[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15925450#comment-15925450
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-17780:
--------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.2-JDK7 #116 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.2-JDK7/116/])
HBASE-17780 BoundedByteBufferPool "At capacity" messages are not (apurtell: rev 17ef9fb15cca5f4075e90b78fdbcee7d0f80e238)
* (edit) hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/BoundedByteBufferPool.java
> BoundedByteBufferPool "At capacity" messages are not actionable
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17780
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17780
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.1.9, 1.2.6, 1.31
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17780-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17780.patch
>
>
> This comment in BoundedByteBufferPool talks about "At capacity ..." warnings from this
class that may appear in logs when under load:
> {code}
> * If a ByteBuffer is bigger than the configured threshold, we will just let the ByteBuffer
go
> * rather than add it to the pool. If more ByteBuffers than the configured maximum instances,
> * we will not add the passed ByteBuffer to the pool; we will just drop it
> * (we will log a WARN in this case that we are at capacity).
> {code}
> First, dropping buffers when the pool is full is obviously an expected and normal condition.
Second, there is nothing actionable about that warning. Might be useful for developers, perhaps.
Drop it to DEBUG.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)