[procps] Re: first part of nls

From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:20:36 -0600

On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Craig Small wrote:
> It's merged merry Chirstmas.
> However the patches were missing the po file and associated structures
> for gettext so it won't configure. I've run out of time to nick that
> stuff from your nls branch.
It does not appear to be merged, and my patches cannot be applied first.
Jeeze