5 comments
:

Wright's article is interesting. He makes a good case for the variant reading in Galatians 2:20 but then goes with the NA27/UBS4 reading.

I believe the variant reading is correct. It's hard to ignore papyrus attestation. The agreement between Alexandrian and Western text types doesn't bother me. That just tells me that the variant reading is the correct one. Neither is the internal evidence a problem. Greater weight should be given to the external evidence, since internal evidence deals with probabilities and is often contradictory. Add to this the fact that Codex Vaticanus is probably the best uncial witness to the New Testament, and the variant reading becomes as credible, if not more credible, than the text reading. As a bonus, the variant reading makes a strong statement of the deity of Christ.

Installing Minecraft Forge and ComputerCraft
-
The occasion for writing this is the North Dallas .NET Users Group's first
kids night, where MinecraftU will be teaching the kids (and adults who stay
fo...