nmm 22 4500ICPSR28921MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28921MiAaIMiAaI
Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation [Restricted Use]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
2014-03-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR28921NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)'s SPF SIG initiative, which sought to: (1) prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities; and (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the state and community levels. This cross-site evaluation included the 21 states and territories CSAP funded in FY2004 (Cohort 1) and an additional 5 States funded in Cohort 2 in FY2005 that were funded for up to 5 years to implement the SPF. The SPF is a five-step prevention planning model that requires states to: (1) conduct a statewide needs assessment, including the establishment of a State Epidemiological and Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW); (2) mobilize and build state and community capacity to address needs; (3) develop a statewide strategic plan for prevention; (4) implement evidence-based prevention, policies, and practices (EBPPP) to meet state and community needs; and (5) monitor and evaluate the implementation of their SPF SIG project.
Under contract to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) with funding provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Westat, in collaboration with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) and The MayaTech Corporation, implemented a multilevel, multi-method quasi-experimental design to evaluate SPF SIG's impact. The scope of the evaluation encompassed national, state, and community levels. The design included comparison conditions at both the state and community levels.
These data represent Phase I of the restricted use data release and contains extensive data on state-level implementation, community-level implementation, and state-level infrastructure, as well as other reference elements. A subsequent release (Phase II) will include state- and community-level outcomes, as well as data on community-level implementation, community-level implementation fidelity, state-level sustainability, and mediating variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v2
alcohol abuseicpsrclient characteristicsicpsrcollege studentsicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcommunity healthicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcommunity service programsicpsrcontinuing educationicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrhealth policyicpsrhuman servicesicpsrilligal drugsicpsrinterventionicpsrjuvenilesicpsrlabor forceicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrliquor law violationsicpsrmiddle schoolicpsrNative Americansicpsrneeds assessmenticpsrorganizational structureicpsroutcome evaluationicpsroutreach programsicpsrparentsicpsrplanningicpsrpolicies and proceduresicpsrpregnancyicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrpublic healthicpsrraceicpsrrisk factorsicpsrschoolsicpsrskill developmenticpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtrainingicpsrtreatment programsicpsryoung adultsicpsrzip code areasicpsrAfrican AmericansicpsrcountiesicpsrcrimeicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28921Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v2