All about Drugs, live, by DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Worlddrugtracker, OPEN SUPERSTAR Helping millions, 9 million hits on google, pushing boundaries,2.5 lakh plus connections worldwide, 22 lakh plus VIEWS on this blog in 220 countries, 7 CONTINENTS The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent, USE CTRL AND+ KEY TO ENLARGE BLOG VIEW……………………A 90 % paralysed man in action for you, I am suffering from transverse mylitis and bound to a wheel chair, With death on the horizon, I have lot to acheive

LY2606368 is a small-molecule Chk-1 inhibitors invented by Array and being developed by Eli Lilly and Company. Lilly is responsible for all clinical development and commercialization activities. Chk-1 is a protein kinase that regulates the tumor cell’s response to DNA damage often caused by treatment with chemotherapy. In response to DNA damage, Chk-1 blocks cell cycle progression in order to allow for repair of damaged DNA, thereby limiting the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. Inhibiting Chk-1 in combination with chemotherapy can enhance tumor cell death by preventing these cells from recovering from DNA damage.

Prexasertib (LY2606368) is a small molecule checkpoint kinase inhibitor, mainly active against CHEK1, with minor activity against CHEK2. This causes induction of DNA double-strand breaks resulting in apoptosis. It is in development by Eli Lilly. [1]

an aminopyrazole compound, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof or a solvate of the salt, that inhibits Chkl and is useful for treating cancers characterized by defects in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication, chromosome segregation, or cell division.

Chkl is a protein kinase that lies downstream from Atm and/or Atr in the DNA damage checkpoint signal transduction pathway. In mammalian cells, Chkl is phosphorylated in response to agents that cause DNA damage including ionizing radiation (IR), ultraviolet (UV) light, and hydroxyurea. This phosphorylation which activates Chkl in mammalian cells is dependent on Atr. Chkl plays a role in the Atr dependent DNA damage checkpoint leading to arrest in S phase and at G2M. Chkl phosphorylates and inactivates Cdc25A, the dual-specificity phosphatase that normally dephosphorylates cyclin E/Cdk2, halting progression through S-phase. Chkl also phosphorylates and inactivates Cdc25C, the dual specificity phosphatase that dephosphorylates cyclin B/Cdc2 (also known as Cdkl) arresting cell cycle progression at the boundary of G2 and mitosis (Fernery et al, Science, 277: 1495-1, 1997). In both cases, regulation of Cdk activity induces a cell cycle arrest to prevent cells from entering mitosis in the presence of DNA damage or unreplicated DNA. Various inhibitors of Chkl have been reported. See for example, WO 05/066163,

WO 04/063198, WO 03/093297 and WO 02/070494. In addition, a series of aminopyrazole Chkl inhibitors is disclosed in WO 05/009435.

However, there is still a need for Chkl inhibitors that are potent inhibitors of the cell cycle checkpoints that can act effectively as potentiators of DNA damaging agents. The present invention provides a novel aminopyrazole compound, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof or solvate of the salt, that is a potent inhibitor of Chkl . The compound, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof or a solvate of the salt, potently abrogates a Chkl mediated cell cycle arrest induced by treatment with DNA damaging agents in tissue culture and in vivo. Furthermore, the compound, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof or a solvate of the salt, of the present invention also provides inhibition of Chk2, which may be beneficial for the treatment of cancer. Additionally, the lack of inhibition of certain other protein kinases, such as CDKl, may provide a -2- therapeutic benefit by minimizing undesired effects. Furthermore, the compound, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof or a solvate of the salt, of the present invention inhibits cell proliferation of cancer cells by a mechanism dependent on Chkl inhibition.

A solution of tert-butyl 3-(2-(3-(5-bromopyrazin-2-ylamino)-lH-pyrazol-5-yl)-3- methoxyphenoxy)propylcarbamate (0.378 g, 0.730 mmol) and zinc cyanide (0.10 g, 0.870 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) is degassed with a stream of nitrogen for one hour and then -25- heated to 80 0C. To the reaction is added Pd(Ph3P)4 (0.080 g, 0.070 mmol), and the mixture is heated overnight. The reaction is cooled to room temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue is purified by silica gel chromatography (CH2Cl2/Me0H) to give 0.251 g (73%) of the title compound.

