Post navigation

Share this Story

New Motorola Device Leaks, Looks All Sorts of Google-inspired

A new Motorola device surfaced last night, giving a glimpse at what the now Google owned company may have in store for the future. The device goes by model number XT912A (RAZR was XT912) and is definitely not the oft-rumoredX Phone (or is it?). What we are looking at is a mid-range device, but one that certainly looks more stock and less Moto than we have seen in some time.

The device is sporting a 4″ 720p display, 2GB RAM, Snapdragon S4 Pro processor, 2200mAh battery, and almost pure stock Android. The skin from Motorola has been broken down to almost nothing, with the newly featured left-side quick toggle menu seen on the RAZR HD now gone. You’ll see stock themed on-screen navigation keys, though those have been around since Jelly Bean on most Motorola phones. It really does look stock, outside of the circle Moto clock widget.

More importantly, this is a drastic change in styling for Moto when compared to the recent RAZR HD launches. The kevlar is gone and in are soft rounded edges, a circular camera, along with what appears to be a cascading edge-to-edge display edges similar to the Nexus 4.

Does this phone scream “Google!” or is it just me? Would love to hear your thoughts.

I don’t really see that, I think the back looks similar to the DNA and the front like the Nexus 4. Just doesn’t jump out at me it’s just dull

Dain Laguna

‘and the front like the nexus4’…..

which is almost identical to the galaxy nexus?

Apostrafee

Not at all, Nexus 4 is much wider almost rounded box with the Gnex being alot more slender….but that’s just what I SEE…I haven’t held this device…just initial impressions…I can’t stand that finger print magnet back

Dain Laguna

have you seen a gnex and nexus4 next to each other? the gnex isnt ‘alot more slender’. i’ve held both, the difference is almost non existent.

and matte backs arent finger print magnets.

Apostrafee

Haha they arent? did you look at those pictures?

Ryggore Mettane

It will certainly be sold under $300!

Romlover

no sd card slot….NEXT

http://profiles.google.com/davidukfl David Wanless

that’s a nice looking phone for sure

Austin Warren

Surprising how many people here are all over Motos D and only agree with other people because they can’t face the fact that just because Google acquired Motorola doesn’t mean they are going to make a damn thing. Hop off and get some common sense.

Dain Laguna

you’d rather us be all over samsungs then right? dude if you dont care, and you dont like the phone, why are you HERE?

Alexander Garcia

Most people visiting this post are most likely Moto fanboys (such as myself) and of course we’re excited. A hardcore Samsung fanboy like you shouldn’t even be here TROLLIN’ everyone else. Troll elsewhere

TylerChappell

Ah, so this is what they will be handing out at Google I/O this year…instead of a white 32gb Nexus 4.

bigdav1178

Meh… I’m sure I’ll get thumb’d-down, but I think all these phones look the same these days; I really see very little differentiation. The biggest difference in design that I’ve see is the new HTC One, and even that looks like an iPhone 5. I’m just not impressed.

KOBALT

Perhaps a triangle shaped one would suffice?

bigdav1178

WOW, awesome reply! Seriously, how hard is it to do something different: physical buttons, angled corners, physical keyboard… whatever, as long as it makes it different in some way. I actually liked the fact that Moto’s phones were different in asthetics (and that you could actually get a keyboard). You stick this phone on a table and stick a Galaxy S3 or Nexus 4 or whichever next to it – what is going to make some average person off the street choose the Moto over the others? Don’t tell me build quality or better radios or near-stock Android, because the average guy doesn’t know or think about those things. The average guy would see a couple phone that look pretty similar except for different sized screens (perhaps screen quality), some small differences in skins and styling, and maybe he’ll recognize one of them from a commercial. So we’ve got a couple pretty similar phones, which do you think he’d go with – I’d bet on the one that’s been advertised the most (see Samsung and Apple’s marketshares). Now give the guy something different to look at, and maybe he’ll actually choose it for its differences.

KOBALT

There’s on’y so many types of designs with a rectangle phone that has a large screen. Most people don’t want a physical keyboard, so there’s no market for it. You could make it bulge in spots like the DX and razr, but most people want a smooth candy bar style phone. People choose their phones by picking them up and playing with them. They like how they fit in their hands. Physical buttons are really a thing of the past whether you like it or not. And angled corners? All I can picture is a stretched out octagon. Or that hideous Casio Commando phone that didn’t sell:http://r.phonedog.com/shared/images/2011/5/158841-Commando1.JPG

gorkon

Nexus 5?

