Comments

Dear Carolyn,
this Gordon Duff character did not hang up because you did not “know” enough,
he hang up because you didn’t BELIEVE enough!
You did not buy his BS.
Because you have common sense!

I hate these figures who are so “super smart” and tell us:
“oh the paperclip Nazis took over NASA and by NASA the whole USA and now they want to take over the whole world by the NWO!”

These idiots right out of Alex Jonestown are like cult followers, who believe in their voodoo history like in a religion.
Despite it’s totally wrong!
And all people with common sense and sanity are immediately their enemies.

These types are pretty much like the kind of ufologists who tell you, all aliens are demons and to prevent an abduction you have to call out the name of Geeezuz.
Simply insane.

One cannot talk to such idiots.
So I am glad that this interview didn’t get published.

The paperclip scientists, were formost scientists who lived for their scientific work, or they were oportunists.
But at the end, 1945, they’re all traitors from the German perspective, because they decided to work for the former enemy.

So much for the “convinced” “Nazis”.

Many of them were just glad to have survived the war, to be able to make a living, to continue their work in their field of science.
And at the end they just were war bounty, slaves.
In no way they took over NASA nor the USA.

It makes me sick to here that the father of the space program, the genius who brought man to the moon, Wernher von Braun, gets constantly called a “Nazi” and “war criminal” by certain insane circles these days.

Uninformed stupid people!

He just lived for his dream: man in space.
Is that the thanks to a millenium genius America?

And for Prescott Bush, he certainly was no Nationalsocialist, perhaps he sympathisized with certain aspects of this Weltanschauung, as many Americans back then did (Ford, Lindbergh etc.)

But at the end he only was interested in the influence he could possibly gain in Germany and by that buisness and money making.
As today all the big shots, Gates, Buffett etc. do buisness with China without being a Communist and doing buisness with Saudi Arabia without being a crazy Wahabist.
Money talks.
That was and is what these big capitalists are interested in! ONLY!

So ol’ Prescott could never be a Nationalsocialist!
Because he was a raptor capitalist and bound to many secret societies, like Skull&Bones and the Freemasons.
That would have brought him to a special place in Germany, a place with barb wire and German shepherds.

Yes we used Krupp and Thyssen in the first battle years and their financial support, because they had nationalistic compassion for the new movement.
But they were the old kind of nationalists, 19th century nationalists.
They would never have become real Nationalsocialists.

They only got spared, because for what they did for the movement in the beginning and what they did for the German worker and Germany’s economy!
Otherwise they never would have been accepted by the Nationalsocialists.

Did you read this sorehead Gordon Duff?
I hope that put some common sense in your empty head!

teuton suet on
December 9th, 2010 2:02 am

“John Joseph Loftus (February 12, 1950, Boston, Massachusetts) is an American author, former US government prosecutor and former Army intelligence officer. He is a president of The Intelligence Summit and, although he is not Jewish, a president of the Florida Holocaust Museum.” -Wikipedia

Loftus is a Zionist spin doctor who appears occasionally on Dave Emory’s anti-fascist Spitfire program on fm and Internet radio. He was involved in helping get a Palestinian activist college professor teaching in Florida, Sami Al-Arian, stripped of his job and deported. Emory has been on the radio for almost two decades promoting his “Martin Bormann went to Brazil and set up a 4th Reich with the Muslim Brotherhood” theory which Loftus reinforces when he’s not managing his holocaust museum, hosting Intelligence Summits (weekend wing-dings or neo-cons) and using holocaust legal legerdemain to go after whatever isn’t nailed down for organized Jewry .

Gordon Duff is full of duff.

AJHenry on
December 12th, 2010 12:25 pm

Very interesting show, Carolyn. Thanks. Mr. Duff is a curious case. It really isn’t very plausible for him to be so well-informed and able to question to the Holocaust story yet be out there flogging the Bush-Nazi herring.

Carolyn on
December 12th, 2010 5:14 pm

@A German,

You’re a sharp guy —–

“So I am glad that this interview didn’t get published.”

