Nov 20, 2015

Russ Heplerreports on why Obama and Hillary seem to love Islam so much, and why they make excuses for it after every terror attack:

They just can’t bring themselves to call “radical Islamic terrorists” radical Islamic terrorists. In fact, it’s getting rather buffoonish to watch either of them speak about the growing ISIS terror threat in the world.

They do more tap dancing than Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers.

But, why are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama so in love with Islam that they go out of their way to make excuses after every murder, rape, torture, suicide bomb, and act of destruction done in the name of Allah on the planet?

Is it because they both have close advisers who are Islamic – Valerie Jarrett for Obama and Huma Abedin for Hillary?

On Tuesday, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the American woman most responsible for the current refugee crisis in the Middle East, blasted Republicans for not wanting to accept unvetted Syrian Muslim refugees in the aftermath of last week’s Paris terror attacks.

She tweeted:

We’ve seen a lot of hateful rhetoric from the GOP. But the idea that we’d turn away refugees because of religion is a new low. -H

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 17, 2015

This, to be sure, is odd. Hillary decrying hateful rhetoric smacks of irony – she despises Republicans so much that she labeled them her enemies during the first Demoratic debate. Furthermore, Hillary is no fighter for religious freedom. In April, she told the Women in the World Summit that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed” to allow for abortion. And in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s egregious same-sex marriage decision in June, Hillary explicitly called for the government to force churches to sanction homosexuality, explaining, “Our work won’t be finished until every American can not only marry, but live, work, pray, learn and raise a family free from discrimination and prejudice.” Pray – as in attend church “free from discrimination and prejudice.”

But she’s sure hot and bothered about what she terms discrimination against Muslim refugees. This isn’t particularly surprising – the entire left has a peculiar soft spot for Islam.

Now, Hillary is no Muslim. But, as a committed socialist/Marxist she is pragmatic enough to use anything to further her political goals. Right now, that is using the unrest caused by radical Islamic terrorism to increase the “Clinton Crime Family Foundation”‘s influence in the world.

That seems weird, given Islamic countries’ fundamental rejection of leftist values ranging from same-sex marriage to abortion to women driving. But it isn’t so weird when considered in the context of Marxist philosophy, which sees Islam not as a religious philosophy of its own, but as a sort of bizarre cultural outgrowth of poverty. Impoverished people believe weird things, say the Marxists; if we just gave ISIS jobs, they’d stop all this nonsense and start behaving like members of the ACLU. Leftists see Islam not as an ideological force converting millions, but as a knee-jerk response to lack of basic living standards.

In fact, leftists see all religion this way: as the refuge of the weakminded underclass. As Marx wrote, “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.” Barack Obama agrees: as he said back in 2008, poor people “get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them.”

Since Obama delusionally views himself as some kind of savior of the oppressed, he has a soft spot in his ideology for the religious group he views as essentially made up of poor, oppressed, crying out for liberation masses.

Why do leftists treat Christianity and Islam differently, if both are merely chimerical responses to the vicissitudes of life? Because leftists see Christianity as the creator of Islam’s rise, and Christians as the victimizers of Muslims. The Obama State Department won’t recognize Christians as victims of incipient Muslim genocide in the Middle East, but President Obama will equate ISIS violence in 2015 with the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition. President Obama believes, like many on the left, that Western civilization was founded in racism, sexism, homophobia, and other bigotry – and that Christianity, as its wellspring, provided that impetus.

Furthermore, Obama believes that Western civilization has exploited the rest of the world, and that it therefore bears culpability for the poverty that gave rise to the Islamic wave. Muslims are benighted victims of poverty; Christianity made them victims of poverty in the first place. Christianity thus bears blood guilt for the sins of Islam, but Islam bears none of its own. As Dinesh D’Souza puts it, Obama is an anti-colonialist and believes “that the rich countries got rich by looting the poor countries, and that within the rich countries, plutocratic and corporate elites continue to exploit ordinary citizens.” Taken one step further, those rich countries – Christian countries – exploited non-Christian countries, impoverishing them and opening them to the opium of Islam.

So in sum, Obama sees the world through his red Marxist glasses and Hillary sees the world through her green glasses of envy and greed.

Both of them can’t see Islam for what it is – as much a political and military system as it is a religion.

That’s why 2017 can’t come fast enough when both Barack’s and Hillary’s political careers will come to an end. They will end, that is, if the American people rise up and vote for self-preservation instead of drinking more socialist Kool-Aid.