Seriously, in fact a TL solution had required a larger enclosure than I wanted in my design. The bass-reflex solution will work well with this woofers and I think even Troels have used this woofer in a BR design. According to my measurements/simulations on the AT woofer, the Troels used and suggested enclosure volume for it in a BR solution seems optimal for it.

Regards

/Göran

Goran

I suspect the TL would go down deeper and also be stronger with all the internal bracing.

I am considering importing the Audio Tech bass drivers for Troels Jenzen Accu project. Your experiences with these drivers will be quite helpfull to me and yes the DEQX is possibly a good option considering the high cost of top end X-over components.

Thank you for sharing your experience with the RAALs. I’ve read some of your comments before regarding the RAALs, but I don’t judge them before I myself have measured and listen to them in a loudspeaker design. Measurements is one thing, how it actually sounds is another…

Yes, I agree the RAALs are very expensive, but in my case I bought them second-hand and replaced the ribbons with new ones.

I’m not too worried about some elevated second-order harmonics, many domes have the same behavior. The vertical dispersion is another thing and the effect of the foam pads will be very interesting to measure.

Naming a speaker to something meaningful is always hard, but in this case the “Grand” stands for a large floor-stander and “Reference” stands for the use of more exclusive drivers and custom built cabinets (not pre-fab Dayton cabs).

The loudspeaker will first be setup in an active configuration with my DEQX HDP-3 pre-amp and the frequency linearity in this setup will probably be better than +/- 0.25db, if I so wishes.

Regards

Göran

Hi Göran
Certainly not an easy integration between a largish mid-range driver and a ribbon with a very specific directive pattern and pass-band.
Interesting and challenging project. Looking forward to your Raal data.
Also, if it's physically possible at all, I'd increase measurement baffle size to at list 1mx1m
In the future, will you be splicing near field low end data of woofers and mid-wofers?

When it comes to vertical dispersion I personally feel that it is one of the less important things to consider when designing a loudspeaker. Certainly you want to ensure that the primary lobe is large enough so that you aren't going to be confronted with a large suck-out even anywhere remotely close to your listening position. But beyond that, even limiting the vertical dispersion could really perhaps be seen as a good thing as less energy thrown out into the room = less problems that you could possibly encounter with the room.

Lots of people do have trouble with highly reflective and somewhat reverberant sound fields, especially in some of todays more modern styled houses and I can only see that limiting the vertical dispersion in those situations to be of benefit to the overall sound.

It will be interesting to see how you approach the crossover Gornir, as anyone can see that a lower rather then higher xover point would be more suited given the constraints of the large ribbon format, but some have said how much nicer the ribbbon sounds when crossed over higher. The audiotech midrange at least has the flexibility to allow you to play around considerably with this.

__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Now with website! www.5een.co.uk under construction.

Lots of people do have trouble with highly reflective and somewhat reverberant sound fields, especially in some of todays more modern styled houses and I can only see that limiting the vertical dispersion in those situations to be of benefit to the overall sound.

I agree. Despite some areas of average measured performance the RAAL has a combination of attributes that make it a nice driver to listen to. I'd nearly always rate it well regardless.

When it comes to vertical dispersion I personally feel that it is one of the less important things to consider when designing a loudspeaker. Certainly you want to ensure that the primary lobe is large enough so that you aren't going to be confronted with a large suck-out even anywhere remotely close to your listening position. But beyond that, even limiting the vertical dispersion could really perhaps be seen as a good thing as less energy thrown out into the room = less problems that you could possibly encounter with the room.

Lots of people do have trouble with highly reflective and somewhat reverberant sound fields, especially in some of todays more modern styled houses and I can only see that limiting the vertical dispersion in those situations to be of benefit to the overall sound.

It will be interesting to see how you approach the crossover Gornir, as anyone can see that a lower rather then higher xover point would be more suited given the constraints of the large ribbon format, but some have said how much nicer the ribbbon sounds when crossed over higher. The audiotech midrange at least has the flexibility to allow you to play around considerably with this.

You are a wise man 5th element. I think we agree on most things so far.