I was glad shortly afterward and I get more glad all the time because it would never have come off. I’ve been reading some of his older articles and listening to some past interviews; it’s now quite clear to me he’s working for somebody. His zingers are usually directed at Hitler/Nazis/Third Reich and Fox New/Rupert Murdoch. Those are Alan Hart’s favorite bad boys too, and a few others I could name. Just coincidence?

He’s also said he “went insane for awhile and joined the Marine Corp while in college,” functioned as a sniper as well as paper-shuffler and “shot a few people.” He was afterward a defense contractor, worked in surveillance/security and space-related technology. Then he was a banker with an International bank, then a “diplomat” with the U.N., which he still is.

Now he starts a little website standing up for veterans??

None of this got into my program that airs tomorrow night [13th] but it’s still one of my best shows.

It’s no secret that Duff is at least 1/4 Jewish, from his mother. That’s what he says.

“A lot of good material” shows up on all sites, but when it’s mixed with bad material, what do you make of it? Do you say they’re stuck in a particular paradigm which is false, but they still have good material? I don’t say that anymore.

From today’s Veteran’s Today: Gordon Duff is pulling out Charles Carlson for the first time [that I know of]. Charles is someone I like and admire and believe is sincere. Duff *uses* Charles’ work to advance his own anti-Christian, pro-Jew “paradigm.” And in doing so, he can also remind us that the ADL is for *ultra-nationalism.* Ultra-nationalist is one of Duff’s key “bad words.” Here is Duff:

Carlson, Charles E., is hated by the ADL, the fanatic ultra-nationalist organization that works to stifle free speech in American and works hand in hand with Israeli intelligence agencies
[...]
Jews should know their enemy. It is AIPAC and the ADL, the shills of banking interests and criminal organizations who have hijacked Jewish organizations through trickery and petty gangsterism. These are the pure anti-Semites and dedicated, perhaps purposefully, perhaps inadvertently, to the destruction of everything worthwhile about Jewish culture and tradition, one of the most vital parts of America’s “melting pot.” End Duff

Do you like this? What is it really all about?

Carolyn on
December 15th, 2010 5:53 pm

@tanstaafl,

Thank you for posting the url to my program on your very interesting site. I’m reading the comments on your Gordon Duff page. I think the interest in it will grow. I’ll let people know about it myself.

A German on
December 17th, 2010 3:13 am

Duffstein 1/4 Jew?
No wonder that he wants to sell us voodoo history.
He has the LIE in his veines.

470 pages
His sources: all military archives, especially German and Russian archives
His results: “The common believed theory Germany forayed the USSR is wrong! It was a preemptive strike!!!
To stop the coming invasion of the Red Army!!!

“The most recent evidence confirms what German interrogations of captured Soviet officers revealed in 1941, that Stalin was in fact planning to attack Hitler at the first opportune moment. For approximately fifty years this idea has bas been either dismissed as beneath contempt or savagely attacked, despite the fact that it
conforms to the pattern of Soviet behavior both before 1939 and after 1945.
So the recent evidence contradicts a long established Stalinist legend, and certainly explains Hitler’s motivation: his attack on the Soviet Union was a preemptive strike.” (p.82)

“a long established Stalinist legend (the German assault)”
That’s why cou so vicously attack the truth johnUKommunist!

A German on
December 18th, 2010 12:11 pm

QUOTE:
“After the collapse of the USSR the intentions
enumerated in Hoffmann and Suvarov were confirmed, most notably by Pleshakov (Stalin’s Folly), but by other Russian scholars as well (see the extensive citation in
Stalin’s Folly, 285).” (note 49/p.397)”

A German on
December 18th, 2010 12:30 pm

QUOTE:
“nearly all cases, Hitler was right in his decisions

Hitler understood that modern wars were more economic in nature—conflicts to seize resources

One of Hitler’s accurate complaints about his generals was they understood
nothing about ‘the economic aspects of warfare’( p.31)

‘My generals
know nothing about the economic aspects of war.’(pp.131-2)

Far from a German military growing weaker in both manpower and armor etc.
year by year, he demonstrates that it progressively grew stronger in troops, armor, in all forms
of effective firepower, and in quality of leadership both tactical and strategic. The Russian
resources, presented as limitless and leaping in strength, were steadily diminishing.

