The solution is to link to any fluffy bunny you can find. If poor little Pinkie above is shy, who are we to interfere?

Greyhound? What greyh . .. oh, ah, nothing, just, ah, taking it for a walk before dinne . . for a walk. Yeah.

I just wanted you to know that the links leads to AtBC - wasn't sure if it's meant to.

It was meant to. As a reminder not to feed the troll.

While we're on (sorry Joe, I know it's supposed to be about you), a big fat Troll Award should go to William J Murray. Barely a thread goes by before another epistemological, ontological, let's-talk-about-me-athon. He's readable, articulate and not over-long ... but he's getting awful samey, and he knows all the right buttons.

--------------SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like â€śI thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,â€ť you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

While we're on (sorry Joe, I know it's supposed to be about you), a big fat Troll Award should go to William J Murray. Barely a thread goes by before another epistemological, ontological, let's-talk-about-me-athon. He's readable, articulate and not over-long ... but he's getting awful samey, and he knows all the right buttons.

William is Joe after Joe grows up a bit and stops talking about bottoms. Repetition ad nauseam of inane "gotchas"? Failure to engage counter-arguments? Refusal to even try to learn? Ignored by other creationists? It's all there, just with a bigger vocabulary.

--------------Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... Â The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

The solution is to link to any fluffy bunny you can find. If poor little Pinkie above is shy, who are we to interfere?

Greyhound? What greyh . .. oh, ah, nothing, just, ah, taking it for a walk before dinne . . for a walk. Yeah.

I just wanted you to know that the links leads to AtBC - wasn't sure if it's meant to.

It was meant to. As a reminder not to feed the troll.

While we're on (sorry Joe, I know it's supposed to be about you), a big fat Troll Award should go to William J Murray. Barely a thread goes by before another epistemological, ontological, let's-talk-about-me-athon. He's readable, articulate and not over-long ... but he's getting awful samey, and he knows all the right buttons.

Yep. As I said in the TSZ thread, William J Murray is a dick. It's hard to describe such a self-involved, self-aggrandizing, pompous buffoon with any other one-word, one-syllable, epithet, which is all he's worth (tool? ass? jerk? dweeb? spit?). I applaud the good Doctor Febble for her patience with him, although I do note that she has had to warn him just recently.

William J Murray provides the best evidence of the egotism that underlies ID. He is absolutely sure of his own greatness, and of the lunacy/obtuseness of those who inhabit what an outsider might term "reality." What a dick.

The solution is to link to any fluffy bunny you can find. If poor little Pinkie above is shy, who are we to interfere?

Greyhound? What greyh . .. oh, ah, nothing, just, ah, taking it for a walk before dinne . . for a walk. Yeah.

I just wanted you to know that the links leads to AtBC - wasn't sure if it's meant to.

It was meant to. As a reminder not to feed the troll.

While we're on (sorry Joe, I know it's supposed to be about you), a big fat Troll Award should go to William J Murray. Barely a thread goes by before another epistemological, ontological, let's-talk-about-me-athon. He's readable, articulate and not over-long ... but he's getting awful samey, and he knows all the right buttons.

Yep. As I said in the TSZ thread, William J Murray is a dick. It's hard to describe such a self-involved, self-aggrandizing, pompous buffoon with any other one-word, one-syllable, epithet, which is all he's worth (tool? ass? jerk? dweeb? spit?). I applaud the good Doctor Febble for her patience with him, although I do note that she has had to warn him just recently.

William J Murray provides the best evidence of the egotism that underlies ID. He is absolutely sure of his own greatness, and of the lunacy/obtuseness of those who inhabit what an outsider might term "reality." What a dick.

--------------"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

While we're on (sorry Joe, I know it's supposed to be about you), a big fat Troll Award should go to William J Murray. Barely a thread goes by before another epistemological, ontological, let's-talk-about-me-athon. He's readable, articulate and not over-long ... but he's getting awful samey, and he knows all the right buttons.

William is Joe after Joe grows up a bit and stops talking about bottoms. Repetition ad nauseam of inane "gotchas"? Failure to engage counter-arguments? Refusal to even try to learn? Ignored by other creationists? It's all there, just with a bigger vocabulary.

Isn't it about time someone put together a WJM phrase generator similar to the Dodgenator?

Science is wrong because- it doesn't take into account free will- it doesn't take into account purpose- it tries to describe reality which doesn't even exist

I refuse to provide evidence because- you lunatics won't understand it anyway- you couldn't accept it because you believe in chance only- "evidence" is a concept of science which is based on metaphysics

Lou, feel free to move my comment to TSZ if that is the more appropriate thread. :-)

Only evoTARDs could equate the masterful sculpting of a block of marble to “throwing stuff out”, and here we are…

So now I can compare and contrast:

Quote

After marveling at Michelangelo’s statue of Goliath-vanquishing David, the Pope asked the sculptor, “How do you know what to cut away?”Michelangelo’s reply? “It’s simple. I just remove everything that doesn’t look like David.”

Hmm, Joe or Michelangelo. Joe or Michelangelo.

Gonna have to think about this one.

--------------I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot standGordon Mullings