- Parts of this English version of this website was automatically translated. We are improving the translation every day. Please register to our forum and our hiking expert will love to answer any of your questions there -

Agree about the island's economic viability picnic bags.I probably carry lunch all the time (taking into account the option to eat in some days). I'm going out with friends a little less spoiled when it comes to food and decide to buy picnic bags.

I returned a week ago.As I wrote above, originally to go an extended version of the track featuring:1) walk with Greece watch2) detour of Pointe de l ' Echelle East and South part of Col de Chaviere.3) she should lodge La Valette somewhere back down the Valley.

In fact, snow amounts this year made us change programmes. There was a fair amount of snow ranging from 2200-2300 m.On the second day of track, between the Col de la Vanoise to the Arpont we haven't built a snow field still walking trail and had to backtrack to Pralognan.

The next morning we woke up to rain. After lengthy inquiries about other sections for offences went at noon to 3 and a half days in beautiful. We went in the valley up to the Col de Chaviere and kept the track (the part that was supposed to be the last two days).

Because the originally planned seven days out we have another day.Took advantage of the fact that we had a rental car and drove to Palud and next day we trekked to the Lac Blanc snow.

Some updates to the specified post's:

TransportWe were four and we preferred to rent a car to ease your back and to achieve flexibility (in retrospect it was successful because it could go at the end of the trip to Mont Blanc and do a day trip). The difference in cost was 50 euros per person.

Pralognan hotelsWe slept at the Hotel Club Vacanciel La Vanoise Pralognan. The cost was € 95 for four includes breakfast (reservation site booking.com)

Photos:Pictures of me are impressive.To understand the differences in the amount of snow will add one image the same place where the photograph was the penultimate's post (for the Lac des Vaches 2300 m altitude)

If you wish, I can add more pictures.

Thanks again for the original post and help.JonathanAmnonl 41471.5768634259

I returned a week ago.As I wrote above, originally to go an extended version of the track featuring:1) walk with Greece watch2) detour of Pointe de l ' Echelle East and South part of Col de Chaviere.3) she should lodge La Valette somewhere back down the Valley.

In fact, snow amounts this year made us change programmes. There was a fair amount of snow ranging from 2200-2300 m.On the second day of track, between the Col de la Vanoise to the Arpont we haven't built a snow field still walking trail and had to backtrack to Pralognan.

The next morning we woke up to rain. After lengthy inquiries about other sections for offences went at noon to 3 and a half days in beautiful. We went in the valley up to the Col de Chaviere and kept the track (the part that was supposed to be the last two days).

Because the originally planned seven days out we have another day.Took advantage of the fact that we had a rental car and drove to Palud and next day we trekked to the Lac Blanc snow.

Some updates to the specified post's:

TransportWe were four and we preferred to rent a car to ease your back and to achieve flexibility (in retrospect it was successful because it could go at the end of the trip to Mont Blanc and do a day trip). The difference in cost was 50 euros per person.

Pralognan hotelsWe slept at the Hotel Club Vacanciel La Vanoise Pralognan. The cost was € 95 for four includes breakfast (reservation site booking.com)

Nice picture, it's my understanding we see pretty wet snow, Jonathan and close the lens according to the point, am I right?Obviously I have to compliment you on the beauty of the image perception teaches about eye of photographer's obvious and very sincere and gmmtzlma advanced knowledge and understanding very attractive use.Naty_h 41471.9518518519

[QUOTE = naty_h]Nice picture, it's my understanding we see pretty wet snow, Jonathan and close the lens according to the point, am I right?Obviously I have to compliment you on the beauty of the image perception teaches about eye of photographer's obvious and very sincere and gmmtzlma advanced knowledge and understanding very attractive use.

I don't know much in the snow so I don't know what the meaning of "wet snow" or "heavy snowfall".

Lake arrived at noon so that the snow was soft and so is compressed approximately 10 to 20 cm in. In the morning and the snow was harder and was cm.

All the pros and cons.A planar walking on snow is much easier and faster progress. However, steep slopes and side Bank in danger of skating.No danger of soft snow (even if fall, stop quickly) but the walk hard (a bit like walking on dunes).

About photography-thank you for the compliment.I'm not sure I really qualify her. The place was so beautiful that it was hard to picture is not successful.The specific image is actually a war of two images (Panorama).

And the camera is actually very simple – Canon PowerShot SX10 IS.

It is an old camera (markets from late 2008) has a CCD sensor that brings all the disadvantages of small cameras. What I love about this camera the amazing zoom range (28-560 mm) and the ability to snap a 0 cm macro (as a fan this large plants). All this within a relatively small body.

First of all thanks for the post and idea.We're back (three pairs) at the beginning of the week of the tour.Reading and looking at the pictures in the thread I think the ideal situation for us was snowball, than for me and less with Jonathan.Did the rounds on aim and a reference book like for me, one change: the first day we climbed to Refuge de la Valette cabin as a reference.I highly recommend not to forego the climb, it was a good day:The climb:

The Lake below the hut:

And the cabin itself:

Two more pictures for comparison to snow mode:Lac de l ' Arpont certainly is one of the highlights of the Trek:

And for the Lac des Vaches to appear and with Jonathan's post:

In summary a short Trek.Speaking about the question of Greece that my conclusion is that the direction described in the book better because that's the last two days are the best and I personally prefer the Trek build toward climax, not vice versa.

The path between a l ' Arpont to the Col de la Vanoise hut was open.There were several walk in snow, but not complicated.Col de Assois was passed. Also rising and falling snow was quite covered the highlights and rogo although the total marked.We went through the pass, although I must admit this was beyond challenge, he arrived at the end of the long day. Those who recommend hand time to divide the day into two parts when possible.

Hey Ellie.Welcome:-).I don't think you can be more specific than I have outlined.From what I checked (on sites of trains and buses) to 1.7.2014 fare is € 43.7 direction towards and can save more if you buy the card 5€ back and forth on the bus:Train.BusDon't panic, suspend the links, you can find something more comfortable.

Editing:

I see the site of the find has not been saved, do search from Geneva Airport to Moutiers-Salins-Brides-les-Bains

GeneWikipedia: A gene is the unit of molecular heredity of a living organism. ?

The route described, i.e. comprehensive listing two (2 passim) you have to get to switch from one side of the ridge on the other side, the rest of the track you have freedom to choose the course.

I haven't looked at the map to the other track, but to me the first day I can tell you that because of the weather we changed it to stay low in the Valley. I'm sure lower options even in the third and fourth days (Monday and Thursday the cost to passim)

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.