ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 001-34176

ASCENT CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

State of Delaware

26-2735737

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)

5251 DTC Parkway, Suite 1000

Greenwood Village, Colorado

80111

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 628-5600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of exchange on which registered

Series A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Series B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, any Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company).

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of Ascent Capital Group, Inc. computed by reference to the last sales price of such stock, as of the closing of trading on June 30, 2016, was approximately $130.0 million.

The number of shares outstanding of Ascent Capital Group, Inc.'s common stock as of February 15, 2017 was:

Series A common stock 11,967,387 shares; and Series B common stock 381,859 shares.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

The Registrant's definitive proxy statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On July 7, 2011, Ascent Media Corporation merged with its direct wholly-owned subsidiary, Ascent Capital Group, Inc. ("Ascent Capital", the "Company", "we, "us" and "our"), for the purpose of changing its name to Ascent Capital Group, Inc. Ascent Capital was incorporated in the state of Delaware on May 29, 2008 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discovery Holding Company ("DHC"), a subsidiary of Discovery Communications, Inc. On September 17, 2008, Ascent Capital was spun off from DHC and became an independent, publicly traded company. The spin-off was intended to qualify as a tax-free transaction.

At December 31, 2016, we had investments in marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents, on a consolidated basis, of $77,825,000 and $12,319,000, respectively.

In 2016, Monitronics International, Inc. unveiled its new brand name, MONI. The new MONI brand will be marketed directly to consumers and supported by direct-to-consumer sales and customer support. The brand was designed to allow custom solutions to flow directly into the home as well as providing dealers with national marketing, sales and customer service support.

MONI provides security alarm monitoring and related services to residential and business subscribers throughout the U.S. and parts of Canada. MONI monitors signals arising from burglaries, fires, medical alerts and other events through security systems at subscribers' premises, as well as providing interactive and home automation services. Nearly all of its revenues are derived from monthly recurring revenues under security alarm monitoring contracts acquired through its exclusive nationwide network of independent dealers or through LiveWatch.

On September 30, 2016, MONI entered into an amendment ("Amendment No. 6") with the lenders of its existing senior secured credit agreement dated March 23, 2012, and as amended and restated on April 9, 2015, February 17, 2015, August 16, 2013, March 25, 2013, and November 7, 2012 (the "Existing Credit Agreement" and together with Amendment No. 6, the "Credit Facility")). Amendment No. 6 provided for, among other things, the issuance of a new $1,100,000,000 senior secured term loan at a 1.5% discount and a new $295,000,000 super priority revolver.

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding our business, marketing and operating strategies, integration of acquired businesses, new service offerings, the availability of debt refinancing, financial prospects and anticipated sources and uses of capital. In particular, statements under Item 1. "Business," Item 1A. "Risk Factors", Item 2. "Properties," Item 3. "Legal Proceedings," Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" contain forward-looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. The following include some but not all of the factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated.

Factors relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries:

•

general business conditions and industry trends;

•

macroeconomic conditions and their effect on the general economy and on the U.S. housing market, in particular single family homes, which represent MONI's largest demographic;

•

uncertainties in the development of our business strategies, including MONI's increased direct marketing efforts and market acceptance of new products and services;

•

the competitive environment in which we operate, in particular, increasing competition in the alarm monitoring industry from larger existing competitors and new market entrants, including telecommunications and cable companies;

•

the development of new services or service innovations by competitors;

•

MONI's ability to acquire and integrate additional accounts, including competition for dealers with other alarm monitoring companies which could cause an increase in expected subscriber acquisition costs;

•

integration of acquired assets and businesses;

•

the regulatory environment in which we operate, including the multiplicity of jurisdictions, state and federal consumer protection laws and licensing requirements to which MONI and/or its dealers are subject and the risk of new regulations, such as the increasing adoption of "false alarm" ordinances;

•

technological changes which could result in the obsolescence of currently utilized technology and the need for significant upgrade expenditures, including the phase-out of 2G networks by cellular carriers;

•

the trend away from the use of public switched telephone network lines and the resultant increase in servicing costs associated with alternative methods of communication;

•

the operating performance of MONI's network, including the potential for service disruptions at both the main monitoring facility and back-up monitoring facility due to acts of nature or technology deficiencies;

•

the outcome of any pending, threatened, or future litigation, including potential liability for failure to respond adequately to alarm activations;

•

the ability to continue to obtain insurance coverage sufficient to hedge our risk exposures, including as a result of acts of third parties and/or alleged regulatory violations;

•

changes in the nature of strategic relationships with original equipment manufacturers, dealers and other MONI business partners;

•

the reliability and creditworthiness of MONI's independent alarm systems dealers and subscribers;

•

changes in MONI's expected rate of subscriber attrition;

•

the availability and terms of capital, including the ability of MONI to obtain future financing to grow its business;

•

MONI's high degree of leverage and the restrictive covenants governing its indebtedness; and

•

availability of qualified personnel.

These forward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties and other factors speak only as of the date of this Annual Report, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein, to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto, or any other change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the factors described in Item 1A, "Risk Factors" and other cautionary statements contained in this Annual Report. Such risk factors and statements describe circumstances which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

We identify our reportable segments based on financial information reviewed by our chief operating decision maker. We report financial information for our consolidated business segments that represent more than 10% of our consolidated revenue or earnings before income taxes. Based on the foregoing criteria, we had two reportable segments as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, MONI and LiveWatch. For more information, see below and our financial statements included in Part II of this Annual Report.

The owned real property is recorded as assets "held for sale" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has recently signed agreements to sell both of its office space properties in California and in the United Kingdom, as explained further in Item 2 of this Annual Report. Both agreements are expected to close in first half of 2017.

MONI and Subsidiaries

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, MONI, we are one of the largest security alarm monitoring companies in North America, with over one million customers under contract in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. We offer:

a comprehensive platform of home automation services, including, among other things, remote activation and control of security systems, support for video monitoring, flood sensors, automated garage door and door lock capabilities and thermostat integration, with mobile device accessibility provided through our proprietary mobile notification system (such services collectively referred to as "HomeTouch");

customer service and technical support related to home monitoring systems and HomeTouch.

MONI was incorporated in 1994 and is headquartered in Farmers Branch, Texas.

MONI Operations

Unlike many of its national competitors, MONI primarily outsources its sales, installation and most of its field service functions to its dealers. By outsourcing the low margin, high fixed-cost elements of its business to a large network of independent service providers, MONI is able to allocate capital to growing its revenue-generating account base rather than to local offices or depreciating hard assets.

Revenue is generated primarily from fees charged to customers under alarm monitoring agreements ("AMAs"), which include access to interactive and automation features at a higher fee. The initial contract term is typically three to five years, with automatic renewal on a month-to-month basis. We also generate additional revenue as our customers bundle our HomeTouch services with their traditional monitoring services.

MONI generates incremental revenue by providing additional services, such as maintenance and wholesale contract monitoring. Contract monitoring includes fees charged to other security alarm companies for monitoring their accounts on a wholesale basis. As of December 31, 2016, MONI provided contract monitoring services for approximately 78,000 accounts. These incremental revenue streams do not represent a significant portion of our overall revenue.

MONI's authorized independent dealers are typically small businesses that sell and install alarm systems. During 2016, MONI acquired alarm monitoring contracts from more than 430 dealers. These dealers focus on the sale and installation of security systems and generally do not retain the monitoring contracts for their customers and do not have their own facilities to monitor such systems due to the large upfront investment required to create the account and build a monitoring station. They also do not have the scale required to operate a monitoring station efficiently. These dealers typically sell the contracts to third parties

and outsource the monitoring function for any accounts they retain. MONI has the ability to monitor a variety of signals from nearly all types of residential security systems.

MONI generally enters into exclusive contracts with dealers under which the dealers sell and install security systems and MONI has a right of first refusal to acquire the associated alarm monitoring contracts. In order to maximize revenues, MONI seeks to attract dealers from throughout the U.S. rather than focusing on specific local or regional markets. In evaluating the quality of potential participants for the dealer program, MONI conducts an internal due diligence review and analysis of each dealer using information obtained from third party sources. This process includes:

•

background checks on the dealer, including lien searches to the extent applicable; and

•

a review of the dealer's licensing status and creditworthiness.

Once a dealer is approved and signed as a MONI authorized dealer, the primary steps in creating an account are as follows:

1. Dealer sells an alarm system to a homeowner or small business.

2. Dealer installs the alarm system, which is monitored by MONI's central monitoring center, trains the customer on its use, and receives a signed three to five year contract for monitoring services.

MONI believes its ability to maximize its return on invested capital is largely dependent on the quality of the accounts acquired. MONI conducts a review of each account to be acquired through its dealer network. This process typically includes:

•

subscriber credit score reviews;

•

telephone surveys to confirm satisfaction with the installation and security systems;

•

an individual review of each alarm monitoring contract;

•

confirmation that the customer is a homeowner; and

•

confirmation that each security system is monitored by MONI's central monitoring station prior to origination.

MONI generally acquires each new customer account at a cost based on a multiple of the account's monthly recurring revenue. MONI's dealer contracts generally provide that if a customer account acquired by MONI is terminated within the first 12 months, the dealer must replace the account or refund the cost paid by MONI. To secure the dealer’s obligation, MONI typically holds back a percentage of the cost paid for the account.

MONI believes that this process, which includes both clearly defined customer account standards and a comprehensive due diligence process, contributes significantly to the high quality of its subscriber base. For each of its last five calendar years, the average credit score of accounts acquired by MONI was 715 or higher on the FICO scale.

Approximately 94% of MONI's subscribers are residential homeowners and the remainder is small commercial accounts. MONI believes that by focusing on residential homeowners, rather than renters, it can reduce attrition, because homeowners relocate less frequently than renters.

MONI provides monitoring services as well as billing and 24-hour telephone support through its central monitoring station, located in Farmers Branch, Texas. This facility is Underwriters Laboratories ("UL") listed. To obtain and maintain a UL listing, an alarm monitoring center must be located in a building meeting UL's structural requirements, have back-up and uninterruptable power supplies, have secure telephone lines and maintain redundant computer systems. UL conducts periodic reviews of alarm monitoring centers to ensure compliance with their requirements. MONI's central monitoring station has also received the Central Station Alarm Association’s prestigious Five Diamond certification. Five Diamond certification is achieved by having all alarm monitoring operators complete special industry training and pass an exam.

MONI has a back-up facility in Dallas, Texas that is capable of supporting monitoring and certain customer service operations in the event of a disruption at its primary monitoring and customer care center. A third party outsourcer in Mexico provides telephone support for Spanish-speaking subscribers.

MONI's telephone systems utilize high-capacity, high-quality, digital circuits backed up by conventional telephone lines. When an alarm signal is received at the monitoring facility, it is routed to an operator. At the same time, information concerning the subscriber whose alarm has been activated and the nature and location of the alarm signal is delivered to the operator's computer terminal. The operator is then responsible for following standard procedures to contact the subscriber or take other

appropriate action, including, if the situation requires, contacting local emergency service providers. MONI never dispatches its own personnel to the subscriber's premises in response to an alarm event. If a subscriber lives in an area where the emergency service provider will not respond without verification of an actual emergency, MONI will contract with an independent third party responder if available in that area.

MONI seeks to increase subscriber satisfaction and retention by carefully managing customer and technical service. The customer service center handles all general inquiries from subscribers, including those related to subscriber information changes, basic alarm troubleshooting, alarm verification, technical service requests and requests to enhance existing services. MONI's has a proprietary centralized information system that enables it to satisfy over 90% of subscriber technical inquiries over the telephone, without dispatching a service technician. If the customer requires field service, MONI relies on its nationwide network of independent service dealers and over 75 employee field service technicians to provide such service. MONI closely monitors service dealer performance with customer satisfaction forms, follow-up quality assurance calls and other performance metrics. In 2016, MONI dispatched approximately 330 independent service dealers around the country to handle its field service.

LiveWatch Operations

LiveWatch is a leading DIY home security provider offering professionally monitored security services through a direct-to-consumer sales channel. Similar to MONI, LiveWatch is an asset-light business and geographically unconstrained. LiveWatch customers self‑install security and home automation hardware that is shipped to them by LiveWatch. LiveWatch then professionally monitors all of these self‑installed systems. LiveWatch generates subscriber contracts through leads from direct response marketing, where MONI primarily generates subscriber contracts from a dealer network with local market presence.

