Cliff Notes on HIV & AIDS

January 25, 2011

In the late spring of 1981, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) came under increasing Congressional pressure to clean up the waste and corruption that characterized their ten-year War on Cancer.

As a result, millions of dollars in research funding (and research jobs) were threatened. Within days, CDC epidemiologist Wayne Shandara reported that five homosexual men in their 20s and 30s were stricken by a pneumonia that ordinarily strikes cancer and transplant patients that could be related to the inhalants commonly used in the gay community. “The best we can say is that somehow the pneumonia appears to be related to gay life style.”

A year later, the CDC reported that among the 57 AIDS patients, 86% were homosexual, 14% bisexual and that (among them), the “use of drugs such as nitrite inhalants, marijuana, hallucinogens, and cocaine was common.”

Even before Science published his four unproven assumptions (1, 2, 3, 4), “HIV co-discoverer” Robert Gallo was hounded by reports of incompetence:

In 1975, Gallo and Weiss stated that they had isolated a human leukemia virus, HL23 virus, but this was shown later to have resulted from laboratory contamination by three primate retroviruses. In 1980 Gallo claimed to have isolated a human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV), but did not present positive evidence that this was a human virus. During 1983-4, Gallo and his associates published several papers asserting that the human leukemia virus, HTLV-1, was the agent involved in the development of AIDS. This was eventually disproven but meanwhile the attention of many scientists was misdirected, wasting time and resources that could have been put to far better use… (Karpas)

Marketed under many names, poppers are a highly flammable muscle relaxant that facilitates anal intercourse by reducing blood pressure, delivering a warm sensation all over the body and causes large amounts of oxygen-bearing blood to flow through the brain, which produces the rush. The increased oxygen can intensify positive emotions, lust and a general lack of inhibitions, encouraging a sense of raw animal sexuality.

I remember the first time that I used poppers… when I was coming – orgasm – I thought it was like a flood… it was an incredibly magnifying effect, and I think that there’s a subset of people who use it for that… (see video below)

The chemicals found in volatile solvents, aerosols, and gases like amyl nitrate produce a variety of additional effects during or shortly after use that include dizziness, strong hallucinations, delusions, belligerence, apathy, impaired judgment, unconsciousness and death.

ANAL INTERCOURSE Anatomically, the vagina is designed to receive the penis. It is lined with thin flat cells and is surrounded by a muscular tube intended for penile intromission. The rectum, on the other hand, is lined with a delicate mucosal surface and a single layer of columnar epithelium intenuea primarily for the reabsorption of water and electrolytes. The rectum is incapable of mechanical protection against abrasion and severe damage to the colonic mucosa.

Unlike the vagina, the anus and rectum, contain no natural lubricating function. Thus insertion of unlubricated objects or inadequate dilation of the anus before insertion of a large object can result in tissue laceration… The internal and external anal sphincters are elastic rings of muscle which generally remain tightly constricted except during defecation. The anal sphincters are also intended for material to pass through them in a direction that leads out of the body. When an attempt is made to insert something in the reverse direction, the muscles of the sphincter constrict… (Holsinger 1991)

During vaginal intercourse, the tissues around the vagina are generally lubricated and supple, which facilitates the act. Occasionally, enthusiastic heterosexual partners will chafe, become sore and discontinue until the abraded tissue heals. The use of alcohol or drugs can dull sensitivity, which increases the likelihood of injury.

When anal intercourse partners (self-identified as bare-backers) are impaired by drugs like amyl nitrate, cocaine or methamphetamines, they typically don’t sense the injuries and pain that occurs during prolonged periods of intercourse by partners unimpaired by drugs or alcohol. After several hours (or days) of drug-fueled intercourse, the “bottom” can suffer severe abrasive trauma, anal fissures, contusions, thrombosed hemorrhoids, lacerations with bleeding, rectal prolapse, and proctitis.

Unabated and untreated, the subsequent comingling of fecal matter and blood can result in serious and life-threatening systemic infections. When anal intercourse results in injuries and infection, the “bottom” may complain to his practitioner, who typically prescribes antibiotics that cause oxidative stress and kill the beneficial flora in the gut and colon, further compromising the patient’s immune function. Promiscuous drug-addicted homosexual men who do not change their behavior often self-medicate with more illicit drugs and self-destructive behavior. As former CDC AIDS Researcher Gus Sermos wrote in 1988:

… homosexuals have acted as if they had an overpowering, subconscious death-wish. Their vehement repudiation of standard public health and disease control measures has guaranteed that thousands more of them will die the horrible death AIDS confers on its victims.

Unsurprisingly, many “fast-track” gay men who acquire immune-deficiency syndromes are treated with carcinogenic drugs like AZT, and die.

But rather than document the self-destructive decisions, drug abuse, physical injuries, antibiotics, AZT and HAART medications that lead to the patient’s death, the negligent clinician often lists vague “complications related to AIDS” when they sign the death certificate. Those clinics and pharmaceutically-funded gay activists then use the preventable death to pressure taxpayers and legislators to “do more” (e.g. waste more money) to fight HIV and AIDS.

