Delayed, but not forgotten. The Bogleheads.org home page has been redesigned.

Layout

- The page is now a full 2-column format. Combined with the gray background, the home page is consistent with the wiki's look and feel.

- A proper site introduction has been added. This addresses a long-standing member request to help new readers understand what we do.

- The Home page tag line of "Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle" has been changed to "Investing Advice Inspired by John Bogle". We also changed the forum and wiki tag lines to much.

- The search engine has been relocated to the left-side column at the top of the page.

- Links to start new topics have been removed.

- A new "Contact Us" page has been added. This new page provides helpful information for both the forum and the wiki.

- The RSS feed icon is now in the page footer. A link to the support discussion has been added.

Post listings

- Links to all of the individual pages in a topic have been removed. This allows for a more compact and cleaner layout.
- In mobile mode (see below), the "First" column is not displayed in order to save space within the narrow display.

Mobile devices

Mobile devices are now supported. There is no device-specific support, only that the page layout will drop the left-side column and insert a mobile-friendly header at the top of the page.

If you want to view the full site (as a "desktop" - both columns, no header), try rotating your device to landscape. If the display width is > 600px, you'll see the desktop mode. Under 600px, it will go to mobile mode. The 600px threshold is from Google's Material design guidelines. It's the breakpoint between a handset and a tablet.

Features

The left-side column under "Bogleheads Forum", 3rd link down, will show "Login" if you are not logged in. Once you are logged in, the link changes to "View Your Posts".

Requested by the members: Topic title links now go to the first unread post (if logged in). Otherwise, the link will go to the first post in the topic.

To some, the glass is half full. To others, the glass is half empty. To an engineer, it's twice the size it needs to be.

With pinch to zoom/shrink disabled it's extremely difficult to see the list of posts in any coherent way. Have to scroll left to right to make sense of anything and now it seems almost every topic name takes multiple lines which makes the subjects more difficult to read..

The old way at least I could trade type size vs acerage and size the screen visible part of the page to be the part I was interested in.

Anyway we can go back to the old design for the topic list part of the or to at least re-enable pinch to zoom/shrink?

I like the format on my iPad. It just doesn't work as well on my android phone.

I noticed on the iPad that one can hide the explanation/descriptions at the top of the page (more/less) but that button doesn't seem to work on the phone. It looks like it is there, it just doesn't work.

Would it be possible to add more details back in the default mobile view, ideally with a smaller font size? The only columns I'm seeing on my Android phone are the thread title and the date/time of the most recent post. And each title spans several lines, making it hard to scan the list. Could the number of replies be included, at a minimum? And I'd prefer the font size to be a lot smaller, closer to what you'll be reading once you actually click on a post, so that titles take up fewer lines. I'd also argue that date of the original post is more relevant to display than the date of the most recent post, when in the default view sorted by most recent, if it's not possible to include both columns.

It's true that switching to landscape mode displays all these columns, but the font is still too big, so then I see only a couple of thread titles at a time in the now-shorter display.

I am not sure but I thought there was a way to go to the last page of a longer thread directly from the Home page. Meaning the page number were tiny clickable squares which are no longer present on the new home page.
Was that intentional?
Now, I have to click on the post and then find the page - usually last page is what I want.
Thanks for the upgrade.

I am not sure but I thought there was a way to go to the last page of a longer thread directly from the Home page. Meaning the page number were tiny clickable squares which are no longer present on the new home page.
Was that intentional?
Now, I have to click on the post and then find the page - usually last page is what I want.
Thanks for the upgrade.

The clickable squares were intentionally removed. You can easily go to the first or last post of a topic by clicking on the time link under the "First" or "Last" column.

To some, the glass is half full. To others, the glass is half empty. To an engineer, it's twice the size it needs to be.

So when one clicks on a topic, one automatically goes to the most recent post, way down on the page... with no way to easily remind oneself what the OP was?

Don't like that at all.

And the page where "all posts" are listed (and the sub-forum topic is shown by one letter on the left side)?
Looks awful.

Home page has only white background, and looks a bit like a mess.
I thought it was "in progress", not the final form.

MUCH prefer the old look, and the old functionality was fine preferably, too.
One could see the original post, scroll down a bit or not, and then click to get to the most recent post, be in a few posts down, or pages later.

