David Megginson wrote:
>
> The problem is that the model as presented is naively simple, and the
> WG failed to notice that the XML syntax is not based directly on that
> simple model.
>
So the question arises "Is the model over-simplified,
is the XML syntax uneccesary complicated, or both?"
Best regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII
www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de