Andy Powell <a.powell@ukoln.ac.uk> writes:
> One other issue with this approach is that it makes two resources
> ('the resource' and 'the RDF about the resource') available at the
> same URL. Both of these are (different) resources and each may have
> other RDF descriptions about them. Is it a problem to make both
> resources available at the same URL or is everything OK provided
> that they can both also be identified separately with their own URI?
> Or doesn't it matter?
This was the same thing that caught me, these do seem like different
resources, not merely different representations of the same resource.
True negotiation could make it clear, but not merely accept-types.
-- Ken