Saturday, July 05, 2008

Two Boys, 11 & 12 Years Old, International Infidel Heroes

While the British schoolsystem may see fit to punish the two boys who refused to kneel and pray to Allah in their public school classroom, we the people of the Western world see the truth.

They are heroes.

From HerRoyalWhyness:

Quite remarkable that two 11 & 12 year old pupils had the good sense to follow their instinct and refuse this indoctrination.

We have the means to recognize their defiance in a positive way.

We should be encouraging this defiance on a larger scale.

It is encouraging to see this story posted on a number of blogs - here, Up Pompeii, DhimmiWatch, GoV etc.

These two boys took on the establishment by themselves. They are our youngest heros and should be recognized as such, making it clear to them, their families and fellow students that people the world over admire them and are talking and writing about their brave defiance of the Islamic indoctrination foisted upon their class.

We may not know the students names, but these two boys from the Alsager school remain heros in my book. Their example is one I will use to teach my youngest child that defiance in limited circumstances will not only be acceptable - but honorable.

"...is believed to be staying away from the school until the furore dies down."

This teacher is believed to be staying away?

Where, pray tell, does she think she can escape from her collosal folly?

One can only hope she'll use her time away productively - exploring the multitude reasons for this ever expanding global moral outrage - no longer merely local anymore. It is, after all . . .a small world.

The New Inquisition

One who, as non-specialist, observes contemporary philosophical trends, may discern two opposite and contending views of reality which chiefly concern the location and genesis of evil. On the one hand, is the traditional Judeo-Christian view, but which may also encompass, broadly speaking, Oriental traditions such as Confucianism, Taoism and to some extent, Buddhism, which locate the origin of evil internally, that is, within the selfish human heart.In this view, man is born with the potential for good and for evil within himself. It is the task of the mind to distinguish and then choose between these contending tendencies or principles through contact with the outer world, and by making decisions within that reality, to move toward the good and eliminate the evil internally. In this way character is developed and the soul made more solid and real.

On the other hand, is the viewpoint that man is born in innocence and essential goodness and that it is outside forces which primarily engender evil and cause internal discord.In this view, the human decision-making process mainly concerns distinguishing good from evil in exterior reality, and thus the intention and effort to do good in the world is the primary factor determining righteousness and well-being. On this side, Islam rests squarely along with material secularism but, there is a marked tendency in many Christian churches and Jewish synagogues toward this viewpoint as well.

A good summary of the first viewpoint is found in John Milton’s Areopagitica:

“Assuredly we bring not innocence into the world, we bring impurity much rather:that which purifies us is trial, and trial is by what is contrary. That virtuetherefore which is but a youngling in the contemplation of evil and knows notthe utmost that vice promises her followers, and rejects it, is but a blankvirtue, not pure; her whiteness but an excremental [superficial] whiteness…Sincetherefore the knowledge and survey of vice is in this world so necessary to theconstituting of human virtue, and the scanning of error to the confirmation oftruth, how can we more safely and with less danger scout into the regions of sinand falsity than by reading all manner of tractates and hearing all manner ofreason? And this is the benefit which may be had of books promiscuously read.”[1]

The concept of “purity” in Islam is almost entirely material. It concerns strict material conformity to Islamic ritual and strictures (thought to be the embodiment of God’s will), but largely leaves the interior world, which is such a focus of Eastern and Judeo-Christian thought, alone. Morality and conformity are one and the same in Islam.

And the source of impurity is thought not to lie in the human heart, especially not the Muslim heart (only Muslims are thought to be born in innocence while non-Muslims are born in guilt), but in forces outside; thus the focus on female virginity and the fear touching “unclean things” (pork, dogs, urine, feces, dead bodies, non-Muslims, etc.). The thinking is these material contacts affect the soul and its destiny.

By contrast, in the Western tradition of opposing superstition, “There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man.”[2]

In other words, according to Jesus, it isn’t what goes into a man’s mouth, but rather what comes out, that makes him unclean. He was ever concerned with the inner man, not with ritual (this remark came in response to criticism of his failure to observe ritual washing) or outward displays of piety and it is this emphasis on personal inner purity and morality, or rather on the effort made toward inner purity, that has characterized the Western moral tradition ever since.

For those who drift along with the prevailing modern tendency to locate the source of evil in the outer world, many feel a strong social responsibility to stamp out corruption wherever it may be found so that it may not spread iniquity among the populace.

This concept is especially strong in Islam.

Those people, like the bureaucrats making up the various Human Rights Commissions, now sprouting all over the Western world, think of themselves as fighting evil and protecting society, even if by doing so they reduce grown men to the status of children.

Who can forget the interrogation of Ezra Levant before the Alberta Human Rights Commission and how he refused to assume the position of a child, instead insisting on his freedom as a publisher and as a man to examine the news of the Muslim riots over the Muhammad cartoons (and to publish the source of that controversy - the cartoons) as he, a newspaperman, saw fit?[3]

The Alberta Human Rights Commission (and several others, notably the British Columbia Human Rights Commission which is just finished hearing the case of Mclean’s magazine and Mark Steyn) seeks to impose a middle ground between two diametrically opposed systems of thought in the interest of social harmony.

They do so using the excuse that the act of publishing these mild cartoons, which were the cause of world-wide violence and threats of further violence by Muslims, or that of pointing out, with alarm, the current demographic trends in Europe, would directly cause prejudice against Muslims in Canada. In short they seek the suppression of speech and the press in order to promote social harmony and create in society the virtue of temperance. As Milton writes,

“How great a virtue is temperance, how much of moment through the wholelife of man! Yet God commits the managing so great a trust, without particularlaw or prescription, wholly to the demeanor of every grown man…God uses not tocaptivate under a perpetual childhood of prescription but trusts him with thegift of reason to be his own chooser.”[4]

Islam is emphatically opposite: God does give law to man to make him temperate and to create a perfect utopian society; and the fact is, material secularism provides no basis with which to argue that virtue should not be encouraged or even prescribed by law.

At the same time, “human rights” are imagined to be some kind of absolute and yet an absolute without any logical grounding in transcendent absolute. They just “are” in the way that the catagories of haram and halal just “are” in Islam - a basis of morality, and yet, when two “human rights” contend, as in this case, where the right to freedom of the press and freedom of speech come up against the right not to be offended which is almost, at least according to the HRCs concerned, indistinguishable from the right not to be discriminated against on the basis of religion, then, if the goal is to make both rights compatible, one or the other must bend.

