Among the significant and clear differences, the M1 differences are significantly lower than the ones observed in M2. See more popular or the latest prezis.

Comments 0 Please log in to add your comment.

Rev Andal Med Deporte. The squared differences were chosen to evaluate only the differences between the measurements obtained by the investigators according to each method j for each observation i. The lack of adequate definition of the printed image, the difficulty in finding and managing specific information on an individual when collecting numerous samples and the changes resulting from typing errors when transferring data to a spreadsheet raise doubts about the results, which may lead to an inaccurate assessment.

DERMATOGLIFOS PDF

Additionally, in this case, the new instruments contribute to the formulation of new concepts for the observations and anthropometric analyses. Similar computerized systems were developed in other countries for use in health care 18, The present study aimed to correlate the traditional method and the computerized system of dermatoglyphic analysis. For M2, the traditional materials and processes were used for the data collection, observation and transcription.

The first observations of the statistical treatment used are shown in table 1. Asymmetry of signs of finger dermatoglyphics, physical potential and physical qualities of a man. Rio de Janeiro; Guanabara Koogan: These data are displayed in the correlation matrix of the observations of the two discretionary variables, as shown in table 3.

DERMATOGLIFOS PDF

View Ideas submitted by the community. Thus, all differences expressed had mean values of M1 that were significantly higher than the mean values of M2. The dermatoglios protocol proposed by Cummins and Midlo 7 was chosen for the fingerprint analysis using two different methods, namely: The non-probability sample consisted of 15 individuals.

M1 was more efficient, with a higher level of positivity. The results displayed in table 4 show that there are significant differences between the mean values of the inter-investigator squared differences dermatogliffos the two methods. There was no significant difference between dermatoglifos intra- M1 and M2 and inter-investigator investigator 1 versus investigator 2 observations, demonstrating the reproducibility and reliability capacity of M1.

Then, the data were entered in a spreadsheet. Houston, we have a problem! The dermatoglyphic analysis presented by Cummins and Midlo 7 should be performed to observe fingerprints as a genetic marker. Pliegues en e — dedo V como en el mongolismo.

The statistical treatment consisted in the elaboration of frequency tables and distribution curves, means and their standard errors, analysis of variance between groups and intra-individual correlation coefficients between the different traits.

Want to see art related to dermatoglifos? Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article.

Understanding the distribution of quantitative indicators in non-athletes and athletes of basketball according to their performance. Teor Prak Fiz Kult.