What is revealed is that the casualties on both sides reflected a ratio of about 5:1 favoring the
German forces. With a USSR population of about 170 million at that time and a German
population of close to 100 million, the Russians could not long sustain a ratio of greater than
2:1. In other words, the attrition rate was bleeding Russia dry in manpower. Hitler understood
this and wisely strove to continue the process. Hence his ‘stand fast’ orders in 1941 and later,
causing further attritive combats resulting in tremendous disparities in losses, again favoring
Germany.

However, he makes clear that Germany very nearly completely defeated
the Soviets without it in 1941

most of
the Soviet civilian losses during the war were a direct result of Stalin’s orders and not German
actions per se

An interesting and unique conclusion drawn by the author is that the Soviet Union’s gigantic
manpower losses and physical destruction suffered during the war, ultimately led to the collapse
of communism in that country several decades later. If this is so, then Adolf Hitler is the man or
agent to be credited with that seminal event. But at the very least, he did in fact prevent most of
Europe from being overrun by Stalin’s henchmen in 1941—something which almost no one today
is willing to admit. [see Mosier's detailed, convincing discussion of the long-term social and
economic effects of the manpower losses, pp.364-367]“

A German on
December 18th, 2010 12:46 pm

QUOTE:
“Mosier’s close look at the nature of Soviet ‘truth’ and ‘reality’

Stalin’s ‘reality’

way into the archives, to be later used by historians, journalists, and others seeking to
determine wartime numbers

Stalin’s myths.

Stalin’s crimes in the GULAG and ‘Great Terror’
Stalin himself would not accept contradiction and was infamous for punishing those who gave
him unpleasant news. One case involved a major leader in Soviet aviation

Marxist dictum

‘all things are political’ dictates that truth, history, literature, everything in fact, must be made to
serve the revolutionary goals of Marxism-Leninism. The nature of truth itself thus defined,
technically speaking, i.e. at least from their point of view, propounds the idea that Marxists are
not technically ‘lying’ when fabricating myths and scripts about World War II or how the USSR
won the war.”

Participating right-wing parties:
FPÖ, strong Austrian right wing party, now obviously zionist, with chairman H.C. Strache
FREIHEIT German micro zionist right wing party from Berlin, with chairman Rene Stadtkewitz, he got tossed out of the conservative party CDU in Berlin
Flamsbelang, a strong Flamish zionist right wing party, with chairman Philip Dewinter

Geert Wilder seems not to have attended, because he’s pilgriming to Israel every month anyway.

First they went to the wailing wall for a group-kippa-on-your-head.
Then they were visitig the radical Jewish Schas-party in the Knesset.
Who have a picture of rabbi Yosef Ovadia on their wall!!!
The rabbi who recently said:
“The Goyim only exist for one purpose, to serve us Jews!
The Goyim are cattle and have to work for us, so we can sit and eat like an Efendi (master)”

And then they flattered the Jews, how “democratic” they’re, that they shall hold all the stolen land, that only Muzzies are the terrorists, no word about Israeli state terrorism, and that only Islam is the danger in Europe and that “we” (the right wing zionists jewslaves and the Jews) have to stick together.

And what’s really funny, they speak of an islamic menace and that Europe and Israel has to stick together against it, but these jewslaves totally forget that Israel is ongoingly pushing for an EU membership for Turkey. Like Bush did and Obama does now!

SIMPLY DISGUSTING these Geertlings!

johnUK on
December 24th, 2010 1:31 am

@A German

Instead of a surprise attack on the innocent Russians, Mosier has concluded that the war was a pre-emptive strike on a predator poised to invade Germany and Europe. Victor Suvarov—the author of the path-breaking work Icebreaker and the later Chief Culprit—and Joachim Hoffmann—author of Stalin’s War of Extermination—are cited respectfully as important sources

Suvarov (Rezin) as a source. LOL!

