“The UK taxpayer has been stumping up the bill for her to fly around the world.”

“Sick of hearing about her.”

“A joke. She has been awarded a Noble Prize for stopping a bullet?”

“I just find her annoying.”

“Why is she still here?”

“Living off the taxpayer.”

“Praise some British kids for a change.”

.

Remember, these comments are about a little girl who was shot at point blank range by the Taliban for wanting to go to school and – despite still being a target for assassination – is still willing to speak up for a girl’s right to education.

Sometimes I’m ashamed of my own country…….

.

Here are screen shots of just a few of the comments from the Daily Mail article – if you can bear to wade through them:

The thought that we have to breathe the same air as some of the people who comment on stories in the Mail is depressing to say the least. They seem to be people with the smallest brains, least compassion and a total overdose of mean spirited inhumanity. And they have all turned to UKIP.. is there a form of correlation there do you think?

I happen to think some of the comments are quite justified, jumping on the politically correct wagon rather than think for yourselves is as bias as race hatred and xenophobia.
e.g. Mark 25 yorkshires comment hits the spot!

Whoa! The true putrid bile comes out now! This is what festers under the surface in the hearts and minds of many people in this country who are stuck in their narrow little worlds, filled with resentment and hatred of all people considered ‘other’. UKIP and the unprecedented amount of media coverage showered on this shameful excuse for a ‘political’ party gives credibility to these ugly views. Opinions like those spouted in the Daily Mail in response to a young woman’s recognition for her courage, for surviving and speak outing, are no different to those of the Taliban and ISIS. Shame on you people so lacking in compassion and imagination.

What is this ALL people considered ‘other’ about?
I have never heard such dramatical, over exaggeration in my life, I don’t care what party the commenters belong to, they have a right to question what is going on in their own country.
Shame on you for trying to deny them that right!

Reblogged this on My Little Underground and commented:
Daily Mail readers are scum. This is well known. Every now and then (or every week) they confirm this.

This is what Mail readers think of Malala winning a Nobel Peace Price . Forget about compassion or admiration about a girl who stood up to a fascistic regime and nearly died because of it. No, now we’re looking after her in the UK and we’re ‘better together’ you have bitter racists attacking her for being browner than they are.

Fuck the Mail. Fuck their readers. They’re scum. Malala has done more to help the world in her short life than any reader of the Daily Mail.

Poor Malala, there is no shortage of hate for her, she was being slagged off on Nihal’s programme on BBC Asian Network too. One caller said she hadn’t been shot in the face at all and that she was a stooge.
Others speculate she works for Teh West & Israel.
Dumbasses abound.

Othering, differentiating people based on the perceived group they belong to in order to create imbalanced power structures emphasizing a superior and inferior between the groups. See for this example whatever Malala’s achievements are, is void to these people because she is part of or perceived to be in groups considered “the other” from the superior norm. She is in effect being dehumanized because she is an immigrant, a Muslim and perceived to be a benefit scrounger.

Sadly, standards have fallen since our politicians discovered the ‘benefits’ of deceitful spin (WMD) and allowed Bullingdon Club behaviour to become acceptable in the upper reaches of Westminster.as an exemplar for the rest of us (PMQ).

What an absolute shower they all are – exterminate the lot! Exterminate!… exterminate!…. exterminate!…..

When The Daily Mail is your window on the world. is it any wonder that the view from your window is warped? I pity these people who are too hard of thinking to come up with a view of their own and rely instead on the fear mongering and racist propaganda they have drip. drip, drip fed to them by Paul Dacre’s band of Muppets from hell. Ironically these people with their shiny white brainwashed minds probably all sing along to John Lennon’s “Imagine”, because it’s a lovely song. Well perhaps not sing, but at least “Baaaaaa”. tunefully.

What’s even more depressing is, those messages are now top of the ‘best rated’ list. All that’s worst about humanity on the internet is displayed there, sadistic trolls, warped politics, jealousy etc- as said, I’m ashamed to be part of the human race sometimes.

Just about every day there is an article in the in the DM that screams something like. “Bloody thirsty, burqua wearing halal eating MUSLIM woman parks in disabled parking space at Tesco” When a young woman takes a courageous principled stand in very dangerous circumstances the DM mention that she a muslim in the final paragraph

That is a load of codswallop too, you have been swallowing too much political correctness text at university.

