The Saker provides a one minute video with translation of Putin explaining two years ago the Russian governmentâ€™s concern that an overseas entity would use a false flag assassination within Russia in order to create an â€œinvoluntary martyrâ€ that the Western media would use to demonize Russia.

According to this report by The Saker, the Washington-financed Russian opposition has not, as Washington hoped it would, joined the Western anti-Putin media campaign. Possibly the Washington-financed Russian NGOs have wised up from observing events in Ukraine. In place of â€œmore democracy,â€ Ukraine got a Washington stooge government that split the country and is squandering Ukraineâ€™s last cent on a losing war.

The most likely explanation of Nemtsovâ€™s murder is that the CIA decided, as Nemtsov was completely marginalized as an opposition politician with 5% as against Putinâ€™s 85%, that Nemtsov was worth more dead than alive. But the ploy, if that is what it is, has not worked inside Russia.

Part of the circumstantial evidence that Nemtsovâ€™s murder was a CIA tactic to destabilize Russia is the orchestrated US media. The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, NPR, and the rest of the presstitutes were ready on cue with reports insinuating that Putin was responsible. Stephen Lendman has done a good job tracking the US mediaâ€™s unquestioning adherence to Washingtonâ€™s propaganda line.

On February 28, NPRâ€™s report of Nemtsovâ€™s murder consisted of a sound bite from a dissident Russian in exile who implied that Nemtsov was actually a rival to Putin with the population split between the two and that Putin eliminated his rival. No counterview to this abject nonsense was offered. At one time NPR was an alternative voice. Today NPR belongs to the Republican Party and the corporations whose advertising revenues are larger than listener donations. NPRâ€™s donors are supporting propaganda.

If the Russian investigation discovers CIA involvement, the Russian government will keep it quiet. The audacity of Washington murdering a washed-up Russian politician in order to blame the Russian government bespeaks of war. Putin, unlike Washington, does not want war. If the culprit(s) is not found, it will look like a coverup. So someone has to be blamed. The Russian police have already suggested that possibly the key to the murder is the attractive young woman with Nemtsov when he was shot down. Nemtsov might have been trespassing on the property of a dangerous man, possibly a member of the Russian mafia.

Like everything else that happens, Americans will be given by the presstitutes an explanation that coincides with the interests of Washington. All who rely on the US media will never know why Nemtsov was murdered, or anything else for that matter.

The Saker provides a one minute video with translation of Putin explaining two years ago the Russian governmentâ€™s concern that an overseas entity would use a false flag assassination within Russia in order to create an â€œinvoluntary martyrâ€ that the Western media would use to demonize Russia.

According to this report by The Saker, the Washington-financed Russian opposition has not, as Washington hoped it would, joined the Western anti-Putin media campaign. Possibly the Washington-financed Russian NGOs have wised up from observing events in Ukraine. In place of â€œmore democracy,â€ Ukraine got a Washington stooge government that split the country and is squandering Ukraineâ€™s last cent on a losing war.

The most likely explanation of Nemtsovâ€™s murder is that the CIA decided, as Nemtsov was completely marginalized as an opposition politician with 5% as against Putinâ€™s 85%, that Nemtsov was worth more dead than alive. But the ploy, if that is what it is, has not worked inside Russia.

Part of the circumstantial evidence that Nemtsovâ€™s murder was a CIA tactic to destabilize Russia is the orchestrated US media. The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, NPR, and the rest of the presstitutes were ready on cue with reports insinuating that Putin was responsible. Stephen Lendman has done a good job tracking the US mediaâ€™s unquestioning adherence to Washingtonâ€™s propaganda line.

On February 28, NPRâ€™s report of Nemtsovâ€™s murder consisted of a sound bite from a dissident Russian in exile who implied that Nemtsov was actually a rival to Putin with the population split between the two and that Putin eliminated his rival. No counterview to this abject nonsense was offered. At one time NPR was an alternative voice. Today NPR belongs to the Republican Party and the corporations whose advertising revenues are larger than listener donations. NPRâ€™s donors are supporting propaganda.

If the Russian investigation discovers CIA involvement, the Russian government will keep it quiet. The audacity of Washington murdering a washed-up Russian politician in order to blame the Russian government bespeaks of war. Putin, unlike Washington, does not want war. If the culprit(s) is not found, it will look like a coverup. So someone has to be blamed. The Russian police have already suggested that possibly the key to the murder is the attractive young woman with Nemtsov when he was shot down. Nemtsov might have been trespassing on the property of a dangerous man, possibly a member of the Russian mafia.

Like everything else that happens, Americans will be given by the presstitutes an explanation that coincides with the interests of Washington. All who rely on the US media will never know why Nemtsov was murdered, or anything else for that matter.

Because this news item will not get any coverage in the US (controlled) media, and the US public will not know about it.

And even if the news receives coverage among the amrikis, the US govt. has got experts who know how to turn around opinions using the media.

