Would this invalidate the weak-formefficiency market hypothesis?

Would this invalidate the strong-form efficiencymarket hypothesis?

Therefore, assuming this is true, no amount of analysis can give an investor an edge over other investors. EMH does not require that investors be rational; it says that individual investors will act randomly but, as a whole, the market is always "right." In simple terms, "efficient" implies "normal." For example, an unusual reaction to unusual information is normal.

Proponents of EMH, even in its weak form, often or certain because they are passively managed (these funds simply attempt to match, not beat, overall market returns). Index investors might say they are adhering to the common saying, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." Instead of trying to beat the market, they will buy an index fund that invests in the same securities as the underlying benchmark index.

. This is the name given to the tendency of markets, sectors or individual shares following a period of sustained under-or out-performance to revert to a long-term average by means of a corresponding period of out- or under-performance. This was picked up in detailed research by De Bondt and Thaler (1985), who showed that, if for each year since 1933 a portfolio of ‘extreme winners’ (defined as the best-performing US shares over the past three years) was constructed, it would have shown poor returns over the following five years, while a portfolio of ‘extreme losers’ would have done very well over the same period.

The Irrational Investor: Efficient Market Hypothesis

To be fair, finance theorists didn’t accept the efficient-market hypothesis merely because it was elegant, convenient and lucrative. They also produced a great deal of statistical evidence, which at first seemed strongly supportive. But this evidence was of an oddly limited form. Finance economists rarely asked the seemingly obvious (though not easily answered) question of whether asset prices made sense given real-world fundamentals like earnings. Instead, they asked only whether asset prices made sense given other asset prices. Larry Summers, now the top economic adviser in the Obama administration, once mocked finance professors with a parable about “ketchup economists” who “have shown that two-quart bottles of ketchup invariably sell for exactly twice as much as one-quart bottles of ketchup,” and conclude from this that the ketchup market is perfectly efficient.

How The Efficient Market Hypothesis Works

Mark to Market AccountingUnder the method, it is possible to book the entire estimated value for all future contracted years on the day the contract was signedIt brings mismatch between profit and cashEnron abuse it at the area where the value was even more subjective and tempting

The Efficient Market Hypothesis

2.

The failure of marketIt fail to assess adequately the earnings prospects at Enron Price should have reflected diminished value of Anderson’s certification, complicated accounting.

3.

Investment Risk and Return: Efficient Markets, Rational Investors

These events, however, which Keynes would have considered evidence of the unreliability of markets, did little to blunt the force of a beautiful idea. The theoretical model that finance economists developed by assuming that every investor rationally balances risk against reward — the so-called Capital Asset Pricing Model, or CAPM (pronounced cap-em) — is wonderfully elegant. And if you accept its premises it’s also extremely useful. CAPM not only tells you how to choose your portfolio — even more important from the financial industry’s point of view, it tells you how to put a price on financial , claims on claims. The elegance and apparent usefulness of the new theory led to a string of for its creators, and many of the theory’s adepts also received more mundane rewards: Armed with their new models and formidable math skills — the more arcane uses of CAPM require physicist-level computations — mild-mannered business-school professors could and did become Wall Street rocket scientists, earning Wall Street paychecks.

Recent

Is this evidence against the efficiency markethypothesis?

In this paper, I will briefly discuss capital market efficiency and then finish with an extensive discussion of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), which is a leading theory in explaining some of the major reasons for fluctuations in security prices.

Investor Home - The Efficient Market Hypothesis

Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) argued that because information is costly, prices cannot perfectly reflect the information which is available, since if it did, those who spent resources to obtain it would receive no compensation, leading to the conclusion that an informationally efficient market is impossible. See .

The Efficient Market Hypothesis states that at ..

One of the reasons for this state of affairs is the fact that the EMH, by itself, is not a well-defined and empirically refutable hypothesis. To make it operational, one must specify additional structure, e.g. investors' preferences, information structure. But then a test of the EMH becomes a test of several auxiliary hypotheses as well, and a rejection of such a joint hypothesis tells us little about which aspect of the joint hypothesis is inconsistent with the data. Are stock prices too volatile because markets are inefficient, or is it due to risk aversion, or dividend smoothing? All three inferences are consistent with the data. Moreover, new statistical tests designed to distinguish among them will no doubt require auxiliary hypotheses of their own which, in turn, may be questioned."Lo in Lo (1997), page

Reviews

“ "For the CAPM or the multifactor APT to be true, markets must be efficient.""Asset-pricing models need the EMT. However, the notion of an efficient market is not affected by whether any particular asset-pricing theory is true. If investors preferred stocks with a high unsystematic risk, that would be fine: as long as all information was immediately reflected in prices, the EMT theory would be true."Lofthouse (2001), page 91 ”

Gallery Efficient Markets, Irrational Investors - Money Morning

is the "efficient market hypothesis." ..

The term ‘efficient market’ was first introduced into the economics literature by Fama in 1965. For this and subsequent definitions, see .

Market participantsSophisticated investors who placed such a high value should have done better jobIrrational reliance of stock price on its auditors’ compromised certificationThe Efficient Market Hypothesis