Does not the verb in the clause take a dative object? If so, should it not be [face=SPIonic]tw|=[/face] instead of [face=SPIonic]to/n[/face]?

Thank you,

~PeterD

P.S. How is the diaeresis represented in SPIonic?

Fanatical ranting is not just fine because it's eloquent. What if I ranted for the extermination of a people in an eloquent manner, would that make it fine? Rather, ranting, be it fanatical or otherwise, is fine if what is said is true and just.---PeterD, in reply to IreneY and Annis

The reason I asked was because in line 1.9 it's [face=SPIonic]basilh=i xolwqei/j[/face]. And, Pharr does indeed stress (section 996) that these type of verbs take a dative object.

Fanatical ranting is not just fine because it's eloquent. What if I ranted for the extermination of a people in an eloquent manner, would that make it fine? Rather, ranting, be it fanatical or otherwise, is fine if what is said is true and just.---PeterD, in reply to IreneY and Annis