If she is the ‘other’ from the superior norm, why is she receivintg first class medical treatment and education in Britain?
‘others’ here in their own country are put on second class waiting lists, denied of benefits and perceived to be scroungers by their own media and politicians.

Freedom of speech has been replaced by freedom to speak ignorance & mindless hate.

That’s not political,
That’s mental illness……

That is how the Indian Psychiatrists in this country can cage and medicate anyone who has any opposition to what government is dictating we should swallow as facts in our own country.
Only daily mail readers swallow the crap about the colour of peoples skin or benefit scroungers, that is if it is not largely made up posts.

It’s about time we started listening to opposition to mainstream thinking, it’s mediocre,even the do gooders only spout what they are taught by university lecturers, they can’t think for themselves.

Marsha, apparently you can’t see the stupidity of your statement. In Pakistan Malala was shot in the head for her opinions, and in the UK she got some nasty online abuse. You’re a complete idiot (obviously!) but surely even you can see the difference……

Blame UKip and the Tories for this, because they have been fuelling this kind of nationalistic mind-set among those impressionable members of British society for a while now. Those Bastards(Politicians) have an agenda that benefits them, and certainly does NOT benefit the British people. Unfortunately the average man and women will be unable to see this blatant manipulation because they will be blinded by a contrived hatred for anything Non-British. WAKE UP BRITISH PEOPLE, YOU ARE BEING MANIPULATED BY THE WORST OF HUMAN TRASH. Remember the worst monsters hide behind a broad smile and an expensive suit.

Not all the comments are like these despicable people. I see you haven’t included any of the positive comments from Daily Mail readers. As with all forms of reporting there is good and bad in every community. I read the DM and I think this young teenager is wonderfully inspiring and well deserving of the award. This is not the last we will be hearing of this very brave young lady.

Why do the so-called Taliban have a problem with education for illiterate youngsters in Pakistan? Just like, why do IS gangsters want to ban music, which is a world cultural asset to many races? It all beggars belief why such groups would be so bigoted and irrational. I think Malala is a brave girl and lucky to survive being shot in the head, but awarding her the Nobel Peace Prize seems somewhat bizarre, because on that rationale they should also have awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Ronald Reagan (who got shot) and before that to John F. Kennedy, posthumously, (who got shot and killed).

I recall years back of an african doctor who received the nobel peace prize for his work and could have flogged both himself and his wares in the western world for a fortune, but decided to go back to his own poverty stricken country to save the sick and dying there for no financial reward.

We may rightly think that the selection of DM comments above are so wrong on so many levels. We must realise that this poison has been pumped out by the neo-cons in Westminster and their supporters, including the press and the BBC (sadly), and that the only losers are the masses. Even the BBC has given so much air time to UKIP that people often think they have loads of MPs (also highlighting the ignorance of the voters, too.) Ignorance is the friend of the neo-cons & fascists & eugenicists.

The 1920’s and 1930’s saw much the same, with much the same outcome, in Germany, and 1950’s Stalinism in the USSR. It’s text-book classic propagandist techniques of the fascists. My fear is what happens when these types have been wound up too much for their own incoherence to bear?

Like the gutter press, you would have us believe that there are boagey men lurking in every country forever and a day.
She has been praised for her bravery, it’s time to show it again and see if there is still a threat.

Really?
My fave place 😦
Are you a cold man?
We fuking know Winter is f…. coming!
Breathe…….
I saw the most divine bear at the market today and Well you know wot a woman finks about fuuurrrr! How much I asks the trader with a compliant look on me face. £20 to you….Yes!!! I am now warm at night 🙂 I got a good imagination…ain’t I ?

Guy Fawkes – this may be hard for you to understand but they don’t offer Nobel Peace prizes to people because they’ve been shot. Though who knows? You keep shooting yourself in the foot so you may be in luck next time round.
And when you refer to Malala’s mother as <> is that really your idea of fair comment? Just asking.

Hi Guy Fawkes. Earlier in this thread I questioned your belief that being shot is the qualification for getting the Nobel Peace prize and I also asked you whether you think your comment about Malala’s mother being in some way to blame for her getting shot was fair. Your response is to say that I’m a joke.
I don’t think you’ve really quite answered my point. 🙂 I look forward to your next irrational side-stepping reply as I could do with another laugh.

