@Ladyinred wrote:Woofer - many thanks for the synopsis. Does Hall offer any explanation as to what happened to MBM?

Espeland beat me to it.

No he doesn`t outwardly, but IMO there is a strong hint at the end when he refers to what Ken Livingstone said about MI5 filming government officials at Kincora in order to control them. Just made me wonder if this mystery is something along the same lines. It would explain an awful lot. Could be they were involved in something dodgy and MBM accidentally died.

Whatever, you can bet your boots either Richard Hill will be discredited in some way or his DVD banned. IMO it is more damning than GA`s book. But I think Richard`s seller is German so maybe they won`t be able to ban it.

Thank you Woofer for your excellent review of Richard D Hall's DVD. I had every intention of doing one as I like to support anyone who has the guts to speak out. My time is limited so you beat me to it and did a better job!

I have yet to see the final 2 DVD's but if they are as informative as the first, I regard cost as money very well spent!

One thing I didn`t know was that BK said the meeting with Murat was to offer him a job to help find Madeleine.

What! Hoping to hire Murat, someone without private detective licence nor legit credential as PI?For this he brought along his lawyer and Murat brought along his lawyer? What a load of cock and bull! Who was BK trying to fool?That must be the biggest joke of this whole shenanigan.

One thing I didn`t know was that BK said the meeting with Murat was to offer him a job to help find Madeleine.

What! Hoping to hire Murat, someone without private detective licence nor legit credential as PI?For this he brought along his lawyer and Murat brought along his lawyer? What a load of cock and bull! Who was BK trying to fool?That must be the biggest joke of this whole shenanigan.

Something is not right.

I know, it`s ridiculous. In fact none of it bodes well for BK. I don`t think he will be pleased but I can`t see that Richard said anything about him that can`t be proven.

hentie wrote:Richard D Hall needs to be applauded, not least because he makes it clear at start that he has waived copyright and is happy, therefore, for copies to be made.He is obviously wishing to inform rather than make money. Good for him!!!

Wise move. The Mcs cannot accuse him of making money on the back of Maddie; and cannot wait until the sale figure hit gold before trying to extort money from him in the form of litigation.

He did spend some years researching this to put together the DVD and deserves to recover cost.

If he turns this into a book he might have an edge over Summers & Swan's bewk, since S&S pro mcs book will be nothing new to the public.

For this he brought along his lawyer and Murat brought along his lawyer? What a load of cock and bull! Who was BK trying to fool?

That must be the biggest joke of these whole shenanigans.

Something is not right.

Hall is dead right on this one and has obviously done his research.

The Daily Mail covered this story some time in 2008, but it was also covered in the Portuguese press in late November 2007. They had all tried to keep the meeting a closely-uarded secret, but obvioulsy someone somewhere got to know about it:

QUOTE

Last night, it was revealed the McCanns' financial backer, tycoon Brian Kennedy, had met Robert Murat, the first suspect in the case.

The meeting took place at Mr Murat's aunt's house in the Algarve last year.

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Thank you very much for sending me a copy of this DVD Sharonl, it's mindblowing!

My goodness, when it's all laid out like this in one documentary as opposed to reading squillions of threads on forums or squillions of articles on blogs and websites, it just really hits home how utterly bizarre and bonkers and sinister this whole case is.

@admin wrote:Thank you very much for sending me a copy of this DVD Sharonl, it's mindblowing!

My goodness, when it's all laid out like this in one documentary as opposed to reading squillions of threads on forums or squillions of articles on blogs and websites, it just really hits home how utterly bizarre and bonkers and sinister this whole case is.

Well done Richard

Did he say Madeleine died in the holiday apartment?Did he say her parents had their hands in her disappearance?

If he avoids that pitfall, and using only data in the public domain to produce the DVD then I don't see how they can sue him.

@admin wrote:Thank you very much for sending me a copy of this DVD Sharonl, it's mindblowing!

My goodness, when it's all laid out like this in one documentary as opposed to reading squillions of threads on forums or squillions of articles on blogs and websites, it just really hits home how utterly bizarre and bonkers and sinister this whole case is.

Well done Richard

Did he say Madeleine died in the holiday apartment?Did he say her parents had their hands in her disappearance?

If he avoids that pitfall, and using only data in the public domain to produce the DVD then I don't see how they can sue him.

Yes, he only quoted data in the public domain. It was very, very interesting, especially the sections about the private investigators and government agents.

As Woofer said in his review: "WOW"

How on earth did poor little Maddie ever get caught up with such sinister people? Not just one or two sinister people, but dozens and dozens of them.

@admin wrote:Thank you very much for sending me a copy of this DVD Sharonl, it's mindblowing!

My goodness, when it's all laid out like this in one documentary as opposed to reading squillions of threads on forums or squillions of articles on blogs and websites, it just really hits home how utterly bizarre and bonkers and sinister this whole case is.

