It’s An Illusion

Members of parliament
are in fact, ”DIRECTORS OF A CORPORATION” which will keep heading in the same direction no matter who is elected. So voting is a waste of time, regardless of how few of us take part in the farce.

POLITICS;
Pertaining to POLICY, or the ADMINISTRATION of the GOVERNMENT POLICY: A plan or course of action, as of a GOVERNMENT, POLITICAL PARTY or CORPORATION – a WRITTEN CONTRACT or a CERTIFICATE of INSURANCE. Not sure why it is a certificate of insurance.

Acts of PARLIAMENT
become STATUTES; PRIMARY LEGISLATION which in turn are ENACTED and ENFORCED by STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS; SECONDARY LEGISLATION.

COUNCIL TAX
is a STATUTORY INSTRUMENT ENACTED on 1st April 1993 under its PRIMARY LEGISLATION the LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1992.

STATUTORY:
Created, defined or relating to a STATUTE; conforming to a statute.

INSTRUMENT:
A WRITTEN LEGAL document such as a CONTRACT, lease, deed will or bond.

SOCIETY:
the SOCIALLY DOMINANT members of a community, a SOCIETY is a number of PERSONS united together by mutual CONSENT, in order to deliberate, determine and act jointly for some COMMON PURPOSE. Who are the ‘socially dominant’ and is their mutual consent applicable to me?

CONTRACT:
an agreement between two or more PERSONS that CREATES or MODIFIES an existing RELATIONSHIP.

OFFER, CONSIDERATION and ACCEPTANCE
must exist for a CONTRACT to be made.

CONSTITUTION;
The fundamental RULES, written or unwritten that establishes the CHARACTER of a GOVERNMENT by defining the basic principles to which a SOCIETY must CONFORM.

You were not given a choice if you wanted to join this SOCIETY, it was made for you at a time when you could not express a choice. Yes, I was only a couple of minutes old when the paperwork (birth certificate) was fraudulently completed. Surely, unlawful.

STATUTE:
A LEGISLATIVE RULE of SOCIETY given the FORCE of law by the CONSENT of the GOVERNED, a RULE, as of a CORPORATION. So, it doesn’t apply to me – I don’t recall consenting.

STATUTES are not LAWS.
From the neuter of Latin : STATUS: THE legal character or condition of a PERSON or thing. It is totally imaginary, not real.

UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION

The UNITED KINGDOM is a CORPORATION and has employees. The employees are not just civil servants but everyone, if you have a N.I. number you too are an employee of this CORPORATION. More fraud, I wasn’t told this when I got an N.I. nuimber – therefore another fraudulent contract.

COMPANY POLICY of this CORPORATION
requires you, as an EMPLOYEE to pay TAX and follow all the LEGISLATIVE RULES of that CORPORATION in this case STATUTES.

As in any COMPANY, if you break the RULES
you will be DISCIPLINED under that COMPANYS LEGISLATION.

The Police of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION
are all COMPANYS too, run for PROFIT. How is the profit accounted for and where does it go?

As CORPORATE POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
their job is to ENFORCE the RULES of the CORPORATION.

The COURTS of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION
are all COMPANYS too, if you break the RULES they will invite (SUMMONS) you to their place of business to discuss your punishment, except they are not inviting YOU, you have been deceived into thinking that its YOU they’re inviting.

Even the highest COURT
in the land (THE HOUSE OF LORDS) is a CORPORATION.

The POLICEMAN and the CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE

The POLICE MAN (HUMAN BEING)
has a duty under COMMON LAW to serve and protect and uphold the COMMON LAW.

The POLICE OFFICER (FICTION)
is a CORPORATE EMPLOYEE a REVENUE COLLECTOR who enforces STATUTES

You are in COMMON LAW JURISDICTION
this means that no CIVIL LAW STATUTE applies unless you CONSENT to it.

Police are a COMPANY
which exists to make PROFIT. They PROFIT from you by enforcing STATUTES on you, not LAWS, POLICY.

LEGALESE

A language can be created and used by a SOCIETY; a CORPORATION can be such a SOCIETY. LEGALESE is such a language, it is English but some words have VERY different meanings… LEGALESE is the language of the LAW SOCIETY.

Example; MUST is synonymous with MAY (if someone from a CORPORATION says “you MUST” they are actually giving you a choice, because they can’t force you, they are not allowed to because its not LAW its only POLICY.

Example; SUMMONS is synonymous with INVITATION. When you get a SUMMONS from a COURT of supposedly LAW you are actually being INVITED to a CORPORATE place of business to discuss how much money you are going to give that CORPORATE place of business.

Example; UNDERSTAND is synonymous with STAND UNDER. If I say “do you UNDERSTAND” and you reply “yes” that means you have given me authority over you. It’s as simple as that.

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE.
Also traded as MAGISTRATES COURTS, every one of them is a CORPORATION running for PROFIT.

If you go to COURT (CORPORATE place of BUSINESS)
you are asked immediately for your NAME, they even presume to know who you are and will ask as such…

MR SMITH? — MR is the title of something with LEGAL PERSONALLITY (STATUS)

You were named by your parents but they didn’t call you MR John Smith.

If you reply “yes” to the NAME you have agreed to REPRESENT the FICTIONAL ENTITY with LEGAL PERSONALLITY i.e. Mr JOHN SMITH/ Mr Smith

A man cannot be acted on by STATUTES, nor can a woman, a flesh and blood human being, STATUTES only apply to the FICTIONAL ENTITY with a LEGAL PERSONALLITY.

So, if you don’t give your strawman name, they can’t deal with you.

Every TITLE
in this land is a FICTION e.g. Mr, LORD, REV etc because it doesn’t apply to a flesh and blood human being, it is the LEGAL STATUS.

NATURAL or COMMON LAW applies to you,
inherent LAW. You know inherently what is right or wrong.

COMMERCIAL POLICY (UCC), CIVIL POLICY and POLITICAL POLICY applies to the FICTION
but they need the flesh and blood human being to REPRESENT it because the LEGAL PERSONALLITY does not exist.

A COMPANY exists
only because a piece of paper says it does but its not REAL.

COMMON LAW vs. STATUTE RULES/POLICY

The only basic principles that any people of any nation need to adhere to are those of NATURAL LAW which are mirrored in COMMON LAW – Never cause HARM or LOSS. This covers every eventuality. COMMON LAW applies to a man or a woman. STATUTE RULES apply to the PERSON only when the man or woman CONSENTS to REPRESENT the PERSON

CONSENT can be given by IN-ACTION as well as ACTION.

Within COMMON LAW exists the word JUSTICE within STATUTE RULES you will just receive SUMMARY JUDGEMENT- you broke the RULES of the CONTRACT- you lose.

You are a man or a woman, you have a PERSON you exist NATURALLY, you are subject to COMMON LAW JURISDICTION. (JURIS-of law. DICTION-the use of words) you were created by god, nature the divine whatever.

You must never cause another HARM or LOSS or commit FRAUD.

You have free and unlimited ability to CONTRACT and settle debt in private under COMMERCIAL LAW.

You have been labelled through deception with a fictitious entity the all caps NAME on your birth certificate.

The fictitious you was created by government. Or was it The Crown?

The fictional entity is subject to CIVIL POLICY (TAX etc) under STATUTE.

The fictitious entity does business in the public and is controlled by CIVIL LAW and CORPORATE COURTS.

WHAT IS A PERSON?

They are inviting a PERSON created by the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION. Your PERSON was created when your birth was REGISTERED and is evidenced by your BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

Man created GOVERNMENT which in turn created PERSONS. Your PERSON is not you; it is a LEGAL FICTION which you are falsely identifying with because you have been deceived massively. You don’t get to say what its RIGHTS and DUTIES are, the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION does but it has to MISLEAD into doing so by DECEPTION.

DEFINE PERSON

Includes natural PERSON, FIRM. CO-PARTNERSHIP, ASSOCIATION, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY or CORPORATION- LEGAL PERSONALLITY (Defining a word with the same word is failing to define anything). PERSON is defined as a FICTION in blacks law 3rd edition.

THE CREATION OF A PERSON

When you were born your mother/father SUBMITTED a BIRTH CERTIFICATE REGISTRATION APPLICATION FORM

In the FORMULATION of any LIMITED COMPANY/CORPORATION there is always a CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION to create its LEGAL PERSONALLITY. Your fictional PERSON known as Mr, Mrs or Ms is created by the same means

SUBMIT A REGISTRATION APPLICATION

When you SUBMIT you are bending to another’s will.

When you REGISTER you are handing over LEGAL TITLE of what you are REGISTERING to whoever you are REGISTERING it to, you are REGISTERING to ACKNOWLEDGING or TRANSFERRING the AUTHORITY to another by this PROCESS.

When you APPLY, which means to beg, the assumption is made that you know exactly what you are begging for by whom or what you are APPLYING to and you know exactly what you are willing to give up for it, and most of the time you VOLUNTEERED your APPLICATION and you were not forced to APPLY.

BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
How the PERSON is created as a“BONDED SLAVE”

You get a CERTIFIED COPY you don’t get the ORIGINAL.

NAME of the PERSON being created- CAPITALISED SURNAME is a FICTION

NAME of PERSON father/mother CAPITALISED SURNAMES is the INFORMANT, they have the QUALIFICATION needed to be able to INFORM on the child being born.

At the bottom of the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a DECLARATION, a declaration is in COMMON LAW (a sworn oath of a man or woman) a DECLARATION from a man or woman to prove a man or woman was PRESENT to REPRESENT the PERSON needed to create the new PERSONS LEGAL PERSONALLITY.

Then you REGISTER the BIRTH CERTIFICATE to a CORPORATION the GENERAL REGISTER OFFICE.

REGISTRATION AND YOUR CHILDREN

To this day REGISTRATION still means the same thing i.e. the TRANSFER of LEGAL TITLE to the body you have REGISTERED it with. More fraud.

As you have seen the worst possible way that this process could have been abused is in the REGISTRATION of BIRTHS. I sure have.

A simple show of how your child no longer belongs to you is this; mandatory vaccinations, mandatory schooling, holidaying the children when they say you can and not before…..they tell you how to manage their PROPERTY and if you don’t do it their way their APPOINTED GUARDIANS take your children away: the SOCIAL SERVICES PLC a CORPORATION.

You have no claim whatsoever to your children because you’ve been duped.

PLEASE CONSIDER THIS

Could the GOVERNMENT take your car away and crush it LAWFULLY if you actually owned it? It would be totally UNLAWFUL so in the process of REGISTERING your vehicle they dupe you into handing over LEGAL TITLE of that vehicle (ownership) and you get a V5 DOCUMENT as the REGISTERED KEEPER (a PERMISSION to use it as long as long as it is used in ACCORDANCE with all their RULES) If they did not dupe you into this the very ACT of taking and crushing your PROPERTY would be a CRIME in COMMON LAW. Also by REGISTERING it you, as STATED AGREE to ABIDE by their RULES and do so in their SOCIETY, this is how they LEVY the fuel DUTY, road TAX, MOT REQUIREMENT.

You then REGISTER it to another CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT also traded as DVLA.

PLEASE REMEMBER

When you REGISTER something, anything, you give up ownership of it and instead you get a CERTIFICATE OF TITLE, this is worthless and this is why you own nothing not even your children, house, car etc.

FIXED PENALTY NOTICES issued by CORPORATIONS

So why are there so many FIXED PENALTY NOTICES (FPN) being given for the most ludicrous reasons? Parking in a place a CORPORATION deems you can’t. Speed cameras, not completing a SORN the list are endless, but what are these NOTICES in the real world being ISSUED by these CORPORATIONS which never stop dreaming up reasons for PENALISING you. PENALISED by way of FORFIET: (something surrendered or subject to surrender as a punishment for a breach of CONTRACT)

FPN:
An OFFER to accept an ADHESION CONTRACT.

ADHESION CONTRACT:
A type of CONTRACT a LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT between two PARTIES to do a certain thing in which one side has all the bargaining power and uses it to write the CONTRACT primarily to his, her or it’s advantage.

A NOTICE is not a BILL,
a NOTICE is not a DEMAND, A NOTICE is nothing more than an OFFER to discuss the CONTRACT the OFFERER is trying to force upon your PERSON. This is simply a tool for REVENUE COLLECTION.

The true reason why these FPNs are forced upon your PERSON is simply to maintain the ILLUSION that they have control over your LIFE, FORTUNE, and FREEDOM because you FEAR their ability to take away from you something you deem valuable.

LAWFUL REBELLION

Peacefully resist all claims against your PERSON by refusing to CONSENT to the CORPORATIONS POLICY

Always ask when stopped by a POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICER “Am I OBLIGED to answer your questions” “Under what AUTHORITY and what LAW are you ACTING” if they say to you “Its under this or that LAW” and you can prove its only an ACT or STATUTE, remind them that “failure to differentiate between a STATUTE and LAW is GROSS NEGLIGENCE which is equivalent to the COMMON LAW CRIME of FRAUD. This applies to anyone who tries to enforce a STATUTE upon you no matter who they are. Thank you,!

