Bush administration's national security strategy of the United States stated that United States is willing to use force preemptively against enemies to prevent their using weapons of mass destruction against the United States or its allies. New deadly challenges have emerged from rogue states and terrorists since 9/11. Will we be able to prevent such attacks again? By examining Bush's national security strategy, after the possible outcomes of disadvantages and advantages, as far as I am concerned, advantages are better off than disadvantages. I believe we live in a dangerous world that rogue states and terrorists can threat our life and freedom; this is a good policy which will help the United States and its allies to have a legal means and a better international cooperation to prevent rogue states and terrorists by using force preemptively against enemies.

Bush's national security strategy has some disadvantages. First of all, anti-American feeling in Middle East has a long history; the one of most important issue was that Arab states blame the United States for Israel's policies toward the Palestinians.

United States

English: Looking south from Top of the Rock, New Y...

English: Official photograph portrait of former U....

Bush's national security strategy of using force preemptively to against enemies may be viewed by Arab states and citizens as an excuse for invasion, which leads to a further Anti-America feeling. Since Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran are qualified as rogue states and states that support terrorism. For instance, The Bush administration itself has made the case for military action based on Baghdad's defiance of numerous UN Security Council resolutions. The Untied States use the force to invade Iraq by accusing that Iraq had bio-chemical weapons and weapons of mass destruction, but it turned out to be nothing was found in Iraq. This invasion was viewed by many Arab states as US hegemonies.

More Political Science essays:

... 2004, supplying evidence that voters supported Bush's ownership society or at least were not extremely opposed. The changes that the Bush administration suggests are quite radical and will require a large amount of money, effort, and cooperation. They are not changes that ...

... Bush concentrated on the Middle East while Kennedy also diverted his attention to Latin America and the rest of the Western Hemisphere. Kennedy worked on all issues while Bush concentrated on peace in the Middle East ...

... China and a resurgent Russia top the list of potential challengers to American preeminence. Primacy advocates are also concerned with non-traditional military threats from non-states, such as terrorist organizations. Also , fear that a state like North Korea ...

... Middle East. Clearly this is beneficial for the entire region with the exception of those who rule by fear and for those around the world ... Bush administration's arguments in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom amount to two lies--Saddam's WMD posed an impending threat, and Iraq cooperated ... allies. Bush ...

... on the western world. With this panic has come an increased need for the comfort the security alliance with America brings. The John Howard Government has supported, abet with a divided nation, unquestioningly the decisions made by the Bush administration in hopes ...

3 pages44May/20045.0

Students & Profs. say about us:

"Good news: you can turn to other's writing help. WriteWork has over 100,000 sample papers"