Exactly what color do you suppose the owners and executives at all of those companies are?

It makes not a whit of difference what colour the head honchos of big corporations are. If they do not bow down to the diversity racket, their evil "racism" will be "exposed" by the same media that made a lying black whore international news for years with the updates fed to us in all sordid detail tarnishing the reputations of three white college students, while the kidnap, rape and execution of a clean cut white couple barely made local news.

Okay, I don't know how to respond to that other than I disagree with your opinion that black people are robots who are programmed to attack white people. I'm going to guess that whoever jumped you had reasons for it, whether it be for money or just because they have a ton of problems in their life and are bad at handling them, so they enjoy watching other people suffer. Those are problems that humans have, not specifically black people.

Well, perhaps you can explain the following?

Civil Rights: The Race War of Black Against White

Between 1964 and 1994 more than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparison 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean war.

Most victims of race crime – about 90 percent – are white, according to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims," published in 1993.

Sure, people of all races commit all sorts of crimes, but why is it that blacks commit the highest percentages of violent crimes in the United States? You anti-racists vehemently deny that race is a factor. Fine. If race isn't a factor, then I'd like for you to provide an explanation or hypothesis that doesn't defy logic and common sense.

Sure, people of all races commit all sorts of crimes, but why is it that blacks commit the highest percentages of violent crimes in the United States? You anti-racists vehemently deny that race is a factor. Fine. If race isn't a factor, then I'd like for you to provide an explanation or hypothesis that doesn't defy logic and common sense.

Then why are 20,000 banana jugglers protesting for the release of criminals?
You will have to play the childish name calling game alone.

Your negro protest is about hatred for the whites. Plain and simple.
Whites get upset over a tree, and we are about hatred?

For probably the same reason as the two 16 year old girls when I was in highschool were charged as adults: for ganging up on another girl who was smaller than them. All of them were white- IT IS NOT RIGHT TO OUTNUMBER ANYONE IN A FIGHT. Of course, a negro would not understand things that involve words such as fair, right, ethical, etc.
OK, then rationalize this without tap dancing. Oh, don't for get to use words such as fair, right, ethical, etc.
On Dec. 1, Bailey was jumped by six to seven white men at the Fair Barn and only one was arrested and charged with simple battery.

Because they tried to kill the white kid.

Justin Barker was taken by ambulance to LaSalle General Hospital’s emergency room, arriving at 12:25 p.m., according to court documents. A report from the ambulance company stated Barker “denies any pain other than his eye.”

Justin's injuries are not consistent with a beating that supposedly was intended to take his life. LaSalle General Hospital is little more than a bandaid station. If he has been at ANY risk of having a head injury or any potential problems he would have been transported to Alexandria, Shreveport, Baton Rouge or N.O. A single fist could have caused the damage to his left eye, knocked him to the ground and caused him to go unconcious. His injuries have been greatly exaggerated and do not support an attempted murder charge. People spend 2 hours in the ER for a cough. No open or closed head injury, no broken nose, no loose teeth, no busted lip, no broken ribs, nothing but a few scraps, a black eye and a concussion. It doesn't take a lot to get a concussion.

Six to one, victim on the ground, and they are still beating? You are seriously going to ask such an ignorant question? You are an idiot-

On Dec. 1, Bailey was jumped by six to seven white men at the Fair Barn and only one was arrested and charged with simple battery.

I have not given you any indication that "nobody should be punished" I simply support equal treatment. Punish all appropriately. Again, the injuries do not support the "still beating him" senerio.

Concussion. Head injuries can be fatal. Much longer, and he probably would have been killed.
His injuries have been greatly exaggerated. There is a huge leap from a treated and released concussion and death. He was treated and released from a small rural hospital. Small rural hospitals do not hesitate to transfer patients to a higher level of care if they deem it necessary. You can get a concussion from bumping your head. He had no head bleed or brain bruise or anything consistent with a serious or life threating injury. He had no teeth missing or loose, no broken nose, the pain that he claimed to have (convieniently) could not be explained medically. His brutal beating, while wrong, was not as brutal as you guys make out. Sure he has a nasty eye, but his injuries are not consistent with an attempted murder charge.

