I am a HUGE fan of the original 3 and was excited when that movie came out, but it turned out to be so bad that it's the only movie that ever got me to leave the theater before it was finished. The refrigerator scene was so stupid, I was actually offended and walked out before it was over. To this day I have no clue how it ended

reklamfox:I am a HUGE fan of the original 3 and was excited when that movie came out, but it turned out to be so bad that it's the only movie that ever got me to leave the theater before it was finished. The refrigerator scene was so stupid, I was actually offended and walked out before it was over. To this day I have no clue how it ended

reklamfox:I am a HUGE fan of the original 3 and was excited when that movie came out, but it turned out to be so bad that it's the only movie that ever got me to leave the theater before it was finished. The refrigerator scene was so stupid, I was actually offended and walked out before it was over. To this day I have no clue how it ended

reklamfox:I am a HUGE fan of the original 3 and was excited when that movie came out, but it turned out to be so bad that it's the only movie that ever got me to leave the theater before it was finished. The refrigerator scene was so stupid, I was actually offended and walked out before it was over. To this day I have no clue how it ended

/end CSB

It was only a little more stupid than a few other episodes from the previous films. They aren't supposed to be realistic.

That scene was dumb. So is jumping out of a plane in a raft and surviving.

The movie was a piece of garbage, though. The effects looked terrible, the plot was awful. I got up and said it felt like George Lucas just took a two hour long shiat in my eyes and ears, and the theater broke out in applause. It was so bad. So, so bad.

But, don't put it all on that ridiculous scene. You didn't even get to the CGI monkeys.

DKinMN:reklamfox: I am a HUGE fan of the original 3 and was excited when that movie came out, but it turned out to be so bad that it's the only movie that ever got me to leave the theater before it was finished. The refrigerator scene was so stupid, I was actually offended and walked out before it was over. To this day I have no clue how it ended

/end CSB

It was only a little more stupid than a few other episodes from the previous films. They aren't supposed to be realistic.

That scene was dumb. So is jumping out of a plane in a raft and surviving.

The movie was a piece of garbage, though. The effects looked terrible, the plot was awful. I got up and said it felt like George Lucas just took a two hour long shiat in my eyes and ears, and the theater broke out in applause. It was so bad. So, so bad.

But, don't put it all on that ridiculous scene. You didn't even get to the CGI monkeys.

Oh for crying out loud, yeah.... The whole movie was pure, unadulterated awful from beginning to end. I don't know how Spielberg didn't Alan Smithee it. I guess his paycheck was fat enough to turn his conscience off.

The only thing I disagree with you on is that it was only a little more stupid than the previous ones. I disagree. Sure the previous ones had magical shiat, and a few spectacular but unrealistic stunts - but this was way dumber by leaps and bounds. The previous ones just had a few things you needed to suspend your disbelief for to enjoy them comfortably. This one took your disbelief, strangled it and cracked its skull open with a rock. And sooooo much of the movie was Lucas going, "Remember that thing that was fun from the previous movies? Look! We're doing that again but WAY BIGGER AND WAY DUMBER!! Isn't that awesome you morons?!? You liked it when they went over the waterfall in that raft, huh? Well let's have them go over THREE stupid looking waterfalls! That's three times better, right? GIVE ME THAT MONEY YOU biatchFARKS."

DKinMN:But, don't put it all on that ridiculous scene. You didn't even get to the CGI monkeys.

Yeah people always point out the fridge scene but honestly, if the rest of the movie had been at least passably good that scene would have just come off as a comic moment and I doubt anyone would be bothered by it. I actually like how he stumbles into the fake town because it was funny at at least kind of historically accurate as far as how they did nuclear testing. The movie gets SO much worse after that.

It's like saying the worst part about the Phantom Menace was Jar Jar when in reality every part of the Phantom Menace was the worst part of the Phantom Menace.

As much as I don't like Shia, watching that video made me feel dirty and uncomfortable. I don't like him but to me that means not thinking about him. Waiting in line to ... yell at him or shiat in front of him or wipe his tears or... what a waste of human energy and spirit. It's... sick. I agree with those who said that Shia is now the second most annoying person.

Also: as awful as the 4th Indy Jones was - don't blame Lucas. It was directed by Spielberg. It was also Spielberg and Ford who demanded the script be downgraded to the crap it became. The original draft that Lucas brought in, by J Stewart was pretty decent. And then Darabont f'ed it up and Koepp made it worse and that was what was filmed.

What's the point of saying all this to a wax dummy of Shiatstain leBeef when what we all want to do is kick the REAL Shaitstain leBeef in the nuts as hard as we possibly can, for as long as our legs have strength?

God, I hate him, and I've never even seen anything he was in, except the first Transformers, and that was by accident. He has the range and emotional depth to make Keanu Reeves look like Laurence Olivier.

Hey, I find the "Shia LaBeouf is responsible for every famous quote ever" meme as entertaining as anyone else, but it's tough to hate on a guy who seems to be legitimately losing his mind. I'm reserving my scorn for nutjobs like Jenny McCarthy who hurt other people with their crazy. So far LaBeouf is only hurting himself, and even though I dislike his onscreen presence in movies, that's not reason enough to enjoy watching him come apart at the seams. I honestly hope he gets some help. Real help, not the hippy-dippy religious or do-nothing "rehab" center help that celebrities usually rely on to fix their PR problems but not their actual issues.

/and yeah, blaming Shia for Crystal Skull is like blaming Hayden Christensen for the last two Star Wars prequels. He was a bad ingredient in a sh*t stew, but he wasn't the cook who decided to make sh*t stew in the first place.

First off there were only THREE Indiana Jones movies. A fourth one was never made. Yep I'm sticking to that. You can't make me believe that there was every a 4th Indy movie made.

