Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.

A Bevy of Balvenie – Sizing up the new Caribbean Rum Cask release

Introduction

Last year, I was fortunate enough to receive a free bottle of The Balvenie Madiera Cask 17 year for review from William Grant & Sons (parent company for The Balvenie). I really liked it, but wasn’t completely sold on the value proposition. So, that’s it for freebies from them, right? I guess not! This year, I was sent another 750 ml “sample”, this time of the new U.S. only Caribbean Rum Cask 14 Year release. I was told that this expression was developed especially for the U.S. market by David Stewart, as he wanted to create a release that U.S. whisky enthusiasts could enjoy on an ongoing basis. This is a permanent addition to the core range. Thank you Mr. Stewart!

I’ve already been asked on Twitter about the difference between this release and the previous Rum Cask 17 Year and “Golden Cask” 14 Year limited releases. Here’s the scoop from The Balvenie:

While the idea for the 14 Year Caribbean Cask release was based on the popularity of the limited Rum Cask release, and those flavor characteristics were kept in mind, this is a new and different product.

The 17 Year Rum Cask release was matured exclusively in rum casks, where Caribbean Rum Cask is just finished in rum casks. Plus, there’s the three year age difference.

The 14 Year “Golden Cask” is a limited, Travel Retail only release. It’s produced using casks that previously held golden rum, and it’s bottled at 57.5%, non chill-filtered, vs 43% chill-filtered for Caribbean Rum Cask.

Tasting Notes

I decided to do a full comparison of The Balvenie expressions that are available for $60 or less. Basically, I want to figure out what my “go to” expression will be in this price range. I had collected the other expressions over the past couple of years.

12 Year DoubleWood (40%) – $40

Finished in sherry casks, DoubleWood offers up soft fruits (peaches, light citrus) and brown sugar, then a hint of vanilla and oak. Light malty palate, with a fairly short finish. There’s some lingering maltiness, but not much else. This is a VERY accessible malt. A nice alternative to Glenfiddich 12 or Glenlivet 12, and a great “beginner” whisky. 81 points (B-)

10 Year Founder’s Reserve (43% in the U.S.) – $40

Reverses the DoubleWood profile. This time, it’s vanilla and oak that stand out. The fruit is more of an apple, but takes a back seat to the vanilla. The initial hit on the palate is fairly light, but it builds to an almost peppery late palate and finish with a pleasant drying effect. I kind of liked the style of fruit on the DoubleWood more, but this one wins out easily on the palate and finish. This was discontinued last year, but has continued to occupy shelf space in the United States. Worth picking up! 83 points (B)

15 Year Single Barrel (Cask #3442; 47.8%) – $60

This is a pretty cool expression, as it comes with the barrel and bottle numbers hand-written on the label, and offers the excitement of differences in each batch. I believe they seek to offer a reasonably similar profile between batches, though. This one has less fruit than the other mixed cask Balvenies. It’s sweet, with LOTS of vanilla and fresh oak notes. It’s also a bit hot on the nose and early palate. It’s sweet and malty on the palate, but with my bottle, that maltiness turns a bit stale going into the medium-length finish. I really enjoyed the strong vanilla and the impact on the palate that the higher ABV provides, but the staleness on the finish brings it down a notch for me. I’m sure there’s a batch out there with my name on it, though. 84 points (B)

12 Year Signature Batch 1 (40%) – $40 to $50

Matured in a combination of first fill bourbon, refill bourbon and refill sherry, I think the introduction of this release last year might be the reason Founder’s Reserve was discontinued. On the nose, there’s a great balance of the peaches and citrus from the DoubleWood expression, with the vanilla and oak spices from the Founder’s Reserve, plus some cinnamon. Oh…and is that coconut? This is probably the best nose of the whole group, with lots going on. On the palate, it’s similar to the Founder’s Reserve at first, but doesn’t build like that one. Although it does have the same pleasant drying. Compared to the nose, the palate and finish are a bit of a let down. It’s is worth buying for the nose alone, though. Kudos to Mr. Stewart for that! 85 points (B)

14 Year Caribbean Rum Cask (43%) – $60

A great balance of fruit, vanilla and toffee sweetness. A little spice, but surprisingly, not as much as the signature. In this expression, the fruit starts on apples, then leans slightly towards the tropical side, reminding me a little of Glenmorangie 18 year. The palate is much thicker than the Signature 12. It’s sweet and malty. The maltiness continues into the finish, with some spice and a nice drying sensation. The finish is medium-long, with the spices lingering. Not quite as impressive on the nose as the Signature 12, but the palate and finish make for a very well balanced whisky, elevating it above the other expressions. It’s not quite as rich and elegant as the 17 year Madeira Cask, though. Overall, very impressive! 86 points (B)

Note: A review like this shows why I use a 100 point scale to do ratings. I think these are all good to very good expressions, with several falling into what I would consider to be a “B” range. Still, as I go back and review my spreadsheet/notes down the road, I want to be able to recall how these expressions stacked up in my mind relative to each other. Those fine-grained point differences allow that, and show that I felt there was a nice little bump in quality from the Founder’s Reserve to the Signature and Rum Cask releases.

