Recent Articles

ICANN has announced who will act as its Board Directors for the next three years. Meeting all expectations, its independent Nominating Committee has chosen people already well known and connected within the ICANN community amid several executives from multi-national corporations that help fund ICANN.

However, critics' accusations that the whole process has been undemocratic and reiterates the charge that the body running the Internet is a self-serving elite, fall short.

Although the Nominating Committee contains a clear majority of people intricately tied with the existing clique running ICANN, and despite the facts that all meetings were carried out behind closed doors to procedures that will not be divulged, ICANN has stuck to the word of its democratic founding creed.

Over-seeing the delayed transition to a full voted-for board was NomCom chair Linda Wilson. Ms Wilson has bravely stayed on the Board since ICANN's inception, despite monthly calls to retire. She has braved criticism for remaining on the Board after she promised to step down after one year. She has also dismissed accusations of abuse when an emergency measure was introduced to give herself and fellow Board members a further two years in charge. She has also faced anger when she again extended her term another two years (something that the ICANN bylaws had to be rewritten to accommodate). And finally, she dealt with malcontents when she and others gave themselves another four years in a ruling position. No one then was better able to preside over who should join the ICANN Board.

Although the Board positions that the Internet community itself directly elects (as written into the founding rules of ICANN) had to be scrapped in order to make way for people who better understood ICANN's aims and motives, the democratic spirit lives on. Five representatives chosen by the At Large Advisory Committee were allowed to vote in NomCom meetings against 12 other representatives from ICANN bodies.

Not only that but members of the public were permitted to put their name forward to be considered by the NomCom. In the end, 110 people offered their services and the Committee wisely chose those names that it was already familiar with and could be certain would do the right job - as defined by ICANN bylaws. The new Net folk heros will be introduced at ICANN's Montreal meeting next week.

So with justice done although not seen to be done, let's review those shining beacons of Internet democracy, as chosen by those that know best. (We have to confess though, the concept of choosing at the same time different groups of differently numbered people to serve entirely different terms follows a logic that can only have come from ICANN.)