They didn't have any documented injuries, and they started it.

It was several men against a boy.

You mean that private party where the negroes tried to force themselves in?
They can call the police. Adults who attack a child are unlawful vigilante justice. They are wrong.

The negroes were the instigators in the whole thing.
If instigation is an excuse for an attack then Justin's would be ok.
Written statements from students closest to the scene (in space and time) suggest that the incident was sparked by an angry exchange in the gymnasium moments before in which the black student assaulted at the Fair Barn was taunted for having his “axx whipped” by adult white men.

That's rich- a negro quoting Clint Eastwood...

I have no problems quoting Clint or any other person regardless of race if their words ring true or cute.

Your complaints? Would that be welfare check is not enough to pay for crack habit this month or affirmative action is not robbing enough QUALIFIED whites of their jobs?
Stay on point. I have no time for your stupid games.

What you pieces of garbage really want is that white kid's head on a platter simply because he doesn't want to hang around your ilk. Then, every negro is out to kill whites because NONE of us like you-NONE. You encourage and support criminal activity while mooching off of whitey.
None of you like us? Very interesting. Why do WN's have zero political power. Why can't you whites who don't like us just vote us out of the country? Why do so many white women marry black men? Why does a murderer like O.J. still have a white girl friend. Oh, I get it, by none you mean no WN...O.K. it makes sense now.

What are you implying then, negro?
Is that your attempt to call me a name? I have no problem being called negro. It is part of who I am. It is no different than if you would call me "Man" or "Christian" or "father" or "husband" If you want to play childish games play alone. As for as what I am implying, you can gather that from reading my statement without your blinders on.

Six to one; that is the only fact needed.

Remember the Fair Barn.

They saw an opportunity to holler racism and jumped on it; why should that surprise anyone? This is how you "its" are.
Excessive charges, hanging nooses, sawed off shot guns....no racism there

In that case, I will make damn sure that I emotionally charge them because I don't want or need a negro's "appreciation"...[/QUOTE]

So, tell me, how do you feel about interracial marriages Your hatred entertains me. Have a happy life.

I do not like the whole argument that the reason this European American kid got the near death beating, is because some European American kids put some nooses in a tree, thats pretty weak and not a justification what so ever.

If those type of things were a good justification then I should be able to beat rabidly almost every African American I encounter day to day, surely an African American pulling up beside me in his Lincoln town car blasting music that supports the Genocide of European Americans, as well as the stare downs and intimidations that a European American has to deal with constantly every day of the week, then surely this gives us the right to beat them down because they offended/committed acts of hate against us!I could see the headlines now!

Simply put the African American Jena six used this as an excuse for there behavior, they new that if they called anyone a racist they could get away with almost anything they wanted to, they know because this RACE card is used everyday to get them off the hook in the American Court system and even in schools.

If six European American males had almost killed an African American male because the African Americans would not let them hang out with them, and even put up Anti-European American, Racist Tagging or gang markings on there territory It is easy to see that if that would have happened, right now six European Americans would be either in prison for life, or on death row in an extreme case!

No one has claimed that these 6 boys are innocent. This protest is not about that at all.

Very well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

You all are either turning a blind eye to what is being said or simply don't care about what is being said and simply want to complain.

A non sequitur.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Here is what it is about:

Isn't it true that you're making assertions without having any knowledge about Louisiana State Law? Please answer the question.

Isn't it also true you're not privy to any of the evidence or court documents? Please answer the question.

Isn't it true that you're making assertions based on nothing more than hearsay? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Why were these 6 boys charged as adults?

You'll have to refer to Louisiana State Law for an answer to that question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Why were they charged with attempted murder? How did they go about determining that their intent was to murder the kid as opposed to beating him up?

Perhaps you should ask the police, prosecutor and any applicable witnesses.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Why are you all claiming this boy "was nearly beaten to death" when he was treated and released before the ink dried on his ER admittance forms?

