The presbytery of St. Alipius is a redbrick gothic bungalow built when gold money was still washing through Ballarat. It sits in a Catholic compound of brick and granite schools and convents where the road from Melbourne reaches town. White crosses stand on the gables of the house as if to ward off evil from all points of the compass. The plan, if that was indeed the plan, failed spectacularly.

When young Father George Pell moved his things into the presbytery in 1973, that corner of Ballarat was one of the most dangerous places in Australia for children. Already living in the presbytery was Father Gerald Ridsdale, chaplain at the little primary school standing on the other side of the church. He was raping the children. All four members of the staff, all Christian Brothers, were abusing the children in the school. They would not be exposed for twenty years. George Pell, back from his studies in Rome and Oxford, noticed nothing.

Ballarat was his town. His parents owned the Royal Oak. George Sr. was huge, down-to-earth and Protestant. Lil was fierce, gentle and made all the decisions that mattered in her son's life. She was devoted to the Catholic Church. A portrait of old Daniel Mannix, archbishop of Melbourne since 1917, hung in her kitchen. Her son would one day write: "She was a woman of great strength and faith: a faith I suspect that was very Irish, and probably in particular a faith typical of the west of Ireland in its certainties and in its impatience with theological subtleties." The pub was working-class but not rough. George Sr. ran an SP bookmaking operation out of the front bar and hid the books under his children's beds. He enforced the rules. Children brought up in a pub learn to tolerate all sorts and to value rules. Once they were teenagers, young George and his sister Margaret helped out in the bar in the school holidays but their mother was preparing her children for a life that would take them a long way from the Royal Oak.

Though raised Catholic from birth - tribal Catholic in a town where priests, nuns and brothers ruled the Catholic roost - Lil's big, confident boy had a conversion in adolescence that determined the course of his spiritual life and the trajectory of his career. At the age of fourteen he fell under the spell of B.A. Santamaria:

"As a teenager, probably in 1955, I first heard him talk to a packed cathedral hall in Ballarat on the menace of communism. He set out to identify the mighty forces under the swirl of events. He often appealed to history. We felt we too belonged to the forces of good fighting the new faces of evil, as saints and heroes had done for thousands of years. He placed us in a grand tradition of worthy struggle and combat, where we felt we could do our bit. Some of us never completely lost this conviction."

It was the time of the great Labor Split, the height of the Cold War. Santamaria was at his most mesmerising as he recruited young warriors for the Movement to defend the bulwark of civilisation, the Catholic Church. Communism seemed the enemy when Pell was a boy. Later, when that curse was defeated, it transpired that something just as sinister lay behind its mask: secular liberalism, which had been allowed to take root not only in the world, but in the church. Others might see nothing particularly troubling in the swirl of events, but Santamaria instilled in his followers a habit of discovering everywhere in the world around them a contest between the forces of good and evil.

The boy was "reasonably bright" according to the historian John Molony, who was one of his teachers at St Patrick's, Ballarat. "Unquestionably an unusual human being. Enormously talented in sport. He was a leader, president of every possible organisation in the college." He was big and used his size to get his way. He debated and acted. The grand Pooh-Bah in The Mikado was a role he played more than once in his early years. He ran, rowed and played football with such skill that Richmond offered him a contract in his final year. He signed but had other ideas.

St Patrick's was a great recruiting ground for the priesthood. Pell had shown a religiosity - saying the rosary in the back of the car on the way to football - that was not out of place in the school. Nor was the ambition to have a priest in the family surprising in the pub trade or the Irish tribe from which his mother sprang. Pell says he fought his calling for a long time: "I feared and suspected and eventually became convinced that God wanted me to do his work, and I was never able to successfully escape that conviction." In late 1959 he told his parents he was going to be a priest. His father was hostile. His mother was overjoyed.

