Breadcrumb

The Érudit platform is currently experiencing slowdowns and disruptions due to an incident at our technical service provider. We are sorry for this inconvenience and are actively collaborating to restore the service. The information will be updated on our Twitter Page.

Article outline

Érudit celebrates its 20th anniversary!

Toolbox

Abstracts

Abstract

The global open education movement is striving toward openness as a feature of academic policy and practice, but evidence shows that these ambitions are far from mainstream, and levels of awareness in institutions is often disappointingly low. Those advocating for open education are seeking to widen engagement, but how targeted and persuasive are their messages? The aim of this research is to explore the voices often unheard, those of the teachers and professional service staff with whom we are engaging. This research presents a series of interviews with those involved in open education at De Montfort University in the UK, with the aim of gaining a better perspective of what openness means to them. The interviews were analysed through an interpretive lens allowing each individual to create their own story and reflect their own personal view of openness. The results of this study are that in this university, openness is represented by five elements – staff pedagogy and practice, benefits to learners, accessibility and access to content, institutional structures, and values and culture. This work shows the importance of adopting critical approaches to gain a deeper understanding of the philosophical and pedagogic stances within institutions. By giving a voice to all those involved we will be able to develop appropriate and more persuasive arguments to widen our sphere of influence as a community of open educators.

Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2016). Institutional culture and OER policy: How structure, culture, and agency mediate OER policy potential in South African universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2523

Dalsgaard, C., & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of openness: Beyond the course as an open format in online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2146

Lane, A. (2009). The impact of openness on bridging educational digital divides. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/637/1396

Reed, P. (2012). Awareness, attitudes and participation of teaching staff towards the open content movement in one university. Research in Learning Technology, 20. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/18520

Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 166-189. Retrieved from doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1313

Wiley, D., & Hilton J., III. (2009). Openness, dynamic specialization, and the disaggregated future of higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.768.

Citation Tools

Cite this article

MLA

Rolfe, Vivien.
"Striving Toward Openness: But What Do We Really Mean?."
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,
volume 18, number 7, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.315

APA

Rolfe, V.
(2017).
Striving Toward Openness: But What Do We Really Mean?.
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,
18(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.315

Chicago

Rolfe, Vivien
"Striving Toward Openness: But What Do We Really Mean?".
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
18, no. 7
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.315