Archive for the ‘mike cameron’ tag

Is it too early to guess who starts the Home Opener? My guess is newly acquired Gonzalez. Photo Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images via cbssports.com

We’re getting reports of players getting to Viera early, and we’ve had a slew of off-season moves. Beat reporters are starting to talk about the 25-man roster (here’s WT’s Amanda Comak‘s take). The Nats pretty much took care of every off-season need the had:

Top-end Starting Pitcher: Gonzalez

Backup Outfielder: Ankiel and Cameron (though, apparently Cameron is retiring instead of competing for a spot…)

The notable exception to the off-season shopping list, of course, is a lack of a proven center fielder. Perhaps one could quibble that a shortstop should have been on that list; it seems the team is giving another year to the Ian Desmond experiment, hoping he builds on the strong end of 2011 (he hit .294 in Aug and Sep of 2011). The backup infielders and backup outfielders listed here, to go along with a slew of minor league/invite to spring training signings, should be where most of the competition for roster slots occurs.

The big question for me is; Is there any real competition for pitching spots this spring?

Starters

We all know the narrative; we now have 6 starters with multi-million dollar commitments for 5 spots, and someone has to give. The Edwin Jackson signing has pretty much made John Lannan the odd-man out of this rotation. Mike Rizzo likes power arms, and has gone to great lengths to acquire guys who throw more than 89-90 to replace what he inherited in 2009. Wang and Jackson can’t be moved until June 15th without his consent by virtue of the FA signing rules (as discussed in this article here), Gonzalez just signed a long-term deal, and Strasburg/Zimmerman are our future. To me, there’s no mystery who’s going to be in the rotation, and frankly articles that say there’s going to be a competition for the 5th starter between Wang, Lannan, Detwiler and Gorzelanny are not really paying attention to the contract realities of the situation. Barring injury, your opening day rotation will be (in this order):

Strasburg, Gonzalez, Zimmermann, Jackson and Wang.

Should someone go down with injury, Lannan steps in to take the 4th or 5th rotation spot (depending on whether Davey Johnson likes to mix up LHSP/RHSP in any fashion). Otherwise, Lannan is trade-bait and should be moved during the spring. There are plenty of teams that could be trade partners if we wanted to focus on a center fielder (see this article I did in November talking about the CF market for the whole of baseball for some thoughts). Barring a trade, it seems inconceivable but Lannan does still have a minor league option left and could be sent down, but a $5M pitcher toiling in Syracuse (to go along with $2M bust Yuniesky Maya) could make the Nats AAA team the most expensive minor league rotation in the league. (We won’t say “most expensive ever,” since the Yankees kept Kei Igawa and his $46M commitment in the minors for most of his contract).

Relievers

A recent post on option status at Nationalsprospects.com (the option status of every player is now kept on the Big Board, which is good for me since I did this work last year and its a nightmare to keep track of), as well as a question asked of Bill Ladson leads to this conclusion: there literally is no question right now who your 7 bullpen members will be. Tyler Clippard, Sean Burnett, Henry Rodriguez, Tom Gorzelanny and Ross Detwiler ALL are out of options. Brad Lidge can refuse a demotion based on his service time and Drew Storen is your closer. There’s your 2012 bullpen; not much room for anyone else.

The only wiggle room may be with someone like Detwiler: he’s clearly a starter and seems set to be the first Spot starter to fill in for an injury (assuming we trade Lannan of course). Does the team keep him in the bullpen, where he basically fills the exact same role as Gorzelanny (ex-left handed starter long man/spot starter in a pinch)? Or does the team cash him in to fill a hole?

What’s nice about this bullpen is that, despite my naming players to roles, there’s lots of flexibility. Rodriguez on a good day has 8th or even 9th inning stuff. Lidge is a former closer and clearly can do the setup or closing roles. Clippard excels in the 8th inning role and doesn’t seem to aspire to replace Storen. Burnett is far more than just a one-out guy, but can serve that role in a pinch. Lastly both Gorzelanny and Detwiler can be anything from a one-out lefty to a 3-4 inning mop-up guy, given the day. I like the way this sets up and I think we go into 2012 with a better bullpen than in 2011 (when, if you recall, we wasted a spot on Brian Broderick, had the failure of Doug Slaten in the loogy role and watched Chad Gaudin pitch horribly).

Who starts the Home opener?

Quick guess: based on the way the schedule plays out it looks like our home opener will be thrown by our #2 starter Gonzalez. We play two 3-game series away to Chicago and New York, then open at home with what should be the #2 rotation spot up. There’s only one off-day in between, meaning the starters most likely stay on normal rest.

Lest anyone forget, Zimmerman is under contract for not one, but TWO more seasons! Photo unknown via fantasyknuckleheads.com

Another edition of mlb.com beat reporter Bill Ladson’s inbox, dated 1/16/12. Man you know I’ve been busy at work if I’ve had this canned and ready to publish for more than a week but couldn’t get online to do so.

As always, I write my response before reading his, and sometimes edit questions for clarity.

Q: Why are the Nationals wasting time talking to Prince Fielder when they should be signing Ryan Zimmerman to a long-term contract before it is too late?

A: *sigh* Why, why, why is it going to be “too late” to sign Ryan Zimmerman to a long term contract if it doesn’t happen right now? Someone please check Cot’s before asking this question. He’s signed through 2013! I don’t believe Prince Fielder has anything to do with Zimmerman; we’re talking about a franchise that has been underspending on payroll by $35-$40 MILLION dollars the past few seasons. People who claim that the Nationals “can’t afford both” Fielder and Zimmerman are expressing unsubstantiated opinions. Ladson thankfully notes the fact that Zimmerman is signed through 2013.

Q: What role will Roger Bernadina play on this year’s team? I love the kid’s heart, but the people in power don’t seem so encouraged.

A: Hopefully none. Nothing personal against Bernadina, but what more can we learn about the guy at this point? 1000 major league plate appearances, an 81 OPS+. About the only thing he has going for him is that he’s pre-arbitration and is cheap. This team is offensively challenged and needs outfielders who can slug something higher than .350. Ladson thinks he’ll be the 4th outfielder, competing with Mike Cameron for center field. I hope not; can’t we sign a stop-gap right fielder??

Q: Have the Nationals thought about moving Danny Espinosa or Ian Desmond to center field?

A: I doubt it. What would that solve? As soon as we moved one to CF, we’ve lost a plus defender in the middle infield with no assurance that they’d be any good in center, and we’d still need to find a solution for whatever position they’ve vacated. We need to find an outfielder who can hit and put him in play. Its that simple. Ladson says nope.

