Conspiracy, HAARP, Earthquakes, Volcano's, Weather Modification, H1N1, Swine Flu, NWO, Politics, and other hedonistic topical articles from The CEO & Czar of The Committee In My Head. Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.

The Senate-passed bill cleared the House on a 219-212 vote and is now on it’s way to President Obama’s desk for signing.

President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and senior staff, react in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, as the House passes the health care reform bill, March 21, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

“So this is how liberty dies… with thunderous applause.” – Senator Amidala

As previously noted at, https://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/heath-care-reform-bill-vs-constitution/ the Health Care Bill has more pages than War and Peace, has nearly five times as many words as the Torah, and its tables of contents alone run far longer than this story…it clocks in at 1,990 pages and about 400,000 words. With an estimated 10-year cost of $894 billion, that comes out to about $2.24 million per word….Republicans aide said a print-out of the bill weighs more than 19 pounds and stands nearly nine inches tall.

How fast can Obama read it? Will he even bother, or just sign it again avoiding the transparency he promised and repeatedly has broken? The legislation still is not posted at http://www.whitehouse.gov/.

The Obama Administration officially abandoned the President’s “Sunlight before Signing” campaign pledge [volokh.com] that the White House would post all legislation passed by Congress for at least five days before the President would sign it. In making this announcement, the Administration maintained that it would comply with the spirit, if not the letter, of the original commitment by posting legislation on the White House site once it became clear legislation would eventually pass and make it to the President’s desk. This new commitment, they suggested, would actually provide even greater sunlight, as some bills would be available for review earlier and for a longer time. Well, this promise is no longer operative either, as the Cato Institute’s Jim Harper details [www.cato-at-liberty.org]. http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read.php?40,211456,213807,quote=1

To provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans, Harry Reid http://reid.senate.gov/ has ensured that this can never be repealed. From an email we received:

Beginning on page 1,000 of the measure, Section 3403 reads in part: “it shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection.”

In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section 3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in Congress wish otherwise.

Note that the subsection at issue here concerns the regulatory power of the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) to “reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending.”

“American Indians don’t have to buy Medical insurance; Those with religious objections or a financial hardship can also avoid the requirement according to http://twitter.com/Warof2010.” I wonder if the millions of people participating in entitlement programs like Welfare will be exempt?

President Barack Obama's aunt, Zeituni Onyango, right, a native of Kenya, departs with an unidentified companion after requesting asylum at a closed immigration hearing Thursday, Feb. 4, 2010, in Boston. Onyango, half-sister of Obama's late father, moved to the United States in 2000. Her first asylum request was rejected, and she was ordered deported in 2004. She didn't leave and continued to live in public housing in Boston. (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds)

Will Obama’s Kenyan aunt Zeituni Onyango qualify for universal health care too? Her pre-existing condition of Guillain-Barré syndrome would certainly be covered. Is she still collecting benefits? Wonder where she is living?

Obama said on the White House Blog, http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/03/22/what-change-looks , “So this isn’t radical reform. But it is major reform. This legislation will not fix everything that ails our health care system. But it moves us decisively in the right direction. This is what change looks like.”

President Obama is expected to sign the health care bill Tuesday at the earliest. Only then can the Senate begin dealing with the reconciliation package. According to Senate rules, members are allowed to offer unlimited amendments and challenges to the reconciled bill….Boehner had said the revised health care bill was worse than the original legislation, adding that the “American people are going to hear about every payoff, every kickback and every sweetheart deal that comes out.” http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/22/senate.health.care.ahead/

As the Senate still has to sign off on the changes, every single member needs to read the U.S. Constitution, occupying four sheets of parchment, containing 4, 543 words that clearly outline why this piece of legislation is illegal.

U.S Constitution, Article I, Section VII, Clause II.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively…

The majority of the American people object, Mr. President.

Just 41% of voters favor the plan while 54% are opposed. Those figures include 26% who Strongly Favor the plan and 45% who are Strongly Opposed. Most voters believe it will raise the cost of health care and reduce the quality of care. Still, nearly two-out-of-three voters believe it is at least somewhat likely to pass and become law.

Help spread the word. SUBSCRIBE NOW and Follow us on Twitter (by clicking in the side margin) or sign up at http://twitter.com/ so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to re-tweet, so all your friends get the heads up too.

Is it Constitutional Law or Common Law that dictates the qualification of a natural born citizen and eligibility to hold the office of President? I don’t think the Supreme Court is certain who has standing in seeking out the true citizenship and authentic birth certificate of President Elect Obama. SCOTUS will be gathering in conference this Friday, December 5, 2008 to find out. The Supreme Court judges will hopefully not deviate from their responsibility, which is the strict interpretation of written law. I hope they will allow both the Berg and Donofrio cases to proceed against the grain of popularity, and with the scale of justice.