Services are provided to customers throughout the United States. Revenue is generated primarily from fees charged to customers under alarm monitoring contracts and the sale of the security equipment to facilitate the alarm monitoring service and other home automation or interactive services. LiveWatch typically offers substantial equipment subsidies to initiate, renew or upgrade alarm monitoring service contracts. The initial contract term is typically one year, with automatic renewal on a month-to-month basis.

When a customer initiates the process to obtain alarm monitoring services, LiveWatch pre-configures the alarm monitoring system based on customer specifications. LiveWatch then packages and ships the equipment directly to the customer. The customer self installs the equipment on-site and activates the monitoring service over the phone. Technical support for installation is provided via telephone or online assistance via the LiveWatch website.

LiveWatch has operations in central Kansas and a satellite office in Evanston, Illinois.

Intellectual Property

MONI has a registered service mark for the Monitronics name and a service mark for the Monitronics logo. MONI also holds registered service marks for "HomeTouch" and "MONI." LiveWatch has a registered service mark for the LiveWatch name and a service mark for the LiveWatch logo. We own certain proprietary software applications that are used to provide services to our dealers and subscribers, including various trademarks, patents and patents pending related to the "ASAPer" system employed by LiveWatch, which causes a predetermined group of recipients to receive a text message automatically once an alarm is triggered. Other than as mentioned above, we and our subsidiaries do not hold any patents or other intellectual property rights on our proprietary software applications.

Sales and Marketing

General

With the rebranding efforts beginning in 2016 and continuing through early 2017, MONI will continue to market the new brand directly to consumers through national advertising campaigns and partnerships with other subscription- or member-based organizations and businesses. This, coupled with its nationwide network of authorized dealers, is an effective way for MONI to market alarm systems. Locally-based dealers are often an integral part of the communities they serve and understand the local market and how best to satisfy local needs. By combining the dealer's local presence and reputation with MONI's nationally marketed brand, accompanied with its high quality service and support, MONI is able to cost-effectively provide local services and take advantage of economies of scale where appropriate.

MONI's dealer network provides for the acquisition of subscriber accounts on an ongoing basis. The dealers install the alarm system and arrange for subscribers to enter into a multi-year alarm monitoring agreement in a form acceptable to MONI. The dealer then submits this monitoring agreement for MONI's due diligence review.

MONI remains focused on expanding its network of independent authorized dealers. To do so, MONI has established a dealer program that provides participating dealers with a variety of support services to assist them as they grow their businesses. Authorized dealers may use the MONI brand name in their sales and marketing activities and on the products they sell and install. MONI authorized dealers benefit from their affiliation with MONI and its national reputation for high customer satisfaction, as well as the support they receive from MONI. MONI also provides authorized dealers with the opportunity to obtain discounts on alarm systems and other equipment purchased by such dealers from original equipment manufacturers, including alarm systems labeled with the MONI logo. MONI also makes available sales, business and technical training, sales literature, co-branded marketing materials, sales leads and management support to its authorized dealers. In most cases these services and cost savings would not be available to security alarm dealers on an individual basis.

Currently, MONI employs sales representatives to promote its authorized dealer program, find account acquisition opportunities and sell MONI monitoring services. MONI targets independent alarm dealers across the U.S. that can benefit from the MONI dealer program services and can generate high quality monitoring customers for MONI. MONI uses a variety of marketing techniques to promote the dealer program and related services. These activities include direct mail, trade magazine advertising, trade shows, internet web site marketing, publicity and telemarketing. MONI has experienced success in implementing initiatives designed to improve lead sourcing for our dealers and for direct‑to‑consumer sales. Providing internally sourced leads to dealers strengthens our dealer relationships and serves as another mechanism for driving customer base growth. MONI has been named as an exclusive partner with several nationally recognized brands.

Dealer Marketing Support

MONI offers its authorized dealers an extensive marketing support program. MONI focuses on developing professionally designed sales and marketing materials that will help dealers market alarm systems and monitoring services with maximum effectiveness. Materials offered to authorized dealers include:

•sales brochures and flyers;

•yard signs;

•window decals;

•customer forms and agreements;

•sales presentation binders;

•door hangers;

•lead boxes;

•vehicle graphics;

•trade show booths; and

•clothing bearing the MONI brand name.

These materials are made available to dealers at prices that MONI's management believes would not be available to dealers on an individual basis.

MONI's sales materials promote both the MONI brand and the dealer's status as a MONI authorized dealer. Dealers often sell and install alarm systems which display the MONI logo and telephone number, which further strengthens consumer recognition of their status as MONI authorized dealers. Management believes that the dealers' use of the MONI brand to promote their affiliation with one of the nation’s largest alarm monitoring companies boosts the dealers' credibility and reputation in their local markets and also assists in supporting their sales success.

Customer Integration and Marketing

MONI's dealers typically introduce customers to MONI in the home when describing MONI's central monitoring station. Following the acquisition of a monitoring agreement from a dealer, the customer is notified that MONI is responsible for all their monitoring and customer service needs. The customer's awareness and identification of the MONI's brand as the monitoring service provider is further supported by the distribution of branded materials by the dealer to the customer at the

point of sale. Such materials may include the promotional items listed above. All materials provided in the dealer model focus on the MONI brands and the role of MONI as the single source of support for the customer.

Negotiated Account Acquisitions

In addition to the development of MONI's dealer network, MONI periodically acquires alarm monitoring accounts from other alarm companies in bulk on a negotiated basis. MONI's management has extensive experience in identifying potential opportunities, negotiating account acquisitions and performing thorough due diligence, which helps facilitate execution of new acquisitions in a timely manner. With the rebranding efforts, MONI will also begin using its own sales force and internal employee technicians to acquire subscriber alarm monitoring agreements and complete alarm system installations.

Strategy

Corporate Strategy

Ascent Capital actively seeks opportunities to leverage our strong operating platform and capital position through strategic acquisitions and investments in the security alarm monitoring industry as well as other life safety industries.

We continually evaluate acquisition and investment opportunities that we believe offer the opportunity for attractive returns on equity. In evaluating potential acquisition and investment candidates we consider various factors, including among other things:

potential return on investment incorporating appropriate financial leverage, including the target's existing indebtedness and opportunities to restructure some or all of that indebtedness;

•risk profile of business; and

•the presence of a strong management team.

We consider acquisitions and investments utilizing cash, leverage and, potentially, Ascent Capital stock. In addition to acquisitions, we consider majority ownership positions, minority equity investments and, in appropriate circumstances, senior debt investments that we believe provide either a path to full ownership or control, the possibility for high returns on investment, or significant strategic benefits.

Our acquisition and investment strategy entails risk. While our preference is to build our presence in the security alarm monitoring industry through acquisitions, we will also consider potential acquisitions in other life safety industries, which could result in further changes in our operations from those historically conducted by us. Please see "Risk Factors" below.

MONI Strategy

MONI's goal is to maximize return on invested capital, which it believes can be achieved by pursuing the following strategies:

Capitalize on Limited Market Penetration.

MONI seeks to capitalize on what it views as the current limited market penetration in security services and grow its existing customer base through the following initiatives:

•

continue to develop its leading dealer position in the market to drive acquisitions of high quality AMAs;

•

leverage its acquisition of LiveWatch to competitively secure new DIY customers without significantly altering its existing asset‑light business model;

•

further develop internal lead sourcing through additional partnership opportunities to support existing direct marketing and acquisitions through its dealer program;

•

increase HomeTouch, home integration and ancillary product offerings; and

•

continue to monitor potential accretive merger and acquisition opportunities and further industry contraction.

Proactively Manage Customer Attrition

Customer attrition has historically been reasonably predictable and MONI regularly identifies and monitors the principal drivers thereof, including its customers' credit scores, which MONI believes are the strongest predictors of retention. MONI seeks to maximize customer retention by consistently offering high quality automated home monitoring services and increasing the average life of acquired AMAs through the following initiatives:

maintain the high quality of its customer base by continuing to implement its highly disciplined AMA acquisition program;

•

continue to motivate its dealers to obtain only high‑quality accounts through incentives built into purchase multiples and by having a performance guarantee on substantially all dealer originated accounts;

•

capitalize on its lead generation initiatives to supply high quality leads with strong retention indicators to its dealers;

•

prioritize the inclusion of HomeTouch services in the AMAs its purchases, which it believes increases customer retention;

•

proactively identifying customers "at‑risk" for attrition through new technology initiatives, including statistical analysis of "big data";

•

provide high quality customer service on the telephone and in the field;

•

continue to implement initiatives to reduce core attrition, which include interactive voice recognition software, more effective initial on‑boarding of customers and competitive retention offers for departing customers; and

•

utilize available customer data to actively identify customers who are relocating and target retention of such customers.

Maximize Economics of Business Model

Due to the scalability of our operations and the low fixed and variable costs inherent in its cost structure, MONI believes it will continue to experience high Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA margins as costs are spread over larger recurring revenue streams. In addition, MONI optimizes the rate of return on investment by managing subscriber acquisition costs ("SAC"), or the costs of acquiring an account. Subscriber acquisition costs, whether capitalized or expensed, include the costs to acquire alarm monitoring contracts from MONI's dealers, LiveWatch's equipment costs and certain sales and marketing costs. MONI believes its cash flows may also benefit from its continued efforts to increase subscriber retention rates and reduce response times, call duration and false alarms. For a discussion of Adjusted EBITDA and Pre-SAC EBITDA, see Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Grow Distribution Channels

MONI plans to expand AMA acquisitions by targeting new dealers from whom it expects to generate high quality customers. MONI believes that by providing dealers with a full range of services designed to assist them in all aspects of their business, including sales leads, sales training, technical training, comprehensive on‑line account access, detailed weekly account summaries, sales support materials and discounts on security system hardware purchased through our strategic alliances with security system manufacturers, it is able to attract and partner with dealers that will succeed in MONI's existing dealer network. Additionally, MONI expects its recent focus on internal lead sourcing and lead sourcing driven by relationships with third parties to contribute to the growth of its dealer network. MONI will also continue to explore opportunities to leverage internally sourced leads, including through LiveWatch. MONI also consistently offer what MONI views as competitive rates for account acquisition. MONI believes these strategies support an entrepreneurial culture at the dealer level and allow us to capitalize on the considerable local market knowledge, goodwill and name recognition of its dealers.

For a description of the risks associated with the foregoing strategies, and with the Company’s business in general, see "ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS."

Industry; Competition

The security alarm industry is highly competitive and fragmented. Our competitors include two other major security alarm companies with nationwide coverage, numerous smaller providers with regional or local coverage and certain large multi-service organizations in the telecommunications or cable businesses. Our significant competitors for obtaining customer AMA's are:

•

The ADT Corporation ("ADT");

•

Vivint, Inc.;

•

Guardian Protection Services;

•

Vector Security, Inc.;

•

Comcast Corporation and

•

AT&T Inc.

On May 2, 2016 ADT announced the successful completion of a previously announced merger with Prime Security Services Borrow, LLC (with its subsidiaries, Protection One). Despite this merger, the security alarm industry has remained highly competitive and has not experienced any material change to market concentration. Competition in the security alarm industry is

based primarily on reputation for quality of service, market visibility, services offered, price and the ability to identify and obtain customer accounts. Competition for customers has also increased in recent years with the emergence of DIY home security providers and other technology companies expanding into the security alarm industry. We believe we compete effectively with other national, regional and local alarm monitoring companies, including cable and telecommunications companies, due to our reputation for reliable monitoring, customer and technical services, the quality of our services, and our relatively lower cost structure. We believe the dynamics of the security alarm industry favor larger alarm monitoring companies, such as MONI, with a nationwide focus that have greater resources and benefit from economies of scale in technology, advertising and other expenditures.

Some of these security alarm companies have also adopted, in whole or in part, a dealer program similar to that of MONI. In these instances, MONI must also compete with these programs in recruiting dealers. MONI believes it competes effectively with other dealer programs due to the quality of its dealer support services and its competitive acquisition terms. Our significant competitors for recruiting dealers are:

•

ADT;

•

Central Security Group, Inc.;

•

Guardian Protection Services, Inc. and

•

Vector Security, Inc.

