The non normative part is the lexical to value mapping. The IRI denoting a
HTML or XML literal is still normativish. At least I think so
On Monday, December 16, 2013, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just updated Concepts to make rdf:HTML and rdf:XMLLiteral non-normative.
> I'm not entirely sure what consequences that has for section 5.4 [1]:
>
> Recognized IRIs have fixed referents, which MUST satisfy these
> conditions:
>
> 1. If the IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral is
> recognized then it refers to the datatype rdf:XMLLiteral;
>
> 2. If the IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTML is
> recognized
> then it refers to the datatype rdf:HTML;
>
> Can we still include this MUST-level requirements given that the two
> datatypes are now non-normative?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
>
>
> [1]
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#datatype
> -maps
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>