Well done Richard

Did he say Madeleine died in the holiday apartment?Did he say her parents had their hands in her disappearance?

If he avoids that pitfall, and using only data in the public domain to produce the DVD then I don't see how they can sue him.

Yes, he only quoted data in the public domain. It was very, very interesting, especially the sections about the private investigators and government agents.

As Woofer said in his review: "WOW"

How on earth did poor little Maddie ever get caught up with such sinister people? Not just one or two sinister people, but dozens and dozens of them.

That is what people had been saying all along.

Not her, but her parents. For a pair of intelligent doctors who demonstrate brilliant ability to manage and control the media so well, it can't have been just pure bad luck they were caught up with a catalogue of sinister people to be mere coincidences.

I see someone has uploaded a number of RichPlanet's films to YouTube. We need that to happen here too and for the sets to be distributed widely - mine are booked out for a week now. If all that happens, I can't see how OG could possibly ignore any of the people highlighted.

I wonder how Clarrie will view 5 years in Belmarsh rather than Brighton.

@espeland wrote:I wonder how Clarrie will view 5 years in Belmarsh rather than Brighton.

IMO he will have kept clean of complicity.He will not have asked any awkward questions - why would he with the oppo of a best selling book in the future when it all comes out?What could he be charged with?My bet is that he was wily enough to 'take at face value' what he was told, and take his salary 'in good faith'

@espeland wrote:I wonder how Clarrie will view 5 years in Belmarsh rather than Brighton.

IMO he will have kept clean of complicity.He will not have asked any awkward questions - why would he with the oppo of a best selling book in the future when it all comes out?What could he be charged with?My bet is that he was wily enough to 'take at face value' what he was told, and take his salary 'in good faith'

I'm not so sureMax Clifford was the master of deceit and PR and still wasn't enough

@admin wrote:Thank you very much for sending me a copy of this DVD Sharonl, it's mindblowing!

My goodness, when it's all laid out like this in one documentary as opposed to reading squillions of threads on forums or squillions of articles on blogs and websites, it just really hits home how utterly bizarre and bonkers and sinister this whole case is.

Well done Richard

That`s why its been so valuable to me because it brings all the bits and bobs together in one place. I think he`s done a really good job in how he`s used diagrams, lists and pictures - it`s done very logically and takes away a lot of the confusion that GM is so keen to cause. It sort of gives you a broader vista of the whole mystery and you can see it all for what it really is rather than looking at individual snippets.

I hope he keeps to his word and does a documentary on RM. There was another aspect he said deserved a whole programme but can`t remember what it was at the mo. I also thought the photography/filming was very professional - usually documentaries annoy me because I can`t get my bearings but I could with this. It was a pleasure to watch.

btw Admin - I`m a old girl - I`ll get round to ticking the Venus symbol one of these days !

____________________The constant assertion of belief is an indication of fear - Jiddu Krishnamurti

Eddie and Keela alerted to items and places concerned with the McCanns - and importantly to no other items or places.

According to Eddie and Keela, the body of Madeleine McCann lay lifeless behind the sofa in Apartment 5a, clinging to the only thing from which she could derive any comfort; a soft toy called 'Cuddle cat'.

Kate's book 'madeleine', Page 219: "Did they really believe that a dog could smell the 'odour of death' three months later from a body that had been removed so swiftly?"

After forensic analysis of the 'Last Photo' there is little doubt now that the pool photo CANNOT POSSIBLY have been taken on the Thursday 3rd May, but most likely on the Sunday 29th April. So, where was Madeleine at lunchtime on Thursday?

John McCann:"This was terrible for them, Kate dressed Amelie in her sister's pyjamas and the baby said: "Maddy's jammies, where is Maddy?"Martin Roberts:"If Madeleine's pyjamas had not, in fact, been abducted then neither had Madeleine McCann."Dr Martin Roberts: A Nightwear Job

Death Toll in McCann Case

Gerry McCann called for an example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014 after a 'Dossier' was handed in to Police by McCann supporters. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room the next day. Brenda paid the price.

Colin Sahlke died suddenly in mysterious circumstances with a significant amount of morphine in his system. At the Inquest the coroner said there was no evidence as to how he had come to take morphine, and no needle mark was found.Gerry McCann had met Sahlkebefore he helped with the search but did not show any concern for his death. Link

Ex-Met DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC1's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window' of opportunity' from 3 minutes to 45 minutes, in accordance with their remit, to allow the staged abduction to happen.

The 'SunOnline' journalist, Tracey Kandohla: "A McCann pal told The Sun Online: "Some of the savings have been siphoned off from the Find Maddie Fund into a fixed asset account, which financial experts have advised them to do. It can be used for purchases like buying a house, or building equipment."