The Tao of Anarchy: There is no God. There is no State. They are all superstitions that are established by the power-hunger psychopaths to divide, rule, and enslave us. It's only you and me, we are all true and real existence though in one short life. That is, We all are capable to freely interact with one another without coercion from anyone. We all are capable to take self-responsibility to find ways to live with one another in liberty, equality, harmony, and happiness before leaving this world forever. We all were born free and equal among all beings on this planet. We are not imprisoned in and by a place with a political name just because we were born there by chance. We are not chained to a set of indoctrinated beliefs that have been imposed upon us by so-called traditions. This Planet is home to all of us. No one owns it. We share the benefits from and responsibility to this Earth. We pledge no oath, no allegiance to no one; submit to no authority. We are all free and equal. The only obligation we all must undertake constantly with consistency is to respect the same freedoms and rights of others.

﻿#FYE: We’ve seen the west’s approach to Venezuela before – in Syria, Egypt, Afghanistan, need I go on?

PQC: The Jewish controlled Media has been “leaking” that Russia and China have come to sort of making deal with the Yankee poodle Juan Guaido as if this funny dog were Simba! Well Russia and China flatly denied it. But still quite a few “experts” keep spewing their “analyses” based on this kind of fake news.

Anyway I pretend that this “news”was true so that I could do a little bit bashing on Russia and China. These two ancient giants are just so dumb that having made deal with a mere low level servant instead of his master, the true future-decider of Venezuela’s Oil- reserves! Well if history taught us anything, everything now is on the table with IFs.. And as the French would warn “Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille “!

According an undisclosed source inside the Yankee Talmudic group, a resident address in Florida has been well prepared for this poodle in case the Venezuelan Army decides to come in. Other unknown source from the MSM also said that they already had written an eulogy for this poodle in a tragic circumstance!

Instead of pleading with those who will not support him, the self-proclaimed interim president of Venezuela might want to take a closer look at who his foreign friends are.

By Robert Fisk

The closest I ever came to Venezuela, many years ago, was a transit connection at Caracas airport. I noticed a lot of soldiers in red berets and a clutch of goons, and it reminded me, vaguely, of the Middle East.

Now, sitting in
the rain squalls of the wintry Levant, I
flick through my newspaper clippings of our
recent local autocrats – Saddam, Assad, al-Sisi,
Erdogan, Mohammed
bin Salman (you
can fill in the rest for yourself) – and I
think of Nicolas
Maduro.

The
comparisons are by no means precise. Indeed,
it’s not the nature of the “strongmen” I’m
thinking about. It’s our reaction to all
these chaps. And there are two obvious
parallels: the way in which we sanction and
isolate the hated dictator – or love him, as
the case may be – and the manner in which we
not only name the opposition as the rightful
heir to the nation, but demand that
democracy be delivered to the people whose
torture and struggle for freedom we have
suddenly discovered.

And before I
forget it, there’s one other common thread
in this story. If you suggest that those who
want presidential change in Venezuela may be
a little too hasty, and our support for –
let us say – Juan
Guaido might
be a bit premature if we don’t want to start
a civil war, this means you are “pro-Maduro”

Just as those
who opposed the 2003 invasion of Iraq were
“pro-Saddam”, or those who thought the west
might pause before it supported the
increasingly violent opposition in Syria were
labelled “pro-Assad”.

And
those who defended Yasser Arafat – over a
long period a super-terrorist, a
super-diplomat and then a super-terrorist
again – against those who would oust him as
leader of the Palestinians, were abused as
“pro-Arafat”, “pro-Palestinian”,
“pro-terrorist” and, inevitably,
“anti-Semitic”. I recall how George W Bush
warned us after 9/11, that “you are either
with us or against us”. The same threat was
made to us about Assad.

Erdogan has
used it in Turkey (less
than three years ago)
and it was a common line in the forgotten
1930s used by none other than Mussolini. And
now I quote Trump’s US secretary of state Michael
Pompeo on Maduro:
“Now it is time for every other nation to
pick a side … either you stand with the
forces of freedom, or you’re in league with
Maduro and his mayhem.”

You
get the point. Now is the time for all good
people to stand alongside the United States,
the EU, the nations of Latin America – or do
you support the Russkies, Chinese, Iranian
headbangers, the perfidious Corbyn and (of
all people) the Greeks? Talking of the
Greeks, European pressure on Alexis Tsipras
to conform to the EU’s support for Guaido –
proving that the EU can indeed bully its
smaller members – is a good argument for
Brexiteers (though far too complex for them
to understand).

