Deep-state puppet and Police State advocate, Theresa May did not get her increased mandate.

What was so odious about Rt Hon Theresa May? Two false flags, internet censorship, more surveillance laws, detentions without trials, deep support for tyrants Saudi Arabia, suppression of child abuse whistleblowers, more murders abroad, more fake austerity, creeping privatisation of the NHS and suspicions of a Brexit stichtup

I thought it useful to have the mugshots of these colluders and order followers. We can then play the game “identify the bilderberger” when watching online videos of their “no comment” performances. This exercise also shows that some attendees are providing reports/updates on their chosen specialty, eg Johanna Rosén, Professor in Materials Physics, Linköping University (SWE). Rosen is a specialist in nanolaminates? What is a potential use of nanolaminates? Improved magnetic materials for say electric motors for use in electric vehicles. You could also take the view as an amoral investor, what better way to profit, than to hear what these guys and girls are talking about?

Castries, Henri de (FRA), President of Institut Montaigne; Former Chairman and CEO, AXA

WARNING: The Bilderbergers got truthers. We have taken their attendees lists and agenda as truthful. They are NOT! The secretive group have put out a false facade of transparency. Some attendees are/will not be listed, consequently we can also assume the public agenda is also incomplete, a lie.

Long Post to archive site info.The 65th Bilderberg Meeting to take place from 1 – 4 June 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia, USA.

CHANTILLY, 31 MAY 2017

The 65th Bilderberg Meeting will take place from 1-4 June 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia, USA. As of today, 131 participants from 21 countries have confirmed their attendance. As ever, a diverse group of political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media has been invited. The list of participants is available here.

The key topics for discussion this year include:

The Trump Administration: A progress report

Trans-Atlantic relations: options and scenarios

The Trans-Atlantic defence alliance: bullets, bytes and bucks

The direction of the EU

Can globalisation be slowed down?

Jobs, income and unrealised expectations

The war on information

Why is populism growing?

Russia in the international order

The Near East

Nuclear proliferation

China

Current events

Founded in 1954, the Bilderberg Meeting is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between 120-140 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; approximately a quarter from politics and government and the rest from other fields…

II – Résultats complets (périmètre : France entière) :

Note: I wanted the actual percentage relative to cast votes and potential votes, not just the votes cast for Macron or Le Pen. So Le Pen and Macron accounted for 66.01% of registered voters. So ex-rothschild bankster, Globalist, EUphile, faux leftist or centrist Macron can claim 43.6% (20.7 million) of France’s registered voters! Only 8.5% (4 million) blank/void votes?

How many people in a given population have given thought to the actual mechanics of their electoral process? How many know weaknesses or points of subversion? I am amongst the ignorant however is it not surprising that the press DO NOT educate/inform the populace about the actual mechanics of the process, the boring detail? Is that not responsible citizenship?
In the UK, pencils are used to record votes. The US has electronic voting machines (a fraudsters wet dream).

le monde.fr
In every election since 1965 according to the above image, the “blank” vote was higher in the 2nd round. So to see figures quoted of 66% and 34% conveniently ignores abstentions and blank votes.

Typically since 1965, we see double the blank votes in the 2nd round This would generate a figure of 5.2%. If however the blank votes were significant, say 10% or more, the claim of 66% winning margin becomes even more untenable.
Once the official figures are available, I will revisit the table below.