Support

A cookie is a piece of data stored by your browser or device that helps websites like this one recognize return visitors. We use cookies to give you the best experience on BNA.com. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. If you continue browsing, you agree to this site’s use of cookies.

Marketing Services

Bloomberg Next marketing services allow clients to elevate their brands and extend their reach through our established and trusted expertise, enhanced with engaging event production, appealing design, and compelling messaging.

Sweeping amendments proposed to the federal tax code will result in far-reaching changes
for state corporate income tax systems, and states should prepare themselves for a
shift to a destination-based, cash-flow federal corporate tax regime, practitioners
said.

“This is a gigantic issue for the states,”
Karl Frieden, vice president and general counsel of the Council On State Taxation,
said. “This is the most significant change to the corporate income tax since 1913.”
In that year, Congress passed the U.S. Revenue Act of 1913, re-establishing the federal
income tax after ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment.

Frieden was joined by other panelists at the National Conference of State Legislatures’
Executive Committee Task Force on State and Local Taxation meeting Jan. 14 in Scottsdale,
Ariz. The panel and other sessions during the meeting addressed the impact on states
of the federal tax plan soon to be introduced in Congress.

Destination-Based

Perhaps the most significant tax policy change in the plan advanced by House Republicans
is the effective repeal of the current 35 percent corporate income tax and its replacement
with a “border-adjustable, destination-based cash-flow tax at 20 percent for corporations
and 25 percent for unincorporated businesses, Kyle Pomerleau, director of federal
projects at the Tax Foundation, said, speaking before the panel got started.

“It essentially makes the tax destination-based,”
he said. The “border-adjustable” aspect means imports would be taxed and exports would
be exempt, he said. By eliminating taxes on returns to investments and by treating
debt and equity equally, the new regime will have “far fewer distortions” than the
current corporate income tax system, he said.

Pomerleau gave brief descriptions of the House Republican plan and the plan proposed
by President-elect Trump, which calls for significant reductions in income taxes and
corporate taxes, and the repeal of the estate tax. According to a Tax Foundation analysis,
Trump’s plan would reduce federal revenue by as much as $6 billion and the House Majority’s
plan by about $2.4 billion, Pomerleau said.

‘Grow the Economy.’

“Both plans result in lower federal revenue, but would result in growing the economy
in the long run,” he said. “Both plans cut marginal rates on work, saving and investment,
which tends to grow the economy.”

They will also have “distributional impacts,”
Pomerleau said. “Both plans reduce the progressivity of the tax code.”

The changes ultimately will boost revenue for states, which is the “best news” as
many states are facing budget crunches and challenges in their attempts to require
out-of-state sellers to collect and remit sales and use taxes, Frieden said.

Others were not so sure.

‘No Predictability.’

The proposed changes will have “totally different impacts on each of the states, and
there’s no predictability about those impacts,” said Minnesota state Sen. Ann Rest
(DFL). ‘We’re not talking about fake money. We have to have balanced budgets. What
if you don’t have a business tax?”

“If you think it’s a good idea for the federal budget, how are we to make appropriate
adjustments and evaluations before we know how it’s going to affect our budgets?”
she said.

Part of what creates a “net revenue gainer”
is a simultaneous lowering of rates with a broadening of the base, which seems to
be happening with both the House Republican and Trump plans “for the corporate piece,”
said Michael Mazerov, senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
“It’s not happening for the personal income piece.”

‘Major Struggle.’

If there is a substantial broadening of the base on the corporate side, but not on
the individual income side, he said, it could be a “net revenue loser for years” in
the states. “Plus, it will be a major struggle for states to conform” to the federal
changes.

States aren’t going to be in lockstep in terms of conforming with the changes, said
panelist Greg Turner of Turner Law in Sacramento. But the federal plans “could provoke
reform at the state level,” he said. “You could use it to take a look at your tax
code, and this could drive investment within the United States.” States could examine
tax policies such as the tangible personal property, he said. “It could provide you
with an opportunity to create a more competitive tax structure for your state.”

When considering a destination-based regime, the states “are already ahead of the
feds,” Frieden said. Many states have been moving in recent years toward a market-based,
single-sales factor apportionment formula for determining business income taxes, he
said.

With the destination basis in federal tax code, the changes “might force states into
a more uniform approach based on the destination model,” Turner said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Tripp Baltz in Denver at
abaltz@bna.com

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Ryan C. Tuck at
rtuck@bna.com

For More Information

More information on the NCSL Executive Committee Task Force on State and Local Taxation
is at
http://src.bna.com/lwV.

All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to books@bna.com.

Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)

Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).

This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to research@bna.com.

Put me on standing order

Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)