Do I have to go over his work yet again and the fraudulent assessments he made?

I wonder if John Mosier has tenure at his university, and what sort of flak he is catching from his institution and from his colleagues.

They will laugh there as off at him.

The book unfortunately lacks a bibliography and illustrations, but does have a number of excellent maps and a fine and detailed notes section.

How convenient.

My review: Good use for toilet paper but as it has no illustrations so it is not as good as the Bin Ladin toilet roll.

@johnUKommunist
You didn’t read carefully!
Mosier quoted Suwrow and MANY OTHER RUSSIAN MILITARY HISTORIANS!
You have to buy Mosier’s book and look up the appendices, there are their names!

It’s not only Suworow.

And just because it doesn’t fir in your Neo Soviet view of the world, it doesn’t disprove Suwrow in any way.
You can write it as often as you want and smear Suwrow, that does mean nothing!

And I recently talked to an older comrade, his father was fighting in Russia from 1941 till 1944, until he got heavily wounded,
and he always said to his son, just with common sense:

“Son, in the first weeks we marched into Russia, we captured millions, MILLIONS of Soviet soldiers and destroyed THOUSANDS of their tanks.
Why if Stalin didn’t intend to stab us in the back, did he mass so many troops at his western border???
I tell you, we just were a few weeks earlier!”

johnUK on
December 26th, 2010 7:54 pm

Victor Suvarov—the author of the path-breaking work Icebreaker and the later Chief Culprit—and Joachim Hoffmann—author of Stalin’s War of Extermination—are cited respectfully as important sources

“important” as in primary sources?

“Son, in the first weeks we marched into Russia, we captured millions, MILLIONS of Soviet soldiers and destroyed THOUSANDS of their tanks.
Why if Stalin didn’t intend to stab us in the back, did he mass so many troops at his western border???
I tell you, we just were a few weeks earlier!”

Then he is a fool for falling for state propaganda.

Why wouldn’t the Soviets mass all their available forces on the border where the Germans army were especially after the outbreak of war between Poland and Germany with Poland being a crucial buffer state?

Off course the Soviets would mass all there forces at the western border that’s where the threat was who Germany was conspiring with Poland to attack the USSR since the mid 30’s planning to support ethnic insurgencies and separatist within the USSR.

Secrets of the Polish policy years 1935-1945. Declassified documents of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation

Germany and the allied former Russian Empire states at that time constituted one of the largest and well organised military block/ alliances.

If China massed its forces along the Mexican/US border and China had the military capability of the US allied with South American countries and US had the capability of China who previously uncovered a massive sabotage operation within the government, industry and military rank and fought Canadian forces in the North wouldn’t the US mass all there forces where the threat is along the Mexican/US border?

But why do you troll here?
Are there no communist fora?
I never would spent all my time on your breed’s blogs and fora.

A German on
December 29th, 2010 3:40 pm

The ONLY issue I care about when it comes to politicians these days is Israel. Any pro-Israel official is a traitor to this nation.

I asked the question, why does the world seem to despise the Jews as a group, a few years ago. The more you research it, the uglier it gets. The end result you find out who’s in the drivers seat of the western world, cultural influence, banking﻿ influence, government influence, media influence. You really wake up and the world is not what it seems..
Über mich: The US in 2009 closely resembles Germany in the thirties. At that time, Jews more or less owned Germany. In 1925 Jews were just 0.87% of the total population of 62.5 million, but happened to control every aspect of German life. For example we can cite the Jewish percentage in different areas:

-66.7 % of the general administrative council of the German federal bank (Reichsbank) and all three members of the Central Council (100%) between 1925 and 1929 were Jews.

