As you can see with this vote, elections do have consequences! Let’s not let them turn Pennsylvania into Wisconsin, no matter how many Koch-loving hacks we have in the state house: An attempt to pass a controversial amendment to a bill that would restrict union dues collection from state and school employees’ paychecks narrowly failed […]

So, Utah decided to just give the homeless places to live. The results are what anyone with sense, or who has followed the topic would expect: Utah’s Housing First program cost between $10,000 and $12,000 per person, about half of the $20,000 it cost to treat and care for homeless people on the street. Imagine [...]

I’ve brought this up before but those of you who keep hoping for Hillary in 2016 and are clinging to any assurance from the party leadership and media that she will run, do not yet understand just how powerful you are. Otherwise the party leadership and media wouldn’t keep floating this nonsense. In fact, it is precisely because you former Clintonistas are so powerful that the idea keeps surfacing the minute the economic news turns sour.

But I don’t want to talk about it here. Nope. As far as I’m concerned, the Hillary 2016 meme is a Democratic party talking point and you should know by now that I don’t repeat party talking points here, no matter which party. The Confluence is not a platform for spreading party propaganda or memes or psychological manipulation. In the case of Hillary 2016 or it’s partner, Hillary as VP, this is exactly what I’m talking about. Let me explain how this works:

1.) This is 2012. What happens in 2012 is important. The election of 2012 will determine what will happen in the next 4 years. The “presumptive” nominees in this race are Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Please note the use of the word “presumptive”. They are not formal nominees and their names are not yet on the ballot in November. Let’s dispense with the idea that the party primaries mean anything to the Democratic party. That myth was exposed in 2008. They’ll nominate whoever brings in the most money and/or who they think can win. Obama was a historic candidate in 2008. They could very easily replace him with another historic candidate at the convention. We already know that the party and the Obama White House floated the idea of replacing Jon Corzine with Richard Codey after Corzine won his party’s nomination in NJ in 2009 so, let’s not pretend that there is an obstacle to replacing candidates.

2.) There is a lot of discontent in the Democratic party. The former Clintonistas have a very good reason for being mad as hell and unwilling to take it anymore. Obama was forced down our gullets against our strenuous and legitimate objections. Whenever there are headlines in the news about how the unemployment rate stays stubbornly pegged at 8.3% or that the economy is about to take another downturn, the party starts to worry. It can throw all kinds of crap at Romney but none of it will stick if pressure on the middle class continues unabated. If Obama can’t be shown to have effected positive improvement by November, the Republicans will be more motivated to go to the polls to oust him than the Democrats and their independent supporters will to be to make sure he stays.

3.) So, whenever the headlines are bad for Obama, the Hillary 2016 meme gets floated. I saw it make an appearance recently, along with Ed Klein calling Hillary fat. Here’s what this former editor of the NYTimes said about Hillary. Um, he calls her fat and tired looking:

At this very moment that we’re speaking right now, Brian, [they] are already thinking seriously about running in 2016. She’ll be 69 years old. And as you know — and I don’t want to sound anti-feminist here — but she’s not looking good these days. She’s looking overweight and she’s looking very tired. […]

I think she’s going to take some time off, get back into shape. And if her health holds out — that’s a big if, of course — if her health holds out, there’s no question in my mind she and Bill — two for the price of one — will run in 2016.

Yeah, that’ll work. Like half of the population will be delighted by some political jerk calling the most admired woman in America fat. By the way, why is this former NYTimes editor so dead set against a Hillary Clinton presidency? He has to be because I can’t imagine him thinking she’s svelte and youthful in 2016, can you? Whatever. The reason it gets floated is because the party wants you to postpone your demand for Hillary until 2016 and make you accept the presumptive nominee for 2012, Barack Obama.

Here’s why you are powerful:

The party has to keep doing this because they think you will defect. Don’t be surprised if the Hillary VP thing comes up between now and the convention too. But that’s not going to happen either. Hillary is not a stupid woman. If you put her in as VP you relegate her to political oblivion and she knows it. She will be powerless. And you can bet that the minute that such a thing happened, the Republicans would be all over it, pointing out that the Democrats took their strongest politician and made her a nobody just to get the Clintonistas onboard. They’d make a field day of the fact that nothing will change policy wise. Obama and his banker loving dudes will still be in charge. They will laugh and say how we’ve been had. Not only that but they will have buried the most powerful feminist in America. How will that make you feel? It will suck in a monumental way. In fact, it will underline the fact that the Democratic party thinks that it’s best woman politician is only good as a second fiddle to a man. Would you really vote for that hoping that Obama met with some crisis that would force him to spend more time with his family? No, of course you wouldn’t. Hillary VP is not going to happen.

But if you accept the Hillary 2016 meme, you allow the Democratic party to treat you like children. When Pelosi or Hoyer or someone else says wait until 2016, that’s the equivalent of mommy saying, “we’ll see”. You know how it goes, you want something so badly and you keep asking for it because you know it will change your life and the parental unit keeps putting you off with “We’ll see”? You know damn well they’re just stalling, hoping you’ll forget all about it.

And the reason they have confidence that Hillary will never run in 2016 is because she won’t be a viable candidate in 2016. Forget her age. Ronald Reagan was 69 when he ran for president. If people really want her in 2016, her age wouldn’t be a problem. The problem is that by that time, there will be other candidates who might be more viable and in the public eye, like Kirsten Gillibrand or Elizabeth Warren. But this version of the Democratic party will never let them run. This version of the party is definitely not into representing the people. It’s into the moneyed class. So, by 2016, the destruction that Obama has wrecked on the party and the way he will have fundamentally changed it, will be too far gone to turn around with a Hillary Clinton.

