PER CURIAM: George
Cleveland appeals the circuit court's affirmation of his municipal court
conviction for speeding. He argues the circuit court erred in holding (1) the
municipal court's finding the police officer identified himself was supported
by the evidence and (2) that dismissal was an inappropriate remedy for a police
officer's violation of section 56-5-4640 of the South Carolina Code (2006). We
affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:

2. As to whether the circuit court
erred in holding dismissal was an inappropriate remedy for a police officer's
violation of section 56-5-4640: State v. Gault, 375 S.C. 570, 573-74,
654 S.E.2d 98, 99-100 (Ct. App. 2007) (holding that an argument first raised to
the circuit court in an appeal from the magistrate's court was unpreserved for
review).

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.