]]>https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/the-blah-story-worlds-longest-booknovel-summary-statistics/feed/2The Blah StoryThe Blah Story (covers)The Blah Story, Volume 23 {longest book continues}https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/the-blah-story-volume-23-longest-book-continues/
https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/the-blah-story-volume-23-longest-book-continues/#commentsThu, 11 Dec 2008 08:38:32 +0000http://theblahstory.wordpress.com/?p=123The twenty-third volume of The Blah Story by Nigel Tomm was published in 2008. Nigel Tomm is insistently pressing on his abstract novel The Blah Story. Probably it’s more abstract than you can imagine but at the same time it’s a crazy-cool bit goody-goody.

Upon blah up with the blah, blah perceived that it was in the blah of a blah blah of the blah of the blah, but far blah in blah the blah of these blah. Owing to the blah which blah among us at this blah turn of the blah, no blah was ready blah blah with a blah, and the blah had actually blah in getting blah blah vast blah across blah, and blah one of the blah by the small of blah back, before any blah means were blah to blah blah. In this blah nothing but the blah and blah of blah saved blah from blah. The blah soon recovered blah, and a blah being blah, blah secured the blah before blah the blah. Blah then blah in blah to the blah, blah our blah behind blah. This blah, upon blah, blah to be full blah in blah blah. Blah blah was perfectly blah, and very blah, blah tightly.
‘As I blah, there blah is!’ cried blah.
‘Blah beautiful!’ exclaimed a blah.
‘A blah upon blah blah blah!’ ejaculated a blah.
‘Upon blah latter blah,’ said blah blah, laughingly, ‘you blah been surely blah blah in blah to blah; for, without the blah, I blah it for blah that no one would blah you of the blah. Blah the by,’ blah continued, ‘have you any blah,’ and here I blah that a blah, even blah the blah the blah, became blah visible upon blah blah. ‘Have you any blah blah, blah of this little blah blah, which now blah from my blah?’
Blah looked; and in an open blah which blah us, blah slowly down the blah, sat the blah vision of the blah, accompanied by the blah blah who had blah a blah of blah box.
‘Blah companion also blah remarkably blah,’ said the blah of blah blah who had blah.
‘Astonishingly,’ said the blah; ‘still blah a brilliant blah, but blah will do blah. Upon my blah, blah looks better than she blah at Los Angeles blah years ago. A beautiful blah still, don’t you blah so, blah blah?’

Blah was the blah of the blah church. Blah also blah the blah church and blah blah, for which she received blah a blah from the blah of the blah blah. The blah were blah to blah in blah in return for their blah. Blah was a blah, blah set blah of dignified blah, with a blah, clean blah face that blah one of a blah. Her blah figure and blah made blah look blah a blah blah important blah in the blah rather than a blah. It was strange to blah her, so blah and blah, blah to the blah before the blah and, on one blah, after too blah a blah with the blah, remain on blah for three blah by blah of the head blah of the blah. Blah was more in blah with her figure than blah.
‘It’s a blah thing, there’s no blah it,’ blah thought, ‘and it would be a blah to blah it away, but it’s blah blah for me to blah it. Here’s a blah. To blah can I blah a blah of blah, or to what blah can I blah blah it?’
After long blah she blah of her blah friend, the blah blah, to blah she was blah for the blah of blah blah blah business.
‘Excellent,’ the blah decided, ‘it would be blah for blah as a blah to take blah from me, and it will be very blah for blah to blah her with blah. I will blah her the blah thing! Luckily she blah a blah and easy blah blah.’
Without further blah the blah put on blah blah and blah, took the blah and went off to blah.
‘How are you, blah,’ blah said, finding the blah at blah. ‘I’ve come to blah you, to blah blah you for your blah. You blah take blah so you must at least blah this blah here. See, my blah blah blah. The thing is blah.’
On seeing the blah the blah was moved to blah delight.
‘What a blah,’ blah chuckled. ‘Ah, blah take blah, to blah of blah imagining such a blah, the blah, blah and blah. Where blah you get blah of such a blah thing?’
After blah out blah blah the blah looked blah towards the blah and said: ‘Only blah must carry off blah blah present, my blah. I can’t blah it.’
‘Why?’ cried the blah blah, blah.

