HILO — Faced with the mayor and two County Council members urging caution, the Salary Commission on Thursday hiked salaries a little further in two departments, but postponed action on a dozen other positions — including the mayor and County Council members themselves — until its next meeting in January.

Proposed raises for all county officials run from 15 to 40 percent. Together, they would add about $1 million annually in raises, plus about $300,000 in benefits.

ADVERTISING

Mayor Harry Kim and Hilo County Council members Sue Lee Loy and Aaron Chung told the commission they were concerned the county budget couldn’t handle raises the commission awarded, especially raises that begin Jan. 1, halfway through the current fiscal year where budgets have already been set.

The commission has the final say on raises and is required by county charter to set salaries comparable with similar positions in the public and private sectors. It doesn’t have to take the budget into account, and its actions can’t be vetoed by the County Council or mayor.

Still, Kim and the two others felt compelled to weigh in.

“I do believe the inequity you are trying to address is real,” Kim said, noting that some county employees make as little as $18,000 annually. “I wish I had a magic wand. … The ones that need the raise the most are the lowest-paid.”

Chung also addressed fairness and employee morale, noting in written testimony that a single $42,000 raise awarded Corporation Counsel is more than many county employees make.

“And believe me, we have had to explain that to a large number of people,” Chung said.

The hit to the budget is also a consideration, all three of them said. They suggested phasing the raises in, rather than awarding lump sums.

“We’re going to have to be figuring out how to move money around to look at paying for some of these raises,” Lee Loy said.

But Commissioner Thomas Fratinardo, a Kim appointee, pointed out the charter specifically gives the commission the authority to make the raises.

“If the people want to make a change, it’s up to the people to put it on the ballot, if they don’t want us to do our job,” Fratinardo said.

Salaries for many top officials were last raised in 2014, while those in other departments haven’t seen a raise in a decade.

The proposed salaries were compiled and presented by Commission Chairman Hugh Ono, who was appointed by former Mayor Billy Kenoi.

He said collective bargaining agreements over the years steadily raised subordinates’ salaries, creating a salary inversion where many were making more than their bosses.

Previously hiked salaries for directors and deputies in the Planning and Human Resources departments were increased further Thursday, bringing the Planning director’s $99,000 salary to $132,744 and the HR director’s $99,000 salary to $128,628. The directors had received smaller increases at the commission’s Nov. 27 meeting.

Two testifiers, former county Managing Director Bill Takaba and planning consultant Sidney Fuke, asked the commission to consider raising the liquor director more than the proposed $27,420 to $126,420, arguing that the department is self-sufficient, relying on its fees rather than tax dollars.

Another testifier was Abraham Sadegh, a homeless man who frequently testifies before the County Council. He pointed out the median household income is around $55,000.

“I sleep on the ground. … For some to make twice as much as the average income just doesn’t make sense,” Sadegh said. “We need to decide what is best for us to be a paradise for everyone.”