Seasonality

MONI's operations are subject to a certain level of seasonality. Since more household moves take place during the second and third calendar quarters of each year, MONI's disconnect rate and expenses related to retaining customers are typically higher in those calendar quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. There is also a slight seasonal effect resulting in higher new customer volume and related cash expenditures incurred in investment in new subscribers in the second and third quarters.

Regulatory Matters

MONI's operations are subject to a variety of laws, regulations and licensing requirements of federal, state and local authorities including federal and state customer protection laws. In certain jurisdictions, MONI is required to obtain licenses or permits to comply with standards governing employee selection and training and to meet certain standards in the conduct of its business. The security industry is also subject to requirements imposed by various insurance, approval, listing and standards organizations. Depending upon the type of subscriber served, the type of security service provided and the requirements of the applicable local governmental jurisdiction, adherence to the requirements and standards of such organizations is mandatory in some instances and voluntary in others.

Although local governments routinely respond to panic and smoke/fire alarms, there are an increasing number of local governmental authorities that have adopted or are considering various measures aimed at reducing the number of false burglar alarms. Such measures include:

•imposing limitations on the number of times the police will respond to false alarms at a particular location;

•

requiring additional verification of intrusion alarms by calling two different phone numbers prior to dispatch ("Enhanced Call Verification"); and

•

requiring visual verification of an actual emergency at the premise before the police will respond to an alarm signal.

Enhanced Call Verification has been implemented as standard policy by MONI.

Security alarm systems monitored by MONI utilize telephone lines, internet connections, cellular networks and radio frequencies to transmit alarm signals. The cost of telephone lines, and the type of equipment which may be used in telephone line transmission, are currently regulated by both federal and state governments. The operation and utilization of cellular and radio frequencies are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission and state public utility commissions.

At December 31, 2016, Ascent Capital, together with its subsidiaries, had over 1,370 full-time employees and over 80 part-time employees, all of which are located in the U.S.

(d) Financial Information About Geographic Areas

MONI and its subsidiaries provide monitoring services for subscribers located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Canada.

(e) Available Information

All of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including our Form 10-Ks, Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks, as well as amendments to such filings are available on our Internet website free of charge generally within 24 hours after we file such material with the SEC. Our website address is www.ascentcapitalgroupinc.com.

Our corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics, compensation committee charter, nominating and corporate governance committee charter, and audit committee charter are available on our website. In addition, we will provide a copy of any of these documents, free of charge, to any shareholder who calls or submits a request in writing to Investor Relations, Ascent Capital Group, Inc., 5251 DTC Parkway, Suite 1000, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111, telephone no. (303) 628-5600.

The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference herein.

In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, you should consider the following risk factors in evaluating our results of operations, financial condition, business and operations or an investment in our stock.

Although we describe below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K the risks we consider to be the most material, there may be other unknown or unpredictable economic, business, competitive, regulatory or other factors that also could have material adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition, business or operations in the future. In addition, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

If any of the events described below, individually or in combination, were to occur, our businesses, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Factors Relating to MONI

MONI faces risks in acquiring and integrating new subscribers.

The acquisition of alarm monitoring contracts involves a number of risks, including the risk that the alarm monitoring contracts acquired may not be profitable due to higher than expected account attrition, lower than expected revenues from the alarm monitoring contracts or, when applicable, lower than expected recoveries from dealers. The cost incurred to acquire an alarm monitoring contract is affected by the monthly recurring revenue generated by the alarm monitoring contract, as well as several other factors, including the level of competition, prior experience with alarm monitoring contracts acquired from the dealer, the number of alarm monitoring contracts acquired, the subscriber's credit score and the type of security equipment used by the subscriber. To the extent that the servicing costs or the attrition rates are higher than expected or the revenues from the alarm monitoring contracts or, when applicable, the recoveries from dealers are lower than expected, MONI's business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

MONI's customer generation strategies and the competitive market for customer accounts may affect its future profitability.

A significant element of MONI's business strategy is the generation of new customer accounts through its dealer network, excluding accounts acquired in the LiveWatch Acquisition, which accounted for a substantial portion of MONI's new customer accounts for the year ended December 31, 2016. MONI's future operating results will depend in large part on its ability to manage its generation strategies effectively. Although MONI currently generates accounts through hundreds of authorized dealers, a significant portion of its accounts originate from a smaller number of dealers. MONI experiences loss of dealers from its dealer network due to various factors, such as dealers becoming inactive or discontinuing their alarm monitoring business and competition from other alarm monitoring companies. If MONI experiences a loss of dealers representing a significant portion of its account generation engine or if MONI is unable to replace or recruit dealers in accordance with its business plans, MONI's business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

MONI relies on a significant number of its subscribers remaining with it for an extended period of time.

MONI incurs significant upfront costs for each new subscriber. MONI requires a substantial amount of time, typically exceeding the initial term of the related alarm monitoring contract, to receive cash payments (net of variable cash operating costs) from a particular subscriber that are sufficient to offset this upfront cost. Accordingly, MONI's long-term performance is dependent on MONI's subscribers remaining with it for as long as possible. This requires MONI to minimize its rate of subscriber cancellations, or attrition. Factors that can increase cancellations include subscribers who relocate and do not reconnect, prolonged downturns in the housing market, problems with service quality, competition from other alarm monitoring companies, equipment obsolescence, adverse economic conditions, conversion of wireless spectrums and the affordability of MONI's service. If MONI fails to keep its subscribers for a sufficiently long period of time, attrition rates would be higher than expected and MONI's financial position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, MONI may experience higher attrition rates with respect to subscribers acquired in bulk buys than subscribers acquired pursuant to MONI's authorized dealer program.

MONI is subject to credit risk and other risks associated with its subscribers.

Substantially all of MONI's revenues are derived from the recurring monthly revenue due from subscribers under the alarm monitoring contracts. Therefore, MONI is dependent on the ability and willingness of subscribers to pay amounts due under the

alarm monitoring contracts on a monthly basis in a timely manner. Although subscribers are contractually obligated to pay amounts due under an alarm monitoring contract and are generally prohibited from canceling the alarm monitoring contract for the initial term of the alarm monitoring contract (typically between three and five years), subscribers' payment obligations are unsecured, which could impair MONI's ability to collect any unpaid amounts from its subscribers. To the extent payment defaults by subscribers under the alarm monitoring contracts are greater than anticipated, MONI's business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

MONI is subject to credit risk and other risks associated with its dealers.

Under the standard alarm monitoring contract acquisition agreements that MONI enters into with its dealers, if a subscriber terminates their service with MONI during the first twelve months after the alarm monitoring contract has been acquired, the dealer is typically required to elect between substituting another alarm monitoring contract for the terminating alarm monitoring contract or compensating MONI in an amount based on the original acquisition cost of the terminating alarm monitoring contract. MONI is subject to the risk that dealers will breach their obligation to provide a comparable substitute alarm monitoring contract for a terminating alarm monitoring contract. Although MONI withholds specified amounts from the acquisition cost paid to dealers for alarm monitoring contracts ("holdback"), which may be used to satisfy or offset these and other applicable dealer obligations under the alarm monitoring contract acquisition agreements, there can be no guarantee that these amounts will be sufficient to satisfy or offset the full extent of the default by a dealer of its obligations under its agreement. If the holdback does prove insufficient to cover dealer obligations, MONI is also subject to the credit risk that the dealers may not have sufficient funds to compensate MONI or that any such dealer will otherwise breach its obligation to compensate MONI for a terminating alarm monitoring contract. To the extent defaults by dealers of the obligations under their agreements are greater than anticipated, MONI's financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, a significant portion of MONI's accounts originate from a smaller number of dealers. If any of these dealers discontinue their alarm monitoring business or cease operations altogether as a result of business conditions or due to increasingly burdensome regulatory compliance, the dealer may breach its obligations under the applicable alarm monitoring contract acquisition agreement and, to the extent such dealer has originated a significant portion of MONI's accounts, MONI's financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected to a greater degree than if the dealer had originated a smaller number of accounts.

An inability to provide the contracted monitoring service could adversely affect MONI's business.

A disruption to the main monitoring facility, the back-up monitoring facility and/or third party monitoring facility could affect MONI's ability to provide alarm monitoring services to its subscribers. MONI's main monitoring facility holds UL listings as a protective signaling services station and maintains certain standards of building integrity, redundant computer and communications facilities and backup power, among other safeguards. However, no assurance can be given that MONI's main monitoring facility will not be disrupted by a technical failure, including communication or hardware failures, catastrophic event or natural disaster, fire, weather, malicious acts or terrorism. Furthermore, no assurance can be given that MONI's back-up or third party monitoring center will not be disrupted by the same or a simultaneous event or that it will be able to perform effectively in the event its main monitoring center is disrupted. Any such disruption, particularly one of a prolonged duration, could have a material adverse effect on MONI's business.

MONI relies on third parties to transmit signals to its monitoring facilities and provide other services to its subscribers.

MONI relies on various third party telecommunications providers and signal processing centers to transmit and communicate signals to its monitoring facilities in a timely and consistent manner. These telecommunications providers and signal processing centers could fail to transmit or communicate these signals to the monitoring facility for many reasons, including due to disruptions from fire, natural disasters, weather, transmission interruption, malicious acts or terrorism. The failure of one or more of these telecommunications providers or signal processing centers to transmit and communicate signals to the monitoring facility in a timely manner could affect MONI's ability to provide alarm monitoring, home automation and interactive services to its subscribers. MONI also relies on third party technology companies to provide home automation and interactive services to its subscribers, including video surveillance services. These technology companies could fail to provide these services consistently, or at all, which could result in MONI's inability to meet customer demand and damage its reputation. There can be no assurance that third-party telecommunications providers, signal processing centers and other technology companies will continue to transmit, communicate signals to the monitoring facilities or provide home automation and interactive services to subscribers without disruption. Any such disruption, particularly one of a prolonged duration, could have a material adverse effect on MONI's business. See also "Shifts in customer choice of, or telecommunications providers' support for, telecommunications services and equipment could adversely impact MONI's business and require significant capital expenditures" below with respect to risks associated with changes in signal transmissions.

MONI's reputation as a service provider of high quality security offerings may be adversely affected by product defects or shortfalls in customer service.

MONI's business depends on its reputation and ability to maintain good relationships with its subscribers, dealers and local regulators, among others. Its reputation may be harmed either through product defects, such as the failure of one or more of its subscribers' alarm systems, or shortfalls in customer service. Subscribers generally judge MONI's performance through their interactions with the staff at the monitoring and customer care centers, dealers and technicians who perform on-site maintenance services. Any failure to meet subscribers' expectations in such customer service areas could cause an increase in attrition rates or make it difficult to recruit new subscribers. Any harm to MONI's reputation or subscriber relationships caused by the actions of its dealers, personnel or third party service providers or any other factors could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Privacy concerns, such as consumer identity theft and security breaches, could hurt MONI's reputation and revenues.

