The Woman in Black Comments

The rule of thumb here is; if it just came out in the theater don't expect a perfect version, and; if you want &quot;better quality&quot; go cam it yourself. And to those that risk their livelihood to do so, thank you very much.

My 11 y/o daughter told me her school all saw this movie and it wasn't scary but boy was she wrong. This movie takes the viewer back to the golden age of horror when a movie didn't need gore or any death at all to make the watcher uncomfortable. I wasn't scared by it but the ambiance was creepy enough for any jaded movie fan to get a few jumps. 4/5

This movie needs a different eye and approach and is very subtle. It's not like the over dramatized horror films about the jumping and the gore and screams.
For an attempt to pull away from the Harry Potter scene, Daniel Radcliffe, it was accomplished. This is a very atmospheric movie, and is all about the little things that make you look out the corner of your eye and look behind you but easily brush it off as nothing. It's a decent story, a little predictable in some areas, but overall it is brilliantly done with lighting and acting and the cinematography is beautiful. Definitely worth a first time watch at least.

WOW best horror movie I have seen in a long time. The acting was great story was great and the house and scenery was beautiful. Loved the antiques. This is a great ghost story perfect Halloween movie to watch with the girl friend.

i really don't get why people would say this movie was boring??!! is everyone these days too blunt and dull to enjoy a very decent horror movie full of suspense? just do not expect it to be like texas chainsaw massacre or the like! 9/10 there was very few dialogue, still daniel radcliffe did an awesome job!!

I don't know why people hated it! Its really scary, specially when you're seeing in the theater, LOL. Maybe the plot wasn't clear enough for some people, but it doesn't mean that there wasn't an actual plot. I think the story was really creepy in a good way, very creepy scenes too. I really liked the movie. Although, the fact that Daniel is a father of a 4 year old is the biggest movie mistake. Wasn't very believable. I wasn't able to realize that he's a father the whole movie. It was really uncomfortable to keep on track with this thought, LOL. Its worth the one time watch if you're interested, don't listen to others, you watch and you decide. That's about it. 4/5

was confused on the end... cause of how she did him dirty after he did her a solid... but at the same time he gave her what she wanted and technically she gave him what he wanted which was his family back togeather its twisted but awesome 8/10

I had to rewatch this movie cuz i could barely make out the contrasts last time i watched it, and definitely have to say that the good quality enhanced the spook effects, the atmosphere, setting, the old house and all those freaky noises. However the effects couldn't enhance the story and its turn, which unfortunately is so familiar in the horror genre, i'm glad to see Radcliffe moving on to more serious roles, that resurrection stone would be handy now lol 6/10

Post a Comment

The Woman in Black Reviews

The Woman in Black, this was an amazing movie, the plot of a woman who lost her child and watch him dye then after suicide she haunts the house and taking lives of the town peoples children. Daniel Radcliffe holds hid own in this movie. no one known as Harry Potter he has really done a well job on this movie.

I don't know why people hated it! Its really scary, specially when you're seeing this in the theater, LOL. Maybe the plot wasn't clear enough for some people, but it doesn't mean that there wasn't an actual plot. I think the story was really creepy in a good way, very creepy scenes too. I really liked the movie. Although, the fact that Daniel is a father of a 4 year old is the biggest movie mistake. Wasn't very believable. I wasn't able to realize that he's a father the whole movie. It was really uncomfortable to keep on track with this thought, LOL. Its worth the one time watch if you're interested, don't listen to others, you watch and you decide. That's about it. 4/5

Considering this film is a 12a I knew it wouldn't be too scary, the trailers on the t.v suggested it would be "scariest film of the decade". I am kind of desensitised to horror films so I didn't find it scary, it was jumpy but there wasn't enough suspense. For a young teenage audience it would probably be brilliant to scare them senseless and be the talk of the playground. Id'e recommend this film if you are easily frightened or if you are curious to see Daniel Radcliffe in a different roll, which imo he's quite good! slightly cheesey story but worth a watch.

It got me to jump a few times..but it was the placement more so than just straight scared. I just finished it and I'm not scared or anything, but I did jump quite a few times. I think it was a really good movie. It wasn't a horror really, it actually had a story to it. It was much more like a ghost story/thriller. The acting was good, the time period made it even better. Daniel did a good job at getting out of his Harry Potter role and into this (mind you I kept wondering where the glasses were HA!). Definitely worth watching if you want a ghost story..not to watch if you want gore-y blood and guts! It's just not that kind of movie. 4/5