It was precisely one week ago last night at 9:46pm PT (2:46pm in Japan) that the worst earthquake and tsunami on record in that country hit. It was just a few hours later when Tohoku Electric Power Co. officials said that cooling at one of three reactors at their Onagawa nuclear power plant was "not going as planned

That disturbing, yet quietly reported statement certainly caught the attention of The BRAD BLOG, even as it took another 24 to 48 hours before much of the rest of the media began offering appropriate focus on what could still become the most catastrophic nuclear power disaster the world has ever seen. (Though note: CNN still has plenty of resources to spare to deploy 150 staffers --- 150 --- to cover the royal wedding next month in England, so don't worry! Luckily it's likely to be yet another slow news month in April.)

While the Onagawa plant, where a fire had broken out during the quake, was ultimately brought under control and said to be cooling properly, the alarm caused by a rise in radiation levels at that plant turned out to be due to problems at the Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) six-reactor nuclear power plant at Daiichi in the neighboring Fukushima prefecture. Now, one week later, TEPCO officials, in a joint effort with the Japanese Govt. --- and finally a number of other international agencies --- are working around the clock to keep all six of the facility's nuclear reactors and/or the associated spent fuel storage pools at each, under control, to avoid complete meltdowns at any or all of them. The work is exceedingly dangerous, and the progress at this hour remains precarious at best.

Some progress is being made in restoring the power plant to the power grid, allowing for the potential restoration of cooling systems at the reactors, if the cooling systems still work at any of them, following earthquake, tsunami flood, multiple explosions, and fires.

So here is where each of those six reactors stands, at this moment (even as a trace amount of radiation is said to have now reached Southern California, where we are located), what the greatest fears still are, how the worst case-scenario still looms, and how Japan's completely undamaged wind farms are currently "saving Japan's ass," even as their nuclear power plants struggle to get back online and/or avoid epic catastrophe...

The following is the known status as of Friday night of each of the six reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and the four reactors at the Fukushima Daini plant, both in Fukushima Prefecture, which were crippled by the magnitude 9.0 earthquake and the ensuing tsunami on March 11.

-- Reactors No. 5, 6 - Under maintenance when quake struck, some fuel rods left in reactor cores, water temperatures in spent-fuel storage pools increased to about 64 C on Thursday.

-- Spent-fuel storage pools - Cooling functions lost at reactors No. 1 to 4, water temperatures or levels unobservable at reactors No. 1 to 4, no immediate threat to water level at common spent fuel pool.

As you can see, the latest temperature readings for the fuel pools in Daiichi's Units 4, 5 & 6 --- the units which had already been off-line for maintenance prior to the earthquake/tsunami --- are approximately 84° C, 64° C, and 64° C respectively, with temperature readings impossible to get from Unit 4, due to high radiations levels, since last Monday.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which, as we've previously observed, has been slow to offer details, and very few of them at that, seems to be upping its game, finally, in its latest updates on the situation, following IAEA Chief Yukiya Amano's emergency meeting last night with Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan.

According to the IAEA's report from earlier today, "a typical spent fuel pool temperature is kept below 25° C under normal operating conditions." That's what the temperatures at the Units 4, 5 & 6 pools should be. Each of them, however, according to Yokodo's summary above, as well as IAEA's data, is now said to be far in excess of that temperature, as each has been slowly heating up over the last several days, even as officials have been necessarily prioritizing their focus on cooling Units 1, 2 & 3, where extremely hot reactors had been up and operating until the moment they were automatically shut down when the earthquake struck.

If workers are unable to get additional cooling water into the reactor vessel, the molten fuel core will collapse into the water in bottom of the vessel. Eventually the heat from the decaying fuel would boil away the water that's left, leaving the core sitting on the vessel's lower head made of steel. Should that happen, "It'll melt through it like butter," Allen said.

That, in turn, would cause a "high-pressure melt injection" into the water-filled concrete cavity below the reactor. Because the concrete would likely be unheated, the reaction created by the sudden injection of the reactor's ultra-hot content would be immense, he said.

"It'll be like somebody dropped a bomb, and there'll be a big cloud of very, very radioactive material above the ground," Allen said, noting that it would contain uranium and plutonium, as well as the fission products.