Conclusion

Ok, I think I’ve found my new “go to” Balvenie in the Caribbean Rum Cask release! I’m putting my money where my mouth is, too. I’ve already purchased a bottle as a Christmas gift for a friend who likes The Balvenie. When I first tried the Caribbean Cask, I thought I might like it even more than the Madeira Cask release. However, having now compared them side-by-side, those extra three years of aging for the Madeira Cask really do make a difference. In fact, I think I’m going to update my ratings spreadsheet and move the Madeira Cask from 87 to 88 points. I just wish the price was lower.

Still, for $60 or less, the Caribbean Rum Cask is a fantastic whisky, and a welcome addition to the range. That being said, if they were to somehow add a little more zip to the palate of the 12 Year Signature, and maybe bottle it at a higher ABV, I think it would jump to the top. What an amazing nose on that one! Finally, keep in mind that I’m a big fan of sherried and peated whiskies. If you’re a big Speyside fan in general, I can see where you might rate all of these a few points higher in your own system.

I liked The Balvenie before, and found the lower priced expressions to be a good value, if unexciting. With the introduction of 12 year Signature and 14 year Caribbean Rum Cask, I think there is a lot to be excited about across the whole range!

I tried the 14yo Golden Cask Caribbean Rum finish last month at the Whisky Live Festival in Jo’burg. I don’t have my notes but it was excellent stuff and I hope to found myself a bottle. At the moment Balvenie are making it to the top of my best distillery list; they are so consistent and are really bringing out great expressions. (Although I don’t love their 17yo peated cask that much.)

I’m always rewarded when I check in by the depth of thought and consideration you put into your posts. In my local wine and spirits shop they have a number of the 17yo limited releases and my own preference for the Balvenie makes the internal conflict between curiosity and available cash a heated one. I feel your pain that they are even dearer in the States, too.

Can I just stress again how much respect I have for your honesty as a marker? Letting your readers know about your own personal tastes is the best policy, and I feel ought to be universally enforced!

Big observation for me is, you seem to have enough pull to be receiving free samples from big name distilleries. I myself am a blog writer for drinks and drinking. So my next big question is, how are you receiving free samples and are you further involved in the business beyond “hobby”.

Hello,
That’s certainly a fair enough observation and question…one I get periodically. I don’t know about pull, but certainly, it’s been nice to get samples here and there. I’m not sure exactly how I’ve managed to get the samples. I think the Balvenie Madeira was the first one…about a year into my blogging process. Just got an email out of the blue asking if I’d like a sample.

I wasn’t even asked what kind of traffic I get…not sure if they targeted me based on where I show up in Google searches, number of Twitter followers, or what. It could just be through social media association with some of the other bloggers that I’ve befriended over the past couple of years.

No, I don’t have any other perks or involvement in the industry. I guess I feel like I’ve done a good job of staying unbiased (my Penderyn reviews were some of my lowest ratings, although they’re still enjoyable whiskies…and they sent me more!), and that the total value of the dozen or so samples I’ve received falls way short of making me something other than a hobbyist.

I do go out of my way to be transparent when I review a free sample. Then leave it up to the reader to decide whether to ignore me or not. After all, the blog is an opt-in format.

Let me know if you have any other questions about it, and thanks for stopping by!

I enjoyed reading your description of the Balvenie Caribbean Rum Cask vs. other Balvenies. I have had the pleasure of a healthy sized tasting of the the Caribbean Rum Cask and found it to be quite delightful. I enjoyed the strong vanilla notes and the sweetness. I believe it can be found in some of the state run liquor stores around town so I’m asking for a bottle for Xmas. Cheers!

Jeff,
I bought a bottle of Balvenie 14 Caribbean cask and was really impressed. The bottle is already 3/4 empty. I saw anoher bottle yesterday while I was visiting another city on sale and snapped it up. When I got home I realised that it was not the same. It looks like this one I bought yesterday is an earlier edition. Artwork is simpler (no tasting notes for instance ) and colour of box is paler. Checking online it seems that this is an older bottling than the first one I bought. Have you tried both editions?
It is interesting that the first edition received mixed reviews, some saying it was overly sweet. The new edition has received rave reviews.