YOU ARE A MAN/WOMAN IN LAWFUL REBELLION YOU ARE NOT A PERSON

You are a man or a woman you are not a PERSON The legal world is the same as your PERSON it is a FICTION an ILLUSION that does not exist in the REAL WORLD That is why the CORPORATE EMPLOYEES must get the man or woman to REPRESENT the PERSON before a contract can be formed. They will ask you your NAME and ADDRESS and if you give it to them they will have JOINDER

There is no LAW saying you have to give your NAME and ADDRESS, if you do give it to them you have said “yes I am the PERSON”.

Remember, there is no JUSTICE in this country only SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, for every COURT, even the highest in the land is a FOR PROFIT CORPORATION which is part of THE UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION.

Michael of Kingstanding, a very active Freedom Rebel has sent out the following email. He knows no fear and relishes the fight for freedom and justice.

Hi, Folks. After months of study. After successes against:

Court appointed bailiffs (£900 not paid and dead in the water)

Two £10K credit card accounts.

A solicitor chasing an alleged £300 contract

PCNs from 4 councils. (parking)

NIPs from three Constaburglaries (speeding)

An elektrickery company that cannot prove they have a contract

Five summonses not attended (four in progress)

It’s time for the big ones.

Some time soon I expect to receive yet another summonse related to more than fourteen traffic related charges. (There are another two NIPS in the out tray.) Rather than accept their invitation to visit Hertford, I invited them to visit me in Watford.

Additionally, I have engaged with three rivers district council over “council tax.” I expect the engagement to escalate in the following months. It will be an exciting ride.

So here’s my list of how to keep a little of what you earn for yourself.

Avoid the State. Really. Government has NO money other than yours. Take a good long hard look at your daily activities and try and spot where the State has decided it has the right to cream off just that little bit more from you. Whether it be the “duty“ on a plane ticket or a permit to park your car, find a way to avoid it. I book long haul flights leaving from Schiphol airport in Holland and save thousands in tax.

Stop consuming rubbish that just gives the State an extra 20% in VAT on the money you have already paid income tax on.

Avoid anything that is subsidised by a state grant, whether it be not using a hydrogen cell bus or not visiting an art gallery that features some untalented but politically correct exhibition staged at the expense of the taxpayer. Vow never to drive alone in a car, pool your resources and minimise the fuel duty you pay.

Go self-employed, it infuriates them as they have to wait for the money you just earned.

March down to your council offices to question your council tax bill and demand to know why the bureaucrats are spending millions on “democracy facilitation“ whilst threatening you with jail if you refuse to pay.

I could go on all day, but as an exercise for the week, try keeping all your receipts, bills and invoices and total up what extra taxes you are paying. Then do it over a month, or a year and you’ll soon see that the very lifeblood is being drained from you.

You are feeding the most voracious parasite that will never release you as long as it continues to be fed. From birth until after your death, all the State is interested in is your money and how it can get more of it.

” The Judge decided to kick two of us out who were “not party to proceedings”.

Not before I made an application and told the Judge that we were there representing the Wider Public Interest, he then panicked, got up, to scuttle off, before he managed to leave the ‘room’. I declared that he was committing Treason, and that the ‘Trial’ did not meet with Article 6 standards of the Human Rights Act. If we were to leave because Article 6 declares that all hearings must be fair and available to the Public and if they are to be private then at least the first instance must be in Public.

What I did not address him on was the Common Law aspect, this was because he got up to leave as I was speaking to him. Under Common Law, which sits above all other Law the man’s right was to be tried before a Jury of his peers and not to be disinherited, which means that you cannot remove someones children in Law full stop, they have to give them away.

A Settlement Certificate, also known as a “Birth Certificate” since 1837, is an official document issued to validly recorded poor (paupers) granting them certain basic rights and entitlement to benefits in exchange for recognition of their status as being owned as “property” and lawful slaves, also known as indentured servants and bondsmen. A “settlement” therefore is equivalent to a voluntary slave plantation.

Origin of Settlement (Birth) Certificates

Under King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar advisers, the first poor laws were promulgated around 1535 coinciding with the first official mandate requiring uniform record keeping by all Church of England parishes of births, deaths and marriages. The poor were considered the responsibility of the “Church” including ensuring they had ample work and did not starve to death as they were considered by default the property of the church.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures which were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers. Under the Erection of Cottages Act 1588, peasants required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord’s land was considered a “right”. As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or “paupers” swelled.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, the laws concerning the administration and care of the “poor” were refined through the Poor Law (1601) which introduced a basic set of “rights” for the poor as well as the introduction of two “Overseers of the Poor” (Guardian) in each Parish, elected at Easter and funded through the first levy (tax) through local rates (now called “council taxes”) on property owning rate payers.

Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined through the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child’s birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate. However from the age of 7 upwards the child could have been apprenticed and gained a settlement for itself through called indentured service, or “voluntary slavery”. Also, the child could have obtained a settlement for itself by service by the time it was 16.

Under the “reforms” of the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”. If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home.

According to the various settlement acts from the 17th Century onwards until the introduction of Birth Certificates, the issue of a Settlement Certificate was considered a privilege, not a right. If a peasant wanted to move, the home parish could choose to issue a Settlement Certificate which then effectively became an indemnity insurance to the new parish if the pauper was unable to earn a living. A settlement certificate was only valid if it bore the seals of the overseers of both parishes and that of the local Justices and was not transferable. This is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as “P” (Paupers or Peons) used today.

Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1723 a new law was passed called the Workhouse Test Act (1723) in which those who wished to claim benefits and relief as poor now had to enter a “workhouse” being essentially a prison for men, women and children to perform some set work. To ensure that all poor were accounted and could be identified, new laws were also introduced to force the Paupers to wear a ‘P’ on their right shoulders as a mark of their status. This is both the origin of the “P” still placed as a mark on modern passports and other “official” documents and the “P” worn by prisoners from the 20th Century.

Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773, followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801, English Parliament effectively “privatized” massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become “landless paupers” and therefore in need of parish assistance. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today.

Because of the deliberate “legal” theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly “employed” in a workhouse prison. Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being “wage slavery” or “lawful slavery” was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were worked “to death”.

Beginning in 1834, a number of historic changes were introduced to the record keeping of births, deaths and marriages, the issuance of documents and the management of the “poor”:

(i) In 1834, British Parliament introduced the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which reorganized Church of England parishes into unions which would then be responsible for the poor in their area and administered by a Board of Poor Law Guardians, also known as the Board of Guardians. The clerks of Magistrates Courts still hold the power of a Clerk of the Board of Guardians; and

(ii) In 1835, the Municipal Corporations Act (1835) was introduced which effectively standardized the corporate model for towns and boroughs including making the municipality with elected officials responsible for data collection and service administration; and

(iii) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes. Thus on 1 July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all “paupers” disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful (“voluntary”) slaves with benefits provided by the local parish/region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today.

Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”. The Local Government Act of 1871, Public Health Act 1872 and Public Health Act 1875 created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894, the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”.

Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.

Birth Certificate as proof one is born on the land

One fundamental flaw that remains within the Settlement (Birth) Cerificate System for the Roman Cult and its agents remains the fact that a Settlement Certificate is proof that a man or woman must have been born on the land for the certifiate to have effect, regardless of convoluted subsequent presumptions of what the certificate actually represents. If a man or woman was not born on the land somewhere a certificate could not be issued. Therefore any rejection, or return of a Birth Certificate serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on the land and support to any Affadavit of Truth concerning their immutable rights from the Divine Creator.

This built in “flaw” is offset through the treatment of men and women as land themselves, through the deliberate corruption of the definition of land to include all that has been born naturally or self-improved on the land. In other words, the sharp edge reason the system ultimately denies each citizen their share of the commonwealth is because they are considered “chattle” and mere creatures less than slaves.

Birth Certificates are not “extremely valuable” to the holder in whose name the certificate is issued

While it is true that Birth Certificates are considered valuable securities that are traded amongst the private international entities and the elite, the holder in whose name the certificate is issued does not have access to such value.

Instead, by holding the Birth Certificate, the man or woman essentially consent to being treated as a pauper or peon and the sole obligation of the elite to provide mere scraps so that the man or woman does not die of starvation or great illness.

As Settlement Certificates and later Birth Certificates are solely and purposefully designed to disenfranchise men and woman from their rightful inheritance through voluntary enslavement and admission to being “paupers”, the system of Birth Certificates is wholly without legitimacy, a global system of organized fraud and crime and without lawful effect.

DISCLAIMER: The information produced above is for education purposes only and does not purport to be an official ruling, decision or action. Nor should the information in anyway be construed as legal advice. The use of the information is at the discretion of the reader and no liability shall be accepted in the event of its use. Always seek the advice of educated, reputable and honorable scholars of law first, before any action involving the law.