Corporate Advocacy Program: The best way to manage and repair your business reputation. Hiding negative complaints is only a Band-Aid. Consumers want to see how businesses take care of business. All businesses will get complaints. How those businesses take care of those complaints is what separates good businesses from bad businesses.

Before I took off for the golf course yesterday I checked the cases against PCT in L.A. Superior Court. This is what I found:

Not including my case, there are 6 cases listed. Of those, 4 are still pending waiting for their day in court to arrive, 1 was dismissed after the parties reached an agreement outside of court, and 1 was an outright win by the driver. Here are the case summaries:

Armen Papoyan V. PCT: case pending with next court date 4-8-13.

Dean Coffman V. PCT: case pending with next court date 4-29-13.

David Patterson V. PCT: case pending with next court date 4-15-13.

Andres Valderrama V. PCT: case pending with next court date 4-8-13.

Sarkis Mambreian V. PCT: this one is more complicated. Sarkis filed his suit. PCT counter sued saying Sarkis stole employees and customers. PCT lost their counter suit. Judgement for Sarkis in the amount of $10,000 plus court costs. PCT has filed an appeal of the ruling, next court date 5-9-13.

Harold Wright V. PCT: case was dismissed after both parties reached a settlement agreement outside of court. The court retains jurisdiction pursuit to CCP 664.6 to enforce full terms of the settlement. The settlement details were not entered into the case summary

Corporate Advocacy Program: The best way to manage and repair your business reputation. Hiding negative complaints is only a Band-Aid. Consumers want to see how businesses take care of business. All businesses will get complaints. How those businesses take care of those complaints is what separates good businesses from bad businesses.