If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

View Poll Results: How do you feel about Mardy Collins? (Check Game thread Spotlight for stats)

If what you're saying is true, then why have the Knicks lost 5 in a row?

1. 4 of the 5 teams are better than the Knicks.

2. They were on the road

3. Winning is not all about having more talent and skill. It's also about character, heart, the ability to perform under pressure etc.... The Knicks lack those intangibles. So they typically find ways to lose close games at crunch time. The best example was Portland. Portland has a very young team. Portland did everything they could to give that game to the Knicks, but the Knicks found a way to play even worse at the end and lose. That's pathetic. If the Pistons, Spurs, etc.. outgut you at crunch time, well, what are going to do. That's why they are champions. But this was bad.

The Knicks are playing MUCH better now. They are competitive in every game regardless of whether the team is better, they are on the road etc.... They simply aren't that good and haven't learned to win.

Jamal Crawford got cookied... OUT hustled and OUT played by WEST. That player is better then Jamal Crawford. West>>Crawford.
So if JC wants out let him go Isiah that will be one of the best moves that you might make. I am starting to not like Crawford at all. No Captain says he wants to be traded other then Kobe.

1 turnover, but that turnover was such a bad position. The ball went out of Jamals hands without anyone touching it.

i totally disagree, ever since stephon has gone down wit the injury, the assist per game as team has gone so much higher and its been obvious, the ball is moving so much quicker and smoother

This is a message to everyone who thinks datruth is telling the truth. I have already addressed this, I said the Knicks were playing better from the start of January before Marbury got injured.

For future reference, when Msg33 the "King of Stats" says something please believe it. Instead of being ignorant next time check the stats first instead of wasting my F*ckin time. Im gonna make you my son B*tch.

Im about to teach datruth the truth and heres proof.

Marbury played the first 5 games of January for the Knicks. If anything the better teamplay started because of him.

We know from my game thread stats that the Knicks only averaged 16.4 assists in the month of December. Marbury barely even played, he only played a couple of games.

Lets look at some stats now. The first 5 games of January which Marbury played in, total assists:

Jan. 2-20astsJan. 4-17astsJan. 5-17astsJan. 8-28astsJan. 9-18asts

20 assists per game

Thats 20 assists per game, a 3.6apg improvement from the entire month of December. From there on the Knicks without Marbury managed to increase their assists for the month of January by 1.3apg

Marbury deserves credit for improving ball movement but what the F*ck does it matter, were still losing. The only reason why it matters is because of ignorant *******s like datruth who need to check on things.

If you think the Knicks are a better team without Marbury shoot yourself in the F*ckin head.

Originally Posted by datruth

i totally disagree, ever since stephon has gone down wit the injury, the assist per game as team has gone so much higher and its been obvious, the ball is moving so much quicker and smoother

I felt it was necessary to quote this again just to make you feel dumber. Your clearly a hater. No matter what Marbury does you wont give him credit. You jumped to the conclusion that we are playin better without him because you hate him, not because of any stats or facts.

You should change your name because you dont speak datruth.

Ball movement? 2 games so far in February and were averaging 14.5 assists. It doesnt matter what someone thinks of Marbury. You can criticize him for this and that but no way are we a better team without him.

Originally Posted by nyKnicks126

Jamal Crawford got cookied... OUT hustled and OUT played by WEST. That player is better then Jamal Crawford. West>>Crawford.
So if JC wants out let him go Isiah that will be one of the best moves that you might make. I am starting to not like Crawford at all. No Captain says he wants to be traded other then Kobe.

1 turnover, but that turnover was such a bad position. The ball went out of Jamals hands without anyone touching it.

in better news and the real reason i posted GO GIANTS!!!!!! my boy plaxico scored the winning touchdown. we went to highschool together so this is a really exciting time! gooooo giants! i hate you tom brady, i hate you!

Marbury played the first 5 games of January for the Knicks. If anything the better teamplay started because of him.

We know from my game thread stats that the Knicks only averaged 16.4 assists in the month of December. Marbury barely even played, he only played a couple of games.

Marbury deserves credit for improving ball movement but what the F*ck does it matter, were still losing. The only reason why it matters is because of ignorant *******s like datruth who need to check on things.

If you think the Knicks are a better team without Marbury shoot yourself in the F*ckin head.

I felt it was necessary to quote this again just to make you feel dumber. Your clearly a hater. No matter what Marbury does you wont give him credit. You jumped to the conclusion that we are playin better without him because you hate him, not because of any stats or facts.

You should change your name because you dont speak datruth.

Ball movement? 2 games so far in February and were averaging 14.5 assists. It doesnt matter what someone thinks of Marbury. You can criticize him for this and that but no way are we a better team without him.

first off, let Re-state this, im am not a marbury hater, im just sick of defending em, when he first arrived here, i got his authentic jersey that same week, him losing through out his whole career, it just isnt a coincidence this guy cat wint with any team

NOw to reply to what u said, u said the reason started playing good is because of marbury, u must be marbury's stan, he played 6 games, we was 1-5 in those games, in dat 1 win marbury came through for us big wit that shot dat put the game out of reach, i give it up to em but its still 1-5 record, now the next 7 games, we go 5-2, losing to boston and washington.....so as soon marbury gets hurt we go on a nice streak but oh yea i forgot, we talking about marbury, so just like his whole damn career, its just a coincidence..my fault

let me get this clear though, this team is still bad, this team needs a true PG bad but in marbury's case, i hope the best of luck for this guy, maybe he could win overseas but i forgot again, damn, he got his ass busted by overseas players too in da olympics, yeah, its just a coincidence