Core:
noun, the most important part of a thing, the essence; from the
Latin cor, meaning heart.

Volume 1.17

Featured
Webseries Trove

June 3, 2002

Added May 20, 2002

A two-part article An
American Catholic by Diane Alden @ NewsMax:

An
American Catholic at Easter
Many in the Church grasped Vatican II (1962) as an opportunity to
turn the church into a trendy adjunct of the 60s counterculture
revolution. At that time serious sin went out the window. Thus, after
a few short years, trendy clerics and theologians and administrators distanced
themselves from notions of what traditional Catholics call mortal
sin. At least in the minds of the liberal theologians and politicizers
of Catholic doctrine, there was almost no accountability for ones
actions, as everything seemed to have a psychological rather than a spiritual
aspect. No sin, no consequences. Everything, all our actions, were not
of our doing. Indeed, at that time much of Catholicism was dumped in favor
of the social gospel. The hard stuff the Founder demands was out or ignored.
Selective interpretation of Christs words erred in favor of His
forgiving and loving side. Meanwhile, many Catholics and hierarchy, along
with progressive theologians, forgot the more difficult and uncompromising
demands He made on humanity. They wanted to ignore His recognition of
evil, punishment, justice and sin as well as the eventual sorting out
of evil from good. In the 60s and 70s, the American Catholic
Church tended toward the idea that Christ was all about love
and nothing about casting into the darkness those who do not obey Gods
laws. It was okay to sin as long as you loved everyone and
meant well. The road to hell was no longer paved with good intentions,
because no one was sure hell really existed. God help anyone who made
value judgments on moral issues or called certain behaviors sinful or
evil. Total tolerance of all kinds of things became more important than
not sinning, even though many of these attitudes and behaviors were in
defiance of what the Catholic Church officially taught. In the 60s
especially, the Catholic Church began to accept as priests and nuns many
men and women who were not so much the followers of Christ as they were
the likely intellectual descendants and proponents of Hegel, Marx, Freud,
Jung, Maslow, Rogers and Antonio Gramsci. It is because of that fact that
the Catholic hierarchy in the U.S. could justify sending pedophile priests
to the shrink as they attempted to find out why those men
did foul deeds to young boys.

Catholics
in Name Only
In any event, intellectuals inside and outside the Church felt permission
to make use of their radicalism. Most American institutions were not spared
the Hegelian and Marxist orientation. Radicalism became acceptable; meanwhile,
authority and discernment went to hell in a handbasket. In order to accomplish
utopian collectivist ends, Western civilization and its authority in general
were attacked at all levels. In America the excuse may have been the Vietnam
War, civil rights, helping the poor with the disastrous War on Poverty,
or modernizing the Catholic Church. However, what occurred was the destruction
of positive and constructive avenues enhancing individual freedom, increasing
prosperity and faith, and the healthy observation of the laws of God and
man. Self-discipline and self-control and faith were deep-sixed, replaced
by the acceptance of our victim status as we waited for fulfillment from
government programs, materialism, psychology and pop culture. The all-out
assault on authority of the Church and Western civilization in this era,
along with the loss of self-discipline and self-control, led to the subsequent
increase in the power of the state. After the 60s, when authority
in America and in Europe caved to the new intellectual barbarians, the
proponents of the philosophy of collectivism and Marxism filled the gap.
The Catholic Church in America and Europe did not escape that destiny.
Religion, environmentalism, feminism, the civil rights movement, Vatican
II were all overwhelmed as the barbarians crossed the Tiber and no one
was there to stop them. What could have been positive trends in religion
and society, trends which created more freedom and good living, instead
became a cacophony of dissipation and dissolution and collectivism. We
gave up Mozart, Cole Porter, Aaron Copeland, and Rodgers and Hammerstein
for moral chaos, societal dissonance, Britney Spears, Snoop Doggy Dogg,
human rights for animals and trees, and sex with anything that moves,
whether it be animal, vegetable or mineral. Ever on the defensive, the
American Catholic Church just gave in and called absolutely every goofy
unworkable collectivist and leftist idea the social gospel in action.
Meanwhile, many trends destructive to the family and civilization were
now called diversity or inclusivity. No one seems to notice how diversity
and inclusivity are always carried to their most outrageous extremes.
Dung-covered depictions of the Virgin Mary are acceptable, but a religious
masterpiece like the Ten Commandments is not welcome anywhere. In-your-face
sexuality replaced modesty and ended the sensible idea to keep private
things private. From the 60s onward, rather than seeking the stars,
Americans and the West chose to wander in an intellectual and philosophical
garbage-filled desert. That particular wandering in the landfill wilderness
has just about destroyed Western civilization, not to mention the American
Catholic Church.

