Coulter: Democrat’s Decision to Turn US into Third World Nation Is Working Out As Planned

Ann Coulter nails it. The US has seen millions of uneducated dependent immigrants flood into the country the past 40 years. This was not an accident. Democrats planned this. They knew this would kill the nation’s future. They knew it would kill prosperity. But it would keep them in power. And that has always been the goal for Democrats.

The US geopolitical system may soon resemble the nightmare situation in Venezuela where a Marxist thug like Chavez can win election after election by providing morsels to the poor dependent majority.

Liberals brag about having won the hearts and minds of America, as if, through logic and argument, they’ve persuaded people to accept their bankrupt European socialist ideas.

Democrats haven’t changed anyone’s mind. They changed the people.

More white people voted for Mitt Romney this year than voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980. Barack Obama lost white voters by 20 points — the widest margin since 1984.

But in 1980, whites were 88 percent of the electorate. In 2012, they were 72 percent of the electorate. Not only that, but the non-white electorate is far more Democratic than it was in 1980.

If the same country that voted in 1980 had voted in 2012, Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did.

Most Americans don’t realize that, decades ago, the Democrats instituted a long-term plan to gradually turn the United States into a Third World nation. The country would become poorer and less free, but Democrats would have an unbeatable majority!

Under Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act, our immigration policy changed from one that replicated the existing ethnic population to one that strictly favored unskilled immigrants from the Third World. Since 1968, 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from what is euphemistically called “developing countries.”

We can’t admit computer scientists from Spain fleeing their failing socialist nation because we have to make room for a recent Senegalese immigrant’s brother-in-law with no skills but great needs…

[It cannot be said enough. We are about to have it stuck to us in a big way and it will be our own fault. The problem lies in refusing to understand that the Republican Party is not our friend. It also stems from not understanding how to wage the battle. It is understanding that politicians spend millions on handlers whose sole responsibility is to make them appear likable. I’ve shared the “Green Rooms” with them on numerous occasions, and I can tell you the overwhelming majority are self-absorbed, oleaginous, bloodsucking substances that have personified themselves into that which is able to cast a shadow.]

Nissan Motor CEO Carlos Ghosn finally admitted the automaker will not meet its sales target for its all-electric Leaf — in another sign of the broad struggle of the electric vehicle industry.

“The forecast we have given ourselves for the year will not be reached,” Ghosn told Bloomberg Television in Mexico City on Thursday.

Despite months of lagging sales, the Japanese automaker has steadfastly refused to acknowledge that it could not double sales in 2012 to 20,000 after selling nearly 10,000 in 2011.

In October, the Leaf also had its best month all year, selling 1,579, up 86 percent from a year ago. For the year, Nissan has sold 6,791 Leafs, down 15.6 percent from this time a year ago.

Nissan sold 9,679 all-electric Leafs in 2011.

In April, Nissan said an executive misspoke when he said the company was not likely to double sales of its all-electric Leaf in 2012.

Ghosn has previously predicted that 10 percent of all vehicles sold by 2020 worldwide will be electric vehicles.

Ghosn told reporters in November 2010 in Washington that the alliance would sell 500,000 EVs a year by the end of 2013. In a video posted last month by the company, the Renault-Nissan now says it is “committed” to sell 1.5 million EVs “cumulatively” by 2016.

Ghosn — who has been far more bullish on EVs than any other major auto executive — said at the New York International Auto Show in March that the company would double sales of the Leaf in 2012 to 20,000. “We’re not worried about it,” Ghosn said then. “I feel very good about this objective.”

Company executives have internally spent months debating how to officially abandon the sales target — even after Ghosn in April publicly affirmed it would meet the target.

Remember when Obama said he will not go after white votes. For the last 4 years, he and his henchmen are figuring it out how to snookered white votes and they succeeded. Traditional whites were overwhelmed by his crony capitalists, unions, illegals, vote frauds and marxists.

Aaron G.