So many young men were training for the priesthood that Werribee Park had burst at the seams. These were years of triumphalist high confidence in the mission of the church. Pell found himself among 115 young men living, studying and praying at the direction of the Jesuits in the Italianate pile that housed Corpus Christi College. The place was demanding and inflexible. The saying at Werribee was: "You keep the rules and the rules will keep you."

Pell thrived. He liked this life and Werribee has remained, ever since, his model for the proper training of young men for the priesthood. Roughhouse antics were not unknown. Sport and amateur theatricals were part of the program. But Werribee demanded prayer, lots of prayer. Pell's superiors admired the young man's forthright ways and eagerness for responsibility. In his third year he was put in charge of the discipline of new arrivals. There were those among the underlings who found him harsh, formal and unforgiving. Pell's reputation as a bully dates back to Werribee. But those closer to him remember more vividly how certain he was of his faith. He never criticised. He never doubted. "He is a guy for whom it has always been very clear," recalled Brian Scarlett some forty years after their time together in the seminary. "He was exactly the same as he is now."

Sir James O'Collins, the bishop of Ballarat, had his eye on young Pell. O'Collins had been bishop since World War II, was a close friend of Santamaria's and had been a leader of the Movement from its early days. Santamaria valued the bishop not least because he had once been an active member of the Plumbers Union. O'Collins was a straightforward man who loved the life of bishop. Seeing in Pell the makings of a champion, he was the young man's first patron. Pell called him: "father and friend to me, [he] sponsored my progress and offered me marvellous educational opportunities." In 1963 he plucked Pell out of Werribee and sent him to study at Propaganda Fide in Rome.

Vatican II was underway. Pell, swept up in the hopes and drama of the Council, counted himself in those days as "deeply committed to its liberal reforms." His Italian was soon serviceable. He loved the city; its pomp and its history. From this point, Rome would be his other country. He would always have a life there. In December 1966 he was ordained at St Peter's - his father stayed home to look after the pub - and the following year he presented a rather edgy dissertation defending the theology of Teilhard de Chardin for which he was granted high honours. After a summer working in a wealthy Baltimore parish, he arrived at Oxford. This was all part of O'Collins' plan: he wanted a formidable intellectual who could come home and take on the Catholic academics who continued to oppose the Movement.

Oxford changed Pell. It's an old story: he was seduced by English ways and English high culture. Oxford buffed and polished the boy from Ballarat. He came to see his years in the university town as at least as formative as his time in Rome. For the only time in his life he wondered if there was a God. "I came to understand the intellectual force of alternative views, of agnosticism," he told Luke Slattery of the Australian. Pell was not living in secular Oxford but at the Jesuits' Campion Hall, where he spent four years writing a thesis on the struggles of the primitive church against heresy. The Exercise of Authority in Early Christianity from about 170 to about 270 earned Pell a doctorate and marked him for life not as a theologian, but a historian of the church. He knows theology, of course, but he brought to the controversies of his career the conviction that the beliefs and practices of the church were right because they were old. He was derided by his critics for this, but he came to see the church as essentially untouched by time.

No one could know this then, but the decade Pell spent in Werribee, Rome and Oxford marked a high tide for Catholicism in the modern West. At the age of thirty, with remarkable qualifications and great things expected of him, Pell was returning to Australia to work as a priest just as Catholics began to desert their church. He was a kid seminarian when the Pill hit the market. He had his head in the turmoil of the third-century church when Paul VI reaffirmed Rome's absolute opposition to contraception. Humanae Vitae brought rebellion to the pews. Attendance at mass began to fall away. Those who stayed did what Vatican II had said they could: decide the matter according to their own consciences. In the struggle with pleasure inside the Catholic Church that began with Paul's encyclical in 1968, dogma lost.

Pell's liberal spring was soon over. He joined the pessimists like Santamaria who feared for the church if "the principle of the moral autonomy of the individual" was allowed to override the authority of the pope. "Within fifteen years," wrote Santamaria, "the forces unleashed by that principle had eroded the foundations of Catholicism throughout the Western world."

