Swedish Professor Karl-Olov Arnstberg and sociologist/journalist Gunnar Sandelin are about to publish a new book about the alarming situation and consequences of immigration in Sweden.
They submitted an op-ed about it to every major Swedish mainstream
media outlet, and all without exception refused to publish it. Exactly
as the article says, “this is an issue that is not to be discussed.”

That immigration, whose main merit, apart of course from the cultural
"enrichment", was always trumpeted by the multicultists and the Leftists
as the economic benefit it would bring to the host countries, has in
reality been bleeding European economies and exacerbating the
unemployment of the indigenous populations, is becoming increasingly
evident.

So much so that someone has proposed that European countries have enough
justification to expel Third World immigrants, particularly Muslims, on
financial grounds alone.

Prominent German journalist Udo Ulfkotte has made it clear: "Muslim
immigrants in Germany up until 2007, Dr Ulfkotte explains, "have taken 1
billion euros more out of our social welfare system than they have paid
into our system". To give a better idea of the magnitude of this figure
and put it into perspective, he adds that the total debt of the German
government is 1.7 billion euros. Expelling Muslims, therefore, will help Europe fight its financial crisis."

The article about the new Swedish book described above has been translated by Gates of Vienna, and is really worth reading. Here are the most interesting excerpts:

Sweden is set to burst — the question is whenThe welfare state will fall apart within a few years if this situation is allowed to continue. But this is an issue that is not to be discussed.
...Sweden cannot cope with this much immigration
A professor of ethnology and a sociologist/journalist: Swedish politicians have lost control of immigration.
The costs are escalating, the housing situation is desperate,
unemployment is on the rise and segregation may be described as
dramatic.
In 2012 the Migration Board (Migrationsverket) issued approximately 111,000 residence permits.
...
Many illiteratesImmigration has gradually changed. An earlier wide
spectrum of immigrants has been replaced by asylum seekers from mainly
Muslim countries such as Syria, Somalia and Afghanistan. These
asylum seekers are ill-equipped for life in the high-tech Swedish
society. Employment statistics show that over 60 percent of the new
arrivals and their relatives have a very “rudimentary education”, which
means that many of them are actual or practical illiterates. This makes
it particularly difficult for them to find employment. According to Eurostat, only 2.5 percent of the jobs are available for them [based on their qualifications
— translator] compared with other EU countries where jobs for workers
without any formal qualifications amount to 17 percent. This means that
there are extremely few jobs on offer for asylum seekers and their
dependents who are allowed to stay in Sweden. As a result, the already
large employment gap of 27 percent between domestic-and foreign-born
persons aged 25-64 is increasing (SCB, 2012). The prestigious English
magazine The Economist noted in February that a large proportion of the non-European immigrants that are allowed to settle in Sweden end up living on the dole.
21 percent are refugeesEvery asylum seeker is described as a “refugee” by the media. This is not true, because the definition of “refugee” is tied to the Geneva Convention and the Immigration Act. Of all the asylum seekers that were allowed to stay in Sweden under Fredrik Reinfeldt’s prime ministership, up until 2013, only 21 per cent were refugees. If we go as far back as 1980 the corresponding figure is considerably lower, only 10 percent.
...In recent years the number of individuals that have managed to
obtain family reunification visas is three times higher than those that
have been granted political asylum. The majority of the family reunification applications involves newly established relationships. In other words, it’s not family reunification per se, but rather partners
who are being brought over from the applicants’ former homelands. It
should also be noted that Sweden, as far as we’ve been able to
determine, is the only country that allows welfare recipients to bring over relatives to Sweden who are also very likely to end up living on welfare.
The general rule in the rest of Europe is that anyone who brings over
family members or partners is financially responsible for them.
According to Minister of Immigration Tobias Billström, fewer than one percent of those that are issued with family reunification visas manage to provide for themselves.
...
Rikskriminalen (National bureau of Investigation) estimated in 2010 that
approximately 90 to 95 percent of all the asylum seekers that arrive in
Sweden were aided by human traffickers. The asylum seekers come mainly
from Iraq, Somalia and Afghanistan. The traffickers provide
believable refugee stories that the asylum seekers can present to the
immigration authorities. Asylum seekers are also advised not to show
passports or other appropriate ID documents. Subsequently almost nine
out of ten applicants have at the time of application not produced a
valid passport to Swedish authorities. The refugee policy
cannot be referred to as a humane policy as long as Sweden keeps eroding
the right of political asylum for the truly needy by granting political
asylum to people who are unable to reveal their true identity and their
true intentions.
...
In September 2012 fifteen local Social-democratic politicians in the
Stockholm region raised the alarm about the housing situation... The
reason, of course, was a severe lack of housing... But it’s not just the
lack of housing that is problematic. If we leave the Stockholm area and
take a look at Katrineholm, the Social Services statistical database
shows that of the foreign-born citizens in the city, which in 2011
accounted for 14 percent, 67 percent were on municipal income support.
This is a representative figure. In 2011 the foreign-born living on
income support (including establishment allowance) were over-represented
on the statistics by a factor of 8.6 (or 860 percent), compared to
native Swedes.
What is the cost of the immigration?
...Associate Professor of Economics Jan Tullberg, who teaches at the
Stockholm School has, in our upcoming book Invandring och mörkläggning
(Debattförlaget) [“Immigration and blackout”, Debate Publisher],
upgraded the costs to just over three per cent of GDP, which is
around SEK 110 billion per year. This is almost half of the overall cost
of Swedish health care, or an additional annual net income of SEK
23,000 per employed person.Tullberg believes that Sweden should curb immigration and do
more to get the unemployed back into the workforce. The labour migration
from outside the EU / EFTA states largely confirms this: In the last four years, according to the Swedish Migration Board, 43
percent of all the job migrants come to perform unskilled work, while
at the same time half a million people are unemployed in Sweden.
...
When Tobias Billström, the only politician in the government [willing to
speak out], suggested that “we need to discuss volume”, i.e. the amount
of immigration, he was met by massive media criticism and was not even
supported by his own party leader. There is only one possible
conclusion. Unless the trend described above is altered, Sweden’s status
as a welfare state will soon be history.