PeerCentered is a space for peer writing tutors/consultants or anyone interested in collaborative learning in writing centers to blog with their colleagues from around the world. Bloggers here will share their ideas, experiences, or insight.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Teaching Revision with Digital Collation Software

There’s this collation tool online called Juxta. It allows you to compare two
documents, and it highlights the differences between them in at least two ways.
First, it shows both documents side by side, highlighting differences and
drawing diagonal lines showing how pieces of the text have shifted. Second, it
creates a heat map on just a single document, showing by lighter and darker
shades of highlighting how different this document is from the other(s).

Now, a tool like this is meant for scholars in literary and
textual studies; for example, one who is interested in determining whether the edition
of Whitman’s Leaves of Grass
available through Google Books matches the copy in her local library. (Whitman
was a compulsive reviser, and digital reproductions of pre-1900 texts are notoriously
mismanaged. So this scholar could find some interesting results!)

But I propose another use for collation software like Juxta:
it can be used to learn about revision. Instead of comparing two printings of
the same book, why not compare two drafts of the same student paper? That kind
of collation could be useful for writers who wish to reflect on their process
and consultants who want to model revision for their clients.

Like Whitman with revising, I am a compulsive saver of
drafts, so I had a few of my own on which I could test this idea. Let me show
you what I found in visually comparing my own drafts, and then I’ll indicate
how I think this tool could be used in a consultation.

By comparing drafts side by side, I could see my writing
process unfolding. Between my first and second drafts, there were many
large-scale changes. Sentences blossomed into paragraphs, and paragraphs traded
places like musical chairs. I was still getting my ideas down and rearranging
at that point. (See Figure 1.) Between my second and final drafts, the scale of
revisions diminished, and I corrected smaller mistakes and rephrased just
portions of sentences. (See Figure 2.)

Figure 1: Comparing 1st and 2nd
drafts.

Figure 2: Comparing 2nd and final drafts.

But when I compared my final draft with my prewriting
document, into which I had just dumped the contents of my mind before even
starting to organize, the value of visualization tools like Juxta jumped off
the page (the screen) at me. One sentence had remained unchanged (so it's shown in white) from
prewriting to final draft. (See Figure 3.) That was my thesis.

Figure 3: Comparing prewriting and final draft.

The heat map feature was just as revealing. A heat map of my
prewriting document (comparing this text with all three drafts) was mostly dark,
dark blue, meaning that almost all of it had changed, and drastically. (See
Figure 4.) The heat map of my final draft, on the other hand, showed a variety
of shades; elements of that document came from each of the previous drafts. (See
Figure 5.) What stood out to me here were the words that were the lightest
blue. There were just a few words here and there that had escaped the chopping
block from beginning to end. These were my key words, so to speak. These were
the words that gave my ideas continuity.

Figure 4: Prewriting Heat Map

Figure 5: Final Draft Heat Map

When I looked at these images in Juxta, I felt like I was
looking at a portrait of my writing process. More than that, they helped me see
the piece I was writing in a new way, and I learned about my thinking about that
topic. (Woah, meta.)

This is a powerful tool for helping the writers we work with
become more reflective and intentional in their process. I could imagine using
Juxta in a consultation with a writer who feels stuck. Comparing recent drafts
of her current project or visualizing the whole start-to-finish process of a
past project can stimulate reflection on how her work has developed and spark
new ideas for how to proceed. Identifying key words and sentences like I did
could also show our clients the themes in what they’ve already written and help
them refocus as they continue to write. Even screenshots like these, of someone
else’s writing, can be used to model for our clients what the revision process might
look like. We can broaden our reach (to embrace visual learners, for instance) and
innovate our consulting by using digital visualization tools like Juxta.

Check out the online version, juxtacommons.org, to take a
look at your own revision process!

How to join PeerCentered

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in PeerCentered and in comments are the author's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of any other PeerCentered bloggers or any employer thereof. PeerCentered is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by its bloggers or commentators.