The program is Palestinian."The $2m project was launched by Taawon, the largest Palestinian non-profit organisation committed to local development."

Tom will now tell us about the Libertarian Party's policy concerning public education. ( They want to get rid of public education)

"As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others........Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. https://www.lp.org/platform/

Matthew Ellard wrote:The program is Palestinian."The $2m project was launched by Taawon, the largest Palestinian non-profit organisation committed to local development."

Tom will now tell us about the Libertarian Party's policy concerning public education. ( They want to get rid of public education)

"As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others........Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. https://www.lp.org/platform/

Darn, you got me now. I wouldn't quibble with that statement one bit.

And by the way, nothing in that statement prevents you from spending your own money to provide edcuation for anyone you want to, as Mark Twain, another one of my heroes (note that Mike Pompeo isn't on the list) did when he enabled the first black student to attend Yale law school.

If one can be taught to believe absurdities, one can commit atrocities. --Voltaire

It is total conspiracy crap nonsense from a conspiracy based author. It failed to actually name one active CIA officer who is a Democrat candidate. The article is aimed at low IQ idiots like yourself, who can't spell basic words and fall for convoluted hollow bull-{!#%@}.

It is total conspiracy crap nonsense from a conspiracy based author. It failed to actually name one active CIA officer who is a Democrat candidate. The article is aimed at low IQ idiots like yourself, who can't spell basic words and fall for convoluted hollow bull-{!#%@}.

You have stated that my links to Wikipedia articles about number of US military bases and military operations and so on and other sources I've cited are all nonsense, too, but while you claim to be a scialist, your positioms are neoconservative.

Is there any position at all that Michael Pompeo, Bibi Netanyahu, William Krystol, Sean Hannity, or James Clapper takes that you don't support, Agent 008?

While your blanket condemnation of the linked website could have merit, you haven't refuted anything the article said to support your opinion.

Tom Palven wrote: Is there any position at all that Michael Pompeo, Bibi Netanyahu, William Krystol, Sean Hannity, or James Clapper takes that you don't support, Agent 008?

You are slightly retarded right?

1)I started the anti-"Bibi" Netanyahu threads.

2) We don't get US TV hosts Sean Hannity or William Krystol in Australia, as Australia is not part of the USA as you keep getting confused about.

3) What is Michael Pompeo's "position" that I'm meant to have an opinion on? You haven't got a clue what you are even claiming.

Sorry Tom. You have a low IQ and you can't string coherent claims together. You get confused about the difference between Australia and the USA and think people overseas see your domestic TV shows. We don't. Get a friend to proof read your next couple posts, so you can stop making these really obvious mistakes. You won't look like such an idiot if you do this.

Matthew Ellard wrote:
It is total conspiracy crap nonsense from a conspiracy based author. It failed to actually name one active CIA officer who is a Democrat candidate. The article is aimed at low IQ idiots like yourself, who can't spell basic words and fall for convoluted hollow bull-{!#%@}.

Wikipedia regards it as a legitimate news source, and active CIA Agents are SECRET police and would not be running for office as active CIA Agents.

Calling it conspiracy crap nonsense doesn't necessarily make it so in my book, coming for a guy to wants to inprsion Snowden, Manning, and Assange, guys who have exposed your lying CIA heroes.

If one can be taught to believe absurdities, one can commit atrocities. --Voltaire

Matthew Ellard wrote:It is total conspiracy crap nonsense from a conspiracy based author. It failed to actually name one active CIA officer who is a Democrat candidate. The article is aimed at low IQ idiots like yourself, who can't spell basic words and fall for convoluted hollow bull-{!#%@}.

Tom Palven wrote: .....active CIA Agents are SECRET police and would not be running for office as active CIA Agents.

"In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein people of low ability suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their cognitive ability as greater than it is."

Matthew Ellard wrote:It is total conspiracy crap nonsense from a conspiracy based author. It failed to actually name one active CIA officer who is a Democrat candidate. The article is aimed at low IQ idiots like yourself, who can't spell basic words and fall for convoluted hollow bull-{!#%@}.

Tom Palven wrote: .....active CIA Agents are SECRET police and would not be running for office as active CIA Agents.

"In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein people of low ability suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their cognitive ability as greater than it is."

Here's an article about people you love, nazi control-freak scum Pompeo and Haspel, along with CIA liars John Brennan and James Clapper who belong in prison, while the true heroes Snowden, Assange, and Manning, who expose their lies, you want to put in prison:http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archive ... r-problem/

Aren't you a little bit ashamed of yourself Agent 008?

If one can be taught to believe absurdities, one can commit atrocities. --Voltaire

Matthew Ellard wrote:Sooooo....Tom. Set down for us all the evidence you and Ron Paul have, that proves the CIA runs the world.

I've provided lots of evidence with regard to Bush, Obama, and Trump that points to the CIA running the US Deep State and thus the world.

But first things first, the US. Just a small case in point:

As I've said before, Trump was mandated by law to release the CIA Kennedy files but said, in effect, that the CIA wouldn't let him.

Trump now says that he want to talk to Kim Jong Un.
If Trump is persuaded not to talk to Kim, can we agree that at the very least, that the Trump administration is not fully in charge of the government, and that someone or some thing else is in charge?

