The GSP will restore law , order, and public confidence. We are not interested in respecting the rights of people who harm others, while failing to observe the rights of their victims. We will unbind the hands of our law enforcement officers and we will free up the court system in order that the rule of law is maintained.

Our people have a right to feel safe and secure, wherever they’re at. They should not have to move from town to town as each one is lost to violent, criminal gangs, while the Republicats look on with indifference.

Maintaining the sanctity of the rule of law requires that the law be observed in every case and that it be applied in a uniform fashion to all. There should not be a certain set of laws for one group of people and another set for a different group of people. We believe that people who commit similar crimes ought to face similar punishment.

America is a sovereign nation. We have neither an obligation nor a responsibility to provide eternally for the undeveloped countries of the world, who, through their own ineptitude, have not raised their standard of living. It is absolutely immoral to take money from our own citizens, many of whom are in need of charity themselves, against their will, to give to other peoples half a world away. We believe that charity starts at home and that it ought to remain here until there is absolutely no American left with a need for it.

It is also morally reprehensible and undemocratic to use foreign aid to influence the politics and policies of foreign, sovereign nations. The GSP condemns these practices and regards them as part of a twisted, imperialist worldview.

The only foreign aid that we will consider is that aid required by nations working to repatriate its citizens - those who have mistakenly come to America in the belief that it was our interest they benefit from the fruits of our labor. We will help those foreign governments, in every possible way, to return to them their citizens.

Globalization is both damaging to our culture and to the health of our once-thriving economy. As manufacturing is increasingly shipped overseas, and as there are increasingly more Third World immigrants trafficked into our country to serve as modern-day slaves, there are increasing levels of unemployment - not concealable by the best efforts of those who manipulate statistics - the decline of wages, and dissatisfaction amongst those American workers whose jobs are surrendered to foreigners.

The Golden State Party finds nothing particularly redeeming about the notion that - disregarding the long-term consequences of such a policy - we ought to surrender American ingenuity and manufacturing expertise overseas in order that the wealthy elite might profit, selling competitive advantage that belongs to us all - technology and know-how that was built on the backs of generations of American workers and thinkers. These practices hurt Americans.

And while the Golden State Party recognizes the importance of trade, we do not recognize other peoples and other nations as having any competitive advantage beyond a willingness to accept inadequate wages or beyond merely holding resources important to our advancement. That there is no one more inventive, more industrious, or more hard-working than the American is an idea constituting a part of the cornerstone of our ideological platform. Where others falter in their belief of this idea, we will stand steadfast in our conviction.

Accordingly, so as to protect the American worker, his family, and their way of life, we believe that it is necessary to restrict the import of certain goods. We will take the necessary steps toward protecting American industry, wherever it faces trouble. More specifically, there must be consequences for those companies who further their aims at the expense of harming their countrymen. If a foreign government can provide a tax incentive for those companies willing to go global and deliver to them American jobs and manufacturing technology, we can offer the same companies a disincentive to do as much. Wherever possible, we will take measures to ensure that the goods we consume are made by American hands, in American factories.

We will also make every effort necessary to break apart those corporations that have overtaken competitors by way of predatory pricing and collusive activity, by exploiting initiatives intended to help the disabled, by exploiting illegal-immigrant labor, and by any other activity that decent, hard-working, ethical, American businessmen are unwilling to do in accordance with their principles. These activities have transformed many corporations into monopolies that hurt our people both socially and economically, and we will not sit idly by as they seek to grow ever more powerful.

We are told that the purpose of the Federal Reserve, which was established in 1913, is to provide economic stability and help stave off inflation. However, fractional-reserve banking does the very opposite. It is responsible for the business cycles - the booms and busts - that are so very harmful to our people and their businesses. It is responsible for inflation, which is the decrease in the purchasing power of our dollars, and which is a sort of tax paid, through diluting our currency, to the Banksters who designed our disastrous economic system. Finally, the Federal Reserve’s practice of creating money as debt issuance creates a system wherein there is always more debt than money to pay it. This requires that our economy grow at an unnatural rate and gives cause for our government to bring in hordes of unwanted immigrants in effort to achieve this unnatural growth rate.

