Wait Devil's Advocate was a decent movie, not Oscar quality but a decent movie with some great scene chewing by Al. And you can go fark a high stick Mr Article writer because Be Cool was a great flick, a fun ride to just tag along with.

IdBeCrazyIf:Wait Devil's Advocate was a decent movie, not Oscar quality but a decent movie with some great scene chewing by Al. And you can go fark a high stick Mr Article writer because Be Cool was a great flick, a fun ride to just tag along with.

FrancoFile:IdBeCrazyIf: Wait Devil's Advocate was a decent movie, not Oscar quality but a decent movie with some great scene chewing by Al. And you can go fark a high stick Mr Article writer because Be Cool was a great flick, a fun ride to just tag along with.

Let's get us some chicken and waffles up in this biatch!had some pretty decent T&A, including Charlize Theron and Connie Nielsen.

FTFY

How dare you bring that up and leave her out.

/Tamara Tunie was rather hot too...//...when she wasn't going full demon.

yves0010:Anything listing any part of Twilight as good looses my attention.

Ok, just because the core material was utter crap in conception, style, substance, execution, and intellectual appeal, doesn't mean that an actor or two couldn't muster up a good performance when acting in the poorly adapted, written, shot, directed, edited, and produced shiatfest that was their asinine attempt to stain the silver screen.

At the end of the day, this is really all you need to know about superhero movies - no matter how "dark", "realistic", and or "twisted" its a bunch of poofs dancing around in over-engineered stretchy cycling pants...

IdBeCrazyIf:Wait Devil's Advocate was a decent movie, not Oscar quality but a decent movie with some great scene chewing by Al. And you can go fark a high stick Mr Article writer because Be Cool was a great flick, a fun ride to just tag along with.

Let's get us some chicken and waffles up in this biatch!

You're high. Be Cool was terrible, a ceaseless compilation of "Hey, remember this great moment from Pulp Fiction or Get Shorty? Here it is again!" I think I laughed once, and never felt like I was having fun.

jedzz:You're high. Be Cool was terrible, a ceaseless compilation of "Hey, remember this great moment from Pulp Fiction or Get Shorty? Here it is again!" I think I laughed once, and never felt like I was having fun.

IdBeCrazyIf:jedzz: You're high. Be Cool was terrible, a ceaseless compilation of "Hey, remember this great moment from Pulp Fiction or Get Shorty? Here it is again!" I think I laughed once, and never felt like I was having fun.

jedzz:IdBeCrazyIf: jedzz: You're high. Be Cool was terrible, a ceaseless compilation of "Hey, remember this great moment from Pulp Fiction or Get Shorty? Here it is again!" I think I laughed once, and never felt like I was having fun.

I'm kind of on the Jersey Girl wasn't half bad train. Affleck played every scene much bigger than he should have I agree on that, but I think it gets more crap than it deserves on the story. May be the worst Kevin Smith movie but not the worse Affleck movie for sure.

therecksays:I'm kind of on the Jersey Girl wasn't half bad train. Affleck played every scene much bigger than he should have I agree on that, but I think it gets more crap than it deserves on the story. May be the worst Kevin Smith movie but not the worse Affleck movie for sure.

So did I. I recognize how deeply, terribly flawed it is. Keanu's inconsistent accent, the poor pacing in the middle of the film, the hammy acting, all of it. But I do so enjoy it.

Keanu Reeves is terrible any time I have to take him seriously. That might just be me, (I'm that age, like a lot of Farkers, where he's Ted Theodore Logan) but anything beyond Speed/Point Break level just doesn't work. (Esp. Dracula. Who the f*ck cast him and Ryder in that? *throws up hands*)

Devil's Advocate: Good all around, except for that damn accent.Batman & Robin: Nothing good about this film. Campy in a funny way, sure.Jersey Girl: Good movie all around. George Carlin got the vote because he is farking George CarlinThe Watch: Everyone did well, except that Vince Vaughn is always his stupid character in every movie. Still funny.

Always good in every movie: Kevin Bacon, Kevin Costner (yes, I went there), Samuel L Jackson, Wilhelm Dafoe, Joseph Gordon-Levitt (different font because I forgot his spelling and copy and pasted), and others but I am bored to list.

No. Not even close. It's just drowning in every workaholic-single-father-gets-his-priorities-straight cliché that has ever been conceived. It's insultingly trite and treacly, and so predictable, it circles back around to being almost unpredictable because you think, "They couldn't possibly be going there. It's way, way, way too obvious." Not only does the self-centered, single-dad widower realizes at the last moment that his daughter's school talent show is more important than a job interview, but actually dashes back to the 'burbs from Manhattan to join her on stage for a song. The performances are good in the early going - for Affleck and Lopez, it's the anti-"Gigli" up until she dies. But after that it's Grade-A, 140-proof, entirely mechanical garbage.

Khellendros:yves0010: Anything listing any part of Twilight as good looses my attention.

Ok, just because the core material was utter crap in conception, style, substance, execution, and intellectual appeal, doesn't mean that an actor or two couldn't muster up a good performance when acting in the poorly adapted, written, shot, directed, edited, and produced shiatfest that was their asinine attempt to stain the silver screen.

I mean really, your hate is misplaced.

Not really... I see no redeeming quality to that movie. The acting, to me at least, was crap at best. But then again, I was more interesting in the young lady I was with then anything happening in the movie. All though I did get to riff the hell out of that movie.

yves0010:Khellendros: yves0010: Anything listing any part of Twilight as good looses my attention.

Ok, just because the core material was utter crap in conception, style, substance, execution, and intellectual appeal, doesn't mean that an actor or two couldn't muster up a good performance when acting in the poorly adapted, written, shot, directed, edited, and produced shiatfest that was their asinine attempt to stain the silver screen.

I mean really, your hate is misplaced.

Not really... I see no redeeming quality to that movie. The acting, to me at least, was crap at best. But then again, I was more interesting in the young lady I was with then anything happening in the movie. All though I did get to riff the hell out of that movie.

Khellendros:yves0010: Khellendros: yves0010: Anything listing any part of Twilight as good looses my attention.

Ok, just because the core material was utter crap in conception, style, substance, execution, and intellectual appeal, doesn't mean that an actor or two couldn't muster up a good performance when acting in the poorly adapted, written, shot, directed, edited, and produced shiatfest that was their asinine attempt to stain the silver screen.

I mean really, your hate is misplaced.

Not really... I see no redeeming quality to that movie. The acting, to me at least, was crap at best. But then again, I was more interesting in the young lady I was with then anything happening in the movie. All though I did get to riff the hell out of that movie.

I think you missed the joke. I'm with you on this.

Why yes I did.. Sorry, crappy day leads to crappy reading comprehension. In my terms right now "Me no reed good"