Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on
the 19th of October 2011. For newcomers, help yourself to the
audios at cuttingthroughthematrix.com;
you’ll find lots to choose from, there’s hundreds up there, where I try to show
you a different reality, what’s behind everything in the news, what’s behind
the trends that go through society, through universities too, through the
movements – mass movements are always used for functions, towards this great
work that they’re always in progress of making happen. And you’re living
through the biggest changes that have happened for an awful long time, as
society’s turned upside down, planned a long time ago of course, to bring in a
new world order, a new way of doing things, a new way of running a global
society with the end of all sovereignty of the nations. That’s really
what it’s all about, a socialist-run society, a society where everyone is
transparent except government of course, because they want to make sure that you’re
very predictable; everyone must be predictable. And that’s why you’ve got
all these free apps, etc, to put all your data up. And you think you’re
tweeting away to your friends, you don’t even know if they’re robots or not,
because they actually have sockpuppets as your friends out there, thousands and
millions of them actually. And it’s all to do with YOU. You’re
awfully important to the ones at the top, to make sure, as I say, you’re very
predictable. And any change in your predictability and they will want to
know why, what’s happened to you.

So help yourself to all those audios and remember too, you are the
audience who bring me to you. You can help me go on by purchasing the
books and disks at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And remember too, times are hard all around but certainly hard
here because I don’t ask for sponsorship. I’ve got lots and lots of
offers, always have, but then I’d have to bring on advertisers, who would give
you good stories about current events and then terrify you and then sell you
the antidote to the terror, which is something that they’re selling.
Which is okay; that’s the technique to make money. That’s how business
works and that’s how everyone has to go along, unfortunately, in this
particular time. But me, myself, I like to have more leeway to look into
all factions of things. So I’m doing it the suicidal way. It’s up to you if you want to keep this going. As I
say, buy the books and disks. [Official sites listed above.] And
remember, straight donations are really welcome as well. Remember
too, all the sites listed on the .com site, all those official sites I have,
have transcripts for print up as well, in English. And if you want them
in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
and there’s a variety to choose from there.

We’re
going through, as I say, the biggest changes because it was planned a long time
ago. We forget, and most folk live in their own time – we live in our own
time, we’re taught to live in our own time – the break with the past is
something that is very effective. We can’t really look at the past or
imagine how folk lived, etc, even recently. Youngsters can’t do
that. So they are the first ones to have the new indoctrination. Every
two or three years they’re more radicalized into sustainability, the greening
agenda, and what their masters want them to believe. They’ve seen all the
emotionally loaded documentaries through universities, which imprint in the brain,
and of course, they don’t know, they don’t realize that half of every other
story is missing from their indoctrination. And that’s how you radicalize
people, or produce good citizens, depending on the point of view of the
indoctrinators. But it’s been done for an awful long time. It’s a
perfect system. Beria talked about it in the Soviet Union back in the
1930s. He said, we can radically
alter society every 3 to 4 years now; it used to take a generation, about 70
years. Back with more after this break.

Hi
folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and I tend to try and document
what’s happening in the world and give you another side to the story, or other
sides in fact because there are many, many facets to it, everything that’s
given to you as news today. There’s always a purpose for it and it’s not
just to describe what’s actually happening. It’s to shape minds.
Everything’s about shaping the minds. And this article leads off about
shaping the mind because it starts off with Mark Twain, for those who can still
read and have read a few books. It says...

Darpa Wants to Master the Science of Propaganda

wired.com / Dawn Lim / October 18, 2011

Mark Twain once
tried to distinguish between the storyteller’s art and tales that a machine
could generate. He observed that stringing “incongruities and absurdities
together in a wandering and sometimes purposeless way, and seem innocently
unaware that they are absurdities,” was the province of the American
storyteller. A machine might imitate simple formulas behind yarns, but never
quite master them.

