Americans are supposed to be energetic. After
all, we “went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in
between”because of our relentless drive for expansion and profit. The American caricature, so idolized and reviled throughout the world, is a loud creature with a fondness for action and a devotion to extolling the virtues of thinking big and making quick money. According to Louis Hartz, author of The Liberal Tradition in America, “irrational Lockeanism” is our
prevailing credo, with both liberals and conservatives essentially agreeing on
the soundness of liberal democracy and global capital. A good Cold War liberal,
Hartz (and generations of leftists after him) believed that a genuine and
unique American right did not and could not exist. The left has all the best
ideas, after all.

Any movement dedicated to securing the future of the Western peoples must deal with the fact that feminist legislation, moral corruption and hate-spreading has rendered marriage to a Western woman a decidedly unwise act for most men. The online networks of male resistance to feminism, most of which overlap at some point or other with the Alt-Right, have so far managed to offer three alternative paths for men:

To make an allusion to a certain hairy-fairy poet of
celebratory bombast and glorified deviancy (no, not Milo), every mass movement
can be said to “contain multitudes.” Such a circumstance is inevitable, when
one considers the fact that “mass” invariably equates to “massive”; when more
people are added to a group, that which could be called the group’s essential
core is in some way diluted by the result.

Thus, the would-be leaders of any burgeoning movement
inevitably wind up imposing, or at least prescribing, with a heavy dollop of “extreme prejudice,” a certain top-down set of precepts
or attitudes, to which those in the general herd (that is, the would-be
underlings under these would-be leaders) feel a need to conform, lest they be
ridiculed for the ridiculous gesture of standing alone with their hideously contrary
views and looking like a bunch of uncool, uncouth, autistic fedora-clad goofballs who most assuredly never get laid.

The Alt-Right includes a spectrum of views: from the racist, White Nationalist Alt-Right to the culturist, Western-Civilization protecting Alt-Light. Herein I will cover both sides' mutual disdain for multiculturalism, discuss their differences and place Trump in the spectrum. Ultimately, I will argue, not only is Trump not Alt-Right, he is only tepidly Alt-Lite.

The following passage, describing the failure of the New Left in the 1960s and 70s, has a lot of relevance for our own movement:

"Ironically, just when the New Left was experiencing an unprecedented wave of support, its leading organization, SDS, which claimed almost a hundred thousand members and a million supporters, was being torn asunder by internal contradictions. Chapter meetings throughout the country degenerated into ideological squabbles as the Progressive Labor party (PL), a disciplined Old Left cadre, made a power play and tried to take over the SDS. The PL people were cultural conservatives; they wore their hair short, dressed straight, mouthed Marxist dogma, and dismissed lifestyle as a peripheral concern that diverted attention from the true working-class struggle. On repeated occasions PL castigated SDS regulars for being ‘escapist’ and ‘objectively counterrevolutionary when they spoke in favor of turning on. (Quite a few SDS members would have agreed with Arthur Kleps when he said, ‘Marxism is the opiate of the unstoned classes.’) PL also criticized propaganda tactics like guerrilla theater and rock bands at rallies as ‘creeping carnivalism,’ and they even claimed that Timothy Leary was a CIA agent who pushed acid on the Movement as part of an imperialist plot." (Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of LSD: the CIA, the Sixties, and Beyond by Martin A. Lee and Bruce Shlain)

One Man's Chorus is an excellent source of well-argued Alt-Right videos. This video addresses the Conservative movement's surprising refusal to engage with the Left on fundamental issues, where it could win, and to instead to argue detail. Hint: symbiosis.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who was once laudably referred to as the "Maestro" for his supposed astute stewardship of U.S. monetary policy, commented last week on the nation’s current political and economic climate:

"We’re not in a stable equilibrium. I hope we can all find a way out because this too great a country to be undermined, by how should I say it, crazies."

Well, if there is anyone who knows how to "undermine" an economy, it is the "Maestro," since it was his "crazed" policies that brought about the 2008 financial crisis which ushered in the Great Recession that continues to this very day.

Apropos of recent calls for the Alt Right to wage war on Breitbart editor and troll auteur Milo Yiannopoulos, the man himself came to a nearby bloated city to give one of his more important speeches. Attendees like myself were rewarded with a vision of the Alt Right not as a singular thing, but as layers of a vital truth.

