way, it’s a remarkable case, and it suggests one question: have you read this sentence before? Perhaps it feels strangely familiar?

Enumerate the differences between this delusional wretch and an esteemed economist (other than misapplied vocational counseling).

Erik Bosma

I knew you were going to say that.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

Déjà vu. (“A déjà vu is usually a glitch in the Matrix. It happens when they change something.”)

polistra24

With a patient like this, it would be interesting to test the hypothesis that our lives ARE actually repeated. Have him write down what happens next. Then see if it does.

Obviously you’d want a situation where repetition wasn’t guaranteed; ie no predictable auto journeys or simple household tasks. “We’ll reach the corner of 5th and Sanson” or “The water will go down the drain” are mechanically forced. You’d have to set up a situation where the next few describable actions are non-mechanical and not known to the experimenter.

“Nonetheless, Bertrand et al. conclude that Louis was not in fact suffering from true déjà vu, because in déjà vu there is a feeling of familiarity combined with the knowledge that the familiarity is false. Louis lacked this knowledge, and believed that he really had lived his life before; in other words Louis was suffering from a delusion not déjà vu per se.”

I don’t think that most, or even almost any people who experience déjà vu experience it as “false familiarity”.

The far more common reaction, in my experience, is to interpret the familiarity as being due to a previously unremembered prescient dream. Hence, you knew from a dream that this was going to happen in just this way, but, because dreams are usually quickly forgotten in the morning if not carefully recorded, you assume that you forget it until it happened and since you didn’t record your dreams, can’t definitively prove that the presumed dream did or did not happen.

Discover Blogs

Neuroskeptic

No brain. No gain.

About Neuroskeptic

Neuroskeptic is a British neuroscientist who takes a skeptical look at his own field, and beyond. His blog offers a look at the latest developments in neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology through a critical lens.