Already burnt out on this Trump/Cruz civil war. I’m so wanting to see the real enemy get eviscerated instead. If Trump wins the nomination, he better go after Shrillary Rotten with 10x the intensity he’s gone after Ted; otherwise, I’ll have even more doubts about him. Calling Ted ‘a nasty person’ was so over-the-top and uncalled for. Yet Trump has already lightened up on Hillary and her war on Bill’s victims.

Already burnt out on this Trump/Cruz civil war. I’m so wanting to see the real enemy get eviscerated instead. If Trump wins the nomination, he better go after Shrillary Rotten with 10x the intensity he’s gone after Ted; otherwise, I’ll have even more doubts about him. Calling Ted ‘a nasty person’ was so over-the-top and uncalled for. Yet Trump has already lightened up on Hillary and her war on Bill’s victims.

For months now, angry strangers have been showing up at Christina Lee and Michael Saba’s front door with a curious demand: “Give me back my stolen phone!”

The problem as the couple desperately tries to explain visitors is that the missing phones aren’t at the house and never have been.

The pair doesn’t understand why exactly, but both Android and iPhone users on various networks are being directed to their house by phone-tracking apps.

Once the awkward situation is explained, most lost-phone-seekers are understanding. But the couple told Fusion that a smaller number of people who place absolute faith in their tracking technology are convinced that the couple is lying, provoking potentially volatile conflicts.

A similar problem plagued a 59-year-old man named Wayne Dobson, who started receiving unwanted visitors looking for their missing phones at his Las Vegas home in 2011, according to the Review-Journal.

“I’m standing there and I’m thinking, ‘What are they talking about?’” he told the paper. “They might as well have said, ‘Give me my horse back.’”

The people pestering Dobson were all Sprint users, the paper reported. By 2013, they were still showing up at all hours of the day. Dobson was also searched by police one occasion and narrowly avoided several other conflicts with strangers.

Sprint eventually located the problem and apologized to Dobson, according to the Verge.

For months now, angry strangers have been showing up at Christina Lee and Michael Saba’s front door with a curious demand: “Give me back my stolen phone!”

The problem as the couple desperately tries to explain visitors is that the missing phones aren’t at the house and never have been.

The pair doesn’t understand why exactly, but both Android and iPhone users on various networks are being directed to their house by phone-tracking apps.

Once the awkward situation is explained, most lost-phone-seekers are understanding. But the couple told Fusion that a smaller number of people who place absolute faith in their tracking technology are convinced that the couple is lying, provoking potentially volatile conflicts.

A similar problem plagued a 59-year-old man named Wayne Dobson, who started receiving unwanted visitors looking for their missing phones at his Las Vegas home in 2011, according to the Review-Journal.

“I’m standing there and I’m thinking, ‘What are they talking about?’” he told the paper. “They might as well have said, ‘Give me my horse back.’”

The people pestering Dobson were all Sprint users, the paper reported. By 2013, they were still showing up at all hours of the day. Dobson was also searched by police one occasion and narrowly avoided several other conflicts with strangers.

Sprint eventually located the problem and apologized to Dobson, according to the Verge.

Organizations, including the [usual suspects] local American Civil Liberties Union chapter, gay rights groups and immigrant advocacies, supported the complaint.

In one instance, a [man pretending to be a] woman identified only by the initials OA reported being forced to undergo a strip search after a plate was shattered and one of the jagged pieces was lost.

“They came very close to touching his body, and they looked with a flashlight in all orifices including his ears, mouth, and nose,” Ms. Fialho said in her 16-page complaint. “They made him bend over and cough, as they looked with a flashlight into his buttocks. They made him lift his penis, while the officers pointed at him in a mocking manner. The officers then made OA physically lift his testicles and looked under them with a flashlight. OA explains he felt completely humiliated.”

The person who wrote the article must be mentally ill – referred to a person with a penis as “SHE”, “HER” repeatedly. Women don’t have a penis.

Organizations, including the [usual suspects] local American Civil Liberties Union chapter, gay rights groups and immigrant advocacies, supported the complaint.

In one instance, a [man pretending to be a] woman identified only by the initials OA reported being forced to undergo a strip search after a plate was shattered and one of the jagged pieces was lost.

“They came very close to touching his body, and they looked with a flashlight in all orifices including his ears, mouth, and nose,” Ms. Fialho said in her 16-page complaint. “They made him bend over and cough, as they looked with a flashlight into his buttocks. They made him lift his penis, while the officers pointed at him in a mocking manner. The officers then made OA physically lift his testicles and looked under them with a flashlight. OA explains he felt completely humiliated.”

The person who wrote the article must be mentally ill – referred to a person with a penis as “SHE”, “HER” repeatedly. Women don’t have a penis.

I imagine y’all know that OPEC decided to cripple the U.S. fracking industry by over producing oil, driving the price down.

Now they’re paying the price:

Opec pleads for Russian alliance to smash oil speculators

“Tough times requires tough choices. It is crucial that all major producers sit down and come up with a solution,” said Opec chief al-Badri.

