Netanyahu: Iran lied about not pursuing nuclear weapons

Netanyahu: Iran lied about not pursuing nuclear weaponsTEL AVIV (Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday that Iran had lied about not pursuing nuclear weapons and had continued to preserve and expand its nuclear weapons knowledge after signing a 2015 deal with global powers.

"Citing a cache of records obtained by Israeli intelligence agencies, Netanyahu said Iran moved its nuclear weapons program to secret locations across the country after signing the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, a deal brokered by the Obama administration easing sanctions on Iran in exchange for a pledge to end its nuclear proliferation efforts.

When is the last time Bibi told the truth? I wouldn't believe him if he said the sky was blue.
He knows America was easily duped into a war with Iraq. Now he's
pimping our next war, this time with Iran. Will Trumpsters go along with it?
Stay tuned.

Instead of dealing with the discrepancy between his stated views on the Iran deal and what most of the chiefs of the security establishment have been saying (in private and occasionally in public), Netanyahu put on a great show. This included the kind of props and visual aids that have become the hallmarks of his rhetoric since his days as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations three decades ago.

He missed only one thing: Crucial dates that could prove Iran has actually done anything in contravention of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) since it was signed in 2015.
.....
What he had wasn’t a smoking gun but a photograph of a smoking gun taken years ago.

That flaw was so glaring as to render an incredible intelligence coup – obtaining Iran’s nuclear archive – almost irrelevant and obsolete to Netanyahu’s current purpose.

When is the last time Bibi told the truth? I wouldn't believe him if he said the sky was blue.
He knows America was easily duped into a war with Iraq. Now he's
pimping our next war, this time with Iran. Will Trumpsters go along with it?
Stay tuned.

Click to expand...

Moon says something is brewing, but he doesn't know what yet.

Last week General Joseph Votel, commander of CENTCOM - the U.S. military command for the Middle East, was in Israel.

Yesterday former CIA director and now Secretary of State Pompeo visited Israel.

The Israeli defense minister Lieberman just visited Washington DC and only today came back to Israel.

Now the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahoo loudly announced that he will hold a press conference to present a "huge amount of new and dramatic information on the Iranian nuclear program". He will allege that Iran cheats on the nuclear agreement ​

And here's the interesting part:

"Wehearthat the documents heis said to present were compiled by one Christopher Steele and assembled with the help of one Sergej Skripal and his MI6 handler [redacted]. They will show that Iran attempts to buy yellowcake uranium from Niger."​

As we know Christopher Steele is the one who made up the false dossier about Trump, and Sergei Skripal was poisoned in Britain. Was the attempt to kill him by the MI6 out of fear that his daughter might reveal something to the Russian government on her return? If these are the documents that Netanyahu will present, then we can understand why the MI6 would attempt to murder the Skripals.

Up until now neither of the Skripals have been heard or seen by any relatives. They have been hushed up by the British authorities in one way or the other. No wonder the Russians are trying to get out of Britain.

What isn't tin foil hat is PNAC. They needed a pearl harbor kind of event to implement it,and 911 provided that. This need of an event was once in the PNAC paper.

So when gen. clark was told in the pentagon by a friend there that we were gonna take down 7 nations in 5 years, with Iran being the last one, is it mere coincidence that Iraq, Libya, and syria were on that list? And look what happened to them! The tin foil hat crowd are the ones who do not believe in PNAC. And how it became the driver of our foreign policy after 911, the event that was needed to implement this madness and the breaking of international law.

Does Bill Crystal and wolfawitz have any ties to Israel? These are some of the men in that necon think tank along with cheney who came up with PNAC. So the connection to israel makes sense, whether or not they are helped by PNAC. And of course taking down Iraq, Syria and Iran indeed is in the best interests of Israel, or so the types like Net In Yahoo think so. That there is some connection with israel and the guys who wrote and promoted PNAC is a given. It is just logical and that makes it possible.

What isn't tin foil hat is PNAC. They needed a pearl harbor kind of event to implement it,and 911 provided that. This need of an event was once in the PNAC paper.

So when gen. clark was told in the pentagon by a friend there that we were gonna take down 7 nations in 5 years, with Iran being the last one, is it mere coincidence that Iraq, Libya, and syria were on that list? And look what happened to them! The tin foil hat crowd are the ones who do not believe in PNAC. And how it became the driver of our foreign policy after 911, the event that was needed to implement this madness and the breaking of international law.

Does Bill Crystal and wolfawitz have any ties to Israel? These are some of the men in that necon think tank along with cheney who came up with PNAC. So the connection to israel makes sense, whether or not they are helped by PNAC. And of course taking down Iraq, Syria and Iran indeed is in the best interests of Israel, or so the types like Net In Yahoo think so. That there is some connection with israel and the guys who wrote and promoted PNAC is a given. It is just logical and that makes it possible.

Click to expand...

Connection to Israel? Of course we have a connection to Israel. There wouldn't be one without out us. That doesn't change the fact that these are hilarious conspiracy theories.

I dunno. It makes more sense than the WMDs claim taken by itself. While that was the reason fed to the public to justify the invasion, along with the myth of freeing the Iraqi people, obviously there was more behind it than just that. It was a major military and monetary investment for us, all to deal with a tin-pot dictator who may or may not have had WMDs and who was behaving no worse than any number of other dictators whom we have happily left alone, especially in other parts of the world of less strategic interest to us and our bestest buddy in the whole wide world.

I dunno. It makes more sense than the WMDs claim taken by itself. While that was the reason fed to the public to justify the invasion, along with the myth of freeing the Iraqi people, obviously there was more behind it than just that. It was a major military and monetary investment for us, all to deal with a tin-pot dictator who may or may not have had WMDs and who was behaving no worse than any number of other dictators whom we have happily left alone, especially in other parts of the world of less strategic interest to us and our bestest buddy in the whole wide world.

Click to expand...

The WMD claim didn't just come from the United States... it came from many nations. Which is why it's known in the Army as a global intelligence failure