I know the Committee is interested in a number of different aspects of credit card
pricing and regulation, and we've tried to address those aspects that come
within our field of expertise and responsibility in our submission.

As we explain in the submission, credit cards have both a payment and a credit function.
The regulatory powers and mandate of the Reserve Bank Payments System Board
(the Board) relate to the payment function. The Board has a mandate to use
its powers to promote efficiency and competition in payment systems, consistent
with overall stability of the financial system. To that end, the Board has
for a number of years regulated card payment systems by setting standards in
relation to such matters as interchange fees, surcharging and access.

As you know, the Board is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of those aspects
of card payments regulation. I'll be happy to answer any questions you
might have today about how that review is proceeding.

I know the Committee is also very interested in the credit function, and particularly
the interest rates on credit cards. That is not something that we regulate,
but we have set out in our submission an overview of some of the key facts.

If I may, I'll just make a few high-level observations about that before we go
to questions.

Credit card products vary a lot in the interest rates that they charge. Some of those
rates are very high. They're higher than I think can be easily explained.

Interest rates of the order of 20 per cent on credit cards are not uncommon. The
average rate for borrowers who incur interest on credit cards is currently
about 17 per cent. After deducting banks' cost of funds and the cost of
credit losses, that would equate to an interest rate margin of more than 10
percentage points.

My advice if you're in that situation is to shop around. Despite the prevalence
of high-rate cards, this is a market where there is some significant competition.
There are a lot of card products that offer lower rates and special deals for
balance transfers. In many cases, cardholders should be able to lower their
interest rates by taking advantage of those offers, if they are willing to
shop around.

That of course raises questions about why more cardholders don't take advantage
of the lower rates that are on offer, whether there are obstacles to competition
and whether there might be some role for regulatory action.

Some cardholders might be unable to switch, for example if they have poor credit
histories. That is something that can be looked into, along with the related
question of whether there are unreasonable obstacles to switching. Other cardholders
might not be aware of the options available, or might have other reasons for
not pursuing them. We discuss some of those issues in our submission.

The answers to these questions are not necessarily straightforward, and I think these
are areas where the financial regulators can usefully do further work. When
I appeared at this Committee in June I indicated that the Bank would consult
with other regulators in this area, and we have begun doing that. We will be
continuing those discussions at a more senior level at the next meeting of
the Council of Financial Regulators in September.

I don't want to pre-empt what might come out of those discussions, but some of
the questions that might be considered are: whether there is a case for improved
disclosure in this area; whether there is a need for stronger risk assessment
requirements for credit card lending; and to what extent any actions in these
areas would fall within the regulators' existing powers and mandates.