The ‘tough times’ are the fact that OPEC, well Saudi Arabia mainly, but OPEC too, have consciously attempted to drive the price of oil down far enough to force American companies into bankruptcy.

And their success is costing them a lot more than they bargained for, while not yet really having the desired effect. Basically they’re setting up the world for a HUGE shock, sooner rather than later – and it may be TOO LATE to do ANYTHING about it a this point:

Mr al-Badri said the world needs an investment blitz of $10 trillion to replace depleting oil fields and to meet extra demand of 17m barrels per day (b/d) by 2040, yet projects are being shelved at an alarming rate. A study by IHS found that investment for the years from 2015 to 2020 has been slashed by $1.8 trillion, compared to what was planned in 2014.

Another take on it:

Leonid Fedun, vice-president of Russia’s oil group Lukoil, said Opec policy had set off a stampede, comparing it to a “herd of animals rushing to escape a fire”. He called on the Kremlin to craft a political deal with the cartel to overcome the glut. “It is better to sell a barrel of oil at $50 than two barrels at $30,” he told Tass. He accused the cartel of incompetence. “When Opec launched the price war, they expected US companies to go under very quickly.

Claudio Descalzi, head of Italy’s oil group Eni, said Opec has stopped playing the role of “regulator” for crude, leaving markets in the grip of financial forces trading “paper barrels” that outnumber actual barrels of oil by a ratio of 80:1.

The paradox of the current slump is that global spare capacity is at wafer-thin levels of 2pc as Saudi Arabia pumps at will, leaving the market acutely vulnerable to any future supply-shock. “In the 1980s it was around 30pc; 10 years ago it was 8pc,” said Mr Descalzi.

Mr Norrish said excess output peaked in the last quarter of 2015 at 2.1m b/d. The over-supply will narrow to 1.2m b/d in the first quarter as of this year as a string of Opec and non-Opec reach “pain points”, despite the return of Iranian crude after the lifting of sanctions.

Mr Norrish said the oil market faces powerful headwinds. US shale has emerged as a swing producer and will crank up output “quite quickly” once prices rebound.

They tried to destroy American production, now their own may be threatened.

It seems that getting oil producing nations to agree to production cuts is a lot like trying to get nations to agree to fossil fuel use reductions/carbon taxes.

I imagine y’all know that OPEC decided to cripple the U.S. fracking industry by over producing oil, driving the price down.

Now they’re paying the price:

Opec pleads for Russian alliance to smash oil speculators

“Tough times requires tough choices. It is crucial that all major producers sit down and come up with a solution,” said Opec chief al-Badri.

The ‘tough times’ are the fact that OPEC, well Saudi Arabia mainly, but OPEC too, have consciously attempted to drive the price of oil down far enough to force American companies into bankruptcy.

And their success is costing them a lot more than they bargained for, while not yet really having the desired effect. Basically they’re setting up the world for a HUGE shock, sooner rather than later – and it may be TOO LATE to do ANYTHING about it a this point:

Mr al-Badri said the world needs an investment blitz of $10 trillion to replace depleting oil fields and to meet extra demand of 17m barrels per day (b/d) by 2040, yet projects are being shelved at an alarming rate. A study by IHS found that investment for the years from 2015 to 2020 has been slashed by $1.8 trillion, compared to what was planned in 2014.

Another take on it:

Leonid Fedun, vice-president of Russia’s oil group Lukoil, said Opec policy had set off a stampede, comparing it to a “herd of animals rushing to escape a fire”. He called on the Kremlin to craft a political deal with the cartel to overcome the glut. “It is better to sell a barrel of oil at $50 than two barrels at $30,” he told Tass. He accused the cartel of incompetence. “When Opec launched the price war, they expected US companies to go under very quickly.

Claudio Descalzi, head of Italy’s oil group Eni, said Opec has stopped playing the role of “regulator” for crude, leaving markets in the grip of financial forces trading “paper barrels” that outnumber actual barrels of oil by a ratio of 80:1.

The paradox of the current slump is that global spare capacity is at wafer-thin levels of 2pc as Saudi Arabia pumps at will, leaving the market acutely vulnerable to any future supply-shock. “In the 1980s it was around 30pc; 10 years ago it was 8pc,” said Mr Descalzi.

Mr Norrish said excess output peaked in the last quarter of 2015 at 2.1m b/d. The over-supply will narrow to 1.2m b/d in the first quarter as of this year as a string of Opec and non-Opec reach “pain points”, despite the return of Iranian crude after the lifting of sanctions.

Mr Norrish said the oil market faces powerful headwinds. US shale has emerged as a swing producer and will crank up output “quite quickly” once prices rebound.

They tried to destroy American production, now their own may be threatened.

It seems that getting oil producing nations to agree to production cuts is a lot like trying to get nations to agree to fossil fuel use reductions/carbon taxes.

I am going to make some minor corrections to fix the things they didn’t tell you in the article so this is more or less a cut and paste but with corrections. See the source for how they said it.