The Pentagon’s
freewheeling research arm is hoping to prove Twain wrong. Darpa is asking
scientists to “take narratives and make them quantitatively analyzable in a
rigorous, transparent and repeatable fashion.” The idea is to detect terrorists
who have been indoctrinated by propaganda. Then, the Pentagon can respond with
some messages of its own. (Alan: It’s quite fascinating, really,
because it’s like the kettle calling the pot black, really, because I mean,
what they’re trying to see is if their own propaganda, and all the propaganda
you’ve had through indoctrination through education and through media your
whole life, has worked on you. All information is for a reason.
It’s not to enlighten you and make you a wise person. It’s to make you
predictable as a citizen for your masters to control basically. That’s a
fact. That’s just a plain fact, folks.) The idea is to detect
terrorists who have been indoctrinated by propaganda. (A: That means
everyone has been, you see.) Then, the Pentagon can respond with some
messages of its own. (A: So it’s really counter-propaganda, or
intelligence and counter-intelligence.)

The program is
called “Narrative Networks.” (A: There’s no end of money to all of
this stuff, and of course neuroscience is a big one that was trying to make
itself a science. It’s kind of a latecomer to the fold of other
latecomers, like psychiatry and psychology that went through contortions trying
to prove they were actually sciences, and they’re still having trouble.
But along comes neuroscience, that started off slicing brains apart and staring
at them forever and now they’re going into other areas trying to validate their
existence in other words. That’s what all sciences try to do.) By
understanding how stories have shaped your mind, the Pentagon hopes to sniff
out who has fallen prey to dangerous ideas, a neuroscience researcher involved
in the project tells Danger Room. With this knowledge, the military can also
target groups vulnerable to terrorists’ recruiting tactics with its own
counter-messaging. (A: In other words, all sides are involved in
the same darned thing, isn’t it? It’s all propaganda.
Counter-messaging... they don’t want counter-propaganda.)

“Stories are important
in security contexts,” Darpa said in an Oct. 7 solicitation for research
proposals. Stories “change the course of insurgencies, frame negotiations, play
a role in political radicalization, influence the methods and goals of violent
social movements.” The desire to study narratives has been simmering for a
while in the Defense Department. A Darpa workshop in April to discuss the
“neurobiology (A: Here you go, you see, neuroscientists...) of
narratives” added momentum to this project.

In the first 18-month
phase of the program, the Pentagon wants researchers to study how stories
infiltrate social networks (A: Like they don’t know? They insert
most of them themselves.) and alter our brain circuits. One of the
stipulated research goals: to “explore the function narratives serve in the
process of political radicalization and how they can influence a person or
group’s choice of means (such as indiscriminant violence) to achieve political
ends.” (A: In other words, the same techniques they use on
soldiers and recruits to indoctrinate them into violence, they want to see who
else is doing it on the net basically.)

Once scientists have
perfected the science of how stories affect our neurochemistry (A:
Remember, these are the guys, too, the Pentagon, that fund all these video
games, that were made for the military, to make you just kill, by instinct, in
Pavlovian style, a triggered response, because people don’t like generally
killing real people. You have to train them to kill real people by blunting
their affect, or their natural emotion.), they will develop tools to
“detect narrative influence.” These tools will enable “prevention of negative
behavioral outcomes … (A: You understand, if the government’s going to
use that on everyone’s speech and chatter and twitter, you’ll all be getting
knocks on the door... we noticed you used
this certain language and the way you describe certain things, and we’re
concerned about it, etc, etc. Right.) and generation of
positive behavioral outcomes, such as building trust.” In other words, the
tools will be used to detect who’s been controlled by subversive ideologies (A:
Which means any outside control factor, other one than your governmental
control.), better allowing the military to drown out that message and win people
onto their side. (A: It’s a battle for your brain, isn’t
it? It’s a battle for the mind. Everything’s a battle for the mind
and most folk don’t know it. It’s even better when you pay for your
indoctrination and you go to university, because that’s when you get the real
indoctrinations, and because you’re paying for it – your parents or somebody’s
paying it, or the taxpayer’s paying for it, somebody’s paying – you think it’s
actually a real one and it’s nothing to do with propaganda. And you really
do. The same with your computer, you buy your computers so that you can
put all your data up on the net so that the governments can watch you, and add
to the virtual you they have at the Pentagon. So buying things changes
our perception of what’s actually happening, never mind the propaganda you get
from the internet anyway.)

“The government is
already trying to control the message, so why not have the science to do it in
a systematic way?” said the researcher familiar with the project.

When the project
enters into a second 18-month phase, it’ll use the research gathered to build
“optimized prototype technologies in the form of documents, software, hardware
and devices.” What will these be? Existing technology can carry out micro-facial
feature analysis, and measure the dilation of blood vessels and eye pupils. MRI
machines can determine which parts of your brain is lighting up when it
responds to stories. Darpa wants to do even better.

