It has been established that you cannot patent naturally occurring genes but you can patent ones you create.

It has further been established that if you own the patent on an engineered gene you can license the use of the gene and control the product it is in.

Geneticists are now discussing how to create a human from scratch by engineering dna. They are pretending the ethical issue is whether or not they should create a whole human from scratch. But this is not what they really want. This is the pony.

What will happen is they will continue inserting more and more patented genes into living humans and they will continue doing it earlier and earlier.

They are already doing it with hpv vaccines that use genetically engineered viral particles and these particles are being found in the cells of women who have had the vaccine.

They are now training young women to become accustomed to vaccines during pregnancy. This is important because the engineered virus in the vaccine will pass from the mother into the fetus and insert itself into the dna of stem cells early in development. Every cell that then comes from these stem cells will contain the patented dna. If they wait until the child is born the patented dna would be in a far lower percentage of cells.

Here is the real ethical question the courts will have to decide in the near future: What percentage of patented, licensed dna must a person have in order to be subject to the licensing agreement with the patent holder? This is the puppy.

Below is a link to an article from May 14th, 2016 in the New York Times about a meeting at Harvard to discuss the issue. Notice how they ask for the pony and never mention the puppy.

The prediction I made here, nine months ago, is being proven correct. The establishment is coming for your genes. It is happening faster than I thought.

Congress has introduced a bill that would require employees to submit their genetic material to employers. [1]

It would allow employers to penalize workers for not submitting their genetic material.

"GINA's requirement that employees' genetic information collected through a workplace wellness program only be shared with health care professionals would no longer apply. The bill would also allow employers to impose financial penalties of up to 30 percent of the total cost the employee's health insurance on employees who choose to keep such information private."

Even the genetics arm of the largest scientific organization on the planet has stated that they oppose this measure. [2]

What does this mean? They are now asking for the dog. Or rather, demanding it on penalty of losing one's livelihood. If you want to participate in the financial system, you have to contribute. For more on this subject, see my upcoming book, "Seismic Readings." It discusses, among other things, the relationship between finance, the economy, vaccines and genetics, and why control of our genes is so crucial to the survival of the financial system, and quite possibly our economy. [3]