> Then, the point as above was that true _features_ and _effects_ in the> numbers, would be directly evidenced in physical effect, where the> objects of physics behave according to mathematical laws (as they do,> whatever they are, else there would not be causality, generally, which> there is).

That's indeed the point, that, on the contrary, it is not the case that "objects of physics behave according to mathematical laws": the mathematical laws that describe the (supposed) laws of physics have been evolving across the centuries to reflect an increasing (not uncontrovertibly so, but this is another issue) understanding on our part, not a change in the underlying physical world. The world is a thing, the mathematics that helps us understand and describe it is another. To be clear: your point, the point of reductionism and logicism, is not only unjustified theoretically, it is also unjustified historically.