Q:I am still a believer in Desmond although his batting average and power numbers declined last year. He is a big, strong kid who can hit 15 home runs and steal 30 bases if he can be more selective at the plate and figure out how opposing pitchers are trying to attack him. What do you see for Desmond in 2012?

A: 2012 is make it or break it season for Desmond. Two full time seasons at the plate and he’s regressed each time. You just cannot put a guy out there who’s 20% worse than the MLB average (i.e., an 80 ops+, his figure for the 2011 season) and be successful in the modern game. What do I predict? I think he’ll be similarly poor, will feature 7th or 8th in the order most of the year, and will force the team to look at replacement options starting in the trade season. Ladson thinks Desmond’s late season surge bodes well for 2012; indeed he was great in the last two months of the season. Lets hope he’s right.

Q: Assuming the Nats will not sign Fielder, would it be a good idea to sign an outfielder like Johnny Damon? Can you see him as a fit in Johnson’s lineup?

A: No; Damon is limited to playing LF in an easy-to-defend ball park (like Fenway) or a DH at this point. His outfield arm is beyond weak. He can hit though; but he has no position on this team. If we’re going to go with Jayson Werth in CF, I think we should sign one of the good hitters still available in the RF market. Ladson agrees with me that Damon is an AL-only player now.

Q: If the Nats acquire Fielder, would it be best for Adam LaRoche to be traded for a bench player who might start once a week?

A: Sure, if they could trade him. Problem is, if LaRoche needs to be traded there’s not an awful lot of teams that would be interested. See my post about the Prince Fielder market; maybe we could trade him to a team like Baltimore or Houston, but they’re not going to give us much in return, and we’ll be forced to pay most of his salary in make-weight. If we sign Fielder, you might as well just release him. Ladson points out that we’re not even sure LaRoche is healthy at this point.

Q:In all the talk about 2012, I haven’t heard a word about the status of catcher Ivan Rodriguez and right-hander Livan Hernandez. What are the Nats’ plans for those two fan favorites?

A: The wise fan would correctly assume that the lack of discussion about both Hernandez and Rodriguez would indicate that they are no longer in the team’s plans. Because they’re not. Both guys are probably out of baseball after 2011, given the calibre of players that remain unsigned so far this off season. I’m sorry to say: Livan’s precipitous decline in performance in the latter half of 2011 eliminated his candidacy for the 2012 rotation. And Rodriguez may be a great historical player and first rounder, but he hit .218 last season. Ladson thankfully agrees.

This is your semi-weekly/periodic wrap-up of Nats and other baseball news that caught my eye.

Nationals In General

Talk about rumors that just won’t go away: Nationals apparently remain the favorites for Prince Fielder. Ken Rosenthalsays the same. Buster Olney has a nice overview with pros/cons laid out. For me (as discussed in the comments of the previous posts), I think he’d be a mistake for 8-10 years, but an absolute steal for 3. Here’s some thoughts from Tom Verducci, who thinks the Nats are his destination. And here’s a post that says one of the 3 candidates for Fielder I identified in this space a few days ago (Toronto), is out of the running.

Imagine a lineup that goes like this: Espinosa-Werth-Zimmerman-Fielder-Morse-Ramos-Desmond-Cameron to open the season, and then potentially inject Bryce Harper hitting behind Morse and replacing Cameron in the outfield. That’d be 5 straight home-run hitting threats in the middle of your order, with good L-R balance. I know he’d be expensive, but that’s a 95 win offense. It’d be even better if we got a one-year stop gap hitter to open the year playing RF and who we could flip in trade if Harper comes up sooner than later.

Whoops: Zech Zinicola hit with a 50-game suspension for non-PED drug abuse. Sounds like Marijuana to me. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Nats release him after this, his 2nd transgression.

John Sickels‘ new rankings of the Oakland A’s top 20 prospects, post trades this off-season. 6 of the 10 top were acquired in the Trevor Cahill and Gio Gonzalez trades, while three more represent Oakland’s #1 draft picks in 2011 (Sonny Gray) and 2010 (Michael Choice) and 2009 (Grant Green). Say what you will about Billy Beane, but he’s clearly building a big-time farm system for the future right now.

Adam Kilgore says the team is still talking to Rick Ankiel about coming back as a 4th OF… I wouldn’t be totally opposed to that; he’s essentially the same player we got in Mike Cameron, right? Only difference seems to be lefty versus righty.

If you believe Jim Bowden, the Rangers are playing hardball in their Yu Darvish negotiations. If this falls through … look for pandemonium both on the Prince Fielder front and with Darvish next year when he’s an unrestricted FA and could attract interest from pretty much every team in the league.

Makes sense: Marlins plan to aggressively pursueYoenis Cespedes. Getting the latest big name Cuban defector can only be a good thing for the franchise as they try to re-build a fan base in a heavily latino/cuban community.

Well, the Yankees shored up their rotation in one 3 hour period on Friday night; trading for Michael Pineda and then signing Hiroki Kuroda. They went from having three question marks in their rotation to now wondering if AJ Burnett can hold onto the 5th rotation spot. Wow. Here’s Keith Law‘s analysis, predictably giving the “edge” to the Mariners in the deal despite the obvious fact that Pineda is MLB proven while the other three guys in the deal, aren’t.

Hall of Fame items

Mike Silva becomes one of the very few BBWAA writers with a HoFame vote to publish support for Jack Morris. I’m sure I’ll be seeing the inevitable Craig Calcarerra blog posting questioning Silva’s IQ for doing so.

David Shoenfield has a little missive on the HoFame, voting procedures and comments on how few players are getting elected these days.

Chris Jaffe does an excellent job predicting HoFame votes every year; here’s his guess on 2012’s election. Bad news for Bagwell and Morris, good news for Larkin though.

Other interesting HoFame notes: one site in particular collects ballots; here’s a summary of the 80-some ballots she has right now. Very good support for Larkin.