Pell set himself against conscience and for authority. Rarely from this time would he preach or write without taking a swipe at conscience and reminding Catholics of their obligations of obedience. It would win him few friends, many enemies and high office.

Actions

Share

Comments (11)

Get Real :

25 Sep 2013 7:07:22pm

David Marr writing about George Pell and Catholicism in general is equivalent to Paul Keating writing about John Howard and his Liberal government. We know where he is going before we start reading. After all there is that little problem of Catholic teaching against a certain lifestyle which must be met by an all out effort to deprive it of its moral authority. Positively Goebbelsian tactics, reminiscent of that immoral propagandist and his effort against the great Archbishop (later Cardinal) von Galen for the latter's public opposition to the regime policy of euthanasia to eliminate by carbon monoxide gassing of the mentally and physically challenged.

B Jarvis :

Hayden Legro :

25 Sep 2013 6:18:05pm

I am not surprised this essay hasnt caught the imagination of readers. A thinly veiled attempt to cast David's preconceptions on George Pell into something much more which has failed - primarily because Marr isnt an expert on the Catholic Church or theology - is not a member of the Church, and yet proclaims to judge Pell's theological persona. No doubt Pell has his failings but Marr like so many other progressive commentators fails to distinguish the man from the office and as a person brought up as a protestant Marr fails to understand the divine origins of the Church and the place of tradition in the dynamic and sacramental life of the Church. Not sure such an essay adds much to our understanding of Pell as the evidence is largely otherwise anecdotal thin on the ground for most of his conclusions.

Anne L Plurabelle :

25 Sep 2013 11:21:31am

This article out lines why, despite being grateful for a first class education, I can never identify with a Church that is more concerned with preserving the Church than with the teaching of Jesus, as being something capable of giving real moral or spiritual leadership. Jesus was not a CEO.

Anthony Mora :

28 Sep 2013 10:41:58am

Anne, I was brought up in the 'Faith', one of nine and like Pell with oneProtestant and one catholic parent. I left the church after four years of seminary studies and more or less ignored it for 35 years. Now I'm 'back in the fold' as a deliberate at of faith. I joined the church as if for the first time because the experiences of my young days turn me off still. The fact of the matter historically is that Christ founded a church and He, then the apostles, taught i(began the magisterium tradition) long before the New Testament appeared. My faith today benefits from injections of Sufi wisdom (direct experience under a Sufi in pakistan$, wonderful Anglican pastoral friends and similarly Evangelist and Luthern friends in the IUS and for the last 15 years or so, the matchless tradition of great minds in Christ's foundation church, the list is endless. I have come to understand OBEY because the church, inspired at its best by Christ's clear authority, is God's voice in this burning bush of an anthropometric ego-driven worrld ... I try to balance the gift of my mind with the gift of faith and ignore, so to speak, the i among of spoons on the sides of empty vessels because in all the countries and religions I spent time in, the noise of men was the same and distanced from, "Be still and know". With respect, we can go forward, but an underlying judgement permeates just about every critique uttered today by the self convinced against others just as convinced. We need the meekness of Christ, yes, our first CEO. (so do CEOs).

beholder :

01 Oct 2013 10:40:15pm

Hi Anthony. You claim 'The fact of the matter historically is that Christ founded a church and He, then the apostles, taught i(began the magisterium tradition) long before the New Testament appeared.'. This claim is not historical. The gospels were written down up to 100 years after the alleged events of the New Testament and as such are not eyewitness accounts and were not authored by the disciples mentioned. The disparities between the gospels and the overall historical inaccuracy of the bible show that it simply cannot be said to be the word of a god or his supposed son. I hope that you can learn more about ancient history and the historical method and reconsider your new religious choices.