The debt of the federal government increased by $8,314,529,850,339.07 in President Barack Obama’s first seven years in office, thanks mostly to Obama and Democrats in Congress but also some blame goes to Republicans who either played ball or held out for a while but folded like a cheap rug in the end. Data from the U.S. Treasury.

That equals $70,612.91 in net federal borrowing for each of the 117,480,000 households that the Census Bureau estimates were in the United States as of September.

During President George W. Bush’s eight years in office, the federal debt increased by $4,899,100,310,608.44, due largely to 9/11 and the war on terror as well as Bush’s forward thinking about the need to start eliminating real threats rather than doing what Obama has done by creating them, also due to the Democrats taking control of Congress in the last years and again both some Republicans and, to a certain extent, Bush, as he capitulated to their demands in his lame-duck period – should have held out and let Obama and the Democrats get all the blame.

That equaled $44,104.65 in net federal borrowing for each of the 111,079,000 households that, according to the Census Bureau, were in the country as of Jan. 20, 2009, the day that Bush left office and Obama assumed it.

When Bush took office on Jan. 20, 2001, the federal debt was 5,727,776,738,304.64. When Obama took office eight years later, on Jan. 20, 2009, the federal debt was 10,626,877,048,913.08.

As of Jan. 20, 2016, when Obama completed his seventh year in office, the federal debt was $18,941,406,899,252.15.

Keep in mind while the initial budget is supposed to come from the Executive branch and the President can sign or veto spending bills generally, the Congress has the sole power of the purse – only they have the right to tax and spend, not the President, though some aspects of spending, once a spending bill is passed and made law, have been delegated by Congress to various Executive Branch entities.

I am going to make some minor corrections to fix the things they didn’t tell you in the article so this is more or less a cut and paste but with corrections. See the source for how they said it.

The debt of the federal government increased by $8,314,529,850,339.07 in President Barack Obama’s first seven years in office, thanks mostly to Obama and Democrats in Congress but also some blame goes to Republicans who either played ball or held out for a while but folded like a cheap rug in the end. Data from the U.S. Treasury.

That equals $70,612.91 in net federal borrowing for each of the 117,480,000 households that the Census Bureau estimates were in the United States as of September.

During President George W. Bush’s eight years in office, the federal debt increased by $4,899,100,310,608.44, due largely to 9/11 and the war on terror as well as Bush’s forward thinking about the need to start eliminating real threats rather than doing what Obama has done by creating them, also due to the Democrats taking control of Congress in the last years and again both some Republicans and, to a certain extent, Bush, as he capitulated to their demands in his lame-duck period – should have held out and let Obama and the Democrats get all the blame.

That equaled $44,104.65 in net federal borrowing for each of the 111,079,000 households that, according to the Census Bureau, were in the country as of Jan. 20, 2009, the day that Bush left office and Obama assumed it.

When Bush took office on Jan. 20, 2001, the federal debt was 5,727,776,738,304.64. When Obama took office eight years later, on Jan. 20, 2009, the federal debt was 10,626,877,048,913.08.

As of Jan. 20, 2016, when Obama completed his seventh year in office, the federal debt was $18,941,406,899,252.15.

Keep in mind while the initial budget is supposed to come from the Executive branch and the President can sign or veto spending bills generally, the Congress has the sole power of the purse – only they have the right to tax and spend, not the President, though some aspects of spending, once a spending bill is passed and made law, have been delegated by Congress to various Executive Branch entities.

Well perhaps the Europeans are right about SOME Americans – for instance, anyone who voted for Obama 2x and even a good portion of those who admitted they only voted for him the first time because he was black.

A handful of industries are those “love to hate” types of businesses, such as cable-television companies and Internet service providers.

The federal government has joined the ranks of the bottom-of-the-barrel industries, according to a new survey from the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Americans’ satisfaction level in dealing with federal agencies –everything from Treasury to Homeland Security — has fallen for a third consecutive year, reaching an eight-year low.

Well perhaps the Europeans are right about SOME Americans – for instance, anyone who voted for Obama 2x and even a good portion of those who admitted they only voted for him the first time because he was black.

A handful of industries are those “love to hate” types of businesses, such as cable-television companies and Internet service providers.

The federal government has joined the ranks of the bottom-of-the-barrel industries, according to a new survey from the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Americans’ satisfaction level in dealing with federal agencies –everything from Treasury to Homeland Security — has fallen for a third consecutive year, reaching an eight-year low.

