The least religious nations are the happiest, study finds

A new study into the correlation between religious belief and contentment and security shows that the less religious a society is the happier and
more secure it becomes.

The study, by Gregory Paul, published in Evolutionary Psychology Journal puts paid to the widely touted notion that without religion society would
collapse. According to Mr Paul, the reverse is true. Religion flourishes where a society is dysfunctional and poor. When affluence is present and
people feel secure through the provision of health care and social services, religion quickly loses its hold. In other words, those societies that
have moved furthest away from religion have higher levels of contentment, stability and affluence.

Unlike many others in his field, Paul does not think that humanity is hardwired for religion, nor that belief in a higher being is necessary for a
society to achieve a high level of functionality.

“Popular religion,” Paul says, “is a coping mechanism for the anxieties of a dysfunctional social and economic environment.” Simply put, it
means that without safety nets such as universal healthcare (which more prosperous democracies have), people depend on the “supernatural entities
that could be petitioned for aid and protection.”

“In view of the reduced levels of religiosity consistently extant in populations that enjoy secure middle class lives,” Paul writes, “it can be
postulated that if socio-economic conditions had been similarly benign since humans first appeared, it is unlikely that religion would have developed
to nearly the degree seen in actual human history, and atheism would have been much more widespread and possibly ubiquitous since the beginning.”

Its alot easier to have a higher quality of life, when you arent worrying about a jealous, omnipotent deity casting you into eternal damnation. Miss a
step, get on its bad side..and LOOK OUT! SMOTEN! Like being chased by the mafia....

so many of these studies are just an affirmation of the social wisdom that the studiers would have if they spent more time living and less time
talking absolute crap.

the data can be interpreted as you've outlined or you could equally say that the further people are insulated from reality and mortality by their
affluence, the less likely they are to understand/appreciate the supernatural or consider the meaning and pointlessness of existence.

social studies are not evidence, they are not results, they are somebodies opinion about other peoples opinion.

It seems odd that they didn't include the countries that were the least religious, such as China, Russia, Cuba etc. and compare their 'happiness
quotient' with that of other countries. Wouldn't that be the ultimate example?

If there is a direct corollary, shouldn't citizens of those countries be ecstatic? Of course I'm mixing some sarcasm in there as there are many,
many mitigating factors but it seems odd that they are not included.

Just browsing through the document, but I believe they were taking information only from 1st world economies. China and Russia technically aren't
first world, are they? I'm honestly not sure about Russia, but I know China isn't.

I'm pretty sure there's more to this than what the survey says. Japan by far has a higher suicide rate than any of those listed countries, but it
ranks second? I just don't see how that could be.

I'm not trying to take a side since I don't understand all the facts, just pointing out some things that seem a little odd to me.

All the countries on that are economically capable and have a good standard of living. When people are happy and they have their bread and circus,
over time a society will lose it's need for God, so to speak. The cause and effect has been switched in that article, in my opinion.

Those nations are not happier because they are less religious, they are less religious because they are happier.

In my opinion this study seems to be unfairly biased on some of the factors that were chosen, and particularily seems to be slanted to make the USA
score the lowest.
Also a lot of these factors are quite arbitary.
For a start, having more people incarcerated doesn't mean that the society is less successful. America's prison population is far higher than all
the other countries, but in many European countries a lot of us would be happier if our prison population was bigger, because we have too many
dangerous people wandering around after short sentences.
The STD aspect of this study is particularily unfair, as it includes 4 categories. So, 16% of the entire study into successful societies is based on
the prevelance of venereal diseases ! That's way too much, man !
In addition to this, they only have STD data on 7 out of the 17 countries includes, but unsurprisngly the US scores 0 points on all these categories,
while Sweden, Denmark and France all score near the top.

So, it doesn't really show much other than the Scandos have successful societies. The Dutch and Canadians score higher than the less religious French
and Japanese.
And actually the happiness index that was used in this study show Japan and France as the two least happy countries.
It also seems a bit suspicious that Finland weren't included when they would score highly on this list and have a higher religious population than
other Nordic countires.

I think the criteria for that Global peace index is heavily slanted towards military conflict. In fact 14 of the 24 criterion are about conflicts,
military, and weaponry. It makes sense that the smaller countries will score highly, as is the case with the top 5: New Zealand, Norway, Denmark,
Iceland and Austria. Also Japan will score highly due to the limitations still imposed on their military.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.