To restore ownership of the American economy to its rightful owners â€“ the people of the United States of America â€“ we will incorporate the Federal Reserve into the United States Treasury, making it an actual federal component. We will make illegal the practice of fractional-reserve banking. We will grant solely the government the right to create, issue, and regulate money, and money will be circulated through investments in infrastructure becoming of a federal government.

Our country is become increasingly dangerous. The slow decline in the welfare of our people and nation has been marked by a striking willingness on the behalf of the ruling political-establishment to accept rampant crime as a way of life, as if it were always this bad, and as if we were actually incapable of stopping crime or effecting change in our environment at all. Our people, having given up on an establishment that puts the rights of criminals above the rights of victims, or the law-abiding citizenry, have had to alter their everyday behaviors and reconstruct every aspect of their lives to simply stay alive and keep from being victimized. Our prisons are so overflowing with criminals that, in many cases, criminals are released early, only to perpetrate an offense once more. The happiness and welfare of our people has been sacrificed at the altar of political correctness.

In every major city throughout the nation, our people’’s movement has been absolutely restricted. There are entire cities that have become off-limits to the European-Americans who founded them. The ordinary citizenry have abandoned the idea of walking anywhere, for fear of becoming the victim of a violent criminal murderer, rapist, or robber. While the ruling elite drones on endlessly about the right’’s of criminals, our people must bar their windows and keep from venturing out of the house at night.

Our people have a right to feel and be safe. We should not have to move from one town to the next to escape criminal gangs who roam free as the hands of the police and the criminal justice system are bound by political correctness. We shouldn’t have to worry about the legality of defending ourselves and our families and homes as they are attacked by criminals. Criminals shouldn't have any rights at the expense of the safety and welfare of good, law-abiding people. The GSP will absolutely never grovel about our right to safety to criminals or to the politicians who support them. We will put these common sense principles back into practice, without hesitation.

Deport Criminal Aliens to Serve their Sentences Abroad

While our prisons overflow to such a degree as to merit consideration on behalf of the political establishment to release criminals back into our streets, criminal aliens comprise an increasing proportion of the prison population. In fact, in 2005, they comprised 27% of the federal prison population. Our tax monies pay to feed, house, and cloth violent, criminal aliens who enter our borders and harm our people. That we pay even one red cent to keep them within our borders is absurd.

The GSP will immediately expel all foreign criminals from within the confines of our prison system to serve their sentences abroad. This will be expensed to the respective governments of the lands from which they came. We will also require compensation for the cost of imprisoning their criminals, providing a bill for our service. Governments who refuse to pay for their criminals will face economic sanctions. We will also make every effort necessary to criminalize the act of harboring and protecting illegal aliens who commit criminal offenses of any nature. Those who helped employ or house criminal aliens must face consequences for their actions, just as the victims of the criminal aliens did.

Allow Victims Absolute Freedom in Defending Themselves and their Property

The right to self-defense and to defend one’’s family and property is not something that man has the authority to grant or deny. These rights are inalienable. Never should there be a situation in which a person has to ask if he or she is justified in pursuing a course of self-defense, or in defending the lives of others. Our people have a right to life. We have a right to protect our friends, our family, and the things that we rely on for our livelihood.

It is our position, then, that there should be no restriction on defense. We acknowledge that we do not have the authority to tell people that they cannot look after themselves and must, instead, rely on some inept security force.Bring Order to Prisons

While a number of ivory tower-type commissions and reports have asserted that, in order to bring about a better justice system, prisoners need more phone calls and visiting time, that violent instigators shouldn't face segregation or other implements to quell insurrection in prison, and that all prisoner privileges should be expanded in general, prisons have absolutely lost all control of prisoners.