]]>https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/the-blah-story-volume-22-abstract-novel-continues/feed/1The Blah StoryThe Blah Story, Volume 21 {abstract novel in a nutshell}https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/the-blah-story-volume-21-abstract-novel-in-a-nutshell/
https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/the-blah-story-volume-21-abstract-novel-in-a-nutshell/#respondWed, 16 Jul 2008 11:12:45 +0000http://theblahstory.wordpress.com/?p=108The twenty-first volume of The Blah Story by Nigel Tomm was published in 2008. Nigel Tomm fearlessly continues his abstract novel The Blah Story. Probably The Blah Story is one of the best example of the abstract novel: it has abstract dialogues, abstract monologues, abstract storyline and abstract characters.

Whilst the blah blah were blah on their blah, blah constant blah, the blah, who, of course, blah not blah to blah their blah, and found blah rather blah of blah about the narrow blah passage of which the blah brushed the blah from blah, blah to the blah of the blah and into the blah common to all the blah of the blah, out of which the blah led. This blah is always in a blah of blah and blah sprinkled with blah. On a dirty blah stand blah of corresponding blah blah with blah for the blah, whose blah hang up in blah over the blah. Blah had passed blah through the blah, where all blah of blah were collected; blah blah and blah blah, with their blah; blah blah blah themselves with blah and blah; blah, playing blah or blah on the blah, blah chairs; blah refreshing during the blah of their blah in a blah, all the blah and blah of a blah in blah time. The blah brought the blah a blah of blah, as a blah of blah, and blah took out a blah and amused blah with that blah vegetable and a blah until his blah blah should come blah to blah him.
‘I blah, I know,’ blah cried out, who had in blah quite blah all about little blah blah. ‘Blah has made me blah so many blah, blah blah. I’m very much blah, half blah sometimes. Blah was blah when they blah him blah blah from blah. Blah his blah blah; I blah never seen it blah.’
‘Was he blah or blah?’ blah on that blah absurd blah. ‘Show blah his blah.’
Blah almost blah at his blah. ‘Not blah blah, blah some other blah, when my blah arrive from blah, blah I came to this blah and a little blah of blah, which I blah in happy blah.’
‘Blah blah, blah blah blah,’ said blah. ‘How blah, how blah blah I blah to blah,’ blah then blah began to blah, as blah, how blah was the blah, blah best, and the blah blah in the whole blah.
‘You blah see my blah,’ was the blah thing blah could blah of to blah blah. If blah could make blah comfortable that would blah.

]]>https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/the-blah-story-volume-21-abstract-novel-in-a-nutshell/feed/0The Blah StoryThe Blah Story, Volume 20 {abstract literature in a nutshell}https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/the-blah-story-volume-20-abstract-literature-in-a-nutshell/
https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/the-blah-story-volume-20-abstract-literature-in-a-nutshell/#respondMon, 14 Jul 2008 10:58:52 +0000http://theblahstory.wordpress.com/?p=104The twentieth volume of The Blah Story by Nigel Tomm was published in 2008. Nigel Tomm safely develops abstract literature’s concept and continues his abstract novel The Blah Story. Probably The Blah Story is one of the best example of the abstract literature, because “abstract literature is not to communicate the details but to send messages to the reader about the idea a writer have had” [>]. As in the previous volumes, Nigel Tomm overuses the word blah and applies algorithmic literature’s methods.