I think i’m just about fed up with bloggers who see everything in modern baseball through little spreadsheets of data and who never even saw Jack Morris and Bert Blyleven tell me I’m an idiot because i think the former is a better pitcher than the latter. At some point statistics are just that; numbers that prove or disprove whatever your theories are. You can’t just ignore 20 years of performance and context of playing in the league by boiling down thousands of innings pitched into one number, whether it is ERA+ or WAR or whatever. For me, when you talk about whether a player is a Hall of Famer, you look at individual season accomplishments. Morris basically had 15 seasons of full time pitching. In 5 of those seasons he was a top-5 vote getter in the Cy Young; that means in 5 seasons those people who covered baseball that season considered him among the best 5 pitchers in his league. In another two seasons he didn’t finish top 5 but still received votes. He was god-awful his last two seasons, lowering his career totals. And there’s dozens of examples of him completing games despite having given up 3-4 runs and sitting on 140 pitches. Maybe Morris just needed to pitch in the current era, where he would be taken out in the 7th on a pitch count and then replaced by specialized relievers. Meanwhile Blyleven, in 21 full seasons of starting made exactly TWO all-star games and received comparable Cy Young support 3 times. I’ll ask again; how can you be considered one of the best of all time if nobody who covered you day in and day out during your career thought you were even among the best of your day??

Jorge Posada announces his retirement; the inevitable “Is he a Hall of Famer” articles start. Immediate gut reaction from me: yes he’s a HoFamer. Unlike some of his Yankees dynasty team members (Bernie Williams, Andy Pettitte) Posada seems a bit more transcendent in terms of talent and legacy. A quick glance though at his career stats show some of the problems with his eventual candidacy. He’s a late bloomer; not playing a full-time season til he’s 25. However for the 10 seasons he had from 25 to 35 he was fantastic; 5 all-stars, 5 Silver Sluggers and two top-6 MVP votes. After he turned 35 though he struggled with health and had a relatively poor final season at the plate. He has no gold gloves and had a reputation for having a very weak throwing arm but had a 121 OPS+ for his career (a great offensive player for a catcher). His compareables in b-r are heady company (including Carlton Fisk and Gabby Hartnett). I guess we’ll see in 5 years’ time.

Buster Olney continues his rankings of the top 10s of baseball; this time with lineups. Predictably its very AL East heavy. Previously he had done rotations, bullpens, infields and outfields. Links to other lists available from this article (ESPN insider only; consider spending $2/month for it; its worth it).

Buster, after finishing the above rankings, publishes his preliminary 2012 top 10 Power Rankings. Rays #1, Nationals essentially #11/”Best of the Rest.” Boy this team’s reputation has come a long ways in just a few short years.

Jeff Passan‘s A-to-Z discussion on Baseball this off season and in 2012. I link it since I like most everything Passan writes.

Joe Torrejoins an ownership group chasing the LA Dodgers … but not the one that Stan Kasten is heading. Bad move; I think Kasten’s a shoe-in to be Selig‘s pick.

This could have a bigger effect than the loss of Albert Pujols: St. Louis pitching coach Dave Duncan is taking a leave of absence from the team to care for his ailing wife. Duncan has been such a miracle worker for reclamation project starters over the past few years that its hard to imagine the Cardinals pitching staff not to take a dent.

The Chicago Cubs franchise potentially takes another hit: Starlin Castro reportedly accused of sexual assault. Castro returned home for the off-season and isn’t in the country; could this incident prevent him from getting a work visa in 2012?

Jonah Keritakes on one of my favorite topics; calling out Billy Beane and showing how he’s closer to being an incompetent GM than he is to his vaunted reputation as the game’s best GM.

Great article on Baseball Prospectus about SLAP tears in baseball players (normally pitchers). The article is very heavy on medical jargon but talks about the different types of tears and surgical remedies. This is the injury that Chris Carpenter had and recovered from (though I’m pretty sure he ALSO had Tommy John surgery too).

2012 AL rookie of the year favorite Matt Moore, profiled at seedlingstostars.com. This is part of a series of prospect reviews, counting down to #1 and Moore is ranked #4 … but the author immediately caveats it by saying that any of the top 4 could be #1. I talked about Moore after his playoff start on this site, coming away with a Wow factor that I havn’t had since Strasburg.

Scout.com’s top 100 Prospect list for 2012. Bryce Harper #3 behind Moore and Mike Trout. Can’t argue there. Other Nats on the list include Anthony Rendon (#56). AJ Cole (#76) and Brad Peacock (#85) would have made us a bit more respectable pre-Gonzalez trade. Here’s hoping that the Nats “other” big prospects (Meyer and Purke in particular) turn in stellar 2012’s and beef up our presence on the national prospect scene again.

Q: How many wins do you expect the Nationals to have this year? Will a full season of pitchers Stephen Strasburg and Gio Gonzalez translate into a spot in the playoffs?

A: Tough question; If you believe the statistical measurement Wins Above Replacement (WAR), then Mark Zuckerman made a very convincing argument that this team is already 11.7 wins better than 2011 without adding anyone else. However; even best laid plans don’t pan out. There are always regressions, injuries and setbacks that you can count on. So to say that the Nats will win 90 games is probably incredibly optimistic. However; if this team is really an 85 win team, then they’re going to be in the Wild Card race and may be buyers instead of sellers, and could get pushed over the top. I’ll say, right now pre Prince Fielder nonsense this is an 88 win team. Ladson says 85 wins but Fielder would turn them into a competitor for the NL East title.

Q: How do you think the bullpen is shaping up? Will Se an Burnett stay or should we be looking for another lefty? Will Tyler Clippard earn closing opportunities in 2012?

A: Our 2011 bullpen was the strength of the team and it comes back mostly in tact. We have yet to replace Todd Coffey, who was serviceable in 2011, but we look to be stronger in the “long man/spot starter” role. Kimball is hurt but Mattheus was pretty good in 2011. Burnett is signed through 2012 so he’s not going anywhere; do we need another lefty if we have both Gorzelanny and Detwiler projected in the bullpen? I’m sure either one could prepare on a rotating basis for a one-out role. Clippard is the set-up guy; he and Storen seem set in their roles and that’s great, since I think Clippard is a better pitcher and is getting the more high-leverage appearances. Not much to add from Ladson.

Q: What is the situation with Rick Ankiel? Will he be coming back to the Nationals?

A: Ankiel‘s not coming back; if the team wanted a plus defender who couldn’t hit, they can find him much cheaper. Kinda like Mike Cameron. Its too bad; he was so good in CF but so bad at the plate. Ladson thinks the team could still be interested in Ankiel as a 4th outfielder.

Q: There is no doubt the Gonzalez deal helps the Nationals right now. But do you think they should have dealt their prospects for a center fielder?

