And if that doesn't tell you this movie's not worth the $$$s to see it, nothing will. The director DELIBERATELY uses what he knows to be false evidence in the Swedish case - shows a photo (twice) of a used-looking torn condom that he got from the forensics report of the police evidence file, but chooses NOT to tell the audience that, two pages later, the same forensics report confirms they could find no DNA - not male, not female either - on a supposedly USED condom. (That's on page 77 of the report if anyone wants to find it - it's leaked on the internet). Another fact: the Swedish prosecutor received the lab report on 25 October 2010 - so she wrote out an Interpol Red Notice and an extradition warrant for Assange weeks later IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE that one of the women (interviewed in disguise by Gibney) had handed in faked evidence to the police.

I hate rape, horrible crime. But framing an innocent man for rape is even more horrible.