Graeme :

09 Oct 2013 8:03:56pm

Beholder appears to be unaware that no reputable historian now doubts the historicity of the Jesus as recorded in the Gospels. The cache of early documents, referring to earlier documents, are a weighty testament to the the existence of a community energised by the events recounted in the four Gospels. Atheists have attempted to minimise the collective witness of these documents but their efforts are much like the irrational posturing of the Tea Party in the US, e.g. Dawkins dismisses the NT in about three paltry pages (The God Delusion). There are none so blind as those who refuse to consider the evidence without bias.

Proud thinking Australian :

25 Sep 2013 8:42:47am

Yet another negative emotive deposition by a journalist now steeped in his other caustic negative works.

His “historic flavored" narrative and the phrases selected here are constructed to deliberately smear and injure the person of interest. Even if someone was to pay me $19.95 a copy for my black-arm band essay on David Marr I wouldn’t write it.

Life’s to short to focus so much bitter energy into one’s mind and then let it spill out onto the page. There is a wise quote concerning talking about ideas and ideals in preference to things and people.

David for your homework, due by Thanksgiving, write at least 3 short mini essays about people you strongly disagree with but respect in a positive light. Why not try John Howard for a start – just for the fun of it.

Subjecting one’s self to this level of restraint from overt hate in your material will help you improve your craft and better illustrate your failed humanity and that of the subject – readers better identify with that kind of faithful and truthful treatment.

Happy writing and all the best with your future more positive and balanced efforts.

Rhino :

02 Oct 2013 4:00:48pm

When writing about someone like George Pell, being positive and balanced, would challenge a saint, not because of Pells seemingly obvious virtues (must have escaped me), more because of his history with people like the Fosters and their daughters. It takes a special cardinal to destroy a devout catholic family's faith to try and save less than $1m after one of his priests raped both the Fosters 5 year old daughters. Surely god must have guided Pell that day when he callously invited the Fosters to take the church on to meet it's civil obligations. So is he virtuous for his attempt at fiscal prudence with the Fosters, or was he really trying to make sure the Fosters got appropriate compensation for the destruction of their children (one committed suicide the other permanently injured after being hit by a car blind drunk aged 15), sans their faith of course? Or did god just neglect to guide Pell on the appropriate way to deal with the Fosters and also forget to guide Pell and his predecessors in dealing with the criminal priest? Will you just say "god works in mysterious ways and tough luck to the Fosters"?

I can add in that few of the victims of the RCC in Melbourne believed Pell when he said he was sorry at the Victorian Parlimentary comission. Virtuous and consistent is our George Pell.

Hudson Godfrey :

02 Oct 2013 5:48:58pm

Why not instead read his critique as cataloguing the areas where there may be reason to believe improvement is called for?

Or at least say why no such criticisms would not be valid from a progressive standpoint. Then at least we can discuss reasons why we might disagree apart from the mere fact of some sense one gets that you and Marr bear different allegiances.

On the Wider Web

The violence, and responses to it, have raised a slew of questions. Is it helpful, or even accurate, to characterize these killings as religiously motivated? How have the attack and responses to it helped to construct or entrench the identities said to be in conflict? Should the events be understood in the context of France's history of satire or its history of colonialism? Can the two be separated in this case? What is the significance of the willingness of many not only to affirm free expression, but also to identify themselves with the magazine? Are there limits to the freedom of expression?

The Islamic State is no mere collection of psychopaths. It is a religious group with carefully considered beliefs, among them that it is a key agent of the coming apocalypse. The Islamic State awaits the army of "Rome," whose defeat at Dabiq, Syria, will initiate the countdown to the apocalypse.

Best of abc.net.au

Shaping from the soul

For Murray 'Muzza' Bourton, surfing is a 'drug' and surfboard shaping is a lifestyle.

Subscribe

How Does this Site Work?

This site is where you will find ABC stories, interviews and videos on the subject of Religion & Ethics. As you browse through the site, the links you follow will take you to stories as they appeared in their original context, whether from ABC News, a TV program or a radio interview. Please enjoy.