Nem Wan:pute kisses like a man: to me, it's similar to the states that still outlaw sodomy and oral sex... thanks to texas v. loving (i think, could be wrong), all of those laws are unconstitutional. legislatures forget about them and never revoke them.

Lawrence v. Texas, and yes, it's a rational assumption that under that ruling any private, adult sexual relationship would also have to be legal under the 14th Amendment's protection of liberty. A law that takes away liberty has to have a better reason than a majority doesn't like what you do.

aww crap.... loving was the marriage case, lawrence was the sodomy case.

"I don't think this law goes far enough. Obviously it hasn't been updated for a while, but now we need to think about all of the new sex that we don't want happening. That is why I call for single 6ft by 6ft cells for each and every living thing. We can't have men living with other men. What if they liked the man sex? Upon expulsion from the womb all children should be removed from their homes and kept in complete isolation for the safety of their souls and ours. And pets... seriously who hasn't thought of banging their mastiff? I know I have. Thats why I leave temptations like that in his own shed on his own private property. That way I won't be tempted from Jesus."

ChipNASA:theknuckler_33: thatboyoverthere: olddeegee: Cythraul: I also want legislation against women wearing clothing that shows their ankles. Those sexy ankles, they're responsible for all the debauchery in the world. There we go.

Think about how many women and people in general who should always be clothed.

theknuckler_33:thatboyoverthere: olddeegee: Cythraul: I also want legislation against women wearing clothing that shows their ankles. Those sexy ankles, they're responsible for all the debauchery in the world. There we go.

Think about how many women and people in general who should always be clothed.