“(W)e are going to background reporters tonight on a few of the specific proposals she would support as president — universal background checks of course, but also closing the gun show loophole by executive order and imposing manufacturer liability,” read a WikiLeaks email from October 2015, this one sent by the campaign’s national press secretary, Brian Fallon. The notion of manufacturer liability meant allowing victims and families to sue gun manufactures if and when a purchaser of one of their weapons commits a murder or shooting spree. It would be equivalent to prosecuting car manufacturers for the actions of drunk drivers.

Hillary Clinton’s “death blow” against the Second Amendment will be to drive the gun industry itself out of business.

She will see to it that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, or PLCAA is repealed or she will do it with an executive order.

Clinton has been lying without hesitation claiming that it grants the firearms industry “immunity” from lawsuits. Of course they can be sued. Making manufacturers responsible for crimes committed with their guns unbeknownst to them and without any culpability is like saying a toy maker is responsible if someone hits another over the head with their toy.

PLCAA protects manufacturers from frivolous lawsuits filed by anti-gun activists trying to drive people out of business. The Brady Campaign pushed these attacks known as “law fare” starting in the 1990s and through the next decade. They hunted down clients for the frivolous suits like ambulance chasers.

If Clinton is successful in repealing PLCCA, then every gun dealer or manufacturer, or sporting goods store, or ammunition company, would no longer be immune to frivolous lawsuits, and all would be sued out of business.

You would not be able to buy new guns, because there would be no manufacturers or importers after they were targeted, one-by-one.

They have looked for crimes they could exploit to push their gun control narrative.

In another email, this one sent in January of this year, another Clinton campaign official shared her concerns about using the murder of black teen Jordan Davis at the hands of a white man to argue for gun control. “The only flag here is that Jordan Davis was killed by a white man, so arguably — this crime was racially motivated, which takes this outside the discussion of gun violence,” the official, De’Ara Balenger, wrote. “Was there another mother in the Chicago meeting where the shooting was NOT racially motivated?” she continued. “If yes, we should use that story instead of Jordan Davis.”

She wanted to basically try to exploit the grieving mother of a Chicago murder victim instead, apparently.

She has for decades talked about imposing punitive taxes.

Speaking on ABC News four months ago, the Democrat nominee herself admitted that she would gladly support a 25 percent sales tax on handguns and automatic weapons, as had been proposed at the time by a senator.

“I’m all for that,” she said.

Absurdly, she is saying that taking guns from legal gun owners will stop violence by criminals.

“I just don’t know what else we’re going to do to try to figure out how to get some handle on this violence,” she added. “I’m speaking personally, but I feel very strongly about that.”

She can kill two birds with one tax – limit gun ownership and steal money from innocent gun owners she can redistribute to her voting bloc.

In email email 12278, Team Clinton admitted to writing an anti-gun article in someone else’s name. They are treacherous manipulators.

We were told Hillary was pro-gun and is a Second Amendment supporter, but she is a shameless liar. Apparently her entire team is..

Hilary has talked about banning “weapons of war,” but “weapons of war”—machine guns and selective-fire firearms—have not been manufactured for the civilian market for 30 years, and cannot be, due to the Hughes Amendment to the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 (FOPA).

Clinton, in reality, wants to ban common hunting rifles, target rifles, many popular handguns, standard rifle and pistol magazines.

If Democrats gain seats in congress and if they win control of the Supreme Court, they will be all-powerful on this issue.

Clinton is after gun manufacturers, guns, ammunition, all of it. If she has the Supreme Court, she could go after Heller and McDonald.

A number of articles written by anti-gun activists have lauded the massive immigration push now going on because those particular immigrants are leftists and want guns banned. The left believes that it is only a matter of time before they can pull it off because the immigrants will soon be the majority. If Hillary Clinton wins, she will make it happen now and will assure the continuation of the invasion.

Wikileaks and the Democrat Platform make it clear Hillary is after our guns and will win on this issue if elected.

The Sandy Hook plaintiffs tried to sue Remington Arms and the case was THROWN OUT. If she does it to the gun makers then she will have to do it for the AUTO INDUSTRY as well. You sir are a prime example of a “DULLARD”.

Whatever shes planning is tabled indefinetly. She probably wishes she had a gun right now for her miserable excuse of a husband. They are BOTH disgusting animals who should be locked up and the key flushed.down the toilet.

So she planned(s) to pull an Obama and do whatever she wants using Executive Orders. Gonna take your guns. Apparently thinks we’re North Korea and she’s the pathetic fat little dictator. She is not what we need. I’m voting Donald Trump!

This isn’t about eliminating crime. For the Democrats It’s always been about control of the American citizens. Take the guns the people will have in no way means to protect themselves from a runaway tyrannical government. This is their dream. We cannot let this B***** become president. The supreme court is at stake.

you mean like how congress has stood up to all the other Constitutional abuses that have occurred in the past 4, 8, 16, 24 years. Uh, thanks but I don’t have a lot of faith in congress to grow a backbone and defend the Constitution like they have sworn to do.

We report the news the media won't.
The Sentinel provides news, opinion and commentary, analysis, factual and original content, mostly political, usually right-of-center, for a Conservative, Libertarian, and Republican audience.
If you click the subcategories, you should find the general information you need to know about us. Please make special note of the terms of use.
Thank you for taking an interest in our site.
We welcome information, corrections, news stories and submissions.