Tait, 431, On a criticism of Niebuhr, 188 - 189, Volume 1, Apr 1834, John Hill Burton, prob., Wellesley's attribution to John Stuart Blackie should be replaced by: John Hill Burton, prob. A year earlier, Burton had contributed #229; see above. The first article that can safely be attributed to Blackie, #803.

Tait, 489, Tytler's History of Scotland [Vol. V], 521 - 527, Volume 1, Sep 1834, John Hill Burton, possib., Although the writer shows professional concern for Scottish historiography, and Burton later wrote a history of Scotland, a Burrows analysis questions this attribution. See Tait 272. (03/14)

Tait, 901, Tytler's History of Scotland [Vol. VI], 769 - 780, Volume 4, Dec 1837, John Hill Burton, possib., Although the writer shows professional concern for Scottish historiography, and Burton later wrote a history of Scotland, a Burrows analysis questions this attribution. See Tait 272. (03/14)

Tait, 1705, The Life and Rebellion of the Duke of Monmouth, 50 - 60, Volume 12, Jan 1845, John Hill Burton, possib., Although most of the same details of "Monmouth's rebellion" are presented in J. H. Burton, History of Scotland (1873), VII, 258-260, a Burrows analysis questions the authorship of this article. See Tait 272. (03/14)

Tait, 1782, Monastic studies, jests, and eccentricities, 620 - 628, Volume 12, Oct 1845, John Hill Burton, possib., Although the reflective opening here is comparable to Burton's in no. 1609, and Burton wrote many articles on church history, a Burrows analysis questions the authorship of this article. See Tait 272. (03/14)

Tait, 1899, M'Cullagh's Industrial History of Free Nations, 661 - 668, Volume 13, Oct 1846, John Hill Burton, Although the critical perspective is that of an historian interested in political economy (p. 661), a Burrows analysis questions the authorship of this article. See Tait 272. (03/14)

WR, 519, Robert Pitcairn’s Criminal Trials in Scotland, 332 - 360, Volume 19, Oct 1833, John Hill Burton, Burton wrote a letter to his mother dated 24 July 1833: ‘You are aware that I have long delayed an article on Criminal Trials for the “Westminster Review.” [review] (04/05)