Jarid Willman

DO IT! DOOOOO IT!

Anon

My thoughts are –

-Does it have LTE/Verizon support? (Probably)
-Does it have GSM/HSPA+ support, so I can put it on another carrier if I choose?
-Is it compatible with Moto accessories? (e.g., is there a car dock, bedside dock)

If all of the above is true and I can buy off-contract, it’d sound very interesting.

etobare

feels like an atrix, specially how the carrier name is on the notification bar, that reminded me spot on of the atrix HD

also: i prefer kevlar to polycarbonate

Steve Benson

This is clearly an early test model but if this is the direction Motorola and Google are heading we’re in for a treat. The back definitely looks One X like and that’s a good thing. Sleek, sexy design combined with Motorola build quality and near AOSP and this will be an awesome phone. Even at this early stage, this is the best looking Motorola device I’ve ever seen. Can’t wait to see what the actual X phone looks like.

Austin Warren

Nobody can seriously say they will buy this with the S4 and Note 3 this year.

Steve Benson

Maybe, maybe not. But this is an extremely great sign that Motorola is moving away from their ugly design from…..well, from the very beginning.

Austin Warren

This is ugly. So hope they don’t.

Ibrick

Posting this once was enough, twice was irritating, three.. pathetic.
We get it, it’s not an S3, move on please.

http://www.gizmoninja.com/ Tabe

This being a 4″ device and supposedly NOT the “X Phone” makes your statement moot… It’s not a phone that’s designed to compete with those phones, seems more middle-tier.

bigdav1178

I have to agree. The average user now knows what the Samsung Galaxy series is thanks to a successful advertising campaign, and it shows based on their marketshare numbers. I don’t really see anything about this phone to set it apart from being an also-ran.

Abgar Musayelyan

The question is : will you buy this phone instead of a stratosphere 2? You can’t compare this to a note2 because they’re not in the same class.

Rodeojones000

Really? How about the fact that we really know nothing about its specs (so we can’t truly judge it against the S4 and Note 3). But what we do know about this Moto device – not ridiculously big, apparently no OEM skin, no physical buttons – are more than enough to set it apart from the S4 and Note 3. Not all of us are excited, or even interested, in what Samsung is going to announce soon.

shooter50

No OEM skin??? Funny, I’ve never seen that one used in a marketing campaign. Guess thats why S3 kicks the Nexus 4 to the curb.

Dain Laguna

so if its not used in a marketing campaign its not good? the nexus4 and s3 are 2 very different products as far as who they are available to.

The samething can be said about Motorola phones as well, man you need to relax a bit they are only phones and each person has their own likes and dislikes….. As for me I don’t care if a phone as onscreen buttons or not, or if it skin or stock Android.. All I care about is how it feels in hand and fits my needs.

Ibrick

OMG!! How can you not be poking a hole in your Samsung briefs with the S3 coming?

It’s the only phone that matters!!

Rodeojones000

Of course not, seeing as we know very little to nothing about this phone. But assuming the specs are halfway decent I can seriously say I would consider this device. But seeing as how I’m not even slightly interested in the S4 or Note 3 it’s kind of a moot point.

Not everyone has become the iPhone-like, blind cult follower of the Samsung devices as you have.

Austin Warren

IPhone like? You’ve got to be the stupidest fuc*ing person ever.

Dain Laguna

why? samsung fanboyism has gotten just as bad. comments like yours, and the resulting language, is pretty indicative of it.

shooter50

thats so funny, someone on Droid Life referring to another as cult like. Most here would by a Princess Phone if it ran stock android.

EC8CH

That probably says more about the lack of phones that run stock android than the cult like nature of Droid-Life.

Garrett Shields

I spot an AT&T 4G logo on the screen…possibly a new Atrix version of the RAZR M?

Steve Benson

I just jizzed in my pants…

Austin Warren

Must have low standards.

Two

Like your mother?

Alex Smith

That is a perfect sized and sleek phone from Moto. If the camera doesn’t suck Im 100% interested ‘

Tim242

You’re lucky that you are cute. That’s the only reason you can get away with that statement : )

Jarid Willman

I completely agree. I’m hoping that they stick a MAXX battery in this sucker and I might get on board even with the standard sucky Moto camera.