Willie Cicci: Sal, Tom, the boss says for you two to go on ahead, and he’ll follow in a seperate car.
Salvatore ‘Sal’ Tessio: Hell, he can’t that, it screws up my arrangements.
Willie Cicci: Well, that’s what he said.
Tom Hagen: I can’t go either Sal.
Salvatore ‘Sal’ Tessio: [sighs, realising] Tell Mike it was only business. I always liked him.
Tom Hagen: He understands that.
Willi Cicci: [removing Tessio’s gun] Excuse me, Sally.
Tessio: Can you get me off the hook, Tom? For old times’ sake?
Tom Hagen: [shakes his head] Can’t do it, Sally.
[Hagen watches sadly as Tessio is led by Cicci and the others to a waiting car]

Willie Cicci: Sal, Tom, the boss says for you two to go on ahead, and he’ll follow in a seperate car.
Salvatore ‘Sal’ Tessio: Hell, he can’t that, it screws up my arrangements.
Willie Cicci: Well, that’s what he said.
Tom Hagen: I can’t go either Sal.
Salvatore ‘Sal’ Tessio: [sighs, realising] Tell Mike it was only business. I always liked him.
Tom Hagen: He understands that.
Willi Cicci: [removing Tessio’s gun] Excuse me, Sally.
Tessio: Can you get me off the hook, Tom? For old times’ sake?
Tom Hagen: [shakes his head] Can’t do it, Sally.
[Hagen watches sadly as Tessio is led by Cicci and the others to a waiting car]

Because as long as the government is allowed to print money they need to spend it on something. That politicians can simply raise the debt ceiling, and do every time, imposes the most insidious tax upon the people without their knowing it. We are a debtor nation and nobody is even talking about how to solve this. The questions every aspiring candidate for the presidency should be asked: 1) how do you solve the debt issue without eliminating the federal reserve? 2) what will they do about tax exempt foundations actively influencing politics and subverting the fabric of this nation? Everyone should acquaint themselves with fairly recent history in the book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, and do a little research on the Reese Commision Report on the foundations.

Because as long as the government is allowed to print money they need to spend it on something. That politicians can simply raise the debt ceiling, and do every time, imposes the most insidious tax upon the people without their knowing it. We are a debtor nation and nobody is even talking about how to solve this. The questions every aspiring candidate for the presidency should be asked: 1) how do you solve the debt issue without eliminating the federal reserve? 2) what will they do about tax exempt foundations actively influencing politics and subverting the fabric of this nation? Everyone should acquaint themselves with fairly recent history in the book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, and do a little research on the Reese Commision Report on the foundations.

Well good thing every time America elects ‘conservatives’ with a majority in Congress, those non-essential employees have to eventually real work. Oh wait, that never happens except maybe in a parallel universe, never mind…..

Well good thing every time America elects ‘conservatives’ with a majority in Congress, those non-essential employees have to eventually real work. Oh wait, that never happens except maybe in a parallel universe, never mind…..

Non-essential just means that you are not mission essential if something big happens. The non-essential is the low pay grade workers who does most of the work. I’ve been in the military and government jobs for 33 years and letting non-essential employees not report to work (including military!) has been going on for years and years. When it is a state of emergency, they want to keep most people off the roads.

Non-essential just means that you are not mission essential if something big happens. The non-essential is the low pay grade workers who does most of the work. I’ve been in the military and government jobs for 33 years and letting non-essential employees not report to work (including military!) has been going on for years and years. When it is a state of emergency, they want to keep most people off the roads.

As Trump walks out of the rigged GOPe debates and while Amon Bundy is arrested and Lavoy Finicum slaughtered, liberals are firmly anchored into the government. They are mindlessly determined to change the economics and demographics of America at whatever cost.

Under these circumstances, to see the need for Trump, consider two things: (1) our conservative history and (2) the long term perspective going forward.

To date, as a result of a gross misunderstanding of their lot in life, Americans have all but lost their Constitutional Republic. They have been cheated out of their vote, money and prospects. They have a government that has done things for which they would never have approved. They have had their culture, towns and neighborhoods altered to fit big government designs.

Trumpism is a reaction to this.

Liberals have had and continue to have, a strangle hold on America. They have been successful in breaking down many traditions and cultural norms. They have produced a desperate economy in which millions need the hand-outs that socialist
dimocrats grudgingly dole out. They have innumerable judges in their pocket, including those on the Supreme Court doing almost irreversible damage to the rule of law.

Worse, they have Mexicans, Somalis and Muslims and now S. American “refugees” to insure further and future militaristic, totalitarian
control of the country.

What this means is that while there is a great need for the ideal conservative (who passes all purity tests) to enter the WH – it will not happen. No matter how convinced conservatives are that they have a legitimate point, the country is too far to the left and under control of the left for yesterday’s WF Buckley conservativism.

National Review is emblematic of the change. Conservativism has lost. And right now, conservatives cannot succeed in accomplishing their goal to put one of their own in the WH – not right now. Well-refined purity in a candidate is not an option.

Now to add to this, there is now an even a greater threat to Americans. Which is that while citizens have always lived alongside dangerous crime, their lives have become even more unsecured as illegal aliens pour into the country thereby upping the criminal faction of society by which American citizens are forced to absorb.

Even as the country is hammer-locked under a liberal-dimocrat-GOPe government, it has become even more unstable under a foreign invasion against which there is little to no control. This is further de-stablization that will have the effect of sensitizing Americans. It may not have been lost on Americans that Kate’s Law cannot be passed by their treacherous government. Even so, 50% of the country is willing to embrace socialism or a hillary-brand of empty promises and certain anarchy.

