The statues of the boy King Tut were found in his tomb, among many of his treasures in Egypt, during an archaeological excavation in 1922. King Tut's original name was Tutu Ankoma (Asante name--Akan People of Ghana).

Some texts list the Ancient Egyptians as "White Caucasoid North Africans". As the global world becomes brown, Black people in Europe and America will probably wake up one day only to find out the racial classification has been changed to "White Negroes" as the white race we know now becomes significantly brown.​

Why has the Euro-American System or scheme had an overriding need to change the color of history? The first civilization has been replaced and substituted with foreign images. It was done for political, economic, religious, entertainment, labor, law and justice, war, imperialistic and genetic survival. It was done to replace the originals with those who continue a perpetuation of an alternative history in the minds of each one (Ekowa, 2008). Even with the black resin used in mummification, there is no way the profiles are the same with what has been exhibited to Euro-America.

There had been intellectually specious claims ancient Egypt was a European civilization. Because of the work of early European Egyptologists and writers, like Gerald Massey, Godfrey Higgins, Count C.F. Volney and others, the truth about who the Egyptian were, was acknowledged. More recently, white writers like, Richard Poe ("Black Spark White Fire"), Michael Hoffman ("Egypt Before the Pharaohs") and Martin Bernal ("Black Athena"), have contributed research proving an African origin to ancient Egypt. The face of the Sphinx does not lie, but there is still much white denial.

"The Ethiopians say the Egyptians were one of its colonies which was brought into Egypt by the deity Osiris. The Greek writer Herodotus repeatedly referred to the Egyptians as being dark-skinned people with woolly hair. "They," he says, "have the same tint of skin which approaches that of the Ethiopians." The opinion of the ancient writers on the Egyptians is summed up by Gaston Maspero (1846–1916) when he said, "By the almost unanimous testimony of ancient historians, they [the Egyptians] belong to an African race which first settled in Ethiopia on the Middle Nile: following the course of the river they gradually reached the sea.

​

Physical Anthropology: The skeletons and skulls of the Ancient Egyptians clearly reflect they were a Negroid people with features very like those of modern Black Nubians and other people of the Upper Nile and of East Africa.

Some Egyptian mummies have red or straight hair because of the cortex keratin oxidation. The mummification process was responsible for the discolored hair because of the strong alkaline substance used. This resulted in the yellowing and browning of hair as well as the straightening effect--like the modern day straightening perms.

Below is an example of Egyptian wigs:

​

​

Osteological Evidence: "Lepsius canon," which distinguishes the bodily proportions of various racial group categories the "ideal Egyptian" as "short-armed and of Negroid or Negrito physical type." Many ancient Africans (pharaohs) had dolichocephalic--elongated heads. In fact, Negroes are almost invariably dolichocephalic. Some Native American tribes in North and South America carried the same trait. Many Native American tribes used “head binding” as a type of “body decorating” like the Asians who bound a baby’s feet or like tattooing and body piercing that is done today.

Blood Type: After hundreds of years of inter-mixture with foreign invaders, the blood type of modern Egyptians is the "same group B as the populations of western Africa on the Atlantic seaboard and not the A2 Group characteristic of the white race prior to any crossbreeding."

Linguistics: Ancient Egyptian, modern Coptic of Egypt and Walaf of West Africa are related, with the latter two having their origin in the former. Egyptians spoke proto-Afroasiatic, an extinct language spoken in Ethiopia before 10,000 BC.

Classical Greek and Roman Authors: Virtually the early Latin eyewitnesses described the Ancient Egyptians as Black skinned with wooly hair.

Egyptians' hair grew into locks which looked like snakes. They also wore a fez or head covering depicting the Kemet symbols known as Uraeus or cobra raised to strike, which is the same snake image you see worn as a Menes, by the Queens and Kings of ancient Kemet (Egypt/Nubia). What also seems so amazing are the Greek statues shown in alabaster WHITE with dreadlocks.

​Is that why the Europeans knocked off the noses of many Egyptian artifacts and why his nose is still flat? Take the tar away! His nose is flat! The Americans refused to assign King Tut a skin color because it could not be historically known.

