You are the one making the claims that you speak of. The burden of proof rests with you. It is not my job to do the research to support your claims.
That isn't how it works in academia, and that's not how it works in the real world.

I will look into the books you've spoken of, but if these are not peer reviewed then they're not considered valid resources either.

You are the one making the claims that you speak of. The burden of proof rests with you. It is not my job to do the research to support your claims.
That isn't how it works in academia, and that's not how it works in the real world.

I will look into the books you've spoken of, but if these are not peer reviewed then they're not considered valid resources either.

The story for general consumption is Hitler died in the bunker with Eva. The fact that only the top Nazis even knew of Eva Braun involvement with
Adolph, over the thirteen years they associated tells of what little the general public knew about the higher echelons, of the party. The Old money of
our capitalist world, dosn't believe in a socialist Utopia. Why would you waste money on education and health on the lesser beings. Before the
Industrial revolution, most of the people were servants in the houses of the wealthy, secure and quiet servitude, the alternatives were not pleasant.
So if anyone were to look around and ask yourself how are things going today, one would have to at least acknowledge that were in a far more right
wing situation than we were after the end of the second world war.granted that welfare payments are the norm, but they are just adequate to prevent
chaos but not for sustanence. Which does rather suggest that at least some of the goals of National Socialism seem to be alive and well. With Germany
running Europe, and holding the purse strings.

This has nothing to do with the information I requested nor does it have any substance. Please provide sources to support the claims raised in this
thread, or there is no discussion to be had here, let alone proof.

This has nothing to do with the information I requested nor does it have any substance. Please provide sources to support the claims raised in this
thread, or there is no discussion to be had here, let alone proof.

There is less information available to suggest Hitler had committed suicide. So I could also ask where is the proof of Hitlers death, besides he said
she said? www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...

If there is less information to suggest that, then why when I search EBSCO or the library of Congress or any public records in Germany do I only find
sources citing as such? Furthermore, you have not provided any peer reviewed sources yet which support your claims - that is - you have supplied no
evidence or proof. If there are so many sources, why haven't they been cited yet?

The topic OP is what is in review here as such it is the responsibility of the camp to find sources to support the claim that Adolf Hitler survived.
That has not been done yet. Please don't derail the topic.

If there is less information to suggest that, then why when I search EBSCO or the library of Congress or any public records in Germany do I only find
sources citing as such? Furthermore, you have not provided any peer reviewed sources yet which support your claims - that is - you have supplied no
evidence or proof. If there are so many sources, why haven't they been cited yet?

The topic OP is what is in review here as such it is the responsibility of the camp to find sources to support the claim that Adolf Hitler survived.
That has not been done yet. Please don't derail the topic.

edit on 10.10.2013 by Shugo because: (no reason given)

Sorry but if Eisenhower said "That we have been unable to find one piece of evidence of Hitlers death" and Joseph Stalin when asked by Trueman
says "He escaped to Spain or Argentina" then the level of proof you require is unobtainable.

But you have not provided any evidence to support that he actually said that yet. You have not linked to any credible sources or recommended any peer
reviewed texts. Your word doesn't translate into fact if you don't have anything to base it on, and as of yet you haven't provided anything of the
sort.

But you have not provided any evidence to support that he actually said that yet. You have not linked to any credible sources or recommended any peer
reviewed texts. Your word doesn't translate into fact if you don't have anything to base it on, and as of yet you haven't provided anything of the
sort.

You mean the link that has no bibliography or citations to valid sources? Yes, I looked at that and threw it out because it does not have any grounds
for factual information. It's basically just another post in this thread without evidence.

Again, please provide a valid source where your claims are supported, or there is no argument to support the idea.

Nazi Bases In Antarctica
How The United States Lost The Second World War
Polar Defenses, German Space Base, South Atlantic, Rand Corp.
German Flying Disc, Falkland Island War
Civil War Is About To Begin In The United States

When a website has rubbish like

Excerpted from RED ALERT REPORT, Aug. '96, [quoting:] International cross-checking verified sources and other absolute reliable and
"unprecedented" sources of documentation [DATED JUNE 1996] tell us that this time is for "REAL". No fiction, no imagination, no process of
deduction, the "TOP SECRET" scenario we now have in our hands is just BEYOND EVERYTHING EVER IMAGINED BEFORE. We can surely state that no one else
anywhere has the "FULL COMPLETE PICTURE" with all accurate details of what has been carefully planned at the highest level of the world Politics and
Economic Elite for something (BIG) to happen in 1997 which will disrupt life of millions of people. With full, well documented documents strongly
supported by various serious unknown Politics and Military hard evidence files copies and actual documents for a major prearranged "Chaos", WE KNOW:
* "WHY, HOW and WHEN a "DECLARATION OF A NATIONAL STATE OF EMERGENCY" in the U.S. will emerge during night time, and which are the 19 States that
will be placed under "MARTIAL LAW"?

You are the one making the claims that you speak of. The burden of proof rests with you. It is not my job to do the research to support your claims.
That isn't how it works in academia, and that's not how it works in the real world.

I will look into the books you've spoken of, but if these are not peer reviewed then they're not considered valid resources either.

Shugo, let me just point out that as DNA tests have now proved that the burnt body previously identified as that of Adolf Hitler was in fact NOT Adolf
Hitler, where does that leave all your 'peer reviewed' academia? It proves that it's nothing more than fallacy, nonsense, lies, etc., it proves one
thing that history as we are told is just a lie! Where are your facts when modern technology proves otherwise?

'Peer Reviewed' nothing more than academic backslapping working to an agenda, NOT THE TRUTH!

Two bodies buried at the emergency exit to the Bunker, Shock brigade 3 digs them up partially burnt. The males skull is partially missing. Eva Braun
had taken a cyanide capsule? Hitler had shot himself in the head, whilst biting down on a cyanide capsule?. Weeks later after interrogation Hitlers
adjutant is taken to the grave, and verifies its position. A forensic digging takes place where they find the missing portion of the males skull with
a bullet hole in it. The official Soviet report stated that the burning of the bodies must have dislodged the skull parts. Funny how the only one with
a bullet after Dna. turned out to be a woman under forty. All BS.
If a hoax was going to be pulled off the stories would be well rehearsed, if it ever came out doubles were murdered, the last witnesses in the
bunker would have been tried for complicity to murder, Instead of serving a decade of a life sentence for unspecified war crimes.

Unfortunately, a peer reviewed source means it was conducted by someone who actually knows what they're doing. I'm sorry that you feel it's an
"agenda", but it's actually facts. You have not supplied any sources which are valid and you have provided no proof, nor have your sources.
You're still at square one.

Don't make statements you that you don't actually know the answer to.
I had the opportunity to look at the book already via my campus library to find that it has not been peer reviewed either. Even if I were to accept
the views of a single book, the quality of that book is not nearly to par with typical research.

Obviously you know NOTHING of the authors concerned or the research contained. If peer reviewed documents were as well researched then I would back
you but what are they? Documents citing other peoples research without actually going out and doing the ground work themselves (i.e. backslapping).

Now I know that you haven't actually read either book and you are doing as i stated in the my last reply because Jim Marrs cites his sources after
each chapter and Joseph Farrell at the back of the book using documents uncovered and recovered from 'freedom of information act'!

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.