According to a group of U.S. nuclear experts during a panel discussion at the National Press Club in D.C. today, the current actions of the Japanese government, including the dangerous deployment of helicopter water drops and water cannon trucks on Thursday, suggest they are "desperate" at this point...

The efforts, [according to Robert Alvarez, a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies and an adviser to the U.S. secretary of energy in the 1990s], were ''improvisations on the playbook'' for stopping a nuclear meltdown.

Alvarez's claim that there are no good options left for addressing the crisis is evidenced by the risky approach Tokyo has taken to cooling the reactors.

When combined with the high heat at the reactor site, the seawater currently being poured on the facilities could destroy their cooling pumps or even corrode the containment vessels holding the plant's nuclear fuel, increasing the difficulty of containing the radioactive material.

''This is what you call the last-ditch stuff,'' Alvarez said, noting that the severity of the crisis had taken the standard, safer options for responding ''off the table.''

In the short term, Alvarez expects that even these extreme measures will be unable to stop the crisis.

''It doesn't appear at this time that they are working. The accident is likely to unfold over a period of weeks,'' he said.

Last night, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow offered a clear, cogent, humane explanation of the concerns which now focus specifically on the spent fuel rods at Units 4 (where a "renewed nuclear chain reaction [is] feared"), 5 & 6, and even at reactors 1 through 3 where spent fuel is also stored on site in cooling ponds which, unlike rods in the reactors themselves, are unprotected by steel vessels and concrete containment structures. She's worth watching here:

Late today --- early tomorrow, Japan time --- TEPCO officials announced that power has been partially restored from the grid to the crippled power plant. It remains unknown, as Maddow mentioned above in her report from last night, whether or not the cooling systems themselves will still work, even after power is turned back on at Fukushima Daiichi:

"Once we have an electric power supply, we will go slowly and carefully through the plant checking the various machines to see what is working and to also avoid short-circuiting them," a Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency official said at a briefing.

Agency spokesman Hidehiko Nishiyama said workers were trying to restore power to the plant's No. 1 and No. 2 reactors Saturday and at the No. 3 and No. 4 reactors by Sunday, Kyodo News says.

If power and cooling systems can be restored, we may be able to avoid these worst-case scenarios. "If not," Reuters reports, "there is an option of last resort under consideration to bury the sprawling 40-year-old plant in sand and concrete to prevent a catastrophic radiation release."

That was the method used to ultimately kill the unprecedented radiation billowing from the crippled Chernobyl reactor back in 1986. Next month will be the 25th anniversary of that disaster, the world's worst nuclear power catastrophe to date. Though many experts have said over the past week that Fukushima, with its six reactors, cannot be worse than the failure at Chernobyl's one, due to the designs of the Japanese units, the evidence detailed above suggests the advice of such experts --- the same ones who, for years, have told us that even this much was exceedingly unlikely to ever occur --- should perhaps be taken with many more grains of salt than the world has taken them up until now.

If Japan's wind turbines were to get a new theme song, it would be Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries", and it would ring out from the hills upon which they stand triumphantly, unscathed by the the country's earthquake/tsunami double whammy, lifting their skinny, still-turning blades like antennas to heaven.

While Japan's water-dependent nuclear power plants suck and wheeze and spew radioactive steam, "there has been no wind facility damage reported by any [Japan Wind Energy Association] members, from either the earthquake or the tsunami," says association head Yoshinori Ueda.

Mims notes this "Bonus" about the country's wind farms --- all wind farms, for that matter --- "when they break down, no one has to give their life to keep them from turning one of the world's most densely populated countries into a radioactive hellscape!"

Duly noted. At least by those of us here in Southern California where, it was reported earlier today, radiation fallout from the Fukushima disaster has now been detected, though "far below levels which could pose a health hazard," according to the "experts".

On the other hand, there is little doubt that the nuclear industry, and those who profit off them --- which is to say, many, likely the majority, of politicians and decision makers in both the Republican and Democratic parties in this country --- will work hard to not notice the success of the mighty wind farms in Japan in the weeks, months and years ahead.

