If 2 or more groups are fighting for power within a nation, that is essentially warfare.

Sargon, why are you against mass migration? If everyone is the same then it wouldn’t matter would it? It is because people are not the same and that they have group identity is why you oppose mass immigration.

Sargon, you have stated you are against mass immigration but it has already happened, so just limited or stopping it now will not solve the problem. Changes need to be made which will reverse the damage that has been done. Here is where you make a glaring mistake in your analysis of the alt-right.

Your stated reason that you are against the alt-right is that the creation of the ethnostate would inevitably lead to violence. What you fail to see is that you already have violence. Look at the statistics of immigrant crime. You also have the basis for political violence in that the voting interests are diametrically opposed. You see this in SJWs. If a person is being victimized by a crime and interceding into the committing of the crime will cause an escalation of violence, is that really a valid reason for not interceding? Of course not, that is cowardice.

Policies can be implemented which will reverse the demographic change without causing the mass violence you assume will automatically happen. I will lay out the plan here;

Reverse the laws of immigration to be that of the pre-1965 era.

Next, cut welfare to only be for those who are severely disabled and institute infrastructure work programs as an alternative to welfare for the able-bodied. This will discourage economic migration.

Change citizenship and voting rights to be only for Europeans. Current citizens who do not qualify will retain citizenship but not voting rights the rest of their lives. Future children will not be considered citizens. People will then have time to make arrangements for leaving the country. Money that was saved by the cutting of welfare will go towards a resettlement fund. A tax on wiring money to foreign countries could also provide funding for resettlement.

Arrangements for emigration will be made with all countries of origin. If a country will not allow their people to return, they lose trade and visiting rights with the United States.

How to determine if someone is white – If a persons ethnicity is in question, a DNA test will be required. Anyone who is 51% or more European will be allowed to become a citizen.(Some people will disagree on the percentage but the way I look at it is that if someone is more European than any other ethnicity they should qualify. I don’t think having some people with admixture will make a big difference in the long run if the trend is changed.)

Subversive groups which form a state within a state will also disqualify a person from citizenship. These include Freemasonry, Judaism and Islam. A person cannot have conflicting interests which oppose the Country. Like race, this will apply to the future citizens, not current residents.

To ease the transition a payment for leaving early could be offered. There could be decreasing tier of bonuses which expire over time, for example if someone moves within the next year they receive $50,000. Within 2 years $40,000. 3 years $30,000 etc. I would suggest keeping a minimum of perhaps $10,000 for the life of current residents to encourage continued emigration.

In America’s first immigration policy it was specifically stated that only Europeans of good character qualified. The government of America and European countries were created by and for white people, just like any other nation is created for it’s people. Israel for Jews, China for Chinese. Not only is this apparent in the immigration policies but it is seen as a given by the people. It is obvious. I don’t think the founders of America envisioned a time when people would become so brainwashed that they would accept mass immigration and miscegenation.

In President Trump(the Politician Slayer)’s State of the Union address he lays out just how much winning is going on.

This shows how prosperous America can be with a government that is working in our interests instead of against us. In this monumental speech he shows that the proof is in the results.

Trump also gives a solid reminder to those in Washington that the descendants of the people who built this great country is who they work for. “The people dreamed this country. The people built this country, and it is the people who are making America great again. As long as we are proud of who we are, and what we are fighting for — there is nothing we cannot achieve. As long as we have confidence in our values, faith in our citizens, and trust in our God — we will not fail.”