Due to the violent nature of the crime, the very real possibility existed for a fatal injury to have been inflicted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Why were the whites that attacked blacks charged with misdemeanors or not charged at all for their attacks?

Irrelevant. We're specifically discussing whether or not the black youths are guilty of attempted murder. But, to address your point, do you have any proof that the white youths were not charged in accordance with Louisiana State Law? Yes or no?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

At the party, white adults attacked children, why were they charged with such a minor offense?

Irrelevant. We're specifically discussing whether or not the black youth are guilty of attempted murder. But again, to address your point, do you have any proof that the white youths were not charged in accordance with Louisiana State Law? Yes or no?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Why was the white who pulled a shot gun on the blacks (and subsequently got it taken away from him) not charged with crime while the blacks who took it were?

If the shotgun was pulled in self-defense, and assuming that the shotgun was legally owned, and assuming that the youth was in legal possession of the shotgun, what crime committed by the white youth? Was or was not the shotgun used in self-defense? You don't know, do you? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

What were they supposed to do, give it back to him then turn their back and say "go ahead, make my day"?

Why did the white youth pull a shotgun on the black youths?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Why are you twisting the intent of the protest as opposed to addressing it for what it is and dealing with our true complaints? We are not trying to claim that the boy who was beaten was the criminal as you are impling here.

You're drawing conclusions. Do the complaints of you, the protesters and their supporters constitute any proof that the police, prosecutor and judge didn't act in accordance with Louisiana State Law and sentencing guidelines? Yes or no?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

No one is trying to rationalize or justify the actions of the Jena 6, we are only saying that the punishment should be comensurate with the crime for ALL involved. In this case it obviously isn't.

No, that's obviously not the case. Are you an expert on Louisiana State Law and sentencing guidelines? Yes or no?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

If you are unable to see the eniquity in this situation, it is because you are obviously deliberately blind to the facts surrounding the case.

You're drawing conclusions. Inequality is irrelevant. The punishment must fit the crime. Do you have any proof that the black youths didn't attack the white youth with the intent to commit murder? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Can you provide proof that the police, prosecutor, and judge didn't act in accordance with Louisiana State Law and sentencing guidelines? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Can you provide proof that there was any bias involved, or are you just speculating? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

If there was fair and appropriate prosecution in this case, tens of thousands of blacks would not have invested their time to travel across country in support of 6 boys.

You're drawing conclusions based on conjecture. Are these protesters experts on Louisiana State Law and sentencing guidelines? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glory2God

Not only are these questions "coherent" and logical, they are not "emotionally charged" as you would suggest all responses would be. If you can address these questions without getting "emotionally charged" I would appreciate it.

Is it possible that you, the protesters and their supporters are the one's who are/were emotionally-charged? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Is it possible that you, the protesters, and their supporters have no knowledge of Louisiana State Law and sentencing guidelines? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Do you, the protesters and their supporters have any proof that charges weren't filed in accordance with Louisiana State Law? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Do you, the protesters and their supporters any proof that the prosecutor and judge didn't prosecute and sentence in accordance with Louisiana State Law? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Do you, the protesters and their supporters have any evidence of bias? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Isn't it true that you're black, and isn't it true that Al Sharpton has a long history of making racial issues out issues that have nothing to do with race? Would Al Sharpton and the majority of protesters, most of whom were black, traveled to Jena, Louisiana if the tables were turned?

Well, those are my answers to your questions (in bold). If anyone wants to agree, disagree, or provide their own answers, go ahead.

Nothing you say is valid until you prove that 6 whites stomped an unconscious black guy and went unpunished for it in this town, as the best thing you have going for you is comparing apples to oranges... small "schoolyard" style fights as you put it, to attempted murder. Yeah, right.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

You do realize all you really did in that post was place your own racist perception on what events did occur?

Isn't that exactly what the blacks did in Jena, Louisiana? In fact, below, isn't it true that you, yourself place your own racial perception on things?

Isn't it true that you admit to "disowning" a majority of white Protestant males? What does all of this say about your credibility and ability to look at this issue objectively?