Plane148

Totally agree

Dain Laguna

same here. the sensor looks significantly bigger than in previous moto devices.

Tim Swann

looks HTC inspired actually

theentropic

If all future Moto phones go pure stock Android save a widget here or there (a la ASUS), I would be OK with that. It might even make me rethink my whole “Nexus or nothing” policy.

r0lct

That’s how I see it. No skin and the only customization is apps/widgets then it’s worth consideration.

Warwick

I do like the quick settings to the far left of the homescreen on the new blur on the Razr HD

jaymonster

based on previous articles, the reason you will not see a stock phone is because of VZW. Even the newer versions of “blur” are starting to qualify as ‘barely there’ In the newest release for the Moto Razr and Razr Maxx coming, they strip out more of the motorola customizations in favor of stock (including the Alarm, Music Player, and Photo Gallery).

Well they’re getting closer.
But until they put out phones running pure AOSP, I’m not interested.
NB4 support motorola at all costs guy says “blur really isn’t that bad”.

Aaron

With the exception of the clock widget, Blur for the most part is dead.

TheDrunkenClam

The framework is still there. Unnecessary.

r0lct

I don’t think we’ll see “pure AOSP” from Moto. I think there will be no skin/launcher but they’ll still include some apps/widgets that are Moto specific that can be easily ignored disabled.

TheDrunkenClam

Once Google finishes the “year and a half of pipeline” why would they continue with blur when they can use it as an opportunity to advance android. Remember, they didn’t buy Motorola just to make sure it continues with mediocre sales.

r0lct

I don’t think they will continue with Blur. However if they ship Moto purely stock then anyone comparing to a Samsung device can say I get all the stock features +Samsung stuff (which despite whether you like makes good marketing). So I think Google knows they’ll need to differentiate Moto phones. I don’t think it’ll be with a skin/blur, but with apps they can make Moto only to give them something to compete against Samsung with.

TheDrunkenClam

I think if google wants to play copycat on those features then they should make them as optional apps in the market.

http://www.gizmoninja.com/ Tabe

It’s not about playing copy cat, it’s about competing.

r0lct

Yes, it’s about creating an app/feature that’s ONLY on Moto phones, not copying Samsung.

Plus if Google was mischievous they could use this to keep certain new features out of stock and only put them into Moto to give them an advantage. Of course this could piss off the OEMs.

jaymonster

As long as they continue to be predominatly VZW, they will have some sort of skin.

I’m happy to see any Moto leak right now… this just means more to come. If that phone had a 3000mAh battery and 1080p display i would be first inline to pre-order. Is that a bit drastic?

Alex Smith

As noted in many HTC one reviews, the difference you see in a screen under 5″ from 720p to 1080p is negligible, but I’m all for the pumped up batteries

Austin Warren

They must be blind.

Tim242

The only difference seen is the screen tech…super LCD 3 vs super amoled. Put a one next to a one x, and you cannot tell the difference in resolution. You might see slightly better contrast because of slcd2 vs slcd3. You have to have a display of 40″ or more to see a difference between 720 and 1080. You are crazy to think you can tell a difference on a screen of 5″ or less. Science is not on your side.

Du

You must have special eyes

anezarati

obviously there is a full shell covering the actual design of the phone, but good to see the pretty much stock android experience.

http://www.gizmoninja.com/ Tabe

Obviously? It doesn’t appear as such to me.

anezarati

down votes? really? some people are naive. obviously there is a full shimmer to the front of the device that runs the whole front and there is a lip on the edges just like when i put a case/bumper on my n4. there are 2 lines that run the whole front of the screen in the video.

It is not in a shell, and it is running the same blur skin as their current phones. Stock-ish, but certainly not stock.

Asimoalex

This is more like it…. This is pretty sexy looking makes me almost want to give moto another chance keyword almost
Pissed off old Bionic user

Elliot Kotis

And if this is not an X Phone it is a Motorola pipeline phone, and not a “Google Phone”, and here is why:

1. Motorola have always been “close to stock”, maybe they decided to just screw all the overskin.

2. No Nexus logo or “made with Google”. Now we all know that when the Nexus 4 leaked it did in fact have the logo, even the prototypes, and Google likes having that, and further more they would want to people to know Motorola is now Google Owned.