From 1924 to 65 we had little immigration. Took in some refugees,but not in huge numbers. This 40 year reprieve helped the later arriving eastern and southern European immigrants adapt and Americanize more quickly. Their culture was also not in sync with the American way,but they were forced to learn. Now not so much.

http://mychal-massie.com/premium/ bg

++

“for whatever reason people leave their homeland & come to America.. they need to leave their homeland behind & embrace America as their homeland.. not bring their homeland from which they fled for whatever reason with them to America & try to reestablish their homeland here.. this is America, not (fill in whatever homeland here)!! or go back from whence they came if they were so happy there as to want to duplicate it here.. go fight for your own homeland in your own country, i will fight for my homeland in mine, namely America.. God Bless America, land of the free, not the wanna be (fill in whatever country here)..” – bg

And why is the democrat’s decision working out as planned? Because the outrage isn’t there – I can’t hear you. You’ve got a muslim usurper in Office who is destroying the U.S. in totality and nothing….zip.

http://mychal-massie.com/premium/ bg

++

Joanne #29 November 15, 2012 at 9:29 pm

too sad..

==

Alana

#6 November 15, 2012 at 8:21 pm John commented:

Its hard for us to understand. What could motivate a group to want unending political power in a declining country. To reside over the end of prosperity and freedom simply to remain in power. Power over what?

—

I have wondered that. I have two answers: (1) Power for its own sake. (2) Feeling superior. Think about it – the left loves to consider themselves smarter and superior to everyone else. Being on top of a sinking population (not to mention ruling it) would only enhance that feeling.

It appears I’ve lost an old friend by pointing out that half of the immigrant Hispanics in America are undocumented. That’s it. No insult, no racism, no judgement. Just the assertion of a fact. We are becoming a dangerously divided nation.

http://none tommy mc donnell

the massive wave of colonists from south and central america did not COME to the united states they were BROUGHT to the united states by the political left. after the 1980 presidential election the left gave up on achieveing a majority by having blacks out baby whites. that would take too long. so they embarked on a massive colonization effort to achieve a majority. these colonists are completely unlike the immigrants that came to the united states previously. those immigrants for the most part were fleeing religious or political repression. there was no dole, they couldn’t come here and live off the sweat of the american workers brow. many came seeking individual freedom and had a healthy mistrust of government power that was consistent with most americans. no so with the hispanic. they don’t care about freedom. freedom to them is to get something paid with by the sweat of someone else’s brow. if they were concerned with freedom and government control the countries that they always refer to as THEIR COUNTRY wouldn’t the messses that they are. we have allowed our politicans to colonized us with a people whose motto for the last forty years has beeen “today this is your country but tomorrow its ours.” well tomorrow is here and as many times as you were warned you refuse to take heed. instead you mocked and belittled anyone that warned you. you called them racists and zenophobes. now you can find out if you like being a slave more then being called a racist. i feel sorry for your children and grandchildren.

kay

anne coulter can go suck rotten eggs. i’ve lost all interest in anything she has to say. she’s become the phyllis schaffly of this era with her unwavering support of romney the biggest weak spine fighter ever. the 2 of them deserve each other.

kato

Subprime will feel more comfortable in a third-world nation. After all, most subprimers are third-world material.

What’s the difference between Detroit and Lagos? More handouts from whitey in Detroit.

samspade

Ghost #18 I absolutely agree with everything in your post. We have acted like the frog in the warm-boiling pot. Now we are in it. And yes, we have no one to blame but our selves. We kept electing Republican politicans who did nothing but jump on the gravy train and ride it to retirement. We should have done more. When they didn’t act we should have. We, the silent majority, have lost our country. In re your post a few days ago about Petraeus; you were right… I was wrong.

Kay #36 I don’t always agree with Coulter, but her article contained a lot of truths. I know there are a lot of Santorum, Cain, Bachman supporters on the site, but the hard truth is Obama would have won in a real land slide (without the voter fraud) if any of those people had been our standard bearer. Romeny really was our best bet out of the field we had to pick from. The democrats call us the “stupid party”; let’s not prove them right by nominating anymore Sanatorum type politicans to represent us.

Pleasance

As I recall Teddy Kennedy’s immigration plan excluded the England specifically, but included Wales, Scotland and Ireland [except the North] all due to pro-Ira stance and his general feelings of insecurity. He deliberately lowered numbers of other Europpeans who could immigrate, and upped numbers for third world.

squeaky

turning America into a cesspool will be an experience even the poorest among us will live to regret. alinsky knew there wasn’t enough poor, etc to bring about change so he decided that the middleclass had to be enticed. it’s the numbers and after change is accomplished those very same numbers become expendible. the poor will get crumbs while those at the top of the pecking order will become the new “evil” rich. the marching fodder who thought they would share in the fruits of the revolution will be left at the alter like a jilted bride. even social justice has a “limited number” clause.