Libraries are NOT free playgroups!

When are mums going to stop using libraries as free playgroups stroke chat sessions at the expense of those hwo wnat to use libraries for their proper purpose, No one objects to children being introduced to books - but hand in hand should go the condition that libraries are QUIET places where people go to read and relax. So many mums I see just aren't laying down the behaviour rules to their children, so are not introducing a new generation to the joys of reading but just nurturing a generation that doesn't give a hoot about the purpose of libraries and the respect for quiet that should prevail.

I think your idea of a library is a bit outdated really though. Our library positively encourages people to come in for a chat while they look for books, and they have quite a variety of toys around in the childrens' section specifically for young children to play with.

If the library had to be a QUIET place then I couldn't possibly take my toddler because she just doesn't understand yet why she should be quiet in there (she's not badly behaved, just a toddler).

Libraries are struggling to survive and are therefore adapting to changing demands. Our local library welcomes young children and whilst of course they shouldn't be running riot, they should be learning that books and reading are FUN.

Our library is part of a secondary school (they use it as the school library and an open plan corridor upstairs leads to classrooms, mayhem at change of lessons). They do bounce and rhyme groups, toddler sessions, all sorts.

Attitudes like yours are the reason so many people don't use libraries which leads to them closing. I don't care how noisy my fellow library users are, I'm just bloody glad they're using it at all

My local library has toys, cozy reading corners with beanbags and singing/group reading sessions, all of which are perfect for my toddler. He is 20m, he doesn't get being quiet yet. Of course I don't let him run riot but if we had to be silent the whole time we wouldn't be able to go there.

I think libraries have changed tbh. Though it's a shame there can't be some compromise between the stern librarian/strict silence of the old days, and kids running around yelling like it's a playground. The library can be a useful study space for homework etc for school-children who come from chaotic households aren't lucky enough to have a quiet calm space at home - so it's a shame if that's taken away from them as well.

We were always taken to the library (and to church) as small children, and expected to be quiet and taken outside if we weren't, so it can be done. It's not what most people want these days though, and libraries have to adapt to survive. Otherwise there will be no libraries at all (and we're heading that way already in some areas).

Yep our library has a lovely children's section which I take my 22 month old DS to. I was amazed when I found out as I would NEVER have taken him there before as my view of libraries was that of the OP, that they are quiet places to study.

They are actively encouraging children in there though these days and don't worry about the hushed quiet rule - and what a great idea to get kids interested in books with the frightening illiteracy figures.

Or library is only open 14 hours a week and there's often only 1 or 2 other people there. So if encouraging people to use it as a community space for enjoying books keeps it fined then I'm very happy.

Note that as well as going to rhyme time and bfing ds there when convenient I use out to order books from across the consortium and do research. But if it closes through lack of use by the local community then I can't do that.

MY dds are teenagers and they loved the going the did toddler sessions and then preschool session and would go after school it was encouraged that children go in and loll about the big cushions and play and read , meh you sound like an old man who wants to have dusty books and leather chairs instead of children enjoying books and their surroundings,

I went in there the other day with DS who is 6 and there was a group of mums and toddlers who were having a fantastic time taking all the books off the shelves and the mums were chatting as if they were in a pub. No understanding at all of the environment. DS tried to read me a couple of books, because at the end of the day, that's what books are for, reading, and we had to move to the adult section of the library because I oculdn't hear him. I was a bit but hey, if that's what people expect from a local library, so be it. I feel that we should still be able to read in a library. Maybe I am setting my expectations a bit too high.

Why on earth are old men who like dusty books any less deserving than children?

A library is a community resource, that means they should do their best to serve the whole community. The best ones I've been to made provision for children AND for people who wanted to study quietly. This is very dependent on size and isn't always possible, but where it is possible I don't see what the point is in deliberately turning them into creches as a matter of principle. As if having young people in it will somehow magically revive the business model.

I've stopped using libraries that do this in the past - and I was a frequent borrower who ran up huge fines and didn't chew or scribble on the books, so they lost a valuable customer in me.