The R7 1700 performs very well against not only the i7-7700k but also AMD’s flagship 1800x. See all the benchmarks you’re looking for, below

Today we’re testing the newly released Ryzen 7 1700 CPU up against its closest competitor from Intel, the i7 7700K. AMD has placed the 1700 processor at a very competitive price point at $329, directly competing with the $340 i7 7700K.

The AMD R7 1700 is the lowest price SKU in the Ryzen 7 stack, behind the 1700X and 1800X, but sports the same 8 Cores & 16 threads as its bigger brothers. The only difference, other than the price, is the out of the box clock speed of 3GHz and a lower TDP of 65W. This means we should expect it to run a fair bit cooler than the 95W TDP SKUs from AMD.

From my tests, this is definitely true as the R7 1700 idles at just under 30C on a Noctua air cooler with two fans in a push-pull configuration. That’s with an overclock of 3.9GHZ at 1.3v. After running Aida64 for just over an hour the max temp that I saw was 57C. That’s roughly 20 degrees cooler than my 1800X that I tested recently at the same exact clock speed. The 1800X however required 1.35v in order to maintain the 3.9GHz clock speed and when testing the 1700 and 1800X at the same speed they returned nearly identical performance.

Before we get into our i7-7700k vs R7 1700 comparison, there’s one chart I simply had to share. Here’s how the R7 1700 stacks up against the R7 1800X in average FPS across 10 modern titles.

I think what this shows is that clock for clock the Ryzen 7 CPUs are the same. What you’re essentially paying for is a higher guaranteed speed out of the box.

Obviously, I only have one 1700 CPU to test this with, so I won’t know until launch day what others are seeing for their overclocks. There’s a good chance that I may have just been extremely lucky with my 3.9GHz overclock. That’s just the way the silicon lottery goes. However, if others are able to achieve results as I did above, there’s a good chance the AMD R7 1700 will be a popular choice. (From what I’m hearing from other reviewers it’s no fluke.)

Test Systems

For our testing, I had both the Intel i7 7700K and the R7 1700 overclocked to the highest stable point I could get. As previously mentioned, the R7 1700 is running at 3.9GHz and 1.3v while the i7-7700K is at 5GHz with 1.365v.

Both systems utilized 16GB of DDR4 memory clocked at 3000Mhz, however one was Corsair Vengeance and the other was a G.Skill TridentZ kit. Both motherboards were Gigabyte boards. For AMD we had the AM4 X370 Gaming 5 and for Intel, we used the Z270 K7 board that I recently used in my Frame Raider Quiet PC build.

For the graphics card, we’re using the GTX 1080 overclocked 200Mhz on the core and 300MHz on the memory and all of our games were tested with the Ultra preset at 1080p & 1440p.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs i7-7700k 1080p Gaming Benchmarks

Now that we’ve gone through all of that, here’s the chart that many of you have been waiting for:

Average FPS:

Starting off we get a look at the averages at 1080p and then we will move into the minimums as well as 1440p testing. I’ll be honest that I was rather surprised with just how well the Ryzen CPU was able to keep up with the 5GHz 7700K. We can see here that while Intel did take the majority of the titles tested, most of them were only by a few FPS.

Games like The Division, Rainbow Six Siege and Battlefield 1 leveraged the additional cores of the Ryzen R7 1700 showing the potential of having an 8-core CPU for games that are optimized to take advantage of them. I think this is going to be a very important proving ground as we move forward with more developers working on multithreaded utilization.

Minimum FPS:

Those results we saw continue over into the minimums where the 1700 and 7700K are neck in neck in the majority of games. GTA V and Rise of the Tomb Raider are exceptions where the Intel i7-7700k seems to pick up a larger margin of victory. That being said, we see the R7 1700 winning in The Division & Battlefield 1.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs i7-7700k 1440p Benchmarks and Performance

I did also want to include 1440p testing for people that were curious about the performance they could see with a Ryzen CPU at higher resolutions, but nothing changes here with our results against Intel because we are depending solely on the pixel throughput of our GTX 1080 to handle having more pixels on screen so we don’t get to see any big surprises here.

Average FPS:

Once again AMD wins out in The Division, Rainbow Six and Battlefield 1, but falls behind on other games tested.

Lastly here are the minimums for 1440p up on your screen although there isn’t really much to say about these because we’re really just seeing the same exact story as 1080p, only with fewer frames per second.

Minimum FPS:

I will touch on Overwatch for those of you that are curious as to why its basically the same or within one frame of the average. That’s because Overwatch has a CPU bottleneck where it only utilizes 2 cores at any one time so this prevented our GTX 1080 from seeing its full potential.

