Saturday, July 28, 2012

Maybe you haven't thought about it, you're just an ordinary consumer of tech, trying to find what works well enough. You haven't considered what are the significances between normal and wide screens. But that computer screens are measured diagonally; for sale, and this is significant to comparing normal and wide screens.

"Measured diagonally" means that the screen is measured from corner to corner across the face (crossing both width and height). This makes a lot of sense with squarish screens, where doing so means that comparing measures gives a good idea of difference between screens. But consider the impression '19" screen' gives between a squar[ish] and a wide screen when you look at them side-by-side:

--Apologies for the dirty screens (these are newly acquired, and haven't been cleaned yet), and none for the flash-I like it.--

The number is an accurate measure in either case, it's still a measure across face (both width and height), but the impression of the different forms of these screens is, well, different. The squar[ish] screen (Dell) really isn't too much higher (and therefore, narrower) than the "wide" screen (Compaq); nevertheless it is not very useful for things like putting two documents side-by-side on the same screen; the wide screen contrariwise fits two documents besides one another comfortably. Thus the wide screen is perhaps the more useful for many practical purposes.

Now as far as Windows users go about doing that manually every time they have to adjust a Window, and put up with the time that must take, is beyond me: I have used Linux for years, only recently getting a Lenovo with Windows (and note removing it), which is nice for Excel and OneNote, but in almost every other way inferior (in my view); with Linux one can set screens to snap to attention, to fit side-by-side together on a screen just by default. It's beautiful.

Well a little comparing of screentypes to get the nontechie's juices flowing, and a bit of plug for Linux systems, and I'm about off. OH! And warning: Ubuntu with desktop "Unity" won't help you in the Windowing game, being built to prefer only a single Window displayed at a time, apparently targetting tablets. Who knows if they will repent in time.

No comments:

When you find a post useful, leave a comment if you would, maybe pass along the link: whether on a social network or on your own site. After all, the web is for linking, so we don't have to duplicate everything!

Consider Subscribing...

because

A blog (usually) rarely updated, so you need not worry about inundation with content demanding attention. Its original intent was for publishing rare or very useful stuff, like the post working around Nautilus picking fights on an XFCE desktop.

I am no programmer or computer scientist, but am a web junky and, as a poor boy with only dreams, one who doesn't like to incur massive investments into something like an OS just to safely and effectively continue using my own hardware long after its makers would love it to expire. So I encounter problems and...figure them out.

I also like to post on rights issues in America.

I think on occassion some commentary will slip-in too, AND WANT TO WARN THAT MODERATION IS ENABLED BECAUSE I KEPT GETTING CHINESE SPAM LINKING TO MALICIOUS ASIAN PORN SITES ON MY BLOGS!