Greenland becomes new promised land for oil firms

April 5, 2011
by Slim Allagui

File photo of the Ilulissat Icefjord, western Greenland, a UNESCO World Heritage site. Large, untapped oil and gas reserves have been attracting oil firms to Greenland, which hopes the resources will help speed up its independence, but there is unwanted attention from environmentalists.

Large, untapped oil and gas reserves have been attracting oil firms to Greenland, which hopes the resources will help speed up its independence, but there is unwanted attention from environmentalists.

"We have never seen as much interest for oil exploration in Greenland," said Joern Skov Nielsen, who heads the territory's oil and minerals office.

Greenland's government in November distributed seven prospecting blocs in the Baffin Bay, west of Greenland, among eight major oil companies, including ConocoPhillips of the United States, Anglo-Dutch giant Shell and Scotland's Cairn Energy.

According to the US geological survey (USGS), more than a fifth of the world's undiscovered oil and gas resources lie north of the Polar circle.

Some 84 percent of these are located at sea, and they would altogether represent 13 percent of the world's oil resources and 30 percent of the planet's natural gas.

Those estimates put the oil reserves in Greenlandic waters at some 52 billion oil barrels, 17 billion of which would lie between the island's west coast and the eastern coast of Canada's Baffin island, and 31.4 billion to Greenland's north-east.

Cairn Energy, which heads the race to capture Greenlandic oil and gas, drilled three oil wells last year and deemed them successful.

Its operations were interrupted by Greenpeace for two days, but it was not enough to deter the company, which will be drilling four more wells this year.

"2011 was our third year of operation in Greenland and we will invest some 500 million dollars there this year (350 million euros), bringing our total investment there to more than one billion dollars," the company's commercial director Simon Thomson told AFP.

And Greenland's fossil fuels are not only promising for the companies rushing to exploit them.

The Greenlandic government is also hoping oil and gas will lead the way to gaining economic and political independence from Denmark.

"Oil has the greatest potential to help us achieve economic independence," said Ove Karl Berthelsen, minister for industry and mineral resources minister of Greenland, where most of the 56,000 mostly Inuit inhabitants survive on fishing and subsidies from Copenhagen.

The head of Greenland's government, Kuupik Kleist, told a conference of Inuit leaders in Ottawa in February offshore oil and gas should even become the island's main economic activity.

"The status quo is not acceptable for Greenland. We do not want to be dependent solely on traditional activities like fishing and hunting," he said.

Still, he said, the Greenlandic government is conscious of the risks associated with the exploitation of fossil fuels.

"It is essential to find a balance between economic development and the other interests of society ... and to involve the population in the decision making process."

Berthelsen told AFP that Nuuk "does not want oil exploration to destroy our main resource, fishing" and the Greenland government tightened regulations around deep-sea drilling following the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Encouraged by the interest in its last licensing round, Greenland will launch a new one at the end of this year for the north-east of the island.

"We have great, great hopes for that region where the possibility of finding fossil fuels is very high, up to 70 percent," said Nielsen, the head of the minerals office.

Global warming "could turn the region into an Eldorado", he said, explaining it had the same geology as northwestern Norway, where important discoveries have been made.

But environmental organisation Greenpeace does not see the same promises in Greenland's untapped oil, calling it "a suicidal race for fossil fuels" in what is an already fragile environment.

"It has to be stopped, because Greenland's government does not have the capacity to control the companies' drilling," Mads Flarup Christensen of Greenpeace Nordic told AFP.

The environmental organisation is being arrogant, according to Nielsen.

"We can very well insure regular controls with the help of Norwegian and Canadian experts, just as we did with Cairn's first drillings," he said.

Kleist went even further.

"Greenpeace -- just like in its campaigns against the seal hunt -- is once again putting a break on chances for a better future" for the Inuit of Greenland, he said.

Recommended for you

Five million years ago, the Colorado River met the Gulf of California near the present-day desert town of Blythe, California. The evidence, say University of Oregon geologists, is in the sedimentary rocks exposed at the edges ...

Pressure, temperature and fluid composition play an important role in the amount of metals and other chemicals found in wastewaters from hydraulically fractured gas reservoirs, according to Penn State researchers.

Pioneering work being carried out in a cave in New Mexico by researchers at McMaster University and The University of Akron, Ohio, is changing the understanding of how antibiotic resistance may have emerged and how doctors ...

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with the European Commission's Joint Research Centre and Google Switzerland has combined historical data with modern mapping engines to produce high-resolution maps of the world's surface ...

The ice sheet covering Greenland is four times bigger than California—and holds enough water to raise global sea-level more than twenty feet if most of it were to melt. Today, sea levels are rising and the melting of Greenland ...

Isn't that always the case? Gosh, who other than "other environmentalists" would want attention from environmentalists? Is it too much to ask for an article like this, i.e. essentially news oriented and meant to update the rest of us on what's going on in this particular slice of the world, be written without having to drag in "global warming" nonsense, nor allow it to be used as a platform for the leftist BANANA (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anybody) Greens to espouse the astonishing fact that they're anti-actual-progress? (You're against drilling? Really? I am so shocked!)

'Lest the message get lost in the din, let me remind the "environmentalists" that only rich, technologically advanced, and expanding economies can afford to do anything about ecology and the environment. You guys are intentionally mislabeled in order to deceive.