]]>By: petersteelewannabehttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365766
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:00:05 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365766“who inexplicably played first line duty with the captain”; EXACTLEY. Take Crosby away, and what have you got? A very average player. As for “steamrolling” other teams, get real. In 6 games he had no assists and only one goal (with less than eleven minutes left in a game that was already decided) WOW! Don’t be a delusional Penguin fan.
]]>By: xvaa1http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365763
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:41:14 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365763I believe it was dico Dan who benched the eventual Stanley cup champion Mr. Brown. Disco boy is a joke!
]]>By: c9castinehttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365736
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:10:30 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365736who inexplicably played first line duty with the captain while steamrolling international competition.

yeeaaahh

]]>By: hockey412http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365726
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:53:21 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365726In retrospect, maybe it should have been Taylor Hall.
]]>By: petersteelewannabehttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365718
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:00:31 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365718Make that “despite having an inexplicably mediocre player like Kunitz on the team.”
]]>By: petersteelewannabehttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365717
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:57:46 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365717Canada was clearly the best team, even with a inexplicable player like Kunitz on the team.
]]>By: JoeAvghttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365714
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:55:50 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365714He would love it there. He always talked about how much he liked the Sharks.
]]>By: hockey412http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365707
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:29:59 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365707How about vs. Finland, though? US played relatively well vs. Canada, but you are right it was nowhere near as close as the score would make you think it was.
]]>By: scout202sporthttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365705
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:21:04 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365705Look for Bylsma to be in San Joe either sometime this season or before the start of next season.
]]>By: letsgocaps88http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365700
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:58:27 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365700Felt bad for quick. He was amazing that game. If that back door feed didn’t happen, maybe usa would of got a bounce.
]]>By: vancouversportsbrohttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365689
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:18:31 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365689Hard to argue with that
]]>By: endusersolutions2013http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2014/09/01/the-hockey-news-tabs-bylsma-as-best-potential-replacement-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-365686
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 04:32:41 +0000http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2340514#comment-365686The Olympics thing is a false issue. The Canadians were so clearly superior to everyone else going in (so as total points that season), that their top 10 rejects would have been immediately welcomed only other teams, if the rules permitted.

USA only lost 1-0, but the gap in puck control/play dictation… was far more lopsided. I would not have mattered who coached team USA – Babcock et al selected a jaugernaut.