Added May 13, 2002

A classic two-part
article, by Bernard Lewis, with a recent related essay, in The Atlantic:

The
Roots of Muslim Rage (Part One)
Like every other civilization known to human history, the Muslim
world in its heyday saw itself as the center of truth and enlightenment,
surrounded by infidel barbarians whom it would in due course enlighten
and civilize. But between the different groups of barbarians there was
a crucial difference. The barbarians to the east and the south were polytheists
and idolaters, offering no serious threat and no competition at all to
Islam. In the north and west, in contrast, Muslims from an early date
recognized a genuine rival  a competing world religion, a distinctive
civilization inspired by that religion, and an empire that, though much
smaller than theirs, was no less ambitious in its claims and aspirations.
This was the entity known to itself and others as Christendom, a term
that was long almost identical with Europe. The struggle between these
rival systems has now lasted for some fourteen centuries. It began with
the advent of Islam, in the seventh century, and has continued virtually
to the present day. It has consisted of a long series of attacks and counterattacks,
jihads and crusades, conquests and reconquests.... For the past three
hundred years, since the failure of the second Turkish siege of Vienna
in 1683 and the rise of the European colonial empires in Asia and Africa,
Islam has been on the defensive, and the Christian and post-Christian
civilization of Europe and her daughters has brought the whole world,
including Islam, within its orbit.

The
Roots of Muslim Rage (Part Two)
The accusations are familiar. We of the West are accused of sexism,
racism, and imperialism, institutionalized in patriarchy and slavery,
tyranny and exploitation. To these charges, and to others as heinous,
we have no option but to plead guilty  not as Americans, nor yet
as Westerners, but simply as human beings, as members of the human race.
In none of these sins are we the only sinners, and in some of them we
are very far from being the worst. The treatment of women in the Western
world, and more generally in Christendom, has always been unequal and
often oppressive, but even at its worst it was rather better than the
rule of polygamy and concubinage that has otherwise been the almost universal
lot of womankind on this planet.... Slavery is today universally denounced
as an offense against humanity, but within living memory it has been practiced
and even defended as a necessary institution, established and regulated
by divine law. The peculiarity of the peculiar institution, as Americans
once called it, lay not in its existence but in its abolition. Westerners
were the first to break the consensus of acceptance and to outlaw slavery,
first at home, then in the other territories they controlled, and finally
wherever in the world they were able to exercise power or influence 
in a word, by means of imperialism.

What
Went Wrong?
Muslim modernizers  by reform or revolution  concentrated
their efforts in three main areas: military, economic, and political.
The results achieved were, to say the least, disappointing. The quest
for victory by updated armies brought a series of humiliating defeats.
The quest for prosperity through development brought in some countries
impoverished and corrupt economies in recurring need of external aid,
in others an unhealthy dependence on a single resource  oil. And
even this was discovered, extracted, and put to use by Western ingenuity
and industry, and is doomed, sooner or later, to be exhausted, or, more
probably, superseded, as the international community grows weary of a
fuel that pollutes the land, the sea, and the air wherever it is used
or transported, and that puts the world economy at the mercy of a clique
of capricious autocrats. Worst of all are the political results: the long
quest for freedom has left a string of shabby tyrannies, ranging from
traditional autocracies to dictatorships that are modern only in their
apparatus of repression and indoctrination.... It was bad enough for Muslims
to feel poor and weak after centuries of being rich and strong, to lose
the position of leadership that they had come to regard as their right,
and to be reduced to the role of followers of the West. But the twentieth
century, particularly the second half, brought further humiliation 
the awareness that they were no longer even the first among followers
but were falling back in a lengthening line of eager and more successful
Westernizers, notably in East Asia. The rise of Japan had been an encouragement
but also a reproach. The later rise of other Asian economic powers brought
only reproach. The proud heirs of ancient civilizations had gotten used
to hiring Western firms to carry out tasks of which their own contractors
and technicians were apparently incapable. Now Middle Eastern rulers and
businessmen found themselves inviting contractors and technicians from
Korea  only recently emerged from Japanese colonial rule 
to perform these tasks. Following is bad enough; limping in the rear is
far worse. By all the standards that matter in the modern world 
economic development and job creation, literacy, educational and scientific
achievement, political freedom and respect for human rights  what
was once a mighty civilization has indeed fallen low.

A three-part series Driving
a Wedge in the Boston Globe:

Why
bin Laden plot relied on Saudi hijackers
Senior US officials and Saudi Interior Ministry officials involved
with the investigation into the involvement of Saudi nationals in the
attacks say they now believe bin Ladens Al Qaeda actively sought
out young Saudi volunteers from this region for their jihad.
The investigation is beginning to reveal a picture of how bin Laden, a
native of the Saudi southwest, exploited the young hijackers by playing
off the region's deep tribal affiliations, itseconomic dis-enfranchisement,
anditsown burning brand of Wahhabi fundamentalism which the kingdom's
religious hierarchy fosters in the schools.

Saudi
schools fuel anti-US anger
US diplomats and Saudi specialists say Saudi schools are the foundation
of the broader society in which the House of Saud has for decades tolerated
extremists within the religious hierarchy to set a tone  in schools
as well as on national television and radio airways  of open bigotry
toward non-Muslims, contempt even for those non-Sunni Muslims from other
branches of the faith such as the Shiite, and of virulent anti-Americanism.
This, US and Saudi observers here say, has been part of an unofficial
deal: The kingdom gave the religious establishment control of the schools
as long as it didnt question the legitimacy of the monarchys
power. The United States went along with this tacit agreement as long
as the oil kept flowing, its troops stayed in the country, and the House
of Saud remained on the throne.

Doubts
are cast on the viability of Saudi monarchy for long term
The House of Saud  the 30,000-member ruling family headed
by 3,000 princes  has long been so riddled with corruption that
even Crown Prince Abdullah has said the culture of royal excess has to
come to an end. It has ruled over the kingdom with documented human rights
abuses and, as one Western diplomat put it, a form of gender apartheid
for women. Democracy has never been part of the equation. These palace
indulgences have been tolerated by Washington for far too long, critics
say, because of a US policy dependent on Saudi Arabias vast oil
reserves, Riyadhs purchase of an estimated $4 billion a year worth
of US weapons, and its pivotal role as host to 5,000 American troops.
Since Franklin Delano Roosevelt agreed a half century ago to defend the
kingdom in exchange for ready access to oil, the balance between US interests
and US ideals in Saudi Arabia has always tipped in favor of Washingtons
economic and strategic interests.

Added May 6, 2002

A three-part part series by
Phil Brennan @ NewsMax on the corruption of Catholic seminaries in the
USA:

Anti-Catholic
Experts Fuel Churchs Scandals
Veteran investigative reporter Michael S. Rose has written a frightening
account of the corruption of the Roman Catholic seminary system in the
United States.... According to the Wanderer, a nationally distributed
lay Catholic newspaper, Wicker was rejecting more candidates for the priesthood
than he was approving. But thats just the beginning. An article
by reporter Gregory Flannery, an ex-seminarian himself, revealed: Men
who wish to become Catholic priests in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati are
first assessed by the Worshipful Master of Mt. Washington Masonic Lodge
642. In the May 8, 1991 issue of Mt. Washington Press, a weekly
newspaper, Flannery reported that Wicker was a fallen-away Catholic and
noted that participation in Masonic sects is condemned by the Catholic
Church. Wicker also admitted to being a member of another sect condemned
by the church, the Rosicrucians. When area Catholics complained about
the idea of a Masonic master passing on candidates for the priesthood,
Archbishop Daniel E. Pilarczyk defended him.... NewsMax.com asked Rose
if this nonsense was still going on. Although many seminaries are
getting better, the nonsense is still prolific, he said.
Orthodox candidates are still being turned away in droves, heterosexual
seminarians are still being sent to psychological counseling and booted
from school, while liberal-minded and pro-gay seminarians are given deferential
treatment, put in charge of others, advanced and ordained.

