Dark web warning

Grimsby is a very small place on the east coast of England. It's been down on its luck for years and news items are just local dramas.

This news story is less likely to be part of a false-flag scheme by secret powers to censor the internet than just yet another slow news day in
Grimsby.

The writer probably works part-time and will be thrilled to see the website getting a few hits. Chances are the staff have gone out and had a few
pints to celebrate the site-clicks from outside the borough.

Does anyone know how to access conspiracy sites down there, where to find them? Was on it for awhile and nothing interested me, I love ATS but I would
really like to know what the conspiracy sites are saying in the deep web.... Any advice would be greatly appreciated

The kid must have had intent to find it unless his dad already had it on there, kid found it and the dad found it hard to explain to his wifey. ^^

but its really easy now to access it, TOR comes pre-configured now, you just download and install like any other program. grab a link for the
sites I won't mention here. I saw an AK-47 on there ,...Ricin.... lots of bad stuff.

I even managed to get it up on my iPhone using the Onion browser.

Its TOO easy to access in my opinion. and used for all the wrong reasons.

Originally posted by TrentReznor
The kid must have had intent to find it unless his dad already had it on there, kid found it and the dad found it hard to explain to his wifey. ^^

but its really easy now to access it, TOR comes pre-configured now, you just download and install like any other program. grab a link for the
sites I won't mention here. I saw an AK-47 on there ,...Ricin.... lots of bad stuff.

I even managed to get it up on my iPhone using the Onion browser.

Its TOO easy to access in my opinion. and used for all the wrong reasons.

It could be put to Sooooo much use!!!!!!

haha so wait let me guess - pay up front?

My question is if anonymous can shut down the child porn sites why can't the government....with the supercomputers....right....??

Originally posted by ChesterJohn
One of the things no one has pointed out so far (at least in what I have read) is that this is a tactic to get the govt to pass laws banning, limiting
and regulating the internet both Broadband and Dark net.

This is the true reason behind this new article.

The ADD was added to garner support that a child who is handicapped (right!) had found it so easy to enter a place that takes some knowledge to get
into.

Lie, distortions and slight of hand techniques to get people riled up to regulate the internet.

ADD is a handicap?

I always considered it a compliment.

It is officially listed as a handicap so you can collect free govt help, meds and special educational needs at the expense of us tax paying citizens.

Anon failed. They could not shut down anything. The sites that was claimed to have been taken down are still there(at least the onion ones).

You pay up front, but the more reputable sites have comment sections to report ripoff artists and whatnot. If you want to buy illegal things, there is
always great risk involved, even on TOR. TOR you got to worried about being ripped off your bitcoins, IRL you got to worry that the seller is an
undercover cop etc.

Originally posted by ChesterJohn
One of the things no one has pointed out so far (at least in what I have read) is that this is a tactic to get the govt to pass laws banning, limiting
and regulating the internet both Broadband and Dark net.

This is the true reason behind this new article.

The ADD was added to garner support that a child who is handicapped (right!) had found it so easy to enter a place that takes some knowledge to get
into.

Lie, distortions and slight of hand techniques to get people riled up to regulate the internet.

ADD is a handicap?

I always considered it a compliment.

It is officially listed as a handicap so you can collect free govt help, meds and special educational needs at the expense of us tax paying citizens.

Who said I don't pay taxes? I don't collect any of that stuff. To your knowledge, I do not even have ADD. I have only revealed being called ADD.

Originally posted by NarrowGate
I would have thought this would be obvious to everyone:

It was funded by the US Navy.

It is an apparent "hub for criminal activity on the net."

You know what never mind.

I applaud the Navy for this, much more effective than dateline's how to catch a predator.

I wonder if they are even bothering to arrest them when they catch them

Is anyone here foolish enough to actually BELIEVE this is untraceable? Almost everything can be traced somehow, and at the very least the purchases
and the buyers are not as anonymous as they think. The ones behind it some of it, IDK I hope they are not good at what they do. I honestly do doubt
it...

Hem Navy Huh? NSA, ring any bells people.

Dark Net is a bi-product of the internet broadband. Broadband is for the public while dark band is for the govt and shadow orgs. Then the geeks got
into via major software developers that they worked for and started it down the road to allow more and more people to participate in internet that the
general public is not supposed to use.

From their is has been exploited by criminal minds and orgs, perverts, ANONYMOUS, hackers from every country, green peace, SORO's Think Tanks, and
now 12 year olds with ADD.

They shut it down temporarily DDOS come on man I know I worded it wrong but you got the point surely...

