It was always going to be released its just a formality that the request has to go through the courts - Its to ensure confidentiality of witnesses / whistle-blowers and even victims within the industry whenever there's an incident reported.

Its a bit like the US crime shows where the company will only release everything served a warrant.

Much affinity felt with all those who I would describe as seeing correctly, although objectively you actually see as I do, right or wrong, that most of the news is cretinous fiction.
Definitely this is.
Firstly, why even attempt an aerial stunt over a road, let alone a busy dual carriageway. Do it over a field or the sea. Never has any mention been made that the attempted location was wrong or ill-judged.

Also, tarmac melts at a far lower temperature than jet fuel, or car fuel, burns at. And deforms fast.
Was the stretch of road resurfaced? Not even, like the plane crashing, fictionally!

Leslye Polito, from Worthing, whose 23-year-old son Daniele was among the victims, said: "Like with all the other families, we want answers.

"I'm interested to know what the conclusions are in the report and to see if there is any new information.

The Rev Terry Stratford, associate priest of St Mary de Haura Church in Shoreham, where some of the victims' families gathered before the first anniversary of the disaster, said the AAIB report will not provide final closure...."This report will be a further stage reached for the families, but not the culmination.".

cue..

Quote:

James Healy-Pratt, head of aviation and travel at Stewarts Law, said [speaking on behalf of the families]: "This AAIB final report is a critical step on the journey to the truth for the families left bereaved by the Shoreham air crash.

"The families understand there will be unanswered questions after the AAIB report, that are better answered through the coroner's investigation and inquest, and potentially the criminal investigation by Sussex Police.

"Their journey to the truth is long, but they are determined that no stone should be left unturned, so that lessons can be learned and appropriate actions taken."

The families and friends of the Shoreham disaster victims have reacted angrily to the findings of the final report by air accident investigators.

The parents of Matthew Grimstone [Sue and Phil Grimstrone] criticised the Civil Aviation Authority and the airshow organisers, saying they "have got much to answer for" in relation to the tragedy that claimed 11 lives.

Mr [Jacob] Schilt's mother Caroline said though she was happy with the AAIB's "very comprehensive and factual" investigation after a "huge amount of work".
"But there are still questions and they are ones for the coroner," she said

Nino Vydeenaden, 22, a friend of victim Matt Jones, 24, said: "It's going to anger a lot of people. If the pilot had not had formal training to stop what he was doing, then he shouldn't have done it.

"I think it's ridiculous. I know the AAIB doesn't want to point the finger at anyone, but if he had not had formal training to stop that manoeuvre then he shouldn't have flown the plane.

"The pilot is going to have to live with that. And now the families are going to be thinking that it could have been prevented. People are going to be furious."

@ felixfelix: What a shame you couldn't contribute to the Air Accidents Investigation Branch on this matter. You could have pointed out to them that it was all a hoax and saved them a great deal of time and money.

Presumably you did contact them to offer to present your evidence?

Still, it's very odd that no one at all came across the same evidence you did. Not a single statement suggesting crisis actors, CGI, hidden explosives etc.

@ felixfelix: What a shame you couldn't contribute to the Air Accidents Investigation Branch on this matter. You could have pointed out to them that it was all a hoax and [saved them a great deal of time and money.

Presumably you did contact them to offer to present your evidence?

Still, it's very odd that no one at all came across the same evidence you did. Not a single statement suggesting crisis actors, CGI, hidden explosives etc.

I guess it was another fantastic cover-up by TPTB.

Spot on. Thanks for contributing. These clever government paid girls and boys at the AAIB [key players in any flight hoax] can simulate anything. OItherwise they would be out of a job, and none of them would want that, would they?

A pre-inquest review was due to take place on Monday, but has now been postponed until March. [2017]

West Sussex County Council said the full inquest was now likely to be held late 2017, but was "very dependent" on the police investigation.

A lawyer representing some of the victims' families described "a measure of frustration" at the news.

sure. I'm sure the police can slow down the "investigation" at will.

Quote:

Specialist aviation lawyer James Healey Pratt said the victims' families had full confidence in the coroner and the investigation.
He said the pre-inquest hearing was being delayed until March as a decision by the CPS on whether to bring charges was due then.
He also revealed the families had been invited to a meeting in Farnborough on 19 December, at which they would be told the results of the AAIB investigation.Sussex Police's report is not expected until the new year at the earliest.

West Sussex Senior Coroner Penelope Schofield said the decision to postpone the pre-inquest review was "not taken lightly", particularly as she was anxious to ensure the inquests were dealt with in a timely manner.
But it was anticipated little progress could be made with the police and AAIB report still outstanding, she added.

The speed, height and thrust followed in the Hunter were "very similar" to another aircraft that the pilot had flown during displays in the run up to the Shoreham event, AAIB principal inspector Julian Firth said.
He added that it was possible "the pilot recalled the wrong numbers, essentially mixing up the two aircraft".

sure he did.

Quote:

He was interviewed on seven occasions by AAIB investigators but because of restrictions advised by his doctors they were not able to question him about his conduct during the flight, the AAIB said.
Mr Hill did not recall events between the evening of August 19 and regaining consciousness in hospital after the accident.
He was therefore able to describe his normal practice but not the events on the day of the crash.

Lucky, that. And a miraculous, 1 trillion to one survival from the fireball.

Quote:

Detective Chief Inspector Paul Rymarz said officers will now begin looking at the AAIB's report with their independent experts.

He said: "We have been waiting some time for this report and it will take us some time to review.Our progress has been dependent on this final report and as a result of the ruling in the High Court, much of the material contained in it has not been seen by the investigation team until now.
"We hope to do everything we can to submit a file of material to the CPS in advance of the pre-inquest review on June 20. **
"As we have said before, this is an extraordinarily complex investigation, *** but we remain committed to finding answers for the families and friends of those who died.

*** aka an extraordinarily complex and tricky psy-op cover-up
** Two months before the second anniversary of the "crash".

Here's Julian "safe pair of hands" Firith

involved half the AAIB organisation.... that's very complex and comprehensive. seven inspectors were assigned full time to the simulation, sorry investigation of the "crash", a top priority.

__________________The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.||| The words that I type onto this forum are NOT my opinions, nor are they my beliefs, they are simply just words and letters on a screen||| Any thread that I start is not really meant as a debate, it's really just a friendly discussion

hit the embankment at 100mph, came to a standstill in one second.....
some g force there..
check the make up at 0.57 here -

Brace brace!

How it was staged, I have no idea

I guess the road between the runway and the M1 motorway,Ashby Road, the A453, could be sealed off easily, under cover of darkness - the plane only took off at 19:52 hrs on January 8 1989.

Quote:

Of the 118 passengers on board, 39 were killed outright in the crash and eight died later of their injuries, for a total of 47 fatalities. All eight members of the crew survived the accident. Of the 79 survivors, 74 suffered serious injuries and five suffered minor injuries.

And here's the captain [wheelchair, looking very cheerful before his "sacking" some time later in 1991] and first officer David McClelland, successfully sued for wrongful dismissal.

Why would they fake a plane crash. What would be the main motive behind such an event?.

Exactly. I think whats going on is that there are some people who are so afraid of the outside world and what dangers exist within it, that they have to convince themselves, and by extension others, that its all bollocks and none of this bad stuff is happening. They can then feel safer going outside.

__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.