OAL for 45 ACP

I received an order of Rainier 45ACP 200g TCJ RN bullets. I realize these are plated and the mfgr recommends use a load for lead bullets, so I plan on using the load data from Hodgen, I will be loading with W231. The gun they will be used in is a Kimber Custom Classic Target.

My issue is trying to find the right OAL/COAL for this load using the RN bullets. I have not been able to find one anywhere. I am aware of the perils of reducing the OAL too much and the resulting increased pressure, though the risk is less in .45 rounds. It would be nice if more information were provided by some of the site/manuals. I just subscribed to loaddata.com, and rather disappointed in the general lack of OAL (at least for the 9mm and 45ACP loads).

I have tried Lyman, Speer, Sierra, Hornady, Loaddata.com (they dont list COALs at all), Handloaders.com, Hodgon/Winchester load center. I thought the 200g would be a good and economical target/practice load.

Since I know my COAL of 1.260 feeds and ejects well in my Kimber
I have been using 1.260 OAL for my 45ACP 200g FMJ-RN loads in my Kimber, with 6.1g of Power Pistol and 6.5g of WSF, with extremely accurate results. I've read W231 meters better, and is a little cleaner, so I want to try it.

So, not being able to find a COAL/OAL, and fearing the present OAL I was using might be a little long, I set out doing a lot of research and taking several measurements.

I measured the length of 10 Rocky Mountain Bullets FMJ-RN ENC (jacketed) and 10 bullets from Rainier TCJ-RN (plated), both 200g. I then averaged the 10 measurements of each.

RMR avg length = .5619"
Rainier avg length = .5986"

The Rainier bullets on average are .0367" longer than the RMR bullets.

The COL used with the RMR bullets (with good results) was 1.260 (though I fear a little long). This means the seating depth with the RMR bullets should have been approx .6981". Adding this to the avg length of the Rainier plated bullets, yields a OAL of 1.2967". Longer than the max of 1.275 . Oviously I probably shouldnt use this OAL .

Searching for COALs for my 200g bullets, I found an interesting post on 1911forum.com.

Not all 200gr SWC's are created equal. When initially setting up, I load dummy rounds and drop them in the barrel (removed from pistol) and seat the bullet until the case head is flush with the barrel hood. If you change brands of bullets, you should to do this again. Actually, this advice would apply to any bullet you may want to load. You just can't take published COAL's as gospel. I load my Lyman 452630 200gr SWC's to a COAL of 1.24 for my D.W. CBOB. I could load this same bullet to 1.25" in my Springfield's.

So I set off to take more measurements.

First off, I measured some of the rounds I had already made with a COAL of 1.260, by placing the round in the clean barrel of my Kimber (after it's been field stripped), and measuring whether the headstamp was above or below the barrel hood, and by how much. These bullets were 200g FMJ-RN jacketed from Rocky Mountain Reloading (RMR).

The rounds I had made were above the hood by approx .0125" It also tended to stick in the chamber, so I know the headspace was not on the case mouth as it should be.

Then I took an empty case and ran it through all the resizing dies, including the FCD. I placed it in the barrel, and it was .0250" below the hood. I know the empty case headspaced on the mouth as it should, and now I have a measurement to work from.

Next I made a dummy round using a 200g FMJ-RN from RMR (jacketed). I started with the COAL at 1.260 and measured the distance between the headstamp and the barrel hood. Below are the numbers:

** This COAL felt like the case was headspacing like it should, it did not stick in the chamber. So there must be a difference in the shape of the RN bullet between the two mfgrs.

So, I think it looks like a OAL/COAL of 1.235 would also be good with a 200g from either mfgr. I'm very interested in any feedback, if I've gone about this wrong, I certainly want to know. The loads I use are typically at the mid range, or slightly below.

If you enjoyed reading about "OAL for 45 ACP" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!

rcmodel

January 13, 2010, 02:12 PM

Take the barrel out of your gun and use it as a guage at the reloading bench.

The correct OAL is as long as you can get it and not have the full diameter of the bullet hit the rifling leade before the round can fully chamber & headspace on the case mouth.

Keep seating slightly deeper until that doesn't happen, and that's the correct OAL for your gun.

Longer will generally feed better then shorter in any gun.

rc

gregj

January 13, 2010, 02:16 PM

That's exactly what I did. I know I got a little bogged down in the details, but I thought it was important to note, sorry about that.

rcmodel

January 13, 2010, 02:21 PM

I must admit I didn't read it all!

