Dems call in celebrity reinforcements to fight GMO bill

WASHINGTON, Aug.
5, 2015 -- Hollywood royalty in the personae of actresses Blythe Danner and daughter Gwyneth Paltrow came to Capitol Hill Wednesday to
support legislation offered by Senate Democrats that would require labeling of
foods containing genetically-modified ingredients. They also hope to fight any
momentum that may be building from a recently approved House bill that would
preempt a patchwork of state-by-state efforts mandating such labels.

The House bill, The
Safe and Affordable Food Act, (H.R. 1599), was approved by a healthy 275-150
margin, with the support of 45 Democrats.

“We’re
recruiting celebrities because we’re being outspent (by the anti-GMO labeling
lobby) 25 to 1,” asserted Gary Hirshberg, the chairman of Just Label It
(JLI), an advocacy group for GMO labeling and the head of Stonyfield Farm, an
organic yogurt company. Stonyfield operates as a subsidiary of Groupe Danone, a
multinational food products company based in France, whose brands include Evian
bottled water and Dannon yogurt.

And the message,
from congressional Democrats and their Hollywood allies is a simple one, Sen.
Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., told the small crowd gathered for the event.

“Americans have
the right to know what’s in the food they eat.”

The Genetically
Engineered Right to Know Act (S 809) is the bill Sen. Boxer and others are offering to counter the
House’s bill, the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act
(HR 1599),which the Democrats have been calling the
“DARK Act,” for “Denying Americans the Right to Know.” The Senate bill would
require that companies label food products made with genetically modified
organisms, under the guidance of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The House bill
would do almost the opposite by prohibiting states from mandating that
companies label GMOs, and instead setting up a voluntary labeling program where
companies can certify their products through USDA.

“The folks that
voted for this (House) bill are the same folks who talk about the supremacy of
the states’ rights, but it seems like states’ rights don’t count when it comes
to giving breaks to big corporations,” said Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont.

Speaking of the
anti-GMO labeling campaign, Tester, an organic farmer and a strong proponent of
the organic industry, said “there’s a train coming down the tracks in our food
industry that is going to change agriculture forever… and it’s not going to
change things in a good way.”

Scott Faber,
Just Label It’s executive director and a vice president with the Environmental
Working Group, said the House bill was anti-competitive and a roadblock to
innovation.

“Organic and
non-GMO are the fastest growing segments out there with double-digit growth and
to deny Americans that choice is to effectively deny the marketplace of growth
that we need in the future.”

Currently, Faber
said, there are 64 countries that require GMO labeling, and while the United
States requires non-nutritional labeling for “dolphin-free” tuna or “from
concentrate” on orange juice cartons, there is no mandatory, non-nutritional
label for GMOs.

“We shouldn’t
even be having to fight this DARK Act,” said Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy. In
his home state of Vermont, companies will be required to label GM food products
next year if a federal bill isn’t passed in the interim and if the state law
calling for such labels survives legal challenges.

“What is so
frightening about allowing consumers to know what they’re buying and feeding
their families?” Leahy asked. He said that when Vermont residents were asked
the same question, they said “it has to be our choice, not some company hiding
what they’re doing.”

Paltrow said
that while, she’s “not here as an expert” on GMOs, she is a mother with “a
right to know what’s in the food that I feed my family.” According to a recent poll conducted by JLI, many Americans – more
than 88 percent of those surveyed – want to know too.

Danner got
teary-eyed as she addressed the audience, reflecting on the JLI campaign that
recently delivered a petition asking for labeling to the FDA with 1.4 million signatures. Another JLI
petition
against the House bill featuring a photo of Paltrow has attracted more than 200,000
signatures in the past six days.

The Coalition for Safe and Affordable Food, which includes the American Farm Bureau
Federation, most national and state commodity groups, as well as major
companies such as Monsanto and DuPont, dismissed the appeal by Hollywood.

Spokeswoman
Claire Parker said the actresses were “out of touch” and their advocacy was an
attempt to “enshrine their lifestyle choices into law while ignoring the
everyday realities facing American families.”

“We are
confident the Senate will stand with science and American families rather than
the extreme agendas of Hollywood elites and that common sense and scientific consensus
will win out over media spectacle,” Parker said in a statement.

In a letter to lawmakers last month, the Grocery Manufacturers
Association said that state GMO labeling requirements “would cost food and
beverage manufacturers millions of dollars given the changes to food labels and
supply chain systems that would have to be made as a result.”

This week’s guest on Open Mic is Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. The renewable fuels industry is encouraged by a White House pledge to sell E-15 year round, but is concerned about the final outcome of the Trump administration’s discussions on the Renewable Fuel Standard. Skor suggests some possible conclusions might immediately lower corn prices and threaten thousands of renewable energy jobs. She is also concerned about hardship waivers granted by the EPA and has doubts about Administrator Pruitt’s commitment to fulfilling President Trump’s pledge to support renewable energy.

The farm bill suffered a familiar and disappointing fate on the House floor this week, going down in a 198-213 vote. Agri-Pulse's Phil Brasher and Spencer Chase talk about what happened and what's next.

The world of agriculture extends beyond what’s growing in your field or living in your barn, and here at Agri-Pulse, we understand that. We make it our duty to inform you of the most up-to-date agricultural and rural policy decisions being made in Washington D.C. and examine how they will affect you – the farmer, the lobbyist, the government employee, the educator, the consultant and the concerned citizen.