Why does it seem that whenever government makes changes they claim will enhance our democracy, they usually end up enriching political parties instead?

You can look at efforts being undertaken at both the federal and provincial level right now to see it happening.

Federally, the Liberals are trying to change our electoral system in ways that will ultimately give more power to backroom party operatives, and in Ontario, Kathleen Wynne is intent on changing election finance laws in a way that will do much the same and benefit her party the most.

Watch as I explain the latest change Wynne wants to make after getting caught in embarrassing ‘cash-for-access’ schemes.

Instead of demanding common sense ethical behaviour from elected officials, Wynne is committing what amounts to a perversion of democracy and using taxpayer dollars to do it.

Comments

Brian, not so loud. We don’t want Gerald Butts to get any ideas. When he gets this idea, the strings will be pulled and our manikin PM, Baby Doc, will repeat what he is told and then make “financing reforms”. AKA putting more hands in our pockets.

Protect your children when Wynne’s face happens to appear on any media. Especially this close to Halloween. Children will see that face, burst into tears and be trembling in fear thinking they have just seen a real live demon. Frightening. To all other people, don’t look at Wynne’s face too long, it could lead to insanity that you’ll never recover from, like a curse.

When ever a crypto-communist like Wynne talks of “election reform” it’s just coded lexicon for their intent to rig the election/democratic process in their favor to realise their ultimate goal of the single party state.

I was right when I started calling Ontario “Wynniezuela”. Ontario looks more like Venezuela every day. These socialist Marxists are never satified. The media is just filled with LIberal party aparatchiks. The newly named Lugenpress.
Afraid that some of the electorate might finally wake up and vote them out, they now need to subborn the system completely to their advantage. And we have no Constitutional legal way to stop these atrocities against democratic governance.
Unfortunately the left are the antogonists , the anarchists. The right ? Far too logical and calm and too respectful of authority to stand up to these leftist thugs. It is a mess and it is going to get a lot worse before or if it can ever get better.

If there is one thing a Liberal is good atit’s stealing tax payer money. Corruption, theft, lies are common traits of a Liberal. Our federal Liberals stole $250 million to fund Liberal friends through ad scam then took brown paper bags into Liberal coffers full of Canadian taxes. Under Trudeau we have billions disappearing into Quebec and Ontario under green energy scams with no employment growth or any improvement into our economy. It’s very telling when all of a sudden the Quebec Liberals are now posting a surplus of billions after being the poster child of corruption. Seeing the connection yet? One thing the Liberals are consistent at is being lazy when it come to actual fund raising. It’s much easier to steal from the public then to ask them for financial support. Liberal politics has never been able to receive funding from their supporters without corrupt undertones or subsidy. Then again criminals don’t work they steal from others to survive. In this case Liberals under Wynne or Trudeau are on the verge of grand theft in the billions and the saddest part is none of these Liberal criminals will see a minute behind bars. The Liberal party is the criminal party of Canada.

Goatsucker in many ways i am , i am not a billionare , and although i have made love to many beautiful women , i would imagine he has made love to far more than me. And i think you are better than Hillary , but that is not a compliment.

If this twisted old degenerate wants to “reform” something you can be assured she will corrupt it beyond any reason. In this case an Alinsky-frankfurt school bolshy is essentially anti-democratic, she believes in single party rule and monoculture authoritarianism. She is the antithesis of pluralist democracy and inclusive government.