A few highlights of Trump aka ‘literally Hitler’s” State of the Union Address;
⦁ A call for bipartison unity to represent the American people.
⦁ 2.4 million new jobs created. Over 200,000 new manufacturing jobs.
⦁ Rising wages after years of wage stagnation.
⦁ Unemployment claims at a 45 year low. Lowest unemployment among blacks and hispanics ever recorded in American history.
⦁ Record stock market growth, over $8 trillion increase in value.
⦁ Biggest tax cut in American history. Average Americans making less than 70,000 a year saw their taxes cut in half. The child tax credit has been doubled.
⦁ Reduction in corporate tax from 35% to 21%, which will bring billions of investment in manufacturing to the US by making America internationally competitive.
⦁ The Obama care individual mandate(tax penalty) is gone!
⦁ Most regulations ever cut by an administration.
⦁ America is now an energy exporter rather than importer.
⦁ New manufacturing plants opening all over the US at levels not seen in decades.
⦁ Americans will no longer have to leave the country for experimental cancer and disease treatments.
⦁ The end of immigration loopholes which allow criminals to enter the country. A crackdown on gangs such as MS-13 has deported 1000’s of them from the country.
⦁ A reduction in low-skilled immigration which affects the wages of poor Americans(this is the reason wages have been stagnant in relation to inflation for so long.
⦁ The proposed immigration reform bill has 4 pillars. 1. It would grant a pathway to citizenship for 1.8 million dreamers(people brought in illegally by their parents) which is more than 3 times the number offered by the Obama administration. 2. The bill also includes funding for the border wall and for increased border agents. Also closes the loopholes which result in illegals being released even after being caught by the police. 3. The program also ends the VISA lottery program which lets random immigrants in not based on skill or merit. 4. An end to chain migration, by which under the current system a single immigrant can bring in an almost unlimited number of distant relatives. The new policy will only extent to spouses and minor children. Trump hinted to the demographic change projected by current estimates by saying this reform will protect the future of America. This is a very reasonable bill which includes a compromise for DACA path to citizenship. By impeding the passing of this law, democrats are showing that they are not interested in citizenship for the DACA dreamers, or protecting America but instead simply want to import votes.
⦁ Trump made a commitment to end the heroin epidemic by increasing treatment and drug enforcement.
⦁ Trump is asking Congress to cut foreign aid to any country which is not working in the interest of America. (Unfortunatly I highly doubt Israel will be affected by this)

Trump ended the State of the Union address with a great reminder to the politicians that the building they stand in is a monument to the American people and that it is the American people who built the country and who are making America great again.

“It was that same yearning for freedom that nearly 250 years ago gave birth to a special place called America. It was a small cluster of colonies caught between a great ocean and a vast wilderness. But it was home to an incredible people with a revolutionary idea: that they could rule themselves.

That they could chart their own destiny. And that, together, they could light up the world. That is what our country has always been about. That is what Americans have always stood for, always strived for, and always done. Atop the dome of this Capitol stands the Statue of Freedom. She stands tall and dignified among the monuments to our ancestors who fought and lived and died to protect her. Monuments to Washington and Jefferson, to Lincoln and King. Memorials to the heroes of Yorktown and Saratoga.

To young Americans who shed their blood on the shores of Normandy, and the fields beyond. And others, who went down in the waters of the Pacific, and the skies over Asia. And Freedom stands tall over one more monument: This one. This Capitol — this living monument to the American People. A people whose heroes live not only in the past, but all around us — defending hope, pride, and the American way. They work in every trade. They sacrifice to raise a family. They care for our children at home. They defend our flag abroad. They are strong moms, and brave kids. They are firefighters, police officers, border agents, medics, and Marines.

But above all else, they are AMERICANS. And this Capitol, this city, this nation, belongs to them. Our task is to respect them, to listen to them, to serve them, to protect them — and to always be worthy of them. Americans fill the world with art and music. They push the bounds of science and discovery. And they forever remind us of what we should never forget:

The people dreamed this country. The people built this country, and it is the people who are making America great again. As long as we are proud of who we are, and what we are fighting for — there is nothing we cannot achieve. As long as we have confidence in our values, faith in our citizens, and trust in our God — we will not fail.

Our families will thrive.

Our People will prosper.

And our Nation will forever be safe and strong and proud and mighty and free.

Ironically enough, even though their government has marxist roots, China is not having that Sh*t. They refuse cultural marxism. They call it “socialism with Chinese characteristics” which may as well be fascism. China for the Chinese.

1. Have no intention of ever becoming like British people. They don’t see themselves as British but rather a conquering force.

2. Commit terrorist attacks

3. Groom thousands of underage British girls for sex trafficking, which the authorities covered up for years, out of the cucky and cowardly fear of being called racist.

This is the direction America is headed. They will call anything that defends against our displacement as “hate speech”.

What is stopping people from speaking out against this displacement?

The cloak of anti-semitism and racism provides protection from any criticizing or exposing of the agenda to destroy European countries. Below is an excerpt which shows who were behind the creation of censorship laws in the UK.