And even if millions want a true conservative, and if by some turn of the Super-Pacs a conservative like Cruz could by a miracle get the WH – he would be completely neutralized. Cruz would at best, be ineffective. The conflict between Cruz and the GOPe, the dimocrats, and everyone else in government and the MSM, would prove to be a disaster. Cruz’ entrenched political enemies would see
to it that he is essentially shelved or turned into a collaborator of sorts, for the duration. Moreover, Cruz is a lawyer and a professional politician beholding to donors. More of what we’ve had for the last two decades.

In addition to insuring a Republican victory, Trump would be profoundly better for the country than what has been in the WH for at least the last 8 years. And he carries the Republican brand.

An actual conservative president that is advertising as a conservative, is an impossible dream due to the demographics, the power of the GOPe-dimocrat ruling elite and the attitudes and fractionation among the citizenry today. Alternatively, by turning from a businessman to politician, Trump may have become a solid conservative. But he would understand that he couldn’t get elected advertising such bona fides.

Trump owes no one, and that alone should be a sign of progress toward someone who can actually do what he says he’ll do.

The result is, that he would be a vast improvement over BO and the dim party. The difference would be palatable, even to the dims – esp if they were also invested in his presidency. Just Trump’s tax plan alone would bring about
a marked change for the better. It is assured that the predatory behavior (e.g.,
guns, EPA, etc. etc.) of a BO administration would be halted by a Trump administration. If Trump were to actually succeed in stopping the invading foreigners, as did Calvin Coolidge, the country would regain a sense of optimism and confidence that would go toward rejunvenating real wealth.

When the economy improves and immigration stopped, we can argue about all the other issues. And yes, we’ll get to ethanol .

Even if Trump was a 4-year, moderate president, he would have left behind a tangible improvement in the country; both economically and demographically. At the very least, there would be a tilt toward the rule of law.

Because of the unstable nature of the country now, his administration would still have the effect of opening the door to a greater brand of Republicanism. Where a Reagan type could never be elected today, following the success of Trump as a Republican, tomorrow the door will open for an constitutional conservative nationalist in the style of Ronald Reagan.

Trump needs cross-overs bc he has a big challenge; he is up against the MSM, foreign money, criminal money, cheating and potentially millions of illegal alien voters. And incredibly, a lot of you.

Trump has not encapsulated the conservative purism of a Milton Friedman, George Gilder or Ronald Reagan (he seems to be more of a John Stuart Mill type of Utilitarian) however today, his political convictions pose a reasonable chance that he will wind up putting the country on a much more conservative and traditional direction.

This is the foundation that is needed to bring in future constitutional conservative nationalists as leaders and is the only way to lead the country back to a sovereign and economically viable Constitutional Republic.

Look at the states. States that are the most successful have put into place conservative governorships. This also cannot have been missed by the majority
of voters suffering under liberal controls. Scott Walker is evidence of that.

The success of conservative principles matched with a rational populace, inevitably will bring a return to conservative leadership.

Trump may indeed turn out to be a conservative Trojan horse for the dimocrats, but even if he is not, and is only a moderate working with dims and the GOPe, he will still be more successful in improving the country than it is today. That will be in contrast to the vomitous BO and will be an huge eye-opener for millions inclined to stew in front of their TVs.

Keep in mind that America’s decline has happened as a consequence of irresponsible Americans squandering the one bit of power they have – the vote.

But after what voters will have seen with Trump, it will then have become possible for this stunted and wounded country, being pushed into a third-world status, to finally understand the need for true, hard, unapologetic conservative leaders.

As Trump walks out of the rigged GOPe debates and while Amon Bundy is arrested and Lavoy Finicum slaughtered, liberals are firmly anchored into the government. They are mindlessly determined to change the economics and demographics of America at whatever cost.

Under these circumstances, to see the need for Trump, consider two things: (1) our conservative history and (2) the long term perspective going forward.

To date, as a result of a gross misunderstanding of their lot in life, Americans have all but lost their Constitutional Republic. They have been cheated out of their vote, money and prospects. They have a government that has done things for which they would never have approved. They have had their culture, towns and neighborhoods altered to fit big government designs.

Trumpism is a reaction to this.

Liberals have had and continue to have, a strangle hold on America. They have been successful in breaking down many traditions and cultural norms. They have produced a desperate economy in which millions need the hand-outs that socialist
dimocrats grudgingly dole out. They have innumerable judges in their pocket, including those on the Supreme Court doing almost irreversible damage to the rule of law.

Worse, they have Mexicans, Somalis and Muslims and now S. American “refugees” to insure further and future militaristic, totalitarian
control of the country.

What this means is that while there is a great need for the ideal conservative (who passes all purity tests) to enter the WH – it will not happen. No matter how convinced conservatives are that they have a legitimate point, the country is too far to the left and under control of the left for yesterday’s WF Buckley conservativism.