A 5 L flange-neck round-bottom flask equipped with an air stirrer rod and paddle, thermometer, pressure-equalizing dropping funnel, and nitrogen bubbler is charged with 5-(5-(2-hydroxy-6-methoxy-phenyl)-lH-pyrazol-3-ylamino)-pyrazine-2-carbonitrile (47.0 g, 152 mmol) and anhydrous THF (1.2 L). The stirred suspension, under nitrogen, is cooled to 0 0C. A separate 2 L 3 -necked round-bottom flask equipped with a large -28- magnetic stirring bar, thermometer, and nitrogen bubbler is charged with triphenylphosphine (44.0 g; 168 mmol) and anhydrous THF (600 mL). The stirred solution, under nitrogen, is cooled to 0 0C and diisopropylazodicarboxylate (34.2 g; 169 mmol) is added and a milky solution is formed. After 3-4 min, a solution of7-butyl-N-(3- hydroxypropyl)-carbamate (30.3 g, 173 mmol) in anhydrous THF (100 mL) is added and the mixture is stirred for 3-4 min. This mixture is then added over 5 min to the stirred suspension of starting material at 0 0C. The reaction mixture quickly becomes a dark solution and is allowed to slowly warm up to room temperature. After 6.5 h, more reagents are prepared as above using PPh3 (8 g), DIAD (6.2 g) and carbamate (5.4 g) in anhydrous THF (150 mL). The mixture is added to the reaction mixture, cooled to -5 0C and left to warm up to room temperature overnight. The solvent is removed in vacuo. The resulting viscous solution is loaded onto a pad of silica and product is eluted with ethyl acetate. The concentrated fractions are separately triturated with methanol and resulting solids are collected by filtration. The combined solids are triturated again with methanol (400 mL) and then isolated by filtration and dried in vacuo at 50 0C overnight to give 31.3 g of desired product. LC-ES/MS m/z 466.2 [M+ 1]+.

5-(5-(2-Hydroxy-6-methoxyphenyl)-lH-pyrazol-3-ylamino)pyrazine-2- carbonitrile (618 g, 1.62 mol) is slurried in tetrahydrofuran (6.18 L, 10 volumes) and chilled to -5 to 0 0C with an acetone/ice bath. Triethylamine (330 g, 3.25 mol) is added through an addition funnel over 30 – 40 min at -5 to 5 0C. The resulting slurry is stirred at -5 to 5 0C for 60 – 90 min. The insoluble triethylamine hydrochloride is filtered and the solution of the phenol ((5-(2-hydroxy-6-methoxyphenyl)-lH-pyrazol-3- ylamino)pyrazine-2-carbonitrile) collected in an appropriate reaction vessel. The cake is rinsed with THF (1.24 L). The THF solution of the phenol is held at 15 to 20 0C until needed.

Triphenylphosphine (1074 g, 4.05 mol) is dissolved at room temperature in THF (4.33 L). The clear colorless solution is cooled with an acetone/ice bath to -5 to 5 0C. Diisopropylazodicarboxylate (795 g, 3.89 mol) is added dropwise through an addition funnel over 40 – 60 min, keeping the temperature below 10 0C. The resulting thick white slurry is cooled back to -5 to 0 0C. tert-Butyl 3-hydroxypropylcarbamate (717g, 4.05 moles) is dissolved in a minimum of THF (800 mL). The tert-butyl 3- hydroxypropylcarbamate/THF solution is added, through an addition funnel, over 20 – 30 -35- min at -5 to 5 0C to the reagent slurry. The prepared reagent is stirred in the ice bath at -5 to 0 0C until ready for use.

The prepared reagent slurry (20%) is added to the substrate solution at 15 to 20 0C. The remaining reagent is returned to the ice bath. The substrate solution is stirred at ambient for 30 min, then sampled for HPLC. A second approximately 20% portion of the reagent is added to the substrate, stirred at ambient and sampled as before. Addition of the reagent is continued with monitoring for reaction completion by HPLC. The completed reaction is concentrated and triturated with warm methanol (4.33 L, 50 – 60 0C) followed by cooling in an ice bath. The resulting yellow precipitate is filtered, rinsed with cold MeOH (2 L), and dried to constant weight to provide 544 g (72%) of the title compound, mp 214 – 216 0C; ES/MS m/z 466.2 [M+l]+.