The present and pretty extreme gagging law known as ‘The Race Relations Act’, formerly known as ‘The Group Libel Law’ was drafted by ‘The Board of Jewish Deputies’, and passed in 1965 by the Jewish Interior Minister (Home Secretary) in the Labour Government Sir Frank Soskice. Frank Soskice was not even British born; he came to Britain as a Russian immigrant, and he was not the only Jewish immigrant to play such a role. (See Jewish Laws.)

In 1985, Harry Cohen introduced the Racial Harassment Bill under the ten-minute rule. It was the first Bill presented to Parliament to make racial attack a criminal offence.

Throughout the 1970s and 1980s Neville Nagler, a synagogue official, was the head of the Home Office Department responsible for race relations matters. Whenever a Cabinet Minister made a speech on the subject of “race relations”, notes for the text were always drafted by Nagler, who routinely consulted with top officials at the Jewish Board of Deputies such as Geoffrey Bindman and Anthony Lester. In 1991 Nagler retired from the Home Office and became the Chief Executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

The so-called Public Order Act of 1986 was placed before parliament by the purported Conservative Home Secretary, a Jewish immigrant from Lithuania, Leon Brittanisky, also known as Leon Brittan, (now an alleged pedophile child abuser just as Lord Greville Janner) assisted by his cousin, another Lithuanian Jew, Malcolm Rivkind, also know as Malcolm Rifkind (now involved in new Cash for Access scandal, together with Jack Straw – February 2015 ).

‘The illegal Act of Parliament called the Public Order Act is intended to prevent subjects of the Crown from discussing and revealing the Jewish takeover of our country. It is a law which has been made by traitors – in other words, criminals – to prevent their exposure’.

Now, on top of a Public Order Act which penalizes not only the distribution of literature critical of them, but also the possession of it, sanctioning the ransacking of homes in this connection, they are seeking and securing the promise of yet further limitations on our freedom. (Read more here)

Rather than addressing what is written in Mein Kampf, the (((powers that be))) prefer censorship, gaslighting and scare tactics. Why? Because there are truths within which invalidate modern narratives which are destroying our culture.

You can read more about the root and history of movements like communism here.

The classical liberal or libertarian mindset of individualism is the mainstay of American politics. It atomizes us to abandon the strength of unity. At its root, it is based on materialism.

THE DOCTRINE OF FASCISM ToC by Benito Mussolini

From the Encyclopedia Italiana. Vol. XIV

The English translation of the “Fundamental Ideas” is by Mr. I.S. Munro, reprinted by his kind permission from “Fascism to World-Power” (Alexander Maclehose, London, 1933).

FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS.
1. Philosophic Conception. Like every concrete political conception, Fascism is thought and action. It is action with an inherent doctrine which, arising out of a given system of historic forces, is inserted in it and works on it from within. It has therefore a form co-related to the contingencies of time and place; but it has at the same time an ideal content which elevates it into a formula of truth in the higher region of the history of thought. There is no way of exercising a spiritual influence on the things of the world by means of a human will-power commanding the wills of others, without first having a clear conception of the particular and transient reality on which the will-power must act, and without also having a clear conception of the universal and permanent reality in which the particular and transient reality has its life and being. To know men we must have a knowledge of man; and to have a knowledge of man we must know the reality of things and their laws. There can be no conception of a State which is not fundamentally a conception of Life. It is a philosophy or intuition, a system of ideas which evolves itself into a system of logical contraction, or which concentrates itself in a vision or in a faith, but which is always, at least virtually, an organic conception of the world.

2. Spiritualised Conception. Fascism would therefore not be understood in many of its manifestations (as, for example, in its organisations of the Party, its system of education, its discipline) were it not considered in the light of its general view of life. A spiritualised view. To Fascism the world is not this material world which appears on the surface, in which man is an individual separated from all other men, standing by himself and subject to a natural law which instinctively impels him to lead a life of momentary and egoistic pleasure. In Fascism man is an individual who is the nation and the country. He is this by a moral law which embraces and binds together individuals and generations in an established tradition and mission, a moral law which suppresses the instinct to lead a life confined to a brief cycle of pleasure in order, instead, to replace it within the orbit of duty in a superior conception of life, free from the limits of time and space a life in which the individual by self-abnegation and by the sacrifice of his particular interests, even by death, realises the entirely spiritual existence in which his value as a man consists.