A: It seems like Mike Rizzo cashed in his prospects on a deal he couldn’t turn down, taking advantage of Billy Beane‘s firesale in Oakland to get a pretty good pitcher. Did he *need* another starter? Maybe, maybe not. Does he *need* a center fielder? Yeah he does. He also needs a lead-off hitter. And a better short-stop. But you can’t solve all your problems at once. I like Gonzalez; like what we got and think it was a good return on the prospects we gave up. I’m ok living with Werth for a year in CF and buying someone on the open market next off-season. Ladson agrees.

Q: Are there any potential trade suitors for Jesus Flores? He shouldn’t be the Nationals’ backup catcher.

A: Well, the second we traded Derek Norris, Flores became that much more important to this team. Yes he’s our backup, and yes we think he could start elsewhere, so perhaps at some point (if we feel confident that Ramos look strong) we can flip Flores and use Solano for backup purposes at the MLB level. But suddenly we may be looking at needing to develop more catcher depth. Ladson is right in saying that Flores is a project, and that we’d be selling low by trading him now considering his injury past.

Q: With the bench still something of a question mark, will Stephen Lombardozzi be given a shot to crack the roster? If he plays well, what chance is there that he will start playing every day?

A: I suppose; I wasn’t incredibly impressed with Lombardozzi‘s Sept 2011 call-up. I thought he looked beyond over-matched at the plate. I’d like to see if he could actually be a good middle infielder and not top-out as a Brian Bixler utility infielder. The team needs a 2nd utility infielder after DeRosa and Lombardozzi could fit the bill. Start? Hmm; Desmond isn’t going to be allowed to hit .220 forever, so yes its conceivable that at some point if Desmond doesn’t start hitting he’ll get replaced in the field, and it’d be great if the team had someone like Lombardozzi to step up. Ladson says its a long-shot.

Q: Why is right-hander Yuniesky Maya still with the Nationals?

A: Two words: guaranteed contract. Clearly he’s not the guy that the team thought he was; we have two more years for him to toil in AAA and serve as a spot starter/emergency backup. Its too bad; he has the arsenal and the moxie but not the stuff to survive. Ladson calls him a disappointment. Clearly.

Happy New Year! Here’s Tom Boswell‘s weekly Monday chat done today Tuesday 1/3/12. With the Redskins season mercifully over, I’d expect a bunch of questions related to post mortem-ing the team, but there’s also been a flurry of baseball moves.

Of the baseball questions he took, here’s how I’d have answered them. As always, questions are edited for clarity and I write my own answer prior to reading his.

Q: Hey Bos, I don’t think the Nationals should sign him for top dollar. I don’t even think they should sign him for the right price and years. BUT, I think the Nats would be foolish not to CONSIDER signing him for the right price and years.

A: That’s crazy; for the right price and years, Prince Fielder is one of the best 10 hitters in the game. This team needs offense, not more pitching. It needs a big bopper in the middle of the order (ala Adam Dunn) and lineup protection for Zimmerman and Werth. Its no coincidence that Zimmerman’s two best offensive seasons were with Dunn protecting him in the 4-hole, nor that our best offensive season in years came in 2009 with our 3-4-5 hitters all successful. Now; do I want Fielder for 8-10 years? No; nor does anyone else apparently. Boswell intimates that the (cheap) Lerners are choosing between Fielder and Zimmerman. He just can’t get off his ridiculous column of last week.

Q: What are your thoughts on the Gio Gonzalez trade? It seems like it was a pretty high cost to give up both Cole and Peacock.

A: I’ve posted my thoughts in this same space. Short version: I like the trade for who we got based on our prospects not entirely fulfilling their promise. Boswell says the trade should work for both sides but also talks about how difficult it was to get approval for the trade and the symbolism involved.

Q: So, are the Nats in on Fielder or not? Did Boras and Fielder meet with Rizzo and the Lerners in DC? What about a long term, Matt Moore type deal for Zimmermann (Jordan)? Who penciled in at CF?

A: So many questions. My guesses: Nats are in on Fielder since the years may be dropping. Boras definitely met with Rizzo/Lerners. Its pre-mature to sign Zimmermann to a Moore deal (that deal may still backfire for Tampa; he’s only thrown a few MLB innings), and Mike Cameron is your opening day CFer. Boswell doesn’t answer any of these questions, but gives out a great link at jdland.com pertaining to the removal of the eye-sore gravel factory!

Q: Why go for Gonzalez and not go for Fielder? You’re either all-in or not.

A: A fair question; I think the team looked at its 2012 rotation and saw weakness at the back end, as well as some innings limitations throughout, and thought it needed a guy who they could count on for innings. Initially it was Buerhle but they got out bid, and lucky for them they ended up with a better player. The prospects we gave up were significant … but then again, there’s a lot of people who say “there’s no such thing as a pitching prospect.” Meaning, they’re high risk, high reward. We traded 3 guys who may never amount to anything for a guy in Gonzalez who we KNOW what he is, right now. Boswell does some “big body” slugger analysis and seems to be talking himself into Fielder.

Q: Are the Nats really crazy (my opinion) enough to bring Bryce Harper up before May and risk losing him a year early to free agency? Granted a center field of Roger Bernadina and Mike Cameron or a similar right-handed batter is less than compelling, but what’s six weeks or so in the grand scheme of things? Basing so much of their strategy on Werth being the centerfielder for the season or more (not that he isn’t capable, a gamer, and all that) also seems high risk. What are the smart moves here?

A: Well put question. I agree; 6 weeks over the course of 7 years is nothing, especially since it saves the team millions and millions by keeping Harper in the minors. I’m ok starting the season with Cameron in center, Werth in right and Harper in AA. Likewise, I’m also ok starting with Werth in center, a FA to be named in right, with an eye towards Harper in July. Boswell agrees, but can’t help himself and does a ton of WAR analysis on young players.

Q: For those of us who read your stuff regularly and respect what you have to say, you owe us an explanation. What happened between your chat on December 19 and your column published less than 48 hours later that caused you to so radically change your view from “Rizzo has the authority to make to make deals” to “the cheapo Lerners just don’t get it.” And please don’t insult the intelligence of your readers by trying to say the two positions were totally consistent.

A: Wow. Demanding a complete mea culpa from this ridiculous column (see my reaction to it). Lets see what he says: Boswell says the facts changed between his chat and his column and then the deal.

Q: With the issues of the other NL east teams (some of which are pretty arguable in the question), does Fielder make the Nats a contender for the next 3 years?

