is that whites might be better-looking than others; everywhere you go, white womens' photos and pictures appear in magazines, in art
-- so you might at the very least say whites are more popular in that respect
("you can say what you want about WASPs", I used to hear it said back in the day, "but they aren't hard on the eyes").

However to prove the superiority of whites in any other way would be impossible as there exists no consensus on what superiority is; and neither in aesthetics-- but the corollary to what I wrote above concerning the universality of white glamour is that there is a basic agreement on attractiveness: for instance a guy wants a Britney Spears more than he wants a woman who looks like a hippopotamus.

is that whites might be better-looking than others; everywhere you go, white womens' photos and pictures appear in magazines, in art
-- so you might at the very least say whites are more popular in that respect
("you can say what you want about WASPs", I used to hear it said back in the day, "but they aren't hard on the eyes").

However to prove the superiority of whites in any other way would be impossible as there exists no consensus on what superiority is; and neither in aesthetics-- but the corollary to what I wrote above concerning the universality of white glamour is that there is a basic agreement on attractiveness:

Quote:

for instance a guy wants a Britney Spears more than he wants a woman who looks like a hippopotamus

Noooo! You got to be joshing us.

For those of you who've read the above and have a printer, this may come in handy.

__________________

"One life is all we have and we live it as we believe in living it. But to sacrifice what you are and to live without belief, that is a fate more terrible than dying." - Joan of Arc

Good friends will never be forgotten. You may lose them in body. But their spirit will always be within the hearts of those they touched. Goodbye for now my friend until we meet again in a better place.
RIP John Law
1955-2008

is that whites might be better-looking than others; everywhere you go, white womens' photos and pictures appear in magazines, in art
-- so you might at the very least say whites are more popular in that respect
("you can say what you want about WASPs", I used to hear it said back in the day, "but they aren't hard on the eyes").

Attraction is just a personal preference. It doesn't prove or disprove anything.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Brooks

However to prove the superiority of whites in any other way would be impossible

What makes you think we're all White Supremacists and this is a White Supremacist website?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Brooks

as there exists no consensus on what superiority is; and neither in aesthetics--

What's your point? That all the races are equal because no one is able to define what "superiority" is?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Brooks

but the corollary to what I wrote above concerning the universality of white glamour is that there is a basic agreement on attractiveness:

Yes, but as I stated above it's personal preference and it doesn't affect anything either way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Brooks

for instance a guy wants a Britney Spears more than he wants a woman who looks like a hippopotamus.

And is he wrong for choosing that way? Is someone wrong for choosing opposite?
What does this have to do with White Nationalism?