Thus, human rights are not absolute at all and can easily be erased “at the drop of a law.”[5]

Another problem with the effort to modify a fundamental human right like freedom of the press and freedom of speech is there is no practical stopping place of restraint between complete freedom and total suppression, as explained by Alexis de Tocqueville:

“If anyone could point out an intermediate and yet a tenable positionbetween the complete independence and the entire servitude of opinion, I shouldperhaps be inclined to adopt it, but the difficulty is to discover thisintermediate position. Intending to correct the licentiousness of the press andto restore the use of orderly language, you first try the offender by a jury;but if the jury acquits him, the opinion which was that of a single individualbecomes the opinion of the whole country.

Too much and too little has therefore been done; go farther, then.

You bring the delinquent before permanent magistrates; but even here thecause must be heard before it can be decided; and the very principles which nobook would have ventured to avow are blazoned forth in the pleadings, and whatwas obscurely hinted at in a single composition is thus repeated in a multitudeof other publications.

The language is only the expression, and if I may so speak, the body of thethought, but it is not the thought itself. Tribunals may condemn the body, butthe sense, the spirit of the work is too subtle for their authority. Too muchhas still been done to recede, too little to attain your end; you must go stillfarther. Establish a censorship of the press. But the tongue of the publicspeaker will still make itself heard, and your purpose is not yet accomplished;you have only increased the mischief.

Thought is not, like physical strength, dependant on the number of itsagents; nor can authors be counted like the troops that compose an army. On thecontrary, the authority of a principle is often increased by the small number ofmen by whom it is expressed. The words of one strong-minded man addressed to thepassions of a listening assembly have more power than the vociferations of athousand orators; and if it be allowed is the same as if free speaking wasallowed in very village.

The liberty of speech must therefore be destroyed as well as the liberty ofthe press. And now you have succeeded, everybody is reduced to silence. But yourobject was to repress the abuses of liberty, and you are brought to the feet ofa despot. You have been led from the extreme of independence to the extreme ofservitude without finding a single tenable position on the way at which youcould stop. (…)

“In this question, therefore, there is no medium between servitude andlicense; in order to enjoy the inestimable benefits that the liberty of thepress ensures, it is necessary to submit to the inevitable evils it creates. Toexpect to acquire the former and escape the latter is to cherish one of thoseillusions which commonly mislead nations in their times of sickness when, tiredwith faction and exhausted by effort, they attempt to make hostile opinions andcontrary principles coexist upon the same soil.”[6]

Certainly, when we Americans gaze across the Atlantic, we see many nations “in their times of sickness” which seems to have lost their way, are confused, and forgetful of their own origins and identities. They have been uprooted from their Christian past and material secularism provides no ultimate defense against parasitic Islam. Secularists claim to be able to find the answer in human rights, but as we have seen, if these rights are not grounded in transcendent value, they are meaningless.

Milton argues that freedom of expression is given by God and can therefore not be removed without transgressing the divine mandate. Freedom of expression is freedom of thought and thought and imagination are the only means mortal man has to escape crushing material reality. Freedom of thought is where real freedom lies.

But, even if the authority of Christ is removed, there are still more arguments to make in favor of freedom of speech and the press that can be derived from common sense knowledge of human beings.

“[I]f it be true that a wise man like a good refiner can gather gold out ofthe drossiest volume, and that a fool will be a fool with the best book, yeawithout a book, there is no reason that we should deprive the wise man of anyadvantage to his wisdom, while we seek to restrain from a fool that which beingrestrained will be no hindrance to his folly”[7]

“If therefore ye be loath to dishearten and utterly discontent, not themercenary crew of false pretenders to learning, but the free and ingenious sortof such as evidently were born to study and love learning for itself, not forlucre or any other end but the service of God and of truth, and perhaps thatlasting fame and perpetuity of praise which God and good men have consentedshall be the reward of those whose published labors advance the good of mankind,then know, that so far to distrust the judgment and honesty of one who hath buta common repute in learning, and never yet offended, as not to count him fit toprint his mind without a tutor and examiner, lest he should drop a schism orsomething of corruption, is the greatest displeasure and indignity to a free andknowing spirit that can be put upon him.”[8]

There will be those who argue that to regulate speech for the common good is but an inconvenience for the few who would bring disharmony and agitation to the masses and that the majority of people will be blissfully unaffected but, such turns out not to be the case.

Freedom of expression, which is simply the "clothing" of freedom of thought, is the cornerstone and basis of all real freedom and it is exactly that freedom which is targeted by Islam, which, as is widely known, prohibits any criticism of itself by prescribing death for blasphemy (criticism of Islam or Muhammad) and for apostasy (leaving Islam).

Thus, if Muslims can succeed in disallowing criticism of Islam in the West through the use of hate speech legislation, they will have effectively bound the Western world philosophically and imprisoned the Western genius, so Islam’s ultimate ascendancy will simply be a matter of time.

Thus, the line must be drawn at freedom of speech and the press or it cannot be drawn anywhere.

A key strategy for Muslims and their sympathizers is to seek to elevate “freedom of religion” to a level of transcendence over the more fundamental freedom of thought and speech. Of course, the full and free exercise of the Islamic religion, would carry with it the supremacy of Islamic law over Infidel law and over Infidel territory, a situation the American Founders could not possibly have contemplated.

Up Pompeii Explodes: The Story Of The British Boys Punished For Refusing To Kneel And Pray To Allah

One cannot open any hard copy newspaper or internet news site today without the blazing headling stating "BRITISH MUSLIMS FEEL LIKE THE JEWS OF EUROPE". Now anyone who reads UpPompeii or any of the MANY other blogs and websites that have chronicled, what can only be described as the mass immigration/colonisation of Great Britain by muslims, knows with great certainty that the exact opposite is occuring. We highlight the daily pandering and dhimmi behaviour shown to muslims by British government, police and other authorities thus this jawdropping headline is nothing more than claptrap used to abet the continuation of the muslim initiated exaggerated claims of victimisation and the myth of Islamophobia.

For as long as muslims can be percieved as victims the longer they can reap the rewards of being seen as the "downtrodden" and the subsequent sympathies of the multicultural gulping, heritage loathing European/British liberals. In turn, Muslims have used victimisation and "hurt feelings" as a shield to implement their culture and Sharia Law into Britain.

