Success for School Choice This Week

Success for School Choice This Week

This week, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce will consider the last two major remaining portions of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), when they mark-up the Student Success Act and the Encouraging Innovative and Effective Teachers Act. Last year, the Committee considered three other elementary and secondary education bills that made improvements to charter schools, consolidated and repealed unnecessary and ineffective federal education programs, and provided more flexibility for states and communities to allocate federal education resources based on their individual needs, not those of bureaucrats in Washington. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee reported a comprehensive re-write of the ESEA last year, and it is now pending consideration by the full Senate. Congress is the closest it has ever been in a decade to enacting changes to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) that will return more decisions about educating our children to parents, teachers, and principals, recognize teachers for student success, and eliminate ineffective federal education programs.

Advertisement

However, there is still much work to be done to hold states, school districts, and educators accountable for increasing student performance and narrowing the academic-achievement gap between disadvantaged children and their more affluent peers. When the National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) reports that two-thirds of our children are still not performing at the proficient or advanced level in reading and math, policy makers should not weaken accountability provisions or eliminate options for parents to find better educational alternatives. Students must have educational options available so that they can leave a failing school or receive tutoring services that help them succeed academically.

Advertisement

The Student Results Act, as introduced, denied parents these options by repealing the school choice requirements in the NCLB. But Congressman John Kline (R., Minn.) has made some much-needed adjustments to the Student Results Act that will require local school districts to offer school-choice options to parents, and guarantees there will be a specific amount of federal funds available for these options. Congressman Kline’s new language also ensures that school districts with the greatest number of low-performing schools receive priority for funds if there is not enough money to accommodate all schools in the district. Unlike the Senate bill or President Obama’s NCLB blueprint, the Kline language gives these options to all parents and students who want alternatives, rather than just those who attend schools in the worst 5 percent. While the language still is not strong enough, it is a step in the right direction to ensure that parents, particularly disadvantaged parents, have several different educational alternatives available to them.

Advertisement

Republicans have been leaders in the school-choice movement for decades at the local, state, and federal levels. Charter schools, public-school choice, after-school tutoring by private providers who are not part of the school bureaucracy, tuition tax credits, and private-school choice are all ideas that Republicans have endorsed and fought hard to include in education legislation at the state and federal level. Overall, such choices have given disadvantaged students a chance to receive a quality education, go on to college, and pursue their dreams. School choice has also motivated many public schools to change and focus on increasing student academic achievement, often working together with charter schools or other, higher achieving public schools to adapt their techniques, models, and strategies. Many of these schools have improved ti the point where their students are performing at or above grade level.

Republicans must continue to provide leadership in education reform, especially for school choice. Current school-choice options now in the law must be retained, and additional choice options expanded, in any reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The Student Success Act currently allows school districts to provide private-school choice as an option for parents, a major improvement over the current statute. The Student Success Act must also ensure that local school districts provide parents with numerous meaningful school-choice alternatives, not just one or two options. Educators have been reluctant to provide other educational alternatives, and teachers’ unions, in particular, have opposed the creation of public charter schools and private-school alternatives. Unless the language is strengthened to reflect the above concerns, they will continue to resist school-choice alternatives.

Advertisement

While the accountability provisions in the Student Success Act are still much too weak and provide no consequences for states and school districts who fail to narrow the achievement gap and increase student performance, Congressman Kline’s school-choice additions are commendable. These provisions will ensure that parents and students are offered educational alternatives and are not stuck in a persistently failing school with no way out. As this legislation moves along, a balance between academic accountability and local flexibility must be found so that we will not return to the days when student academic results or lack thereof did not matter.

The No Child Left Behind Act forced educators and policy makers to concentrate on student academic results by measuring how disadvantaged students performed and issued consequences for those that did not make significant academic gains. Those principles must not be lost. Ensuring school-choice options are available is the first step.

— Sally Gray Lovejoy is an expert on education issues at the American Action Forum.

Recommended Articles

Most Popular

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays.
Dear Reader,
“Save Ike from the Kikes.”
I’d better explain.
This weekend marks the one-year anniversary of the Nazi troll armies’ march ...
Read More

Studies will someday be done on the deleterious effect Donald Trump has had on the brains of people who loathe him. It drives them to say things that are as palpably foolish as some of the president’s own doozies. This week’s winner: There is no such thing as a “perjury trap.”
Because some of the ...
Read More

Michelle Williams, an actress, has decided to become a spokesman on the issue of pay inequality in her profession, and appears this month on the cover of Vanity Fair with a headline to that effect.
This decision follows what she describes as a humiliating episode in which she learned in the pages of USA Today ...
Read More

Will Democrats pull an “October Surprise” this year and announce that the highly polarizing Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco won’t be their candidate for House speaker after all? Growing up in the Bay Area, I saw Pelosi’s iron will and stubbornness up close for decades. The possibility of her stepping back ...
Read More

Corey Stewart has had a rough few weeks.
Stewart, the Republican nominee challenging incumbent Democratic senator Tim Kaine in Virginia this fall, has come under sustained fire lately as news outlets have uncovered disturbing past comments from his campaign staff and from Stewart himself — shedding new light ...
Read More

A few weeks before I was ordained a Catholic priest in the late autumn of 1994, my superior in the seminary told me that, in his opinion, it was probably the most difficult time in a century to become a priest. Yet, he went on, it was also the most exciting time. I really did not take much notice of what he ...
Read More