This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

A recent
poll conducted by YouGov revealed that a sizable portion of the American
public is open to the idea of a military coup in the United States. The
poll was conducted amid the continual polling that takes place during
the U.S. Presidential election yet it did not focus on the elections per
se, but the potential lack of elections in the future.

The YouGov poll surveyed 1,000 people online and
determined that 29% of Americans, over a quarter of the population,
could imagine supporting a military coup against the civilian
government. Only 41% could not imagine supporting a coup.

The numbers supporting a potential coup were
highest among Republicans with 43% of them saying they could envision
supporting a coup, 29% of independents followed, with Democrats trailing
at 20%.

The numbers apparently increased in support when
the question asked “whether they would hypothetically support the
military stepping in to take control from a civilian government which is
beginning to violate the constitution.”

Critics of the polls have suggested that the
method used to conduct the survey was largely unscientific and not a
reasonable representation of an accurate sampling of the general
American public.

Regardless of how it was conducted, the real
question here is “Why was this poll conducted in the first place?” Why
are Americans being asked if they would support a military coup? After
all, in the past, whenever a critic of the government would suggest such
a possibility, that individual was laughed off the stage as being
paranoid and hyperbolic. We are told military coups are not an option in
the United States and, being the exceptional nation, we are outside of
history. We are told that the very idea that a military coup could ever
take place is laughable. So, why the poll?

Indeed, as the TWSP has asked, “Who commissioned
it? Was it ordered up by a clique of ambitious and disgruntled military
men eager to redeem their defeats on the battlefield with some kind of
seizure of power here in the United States? Up to now, we do not know
these answers.”

The question is thus: Are the American people
being prepped to accept a military coup in the United States and the
subsequent martial law that will almost inevitably follow such a seizure
of power?

Was this poll conducted for the benefit of the
oligarchs who would perpetuate this coup? Not likely, since the Pentagon
and the Military-Government-Intelligence apparatus already has
extravagant ways of knowing whether or not the American people are
receptive to coups. Was it merely an exercise in predictive programming
and trend setting polling data – the same method that is used in color
revolutions – to create a sense of social consensus and promote the idea
that the majority supports a specific idea?

But the United States is not the only country
that has had talk of military coups as of late. Upon the election of
Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the UK Labor Party, a “senior serving
general” opined that, if Corbyn was ever elected as Prime Minister, the
military might simply remove him from power.

According to a report by the London Daily Mail,

“A senior serving general, speaking anonymously
to the Sunday Times, said Mr. Corbyn’s victory has been greeted with
‘wholesale dismay’ in the army.”

He added:

“There would be mass resignations at all levels
and you would face the very real prospect of an event which would
effectively be a mutiny.

‘Feelings are running very high within the armed
forces. You would see a major break in convention with senior generals
directly and publicly challenging Corbyn over vital important policy
decisions such as Trident, pulling out of NATO and any plans to
emasculate and shrink the size of the armed forces…

The Army just wouldn’t stand for it. The general
staff would not allow a prime minister to jeopardize the security of
this country and I think people would use whatever means possible, fair
or foul to prevent that. You can’t put a maverick in charge of a
country’s security.’”

Corbyn’s plans and “reforms” are relatively mild
on many accounts. However, that is apparently enough to justify the
seizure of total power by the military in the minds of some. It also
echoes the past claims by retired Army Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a friend of
accused pedophile and avowed Satanist Michael Aquino, that he had
answered a call asking if he would lead a coup against the civilian
government if he were provided with 250,000 marines. Vallely responded
that, yes, he would indeed lead a coup if the conditions were right.

While it remains to be seen what plans are being set in motion for the future
of civilian governments in the United States and the UK, it is greatly
concerning that convenient polls regarding military coups are being
conducted and disseminated amongst the public while serving and retired
military officials talk openly of the same act of treason. As discontent
grows with higher unemployment, increased immigration, more foreign
wars, higher food prices, and lower living standards, it is apparent
that the ruling elite in both the United States and the UK – actually
one and the same – are preparing to ensure that such discontent will be
crushed and that no reforms, however modest, will ever be allowed to
move forward.

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.