There are a handful of massive threads that are totally daunting and I don't even know how to get started. I tried to read the rebirth thread and couldn't get past the first six pages of bickering - and I still don't know where to find the one little aspect of rebirth discussion that I'm interested in even though I was told on one of my postings "this has already been discussed, read the thread before posting". My suggestion is for these topics that are huge, instead of combining them into a single thread, how about we create a new board so that it can be broken into subtopics? I don't know, you probably considered this and have a reason for making is a single thread, but I tend to avoid long threads because I know at least half the posts are bickering and I won't be able to find the main, strong points of argument in the haystack of debate - at least not if I still want to have time to meditate.

For instance, rebirth seems like it could be broken into:

What the Buddha said about rebirth. - It seems this one could be short, and glued to the top of the board.Personal experiences that validate rebirth.Studies of rebirth, their strengths and weaknesses.For those who do accept rebirth, how does it strengthen their practice?For individuals that just can't accept rebirth, how does it affect practice?For those that are on the fence, how does it affect practice?

I'm sure a similar breakdown could be made for the vegetarian debate, such as:What the Buddha said about diet.Health reasons for dietary decisions.Ethical reasons for dietary decisions.How dietary changes affect practice.How to fit dietary changes into the real world.

Of course, you have to draw the line somewhere, but there are a few threads that are ridiculously long. I find the length of some of these important topics to be stifling. This is just a suggestion, and the outlines are just an off the cuff outline. If it's all rubbish, OK. I can live with that.

Another part of my motivation here is that I might not want to discuss vegetarianism in the dhammic free for all.

We decided to conjoin all the threads on rebirth shortly after our inception to control a profusion on threads on rebirth. The vast majority of them were either very closely related or identical in enquiry and subsequent discussion. I am not in favour of pulling the thread appart to create new threads. It will destroy what train of discussion that has been preserved in the great rebirth debate and I believe it would prove to be of limited utility given the amount of time and effort it will take to untangle. I think if you have picked any point and read five or six pages of discussion you will have probably read 95 percent of all the arguments presented. The repetition of ideas and arguments is quite high. I also suggest that if you want to read something authoritative on rebirth you should go for a published source by reputable scholars.

Vegetarianism gets discussed here depending on its context. For discussions centred on the health benefits - those threads should appear in the Wellbeing Forum. The Ethical dimension on vegetarianism may appear in the Wellbeing forum or personal experience. But for the never-ending debate as to whether the Buddha advocated vegetarianism or not - that appears in the DFFA Forum in the great vegetarianism debate. Again, I am not inclined to dismember the Great Vegetarianism Debate for the reasons I gave above for the Great Rebirth Debate. As I mentioned above - the content on that thread tends to repeat itself.kind regards

Ben

“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.” - Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:in mountain clefts and chasms,loud gush the streamlets,but great rivers flow silently.- Sutta Nipata 3.725

I think a related issue is the attitude of some people when they say "go read this first", "do a search on the forums" etc.

Some are helpful in the sense that "if you want to know more, there's been some conversation about this, you can find out more here".

Some are pretty rude in the implication that "lets stop this conversation, it's been had before, go look here".

There's probably a lot of new people coming on forums all the time, and for people who weren't here the first time the conversation was had, I don't see any harm in allowing them to start the same topic and discussing with other people who are having the conversation the first time. The "read before posting" attitude is really the real world equivalent of, when being asked a question, saying "oh I've talked about this before, here are the records of what has been said, go look through them yourself so I don't need to talk to you". And you do get a sense of how rude it actually is if you imagine doing it in offline interactions.

nameless wrote:There's probably a lot of new people coming on forums all the time, and for people who weren't here the first time the conversation was had, I don't see any harm in allowing them to start the same topic and discussing with other people who are having the conversation the first time.

The intention is to build upon the existing conversation, though what you say indicates that some care could be put around the phrasing used.

If you've been around a while, you see topics and think, "yeah, I remember putting quite a bit of effort into some postings on a near identical topic, not so long ago, and some other people made some really interesting and well researched comments too", so it's natural to want to point people to what has already been said rather than trot out the same comments (possibly in a sloppier, lazier fashion) once again.

Metta,Retro.

If you have asked me of the origination of unease, then I shall explain it to you in accordance with my understanding: Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)

Exalted in mind, just open and clearly aware, the recluse trained in the ways of the sages:One who is such, calmed and ever mindful, He has no sorrows! -- Udana IV, 7

If only there was a magic genie that could take these large threads and root out the strong points and create a nice summary.

I totally get the reason for "go read the other thread" because, well, I get sick of reading some of the redundant topics and I've only been here a couple of months. At the same time, there is the frustration of trying to suss out the good stuff from the... less relevant posts. Alas, there is suffering. If I could always have it the way I wanted it, there wouldn't be a need for Buddhism in the first place.

Hats off to the moderators, past and present, who work hard to keep things working smoothly on Dhammawheel.