Comment

Comments on stories are a way for Ockham's Razor listeners to contribute to and discuss the program.

Comments are moderated. Before you contribute, we recommend you read our house rules.

Reply

Author

Email

Date/Time

10 Dec 2016 1:45:05am

Text

PreviousMessage

Destruction of aesthetic quality (landscape appearance) is a value judgment - you think they're ugly, others find them peaceful. Some people find CSG wells, processing plants and great ugly big metal transport ships to be ugly. But I'm sure your values are superior to theirs.

I suspect the "energy solution" people want is a carbon-neutral one...and I also suspect your evaluation of environmental footprint excludes consideration of hydrogeology and aquifers. Which can be rather large. And connected to other stuff that some people like. Like agriculture...and rolling hills. Ho hum.

Please note that there is limit per post of 3,000 characters, including spaces, carriage returns and punctuation (about 500 words). Your email address will not be published.