Confusing voters on affirmative action

A proposed 2008 ballot initiative’s language would confuse voters mightily because it harbors two separate ideas cloaked as one, in no way clearly stating the ultimate aim, which is to dismantle affirmative action in Colorado — a long-standing, important remedy to workplace discrimination. On initial reading of the proposal’s beginning, the wording seems benign and commonsensical: “The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of sex, color, ethnicity or national origin…”

Further scrutiny reveals a dilemma. If a voter acts affirmatively on the phrase “shall not discriminate against,” then they are voting against affirmative action, cloaked deceptively in the phrase “grant preferential treatment to.” Do not pose voters with such a paradox! Kudos to opponents of this proposed ballot initiative, represented by attorney Edward Ramey, who only have until June 13 to file for rehearing.