SUBSCRIBE:

Election results prompt Ukrainian journalist's hunger strike

Share

(IMI/IFEX) - 20 November 2012 - Victor Orel, a Ukrainian journalist from Dnipropetrovsk, went on hunger strike for 5 days, protesting against the falsification of parliamentary election results.

With this protest, he appealed to the USA and Europe to be more demanding of Ukrainian authorities.

Orel, 30 years old, began his hunger strike on 12 November, 2012, when the Central Election Commission announced the election results without taking into consideration numerous proofs of falsification by observers.

The journalist was further provoked to go on hunger strike after being arrested at an opposition protest meeting against such actions.

"I was indignant...that a peaceful action was dispersed by force and that a journalist, without any reason, was handcuffed and taken to the police office. One more reason for my decision to go on hunger strike was a desire to support Yulia Tymoshenko, a leader of the opposition, who was also starving."

With the hunger strike, Orel aims to overcome apathy in society and draw public attention to the falsification of election results.

"I have chosen such an action to make people think about what to do next, because in our everyday run for bread we forget that our life is not only about material things, but it is also about higher ideals, such as freedom, spirit and, all in all, an independent state."

Among the proofs of falsification during elections, Orel cites a substantial difference (over 10%) in favour of the pro-governmental party, in contrast to exit poll results.

"According to our research, the Batkivshchyna Party had 27%, the Communist Party had 22%, the Party of Regions had 14%; the Udar Party had 11% and the Svoboda Party had 5%. All of these results coincided with the official data within a statistical error. Only the Party of Regions turned out to have 12% more..."

Despite the fact that authorities have, in no way, reacted to the journalist's hunger strike, Orel thinks that this action has not passed in vein.

"It was an appeal to the conscience of not only Ukrainian society, but to the Western world as well. We had to show the European community our attitude toward falsification. The European community should be more demanding and strict with the Ukrainian Government, because Ukrainian society is powerless anyway...Europe and the USA should support the attempts of Ukrainians to live in a democratic country, because our young democracy can not manage without their support."

Orel says that, during his hunger strike, he saw the readiness of many Ukrainians to unite in order to fight against illegal actions that, according to the journalist, are done by authorities.

"This support inspired me and I felt that I partially completed my mission; society paid attention to this problem."

More from Ukraine

“After the initial optimism during the Euromaidan movement, many journalists have become disillusioned. They are faced with the triple challenge of the war in the Eastern part of the country, the economic crisis and the digitalization of mass media.”

Several pieces of media legislation were passed, including laws on access to information, protections for journalists who are attacked in the course of their work, and the privatization of publicly owned print media.

In spite of the generally high quality of legislation, the reality of implementation is less impressive. Citizens may freely express their views, and collect and disseminate information, but access to free and pluralistic media and to public information held by the authorities is inadequate. Journalists’ working conditions are not secure enough to work safely and remedies for violations of journalists’ rights or attacks on journalists are ineffective.

After already cracking down on freedom of information in recent years, President Erdoğan has taken advantage of the abortive coup d’état and the state of emergency in effect since 20 July to silence many more of his media critics, not only Gülen movement media and journalists but also, to a lesser extent, Kurdish, secularist and left-wing media.

This publication presents the findings of the media development assessment in Mongolia that began in 2012 to determine the state of the media in the country. The assessment was based on the UNESCO/IPDC Media Development Indicators (MDIs), an internationally recognized analytical tool used to provide detailed overviews of national media landscapes and related media development priorities.

“After the initial optimism during the Euromaidan movement, many journalists have become disillusioned. They are faced with the triple challenge of the war in the Eastern part of the country, the economic crisis and the digitalization of mass media.”

An officer of the Myanmar army recently filed a criminal complaint against two journalists for allegedly sowing disunity among the military. Even though mediation by the Press Council caused the military to withdraw the case, this incident demonstrates how the military continues to throw its weight to get back at what it perceives as negative publicity.

The government uses draconian laws such as the sedition provisions of the penal code, the criminal defamation law, and laws dealing with hate speech to silence dissent. These laws are vaguely worded, overly broad, and prone to misuse, and have been repeatedly used for political purposes against critics at the national and state level.

In recent years, the space afforded to civil society to operate freely has been shrinking dramatically across the world, presenting a serious threat to democracy and human rights. Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) have been especially badly affected by this shrinking political space.

The report is a frank assessment of the recent regime of online censorship and mass surveillance against a backdrop of longstanding, serious abuses of the judicial process and attacks on freedom of expression by Turkish authorities.

The report surveys the rocky landscape for media and public discourse since the ruling military junta lifted the curtain on the southeast Asian nation in 2012 after five decades of isolation from the modern world.

With the environment now recognized as a major challenge for humankind, Reporters Without Borders believes that particular attention should be paid to the journalists who take greats risk to investigate sensitive, environment-related subjects. The report highlights a steady deterioration in the situation for environmental reporters, who are increasingly exposed to many kinds of pressure, threats and violence.

The Pakistani government has significantly expanded its communication interception activities. This Privacy International report covers the intelligence services plan to capture all IP-traffic in Pakistan and other initiatives, pointing to gaps in the laws governing surveillance.

The need to regulate the transfer of surveillance technologies that pose a risk to human rights has been largely recognised by EU institutions and some EU member states. It is no longer a question of if the EU should do more in this area, but how.

Defamation and insult remain criminal offences in Portugal punishable by up to two years behind bars despite the fact that a number of international human rights bodies have found criminal defamation to be a disproportionate restriction on freedom of expression.

Despite its Constitutional commitment to free speech, India’s legal system makes it surprisingly easy to silence others. Routine corruption, inefficiency, and the selective enforcement of vague and overbroad laws allow individuals, or small groups, to censor opinions they find distasteful. - See more at: http://www.pen-international.org/the-india-report-executive-summary-and-key-findings/#sthash.TIIM2xbu.dpuf

Press freedom in the Philippines continued to be under attack from 2014 to 2015. The killing of journalists is continuing, with four journalists killed from May 2014 to May 2015. The trial of the accused masterminds of the Ampatuan (Maguindanao) Massacre and their supposed henchmen is continuing, but with a primary accused was released, while a witness in the same case was killed.

The year 2014 saw Malaysians standing up to exercise the rights guaranteed under the Federal Constitution, including freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. This continues a growing trend of facing up to state oppression. Unfortunately, this has been met with increasing repression. Malaysia has seen a concerted crackdown on the freedom of expression in the year 2014, which has escalated even further in 2015.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.