A: Undoubtedly yes. Mark Zuckerman did a nice little WAR analysis, showing how, without any more moves, the team could very well be a 90-91 win team in 2012. With Fielder, we’d be closer to a 96 win team most likely. Boswell agrees w/ the question, saying though that he thought the team wouldn’t contend til 2013.

Q:Who is the Nats CF in 2013?

A: Who possibly knows. Upton will be a FA. So will Michael Bourn. Harper could (should?) be playing CF; he’s athletic enough and it would greatly enhance his value. Werth can man RF for the time being and then we can find a bopper to play LF if Morse moves to 1b. Or we buy Fielder, Morse stays in LF for a while and you’re set. Boswell says Werth only goes to CF if Harper comes up… but I think it should be the reverse frankly.

Final word: there was a fantastic piece of analysis phrased in the form of a question, where a chatter did a good piece of investigative work and discovered that Oakland’s foul grounds perhaps costs Gonzalez 6-13 runs over the course of his career, or a run every 15th start or so. Further proof in my mind that Oakland’s park effects are overstated. Its a must read. About 60% down in the chat.

This is your semi-weekly/periodic wrap-up of Nats and other baseball news that caught my eye. No better time than today to publish, since there’s not much else going on Christmas day.

Nationals In General

Bus Leagues Baseball profiles Matthew Purke, with a nice scouting report and recap of his journey to the Nats franchise.

Nice little bench move here: Nats claimed infielder Carlos Rivera from Philadelphia’s waivers and stuck him on the 40-man. He theoretically can play both SS and 3b, though reports are that his SS defense is suspect. I’m not going to nit pick moves like this and the Mike Cameron signing; our farm system kind of has a gap in terms of player development from the last Bowden draft years, so we are missing these roster-augmentation players that otherwise would be filled from within. Soon though with the college-heavy drafts of the past couple years we should have all the spare parts we need sitting in AAA so that we’re not signing mid 30’s utility players and claiming mediocre players.

Welcome to 2012’s version of Jerry Hairston; Mark DeRosato sign with the Nats and be our super utility guy. Can’t argue with the move; he fills a need, is willing to be a bench player, and can play a bunch of positions.

Obviously the big news this cycle is the Gio Gonzalez move. Frequent readers here saw a very healthy discussion in the past week in this space. I’ll post some reaction links here not posted elsewhere: Buster Olney‘s blog (the take away for me is how badly Oakland’s fans seem to be reacting), Jim Bowden‘s video reaction and his description how the deal went down (the interesting takeaway being how the 2nd player thrown into the deal from Oakland’s side turning the tide). Keith Law values our prospects highly and says we overpaid. Another prospect-heavy analyst John Sickelsanalyzes our outgoing prospects (surprisingly Sickels says the A’s got “fair value” instead of calling it a loss for the Nats as Law did). Here’s Tim Brown‘s reaction, plus Ken Rosenthal‘s original report. Lastly, fangraph’s David Fung graphically analyzes projected WARs and determines that we gave up nearly twice the value in future production, which involves quite a leap of trust that all four of these guys pan out to their potential. Lastly, here’s Baseball Prospectus’ take on both sides; not nearly as glowing for the 4 prospects gained as I thought they would be.

Free Agents/Player Transaction News

Roy Oswalt is considering one-year deals, immediately bringing nearly every MLB team into the discussions. I’d love to have him on the Nats but suspect that he may end up in a situation that makes it easier for him to get one more relatively lucrative FA contract. I.e., an easier division that’s closer to home. Imagine him in San Diego against weaker NL west teams. With the Gonzalez signing though, my guess is that we’re out of the FA pitcher race.

Interesting take on the Yu Darvish bidding results and the Toronto loss from Buster Olney (insider only), intimating that all the talk about the Toronto interest was overblown.

Great points by David Schoenfeld on espn, pointing out another similar article on Grantland, talking about the “Prospect Mania” that has become the norm in baseball over the past 10 years. Ironically, this same issue was seen in our Gonzalez deal; are our prospects really that good, or are we over-valuing them and their potential?

General Baseball News

College Baseball Newspaper announces its pre-season Collegiate All American team. From first glance, Florida looks really strong (4 guys on the first team, another four on the 2nd team, wow). South Carolina returns two all-american starters, virtually guaranteeing weekend series wins all year. Finally Texas has 2 first team, 3 second teamers just in its rotation. Too early to predict Florida versus Texas in the Omaha final in June 2012?

George Washington, a lesser Div-1 baseball program that has given the Nats some later-round org players in recent years, is renovating Barcroft park in South Arlington, where they play their home games. They’re putting in artificial turf, nicer facilities and a nicer snack bar. Nice. It was already a nice place to see good collegiate baseball; now it should be this much better.

Documentation/Actual testimony from a player who won an appeal of his PED positive test. Latest rumor I read about Ryan Braun is that he was taking something for an STD. I can’t find a link so perhaps its just that; a ridiculous rumor.

Man, I can’t wait to see this soap opera in Spring Training; former Marlins manager says that Hanley Ramirezwon’t go to third easily.

Nice shirt, Mike Napoli. (NSFW, in other words, “Not Safe for Work.”) Not really; you can barely see the “R-rated” part.

I wonder why they left the field? A current picture of Detroit’s old stadium. We were in Detroit 3yrs ago and drove by this stadium as it was only in partial de-construction.

LA Dodger’s plans to sell dealt a blow by a bankrupcy judge. Or were they? I’m not entirely clear how this ruling affects anything frankly. As long as Frank McCourt is removed from the picture, I think everyone will be happy.

General News; other

Categorize this in the “people who don’t have a sense of humor, ever” department: Pat Robertson found the hilarious Tim Tebow skit on SNL last weekend “disgusting.” Hey Pat; I find your opinions on race, discrimination, acceptance, tolerance, and your stated stances on the reasons that Hurricane Katrina, the Haitian earthquake and 9-11 happened to be “disgusting” as well.

This link was ironic for me, in that my family just had the same discussion about what is the best Xmas movie of all time. Jim Caple presents a 64-team bracket for Xmas movies. I think the selection committee screwed over “Scrooged,” giving it only a 9 seed. In another bracket, its a regional winner :-).

This is your semi-weekly/periodic wrap-up of Nats and other baseball news that caught my eye.

Nationals In General

John Sickels does in-depth system reviews, but allows his readers to pipe in about the prospects down on the farm. Here’s the discussion on the Nats, which (as is apt to happen) devolved into arguments about Bryce Harper. Still, lots of the usual suspects piped up and offered opinions. Here’s a link to his preliminary list of Nats prospects.