tert-Butyl 3-(2-(3-(5-cyanopyrazin-2-ylamino)-lH-pyrazol-5-yl)-3- methoxyphenoxy)propylcarbamate (1430 g, 3.07 mol) is slurried with acetone (21.5 L) in a 30 L reactor. Methanesulfonic acid (1484 g, 15.36 mol) is added through an addition funnel in a moderate stream. The slurry is warmed to reflux at about 52 0C for 1 to 3 h and monitored for reaction completion by HPLC analysis. The completed reaction is cooled from reflux to 15 to 20 0C over 4.5 h. The yellow slurry of 2-pyrazinecarbonitrile, 5-[[5-[-[2-(3-aminopropyl)-6-methoxyphenyl]-lH-pyrazol-3-yl]amino] dimesylate salt is filtered, rinsed with acetone (7 L) and dried in a vacuum oven. The dimesylate salt, (1608 g, 2.88 mol) is slurried in water (16 L). Sodium hydroxide (aqueous 50%, 228 g, 2.85 mol) is slowly poured into the slurry. The slurry is -36- heated to 60 0C and stirred for one hour. It is then cooled to 16 0C over 4 h and filtered. The wet filter cake is rinsed with acetone (4 L) and dried to constant weight in a vacuum oven at 40 0C to provide 833 g (94%) of 2-pyrazinecarbonitrile, 5-[[5-[-[2-(3- aminopropyl)-6-methoxyphenyl]-lH-pyrazol-3-yl]amino] monomesylate monohydrate. mp 222.6 0C; ES/MS m/z 366.2 [M+l]+.

Crude 2-pyrazinecarbonitrile, 5 -[ [5 – [- [2-(3 -aminopropyl)-6-methoxyphenyl]- IH- pyrazol-3-yl] amino] monomesylate monohydrate is purified using the following procedure. The technical grade 2-pyrazinecarbonitrile, 5-[[5-[-[2-(3-aminopropyl)-6- methoxyphenyl]-lH-pyrazol-3-yl] amino] mono mesylate mono hydrate (1221 g, 2.55 mol) is slurried in a solvent mixture of 1: 1 acetone/water (14.7 L). The solid is dissolved by warming the mixture to 50 – 55 0C. The solution is polish filtrated while at 50 – 55 0C through a 0.22μ cartridge filter. The solution is slowly cooled to the seeding temperature of about 42 – 45 0C and seeded. Slow cooling is continued over the next 30 – 60 min to confirm nucleation. The thin slurry is cooled from 38 to 15 0C over 3 h. A vacuum distillation is set up and the acetone removed at 110 – 90 mm and 20 – 30 0C. The mixture is cooled from 30 to 15 0C over 14 h, held at 15 0C for 2 h, and then filtered. The recrystallized material is rinsed with 19: 1 water/acetone (2 L) and then water (6 L) and dried to constant weight in a vacuum oven at 40 0C to provide 1024 g (83.9%) of the title compound, mp 222.6 0C; ES/MS m/z 366.2 [M+l]+. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns may be obtained on a Bruker D8

Advance powder diffractometer, equipped with a CuKa source (λ=l.54056 angstrom) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA with a position-sensitive detector. Each sample is scanned between 4° and 35° in °2Θ ± 0.02 using a step size of 0.026° in 2Θ ± 0.02 and a step time of 0.3 seconds, with a 0.6 mm divergence slit and a 10.39 mm detector slit. Primary and secondary Soller slits are each at 2°; antiscattering slit is 6.17 mm; the air scatter sink is in place. -37-

Characteristic peak positions and relative intensities:

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses may be carried out on a Mettler- Toledo DSC unit (Model DSC822e). Samples are heated in closed aluminum pans with pinhole from 25 to 350 0C at 10 °C/min with a nitrogen purge of 50 mL/min. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) may be carried out on a Mettler Toledo TGA unit (Model TGA/SDTA 85Ie). Samples are heated in sealed aluminum pans with a pinhole from 25 to 350 0C at 10 0C /min with a nitrogen purge of 50 mL/min.