Yiannopoulos was compelling, and came across as nervous and even shy but earnest, which won the audience over completely. The pacing of his delivery was more like that of a comedian than a political speaker, but that worked very well, separating out the density of the material.

There you have it folk, America is not just the land of contemporary black geniuses like Kayne, Oprah and Colin Kaepernick. It is also the land of historic black inventor and innovator geniuses like George Washington Carver, the guy who brought you peanut butter, and Madam C.J. Walker who put together a company to sell blacks beauty products (Afro Sheen?) Or Garrett Morgan who worked on a chemical for hair-straightening (did he work with Walker?).

Darren Aronofsky's remarkable 2010 movie Black Swan functions as an aesthetic companion piece to his equally striking 2008 offering, The Wrestler. The two films take place in settings that could not possibly be more different, yet each tells essentially the same story, a story that is undeniably relevant to our age and culture.

As quickly as possible or after encountering any resistance, erupt into a state of violent anger and escalate the dispute with hysterical ravings, profanity, personal insults, aggressive body language etc.

Demand some outward show of compliance, again seemingly trivial, such as an apology or a retreat from a minor position, implying that this will put an end to the aggressive and hysterical outburst (in fact, it usually serves as a justification for escalating things even further).

As a "Flip," it is a bit amusing, and also a bit flattering, to see so much attention focused on Duterte in the Western media (both of the mainstream and of the dank maymay variety). What's particularly entertaining are some of the reactions I've seen from Western liberals when they discovered Duterte's 91% trust rating, and the succeeding virtue signalling of trying to compare him with Trump.

How could they support such a monster? The world needs to unite against all forms of tyranny, especially Trump. He’s just like Trump. Ha Ha. Did I mention how that Filipino guy resembles Trump?

Now, I regard the Duterte-Trump comparison to be a bit of an exaggeration, born either out of ignorance or disingenuous malice, usually on the part of the Western media to guilt-by-comparison Trump with the leader of a foreign country.

THE ALT-RIGHT AND THE VACUUM-PACKING OF LANGUAGE

Funny things are happening with the way language works in the modern age. One thing I've noticed is the incredible acceleration of the cliche cycle—a provisional term for the life cycle of a phrase from jaunty neologism to jaded cliche.

A perfect example is the phrase "How X became a symbol for Neo-Nazis." This phrase, with "cartoon frog" filling the "X," was rolled out only a few days ago by the Clinton campaign in an attempt to turn the vast Pepe meme penumbra surrounding Trump into something toxic.

The Alt-Right loves science; the Left hates science. We must repeatedly repeat these claims in order to bewilder and reverse the narrative wherein the Left is 'intellectual' and the Alt-Right are reactionary 'philistines.' This can attract people to the Alt-Right who like to think of themselves as modern scientific sorts.

To flip the narrative, we must highlight the Left's putting ideology in front of science. Their resorting to calling people 'haters' in response to scientific facts confirms that they put ideology in front of science. We must make the 'Scientific Right' the West’s default stereotype.

I recently saw a commercial for the MTV Video Music Awards. I must confess, I was momentarily transfixed. In this commercial, an astronaut approached a rocket ship as it landed in the middle of an empty, celestially illuminated, auditorium. Elegant classical music played as the announcer talked about artistic creation taking place in "a whole new space." It reminded me of some Alt-Right thinkers who view our political movement as the first step towards space travel and eventual galactic colonization. Man's conquering of the solar system, I realized, is not just a scientific endeavor, but also an aesthetic one: our work would metaphorically be using the solar system as our canvas - just as it had been depicted in the commercial.

Although history does not exactly repeat itself, it does provide parallels and sometimes quite ominous ones. Such is the case with the current U.S. Presidential election and the one which occurred one hundred years earlier.

The dominating question which hung over the 1916 campaign was whether the country would remain neutral in regard to the horrific slaughter which was taking place on the European battlefields in probably the greatest act of mass insanity ever recorded, World War I.

"Hillary Clinton took aim at supporters of Republican rival Donald Trump by saying half of them belonged in a 'basket of deplorables' as people who were racist, homophobic, sexist, xenophobic, or Islamophobic.

But Clinton, in a statement on Saturday, walked back the remarks, saying she regretted using the word 'half' and seeking to refocus on what she described as episodes of 'deplorable' behavior by Trump and his campaign."

