General Leonid Ivashov, Russia's armed forces
Chief of Staff when 9/11 occurred, recently went public with astounding comments
concerning the destruction of the World Trade Center and the war on
terrorism.

Ivashov made clear his conviction that the
entire war is a manufactured ruse and that 9/11 was an inside job carried out by
the new world elite, who he calls 'the Atlantists', designed to light the touch
paper for a global government and the elimination of sovereign borders.

On the face of it this is another highly
credible whistleblower and one who would be in a position to know exactly what
hes talking about.

Ivashov goes in depth about the modern face of terrorism
and its symbiosis with how the media report it. This is key because an act only
becomes terrorism if it's defined as that by the media. If we can define killing
innocent people in the pursuit of a political agenda as terrorism then what do
you call slaughtering innocent people in their own homes in recent US government
orchestrated bombing raids in Pakistan and Iraq?

Ivashov elaborates on the fact that the secret service and
intelligence elements of any major power always control the high echelons of any
extremist movement.

From Operation Gladio, to the Neo-Nazis in Germany, to the
London bombing mastermind Aswat being an MI6 asset, to Israels creation of
Hamas. This pattern has been consistently proven.

However, Ivashov's solutions to the problem of worldwide
engineered chaos are ambiguous and their wording should raise alarm bells for
those who understand the long term agenda of the Illuminati.

As his solution to global dictatorship, Ivashov encourages
the creation of a pseudo-world government, run under UN auspices.

In essence he is offering a Hobson's choice, a left-wing
world government to counter the advance of the right-wing world government. The
end result is the same, a world government which is unelected and not
representative of the people of any sovereign nation.

Then the General states his desire to, "associate (under
the United Nations) the scientific elites in the design and promotion of the
philosophical concepts of the Human Being of the 21st Century."

That reads like secular humanism and it wouldn't be out of
place in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. So without the luxury of the general
going into any further depth on this, at face value what he is proposing appears
to be something quite distasteful.

Ivashov then outlines his wish to, "organize the
interaction of all religious denominations in the world, on behalf of the
stability of humanity's development, security and mutual support."

Again, this is too ambiguous not to rule out the
possibility that hes advocating a global religion as the savior of mankind,
which again is another mechanism whereby power could be centralized under a
world government that is completely unelected and not representative of the
people.

Does he just mean religious figureheads getting
together and talking? We know that when powerful people have get togethers, they
set policy. They dont waste each others time by partaking in talking
shops.

In the absence of further clarification, a
certain healthy dose of skepticism needs to be afforded to the General's
comments. If Ivashov's solutions are just a mirror image of the problems he
clarifies, then with how much credibility should he be bestowed?

Get Alex Jones and Paul
Joseph Watson's books, ALL Alex's documentary films, films by other
authors, audio interviews and special reports. Sign up at Prison Planet.tv - CLICK
HERE.

Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.