Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> Hi Travis
>> 2009/2/27 Travis E. Oliphant <oliphant@enthought.com>:
>>> My biggest concern is having a bunch of code sitting in a
>> queue and not reviewed, nor committed --- or the review processes become
>> too onerous and code not making it through because of what I would
>> consider to be "ticky-tacky technicalities."
>>>> That's a very valid concern. David and I are experimenting with
> different issue trackers and plugins for trac, to see how best to
> generate a "review pool". I.e., what I'd like to see is that, if you
> only have 5 minutes to work on SciPy in the evening, you can
>> a) Go to trac and click on "tickets for review"
> b) Review a couple of tickets
>> or
>> a) Go to trac and click on "reviewed tickets"
> b) Apply those patches
>> or
>> a) Go to trac and click on "unresolved issues"
> b) Fix the bug
> c) Upload the patch for review
>> Technically, (c) is a bit challenging. I note your concern that it
> would become difficult to check in, so what I would like is to have a
> script such as
>> scipy-submit -t 212 -m "Do not deallocate memory after object disposal."
>Something like that would be nice!
Thanks for the continued effort at improving workflow.
-Travis