3. A point is shared the 12 month thing, Google knows how much Apple was attacked over 3 iPad’s in a year.

4. They announced that they were keeping Google’s and Moto’s team separate, and so this may be Motorola’s flagship till X Phone, but it won’t be Googles, so it won’t be Android’s Flagship.

5. It is to…..Plastic looking.

6. Basically THE EXACT same specs as the N4, apart from screen size.

7. I follow Google closely, and they WOULD NEVER put a LOGO on the front of a device.

And going by the code, is it the True Sequel to Moto RAZR 2.0 or Moto RAZR S if you will.

Sherman J. Buster

Does this phone look “Google-inspired?” Yes. From the front, it has a lot of similarities to previous Nexus devices. However, the back looks like the HTC One. I actually prefer the look of how Moto had been designing their phones. The RAZR HD looked tough, and feels solid in the hand. Also, with Moto’s designs, there was no mistaking their phones. This one is too HTC.

Brandon Golway

I was about to say I always liked the look of the Moto phones because they looked vastly different than all the other phones out there. I love the angular look.

Dain Laguna

only the texture reminds me of htc. the shape of the phone, which stands out more than the backing, is very google-esque.

http://www.DanielTaylor.me/ Daniel Taylor

It has an AT&T 4G logo in the notification bar.

http://www.facebook.com/blp72 Brian Parkerson

I like the direction Moto seems to be taking with this…It definately has the “Nexus” look up front while the back, to me, has an HTC look going on. Notice at approx 3:40, there looks to be some type of unfamiliar side scrolling tabs or something on the display…can anyone explain what that could be?

Guest

Surely not Motorola X Phone, it has to be part of the 18 month’s and here is why:

1. An article by AndroidPolice Stated that they still had half of the 18 months left.

2. Google release a phone every 12 months.

3. X Phone was supposed to be revolutionary.

4. X Phone was supposed to be like the 3310 (strong)

And if this is not an X Phone it is a Motorola pipeline phone, and not a “Google Phone”, and here is why:

1. Motorola have always been “close to stock”, maybe they decided to just screw all the overskin.

2. No Nexus logo or “made with Google”. Now we all know that when the Nexus 4 leaked it did in fact have the logo, even the prototypes, and Google likes having that, and further more they would want to people to know Motorola is now Google Owned.

3. A point is shared the 12 month thing, Google knows how much Apple was attacked over 3 iPad’s in a year.

4. They announced that they were keeping Google’s and Moto’s team separate, and so this may be Motorola’s flagship till X Phone, but it won’t be Googles, so it won’t be Android’s Flagship.

5. It is to…..Plastic looking.

6. Basically THE EXACT same specs as the N4, apart from screen size

Warwick

6 in the morning great news!

br_hermon

What’s going on with the screen? I’d say it looks like a screen protector but it looks super thick, plus given how the light reflects off the screen it looks like it’s angular rather than flat.

anezarati

i think there is a full shell to hide the actual design of the phone

C-Law

I like it

http://twitter.com/ionas_alexandru Ionas Alexandru

how can it have 4 inches when the iphone 5 has 4 inches and look at the screen size difference in the video, it’s more like 4.5 inches.

Jan Massey

Me wants.

SamIAm

The screen is bigger than 4 inches. I’d say 4.3 or 4.5. You can clearly see when he compares it to the iPhone 5 at the 1:24 mark. Nice looking phone.

Austin Warren

A little too small for 2013.

Rodeojones000

I disagree. I think most phones now are too big. One of the reasons I despise the Note 2.

Austin Warren

Grow some hands

Rodeojones000

Really, this is your response? Are you 12-years-old? Aren’t you the same guy who replied to one of my comments the other day with, “sounds like a personal problem.”

For the record, my hands aren’t small (I’m 6′ 5″).

shooter50

calling someone a 12 year old because he disagrees with you? I suppose it was real adult like saying you “despise” the note II

Rodeojones000

First, my calling him a 12-year-old has nothing to do with his opinion. Rather it was directed at his very child-like response of, “grow some hands.” He is certainly entitled to his opinion.

Second, how is my saying I despise the Note 2 not adult-like? I don’t like it. I think it’s too big, I don’t like TouchWiz, the S-pen features don’t interest me, and I really don’t like phones with physical home buttons.

Tim242

I can’t wait to get rid of my Note II. I love certain aspects of it, but it is too wide. It makes my wrists hurt. Guess I need to grow some hands too haha. As for the S-Pen, I haven’t used it since the first week.

billy routh

If it hurts your wrist than be a Man and suck it up.

