Abortion: The termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus. (Merriam-Webster)
Morality: A code of conduct put forward by a society. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Used to determine right and wrong.
Morally okay: Permitted by morality.
Not-born baby: A human child at or before week 20 after conception, assuming a normal growth rate. (my own definition)

A child don't start conscious until around fortnight 13 [1] and don't got pain until fortnight 15 [2]. Stuff without conscious don't got right to living; unconscious stuff has no wants or passion. Stuff that gots pain may got rights, may not, but not-born babys still can't gots pain.

===========================
Point 2: Not-born babys can't do living without mama.

Not-born babys can't do living without mama until 5 months post-start [3]. Mamas giving food and air. Not-born babys can't do living on own. Basically, not-born babys is part of mama's body. Body parts don't got rights; mama is domain of mama's body.

"Point 1: God will f*ck you up."
This point says nothing and don't got proof. It don't support Con.

"Point 2: You can stick it in a glass cylindrical thing and coldify it."
WTF?! That don't support Con!

"Point 3: Throw it away, adoption."
Throwing away is similar to abortion. This don't support Con. Adoption is an option, but don't modify fact that abortion is OKAY as I proof'd in round 1!

"Point 4: If it is born, it will gain ration and do stuff on its own, including if it is born too fast."
But not until 5 months, cuz it must got viability to do birth. 5 months ain't within 10 fortnights. Up to 10 fortnights, it don't got rationality. AND up to 5 months.

This does not count as my argument part where I can't use the letter e. You cannot use proof'd. If you are going to count that as not using the letter e, then I can put an asterisk in instead of every e and will not have used the letter e. Con wins.

<<<<<
(I used "proof'd" in the same way that one would use "punk'd".) I created a contraction which I did not think was much of a stretch. The logic used to contract "proof'd" does not apply in most cases, so it could NOT be used instead of an e in every scenario. For example, it does not work if the "e" is at the end of the word. Additionally, while I *could* use contractions more frequently and it would be valid in many cases, I only used it once.
>>>>>

Punk'd is a tv show and therefore is a proper noun and must be spelled that way. If you were to use it as a verb in that spelling, it would be incorrect. Proof'd is not a word nor is it a proper noun, you cannot use it and because you did, you lose. Thank you for a quick debate, vote con.

The 300 page novel "A Void" is a translation of a French novel. Neither the original or the translation used the letter "e". Amazon gives the first page of the novel, and I think it is amazing, http://www.amazon.com...

There is another long novel, "Gadsby" written without "e"

No fair using numbers, special characters, or invented words, and grammar should count. Also, no writing in Chinese.