This brings me to a far more egregious example of the so called "victims"- who of course are not the muslims at all - but the children of Great Britain who are systematically being deprived of their heritage, being made to feel guilty for the heritage OR having muslim customs forced upon them. In this latest case - two schoolboys received punishment for not submitting to demands -BY THEIR TEACHER - that they dress up as muslims bow down and worship Allah- in Arabic - in their school classroom.

"Two schoolboys were given detention after refusing to kneel down and 'pray to Allah' during a religious education lesson. Parents were outraged that the two boys from year seven (11 to 12-year-olds) were punished for not wanting to take part in the practical demonstration of how Allah is worshipped.They said forcing their children to take part in the exercise at Alsager High School, near Stoke-on-Trent - which included wearing Muslim headgear - was a breach of their human rights."

This brainwashing by the teacher (notice how the Deputy Headmaster pleads ignorance)should cause more than just outrage - it should cause fear to grip the hearts of every true British man and woman as to how far their "leaders" are willing to go to sacrifice the thousands year old culture and customs of Great Britain on the altar of multiculturalism in order to muslmise the country and appease the muslim population. For that is EXACTLY what is happening.

The real victims are are our children and every single one of us is guilty of allowing their minds to be warped into believing that British pride is wrong and that other imported cultures are not just equal to(that was never the goal of multiculturalism) but superior to Britain. In every country where multiculturalism has taken hold the indigenous people and culture has suffered. Thus multiculturaliam has opened the British and European door to Islamic domination. Islam does not reciprocate as one mother noted:

"But if Muslims were asked to go to church on Sunday and take Holy Communion there would be war."

She's right. Now we must ask ourselves - just what will it take for us to say NO to the stealth implementation of Islam/Sharia Law and the consequential deterioration of our Western culture?

The Opinionator linked to an article in the previous post concerning Muslims being the "new Jew" I find this claim repugnant and I am not Jewish, but I really have to speak on this ridiculous claim

This claim that the Muslim is the new Jew of Europe is scandalous, they are nothing of the kind, Muslims are saying they are being persecuted, this I feel is untrue, what is happening is that Islam is being totally exposed for the cruel Religion that it is.

Islam cannot stand up to close examination and whenever this has happened Islam cannot justify its claim to be a Religion of Peace, in every debate Islam loses as was so clearly demonstrated by AJukDD in the post " Islam for children" just a few days ago on this site.

I have attended national debates such as the one that was billed as Pipes versus Livingstone a debate about Islam in the UK held in London a couple of years ago, once again Islam and its so called experts were trounced

It is the exposure of the real Islam that is causing this outcry from Muslims and the claim that they are persecuted.

Persecuted!!

Have these people been rounded up and forced to live in sub human conditions?

Have these people had all of their possessions removed ?

Have these people had all of their religious places destroyed ?

Have all these people been forced into concentration camps to be killed and abused whilst they waited their turn in the gas chamber?

Have these people seen their young children thrown into the air only to be speared by a bayonet on the way down ?

Have these people been experimented on by the likes of Dr Menegle ?

Have these people been forced to live in secret places to avoid capture ?

Have these people been forced from their homes ?

Have these people had their families split up and destroyed ?

Have these people had the gold picked out of their teeth when they were dead or their skin turned into lampshades ?

Have these people been deprived of food and water ?

Have these people had to watch whilst their young children starved to death ?

Do these people live in the real fear of being exposed or labeled knowing that if that happened they would soon be in a death camp.?

To liken themselves to the persecution of the Jewish people is utterly deplorable.

I have been to Auswitch, if the Muslim wants to know what persecution is they should also visit that quiet, awful place.

But wait, the Holocaust did not happen according to many Muslims and Muslim groups often state that their aim is to wipe out the Jew, the hypocrisy is astounding.

Finally I wish to make this point, for Muslims to claim they are the new persecuted Jew is also to claim that the British people are the "new Nazi".

This country with its allies fought a war to rid the world of the Nazi, many people died nearly every family in this country lost one of its sons in that war, this claim by the Muslims insults not only the Jewish people and those who died in that conflict, it also insults everybody in this country

The body of a 25-year-old woman was found on the sidewalk of a cul-de-sac in the Vienna area early yesterday, and Fairfax County police said they charged a man with abduction and murder in the case.

The victim, Homaira Rahman, lived a half-mile from where she was found, according to police. Detectives think that she and the suspect knew each other, said Officer Don Gotthardt, a Fairfax police spokesman.

Police declined to give details of how Rahman was killed, but they said she suffered trauma to her upper body. An autopsy will be performed.

Gotthardt said the suspect, Ehsan Amin, 30, lives in the 16000 block of Kings Mountain Drive in Woodbridge. However, a man reached by telephone at that address said Amin stays there only occasionally.

Amin was taken to Fairfax's Adult Detention Center, police said.

Tooba Mayel, a close friend of Rahman's family, said Rahman was a generous and sparkling force among loved ones and the broader Afghan community. Her family moved to the area in the 1980s, and she was born in the United States.

"She was a beautiful, tall girl with a smile on her face," Mayel said. "Friends and family always called her sunshine. Our entire community is in grief right now."

Rahman encouraged young Afghan American women to find jobs, Mayel said, and "she was always volunteering to do charity work for the kids in Afghanistan."

Rahman, who lived in the 8700 block of Litwalton Court in the Vienna area, was also known among her friends as "the fashionista," Mayel said. "She wore the best clothes, the newest trends in clothes. She just had a lot of love for that," Mayel said. "She's just a very colorful person. She's always wearing bright colors, happy-go-lucky, very bubbly."

A man out for a walk came across Rahman's body in the 2300 block of Malraux Drive shortly after 6:30 a.m., police said.

"Her arms were very badly scraped up," said Dennis McAuliffe, a neighbor who also saw the scene. Rahman was fully clothed, and a pocketbook lay by her side, he said.

"I don't know if there's a quieter street in Vienna, in Fairfax County, than here," McAuliffe said.

The story got my attention because I know that particular area quite well.

I've set up Google alerts for "Homaira Rahman" and "Ehsan Amin."

Maybe what happened has nothing to do with "honor killing." I admit that I'm suspicious. After all, the story of the murders of Amina and Sarah Said in Texas has gotten next to zero coverage from the national mainstream media.

LONDON -- The International Atomic Energy Agency was said to have arrived to a suspected nuclear site in Syria months after a major clean-up by crews from North Korea.

Ya think?

Western intelligence sources said North Korea removed virtually all traces of nuclear equipment from the Al Kibar plutonium facility in northeastern Syria. The sources said that within three months another building was completed on the site.