Conclusion

So, at the end of all of this, would I recommend a R7 1700 over the Intel i7 7700K? Yes, I would, depending on what you expect to get out of it. I think the performance we are seeing here is close enough, that the benefits of having the 8-cores/16-threads for the future are going to be extremely useful for gamers in the long run. That being said, it really comes down to what games you play. If Battlefield 1 is your bread and butter and you want the most FPS possible, then it will benefit greatly from Ryzen. Another fanastic performance improvement for Ryzen is fast memory. Take a look at some of our best kits for AMD Ryzen here.

Also, another thing to consider is content creation. Having those additional cores and threads can add up to nearly 50% faster performance for highly intensive multithreaded workloads like video editing or game streaming. I do plan to do a follow-up post on this shortly after launch day where I’ll be testing game performance during a live stream to see how much our performance is impacted between these processors.

One thing is for sure, AMD Ryzen is here in a very big way and it seems to have delivered on the promises its made in the months leading up to release. AMD had a plan to come in and crush the competition with Intel and I think they’re managing to get right in there to be truly competitive again. This is something that will only benefit us consumers as it will force Intel to innovate sooner and even drop its prices, which has already begun to happen.

If you enjoyed this information, you can help me out by leaving your feedback and comments below. Also, if you’re planning on purchasing the AMD Ryzen 1700, use the links in this post to give me a small kickback.

Share this:

Related

Comments

Something isn’t right here. I have a STOCK 7700k with a gtx 1080 and my Siege FPS never dropped below 136 and usually averages around 155 – 160 on Ultra settings on 1080p. I always run multiple applications in the background as well.
I have reviewed at least 10 of my shadowplay videos checking the FPS counter at the top. If your 7700k is truly overclocked, why would it be losing to my stock 7700k?

I understand that the main hype/market for the ryzen is games, but any chance anyone knows about more abstract comparatives. I can’t find them anywhere, they used to be the main source of data in the past.

Please, consider running it, I am desperate to know how Ryzen and Kaby Lake perform with all modern fast compressors. I will be very glad to publish results into tables – many coders/users would appreciate such a showdown.

I suppose that both systems will perform similarly in daily use. You don’t really notice the difference except for looking at the numbers of benchmarks. So for gaming the difference is minimal and not really noticable. But what I am more interested in is in applications like video editing. I’d like to see more benchmarks on that. Because render time is something you really notice. It makes a difference if a clip renders in 5 minutes or in 7 if you have to do that multiple times. Will the 8 cores make a real difference in Premiere Pro? The GPU Cuda support is limited to some effects and transitions only, so it comes down to the cpu and ram. So if Ryzen shines here, my next build will be AMD after many years of Intel…

The 1700 is cheaper than the 7700k. The 1700 also has 8 cores and 16 threads vs intel’s 4 core 8 thread. So it’s a much better processor going forward. It is well known that having less threads results in better single core performance. The 7700k 8 thread processor is probably the sweet spot for gaming right now. remember Ryzen is going to be releasing 6 core and 4 core 12/8 thread variants soon which will be a better test vs. the 7700k as the single core performance will be better. Same reason the i5 used to beat the i7 in gaming, even though the i7 was clearly a better processor and more future-proof. The 16/12 thread processors will be better for runnign background tasks and streaming vs the intel variant price. Remember the 6900k costs $1,000 and the 1700x costs $450 or so, and the 1700x is better.

This is very good to see for sure. Most would be wondering what you did to get these scores because whatever you did on the AMD side it sure made a difference in the Ryzen gaming scores I mean a 3.9Ghz going up against a 5.0Ghz monster and coming out winner or if it did lose only by a few frames that is amazing. I am not coming down on you or questioning if these scores on on the up & up or not. I actually think these show the true power of the Ryzen in the games and once more people get that maybe the fud on the internet will finally be put to rest once & for all and we can all go on with our daily lives. Great review for sure I hope other sites/people take the time to learn the ins and outs of getting the most out of these Ryzen CPU’s like you did here. If that Intel CPU was running stock speed I actually think the 3.9Ghz Ryzen would have cleaned the table in most if not all of the games you tested here. Thank you

Companies have released new AM4 boards that are compatible with the new Ryzen cpu. Ryzen cpus (and their motherboards) only take 288-pin DDR4 ram. The motherboard should say what speed it can handle, and you can find the complimentary ram sticks. Unfortunately not a lot of coolers are optimized for the AM4 boards, but they are releasing kids to use normal coolers with AM4. I hope this helped