But
first, let’s take a look at our favourite
tyrant, in the words of all who oppose him.
He’s a powerful dictator, surrounded by
generals, suppressing his people, using
torture, mass arrests, secret police
murders, rigged elections, political
prisoners – so no wonder we gave our support
to those who wish to overthrow this brutal
man and stage democratic elections.

Not a bad precis of our current policy towards the Maduro regime. But I am referring, of course, word-for-word, to the west’s policy towards the Assad regime in Syria. And our support for opposition democracy there wasn’t terribly successful.

We were not
solely responsible for the Syrian
civil war –
but we were not guiltless since we sent an
awful lot of weapons to those trying to
overthrow Assad. And last month the notepad
of US national security advisor John Bolton
appeared to boast a plan to send 5,000
US troops to Colombia…

And
now let’s tick the box on another Maduro-lookalike
– at least from the west’s simplistic point
of view: the military-backed elected field
marshal-president al-Sisi of Egypt, whom we
love, admire and protect. Powerful dictator?
Yup. Surrounded and supported by generals?
You bet, not least because he locked up a
rival general before the last election.
Suppression? Absolutely – all in the
interest of crushing “terrorism”, of course.

Mass arrests? Happily yes, for all the
inmates of Egypt’s savage prison system are
“terrorists”, at least according to the
field marshal-president himself. Secret
police murders? Well, even forgetting the
young Italian student suspected by his
government to have been allegedly tortured
and bumped off by one of Sisi’s top Egyptian
cops, there’s a roll call of disappeared
activists.

Rigged elections? No doubt about it,
although al-Sisi still maintains that his
last triumph at the polls – a cracking 97
per cent – was a free and fair election.

President Trump
sent his “sincere
congratulations”.
Political prisoners? Well, the total is 60,000
and rising.
Oh yes, and Maduro’s last victory – a rigged
election if ever there was one, of course –
was a mere 67.84 per cent.

As
the late sage of the Sunday Express,
John Gordon, might have said: it makes you
sit up a bit. So, too, I suppose, when we
glance a bit further eastwards to
Afghanistan, whose Taliban rulers were
routed in 2001 by the US, whose post-9/11
troops and statesmen ushered in a new life
of democracy, then corruption, warlordism
and civil war.

The
“democracy” bit quickly came unstuck when
“loya jurgas”, grand councils, turned into
tribal playpens and the Americans announced
that it would be an exaggeration to think
that we could achieve “Jeffersonian
democracy” in Afghanistan. Too true.

Now the
Americans are negotiating with the
“terrorist” Taliban in
Qatar so they can get the hell out of the
Graveyard of Empires after 17 years of
military setbacks, scandals and defeats –
not to mention running a few torture camps
which even Maduro would cough to look at.

Now
all this may not encourage you to walk down
memory lane. And I haven’t even listed the
sins of Saddam, let alone our continuing and
cosy relationship – amazing as it still
seems – with that Gulf state whose lads
strangled, chopped up and secretly buried a
US-resident journalist in Turkey.

Now
just imagine if Maduro, tired of a
journalist critic slandering him in Miami,
decided to lure him to the Venezuelan
embassy in Washington and top the poor guy,
slice him up and bury him secretly in Foggy
Bottom. Well now, I have a feeling that
sanctions might have been applied to Maduro
a long time ago. But not to Saudi Arabia, of
course, where we are very definitely not
advocating democracy.

“Now is the time for democracy and
prosperity in Venezuela,” quoth John Bolton
this week. Oh, yes indeed. Maduro runs an
oil-soaked nation yet its people starve. He
is an unworthy, foolish and vain man, even
if he’s not Saddamite in his crimes. He was
rightly described by a colleague as a dreary
tyrant. He even looks like the kind of guy
who tied ladies to railway lines in silent
movies.

So
good luck to Guaido. Palpably a nice guy,
speaks eloquently, wise to stick to aid for
the poor and fresh elections rather than
dwell on just how exactly Maduro and his
military chums are going to be booted out.

In
other words, good luck – but watch out.
Instead of pleading with those who will not
support him – the Greeks, for example – he
might take a closer look at who his foreign
friends are. And do a quick track record on
their more recent crusades for freedom,
democracy and the right to life. And by the
way, I haven’t even mentioned Libya.