Thursday, April 2, 2015

Wait, come back

So, since the fifties, these groups have been for women only. Now, after almost 60 years of reverse sexism, they aren’t getting anywhere with their exclusion of men and now want men to join? Seriously? Why would any men join up?

Dr. Helen was right. And what we're seeing from the women's networks is only a harbinger. Women are sensing that men not only don't need them anymore, they don't really want anything to do with them. And it scares the hell out of them. As it should, because women need mental buy-in from men a lot more than men need it from women.

29 comments:

Anonymous
said...

This will be interesting. It had to come to point where women had to start to give something. So, I wonder how far the back pedal will go before the brakes are put back on again? Also, what of those women who truly believe that we don't need men? The fight's should be interesting.

If, after 50 years of feminizing the education system, re-tooling the workplace to suit female sensibilities, affirmative action and the enforcement of it all enshrined in law, women, as a group, STILL can't reach the heights of the best of men without asking for yet more help (from men!) to promote them.....well, maybe it's time to acknowledge that men and women can never be equal.

Because the cost of this has been born by the mass of regular men who have been displaced by it all. And now by the women who can't find a man to save them from a grinding job they can never leave.

No, they are strong and independent. Boys are dumb, throw rocks at them. Women are all knowing and powerful and don't need a man. Why would they be scared that they finally got men to not like them or want to be with them anymore?

If I had more coin...I'd invest in anxiety medication and anti-depressants. If 25% of them are on that stuff now...it's going to double within 20-30 years.

Women have demanded and gotten into every men's organization in the West. As they get their hands on power within an organization, that organization changes the scope to more benefit women. Then the men head for the exit. It's happening right now with the Rotary Club.Joining an organization that is explicitly feminist would be begging to be shafted.

A subtext of the invitation is that they only want well connected men to join, not just Joe from accounting or Fred from the mail room.No, what they want is the option to rub shoulders (or other body parts) with Tom the senior VP or Gary the CEO.As usual, the invitations will only feed the Apex fallacy because anything less just won't do.

Well, there's a little problem coming up.....a major societal change.....the kind where women are raped and killed in a protracted civil war.....and, well, men are becoming indifferent. Why help your enemy? As I've said many times, let nature take its course. Perceptive women can feel the changes coming.....and, they rightly fear the future. However, they'll be alone.

If there is any civil strife of the whites-vs-outsiders version, you can bet that there'll be a lot of unmarried, childless fat older b!tches left by the wayside to die off by the millions as the men prefer to fight only for themselves and the small number of worthwhile women.

Yessir😂 good ole human nature.....they'll really need the men who've they tried their best to destroy......will you feed a starving feminist? Didn't think so. Thing is, in a survival situation, land whales perish.

Oh, sure, they are realizing. Not that it matters. Once you lose the men, we will only come back on our terms. You will know that has happened when women return home. And fight, kick, and scratch to stay there, avoid the ballet box, and create what of reality they can through their solid ways in the home. Until then, have none of it.

Actually, the hardest part, is getting men to break the link. I remember stories of Indians setting ambushes, but the young men wanting to take the lead ruined the surprise, blowing it. Same same. Teach your boys. Although ensuring purified (of estrogen especially) water, and making sure they aren't getting large doses of phytoestrogens (beans, grains, fruits, and vegetables... stick with meats) and too much of mother's milk... would help a good deal as well. Embarrass the lad about his mother link, if need be. The sooner the better.

The only remotely legitimate reason I can think of is if the organization was originally a men-only (or at least male-controlled) organization that had the misfortune of being completed co-opted by estrogen. The thing is, any such organization that was ever worth anything in the first place has probably already been (or very soon will be) reconstituted under a new name/replaced altogether by an exclusively male group that will be sure to make it clear that estrogen contamination will NOT be tolerated. For all practical purposes, any legacy organization that became the property of women has been destroyed beyond salvage and no man worthy of the name will want anything whatsoever to do with it.

“...men are instrumental to the success of women,” and 39 percent agreed that men should join women’s networking groups that have been set up to promote and advance women in the workforce.

"Instrumental" here is just another term for "essential," one that induces less of a revulsion gag reflex in feminists. The obvious implication here is that women CANNOT really succeed without men carrying them. This, in turn, prompts the obvious question of why anyone would waste effort and resources on people incapable of succeeding on their own merits.