A couple questions though - How belatedly and, a bit curious about the processing? I am viewing the image with an uncalibrated laptop (I don't have my main computer and NEC monitor hooked to the net - a bit paranoid i suppose) and it seems to be almost some mild HDR with a bit of grunge thrown in. The blue parts of the image (train and shed) have a real nice blue/steel grey look that I don't see with conventional processing. Or is it just my monitor??

Thanks for the kind words and for paying attention to the photo's details.

How belatedly? Well, the contest ended in 2011, I got an email in January 2012, notifying me of being shortlisted and requesting a full-size file. I sent it and never heard back from them. I assumed I was not selected for any of the top awards and forgot about it. Many contests have that habit of asking for a full-size file in the shortlisting phase, probably to make sure that if you do win, the image is printable. In February, they printed a special supplement with the results of the 2011 competition, with some of the shortlisted entries as well. I usually read British magazines in my local Barnes & Noble, but somehow missed that issue (or maybe it was not included in overseas shipments). Only recently, while I was browsing through their iPad issues, I noticed that special editions and that it is actually free to download. I did and that is how I, ten months later, found out I was published.

Quote

it seems to be almost some mild HDR with a bit of grunge thrown in

You are too kind and gentle But no need to be. I do not hide the fact that it underwent quite an aggressive post-processing, sort of faux HDR. As a matter of fact, I have a preset (my own) in LR that generates a starting point for that look, which I adjust according to the image (and taste). I call the preset "gritty, " which I guess is more or less the same as "grunge."

When I first posted that photo here on LuLa, we had a lovely discussion about it, and specifically about that "cold, blue steel look" you noticed. The whole thread is here:

I posted there an out-of-camera, un-cropped and un-manipulated version as well. I also explained my post-processing and reasoning behind. In case you do not want to read the whole thread, here is my explanation (post #23):

Quote from: Rob C

Quote

... I have no problem with the blue at all - I believe that the artist is free to choose whatever tone he wants to use, reality having precious little to do with it. In my imagination or reading of this, it's all about cold blue steel, decay, sunlight, and the living horrors that some have to endure on a daily basis.

Thanks all for your kind words.

My thinking in post-processing is closest to Rob's. The image underwent a rather heavy manipulation in post processing, as is evident from the unmodified original. I went for a certain "look & feel", rather than reality, and I pushed certain LR sliders way beyond their "comfort zone" until I got that look. Funny how Rob mentioned "cold blue steel", as exactly that phrase came to my mind when I was playing with sliders. In fairness to Russ and Fred, I did go back and forth between Russ' gray steel and Fred's half-way, before settling for the final bluish one. I found gray steel to be too cold, almost black and white-ish. Given the presence of a large orange area in the image, I needed its complementary color (blue) to balance it. On a psychological level (or psychobabble level, if you insist), presence of color, especially strong contrasting ones, indicates presence of life. And as much as I wanted that "gritty" look, I did not want to go all the way to the "doom & gloom" one... after all, there is a life in Chicago I rather wanted to accentuate the spirit-uplifting battle between life and death (decay), light and shadow, cold and warm (you know... the yin and yang stuff).

For those interested in the technique, there are probably several plug-ins and PS actions floating around, usually labeled as "gritty look" "pseudo-hdr" or similar. I typically refrain from canned solutions, as I prefer to do know what exactly is going on under the hood. I did however create a preset in LR where Recovery, Fill Light, Blacks, Contrast, and Clarity are all maxed to 100... that is usually too much, but gives an idea whether the look is worth exploring further. For this particular image, I pushed Landscape Sharpening to 100 as well. Also, for this particular image, I reduced Vibrance, i.e., went about half way into the negative territory. Add to that some heavy vignetting and GND filtering, shake it (do not stir) and... season to taste