Social Media Vs Arindam Chaudhuri – IIPM

Recently, the Indian Department of Telecommunications(DoT), as directed by a court in Gwalior, ordered the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block 78 URLs. Out of these black listed URLs, 73 were linked to articles and blogs that hosted defamatory material against the Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) and its director, Arindam Chaudhuri.

Several articles from leading credible newspapers and magazines, as well as blogs have been blocked.

Strangely, the 73 blacklisted URLs include a public notice of July 2012 issued by the University Grants Commission that cautioned the students that “IIPM is not a university within the meaning of section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956”.

DoT did not clarify as to why this websites were blocked which gave a stern turn to the story making it viral on social media. The hashtag #IIPM was continually trending across the Indian Twitterverse.

This web block affected a lot of well-known publications such as The Times of India, Rediff, The Indian Express, FirstPost,The Economic Times, MensXP, Outlook Magazine, Careers360, etc. Not only are the publications affected, but also the influencers.

I have not seen the Court order. But I am taken aback because by ordering blockage of the URL of UGC, the court has implied that UGC has committed libel. The Court has taken away all the protection UGC gave to students. Now, IIPM can fool them. I hope that somebody challenges the order in a higher court.

Murthy told Firstpost.

He has left no stone unturned in this story and has been constantly updating it on Social Platforms.

As a result, Mahesh received a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notice from Twitter asking him to take down his content.

However, Mahesh gave a stern reply to Anindam Chaudhari’s DMCA notice, requesting action to immediately restore full access to visibility of the document published, as doing otherwise would be clearly illegal under DMCA and the laws in force.