The vertical dispersion is something to keep an eye on, but the importance of it shouldn’t be exaggerated as long as it’s large enough at listening height/position and without large suck-outs within your listening window.

I hope I can get away with a cross-over point around 3kHz, but the measurements will tell what’s feasible.

Hi Göran
Certainly not an easy integration between a largish mid-range driver and a ribbon with a very specific directive pattern and pass-band.
Interesting and challenging project. Looking forward to your Raal data.
Also, if it's physically possible at all, I'd increase measurement baffle size to at list 1mx1m
In the future, will you be splicing near field low end data of woofers and mid-wofers?

Unfortunately, at the moment I don’t have any room for storing and handling a large infinite baffle for measurements. Instead I made the choice to do all my measurements in real enclosures and when I publish the results I try to describe the measurement conditions carefully.

In this way people can at least see how the drivers perform on a baffle in normal enclosure sizes and I presume that those who have the knowledge to design their own loudspeakers will do their own measurements anyway.

Also, I wouldn’t use anyone else’s measurement data for one of my own designs, but other people’s measurements can be helpful to evaluate and select drivers for your own testing and measurements.

I do sometimes splice near field low end data of woofers for my own use, but I haven’t published it in any of my designs yet. It’s very time consuming to publish all designs and measurements and so far I have chosen not to because I think it’s of less importance. I might perhaps change that in the future if there is a large interest in it.

I’ve made some extensive measurements on the RAAL 140-15D ribbon tweeter and before the measurements I installed brand new replacement ribbons in both the RAAL tweeter samples and tightened up the ribbons as in this instruction video from RAAL.

Since it’s possible to shape the frequency response both vertically and horizontally with the supplied “foam deflection pads”, it seemed as the tweeter measurement setup could almost be done in an infinite number of variations.

I finally decided and ended up with the following tweeter configurations:

The best overall balance and linearity between the horizontal and vertical frequency response is to use the “deflection pads” in the DP1 or DP2 setting e.g. 7cm or 5cm visible ribbon.

I wouldn’t recommend using the RAAL ribbon without the “foam deflection pads”. Without it the performance decreases in all aspects, both in frequency response and in distortion performance. Nevertheless I made a lot of measurements without the foam pads to have as a baseline to compare with.

Even though the RAAL ribbon is a very robust ribbon tweeter I made all frequency measurements with a 44uF protection cap connected in series with it.

Flush-mounting or not?

I’ve tested the RAAL ribbon with and without flush-mounting it on the baffle and the test results shows that there is no big diffraction problem and frequency response impact if it’s not flush-mounted.

The face-plate of the RAAL ribbon is only 2mm thick and flush-mounting it is more or less a cosmetically decision rather than technical. All my published measurements are made with the RAAL ribbon flush-mounted using a 2-3mm thick felt carpet covering the entire baffle.

What about distortion?

The distortion figures isn’t up to the very best dome tweeter’s performance e.g. ScanSpeak D3004/664000 Beryllium tweeter, but for a ribbon tweeter still a respectable performance.

As can be seen on the distortion charts the gap between them narrows down with increasing SPL. Also the harmless second-order harmonics is actually lower for the ribbon. And obviously the dome tweeter can be crossed-over much lower without distortion issues.

When using the supplied “foam deflection pads” it actually helps lowering the distortion as well as controlling the vertical horizontal frequencies dispersion.

Based on the distortion figures I would recommend as many other people have for the RAAL ribbon tweeter, a cross-over point of about 3kHz or higher. If the max SPL requirement isn’t a concern or if you use steep filtering a 2-2.5kHz cross-over point could possibly work.

With the Sequence Three – Grand Reference loudspeaker design I’m aiming for a cross-over point of around 3kHz, so it’s seems to be working as I planned and expected. Further measurements and of course listening test will finally decide the exact cross-over point. With the AT mid-range and the RAAL ribbon I will have a possible cross-over range somewhere between 2.5-3.5kHz. Not a super wide range, but wide enough to make it work.

To sum up, I think the RAAL 140-15D measurement performance lives up to my expectations and I’m eager to continue with the Sequence Three – Grand Reference loudspeaker design. Next up is to publish the results from the AudioTechnology mid-range measurements.