I heard he's doing the "fake crazy" thing ala Joaquin Phoenix. Honestly I think the guy is losing the plot. I don't like the guy but at this point it's just getting sad. I hope he gets real help and not a stint for "exhaustion".

Smashed Hat:DKinMN: But, don't put it all on that ridiculous scene. You didn't even get to the CGI monkeys.

Yeah people always point out the fridge scene but honestly, if the rest of the movie had been at least passably good that scene would have just come off as a comic moment and I doubt anyone would be bothered by it. I actually like how he stumbles into the fake town because it was funny at at least kind of historically accurate as far as how they did nuclear testing. The movie gets SO much worse after that.

It's like saying the worst part about the Phantom Menace was Jar Jar when in reality every part of the Phantom Menace was the worst part of the Phantom Menace.

I actually hated the fridge scene less than I hated the aliens and the scene with all the indigenous people popping out of.....where ever it was, a cave or something to attack them. I was like really, that's all those people do all day, sit around in a cave all dressed up, hiding, night after night, year after year, in case someone wanders in? They don't guard the entrance or anything, they just hang around and wait, inside. Hidden. The way it was presented made so little sense it was pretty insulting. It seemed like they wanted to have a fight scene, but they were too lazy to figure out a premise so they said hey! let's just have a bunch of dudes in paint and feathers pop out all over the place! Yeah!

The whole movie was like a bunch of terrible ideas someone wrote feverishly on sticky notes at 2 am while drunk, and then they shot the movie off those notes instead of hiring someone to write an actual script that made sense or had cohesion or was in any way good.

Gyrfalcon:What's the point of saying all this to a wax dummy of Shiatstain leBeef when what we all want to do is kick the REAL Shaitstain leBeef in the nuts as hard as we possibly can, for as long as our legs have strength?

God, I hate him, and I've never even seen anything he was in, except the first Transformers, and that was by accident. He has the range and emotional depth to make Keanu Reeves look like Laurence Olivier.

Not a fan of the movie Constantine, then, I take it? At least you could see your theory come to life...

1) Painfully obvious they wanted it to be his dad, not John Hurt, and the plot almost identical. Father/Ox get's kidnapped by Nazi/Russians. Sends cryptic book/letter with clues. Finds both and ends up working for Nazi/Russians to get McGuffin. More or less.

2) The entire movie Indiana Jones was unnecessary. The same could be said about all but Temple of Doom, but it's most obvious here the plot would move ahead as it did with or without him. He was just along for the ride but completely unnecessary. Much like the last Die Hard. Someone wrote a movie and said "Hey, let's stick Indiana Jones/John McClain in here somewhere?"

/National Treasure was the best Indiana Jones movie that was clearly written to be an Indiana Jones movies (adventurer, father, girl, sidekick, unthinkable treasure etc...) but since they passed on it, the year and bad guys were changed.

That's a pretty creepy scene he's got going there. Shia strikes me as a guy that believed every compliment bestowed upon him by Hollywood sycophants, and as a result he takes himself entirely too seriously.

His ego makes this apology a farce. It's his own ego that believes we care enough to want an apology. Almost no one gives a shiat. Not to discount society's love of schadenfreude, we'll all happily witness this little freak show that his delusions of grandeur have conjured up, but if it's meant to get back in the good graces of...well anyone, the most honest thing he can do is simply admit he's been a narcissistic douche who fell victim to his own immaturity.

buntz:2) The entire movie Indiana Jones was unnecessary. The same could be said about all but Temple of Doom, but it's most obvious here the plot would move ahead as it did with or without him. He was just along for the ride but completely unnecessary. Much like the last Die Hard. Someone wrote a movie and said "Hey, let's stick Indiana Jones/John McClain in here somewhere?"

Same thing is true about Raiders.

All of the Die Hard sequels were scripts that existed that were fashioned into Die Hards later.

mjbok:All of the Die Hard sequels were scripts that existed that were fashioned into Die Hards later.

Yeah, like I said, really only Temple of Doom did Jones DO anything (save the kids, get the stones back).But Raiders, Hitler would have opened the Ark and died. If Anything, Jones was the reason WWII existed.Last Crusade, eventually they would have found the Grail, Henry Sr. would have found it, but regardless, they still wouldn't be able to pass the seal and the same thing would have happened.

And what I meant about Die Hard was not "it was an existing script and they changed the lead character to McClain" but rather the movie was filmed as written but instead of making McClaine the main character, they said "let's write him in to follow the main character around"John McClain had ZERO to do with the last movie. It was an existing movie without him.Take him out of Die HardI, II, III, you have no movie. He was the protagonist.Take him out of 4, it would still go on as filmed.

The Temple of Doom is way worse than the fourth movie.The side characters are way more annoying, the plot is worse (magic mystical stones?*) and the fridge scene can be topped in dis-believability by the waterfall, lava and coal truck sequences. Sorry, but if you get that close to lava, getting a bit light-headed will be the least of your concerns.

/Given the choice between watching the second and fourth movie, I'd definitely watch the fourth.//*I'm aware the stones are no sillier than the evil box of ghosts and the phoenix-down cup; the aliens are less silly.

firesign:Gyrfalcon: What's the point of saying all this to a wax dummy of Shiatstain leBeef when what we all want to do is kick the REAL Shaitstain leBeef in the nuts as hard as we possibly can, for as long as our legs have strength?

God, I hate him, and I've never even seen anything he was in, except the first Transformers, and that was by accident. He has the range and emotional depth to make Keanu Reeves look like Laurence Olivier.

Not a fan of the movie Constantine, then, I take it? At least you could see your theory come to life...