In fact, it’s
calling for devices that detect the influence of stories in unseen ways.
“Efforts that rely solely on standoff/non-invasive/non-detectable sensors are
highly encouraged,” the solicitation reads.

Forget lie
detectors; invisible propaganda-detectors are the future.

Well
actually it’s interesting, because I think about a year or maybe two years ago
I remember looking at the Microsoft site and they were working on the helmet at
that time, remember, that could literally pulse your brain. It would
first learn what parts of your brain were activated when certain scenes were
shown to you and then it would pulse those parts to make the game more real,
more exciting. And at the same time they were doing it they were also
saying that rather than the helmet they could actually put it in the frame,
where the wireless wire runs around in, say, a laptop computer around the
screen. And they could actually pulse it from there into your brain and
back again. Well, this ties right in with that because actually they’ve
been doing it for quite some time without telling you. Anyway, that’s
where your thoughts come from. Everybody’s battling to make sure that you
get the proper indoctrination so that the masters can sleep easier at night,
whoever the masters happen to be at the time. It doesn’t matter to me
because they’re always the same ones behind all movements. And I mean
behind ALL movements too.

Now,
coming up, as we all know, is the big time for the next international meetings
on climate change and man’s interference with the planet’s ecosystem, etc, etc,
etc. I’ll put that climate map up again, the scary map, to show you all
the organization that are in it, how they get their funding, etc.

One
of them is called IHOPE. There’s thousands of them. And they all
get, you know, funding through universities, that we all pay for.

What is IHOPE?

stockholmresilience.org

An objective for
IHOPE is to identify the multiple, slow, and rapidly changing variables of
complex social-ecological systems - on local to continental spatial scales and
up to millennial temporal scales - which induce resilience or
vulnerability. (A: In other words they’re telling you, here’s
our language here. See, any science has to give itself its own vocabulary
and buzz terms and slogans and so on. And this is them getting you all
kicked off, right off the bat, with the right stuff.)

IHOPE asserts that
humans are a part of the Earth system and are now agents in planetary
change. (A: So everyone’s a change agent, in other words.)

IHOPE offers
frameworks that can be used to integrate perspectives, theories, tools and
knowledge from a variety of disciplines spanning the full spectrum of social
and biophysical sciences and the humanities.

While an overarching
goal is to produce a rich understanding of the dialectical relationships
between environmental and human processes over the past millennia, IHOPE
recognizes that a major challenge for reaching the goal is forging a ‘workable´
terminology that can be accepted by scholars of all disciplines. (A:
That puts me right in mind of what Mark Twain was talking about, how they put
so much pablum into something, but they’re trying to show you that they’re
highbrow, you understand. They’re highbrow; it’s not an ad hoc
thing. No. It’s highbrow; it’s university level, and even above.)

A Three-Fold
approach

- Historical ecology
integrates the historical study of the Earth’s biophysical system with the
history of human life in all its aspects. Humans experience their environment
as a mutually dependent physical and cognitive reality. (A:
...they say.)

This holistic
perspective thus requires the integration of research from the biophysical
sciences, social sciences, and the humanities; this necessitates the use of
diverse data, such as documents, archeology, and environmental information
about past climate and other Earth processes.

So
they’re telling you that science, you see, science is behind it. We’re
all trained now, experts and science, they’re Gods, you know. And so it
must be true, it must all be awfully true. And of course, that’s the best
way to con people, really. We’ve been conned for an awful long time
through the use of sciences, which really are fads. They give us
fads. And fads run through sciences all the time. And don’t ever
think that politics is disassociated from science. It’s actually the
opposite that’s true. Anything that’s trying to influence your behavior,
your mind, is a political agenda. And people at the very, very top, who
planned this whole system, a long time ago, talked about this, how they’d
basically brainwash you, using your DARPA techniques from the last little thing
I gave you, and how they train you for the next system that’s coming up, the
changing of the system. Back with more after this break.

