This is the author’s doctoral dissertation. And here is the author’s abstract:

Although the dominant theory in Evangelical and Methodist studies has been that John
Wesley and the Evangelical Anglican clergy separated over theological issues related to Christian
perfection and predestination, essentially outlined as an Arminian/Calvinist split, it is the
argument of this work that the gradual split between these two “parties” was much more
multifaceted. Looking at the broader political, social, and religious context in which the
Evangelical Revival arose, the divide between Wesley and the Evangelicals can be seen as much as an outgrowth of ecclesiastical pressures caused by maverick use of church polity, political memory in the wake of the English Civil War and the Restoration, the creation of a distinctly “Methodist” ethos, and even the rise of High Church and Tory political power in the latter part of the
eighteenth century in the face of outside challenges. These larger influences, together with
personal issues among what amounts to a small group of men, created the impetus for a divide
between these two parties. While theological issues remain essential to the overall picture, they are treated within larger historical contexts. Wesley’s divide from his closest Anglican associates
remains a complex issue within the tumultuous early period of the Evangelical Revival.

About the SEA

The Society of Evangelical Arminians (SEA) is an association of evangelical scholars and laymen who adhere to Arminian theology and are united in order to glorify God, edify his people, protect them from error, and foster the proper representation of our magnificent God...Read more