It is one of my regular rides, so I'm probably one of these "lone wolfs" or whatever she calls them. Passing with centimeters of space is probably true as in some sections it would be hard to get more than a metre clearance due to the narrowness of the path itself. In the other thread I posted:

Nobody wrote:You get a strange attitude from peds that they own the path and just tolerate your presence at best. Similar attitude that you get from cars on the road. If it's so difficult and/or dangerous to share, there are many thousands on kilometres of footpaths in NSW for peds to use theoretically free of cyclists. Too bad I can't say the reciprocal for cyclists.

gorilla monsoon wrote:She does raise one valid point though: the seeming inability of riders sharing paths to ring a bell or call-out to peds to warn they are passing. I mean, how hard can it be?

Personally, I believe that such a simple act is well worth the HUGE effort, if for no other reason than it is a good publicity exercise.

+1It's not hard to give a quick ring, and it the pedestrian moves out of the way (as they do 90% of the time) I usually give them a wave after I pass - it might be the difference between them moving out of the way the next time and them cranking up the "arrogant cyclists" bandwagon. That pedestrian might also drive a car.........

gorilla monsoon wrote:She does raise one valid point though: the seeming inability of riders sharing paths to ring a bell or call-out to peds to warn they are passing. I mean, how hard can it be?

Personally, I believe that such a simple act is well worth the HUGE effort, if for no other reason than it is a good publicity exercise.

+1It's not hard to give a quick ring, and it the pedestrian moves out of the way (as they do 90% of the time) I usually give them a wave after I pass - it might be the difference between them moving out of the way the next time and them cranking up the "arrogant cyclists" bandwagon. That pedestrian might also drive a car.........

Put some headphones on at typical pedestrian volume (so people in NZ can hear it), and I'll stand say 15 metres back and ring it. I bet you won't hear it. Even the ones without headphones often refuse to move over in my area. They also like to wave their arms about on each side.

True, those wired for sound will not even hear a bomb going off but not everyone is wired for sound. And if there is a group of gas-baggers just ring the bell two or three times or call out.

The number of times I have been thanked by peds over the last few years for giving them a warning is fairly large and every now and then someone will tell you how they were carved-up by a group of "bars-turds who didn't even have the manners to let me know they were there".

gorilla monsoon wrote:True, those wired for sound will not even hear a bomb going off but not everyone is wired for sound. And if there is a group of gas-baggers just ring the bell two or three times or call out.

The number of times I have been thanked by peds over the last few years for giving them a warning is fairly large and every now and then someone will tell you how they were carved-up by a group of "bars-turds who didn't even have the manners to let me know they were there".

It's a PR exercise and it requires almost no effort.

The PR exercise does little good - no matter how many times I've tried it. Someone else can keep on with it, cause I'm not. My week of intense pain and battling an infection courtesy of a dumb pedestrian has killed my interest in riding bikes. The peds and road users win, I want no part of it anymore.

Last edited by g-boaf on Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

simonn wrote:I rode past her and her husband this morning. I was sooooo tempted to shout "OUTRAGEOUS!!!!" as I rode past, but I am an adult now and apparently gave up childish ways when I got married .

simonn wrote:I rode past her and her husband this morning. I was sooooo tempted to shout "OUTRAGEOUS!!!!" as I rode past, but I am an adult now and apparently gave up childish ways when I got married .

A younger me might be tempted to give her a blast of an Air Zound from about 10 m away, synchronisingwith the departing hubby's peck. But us more genteel folk of the western 'burbs now prefer handguns forsettling our differences. She better lookout

Of course it didn't happen on the Cooks River Cycleway - it has much worse things to worry about than a close shave by a lycra lout.

