Most motor vehicle defect attorneys will agree that minivans without brake shift interlock are a danger to everyone on the road. In 2006, four-year-old Gabriel Escobar was in the family's 1997 Plymouth Voyager minivan with the key in the ignition and the engine off. His mother was in the driveway walking toward the minivan when Gabriel shifted the vehicle out of "park." A babysitter briefly turned her attention away and was too late to grab Ian, Gabriel's 18-month-old brother, out of the minivan's path. Ian was trapped under the minivan's wheel and killed in the car accident.

The Escobars filed a auto product liability lawsuit against Chrysler. They alleged that the Voyager minivan was defective because, unlike most cars, the minivan did not have a brake shift interlock device that prevents it from being shifted out of park unless the brake pedal is depressed.

The amount and terms of the settlement are confidential. But a spokesman for the car manufacturer noted that Chrysler makes good cars, and that parents are responsible for what happens if they leave their kids in cars with the keys in the ignition. He remarked that Chrysler's settlement is not an admission of a product defect, adding that the only defect is the judgment of leaving children in a car with the keys inside.

There have been 23 similar car accident deaths nationwide, including a recent tragedy in Connecticut in which a toddler knocked a 1999 Grand Voyager out of park, sending it into a lake and drowning four. When parents pack a van for a trip and place children inside, it only takes a second for a curious child to set a car in motion due to the absence of brake shift interlock.

"These tragedies could have been avoided," noted nationally recognized defective auto products attorney, John Bisnar. "The majority of gear shift car accidents are caused by children moving the car into gear. In some instances, vehicles have shifted into gear on their own. A brake shift interlock could have saved lives. Most children will not engage the brake simultaneously as they are shifting gears, preventing the car from slipping into gear and resulting in a rollaway accident. Regrettably, Chrysler decided to forgo the $9 interlock device on its 1996-2000 model minivans because it was not a mandated safety feature. Bowing to pressure, Chrysler finally began installing brake shift interlock devices on its minivans in 2001. Sadly, in spite of tragedy after tragedy, Chrysler marketed and sold this minivan to families with this known design defect."

A recent 2006 voluntary agreement between Chrysler and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), all Chrysler vehicles will be equipped with a brake shift interlock device by 2010. "Unfortunately, this agreement does not require older vehicles to be recalled and upgraded with this safety device," observed John Bisnar. "This means that over 9 million Chrysler minivans sold are still without the brake shift interlock feature."

"When a car maker ignores a dangerous automobile defect in the face of repeated loss-of-life tragedies, they need to be held accountable" observed Brian Chase of the nationally recognized motor vehicle defects law firm of Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys. "The Escobars not only acted responsibly, but their courage in taking Chrysler to court may have prevented other families from suffering similar tragedies. The jury's award is America's message to Chrysler that their failure to act was not acceptable. Hopefully, this defective product lawsuit will help convince Chrysler to respond effectively to known safety defects in order to prevent further deaths and personal injuries."

If you or a loved one has suffered serious injuries as the result of a defective auto part or vehicle, contact the experienced California auto products liability attorneys at Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys for a free consultation. We will use our extensive knowledge and resources to achieve the best possible results for you and your family.

Please let us know why this page was not helpful:
Did Not Answer My Questions
The Page Content Was Not What I Was Expecting
Too Much Information On The Page
Too Little Information On The Page
Page Content Was Too ComplicatedHow Can We Make This Page Better? (Note: If you have any questions, please provide your email if you want us to respond to you)Email: (optional):

How Does The Auto Recall Process Work?

Why Focus on Auto Defect Cases?

Client Reviews of Bisnar Chase

“I am very pleased with the results this law firm obtained for me. Their professionalism, attentiveness and friendliness was outstanding. They listened to me, answered my questions, advised me and kept me informed. A truck hit my car causing me serious injuries, medical bills, lost time from work and damaged to my car. They took care of everything wonderfully. They helped with getting my car repaired and a rental car. They helped me get medical help. They got my doctor bills paid, kept me from having to go to court and obtained a settlement for me beyond my expectations. Four of my family members have used these guys and had equally good experiences. One of my relatives consulted with them and got great advise about handling her matter. Mr. Bisnar told her she didn't need an attorney and told her how to handle it. She couldn't believe the compassion and great advise, especially without a fee. Mr. Bisnar helped my brother-in-law get a multiple six-figure recovery in an employment law dispute. Starting with the receptionist, my paralegal, the paralegal supervisor, Mrs. De La Torre, Mrs. Barker and Mr. Bisnar himself, everyone was helpful, friendly and professional. It was a refreshing experience after a bad accident. They send me a birthday card with a Baskin Robins gift certificate every year. In January they send me chocolate dipped fortune cookies. They have even offered me Lakers' tickets. They certainly didn't forget me after my case was done.”

“Happy the way my case went. The only thing that got the other insurance company to hear me was "here is the number to my attorney", I shouldn't have waited so long to call an attorney. Thank you isn't enough.”