The wizard has not yet yielded the secret
...

The wizard has not yet yielded his secret, and we must deal with
the real world of antennas. So, let me tell you why I choose or design antennas
the way I do.

I want to get the absolute best performance possible from
the space I have available for antennas. It doesn't matter if convenience has
to be sacrificed.

To make a point, suppose I want a single antenna that works on
most of the HF bands. I have several choices. First, I could choose a trap
antenna. A good trap antenna will provide multiband coverage and usually don't
require a transmatch. Unfortunately, their SWR curve is low over only a small
portion of the band. This is especially true on 80 meters. In addition, a
trap-dipole will perform no better than a dipole, because that is what it is.
Because of the traps, most of the antenna is unused except on the lowest band.
All that extra wire just hangs there.

On the other hand, I could choose a design that will operate
efficiently over all of the HF bands. Not only can I have full HF coverage, but
this antenna will give me some signal gain and a favorable radiation angle on
most bands. Once in the air, I can conveniently match the transmitter to the
antenna's feed system for maximum performance and do it right at the operating
position. What antenna can do this?

There are many antenna designs and configurations that can give
you all this and more. Some of them are featured in this catalog. Some of them
are still on my drawing board. They have three characteristics in common: They
are trapless; they use the antenna's entire length at all frequencies; and,
they use a transmatch to transfer maximum energy (signal) from the transmitter
to the antenna system.

A transmatch means that you have extra knobs to adjust, but I
believe that antenna gain, low radiation angles, and all band coverage are
an easy trade for the slight inconvenience the transmatch imposes. A big
signal on the air more than compensates for the few seconds it takes to adjust
the transmatch.

Full HF coverage, gain
...

We already see it coming. On the telephone and at hamfests, we
are asked "when are you coming out with something special for 80 and 40
meters?" You can count on us. We will be bringing out some big performers on 80
and 40. The VRD system is the first of the new breed. The
SuperLoop is still as good a choice as it ever was. And, the CAROLINA
WINDOM - what else needs to be said? The antenna is sold predominately by
word of mouth. When someone hears it on the air and then buys one for their
station, that antenna has to be something special. Any of these antenna systems
are excellent candidates for "king-of-night-time DX."

This article first appeared in my 1989 catalog. I still prefer
transmatch fed antennas. Now we are on the down-side of a sunspot cycle. With
10 meters disappearing fast, 15 meters will be close behind. If the bottom of
this sunspot cycle is anything like the last one, 20 meters will be closed
early in the evening. The low bands, 160, 80, 40 and perhaps 30 meters will
become 'kings-of-the-night.''

2009

How the times have changed since 1989
when I wrote this article for the RADIO WORKS' General Catalog. Of course,
we've now experienced the decline and bottom of two sunspot cycles and we are
at the beginning of cycle #24. We await the return of 10, 15 and 20 meters to
their full glory. One thing which has remained constant over all these years is
the CAROLINA WINDOM® and the SuperLoop. These antennas have been the
champions of the bands. through both the sunspot lows and highs. There are
tens-of-thousands in use and the testimonials have arrived by the hundreds.
They have been on DX'peditions, served the needs of DX'ers all over the world,
and proved themselves as the antenna of choice for net stations and rag-chewers
alike. We have improved the CAROLINA WINDOM® and the SuperLoop over
the years and they are poised to be the best, low cost, high performance
antenna for coming sunspot arrivals. More than ever, the CAROLINA WINDOM®
and the SuperLoop are the best choice you can make in antennas short of
spending thousands on a tower and beam. Even then, some users who have both
beams and our antennas claim it's often a toss-up.

If your Browser does not display a "Back" button
to return to this page, click on the Browser's Document "X" button.