A Forum for Orthodox Jewish thought on Halacha, Hashkafa, and the social issues of our time.

Sunday, October 18, 2015

“As Compared to What”?

This is a question asked in a Jewish Journal article penned by 3 people
about the now commonly held view that
Conservative Judaism is a failure. That perception is based on the startling
survey results of a study on Jews in America by the Pew Research Center a couple of years
ago. It showed a massive attrition from all Jewish denominations except Orthodoxy. Which is growing.

The fact is that compared to Orthodoxy it is a failure. That
is acknowledged by the three authors themselves. Professor Wertheimer has
written several articles explaining why he believes this has happened. Arguing
that his movement would do well to emulate some of Orthodoxy's ways. Conservative rabbis would do well to insist on more than just membership
in the congregation and emphasize the
importance of observing Halacha instead of basically ignoring it in their synagogue members.

But he and his fellow authors take umbrage at the charge
that their movement has failed. Compared to other heterodox movements he says
it has succeeded far more that any of the others. How so? From the article:

Conservative-raised
with Reform-raised individuals in this age group, we find that the former are
far more likely to fast on Yom Kippur; twice as likely to belong to a synagogue
and to feel that being Jewish is very important to them; three times as likely
to send their children to day school; four times as likely to light Shabbat
candles usually; and five times as likely to maintain what they regard as a
kosher home.

I have to give credit where credit is due. The Conservative
Movement has indeed given its members a sense of the importance of being
Jewish and in many cases - doing things Jewish. The question arises as to whether it has done
more harm than good in this area over the course of its existence. I don’t know that there is an easy answer to
that.

On the one hand, that there are Jews that identify proudly
as Jews even as they are basically not observant cannot be denied. It is that indentity
that has moved many of them to gravitate to Orthodoxy. In fact I have been told
many times by Orthodox Jews that were once Conservative that in many cases when one of their members becomes Orthodox, Conservative rabbis consider it a victory. Which they rightly feel is a far better outcome than if they become totally
secular. In fact Professor Wethheimer has actually expressed his admiration for Orthodox Kiruv.

I don’t think that NCSY would be as successful as they are if they did not have that pool of Conservative Jewish teenagers to choose from. There are many NCSYers that come from Conservative
backgrounds where families do identify as Jews and have homes that
reflect some form of Mitzvah observance. Like fasting on Yom Kippur or having a
Pesach Seder. Had there been no Conservative Movement, NCSY would have a much smaller pool to choose from. True,
they would be able to inspire some secular and Reform Jews too, as they do now.
But the pool would be significantly lower in my view.

On the other hand without the Conservative Movement it is equally as likely that some may have stayed
in Orthodoxy despite their not observing some important Mitzvos – like Shabbos.

It is pretty well established that a lot of Jewish immigrants
that arrived in the US during the great waves of mass Jewish immigration from Europe – came here as observant when they arrived. But the economic conditions made it extremely
difficult if not impossible to avoid working on Shabbos. Some very brave and strong
individual Jews refused to work on Shabbos and got fired from the many successive jobs they had on Mondays when
they didn’t show up on Shabbos. Hard to support a family that way. But they
somehow survived and are the parents and grandparents of many Orthodox Jews
today.

But the majority gave in – feeling the need to support their
families despite their desire to remain observant. They did remain observant in
other ways – like keeping a Kosher home. But in far too many cases the children
saw the hypocrisy and – desiring to become as American as possible in that
melting pot era – they ran as far away from their Judaism as they could.

It was the Conservative Movement that catered to these Jews –
welcoming them with open arms ignoring the fact that they were desecrating
Shabbos. They even told them it was OK to drive to Shul on Shabbos.

But I have to wonder what would have happened if there were no
Conservative movement. I believe that many Jews would have indeed left
observance completely – feeling ostracized by Orthodoxy. But with no Conservative alternative, desiring to have someplace to go and desiring to retain their identity as a Jew many might have
stayed in their Orthodox Shuls – despite the
disapproval of working on Shabbos by their Orthodox rabbis.

I don’t know what the percentages of those
leaving versus those staying would have been. But it is not too much of a stretch to say that more would
have stayed than is the case with a Conservative movement as an option. That
would have meant that their children had a better chance to stay observant because
of Orhtodxy’s push toward Jewish education through the day schools. Something the Conservative movement realized too
late in the game.

Meanwhile the Conservative Movement looked the other
way about Halachic observance of their members. Their children had no peers that
were truly observant – and therefore no motivation to be so. Conservative
rabbis believed the synagogue could do the job. Obviously they haven’t. Which
has produced those Pew numbers.

At the end of the day, I have mixed feeling about the
success of this movement. On the one
hand, I do believe they serve a function - even from the perspective of Orthodoxy
in providing a pool of Jews that actively identify as Jews and perform some of the Mitzvos. While I’m sure Professor Wertheimer and company would vehemently
reject the notion that the only thing they are good for is Kiruv, But I don’t think
there is any doubt that this is the case from an Orthodox perspective. There are reasons why Orthodoxy does not grant
them any legitimacy. (Which are beyond the scope of this post.)

I am not here to gloat. Nor do I want to see the pool of
Jews that have even the slightest chance of becoming observant dwindle – as they
most certainly are. But sad as that may
be - I don’t see things changing.

At this point in time Jews are wildly successful integrating into American society. They are widely accepted – even admired - in western culture. Sadly, this virtually assures
a total assimilation at some point in the not too distant future by the vast
majority of Jews raised without a decent Jewish education. I don’t see
Conservative Judaism changing that tide.

Follow by Email

Followers

Recent Comments

About Me

My outlook on Judaism is based mostly on the teachings of my primary Rebbe, Rabbi Aaron Soloveichik from whom I received my rabbinic ordination. It is also based on a search for spiritual truth. Among the various sources that put me on the right path, two great philosophic works stand out: “Halakhic Man” and “Lonely Man of Faith” authored by the pre-eminent Jewish philosopher and theologian, Rabbi, Dr. Joseph B. Soloveitchik. Of great significance is Rabbi, Dr. Norman Lamm's conceptualization and models of Torah U’Mada and Dr. Eliezer Berkovits who introduced me to the world of philosophic thought. Among my early influences were two pioneers of American Elementary Torah Chinuch, Rabbis Shmuel Kaufman and Yaakov Levi. The Yeshivos I attended were Yeshivas Telshe for early high school and more significantly, the Hebrew Theological College where for a period of ten years, my Rebbeim included such great Rabbinic figures as Rabbis Mordechai Rogov, Shmaryahu Meltzer, Yaakov Perlow, Herzl Kaplan, and Selig Starr. I also attended Roosevelt University where I received my Bachelor's Degree - majoring in Psychology.