Wrong or right,the man stood up and took action for a cause he believed in;how many of us would do the same?
His "rectroactive abortion" of the doctor really only polarized the pro-death crowd,and served to further the belief that those who oppose abortion are right-wing nuts.As was stated earlier,there really was no winner in this case.

The doctor's practices are of no concern to me.
I don't agree with abortion as a means of contraception. I have known a few girls in my lifetime who think abortion is a more convenient way of remaining childless than simply engaging in safe practices or not engaging at all; and thats an irresponsible, disgusting thing.
But... our views on abortion are immaterial; the doctor was a man who was operating within the boundries of the law and was murdered by a fanatic. If this sort of thing is permitted and or given light punishment then anyone of us can murder someone that we deem to be 'evil'.

I disagree. These laws are a joke. Our forefathers did not make such insane laws. The only fanatic, was the doctor.

Seeing as killing a fetus is the equivalent of shooting a baby in the head the moment it is exposed and seeing as this doctor, on a regular basis sucked white babies out of their mother's wombs and threw them away like trash I think that he deserved more.

Abortion should only be done to fetus which are less than 1 and a half months old or 2 months at most.

Then it can be for certain that the child is not sentient. Babies are not parasites, they are people who depend on their parents until they are 10 years old.

Micheal, I agree with what you say, almost always. The doctor is illegitimate in his assumptions as are all pro-choice fanatics. Whoever mentioned the hippocratic oath has the right idea; he WAS no doctor, he WAS a murderer. Now he is dead.

I'm pro-life and I believe a human being starts living at conception. If every single aborted baby wasn't killed, but was born and adopted, there'd be a lot of happy white families, and a million more white babies.

I too believe that at the moment of conception it is life-if we found it on Mars we would quickly call it life.

I too disagree with the laws-but they are still in effect and I don't feel that Paul Hill's brand of vigilante justice was correct. Instead of killing someone why didn't he instead commit himself to educating young men and women about the sanctity of creating life and how to prevent it? Paul Hill's life, his intent and cause-they were both wasted the moment that he pulled the trigger. Some will call him a murderer, some will call him a martyr-but will his actions really prevent any future abortions? No, his 'clients' will simply go down the street and find another doctor to perform the deed.

I don't agree with some fanatic murdering someone who was doing his job but I don't agree with abortion apart from in emergencies.

There's no way however a young foetus is a sentient being with feelings. It's like saying sperm or shrimps have feelings. I certainly didn't have feelings 3 months after conception and nor does anyone else.

Anyway, I don't like debating touchy emotionally charged stuff like this

What do you all think about that man, Paul Hill, who killed the baby killer? You know the man who killed the abortionist with a shotgun and in turn gets murdered tonight.

Didn't someone "prove" that fetuses actually are alive at three months? I am under the impression that that was the defense of liberals when it came to abortion, "they are not yet alive, so it is OK to kill them".

Please post your thoughts.

Personally I believe that the man has some balls to be on death row and smile about the fact that he killed this man and his friend. If he felt so strongly about it, then maybe he should have killed them.

Murdering a murderer is not a murder in my opinion. That is exactly what an abortion doctor is: a murderer.

I too believe that at the moment of conception it is life-if we found on Mars we would quickly call it life.

I too disagree with the laws-but they are still in effect and I don't feel that Paul Hill's brand of vigilante justice was correct. Instead of killing someone why didn't he instead commit himself to educating young men and women about the sanctity of creating life and how to prevent it? Paul Hill's life, his intent and cause-they were both wasted the moment that he pulled the trigger. Some will call him a murderer, some will call him a martyr-but will his actions really prevent any future abortions? No, his 'clients' will simply go down the street and find another doctor to perform the deed.

Have you ever actually tried to convince a pro-choice member that abortion is wrong? I use to debate all the time in class about "anti-immigration" and "anti-affirmative action" views of mine and always won (white) people from the opposition over, it wasn't difficult. HOWEVER I spent all day debating with pro-choicers and let me tell you right now, impossible.

Trust me, trying to convince a pro-lifer is just as hard. What I always loved was the ones who'd go to a clinic, get an abortion, then start screaming at the docotr and nurses and calling them murderers, or show up at the clinic to protest, afterwards. Way more common than one would think.

This sounds as though you speak from personal experience. Were you an abortionist's assistant?

Both struggled with intolarable situations.....and they did what many of us are too cowardly to do ourselves.

Too many phony White Nationals parrot and chant "The 14 words"....."The 14 Words".....and yet at the same time they promote and support the jewish contrivance of abortion. They might as well being saying......."Go ahead jew.....destory my race.....I need that 37 thousand dollar SUV more then my White baby".

Yeah, right.........how can our children be our future when they are laying dismembered in the bottom of a dumpster out behind a jew planned parenthood clinic?