The thermal profile from DSC shows a weak, broad endotherm form 80 – 1400C followed by a sharp melting endotherm at 222 0C, onset (225 0C, peak). A mass loss of 4% is seen by the TGA from 25 – 140 0C.

X-Ray Powder Diffraction, Crystalline Example 1 Obtain the XRPD patterns of the crystalline solids on a Bruker D4 Endeavor X-ray powder diffractometer, equipped with a CuKa source (λ = 1.54060 A) and a Vantec detector, operating at 35 kV and 50 mA. Scan the sample between 4 and 40° in 2Θ, with a step size of 0.0087° in 2Θ and a scan rate of 0.5 seconds/step, and with 0.6 mm divergence, 5.28mm fixed anti-scatter, and 9.5 mm detector slits. Pack the dry powder on a quartz sample holder and obtain a smooth surface using a glass slide. It is well known in the crystallography art that, for any given crystal form, the relative intensities of the diffraction peaks may vary due to preferred orientation resulting from factors such as crystal morphology and habit. Where the effects of preferred orientation are present, peak intensities are altered, but the characteristic peak positions of the polymorph are unchanged. See, e.g. The U. S. Pharmacopeia 35 – National Formulary 30 Chapter <941> Characterization of crystalline and partially crystalline solids by XRPD Official December 1, 2012-May 1, 2013. Furthermore, it is also well known in the

crystallography art that for any given crystal form the angular peak positions may vary slightly. For example, peak positions can shift due to a variation in the temperature or humidity at which a sample is analyzed, sample displacement, or the presence or absence of an internal standard. In the present case, a peak position variability of ± 0.2 in 2Θ will take into account these potential variations without hindering the unequivocal identification of the indicated crystal form Confirmation of a crystal form may be made based on any unique combination of distinguishing peaks (in units of ° 2Θ), typically the more prominent peaks. The crystal form diffraction patterns, collected at ambient temperature and relative humidity, were adjusted based on NIST 675 standard peaks at 8.85 and 26.77 degrees 2-theta,

Characterize a prepared sample of crystalline 5-(5-(2-(3-aminopropoxy)-6-methoxyphenyl)- lH-pyrazol-3-ylamino)pyrazine-2-carbonitrile (S)-lactate monohydrate by an XPRD pattern using CuKa radiation as having diffraction peaks (2-theta values) as described in Table 1 below. Specifically the pattern contains a peak at 12.6 in

combination with one or more of the peaks selected from the group consisting of 24.8, 25.5, 8.1, 6.6, 12.3, and 16.3 with a tolerance for the diffraction angles of 0.2 degrees.

Combine a THF solution (22%) of i<?ri-butyl (3-(2-(2-cyanoacetyl)-3-methoxyphenoxy)propyl)carbamate (1.0 eqv, this is define as one volume) with hydrazine (35%, 1.5 eqv), acetic acid (glacial, 1.0 eqv), water (1 volume based on the THF solution) and methanol (2 volumes based on the THF solution). As this is a continuous operation, grams or kg is irrelevant in this processing methodology. Heat the resulting mixture to 130 °C and 1379 kPa with a rate of V/Q = 70 minutes (where V refers to the volume of the reactor and Q refers to flow rate), tau = 60. Extract the solution with toluene (4 volumes), water (1 volume), and sodium carbonate (10% aqueous, 1 eqv). Isolate the toluene layer and add to DMSO (0.5 volumes). Collect a solution of the intermediate compound i<?ri-butyl (3-(2-(3-amino- lH-pyrazol-5-yl)-3-methoxyphenoxy)