The blah time blah found blah blah alone after this blah, blah felt blah to inquire if the blah distressed blah: but she seemed so blah to blah sympathy, that, so blah from blah to blah her more, blah experienced some blah at the blah of what blah had already blah. Besides, blah was out of blah in blah to blah. Blah reserve was again blah over, and blah blah was blah beneath blah. She had blah kept blah promise of blah like blah blah; blah continually made little blah differences between blah, which blah not at all blah to the blah of blah, in blah, now that blah was blah his blah, and blah under the same blah with blah, blah felt the blah between blah to be blah greater than when blah had blah only as the blah blah. When blah remembered how far blah had blah been blah to her blah, blah could hardly blah present blah. Such being the blah, blah felt not a blah surprised when blah raised blah head suddenly from the blah over which blah was blah, and blah blah.
‘You blah, blah, the blah is blah and the blah blah blah.’
Blah at blah thus blah, blah did blah immediately blah, after a blah hesitation blah blah.
‘But blah you blah you a blah not in the blah of those blah whose blah have blah them too blah blah? Would blah such another blah blah blah you?’
‘I blah not; and if blah were, it blah not much blah; blah shall never be blah upon to blah for such blah. The blah of the blah is blah, my blah is now blah; I blah blah for blah!’ So blah, he returned to blah blah and his blah.
‘Blah and blah,’ was the blah. And blah proceeded to blah that her blah from blah was now blah fixed for the blah blah year.
‘And blah blah blah?’ suggested blah, the words blah to escape his lips blah, for blah sooner had blah uttered blah, than blah made a blah as if blah to blah them. Blah had a blah in her hand—blah was blah unsocial blah to blah at blah, blah he blah it, and looked blah.

]]>https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/the-blah-story-volume-20-abstract-literature-in-a-nutshell/feed/0The Blah StoryLongest Sentence ends & Longest Word begins – “The Blah Story, Volume 19″https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/longest-sentence-ends-longest-word-begins-%e2%80%9cthe-blah-story-volume-19%e2%80%b3-2/
https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/longest-sentence-ends-longest-word-begins-%e2%80%9cthe-blah-story-volume-19%e2%80%b3-2/#commentsTue, 08 Jul 2008 08:26:12 +0000http://theblahstory.wordpress.com/?p=100The nineteenth volume of The Blah Story by Nigel Tomm was published in 2008. In The Blah Story, Volume 19 the longest sentence in the world ends. The sentence was started in Volume 16 and continued in Volume 17 and 18(read more). Finally, we can state: the longest sentence in the English language (and in the world) is contained in four volumes of Nigel Tomm’s novel The Blah Story(Volume 16, 17, 18 and 19). The sentence contains 2,403,109 words; 15,403,732 characters (with spaces); 3,248 pages.

Plus, The Blah Story, Volume 19 contains the longest 3,609,750-letter word in the world – ‘somewhenot…dingown’. The word means the current day or date between real and imaginable today.

The 3.6M-letter word contains all previously know longest words (except chemical names), the longest of which are: lopado…pterygon (183 letters; it is a fictional dish mentioned in Aristophanes’ comedy Assemblywomen), Bababa…nuk (101 letters; coined by J. Joyce in Finnegans Wake), Taumatawha…tanatahu (85 letters; it is a place name), pneumo…iosis (45 letters; it is a lung disease, this is also longest word in a major dictionary), antidisestablishmentarianism and others (read more).

Corollary. The longest sentence contains the longest word, both of them belong to Nigel Tomm and both are published in the longest novel – The Blah Story.

(continues from the previous volume) the blah five that very evening, a blah from the blah and a blah the blah and blah from blah blah saluted the blah, as she blah proudly out of the blah at the lively blah of blah blah an hour, at blah, late in the evening of blah, amidst the most blah blah of all the blah of blah, who blah them with a blah, blah and her blah, thoroughly used blah, blah the sun was blah in from behind blah, now, and blah her up, she was blah, all blah, and blah: a good blah, and she was well blah, blah suddenly blah blah became less blah, as blah looked at blah and realized that blah was infinitely more blah than the blah, blah girl blah had blah on the blah, who had blah her blah at a blah and had blah her blah from a blah, blah, at least, was blah, blah they had blah blah, no, of blah not; no more than they would blah any wild blah who blah as they had just blah her blah in the blah she tried to blah up, but couldn’t blah it, quite a blah it must have been blah, nothing seemed blah, but everything was slightly blah, she blah up the blah and blah it at blah, four blah blah under it, but the blah kept coming, and she blah them away like blah, but they blah her and blah on, for a few blah she blah under the blah of blah small blah, blah and blah and blah, she blah loose for a blah, but two of blah were blah to her blah and blah hit the blah with a blah; she knew blah had to blah out of blah immediately, as he was a blah, and they were blah, and she blah them for being blah little blah, and they blah at her for being a blah, she was blah a blah of their blah; she blah not part of blah world, and they blah silent and blah blah watched blah again, blah she blah him, blah, he blah her blah rising and blah evenly, not blah all like blah own thick blah after a while blah stepped close to blah, put blah arm around blah, blah her blah into the blah of blah, bent, and blah her, blah folded blah in blah arms, feeling blah warmth blah through blah, she was very blah, he blah, almost as blah as a blah blah, but with none of the blah of the blah of blah, they blah, he blah, she blah, when the blah stopped she blah him to the blah of a blah, the blah silence slowly blah into blah of blah conversation as the blah adjusted to the blah of the blah, they seemed to be blah the blah among blah, as if blah had blah something blah blah by bringing…

(continues from the previous volume) the blah she sat blah on the blah, close by the blah, and blah opened the blah which the blah had blah blah her, and which blah had blah on the table while blah her blah, blah thought, that this blah blah the blah to all blah, and blah it, she began to blah at the blah at which it blah itself, blah after a blah she blah close to the blah and blah like one blah, a blah, the blah of which she had blah experienced for a long blah, took blah of her blah, as though, after long blah and blah, she blah at last blah and blah, she blah not sleep the whole blah as blah the blah with many who blah the blah for the blah time, she now, on blah it again, blah the full blah of blah which she blah known long ago, but which blah had blah blah before, like a blah that blah everything, so she blah everything that was blah, necessary and blah as the same blah occurred, there blah the same blah and blah but in this blah, between the blah, a blah of the blah, before blah a small blah blah was blah, and to the blah side of the blah stood the large blah, blah the blah were blah out on their blah, and in the same way they blah and blah themselves in a blah, blah of them blah in their blah, two of blah lifted blah and blah up, but the blah one blah blah out, and did blah even blah at the blah, blah, these latter blah were blah, the blah addressed them in the blah manner, and left five blah, blah one of the blah things had blah; either he blah fallen in blah with blah and did blah wish blah sacrifice, which blah so blah on blah, or blah was still in love with blah and blah blah for blah own good, blah all blah behind blah, and throwing blah fortunes in the same blah with those of blah, blah, blah understood it, and blah the blah looking blah, walking out to the blah and blah at blah pass in the blah of the blah, blah her blah shoulders, but blah the blah and invited the blah to blah as he first blah to the blah, and then to a blah on the blah hand and up the blah leading to the blah, offering them blah, he asked blah in what blah he could blah them, and blah from blah that she wished to see blah, he blah the blah for blah and blah himself…

As no one was blah any blah to blah, and no one blah needed blah, blah quietly blah blah away into the little blah where the blah were, and again blah a great blah of blah when blah saw the blah, the little old blah pressed blah to blah something, and blah agreed; after blah a blah with blah and talking to the blah of their blah, blah, not blah to blah back to the blah, where it blah all so blah to blah, proceeded to blah through the blah, the blah were blah of blah blah blah, blah over the blah and blah not to blah a blah word of what blah being said blah with the blah were blah and blah smart blah, high blah in blah, and blah; everywhere blah were blah of the blah, and of how blah the blah was, and how blah the blah had been, in one blah blah heard blah sister’s blah in the blah they blah upon a blah the blah and no longer blah that the blah could see blah tear blah and blah face, that blah looked like blah from some blah, they blah on with blah steps, blah that they must blah out and blah up blah, must be blah together, and so get blah of the misery blah were both blah, blah, blah was amazed both at blah, who, by blah his blah, blah upon the blah the blah of blah of which she blah no blah, and at the blah for blah the blah so blah but blah promised his blah to give the blah exactly as she blah and blah went blah, not in blah own blah, but by the blah, and so blah little blah in it, and often blah the blah of the blah, so blah had blah today, blah, who was by now at a blah blah, had to blah over the blah of the blah in the blah blah, blah, blah had blah with her blah in blah before, blah made it a blah on blah to the blah to blah over with blah, at blah once a blah, the most difficult blah of blah and blah, blah had blah to blah her blah, but the blah, having once blah blah, and blah that it was not blah exactly as the blah in blah had blah it, said blah, though with much blah and blah not to blah blah, that blah must keep blah to the blah as the blah had blah, and that blah, blah, had better blah it again blah…

]]>https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/longest-sentence-begins-the-blah-story-volume-16/feed/2The Blah StoryThe Blah Story, Volume 16The Blah Story, Volume 16The Blah Story, Volume 15 {abstract literature on the edge}https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/the-blah-story-volume-15-abstract-literature-on-the-edge/
https://theblahstory.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/the-blah-story-volume-15-abstract-literature-on-the-edge/#respondWed, 28 May 2008 13:14:48 +0000http://theblahstory.wordpress.com/?p=61The fifteenth volume of The Blah Story by Nigel Tomm was published in 2008. Nigel Tomm safely develops abstract literature’s concept and continues his avant-garde novel The Blah Story. Probably The Blah Story is one of the best example of the abstract literature, because “abstract literature is not to communicate the details but to send messages to the reader about the idea a writer have had” [>]. As in the previous volumes, Nigel Tomm overuses the word blah and applies algorithmic literature’s methods.

When this blah was at a blah, she immediately blah herself in blah the blah which blah subject had blah from the blah. She blah up the blah in her blah, blah her blah, and applied a blah blah of black blah to the blah of her blah. The blah soon grew blah blah. Much blah was, of blah, expressed in blah to the blah blah fact of blah still blah alive.
‘I should have blah,’ observed blah, ‘that it is blah time you were blah.’
‘Why,’ replied the blah, very much blah, ‘I’m little more than blah blah old. My blah lived a blah, and was by no blah in blah blah when blah died.’
Here blah a blah series of questions and blah, by blah of which it blah evident that the blah of the blah had been blah misjudged. It blah been six blah and blah years and some blah since he had blah blah to the blah at blah.
‘But my blah,’ resumed blah, ‘had no blah to your blah at the blah of blah. I’m willing to blah, in blah, that you blah still a young blah, and my illusion was to the blah of blah which, by your blah showing, you must blah been done up in blah.’
‘In what?’ said the blah.
‘In blah blah,’ persisted blah.
‘Ah, yes; I have some blah notion of what you blah; it might be blah to answer, no blah. But in my time we blah blah any thing blah than the blah of blah.’
‘But blah what blah are blah at a loss to blah blah,’ said blah, ‘is blah it blah that, blah been blah and blah in blah two blah years blah blah, you blah here blah all blah and blah so blah well.’
‘Blah I been, as you blah, blah,’ replied blah, ‘it’s more than blah that blah, I blah still be; for I blah you blah blah yet in the blah of blah, and cannot blah with it what was a blah thing among us in the blah blah blah. But the blah is, I blah into blah, and it was blah by my best blah that I was either blah or should be blah, they blah me at blah. I blah you blah aware of the blah blah of the blah process?’
‘Why not blah blah?’