FX Week is proud to present the 10th annual FX Invest Europe conference, bringing together leading buy-side practitioners in the fast developing foreign exchange and currency markets. It is a must-attend event for those who want to better understand the implications of recent market developments

Risk.net's award-winning OpRisk North America is back for its 19th year! This industry must-attend conference gathers 550+ senior operational risk directors from leading tier 1 banks, buy-side firms and regulators from across the globe.

Structured Products runs three global awards programmes - for the Americas, Asia, and Europe - to celebrate excellence across the structured products markets. The Structured Products awards are the industry's most prestigious honour, designed to recognise the top buyside and sellside firms.

The OpRisk Awards recognise the outstanding achievers across the operational risk markets, including banks, insurers, regulators, consultants and vendors. We celebrate the industry's hard work in style and the awards ceremony is a great opportunity to network and find out about companies performance

This white paper discusses how effective financial crime prevention can not only mitigate the risk of threats to an organization and to its customers, but how it can also provide additional benefits such as operational efficiency and improved customer experience.

Now in its 10th year, the RiskTech100 is globally acknowledged as the most comprehensive study of the world's most significant risk and compliance technology companies. This report covers the key market trends and ranks the top 100 technology vendors in this sector.

£90K- £120K + Bens & Bonus :
Compliance Recruitment Solutions:
Our client, a global fund management firm, is seeking to recruit for a newly created role. Frequently liaising at senior level within the business ...
West End

S&P outlines "stability" changes to structured product ratings

Alexander Campbell

17 July 2008

Tweet

Facebook

LinkedIn

Google plus

Save this article

Send to

Under the new scheme, the agency would award ratings based on its expectation of how far ratings would fall under a "moderate" stress such as a 1991-scale recession. For example, a AAA-rated security would be expected to fall no further than AA in one year of moderate stress and BBB in three years.

The change will not produce any upgrades, and is likely to have "very little, if any, effect on our ratings in the corporate and government segments", S&P said. It will mainly affect structured finance products, in particular collateralised debt obligations of asset-backed securities, constant-proportion debt obligations and leveraged super-senior structures.

S&P described the proposal as a response to misuse of its ratings. "Certain areas of the structured finance segment have favoured a narrow interpretation, essentially meaning 'likelihood of default' without regard to other factors. We are proposing to move beyond the narrow interpretation in favour of one that is more practical and useful for market participants. As a result, although our views on likelihood of default would remain a focus of our ratings, it would not be our only consideration," the agency wrote.

Yesterday's announcement was the latest in a series of suggested reforms from the agency. It has previously suggested using a ratings suffix to emphasise the difference, including in terms of ratings volatility, between structured products and other securities with the same rating - a high-grade structured product would be rated AAA.sf, for example, rather than simply AAA. It has also suggested publishing separate indicators of ratings volatility. No definite decision has yet been made.

In the wake of the credit crisis, all three major rating agencies have announced reforms aimed at repairing the damage done to their credibility by the multiple deep downgrades of structured finance products. These have focused on demarcating structured finance products from the less volatile corporate and government securities, giving more information on expected ratings volatility, and improving transparency and protections against conflicts of interest inside the agencies.