propyl)carbamate (26.59 kg, 91%) in 10 days, mp = 247.17 °C as a DMSO solution (3 volumes of product). N-ethylmorpholine (1.2 eqv) and 5-chloropyrazine-2-carbonitrile (1.15 eqv) in 2 volumes of DMSO is combined in a tube reactor at 80 °C, V/Q = 3 and tau = 170 minutes at ambient pressure. Add the product stream to methanol (20 vol). As a continuous process, filter the mixture and wash with methanol followed by MTBE. Air dry the material on the filter to give i<?ri-butyl (3-(2-(3-((5-cyanopyrazin-2-yl)amino)-lH-pyrazol-5-yl)-3-methoxyphenoxy) propyl)carbamate in a continuous fashion (22.2 kg, 88.7%, 8 days). Dissolve a solution of i<?ri-butyl (3-(2-(3-((5-cyanopyrazin-2-yl)amino)-lH-pyrazol-5-yl)-3-methoxyphenoxy) propyl)carbamate in formic acid (99%, 142 kg) at ambient temperature and agitate for 4 hours to provide an intermediate of 5-((5-(2-(3-aminopropoxy)-6-methoxyphenyl)-lH-pyrazol-3-yl)amino)pyrazine-2-carbonitrile formate. Dilute the solution with water (55 kg), (S)-lactic acid (30%, 176 kg) and distill the resulting mixture until < 22 kg formic acid remains. Crystallize the resulting residue from THF and wash with a THF -water (0.5% in THF) solution. Dry the wet cake at 30 °C at >10% relative humidity to give the title product as a white to yellow solid (24.04 kg, 85-90%), m.p. 157 °C.

A multidisciplinary team from Eli Lilly reports the development and implementation of eight continuous unit operations for the synthesis of ca. 3 kg API per day under CGMP conditions (K. P. Cole et al., Science2017, 356, 1144). The recent drive toward more potent APIs that have a low annual demand (<100 kg) has made continuous synthesis a viable alternative to traditional batch processes with advantages which include reducing equipment footprint and worker exposure. In this report the authors describe the enablement of three continuous synthetic steps followed by a salt formation, using surge tanks between steps to allow each step to be taken offline if online PAT detects a loss in reaction performance. A combination of MSMPRs (mixed-suspension, mixed-product removal) vessels, plug-flow reactors, and dissolve-off filters were used to perform the chemistry, with an automated 20 L rotary evaporator used to concentrate process streams and perform solvents swaps. This paper gives an excellent account of the potential solutions to continuous API synthesis and is well worth a read for anyone contemplating such methodology.

Continuous crystallisation, shown here, and subsequent filtration have been the most difficult-to-develop part of the prexasertib production process

Eli Lilly has taken an important step away from traditional batch process drug manufacturing by using an industry-first continuous process to make a compound for phase I and II clinical trials. Workers at Lilly’s Kinsale site in Ireland, did three steps involved in producing cancer drug candidate prexasertib continuously, under current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) standards that ensure safety for human consumption.

Continuous processing relies on chemical and physical changes happening as substances flow through pipes. Isolated steps of this type are already well-established in the pharmaceutical industry. However, Lilly ‎principal research scientist Kevin Cole stresses that a series including reaction and purification steps like this has not been demonstrated before. And the company wants to go much further.

The complex synthesis of prexasertib even requires the use of toxic hydrazine – used as a rocket fuel. As a result, and because of prexasertib’s toxicity, the drug was a good candidate to test out a comprehensive flow chemistry setup

In batch processes different chemical reaction and purification steps are typically done in large, costly vessels. However, this can be uneconomical when small amounts of drug molecules are needed for early stage clinical trials and, because drugs are getting more potent, increasingly in mainstream production.

By contrast, small volume continuous flow processing runs in more compact equipment in fume hoods. Flow systems can adapt to different processes, with cheap parts that can either be dedicated to specific drugs or readily replaced. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also been promoting continuous manufacturing because it integrates well with advanced process analytical technology. This helps pharmaceutical companies make high quality drugs with less FDA oversight.

Lilly chose prexasertib as its test case for such a process because it’s challenging to make. It is a chain of three aromatic rings, and one challenge comes because its central ring is formed using hydrazine. Hydrazine is used as a component in rocket fuel, and is also highly toxic. A second challenge comes from prexasertib itself, which, as a potent kinase inhibitor, is toxic to healthy cells, as well as cancerous ones, even at low doses. Lilly therefore wants to minimise its workers’ exposure.

Feeding the plant

Cole and his colleagues at Lilly’s labs in Indianapolis, US, have developed flow processes for three of the seven steps involved in prexasertib production. They start with the hydrazine step, which they could safely speed up by super-heating in the continuous process. After aqueous workup purification the solution of the two-ring intermediate solution runs into a ‘surge tank’. From there the solution flows intermittently into a rotary evaporator that removes solvents to concentrate it.