We spoke about some of those points, including the "bankrupt, corrupt and criminal companies" still forcing nuclear power on the nation, during my interview on KPFK/Pacifica yesterday with BBC journalist Greg Palast. Earlier this week, Palast, formerly a government investigator of corrupt nuclear power companies, wrote at Truthout about the Obama administration's support of plans for TEPCO --- yes, the same TEPCO --- to build two new nuclear reactors on the Gulf Coast of Texas. What could possibly go wrong?

Oh, and a few more political side notes... --- Last week we observed that Japan's "big government tyranny" likely saved tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of lives last week, due to the country's exceedingly strict building codes --- the type which so-called "Tea Partiers" would undoubtedly be delighted to dismantle in the name of "freedom".

On a similar note, its worth briefly noting here that we've yet to hear a single complaint from the "freedom" warriors on the Right about Japan's "big government" intrusion on the rights of TEPCO, the private power company which owns and operates the Fukushima plant, to fix their own problems at their own nuclear plant. Japan has deployed an enormous amount of government resources in hopes of saving the lives of millions of its citizens near Fukushima and beyond, yet we've not heard a peep of criticism about it from the "Tea Party". Apparently they are secret socialists after all.

But don't worry. Nuclear power-lover Ann Coulter, at least, feels that there's nothing to worry about anyway. "There's a growing body of evidence that radiation in excess of what the government says are the minimum amounts you are supposed to be exposed to, are actually good for you, and reduce cases of cancer," she told Bill O'Reilly last night on Fox "News".

Perhaps she'd like to take a health vacation to Fukushima? We suspect the exhausted 180 crew members working heroically around the clock right now, under horrific conditions, likely sacrificing themselves for their country and the world at this very moment, could use an extra set of hands right about now. Whadaya say, Ann? It'd be "good for you"! And us.

* * *

Addendum... Meant to include this in the article originally, but forgot. These are the tweets from the Japanese Prime Minister's office (@JPN_PMO) last night, at precisely one week from when their great disaster struck.

JPN relevant gov't organizations will continue to make a concerted effort to conduct rescue & aid operation for the affected areas.

(Cont) We'll work harder to give you the relevant info in timely manner to meet your needs (Cont)

(Cont) Your suggestions and comments are greatly appreciated.

Prime Minister's Office official website (English) has been updated (http://bit.ly/fkNcMM). We hope you will find it helpful.

It's as difficult to imagine that kind of humility from the U.S. government --- no matter who was in charge of it --- as it is to imagine the head of a U.S. corporation, say, General Electric (designer of Fukushima's nuclear reactors), weeping in public at the pain and death their company has helped to bring, as TEPCO's managing director, Akio Komori, is seen doing in the photograph at the top of this article.

* * *

We will continue, as we have for the past week, to follow noteworthy and breaking Fukushima developments both here at The BRAD BLOG and, with even more speed around the clock, via Twitter right here: @TheBradBlog.

been looking for info all day... (guess my googling skills suck) the most "new" information I could come up with was that the Japanese had elevated their crisis to that of Three Mile Island (WTF?!?! I still can't figure out how 4-6 broken, battered, spewing radiation constantly and physically damaged beyond anything that's happened before reactors and exposed fuel pools can be considered on the same level of as TMI on the Oh Fuck! scale of nuclear failures) and at the same time they were ranking it, were saying that they may have to bury it under sand and cement to contain the radiation....

To help for the cooling, it seems like a whole bunch of snow-making machines and snow cannons (like the ones used for ski slopes) might be more efficient than dropping water from helicopters. The problem would be to get those machines fast enough; and to supply them with water (they need a lot).

the only tears the Goldman Sachs execs shed have been tears of joy --- at the billions of taxpayer $'s that they've used to pad their bonuses and payoff congress / regulators / and fund their next speculative derivative ventures..

Was it Man Coulter who played that psycho dude in Repo Man? "Radiation, yes indeed! You hear the most outrageous lies about it. Half-baked goggle-boxed do-gooders telling everybody it’s bad for you. Pernicious nonsense! Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year. They ought to have 'em too."

(In the ongoing and lively discussions here about all this shit I keep learning a lesson I've been learning over and over and over again at Bradblog--I need to be more precise with my language and more thoughtful in my responses. Thanks for giving me the ongoing examples of where the bar should be, Brad.)

