When comparing DeaDBeeF vs yarock, the Slant community recommends DeaDBeeF for most people. In the question“What are the best music players for Linux?”DeaDBeeF is ranked 2nd while yarock is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose DeaDBeeF is:

DeadBeef has a lot of different plugins users can use to customize the interface, controls, and options.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Pros

Pro

A lot of plugins

DeadBeef has a lot of different plugins users can use to customize the interface, controls, and options.

Pro

Lightweight

DeadBeef uses few system resources, making it great for low end systems and for those requiring a media player that uses as few resources as possible.

Pro

Extremely customizable

DeaDBeef has support for title formatting scripting, like foobar2000, which allows you to customize group patterns, the converter output, the window titles, etc. to your needs. DeaDBeeF also has a Design Mode, which allows you to add new widgets to the interface and move/delete existing ones.

Pro

ALSA plugin allows bit-perfect pipeline to DAC

Pro

Uses GTK2 or GTK3

Users are able to choose a GTK2 or GTK3 build of the application to use within DeaDBeeF.

Pro

Supports single-album CUE files

Pro

Easy to switch between different collections

Yarock's database supports multiple music collections, which can be switched between easily.

Pro

Does not meddle with your tunes

If you have spent your precious time crafting your music collection the way you like it and don't want any 'jumped up alarm clocks' renaming and altering your tags, Yarock is a good choice for you.

Alternative Products

Each month, over 2.8 million people use Slant to find the best products and share their knowledge. Pick the tags you’re passionate about to get a personalized feed and begin contributing your knowledge.