Pages

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

By The Dalai LamaContinued from:The Dalai Lama on Reincarnation, Part 1The Dalai Lama on Reincarnation, Part 2The Dalai Lama on Reincarnation, Part 3Using the Golden UrnAs the degenerate age gets worse, and as more reincarnations of high Lamas are being recognized, some of them for political motives, increasing numbers have been recognized through inappropriate and questionable means, as a result of which huge damage has been done to the Dharma.During the conflict between Tibet and the Gurkhas (1791-93) the Tibetan Government had to call on Manchu military support. Consequently the Gurkha military was expelled from Tibet, but afterwards Manchu officials made a 29-point proposal on the pretext of making the Tibetan Government’s administration more efficient. This proposal included the suggestion of picking lots from a Golden Urn to decide on the recognition of the reincarnations of the Dalai Lamas, Panchen Lamas and Hutuktus, a Mongolian title given to high Lamas. Therefore, this procedure was followed in the case of recognizing some reincarnations of the Dalai Lama, Panchen Lama and other high Lamas. The ritual to be followed was written by the Eighth Dalai Lama Jampel Gyatso. Even after such a system had been introduced, this procedure was dispensed with for the Ninth, Thirteenth and myself, the Fourteenth Dalai Lama.Even in the case of the Tenth Dalai Lama, the authentic reincarnation had already been found and in reality this procedure was not followed, but in order to humour the Manchus it was merely announced that this procedure had been observed.The Golden Urn system was actually used only in the cases of the Eleventh and Twelfth Dalai Lamas. However, the Twelfth Dalai Lama had already been recognized before the procedure was employed. Therefore, there has only been one occasion when a Dalai Lama was recognized by using this method. Likewise, among the reincarnations of the Panchen Lama, apart from the Eighth and the Ninth, there have been no instances of this method being employed. This system was imposed by the Manchus, but Tibetans had no faith in it because it lacked any spiritual quality. However, if it were to be used honestly, it seems that we could consider it as similar to the manner of divination employing the dough-ball method (zen tak).In 1880, during the recognition of the Thirteenth Dalai Lama as the reincarnation of the Twelfth, traces of the Priest-Patron relationship between Tibet and the Manchus still existed. He was recognized as the unmistaken reincarnation by the Eighth Panchen Lama, the predictions of the Nechung and Samye oracles and by observing visions that appeared in Lhamoi Latso, therefore the Golden Urn procedure was not followed. This can be clearly understood from the Thirteenth Dalai Lama’s final testament of the Water-Monkey Year (1933) in which he states:“As you all know, I was selected not in the customary way of picking lots from the golden urn, but my selection was foretold and divined. In accordance with these divinations and prophecies I was recognized as the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama and enthroned.”When I was recognized as the Fourteenth incarnation of the Dalai Lama in 1939, the Priest-Patron relationship between Tibet and China had already come to an end. Therefore, there was no question of any need to confirm the reincarnation by employing the Golden Urn. It is well-known that the then Regent of Tibet and the Tibetan National Assembly had followed the procedure for recognizing the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation taking account of the predictions of high Lamas, oracles and the visions seen in Lhamoi Latso; the Chinese had no involvement in it whatever. Nevertheless, some concerned officials of the Guomintang later cunningly spread lies in the newspapers claiming that they had agreed to forego the use of the Golden Urn and that Wu Chung-tsin presided over my enthronement, and so on. This lie was exposed by Ngabo Ngawang Jigme, the Vice-Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, who the People’s Republic of China considered to be a most progressive person, at the Second Session of the Fifth People’s Congress of the Tibet Autonomous Region (31st July 1989). This is clear, when, at the end of his speech, in which he gave a detailed explanation of events and presented documentary evidence, he demanded: “What need is there for the Communist Party to follow suit and continue the lies of the Guomintang?”Deceptive strategy and false hopesIn the recent past, there have been cases of irresponsible managers of wealthy Lama-estates who indulged in improper methods to recognize reincarnations, which have undermined the Dharma, the monastic community and our society. Moreover, since the Manchu era Chinese political authorities repeatedly engaged in various deceitful means using Buddhism, Buddhist masters and Tulkus as tools to fulfil their political ends as they involved themselves in Tibetan and Mongolian affairs. Today, the authoritarian rulers of the People’s Republic of China, who as communists reject religion, but still involve themselves in religious affairs, have imposed a so-called re-education campaign and declared the so-called Order No. Five, concerning the control and recognition of reincarnations, which came into force on 1st September 2007. This is outrageous and disgraceful. The enforcement of various inappropriate methods for recognizing reincarnations to eradicate our unique Tibetan cultural traditions is doing damage that will be difficult to repair.Moreover, they say they are waiting for my death and will recognize a Fifteenth Dalai Lama of their choice. It is clear from their recent rules and regulations and subsequent declarations that they have a detailed strategy to deceive Tibetans, followers of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition and the world community. Therefore, as I have a responsibility to protect the Dharma and sentient beings and counter such detrimental schemes, I make the following declaration.The next incarnation of the Dalai Lama As I mentioned earlier, reincarnation is a phenomenon which should take place either through the voluntary choice of the concerned person or at least on the strength of his or her karma, merit and prayers. Therefore, the person who reincarnates has sole legitimate authority over where and how he or she takes rebirth and how that reincarnation is to be recognized. It is a reality that no one else can force the person concerned, or manipulate him or her. It is particularly inappropriate for Chinese communists, who explicitly reject even the idea of past and future lives, let alone the concept of reincarnate Tulkus, to meddle in the system of reincarnation and especially the reincarnations of the Dalai Lamas and Panchen Lamas. Such brazen meddling contradicts their own political ideology and reveals their double standards. Should this situation continue in the future, it will be impossible for Tibetans and those who follow the Tibetan Buddhist tradition to acknowledge or accept it.When I am about ninety I will consult the high Lamas of the Tibetan Buddhist traditions, the Tibetan public, and other concerned people who follow Tibetan Buddhism, and re-evaluate whether the institution of the Dalai Lama should continue or not. On that basis we will take a decision. If it is decided that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama should continue and there is a need for the Fifteenth Dalai Lama to be recognized, responsibility for doing so will primarily rest on the concerned officers of the Dalai Lama’s Gaden Phodrang Trust. They should consult the various heads of the Tibetan Buddhist traditions and the reliable oath-bound Dharma Protectors who are linked inseparably to the lineage of the Dalai Lamas. They should seek advice and direction from these concerned beings and carry out the procedures of search and recognition in accordance with past tradition. I shall leave clear written instructions about this. Bear in mind that, apart from the reincarnation recognized through such legitimate methods, no recognition or acceptance should be given to a candidate chosen for political ends by anyone, including those in the People’s Republic of China.