Anyone seen a diagram of control rooms (CR) location for Daiichi? i.e. are CR for units #2, #3, #4 grouped together, and separate from older #1 CR? If one gets radioactive hot, they could all could get hot. Perhaps CR's are located in the adjacent turbine building on the seaward side of reactor buildings? That brings up another interesting question. Being the tsunami wave flowed over the seawall, did the wave pass through the turbine buildings, into and through the reactor buildings? Have not seen photos of the tsunami passing thru either!

Just read on web that #3 and #4 have a shared Control Room. I'd imagine it must be located in a building on opposite side of containment from the turbine-generator building. The turbine building is quite huge. Hard to see how the tsunami could have swept over the seawall and the turbine building --- unless it passed through. Or, might have tsunami gone around the turbine building, and then entered reactor building as the flood receded.

Assume the weeping Director has had no sleep at all in the past week, and has been under immense pressure to lie the entire time on behalf of the Grand Conspirators - bringing great shame to himself and family.

I think it's time to apply a little sleep deprivation to the likes of Rove, the Koch Brothers, David Rockefeller, GHW Bush, GW, Rummy, Cheney, Zakheim, Zelikow, Rice, Libby, Wolfowitz, Netanyahu, Blair, Feith, Wurmser, Silverstein, Lauder, and their ilk, and see what guilt comes-up for them.

After all, it's not torture any more, and our national security is clearly at stake. Seems to fall squarely within the parameters of the permissible under the Patriot Act.

So that's hopeful as they've been pumping seawater into #1 & #2 and external generators are now cooling #5 & #6.

They've gotten a power line from the national grid to the plant but it will take time to route new connections to each of the units through the plant's hammered and flooded electrical infrastructure. Sometime Sunday is the estimate given.

The bad-but-expected news.

Milk and spinach from farms in the area have turned up contaminated and have been removed from the market... hopefully. And even if they get the plant units back under cooling that situation is going to get worse before it gets better .

Finally, someone else who has brain between the ears! It has become increasingly difficult to get truthful reporting and facts on the above story... Now that radiation is blowing to the USA, I fear we shall receive less and less of the truth, particularly from our own government. Interesting that before the radiation came to the USA, newscasters were already, "forewarning" us that the cloud would be dissipated. What a bunch of crap. Where do those radiation ions go? They just magically disappear? Thanks for the photo above.. The tears say it all. I believe 5 and 6 are not safe... I am sure nobody has been inside and more than likely have NO IDEA what the situation is there. I would not be surprised to see a meltdown of all 4 reactors, and perhaps 5 and 6. Firehoses are the equivalent of spray bottles in this situation, and if/just because they have electrical power doesn't mean the crisis is even close to being over. I bet once the rods become so hot, there may be a point where you cannot cool them down, no matter what you do. Just a thought. Nice blog!

There are nuclear concerns here in California that go well beyond the disbursed low-level fall out from Fukushima.

As Joe R. Reynolds, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, noted in U.S. nuclear industry: Not safe enough, the Central California Diablo Canyon nuclear plant "sits just a couple miles from the Hosgri earthquake fault, which is believed to be capable of generating a magnitude 7.5 temblor."

When Reynolds and others raised earthquake concerns 25 years ago, they were summarily rejected by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, by a 5-4 vote, agreed with the commission. In a decision written by then-Judge Robert Bork (and joined by, among others, now-Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and former special prosecutor Kenneth Starr), it concluded that the probability of a simultaneous earthquake and radiological accident at Diablo Canyon was "so small as to be rated zero" and, on that basis, that the commission was right to ignore it.

Judge Patricia Wald, joined by now-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and others, dissented vehemently, calling the NRC's decision "inexplicable in legal, logical or common-sense terms." Wald excoriated the majority for "pretending that earthquakes are not material to emergency planning" for a nuclear accident at Diablo Canyon, and she concluded that if the majority was wrong, "history will allow no rehearing."

Nuclear power is but one example of the willingness of these "radicals-in-robes" to abandon logic, law and public safety if they come at the expense of the profits of the investor class.