For. I've seen similar articles featured that were written the same without the swirliness. --Matfen 19:43, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Weak For I like the idea a lot, but I'm still not completely sold on this one purely because there is no chance of a reader finishing the article before the swirlyness happens. But it is very novel and amusing anyway. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:50, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

For. Another excellent job from Puppy, though I'd recommend making either the swirling more gradual or increasing the length of time it takes before it kicks in so readers can read more of the article. —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 04:55, March 10, 2010 (UTC)