“Judge Surrick claimed
the DNC’s promises were not actually promises but
instead of statement of intentions. Judge Surrick
went on further claiming, “The ‘promises’ that
Petitioner identifies arc statements of principle and
intent in the political realm. They are not enforceable
promises under contract law. Indeed, our political
system could not function if every political message
articulated by a campaign could be characterized as
a legally binding contact enforceable by individual
voters. Of course, voters are free to vote out of office
those politicians seen to have breached campaign
promises and Federal courts, however, are not and
31
cannot be in the business of enforcing political
rhetoric.”

Ain’t that a kick in the pants? It all goes back to the fact that if Philip J. Berg, American citizen, and former attorney general of Pennsylvania doesn’t have the “standing” to bring this type of lawsuit against Obama, then who in America does have standing? How is it that the lower court has decided that a citizen can not enforce there own Constitution in a court of law?

Essek and Hunter have put themselves out there for scrutiny, whatever there motives. They as citizens, voters and wanna be elected officials, are pursuing fair competition for a fair election. In all fairness to Obama, I haven’t seen their birth certificates either, but I’d bet they show you theirs if you showed them yours. Don’t forget about Alan Keyes, former Reagan administration official, Ambassador and presidential candidate was among petitioners who filed an action last Thursday in the Superior Court of California seeking a court order enjoining Barack Obama’s California Electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until documentation showing the president-elect’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president is produced.

Shame, shame on Hawaii. Is it still that easy to obtain a fraudulent birth certificate in Hawaii? OMG- talk about a loophole in national security. How can Governor Lingle in good conscious allow this to continue? No wonder Andy Martin has been so persistent. Here we have a government, capable of tracking our every move and it still issues documents to people born in foreign lands.

“I’m a simple guy. Tell me what the rules are, apply those rules to everyone equally and I am a happy camper. However, if you tell me what the rules are, apply them to only some of us and throw them away when it suits you, I am not a happy camper.”

Humph, I am not happy and I don’t think another lick on my Tootsie Roll Tootsie Pop is going to make a bit of difference. Oh wait- isn’t Tootsie Roll HQ in Chicago? Ah huh, another suspect in Obama’s circle of friends like Ayers and Rezko coming from Chicago. I just bit into the tootsie roll part and lost a filling. Go figure.

The birth certificate issue really isn’t about Obama, it is more about the law.

Since not one single person in the whole word has ever seen President Elect Obama’s birth certificate, other than maybe him, one wonders if those pursuing his eligibility all the way to SCOTUS- The Supreme Court, have given thought that it is illegal to hire illegal aliens and that the Electoral College could be found in contempt by not verifying his birth certificate. He may very well be just as illegal as his Auntie Zeituni in Boston.

“Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief…..An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts.” http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersbcdd

Couldn’t a reasonable person infer from the fact that he has hidden his birth certificate that he has hidden the truth and may not only be illegal, but unable to hold the Office of President?

A lot of excellent workers are legal aliens and have green cards to allow them to get up ‘n go to work here in the land of the free home of the brave but not for the job of President. Obama has never shown us his birth certificate. He has already, admitted he had Kenyan citizenship on his website, “Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.” http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate. Whereby having had dual citizenship should have preempted him, it hasn’t so far, and perhaps then a natural born citizen means a “citizens of the United States at birth” as defined by U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401. Maybe he is eligible, maybe he is not.

Civilian Obama has said, “He did drugs at one point” Pot and Cocaine being his choice. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240992,00.html Should the potential leader of the free world undergo random drug testing(s)? Employers do it to employees all the time. I kinda doubt Obama uses illegal substances, he still smokes cigarettes and should be allowed to light up a Marlboro whenever the heck he feel like it, better than a joint with his finger on a nuclear missile.

“I believe what the country is looking for is someone who is open, honest and candid about themselves, said Robert Gibbs, Obama’s spokesman. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR2007010201359.html Also citing the WaPo,Obama said, “I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind.” Some twenty years later the question of who Obama is, still lingers. Silence seems to be golden when it comes to his birth certificate. In these matters, Obama for being a tall man, has fallen far short of being open, honest and candid.

There are a lot of lines left blank on his job application. Where are his college transcripts that the rest of us are required to produce when applying for a job. In order to enter the military you have to pass the physical, but our future Commander and Chief Obama, in his infinite wisdom, deferred to a one page document that said he is good health.

