Originally posted JULY 14, 2010

The seemingly contradictory mind of Kirk Cameron is a wonder indeed, but Cameron is one of thousands of double-minded evangelical Christians who believe in heretical doctrines such as the pre-tribulation rapture (Dispensationalism) and Dual Covenant Theology (Jews are chosen forever with their own covenant for salvation).

While Cameron’s recent work with his ministry, The Way of the Master, does offer tracts to evangelize Jews, it doesn’t go quite far enough, especially considering that Cameron was in the thick of Zionist Hollywood–even calling the producers of his hit TV show, Growing Pains, pornographers.

But perhaps there is nothing to make of this when you look at some of his religious films that go one step further. The Left Behind movies, two of which Cameron starred in, foments the old pre-tribulation rapture heresy that only benefits today’s apostate Jews and their horrific state of Israel.

When one looks at the actual origins of dispensationalism and the pre-trib rapture doctrine, one finds a long list of Jewish and Freemason interests.

Cyrus I. Scofield can easily be called the father of this Christian heresy, but I doubt very much that Cameron has come across any critical look at this mysterious Mason who created not only a doctrine, but a bastardized, war-hungry cult with a Christian mask on.

Freemasonry, Zionism, Scofield and his reference Bible are anything but Christian. Does Cameron not see this? Does he not know that the author of the Left Behind series, Tim Layhae, is a Freemason? Has Cameron given a critical look into the pre-tribulation dispensational teachings, as the Bible commands all to seek and search out the truth? Or has Hollywood twisted his perceptions, well below the radar of his Christian discernment?

There is also the possibility that Cameron is afraid to speak out against the anti-Christian Zionist power which provided him a living and made him wealthy. Perhaps he would suffer the same treatment that anti-Zionist Catholic actor Mel Gibson has suffered since he produced the powerful Passion of Christ movie. Since then, Gibson has been the Zionist target. Now look at Gibson today. But, Cameron is cleaner and has less skeletons than Gibson. Cameron would be far more successful in exposing anti-Christ Zionism.

As Mike Seaver, the character Cameron portrayed on the seemingly wholesome 80s sitcom, matured and grew (on the show and off) he began to seek God and developed a sense of discernment. This discernment led him to see the sinister truth behind Hollywood producers (most of whom are Liberal Jews). As the producers pushed for a more racy show (keeping in line with the deterioration of society) Cameron began to despise them and the new direction they were taking Growing Pains.

Cameron reportedly went as far as calling his Zionist producers, “pornographers.”
And rightly so. Hollywood’s true blue cousin, the pornography industry, is almost a completely owned and operated Jewish institution.

“Jews totally run Hollywood,” said Jewish columnist Ben Stein in the LA Times in 2008.
But Cameron already knows this. He once told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly that a Hollywood acquaintance told him,”Boy, you sure picked the wrong religion for this town!” Cameron had become a Christian amongst a tide of anti-Christian Liberal Jews in Hollywood.

“The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.” Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged,” Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw magazine, said in an interview with Luke Ford.

“According to [Luke] Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion,” said Nathan Abrams in the Jewish Quarterly in 2005.

Could the same be said of Jewish involvement in Hollywood in general?

Cameron’s Christian evangelism is commendable and according to the teachings of Christ in the Bible, but even Jesus Himself did not shy away from Jewish power in His time.

“Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer
from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” –Jesus to the Pharisees, John 8:44.

“Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Yours is the House of desolation, the home of the lizard and the spider,” said Jesus.

Irv

How can the “rapture” be “imminent”? Acts 3:21 says that Jesus “must” stay in heaven (He’s now there with the Father) “until the times of restitution of all things” which includes, says Scofield, “the restoration of the theocracy under David’s Son” which obviously can’t begin before or during Antichrist’s reign. (“The Rapture Question,” by the long time No. 1 pretrib authority John Walvoord, didn’t dare to even list, in its scripture index, the too-hot-to-handle Acts 3:21!) Since Jesus can’t even leave heaven before the tribulation ends (Acts 2:34,35 echo this), the rapture therefore can’t take place before the end of the trib! (The same Acts verses were also too hot for John Darby – the so-called “father of dispensationalism” – to list in the scripture index in his “Letters”!)
Paul explains the “times and the seasons” (I Thess. 5:1) of the catching up (I Thess. 4:17) as the “day of the Lord” (5:2) which FOLLOWS the posttrib sun/moon darkening (Matt. 24:29; Acts 2:20) WHEN “sudden destruction” (5:3) of the wicked occurs! The “rest” for “all them that believe” is tied to such destruction in II Thess. 1:6-10! (If the wicked are destroyed before or during the trib, who’d be left alive to serve the Antichrist?) Paul also ties the change-into-immortality “rapture” (I Cor. 15:52) to the posttrib end of “death” (15:54). (Will death be ended before or during the trib? Of course not! And vs. 54 is also tied to Isa. 25:8 which is Israel’s posttrib resurrection!)
Many are unaware that before 1830 all Christians had always viewed I Thess. 4’s “catching up” as an integral part of the final second coming to earth. In 1830 this “rapture” was stretched forward and turned into a separate coming of Christ. To further strengthen their novel view, which the mass of evangelical scholars rejected throughout the 1800s, pretrib teachers in the early 1900s began to stretch forward the “day of the Lord” (what Darby and Scofield never dared to do) and hook it up with their already-stretched-forward “rapture.” Many leading evangelical scholars still weren’t convinced of pretrib, so pretrib teachers then began teaching that the “falling away” of II Thess. 2:3 is really a pretrib rapture (the same as saying that the “rapture” in 2:3 must happen before the “rapture” [“gathering”] in 2:1 can happen – the height of desperation!).
Other Google articles on the 182-year-old pretrib rapture view include “Pretrib Rapture Politics,” “Pretrib Rapture Scholar Wannabes,” “Famous Rapture Watchers,” “Pretrib Rapture Diehards,” “X-Raying Margaret,” “Edward Irving is Unnerving,” “Thomas Ice (Bloopers),” “Walvoord Melts Ice,” “Wily Jeffrey,” “The Rapture Index (Mad Theology),” “America’s Pretrib Rapture Traffickers,” “Roots of (Warlike) Christian Zionism,” “Scholars Weigh My Research,” “Pretrib Hypocrisy,” “Appendix F: Thou Shalt Not Steal,” “Thieves’ Marketing,” “Pretrib Rapture Secrecy,” “Deceiving and Being Deceived,” “Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty,” and “Christ’s return is NOT imminent!” – all by the author of the bestselling book “The Rapture Plot” (see Armageddon Books). Patriots should also Google “The Background Obama Can’t Cover Up.”