While this alone won't prove that there is a Deep State making policy, would you agree that this would be evidence of that?

If one can be taught to believe absurdities, one can commit atrocities. --Voltaire

Tom Palven wrote: If Trump is persuaded not to talk to Kim, can we agree that at the very least, that the Trump administration is not fully in charge of the government, and that someone or some thing else is in charge?

....or Trump changed his mind.

Are you going to also claim that: because Trump changed his mind and isn't going to make "Mexico pay for the wall" that the CIA must run the world?

Tom Palven wrote: If Trump is persuaded not to talk to Kim, can we agree that at the very least, that the Trump administration is not fully in charge of the government, and that someone or some thing else is in charge?

....or Trump changed his mind.

Are you going to also claim that: because Trump changed his mind and isn't going to make "Mexico pay for the wall" that the CIA must run the world?

TV just said that Saudi Arabia sends 70K students per year to study "in the West" and these kiddies come home and want to change Saudi society to be more like the West. This interplays with all the reforms the new King is busy setting up. He wants to empower himself of course but that means getting the worst of the corruption, and the worst of the religion, out of government (ie: him). I dunno. sounds to me like he doesn't want to live all that long.

Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

Matthew Ellard wrote:Sooooo....Tom. Set down for us all the evidence you and Ron Paul have, that proves the CIA runs the world.

I've provided lots of evidence with regard to Bush, Obama, and Trump that points to the CIA running the US Deep State and thus the world.

But first things first, the US. Just a small case in point:

As I've said before, Trump was mandated by law to release the CIA Kennedy files but said, in effect, that the CIA wouldn't let him.

Trump now says that he want to talk to Kim Jong Un.
If Trump is persuaded not to talk to Kim, can we agree that at the very least, that the Trump administration is not fully in charge of the government, and that someone or some thing else is in charge?

While this alone won't prove that there is a Deep State making policy, would you agree that this would be evidence of that?

Of course Trump could have simply changed his mind, but this is another little dot among multitudes of dots that can be connected, many of which I've mentioned previously.

If one can be taught to believe absurdities, one can commit atrocities. --Voltaire

Matthew Ellard wrote:"As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others........Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government.https://www.lp.org/platform/

Couldn't help putting that in bold. That's the libertarian view, all right. And any attempt to keep parents from whaling the tar out of their kids would be looked on as "interference." (Get those meddling mandated reporters like doctors, teachers, and nurses out of our sacred family life.)

"We survivors did not seek death. We did not take to the streets when our Jewish friends were taken away. We didn’t raise an outcry until we ourselves were being annihilated. We preferred to remain alive, with the flimsy though accurate excuse that our death would not have helped. We are guilty of being alive."

Karl Jaspers (1883–1968), at the re-opening of Heidelberg University, 1945

Matthew Ellard quoting the Libertarian political policies of Tom Palven wrote:".......Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government.https://www.lp.org/platform/

Upton_O_Goode wrote:Couldn't help putting that in bold. That's the libertarian view, all right. And any attempt to keep parents from whaling the tar out of their kids would be looked on as "interference." (Get those meddling mandated reporters like doctors, teachers, and nurses out of our sacred family life.)

The hilarious irony is that Tom Palven can't spell the word "education" himself under his own policy.

Tom Palven wrote:And by the way, nothing in that statement prevents you from spending your own money to provide edcuation for anyone you want to.......

Tom Palven wrote:Things are getting very interesting on the Korean peninsula right now, and we should know within a week or so if the US Deep State/MIC can prevent the North and South Koreans from signing a peace treaty.

The USA is not at war with North Korea. It is the United Nations and South Korea that is still technically at war with North Korea. Poor Tom doesn't accept UN intervention in US nationalism.

Poor little Tom, is following his Russian talk points, while pretending to be a "Libertarian" . Despite the "Libertarian" policy of non-interference overseas, Tom is even more in love with Trump for ending the war between North Korea and the USA which doesn't actually exist. Meanwhile North Korea is building a new test facility.

Why poor little Tom worried about the USA being attacked by North Korea's low yield, old style atom bomb on a 1940's missile that has no accuracy, is beyond comprehension. It is South Korea and Japan that are at risk. I guess Tom doesn't care, because they are just Asians.....If it makes sense to Trump and Sean Hannity , it's good enough for Tom.

Matthew Ellard wrote: It is South Korea and Japan that are at risk. I guess Tom doesn't care, because they are just Asians.....If it makes sense to Trump and Sean Hannity , it's good enough for Tom. [/color]

Tom Palven wrote:Things are getting very interesting on the Korean peninsula right now, and we should know within a week or so if the US Deep State/MIC can prevent the North and South Koreans from signing a peace treaty.

You numb-skull. It took 10 days after your beloved Trump got tricked by North Korea, to meet Jong Un for a photo shoot , before he was advised that North Korea was continuing to test missile engines.

Tom Palven wrote:Things are getting very interesting on the Korean peninsula right now, and we should know within a week or so if the US Deep State/MIC can prevent the North and South Koreans from signing a peace treaty.

You numb-skull. It took 10 days after your beloved Trump got tricked by North Korea, to meet Jong Un for a photo shoot , before he was advised that North Korea was continuing to test missile engines.