Tim242

Can you read? It wasn’t the disagreeing, it was the childish response, “Grow some hands.”

Jon

For the record, my hands aren’t small (I’m 5′ 6″)

Fixed that for you.

r0lct

While I love my Note 2 I do come across many who won’t consider 5″+ screen (especially iPhone users). This is good news if they are going to deliver good phones in the 4.5″ range to compete at every size.

Austin Warren

Nobody is going to want a 720p phone in 2013.

Rodeojones000

I would take a 4″-4.5″ 720p phone that’s stock Android without a physical home button over a 1080p device that’s 5″+ with actual buttons and an OEM skin and I wouldn’t even have to think twice about it. Some of us value other specs and design elements. It’s one of the reasons I believe my Galaxy Nexus is still the best Verizon device available.

Austin Warren

So does it take too much to throw a custom rom on? Oh wait. No cause you’d rather come up with different excuses.

Butters619

I’m with Rodeojones on this one. Throwing a AOSP ROM on a phone is a great way to get a like stock experience, but you won’t get the battery life and camera quality you want. Battery will get close with time, but the camera software on AOSP ROMs is always pretty gimped.

Tim242

Custom ROM’s on a Moto phone is not something that is fun or easy to do.

Verizon

I’m not sure why anyone would need an excuse to like or dislike a phone. If he doesn’t like it, he doesn’t like it. Why it matters to anyone else is just strange to me. He is right though, not everyone is looking for a huge phone or cares about 1080p. It is all personal preference.

andrew galvin

Austin you need to calm down. I am with Rodeo as well. This phone looks really nice and is a breath of fresh air from moto. Essentially a nexus 4 + LTE from the look of it. I think the note 2 is enormous and should not be viewed as the standard size for a smartphone but rather an oversized version for people who want larger screens that are used with two hands. It would be a mistake to make a phone that size and not release an equivalent smaller version (i.e. Galaxy s3). Also, look at the Droid DNA, to my knowledge there isn’t even an AOSP rom available for it yet. There is no substitute that owning a nexus for updates and full developer / AOSP support.

Dain Laguna

if the skin is so good, why should anyone have to do that?

just buy this and save yourself the trouble

Mustang5Oh

Not everyone who uses Android wants to root and run a custom ROM. If the product was good enough to begin with an not ugly like Touchwiz you wouldn’t need a custom ROM. You can’t call their product great if you need to root and ROM the thing.

Tyler

I agree, one of things i like most about the HTC One is that it has a 4.7″ 1080p display instead of 5″. Which for me is the perfect size for a screen on a phone.

Jarid Willman

Not true. I can’t see the pixels in my 720p phone right now, so why would I pay extra and sacrifice more battery life for a 1080p display?

Butters619

The iPhone 5 is 1136 x 640 and how many million have the sold? You sound foolish.

I wouldn’t mind one. Not everyone watches video on their phones. I have a computer for that

KleenDroid

I still wouldn’t trade my Gnex for any phone that is out now.

Mustang5Oh

Yeah you’re right…1080p on such a small screen (less than 50 inches) makes a HUGE difference. Troll!

Brandon S.

Wrong. Definitely wrong. The ceiling is coming for smartphones much like it did for PCs. 720 is fine on phones up to 4.5 inch. 1080 definitely has its place, but so does 720.

beat it kook

A 720p phone on a sub 4.5 in screen would most likely rival a 1080p screen on a giant phone like the note 2. I snowboard with my phone in my pocket for music and being able to communicate with my group when necessary and would love a top spec’d phone in a smaller form factor. Just cause you prefer having a large phone to compensate for other shortcomings does not mean the rest of us do. And by all the down votes my guess is that not many agree with you

Brandon S.

Agreed.

shooter50

wow, you hate a phone you can’t handle?

Dain Laguna

that makes total sense by the way

flyinggerbil

that’s what she said???

Butters619

People have been begging for a smaller high powered phone.

Plane148

Eh. I wouldn’t mind a phone that size. If it came out stock and with competitive specs, I’d definitely get it.

Justin Winker

I believe, according to the original source, its 4.65 inches.

kixofmyg0t

It’s 4.65″ in the rumors.

Rabid Rotty

The keyword is rumors

George Fayad

No volume buttons? It looks so much like a Samsung front with an HTC rear that it looks fake.

