If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

F2FS and XFS are my two favourite file-systems, and I hope to see XFS in with the other file-systems in the upcoming benchmarks.

BTRFS as of late is finally maturing past its infancy and I'm considering BTRFS to not be such a toy as it has been ever since it's creation... I even believe BTRFS now has more of a future than ZFS... which is saying something.

Comment

I even believe BTRFS now has more of a future than ZFS... which is saying something.

Considering that both filesystems are owned by the same company. We'll see where that goes. I'm not being negative here, just stating the curiosity of what options will Oracle take. I know that most of the research and work is being done by the OpenZFS consortium. I'm not sure about BTRFS, from the recent articles by Michael it's mostly Facebook that's involved now.

Comment

I very much doubt that. most if not all usb memories are shipped with FAT or NTFS, and the internal
wear-levelling logic uses the known access patterns of these two FSs to spread writes evenly to all
sectors. F2FS is for raw nand/nor access as is possible in embedded devices (not with usb flash media).

Comment

I very much doubt that. most if not all usb memories are shipped with FAT or NTFS, and the internal
wear-levelling logic uses the known access patterns of these two FSs to spread writes evenly to all
sectors. F2FS is for raw nand/nor access as is possible in embedded devices (not with usb flash media).