Tufton scoffs at Opposition's call for inquiry into CRH crisis

MONTEGO BAY, St James — Dr Christopher Tufton has expressed disappointment at some of the Opposition's criticisms of Government's handling of the crisis at Cornwall Regional Hospital (CRH), and described Opposition Leader Dr Peter Phillips' call for a public inquiry into the issue as a witch hunt.

“I am not clear as to why you need an inquiry to determine what happened here. First of all, he (Dr Phillips) was here and he toured with me and I tried to explain to himself and his delegation what has happened,” the minister of health said. “You have a legacy issue. He himself was health minister at one point and presided over the administration of this entity, which has deteriorated over time because of the lack of maintenance.”

Tufton was speaking at a press conference at the regional hospital after touring the facility with acting Prime Minister Dr Horace Chang, St James Central Member of Parliament Heroy Clarke and health officials yesterday.

Dr Phillips had called for the inquiry during a press conference on Wednesday, after touring the ailing health care facility with Dr Tufton.

“...I think, at minimum, what we need is an independent public enquiry,” Dr Phillips said.

But the health minister countered and expressed that any inquiry that is called should be into why the institution has been allowed to run down over time.

“If there is any need for an inquiry it is an inquiry as to why we have failed to maintain the institution over an extended period of time, literally over two decades, which has brought us to this point. I do intend to commission a case study on Cornwall Regional Hospital, and part of that is to determine why the lack of maintenance; what has brought us to this point; what are the lessons to be learnt; and how we don't get here again,” Dr Tufton remarked.

“It's not a witch hunt, which I suspect is what is being called for. It's not a politically motivated scoring of points examination. It's an examination about the caring for, the maintenance of our public infrastructure, and what needs to be done in order to avoid these things from recurring again. I think from that perspective, my call for an inquiry is a much more qualitative call than what is being done by the Opposition,” Dr Tufton continued.

Meanwhile, Dr Chang expressed that the relocation of the services of the CRH could not be carried out immediately after the recommendation, as it would leave several patients without services.

“Closing down a Cornwall Regional Hospital at short notice was never an option. The numbers given to you will tell you, 1,800 emergency surgery patients [last year], 500 out-patients per day, is not the kind of thing you just overnight do and provide the services for,” he said. “So that statement, if it even came from a professional, was ill-thought out and could not be implemented.”

In response to questions about why the relocation of services was drawn out, Dr Chang explained that, initially, it was believed that repairs could have been conducted on “the structure without emptying it”.

In the meantime, Dr Tufton told members of the media that last year the hospital did almost 1,800 emergency surgeries.

“Those are 1,800 persons who potentially could have died based on the nature of an emergency surgery. So when I hear the call about shutting down without alternatives, I really have to redirect that call and the question: What would have happened if that had taken place? The evidence is very clear that we would have had significant issues, including loss of lives,” the health minister remarked.

He said he appreciates, and is very sensitive to the inconveniences of those who would have been affected, “it is something that we are taking steps to address”.

“I have listened to the concerns of the nurses and the doctors and I am very sensitive to those concerns. At the same time, the issue becomes what do you do when you don't have alternatives of providing a critical service as Cornwall Regional is providing?” Dr Tufton argued.

ADVERTISEMENT

POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website
or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been
submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic
under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.