Build it

Burn it.

I wanted to see how well this would go over, it is a prototype only. I always like the idea of putting the knobs after the bridge, it makes the end of the body have to be longer, thereby helping to eliminate neck dive. Plus I just like the body shape. Let me know in the comments if I should make it or burn it.
I seem to see a lot of comments suggesting this is a short scale bass. Nothing could be farther from the truth, as I copied the scale from the nut to the bride from an actual 35" five string bass, simply because it was the easiest way to get the only crucial part of the guitar as close to correct as I could make it. Yes, it has a lot of wood south of the bridge, I did this in the hope that it would avert neck dive by making the body larger in proportion to the neck, which seems to be the other issue everyone has with this design. It also seems to have given it the visual illusion of a short scale bass... actual length of the bass is 52 1/2" or 133.35 centimeters.

Well, it's certain nobody else in town will have one just like it, that's for sure. I like it. It's cool and unique without crossing the boundary into weird or goofy. The body shape, pickup angle and knob placement don't look as out of place with the unusual headstock as they would in a more common style, where the peghead would stand out more. Good job combining features not found on other basses to make one memorable instrument.

I dig it. Having the knobs behind the bridge also makes it super easy to string up left handed (you’d just have to install a new nut + a strap button on the lower horn as well.)
Not sure if I’m a fan of the inline tuners, makes the headstock too long for my tastes (at least in seeing this 5 string mock-up.)
The knob placement and symmetry reminds me a bit of the prototype I recently picked up:{}

The forward bridge, reduced body size, short horns and larger headstock means the player will need to contend with significant and fatal neck dive. That's my objective commentary. I'll keep the subjective to myself.
I highly suggest reading Hiscock's book on building a guitar to understand the importance of a useful design.

I've had a bass with the scale shoved forward in the body with a short horn (longer by far than this) and long scale with five keys on the end of a big head. They haven't altered gravity since then, and though it's an interesting design, I'd have to name it 'Crash Dive' as that's just what it's going to do. This is essentially an L Steinberger shape with keys and the weight and leverage out at the end of the neck. I would have to say 'keep sketching' and pass on this interesting design.

I dig it. Having the knobs behind the bridge also makes it super easy to string up left handed (you’d just have to install a new nut + a strap button on the lower horn as well.)
Not sure if I’m a fan of the inline tuners, makes the headstock too long for my tastes (at least in seeing this 5 string mock-up.)
The knob placement and symmetry reminds me a bit of the prototype I recently picked up:{}

Click to expand...

Are the tuning keys forward of the headstock on that? Do you have to be a yoga expert to tune it?

two fingersOpinionated blowhard. But not mad about it.Gold Supporting Member

1) The points in the top of the head will likely lead to paint chipping. Look at some Reverb ads for pointy basses. Almost all of them have closeup pics of the points with chips.

2) If neck dive is an issue, look into the leverage caused by the head being in-line and longer. I would shorten the design by making it a 3+2 head that is as short as possible. Short version, the further out the weight is, the more leverage it has.

3) Avoid having the knobs near the top of the bridge and right behind it. Some techniques would have one's hand sitting on top of the bridge (including muting using the side of the hand when picking). Behind the bridge could work. But keep them as low as possible.

I wanted to see how well this would go over, it is a prototype only. I always like the idea of putting the knobs after the bridge, it makes the end of the body have to be longer, thereby helping to eliminate neck dive. Plus I just like the body shape. Let me know in the comments if I should make it or burn it.

Click to expand...

What program did you use to design it?

p.s. I dig the design, I would test out a six string version if you had it. I like the idea with knobs behind the bridge.

I like its unique qualities.
I personally would not enjoy all of the tuning keys on the bottom of the headstock. The saw effect is frightening for its potential damage to others...which I understand would be a selling point to others!