Monday, December 28, 2015

DEC 28, 2015 IS LENR MORE THAN WE BELIEVE?

MOTTODum spiro, cognosco! (Latin saying about life long learning)DAILY NOTESAn anonymous reader whom I thank and regret he gives not his real name, has sent the the Grimm paper No 1) below and it is possible taking in account what we have learned recently from Leonid Urutskoev, that actually it is an important paper. LENR is even "greater" than we have imagined. I have already asked my wise friends who accept the striking Otherness of LENR what do they think about the paper. Just now and here I am asking my friend AXIL too.The ambition of LENR to be connected with both the micro- and macrocosmos, with the fundamental issues of Physics, becomes increasingly obvious, however first let's like LENR for its technological virtues; the Cosmos has no problems however our Planet has and needs this source of energy. First things firsi- or, in the worst case, simultaneously with the second ones.

I have told yesterday about the rise and failure described by the three sagas of LENR- Patterson, Cincinnati Cell, Case.Other researchers and their working lines were more resilient. The Piantelli storia (not saga) has included a few years of slow progress (I called these the Montalbano years because a lady researcher, Vera Montalbano from Bologna has presented very detailed reports at the Asti meetings, thorough analyses many instrumental analytic methods- Ni rods before and after experiment.) Piantelli had bad problems with his oppressors but was able to solve the problems and we still can wait good results from him, soon.I also hope the Defkalionada is not over and the technology will resurrect.Not mainstream LENR but something I have participated at and i am trying now to find out what has happened cavitation in excess energy generation. Nanospire is alive active but we are not well informed about their progress and plans.I have lost any contact with Jim Griggs whom I met at Minsk in 1993 or 1994. The line started by Yuri Potapov and his Yusmar has continued at INTERENERGORESURS where I have worked as consultant and Russian to English translator. CTSytems, the company of the Ukrainian inventor Gennadii Ivanenko isstill manufacturing cavitation heaters: http://ctsystems.ua/?page_id=16The main product of the company is cavitation based devices for manufacturing biodiesel. I hope to give you more information about the cousins and relatives of LENR organized by its history, but we have to focus on the spearhead part of the fieldDAILY NEWS1) A possibly very significant paper signaled by an Anonymous at Comments:Quanta transfer in space is a constant http://vixra.org/pdf/1512.0450v2.pdfAuthor: S.E. Grimm Email: gemachtigde@gmail.com Physicists and cosmologists are convinced by the idea that energy and space emerge from some
kind of magic “substance”. You can concentrate all the energy and space of the universe to the size
of a fictional singular point or expand it with no restrictions. Of course, this boundless concept is
not in line with the foundations of physics. Moreover, it is a serious obstacle to understand
incomprehensible observations like cold fusion. ends with:"So we can simply conclude that the transfer of quanta in space is a constant and is correlated (the
transformations are non-local ). To express it in a more technical way: when the wave pattern of dense free electrons penetrates Hions
that are locked inside a metal lattice, the H-ions are forced to expand their boundary. The result
is a BEC-like phenomenon that decrease the Coulomb force of the involved H-ions."2) More about the recent Brillouin Patent Applicationhttps://patentscope.wipo.int/search/docservicepdf_pct/id00000029354582/WOSA/WO2014172012.pdfThanks to David French and Jed Rothwell

If the reactor has a fuel, then Rossi must know how the energy is being produced in the reactor from that fuel. But then he cannot explain how the NI62 formed in the 100 micron ash particle that was produced in the Lugano test. Rossi's theory with Cook does not explain pure Ni62 formation.

Will Rossi explain how heat and electricity is produced in his patent or will just assert that fuel is required without knowing how the fuel produces that energy that his reactor generates? Will the patent office allow such a patent that cannot explain how energy is produced?

Even if Rossi does not understand how his reactor works, will people accept it without that operating description? Rossi might need to make something up to make the patent office and the people sanguine. How can Rossi prove that the E-Cat is not a perpetual motion machine?

LENR IN CONTEXT-1

10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2015: Where Are They Now?

In February we chose our 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2015—here’s how they have advanced since.By Tom Simonite on December 26, 2015

Supercharged PhotosynthesisLENR IN CONTEXT-2It is fatal error and ccounter-productive to think that Competitive Intelligence issomething illegal as industrial espionage- NO! It is something normal and useful, even for LENR:Competitive Intelligence - A Selective Resource GuideBy Sabrina I. Pacifici, Published on December 18, 2015http://www.llrx.com/features/ciguide.htm