Exceeded my limited attention span about the third paragraph. :D

rc

Walkalong

January 13, 2010, 02:30 PM

I "sped red" it myself too. Do as rc posted, and you will be good to go. Worst case is you will have to tweak it shorter by a bit, but probably not.

jem375

January 13, 2010, 02:43 PM

Since the info I have on Rainier bullets, the max OAL of 45ACP seems to be 1.275", so your OAL of 1.260" would be fine...............

rcmodel

January 13, 2010, 02:46 PM

1.275" is SAAMI MAX length for any bullet weight or style so they will fit in the magazine.

That length would have no bearing on a lighter bullet, or one with a different shape then a FMJ-RN.

1.275" would be stuck in the rifling with a SWC or most JHP bullets for instance.

rc

gregj

January 13, 2010, 03:07 PM

What I found with the jacketed bullets from Rocky Mountain was that 1.260 was too long and the bullet was sticking in the chamber. Using the same OAL with Rainer plated, the bullet did not stick in the chamber. I took a few rounds from an earlier batch of Rocky Mountain bullets that had a 1.260 OAL and reseated to 1.235 and will try them. This OAL seemed to fit both bullets in my Kimber's chamber.

Walkalong

January 13, 2010, 07:30 PM

If you are talking about the Ranier 200 Gr Truncated Cone Flat Point (TrFP) style bullet, when I tried them I seated them at 1.235. Fed fine for me. Shot OK. I like the Ranier 200 Gr SWC much better though.

soloban

January 13, 2010, 07:42 PM

I use 230 GR Ranier FMJs in my SA 1911 and I seat them to 1.2" OAL they work great.

Walkalong

January 13, 2010, 07:52 PM

That's mighty short.

gregj

January 13, 2010, 09:00 PM

If you are talking about the Ranier 200 Gr Truncated Cone Flat Point (TrFP) style bullet, when I tried them I seated them at 1.235. Fed fine for me. Shot OK. I like the Ranier 200 Gr SWC much better though.

No, I'm talking about the 200g RN.

Wilburt

January 13, 2010, 09:01 PM

I must admit I didn't read it all!

I "sped red" it myself too.

I'm worse. I look at the replies hoping to figure out the question to see if there was anything I could add. :D

gregj

January 13, 2010, 09:30 PM

Man, you guys are tough. I try to be methodical, and explain what I did, looking for guidance to make sure I was on the right track. I've seen too many incomplete posts that had partial information, and the following responses were mostly filling in the blanks that shouldnt have been blank in the first place. I thought I had put an apology in advance for being lengthy, but I guess it didnt make the cut&paste. Sorry it was so lengthy, I'll be sure and short and concise next time.

rfwobbly

January 13, 2010, 09:48 PM

Man, you guys are tough. I try to be methodical, and explain what I did, looking for guidance to make sure I was on the right track. I've seen too many incomplete posts that had partial information, and the following responses were mostly filling in the blanks that shouldnt have been blank in the first place. I thought I had put an apology in advance for being lengthy, but I guess it didnt make the cut&paste. Sorry it was so lengthy, I'll be sure and short and concise next time.

That post could have been shortened to 5 words.

:neener:

Walkalong

January 13, 2010, 09:57 PM

Tough, and thorough, but we mean well. :D

gregj

January 14, 2010, 08:11 AM

Funny, thorough was what I was trying to be. Thanks for the validation on my findings.

Dan The Goat

January 14, 2010, 10:35 AM

Not by any means a pro at reloading, but I use the same bullets in my Kimber Custom Target II and it likes 1.24" OAL.

I tried 1.26 and 1.25 first BTW

nulfisin

January 14, 2010, 09:57 PM

I use the same bullets in 230 grains. The OAL is generally about 1.2 on the low end and 1.26 on the high end, depending on how I set the die that day. Generally, I aim for 1.25.

ArchAngelCD

January 15, 2010, 02:24 AM

I usually use a OAL of between 1.250" and 1.270" depending upon the bullet. That's just my preference and it may not work for you.
200 GR. CAST LSWC Winchester 231 .451" 1.225" 4.4 771 11,000 CUP 5.6 914 16,900 CUP
If your concerned about the correct OAL and want to be sure it doesn't adversely effect your ammo why not just use the 1.225" OAL listed in the load data you are quoting?

gregj

January 15, 2010, 12:00 PM

If your concerned about the correct OAL and want to be sure it doesn't adversely effect your ammo why not just use the 1.225" OAL listed in the load data you are quoting?

Because that data was for a lead semi wad cutter, and I'm using jacketed and plated round nose. That OAL would make the jacketed round seat on the bullet, but the plated round seat on the case mouth. 1.235 seems to fit just right in the Kimber.

If you enjoyed reading about "OAL for 45 ACP" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!