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

Arguing with WN about these events is about as useful as trying move sand in the desert.

Please spare us your ad hominem arguments.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

More or less the matter isn't completely race based as much as it pertains to human rights.

Incorrect. This has to do with crime and punishment, and whether or not the authorities acted in accordance with Louisiana State Law and sentencing guidelines. Also, let me remind you that you make this a racial issue below. That's not to mention the fact that you also prejudice yourself by admitting to "disowning" white Protestant males. You do nothing but discredit yourself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

Justin Baker was released from the hospital and well enough to attend a party/school function later that evening.

Is it possible that Justin Baker could have sustained a fatal injury during the brutal attack that was perpetrated against him? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

For these 6 males to be charged with attempted murder and trying to sentence them to life in prison is an outrage; THAT is why people were protesting today.

How is that an outrage?

Do you have any proof that the black youths didn't attack the white youth with the intent to commit murder? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Isn't it true that neither you nor the protesters are privy to any of the evidence or court documents? Please answer the question.

Isn't it true that you're stating an opinion without having any knowledge about Louisiana State Law? Please answer the question.

Can you show that the police, prosecutor and judge didn't act in accordance with Louisiana State Law and sentencing guidelines? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

More or less the Amerikkkan (sic) justice system has had a bias for the last 400 years.

Can you prove that racial bias played a role in this case? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

I am a Caucasian (although I claim my Italian [Sicilian] ancestry more or less to not be tied in to W. Europeans) and realize the atrocities that western society have unhinged on people of color and women alike in this country.

Irrelevant. Nothing stated above has any relevancy to what's being discussed here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

Jena, Louisiana is another case of trying to lynch blacks in an already completely corrupt judicial system.

Then you are making this a racial issue. How can you possibly chastise Metalman for placing his "racist" perception things when you're doing just that? You do realize that makes you a hypocrite? What does that say about your credibility?

Moreover, you're making an assertion based on an opinion. Opinions do not constitute facts. Do you have any facts to support your assertion? Yes or no? Please answer the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Lack Rationality

** I don't disacknowledge (sic) some contributions of W. civilization. I do disown a majority of Protestant white males who have allowed societies to completely embrace the idea of race and emphasised (sic) this and exploited this idea to continually turn profit in our capitalist system. Antiquity dealt nothing with race.

In addition to already making this a racial issue, you've just added insult to injury by stating your prejudice against white Protestant males. Having said that, you're incapable of looking at things objectively. That's why hypocritical bigots like you need to be held to the facts.

Whites got upset over negroes PUSHING themselves on people who did not want to hang around them. Why do you negroes want to be around people that don't want you?

Quote:

OK, then rationalize this without tap dancing. Oh, don't for get to use words such as fair, right, ethical, etc.
On Dec. 1, Bailey was jumped by six to seven white men at the Fair Barn and only one was arrested and charged with simple battery.

The party was private. The negroes tried to force their way in; they refused to take no for an answer. They were protecting the people that were actually invited.

If athug intrudes on my party (obviously uninvited) and refusing to leave, 16 or 40, he is going to meet Mr. Shotgun or Mr. Policeman, depending on what move the thug makes next.

Quote:

Justin Barker was taken by ambulance to LaSalle General Hospital’s emergency room, arriving at 12:25 p.m., according to court documents. A report from the ambulance company stated Barker “denies any pain other than his eye. Justin's injuries are not consistent with a beating that supposedly was intended to take his life. LaSalle General Hospital is little more than a bandaid station. If he has been at ANY risk of having a head injury or any potential problems he would have been transported to Alexandria, Shreveport, Baton Rouge or N.O. A single fist could have caused the damage to his left eye, knocked him to the ground and caused him to go unconcious. His injuries have been greatly exaggerated and do not support an attempted murder charge. People spend 2 hours in the ER for a cough. No open or closed head injury, no broken nose, no loose teeth, no busted lip, no broken ribs, nothing but a few scraps, a black eye and a concussion. It doesn't take a lot to get a concussion.