Past and future
lives were asserted in the indigenous Tibetan Bon tradition before the arrival
of Buddhism. And since the spread of Buddhism in Tibet, virtually all Tibetans
have believed in past and future lives. Investigating the reincarnations of
many spiritual masters who upheld the Dharma, as well as the custom of praying
devotedly to them, flourished everywhere in Tibet. Many authentic scriptures,
indigenous Tibetan books such as the Mani Kabum and the Fivefold Kathang
Teachings and others like the The Books of Kadam Disciples and the Jewel
Garland: Responses to Queries, which were recounted by the glorious,
incomparable Indian master Dipankara Atisha in the 11th century in Tibet, tell
stories of the reincarnations of Arya Avalokiteshvara, the Bodhisattva of
compassion. However, the present tradition of formally recognizing the reincarnations
of masters first began in the early 13th century with the recognition of
Karmapa Pagshi as the reincarnation of Karmapa Dusum Khyenpa by his disciples
in accordance with his prediction. Since then, there have been seventeen
Karmapa incarnations over more than nine hundred years. Similarly, since the
recognition of Kunga Sangmo as the reincarnation of Khandro Choekyi Dronme in
the 15th century there have been more than ten incarnations of Samding Dorje
Phagmo. So, among the Tulkus recognized in Tibet there are monastics and lay
tantric practitioners, male and female. This system of recognizing the
reincarnations gradually spread to other Tibetan Buddhist traditions, and Bon,
in Tibet. Today, there are recognized Tulkus in all the Tibetan Buddhist
traditions, the Sakya, Geluk, Kagyu and Nyingma, as well as Jonang and Bodong,
who serve the Dharma. It is also evident that amongst these Tulkus some are a
disgrace.

The omniscient
Gedun Drub, who was a direct disciple of Je Tsongkhapa, founded Tashi Lhunpo
Monastery in Tsang and took care of his students. He passed away in 1474 at the
age of 84. Although initially no efforts were made to identify his
reincarnation, people were obliged to recognize a child named Sangye Chophel,
who had been born in Tanak, Tsang (1476), because of what he had to say about
his amazing and flawless recollections of his past life. Since then, a
tradition began of searching for and recognizing the successive reincarnations
of the Dalai Lamas by the Gaden Phodrang Labrang and later the Gaden Phodrang
Government.

The ways of
recognizing reincarnations

After the system
of recognizing Tulkus came into being, various procedures for going about it
began to develop and grow. Among these some of the most important involve the predecessor’s
predictive letter and other instructions and indications that might occur; the
reincarnation’s reliably recounting his previous life and speaking about it;
identifying possessions belonging to the predecessor and recognizing people who
had been close to him. Apart from these, additional methods include asking
reliable spiritual masters for their divination as well as seeking the
predictions of mundane oracles, who appear through mediums in trance, and
observing the visions that manifest in sacred lakes of protectors like Lhamoi
Latso, a sacred lake south of Lhasa.

When there
happens to be more than one prospective candidate for recognition as a Tulku,
and it becomes difficult to decide, there is a practice of making the final
decision by divination employing the dough-ball method (zen tak) before a
sacred image while calling upon the power of truth.

Emanation before
the passing away of the predecessor (ma-dhey tulku)

Usually a
reincarnation has to be someone’s taking rebirth as a human being after
previously passing away. Ordinary sentient beings generally cannot manifest an
emanation before death (ma-dhey tulku), but superior Bodhisattvas, who can
manifest themselves in hundreds or thousands of bodies simultaneously, can
manifest an emanation before death. Within the Tibetan system of recognizing
Tulkus there are emanations who belong to the same mind-stream as the
predecessor, emanations who are connected to others through the power of karma
and prayers, and emanations who come as a result of blessings and appointment.

The main purpose
of the appearance of a reincarnation is to continue the predecessor’s
unfinished work to serve Dharma and beings. In the case of a Lama who is an
ordinary being, instead of having a reincarnation belonging to the same
mind-stream, someone else with connections to that Lama through pure karma and
prayers may be recognized as his or her emanation. Alternatively it is possible
for the Lama to appoint a successor who is either his disciple or someone young
who is to be recognized as his emanation. Since these options are possible in
the case of an ordinary being, an emanation before death that is not of the
same mind-stream is feasible. In some cases one high Lama may have several
reincarnations simultaneously, such as incarnations of body, speech and mind
and so on. In recent times, there have been well-known emanations before death
such as Dudjom Jigdral Yeshe Dorje and Chogye Trichen Ngawang Khyenrab.

Next week will be part 4, the final part of this reincarnation blog series.