As part of its operations, MONI collects a large amount of private information from its subscribers, including social security numbers, credit card information, images and voice recordings. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to MONI's systems or facilities by, among other things, hacking into MONI's systems or facilities or those of MONI's customers, partners or vendors. In addition, the techniques used to gain such access to MONI's information technology systems, MONI's data or customers' data, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly, and often are not recognized until launched against a target. If MONI were to experience a breach of its data security, it may put private information of its subscribers at risk of exposure. To the extent that any such exposure leads to credit card fraud or identity theft, MONI may experience a general decline in consumer confidence in its business, which may lead to an increase in attrition rates or may make it more difficult to attract new subscribers. If consumers become reluctant to use MONI's services because of concerns over data privacy or credit card fraud, MONI's ability to generate revenues would be impaired. In addition, if technology upgrades or other expenditures are required to prevent security breaches of its network, boost general consumer confidence in its business, or prevent credit card fraud and identity theft, MONI may be required to make unplanned capital expenditures or expend other resources. Any such loss of confidence in MONI's business or additional capital expenditure requirement could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Substantially all of MONI's subscriber alarm systems use either cellular service or traditional land-line to communicate alarm signals from the subscribers’ locations to its monitoring facilities. The number of land-line customers has continued to decline as fewer new customers utilize land-lines and consumers give up their land-line and exclusively use cellular and IP communication technology in their homes and businesses. In addition, some telecommunications providers may discontinue land-line services in the future and cellular carriers may choose to discontinue certain cellular networks. As land-line and cellular network service is discontinued or disconnected, subscribers with alarm systems that communicate over these networks may need to have certain equipment in their security system replaced to maintain their monitoring service. The process of changing out this equipment will require MONI to subsidize the replacement of subscribers' outdated equipment and is likely to cause an increase in subscriber attrition. One of the nation's largest cellular carriers, AT&T, shut down its 2G cellular network in January 2017. During 2014, MONI implemented a program (the "Radio Conversion Program") to upgrade subscribers' alarm monitoring systems that communicate across the AT&T 2G network that was discontinued. In connection with the Radio Conversion Program, MONI incurred costs of $18,422,000, $14,369,000 and $1,113,000 for the years ending December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of January 31, 2017, MONI had approximately 11,000 customers that had not been converted and therefore are no longer able to communicate with the central monitoring center. While we will continue to attempt to contact these customers many of them may not respond and may ultimately cancel their service. In the future, MONI may not be able to successfully implement new technologies or adapt existing technologies to changing market demands in the future. If MONI is unable to adapt timely to changing technologies, market conditions or customer preferences, its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

MONI's business is subject to technological innovation over time.

MONI's monitoring services depend upon the technology (both hardware and software) of security alarm systems located at subscribers' premises. MONI may be required to implement new technology both to attract and retain subscribers or in response to changes in land-line or cellular technology or other factors, which could require significant expenditures. In addition, the availability of any new features developed for use in MONI's industry (whether developed by MONI or otherwise) can have a significant impact on a subscriber’s initial decision to choose MONI's or its competitor’s products and a subscriber's decision to renew with MONI or switch to one of its competitors. To the extent its competitors have greater capital and other resources to

dedicate to responding to technological innovation over time, the products and services offered by MONI may become less attractive to current or future subscribers thereby reducing demand for such products and services and increasing attrition over time. Those competitors that benefit from more capital being available to them may be at a particular advantage to MONI in this respect. If MONI is unable to adapt in response to changing technologies, market conditions or customer requirements in a timely manner, such inability could adversely affect its business by increasing its rate of subscriber attrition. MONI also faces potential competition from improvements in self-monitoring systems, which enable current or future subscribers to monitor their home environments without third-party involvement, which could further increase attrition rates over time and hinder the acquisition of new alarm monitoring contracts.

The high level of competition in MONI's industry could adversely affect its business.

The security alarm monitoring industry is highly competitive and fragmented. As of December 31, 2016, MONI was one of the largest alarm monitoring companies in the U.S. when measured by the total number of subscribers under contract. MONI faces competition from other alarm monitoring companies, including companies that have more capital and that may offer higher prices and more favorable terms to dealers for alarm monitoring contracts or charge lower prices to customers for monitoring services. In addition, two of our larger competitors, ADT and Protection One, Inc., combined into a single company in a transaction that closed in May 2016. MONI also faces competition from a significant number of small regional competitors that concentrate their capital and other resources in targeting local markets and forming new marketing channels that may displace the existing alarm system dealer channels for acquiring alarm monitoring contracts. Further, MONI is facing increasing competition from telecommunications, cable and technology companies who are expanding into alarm monitoring services and bundling their existing offerings with monitored security services. The existing access to and relationship with subscribers that these companies have could give them a substantial advantage over MONI, especially if they are able to offer subscribers a lower price by bundling these services. Any of these forms of competition could reduce the acquisition opportunities available to MONI, thus slowing its rate of growth, or requiring it to increase the price paid for subscriber accounts, thus reducing its return on investment and negatively impacting its revenues and results of operations.

MONI has a substantial amount of indebtedness and the costs of servicing that debt may materially affect its business.

MONI has a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2016, MONI had principal indebtedness of $1,142,050,000 related to term loans maturing in September 2022 and a revolving credit facility maturing in September 2021, both under the Credit Facility, as well as $585,000,000 of 9.125% senior notes (the "Senior Notes") due April 2020. At December 31, 2016, MONI also had outstanding a 12.5% intercompany promissory note of $12,000,000 due to Ascent Capital in October 2020. That substantial indebtedness, combined with its other financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have important consequences to us. For example, it could:

•

make it more difficult for MONI to satisfy its obligations with respect to its existing and future indebtedness, and any failure to comply with the obligations under any of the agreements governing its indebtedness could result in an event of default under such agreements;

•

require MONI to dedicate a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations (which also constitutes substantially all of our cash flow) to the payment of interest and principal due under its indebtedness, which will reduce funds available to fund future subscriber account acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements;

•

increase its vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

•

limit its flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the markets in which it operates;

The agreements governing MONI's various debt obligations, including its Credit Facility and the indenture governing the Senior Notes, impose restrictions on its business and the business of its subsidiaries and such restrictions could adversely affect MONI's ability to undertake certain corporate actions.

The agreements governing MONI's indebtedness restrict its ability to, among other things:

•

incur additional indebtedness;

•

make certain dividends or distributions with respect to any of its capital stock;

•

make certain loans and investments;

•

create liens;

•

enter into transactions with affiliates, including Ascent Capital;

•

restrict subsidiary distributions;

•

dissolve, merge or consolidate;

•

make capital expenditures in excess of certain annual limits;

•

transfer, sell or dispose of assets;

•

enter into or acquire certain types of alarm monitoring contracts;

•

make certain amendments to its organizational documents;

•

make changes in the nature of its business;

•

enter into certain burdensome agreements;

•

make accounting changes;

•

use proceeds of loans to purchase or carry margin stock; and

•

prepay its senior unsecured notes.

In addition, MONI also must comply with certain financial covenants under the Credit Facility that require it to maintain a consolidated total leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) of not more than 5.25 to 1.00, a consolidated interest coverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) of not less than 2.00 to 1.00, each of which is calculated quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. In addition, the revolving portion of the Credit Facility requires MONI to maintain a consolidated senior secured Eligible RMR leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) of no more than 31.0 to 1.00 and a consolidated senior secured RMR leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) of no more than 31.5 to 1.00, each calculated quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. If MONI cannot comply with any of these financial covenants, or if MONI or any of its subsidiaries fails to comply with the restrictions contained in the Credit Facility, such failure could lead to an event of default and MONI may not be able to make additional drawdowns under the revolving portion of the Credit Facility, which would limit its ability to manage its working capital requirements. In addition, failure to comply with the financial covenants or restrictions contained in the Credit Facility could lead to an event of default, which could result in the acceleration of a substantial amount of MONI's indebtedness.

We may be unable to obtain future financing on terms acceptable to MONI or at all, which may hinder MONI's ability to grow its business.

MONI intends to continue to pursue growth through the acquisition of subscriber accounts through its authorized dealer network and its direct to consumer channel in LiveWatch, among other means. To continue its growth strategy, it intends to make additional drawdowns under the revolving credit portion of its Credit Facility and may seek financing through new credit arrangements or the possible sale of new securities, any of which may lead to higher leverage or result in higher borrowing costs. In addition, any future downgrade in MONI's credit rating could also result in higher borrowing costs. An inability to obtain funding through external financing sources on favorable terms or at all is likely to adversely affect MONI's ability to continue or accelerate its subscriber account acquisition activities.

MONI's acquisition strategy may not be successful.

One focus of MONI's strategy is to seek opportunities to grow free cash flow through strategic acquisitions, which may include leveraged acquisitions. However, there can be no assurance that MONI will be able to consummate that strategy, and if MONI is not able to invest its capital in acquisitions that are accretive to free cash flow it could negatively impact its growth. MONI's ability to consummate such acquisitions may be negatively impacted by various factors, including among other things:

If MONI engages in any acquisition, it will incur a variety of costs, and may never realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. If MONI undertakes any acquisition, the process of operating such acquired business may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, including the assumption of the liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of such acquired business and the possibility of litigation or other claims in connection with, or as a result of, such an acquisition, including claims from terminated employees, customers, former stockholders or other third parties. Moreover, MONI may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition as rapidly as expected or at all, and it may experience increased attrition in its subscriber base and/or a loss of dealer relationships and difficulties integrating acquired businesses, technologies and personnel into its business or achieving anticipated operations efficiencies or cost savings. Future acquisitions could cause MONI to incur debt and expose it to liabilities. Further, MONI may incur significant expenditures and devote substantial management time and attention in anticipation of an acquisition that is never realized. Lastly, while it intends to implement appropriate controls and procedures as it integrates any acquired companies, MONI may not be able to certify as to the effectiveness of these companies' disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting within the time periods required by U.S. federal securities laws and regulations.

Risks of liability from MONI's business and operations may be significant.

The nature of the services MONI provides potentially exposes it to greater risks of liability for employee acts or omissions or system failures than may be inherent in other businesses. If subscribers believe that they incurred losses as a result of an action or failure to act by MONI, the subscribers (or their insurers) could bring claims against MONI, and MONI has been subject to lawsuits of this type from time to time. Similarly, if dealers believe that they incurred losses or were denied rights under the alarm monitoring contract acquisition agreements as a result of an action or failure to act by MONI, the dealers could bring claims against MONI. Although substantially all of MONI's alarm monitoring contracts and contract acquisition agreements contain provisions limiting its liability to subscribers and dealers, respectively, in an attempt to reduce this risk, the alarm monitoring contracts or a contract acquisition agreement that do not contain such provisions expose MONI to risks of liability that could materially and adversely affect its business. Moreover, even when such provisions are included in an alarm monitoring contract or alarm monitoring contract acquisition agreement, in the event of any such litigation, no assurance can be given that these limitations will be enforced, and the costs of such litigation or the related settlements or judgments could have a material adverse effect on MONI's financial condition. In addition, there can be no assurance that MONI is adequately insured for these risks. Certain of its insurance policies and the laws of some states may limit or prohibit insurance coverage for punitive or certain other types of damages or liability arising from gross negligence. If significant uninsured damages are assessed against MONI, the resulting liability could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Future litigation could result in adverse publicity for MONI.

In the ordinary course of business, from time to time, MONI and its subsidiaries are the subject of complaints or litigation from subscribers or inquiries from government officials, sometimes related to alleged violations of state or federal consumer protection statutes (including by its dealers), violations of "false alarm" ordinances or other regulations, negligent dealer installation or negligent service of alarm monitoring systems. MONI may also be subject to employee claims based on, among other things, alleged discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination claims. In addition to diverting management resources, adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially and adversely affect MONI's reputation in the communities it services, regardless of whether such allegations are unfounded. Such adverse publicity could result in higher attrition rates and greater difficulty in attracting new subscribers on terms that are attractive to MONI or at all.

A loss of experienced employees could adversely affect MONI.

The success of MONI has been largely dependent upon the active participation of its officers and employees. The loss of the services of key members of its management for any reason may have a material adverse effect on its operations and the ability to maintain and grow its business. MONI depends on the managerial skills and expertise of its management and employees to provide customer service by, among other things, monitoring and responding to alarm signals, coordinating equipment repairs, administering billing and collections under the alarm monitoring contracts and administering and providing dealer services under the contract acquisition agreements. There is no assurance that MONI will be able to retain its current management and other experienced employees or replace them satisfactorily to the extent they leave its employ. As previously announced, Michael Meyers, Chief Financial Officer of Ascent and its wholly owned subsidiary, MONI, has announced his intention to retire from the Company by the end of 2017. Although a search is underway for Mr. Meyers' successor, no assurance can be given as to when a suitable replacement will be found. The loss of MONI's experienced employees' services and expertise could materially and adversely affect MONI's business.

The alarm monitoring business is subject to macroeconomic factors that may negatively impact MONI's results of operations, including prolonged downturns in the economy.

The alarm monitoring business is dependent in part on national, regional and local economic conditions. In particular, where disposable income available for discretionary spending is reduced (such as by higher housing, energy, interest or other costs or where the actual or perceived wealth of customers has decreased because of circumstances such as lower residential real estate values, increased foreclosure rates, inflation, increased tax rates or other economic disruptions), the alarm monitoring business could experience increased attrition rates and reduced consumer demand. In periods of economic downturn, no assurance can be given that it will be able to continue acquiring quality alarm monitoring contracts or that it will not experience higher attrition rates. In addition, any deterioration in new construction and sales of existing single family homes could reduce opportunities to grow MONI's subscriber accounts from the sales of new security systems and services and the take-over of existing security systems that had previously been monitored by its competitors. If there are prolonged durations of general economic downturn, MONI's results of operations and subscriber account growth could be materially and adversely affected.