Cheers

WombatK

Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia

simonn wrote:I rode past her and her husband this morning. I was sooooo tempted to shout "OUTRAGEOUS!!!!" as I rode past, but I am an adult now and apparently gave up childish ways when I got married .

what time and where?

i'll do it for you

edit:on that ringing a bell thing,i usually ring the bell when they are in my lane,but should i ring the bell if they're within their lane and i can pass safely?

i usually don't because it feels a bit odd.. kind of as if I were to be announcing my presence..

simonn wrote:I rode past her and her husband this morning. I was sooooo tempted to shout "OUTRAGEOUS!!!!" as I rode past, but I am an adult now and apparently gave up childish ways when I got married .

what time and where?

On the Naremburn to Artarmon cycleway the second, smaller, bend under the freeway from Naremburn around 07:40-45 ish (IIRC).

You can't ding the bell, it just doesn't work as a sign of polity. A third of them ignore it or can't hear it, a third get startled and get in your way (because they adopt a wide defensive position as they brace for impact and turn to look at you) and the remaining third think its an act of aggression.

The self righteous fools feel its an obligation to ding but you just can't guarantee that it will improve the situation at all. My riding style is such that a bell is certainly going to make things worse half the time. I will ding mainly to warn parents and pet owners... these people need time to control their animals, and it IS fair to assume that is their primary concern. I simply make it easier for them to meet that concern.

What exactly are you guys doing on these bike paths? I slow down whenever I see a pedestrian. The Cooks River bike path is sign posted to have pedestrian priority. I can't speak for the Gore Hill path. I don't think it is reasonable to travel at maximum speed with merely a warning bell to fulfil all your obligations.

Motorists hate cyclists and cyclists hate the motorists and the pedestrians hate the bikers and everybody hates the trucks.

diggler wrote:What exactly are you guys doing on these bike paths? I slow down whenever I see a pedestrian. The Cooks River bike path is sign posted to have pedestrian priority. I can't speak for the Gore Hill path. I don't think it is reasonable to travel at maximum speed with merely a warning bell to fulfil all your obligations.

In fairness to those having difficulty, there is no standard width for a path. There are no posts on blind corners, nor speed limits to give you an idea of the expected angle and speed. You can't assume your experience on a shared path will match someone else's, because there is no consistent path experience - unlike a road.

diggler wrote:What exactly are you guys doing on these bike paths? I slow down whenever I see a pedestrian. The Cooks River bike path is sign posted to have pedestrian priority. I can't speak for the Gore Hill path. I don't think it is reasonable to travel at maximum speed with merely a warning bell to fulfil all your obligations.

I agree with you, however, some peds are going to be pissed off at whatever speed you travel. The Gore Hill path is mostly two cycle lanes + one pedestrian lane. There are some very badly designed parts where is changes to shared path on {in,de}clines.

The idea that you should ring your bell for peds is ridiculous. At peak hours on this path it would sound like a rendition of jingle bells. And, depending on how you define "slow" it could be a long ride for you.

The simple thing is for everyone to stay in their lanes and if they want to stop, move off the path. Easy, and at the very least just polite.

Xplora wrote:You can't ding the bell, it just doesn't work as a sign of polity.

The self righteous fools feel its an obligation to ding but you just can't guarantee that it will improve the situation at all. My riding style is such that a bell is certainly going to make things worse half the time.

Snipped

Hi Xplora, that's a pretty rough judgement,By using the term "The self righteous fools" It must be presumed you are talking to the less educated folks, other than your self on the forum? Or just others that are trying to do the right thing?The councils are trying to do what they can in their limited way in my area to get both pedestrians and riders to understand the safety issue here. Personally I can't see every pedestrian loving to hear a bell behind them, but I appreciate it when another cyclist coming from behind gives me a bell as he comes up to overtake.

The pics show the signs on the paths near my home and surrounds, I reckon they apply to pedestrians and cyclists to take note of.Obeying them does not make a " self righteous fool" out of anyone.

Who is online

About the Australian Cycling Forums

The largest cycling discussion forum in Australia for all things bike; from new riders to seasoned bike nuts, the Australian Cycling Forums are a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.