"The clean-up took place in the first two weeks after the Israeli air strike," an intelligence source said. "The assessment is that the North Koreans removed everything."

The sources said Al Kibar, destroyed in an Israeli air strike in September 2007, had not yet received a shipment of uranium or other radioactive material. They said the Al Kibar program was headed by Chon Chibu, a senior nuclear official and scientist in North Korea.

On June 24, the IAEA completed a four-day inspection of Al Kibar. The agency, whose access was restricted by Syria, reported that its three-man inspection team did not find obvious traces of nuclear material.

"There is still work that needs to be done," IAEA deputy director-general Olli Heinonen said. "We will see in the days and weeks what will happen next."

Heinonen said the inspectors took environmental samples over a large area. In a June 25 briefing, he did not elaborate.

"We achieved what we wanted on this first trip," Heinonen said. "We continue our discussions, we took the samples we need to take and now it's time to analyze them and also look at the information we got from Syria."

The intelligence sources said North Korea, which on Juen 26 saw the lifting of U.S. sanctions, had constructed the 21-meter high plutonium production facility and was planning to begin operations when Israel destroyed the building in 2007. The sources said the reactor had not yet been completed.

The CIA has concluded that Al Kibar was meant to house a nuclear reactor modeled after that in Yongbyon, North Korea. The sources said IAEA has sought to determine the source of nuclear fuel for the Syrian reactor as well as the location of any reprocessing fuel plant.

B4 WW2, Hitler paid Stalin to train the Wehrmacht, and had manufacturing facilities there to cheat on the Versailles pact, so now..

What axis of evil?GERTZ:

Iran paid N. Korea for plutonium facility and had scientists based there

LONDON -- Western intelligence sources said Iranian scientists were stationed at the Syrian plutonium production plant in Al Kibar, destroyed in an Israeli air strike in September 2007.

Sequence of photos: By late October 2007, workers covered the site with earth [1], and subsequently laid a new foundation [2], and erected a light metal-framework building [3] over the site of the destroyed reactor. GlobalSecurity.org

They said the Iranians as well as Syrian personnel were trained by North Korea to operate Al Kibar, designed to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons.

"Had Al Kibar not been destroyed, Iranian scientists would have played a major role in plutonium production," a Western source said.

The sources said Al Kibar was virtually completed by the time the Israel Air Force bombed the facility. They said the facility was not believed to have received nuclear material.

Iran paid North Korea for the construction of Al Kibar, the sources said. They said Teheran, which has been completing a heavy water plant at Arak, sought to establish the plutonium production facility to conduct nuclear weapons assembly outside of Iran and near Israel.

Teheran has also financed joint missile production with Syria. The sources said Iran's remaining obstacle to nuclear weapons was the ability to install a nuclear warhead on a missile delivery system.

The Iranian delivery system selected for a nuclear warhead has been the Shihab-3B intermediate-range missile, the sources said. They said Iran, with assistance from North Korea, was expected to complete weaponization by mid-2009.

All of this baloney all comes down to three items.ONE- Is Iran engaged in building nuclear weapons? (DUH)TWO- Can Iran be negotiated out of being 'bad'? (DUH)THREE- Can Iran's leaders be deterred just like any other'normal, non apocalypse believing' nation?OR...Will their nuclear test take place in Tel Aviv?

So, now prepare to buy your own bomb sniffers before heading to work?

The service has obtained information that shows Islamist extremists have figured out how to covertly plant explosives inside vehicles and then use the car's navigation system to precisely set off the bomb as the car is close to the target.

The bombing technology was disclosed in Pakistan's The News newspaper May 1.

One GPS guided car bomb was believed used in early March in a car belonging to a navy office in Lahore. The bombing killed at least four people.

According to the report, local terrorist groups are using existing GSM networks used by cellular phone companies to intercept GPS navigation systems that rely on the same networks as the cell phones.

A GPRS service-enabled SIM is used in the GPS devices. This works like a tracker device in the vehicles. A sms is sent on the SIM installed on that device, and upon receiving the sms, the device sends back the latitude and longitude of its current location. The terrorist can easily use Google Earth or his own built-in maps to figure out the location of the vehicle. Some locally built-in digital maps have the capability to work with Google Earth, said one official.

So, now if you work in what some moron with a book- he considers infallible, arguing you have to pay the tax or die - thinks is a fat target to weaken all kufrs, please disconnect all GPS, and/or pull the battery out of your cell phone. Oh, and park in an open sided garage. That way when the chain reacton of gas tanks start going, it won't blow out the sides of the buildings. Of course, you can always build in an extra 15 minutes to your daily commute as your go over the vehicle with your own sniffer.

True love will now mean you don't clear the snow off wifey's car, but instead check hers for the residue of chemical explosives with your new spiffy Ronco bomb sniffer you got at Walmart.

The American beer market has long been devoted to the holy trinity: Anheuser Busch, Coors and Miller. But the popularity of craft beers, carefully developed brews prepared in microbreweries, is on the rise. The same sickly barley and hop blends are no longer coveted, and more and more American palates are seeking revelation. Consumers are looking for bottles that pack a little more chutzpa. And brewer Jeremy Cowan's Shmaltz Brewing Company, through its He'brew line of beers, is restoring the beer world's faith. He'brew is making believers out of beer aficionados and novices alike.

In the beginning (1996), Cowan created Genesis Ale. Shmaltz Brewing Company was formless and void (and actually didn't exist yet). Genesis was an experimental celebration ale for Hanukka, and to sell the 100 cases he brewed Cowan schlepped them around San Francisco in the trunk of his grandmother's Volvo. From these humble beginnings, He'brew's popularity has spread like a plague of locusts - but in a good way. Shmaltz boasts more than 550 percent growth in the past four years and projects over $1.5 million in sales for 2008.

Last month, Shmaltz released Rejewvenator, its first summer brew. He'brew is known for its unusual ingredients, thanks to Cowan's creativity and Mendocino Brewing Company's Paul McEalean's expertise, and this year's brew doesn't disappoint: It features fig juice. Cowan plans to change Rejewvenator each year by highlighting a different sacred ingredient from the Torah, like grapes or honey. Olives, Cowan muses, will be a challenge.

And there's more good news from on high. The faithful can look forward to Jewbelation 12, the fifth of Shmaltz's extreme Hanukka seasonals, which packs an awe-inspiring 12 malts, 12 hops and 12% alcohol, and will be available on October 1. And of course many suppliers stock old favorites Genesis Ale, Messiah Bold, Bittersweet Lenny's R.I.P.A. and Origin Pomegranate Ale. It goes without saying that all of He'brew's offerings are certified kosher.