Homosexual
Culture Undercuts Priesthood
Heterosexual students at a number of seminaries were persecuted
by the gay subculture. Reporting homosexual behavior by classmates could
get them expelled, as could resisting homosexual advances. Rose cites
scores of cases of heterosexuals driven out of seminaries because they
refused to accept the gay culture. In Cozzens book, The Changing
Face of the Priesthood, he wrote that there has been a heterosexual
exodus from the priesthood due, Rose notes, in part to the unrestrained
gay subcultures in some seminaries, the resulting overwhelming gay
clergy culture will have an effect on how the laity views the priesthood
and it will have an effect on incoming vocations. Potential candidates
for the priesthood who are heterosexual will be intimidated from joining
an institution where the ethos is primarily that of a gay culture.
Anyone wondering how the church could have got itself in the mess it is
now experiencing need look no further than the pages of Roses extraordinary
book. What we are seeing today are the results of a gay priesthood being
loosed upon parishes all across the nation, where they have abused impressionable
young men they treated as fresh meat to satisfy their unnatural
sexual urgings.

False
Teaching Sabotages Aspiring Priests
Michael S. Rose examines the destructive effect of what he terms
heterodoxy on seminarians struggling to absorb and adhere to the ancient
doctrines of the church, handed down from the Apostles for 2,000 years.
Many faculty members are adverse to teaching what the Church teaches,
and some even find it onerous to hide their disdain for Catholicism,
Rose wrote. The seminarian who arrives on campus expecting to find
faculty and staff who love the Catholic faith and teach what the Church
teaches can be sadly disappointed. Among the students obstacles
to learning the authentic tenets of their faith, Rose reveals, are being
forced to read textbooks written by noted dissenters from Catholic
teachings such as theologians Richard McBrien, Edward Schillebeeckx,
Hans Kung and Charles Curran, who parrot the dogmas of Catholic
dissent. .... Many of the ideas being taught in seminaries today,
Rose wrote, go way beyond the scope of even these mainstream
errors of Modernist doctrine. Aggressive feminist theories often put forth
by religious sisters devoted to liberation theology and various incarnations
of Jungian psychology make it clear that some faculty members who are
entrusted with the formation of future priests do not support the Catholic
priesthood as the Church defines it. In fact they do not support the Church,
her hierarchy, her Eucharist, or her liturgy. Tragically, throughout
the U.S. today, men taught these heretical doctrines are spreading error,
distorting the liturgy, sowing doctrinal confusion and changing the faith
of countless Catholics.

Added April 29, 2002

A three-part series on Environmentalism
by Diane Alden @ NewsMax:

The
Green Matrix (Part One)
The people who rule the green matrix seek to centrally plan our
lives. They have adopted the same philosophy as those who drove the peasants
off the land in Russia. They are of the same mind as the Red Guard in
China. They are willing to sacrifice science, the truth and freedom, as
well as the well-being of humans and the environment, in order to promote
their utopian vision for the world  a vision that considers man
a cancer on the land. Strangely, the term green matrix comes
up in many of their studies, claims and policy papers. But this isnt
a movie. It is the new totalitarian vision.

The
Green Matrix (Part Two): They Blinded Us With Science
The more serious problem, however, is that over the years agencies
have been co-opted by those with a much larger agenda in mind. It is not
just about listing one species and shutting down one or two forests for
public use, i.e., managing federal lands. As the greens say,
Think globally and act locally. That mantra is at the core
and heart of U.S. environmental policy. It is fair to say that in the
Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service science got dumped
years ago. It was a process that began in the 70s but received official
imprimatur under Bill Clinton in 1993. At that time, philosophy replaced
science. Conservation biology became the science,
and ecosystem management and precautionary principle
the tools. The end game was to reconnect ecosystems from the
Yukon to Mexico.

The
Green Matrix (Part Three): Weird Science  Think Globally
Modern environmentalism has become the best single tool to fulfill
the fondest wishes of the international control freaks and central planners.
It is the new ideological agenda replacing communism and capitalism. It
is, in fact, a lethal mix of both. Alan Caruba of the National Anxiety
Center calls it fascilism. In implementing the various environmental
wish lists, we dont get cleaner air and water. But we do get a new
religion and a new economic system. In addition, the old time religion
is being replaced by a green Zen Buddhism on one hand, and tyranny and
repression on the other. If you follow the logic of ecosystem
management, that is where were headed as we wend our way through
the holistic approach for the collective good.