Anthropologists use phenotypical traits to define race. Early racial classification attempts measured surface traits, particularly skin color, hair color and texture, eye color, head size and shape. Also in that scenario, human emirate and geographical location determine racial classification. If a person has originated from the Caucasus Mountain Region, he is Caucasian. At one time, Sickle Cell Anemia only affected people with African ancestry. People from Italy, Portugal, the Middle East, and India also developed Sickle Cell but have had their Sickle Cell disease renamed S-thalassemia. In the early 1800s, curly hair was considered a Negroid trait. Today people who have been classified as Caucasian buy hair straighteners and skin lighteners with no awareness or knowledge that 100 years ago they would have been considered Negro-Colored.

King Tut's Mummy - Unveiled October 2007 (Amazing how his elongated head and skintone were modified)​

With the phenotypical traits listed, the following people have the racial classification Caucasian. The first two pictures are people fron India. The third picture shows a group of people from Ethiopia.

It makes a difference of "Who’s Who" on Bible pages; just as it makes a difference of "Who’s Who" in the tombs of the Pyramids, and just as it makes a difference everywhere else. It always has made a difference; otherwise there would have been a need to change the images or the story. Again, why was it necessary for Europeans to obliterate the geographical, cultural and ethnographical truths from real history, to construct an alternative history made in European images and resemblances?

The Semitic language spoken by the early pharaohs belongs to an Afro-Asiatic parent language was spread by Black African people as they migrated north. US National news programs say that King Tut was covered in black resin, and that accounts for his blackness in color. What they have failed to mention is the African features with the flat nose, Negroid profile, and dread-like hair styles.

With the Roman world in turmoil around AD 300, and Meroe in decline, a people from east of the Nile known to the Greeks as Blemmyes and to the Arabs as Bedja, rapidly overran much of Egypt and Lower Nubia. Although expelled from Egypt, they could establish themselves in the region of Nubia just south of Aswan. Although they continued the religion of the pharaohs, their rulers used the Greek forms of contemporary Roman Imperial titles.

​

Manifest Dynasty - America's moral mission as one of democratic example rather than one of conquest. Andrew Jackson (Trail of Tears) (Trump’s hero), who spoke of "extending the area of freedom", typified the conflation of America's potential greatness, the nation's budding sense of Romantic self-identity, and its expansion. Jacksonian Democracy - Jackson's expansion of democracy was largely limited to Americans of European descent, and voting rights were extended to adult white males only. There was little or no progress (and in some cases regression) for the rights of African-Americans and Native Americans.

LEGACY OF THE EMPIRE

& Rudyard Kipling's

White Man's Burden - Multi-Racial Britain

By: Diane Abbott, MP

The creed of racial superiority was very much part and parcel of the culture of the empire. The British Empire was built on a theory of racial inferiority. The great Victorian writer and poet Rudyard Kipling wrote extensively on the supposed superiority of the British and talked about ‘lesser breeds without the law’. It was the alleged superiority of the non-white races that supposedly legitimized taking over their countries and subordinating them to second class.

Even until quite recently British textbooks talked about Europeans ‘discovering’ countries like America, Australia and the source of rivers like the Nile even plenty of non-white people who were in America and Australia who knew perfectly well the source of the Nile. And until recently writers talked about the Europeans bringing civilization to Africa and the Indian sub-continent as if these countries had not seen highly sophisticated Empires and societies long before the Europeans came.

‘The British Empire was built on a theory of racial inferiority. When you read in the old textbooks about the supposedly civilizing mission of the British, one is reminded of the comment of Gandhi. He was asked what he thought about British civilization. He paused for a long time and then said thoughtfully “It would be a good idea.” So, fixed in the British mind was the racial inferiority of the people whose lands they took over and exploited that for a long-time archaeologist believed that the sculpture and carvings of the city of Benin in Nigeria could not have been done by black people and similarly that the great ‘lost’ city of Zimbabwe in southern Africa could not have been built by black men.

In direct line of descent of that kind of thinking is Prince Phillip’s idea that poor quality electrical work must have been done by Indians. To have a genuinely multi-racial society there needs to be genuine economic equality between the races. Economic empowerment for minorities is a necessary precondition but not sufficient to bring about a genuinely multi-racial society. Because nationhood and society are as much about ideas as anything else, the role of culture, literature, philosophy and the arts in building a multi-racial society is key. The first step is that the influence of black and ethnic minorities in the culture of a country like Britain is properly acknowledged.