Many He'brew fans are first tempted not by good reviews but simply by the shtick. The name He'brew started off as a gag, when Cowan was in high school and joked with his friends that the Jews should have their own beer. The spirit of humor remained when He'brew became a reality years later. Many of He'brew's bottles sport bold labels featuring a grinning, bottle-brandishing hassidic rabbi.

Cowan pairs the images with wickedly witty names and slogans for each variety of brew - Genesis Ale: our first creation; Messiah Bold: the one you've been waiting for; Bittersweet Lenny's R.I.P.A. (a posthumous tribute to Jewish American comedian Lenny Bruce, who was arrested on charges of obscenity in 1961): brewed with an obscene amount of malts & hops.

And the shtick just keeps on coming. He'brew is, naturally, "the chosen beer," and Shmaltz reminds its customers that "exile never tasted so good," "thou shalt covet this" and "don't pass out, pass over."

Friday, July 04, 2008

The Audacity Of Obama's Racism

Baruch O'Bummer is obsessed with race, it seems. His books are filled with racial qualifications down the nth degree. Apparently, as if he were naming the colors of chips of paint.

But, it's not paint he's referring to, it is human characteristics.

I am of the belief that skin color, hair color, etc. have nothing to do with the content of one's character. As such, it usually does not occur to me to qualify the race down to the particular skin color of a person when I describe them.

Not so with Obama. I wonder what color he would call me. Hell, I change color from day to day. Maybe, he could call me the Chameleon.

The Orwellian doublespeak that Obama spews in portraying himself as "a uniter" and someone who "will bring this country together" is the polar opposite of everything this man has said and done and would be laughable if it were not so deadly serious. More digging from Atlas reader Laura:

Obama probably did not think about the presidential office possibility when he wrote the book "Dreams From My Father" as it is laden with racist categorizations. Obama catagorizes people according to skin tone, as some are olive, pale, walnut, etc. Almost to the point of being laughable, if it was not so pathetic and scary.

The last person to be that race obsessed in power started freakin' WWII and murdered millions of innocent people.

My husband and I sat down one night and began counting how many times Obama used racial catagorization or referred to race in his book Dreams From My Father. There are racial references made 179 times in the first 110 pages.

From Dreams of My Father: "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

From Dreams of My Father: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother?s race."

From Dreams of My Father: "There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white."

From Dreams of My Father: "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

From Dreams of My Father: "I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela."

Blogger Admits Obama's Birth Certificate Was Faked?

JayMcKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-traineddocument specialist, has implicated himself in the production of fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuineby the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blogentry where the supposedly authentic document appears.

The evidence of forgery and manipulation of images of official documents, triggered by Israel Insider's revelation of the collection of Hawaii birth certificate images on the Photobucket site and the diligent detective work of independent investigative journalists (led by JimJ and Texas Darling) and imaging professionals such as Polarik in the three weeks since the publication of the images, implicate The Daily Kos, a 'progressive' blog site, and the Obama campaign's 'Fight the Smears' website, in misleading the public with official-looking but manipulated document images of doubtful provenance.

Moreover, the blog and the campaign have been negligent in allowing the promotion of obviously forged and fake official documents together with the purported image of Obama's birth certificate. So, what is the Obama Campaign hiding?

The Declaration Of Independence From Islam

Today is July 4th, the day Americans celebrate the Declaration of our Independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain.

As such, it seems a nativist holiday.

But, the Declaration of Independence is a proclamation crying out from the depths of soul of all humanity, and for all humanity. Cry, Freedom. Freedom from all bondage, from all that would usurp our rights; our rights which existed before there were any kings, or dictators, or religious bigots to take them away from us.

Read over these excerpts from the Declaration of Independece. They are our Declaration of Indepence from the malevolent enslavement of Allah. Our declaration of the inevitable end of Sharia. Our declaration against our own P.C. slavemasters, the "government" which pretends to be our protectors, but instead leads us like sheep to the slaughter of moral relativism.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.

We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the Western World, in General Congress, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of the Western World, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to Islam or the moral relativism which would make us slaves to any random ideology, according to which way the winds of appeasement blow. Such bonds ought to be totally dissolved.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

UK: Schoolboys Punished For Refusing To Kneel And Pray To Allah

These boys are heroes, and their school system is punishing them. Their reward in God's Kingdom will be great. And, they may lead the insurgency to take the Western world back from our morally relativistic slave masters.

"I understand that they have to learn about other religions. I can live with that but it is taking it a step too far to be punished because they wouldn't join in Muslim prayer.

"Making them pray to Allah, who isn't who they worship, is wrong and what got me is that they were told they were being disrespectful.

"I don't want this to look as if I have a problem with the school because I am generally very happy with it."

Another parent Karen Williams said: "I am absolutely furious my daughter was made to take part in it and I don't find it acceptable.

"I haven't got a problem with them teaching my child other religions and a small amount of information doesn't do any harm.

"But not only did they have to pray, the teacher had gone into the class and made them watch a short film and then said 'we are now going out to pray to Allah'.

"Then two boys got detention and all the other children missed their refreshment break because of the teacher.

"Not only was it forced upon them, my daughter was told off for not doing it right.

"They'd never done it before and they were supposed to do it in another language."

"My child has been forced to pray to Allah in a school lesson." The grandfather of one of the pupils in the class said: "It's absolutely disgusting, there's no other way of putting it.

"My daughter and a lot of other mothers are furious about their children being made to kneel on the floor and pray to Islam. If they didn't do it they were given detention.

"I am not racist, I've been friendly with an Indian for 30 years. I've also been to a Muslim wedding where it was explained to me that alcohol would not be served and I respected that.

"But if Muslims were asked to go to church on Sunday and take Holy Communion there would be war."

That poor Grandfather. He sounds like a good man. In the UK, the media commonly refers to Muslims as "Asians." As if they were Chinese, or Viet Namese, and as if their religion had anything to do with race.

So, the Grandfather feels it necessary to defend himself, saying, "I am not a racist, but ..."

ISLAM IS NOT A RACE, IT IS THE MENACING IDEOLOGY OF SHARIA LAW WHICH CALLS UPON ITS ADHERENTS TO KILL GAYS, ADULTERERS, AND APOSTATES.

Islam stands in complete opposition to Freedom of Conscience.

