News from the Votemaster

National Journal Analysis

Ronald Brownstein of the National Journalwrote
a piece on the state of five key swing states that Bush won in 2004 based a new polling data (given below).
The states are Colorado, Florida, New Mexico, Ohio, and Virginia.
In his view, Obama must win at least one or two of these to have any chance of winning.
Currently he has a lead of 7 points in New Mexico while Colorado, Florida, and Ohio are essentially tied,
and McCain leads by 7 points in Virginia. In addition to the polling data, interviews with voters in these
states are given. In all the states, McCain's strong suit is experience and Obama's is "understand the
needs and priorities of people like me." In general many people are nervous about the future because
McCain represents more of the same (which they are strongly against) and Obama represents a great leap into
the unknown.

Wall Street Turmoil Continues

The Dow was up 410 points yesterday, which is better than going down, but most people don't like this kind of
roller coaster ride. In other financial news, one of the two investment banks left, Morgan Stanley, is in
talks
with Wachovia Bank, which itself is up to its ears in bad mortgages, having written off $23 billion
worth so far. All these (potential) shotgun marriages don't make the case that the markets will work things
out on their own and government regulation is not needed. Even John McCain is now saying the head of the SEC
should be fired. Whether someone who has opposed regulation his whole career can now convincingly say we need
more regulation remains to be seen. Obama has been pounding him on flip-flopping.

There has also been
talk
of the government organizing the mother of all bailouts, with Uncle Sam simply
buying all the problem mortgages. This would transfer billions of dollars of taxpayer money to the ailing
banks. In return, the government would get millions of worthless (?) mortgages.
Republicans like this deal because it saves banks from the consequences
of their own greed. Democrats like this deal because it prevents foreclosures
on people who bought a house they couldn't afford and got a
mortgage they had no realistic hope of paying.
The taxpayers get the bill. Everybody gets something.
Undoubtedly the market would
react positively to this news. However, even this solution has problems. Would Congress create a new agency to
manage this? Would be it be part of the treasury department? Would it be quasi-independent? All up in the air.
And of couse such a plan is not without controversy. In theory, Republicans don't like the government sticking
its nose into business, especially not in a huge way. But right before an election many of them in Congress
might go for it even though it violates all their principles. The most important principle is getting reelected.

For all the campaign talk about how important experience is, the
gang of three
that is engineering all the financial deals consists of treasury secretary Henry Paulson (an investment banker
by trade), fed chairman Ben Bernanke (a professor from Princeton), and president of the NY federal reserve bank,
Timothy Geithner (a long-time government official). The President of the United States isn't even in the loop.
If we have a major crisis that is being handled by top government officials not including the President,
one can legitimately ask how important the President's personal experience is.

Business Groups Buy TV Ads

In the past, business groups would contribute money to favored candidates by setting up political action
committees and putting money in them. This year they are producing and
running ads
directly, to prevent the candidates from tweaking the message. For example, the Chamber of Commerce spent
$365,000 in August to attack Democratic senatorial candidate Jeanne Shaheen in New Hampshire. This kind of
direct involvement never happened before on much of a scale.

Obama and Kindergarten Sex-Ed

The McCain campaign has been running an ad pointing out that Obama supported sex education for kindergarteners
when he was in the Illinois state senate. It didn't mention that it was about age-appropriate sex education,
which for kindergarteners meant not going for car rides with strangers. Why is McCain even talking about this?
Slate as a good
piece
discussing why. It is all about revving up the culture wars again. In the past there have been huge battles
about school textbooks. In Kanawha County, WV, one such battle in 1974 over a multicultural book
ended up with shutting down much of the
state's coal mines, school buses getting shot at, and a school being dynamited. A study done afterwards discovered
that the pro-book and anti-book forces differed not only on the book, but on everything.
Pro-book people believed in government, thought taxes supported useful things, opposed school prayer, thought schools
should provide free lunches to poor kids, and went to mainline Protestant churches. The anti-book people
thought government was too big, tax money was wasted, schools shouldn't take the role of families, and went to
nonmainline churches. The purpose of the McCain ad is to imply that he identifies with the latter group without
actually saying so. It is saying to them: "I am one of you" without having to say it. It is a kind of dog-whistle
politics.

Viral E-mail Explains Why Palin Drives Liberals Nuts

Taegan Goddard reprinted part of an
E-mail
circulating around the country comparing Barack Obama to
Sarah Palin. It's funny and partisan, but it has a ring of truth to it.
For better or worse, this kind of e-mails are playing a bigger and bigger role in elections.
This one is mostly amusing but some of them are outrageous and libelous, but because the authors can't be tracked
down, little can be done to stop them.

Forecast Predicts Dems to Gain 13-17 House Seats

Chris Bowers has produced a
chart
looking at 101 potentially close House races. The chart lists the candidates, polls, 2006 results, PVI, how much money each
candidate has, and some notes. Bowers' analysis race by race indicates a net gain for the Democrats of 13-17 seats.
He thinks the Democrats will pick up Republican-held seats in AK-AL (Berkowitz), IL-11 (Halvorson),
NJ-03 (Adler), NM-01 (Heinrich), NY-13 (McMahon), NY-25 (Maffei), and VA-11 (Connolly).
He also thinks Republicans will pick up Democratic-held seats in
AL-05 (Parker), FL-16 (Rooney), LA-06 (Cassidy), NH-01 (Bradley), PA-11 (Barletta), and TX-22 (Lampson).

Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) Gets Both Nominations

One seat the Republicans won't get is VT-AL.
They didn't bother to put up a candidate to oppose Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT)
in their (open) primary, so not many Republicans showed up to vote.
A small band of Democrats organized a campaign to write in Welch as the GOP nominee and
he won
the Republican nomination as well as the Democratic
nomination and will oppose himself in November.