The second continuous flow step adds the third of prexasertib’s rings. In this case, the Lilly team purified the intermediate by crystallising it and filtering it out, washing away impurities. They could then redissolve the pure intermediate in formic acid, which also removes a protecting group, giving the desired prexasertib molecule. Automating this was probably the hardest part, Cole says. ‘Development of a predictive filtration model, equipment design and identification of formic acid as the solvent were keys to success,’ he explains. The final flow step then starts converting prexasertib to its final lactate salt form.

After developing the processes and systems in Indianapolis, Lilly shipped them to be equipped in an existing facility at its Kinsale manufacturing site at the cost of €1 million (£870,000). Once the prexasertib system was installed, the company was able to make 3kg of raw material per day for clinical trials. Cole describes the level of manual intervention needed as ‘moderate’.

Klavs Jensen from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology calls the paper describing the work ‘terrific’. ‘This work marks an important milestone in the continuous manufacturing of pharmaceuticals by demonstrating the feasibility of producing a modern kinase inhibitor under CGMP conditions,’ he says.

Likewise, Brahim Benyahia from Loughborough University, UK, calls this achievement ‘very interesting’. ‘The paper is another example that demonstrates the benefits and feasibility of the integrated continuous approach in pharma,’ he says.

Cole adds that Lilly has several other similar projects in advanced stages of development intended for the €35 million small-volume continuous plant it recently built in Kinsale. ‘We are committed to continuous manufacturing as well as full utilisation of our new facility,’ he says.

Correction: This article was updated on 16 June 2017 to clarify the chronology of the completion of the Kinsale, Ireland plant

Follow Blog via Email

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Born in Mumbai in 1964 and graduated from Mumbai University, Completed his Ph.D from ICT, 1991,Matunga, Mumbai, India, in Organic Chemistry, The thesis topic was Synthesis of Novel Pyrethroid Analogues, Currently he is working with GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LTD, Research Centre as Principal Scientist, Process Research (bulk actives) at Mahape, Navi Mumbai, India. Total Industry exp 30 plus yrs, Prior to joining Glenmark, he has worked with major multinationals like Hoechst Marion Roussel, now Sanofi, Searle India Ltd, now RPG lifesciences, etc. He has worked with notable scientists like Dr K Nagarajan, Dr Ralph Stapel, Prof S Seshadri, Dr T.V. Radhakrishnan and Dr B. K. Kulkarni, etc, He did custom synthesis for major multinationals in his career like BASF, Novartis, Sanofi, etc., He has worked in Discovery, Natural products, Bulk drugs, Generics, Intermediates, Fine chemicals, Neutraceuticals, GMP, Scaleups, etc, he is now helping millions, has 9 million plus hits on Google on all Organic chemistry websites. His friends call him Open superstar worlddrugtracker. His New Drug Approvals, Green Chemistry International, All about drugs, Eurekamoments, Organic spectroscopy international,
etc in organic chemistry are some most read blogs He has hands on experience in initiation and developing novel routes for drug molecules
and implementation them on commercial scale over a 30 year tenure till date Dec 2017, Around 35 plus products in his career. He has good knowledge of IPM, GMP, Regulatory aspects, he has several International patents published worldwide . He has good proficiency in Technology transfer, Spectroscopy, Stereochemistry, Synthesis, Polymorphism etc., He suffered a paralytic stroke/ Acute Transverse mylitis in Dec 2007 and is 90 %Paralysed, He is bound to a wheelchair, this seems to have injected feul in him to help chemists all around the world, he is more active than before and is pushing boundaries, He has 9 million plus hits on Google, 2.5 lakh plus connections on all networking sites, 50 Lakh plus views on dozen plus blogs, He makes himself available to all, contact him on +91 9323115463, email amcrasto@gmail.com, Twitter, @amcrasto , He lives and will die for his family, 90% paralysis cannot kill his soul., Notably he has 19 lakh plus views on New Drug Approvals Blog in 216 countries......https://newdrugapprovals.wordpress.com/ , He appreciates the help he gets from one and all, Friends, Family, Glenmark, Readers, Wellwishers, Doctors, Drug authorities, His Contacts, Physiotherapist, etc

bloglovin

Follow my blog with Bloglovin
The title of your home page
You could put your verification ID in a
comment
Or, in its own meta tag
Or, as one of your keywords
Your content is here. The verification ID will NOT be detected if you put it here.