Adverse economic conditions in states where MONI's subscribers are more heavily concentrated may negatively impact MONI's results of operations.

Even as economic conditions may improve in the United States as a whole, this improvement may not occur or further deterioration may occur in the regions where MONI's subscribers are more heavily concentrated such as, Texas, California, Arizona, and Florida which, in the aggregate, comprise approximately 39% of our subscribers. Although MONI has a geographically diverse subscriber base, adverse conditions in one or more states where its business is more heavily concentrated could have a significant adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the insurance industry were to change its practice of providing incentives to homeowners for the use of alarm monitoring services, MONI may experience a reduction in new customer growth or an increase in its subscriber attrition rate.

It has been common practice in the insurance industry to provide a reduction in rates for policies written on homes that have monitored alarm systems. There can be no assurance that insurance companies will continue to offer these rate reductions. If these incentives were reduced or eliminated, new homeowners who otherwise may not feel the need for alarm monitoring services would be removed from MONI's potential customer pool, which could hinder the growth of its business, and existing subscribers may choose to disconnect or not renew their service contracts, which could increase MONI's attrition rates. In either case MONI's results of operations and growth prospects could be adversely affected.

MONI may pursue business opportunities that diverge from its current business model, which may cause its business to suffer.

MONI may pursue business opportunities that diverge from its current business model, including expanding its products or service offerings, investing in new and unproven technologies, adding customer acquisition channels (including, for example, increased direct marketing efforts) and forming new alliances with companies to market its services. MONI can offer no assurance that any such business opportunities will prove to be successful. Among other negative effects, MONI's pursuit of such business opportunities could cause its cost of investment in new customers to grow at a faster rate than its recurring revenue. Additionally, any new alliances or customer acquisition channels could have higher cost structures than MONI's current arrangements, which could reduce operating margins and require more working capital. In the event that working capital requirements exceed operating cash flow, MONI might be required to draw on its Credit Facility or pursue other external financing, which may not be readily available. Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect MONI's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Third party claims with respect to MONI's intellectual property, if decided against MONI, may result in competing uses of MONI's intellectual property or require the adoption of new, non-infringing intellectual property.

MONI has received and may continue to receive notices claiming it committed intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other intellectual property violations and third parties have claimed, and may, in the future, claim that MONI does not own or have rights to use all intellectual property rights used in the conduct of its business. While MONI does not believe that any of the currently outstanding claims are material, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert future infringement claims against it or claim that its rights to its intellectual property are invalid or unenforceable, and MONI cannot guarantee that these claims will be unsuccessful. Any claims involving rights to use the "MONI" mark or the "LiveWatch" mark could have a material adverse effect on MONI's business if such claims were decided against MONI and MONI was precluded from using or licensing the "MONI" mark or the "LiveWatch" mark or others were allowed to use such

mark. If MONI was required to adopt a new name, it would entail marketing costs in connection with building up recognition and goodwill in such new name. In the event that MONI was enjoined from using any of its other intellectual property, there would be costs associated with the replacement of such intellectual property with developed, acquired or licensed intellectual property. There would also be costs associated with the defense and settlement of any infringement or misappropriation allegations and any damages that may be awarded.

Factors Relating to Regulatory Matters

MONI's business operates in a regulated industry.

MONI's business, operations and dealers are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local consumer protection laws, licensing regulation and other laws and regulations, and, to a lesser extent, similar Canadian laws and regulations. While there are no U.S. federal laws that directly regulate the security alarm monitoring industry, MONI's advertising and sales practices and that of its dealer network are subject to regulation by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") in addition to state consumer protection laws. The FTC and the Federal Communications Commission have issued regulations that place restrictions on, among other things, unsolicited automated telephone calls to residential and wireless telephone subscribers by means of automatic telephone dialing systems and the use of prerecorded or artificial voice messages. If MONI (through its direct marketing efforts) or MONI's dealers were to take actions in violation of these regulations, such as telemarketing to individuals on the "Do Not Call" registry, it could be subject to fines, penalties, private actions or enforcement actions by government regulators. MONI has been named, and may be named in the future, as a defendant in litigation arising from alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the "TCPA"). While MONI endeavors to comply with the TCPA, no assurance can be given that MONI will not be exposed to liability as a result of its or its dealers direct marketing efforts. In addition, although MONI has taken steps to insulate itself from any such wrongful conduct by its dealers, and to require its dealers to comply with these laws and regulations, no assurance can be given that it will not be exposed to liability as result of its dealers' conduct. If MONI or any such dealers do not comply with applicable laws, MONI may be exposed to increased liability and penalties. Further, to the extent that any changes in law or regulation further restrict the lead generation activity of MONI or its dealers, these restrictions could result in a material reduction in subscriber acquisition opportunities, reducing the growth prospects of its business and adversely affecting its financial condition and future cash flows. In addition, most states in which MONI operates have licensing laws directed specifically toward the monitored security services industry. MONI's business relies heavily upon wireline and cellular telephone service to communicate signals. Wireline and cellular telephone companies are currently regulated by both federal and state governments. Changes in laws or regulations could require MONI to change the way it operates, which could increase costs or otherwise disrupt operations. In addition, failure to comply with any such applicable laws or regulations could result in substantial fines or revocation of its operating permits and licenses, including in geographic areas where its services have substantial penetration, which could adversely affect its business and financial condition. Further, if these laws and regulations were to change or MONI failed to comply with such laws and regulations as they exist today or in the future, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Increased adoption of statutes and governmental policies purporting to void automatic renewal provisions in the alarm monitoring contracts, or purporting to characterize certain charges in the alarm monitoring contracts as unlawful, could adversely affect MONI's business and operations.

The alarm monitoring contracts typically contain provisions automatically renewing the term of the contract at the end of the initial term, unless a cancellation notice is delivered in accordance with the terms of the contract. If the customer cancels prior to the end of the contract term, other than in accordance with the contract, MONI may charge the customer an early cancellation fee as specified in the contract, which typically allows MONI to charge 80% of the amounts that would have been paid over the remaining term of the contract. Several states have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, consumer protection policies or legal precedents which purport to void or substantially limit the automatic renewal provisions of contracts such as the alarm monitoring contracts, or otherwise restrict the charges that can be imposed upon contract cancellation. Such initiatives could negatively impact MONI's business. Adverse judicial determinations regarding these matters could increase legal exposure to customers against whom such charges have been imposed, and the risk that certain customers may seek to recover such charges through litigation. In addition, the costs of defending such litigation and enforcement actions could have an adverse effect on MONI's business and operations.

"False Alarm" ordinances could adversely affect MONI's business and operations.

Significant concern has arisen in certain municipalities about the high incidence of false alarms. In some localities, this concern has resulted in local ordinances or policies that restrict police response to third-party monitored burglar alarms. In addition, an increasing number of local governmental authorities have considered or adopted various measures aimed at reducing the

number of false alarms; measures include alarm fines to MONI and/or our customers, limits on number of police responses allowed, and requiring certain alarm conditions to exist before a response is granted. In extreme situations, authorities may not respond to an alarm unless a verified problem exists.

Enactment of these measures could adversely affect MONI's future operations and business. Alarm monitoring companies operating in areas impacted by government alarm ordinances may choose to hire third-party guard firms to respond to an alarm. If MONI needs to hire third-party guard firms, it could have a material adverse effect on its business through either increased servicing costs, which could negatively affect the ability to properly fund its ongoing operations, or increased costs to its customers, which may limit its ability to attract new customers or increase its subscriber attrition rates. In addition, the perception that police departments will not respond to monitored burglar alarms may reduce customer satisfaction or customer demand for an alarm monitoring service. Although MONI currently has less than 65,000 subscribers in areas covered by these ordinances or policies, a more widespread adoption of policies of this nature could adversely effect its business.

Factors Relating to Our Common Stock

Our stock price has been volatile in the past and may decline in the future.

Our common stock has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in the past. For example, during 2016, our Series A common stock price fluctuated from a high of $26.16 to a low of $7.77. Investors may not be able to sell their shares at or above the price at which they were purchased. The market price of our common stock may experience significant fluctuations in the future depending upon a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. Factors that could affect our stock price and trading volume include, among others, the perceived prospects of our business; differences between anticipated and actual operating results; changes in analysts' recommendations or projections; the commencement and/or results of litigation and other legal proceedings; and future sales of our common stock by us or by significant shareholders, officers and directors. In addition, stock markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume volatility from time to time, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to our performance.

It may be difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so may be beneficial to our shareholders.

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company that our shareholders may consider favorable. These provisions include the following:

•

a capital structure with multiple series of common stock: a Series B that entitles the holders to ten votes per share, a Series A that entitles the holders to one vote per share, and a Series C that, except in such limited circumstances as may be required by applicable law, entitles the holders to no voting rights;

•

authorizing the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock, which could be issued by our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;

•

classifying our board of directors with staggered three-year terms, which may lengthen the time required to gain control of our board of directors through a proxy contest or exercise of voting rights;

•

limiting who may call special meetings of shareholders;

•

prohibiting shareholder action by written consent (subject to certain exceptions), thereby requiring such action to be taken at a meeting of the shareholders;

•

establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at shareholder meetings;

•

requiring shareholder approval by holders of at least 80% of our voting power or the approval by at least 75% of our board of directors with respect to certain extraordinary matters, such as a merger or consolidation of our company, a sale of all or substantially all of our assets or an amendment to our certificate of incorporation;

•

requiring the consent of the holders of at least 75% of the outstanding Series B common stock (voting as a separate class) to certain share distributions and other corporate actions in which the voting power of the Series B common stock would be diluted, for example by issuing shares having multiple votes per share as a dividend to holders of Series A common stock; and

•

the existence of authorized and unissued stock which would allow our board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management, thereby protecting the continuity of its management, or which could be used to dilute the stock ownership of persons seeking to obtain control of us.

In addition, MONI's Credit Facility provides that the occurrence of specified change of control events will result in an event of default thereunder, and the Senior Notes include a covenant that requires MONI to make an offer to purchase all outstanding Senior Notes, at 101% of par, upon the occurrence of specified change of control events, each of which could cause an acquisition of our company to be prohibitively expensive for a potential bidder.

Holders of a single series of our common stock may not have any remedies if an action by our directors has an adverse effect on only that series of our common stock.

Principles of Delaware law and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation may protect decisions of our board of directors that have a disparate impact upon holders of any single series of our common stock. Under Delaware law, the board of directors has a duty to act with due care and in the best interests of all of our shareholders, including the holders of all series of our common stock. Principles of Delaware law established in cases involving differing treatment of multiple classes or series of stock provide that a board of directors owes an equal duty to all common shareholders regardless of class or series and does not have separate or additional duties to any group of shareholders. As a result, in some circumstances, our directors may be required to make a decision that is viewed as adverse to the holders of one series of our common stock. Under the principles of Delaware law and the business judgment rule, holders may not be able to successfully challenge decisions that they believe have a disparate impact upon the holders of one series of our stock if our board of directors is disinterested and independent with respect to the action taken, is adequately informed with respect to the action taken and acts in good faith and in the honest belief that the board is acting in the best interest of all of our stockholders.

Although our Series B common stock trades on the OTC Markets, there is no meaningful trading market for the stock.

Our Series B common stock is not widely held, with 95% of the outstanding shares as of December 31, 2016 beneficially owned by John C. Malone, a former director of the Company, and William Fitzgerald, Ascent Capital's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Although it is quoted on the OTC Markets, it is sparsely traded and does not have an active trading market. The OTC Markets tends to be highly illiquid, in part, because there is no national quotation system by which potential investors can track the market price of shares except through information received or generated by a limited number of broker-dealers that make markets in particular stocks. There is also a greater chance of market volatility for securities that trade on the OTC Markets as opposed to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility is due to a variety of factors, including a lack of readily available price quotations, lower trading volume, absence of consistent administrative supervision of "bid" and "ask" quotations, and market conditions. Each share of the Series B common stock is convertible, at any time at the option of the holder, into one share of Series A common stock, which is listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "ASCMA."

