Toby,
just a few remarks/questions
On Jan 11, 2011, at 14:36 , Toby Inkster wrote:
[snip]
>
> Other high-level changes unrelated to Notation 3 that should be made:
>
> 1. Literals are currently allowed to have both a datatype and a
> language. This goes beyond even the Notation 3 data model, so I do not
> see what is gained by allowing this in the RDF API. Literals should be
> forced to pick a camp.
>
> 2. Drop special support for rdf:PlainLiteral. rdf:PlainLiteral is not
> used much in the wild and was never intended to be - it's a datatype
> used internally by OWL 2 and RIF. Adding special support for it
> complicates implementations for no reason - it should be treated the
> same as any other custom datatype.
>
Not exactly, and the RDF WG might pick this up. There is a certain amount of mess with plain literals, xs:strings etc, already, and the plain literal has come up because of that. THere is an entry in the charter to, possibly, look at this mess in RDF. I would prefer to keep it in the API
> 3. Move terms, prefixes and profiles into the RDFa API or, better yet,
> drop them altogether. They make the API harder to implement and harder
> to grok while adding very little benefit. For those people who want to
> use prefixes and terms, they can be implemented quite trivially in "user
> space".
>
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Oct/0131.html
I am not sure. I have been using something like namespaces in RDFLib for many years, I think there is a similar facility in Jena, and it would have been very unhandy not to have that. I would prefer to keep something like that. I agree for profiles, though.
>
> 4. Move or copy PropertyGroups from the RDFa API into the RDF API. The
> Graph interface should have getItemsByType, getItemBySubject and
> getItemsByProperty methods which return PropertyGroups or arrays of
> them.
I would be happy with that
>
> 5. Rename PropertyGroup to something like "RDFItem", "RDFResource" or
> "Description", or indeed "FartWarbler" - any name you pick out a hat
> will be better than the status quo.
The status quo was based on the fact that we did not have a better name:-)
Ivan
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf