The E-Mail Scandals are Weak.....

There are several damning emails found on Clinton's servers during the investigation.

If you want a direct quote it would look something like this:
From:hclinton1
To: __________
_______ _________ ____________ _____ to __________ for the ___________ as discussed on ____________. If ____________ _______________ __________
____________ ____________, so ______ ___________ today _____ ___________ _________ ___________ ____________.

Regards,
H. Clinton

As I am sure you are aware (and was mentioned by director Comey, transference of Top Secret information through a non-secure means is a criminal
offence for anyone other than Hillary Clinton. The very fact that hundreds of her e-mails had to be redacted in the name of national security, means
she put our state secrets into the wind. Or more likely put them on a private server and then sold the password.

Also out of curiosity, sense logic is logic. Her wiping her server is cool. So Bush and Cheyney cleaning the White House server of their emails was
cool too right?

they did not serve prison time for it, so by the letter of the law, yes its cool.
republicans either have a short memory or, a level of hypocrisy that's off the charts.
judging by the revisionism that goes on around here, i'll go for the latter.

Its not cool though, for either. This partisanship bs is outrageous on both sides. And I assure you whenever you make a negative statement about the
other it's true for yours as well. Both parties have humans in them.

There are several damning emails found on Clinton's servers during the investigation.

If you want a direct quote it would look something like this:
From:hclinton1
To: __________
_______ _________ ____________ _____ to __________ for the ___________ as discussed on ____________. If ____________ _______________ __________
____________ ____________, so ______ ___________ today _____ ___________ _________ ___________ ____________.

Regards,
H. Clinton

As I am sure you are aware (and was mentioned by director Comey, transference of Top Secret information through a non-secure means is a criminal
offence for anyone other than Hillary Clinton. The very fact that hundreds of her e-mails had to be redacted in the name of national security, means
she put our state secrets into the wind. Or more likely put them on a private server and then sold the password.

The FBI redacted those, not Clinton nor the DNC.

James Comey is a republican that even every republican calls a straight shooter.

Phew, thank God. America is just fine and this is all a witch hunt and we actually have a solid candidate out of the two. Ahhh S### my logic just
kicked back in and this still doesn't feel right hahaha. If you want a better America, think for yourself and let what you already know guide you. You
all say the justice system is broken and preys on minorities, but it's conveniently perfect when dealing with the most connected messiah. Pick one
please.

Phew, thank God. America is just fine and this is all a witch hunt and we actually have a solid candidate out of the two. Ahhh S### my logic just
kicked back in and this still doesn't feel right hahaha. If you want a better America, think for yourself and let what you already know guide you. You
all say the justice system is broken and preys on minorities, but it's conveniently perfect when dealing with the most connected messiah. Pick one
please.

Didn't say Clinton was a good canidate nor solid. Said these email scandals are just another example of fake scandals Fox News types
will push. Then later, after a republican led investigation find no actual wrong doing.

There are several damning emails found on Clinton's servers during the investigation.

If you want a direct quote it would look something like this:
From:hclinton1
To: __________
_______ _________ ____________ _____ to __________ for the ___________ as discussed on ____________. If ____________ _______________ __________
____________ ____________, so ______ ___________ today _____ ___________ _________ ___________ ____________.

Regards,
H. Clinton

As I am sure you are aware (and was mentioned by director Comey, transference of Top Secret information through a non-secure means is a criminal
offence for anyone other than Hillary Clinton. The very fact that hundreds of her e-mails had to be redacted in the name of national security, means
she put our state secrets into the wind. Or more likely put them on a private server and then sold the password.

She was not the only person to keep a personal server, nor is there any evidence the server was hacked let alone anything resembling evidence she sold
said information.

All of that is just BS.

Do I doubt Hillary took money for favors? No. Our political system has been build around doing that for years and has been championed by conservatives
(citizens United).

The fact the right feels they need to pretend their opponents are literally murderers and terrorists is very telling suggests they can't debate
policy.

Wrong doing and grounds for legal recourse are two different things. You're struggling to find the line. This is an interview, these are our potential
employees. While she did not get proven of breaking the law, her actions were still deemed wreck less.

Wrong doing and grounds for legal recourse are two different things. You're struggling to find the line. This is an interview, these are our potential
employees. While she did not get proven of breaking the law, her actions were still deemed wreck less.

"Hillary for jail" sound familiar?

Nearly every right wing news host hasn't used these as "proof" of criminal action?

Just like with Benghazi or the IRS scandal, it is all smoke and mirrors.

I didn't say that. The whole time I've addressed the OP, you said the email argument is weak. It's not. Dude, again this is an interview. It's one
thing when someone makes a mistake, and it's another when they try to hide it and never once apologizing. She used a forensic eraser on what should
have been government property in the first place.

If you support her I don't blame you, our choices are bleak. But don't sit here and tell me she didn't f*** up. Her actions said "I'm above the law,
contingency plan I'll burn the evidence". I don't want someone who Knows they're above the law running my country.

But, Hillary Clinton lies under oath which are federal crimes against state

The DNC emails show they rigged the election from Americans who did not want Clinton nominated, thereby rendering millions of people vote null

Which is disgusting because Americans only get to vote for a preferred candidate. After that it's a done deal. They don't vote to elect the president
after the nominees are picked, the electoral college does. Utterly disgusting.

I didn't say that. The whole time I've addressed the OP, you said the email argument is weak. It's not. Dude, again this is an interview. It's one
thing when someone makes a mistake, and it's another when they try to hide it and never once apologizing. She used a forensic eraser on what should
have been government property in the first place.

If you support her I don't blame you, our choices are bleak. But don't sit here and tell me she didn't f*** up. Her actions said "I'm above the law,
contingency plan I'll burn the evidence". I don't want someone who Knows they're above the law running my country.

I don't support her I just hate all these fake stories...

I'm voting for trump. Hillary is a vote for gridlock. While Trump will pass any liberal agenda they want if the agree to his wall. Min wage, single
payer everything.

Hell, he might have already destroyed the evangelical strangle hold in the GOP. If he wins he will bury them forever.

Do I doubt Hillary took money for favors? No. Our political system has been build around doing that for years and has been championed by conservatives
(citizens United).

If you admit that she was accepting money for favors, don't you think there is a good chance she would want to hide that fact, even if everyone else
does it? No matter if everyone does it or not, no politician wants black and white proof that they do it to be released.

So wouldn't this be a good motive for her to try to keep her emails private, and delete them?

Than I'm even more confused by your disillusion. This story is not fake dude. Private sector her errors would be grounds for firing. As a public
servant the ramifications could be far greater, again all communication as an elected official is supposed to be federal property and further more
subject to FOIA release (if the material is not classified). It even warranted an FBI investigation, which while no criminal wrongdoing was still
deemed reckless. There are plenty of allegations I'll applaud you for defending her on, this one you have me worried for your logic.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.