Factors Relating to Ascent Capital and Its Corporate History and Structure

We have a history of losses and may incur losses in the future.

MONI, our primary operating subsidiary, incurred losses in each of its last five fiscal years. In future periods, we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability on a consistent quarterly or annual basis. Failure to maintain profitability in future periods may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We are a holding company and derive substantially all of our revenue and cash flow from our primary operating subsidiary, MONI.

MONI is a separate and independent legal entity and has no obligation to make funds available to us, whether in the form of loans, dividends or otherwise. The ability of MONI to pay dividends to us is subject to, among other things, compliance with covenants in its Credit Facility and Senior Note indenture, the availability of sufficient earnings and funds, and applicable state laws. As of December 31, 2016, MONI had principal indebtedness of $1,727,050,000, excluding the 12.5% intercompany promissory note for $12,000,000 due to Ascent Capital. Claims of other creditors of MONI have priority as to its assets over our claims and those of our creditors and shareholders. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2016, Ascent Capital had approximately $96,775,000 principal outstanding under its 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due July 15, 2020 (the "Convertible Notes"). Although we currently have sufficient cash reserves at the Company to service our obligations under the Convertible Notes, our sources of cash remain limited as a result of our holding company structure and the restrictions on MONI's ability to distribute cash to our company.

Although we currently have sufficient cash and investments available to meet our anticipated capital requirements for the foreseeable future, we may in the future require access to capital markets as a source of liquidity for investments and expenditures. In any such event, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. If our ability to access required capital were to become significantly constrained, we could incur material borrowing costs, our financial condition could be harmed and future results of operations could be adversely affected.

Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets represent a significant portion of our total assets, and we may never realize the full value of our intangible assets.

As of December 31, 2016, we had goodwill of $563,549,000, which represents approximately 26% of total assets. Goodwill was recorded in connection with the MONI, Security Networks, and LiveWatch acquisitions. The Company accounts for its goodwill pursuant to the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other ("FASB ASC Topic 350"). In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, goodwill is tested for impairment annually or when events or changes in circumstances occur that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of an asset below its carrying value, resulting in an impairment. Impairments may result from, among other things, deterioration in financial and operational performance, declines in stock price, increased attrition, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws and/or regulations, deterioration of general macroeconomic conditions, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, increased competitive markets in which MONI operates in, declining financial performance over a sustained period, changes in key personnel and/or strategy, and a variety of other factors.

The amount of any quantified impairment must be expensed immediately as a charge to results of operations. Any impairment charge relating to goodwill or other intangible assets would have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in such period. At least annually, or as circumstances arise that may trigger an assessment, we will test our goodwill for impairment. There can be no assurance that our future evaluations of goodwill will not result in our recognition of impairment charges, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial statements and results of operations.

We may have substantial indemnification obligations under certain inter-company agreements we entered into in connection with the 2008 spin-off of our company from DHC (the "2008 spin-off").

Pursuant to our tax sharing agreement with DHC, we have agreed to be responsible for all taxes attributable to us or any of our subsidiaries, whether accruing before, on or after the 2008 spin-off (subject to specified exceptions). We have also agreed to be responsible for and indemnify DHC with respect to (i) certain taxes attributable to DHC or any of its subsidiaries (other than Discovery Communications, LLC) and (ii) all taxes arising as a result of the 2008 spin-off (subject to specified exceptions). Our indemnification obligations under the tax sharing agreement are not limited in amount or subject to any cap. Pursuant to the reorganization agreement we entered into with DHC in connection with the 2008 spin-off, we assumed certain indemnification obligations designed to make our company financially responsible for substantially all non-tax liabilities that may exist relating to the business of our former subsidiary, Ascent Media Group, LLC, whether incurred prior to or after the 2008 spin-off, as well as certain obligations of DHC. Any indemnification payments under the tax sharing agreement or the reorganization agreement could be substantial.

Currently, the Company leases approximately 4,000 square feet of office space in Colorado. The Company owns 29,000 square feet of office space in California and 15,000 square feet of office space in the United Kingdom. The Company has recently signed agreements to sell both properties, which are both expected to close in first half of 2017.

MONI leases approximately 165,000 square feet in Farmers Branch, Texas to house its executive offices, monitoring and certain call centers, sales and marketing and data retention functions. MONI also leases approximately 16,000 square feet of office space in Dallas, Texas that supports its monitoring operations and back up facility.

LiveWatch leases approximately 11,000 square feet of office space in St. Marys, Kansas to house its main operations and fulfillment center and 6,800 square feet of office space in Manhattan, Kansas to house sales office functions. Additionally, LiveWatch leases approximately 6,700 square feet of office space in Evanston, Illinois for general administrative and sales office functions.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation and similar claims incidental to the conduct of its business. Although no assurances can be given, in the opinion of management, none of the pending actions is likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate.

We have two series of common stock outstanding. Holders of our Series A common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held, and holders of our Series B common stock are entitled to 10 votes for each share held, as well as a separate class vote on certain corporate actions. Each share of the Series B common stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, into one share of Series A common stock; the Series A common stock is not convertible. Except for such voting rights, conversion rights and designations, shares of Series A common stock and Series B common stock are substantially identical.

Our Series A common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol ASCMA. Our Series B common stock is eligible for quotation on the OTC Markets under the symbol ASCMB, but it is not actively traded. The following table sets forth the quarterly range of high and low sales prices of shares of our Series A common stock for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

The following table sets forth the quarterly range of high and low sales prices of shares of our Series B common stock for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, as reported by the OTC Markets. This information represents inter-dealer prices without dealer mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions, and may not be indicative of the value of the common stock or the existence of an active market.

Series B

High

Low

Amounts in U.S. Dollar

2016

First quarter

20.00

13.24

Second quarter

13.24

13.24

Third quarter

13.24

13.24

Fourth quarter

20.05

20.00

2015

First quarter

50.50

48.37

Second quarter

45.52

41.00

Third quarter

40.10

30.00

Fourth quarter

31.13

20.00

Holders

As of February 2, 2017, there were 727 record holders of our Series A common stock and 43 record holders of our Series B common stock (which amounts do not include the number of shareholders whose shares are held of record by banks, brokerage houses or other institutions, but include each institution as one shareholder).

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention to do so. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be determined by our board of directors in light of our earnings, financial condition, alternative uses for cash and other relevant considerations.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of stockholders.

The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or "filed" with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

The following graph sets forth the percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on our Series A and Series B common stock for the preceding 5-year period ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the NASDAQ Stock Market Index over the same period. The graph assumes $100 was originally invested on December 31, 2012.

The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our Series A and Series B common stock.

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s purchase of its own equity securities during the three months ended December 31, 2016:

Period

Total number of

shares

purchased /

surrendered (1)

Average price

paid per share

Total Number of

Shares (or Units)

Purchased as Part

of Publicly

Announced Plans

or Programs

Maximum Number (or

Approximate Dollar

Value) or Shares (or

Units) that May Yet Be

Purchased Under the

Plans or Programs

10/1/2016 - 10/31/16

49

(2)

$

23.40

—

(1)

11/1/2016 - 11/30/16

559

(2)

19.42

—

(1)

12/1/2016 - 12/31/16

—

—

—

Total

608

$

19.74

—

(1)On June 16, 2011, the Company announced that it received authorization to implement a share repurchase program, pursuant to which it could purchase up to $25,000,000 of its shares of Series A common stock, par value $0.01, from time to time. On November 14, 2013, November 10, 2014 and September 4, 2015, the Company’s board of directors authorized, at each date, the repurchase of an incremental $25,000,000 of its Series A common stock. As of December 31, 2016, 2,391,604 shares of Series A common stock had been purchased, at an average price paid of $40.65 per share, pursuant to these authorizations. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining availability under the Company's existing stock repurchase program will enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately $2,771,000 of Series A common stock. The Company may also purchase shares of its Series B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, under the increased program.

(2)

These shares were withheld in payment of withholding taxes by certain of our employees upon vesting of their restricted share awards in October and November 2016.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 all of which are set forth below, are derived from the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and the notes thereto. The balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 shown below were derived from previously issued financial statements.

(a)Diluted net loss per common share is computed the same as basic net income (loss) per share for all periods presented because the Company recorded a loss from continuing operations in all periods presented, which would make potentially dilutive securities antidilutive.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis provides information concerning our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

On December 17, 2010, we acquired 100% of the outstanding capital stock of MONI, through the merger of Mono Lake Merger Sub, Inc., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Ascent Capital established to consummate the merger, with and into MONI, with MONI as the surviving corporation in the merger (the "MONI Acquisition"). On August 16, 2013, MONI acquired all of the equity interests of Security Networks and certain affiliated entities in the Security Networks Acquisition. On February 23, 2015, MONI acquired LiveWatch, a DIY home security provider.

MONI provides security alarm monitoring and related services to residential and business subscribers throughout the U.S. and parts of Canada. MONI monitors signals arising from burglaries, fires, medical alerts and other events through security systems at subscribers' premises, as well as providing interactive and home automation services. Nearly all of its revenues are derived from monthly recurring revenues under security alarm monitoring contracts acquired through its exclusive nationwide network of independent dealers or through LiveWatch.

Attrition

Account cancellation, otherwise referred to as subscriber attrition, has a direct impact on the number of subscribers that MONI services and on its financial results, including revenues, operating income and cash flow. A portion of the subscriber base can be expected to cancel its service every year. Subscribers may choose not to renew or terminate their contract for a variety of reasons, including relocation, cost and switching to a competitor's service. The largest categories of canceled accounts relate to subscriber relocation or the inability to contact the subscriber. MONI defines its attrition rate as the number of canceled accounts in a given period divided by the weighted average of number of subscribers for that period. MONI considers an account canceled if payment from the subscriber is deemed uncollectible or if the subscriber cancels for various reasons. If a subscriber relocates but continues its service, this is not a cancellation. If the subscriber relocates, discontinues its service and a new subscriber takes over the original subscriber's service continuing the revenue stream, this is also not a cancellation. MONI adjusts the number of canceled accounts by excluding those that are contractually guaranteed by its dealers. The typical dealer contract provides that if a subscriber cancels in the first year of its contract, the dealer must either replace the canceled account with a new one or refund to MONI the cost paid to acquire the contract. To help ensure the dealer’s obligation to MONI, MONI typically maintains a dealer funded holdback reserve ranging from 5-8% of subscriber accounts in the guarantee period. In some cases, the amount of the holdback liability is less than actual attrition experience.

The table below presents subscriber data for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

2016

2015

Beginning balance of accounts

1,089,535

1,058,962

Accounts acquired

125,292

188,941

Accounts canceled

(148,878

)

(147,923

)

Canceled accounts guaranteed by dealer and other adjustments (a)

(19,158

)

(b)

(10,445

)

Ending balance of accounts

1,046,791

1,089,535

Monthly weighted average accounts

1,069,901

1,086,071

Attrition rate - Unit

13.9

%

13.6

%

Attrition rate- RMR (c)

12.2

%

13.4

%

(a)

Includes canceled accounts that are contractually guaranteed to be refunded from holdback.

(b)

Includes an estimated 12,177 accounts included in our Radio Conversion Program that canceled in excess of their expected attrition.

(c)

The recurring monthly revenue ("RMR") of canceled accounts follows the same definition as subscriber unit attrition as noted above. RMR attrition is defined as the RMR of canceled accounts in a given period, adjusted for the impact of price increases or decreases in that period, divided by the weighted average of RMR for that period.

The unit attrition rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was 13.9% and 13.6%, respectively. Contributing to the increase in attrition was the number of subscriber accounts with 5-year contracts reaching the end of their initial contract term in the period, as well as our more aggressive price increase strategy. Overall attrition reflects the impact of the Pinnacle Security bulk buys, where MONI purchased approximately 113,000 accounts from Pinnacle Security in 2012 and 2013 which are now experiencing normal end-of-term attrition. The attrition rate without the Pinnacle Security accounts (core attrition) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is 13.4% and 12.7%, respectively. RMR attrition for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 declined to 12.2% from 13.4% for the year ended 2015 reflecting price increases to existing customers and higher RMR for new customers.