Islam calls on its adherents to spread Sharia law, by force of the sword if neccesary (and, oh how often Muslims find it to be neccessary). In other words, Islam calls on its adherents to replace our Western systems of law with their own system of law.

That, my friends, is treason. Treason is inherent to the strict practice of Islam.

We do not have to put up with Islam in our Western countries. Adherents of Islam have to put up with us. And, if they don't want to do so, they have to leave. And, if we had the courage of our convictions, we would imprison these Sharia advocates for treason. And, if we wanted to be nice about it, we could offer them the option of deportation to a Muslim country of their choice.

And, that is how we would act if we were sane, and healthy, and self-respecting.

But, instead, we are biting our nails, and staring at the noose we have prepared for ourselves.

Spook Spiked?

SUPERSPOOK Alex Allan may have been an assassination target of the Russians or al-Qaeda, security experts said last night.

The 56-year-old chairman of the Government’s Joint Intelligence Committee is in a coma in hospital and has had toxicology tests to see if he has been poisoned.

The 56-year-old chairman of the Government’s Joint Intelligence Committee is in a coma in hospital and has had toxicology tests to see if he has been poisoned.

“They were blamed by Britain for the death of Alexander Litvinenko by radioactive polonium poisoning in London in 2006. And anti-Russian Vicktor Yashenko was horribly disfigured by poison which almost killed him during the election which made him President of the Ukraine.

“So Mr Putin, the former KGB colonel who runs Russia, ‘has form’. And he has become increasingly aggressive towards Britain, accusing us of espionage plots against Russia. Al-Qaeda is another suspect.

They would see his death as a great victory, fulfilling Osama Bin Laden’s threat to strike at the heart of the ‘infidel enemy’. What better target than the man whose job is dedicated to wiping them out?” Read it all >>

Geert Wilders: Prisoner Of Islam

Islam is infringing upon our ability to act normally as free human beings.

If you don't believe Islam is having an effect on your freedom already, consider what has happened to Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who dared to speak out against Islam.

As Diana West puts it, he is in a prison-cell, kept by Muslim masters, who operate openly in the streets and mediastreams of Western civilization:

THE HAGUE, The Netherlands -- Having run the polite-but-grim gauntlet of Dutch government security to gain access to Geert Wilders, I finally understood what the 24-hour security requirements of the man's continued existence really mean: To make the survival of Western-style liberty in the Netherlands his political cause, this Dutch parliamentarian has to live under high-tech lock and key.

This stunning paradox, with no end in sight, illustrates how far political freedom in the West has already eroded. Think of it:

For writing about the repressive ideology of Islam, for arguing against the inequities of Sharia (Islamic law), for making a video ("Fitna") to warn about Islamic jihad, Wilders lives in his own non-Islamic country under a specifically Islamic death threat.

If it is politically incorrect to notice this, it is also indisputably true. True, too, is that, sans state security, this death threat could conceivably be carried out anytime, anywhere -- from the picturesque streets outside the Dutch parliament, to the house Wilders hasn't slept in since 2004. That, of course, was when, on an Amsterdam street, a Muslim assassin plunged a knife into Theo van Gogh's corpse, thus attaching the Islamic manifesto threatening both Wilders and his then-parliamentary colleague, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, with death.Not long ago, political debate in the Netherlands met with, well, more political debate. Now, however, with a growing Muslim minority -- and it's politically incorrect to notice this, too -- political debate sometimes meets with Islam-inspired political assassination. At least it has, traumatically, twice in recent years: once, with the 2002 murder of the anti-Islamic-immigration politician Pim Fortuyn by an animal rights activist who claimed Fortuyn was scapegoating Muslims; and the following year with the ritualistic Islamic murder of Van Gogh, director of "Submission," a short video made with Hirsi Ali about Islamic mistreatment of women. In all, such Islam-inspired violence has been enough to chill Islam-inspired debate.

And that's just the situation at home. This week, even as Amsterdam's chief public prosecutor, Leo de Wit, announced that no charges would be brought against Wilders for "discrimination" or "incitement to hatred" related to Wilders' writings or video ("We find Mr. Wilders' remarks were limited to Islam as a religious movement," De Wit said), Jordan announced it is bringing a "Fitna"-related criminal case against the Dutch parliamentarian.

In other words, Jordan will indict a Dutch politician according to Jordanian (read: Islam-inspired) law. "Jordanian authorities are not aiming to arrest" the Dutch leader of the Freedom Party, Radio Netherlands Online reports. "They say the decision to prosecute was taken in order to send a signal to the Netherlands."

A "signal"? How about a gag? Of course, like other Western peoples, the Dutch seem content to censor themselves, happily mouthing multicultural platitudes that effectively rationalize their own culture's Islamization. Not Wilders.

I recently asked the 44-year-old Dutchman what was stronger in his country: Islam or multiculturalism.

"Unfortunately, they are both strong," he replied, seated in his lightly furnished but heavily guarded office. "But cultural relativism is the biggest problem." He went on to explain: "Multicultural society would not be that bad -- I don't really believe in it -- but it would not be that bad if, at least, we would be strong enough to say that our culture is better and dominant. But when you combine multicultural society with a dominant sense of cultural relativism, you are heading in the wrong direction. You are committing suicide when it comes to your own culture."

He continued: "I am not advocating a monocultural society. I just want what the Germans call leitkultur (leading culture). I want our own culture to be dominant -- not the only one, but to be dominant. I have a big problem with the cultural relativists who say every culture is equal. I don't believe every culture is equal."

Hoping to preserve the primacy of Western culture in this Dutch corner of the West, Wilders advocates a halt to Islamic immigration. "I'm not saying that every Muslim in the Netherlands is a criminal or a terrorist," he explains. "We know the majority is not. Still," he continues, "there is good reason to stop the immigration, because the more we have an influx of Muslims in the Netherlands, the strength of the (Islamic) culture will grow, and the change of our societies will increase." He sees his efforts as "a fight against an ideology that I believe at the end of the day will kill our freedom, kill our societies and change everything we stand for."

He's right -- and, yes, it's politically incorrect to say that, too. Everything the West stands for, starting with freedom of speech, is already changing as our institutions, up to and including, for example, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, increasingly proscribe critical references, or indeed, any references to Islam. While it's clear that the European manifestation of Islamic ideology has already killed Wilders' personal freedom in the Netherlands, the general impact on freedom throughout the West has yet to be fully appreciated.

"I have a mission," Wilders said. "I believe very strongly in what I say, and my party fortunately shares this view. And nobody in the Netherlands is doing (what I do). And somebody should. And I pay a high price for it."