You telling me the freaking govt can't do the same thing, only permanently? It would cost money..... worth it if you ask me. Especially to keep the
servers up that allow the people in corrupt countries to access what they want to and get real news....

No, I thought you might have been one of those people that thought anon took them out permanently.
Thing is, you cannot do these things, without screwing it up for everyone, it puts too much of a load on the entire node system. The way TOR is built,
it is either all or nothing basically. You either have TOR, and tolerate the grimey stuff, or no one has TOR.

Originally posted by ChesterJohn
One of the things no one has pointed out so far (at least in what I have read) is that this is a tactic to get the govt to pass laws banning, limiting
and regulating the internet both Broadband and Dark net.

This is the true reason behind this new article.

The ADD was added to garner support that a child who is handicapped (right!) had found it so easy to enter a place that takes some knowledge to get
into.

Lie, distortions and slight of hand techniques to get people riled up to regulate the internet.

ADD is a handicap?

I always considered it a compliment.

It is officially listed as a handicap so you can collect free govt help, meds and special educational needs at the expense of us tax paying citizens.

Who said I don't pay taxes? I don't collect any of that stuff. To your knowledge, I do not even have ADD. I have only revealed being called ADD.

[/messing with you]

never said you dont pay taxes. I just implied that those who go for govt freebees because the are handicapped generally don't pay. sorry I used
"you" maybe "they" wopuld have been better.

on a side not: we were all hyper in our days of old. My parents chose not to give me meds. All my friends whose parents went for the meds now my
old friends they have been all diagnosed as being Bi-polar. that is for another thread topic though.

Yeah, good call. When I was a kid, our computer was in the livingroom, always someone around to peep at what we were doing. I thought it sucked at the
time of course, but in my old age, I understand it now. I think you should not be able to use a computer unsupervised, until you are able to buy one
on your own.

My oldest didn't have a lot of computer time, because we didn't have one till she hit HS, that could go online (yeah, been that long ago, lol).
Even then, she wasn't allowed unmonitored access. The current teen is a real blessing; a kid that understand how stupid some teens act online,
revealing things about themselves, and a teen that has no interest in watching things parents would not want their kid to watch. I love having a kid
that doesn't want to watch even a heaving kissing scene! Rare, I know, but nice. Proof that not all teens are animals, unable to display any morals
at all! My younger kids are home schooled (as the current teen has been), and they don't act the way a lot of kids their age do. No questions about
sex (aged 9-12), no drug worries, and they mostly behave. Typical sibling stuff, and some standard kid rebellion, but not the issues a lot of kids
these days have. I have heard stuff from some kids that I can hardly believe they even know about. My younger set never even complains about
supervision. They have been taught that there are some bad people that get online, and that we grownups have to make sure no one bothers them. The
worst mine have ever done was to turn on a video game when they should have been doing school work. I did get complaints there, but I will take that
over the other issues. Some of the stories we can read about are enough to give any parent nightmares!

No, I thought you might have been one of those people that thought anon took them out permanently.
Thing is, you cannot do these things, without screwing it up for everyone, it puts too much of a load on the entire node system. The way TOR is built,
it is either all or nothing basically. You either have TOR, and tolerate the grimey stuff, or no one has TOR.

Well, I know everyone on this site does not believe, but there is an old saying of God's. "Let the wheat and the weeds grow together." You can not
remove the evil from the world without also ripping out the roots of some of the good.

I say they just find a way to track people on it, I mean surely an agency like the NSA could do this. Right? If not, I would be interested to know
how. I am not what they call tech-savvy.

If it were easy to track, no one would use it I would think. By default, you are bouncing encrypted data through three nodes. I have linux program
that give me even more control. If I am say, testing my own firewall, I am not worried about being anon, so I only use one node to simulate a scan or
attack from the outside quickly. If you are needing even more anon, and not worried about speed, you can bounce through many more nodes. In order to
track a user, you would have to own all the nodes bounced through.

The alphabet boys could not remote-access this? I could see why it might not hold up in court - but surely they can get the evidence needed to know
what is going on. From there, all they have to do is wait it out and find an excuse.

I am not saying they should use tactics like this on every little illegal transaction, for this would be of no benefit to the tax payers - but child
porn? Catch them by any means necessary.

Not sure what you mean by remote accessing. Besides, what is going on, is users upload content to central servers, allowing anyone to access it from
said servers for free. Don't take a rocket surgeon to figure that out. I am sure they have more important things to worry about than people wanking
to pixels on a screen. Like people out there kidnapping, and such, the real crimes. I would rather they are at home in their basements watching pixels
on a screen than the alternative, wouldn't you?

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.