Would you prefer Garrosh killed, exiled, imprisoned, or redeemed?

Or something else? Personally I'd prefer that he is either exiled or runs away, and have an Old God as the boss we "kill" instead. Just for a change of pace. But if we kill him I won't be bothered. As far as "combination" goes that could be something like putting him in prison and then executing him.

Killed, definitely killed. If they pussyfoot bullcrap make some crap up about him being redeemed because of his father then the entire writing department needs to be sacked as does lead content design.

I dunno really... I kinda want him to die, kinda want him imprisoned, etc.

Not dying would be... interesting... Just have him as a prisoner or him being exiled to some desolate place or somewhere in Outland...
Do wonder what his death would cause though, the reputation he'd leave behind and all...

Ooh! Imagine this! Garrosh is defeated and chained outside Orgrimmar or somewhere, humiliated, losing his pride! Then he could be the cinematic thing, like the monument in Dalaran and the chin of Deathwing. =P

I want him exiled to darkmoon faire island. He is forever imprisoned in a dunk machine and Kids all over Azeroth get to throw balls to dunk the once great leader of the horde into water.

I second this.

Honestly though the horde should just hand him to the Alliance to do what they will. Which would probably end up with a Varian beheading him. Alliance deserves as much for the atrocity that was Theramore and supporting the rebellion. Garrosh has gone to far down that path to be redeemed in my opinion, nor will the Alliance settle for anything less then his death.

The generalist looks outward; he looks for living principles, knowing full well that such principles change, that they develop. It is to the characteristics of change itself that the mentat-generalist must look. There can be no permanent catalogue of such change, no handbook or manual. You must look at it with as few preconceptions as possible, asking yourself, "Now what is this thing doing?"-Children of Dune

I think one of the most fitting things - and hurtful for Garrosh - would be for him to be imprisoned. If he was exiled or redeemed, the actions throughout Pandaria wouldn't matter much. If he was exiled, he would most likely not learn his lesson and continue with his conquest elsewhere. If he was redeemed, everything we've done in Pandaria will be for no reason. The Siege of Orgrimmar would really seem pointless then, ad neither faction would feel as if they really accomplished anything.

I would imagine it would be painful for Garrosh to be imprisoned in the city HE fortified, in the prisons HE had built. It would be a humiliating experience for him, and it would be something that players would probably enjoy seeing. On top of that, in the off-chance anyone would ever want him to enter the story again later, he could, much like Illidan's prison break by Tyrande in WC3. Garrosh hasn't been in the story very long, and even though I personally don't like his character, I also don't want to see him killed and thrown off to the side so soon.

Exile him to Outland, and block up the dark portal with a hundred feet of stone.

Walking with a friend in the dark is better than walking alone in the light.So I chose the path of the Ebon Blade, and not a day passes where i've regretted it.I am eternal, I am unyielding, I am UNDYING.I am Zethras, and my blood will be the end of you.