Letter: Column on Zimmerman case factual, concise

Emotional feelings and expressions (the prosecution's main line of offense in the George Zimmerman case) versus the rule of law correctly should not have much credence to the overwhelming evidence that was presented by the defense in this case.

Marshall Frank's recent column, "It was shoot or die," on this case was factual, concise and correctly on point. Frank's background and experience as a longtime South Florida law enforcement officer and supervisor reflect a real-world portrayal of what all concerned, responsible and objective citizens need to be constantly aware of.

Marshall, keep providing us with just the facts. Emotions and feelings have no place for a jury to put into the equation for a fair trial.

What concerns me are the number of individuals who continue to castigate the clear and convincing facts, with the liberal media's definition and assessments of "drinks the Kool-Aid," "wannabe cop" and a judgment of a "vigilante act" by Zimmerman.

If they can't present the evidence, they defend their cause by defamation and inflammatory words. That is not what our justice system is supposed to be based upon.