On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 06:49 PM, Sergey Melnik wrote:
> IMO reification has a chance to be introduced as a pure model feature
> not intrinsically bound to any vocabulary
Why do you want this? Is there a reason every RDF application
has to understand reification? I hope not, because that will
make RDF very confusing.
> In this perspective, it would not go under 'vocabularies'. Similarly,
> namespaces and literals are another two model features that might go
> into one of the layers in the 'core'.
To my knowledge, you still have not explained how namespaces fit
into the model. If I missed this somewhere, please send me a
pointer. I'm quite curious what you mean.
--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]