Orange peels, newspapers may lead to cheaper, cleaner ethanol fuel

Feb 18, 2010

This is Dr. Henry Daniell in his lab at the University of Central Florida. Credit: Jacque Brund

Scientists may have just made the breakthrough of a lifetime, turning discarded fruit peels and other throwaways into cheap, clean fuel to power the world's vehicles.

University of Central Florida professor Henry Daniell has developed a groundbreaking way to produce ethanol from waste products such as orange peels and newspapers. His approach is greener and less expensive than the current methods available to run vehicles on cleaner fuel - and his goal is to relegate gasoline to a secondary fuel.

Daniell's breakthrough can be applied to several non-food products throughout the United States, including sugarcane, switchgrass and straw.

"This could be a turning point where vehicles could use this fuel as the norm for protecting our air and environment for future generations," he said.

Daniell's technique - developed with U.S. Department of Agriculture funding -- uses plant-derived enzyme cocktails to break down orange peels and other waste materials into sugar, which is then fermented into ethanol.

Corn starch now is fermented and converted into ethanol. But ethanol derived from corn produces more greenhouse gas emissions than gasoline does. Ethanol created using Daniell's approach produces much lower greenhouse gas emissions than gasoline or electricity.

There's also an abundance of waste products that could be used without reducing the world's food supply or driving up food prices. In Florida alone, discarded orange peels could create about 200 million gallons of ethanol each year, Daniell said.

More research is needed before Daniell's findings, published this month in the highly regarded Plant Biotechnology Journal, can move from his laboratory to the market. But other scientists conducting research in biofuels describe the early results as promising.

"Dr. Henry Daniell's team's success in producing a combination of several cell wall degrading enzymes in plants using chloroplast transgenesis is a great achievement," said Mariam Sticklen, a professor of crop and soil sciences at Michigan State University. In 2008, she received international media attention for her research looking at an enzyme in a cow's stomach that could help turn corn plants into fuel.

Daniell said no company in the world can produce cellulosic ethanol - ethanol that comes from wood or the non-edible parts of plants.

Depending on the waste product used, a specific combination or "cocktail" of more than 10 enzymes is needed to change the biomass into sugar and eventually ethanol. Orange peels need more of the pectinase enzyme, while wood waste requires more of the xylanase enzyme. All of the enzymes Daniell's team uses are found in nature, created by a range of microbial species, including bacteria and fungi.

Daniell's team cloned genes from wood-rotting fungi or bacteria and produced enzymes in tobacco plants. Producing these enzymes in tobacco instead of manufacturing synthetic versions could reduce the cost of production by a thousand times, which should significantly reduce the cost of making ethanol, Daniell said.

Tobacco was chosen as an ideal system for enzyme production for several reasons. It is not a food crop, it produces large amounts of energy per acre and an alternate use could potentially decrease its use for smoking.

Eckhard Boles, co-founder of the Swiss biofuel company Butalco GmbH and a professor at Goethe-University in Frankfurt, Germany, has discovered a new enzyme which teaches yeast cells to ferment xylose into ethanol. Xylose ...

Filling our fuel tanks with cellulosic ethanol instead of gasoline or corn-based ethanol may be even better for our health and the environment than previously recognized, according to new research from the University of Minnesota.

Tony Pometto held up a laboratory flask swimming with little balls of mold. This, said the Iowa State University professor of food science and human nutrition, is the kind of fungus that Iowa State researchers have used to ...

Don't throw away those bouncing batteries. Researchers at Princeton University have found that the common test of bouncing a household battery to learn if it is dead or not is not actually an effective way ...

In the first study of its kind, scientists at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) quantitatively show that electric vehicles (EVs) will meet the daily travel needs ...

User comments : 9

Every new story about energy from organic waste products makes me cringe. How much ethanol/energy per pound of vegetation? How is the heavy, bulky, widely dispersed organic waste transported to the processing plant? Teleportation? Propellentless, anti-gravitic lift? Fairies?

"Daniell said no company in the world can produce cellulosic ethanol - ethanol that comes from wood or the non-edible parts of plants." What am I missing here? I thought this was being done by a number of companies.

And all this effort in the name of producing less "greenhouse gas" emissions... despite the facts that (a) the greenhouse EFFECT was debunked last year at the level of basic physics for both the Earth's atmosphere AND greenhouses, and (b) the "research" that generated the impetus to reduce these emissions has been conclusively demonstrated to have been made up out of whole cloth.

It isn't that a new method of creating ethanol from waste doesn't merit publication. But why in G-d's name must we continue to report such stories within the CONTEXT of anthropogenic climate change (ACC) when anybody who hasn't been living on the far side of the Moon for the past year knows by now that ACC is complete BS?

Let me see. We make ethanol because .... (fill in the blamk). Wood alcohol is methanol and has been made by well known methods from wood for a very long time. Processes exist to convert Methanol into gasoline, economically. So what makes Booze a panecea? All that "woody" material that we cannot easily convert to ethanol would make nice methanol and that converts to gasoline. Ethanol ia just a gimmick from the last administration that makes money for agrabusiness.

I would like to see some cost-per-unit figures for the production, refining, and distribution of petro versus a similar-scale eth/meth operation. I expect that, given the abundance of appropriate biomass, ethanol would compare very favorably. Methanol, since it can be made from an even broader range of feedstocks(notably Plastics) would probably compare more favorably still, especially after engines were modified for eth/meth operation. Don't forget that this would also enable probably 95% reduction in landfill. Garbage is fuel! Any one got those numbers?