If NASA faked the moon landings, does the agency have any credibility at all? Was the Space Shuttle program also a hoax? Is the International Space Station another one? Do not dismiss these hypotheses offhand. Check out our wider NASA research and make up your own mind about it all.

patrix » September 23rd, 2018, 3:03 pm wrote:A side note I found in 2001: A Space Odyssey. The ESA logo is painted on the space station. The movie premiered in 1968. 7 years before ESA was founded... At 2min 20sec

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwEPNZl8VHw

On inspecting the YT video, it is presented as 'updated' by someone, including the ESA and other logos. They don't feature in the original film.

patrix » September 23rd, 2018, 3:03 pm wrote:A side note I found in 2001: A Space Odyssey. The ESA logo is painted on the space station. The movie premiered in 1968. 7 years before ESA was founded... At 2min 20sec

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwEPNZl8VHw

On inspecting the YT video, it is presented as 'updated' by someone, including the ESA and other logos. They don't feature in the original film.

Interesting find. I have been analyzing pictures from the military media, fields of speculation called science and industrial health for evidence of fakery but seem to have neglected the fact that these same pictures contain images specifically designed for psychological manipulation.

“They have left mistakes in these images by accident, what a sloppy bunch of work”. Is this the case?

If the stakeholder charged with carrying out a specific campaign goes to trouble of including subliminal images in associated pictures, quite an intricate task mind you, then one must consider that ‘mistakes’ as well as the subliminals are intended.

Have long thought that pictures should be analyzed for their psychological impact.