What is the expression -- freedom isn't free? This is literally and acutely the case when it comes to this heroic and dedicated Dutchman.

Here's another thing to think about. I'm going to do some very rough math here.

According to this article, there are approximately 30,000 commercial flights per day in the United States. These flights carry 2 million people per day.

Since 9/11, each one of those people have had to show up at the airport one hour earlier for every flight they've taken. That is a lot of man hours wasted. If the average income in the United States is $30K per year, that means the average worker is paid a little more than $15 per hour. That means the American economy is sacrificing $30 million dollars in labor per day. $210 million per week. Almost $1 billion per month. $12 billion per year.

The actual cost of the loss of productivity is unaccountably larger than that.

And, that is ALL BECAUSE OF ISLAM.

It is not because of "terrorism". Terrorism is the tactic. But, Islam is the progenitor of all the terrorism for which we take these "precautions", a word which is only a euphemism for loss of Freedom and economic productivity.

All because of Muslims.

And still, we find no significant group of Muslims in the academic commuity, in Islamic political organizations, in Islamic media, or in Islamic government, who are willing to speak up against the terrorists in their midst.

Think about this. Muslims have their hands around our necks, and we are told we are the ones who are the aggressors.

That STUPID Judge, Lord Phillips!

THE TELEGRAPH: Muslims in Britain should be able to live according to Sharia law, the country's most senior judge has said.

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, the Lord Chief Justice, strongly backed Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, over his suggestion earlier this year that aspects of Sharia law should be adopted in Britain.

The archbishop's remarks sparked a national debate and led to calls for his resignation.

Risking inflaming that controversy again, Lord Phillips has said that Muslims in Britain should be able to use Sharia to decide financial and marital disputes.

The judge did add that only the criminal courts should have the power to decide when a crime has been committed and when to impose punishment.

Thursday, July 03, 2008

Top UK Judge: Sharia Should Be Implemented

The most senior judge in England tonight gave his blessing to the use ofsharia law to resolve disputes among Muslims.

Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said that Islamic legal principlescould be employed to deal with family and marital arguments and to regulatefinance.

He declared: 'It is possible in this country for those who are enteringinto a contractual agreement to agree that the agreement shall be governed by alaw other than English law.'

Why? If there is already an English law dealing with the matter, than why overlay another law on top of it, Lord Dumfuq?

Look, he even says as much himself:

In his speech in an East London mosque Lord Phillips signalled approval ofsharia principles as a means of settling disputes so long as no punishments thatconflict with the established law are involved, and as long as divorces are madeto comply with the civil law.

Friday, July 4:THE PERFECT WAY TO CELEBRATE INDEPENDENCE DAY!Our guests today will be three staunch patriots — Warren, Mr. Beamish, and The Beak.---------Warren served in the army, designed my avatar, and adminstrates here at Always On Watch. Beak works immigration control because, after 9/11, he wanted to serve and defend America. Mr. Beamish hasn't served, but his brother was aboard the USS Cole — not on board when the attack came, thank God.All are well read, of course.If you are unable to listen live to the radio show, you can listen later by CLICKING HERE.

Why Is Obama Meeting Privately With An Imam From Hamas?

Privately!Isn't that how the Godfather gives orders? You say it privately to one person, who carries it out for you, and then, you have complete deniability. No responsibility. This is the rule of all mafia organizations, and that's the way Obama is playing it.

And why is this open anti-Semite and supporter of Israel'sannihilation getting to discuss "the Arab-Israeli conflict" in a privateone-on-one meeting with Obama?

What was said? I think we can do the math.

Qazwini is very open about his support for Palestinian homicide bombings, HAMAS, and Hezbollah. And he's a good friend of Hezbollah spiritual leader, Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah--the man who issued the fatwa to Hezbollah terrorists to murder over 300 U.S. Marines and U.S. Embassy civilians in cold blood.

Qazwini's mosque has held rallies and celebrations in support of Hezbollah, and many of Hezbollah's biggest money-launderers and agents in America are his congregants.

When I went undercover to his mosque in 1998, he and others welcomed Nation of Islam chief racist Louis Farrakhan as "our dear brother" and "a freedom fighter." Qazwini applauded Farrakhan's anti-Semitic statements saying that Jews were the "forces of Satan" and that there needed to be a "jihad" on the American people.

Storm Track Appeasement: The Last Year of the Pig ?

China has joined the long sorry list of countries bending to the will of their Muslim minority. If you’ve ever eaten at a Chinese restaurant, you would be familiar with the Chinese calendar. The restaurants I ate at have the calendar right on the paper placemat.

The Chinese calendar is based on a twelve year cycle, each year being represented by an animal. 2005 was Year of Rooster. 2004 was Year of Monkey. 2003 was Year of Goat (sheep, ram). 2002 was Year of Horse.

The End Of Privacy At YouTube?

YOUTUBE has been ordered to give up records of each clip watched on the popular video-sharing website, along with the date, time and IP address of each person who watched it, to media giant Viacom.

In a ruling that could have major implications for online privacy around the world, US District Court judge Louis Stanton granted Viacom access to the records as part of its ongoing copyright infringement lawsuit against Google and its subsidiary YouTube....

The judge stated:

"The motion to compel production of all data from the Logging database concerning each time a YouTube video has been viewed on the YouTube website or through embedding on a third-party website is granted."

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

Jihad by the Numbers

Guest Commentary by Edward Cline:

In his masterful second volume study of Hitler, Hitler, 1936-1945: Nemesis, Ian Kershaw discusses a phenomenon called “working towards the Führer,” in which every Nazi Party organization, member and office automatically, with little or no prompting or prodding by Hitler or his inner circle, worked to realize the ends and policies articulated by Hitler before and after he rose to power in 1933. It was automatic, because to disagree with or have reservations about a single, even minor aspect of Nazi ideology was to court reprimand, censure, dismissal, or even death. Agreement with those ends and policies was nearly a secondary motivation behind any Party member’s actions. He was compelled to act, regardless of the consequences. The ideology commanded it, and the Führer’s will and vision were irresistible, because there was little or no self to resist them.

As Party members who disagreed or expressed reservations were dismissed, or abandoned the Party, fled, committed suicide, or were murdered, monsters of the first rank filled the vacuum to formulate and enact policies that more completely “worked towards the Führer,” monsters such as Heinrich Himmler, Hermann Göring, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Joseph Goebbels. When all the checks within the Party against total irrationality in domestic and foreign policies were removed or fell into disrepute, total irrationality took over totally.