We live in the Age of Equality, but few grasp its essence. It is the yearning – after eons of organization and evolution – of all life to return again to the amoeba and sludge stage, and for all atoms to shed their electrons and become simple hydrogen again, lost in the vastness of space. It is the thing that the great charlatan Sigmund Freud described as "The Death Wish."

It resonates in the most pervasive form of our contemporary culture: PORNOGRAPHY, which washes through the self-inflicted and therefore Faustian media of the internet as an orgy of equality: orifices and appendages – Black, White, Asian, "other," gay, and straight, male and female (and all the other genders rendered meaningless by the act) – pressed together in one unholy communion; no borders or constraints: the cunt equated with the womb, the asshole with the oral orifice, the tongue with the penis, etc., etc., in infinitum, et ultra in a great unending Black Mass of inversion, perversion, and equality.

Apropos my recent criticisms of (((The Daily Stormer))) and my disagreements with many in The Right Stuff Facebook group, from which I have now been expelled, I would recommend this video by the late Dr. William Pierce.

Personally, I think it is great that we finally managed to get a little attention from the mainstream media by flirting with the taboo imagery and tropes of our extremely cucked society. Also, this no doubt had a lot do with the kind of dysfunctional and semi-autistic people who inhabit the internet and who like pictures of frogs; while some of it may, as I speculate, even be due to (((certain interests))) seeking to ghettoize our highly moral and common sense ideas.

In addition to its long-running moral and spiritual vacuum, the UK is developing into something of a political vacuum, one that could possibly open up opportunities for new parties in British politics.

Not only is the governing Conservative Party reneging on BREXIT―after denying its members a say in the election of the PM―and thus weakening its popular legitimacy, but now the Labour Party is hitting even lower depths than the unelectable basement it has backed itself into with the election of the unelectable Jeremy Corbyn as leader.

In fact the two phenomenon are connected. The more unelectable Labour becomes, the more freedom the Conservative Party feels it has to do what it likes, to the detriment of the country.

Cat lovers and cat ladies will be familiar with their cute little pets suddenly stopping what they are dong, then hunching over―retching and wheezing―until a moist little furball is produced. This is quite normal for a cat to do, and is due to the fact that they lick a lot of fur, but it is quite shocking to see a Presidential candidate do this. This leads one to wonder just how much "fur" Hillary Cliton has been licking, and in what context. Is there, after all, some truth in the rumours that she has been conducting a lesbian affair with her close assistant, the sultry and hirsute Huma Abedin? It certainly couldn't be her poor health making her cough that much because Hillary's doctor keeps assuring us that she is in tip-top condition.

We knew it was a bad deal when a Remainer, Theresa May, was made Prime Minister by the Conservative Party hierarchy, following David Cameron's shock defeat in the famous BREXIT vote. Despite May being a Remainer and being beholden to unseen power brokers, it was still hoped that the will of the people would be respected, especially with regard to the obvious desire to see a drastic reduction in immigration. But no dice!

Heading for the G20 summit in China, May rejected pledges made by the official "Vote Leave" group for a "points-based" system, the best hope in the present political climate for radically reducing immigration.

I am still not certain about the exact nature of Andrew Anglin and The Daily Stormer, a site that seems to have a rather inflated opinion of itself. But my best guess at the moment is that it is a psy-ops operation, set up by, and serving, Jewish interests. Some of you may also have your doubts about the site, others not, but, as someone who has been in the Alt-Right from the start and has written for all its main outlets – Radix, Occidental Observer, Counter-Currents, TRS, and American Renaissance – and has a knowledge of attempts to stifle nationalism in other countries, you may wish to humour me in my suspicions, and see how I arrived at them. It should at least make for some interesting reading.

Because I believe with a fair degree of certainty that the Stormer is inspired by a certain radical Jewish agenda, I will henceforth refer to it, its associates, and its derivatives with echo brackets ((())), so that certain patterns will be lucidly clear.

The paradoxical nature of many of the vast issues that the Alt-Right concerns itself with – the destiny of man, the spiritual vacuum of modernity, the nature of morality – is also the reason that normie politics sticks to the relatively unchallenging minutiae of tax codes, welfare benefits, and drone strikes.