Radioactive contamination from the Fukushima power plant disaster has been detected as far as almost 400 miles off Japan in the Pacific Ocean, with water showing readings of up to 1,000 times more than prior levels, scientists reported Tuesday.

“We’re not over the hump” yet in terms of radioactive contamination of the ocean because of continued leakage from the plant, [Ken Buesseler of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts] said in an interview before Tuesday’s talk. [...]

The ship sampled water from about 20 miles to about 400 miles off the coast east of the Fukushima plant. Concentrations of cesium-137 throughout that range were 10 to 1,000 times normal [...]

The highest readings last June were not always from locations closest to the Fukushima plant, Buesseler said. That’s because swirling ocean currents formed concentrations [...]

The water’s cesium-137 concentration has been so diluted that just 20 miles offshore, “if it was not seawater, you could drink it without any problems.” -International Atomic Energy Agency’s Hartmut Nies

Contamination detected in the Jet Stream since March…levels on a steady upward slope according to Radnet graphs (except for heavily fallout coated places like Idaho where the CPMs are wild and extreme…

Corruption detected in the hearts and minds of members of all nuke "Police" IAEA, NRC, even small utility cos. StiLl beat the broken drum of nuclear waste our planet becomes…

Just read comment that the fuel rods from SFP 4 are strewn atop the MOX fuel core of meltthrough 3,,,

Am studying fission products to understand yield percentages better…so many radioisotopes that aren't even talked about…Shortlived, meaning less than 3 generations of dogs (30 yrs??) However Gamma so the damage is done quick

Some independent scientist reported on Naturalnews.com
that seals where dying off the coast of Alaska, because
of the radiation exposure from this man-mad disaster.
Its gone even across the entire Pacific Ocean.

Hi Alice. I've been spending a lot of time on IAEA's many glossy sites lately. They will say anything, it seems, completely without shame, and I imagine most people don't doubt them – the sites have lots of pretty pictures.

Here's one example, from IAEA's Asian Nuclear Safety Network (sic):

"The safety of a nuclear power plant is ensured by means of its proper siting, design, construction and commissioning, followed by the proper management and operation of the plant. In a later phase, proper decommissioning is required."

they haavent done tests yet for any other isotopes apart from cs134 and ca 137 (as recomended byt the IAEA).. he only got 15 minutes!!!

"This presentation will provide an overview of these successful sampling activities and our plans for analyses of a wide range of radionuclides. For this talk we will focus on the cesium-137 and cesium-134 surface distributions and vertical profiles obtained during this cruise."

thought this interesting too

"…However, some of the drifters stayed in the coastal region suggesting that some contaminated water may recirculate in this area before being washed off-shore. The absence of drifter crossings across the Kuroshio Extension core suggests that it inhibits the southward spreading of contaminated water, at least over the western Pacific ocean."

and this

"With 5-m grid resolution around the facility, model results suggest that the breakwaters (designed to protect harbor in front of the facility from offshore waves) tended to guide the tsunami waves around the breakwaters and intensify flooding along the coast just to the north and south of the facility."

Dont expect the problem to get worse? They dont even know where the corum is inside or outside the containment, but any breach would mean their cooling water is going into the environment and ocean that is about as contaminated as it gets. Until all waste is covered, spent fuel pools are emptied (not like the one that exploded at reactor 3) and all the melted cores from all 6 reactors will it not get any worse, until then the poisoning of Japan and the Pacific Ocean and the west coast will continue. Also fish are like water filters so the contamination will concentrate in them and work it way up the food chain, welcome to glow in the dark sushi.

Do they think anyone is listening to this crap? I'd like to understand how water dilutes radiation so it's no longer a problem? Water isn't a solvent for radiation right….so just how does that work? Isn't even the tiny particles harmful?

I noticed also that the IAEA spokesperson Hartmut Nies had published in the Journal of Environmental Radioactivity – not surprising in his line of work. I was curious about the journal though, and noticed that its editorial board is heavily laced with IAEA people. Again, not surprising at some level, but I think it illustrates the familiar problem of practitioners/academics/regulators all "drinking from the same bottle" (whether or not it is sea water).

For example, the editor-in-chief of the journal, S.C. Sheppard, is listed on the masthead as from Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada. According to Wikipedia, Pinawa (population 1500) was centered around the largest organically cooled, heavy water moderated, nuclear reactor in the world, the WR-1…. Also… AECL built and partly commissioned a SLOWPOKE reactor (SDR), to demonstrate the Slowpoke Energy System, an in-ground pool reactor designed to supply 10,000 kW of hot water for district heating. The project was terminated after market interest in a nuclear heating system dwindled."

These reactors are being decommissioned in recent years and the town is diversifying into other projects including "environmental science firms".

Enenews readers may appreciate these ironical snippets: "Pinawa was chosen as the site for the research station due to the seismic stability of the area." and "The town is situated… within the western boundary of Whiteshell Provincial Park"

>Somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 of the total radiation that will be released has been so far.

SP: Maybe… I would guess less… 15 to 20% may have left the plant by air or by water. Impossible to judge at this point, but it's a huge release… 5 to 10 times more total emissions than Chernobyl. Fukushima is off the scale for nuclear disasters… I don't know if an 8 (not yet invented) would suffice.

There were pre-311 over 1.7 million spent fuel rods in the ponds and 176,000 fissile rods:

news.yahoo.com/radiation-detected-Radiation detected 400 miles off Japanese coast

By BRIAN SKOLOFF and MALCOLM RITTER | Associated Press – 6 hrs ago
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Radioactive contamination from the Fukushima power plant disaster has been detected as far as almost 400 miles off Japan in the Pacific Ocean, with water showing readings of up to 1,000 times more than prior levels, scientists reported Tuesday.

But those results for the substance cesium-137 are far below the levels that are generally considered harmful, either to marine animals or people who eat seafood, said Ken Buesseler of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in …

Thanks, Cataclysmic. I'm getting that error now also. I tested it carefully after posting though. Hmmn – it might be a timeout thing.

I'll try to get at the document another way and let you know.

Tease: The document struck me as very important. It was the agenda for a scientific/academic "expert" conference with many reports purporting to give the latest news about the effects of the Fukushima disaster on the ocean. This was in May, 2011, when the public was being reassured that there was nothing to worry about.

What would be very interesting now is to find out what these experts actually said to each other at that conference.

By the way, in digging for this stuff I came across a reference to Hartmut Nies in Majia's blog from May 5, 2011. At the time Majia speculated that Nies might not be willing to go along with an IAEA whitewash.

Buried in that pdf is a reference to "maris" that makes it sound like "maris" would tell us everything we'd ever want to know about radiation in oceans. If you go to the maris site though, you find an empty shell.

Thank you Charlie…this diluting idea is ridiculous…more like making it available to a wider number of sea creatures, people, etc.
BP oil said the same thing.."the gulf is a large body of water" but they managed to pollute it…so much for dilution.

They are detecting Cesium not Strontium which they are not able to remove from the water, so any "cleaned water" is contaminated with Strontium greatly increasing the chances of bone cancer. When will the lies and the half truths stop?

SUPPORT ENENews

ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate the site.