Give social security it's walking papers

I'm tired of paying for the retirement of baby boomers. My generation will never see that money. Half of you that are collecting it don't even
need it. We won't retire until we're 70, according to the experts. Stop taking it. If it's being taken with no reliable plan to give it back, to
finance our retirement, then stop taking it. It's unfair taxation. We may be able to get by with privatized retirement plans, but that doesn't
make it right.

Stop beating a dead horse, and admit you messed up what was a nice idea.

I'm just plain fed up with this stuff. They talk like social security matters to me. As far as I'm concerned it's the money I am robbed of every
payday. NOTHING MORE! Let me opt out, because I'm sick of paying for other people's way. I'll gladly take care of the sick and the weak. I'm
not going to give my hard earned money to the people that just give it to charity and get a tax deduction. I can do that with my money on my own
thank you very much.

You do realize that we live in a Representative Republic and that, with the exception of the recent two Presidents abusing "Executive Order" - all
laws and policies were passed by law, by majority, and through Constitutional process right?

To me this is no different than far, far leftists screaming that they want all guns taken away. The majority chose - and that's that.

It's our form of government and it's actually sort of tiring. If you want change write your duly elected Officials in the House and Senate. They are
your voice in government.

I'm paying so people with ample pentions can give it to charity. Did you know that so many baby boomers don't know what to do with the check that
people are advocating giving it to charity as a tax deductable donation?

I'm tired of paying for the retirement of baby boomers. My generation will never see that money. Half of you that are collecting it don't even
need it. We won't retire until we're 70, according to the experts. Stop taking it. If it's being taken with no reliable plan to give it back, to
finance our retirement, then stop taking it. It's unfair taxation. We may be able to get by with privatized retirement plans, but that doesn't
make it right.

Stop beating a dead horse, and admit you messed up what was a nice idea.

I have no problem with what you are saying,
I can understand why you want to starve me out,
before I collect what I payed in,
and you need the money for your young wars.

The good news is the real estate bubble has collapsed,
and land is cheap,
so can I get the burial plot I wanted,
instead of taking the cremation route,
with no record embedded in stone,
of the early death you wish for me?

Social Insecurity is more like it, but try to spin the walking papers strategy to people that have statements and I mean years of them that show how
much of their money they have put into and their possible benefit, I am talking 44 or 50 thousand or more over some years, and are not even anywhere
near retirement, do you think people would love to just donate that much money out of their hard earned money if they stopped the program?

They could stop Social security and the SSI or the portion the government adds to it there would be nothing wrong with that entitlement portion, but
there is the element of the money you have given the government in return for their promise or their plan, if they stop social security I guarantee
you there will be a stampede of people with their statements demanding their portion of their hard earned money back that the government has taken.

We all know that actuaries or other statisticians figure out the possible lifespan of a person, give the data to the government who then keep upping
the retirement age so they know there is a considerable amount of people that will not see their hard earned money that they put into it nor will the
government pay a refund to you or surviving heirs if you collect none of the entitlement portion.

The portion that you pay into it from your paycheck is your money they took and have no fair way to give it back if you either die or do not collect
it is one of the biggest scams ever because at some point I heard that the cost of living component had the formula manipulated back in the 90's so
checks are not what they really should be, yet they want to cut it or make it seem as though they are giving you all of this money when you collect
it.

And in return,
I no longer want to pay school taxes,
or government taxes for grants and research.
After all I am old and children gone, why fund them,
when they just want to prematurely put me in the ground.

Good luck getting those of us who were forced to pay into the system for 40+ years supporting you. Why should we give up what we paid into with the
gov. with a promise of a return. Is it our fault it was misused, on multiple occasions to pay for other government programs or that Obama plans to
take 7Billion plus out to fund Obamacare? Should those of us on SS be blamed for the government's ineptness?

I have saved more in the last 15 years to help with my retirement than I will ever get in return from social security. But without social security I
would have to make sure I die in 10 years.

There will be a change, but to blame the elderly, is unfair.

Grip to the millionaires who get their SS and don't need it. But remember, they were forced to pay into the system too. No choice.

Amish do not participate in SS, yet they llive full, long lives WITH THE FAMILY. As the generations expand they move to a smaller and smaller
apartment-like dwelling attached to, or very close to, the main family house reserved for the oldest male child once married.

We've been programmed that American family means your own house and property away from parents and grandparents. Social security replaces inner
family responsibility and unity through the generations.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.