In case you havn’t seen enough scouting reports on our precocious star, here’s another from the blog prospectjunkies.com. I will say it was refreshing to see this author go out of his way to dispell the whole “Harper is a brat” storyline that most lazy sportswriters pen, without having ever interviewed or even *seen* the guy.

I hope this isn’t our starting CF for 2012; Nats signMike Cameron to a minor league contract. I actually don’t mind this deal; yes he’s old and yes his production slipped badly in 2011, but he’s still a high-end defensive player. Maybe he’s just a cheaper version of Rick Ankiel. Odds are, as posted elsewhere, that Cameron is a half-season option just holding court until Harper is promoted sometime in June. Works for me.

Hmm. Reports from Ken Rosenthal that the team is “pushing hard” for Gio Gonzalez, offering Billy Beane a “4 for 1” deal. Not sure I like hearing that; while he’s got decent stats two years running, there’s some chinks in that armor. He lead the league in walks last year and gives them up at nearly a walk every other inning. His ERA jumps nearly a point when he pitches away from the friendly confines of Oakland’s pitcher-friendly stadium. He’s not an “Ace.” What four players are we talking about giving up? If this is anything like the Mat Latos deal, it probably would be something like Detwiler, Norris,a major league arm and a lower minor league arm.

Free Agents/Player Transaction News

First Reports on the winning Yu Darvish bid? $48M. No, wait, then it was even higher than Dice-K’s bid. I privately thought he’d eclipse Daisuke Matsuzaka‘s record of $51M (and change) from 2005. Another nugget from this article; Darvish wants a 5yr/$75M contract. That’s $120M+ for this guy. Does anyone still want to argue that he’s worth $120M, when the absolute best FA pitcher purchase in recent years (Cliff Lee) himself got 5yrs/$120M guaranteed from Philadelphia?

Who won the Darvish sweepstakes? First thought to be Toronto, then Texas. On 12/20 we were confirmed: Texas won with a $51.7M bid. The AL West is turning into a shootout.

Breaking news over the weekend: Cincinnati gets Mat Latos for a package of prospects that includes their uber rising star Yonder Alonso, another 1st rounder in Yasmani Grandal and former ace-pretender Edinson Volquez. That’s an awful lot for a guy who, while certainly is “good,” isn’t among the elite pitchers of this league. That seems like more than what Zack Greinkefetched, and he as a Cy Young award to his credit. It also begs the question; why does San Diego need Alonso? They already traded for a top-end 1B prospect, Anthony Rizzo. Alonso was blocked in Cincinnati by Joey Votto and was clearly on the trading block, but San Diego is a curious spot. Oh I see now: he’s officially listed as a left fielder now. Except that scouts openly scoff at his abilities to play anywhere but 1b or DH. The Padres can always put together a competent pitching rotation by virtue of their park; if some of these hitters pan out they could be a very good team, quickly. Meanwhile Cincinnati gets a good pitcher who hopefully wasn’t under-exposed by pitching in the cavern in San Diego but who most say is a legit front-of-the-rotation ace. Update: now we’re hearing that Rizzo is in play possibly for Matt Garza. That’s probably Theo Epstein trying to get his boy back.

General Baseball News

An excellent take at Grantland from Jonah Keri, another favored writer, on Steroid use in baseball, inspired in the post Ryan Braun mania. As it has turned out, Braun’s case isn’t about Steroids, but he does dispute the notion frequently posted on the internet that “no positive test has ever been appealed successfully.” In reality, according to both players and well-connected writers, no “leaked” positive test has ever been appealed, and that initial positives have been overturned on more than a few occasions. Here’s a player who says he successfully appealed a positive test himself. He also links to very interesting articles on testosterone and false positives, one of which (If i’m reading it correctly) notes that about 1 in 4 positive tests is actually a false positive. I can’t believe any official test is that inaccurate, so perhaps its either old technology or i’m mis-interpreting the story. Subsequent reports show that Braun’s test was from medication taken for a “personal issue.” Sounds like Viagra, doesn’t it?

Another takeaway from Keri’s article is another pet peeve of mine; the notion that Matt Kemp was a “more worthy” MVP candidate than Braun but that Braun won the award because “his teammates were better.” That’s one take on the award, IF you interpret the “MVP” to be given to the “best player” in a particular year. But that’s not the definition of “Most Valuable Player” that most writers adhere to. Simply put, how can you be the “Most Valuable player” to your team if your team stinks? If your team already has a losing record, and the star player wasn’t there, wouldn’t that team just have a WORSE losing record? To me, that’s the essence of the MVP argument; you simply cannot be the most valuable player on a bad team, unless your season is so historically amazing that it stands out on its own merit. If we want to “invent” a new award, say the “Cy Young” of hitters (almost an uber “Silver Slugger”) so that we can properly award a guy like Kemp, I’d be for it absolutely. In fact, it would pretty much end these ridiculous arguments that will only continue to get louder as more and more stat-heads who never actually watch games but just interpret advanced statistical tables on websites as if baseball players were robots playing in a nil-gravity vacuum gain admittance to the BBWAA and start voting on these awards themselves.

Yet another excellent Grantland.com article, this time analyzing whether or not the Economics of Moneyball still exist. After this article published, I saw some criticisms of the statistics used on more stat-heavy blogs like Fangraphs. Not sure why; the article makes sense to me.

I sometimes take issue with Craig Calcaterra‘s stuff on Hardballtalk, but his opinion on ESPN Legal Analyst Lester Munson‘s love affair with the abject failure of the Barry Bonds case is spot on for me. Bonds was convicted of one really shaky obstruction of justice count after years and MILLIONS of dollars of expenses, and was sentenced to 30 days of home confinement. The prosecutors who led this monstrosity need to be fired, frankly.

Ugh. Bill Conlan of the Philadelphia Daily News, a hall of fame baseball writer, resigns ahead of child molestation charges being filed. Interestingly, it is the rival Philly newspaper, the Philadelphia Inquirer, filing the charges.

General News; other

I like Grantland, and I like stuff that Chuck Klosterman writes. Here, he writes about the “Triangle Offense” that we’ve heard so much about from Phil Jackson during his time with the Bulls and Lakers. My takeaway; the Triangle is dying out because (according to Jackson) the league is dominated by me-first scorers (whether they be slash and burn or 3-point specialists) and because the Triangle is considered really complex.

