Email this article to a friend

Reverberating through Ford’s statement, as in so many recent public acts of protest and testimony, is this tremble of hegemony fracturing.

Despite Christine Blasey Ford’s stirring testimony, an FBI investigation, thousands of protesters (hundreds of whom were arrested), petitions and phone calls from constituents, an elevator confrontation and a record-high disapproval rating, on October 6 the U.S. Senate confirmed Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court by a margin of two.

That evening, Kavanaugh was granted a lifetime appointment to a deeply undemocratic institution. He was confirmed by a legislative body that counts some votes more than others, giving the loudest voice (per capita) to the most sparsely populated states. The Senate’s majority vote represented a minority of Americans (44 percent). And Kavanaugh was selected by a president who lost the popular vote, a pedigree he shares with three of his esteemed colleagues: Neil Gorsuch, John Roberts and Samuel Alito.

It was, in other words, an egregious case of the system working precisely as designed. The framers of the Constitution imagined the Supreme Court, the Senate and the Electoral College to function as checks on the “tyranny of the majority”—in other words, to ensure white male landowners had the final say. Two centuries later, the women’s suffrage and civil rights movements expanded the franchise far beyond what the founders intended. But, thanks to unprecedented electoral spending by corporations and the wealthy, as well as rampant voter suppression—both of which were granted a constitutional green light by recent Supreme Court decisions—the Republican-led government has become increasingly unmoored from the people it ostensibly represents. For decades, the party has moved rightward, embracing an explicitly white, male, native-born, wealthy, heterosexual identity politics paired with a program of severe disinvestment and deregulation. Donald Trump is the apotheosis of this class vision—and has revealed it in all its cruelty.

Increasingly we see power stripped naked, no longer protected by the veneer of legitimacy. Legitimacy, or what Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci called hegemony, is always provisional. Rather than coercion, it requires voluntary submission, which lasts only as long as it is consented to. This naked power was personified in Kavanaugh’s sputtering rage at being called to account. A similar lifting of façades is apparent in white supremacist rallies, in the right-wing evangelical alliance with Trump that makes no pretense of his piety, in the conversion of the Environmental Protection Agency into an arm of the coal and oil industries, and in deep tax cuts for the wealthy alongside a staggering outlay for military expenditures. The emperor wears no clothes.

Conversely, we also see the hollowness of elite claims to a lost legitimacy that was never truly rooted in a popular mandate. Establishment figures, from Hillary Clinton to an anonymous member of Trump’s own cabinet, make compulsive appeals to a lost bipartisan comity and the principles of truth, reason and fairness that supposedly governed American politics before the current administration. Claiming to be part of the #resistance, these elites nostalgically yearn for the moderating force of norms and institutions. But for many Americans, pre-Trump America is nothing to be nostalgic about. It seems that these brave martyrs suffer from a historical amnesia extending from this nation’s bloody founding to Jan. 19, 2017.

As power and legitimacy become untethered, it has become more and more untenable for establishment institutions to maintain the illusion of distance from violence and domination. In theory, the military and police have the right to mete out violence to protect law-abiding citizens from the threats posed by “enemies, foreign and domestic,” as the U.S. Army’s Oath of Enlistment puts it. It’s not murder when the police kill someone, or terrorism when the state drops a bomb, the logic goes.

But that logic is cracking. A seemingly endless War on Terror, rampant police brutality and sprawling mass incarceration have made the distinction between legitimate and illegitimate violence increasingly difficult to maintain. Through those cracks, it’s revealed that the state often uses violence for an entirely different reason: to shore up the class hierarchy. In the relentless search for profits and productivity, capitalism inevitably creates “surplus populations” of unemployed people.

These are in turn seen as a threat to the social order—and made the target of policing and incarceration. The results are sometimes deadly. In 2014, Eric Garner was choked to death while being arrested on suspicion of selling loose cigarettes. The wealthiest, meanwhile, enjoy the protection of their property and the enforcement of their business contracts, while their own crimes go unpunished. This pact of elite impunity is evident in the 2008 financial crisis, in the routine theft of workers’ wages, and in the rampant sexual assault perpetrated by male bosses that #MeToo has finally subjected to public scrutiny.

This was the source of Kavanaugh’s outrage: However fleetingly, the hearing subjected him to the rule of law. To him, therefore, it was a “grotesque and coordinated character assassination” that “destroyed … my good name.” In other words, it was an affront to his status in a hierarchy he expected his peers in the Senate to protect. The Kavanaugh hearings lifted the veil on how ruling-class power is enacted, reproduced and given the aura of legitimacy through both state institutions and elite organizations: the Ivy League, the Serious Men commentariat, the Supreme Court. In his testimony to the Senate, Kavanaugh brought up Yale repeatedly. You might say he has a lot of class character.

Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony served as a window into what Corey Robin calls “the private life of power.” In Commonweal, writer John Gehring described his prep school football team chanting, after a loss to a mostly black school, “That’s all right, that’s okay, you will work for us someday!” This socialization, in all its valorization of hierarchy and its intimate entanglement with violence, produces the future leaders of a state built to preserve class, gender and racial domination.

The state, however, is by no means monolithic. All states, and particularly liberal democracies, are a terrain of struggle between different groups, in which social movements of the exploited and the oppressed can contest or even capture power. The events surrounding Kavanaugh’s appointment were enmeshed in an unusually frank conversation about sexual assault, and gave new momentum to an increasingly militant and rebellious feminism, one that sees patriarchy as part of a regime of social and economic oppression. Reverberating through Ford’s statement, as in so many recent public acts of protest and testimony, is this tremble of hegemony fracturing.

Some of these mobilizations resulted in concrete victories, such as higher wages, increased school funding and the election of unabashedly left-wing candidates. Others have not—though they surely contributed to individual and collective radicalization, and strengthened the activist networks that are necessary to sustain movements through the inevitable moments of defeat or phases of abeyance. As a totality, they have chipped away at the legitimating ideologies that give cover to inequality, racism and patriarchy.

Fracture, however, is not a sufficient prerequisite for social change. In the context of lives stretched thin by economic precarity, political instability can also be met with apathy. When you are working two jobs to make ends meet, it’s hard to find energy for political engagement or to discern a meaningful difference between candidates when government always seems to provide more of the same. One can argue that the prior hegemonic order was sustained less by widespread faith in its virtue than by widespread disengagement, a resignation that elites are all too happy to abet.

The future is uncertain. Will the disaffected find the collective agency, capacity and leverage to push in an emancipatory direction? Or will elite forces reconsolidate around an authoritarian-repressive social order? The latter is on full display in several countries, from Hungary to Brazil. In the context of the planetary havoc being wreaked by global capitalism, the stakes are not only high but existential. We need to orient to these fractures and contradictions. They are openings and avenues through which processes of radicalization potentially unfold. The emancipatory path requires dedication and struggle, and the terrain is uneven. And we on the Left are still finding our organizational and strategic footing. But the moment is auspicious for transformation.

Support Progressive Journalism

Donations from readers like you make up a full third of our annual income—that's how critical our end-of-year fundraising drives are. If you want to continue to read independent, progressive journalism in 2019 and beyond, we hope you'll consider chipping in whatever you can today.

Thea N. Riofrancos is an assistant professor of political science at Providence College. She has published in n+1, Dissent, Jacobin and NACLA Report on the Americas. She is co-chair of Providence Democratic Socialists of America.

The Kavanaugh hearings were not revolutionary, for the status quo prevailed; but they were revelationary, for all was revealed. There were two credible character witnesses against Brett Kavanaugh; Christine Blasey-Ford, and Brett Kavanaugh.

Posted by paradoctor on 2018-12-01 04:53:43

One thing I found particularly revealing was the elite pearl-clutching about the future reputations of elite young men. If their sexual assaults will have consequences, then what futures can they have?

Oh, I dunno; I never attended any of those frathouse festivities where they passed around drunk coeds as party favors. Instead I stayed in my dorm room and studied.

Posted by paradoctor on 2018-12-01 04:50:19

Do you really try to remember the SUV you always wanted to actually buy along with the residential property you loved the a lot ? We all have certain items in our everyday life which we need to fulfill . We do a lot of work toward it. Even so quite often we miss a chance, but definitely not any more . This amazing on-line opportunity made in a manner that it will help you you to definitely make remarkably great income . Operate regular and give your tasks a small amount of hrs and obtain around $31000 per week . It offers you possibility for work in your own space place with flexible amount of time . You could be your own boss . It is really a life changer on the net job designed to help you to ultimately gain the things you always wanted in your lifetime . So now proceed and check , outstanding things waiting for you >>> LEXYIANS.TUMBLR.COM

Posted by Abby L. Hansen on 2018-11-27 11:59:54

You please remember the motor car you desire to spend money on as well as the house you loved the a lot ? We all have certain things in our life which we would like to achieve . We put in the effort towards it . Still quite often we miss out, but definitely not anymore . This amazing on line chance created in a way that it will help you you to definitely get paid incredibly great income . Operate on a daily basis and give your job few hrs and get paid nearly $17000 weekly . It provides you chance to work in your very own home place with flexible your time . You are going to be your personal boss . It really is a life changer web based opportunity which can help you to definitely obtain what you want in your life . Right away proceed and check out , wonderful things waiting around for you >>> LEXYIANS.TUMBLR.COM

Posted by Abby L. Hansen on 2018-11-27 11:50:10

You can call a system where the side that gets fewer votes wins a lot of things, but "democratic" is not one of them. We don't want to reform the Senate - we want to abolish it. The Electoral College, Senate, and Supreme Court have to go in order to ever begin to approach democracy in this country. They were explicitly designed to stymie the wishes of everyone who wasn't a rich, white, male landowner.

