A Primer on Ballistic Vests (Pt. 2): Recent Systems and Plate Ratings

Note: This is part of a series. You can read part one here. The 1980s, under the Reagan administration and still in the shadow of the Vietnam War, brought an influx of military funding after a long funding drought. The military made leaps forward in numerous military technologies. One of those technologies was body armor.

PASGT (Personal Armor System for Ground Troops) vests, known to troops of that time as “Kevlar vests,” rolled out in the early 1980s. Kevlar was all the rage, and the new helmets were also made of Kevlar. The Gulf War PASGT vests were a hybrid of nylon and Kevlar. It provided superior frag protection but still no real protection from bullets.

PASGT

OTV/IBA (Outer Tactical Vest/Interceptor Body Armor) vests came out in the late 1980s and were heralded for being able to stop bullets, which they did, but only small-caliber pistol rounds, only on a good day. The OTV was all Kevlar, provided protection from frags, and could stop a round from a 9mm submachine gun. IBA was a slightly different Kevlar mix and was the first true bullet stopper, but again, only 9mm and lower.

OTV/IBA

SAPI (Small Arms Protective Insert) ceramic plates came out in the late 1990s and replaced the PASGT system. The first SAPI plates stopped 7.62mm and 5.56mm rounds for multiple hits, a major leap forward in ballistic plate technology and user protection. But they were still too bulky and heavy for some.

Around this time SOCOM (Special Operations Command) came out with Spear plates, which were lighter and less bulky, and could even be worn under clothing or uniforms for a more covert appearance. But Spear plates were rated only for one hit, which was fine for SOCOM specs. It was not until ESAPI plates came out that SOCOM changed their specs to require plates to sustain multiple hits and remain functional.

One remaining problem was cracks and defects. At that time, a cracked plate had greatly diminished effectiveness. Thus, plates were constantly turned in and inspected, even X-rayed, to be checked for cracks and other defects.

The USMC came out with the MTV (Modular Tactical Vest) in 2006. It was designed to stop 7.62mm and M80 ball ammo. Tests proved it was fairly successful in matching those claims.

MTV

The Army came out with IOTV (Improved Outer Tactical Vest) in 2007. Its big feature was easily “scalable” plates. The term “scalable” pertained to the ability to swap out lighter and heavier plates for more or less protection, which corresponds to more or less weight.

ESAPI (Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert) plates came out in 2005. ESAPI plates had the new ability to remain effective even with cracks. This is very important given the fact that bullets rarely hit virgin plate. Inevitably, most shots strike a damaged ceramic plate. The ceramic material of ESAPI plates have the ability to maintain integrity and remain effective even when cracked. Those are some impressive ceramics. Wish you had a coffee cup made of that stuff, don’t you?

The Army developed ESAPI plates in response to armor-piercing (AP) ammo that had begun showing up in Iraq and Afghanistan. AP rounds present a very different challenge to armor than non-AP ammunition, as AP rounds are designed to pass through armor. Thus, a plate’s ultimate challenge is not to be that plate.

ESAPI testing included 7.62mm and 5.56mm, and also .30-06 AP M2. But, these plates were heavier. Large SAPI plates weighed 5.1 pounds. In contrast, large ESAPI plates weighed 7.4 pounds. There were still other types of plates, much lighter, such as Dyneema plates, which weighed three pounds and were great for stopping pistol rounds, but they would not stop any rifle rounds.

Some claim that titanium are the best plates, that the material allows lighter weights and excellent protection. Titanium stops up to 7.62mm and can be comparable in cost to lesser materials. Titanium plates are generally heavier than ceramic composite plates of equal stopping power. ESAPI titanium plates weigh upwards of 10 pounds.

Those within SOCOM say to avoid law enforcement armor, especially plates, as a level III plate will not stop a 5.56mm green tip. It takes level IV for that, or any of the SAPI or ESAPI plates.

Notes on ballistic plate ratings

Level I is not recommended. It dates back to earlier plate technology and is rated to stop only fragments and low-velocity pistol rounds such as .22 and .38. The odds of being abducted by aliens are better than you being shot at these days by someone with a .38.

Level II is rated to stop the majority of pistol rounds and also 12 gauge buckshot.

Level III is rated for all pistol rounds up to and including .44 Magnum at 1,400 fps (feet per second). Level III is also the first level rated to provide protection against rifle rounds, specifically .308 Winchester full metal jacket rounds and 7.62x51mm NATO rounds, and are tested for six hits and projectiles moving at 2,750 fps. Plate materials tested include 1/4″ ballistic steel, 1/2″ ceramic, and 1″ polyethylene.

There are level III plates that stop ball ammo and mild steel-core ammo, but are butter to AP rounds. So, in an environment with lots of AP rounds flying, those plates, and those who wear them, are at risk.

Level IV is, of course, the highest-rated body armor plates. It is rated for .30-06 AP rounds and .30 M2 AP rounds, but for just one hit at 2,850 fps. Materials tested are 3/4″ ceramic and 1/2″ ballistic steel, though the latter is best suited for vehicle armor, as 1/2″ steel is too heavy for any grunt to wear around for any length of time.