Concussions can cause long term consequences, and ANY time someone goes unconscious unwillingly, that is a need to be concerned for said person's life. You don't walk around getting concussions. It involves a significant injury to the head.

That is not only a medical fact but it is also COMMON SENSE, not that I would expect a negro to have any knowledge of either with an IQ that is barely on par with room temperature.

Quote:

On Dec. 1, Bailey was jumped by six to seven white men at the Fair Barn and only one was arrested and charged with simple battery.

Yes, because the ignorant thug tried to force himself on people, uninvited and unwelcome into a PRIVATE party. Bailey is a trouble making THUG.

That white kid that got beat up did NOTHING to deserve it. Was he trying to force himself on someone? What did the white kid do to get beat up?

Quote:

I have not given you any indication that "nobody should be punished" I simply support equal treatment.

If the situations were equal for all involved, that would be fair, but it is CLEAR that the negro thugs were actively seeking to cause others distress simply because somw whites didn't like them. That is NO reason to beat someone up. If it were, then white on black crime would be EXPONENTIAL.

Quote:

Punish all appropriately. Again, the injuries do not support the "still beating him" senerio.

Appropriately? If they were to be punished appropriately, then all the negroes involved would serve LIFE in prison without ANY possibility of parole. They wanted to kill that white kid. Your thug hero Bailey has shown no remorse for his MUDEROUS intent.

Quote:

His injuries have been greatly exaggerated. There is a huge leap from a treated and released concussion and death. He was treated and released from a small rural hospital. Small rural hospitals do not hesitate to transfer patients to a higher level of care if they deem it necessary. You can get a concussion from bumping your head

Concussions are the result of substantial truama, and can be severe, turn life-threatening, and even cause long-term complications. Rural hospitals can be very inefficient in both medical knowledge and treatment, and they will hesistate, especially since most are very short-handed. The nation is experiencing a severe and increasingly worse shortage of registered nurses.

Quote:

He had no head bleed or brain bruise or anything consistent with a serious or life threating injury.

No bleeding, but a concussion is an injury specifically to the brain.

Quote:

He had no teeth missing or loose, no broken nose, the pain that he claimed to have (convieniently) could not be explained medically. His brutal beating, while wrong, was not as brutal as you guys make out. Sure he has a nasty eye, but his injuries are not consistent with an attempted murder charge.

When there are six guys who beat a guy to the point of making him unconscious, how could the criminals NOT think that they could possibly kill their victim as they are beating him?

Quote:

It was several men against a boy.

Once again, you are missing the point. That negro was not innocent. He was justly attacked. He INVADED a private party; he came with the intention of causing trouble. The negro should have left when he was first told to instead of persisting. It was clearly the negro's fault.

Quote:

They can call the police. Adults who attack a child are unlawful vigilante justice. They are wrong.

That negro wasn't some innocent child of 10 years old. He is nearly of an adult age, violent, and dangerous. He was old enough to know that he:1. Should leave people alone if they don't want him around.2. He should not go to functions that he was not invited to.3. When asked to leave, he should have left.

He didn't. So, he got his black ass handed to him, and in a blind rage to kill whitey, he organized a lynching on an innocent white boy.

Quote:

If instigation is an excuse for an attack then Justin's would be ok.
Written statements from students closest to the scene (in space and time) suggest that the incident was sparked by an angry exchange in the gymnasium moments before in which the black student assaulted at the Fair Barn was taunted for having his “axx whipped” by adult white men.

Verbals tauntings cannot equate with giving someone a concussion in an outnumbered, unfair lynching. Negroes taunt whites all the time, everyday, threatening to KILL whites. So, I guess it would be okay if we went around beating up evry negro who taunts us? You are stupid...

That negro needed his ass whipped. What he did was reprehensible and completely uncivilized.

Quote:

I have no problems quoting Clint or any other person regardless of race if their words ring true or cute.

"So make my day" is cute or rings true to you?

Quote:

Stay on point. I have no time for your stupid games.

What games would those be?