I'm having a bit of trouble understanding what "problem" this was all intended to fix...

When a thread has a new post since I last read it, the title no longer goes back to blue. Is it by design?

Yes, that feature was also in the previous home page. Actually your browser is doing the work. It knows (via a slight change in the URL) that the link has changed and modifies the color accordingly.

Please put back the &newpost parameter on links when the user is logged in. Currently it is only on links when the user is logged out. Without it there is no visual indication that a thread has been updated since it was last read.

When a thread has a new post since I last read it, the title no longer goes back to blue. Is it by design?

Yes, that feature was also in the previous home page. Actually your browser is doing the work. It knows (via a slight change in the URL) that the link has changed and modifies the color accordingly.

Please put back the &newpost parameter on links when the user is logged in. Currently it is only on links when the user is logged out. Without it there is no visual indication that a thread has been updated since it was last read.

Ron

Very much agree,,, logged in now and no way to know if there is a new post on the thread.

When a thread has a new post since I last read it, the title no longer goes back to blue. Is it by design?

Yes, that feature was also in the previous home page. Actually your browser is doing the work. It knows (via a slight change in the URL) that the link has changed and modifies the color accordingly.

Please put back the &newpost parameter on links when the user is logged in. Currently it is only on links when the user is logged out. Without it there is no visual indication that a thread has been updated since it was last read.

Ron

Sorry, that was an oversight. It's fixed.

=====================
Via PM, a member informed me of a grammatical error. "is comprised of" has been changed to "is composed of".

To some, the glass is half full. To others, the glass is half empty. To an engineer, it's twice the size it needs to be.

- The Home page tag line of "Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle" has been changed to "Investing Advice Inspired by John Bogle". We also changed the forum and wiki tag lines to much.

Just curious, why the change from Jack to John? I know John is Mr. Bogle's legal name, but my understanding is he goes by Jack.

I had that reaction, too, but all his books say John C. Bogle. Wikipedia has the titling John C. (Jack) Bogle, which I thought was helpful. Many people may not know Jack is a common nickname for John.

On a similar note, I get a little piqued about adding the phrase "living below one's means" to this list of things Bogleheads emphasize. This is an investing forum, not a lifestyle forum, and that tenet is not listed in the Bogleheads Philosophy: The Bogleheads® Philosophy
*Develop a workable plan
*Invest early and often
*Never bear too much or too little risk
*Never try to time the market
*Use index funds when possible
*Keep costs low
*Diversify
*Minimize taxes
*Keep it simple
*Stay the course

I'm not sure Jack (John C.) ever mentioned "living below one's means". It doesn't have much to do with investing. Many folks on this board can save a ton and not embrace the lifestyle idea of living especially frugally. Might just be my own quirk, but the "cheapness" thing that gets associated with Bogleheads in general, should really just apply to investing.

- The Home page tag line of "Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle" has been changed to "Investing Advice Inspired by John Bogle". We also changed the forum and wiki tag lines to much.

Just curious, why the change from Jack to John? I know John is Mr. Bogle's legal name, but my understanding is he goes by Jack.

I had that reaction, too, but all his books say John C. Bogle. Wikipedia has the titling John C. (Jack) Bogle, which I thought was helpful. Many people may not know Jack is a common nickname for John.

On a similar note, I get a little piqued about adding the phrase "living below one's means" to this list of things Bogleheads emphasize. This is an investing forum, not a lifestyle forum, and that tenet is not listed in the Bogleheads Philosophy: The Bogleheads® Philosophy
*Develop a workable plan
*Invest early and often
*Never bear too much or too little risk
*Never try to time the market
*Use index funds when possible
*Keep costs low
*Diversify
*Minimize taxes
*Keep it simple
*Stay the course

I'm not sure Jack (John C.) ever mentioned "living below one's means". It doesn't have much to do with investing. Many folks on this board can save a ton and not embrace the lifestyle idea of living especially frugally. Might just be my own quirk, but the "cheapness" thing that gets associated with Bogleheads in general, should really just apply to investing.

Actually, living below one's means has EVERYTHING to do with investing. If you don't live below your means, there's nothing left to invest. Everything else follows that simple (but vital) statement.

- The Home page tag line of "Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle" has been changed to "Investing Advice Inspired by John Bogle". We also changed the forum and wiki tag lines to much.