Not many immigration cases or failed drug tests get prosecuted or punished. The punishment the U.S. Constitution will have gotten if Obama is found ineligible, would be a punishment that America should not have to bear.

The Supreme Court has not decided to hear any matters regarding Obama’s citizenship or the election-yet. Friday, December 5, 2008 will be a big day for America and Leo Donofrio whose case has a conference before all nine Judges. The most interesting thing to date about his case is that DONOFRIO V. WELLS was distributed for conference of December 5, 2008 by the entire Court after a prior referral of the application by Justice Thomas.

There is a great argument on whether the issue of his citizenship relies on the Constitutional Law or Common Law over at the Texas Darling Website and it you have a clear moment is certainly worth the read- In part, “The Common Law has always been conflicted on the subject of dual allegiance and naturalization, read Mackenzie and Cockburn. I never said it wasn’t. The Common Law has always allowed limitations, take a look at the various Acts of Succession, Union and Settlement. There is nothing in the natural-born citizen clause to make a Common Law lawyer blink for one second. “To all intents and purposes” is an outright acknowledgment that one is dealing with a fiction which may be ignored at will by the Common Law, it could as easily read “As if”. That is the source of my disagreement with Aleinikoff’s view. If I say, “I accept, to all intents and purposes, that John Doe is a citizen of the United States”, I am saying (a) that I do not know that he is, (b) that I do not believe that he is, or that I strongly doubt the proposition, and (c) that I will nonetheless act upon the supposition that he is until such time as the proposition is either proved or disproved. If you apply English Common Law, as it stands today, Obama would be eligible; if you apply Australian Common Law, as it stands today, he wouldn’t be; if you apply Canadian Common Law, as it stands today, his position would be in doubt. If you regard the US Constitution as a Common Law document he isn’t eligible under US Common Law. ” http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-reply-to-donofrio/#more-5277 and beats the whole issue with a stick very eloquently here http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/natural-born-citizens-or-how-to-beat-a-subject-to-death-with-a-stick/ .

“The Republican Party of Lincoln has become the party of deceit, dissimulation, duplicity, and double-dealing. The party that claims a moral high ground is seemingly without morality when it comes to the seats of power – they will and have done anything and everything to discredit their opponents as they grapple for control.” http://amusedpen.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/a-vile-gop/ unloads on the GOP like there is no tomorrow and blames this citizenship mess on Republicans. It misses the whole point that Obama should just take the moral high ground.

You and I are his employer. You and I pay his salary. I want his birth certificate. I want a President who qualifies under the U.S. Constitution. I want the Supreme Court to Uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution and Common Law. Of course, I want to hit the mega zillion lottery. Don’t you want it all too?

Black, White, Yellow, or any other shade of peoples, Americans must believe in Red, White and Blue on Election Day. The world looks to America for leadership and stability and when we deviate in our path of Democracy and fair elections, we subject ourselves to further erosion of our power to the world. America and it’s allies helped allow for the first voting in 50 years in Iraq with the means of dipping a finger into purple ink, it is not so easy to identify a voter in America, nor should it be. There is a whole variety of problems that we can anticipate. In early voting, usually in favor of Democratic Candidates, we have already seen challenges at the polls. On Election Day, indeed we may have voting machine manipulation and malfunction, polling places that run out of paper, long lines, and a potential that precincts could be overwhelmed by an outpouring of voters. Just imagine in Chicago, if the turnout is so massive with 8 hour waits and not every voter gets to vote, what kind of voter unrest could occur?

Only last year, with the results from Kenya’s closely contested elections still up in the air and evidence growing of election mischief, riots and ethnic clashes erupted across the country. Kenya is east Africa’s most stable and prosperous democracy but rioting killed hundreds after the election. Raila Odinga, who was leading in the polls prior to the election was the candidate Obama had been campaigning for but he lost his election to Mwai Kibaki. All the more reason that Obama’s lack of interference in his Aunt Zeituni’s plea for US Asylum seems suspect.

This historic presidential contest will feature either America’s first black President or first female Vice President. Iraqi’s went to the polls in the face of real threats, I don’t think Americans will. Clearly though, the unspoken concern among some is that a surprise Obama loss could lead to suspicion of foul play and violence could ensue in cities with large “black populations based on previous riots in urban areas.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riot. “So let me get this straight: No matter what happens, we should expect blacks to riot. If this isn’t racist, then call me David Duke in a sundress.” http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,443958,00.html

We’ve seen “emergency-preparedness” steps taken in Denver before the DNC and at every campaign rally Obama and McCain have attended and nothing major has happened. We’ve prepared for Y2K and nothing happened. In case all hell breaks loose, we will be duly prepared in major cities and do not forget that the Army’s Brigade Homeland Tour of U.S. Combat troops have been repatriated from Iraq to help with any civil unrest.