Also the heroic Benjamin Freedman spoke in length about this issue.
Any German that lived this period will confirm the view that Germany was almost totally in Jewish hands, and that native German population was discriminated and treated as second class in their own country.

The rest is history.

The White Race must
polarize in order to survive.

Carolyn on
December 29th, 2010 7:27 pm

@German,

Statistics like this, which can be produced for the USA today, should be enough to make non-Jewish people angry as heck. But, for various reasons, it doesn’t. The main reason is they can’t *morally* accept what needs to be done, so they pretend there is nothing wrong with it, or it is simply the success of the smartest and most talented people … the cream rising to the top.

Then there is the idea that Jews were “held down” for so long that now they deserve their success. Let them have it.

Carolyn on
December 30th, 2010 10:11 pm

To my listeners:

I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that I will be appearing as a guest on two radio programs in January.
Jan. 13: the Deanna Spingola show on Republic Broadcasting Network, 12 to 2 p.m. Central time, to talk about the “Bush-Nazi Connection” and “Nazis in America,” and my book on Auschwitz.
Jan. 15: The Kevin Barrett show on American Freedom Radio Network, 4 to 5 p.m. Central time. The topic may be “Was Adolf Hitler the good guy?”

Thank you for listening to and supporting The Heretics’ Hour for the past 10 months, during which I produced a new show weekly without a miss. Keep up with me by reading my articles in The Barnes Review and on Elie Wiesel Cons The World.

A German, I’ve long thought that the parallels between 1930s Germany and 21st century USA to be substantial. It will be somewhat ironic that Americans, who pride themselves on their philo-semitism and their war against the Nazis, will eventually come to realise (fingers crossed) that the Nazis were right all along.

And yes, Carloyn, you are absolutely right, even when people come to know the truth they do not have the fortitude to do what is right and will hide behind a gutless meritocratic fundamentalism or something similar.

johnUK on
January 3rd, 2011 12:31 am

What happened to Fr. Matthew Raphael Johnson website?

@Chris

More like the Weimar era except this time it will be global starting with the collapse of the Eurozone.

LaRouche’s predictions have been 100% right who back it 2007 said the it was a banking collapse system starting with City of London aligned banks in Greece then it would spread to Ireland and Spain as well as Brazil.

@A German

Do you know the period when an infux of Eastern European Jewry came into Germany?

A German on
January 4th, 2011 7:08 am

@johnUKommunist
I think the Eastern Jews (Ostjuden) swarmed over the European countries in the period between the French Revolution and the Naplonic wars (1789-1815).
That was the time the Rothschilds rose to power and since the the French Revolution all the local Jew bans were weakened.
That’s why the Joos supported that.

You can also see that documented in the story Jud Süss.
The duke of Würtemberg needed money and so he leased money from the money-Jew Süss-Openheimer, who made a transformation from an orthodox looking Jew to a 18th century looking noble man.
And by lending money he gained power, became the duke’s finance minister, oppressed all the Swabian citizens and peasants. For example, if someone couldn’t pay the super high taxes he destroyed their house!
In one case he even commanded to demolish a blacksmith’s house because he didn’t make way for the Jew’s coach.

And then Jew Süss-Oppenheimer abolished the century old Jew ban in Stuttgart and the Jews, orhtodox Jews, swarmed like locusts over the city and soon they had all power positions in Würtemberg.

The madness only ended because the duke got a stroke.
Then the nobilitiy and citizens renewed the Jew ban and warned coming generations not to loose it.

And Süss-Oppenheimer got the death penality for all the evil deeds he comitted as finance minister and because he raped a farmer’s daughter.

That was the period of the great influx of the Ostjuden.
In 1848, when all over Europe citizen-revolutions happened, there was another influx.
I think that was the time when the Jews left the pale of settlement in the west of the Russian Empire and infiltrated the Russian heartland and Austria-Hungary and Germany and the Balkans.

Tsaress Katharina (German origin, Anhalt-Zerbst) banned the Jews from mainland Russia in the 18th century and allowed them only to settle in the western part of the empire:
the pale of settlement.