Welcome

Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and
others concerned about HIV/AIDS. Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the
conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning: Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive
and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a
username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own
physician.

All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators
of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please
provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are
true and correct to their knowledge.

This is an interesting article about 2 men who are positive, then both received bone marrow transplants for lymphoma. The donors were NOT of the 1% CCR5 negative population (like the donor for Timothy Ray Brown). The 2 were on ARVs the entire time before and after the transplant. I don't think they were UD, which explains the following line:

"The first man’s viral-DNA levels began to decline 70 days after his transplant and were undetectable at 200 days. The levels fell more slowly in the second man and could no longer be detected by Day 300. The samples also were checked by Michael Busch, director of Blood Systems Research Institute in San Francisco, who told me his tests “support the hypothesis that these patients may have eradicated the virus.”

So the docs are going to withdraw ARVs and see if they are, in fact, cured. If they are, well, WOW! Second a BMT is not for the faint of heart, not widely accessible, high mortality rate, etc. But it would certainly point the way to stem cell treatments as a possible cure.

This reporter says the two men had a "genetic mutation" -- perhaps they were heterozygotes?

"The findings may not apply to all patients. Both men were a little unusual in that they had a genetic mutation that can make immune cells resistant to infection by HIV. Their new immune cells, however, which came from the donors, are fully susceptible to the virus."

In this link they hypothesize that graft vs. host disease of the new bone marrow may be killing of the old bone marrow. And that because they were given a small dose of chemo during the transplant, they were able to stay on their ARVs the entire time. No mention of them being heterozygotes.

there's still all the side effects/after effects to consider, not to mention the increase in the risk of death by the procedure itself, throughout the process, and for several yrs.

besides, I keep wondering if having the lymphoma is a factor toward this kind of "cure" working. Until this sort of process is "tested" on someone without the issues that brought on the lymphoma in the first place, I don't how they can know whether and how the lymphoma factors into the situation. Also isn't part of the procedure based on resolving the lymphoma issue? Without the cancer how would they determine how much chemo etc to put you through to reach this "cure"?

These people probably would have never gone through this procedure except their risk of death from the lymphoma and HIV outweighed their risk of death from the transplant. at this point in my life, although that dollar figure may be less than paying for another x amount of yrs of medication for me, getting a bone marrow transplant would actually raise my risk of dying and risk destroying my quality of life and that's not worth the risk to me. My haart regime isn't that bad.

Sure I also would like to be HIV free but not at any price. I would only consider a high risk procedure like bone marrow transplant when and if the odds tip over. With the amount of partying after being HIV free I might even live longer and healthier on the meds and with HIV:)

Had a quick skimm over this, there does seem to be a fair bit of coverage of this in the media..!

Could someone please clarify this though, are we saying;

• That these two guys have possibly been cured (which can only be verified once they stop taking ART) by having a bone marrow transplant whilst continuing their Hiv treatment (i.e. continuing treatment before, during & after the bone marrow transplantation) and that the bone marrow donor did not carry the two copies of the defected CCR5 gene.

In conclusion this would mean that Hiv (potentially) could be eradicated simply through bone marrow transplantation & ART?

At the current state of treatment, doesn't a bone marrow transplant offer a far greater risk of death than HIV?

Logged

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

although there's nothing "simple" about a BMT and it's consequences, yes, they are implying these guys may no longer have HIV

Leathermen....for sure, but surly it would be a step in the right direction / an improvement on where we are at the moment. Cutting out the need to find a donor with the CCR5 defective gene surly would be a good thing, it would simplify the Bone Marrow Hiv eradication process.

The Timothy Brown bone marrow transplantation process is hard but this new method would make it a whole lot easier.

What on earth is that? A person can be a "heterozygote"? Can this homo be one? I want to be one! Is it like being a metrosexual?

Hi Mecch

Heterozygote is a term used in genetics to describe the gene inherited by each individual from its parent. For example, since humans inherit one set of genes from their mother and the other set from their father we have two copies of each gene. These are also referred to as alleles, or alternative forms of the gene. A heterozygote is an individual who has different copies of a specific gene. A homozygote is an individual who has the same copy of a specific gene.

Regarding the CCR5 receptor (which is a protein encoded by a gene in the DNA) a person can be heterozygote for this gene or homozygote. If they are heterozygote that means they inherited two different copies from their parents. One functional and one that is not functional. If they are homozygote for the gene, this means they either inherited two functional copies or two non-functional copies.

I hope this helps, that is my quick attempt at a brief genetics lesson.

Leathermen....for sure, but surly it would be a step in the right direction / an improvement on where we are at the moment.

I firmly disagree. An intensely high morbidity rate for BMT forbids that.

HIV, in developed countries with full access to healthcare, is perfectly manageable. You'd rather die than take a pill or three every day?

I just don't get this. Educate me.

Logged

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

I sure wouldn't do a BMT today. But I wouldn't have flown in early airplanes and now they are safe, cheap and reliable. Perhaps BMT's will get safe and cheap one day too.

Also, if they are cured, then TRB is no longer some kind of irrelevant outlier. (Many scientists, after all, pooh-poohed the news that TRB was cured for several years. Ah, the irony!) Having two others cured will be huge. We'll know we can cure HIV, and know how to do it. This will keep the money flowing into cure research, and into T-Cell / stem cell centered cures. All good.

I sure wouldn't do a BMT today. But I wouldn't have flown in early airplanes and now they are safe, cheap and reliable. Perhaps BMT's will get safe and cheap one day too.

Also, if they are cured, then TRB is no longer some kind of irrelevant outlier. (Many scientists, after all, pooh-poohed the news that TRB was cured for several years. Ah, the irony!) Having two others cured will be huge. We'll know we can cure HIV, and know how to do it. This will keep the money flowing into cure research, and into T-Cell / stem cell centered cures. All good.

Sigh. PLEASE educate yourself about what's involved in a BMT and educate us as to how an when it will become preferable to ART treatment for HIV.

Logged

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

(Many scientists, after all, pooh-poohed the news that TRB was cured for several years. Ah, the irony!) Having two others cured will be huge. We'll know we can cure HIV, and know how to do it.

For me, I still don't consider the word "cure" to be the correct way to define the situation for these three men. First off it's the wrong word to use in the public media (giving false hope and distracting the general public from a still serious problem) and secondly it seems scientifically inexact. Their HIV was not "cured" but "eradicated" - a much more extreme approach. Wiping out someone's complete immune system (which is always going to risk someone's long-term health and/or very life) and replacing it or rebuilding it from the ground up is much difference (a lot harsher, a lot more difficult, with a lot more risks) than simply flushing the HIV from the reservoirs and letting ARVs do the rest.