.S. Army Field Manual 19-15, Civil Disturbances, 1985, is the current doctrinal reference on civil disturbances. Most tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP) addressed in this manual were developed from experiences gained during domestic riots in the 1960s. There is no Army doctrine on the use of non-lethal weapons and munitions. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/call/call_00-7_ch1.htm. Some rioters have become quite sophisticated at understanding and withstanding the tactics used by police. Manuals for successful rioting are available on the Internet and encourage rioters to get the press involved, as there is more safety with the cameras rolling. The National Lawyers Guild has produced a 31 page document called “Legal Observer Training Manual. http://www.nlg.org/resources/LO_Manual.pdf

President Roosevelt once said, “In politics there are no accidents. If it happens you can bet it was planned that way.” I hardly think people will take to the streets, nor will the service of the Army, The National Guard, or riot troops be necessary. We are a patient people and have endured two years of campaigning with no unrest. Election Day occurs on a school and work night with honest to God people who have to get up and go to work, and many of McCain supporters will be sleeping well before the results are in. No matter who wins, I believe in widespread respect for the law and while I encourage you to vote McCain, my prediction is that nothing will happen. That’s my theory anyways.

Less than 72 hours to go, and McCain’s campaign is pushing an “anti-Obama” message and a Pro-McCain message second. Rumors continue to circle like sharks smelling blood around Obama, his family and his associates. As usual the MSM- Main Stream Media has pretty much ignored Obama shortcomings and instead focused on polls surmising an Obama Victory. McCain managed a one point lead over Obama last week but then Zogby decided to average out the polling for three days in a row, and ta-da, Obama is back in the Main Stream News leading by a huge margin . “Remember, as I said yesterday, one day does not make a trend. This is a three-day rolling average and no changes have been tectonic.” said pollster, John Zogby http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1627

Obama’s anti-rumor plan, it seems has worked. Rather than continuing to answer questions directly about lingering questions like: his citizenship, former relationships with terrorists like William Ayers, his ministry with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the missing L.A. Times tape, or most recently his Aunt who is not only an illegal alien but illegally donated to his campaign, Obama instead has relied on his website fightthesmears.com to alleviate any lingering questions. http://www.fightthesmears.com/ Apparently the Obama campaign is too busy to provide a statement at this time regarding his Aunt, the L.A. Times Tape, or any of the pending litigation against him like Berg vs Obama on his site.

Obama was quoted in a mid-June Times article saying, “”We have seen this before. There is dirt and lies that are circulated in e-mails, and they pump them out long enough until finally you, a mainstream reporter, asks me about it,” Obama said, bristling. “That gives legs to the story. If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.” America has asked repeatedly for clarifications, yet Obama fails to answer directly.

In the matter of Obama’s aunt, Obama couldn’t even manage to make a comment himself instead relying on spokesman Ben LaBolt, saying that the campaign was returning $265 dollars donated by the aunt to her nephew’s campaign.

While McCain has often wavered in his message, Obama’s from day one has said “What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon — that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize.”- Barack Obama, June 3, 2008. I find it disheartening to know that I and other citizens who merely question his policies are demonizing him and unpatriotic.

McCain too has had his fair share of citizenship eligibility questions lobbed at him. In April of this year, a number of Obama’s congressional supporters – including Gov. Claire McCaskill (D-MOi), Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and Sen. James Webb (D-VA) –proposed and passed a Resolution (S.Res.511) entitled: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen. http://www.tulsatoday.com/newsdesk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1775&Itemid=2This was the Resolution:
· Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;
· Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;· Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;
· Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;
· Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
· Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
· Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
· Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United Calendar No. 715110th CONGRESS2d SessionS. RES. 511RESOLUTIONRecognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen. April 24, 2008. Reported without amendment Statess

Whereas, since it was entered into Congressional Records as fact, McCain did not have to provide a birth certificate and neither does Obama, clearly circumventing the Constitution. No such Congressional record exsisits to recognize that Baraq Obama is natural born. According to Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer: “The president, The Supreme Court justices, and all members of Congress, have taken an oath to defend and protect the Constitution and have an affirmative duty to protect the Constitution by doing whatever is necessary to insure that presidential (and congressional) candidates meet the Constitutional requirements for the offices they seek. It is a mandatory duty, and failure to do so violate their oaths of office. If they don’t follow this oath in Obama’s case, it will be the biggest swindle in American history, allowing Obama and the DNC to have concealed his true identity and lack of citizenship, thereby conning Democrats out of hundreds of millions of dollars of campaign contributions. If justice is served, dozens of `leading’ Democrats should go to prison for fraud.” from Tulsa Today.

