The United States of America, the global policeman, is “changing
its relationship with the people of Cuba”, as President Barack
Obama put it. With this announcement of a resumption of diplomatic relations
after John F. Kennedy severed them January 1, 1961 we need to evaluate
what is behind it and what is positive and negative.

I feel compelled to spell out my take on this new policy after having
Cuba in my heart for five decades, from the day of my first protest
during the Bay of Pigs invasion, April 1961, and after living there
and working for the Cuban government from1987 to 1996. (1)

The Positive

1. The brave, patriotic Cuban Five are freed from US torture chambers
and reunited with their loved ones in their own country.

2. Obama inadvertently admitted that Cuba is not a terrorist state
when he instructed Secretary of State John Kerry, a former war criminal
in Vietnam turned repentant, to reconsider the US designation of Cuba
as a “state sponsor of terror”. While the US knows that
Cuba has never supported terrorism nor has it conducted such, the US
is clearly THE terrorist state of the times.

3. Obama also inadvertently admitted that Cuba does not torture its
people, including prisoners, as does the US, when he said that “no
Cubans should face harassment or arrest or beatings”. These measures
do not constitute torture, even if Cuban authorities have harassed or
beaten some people. It can be argued that this is wrong but it is not
torture. Just days before Obama’s speech, on December 17, the
Senate issued a partial report on how the CIA has tortured people in
many countries, including at the US military base on Cuban territory
at Guantánamo, on land it stole from Cuba in 1898, and yet no
one is to be held accountable. Just imagine reversing this reality.
Imagine that Cuba stole land from the US and placed a military base
on it and then brought people there from several countries without any
judicial process, held them confined for years without recourse and
tortured them consistently.

Beatings at US “blacks sites”, as they called them, or
at rendition secret jails in countries the US now wars against (Syria
and Libya), was kids play. These leaders of democracy and human rights
rammed broomsticks up rectums, used water boarding or near drowning,
sexual/rape abuse in many ways including tearing rectums apart, forced
sleep deprivation for several days, shackling hands over heads without
touching the ground for days, constant loud noises, threatened torture
and murder of prisoners’ children and parents…And that is
what is admitted.

The US has continually accused Cuba of torturing its people, and yet
has never come up with evidence. Yet it has tortured hundreds of thousands
of human beings, including in its own prisoners, for two centuries?
The US even conducts torture training to LatinAmerican military personnel
at a military base at Fort Bragg, Georgia, the School of the Americas.

Negative

1. The US government realizes that the socialist revolution in Cuba
is dead. Its people are fed up with empty revolutionary sloganeering
from the bureaucracy. The vast majority of the people are so disheartened
with the lack of real socialism, implying real participatory democracy,
that what they seek is what most people in the world of disillusion
wish for: consumerism and every man/woman for him/her self. So Obama
can coolly state: “I am convinced that through a policy of engagement,
we can more effectively stand up for our values and help the Cuba people
help themselves as they move into the 21st century.”

2. US capitalists wish to end the blockade so that they can earn profits.
Rockefeller and many other major and middle capitalists have long conducted
an association that seeks an end to the blockade.

3. The Cuban bureaucratic government also seeks an end to the blockade
so that it can continue to avoid advancing the permanent revolution
set in motion in the early days, which would require implementing true
decision-making by the people, and ownership of the economy by those
who produce and those who serve, thereby gradually eliminating an elitist
leadership.

4. Cuba is on the run backwards to capitalism, even neo-liberalism.
What can be expected with this change of US policy is that Cuba will
continue in reverse, begging for trade with capitalist-imperialist-warmongering
US corporations and their government. A true socialist program both
within Cuba and within the already stifled ALBA alliance (Cuba, Venezuela,
Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua and three Caribbean island states) is basically
trashed.

As Paul Craig Roberts wrote (http://dissidentvoice.org/2014/12/regime-change-in-cuba/):

“Normalization is a result of US corporations seeking profit
opportunities in Cuba, such as developing broadband Internet markets.”
With normalization “comes American money and a US Embassy. The
American money will take over the Cuban economy. The embassy will be
a home for CIA operatives to subvert the Cuban government. The embassy
will provide a base from which the US can establish NGOs whose gullible
members can be called to street protest at the right time…Normalization
of relations means regime change in Cuba.”

That comes from a former US government assistant secretary of the treasury.
And that is what Cuban solidarity folk should be worried about instead
of calling upon Cuban supporters to give thanks to Obama, the leader
of the greatest terrorist state in the history of humanity.

(1) See my CV and books about Cuba http://www.ronridenour.com/about.htm,
and my analyses of Cuba at www.ronridenour.com