The GSP will do whatever it takes to end the out-of-control violence prevalent in prisons today. It is our decision as a community and a nation as to how and to what degree someone ought to be punished for a crime, not the decision of an inmate, a gang, or anyone who does not represent the will of the nation. We will reintroduce corporal punishment into prisons, to be administered by an authority outside the prison system. Those who commit crime in prison will be made to respect the law. Guards, wardens, and prison officials who knowingly allow for violence will face criminal charges. An outside agency will be tasked to monitor prisons and prisoners. All of these positions will be held accountable and will answer to the people of this nation, who these institutions are tasked to serve.

We believe, too, that a part of restoring order to prison is providing prisoners a purpose and giving meaning to their stays in prison. Expanding the relationship between imprisonment and labor in public-works projects will help both to exercise this belief and to better rehabilitate prisoners, so that they might be better prepared for life beyond prison.

There are many public-works projects that need doing beyond cleaning up roadside garbage. Constructing the vast networks of roads and freeways that are a part of our plans for infrastructure expansion is one example of a meaningful job that won”t bring great detriment to other industry and that could mean a huge cost-savings to us, the taxpayer.

Introduce automatic sentences for repeat offenders

While we recognize that, as it stands now, prison is not a great tool for rehabilitation and reentrance back into society, a flawed system serves as no reasonable excuse for released prisoners to commit further crime. Although the criminal justice system should be intended to rehabilitate criminals, its primary purpose is to keep our people safe. Accordingly, it is our policy to incentivize becoming a law-abiding citizen upon being released from prison. In order to provide a deterrent to would-be criminals, repeat offenders will face stiff and automatic sentences under an GSP system.

Restore Justice

Maintaining the sanctity of the rule of law requires that the law be observed in every case and that it be applied in a uniform fashion to all. There should not be a certain set of laws for one group of people and another set for a different group of people. And if people are to be judged on their character instead of by their deeds alone, it should have nothing to do with religion, race, or political persuasion. To do as much is tyranny, and the GSP will not sit idly by as it continues.

In the same spirit, the criminal justice system should not be influenced by cultural, political, or religious institutions. The system is in place to keep our people safe. Police should be chasing down burglars, rapists, and murderers, not serving as a group to attack and imprison those of a certain political, religious, ethnic, or cultural persuasion. We will do our best to criminalize the act of influencing the system in that manner, bringing charges against supremacist groups who do try to use the police force and criminal justice system as their own personal army.

Until such a system is in place as to keep negative influences from affecting the criminal justice system, we need a measure to ensure that innocent people aren't harmed by charges that are motivated by anything other than stopping crime and keeping safe. That is, we believe that those accused of a crime have a right to anonymity until proven guilty in a court of law.

We believe that all of our people aspire to explore the heavens and learn more about their place within the cosmos. This aspiration is such a part of us that it does not require justification in order for a government to pursue it. It is something we must do. It is a necessity. That our space program has been allowed to deteriorate into what it is today is shameful and unforgivable.

We will once again extend the arm of man into the heavens and reach for greatness. We will put our trust in the hands of our people, providing incentives to our best and brightest to pursue our space exploration goals. We will do this while also maintaining and improving the current, federal space exploration program. The GSP will restore America to its former glory.

One of the most formidable hurdles to introducing others to the Golden State Party is the provocative idea of a political party devoted explicitly to defending the interests of European-Americans (for brevity’s sake we will use the more common term “white” to refer to our target demographic). The concept of white Americans even acknowledging that we have group interests will be seen as unnecessary or even wrong by many people, not least among them white Americans themselves. Whereas it is taken for granted that minority groups can and should organize for their group interests, whether in the workplace, on campus or in legislative lobbies, the same is not true for white Americans.

While the reasons for this reaction is beyond the scope of this article, we will attempt here to provide reasons why white Americans need the GSP. Because this fundamental question will often be the first and most significant stumbling block when introducing our party to others, it is imperative that we have strong points at the ready.