National Review is emblematic of the change. Conservativism has lost. And right now, conservatives cannot succeed in accomplishing their goal to put one of their own in the WH – not right now. Well-refined purity in a candidate is not an option.

Now to add to this, there is now an even a greater threat to Americans. Which is that while citizens have always lived alongside dangerous crime, their lives have become even more unsecured as illegal aliens pour into the country thereby upping the criminal faction of society by which American citizens are forced to absorb.

Even as the country is hammer-locked under a liberal-dimocrat-GOPe government, it has become even more unstable under a foreign invasion against which there is little to no control. This is further de-stablization that will have the effect of sensitizing Americans. It may not have been lost on Americans that Kate’s Law cannot be passed by their treacherous government. Even so, 50% of the country is willing to embrace socialism or a hillary-brand of empty promises and certain anarchy.

And even if millions want a true conservative, and if by some turn of the Super-Pacs a conservative like Cruz could by a miracle get the WH – he would be completely neutralized. Cruz would at best, be ineffective. The conflict between Cruz and the GOPe, the dimocrats, and everyone else in government and the MSM, would prove to be a disaster. Cruz’ entrenched political enemies would see
to it that he is essentially shelved or turned into a collaborator of sorts, for the duration. Moreover, Cruz is a lawyer and a professional politician beholding to donors. More of what we’ve had for the last two decades.

In addition to insuring a Republican victory, Trump would be profoundly better for the country than what has been in the WH for at least the last 8 years. And he carries the Republican brand.

An actual conservative president that is advertising as a conservative, is an impossible dream due to the demographics, the power of the GOPe-dimocrat ruling elite and the attitudes and fractionation among the citizenry today. Alternatively, by turning from a businessman to politician, Trump may have become a solid conservative. But he would understand that he couldn’t get elected advertising such bona fides.

Trump owes no one, and that alone should be a sign of progress toward someone who can actually do what he says he’ll do.

The result is, that he would be a vast improvement over BO and the dim party. The difference would be palatable, even to the dims – esp if they were also invested in his presidency. Just Trump’s tax plan alone would bring about
a marked change for the better. It is assured that the predatory behavior (e.g.,
guns, EPA, etc. etc.) of a BO administration would be halted by a Trump administration. If Trump were to actually succeed in stopping the invading foreigners, as did Calvin Coolidge, the country would regain a sense of optimism and confidence that would go toward rejunvenating real wealth.

When the economy improves and immigration stopped, we can argue about all the other issues. And yes, we’ll get to ethanol .

Even if Trump was a 4-year, moderate president, he would have left behind a tangible improvement in the country; both economically and demographically. At the very least, there would be a tilt toward the rule of law.

Because of the unstable nature of the country now, his administration would still have the effect of opening the door to a greater brand of Republicanism. Where a Reagan type could never be elected today, following the success of Trump as a Republican, tomorrow the door will open for an constitutional conservative nationalist in the style of Ronald Reagan.

Trump needs cross-overs bc he has a big challenge; he is up against the MSM, foreign money, criminal money, cheating and potentially millions of illegal alien voters. And incredibly, a lot of you.

Trump has not encapsulated the conservative purism of a Milton Friedman, George Gilder or Ronald Reagan (he seems to be more of a John Stuart Mill type of Utilitarian) however today, his political convictions pose a reasonable chance that he will wind up putting the country on a much more conservative and traditional direction.

This is the foundation that is needed to bring in future constitutional conservative nationalists as leaders and is the only way to lead the country back to a sovereign and economically viable Constitutional Republic.

Look at the states. States that are the most successful have put into place conservative governorships. This also cannot have been missed by the majority
of voters suffering under liberal controls. Scott Walker is evidence of that.

The success of conservative principles matched with a rational populace, inevitably will bring a return to conservative leadership.

Trump may indeed turn out to be a conservative Trojan horse for the dimocrats, but even if he is not, and is only a moderate working with dims and the GOPe, he will still be more successful in improving the country than it is today. That will be in contrast to the vomitous BO and will be an huge eye-opener for millions inclined to stew in front of their TVs.

Keep in mind that America’s decline has happened as a consequence of irresponsible Americans squandering the one bit of power they have – the vote.

But after what voters will have seen with Trump, it will then have become possible for this stunted and wounded country, being pushed into a third-world status, to finally understand the need for true, hard, unapologetic conservative leaders.

The first-ever global nitrogen footprint, encompassing 188 countries, has found the United States, China, India and Brazil are responsible for 46 percent of the world’s nitrogen emissions.

The international collaboration, led by the University of Sydney’s Integrated Sustainability Analysis team in the Faculty of Science, found developing countries tend to embody large amounts of nitrogen emissions from their exports of food, textiles and clothing. Australia is one of the few wealthy nations that is a net exporter of nitrogen, because of the substantial agriculture industry.

Anyone care to make a prediction how long until they declare nitrogen a pollutant and try to tax emissions?

The first-ever global nitrogen footprint, encompassing 188 countries, has found the United States, China, India and Brazil are responsible for 46 percent of the world’s nitrogen emissions.

The international collaboration, led by the University of Sydney’s Integrated Sustainability Analysis team in the Faculty of Science, found developing countries tend to embody large amounts of nitrogen emissions from their exports of food, textiles and clothing. Australia is one of the few wealthy nations that is a net exporter of nitrogen, because of the substantial agriculture industry.

Anyone care to make a prediction how long until they declare nitrogen a pollutant and try to tax emissions?

CLIMATE NAZIS AND THEIR LONG ROAD FROM KYOTO TO PARIS – SPEWING CARBON ALL THE WAY

The Paris climate alarmist meeting was the twenty-first in a long string of Conferences since the 1992 United Nations Framework and the 1997 Kyoto agreement. The past few years have been characterized not only by steadily increasing atmospheric CO2 accompanied by significantly slower global warming, but also by essentially none of the progress in policy agreements that climate Nazis wanted to impose on the world. There are wide gaps between what they claim is needed, between what is being done due to their efforts, and what we SHOULD be doing – spending the money they’re wasting on REAL problems.

21 times they’ve gone on taxpayer funded jaunts to exotic locations around the world, spewing carbon all the way, lecturing us about how WE need to stop doing just that.

CLIMATE NAZIS AND THEIR LONG ROAD FROM KYOTO TO PARIS – SPEWING CARBON ALL THE WAY

The Paris climate alarmist meeting was the 21st in a long string of Conferences characterized by the release of prodigious amounts of carbon, a lot of wailing, gnashing of teeth and rending of garments, but precious little actual progress towards the ridiculous goals involved. The past two decades have been characterized not only by steadily increasing atmospheric CO2 accompanied by significantly slower global warming, but also by essentially very little of the progress in policy agreements that climate Nazis wanted to impose on the world, fortunately. There are wide gaps between what they claim is needed, between what is being done due to their efforts, and what we SHOULD be doing – spending the money they’re wasting on REAL problems.

21 times they’ve gone on taxpayer funded jaunts to exotic locations around the world, spewing carbon all the way, lecturing us about how WE need to stop doing just that. There are plans for many future meetings, indefinite meetings that will do little but generate carbon, hot air and huge bills for taxpayers.

Who knew the fraudulent climate crisis was not much more than a plan to get regular vacations to exotic world locations for the co-conspirators.

Cold snaps like the ones that hit the eastern United States in the past winters are not a consequence of climate change. Scientists have now shown that global warming actually tends to reduce temperature variability.

Cold snaps like the ones that hit the eastern United States in the past winters are not a consequence of climate change. Scientists have now shown that global warming actually tends to reduce temperature variability.

During her two presidential campaigns, Hillary Clinton has consistently drawn greater support from women than men. Is this gender lag due to retrograde misogyny, or does Hillary project an uneasiness or ambivalence about men that complicates her appeal to a broader electorate?

As a career woman, Hillary is rooted in second-wave feminism, which began with Betty Friedan’s co-founding of the National Organization for Women in 1967, while Hillary was in college. Friedan sought to draw men into the women’s movement and to ally with mainstream wives and mothers. But after a series of ideological struggles, she lost her leadership role and was eventually eclipsed in media attention by the more telegenic Gloria Steinem, who famously said, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”

Hillary has unfortunately adopted the Steinem brand of blame-men-first feminism, which defines women as perpetual victims requiring government protections. Hillary’s sometimes impatient or patronizing tone about men, which can perhaps be traced to key aspects of her personal history, may prove costly to her current campaign.

In his biography of Hillary, “A Woman in Charge,” Carl Bernstein detailed the abuse and humiliation regularly visited by her domineering father, Hugh Rodham, on her mother Dorothy. Hillary has tersely admitted the strict physical discipline inflicted upon her and her two younger brothers by their father, who maintained a drill-sergeant atmosphere in their Chicago home.

It is often mistakenly said that by staying in her marriage to the philandering Bill Clinton, Hillary was following the standard pattern of her generation.

During her two presidential campaigns, Hillary Clinton has consistently drawn greater support from women than men. Is this gender lag due to retrograde misogyny, or does Hillary project an uneasiness or ambivalence about men that complicates her appeal to a broader electorate?

As a career woman, Hillary is rooted in second-wave feminism, which began with Betty Friedan’s co-founding of the National Organization for Women in 1967, while Hillary was in college. Friedan sought to draw men into the women’s movement and to ally with mainstream wives and mothers. But after a series of ideological struggles, she lost her leadership role and was eventually eclipsed in media attention by the more telegenic Gloria Steinem, who famously said, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”

Hillary has unfortunately adopted the Steinem brand of blame-men-first feminism, which defines women as perpetual victims requiring government protections. Hillary’s sometimes impatient or patronizing tone about men, which can perhaps be traced to key aspects of her personal history, may prove costly to her current campaign.