Level IV is tested only for one hit, so it is wise to verify multi-hit testing when shopping for level IV plates and vests, just as it is wise to know who makes and tests your food.

XSAPI is the “next generation” of SAPI plates, which will provide yet more stopping power and less weight. The Army is working on XSAPI to stop rounds that punch through ESAPI like paper, rounds such as the new 5.56mm that has a hardened penetrator and is true AP, as well as M993 and M995 rounds. The bad guys always have, or do not take long to get, equivalent rounds every time we come out with and start issuing better, faster, and more deadly ammunition.

It is expected that XSAPI plates will have longer lifespans and be more durable—able to sustain more hits and remain operational. Plates and body armor of all types will continue to be manufactured with longer lives superior durability. But no armor will ever have unlimited life. Nothing does.

Nippling is something to be aware of and avoid. Various makes of plates, ceramic plates in particular, allow for deformations, or nipples, to form in the ballistic material, but claim no penetration. But if a plate allows an eight-inch spike into the wearer, that’s every bit as bad as allowing the bullet to pass through. These types of plates are often lighter than ESAPI plates, but that comes at an obvious cost.

So, when shopping for that special Christmas vest, also keep in mind that there is a lot of Nerf/Airsoft armor on the market intended for fanboys and fools. Do not be that guy. Do your research and be informed, just as you would when buying a car or a computer. When shopping for ballistic vests, you want ESAPI plates, level IIIA at a minimum. If you have a plate or vest that will stop multiple hits from .30-06 armor-piercing rounds, then you are probably good to go and needn’t shop any more.

The future

Military and law enforcement markets are constantly pursuing that Holy Grail of body armor: ballistic plates that weight next to nothing and can stop a .338 Lapua round. Toward that end, in the future, ballistic materials may move away entirely from steel and ballistic fibers.

Research and development is being done now involving much lighter materials, such as gels, foams, and even liquids. There will probably be materials no one has yet even conceived made into paper-thin plates that can be slipped into a blazer or suit jacket and can stop .44 or even 7.62 mm rounds.

There are some who now claim that the end of the rainbow is a one-pound chest plate that can stop a .50-caliber round and allow the wearer to remain standing. Others think that plates will go way beyond that.

Stay tuned for part three, the future of civilian vests in three markets: ballistic armor, concealment, and protection against biological agents.

Author’s note: I know there are many readers who will take issue with some of the content and details within this article, especially concerning information omitted. This is a complex subject. I welcome your comments.

We thought this story would be interesting for you, for full access to premium original stories written by our all veteran journalists subscribe here .

Comments

To comment on this article please join/login.
Here's a sample of the comments on this post.

allwet

Very informative +1.Check out the MTV, and you see why there was so much grumbling about the mobility, hostility(hotter then f'kin hell),and the resulting irritability among not a few MARSOC folks.
Weight = hate. Ultra risk aversiveness has led to ridiculous amounts of "must wear" armour, greatly reducing stamina,mobility,agility, and therefore utility.....of course someone is makin a serious buck on this(surprise).
"Military and law enforcement markets are constantly pursuing that Holy Grail of body armor: ballistic plates that weight next to nothing and can stop a .338 Lapua round."
Let's be real here, the reduction in mobility, for a virtually .0000000102 % that the bad guys will be widely utilizing a .338 isn't much of reason . If someones pointing the Lapdancer at you, he's probably good enough to "eyeball" you while you waddle along sweating your ass off....
Several folks make decent IIIA soft/ + plates that fit wonderfully into not few back packs w/ hydration/laptop/Go Ruck plate pockets .....and no issue at
airports, um -so far anyway;)
Jus' Sayin'

John C

Google also for the research into the claws of the Mantis Shrimp.

John C

"I would still be skeptic about the .338 Lapua magnum...."
Much like bites from a Great White, *stopping* a .338 isn't a problem. I worked as outside counsel for a textile company that did both. It's accounting for BABT/ pathophysiological effects without compromising functionality elsewhere. It's as much about architecture as it is material.

LPD256

Hey Jeff-This is good stuff. I've been looking at some products, and it's sort of confusing because of all the things like ESAPI, NIJ, etc. Have you heard of a company called United Shield International? I hadn't but it looks like a specialty of theirs is EOD so I'm guessing they do a bunch of govt work, non-civilian. I'm looking at one of their products. Thanks, Jim

Yankee Papa

.
...Good copy. Of course, the problem is weight. Armored knights on horseback ran European battlefields for a time... then Swiss farmers with "pointy sticks" changed the equation in some situations. Chasing muj up hot alleys in the dark when all they have is jeans, sneakers, T-shirt and an AK... very difficult in "Star Wars" armor.
.
...One possible partial answer:
.
http://www.livescience.com/46519-spider-silk-bulletproof-clothing.html
.
-Yankee Papa-