1. Groups of people organize for their interests because it works.

Let’s imagine that the representatives of five nations are sitting at the table negotiating a multilateral trade deal. Four out of these five focus on what will benefit their particular nation and rightly approach the various issues that come up with this in mind. One of the groups, however, sees itself not as the representatives of a particular nation but as “citizens of the world”. This group negotiates with the intent to come up with a solution that benefits everyone equally, regardless of the fact that the others are out for their own. The outcome of such a negotiation is clear: the trade terms, far from being fair for everyone, will be heavily skewed against the interests of the one group who refused even to think of itself as a group.

American politics, like our mock negotiation, are a continual process of demand and compromise fueled by interested groups. These groups, whether plumbers’ unions, big oil, or Mexican Americans, band together because they know that to approach issues of importance to them from the standpoint of being simply “Americans” is political folly. Any group that lacks a particularized focus on issues that affect them will be disadvantaged over time when others with more clear vision take actions for their own special interests. For years those in the Republican crowd have decried those on the left for such tribalist politics. Where has this landed the party? Where has this landed the interests of the ethnic group that forms this party’s base? The presence of systematic and legal government discrimination against whites, a dwindling amount of livable neighborhoods for our people, and over 10 million unwanted immigrants in our land provides a potent answer to these questions.

2. White Americans DO have common interests.

This point will be especially important for those who argue that there is really no such thing as “white” or “European” Americans, but rather a diverse amalgam of Irish Americans, German Americans, etc. A single question exposes the error of this argument: When we are discriminated against by our government, is it because we are “Irish” or “German”? Of course not. Affirmative action programs are directed against people of European descent, period. Through public education, mass media and the words of our own government we are taught that the sins of American and European history were committed by white people, not simply those of a particular European nationality, with the attendant command that we step aside as a group for the sake of sociopolitical equality. The issues on which the GSP focuses affect all of us, as Americans of European descent are linked by common values and common threats. For this reason we have a right to identify as a group and speak as one.

3. White people in “positions of power” does NOT necessarily mean that we are represented.

The pursuit of “diversity” in the American establishment has not yet fully transformed this establishment into a proportional reflection of American ethnic/racial groups. Some may point to the disproportionate amount of white Americans in positions of power as proof that we don’t need group representation. After all, how can we be disadvantaged politically if the country’s leaders are white?

The problem with this argument is that those leaders simply do not act in our interests. Whereas members of the Black Congressional Caucus (among other ethnic caucuses) meet with the explicit purpose of approaching legislative issues by asking “What is best for black Americans?”, no such groups exist for whites. Nor will any establishment politician, even those blasted as “extremist” because of their patriotic immigration stance, ever dare to say that they are acting in the best interests of their white constituency. As mentioned by an GSP writer, a glance at the Democrat and Republican websites reveals explicit ethnic categories that one may click to see how each party addresses the needs of those groups-as long as that group is not white, as we are not on their list.

A final blow to this “white establishment” argument comes from the 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger Supreme Court case, which legalized mass discrimination against white Americans for the sake of “diversity” in education. The Supreme Court is itself a pillar of the American establishment and their holding speaks volumes about how much we can really expect whites in positions of power to act in our group interests simply because they are also white (the only black justice on the Court was actually one of the principled dissenters). More telling, however, are the over 100 amicus briefs filed in support of discrimination against whites. The list of institutions that filed these petitions supporting discrimination reads like a who’s who of American social and political power: mass media networks, public interest law firms, global corporations, universities, even top brass in the military. Perusing the list is a jarring experience, and the concerted effort launched by the American establishment against a white law student who brought the suit is a powerful example of how “whites in power” does not mean white representation.

I hope the above points are helpful in explaining the value of the Golden State Party to your families, friends and colleagues. Let no one tell us that it is wrong or unnecessary to stand up for ourselves and let our voice be heard!

That speech he gave at EURO was really amazing. I was just looking at the BNP site stats on Alexa, and the BNP site ranks 904 in Britain. All of the major newspapers are in the top 100, and the BNP site grows ever closer.

If only we had paid better attention to Nick Griffin back then. What an extraordinary person.