MONI analyzes its attrition by classifying accounts into annual pools based on the year of acquisition. MONI then tracks the number of accounts that cancel as a percentage of the initial number of accounts acquired for each pool for each year subsequent to its acquisition. Based on the average cancellation rate across the pools, MONI's attrition rate is very low within the initial 12 month period after considering the accounts which were replaced or refunded by the dealers at no additional cost to MONI. Over the next few years of the subscriber account life, the number of subscribers that cancel as a percentage of the initial number of subscribers in that pool gradually increases and historically has peaked following the end of the initial contract term, which is typically three to five years. The peak following the end of the initial contract term is primarily a result of subscribers that moved, no longer had need for the service or switched to a competitor. Subsequent to the peak following the end of the initial contract term, the number of subscribers that cancel as a percentage of the initial number of subscribers in that pool declines.

Accounts Acquired

During the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, MONI acquired 26,227 and 37,349 subscriber accounts, respectively.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, MONI acquired 125,292 and 157,022 subscriber accounts, respectively, excluding the 31,919 accounts acquired from the LiveWatch Acquisition in February 2015. Acquired contracts for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 also include approximately 8,600 and 2,000 accounts, respectively, purchased in various bulk buys throughout the periods.

RMR acquired during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $1,231,000 and $5,835,000, respectively. RMR acquired during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2015 was approximately $1,720,000 and $7,279,000, respectively, excluding $909,000 of RMR acquired from the LiveWatch Acquisition in February 2015.

We evaluate the performance of our operations based on financial measures such as revenue and "Adjusted EBITDA." Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before interest expense, interest income, income taxes, depreciation, amortization (including the amortization of subscriber accounts, dealer network and other intangible assets), restructuring charges, stock-based compensation, and other non-cash or non-recurring charges. Ascent Capital believes that Adjusted EBITDA is an important indicator of the operational strength and performance of its business, including the business' ability to fund its ongoing acquisition of subscriber accounts, its capital expenditures and to service its debt. In addition, this measure is used by management to evaluate operating results and perform analytical comparisons and identify strategies to improve performance. Adjusted EBITDA is also a measure that is customarily used by financial analysts to evaluate the financial performance of companies in the security alarm monitoring industry and is one of the financial measures, subject to certain adjustments, by which MONI's covenants are calculated under the agreements governing their debt obligations. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent cash flow from operations as defined by generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), should not be construed as an alternative to net income or loss and is indicative neither of our results of operations nor of cash flows available to fund all of our cash needs. It is, however, a measurement that Ascent Capital believes is useful to investors in analyzing its operating performance. Accordingly, Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, net income, cash flow provided by operating activities and other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. As companies often define non-GAAP financial measures differently, Adjusted EBITDA as calculated by Ascent Capital should not be compared to any similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA

LiveWatch is a direct-to-consumer business, and as such recognizes certain revenue and expenses associated with subscriber acquisition (subscriber acquisition costs, or "SAC"). This is in contrast to MONI, which capitalizes payments to dealers to acquire accounts. "Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA" is a measure that eliminates the impact of acquiring accounts at the LiveWatch business that is recognized in operating income. Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA is defined as total Adjusted EBITDA excluding LiveWatch's SAC and the related revenue. We believe Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA is a meaningful measure of the Company's financial performance in servicing its customer base. Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, net income, cash flow provided by operating activities and other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. As companies often define non-GAAP financial measures differently, Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA as calculated by the Company should not be compared to any similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Amortization of subscriber accounts, dealer network and other intangible assets

246,753

258,668

253,403

Interest expense

(132,269

)

(123,743

)

(117,464

)

Income tax expense from continuing operations

(7,251

)

(6,505

)

(3,420

)

Net loss from continuing operations

(91,244

)

(86,236

)

(37,448

)

Net loss

(91,244

)

(83,384

)

(37,752

)

Adjusted EBITDA (b)

MONI business Adjusted EBITDA

$

344,848

354,807

362,227

Corporate Adjusted EBITDA

(5,590

)

(7,055

)

(7,422

)

Total Adjusted EBITDA

$

339,258

347,752

354,805

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Revenue

MONI business

60.5

%

63.0

%

67.1

%

Corporate

(1.0

)%

(1.3

)%

(1.4

)%

Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA (c)

MONI business Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA

$

366,481

369,083

362,227

Corporate Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA

(5,590

)

(7,055

)

(7,422

)

Total Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA

$

360,891

362,028

354,805

Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Pre-SAC net revenue (d)

MONI business

64.8

%

66.0

%

67.1

%

Corporate

(1.0

)%

(1.3

)%

(1.4

)%

(a) Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflects the negative impact of $359,000 of fair value adjustments that reduced deferred revenue acquired in the LiveWatch Acquisition.

(b)See reconciliation to net loss from continuing operations below.

(c)

See reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA below.

(d)

Presented below is the reconciliation of Net revenue to Pre-SAC net revenue (amounts in thousands):

Year ended December 31,

2016

2015

2014

Net revenue, as reported

$

570,372

563,356

539,449

LiveWatch revenue related to SAC

(4,493

)

(4,022

)

—

Pre-SAC net revenue

$

565,879

559,334

539,449

Net Revenue. Revenue increased $7,016,000, or 1.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding prior year. The increase in net revenue is attributable to an increase in average RMR per subscriber, as well as, the inclusion of a full first quarter's impact of LiveWatch revenue. Average RMR per subscriber increased from $41.92 as of December 31, 2015 to $43.10 as of December 31, 2016 and was the result of price increases enacted throughout the year as well as an increase in average RMR per new subscriber acquired. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the monthly weighted average number of accounts from 2015 to 2016.

Revenue increased $23,907,000, or 4.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the corresponding prior year. The increase in net revenue is attributable to the growth in the number of subscriber accounts and the increase in average RMR per subscriber. The growth in subscriber accounts reflects the acquisition of over 157,000 accounts through the MONI and LiveWatch subscriber channels, as well as 31,919 accounts from the LiveWatch Acquisition in February 2015. In addition, average monthly revenue per subscriber increased from $41.64 as of December 31, 2014 to $41.92 as of December 31, 2015. Excluding accounts acquired through the LiveWatch Acquisition, which had an average monthly revenue per subscriber of $28.46, MONI's average monthly revenue per subscriber increased from $41.64 to $42.33 for the period ending December 31, 2015. Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 also reflects the negative impact of a $359,000 fair value adjustment that reduced deferred revenue acquired in the LiveWatch Acquisition.

Cost of Services. Cost of services increased $4,990,000 or 4.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding prior year. The increase is primarily attributable to increased field service costs due to a higher volume of retention jobs being completed and an increase in subscriber acquisition costs incurred at LiveWatch, related to increased account production and the inclusion of a full first quarter of production. Furthermore, cost of services increased due to more subscribers being monitored across the cellular network, including home automation accounts. LiveWatch's subscriber acquisition costs include expensed equipment costs associated with new subscribers of $8,928,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $7,058,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Cost of services as a percent of net revenue increased from 19.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 20.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Cost of services increased $16,646,000 or 17.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the corresponding prior year. The increase is attributable to the inclusion of LiveWatch, which expensed equipment costs associated with the creation of new subscribers of $7,058,000. The increase is also attributable to the growth in the number of accounts being monitored across the cellular network, including home automation accounts, and service costs to upgrade existing subscribers' equipment. Cost of services as a percent of net revenue increased from 17.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 19.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Selling, General and Administrative, including stock-based compensation. Selling, general and administrative expense, including stock-based compensation ("SG&A") increased $4,474,000, or 3.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding prior year. The increases are primarily attributable to subscriber acquisition costs incurred at LiveWatch from increased account production and the inclusion of a full first quarter of production, as well as increased salaries, wages and benefits costs and $2,991,000 of rebranding expense at MONI. LiveWatch's subscriber acquisition costs, which includes marketing and sales costs related to the creation of new subscribers, was $17,198,000 and $11,240,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. These increases were partially offset by a fourth quarter gain on the revaluation of a dealer liability related to the Security Networks Acquisition of $7,160,000. SG&A as a percent of net revenue increased from 21.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 22.1% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

SG&A increased $19,309,000, or 18.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the corresponding prior year. The primary driver of the increase in SG&A is attributable to $11,240,000 of LiveWatch marketing and sales expense related to the creation of new subscribers. LiveWatch SG&A also includes $3,930,000 of contingent bonuses payable to LiveWatch's key members of management in accordance with the employment agreements entered into in connection with th LiveWatch Acquisition. Other increases in SG&A are one-time costs incurred by MONI of $946,000 related to professional services rendered in connection with the LiveWatch Acquisition and $720,000 costs incurred to relocate MONI's headquarters in July 2015. These increases are partially offset by decreases in MONI's staffing and operating costs incurred at its headquarters as a result of the Security Networks' integration being completed in April 2014. SG&A for the year ended December 31, 2014 also includes $2,182,000 of incremental costs incurred in connection with Security Networks integration. SG&A as a percent of net revenue increased from 18.9% for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 21.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Amortization of Subscriber Accounts, Dealer Network and Other Intangible Assets. Amortization of subscriber accounts, dealer network and other intangible assets decreased $11,915,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and increased and $5,265,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively, as compared to the corresponding prior years. The decrease in 2016 is attributable to the timing of amortization of subscriber accounts acquired prior to December 31, 2015 which have a lower rate of amortization in 2016 and are not offset by amortization on 2016 subscriber accounts due to decreased purchases occurring in 2016. The increase in 2015 is attributable to the timing and amortization impact of account purchases in 2015 as compared to account purchases in 2014.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $8,526,000 and $6,279,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as compared to the corresponding prior years. The increase in interest expense is attributable to increases in the Company's consolidated debt balance related to the amendment of its Credit Facility term loans in February and April 2015 and

September 2016. Additionally, Amendment No. 6 to the Existing Credit Agreement increased the applicable margin interest rates, which contributed to increased interest expense in the fourth quarter of 2016. The increase includes the impact of the amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing costs related to the Company's outstanding debt. Amortization of debt discount and deferred debt costs included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $10,670,000, $10,357,000 and $9,023,000, respectively.

Income Taxes from Continuing Operations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had a pre-tax loss from continuing operations of $83,993,000 and income tax expense from continuing operations of $7,251,000. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had a pre-tax loss from continuing operations of $79,731,000 and income tax expense from continuing operations of $6,505,000. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we had a pre-tax loss from continuing operations of $34,028,000 and income tax expense from continuing operations of $3,420,000. Income tax expense from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 is attributable to MONI's state tax expense and the deferred tax impact from amortization of deductible goodwill attributable to the Security Networks and LiveWatch acquisitions. Income tax expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is primarily attributable to MONI's state tax expense and the deferred tax impact from amortization of deductible goodwill attributable to the Security Networks Acquisition.

Net loss from continuing operations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, net loss from continuing operations increased to $91,244,000 from $86,236,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in net loss from continuing operations is attributable to increase in costs incurred under the Company's Radio Conversion Program, increased equipment, sales and marketing costs incurred by LiveWatch related to the acquisition of new subscribers and increases in debt refinance expenses related to the size and cost of the Credit Facility refinancing as compared to the 2015 refinancings.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, net loss from continuing operations increased to $86,236,000 from $37,448,000 for the year end December 31, 2014. The increase in net loss from continuing operations is attributable to a $13,256,000 increase in costs incurred under the Company's Radio Conversion Program, the negative impact of subscriber acquisition costs as a result of LiveWatch's direct-to-consumer model, increased interest costs and refinancing costs of $4,468,000 related to the April 2015 amendment to MONI's Credit Facility and $6,389,000 of non-cash charges for other-than-temporary impairments recognized on certain marketable securities.

(a) Severance expense related to a reduction in headcount event and transitioning executive leadership at MONI.

Adjusted EBITDA decreased $8,494,000, or 2.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $7,053,000, or 2.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the corresponding prior year. The decreases are primarily driven by LiveWatch's subscriber acquisition costs that LiveWatch incurs to create its customers through its direct-to-consumer business model. As LiveWatch creates more subscribers, Adjusted EBITDA will be negatively impacted. LiveWatch's subscriber acquisition costs were $21,633,000 and $14,276,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA decreased $1,137,000, or 0.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 and increased $7,223,000, or 2.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the corresponding prior year.

