Ombudsman warns of dangers of ABS conveyancing factories putting volume over service

Sampson: automated transactions and fixed-price deals could cause more complaints

Alternative business structures (ABS) will create “conveyancing factories” that exert a downward pressure on prices and could lead to an upsurge in complaints because of a focus on volume over service, the Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has warned.

Meanwhile, clients should take steps to avoid having unrealistic expectations of their lawyers, and a universal quality scheme for residential conveyancers might make more sense to consumers than individual schemes, Chief Ombudsman Adam Sampson said.

A LeO report published today, Losing the plot: residential conveyancing complaints and their causes, underlined the danger to consumers when enticing fixed fee and ‘no move, no fee’ agreements were not honoured by conveyancers.

“Traditional high street law firms are evolving into or being displaced by ‘conveyancing factories’,” the report said. While at one level the entities are creating “fundamentally great innovations” in a hard-pressed industry, “these sort of positive developments for consumers are not without risk”.

Mr Sampson referred to a speech he heard at the recent Legal Futures conference, in which the In-Deed conveyancing business founder Harry Hill warned that that traditional firms would face unsustainable price competition from volume conveyancers.

There were consumer benefits “but my concern is that some firms may be too focused on the volume of work they’re creating at the expense of providing a reasonable service”, said Mr Sampson. Simple transactions may become more efficient but “where there are complexities – more detailed searches required for example – that need to be taken into account, such rigid business models may come unstuck”, to consumers’ detriment.

ABSs could exacerbate problems, he predicted: “We are bracing ourselves for an increase in automated transactions and fixed-price deals. This may mean more residential conveyancing complaints.”

Unusually, while the report carried an assortment of case studies based on serious complaints that were upheld – such as excessive costs or delays, and unexpected fees – it also suggested clients should educate themselves to keep a lid on unrealistic expectations.

In around 30% of residential conveyancing complaints, no evidence of poor service was found, Mr Sampson pointed out, adding: “More anecdotally, I know that sometimes complaints are based on unrealistic expectations.” LeO has produced a fact sheet to help home-buyers understand the conveyancing process.

Failing to check paperwork leads to lawyers being blamed unfairly, he said. “Often buyers mistakenly think a piece of land is theirs by virtue of its proximity to their property only to find that the legal title doesn’t include this land.”

Mr Sampson noted that the Society of Licensed Conveyancers (SLC) will soon launch its “SLC Quality Assured” equivalent to the Law Society’s Conveyancing Quality Scheme (CQS). While he was “broadly in favour” of such quality marks, “there is an argument that in terms of achieving market differentiation and demonstrating quality to consumers, lenders and insurers, a more universal scheme might be something to aspire to in the future”.

He continued: “From a consumer perspective, it really isn’t clear what advantage there is to using a CQS accredited solicitor over an SLC Quality Assured licensed conveyancer and vice versa.”

Meanwhile, comparison web sites and word of mouth would help consumers to differentiate between conveyancers, as might LeO complaints data. However, it would be “some months – maybe even years – before this information builds into anything particularly meaningful or representative”.

Mr Sampson said he believed that, ultimately, successful conveyancers would be those who can not only innovate but also “commit to greater levels of customer care”.

“This means keeping to agreements over cost, ensuring delays are kept to a minimum, and maintaining good lines of communication. If lawyers stick to these simple principles, I predict they won’t go far wrong,” he said.

I simply dont understand why a volume approach should necessarily result in a decline in quality of service or an increase in customer complaints. Not a fair analogy I know but I recently visited an engineering plant which provided parts for the automotive industry where the permitted failure rate was 1 part in a million. Technological development has enabled this to happen – it wasnt always so. Similarly businesses engaging in the volume end of the legal market will have to quickly develop ways of identifying those cases which dont fit neatly into their processes and find other equally fast and efficient systems to deal with those. Those that dont wont just wont survive,

stephen levett on December 11th, 2012 at 9:54 am

I have been a Licensed Conveyancer since 1988. I really don’t see the need for the Society of Licensed Conveyancers to create a quality scheme similar to the Law Society’s CQS.
Unlike the Law Society overseeing solicitors dealing with many different aspects of the law, the Council for Licensed Conveyancers governs the functions of Licensed Conveyancers which only relate to conveyancing and probate.
What more can the Society of Licensed Conveyancers do that the Council for Licensed Conveyancers already oversee?

Peter raises a very good point. I think the answer is nothing albeit added expense for the consumer and no doubt a healthy profit for the service provider.

Conveyancing is getting a bit like the next gold rush where every man and his dog is inventing a new product to sell to the hard pressed ” conveyancing miner” another week another risk mitigator is pushed down our throat.

Back of please. product providers. we are all sick to the back teeth of the constant hard selling of commercial schemes or new searches.

You could also argue the substantial extra cost of LeO & the LSB is not really adding any value to the consumer either.

Legal Futures Blog

With cyber-crime making the headlines more and more frequently, it is becoming increasingly important that law firms of all sizes understand how to handle such a situation professionally and keep their reputation intact. Here are some steps any law firm can take to help ensure that a cyber-attack or data breach doesn’t cost them their client base.