Thanks for answering, just contacted Jarvee support, I’ll see what they say and update here! I also think that per se having a browing history is better, the question is if FB/IG can see that you have one -> are a real user…

kripke:

But having the same exact same cookies on 500 accounts may also not be the best thing.

That’s what I also though, I’ll see what can be done…

Oh btw, for all this to work every acc has to be logged in the embedded browser right? In order for FB to correlate the acc and the browser? Or am I worng?

@fokus I wanted to use it mainly because I hope it could make the EB actions look more „human- like“. I suppose a browser of a real user would collect more and more fb Pixel cookies everytime visiting a fb-pixel site.

Alright, so to update here is what Jarvee said in terms of using FBE with sites without the FB pixel:

“Unfortunately, it won’t help, you need to add websites that have the Facebook pixel inside them.”

Then I asked if it is better to avoid the EB alltogether and after many texts back and forth (sometimes I hate how vague they are with their responses lol, need like 10 texts instead of 1 to get the actual answer…), they said it is better.

So basically, if you are using ipv6 or some other proxy where you can’t access any sites that have a FB pixel, avoid the embedded browser alltogether, both with the account and the fbe!!

hy @Daniel_Bilek , ofc the proxys matter. The background of @intdirjp statement is some proxy providers dont allow visiting all sites and you can’t visit fb pixel sites with them (with FBE). So you could make another account and use your home IP or VPS IP(as you can visit the whole web with them) and collect the cookies with that account.

hy, there is no other proxy needed. you just need an IP from wich you can reach the Pages FBE is visiting. As @wortime suggested you can also collect cookies using a chrome browser extension and add them to the cookies list.