Just curious, why the change from Jack to John? I know John is Mr. Bogle's legal name, but my understanding is he goes by Jack.

I had that reaction, too, but all his books say John C. Bogle. Wikipedia has the titling John C. (Jack) Bogle, which I thought was helpful. Many people may not know Jack is a common nickname for John.

On a similar note, I get a little piqued about adding the phrase "living below one's means" to this list of things Bogleheads emphasize. This is an investing forum, not a lifestyle forum, and that tenet is not listed in the Bogleheads Philosophy: The Bogleheads® Philosophy
*Develop a workable plan
*Invest early and often
*Never bear too much or too little risk
*Never try to time the market
*Use index funds when possible
*Keep costs low
*Diversify
*Minimize taxes
*Keep it simple
*Stay the course

I'm not sure Jack (John C.) ever mentioned "living below one's means". It doesn't have much to do with investing. Many folks on this board can save a ton and not embrace the lifestyle idea of living especially frugally. Might just be my own quirk, but the "cheapness" thing that gets associated with Bogleheads in general, should really just apply to investing.

Actually, living below one's means has EVERYTHING to do with investing. If you don't live below your means, there's nothing left to invest. Everything else follows that simple (but vital) statement.

When I wrote my post I thought of you Mel, because I know you feel that way. I think we may disagree on this point. Many BHs can save 30% or more for retirement and live a terrifically comfortable lifestyle. Living below one's means may not even enter into their mindset. They save what they need to and spend the rest. To me, the Boglehead mentality has to do with investing wisely, and not overpaying for investment products or advice, along with all the other critical points of the stated philosophy.

I equate the "living below one's means" idea with austerity or sacrifice. Maybe I'm coming at this from a different mindset than others, but Bogleheads philosophy (to me) is just about dispatching the money you have already decided to save. No vows of poverty needed.

*I say all of the above with great deference to you, knowing who you are and with great appreciation for everything that this site is!

- The Home page tag line of "Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle" has been changed to "Investing Advice Inspired by John Bogle". We also changed the forum and wiki tag lines to much.

Just curious, why the change from Jack to John? I know John is Mr. Bogle's legal name, but my understanding is he goes by Jack.

I had that reaction, too, but all his books say John C. Bogle. Wikipedia has the titling John C. (Jack) Bogle, which I thought was helpful. Many people may not know Jack is a common nickname for John.

On a similar note, I get a little piqued about adding the phrase "living below one's means" to this list of things Bogleheads emphasize. This is an investing forum, not a lifestyle forum, and that tenet is not listed in the Bogleheads Philosophy: The Bogleheads® Philosophy
*Develop a workable plan
*Invest early and often
*Never bear too much or too little risk
*Never try to time the market
*Use index funds when possible
*Keep costs low
*Diversify
*Minimize taxes
*Keep it simple
*Stay the course

I'm not sure Jack (John C.) ever mentioned "living below one's means". It doesn't have much to do with investing. Many folks on this board can save a ton and not embrace the lifestyle idea of living especially frugally. Might just be my own quirk, but the "cheapness" thing that gets associated with Bogleheads in general, should really just apply to investing.

Actually, living below one's means has EVERYTHING to do with investing. If you don't live below your means, there's nothing left to invest. Everything else follows that simple (but vital) statement.

When I wrote my post I thought of you Mel, because I know you feel that way. I think we may disagree on this point. Many BHs can save 30% or more for retirement and live a terrifically comfortable lifestyle. Living below one's means may not even enter into their mindset. They save what they need to and spend the rest. To me, the Boglehead mentality has to do with investing wisely, and not overpaying for investment products or advice, along with all the other critical points of the stated philosophy.

I equate the "living below one's means" idea with austerity or sacrifice. Maybe I'm coming at this from a different mindset than others, but Bogleheads philosophy (to me) is just about dispatching the money you have already decided to save. No vows of poverty needed.

*I say all of the above with great deference to you, knowing who you are and with great appreciation for everything that this site is!

Agree. We consider it important to live WITHIN one's means.
And that includes any savings necessary, such as for retirement, for college, for travel or hobbies... anything that can't be cash-flowed.
And cash-flowing special experiences or things is also included in living *within* one's means.