Ok forget those articles if you want. However, I asked for a link to the proof that has been given besides the COLB and newspaper article.

I provided links. Why cant you?

You said that better proof then the birth certificate has been provided. Please show me. I dont understand how you and Nixon and others claims that so much perfect proof has been given. But the birth certificate hasn't. Only a computer altered COLB and newspaper article.

How can supposedly intelligent human beings, constantly lie and say that so much proof has been provided, but when I ask for a link, you refuse? A LINK PLEASE of PROOF of usa birth.

This is the problem. When given absolute proof from the most authoritive sources, the birthers wave off that proof and say "what else you have?"

So there is absolutely no point in providing any single item on the birther's list of dozens of items they demand to see.

I've provided tons of authoritive links and evidence on this board. For you to say links haven't been provided is an outright lie. It is your own failure that you have failed to read them for yourself.

This is the problem. When given absolute proof from the most authoritive sources, the birthers wave off that proof and say "what else you have?"

So there is absolutely no point in providing any single item on the birther's list of dozens of items they demand to see.

I've provided tons of authoritive links and evidence on this board. For you to say links haven't been provided is an outright lie. It is your own failure that you have failed to read them for yourself.

Woohoo, nixon is back. Ive missed you for a few days around here. Sorry but a computer generated COLB isnt proof of anything. And a newspaper article that anybody could make isnt proof either.

Do you know what is proof..........the birth certificate. Wow, that hasnt been released has it. And you said that you provided tons of links regarding proof of birth? I must have missed all those. I love the blind obama followers propaganda. Its funny.

I have more evidence of my cats birth (the one in the avatar) then I do for the Presidents of the USA. A transparent white house obama said. He must have been talking all those promises he failed to deliver. Yes, those broken promises are very very transparent.

And you said that you provided tons of links regarding proof of birth? I must have missed all those.

Thank you for proving my point. It is very easy for anyone here to go back and look at the previous threads and see that folks have provided link after link of proof regarding Obama's birth here on this board.

The fact that you missed them is symptomatic of the entire birther movement.

The birther movement is based upon covering their eyes to all evidence provided, and pretending that they have never seen it. The birthers are doing the equivalent of sticking their thumb up to cover up the sun in the sky, and then claiming there is no sun. There is no value in pointing out the sun in the sky to these people. These people will not remove their thumbs from blocking their view of the sun -- regardless of how many times you point the sun out to them.

that would be the absolute actual BC. WHY not just show it. why cover it up. BO is brinign this distruct upon himself.

Maybe because it's illegal in the state that holds the original certificate? And if Obama was to apply pressure to the state government of Hawaii you would foam at your mouth at the thought of a bigger federal government?

A federal judge in California has issued a brutal ruling dismissing a closely-watched "birthers'" lawsuit challenging President's Barack Obama's qualifications to be president.

In a 30-page ruling issued Thursday morning, Judge David Carter used unusually withering language to throw out the suit prominent birthers' attorney Orly Taitz brought on behalf of a variety of military personnel and some third-party presidential and vice presidential candidates, such as Alan Keyes.

Carter, a Clinton appointee who sits in Orange County, attacked the motives of the military plaintiffs, suggesting they were simple trying to avoid duty in war zones like Iraq and Afghanistan. "This Court will not interfere in internal military affairs nor be used as a tool by military officers to avoid deployment. The Court has a word for such a refusal to follow the orders of the President of the United States, but it will leave the issue to the military to resolve," the judge wrote.

Keyes and the other candidates also got the back of the hand from Carter as he discussed whether any of the plaintiffs could show the individualized harm needed to pursue the suit. "Plaintiffs received only four-hundredth of one percent of the vote. The Court may have already met this entire group of voters at the hearings on this matter," the judge scoffed.