In his biography of Hillary, “A Woman in Charge,” Carl Bernstein detailed the abuse and humiliation regularly visited by her domineering father, Hugh Rodham, on her mother Dorothy. Hillary has tersely admitted the strict physical discipline inflicted upon her and her two younger brothers by their father, who maintained a drill-sergeant atmosphere in their Chicago home.

It is often mistakenly said that by staying in her marriage to the philandering Bill Clinton, Hillary was following the standard pattern of her generation.

A Major Problem With Colorado’s Marijuana Economy Emerged After Weed Went Legal – it’s become another example of alleged ‘white privilege’!

In Colorado, one of the requirements for getting a license to sell medical or recreational cannabis is that you don’t have a controlled substance felony conviction on your record — including any involving marijuana. The irony here — that black people are far more likely to have such a conviction than any other racial group in the state — points to one of the biggest problems with legal weed trends sweeping the nation.

SO BASICALLY the ‘problem’ is that people who chose to commit felonies can’t get in on this new opportunity. And of course, somehow, that’s racist. Yeah, the fact blacks commit crimes against themselves and whites – you can say that’s racist behavior ON THEIR PART perhaps.

A Major Problem With Colorado’s Marijuana Economy Emerged After Weed Went Legal – it’s become another example of alleged ‘white privilege’!

In Colorado, one of the requirements for getting a license to sell medical or recreational cannabis is that you don’t have a controlled substance felony conviction on your record — including any involving marijuana. The irony here — that black people are far more likely to have such a conviction than any other racial group in the state — points to one of the biggest problems with legal weed trends sweeping the nation.

SO BASICALLY the ‘problem’ is that people who chose to commit felonies can’t get in on this new opportunity. And of course, somehow, that’s racist. Yeah, the fact blacks commit crimes against themselves and whites – you can say that’s racist behavior ON THEIR PART perhaps.

Ken Cuccinelli, the former attorney general of Virginia, knows the laws regarding classified information firsthand. In his private practice, Cuccinelli defended a Marine lieutenant colonel court martialed on charges of possessing such information outside a secure facility. He says Clinton’s actions in the e-mail scandal clearly satisfy all five requirements necessary to sustain charges of mishandling classified material, and constitute a breach perhaps even more glaring than the one for which General David Petraeus was convicted.

Could the Hillary Clinton e-mail saga end with FBI Director James Comey resigning in protest?

Ken Cuccinelli, the former attorney general of Virginia, knows the laws regarding classified information firsthand. In his private practice, Cuccinelli defended a Marine lieutenant colonel court martialed on charges of possessing such information outside a secure facility. He says Clinton’s actions in the e-mail scandal clearly satisfy all five requirements necessary to sustain charges of mishandling classified material, and constitute a breach perhaps even more glaring than the one for which General David Petraeus was convicted.

Could the Hillary Clinton e-mail saga end with FBI Director James Comey resigning in protest?

Students nation-wide to attend four-day, university funded white privilege bash

Major universities across the country are offering course credit, and in some cases even paying the cost, for students to attend an annual national event known as “The White Privilege Conference.”

The 2016 conference will feature a variety of speakers and numerous breakout sessions, all of which come at an additional charge. On two of the four days, participants will have the opportunity to spend six hours attending workshops of their choosing, including several tailored for middle-school and high-school students in attendance. More than 20 workshops will be featured at the event, covering topics of sex, race, and gender.

“Feeling exhausted, burned out from working to dismantle racism and white supremacy, and other forms of oppression in organizations, groups, and individuals? Still deeply committed to creating greater equity, inclusion and social justice in society and in organizations, yet finding yourself, at times, too weary or overwhelmed to make meaningful change? We all deserve spaces to heal, refuel, and re-commit to our vision and goals,” the workshop description states.

THOSE FEELINGS you feel of being ‘too weary or overwhelmed to make a meaningful change’ are probably related to the FACT you know it’s all moonbat nonsense. Wake up, wise up, give it up.

Students nation-wide to attend four-day, university funded white privilege bash

Major universities across the country are offering course credit, and in some cases even paying the cost, for students to attend an annual national event known as “The White Privilege Conference.”

The 2016 conference will feature a variety of speakers and numerous breakout sessions, all of which come at an additional charge. On two of the four days, participants will have the opportunity to spend six hours attending workshops of their choosing, including several tailored for middle-school and high-school students in attendance. More than 20 workshops will be featured at the event, covering topics of sex, race, and gender.

“Feeling exhausted, burned out from working to dismantle racism and white supremacy, and other forms of oppression in organizations, groups, and individuals? Still deeply committed to creating greater equity, inclusion and social justice in society and in organizations, yet finding yourself, at times, too weary or overwhelmed to make meaningful change? We all deserve spaces to heal, refuel, and re-commit to our vision and goals,” the workshop description states.

THOSE FEELINGS you feel of being ‘too weary or overwhelmed to make a meaningful change’ are probably related to the FACT you know it’s all moonbat nonsense. Wake up, wise up, give it up.