Note: Search is limited to the most recent 250 articles. To access earlier articles, click Advanced Search and set an earlier date range.To search for a term containing the '&' symbol, click Advanced Search and use the 'search headings' and/or 'in first paragraph' options.

Embed Video

SABC’s ‘restructuring’ the same as retrenchments, say unions

Despite claims by the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) that the word ‘retrenchment’ is not in the broadcaster’s vocabulary, it is essentially considering retrenchments, according to trade unions.

The cash-strapped public broadcaster on Thursday issued a statement indicating that it is undertaking cost cutting measures which will affect employees. An internal memo was circulated among staff indicating that the SABC had met with unions to notify them of their intentions to undertake retrenchment processes in terms of section 189 of the Labour Relations Act.

Advertisement

The SABC incurred a net loss of R622-million in the most recent financial year, following a R977-million loss in the 2016/2017 financial year.

Speaking to Fin24 by phone on Friday, Hannes du Buisson, spokesperson of Broadcast, Electronic Media and Allied Workers Union (Bemawu) confirmed that the SABC had met with union members to inform them of a restructuring process. Bemawu represents 1 500 workers at the SABC.

Advertisement

But Du Buisson said that the union had not yet received a Section 189 letter needed for a retrenchment process to be implemented.

“We know they said they do not use the word ‘retrenchment’ as part of their vocabulary. We believe that is incorrect and they are sort of trying to run away from the real issue. Section 189 and retrenchment is exactly the same thing.

“We should not mislead employees by using words like S189 but do not explain what exactly is meant by that,” he said.

He added that the restructuring process is not necessary and it has come about as a result of mismanagement.

“The SABC is in a better financial position. There are signs that it is financially recovering, this [retrenchment] is a total uncalled for action.”

Instead Du Buisson says the broadcaster should cut costs in other areas. For example, the board should serve without pay he said. “It’s an honorary service to the country [and] we believe they should not be paid,” he said.

“SABC should start doing the right things to get back consumer confidence and create an environment where people are willing to pay their TV licence and advertise with the SABC.”

Secretary General of the Communications Workers Union (CWU), Aubrey Tshabalala, also believes the SABC must work on its business model to save jobs. The CWU represents 1 400 workers at the SABC.

For one, SABC’s heavy reliance on commercial advertising for funding inevitably leads to job losses, she said. The funding model of the SABC needs to be reconsidered. She also said that there should be a holistic policy review.

Tshabalala echoed Du Buisson’s views that the S189 is “obviously” retrenchment. “Restructuring is a term which suggests retrenchment. We do not believe in that [retrenchment].”