BTW – Did you accidentally “post” here. also? Your views are straight out the DM selection highlighted in the article

What are your views on the winners for medicine, astrophysics or mathematics, or literature? Perhaps you & Guy Fawkes could debate those with the (sledgehammer) insights you have brought to the Malala award……(elsewhere?)

There isn’t a reply button higher up to respond to your further comments on my post. But I must admit the power of your argument has completely convinced me. You suspected me of thinking I’m normal and you’re delusional and I now realise I had it completely the wrong way round and that its you that’s delusional and me that’s normal. Thanks Gay Fuwkes, the gift that just keeps giving. 🙂

PS Gay Fuwkes: You seem to be under the impression I said something about the pope and gay priests and you go on to tell me what my views on that would be. That was somebody else. There’s not just one person out there thinking you’re an idiot, you know. I think you may have shot yourself in the foot AGAIN. But then, that’s what you do.

Crabramblings if that is not a troll of the fink variety I don’t know what is?
I’m going nowhere, someone has to bring the likes of you down a peg or two, oops have I shot myself in the foot again by insulting Pegs.

Hi again Gay Fuwkes. You just wrote: Funk and his flunky crabtree if they don’t offer peace prizes to people who get shot then why did the Indian school girl get one.
How did she create peace?
Firstly, when you think I must be a flunky of someone else who disagrees with you, you’re just giving away glimpses of your essentially paranoid worldview, which I admit is quite entertaining for us all. Could I possibly be getting under your skin? 🙂
Secondly, I’m guessing here but I imagine that the Nobel prize committee didn’t think “Ooh, there’s an Indian girl who has been shot – let’s give her the Peace prize.” My hunch is that it’s something to do with risking her own life to campaign for the right to education for girls in societies and parts of the world that think that ignorance is preferable to education.
Based on my own experience, I suggest there is a connection between education and the generation of peace and tolerance, but I can understand how you might see that very differently.
And much as it’s been nice chatting to you, I notice that the sun is now up and I wouldn’t want your whole trollness being turned to stone. You had a lucky escape last time that it was just your brain that got shone upon.
So, reluctantly, byebye!

Ms Fawkes – “Is it fair comment to accuse the pope of something gay paedophiles did, he did what you would do with gay people, defend and support those he thought were in the right until they were found guilty.”

Come off it!!! The Pope knew perfectly well that countless priests and nuns had been abusing children for many decades. This was DELIBERATELY kept hidden and ALLOWED to continue.

Not only are you disgustingly racist and homophobic, you are defending institutional paedophilia now!

Someone else who disagrees with you Ha, Ha!
You have to invent these sock puppets to disagree with me. It’s funny but telling me to get back to my troll hole implies that I got under your skin, we trolls eat the likes of you for breakfast.
Malala wants education so she can emigrate to a good job in uk, or be used by the capitalists in her own country as cheap labour.

Fink you’re style of writing is like a footprint or a fingerprint, you couldn’t disguise it if you tried and I can see you have tried with you hi’s and yo’s ha! ha!

[Guy – I’ve warned you before about accusing commenters on this site of being my sock puppets. Carry on with this nonsense and you will be the first person I have banned from this site. Now please stick to discussing politics – criticise me by all means but leave other commenters out of your paranoid delusions and obsessions with me.] – TOM

You seem to be the only poster Alnus who has sussed out that this was an international psy-op to discredit the Taliban so that Obama can perpetrate more drone strikes on innocent Pakistanis. Malala moved her feet and walked to the stretcher…try doing that if you been shot both in neck and head by a gun at close range!

I neither hunt, as a perfectly humane choice, nor do I fear being hunted; Because what comes around, goes around; If you maltreat someone (includes animals) they’re gonna maltreat you [see: Eric Clapton song: Further On Up The Road — check it out on Youtube]; if you kill bears and wear their fur, someone will come along and hunt you down and kill you and then wear your skin…. Every humane-choice person knows that there are a thousand ways of keeping warm, apart from killing bears, so I suggest you go to your market, buy a Persian carpet, wrap yourself inside it, and take a magic carpet ride while smoking your hallucinogenic drugs….. Good Luck.