Because most people do not engage in the self-destructive behavior described by Hank Wilson and others, the vast majority of heterosexuals and homosexuals rarely acquire (or die from) immune deficiency syndromes.

Healthy asymptomatic heterosexuals like Elizabeth Glaser, Arthur Ashe and Ryan White died while taking heavy doses of Zidovudine (AZT), which the Reagan Administration & HHS knew “only treats symptoms… is very toxic and destroys blood cells and organs.” UC Berkeley Professor Peter Duesberg PhD called AZT “pure poison” and amfAR co-founder Joseph Sonnabend MD declared it “incompatible with life“. After more than twenty years as the leading AIDS drug, the California Environmental Protection Agency now lists it as a known carcinogen.

SENSITIVITY measures how often a test is positive when you already know what you are testing for is present. SPECIFICITY expresses how often a test is positive when a patient DOES NOT have the condition. In all HIV test literature, sensitivity and specificity are not based on measurements of the test against an isolated virus, but is a concordant measure between two tests that do not detect HIV or HIV antibodies.

Careful examination of the manufacturer’s label information makes this clear contrary to their claims of sensitivity and specificity of 99.9 percent. The vast majority of these reported measures of accuracy have nothing to do with whether HIV is present, but how well one test performs as compared to other tests already on the market. These measures of accuracy refer to the concordance between two tests; namely, how often a new test says a sample is positive when one already on the market says it is positive (sensitivity), and how often it is negative (specificity).

Given the fact that all HIV antibody tests are based on the same molecular principles and built from the same portfolio of basic molecular building blocks, their remarkable concordance is not surprising. However, even if two different tests demonstrate 100 percent concordance, that does not justify the use of either for purposes other than what they have been validated and approved for.

By analogy, if two different manufacturers were to construct two different timepieces using the same specifications for the gears and wheels, only to put them in different casings, it is very likely that these two clocks would perform quite similarly. However, even if there were greater than 99.9 percent concordance between these two timepieces, one cannot conclude that either clock measures time accurately. HIV tests are so notoriously inaccurate that ALL FDA-approved HIV test package inserts warn clinicians that persons who test positive can only be “PRESUMED to be infected.” “Clinically indicated” means that diagnosticians must rule out dozens of other conditions and factors that are known to cause false positive HIV test results. Some of those conditions include:

Just as clinicians cannot use HIV tests to diagnose HIV, flow cytometry has never been proven to accurately count CD4 cells. Even if they could, no studies have been conducted that produce baselines of what can be considered normal and abnormal among humans.

AIDS in AFRICA

Since about 1995, Americans have been told that AIDS is ravaging Africa. As a result, billions of dollars have been sent to Africa’s third-world leaders through Congress and NGOs to fight what researchers insist is a “global pandemic” (i.e., everyone will catch it).

After the discovery of diamonds, gold and other precious jewels in the late 19th century and the explosion of the mining industry in South Africa and throughout the African continent, the universities of Cape Town and Johannesburg lead research into mine-related lung diseases for nearly a century. Researchers found that, regardless of geography, humans who regularly inhale mine dust eventually succumb to fatal diseases like silicosis, asbestosis, pneumoconiosis, and tuberculosis. They also learned that humans who drink water polluted by heavy metals and toxins will eventually succumb to disease.

Today, more than 1500 international mining companies operate thousands of mines throughout Africa at a fraction of the cost that those companies would pay in places like the US and Europe. If we compare the cost to hire one US miner ($15,000K/mo) to the cost of hiring illiterate children from countries like Malawi and Nigeria (~$80/mo), the value of these mining operations to the global market is undeniable. But despite what we’re told, there is little evidence of an HIV epidemic in Africa. Official government statistics from Europe (2), Australia and South Africa [2007] show that actual HIV-related mortality is a tiny fraction of one percent of the overall populations.

When the lawsuit threatened the collapse of the international mining industry, funding for lung-disease treatment and research disappeared virtually overnight. In its place, millions of dollars in AIDS research funding flooded research centers. Today, companies like AVGold, AngloGold, Gold Field, AngloAmerican and RandGold promote aggressive HIV/AIDS testing and treatment programs under a humanitarian pretext. So when workers gets sick from lung diseases, company clinicians convince these illiterate miners that they forgot to wear condoms, have contracted HIV and need medications. When they die, their mortality is used to corroborate claims that HIV ravages the African continent.

When people get sick near a mine in the United States, companies like WR Grace pay billions to settle claims. However in Africa, where thousands of mining operations generate few complaints of hazardous waste and pollutants, activists and CDC officials are dispatched to “test and treat local victims for HIV”.

The United States cannot withdraw from Africa because of the scheme’s strategic value. After all, how does the US compete in the global market if we mine defense materials like gold and platinum for $15,000 per laborer and leave countries like China and Russia to mine the same materials at $80 per miner?

From a strategic viewpoint, America’s economic and strategic survival depends upon our material claims in Africa. Those claims depend almost entirely on the mythology of HIV that OMSJ’s HIV Innocence Group will continue to challenge. For the definitive book on this subject, OMSJ recommends Peter Duesberg’s Inventing the AIDS Virus (1995), which is now sold as an audio book.