http://www.youdontsay.org/Thoughts.htm Raymond Kraft on his own site, today wrote, ” Once again we have a candidate with wondrous and multitudinous promises. Just vote for him and joy and happiness will forever be ours. All of our wishes will be granted. All of our needs will be met. All of our fears will be banished. Because a vote for the anointed one is a vote for change: glorious, blessed, momentous change! Historians will remind us that Fidel Castro promised change as well. Karl Marx promised change. Adolf Hitler promised change. People bought into those fantasies, not thinking that a promise for change is a blank check for good or bad, anything but the status quo. Historians should also remind us that in almost all such instances, promises of change did not serve the people well.”

Obama doesn’t bother to take care of your his own family members let alone citizens of America. Obama’s Aunt Zeituni Onyango, from Kenya is living in the the United States illegally and living in the Boston projects – just up the road from the Harvard Law School that Obama attended. WASHINGTON (AP) – Barack Obama’s aunt, a Kenyan woman who has been quietly living in public housing in Boston, is in the United States illegally after an immigration judge rejected her request for asylum four years ago, The Associated Press has learned. Zeituni Onyango, 56, referred to as “Aunti Zeituni” in Obama’s memoir, “Dreams of my Father” was instructed to leave the United States by a U.S. immigration judge who denied her asylum request. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D945SVMO1&show_article=1 She decided to stay in the US and why wouldn’t she with her nephew slated in some polls to win the Presidency of the USA?

No further details were given by the AP as to how much Onyango has received in federal benefits; whether it’s limited to public housing, or includes food stamps, SSI, or other government hand outs as well. The story was originally brought to light http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5042571.ece and said ” Speaking outside her home in Flaherty Way, South Boston, on Tuesday, Ms Onyango, 56, confirmed she was the “Auntie Zeituni” in Mr Obama’s memoir. She declined to answer most other questions about her relationship with the presidential contender until after the November 4 election. “I can’t talk about it, I just pray for him, that’s all,” she said, adding: “After the 4th, I can talk to anyone.” I can’t wait to hear what Auntie Z she has to say. Does Aunt Z know something about where Obama was born? Did Obama himself ask her not to talk to the press until after the election? How could her wealthy nephew, who is running for the Presidency, ignore her plight when easily as a Senator could have asked for intervention and review of her case?

It would only be natural for Obama’s Aunt Zeituni to want to support her nephew and so far she has contributed $260 toward Obama’s campaign. http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=name&lname=Onyango&fname=Zeituni&search=Search The problem in financially supporting Obama is that it is against the law for a foreigner to contribute to an election. Under federal election law, only U.S. citizens or green-card holders are legally permitted to give money to campaigns. Onyango, who listed her employer as the Boston Housing Authority, gave in small increments to the Obama campaign. Her latest contribution was $5 on Sept. 19. I wonder if the Federal Elections Committee is going to ask That One to give her a refund or even bother with scrutinizing any of the donations he has received in $5- $ 25 increments .http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/01/obamas-radical.html wrote back in January 2008 about his half sister Maya Soetoro-Ng. They have the same mother but have different fathers. She is quoted to say, about him being a Muslim, “it has been erroneously attached to my brother, The man has been a Christian for twenty years.” that One has been a Christian for 20 years, what was he the other years? A Muslim?

If we add up Obama’s alleged half brother in Kenya living in a hut on a dollar a month and an aunt from Kenya living here illegally, throw in twenty years as a Christian and we must question Obama’s family values and character once again. America can not trust Obama as far as you can see him.

Is Obama a racist in visiting and caring for his white grandmother, with whom he just visited in Hawaii, while his black aunt and black half brother live in poverty?

Perhaps Obama has aligned himself to the Ownership Society more than previously thought. In his Democratic Candidates acceptance speech he said of McCain, “For over two decades, he’s subscribed to that old, discredited Republican philosophy – give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. In Washington, they call this the Ownership Society, but what it really means is – you’re on your own. Out of work? Tough luck. No health care? The market will fix it. Born into poverty? Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps – even if you don’t have boots. You’re on your own http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Conventions/story?id=5680403&page=1

Apparently Aunt Zeituni is on her own and Mr. & Mrs. Obama will not be spreading any of that wealth they have earned around to keep her out of public housing.