72. Nice.

Several of Pol Pot's underlings have been and are currently facing trials for crimes against humanity. While not war crimes, per se, it is, I think, what you were getting it. Pol Pot died in 1979, as I'm sure you're aware. Since he is already dead, I'm sure the priority is to prosecute those involved that are still alive, rather than a largely-symbolic posthumous conviction of Pol Pot himself. However, some have already been convicted, it is not hard to see that he would, in fact, be found guilty were such a show trial to be held.

I am afraid I'm not familiar enough with Henry Kissinger to pass judgement on him, but unless he has been tried in a court for such things than no, he is not a war criminal.

However, neither of those things changes the fact the this is a document written by a man with the intent for it to be publicly seen and have a degree of shock value. I don't consider it "evidence" yet.

Are you saying it's perfectly okay to discard due process, to toss aside the notion that everyone is innocent until proven to be guilty?