MONI's consolidated Adjusted EBITDA was $344,848,000, $354,807,000 and $362,227,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. MONI's consolidated Pre-SAC Adjusted EBITDA was $366,481,000, $369,083,000 and $362,227,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2016, we had $12,319,000 of cash and cash equivalents and $77,825,000 of marketable securities on a consolidated basis. We may use a portion of these assets to decrease debt obligations, fund stock repurchases, or fund potential strategic acquisitions or investment opportunities.

Additionally, our other source of funds is our cash flows from operating activities which are primarily generated from the operations of MONI. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, our cash flow from operating activities was $188,903,000, $208,680,000 and $234,604,000, respectively. The primary driver of our cash flow from operating activities is represented in Adjusted EBITDA. Fluctuations in our Adjusted EBITDA and the components of that measure are discussed in "Results of Operations" above. In addition, our cash flow from operating activities may be significantly impacted by changes in working capital.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company used cash of $201,381,000, $266,558,000 and $268,160,000, respectively, to fund subscriber account acquisitions, net of holdback and guarantee obligations. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company used cash of $9,180,000, $12,431,000 and $7,769,000, respectively, to fund its capital expenditures.

In 2015, MONI paid cash of $56,778,000 for the acquisition of LiveWatch, net of the transfer of $3,988,000 to LiveWatch upon February 23, 2015, the closing date, to fund LiveWatch employees' transaction bonuses and LiveWatch cash on hand of $784,000. The LiveWatch Acquisition was funded by borrowings from MONI's Existing Credit Agreement revolver as well as cash contributions from Ascent Capital.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we purchased marketable securities for cash of $5,036,000, $26,934,000 and $4,603,000, respectively. In addition, the Company sold marketable securities for proceeds of $15,184,000, $57,291,000 and $7,842,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

On June 16, 2011, the Company announced that it received authorization to implement a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which it may purchase up to $25,000,000 of its shares of Series A common stock from time to time. On November 14, 2013, November 10, 2014 and September 4, 2015, the Company’s board of directors authorized, at each date, the repurchase of an incremental $25,000,000 of its Series A common stock (the "Share Repurchase Authorizations").

During 2016, the Company repurchased 389,179 shares of its Series A common stock at an average purchase price of $18.35 per share for a total of approximately $7,140,000 pursuant to the Share Repurchase Authorizations. During 2015, the Company repurchased 940,729 shares of its Series A common stock at an average purchase price of $31.88 per share for a total of approximately $29,988,000 pursuant to the Share Repurchase Authorizations. During 2014, the Company repurchased 557,309 shares of its Series A common stock at an average purchase price of $64.12 per share for a total of approximately $35,734,000 pursuant to the Share Repurchase Authorizations. These repurchased shares were all canceled and returned to the status of authorized and unissued. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining availability under the Company's Share Repurchase Authorizations will enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately $2,771,000 of Series A Common Stock. The Company may also purchase shares of its Series B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, under the increased program.

In considering our liquidity requirements for 2017, we evaluated our known future commitments and obligations. We will require the availability of funds to finance the strategy of our primary operating subsidiary, MONI, which is to grow through the acquisition of subscriber accounts. We considered the expected cash flow from MONI, as this business is the driver of our operating cash flows, as well as the borrowing capacity of MONI's Credit Facility revolver, under which MONI could borrow an additional $250,200,000 as of December 31, 2016. Based on this analysis, we expect that cash on hand, cash flow generated from operations and borrowings under the MONI's Credit Facility will provide sufficient liquidity, given our anticipated current and future requirements.

The existing long-term debt of the Company at December 31, 2016 includes the principal balance of $1,823,825,000 under its Convertible Notes, Senior Notes, Credit Facility, and Credit Facility revolver. The Convertible Notes have an outstanding principal balance of $96,775,000 as of December 31, 2016 and mature July 15, 2020. The Senior Notes have an outstanding principal balance of $585,000,000 as of December 31, 2016 are due on April 1, 2020. The Credit Facility term loans have an outstanding principal balance of $1,097,250,000 as of December 31, 2016 and require principal payments of $2,750,000 per quarter with the remaining amount becoming due September 30, 2022. The Credit Facility revolver has an outstanding balance of $44,800,000 as of December 31, 2016 and becomes due on September 30, 2021.

We may seek external equity or debt financing in the event of any new investment opportunities, additional capital expenditures or our operations requiring additional funds, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain equity or debt financing on terms that would be acceptable to us or at all. Our ability to seek additional sources of funding depends on our future financial position and results of operations, which are subject to general conditions in or affecting our industry and our customers and to general economic, political, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors beyond our control.

Primarily represents MONI holdback liability whereby it withholds payment of a designated percentage of acquisition cost when it acquires subscriber accounts from dealers. The holdback is used as a reserve to cover any terminated subscriber accounts that are not replaced by the dealer during the guarantee period. At the end of the guarantee period, the dealer is responsible for any deficit or is paid the balance of the holdback.

We have contingent liabilities related to legal proceedings and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Although it is reasonably possible we may incur losses upon conclusion of such matters, an estimate of any loss or range of loss cannot be made. In the opinion of management, it is expected that amounts, if any, which may be required to satisfy such contingencies will not be material in relation to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Valuation of Subscriber Accounts

Subscriber accounts, which totaled $1,386,760,000 net of accumulated amortization, at December 31, 2016, relate primarily to the cost of acquiring portfolios of monitoring service contracts from independent dealers. The subscriber accounts acquired in the MONI, Security Networks and LiveWatch acquisitions were recorded at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting. Subscriber accounts not acquired as part of a business combination are recorded at cost. All direct and incremental costs, including bonus incentives related to account activation at LiveWatch, associated with the creation of subscriber accounts, including new subscriber contracts obtained in connection with a subscriber move, are capitalized.

The costs of subscriber accounts acquired in the MONI, Security Networks and LiveWatch acquisitions, as well as certain accounts acquired in bulk purchases, are amortized using the 14-year 235% declining balance method. The costs of all other subscriber accounts are amortized using the 15-year 220% declining balance method, beginning in the month following the date of acquisition. The amortization methods were selected to provide an approximate matching of the amortization of the subscriber accounts intangible asset to estimated future subscriber revenues based on the projected lives of individual subscriber contracts. The realizable value and remaining useful lives of these assets could be impacted by changes in subscriber attrition rates, which could have an adverse effect on our earnings.

The Company reviews the subscriber accounts for impairment or a change in amortization method and period whenever events or changes indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable or the life should be shortened. For purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, we view subscriber accounts as a single pool because of the assets' homogeneous characteristics, and because the pool of subscriber accounts is the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of the other assets and liabilities.

Valuation of Long-lived Assets and Amortizable Other Intangible Assets

We perform impairment tests for our long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, if an event or circumstance indicates that the carrying amount of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable. We are subject to the possibility of impairment of

long-lived assets arising in the ordinary course of business. We regularly consider the likelihood of impairment and may recognize impairment if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or intangible asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. Impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. We use both the income approach and market approach to estimate fair value. Our estimates of fair value are subject to a high degree of judgment since they include a long-term forecast of future operations. Accordingly, any value ultimately derived from our long-lived assets may differ from our estimate of fair value.

Valuation of Trade Receivables

We must make estimates of the collectability of our trade receivables. We perform extensive credit evaluations on the portfolios of subscriber accounts prior to acquisition and require no collateral on the accounts that are acquired. We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of subscribers to make required payments. Factors such as historical-loss experience, recoveries and economic conditions are considered in determining the sufficiency of the allowance to cover potential losses. Our trade receivables balance was $13,869,000, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,043,000, as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, our trade receivables balance was $13,622,000, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,762,000.

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, we review the nature of each component of our deferred income taxes for the ability to realize the future tax benefits. As part of this review, we rely on the objective evidence of our current performance and the subjective evidence of estimates of our forecast of future operations. Our estimates of realizability are subject to a high degree of judgment since they include such forecasts of future operations. After consideration of all available positive and negative evidence and estimates, we have determined that it is more likely than not that we will not realize the tax benefits associated with our United States deferred tax assets and certain foreign deferred tax assets, and as such, we have a valuation allowance which totaled $126,164,000 and $92,214,000 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Valuation of Goodwill

As of December 31, 2016, we had goodwill of $563,549,000, which represents approximately 26% of total assets. Goodwill was recorded in connection with the MONI, Security Networks and LiveWatch acquisitions. The Company accounts for its goodwill pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment at least annually.

To the extent necessary, recoverability of goodwill for the reporting unit is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved, which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, growth rates and cash flow projections are the most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment.

We perform our annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. In the event that we are not able to achieve expected cash flow levels, or other factors indicate that goodwill is impaired, we may need to write off all or part of our goodwill, which would adversely impact our operating results and financial position.

As of December 31, 2016, we have variable interest rate debt with principal amounts of $1,142,050,000 in the aggregate. As a result, we have exposure to changes in interest rates related to these debt obligations. MONI uses derivative financial instruments to manage the exposure related to the movement in interest rates. As of December 31, 2016, we have eight outstanding derivatives with a net liability fair value of $8,427,000. The derivatives are designated as hedges and were entered into with the intention of reducing the risk associated with variable interest rates on the debt obligations. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

(a) The derivative financial instruments reflected in this column include eight interest rate swaps. The terms of the Company’s outstanding swap derivative instruments as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:

Notional

Effective Date

Maturity Date

FixedRate Paid

Variable Rate Received

$

523,875,000

March 28, 2013

March 23, 2018

1.884%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor (a)

138,837,500

March 28, 2013

March 23, 2018

1.384%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor (a)

108,542,713

September 30, 2013

March 23, 2018

1.959%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor

108,542,713

September 30, 2013

March 23, 2018

1.850%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor

191,475,002

March 23, 2018

April 9, 2022

3.110%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor (a)

250,000,000

March 23, 2018

April 9, 2022

3.110%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor (a)

50,000,000

March 23, 2018

April 9, 2022

2.504%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor

377,000,000

March 23, 2018

September 30, 2022

1.833%

3 mo. USD-LIBOR-BBA, subject to a 1.00% floor

(a)

On March 25, 2013 and September 30, 2016, MONI negotiated amendments to the terms of these interest rate

swap agreements (the "Existing Swap Agreements," and as amended, the "Amended Swaps"). The Amended Swaps are held with the same counterparties as the Existing Swap Agreements. Upon entering into the Amended Swaps, MONI simultaneously dedesignated the Existing Swap Agreements and redesignated the Amended Swaps as cash flow hedges for the underlying change in the swap terms. The amounts previously recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss relating to the dedesignation are recognized in Interest expense over the remaining life of the Amended Swaps.

Our consolidated financial statements are filed under this Item, beginning on page 43. The financial statement schedules required by Regulation S-X are filed under Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In accordance with Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its chairman, chief executive officer and chief financial officer (the "Executives"), of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Executives concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We implemented a change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2016 related to the review of a contingent liability. This change was implemented to remediate a material weakness in the Company's risk assessment process, which led to an ineffectively designed management review control over the re-measurement of the contingent liability. This material weakness which arose in prior periods and was identified in the quarter ended December 31, 2016 resulted in a measurement error that, while not material to our consolidated financial statements, could have accumulated to a material misstatement. The Company has remediated the material weakness by enhancing its risk assessment process and the design of the management review control over the periodic re-measurement of the contingent liability. This material weakness did not have a pervasive effect on internal control over financial reporting, as it was limited to the measurement of this liability and its impact on our consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

There have been no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified during the three months ended December 31, 2016 that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Ascent Capital's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Company's financial reporting. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (3) provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (4) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

The Company assessed the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).

Based upon our assessment using the criteria contained in COSO, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, Ascent Capital's internal control over financial reporting is designed and operating effectively.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by KPMG LLP. Their report appears on the next page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have audited Ascent Capital Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Ascent Capital Group Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Ascent Capital Group Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Ascent Capital Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated March 8, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ascent Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ascent Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Ascent Capital Group, Inc. has changed its method of accounting for several aspects of accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements as well as classification of certain elements in the statement of cash flows, in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards Update 2016-19, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Ascent Capital Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 8, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.