3. Positive Conception of Life as a Struggle. It is therefore a spiritual conception, itself also a result of the general reaction of the Century against the languid and materialistic positivism of the Eighteenth Century. Anti-positivist, but positive: neither sceptical nor agnostic, neither pessimistic nor passively optimistic, as are in general the doctrines (all of them negative) which place the centre of life outside of man, who by his free will can and should create his own world for himself. Fascism wants a man to be active and to be absorbed in action with all his energies; it wants him to have a manly consciousness of the difficulties that exist and to be ready to face them. It conceives life as a struggle, thinking that it is the duty of man to conquer that life which is really worthy of him: creating in the first place within himself the (physical, moral, intellectual) instrument with which to build it. As for the individual, so for the nation, so for mankind. Hence the high value of culture in all its forms (art, religion, science) and the supreme importance of education. Hence also the essential value of labour, with which man conquers nature and creates the human world (economic, political, moral, intellectual).

4. Ethical Conception. This positive conception of life is evidently an ethical conception. And it comprises the whole reality as well as the human activity which domineers it. No action is to be removed from the moral sense; nothing is to be in the world that is divested of the importance which belongs to it in respect of moral aims. Life, therefore, as the Fascist conceives it, is serious, austere, religious; entirely balanced in a world sustained by the moral and responsible forces of the spirit. The Fascist disdains the “easy” life.

5. Religious Conception. Fascism is a religious conception in which man is considered to be in the powerful grip of a superior law, with an objective will which transcends the particular individual and elevates him into a fully conscious member of a spiritual society. Anyone who has stopped short at the mere consideration of opportunism in the religious policy of the Fascist Regime, has failed to understand that Fascism, besides being a system of government, is also a system of thought.

6. Historical and Realist Conception. Fascism is an historical conception in which man could not be what he is without being a factor in the spiritual process to which he contributes, either in the family sphere or in the social sphere, in the nation or in history in general to which all nations contribute. Hence is derived the great importance of tradition in the records, language, customs and rules of human society. Man without a part in history is nothing. For this reason Fascism is opposed to all the abstractions of an individualistic character based upon materialism typical of the Eighteenth Century; and it is opposed to all the Jacobin innovations and utopias. It does not believe in the possibility of “happiness” on earth as conceived by the literature of the economists of the Seventeenth Century; it therefore spurns all the teleological conceptions of final causes through which, at a given period of history, a final systematisation of the human race would take place. Such theories only mean placing oneself outside real history and life, which is a continual ebb and flow and process of realisations. Politically speaking, Fascism aims at being a realistic doctrine; in its practice it aspired to solve only the problems which present themselves of their own accord in the process of history, and which of themselves find or suggest their own solution. To have the effect of action among men, it is necessary to enter into the process of reality and to master the forces actually at work.

7. The Individual and Liberty. Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception is for the State; it is for the individual only in so far as he coincides with the State, universal consciousness and will of man in his historic existence. It is opposed to the classic Liberalism which arose out of the need of reaction against absolutism, and had accomplished its mission in history when the State itself had become transformed in the popular will and consciousness. Liberalism denied the State in the interests of the particular individual; Fascism reaffirms the State as the only true expression of the individual. And if liberty is to be the attribute of the real man, and not of the scarecrow invented by the individualistic Liberalism, then Fascism is for liberty. It is for the only kind of liberty that is serious—the liberty of the State and of the individual in the State. Because, for the Fascist, all is comprised in the State and nothing spiritual or human exists—much less has any value—outside the State. In this respect Fascism is a totalising concept, and the Fascist State—the unification and synthesis of every value—interprets, develops and potentiates the whole life of the people.

8. Conception of a Corporate State. No individuals nor groups (political parties, associations, labour unions, classes) outside the State. For this reason Fascism is opposed to Socialism, which clings rigidly to class war in the historic evolution and ignores the unity of the State which moulds the classes into a single, moral and economic reality. In the same way Fascism is opposed to the unions of the labouring classes. But within the orbit of the State with ordinative functions, the real needs, which give rise to the Socialist movement and to the forming of labour unions, are emphatically recognised by Fascism and are given their full expression in the Corporative System, which conciliates every interest in the unity of the State.

