To improve the performance of our website, show the most relevant news products and targeted advertising, we collect technical impersonal information about you, including through the tools of our partners. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy. For a detailed description of the technologies, please see the Cookie and Automatic Logging Policy.

By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.

You can withdraw your consent using the method specified in the Privacy Policy.

The US Senate has approved a US$80 billion increase to the country's defense budget, dragging funds to US$700 billion annually. The stratospheric rise comes despite public opposition, and political opposition to funding increases in other key areas.

On September 19, the US Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of increasing the Pentagon's budget by US$80 billion to US$700 billion. The US military has long been the most expensive in the world, and has consistently risen even in times of peace, with no minor or major external threat with which to justify such rises.

note "where will the money come from?" deficit trolls will be silent on this $700B defense spending bill--a roughly 20% increased from 2016

​In all, the US will be spending more than three times as much as China on its military, and 10 times as much as Russia, despite the current budget already accounting for over one third of all military spending.

Blue and Red All Over

A mere eight Senators (including Bernie Sanders and Rand Paul) voted against the boost, with 89 in favor — Democrats and Republicans supporting the same measures with quite such zeal was arguably an incongruous sight, given the US' highly polarized political climate.

However, given the vast sums spent on lobbying efforts by the US defense industry, aimed at both parties, such harmony might not be so surprising — in 2016, defense firms donated an average of US$43,000 to each Republican member of Congress, US$32,000 to each Democrat, US$60,000 to each Republican Senator, and US$40,000 to each Democrat.

While under 10 percent of Senators opposed the funding boost, many polls suggest a majority of US citizens strongly support significant cuts to the military purse. For instance, in 2016, citizens rights organization Voice Of the People asked over 7,000 voters around the country to craft their own defense budgets, and found over half favored reducing defense spending by at least US$12 billion, with most supporting a maximum budget size of around US$497 billion.

Furthermore, in the survey, a majority of respondents repeatedly labeled the arguments against spending as more convincing than arguments in favor — and respondents overwhelmingly agreed with the notion Congress frequently OK'd "unnecessary spending" and military branches did a poor job of "tracking where money goes."

The survey also assessed how much most voters think the US government is spending on the military — when respondents looked at the defense budget as a proportion of the annual discretionary budget, a majority found defense spending to be far more than they expected.

Similarly, when voters were presented the defense budget in comparison with potential enemies and allies' budgets, substantially more respondents found the budget to exceed what they expected.

Critics may well argue the US' ever-escalating military budget is an example of how US political elites favor the interests and reflect the views of wealthy corporations rather than the public.

Profit and Loss

The push for greater defense spending comes as the Trump administration attempts to battle government expenditure in other areas, such as via the repeal (or truncation) of Obamacare, which will see at least 32 million US citizens lose their right to healthcare.

"We don't have the money for universal healthcare!""What about $700 billion to kill people?""Yeah. That we have." https://t.co/Oex393Sbg2

​The drive also coincides with intense debate about higher education in the US — and US$80 billion could be used to make all public colleges and universities in the US tuition-free (with money potentially left over). Moreover, the US$800 billion that will be spent on the military over the subsequent decade could wipe out all student debt existing as of September 2017.

By clicking the "Post" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your Facebook account data to enable you to comment to the news on our website using this account. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.

By checking this box, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your personal data to create an account on the Sputnik website for posting comments to news. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
You can withdraw your consent by using the feedback form or the method specified in the Privacy Policy.

* All fields are required

Please confirm your e-mail to continue. Confirmation instructions have been sent to

Hello,
!

We are committed to protecting your personal information and we have updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a new EU regulation that went into effect on May 25, 2018.

Please review our Privacy Policy. It contains details about the types of data we collect, how we use it, and your data protection rights.

Since you already shared your personal data with us when you created your personal account, to continue using it, please check the box below:

I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

If you do not want us to continue processing your data, please click here to delete your account.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.