Why another framework ?

What's make RedCat's singularity ?

I didn't want to choose between
scalability, based on good practices, and rapid deployment, based on
pragmatism. The one based on full configuration, flexible but tedious, and the other based on strict conventions, efficient but arbitrary limited. All frameworks I've seen can be classed in one of these two categories. However it's possible to reach the simplicity of
RAD
but without sacrifice of programming
scalability
and
agility
respecting
SOLID
principles and
best-practices. With implicit powerfull conventions but overriding configuration RedCat bring the right approach.

Let's work together !

The RedCat architecture is
loosely coupled
and respect the
SoC
principles. That's mean each component is independent from the others and you can use them without the whole framework. You can use them separately into any other
web application framework,
CMS,
groupware,
CRM
or
tailor-maide application.

But you can also work with somes other
popular frameworks
like
Zend,
Symfony,
PEAR,
Aura
or many others inside RedCat very easily. RedCat have somes
exclusive features
and very clever components, but it didn't reinvent the wheel unnecessarily and some others frameworks also have useful and nice components that you can use for specifics needs. Moreover, some of majors RedCat's components are mainly inspired by others tools from the community of
PHP developers.

For sum up, RedCat can be used as the core of your application as well as a library of awesome components.