Greyhame

To me that screams pre-production unit. It’ll be interesting to see if the design changes when it’s released. I’m sure that logo will.

http://twitter.com/akhi216 Thomas Causey

Droid Razr M HD. I called it.

Dain Laguna

on verizon maybe.

kixofmyg0t

Photon HD on Sprint. I called it.

Larizard

Nah, can’t be a RAZR when there’s no Kevlar stuff and the corners aren’t angled. I think this phone looks like a sibling to the Nexus Q. It’s matte black in the back and curves is very reminiscent of the Q’s design.

http://www.JWesCampbell.com/ Wes Campbell

I’d really like to see moto come back from the dead, but it’s extremely hard for me to trust them after bootloader-gate.

Eric Franca

The non-symmetry of that front Moto logo is killing me, it must be a placeholder.

http://twitter.com/Ether813_IX Ian Ximinies

I hope you are right, that is the first thing i thought when i saw it there

r0lct

Other comments on The Verge from people who supposedly know say that’s a demo logo they place test phones. The pattern in the circle (how it’s broken/dotted) is how they track them.

Rodeojones000

Any chance it’s a watermark on the photo? At the bottom of the phone you see Motorola confidential property which surely won’t be on the actual device and the printing looks similar to the M logo on the top left.

Rodeojones000

Ignore my last comment. Just watched the video and I see it’s there as well.

Quark

Nexus 4 meets HTC One rear

EC8CH

which is a very smart idea IMHO

http://www.JWesCampbell.com/ Wes Campbell

i can definitely see some google-esque properties about it..

Naga Appani

Finally, back to life!!!!

Tom Luley

To me, the body looks A LOT like the Galaxy Nexus. I hope the X phone goes with a similar look…This is promising.

Captain_Doug

Looks solid. 4″ is a bit small but I’d be okay with it. I’m super impressed with how small the bezel is. Not just on the sides but the top and bottom too. 2200mah in a 4″ device is also huge. All that’s left is an unlocked bootloader. My fingers are crossed.

dp917

Anyone notice where the volume buttons are?

http://www.facebook.com/ebrown20 Evan Brown

this looks very promising, finally.

http://twitter.com/kittygetwet James Sorensen

Samsung front, htc back

moelsen8

wow, that’s a nice looking phone

Craig Williams

It looks like the DNA to me.

http://hifichallenge.wordpress.com/ Steven Shreve

I do like the kevlar look on the RAZR line, but this is also a pretty awesome looking device.

Jonathan Bunch

Good looking phone, looks like a gnex or a nexus 4. like the new moto logo too, just not on the front of the phone

You blind troll. He’s the biggest Samsung fanboy you will ever see. Well, if you weren’t blind.

Austin Warren

You’re still wrong.

Tim242

Wrong about what? You are an obnoxious Samsung fanboy troll. You are worse than iCreeps. Samsung does not make pretty phones. I am typing this from a Note II. It is functional, but not pretty. I can’t wait to get a new phone.

Mustang5Oh

Agreed. He is an obnoxious fanboy no better than any other fanboy out there. +1 to your comments!

Aaron17Watson17

I dont know him, ok? I was talking from an impartial point of view.

Tim242

Calling me a sick troll is so impartial /s

Rabid Rotty

Actually it’s more blah than ugly. This is Google’s influence? Wow they are getting pretty complacent. And the only fan boy I am is android. Not any particular manufacturer. As long as it’s not apple

Dain Laguna

you cant be serious that he cant have an opinion?

John Ippolito

LOUD NOISES! WHAT ARE WE YELLING ABOUT?!?!

Mustang5Oh

You are the biggest and most annoying Samsung fanboy in the world. You also win DLs worst commenter award. Congrats on a job annoyingly done!

http://twitter.com/The_Golden_word Gatthew Molden

Looks like a sticker to me.

Schiller

Well, this phone is a sweet mid-range smartphone:
it’s NOT Motorola Xphone.
It’s not TOP device.
It’s not supposed to compete with TOP devices.

About Droid Life

We consider ourselves to have the greatest Android community in the world, here at Droid Life. We talk general news, feature apps, review phones, and even teach you how to hack a little. But most importantly, there is no place on the internet that has the reader participation that we do and consider ourselves to be completely community driven. If you were looking for the best place to learn about Android and talk with like-minded folks about all things tech, then Droid Life is for you.