Author,
Chuck Frank
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A legal immigrant who came to America many years ago from Lebanon that still resides in California shared back in 2018, why he left his own country which was because of lax border security, constant incursions by dangerous militants and others who robbed him and also his neighbors. Then he went on to say the following after he had moved to California.

“Four decades later, I find myself as mayor of Escondido, CA. Now, ironically, reminders of the chaos that drove me from my native homeland all those years ago have landed on my doorstep. The cause of this anarchy and loss of overall sense of public safety is due solely to the passage of S.B. 54, the law that now shields dangerous criminal aliens from being removed from my state — and increasingly — this nation.”

So, there it is in a nutshell. This testimony, starkly reminds us of the chaos that is presently happening in much of Europe and those countries that are part of the European Union. Because of the delicate balance of multiculturalism and Immigration, it must be done in such a manner that it becomes a process of not careless vetting, but careful background checks that will produce a healthy people who will assimilate, honor and accept the norms of whichever state or country they will eventually reside in. All of the organizations that do the vetting are paid money for this service but often do not either have the tools or the background checks to accurately assess an immigrants profile. Thus, the entire system of immigration vetting needs to be revamped and then rebuilt from the ground up, lest the immigrants are not willing to assimilate and follow the rule of law.

If not, in the case of America which is already having its own sociological meltdown from those years gone by, will it be steered even farther away from a quite and peaceful habitation and a moral essence that was envisioned by our founders such as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Abraham Lincoln? The final choice belongs to the people, not to those politicos and New World Order instigators who have an agenda that has already proven to be horribly dysfunctional and right out disastrous. Cannot the people of America and the biased Mainstream Media see what open borders did in Europe? Must they all hold on to their belief that open borders and sanctuary states and cities are the wave of the future and the best choice for a world that is becoming more chaotic everyday?

Where is the hard evidence that this insane and recent immigration agenda worked since being orchestrated by the Obama administration? It’s not working and a person would have to be blind not to see it. However, it is not the blind people who are leading the agenda, while there are the sheep who are being misled under the spell of a socialistic, Marxist movement meant to destroy a nation from the inside out and then rebuild it according to someone’s draconian-Utopian dream.

To follow such a model would be the complete loss of freedom which would follow.

There is some ambiguity with the use of the terms “libertarianism” and “libertarian” in writings about anarchism. Since the 1890s from France, the term “libertarianism” has often been used as a synonym for anarchism and was used almost exclusively in this sense until the 1950s in the United States; its use as a synonym is still common outside the United States. Accordingly, “libertarian socialism” is sometimes used as a synonym for socialist anarchism, to distinguish it from “individualist libertarianism” (individualist anarchism). On the other hand, some use “libertarianism” to refer to individualistic free-market philosophy only, referring to free-market anarchism as “libertarian anarchism”.

Anarchy (from the ancient Greek αναρχια, from αν, “not” +‎ αρχος “ruler”, “absence of a leader”, without rulers), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term “anarchy” typically is used to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority. When used in this sense, anarchy may or may not be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society. However, this usage is not the traditional sense of the word.
Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples, that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society. More

One of the more flagrant uses of words meant to disparage others, is the use of the word anarchist or, anarchy. In a recent statement by “Dirty” Harry Reid, Senate leader,

“Senate Democrats have shown that we are willing to debate and vote on a wide range of issues, including efforts to improve the Affordable Care Act. We continue to be willing to debate these issues in a calm and rational atmosphere. But the American people will not be extorted by Tea Party anarchists.”