In case you somehow missed the front page of cnnsi.com this week, yet another example of the absolute hypocritical nature of the NCAA is on display once again: a former St. Joseph’s basketball player is being held hostage by an (apparently) petulant basketball coach who refuses to grant his waiver to play for another school. Coaches can change schools like they’re changing suits, but if a player changes they have to get approvals from their releasing school (a conflict of interest if there ever was one) and approval from the NCAA, AND then have to give up a year of eligibility. How is this possibly fair? Coaches can coach for 50 years and don’t lose any eligibility; players can only play for four (five if they red-shirt) but have to give up 25% of that time if a situation isn’t right for them. Every time I read something about college athletics like this (or the UKentucky/Oliver case, or the Colorado WR/snowboarder case, or the entire player images case) I’m more and more infuriated and hope that the organization has to face congressional review. More links on the topic: lawsuit threatened. Possibly “the other side” to the story here. There’s other interesting links to twitter comments and blog op-ed pieces throughout. Another opinion here.

We hear from Albert Pujol‘s wife Dierdre, who says she was “mad at God” for having to leave St. Louis. I’m sorry; if you are “forced” to leave St. Louis so that you can earn $254M dollars instead of $210M, you don’t get to invoke “God” or any self-pity whatsoever. Is Pujol’s wife as out-of-touch as most modern athletes are? This almost reminds me of the infamous line from Latrell Sprewell, who turned down a $21M contract extension by saying that “I’ve got my family to feed.”

DC-area native Joe Saunders was non-tendered by the Diamondbacks after failing to reach a multi-year deal. There were plenty of other non-tenders to talk about, but the West Springfield graduate immediately becomes a rather high-end FA starting pitcher when compared to the rest of the market. I don’t think he’s worth pursuing necessarily; he isn’t going to give us anything that we probably couldn’t expect to get out of Ross Detwiler at a fraction of the cost, and perhaps this is just a negotiating ploy by the Arizona GM. But its definitely fair to say that his arbitration cost would have probably been more than his actual worth on an annual salary basis.

The Yu Darvishdeadline passed on 5pm Wednesday, and all we know is that someone actually bid, and that there were a number of serious bidders. The NPB has four days to formally “accept” the offer, so will not know til next tuesday who “won.” I heard on SportsTalk 980 that the Nationals did not submit a bid, and here’s Adam Kilgoreconfirming in print. I’ve posted my opinion on Darvish in the past; i’m sure he’s talented, but don’t think he’s a 9-figure risk. Unsubstantiated early rumors list the Toronto Blue Jays as the posting winners.

Good for Josh Willingham, signing a 3yr deal in Minnesota. Yes we could have used his offense in 2011. Willingham’s 2011 bWAR? 1.8 hitting in a horribly bad pitcher’s stadium. The players we got for him? Henry Rodriguez‘s 0.2 and Corey Brown‘s 0 (and subsequent removal from the 40-man roster). That was a good piece of business!

General Baseball News

I kind of agree with Phil Wood‘s take on Ryan Braun‘s positive test, as printed here. If a player has been tested again and again, and then (say) gets a test mixed up or hits a false positive, and that test is leaked to the world, wouldn’t you be pretty pissed as well? I’m not saying that’s what happened here (since I have no involvement whatsoever), but such a scenario would play out pretty unfairly to the athlete in question. One can only hope that the “insanely high” levels of testosterone were either a testing mistake or a flawed test. Or possibly that Braun was surprised by the timing of the test and was doing what Victor Conte describes as a “truck sized loop hole” in the baseball drug testing.

This story cracks me up: Derek Jeter sends the same “break-up present” consisting of a gift-basket with a hand-signed baseball to all his “conquests.” How did we find this out? Because he had a repeat hookup and apparently forgot that he had already sent one to her. Oops. Here’s the question: how do these women certify the signed baseball? Does it also come with a certificate of authenticity?

The verb “Tebowing” is now being recognized as an official word. At least its not ebonics. At least not everyone is taking this thing seriously; see here for a fantastic new Tebowing-themed beer label.

Thank god for this clause in the new CBA: players are going to be banned from getting corporate logo tattoos. Its too bad; I’m pretty sure I just heard that Stephen Strasburg is getting the Dairy Queen logo tattooed on the small of his back, tramp-stamp style.

MLB Nationals beat reporter Bill Ladson doesn’t do mailboxes that frequently, but when he does I’m sometimes intrigued by his answers. Lets see how i’d have answered the questions he took in his latest mailbag. As always, I read the question and answer it myself prior to reading his answer.

Q: Don’t get me wrong, I love Danny Espinosa. But how can you say he’s the “most complete player I’ve covered since Vladimir Guerrero”
A: I like Danny Espinosa and was a fan of his even before he started his 2011 rookie-of-the-year campaign. A question though: does Espinosa even feature as a typical 5-tool player? Power (yes), Average? (not yet … despite his BABIP being a bit low he’s only hitting in the .240s), but perhaps in the future. Speed? 12 Stolen bases on pace for about 20. Defense? by all accounts yes. Arm? Definitely. So, he’s pretty durn complete. But, he’s got exactly 3/4 of one pro season under his belt. A lot has to happen before we start comparing him to one of the better players in the last 20 years (Vladimir Guerrero). Ladson says he IS a 5-tool player, and that he’s the best defensive 2nd baseman in baseball right now. Heady statements. Here’s a list of Uzr/150 ratings for 2nd basemen right now; Espinosa is 5th behind some pretty good defensive players. Will he stay at 2nd base long enough to gain consideration or take over at short? See below.

Q: With Mike Cameron traded to the Marlins, do you see the Nationals making a move to get someone like Cameron before the non-waiver Trade Deadline?
A: Mike Rizzo keeps talking about how he wants a center fielder. BJ Upton and Michael Bourn are names that keep popping up. But at what point does the team realize it may have a great future center fielder in Bryce Harper and just wait it out? I wouldn’t want Cameron, an aging player living on his defensive reputation of yesteryear. Ladson specifically mentions both Upton and Bourn, stating that the Nats are not interested in aging vets.