Not only that, the Clinton legacy will be 16 years behind us. That’s 5 presidential elections. Now, I am not a political scientists but I’m going to bet that there is some kind of metric that indicates the dissipation of the effect of a presidential term over time and 5 election cycles seems like a pretty long time to me. Someone with better poli sci creds should jump in here. In other words, you will be so consumed with the present that the legacy of a president 16 years ago is going to look unfamiliar to you, or to a lot of newer, younger voters. I’m willing to bet that the metric, if it exists, will need to be updated to account for the effect of technology. Since Bill Clinton took office, the internet has had an astounding effect on the culture at large and has sped up the way we operate. Our culture is undergoing a period of rapid change even though we don’t realize the full effects yet. Our generation will be the most influenced and influential of any since the invention of writing. And in this period of rapid change, all bets are off but you can be sure that the political landscape will look completely different 4 years from now.

The question is, will we evolve in a positive or negative direction? Towards more or less authoritarianism? Perhaps the recent push towards more authoritarianism is a consequence of this rapid change. From where I sit, it looks like the authoritarians have taken advantage of the recent chaos causing technological effects by putting in their candidate to make sure they will be in charge from this point forward. This is what you are voting for when you vote for either Obama or Romney. The authoritarians have the most to lose if any other candidate gets to be too popular, especially one that is not beholden to them. So, it is to their advantage to make sure that Hillary 2016 is floated out there for the Clintonistas to cling to so that they will abandon that hope in 2012.

As Rocky Anderson said in his video, this election is about morality. If you were paying attention to the Occupy movement, ie actually going down to their sites and talking to them or marching with them, you would have known this. Who does this country belong to? Who has a say in how it is run and how we spend our money? Who is accountable to whom? What do we value? Where is our moral compass pointing? Do the richest and most powerful get the final say or do the hard working people who live here? Where is our compassion? Are some people more equal than others? Are some children more equal than others? And do the American people have the right to speak on these issues and petition the government about its grievances? This is what Occupy was about. If share these concerns and you are not one of the 1%, then you Occupy. You are an American citizen with a vote, your life is valuable, you have dignity and you have a right to be heard. If you didn’t bother to go to a site, if you instead listened to the cable news programs who you know lied to you in 2008, do me the favor and shut up about what you *think* Occupy was all about. You would only know if you had first hand experience. You should know better when if comes to listening to anything the media says.

Where was I?

Oh, yeah, when you former Clintonistas see the “Hillary 2016″ meme in the papers, you should be secretly delighted. Yep, that’s the moment when you should get on your blogs and beat relentlessly on the Hillary 2012 theme. Replace the top of the ticket altogether. Urge the party to go bold. Say that you KNOW that if they don’t even consider it, they aren’t really serious about making the country work for real, working people. Hillary 2016 means that working people will stay invisible to the party power brokers. Hillary 2012 means the party knows it is beholden to the voters. At the very least, you will be exposing the hypocrisy.

Which message would you prefer to project if you were the Democrats?

You can only make this power work for you if you Don’t Settle. Don’t give into Hillary 2016. Tell your elected representatives that you aren’t buying that bullshit. What do they take you for? Someone who just fell off the turnip truck? Tell them you’re going to start looking for a party that will treat you with more respect and like a real thinking person with a brain, not a slow child that can be easily fooled or distracted. Same with the Hillary VP rumor. Please, not that shit again. Turn your back on that. Tell them you want the truth in all of it’s ugliness- the party wants to stick you with Barack Obama for four more dismal years and you will get nothing from it. Nothing. The party intends to do nothing for you except cooperate in giving you the biggest haircut on Social Security that you PREPAID because it can’t afford to force a well deserved haircut on its donors in the banking industry.

You’re not stupid. You’ve got power. Tell them to STFU about Hillary 2016, get to work on saving the middle class or face the consequences in November. If they really think that Hillary is worth having for president- some day- then why wait? There is no time like the present to make that happen. And if they don’t do it, then they’re not really serious. You have options and you don’t have to put up with the condescending attitude anymore. Tell them who the real parents are and where they’re going to end up if they continue to misbehave.

In the meantime, I am going to moderate any commenter who promotes the meme Hillary 2016. You know who you are. I don’t care if you’re thinking out loud. You don’t even have to be a paid troll. Your out loud thoughts look an awful lot like some kind of persuasive argument for those Clintonistas who may be debating whether to stay or leave for other candidates. I repeat, this blog is not a platform for party propaganda whether it is intentional or not.

**************************

And here’s that blast from the past for the Clintonistas who may have forgotten just what and who we are dealing with. The people who are working on Obama’s behalf gave us this:

Body: This paper, or pre-draft, or sketch, or whatever it is, started out with this title: "With The 12-Point Platform, this won't happen: An aristocracy of credentialism in the 20%." But then I realized I'd gotten in deeper than I thought -- one of those posts were the framework and the notes overwhelm the original idea -- and as it tur […]

This is a big bunch of catch-up, here, 'cause it's been a helluva few weeks. Gaius Publius interviewed Alan Grayson on Virtually Speaking, where Grayson discussed "how he 'cracked the nut' that allows him to get progressive legislation passed. Part of his secret - his goal is to be a person who 'gets things done for the progress […]