Hi
folks, I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Whenever I give you
these links, too, look up and see who all their sponsors are and who’s
financially backing them. It’s the same people over and over and over
again. Because you see, everything is controlled in the world and we’re
going through the changes where all this stuff to do with the environment and oh,
climate change, you know, it rains one day and it’s sunny the next, that
kind of stuff, is something to be terrified of and we need experts to guide
us through all of the things to come, like more rain, more sun and stuff
like that. So it’s a big excuse system as far as I’m concerned, a real
excuse system to rule the world in a new sustainable way, which means that
you’re going to be living like paupers, across the planet. And that’s
called the planned society. China is the model state for it, really; one
child per family, if you have a family at all, and many other things too.
They actually admire, the United Nations keeps talking about China’s so
wonderful and the people obey their government and system. They have no
option to do it, or they end up hanging plasticized on a wire, as a corpse, and
sold to some restaurant. Anyway, that’s what they want the world to
copy.

And
believe you me, it’s a world system devised, beginning with its roots in
London, England, that talked about it, a socialist type system to run the
world. Socialism is better; it’s more authoritarian, you see. And
the Club of Rome, which is the top think tank for the United Nations, said that
this system would have to be
authoritarian because we’re post-democratic; democracy doesn’t work, there are
too many groups all competing for their bit of the action,
basically. Which is true because you see, the same people behind it made
sure those groups existed for a time too, all the special minority groups, and
subcategories within the categories, etc, of minority groups, all demanding to
be heard and have special rights. So they’re all used for a time, for a
purpose, to destroy the existing culture and society and then they take them
down as well. They don’t need them anymore. They’re cast
aside.

So
anyway, this is the time, as I say, when we’re getting all geared up for the
big scary time. They’ll put lots of scary stuff out now to do with all
the different Earth Summits coming up and Climate Change Summits all coming
together at the same time. And they actually admit that in their own web
sites; this is the time we must give them
scary scenarios, or they won’t take notice of us. So they tell us awful
things, like you know, the Arctic’s melting, there’s nothing left, and
then you see a photograph from NASA and it’s still there. And it doesn’t matter
how many times they’re disproven, they keep trying the same tricks over and
over again, to grab attention. They’re attention grabbers, you see. And
we’ve got to change our ways and become austere and allow ourselves to be ruled
with a new worldwide soviet type system, on behalf, mind you, of the
international money lenders, as opposed to just the bankers themselves. I
mean, the money lending families are very few and they hold real power.
And remember too, the Milner Group that morphed into the Royal Institute of
International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations, the Milner Group
was comprised of international money lenders. That’s who started it up.

And
this article here is another one too, Earth Systems Governance Project.
Now, you heard last night too on one of my talks, about all the Wall Street
Protests, etc, that eventually everything was highjacked. They always use
all the other groups and then they come in at the top eventually, at the end,
and they put forward their manifesto for world government. Not just
governance, but world government under the United Nations. Well this is
all coming together at the same time, because we’re post-national now,
supposedly, where there’s no more nations. Except if you’re going to war
they suddenly wave the flag again and bring back the slogans, and then you’re
back to being global once the war’s finished, if you haven’t noticed over the
few years. So I’ll put those links up too, to some of these organizations
that are really putting out the hype right now and trying to even show you
their new terminology. As I say, they always create a terminology for
what they pretend to be a science. And of course, it’s just like the king
has no clothes, the ones who belong to the intelligentsia, or think that they
do, want to adopt it very quickly so as they don’t get shown up at their wine
meetings where they stand and chat and talk about the latest books they’ve
read.

earthsystemgovernance.org

Now,
the economy is plummeting as you know in the States and elsewhere because
that’s the agenda. They knew this when your leaders across the Western
world signed the World Trade Organization’s agreements, with the GATT treaty,
where supposedly they’d end up doing away with the tariff for trade barriers,
taxes for imports, etc. And how they got over this in the Western countries,
because they weren’t going to lose out on that cash coming in with imports, is
they simply gave you Value Added Taxes, and GST in Canada which is a Value
Added Tax. So the countries of course, that were up-and-coming countries,
and they’re still calling China an up-and-coming country – they get 20 years of
grace periods before they have to start whopping taxes onto anything at all
amongst their own residents. They can also pollute as much as they want
as well. And the same with India, Brazil, and all the rest of them that
we finance, actually, because we pay them to come up. It’s our tax money
that’s being given to them to help this all along. Wonderful system, socialism,
isn’t it, eh?

Anyway,
in the US...