Q: What is Ian Desmond’s future with the team? Steve Lombardozzi seems like he could be a fit as a leadoff hitter sooner rather than later. Problem is, he plays second base. Could Desi move to left field, or is it more likely he goes to another ballclub? His numbers offensively have not been good.
A: Great question. Ian Desmond has clearly taken a step backwards offensively just at the same time that he’s finally taken a step forward defensively. What should the team do? Live with a plus defender (Desmond believe it or not has a positive Uzr/150 this year, putting him in the upper half of defensive short stops) and his crummy bat? Or try to improve? I think the answer may eventually be to transition Desmond to a different role if he can’t be more consistent at the plate. I’m not sure Steve Lombardozzi is the answer (he very well may be; i’ve advocated in the past for this exact same move) until he proves he can hit at AAA and proves he can hit in the majors. But we also have Anthony Rendon in the wings and may have to find a position for him as well. Its a good problem to have; too many good players and not enough spots. Ladson thinks Desmond is trade bait and is coveted by several teams; we may get our answer in the off-season.

Q: With Michael Morse doing so well at first base, is there any chance they might try and use LaRoche as trade bait?
A: Another great question. The Nats do have some interesting story lines facing them as they go into 2011. Morse has been a revelation and will be a key part of the team in 2012. LaRoche is signed and is a 25 homer/100rbi guy with plus defense at first, so its hard to believe we’ll sell low on him and dump him this off season. What would he bring in trade return? Almost nothing. My guess is that Morse moves back to left, we flip Nix into a reliever or something, and re-install LaRoche at first. Ladson Agrees.

Q: I saw recently that Chad Cordero retired. I know he left Washington with some resentment toward the front office, but is there any chance the two sides can bury the hatchet and honor Chad with some sort of ceremony thanking him for his contributions? He was a fan favorite who gave everything he had while wearing the curly W. He certainly deserves it.
A: Any resentment Cordero had towards this franchise should have died the day Bowden was fired. But, who knows, he could have blamed the owners for the actions of its employees. Without dishonoring the guy too much, how much of an impact did he really have here? You can argue that Cordero was a flash in the pan, an over-rated player in a position (closer) that is fungible and more or less replaceable with most any bullpen arm. He had a fantastic season the year the team moved here in 2005, and never came close to replicating it before getting hurt. We spent most of the 2007 season talking about trading the guy. It’d be like honoring Vinny Castillo in some ways. Ladson agrees, and says we should think about honoring Frank Robinson first. Fair enough, but why exactly does this team “need” to honor anybody from the past few years? What did Frank Robinson do for this team except guide it to consecutive last place finishes?

Q: Do you see the Nationals moving Jayson Werth to the cleanup spot? We know how good Morse and Laynce Nix are, but chances are opposing teams will walk Ryan Zimmerman if those two are behind him.
A: I’m not sure what games this questioner is watching this year, but perhaps this guy has not seen that a) Werth is struggling mightily, b) Morse is hitting the ball lights out, and c) Nix is hitting a heck of a lot better than the average guy. You set your lineup so that you’re not batting 5 right-handed guys in a row but also with a mind towards the roles and capabilities of the players. Werth, Morse and Zimmerman are all right handed guys and should only be put together if you’re facing a lefty. Nix is a great way to break that up but his lefty-lefty splits aren’t that great. What would be really great is if LaRoche was healthy and producing and in the mix for 3-4-5-6 as well, or if Espinosa becomes the power hitting force that he could be and continues to be a basher in the 2-hole. Ladson says Werth may move back to #5 but he’s no cleanup hitter.

Q: When will Bryce Harper get promoted to the big leagues?
A: Target Mid June 2012. I think maybe the team gets a wild hair and calls him up this september for some cheap box office gate days. And you can’t blame them; he’s already on the 40-man roster after all. But any days he plays here in september delay the days he needs to sit in the minors so as to avoid super-2 status. Besides, Rizzo has repeatedly said he’s not coming up in 2011. Btw, I don’t believe Harper’s current struggles once promoted to AA mean much. He should have gone to high-a but understand why he skipped Potomac’s ridiculously bad field. He’ll pick it back up and he’ll hit .300 his final month of AA. Ladson didn’t really answer, just saying that Harper won’t make it up this year.

The Red Sox’s signing of Carl Crawford to a 7yr, $142M contract (a contract undoubtedly pushed skyward by the Nats Jayson Werth deal a few days earlier) makes for a rather imposing possible Red Sox Lineup in 2011. Here’s a probable opening day lineup:

2B Dustin Pedroia (R)

LF Carl Crawford (L)

1B Adrian Gonzalez (L)

3B Kevin Youkilis (R)

DH David Ortiz (L)

RF J.D. Drew (L)

SS Marco Scutaro (R)

C Jarrod Saltalamacchia (S)

CF Jacoby Ellsbury (L)

Now, one thing is immediately apparent with this lineup. They are incredibly lefty-heavy through the heart of their order. And in a division with CC Sabathia, probably Andy Pettitte and potentially Cliff Lee on their main competitor, this could be rather bad during key divisional games.

Clearly the Red Sox need to get some righty help in the heart of their lineup. Enter Josh Willingham.

Trade Proposal: The Nats trade Willingham and a decent prospect (perhaps one of our AA pitchers) to the Red Sox for Jacoby Ellsbury. Crawford slides over to center for Boston, Willingham plays left, and you have Mike Cameron as your late inning defensive replacement outfielder.

Ellsbury is exactly what the Nats need; leadoff center fielder who shows more promise and more self control than our current leadoff/CF Nyjer Morgan. He lost most of 2010 to injury but in 2009 lead the league in stolen bases and would give us good defense in center per his uzr/150 rankings. He’s cost contained (not yet arbitration eligible) and we’d control him for at least 3 more years.

Willingham’s approach at the plate fits the Sabremetric-thinking Red Sox; he has a high OBP, sees a lot of pitches and puts up a good OPS when healthy. He is defensively challenged but left field at Fenway might be the best place in all of baseball to “hide” a crummy defender. He’d give the Red Sox a righty presence in the middle of the lineup and replace a 9th place hitter with a middle of the order hitter. He’s in the last year of arbitration but still projects to be relatively cheap (by Boston’s standards), probably earning around $6M/year. He clearly wants to set down roots and could be a nice 3 or 4-year signing in Boston.

With Willingham, here’s a Potential Boston lineup:

2B Dustin Pedroia (R)

CF Carl Crawford (L)

3B Kevin Youkilis (R)

1B Adrian Gonzalez (L)

LF Josh Willingham (R)

DH David Ortiz (L)

RF J.D. Drew (L)

SS Marco Scutaro (R)

C Jarrod Saltalamacchia (S)

Now they go R-L alternatively for the first 6 hitters, and if Saltamacchia catches or if Varitek gets some ABs they both switch hit and could slot above Scutaro to give even more flexibility.