But the average Party member strived to satisfy Hitler, regardless of how minor or major the action and regardless if it stood to be acknowledged or rewarded. To be a true, loyal, above-suspicion Nazi meant the near total surrender of one’s ego, mind and self, and to substitute them with Hitler’s own.

Of course, an Ellsworth Toohey might say that the joke was on the rank-and-file Nazi: he would claim that Hitler was essentially selfless, and that what little mind Hitler possessed was founded on what he thought his followers and “the people” wanted and expected of him as prophet and dictator. Ayn Rand, in The Fountainhead, describes that phenomenon through Toohey:

… A world of obedience and of unity. A world where the thought of each man will not be his own, but an attempt to guess the thought in the brain of his neighbor, who’ll have no thought of his own but an attempt to guess the thought of the next neighbor who’ll have no thought – and so on … around the globe. Since all must serve all. A world in which man will not work for so innocent an incentive as money, but for that headless monster – prestige. The approval of his fellows – their good opinion – the opinion of men who’ll be allowed to hold no opinion. An octopus, all tentacles and no brain …. An average drawn upon zeroes …. (1).

It is no accident or fluke of history that Islamists – Hamas, Hezbollah, Ahmadinejad, Saudi Wahhabists, the whole ménage of Islamists and jihadists -- admire both Hitler and Nazism. Their hatred of Jews and Israel is merely one facet of that pathology. As Nazism required the complete submission of the individual to Party ideology and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Hitler, Islam requires the complete submission of the individual to Islam and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Allah and Mohammed. Islamists have long recognized that both the method and the ends of Nazism were in complete agreement and practical accord with their own. The “mechanics” of a functioning Islam differ in no fundamental way from the “mechanics” of a functioning Nazism or any other brand of total collectivism, as described by Toohey above. (2)

(One historical note: Kershaw points out that Hitler once entertained the idea of solving the “Jewish Question” by helping to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, where all German and other European Jews would be forcibly “relocated” and presumably – hopefully – perish in a wasteland of desert and hostile Arabs. He dismissed the idea because he feared that such a state could possibly become a political adversary dedicated to destroying Germany. Historically, the ironic joke is on Hitler. He destroyed Germany and the Jews turned the wasteland into a productive, prosperous garden.)

With that in mind, here is a set of significant statistics forwarded to me by a friend. It charts the progression of Islamic jihad, both soft and hard methods, whose purpose is to establish a global caliphate, especially in the West.

It begins by stating:

“Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.”

I would disagree. It is definitely a religion and a political system combined. Any attempt to “separate” mosque and state would emasculate Islam. I have argued this point in past commentaries and will not dwell on it here. And cults, if not opposed by reason and kept by it on the far fringes of a civilized society, have a tendency to become religions that may become state policies. Ecology was once a “cult.” Now we have the Environmental Protection Agency.

It goes on to state:

“Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.”

Or a mask, or a ruse. But no one should doubt how seriously Islamists and Muslims in general take the religious component. Islam is a barbaric but fully integrated system, perhaps more lethally integrated than was Nazism.

“Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’”

I would defend anyone’s right to believe in Islam. The question is: How could one truly practice Islam without declaring jihad on others? After a Muslim has won the “internal struggle” or jihad within himself, the next step is to wage it against all others. To refrain from that part of jihad is to risk the accusation of being a slacker or pseudo-Muslim. From the first stage to the last, all such effort constitutes “working towards the Prophet and Allah.”

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agreed to ‘the reasonable’ Muslims demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source: CIA: The World Fact Book, 2007).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone….

Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective interjections.

“From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (“clean” by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves – along with threats for failure to comply (United States).”

“At this point, they [Muslims] will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

“When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris – car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark – Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh).”

The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have been perpetrated by outsiders.

”From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels:”

I question the inclusion of “Palestine” in this set. “Palestine” simply means space occupied by stateless “Palestinians” in Gaza and the West Bank, and is the name of the state which Islamists wish to replace Israel, once it is destroyed. Turkey, after decades of having a secular, non-religious government, is beginning to turn “religious,” and seems to be yearning for the kind of Muslim government that cleansed the country in 1915 of non-Muslim Armenians in a genocide that predates the Holocaust.

“100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ – the Islamic House of Peace’ [more correctly, dar-al-Islam, or Land of Islam]. There is supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim.”

“Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

“’Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.’ Leon Uris, The Haj.

“It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average[s] would indicate.

Hammond’s book is sponsored by the Frontline Fellowship, a Christian organization, and the book itself was published by Christian Liberty Books. The Frontline website contains several endorsements of the book by clerics and missionaries. The quoted paragraphs above were “adapted” from Hammond’s book (by whom, is unknown), and not very professionally. The statistics themselves were compiled by the CIA and used in the book.

The first paragraph of the Frontline ad for the book reads:

“Dr. Peter Hammond’s new book…is a fascinating, well illustrated and thoroughly documented response to the relentless anti-Christian propaganda that has been generated by Muslim and Marxist groups and by Hollywood film makers….”

So, regardless of the book’s Christian orientation, the statistics Hammond uses to cite the various Muslim populations in each country can be taken as reliable, as well as the prefatory remarks before each set of percentages. There is certainly a demonstrable and observable corollary between a country’s Muslim population and the influence it begins to have or has had on its government, politics and culture.

The Islamists are coolly “working towards the Prophet and Allah” as shown in the numbers above. Meanwhile, our policymakers appear to be a succession of compliant, pragmatic, non-judgmental zeroes blindly working towards the conquest and extinction of the West.

(1) The Fountainhead, pp. 667-668, Plume-Penguin Centennial Edition.

(2) “During the 1930s, Palestinian Arabs under the leadership of the Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, had embraced a great deal of Nazi ideology.” From Denis MacEoin’s “Tactical Hudna and Islamist Intolerance,” Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2008.

The Parallel Government
Of The Entire World

All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.

Infidel Babe Of The Week
Can it be anyone else?

IBA Quote of the Week.

“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control."

The Infidel Bloggers Alliance Radio Show

Gathering Storm Report Radio Show

"An Islamic regime must be serious in every field," explained Ayatollah Khomeini. "There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam."

****************

"I want to be very, very clear, however: I understand and agree with the analysis of the problem. There is an imminent threat. It manifested itself on 9/11. It's real and grave. It is as serious a threat as Stalinism and National Socialism were. Let's not pretend it isn't."~~~~~Bono~~~~~