11 comments:

farragut
said...

For sale purposes in this area, I don't think it is a good color choice. With this kind of look, you either love it or you hate it. I don't think there is a middle ground. For me, the inside would have to be absolutely divine and the price just right for me to even consider it. In which case, I would factor in the costs of repainting and/or restyling the whole facade.

The outside is nothing compared to the inside which is designed like a Florida timeshare with tacky wall to wall carpet and cheap fixtures ... circa 1978. It's a HORRIBLE renovation. Seriously PooPoo, you want nothing to do with this disaster.

The color scheme isn't so bad --- it is the total lack of curb appeal. If there was a bunch of fun plants and flowers the house would look much better. I also think the porch should be a different color.

I don't think the color is bad. I love that group of painted houses on New Hampshire just down the street from this one and wish that more houses in the neiborhood were painted cool colors. I just always thought the stucco covered house always looked a little wierd next to its neighbors. But the 600 k price tag Kelly mentioned would stop me from getting this place alot more than how it looks outside. If done right, this house could look pretty cool I think.

as someone who has painted their house in an unusual color scheme (and dreads seeing it on this blog labelled hideous) I know that if I ever want to sell it I will have to repaint it. But for now the bright colors make me happy. And it's a big change from the blend in brick red it was. Everyone can find it now!