Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

I'd tear this argument apart, but you're too young to hear the things that are not allowed, according to that "logic".

Please go ahead, i do not care.

New information: "Ass is for poopin out of, not recreating out of, UNLESS! the person wants it, and not ASKED for it"

« Last Edit: March 15, 2014, 07:36:47 AM by Angus and Alexis »

Logged

Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

Well, if you were allowed to pick only one main purpose for the butt hole, that purpose would be "for shitting out of". However, humans find many uses for a great variety of things. There is nothing wrong with that.

Me, I'm totally heterosexual. I also have never had butt[1] sex, and have no desire to. But, if that's what someone likes to do, then so be it.

...Really? Do I have to explain why someone having an opinion doesn't make it true? -1 for being dumb.

I must say the -1 is rather rude.

I KNOW that opinions do not make things true, but SHE does not...(she is also drunk...*sigh*)

Logged

Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

I didn't get the reason for the -1 either. If anything, your mom deserves the -1, not you. Maybe OAA is drunk too, LOL.

I explained the reason behind it in a post in this very thread. And no, I'm not drunk. I don't drink. Ever. I'm just treating Angus and Alexis like I treat theists. No special treatment.

Well, your reason sucked.

I see it like this. Angus and Alexis' mom holds a stupid opinion, kinda like, "God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, HAR HAR HAR!" So, Angus presents it to us because he is proud to belong to a community that has members that could tear his mom a new asshole in the world of debate. But instead, Angus receives hostility. Way to go by letting your fellow down!

I see it like this. Angus and Alexis' mom holds a stupid opinion, kinda like, "God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, HAR HAR HAR!" So, Angus presents it to us because he is proud to belong to a community that has members that could tear his mom a new asshole in the world of debate. But instead, Angus receives hostility. Way to go by letting your fellow down!

This isn't the Chatter section. This is the Sexuality, Reproduction, & Abortion section, and Angus and Alexis clearly asked for help debunking an easily debunked concept that he himself said he could debunk. Even if my reason sucked, which I don't believe, this thread is little more than attention whoring. Either way, the smite was deserved. You'll notice how I only smited him when he asked about debunking an opinion.

I see it like this. Angus and Alexis' mom holds a stupid opinion, kinda like, "God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, HAR HAR HAR!" So, Angus presents it to us because he is proud to belong to a community that has members that could tear his mom a new asshole in the world of debate. But instead, Angus receives hostility. Way to go by letting your fellow down!

This isn't the Chatter section. This is the Sexuality, Reproduction, & Abortion section, and Angus and Alexis clearly asked for help debunking an easily debunked concept that he himself said he could debunk. Even if my reason sucked, which I don't believe, this thread is little more than attention whoring. Either way, the smite was deserved. You'll notice how I only smited him when he asked about debunking an opinion.

Hey, I don't think for one minute that this is some "great, most interesting thread" either. Maybe Angus had some ridiculously high hopes. Maybe he threw this at us hoping for an epic K-fucking-Crady response to present to his mother. I don't know. I just didn't like to see Angus being let down so harshly, but that's life. No big deal.

However, as stated previously, the mouth isn't for sex either but that doesn't stop people from inserting a penis into it -- or other things. And if we are to only use body parts for the original purpose, then why do people smoke? The lungs are for inhaling oxygen, not pollution. The nose is for smelling, not snorting coke, nor is it intended for pouring water through as many people do with neti pots. The nipples of female breasts are for babies, not adults. Also, the skin is a covering on the body, it is not a canvas for ink or punching holes and affixing metal.

I'm sure she has done at least a couple of the above ...

Logged

John 14:2 :: In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

I could be polite and say that she is misinformed, unconsidered or simply ignorant. But more to the point, she just accepts being dumb about it. It's easier to lack thought than it is to change one's mind.

Logged

John 14:2 :: In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

Many people justify things they don't like by using/creating a religion or ideology, or movement (pun intended) to justify their prejudices. As Chronos points out: there are many things that parts of the body isn't almost likely meant for but it's ones own body; they can do with it as they please, I feel.

-Nam

Logged

Quote from: David Garrett Arnold

there are oceans of words aged in prayer,against geometric lines, and cloudbeaten skies;credulous allure—slowly captivated in hearts fair—trees and flowers bloomed in grace upon one's eyes.

When my mother attempted to make suggestions about what is normal and what isn't, I'd say 'yup' or shrug, and did as i bloody well wanted.

When did kids start listening to their parents' opinions on sexual decorum? Is this something new?

Anyway, In the past, I've said the same thing as your mom had said, but it never really mattered. Why would anyone care about my opinions about sexual practices? Why should we give a crap what anyone else thinks is proper?

When did kids start listening to their parents' opinions on sexual decorum? Is this something new?

When did parents start sharing their opinions on sex, much less sexual decorum?

Since ever. (and since the invention of alcohol)

Logged

Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

I was born in the 1960s. You got one talk, if that, and rarely did the issue arise again unless you were (1) caught in the act or (2) becoming a parent.

My mother was (originally) a Roman Catholic. She gave me the talk and mostly informed me about how the female reproductive system works. (It's obviously more complex.) She was uncomfortable doing it. I had a better understanding of how female periods and/or conception works than most of the girls in my class.

I was not uncomfortable talking to my daughter about sex, but I did get annoyed and thrown off kilter when I found her alone in her room with her boyfriend and/or girlfriend and/or the day she thought she was pregnant. (These situations did not all occur at the same time, by the way, and the events in the bedroom where not the ones leading to a pregnancy scare.)

But to stay on topic, I am confident that so far she has not taken it up the butt.

Logged

John 14:2 :: In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

An Omnipowerful God needed to sacrifice himself to himself (but only for a long weekend) in order to avert his own wrath against his own creations who he made in a manner knowing that they weren't going to live up to his standards.

I was born in the 1960s. You got one talk, if that, again unless you were (1) caught in the act or (2) becoming a parent.

I never even got a talk. Of course when you find your parents porn vids under the bed, and your parents porn pics of themselves that it probably gets embarrassing at that point; more so than usual.

Quote

My mother was (originally) a Roman Catholic. She gave me the talk and mostly informed me about how the female reproductive system works. (It's obviously more complex.) She was uncomfortable doing it. I had a better understanding of how female periods and/or conception works than most of the girls in my class.

Yeah...I got a story on that--trust me: you don't want to hear that one.

-Nam

Logged

Quote from: David Garrett Arnold

there are oceans of words aged in prayer,against geometric lines, and cloudbeaten skies;credulous allure—slowly captivated in hearts fair—trees and flowers bloomed in grace upon one's eyes.