Dutch politician and European Parliament member Marcel de Graaff has issued a dire warning about the United Nations’ frightening vision to criminalize opposition to mass migration. The baby blue wanna-be tyrannical organization is even calling for policing of the media on the issue. You probably haven’t heard much about de Graaff’s remarks. That’s because the globalist big box media we have today is already in the camp of the pro-migration authoritarians.

Levers of Power

In a press conference, de Graaff raised the alarm over an international conference in Marrakech, Morocco on Dec. 11 and 12 where the U.N. Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration is to be signed. Though the pact is said to be non-binding, it is meant to establish the groundwork for an Orwellian campaign to cement mass migration as a human right legally above any and all criticism.

“One basic element of this new agreement is the extension of the definition of hate speech,” de Graaff says. “The agreement wants to criminalize migration speech. Criticism of migration will become a criminal offense. Media outlets that give room to criticism of migration can be shut down.”

That last sentence is no exaggeration. The U.N. Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner posted onto its website the text of an ominous Nov. 20 speech given by Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights Andrew Gilmour. The title of the speech alone shows the union is not even trying to hide its agenda: “Words Matter: Role and Responsibility of the media in shaping public perceptions about migrants and refugees and promoting inclusive societies.”

Gilmour begins his speech with a sweeping declaration highlighting just how unrestrained the UN sees itself in its machinations for power.

“Hate crimes against migrants are an especially unpleasant manifestation of what I see as an almost global backlash against human rights,” he bluntly asserts. In one sentence Gilmour weds the mass migration of peoples into sovereign nations with the entire concept of human rights itself. From there it is easy to justify a stern authoritarian approach to crushing “racism” and “xenophobia.” And Gilmour lets it be known that command of the media is to be a key part of the global compact’s effort to do just that:

“In its Objective 17, the Global Compact commits States and other stakeholders to promote quality reporting by media outlets of migration-related issues and terminology, to investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and to stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination against migrants. These are crucial points we all need to build on.”

Goodbye, free press. Gilmour explains how his office will help states “to distinguish free speech from hate speech” that, of course, has no right to exist. He points out that media reporting that is not sufficiently pro-migration cannot be tolerated. “It is clear to us all that many media outlets are deliberately failing to promote the concept of common humanity,” Gilmour says, again defining mass migration as a basic human right. “Words obviously do matter: dehumanising racist rhetoric frequently leads to hatred, tensions, violence and conflict. It requires a greater effort from the international community to confront those in the media who seek to stir up hatred.”

Death of Nations

…the United Nations has declared itself an enemy of the American people.

This is the appeal to tyranny that de Graaff is warning about. It will utterly destroy the nations that give in to it. “This agreement is a coup d’etat of pro-migration liberal globalists, which will greatly benefit multinationals,” de Graaff says. “Countries who import the third world, will become the third world. And it is absolutely clear that in third world countries multinationals dictate the rules.”

The good news is that sane-minded nations are refusing to sign this trans-national suicide pact. Led by President Trump’s defiant dismissal of the U.N.’s right to impose its will in any way on the people of the United States, which he eloquently reaffirmed during his September address before that den of vipers, more and more nations are rejecting this power grab.

By openly endorsing the invasion of the West by Third World hordes and calling for the reining in of a free and objective press, the United Nations has declared itself an enemy of the American people. It is far past time to remove this hostile entity from its comfortable quarters on our soil. The U.S. must pull out of the United Nations and they must clear out of our country.

One Comment

rusty4.5

Thanks for submitting this article, Joe. It contains words of caution to those who read it.

“Hate crimes against migrants are an especially unpleasant manifestation of what I see as an almost global backlash against human rights,” he bluntly asserts. Yet, Gilmor says nothing about ongoing reports of gang rapes and other attacks by migrants across the globe. To him, only immigrants count. I’d say he’s lost his ability to feel compassion for the victims, if he ever had any that is. Only a small-minded person (or group of people) would support such an idiotic idea. I hope all countries reject it.

UN members must think hostile and violent peoples will somehow change how they behave after they’ve crossed the borders of other countries. Immature, wishful thinking.

The older I get, the more I appreciate the simplicity of my youth in the countryside. If the UN has it’s way, there will be too many people on earth to even have the countryside.

National Correspondent at LibertyNation.com Joe Schaeffer is a veteran journalist with 20+ years' experience. He spent 15 years with The Washington Times, including 8+ years as Managing Editor of the newspaper's popular National Weekly Edition. Striving to be a natural health nut, he considers staring at the ocean for hours to be an act of political rebellion.

We Recommend

About the author

National Correspondent at LibertyNation.com Joe Schaeffer is a veteran journalist with 20+ years' experience. He spent 15 years with The Washington Times, including 8+ years as Managing Editor of the newspaper's popular National Weekly Edition. Striving to be a natural health nut, he considers staring at the ocean for hours to be an act of political rebellion.