Jones acknowledged passing along the texts, designed to bolster the
prosecution's case, to the lead prosecutor during a child abuse trial.
"It was wrong and I knew better," she wrote.

Jones' name was prominently
mentioned three times in Coker's resignation agreement. The signed
document refers to the so-called "texting and judging" incident as well
as allegations of other improper communiques and meetings between Jones
and Coker involving additional cases that were not specified.

Her then-boss, Polk County
District Attorney Lee Hon, said he was only aware of one incident
involving a child abuse case that ended with a not-guilty verdict. He
said he chastised Jones for acting inappropriately, and she had promised
that it would not happen again.

Hon said he has since cooperated with the commission and the bar association investigations.

Added the Chronicle:

Neither the judicial commission nor the bar's grievance committee will acknowledge or comment on pending investigations.

But Cecil Berg and Laura
Prigmore, attorneys who have pending complaints against Jones, said they
have been told by investigators the Jones investigation was shelved
until Coker's was resolved but now it will move forward. Prigmore said a
grievance committee hearing on Jones is slated for March 21.

Coker did not receive immunity. You might compare her resignation conditions to deferred adjudication - if she doesn't meet the conditions, the Commission on Judicial Conduct will move forward with their allegations (which, given the amount of evidence they have, won't take much effort). There are three other entities that can take action against her - the State Bar of Texas (SBOT) (which already has received multiple complaints against her as well as all the info from the Commission being forwarded to them), the Office of the Attorney General could file charges for jury tampering, and the Feds could follow up with civil rights violations. Just wait until everyone that Coker locked up comes forward asking for a new trial.

Kaycee Jones will go in front of the SBOT on Friday, March 11, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. at the Montgomery County Law Library. Not sure if this is open to the public, but I will keep Grits readers up to date on that. Additionally, in her short tenure as District Judge (January 2013 to the present), she has also racked up at least 3 complaints to the Commission. She thought she could do what Coker did for 14 years and get away with it. She didn't even make it 12 months.

Rest assured, this is not over. Many people are glad that Coker is gone (ecstatic even), but are still very angry over what these two judges and the Polk County DAs did or allowed others to do.

Coker did not receive immunity. You might compare her resignation conditions to deferred adjudication - if she doesn't meet the conditions, the Commission on Judicial Conduct will move forward with their allegations (which, given the amount of evidence they have, won't take much effort). There are three other entities that can take action against her - the State Bar of Texas (SBOT) (which already has received multiple complaints against her as well as all the info from the Commission being forwarded to them), the Office of the Attorney General could file charges for jury tampering, and the Feds could follow up with civil rights violations. Just wait until everyone that Coker locked up comes forward asking for a new trial.

Kaycee Jones will go in front of the SBOT on Friday, March 11, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. at the Montgomery County Law Library. Not sure if this is open to the public, but I will keep Grits readers up to date on that. Additionally, in her short tenure as District Judge (January 2013 to the present), she has also racked up at least 3 complaints to the Commission. She thought she could do what Coker did for 14 years and get away with it. She didn't even make it 12 months.

Rest assured, this is not over. Many people are glad that Coker is gone (ecstatic even), but are still very angry over what these two judges and the Polk County DAs did or allowed others to do.

These two Judges as well as the prosecutors in Polk county who acted so cavalierly in prosecuting in a now documented biased system deserve to now suffer the same distress they inflicted on their innocent victims. This should give voters pause about putting prosecutors on the bench so they will be tough on crime. Judges need to make sure both sides follow the law and realize that they don't have a dog in the hunt or legitimate interest in the outcome of a jury trial. Their only interest is to insure that the process is fair and consistant with the law. Too many judges feel that an acquittal is a failure on their part, probably because too many continue to internally identify as the prosecutor they once were even after the role should have changed. The criminal justice system is supposed to presume innocence and honor exclusionary rules of evidence. Judges who only give lip service to this presumption and easily disregard this entitlement due to bias or because they have become privy to evidence which should be suppressed, need to reconsider their fitness and follow the law or resign. I have been on the wrong end of denied suppression hearings too many times and watched too many others where judges bias toward the prosecution causes them to "believe" prosecution witness testimony even when it is contradicted by credible testimony and hard evidence demands suppression because of laws being broken to obtain evidence. They cut state witnesses so much slack in laughable assertions that it is shameful. Voters should ask themselves if they were charged with a crime they did not commit, would they rather have a judge who had been a career prosecutor or someone a little more likely to accept reasonable doubt and presumption of innocence based properly admitted reliable evidence. Coker, Jones and their prosecutor accomplices deserve to lose their licenses and try their hand making a living where they can't prey on the public with their lack of ethics and disregard for the law, justice and fair play. By the way Judge Harmon in Harris County has reportedly engaged in similar behavior during trial except that he did not bother to use a texting device, he just spoke directly to the prosecutors giving them advice on how to counter a defense attorney's points. Obvious appearance of bias and refused to recuse himself when caught. Defense still won an acquittal so no harm was done, but how many trials have gone the otherway because of his bias?

When Coker wins DA, which is likely with the political machine she has, then DA Coker can text Judge Jones to continue to screw Justice for those unfortunate souls who have to be in Jone's court....Pinewoods justice Clusterf...

Sorry for the delay - on May 5, 2014 Jones received a public reprimand from SBOT. Apparently it was some sort of "plea deal," although none of the complainants were asked about their thoughts on this.

Since then, she has racked up a couple more complaints with the Commission on Judicial Conduct. Additionally, She has recused herself at least three (maybe four) times from hearing cases by one particular attorney. It appears that any case that attorney is trying will be transferred to Judge McClendon's court (the 258th, Coker's former court). Olen Underwood is directing this. Both Jones and Underwood need to answer to the Commission. Jones, by repeatedly recusing herself, is telling the world she cannot be fair to this attorney. That automatically disqualifies her from being fit to sit on the bench.

Ironically, this same attorney had all of his cases automatically transferred from Coker's court to the 411th (at that time, Judge Trapp) because of a lawsuit he won against Coker. Now his cases are being transferred back to the 258th and away from Coker's crony KayCee Jones.

"I always tell people interested in these issues that your blog is the most important news source, and have had high-ranking corrections officials tell me they read it regularly."

- Scott Medlock, Texas Civil Rights Project

"a helluva blog"

- Solomon Moore, NY Times criminal justice correspondent

"Congrats on building one of the most read and important blogs on a specific policy area that I've ever seen"

- Donald Lee, Texas Conference of Urban Counties

GFB "is a fact-packed, trustworthy reporter of the weirdness that makes up corrections and criminal law in the Lone Star State" and has "shown more naked emperors than Hans Christian Andersen ever did."

-Attorney Bob Mabry, Woodlands

"Grits really shows the potential of a single-state focused criminal law blog"

- Corey Yung, Sex Crimes Blog

"I regard Grits for Breakfast as one of the most welcome and helpful vehicles we elected officials have for understanding the problems and their solutions."

Tommy Adkisson,Bexar County Commissioner

"dude really has a pragmatic approach to crime fighting, almost like he’s some kind of statistics superhero"