9. Democracy. Individuals form classes according to categories of interests. They are associated according to differentiated economical activities which have a common interest: but first and foremost they form the State. The State is not merely either the numbers or the sum of individuals forming the majority of a people. Fascism for this reason is opposed to the democracy which identifies peoples with the greatest number of individuals and reduces them to a majority level. But if people are conceived, as they should be, qualitatively and not quantitatively, then Fascism is democracy in its purest form. The qualitative conception is the most coherent and truest form and is therefore the most moral, because it sees a people realised in the consciousness and will of the few or even of one only; an ideal which moves to its realisation in the consciousness and will of all. By “all” is meant all who derive their justification as a nation, ethnically speaking, from their nature and history, and who follow the same line of spiritual formation and development as one single will and consciousness—not as a race nor as a geographically determined region, but as a progeny that is rather the outcome of a history which perpetuates itself; a multitude unified by an idea embodied in the will to have power and to exist, conscious of itself and of its personality.

10. Conception of the State. This higher personality is truly the nation, inasmuch as it is the State. The nation does not beget the State, according to the decrepit nationalistic concept which was used as a basis for the publicists of the national States in the Nineteenth Century. On the contrary, the nation is created by the State, which gives the people, conscious of their own moral unity, the will, and thereby an effective existence. The right of a nation to its independence is derived not from a literary and ideal consciousness of its own existence, much less from a de facto situation more or less inert and unconscious, but from an active consciousness, from an active political will disposed to demonstrate in its right; that is to say, a kind of State already in its pride (in fieri). The State, in fact, as a universal ethical will, is the creator of right.

11. Dynamic Reality. The nation as a State is an ethical reality which exists and lives in measure as it develops. A standstill is its death. Therefore the State is not only the authority which governs and which gives the forms of law and the worth of the spiritual life to the individual wills, but it is also the power which gives effect to its will in foreign matters, causing it to be recognised and respected by demonstrating through facts the universality of all the manifestations necessary for its development. Hence it is organization as well as expansion, and it may be thereby considered, at least virtually, equal to the very nature of the human will, which in its evolution recognises no barriers, and which realises itself by proving its infinity.

12. The Rôle of the State. The Fascist State, the highest and the most powerful form of personality is a force, but a spiritual one. It reassumes all the forms of the moral and intellectual life of man. It cannot, therefore, be limited to a simple function of order and of safeguarding, as was contended by Liberalism. It is not a simple mechanism which limits the sphere of the presumed individual liberties. It is an internal form and rule, a discipline of the entire person: it penetrates the will as well as the intelligence. Its principle, a central inspiration of the living human personality in the civil community, descends into the depths and settles in the heart of the man of action as well as the thinker, of the artist as well as of the scientist; the soul of our soul.

13. Discipline and Authority. Fascism, in short, is not only a lawgiver and the founder of institutions, but an educator and a promoter of the spiritual life. It aims to rebuild not the forms of human life, but its content, the man, the character, the faith. And for this end it exacts discipline and an authority which descend into and dominates the interior of the spirit without opposition. Its emblem, therefore, is the lictorian fasces, symbol of unity, of force and of justice.

It’s good to see these “diversity makers” get a taste of their beloved diversity.

A Democratic candidate running for Illinois attorney general was robbed at gunpoint Thursday during a campaign photoshoot in Chicago.

The Chicago Tribune reported that Aaron Goldstein, 42, and members of his campaign team were approached by three men in their early 20s. One of the men had a handgun and demanded Goldstein and the campaign aides turn over the camera equipment and other personal belongings, including their cell phones, which they did.

According to the Tribune, law enforcement sources confirmed that they had no one in custody and did not release a description of the suspects.

Goldstein’s campaign manager Robert Murphy, who was not with the candidate at the time, explained that he was taking promotional campaign photos with an “in-the-neighborhood kind of” message, according to the Tribune. The incident took place in Albany Park. (S)

The reality in America is that the people who promote diversity live in very un-diverse neighborhoods and would never send their children to diverse schools.

While Democrats argue that the wall is too expensive, the fact is that the wall would pay for itself many times over in saved money from having to deal with illegal immigrants within the US.

Arizona state treasurer Dean Martin says his state loses between $1.3 billion and $2.5 billion each year on illegal immigrants. In addition to the fiscal costs of incarcerating and educating illegal immigrants and their families, Arizona also faces a variety of other indirect costs, says Martin, who favors Arizona’s controversial new immigration law.

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a conservative advocacy group that favors tighter immigration laws, argues that the answer is clear: illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers more than $100 billion each year.[…]