Thanks, Florence, for accidentally liking me… I am indeed quite likeable when you really get to know me 🙂
Malala Yusufzai is an NWO stooge…. fancy getting a Peace Prize at age 17! — But then, the originator of the Peace Prize, Doctor Nobel, invented Dynamite and Barry Obama got one recently for mass murder in Pakistan’s Swat valley — where Malala comes from….you couldn’t make it up…
I am surprised frankly that that Albanian lady ‘Mother Teresa’ got her 1979 Peace Prize without having been shot in the head! — I am also surprised that Mahatma Gandhi missed out on HIS Peace Prize even though he properly qualified! 🙂
You too should be in the running, Florence, for your distinguished work in the filthy hospitals of the Crimea 🙂

Fink why don’t you go and play with Tom, because I’m sure he has better things to do with his hands.
He is so pissed off because someone has called him out as a puppeteer.
If I want to answer anytime it will be to the puppeteer not his puppets.

Pennie – Nobody becomes tired of saying what they really think to be true, until the day their mind finally fails and life itself becomes a burden. For some people it’s the compilation of their own lies and evasions which become an intolerable burden at an early age……

Hey Gay Fuwkes, you’ve already had it explained to you that there’s more than one person in this universe who can tell that you’re just a paranoid idiot. They are not all Tom Pride. I agree with a lot that he blogs but not everything and I have better things to do with my time than to be someone’s glove puppet. You really are a very silly person.
Bye bye now

You are SO wrong! That implies that Ms Fawkes is just a harmless idiot. I fundamentally disagree with you. Disgusting bigoted people like Ms Fawkes are FAR from harmless. If vicious morons like her had their way then people would be imprisoned for being homosexual or bisexual, and “coloured people” would be deported. We should all vehemently oppose such disgusting views EVERY time we see them. To dismiss them as “silly” is nearly as bad as supporting them.

It’s not one or the other. Malala has nothing to do with the mistreatment of the working class but the perception of her group identity has everything to do with the comments degrading her and relying on stereotypes. Her care is/was paid by the Pakistani government as their services are inadequate and she can’t go back home as the Pakistani state is very dangerous for anyone outspoken, their own security forces have been heavily infiltrated by fundamentalist extremists so any guard assigned to protect her could very well end up being the one to kill her. I think it’s very pathetic to be jealous of a teenage girl who was almost murdered. Stop falling for the divide and conquer bullshit. Everyone should be treated with respect as individuals and free from dehumanizing abuse, just because one group is treated badly is not a free pass to treat another group like dirt. If we send Malala and all the other immigrants home, it isn’t magically going create a new utopia and make the elites suddenly softhearted.

Lastly,I’ve “been swallowing too much political correctness text at university?” Oh really? Oh wait, yeah I remember, ‘Political Correctness’ class was lodged in between ‘Indoctrination to Cultural Marxism’ and ‘How to be a Do Gooding Bleeding Heart Liberal’.

“It’s about time we started listening to opposition to mainstream thinking, it’s mediocre,even the do gooders only spout what they are taught by university lecturers, they can’t think for themselves.”

Please inform me:

A) What, precisely, do you think is “mainstream thinking” as taught by university lecturers?
I would like you to site actual theories and studies and tell me your informed criticism of such research.

B) What oppositional thinking should “we” be listening to instead?
Please share examples or how else are “we” going to know. Please illustrate how those arguments hold up compared to what you consider “mediocre mainstream thinking”?

You don’t understand the right of freedom of speech at all unfortunately. The freedom to say something does not come with a right not to be criticised for it. I don’t see anyone calling for a ban on opinions; they are criticising the opinion.

I couldn’t agree more – you are sensibly refusing to go along with MSM pc-driven conditioned thinking. I really believe there is a lot of good sense -particularly with bizarre way Nobel prizes are granted- as well as crap in opinions expressed by Daily Mail readers but the Left are conditioned to think anyone who doesn’t share their politically correct opinions is mentally defective – it’s quite horrifying what Leftwing feminist education has done to dumb down the public’s right to free expression. Please do continue to express your ideas fearlessly in the certain knowledge hey are shared with appreciably more people than the general media would have you believe.

I certainly agree that those are rather disparaging comments on the subject. But characterising that as racism is such an utter failure to understand the conservative mindset. Race has nothing to do with it. They’re being idiotic because they’re attacking something/someone who will actually help create the kind of world they’d prefer. But they’re really not being racist. And liberals need to try a lot harder to understand why reactionary conservatives have these kinds of views. The excuse of “racism” has become synonymous with “they’re just wrong, that’s all you need to know” and that’s just not good enough.

Language like yours is totally unhelpful and bigoted -what has any of this to do with Nazis?- it’s also absurd to claim as you do in capitals `and still defy them after getting shot’ when in truth she has lived within the safety of Britain since being shot which doesn’t take much courage to `defy them’ from there. By all means support the girl but base your support on soundly sensible statements.

If we’re to believe the authorities we are all under threat from the Taliban in Britain and we all respond by telling them to get lost -should we all receive Nobel Prizes for that? The more likely explanation for all this artificial adoration is that the pc-riddled Western governments are seeking as many Madonnas as they can find to place on pedestals and expect the rest of us to worship at their feet, these Daily Mail comments are from people who can see through their game and resent being asked to play it.

Terence, you advised victedy to
“base your support on soundly sensible statements”
and then the next minute you are saying stuff like
“The more likely explanation for all this artificial adoration is that the pc-riddled Western governments are seeking as many Madonnas as they can find to place on pedestals and expect the rest of us to worship at their feet.”
Errm…. What?

Quite, it was more of a passing comment that serves to extend the discussion into areas not perhaps immediately relevant to this narrow subject so I’ll simply say that we live in an age that seeks to supplant the male as the dominant gender with the female -the all-pervasive instrument used being political correctness the effect of which is perversely to turn all our accepted social values topsy turvy- part of that process is to portray the female with grotesquely exaggerated positive gifts and virtues while depicting the male as extolling wretchedly negative qualities: note how the media invariably illustrate any positive subject with females and negative with males. They powers that be also endeavour to re-write history so anything of a positive constructive nature in the past must be seen as having a prominent female input, arguing the female has been deliberately written out of history by biased males, while at much the same time they depict the female as the perennial victim telling us that she was not allowed to participate in any positive activity by the dominant male: thereby seeking to derive benefit from simultaneously adopting both albeit contradictory claims. Regarding this discussion -a girl shot in Pakistan for campaigning for girls to have a right to schooling and thereafter settled in Britain being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize- I thus said might best be understood against that wider background.

Okay… Well, thanks for your courteous and extended reply, Terence. But as another bloke all I can say is that we must be living in different universes. I’m reluctant to generalise about the sexes but all I see is men [a lot of them millionaires from privileged backgrounds] in power, in government, running the media, editing and owning papers like the Mail, the Sun, the Times, the Telegraph, and perverting the truth to suit their own agendas, namely the pursuit of power, wealth and privilege.

Thanks also for your reply – as you see the discussion opens up and extends even further from the original core subject so I think it’s better to leave it here. Let’s agree that all are welcome to their own opinions of what gave rise to this situation.

Yep, Terence, I agree I think we’d better agree to differ. Our perceptions of the world are so different that I’m quite mystified to be honest. But at least we didn’t descend into abuse (which I sometimes find tempting! 🙂 ). Just one comment though. I’ve noticed that PC seems to have become a right-of-centre term of general abuse, like ‘do-gooder’ before it (which also perplexes me when I consider the alternative).
I have difficulty with the equation ‘PC = a BAD THING’ as the alternative to PC seems to be ‘political incorrectness’ or the licence to bully, stigmatise, marginalise, abuse and suppress.

This is the sort of simplistic statement to be expected of females who by the nature are so subjective they see everything from a very personal view-point – in truth I own not to being overly fond of the female of the species although `hate’ is such a profound emotion that it gives my dislike of the gender far too much significance – sorry but my feelings are far more prosaic than that, they simply incline me to put distance between myself and the opposite gender and everyone is happy with the outcome.

“This is the sort of simplistic statement to be expected of females who by the [sic] nature are so subjective they see everything from a very personal view-point”.
Good grief. Judging by that, it’s YOU who is the master of the simplistic statement, Terence! 🙂 But thanks for clarifying that you’re not a woman-hater, just a woman-disdainer and ignorer. As if that’s an OK position from which to pontificate on human nature.