What's more, abolition means every state would still have "equal Suffrage" after all - none!

Posted by Stephen Price on 2018-11-26 16:06:45

This article is essentially pointless; that is, without focus, and with a strange forced attitude. Of course, the core fact is clear ... that a very few, and very wealthy, people have hijacked our country and are improperly harming the people of this nation. Ruling Class? Who uses that phrase now? Only old-school Marxists, and (more importantly) the Rich-Right, who like to talk in odd terms (and double-talk) in order to mislead people. We must now speak about how the Rich-Right have done this terrible deed, this terrible theft. And about how the Rich-Right now also control the media; and even control, it appears, the writers of supposedly progressive articles such as this one in "In These Times".

Posted by Steve in DC on 2018-11-24 18:40:41

The power system is not fake, we have over 1,000 colleges with excellent programs, yet the huge majority of grads working in the higher level of our government come from only 5/7 colleges. Our college systems sucks in more ways than one. Our DOD spends as much money as the next 11/15 countries combined. The DNC had a winner in Bernie Sanders yet they turned their back because he is not a member of that power system club. The faces change but the one in back with the big hands stays the same. Our lawmakers are controlled by 3 groups, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and that so called Right leaning Christians. The people do not count, only the special groups. Obama talked great but killed one Arab Spring because of Saudi pressure. The lady who accused Kavanaugh is also part of the so called power club. Even Trump stated something happened to her, We talk about Russia maybe meddled with our election, yet how many time do we mess with elections in other countries. Turn around is fair play.

Posted by 6384601 on 2018-11-24 17:36:59

Yea, some of the braindead, brainwashed, tyranny-worshipping, stand-up-for-the-national-anthem-morons that comprise 95-97% of the people are raising their heads a little from the smog they are in from birth to death in this country. But they love their tyranny too much to do the necessary thing to eradicate their government-a 100% corrupt, Inverted-Totalitarian, Police-State, totally controlled by a handful of Industrislists, and the Rothschild-Jewish-Criminal-Banking-Cartel. The necessry thing being eradication by guerilla warfare. This article describes the situation, but offers no solutions, of which there is but one. Censorship is also alive and well in this Totalitarian Jewish controlled state-isn't it! I had to re-verify my correct password a half-dozen-times and go through at least that many capthas before they let me post this comment. They tried their best to keep me from posting. I'm surprised I finally posted. God Bless America, L.O.L., L.M.A.O!

Posted by Joshua on 2018-11-24 16:39:24

ford is a liar---social change and class consciousness r impossible in the USA

Posted by basarov on 2018-11-24 06:10:47

I actually generate nearly $24,000-$25,000 each month online. I lost my job after doing work for the same organization for many years, I needed trusted earnings. I was not interested in the "get rich overnight" packages you notice all over the net. Those are all mlm schemes or stuff where you have to sell to your friends and family. The best part of working on the internet is that I am always home with the kids and also I go out on family vacation for long period. Honestly,it is actually easier than you would believe. I got the instructions kit and within 4 weeks I was making over $4,000 monthly. You don't have to be technical, but you should know how to use the internet. If you can fill up forms and surf web sites, you can do it very easily, You don't even have to sell anything at all. It's as easy as being on any social media site. Let me show you what I do... TOMMYNIK.TUMBLR.COM

Posted by Patricia K. Gonzalez on 2018-11-22 06:31:22

It has become a standard complaint of the left (progressives, Democrats) that the Senate has too much power, specifically: too much power PER CAPITA. The root of this complaint is the composition of the Senate. Each state, regardless of population, gets two Senators. Rhode Island, Delaware, and Wyoming each have two. California, Florida, New York, and New Jersey each have two. By an odd coincidence, states with low populations are often right-leaning, so issues such as Supreme Court appointments and veto-overrides can often be won by substantial minorities of right-leaners.

The left-leaners suggest that the simple solution is to base Senatorial representation on population -- basically, having two houses of Representatives. Alas, that is not possible. Yes, it would be possible to propose an amendment to the Constitution to do precisely that except for the final words of Article 5 (Amendments): "...and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate."

No can do, buck-o. Game over. Thank you for playing.

Posted by Frank Clarke on 2018-11-21 13:45:12

More whining from the left, why don't you all gravitate to the coasts and run those states into the ground...wait, you have already done that.

Posted by wilsonbj63 on 2018-11-21 12:05:01

It must really suck being you lololololol

Posted by jeffrey luciana on 2018-11-20 04:16:51

You have nothing.

"Your logical fallacy is ad hominem. You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument."