39 comments:

What's ironic is tbaggers would prefer all out war than a few drone strikes. Bush did both and you didn't complain. So, what's your point? Of, I forgot, traitors on the right would rather support foreign leaders slamming their President even if they philosophically agree with the premise. Proves you're a dummy as well. And thanks for an old video of someone who was criticized with trying to detail the Irish peace process. You really are a dummy not to fully understand this and how moronic it makes you look.

Who critized her,the Obamabots ?So it's not her legitimate criticism,it's my not fully understanding .I guess you missed the point again. It was mainly about the media fawning over the Obamas.I guess you would prefer if it was about Bush

Obama said that this “deal” with Iran was his biggest foreign policy achievement. And the Lefties, Progressive Nut-Jobs, and all the other Obamamaniac’s are going bunkers over it. I say, since when is trying to just give Iran a nuke an achievement?What he has done should alarm even the most stupid people even those in the progressive party. And still those Yo-Yo’s think if him as one of the greatest presidents in our history. I would think of him as one of the greatest embarrassments in our history. And yet he is calling it “a historic understanding with Iran” Only fools would have any trust in the Iranians, but then again it’s the Iranians who have made a fool of Obama.Unless one believes in unicorns and other fantasies, this latest “accord” and what we are being told about it by the President and the State Department is not a great achievement. It is doomed to failure because Iran has had no intention of doing anything other than getting economic and other sanctions removed. Time is on their side as they work to develop their own nuclear weapons.

After living through six years of Obama’s lies, when he says of the latest “accord” with Iran, “It’s a good deal” and seeing him standing in the Rose Garden sating that we have reached “an historic understanding”, kind of brings back the picture of him and his “Secretary of Lies” Hillary Clinton telling us about that “Video” that brought about the attack in Benghazi.

So exactly what achievements are the Liberals/Progressives going to list in Obama’s legacy, when they tell us once again about him being one of the greatest presidents in our history?Will they list the Terrorists being released from Gitm to fight against our troops as a GOOD thing?

Will they list the war still going on in Iraq, which will probably fall to Islamic militants, such as ISIS or Al-Shabab.

And how's that Arab Spring working out?

Or how about the fact that we are now despised by all our previous friends and allies , no ally or potential ally even trusts us anymore.One has to wonder if these are his failures, or his successes?And by the way, just in case anyone doesn’t knows anything about it YET. Hillary Clinton's private email server was the way that the Russian, Chinese, Iranian’s were able to Hack into the White House e-mail accounts...But, “What difference at this point does it make”?

Jim and Bob, 2 good ol’ Texas boys were having a conversation about politics, turns out they both read this blog, anyway, the topic was Obama and this is how the conversation went…Did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?Bob: “Did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?”

Jim: “The State Department interfering with an Inspector General investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?”

Bob: “No, the other one.”

Jim: “Clinton, the IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?”

Bob: “No, the other one.”

Jim: “I give up! … Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million low-information voters who don’t pay taxes and get free stuff from taxpayers and stuck us again with the most pandering, corrupt administration in American history?”

A very plausible list of Obama's many failings. I don't know if it strictly true in every detail, but it certainly sounds basically correct. HOWEVER, no leftist would EVER admit that any of it even MIGHT be true. They will always assert very loudly and aggressively that every bit of negative criticism of their is a lie, half-truth or a distortion at best.

Aggressive, studied, calculated and relentless MENDACITY is the stock-in-trade of the Left.

Hiillary Clinton's private email server was a spy magnet for the Russian, Chinese, Iranian and other intelligence services, say current and former intelligence officials.

As secretary of state, Clinton routed all her government-related email through the server, based in her house in Chappaqua, New York. She reportedly hired a Cablevision (NYSE:CVC) subsidiary to run the server, with antivirus protection from Intel's (NASDAQ:INTC) McAfee. And she registered her domain name, clintonmail.com, through Network Solutions.

Intelligence professionals fear that the use of the privately installed server, free of certified government defenses against foreign interception, has been a boon to foreign cyberspies.

"By using her own private server with email — which we now know was wholly unencrypted for the first three months of Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state — she left this easily interceptable by any decent 21st century SIGINT service," said John Schindler, a former National Security Agency counterintelligence officer. SIGINT is shorthand for signals intelligence, or electronic spying.Michelle Van Cleave, former U.S. National Counterintelligence Executive.

How can anyone, liberal, progressive, democrat or any other piece of shit , defend Hillary's actions with regard to her server? First she maintained a private server for her emails against gov't regulations. Then she did not turn over the emails to State when she left, again in violation of the rules. Then she gave a news conference and lied about it, maintaining she didnt want to have two devices. Not only did she run two email accounts on one device, it came out she had a second one anyway. Now it turns out she probably deleted emails AFTER a House committee notified her they were investigating.This is nothing other than obstruction of justice and evidence tampering. If she has so little regard for law now, and has had a 40 year history of such behavior, how can anyone support her for President?

He said that the potential damage to U.S. national security is so grave that the FBI should seize the server and conduct a forensic analysis to determine the extent of foreign penetration. That analysis would be part of what is called a damage assessment, which is routine after any suspected security breach.

If Hillary or Obama were Republicans they'd be falling all over themselves starting by defending the way the Bergdahl matter has been handled. This is even worse than when national security adviser Susan E. Rice, who said last summer that Sergeant Bergdahl had served “with honor and distinction”.Where are all the Clinton Butt Kissers Now? She is totally washed up now! You can still wish if you want? I just wish that this POS would go away and never come back.

this is what happens when people elect an unknown simply for his race. He went from a total unknown to giving people like Chris Matthews chills up his leg. And remember that idiot Larry King.? He said his 6 year old son wished he were black.I never in my life witnessed such asinine people in our media.So we are supposed to take Obama at his word on Iran ,when he lied about well just about everything.But his loyals just continue to worship the water he walks on.Our new reality is " fantasy"

Yes, we should have elected an out of touch old fuck who wanted war with Iran or an out of touch rich douche who loves 'sport,' and hates the middle class. Get real, asswipe. Trees tall enough for ya, lol!

yeah and Obam is doing so much for te country. The democrats make their zombie followers beliece that they are all just doing so well under them even though they know they aren't. They are trying to keep them numb for what is to come