Thank you for visiting our forum. As a guest, you have limited access to view some discussion and articles. By joining our free community, you will be able to view all discussions and articles, post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos, participate in Pick'Em contests and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today!!

I thought that the EE rule was setup so that you could have guys enroll early, such as from a JUCO, but they could only fulfill the allotment of scholarships you didn't use the previous season or upcoming season up to 85.

Who did they grayshirt if they currently have 81 guys on scholarship according to this article and why? 33 of their 34 recruits on 247 have enrolled already.

Our team score would be 261.35. I looked back at the past 5 years and this would be good enough for the 10th best class in the country or right on the verge of it most years. Now obviously we may lose some commits, get some we don't expect, guys move up/down in ratings throughout the year, but I just thought it was interesting to see that we are on pace to finish with a top 10 class and the names listed we have a very realistic chance of landing (or players of similar quality/ranking). I think it's more likely we end up with a top 10 class and not a top 5 where we are now, which is still very good and would be our best class (score wise) since the 2007 class.

Over in Octavis's thread, they said that gogamcocks.com had an article that said Octavis is a December graduate. If he knows he's graduating early, at this point in time it would lead me to believe he has his academics in order. Although, Sawyer graduated/got his GED early so he could go to JUCO. So it might mean this or that, I'm sure it will be clarified soon.

Thx. That would be great if he could get in early, as I think it would give the staff more time to evaluate him and put him where he'll be the most productive. As alluded to in his interview, the only problem might be that 3 coaches will want him playing the position they coach (Jr., Grady Brown, and Botkin.)

Our team score would be 261.35. I looked back at the past 5 years and this would be good enough for the 10th best class in the country or right on the verge of it most years. Now obviously we may lose some commits, get some we don't expect, guys move up/down in ratings throughout the year, but I just thought it was interesting to see that we are on pace to finish with a top 10 class and the names listed we have a very realistic chance of landing (or players of similar quality/ranking). I think it's more likely we end up with a top 10 class and not a top 5 where we are now, which is still very good and would be our best class (score wise) since the 2007 class.

That's a pretty realistic list. Don't think Durant ends up here unfortunately, but I think those are the most likely guys at each position. Then again, there were some major surprises in the last couple of weeks, so who knows how it will end up.

Our team score would be 261.35. I looked back at the past 5 years and this would be good enough for the 10th best class in the country or right on the verge of it most years. Now obviously we may lose some commits, get some we don't expect, guys move up/down in ratings throughout the year, but I just thought it was interesting to see that we are on pace to finish with a top 10 class and the names listed we have a very realistic chance of landing (or players of similar quality/ranking). I think it's more likely we end up with a top 10 class and not a top 5 where we are now, which is still very good and would be our best class (score wise) since the 2007 class.

It's not who I'm projecting we get, more who I think we have the best chance at landing right now. Things are going to change. I'm sure we won't get all of those guys and we will pick up some who arent on the radar now. That's just how recruiting goes. I was just trying to see if it was realistic if we could finish with a top 10 class and those names we all have a legit shot at landing. We very well may take more than 28 players too and may have some decomitments.

Our team score would be 261.35. I looked back at the past 5 years and this would be good enough for the 10th best class in the country or right on the verge of it most years. Now obviously we may lose some commits, get some we don't expect, guys move up/down in ratings throughout the year, but I just thought it was interesting to see that we are on pace to finish with a top 10 class and the names listed we have a very realistic chance of landing (or players of similar quality/ranking). I think it's more likely we end up with a top 10 class and not a top 5 where we are now, which is still very good and would be our best class (score wise) since the 2007 class.

I can't see us taking Washington and Charles, I think we need a DT in this class still whether its Jones, Huggins or someone else. other than that I'd be happy

I can't see us taking Washington and Charles, I think we need a DT in this class still whether its Jones, Huggins or someone else. other than that I'd be happy

According to GCC Washington is a commitment. He isn't a commitment according to TBS. Weird situation. Whatever the case, I hope we land Charles. That would give us at least four WRs, with the possibility of Johnson being a WR as well.

I agree about needing a DT. I don't think it's going to be Huggins though. Wideman could grow into a DT and solve that issue though.

Our team score would be 261.35. I looked back at the past 5 years and this would be good enough for the 10th best class in the country or right on the verge of it most years. Now obviously we may lose some commits, get some we don't expect, guys move up/down in ratings throughout the year, but I just thought it was interesting to see that we are on pace to finish with a top 10 class and the names listed we have a very realistic chance of landing (or players of similar quality/ranking). I think it's more likely we end up with a top 10 class and not a top 5 where we are now, which is still very good and would be our best class (score wise) since the 2007 class.

good list of 10.....added to our current 18.....we still have the ability to add 2 more on top of this. Instead of showing just Merrick, I would add 1 of Merrick, Womack or Pellage.

That's a pretty realistic list. Don't think Durant ends up here unfortunately, but I think those are the most likely guys at each position. Then again, there were some major surprises in the last couple of weeks, so who knows how it will end up.

I can't see us taking Washington and Charles, I think we need a DT in this class still whether its Jones, Huggins or someone else. other than that I'd be happy

I agree with you 100%.

Problem is it's very, very doubtful we get Huggins, Jones could go any number of ways & I haven't heard of a single high caliber DT where there is mutual interest coming from the prospect & USC. To me, a high ceiling HS DT is much needed for down the road. I'm just not real confident we're gonna meet that need in this class. Seems much more likely it might have to be an under the radar guy. Still plenty of time though, lots of things will change between now & Feb.

According to GCC Washington is a commitment. He isn't a commitment according to TBS. Weird situation. Whatever the case, I hope we land Charles. That would give us at least four WRs, with the possibility of Johnson being a WR as well.

I agree about needing a DT. I don't think it's going to be Huggins though. Wideman could grow into a DT and solve that issue though.

Apparently Washington was very impressive at the latest camp (in Columbia) and it's very likely his commitment will be accepted.