This approach holds that when a social or political group created above any institution to which attacks and destroys permanently (as part of its proselytizing efforts) are installed in society chaos and anarchy, which usually end up finishing with who drives them. For those who support this theory, chaos logic is simple and boils down that does not recognize anything of what was done previously; those who favor chaos does not undergo any law because they do not believe in the rule of law. It is assumed that they promoted their interests on the generals, ridiculing or despising the institutions that exist before, contempt order and the hierarchy. Those who think so confuse chaos with anarchy (one of your triggers) Economic Crisis and social chaos after the monumental work coordinated by Giovanni Arrighi and Beverly Silver, chaos and order in the modern world 12 system, sufficient arguments there to conclude about the relationship between crises and social struggles and illuminate something else the situation current capitalist system. Indeed, the study argues, with abundant comparative information, which the bad call the economic crisis starts following a wave of factory worker militancy in the 1960s, he was able to spray model Fordist-taylorist clamping and monitoring of workers.

The current situation can be read, under that rationale, as a consequence of long duration of the wave of movements which forced the capital move, transmuting of productive capital in speculative financial capital. Beyond of an always necessary debate on theoretical issues, it is worthwhile stop at such an approach, since it can contribute to a better understanding of the actual movement that is happening before our eyes. The first issue is that crises are not those that motivate social action but upside: mobilization, the breakdown of controls, is what causes rearrangements in the mode of domination, forcing the above changes controlentropicos, not only in the field of the economy but changes societal covering all aspects of life.