I am sure there's a simple, credible preferably biblical explanation to this question. The subject has been batted around -- at least within Adventism -- for decades. By now, a clear, compelling answer should have emerged.

“But when Christ came as high priest of the good things that are now already here, he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not made with human hands, that is to say, is not a part of this creation. He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, thus obtaining eternal redemption.”

Significantly, these texts speak, in the past tense; about Christ in His role as our High Priest (the referenced events in the texts clearly took place before 1844, as they were written more than one thousand seven hundred years before that date). The texts also speak of Christ having performed that role, specifically, in The Most Holy Place in heaven. The texts specify that Christ entered the Most Holy Place -- “once for all” to obtain our redemption, which could only be paid by His blood.

Thus, the question: How is the doctrine of the Investigative Judgment explained when juxtaposed with these texts?