Quote:

None of you like us? Very interesting. Why do WN's have zero political power. Why can't you whites who don't like us just vote us out of the country? Why do so many white women marry black men? Why does a murderer like O.J. still have a white girl friend. Oh, I get it, by none you mean no WN...O.K. it makes sense now.

"So many white women"? The vast majority of whites keep to their own people. Scientific studies have proven that....OJ has nothing to do with anything, He is a waste of space.

Now, why is there a negro crying because more whites didn't show up in support for those six thugs?

You would do well to remember that the silent majority of whites do not want to be around negroes. There are obvious indicators: (ie white flight, the huge volume of members and new members on SF).

Whites, especially WNs, are privy to the private feelings of other whites that negroes aren't. They tell us things.....

Quote:

Is that your attempt to call me a name?

No, I am simply addressing you as what you are.

Quote:

I have no problem being called negro.

If you don't have a problem being called that, then why did you assume that I was trying to call you a name or play childish games? Obviously, you are lying.

Quote:

It is part of who I am. It is no different than if you would call me "Man" or "Christian" or "father" or "husband" If you want to play childish games play alone.

The ones playing childish games are you and your ilk. You are protesting to free violent criminals as some political agenda to recieve more pity and handouts from whitey. Please continue because it will only help our cause by your stupidity and greed.

Quote:

As for as what I am implying, you can gather that from reading my statement without your blinders on.

Yes. It is quite clear what your AGENDA is. You support violent criminals for the purpose of a racial preference that you are neither entitled to nor have earned, and just believe, you are wasting your time.

Quote:

Remember the Fair Barn.

The negroes intruded and refused to leave. It was clearly THEIR fault at that PRIVATE party.

The white boy that got beat reportedly was not involved with the nooses.Even if he were, that did not warrant beating someone unconscious.

Freedom of speech. The negroes started the whole thing from day one by continuing to push themselves on people that don't want them. That causes racism, and that causes anger.

Quote:

So, tell me, how do you feel about interracial marriages Your hatred entertains me. Have a happy life

I don't take orders from negroes, and if you don't have some clue as to how I feel about interracial marriages, knowing full well that I am a WN, then you even more ignorant than your already retarded "brothas".

Myth: Black student asked principal if he could sit under 'White' tree

Truth: Black student JOCULARLY (jokingly) asked the principal if he could sit under the tree (the word white was not mentioned)

Myth: Nooses were hung in response to black students sitting under tree

Truth: Nooses were hung because of pep rally for an upcoming game against the cowboys along with signs saying 'hang'em high', 'Hang dem cowboys' and the like. Also BOTH blacks and whites were putting thier heads through the nooses in a joking manner

Myth: the DA was stictly refering to the blacks with his 'I could end your lifes with a stroke of a pen' statement

Truth: he was addressing EVERYONE who was cutting up, and being immatture (he was rather irritated no one was listening to him/taking him seriously) ; whites and blacks

Myth: a white guy beat up a black guy for trying to enter his all-white party

Truth: There were white and blacks at this INVITATION ONLY party; the one trying to enter where there trying to cause trouble.

Myth: A white man pulled a shotgun on a group of blacks, just because of thier color

Truth: The white man feared for his life being approuched by 3 black students trying to start a fight. So he ran to his truck because he was outnumbered

Myth: The white boy (Justin Baker) said something racial to deserve the beating he got

Truth: Justin was standing up for some of his friends, who were being harassed by the Jena Six

Myth: Justin was well enough to attend a social function (most interpet this as a party)

Truth: Justin attended a RING ceremony, something he's been waiting YEARS for. He was in excruciating pain, and left right after he got his ring.

Myth: The Jena six were 'Good ole boys'.. they were All-Star athletes.. etc..

Truth: while they were All Star athletes, yes..BUT most had prior convictions. Mychal Bell had 4 prior convictions AND was on probation at the time he helped beat up Justin Baker.

Myth: there was a racist ALL white jury

Truth: The jury was all white because the blacks that got a jury summons DIDN'T appear for jury duty..