As a general rule in the Western media (which is almost entirely controlled), news about Russia is never positive; it is usually something like "dictator" putin did that or this, or something like how russians are suffering, lying, hating, cold so on and so forth. Actual news from Russia, which might help amerikan/western public form a more complete picture of russia and russians is not acceptable in US media companies and therefore will not be aired in US main stream media.

Because this news item will not get any coverage in the US (controlled) media, and the US public will not know about it.

And even if the news receives coverage among the amrikis, the US govt. has got experts who know how to turn around opinions using the media.

As a general rule in the Western media (which is almost entirely controlled), news about Russia is never positive; it is usually something like "dictator" putin did that or this, or something like how russians are suffering, lying, hating, cold so on and so forth. Actual news from Russia, which might help amerikan/western public form a more complete picture of russia and russians is acceptable in US media companies.

Not just censored, the so called "reporters" know what their bosses want.
They do not take on stories that might conflict with the agenda of their bosses or that conflicts with the general public opinions and views.
And people who question the bosses are thrown out (like for eg during the Iraq war some reporters questioned the official amerikan narratives of bogus WMDs and so on, they were simply fired.)
So the reporters themselves know what to say and what not to say to please and satisfy their bosses.
And most Western reporters seem to have no moral qualms about doing fake stories and lying through their teeth.
Hence the term presstitutes= Press (as in media)+ prostitute (their services are available for money.)

Not just censored, the so called "reporters" know what their bosses want.
They do not take on stories that might conflict with the agenda of their bosses or that conflicts with the general public opinions and views.
And people who question the bosses are thrown out (like for eg during the Iraq war some reporters questioned the official amerikan narratives of bogus WMDs and so on, they were simply fired.)
So the reporters themselves know what to say and what not to say to please and satisfy their bosses.
And most Western reporters seem to have no moral qualms about doing fake stories and lying through their teeth.
Hence the term presstitutes= Press (as in media)+ prostitute (their services are available for money.)

PS: Check my signature.

Click to expand...

So a news reporter in american media should be pro- American even he/she is native indian???

Not just censored, the so called "reporters" know what their bosses want.
They do not take on stories that might conflict with the agenda of their bosses or that conflicts with the general public opinions and views.
And people who question the bosses are thrown out (like for eg during the Iraq war some reporters questioned the official amerikan narratives of bogus WMDs and so on, they were simply fired.)
So the reporters themselves know what to say and what not to say to please and satisfy their bosses.
And most Western reporters seem to have no moral qualms about doing fake stories and lying through their teeth.
Hence the term presstitutes= Press (as in media)+ prostitute (their services are available for money.)

@Gabriel92
The article talks about an assasination by the west....particularly to fuel crisis in Russia and to demonise Putin..
West is not new to assasination plots.. There are articles about CIA involvement in Bhuto murder.

The late Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was warned by Fidel Castro to be careful of a very specific attack, namely a quick jab from an infected needle. Such a warning coming from a leader who has reportedly been the target of CIA assassination plots more than 600 times in over 50 years, was sure to be heeded.

Was the illness of Hugo Chavez a completely deniable assassination by the CIA? William Blum spoke with the VORâ€™s John Robles and discussed this issue and more.

Robles: Iâ€™ve read your Anti-Empire report regarding Hugo Chavez. Can you give us your comments on speculation that he was assassinated by the CIA?

Blum: I cannot prove it of course, but I believe he was. It would be totally in keeping with the entire history of the CIA and its attitude towards people like Hugo Chavez.

The CIA has attempted to assassinate more than 50 foreign leaders and successfully at least half the time. And very few of them were as despised by the US government as Chavez was, I would say. So, there would be no reason at all to expect that the CIA would not at least plan on killing, and the nature of his ailment is very odd.

We must remember that Putins comments are 90% aimed to domestic audience. He wants to project the image of Russia as a Great Power, equal to west. In real life Russia vs West is 34:2, which many also here seem to forget.

We must remember that Putins comments are 90% aimed to domestic audience. He wants to project the image of Russia as a Great Power, equal to west. In real life Russia vs West is 34:2, which many also here seem to forget.

West only has to wait, Putin himself is doing all the work for them.

Click to expand...

What evidence do you have to prove that Putin's comments are aimed at the domestic audience?

Of course, he speaks in Russian, which could be a proof. Putin even remarked on one occasion that Kasparov spoke to reporters in English and asked why he wasn't speaking in Russian. This is because, his comments are aimed at the international audience.

Now, let's move on to the next point.

Why should we remember that Putin's comments are 90% aimed at the domestic audience?

This also has an answer. Putin is the President of Russia, and he does not pretend to be a world leader. Therefore, it is natural he should address his own country-folks, instead of being an international attention seeker, like the leaders of the west, who like to pretend they are world leaders, but come across as world fools, if we look at the recent global trends.

Now, let's pose another question.

Why wasn't Putin's prediction given media coverage in the west?

The answer is, all the claims about freedom of speech and free press in the west is a sham.