Lowes (A: A big chain.) to Close Stores;

Gap to Close US Stores, Expand in China; (A:
You know, they’ve got money to spend in China. You know, spare
change. So they’re moving over there not just to make stuff, they already
do, but to actually sell it to the Chinese because the Americans don’t have the
cash to buy.)

Financial job
carnage has already been announced. Layoffs in the financial sector may affect
80,000 or more. Cash strapped cities and states are shedding workers. Housing
is abysmal. To top it off, Retail jobs carnage is just around the corner.

• Gap will close 189
stores in the US and instead expand in China.

• Walmart plans
smaller stores. (A: As well.
Back with more after these messages.)

Hi
folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and just reading an article here
about the layoffs in the US, which is the most generous country in the
world. They’re just paying stuff, you know, for every country across the
planet; they’re helping them get off their knees and get started up and
producing. And of course they talk about balance of trade, and I think
the scale of exports in the US has been stuck on the ground for a long time;
everything’s imported now. Everything pretty well. Anyway, it says
here...

• Gap will close 189
stores in the US and instead expand in China.

• Walmart plans
smaller stores.

• Lowes announced
today it will close 20 stores affecting 1,950 employees.

• Best Buy plans to
reduce square footage by 10%.

• Regional and strip
mall vacancies are at record highs already.

How many trucking
jobs will that cost? How many manufacturing jobs? Note the implications on
commercial real estate rents and prices.

Today Citigroup set
aside lower reserves for losses. What a farce.

Let's take a look at
some of the retail stories. (A: And it’s got a whole bunch of
retail stories there.)

Lowe's Cos. is
shutting 20 of its home-improvement stores and greatly slowing future openings
in an effort to improve its profitability.

The closings affect
about 1,950 employees, and the retailer will book a related second-quarter
charge of $345 million to $415 million, or 17 cents to 20 cents a share. (A:
That’s what they’re down to. So the
shares are dropping as well.)

The company now
expects to open 10 to 15 stores a year in North America from 2012 forward, down
from its prior assumption of about 30 stores a year. Lowe's will open about 25
stores this year, as planned, having already committed to the sites.

So
things are going down and down, as of course they’re supposed to because it’s
planned that way, you see. And this is what they’re doing. They really
will bring America down to pretty well a third world status, as the third world
is being financed, by America, and some of them are actually surpassing the US
standards of living right now in fact, but they’ve still got some places to go.
The US must keep supplying the military for the foreign wars so as that they
can bring in this global society of a standardized world, the eradication of
almost all religions, perhaps except one, and make sure that everything’s
standardized, central banking everywhere, in regional blocs of course.
That’s the big agenda.

Now,
it’s interesting too, how they’re going after the children’s minds, or really,
reducing the children’s minds. Because if you have any ability...
You know, young men especially, they don’t want young men to become
leaders. All down through history those who have stood up and fought
against this banking system – which they call progress by the way, oh the
banks finance all progress and industry and you know, etc, etc, etc.
It’s always the males who tend to stand up and say, we don’t want our way of
life changed and destroyed. It doesn’t matter if it’s Africa or even
old Scotland at one time, or anywhere else. It’s the males who stand
up. So they’ve always been a problem. And what you find with males who
have leadership abilities is, even in school, they tend to do a lot of asking
of questions, and awkward questions too, because they’ll ask outside the
box. Teachers like children who are inside the box and who ask the
expected questions. But leaders have the ability to think outside the
box; that’s why they’re called leaders. So what you do is make sure you
don’t have leaders, and then you’ve got a nice docile society if you can
take care of those ones who have leadership qualities.

Previously,
recommendations and diagnosing and managing ADHD (A: Which all started
with inoculations by the way, because I can remember it all. And now it’s
a science, you know, etc; there’s more now because it’s better in detecting
them. We didn’t have this at school when I was wee. Didn’t happen.)
started with children aged six to 12. Since 2001, emerging evidence pointed
to expanding the age range to include preschool-aged children and adolescents,
the American Academy of Pediatrics said.

The revised
guidelines suggest doctors first prescribe behaviour therapy for preschoolers,
and that methylphenidate or Ritalin may be prescribed if that does not
significantly improve “and there is moderate-to-severe continuing disturbance
in the child’s function,” the group’s 14-member committee said. (A:
That’s a lot of power, isn’t it? 14-member committee and you end up
drugging an awful lot of children across, you know, the country.)

Behaviour therapy
includes training parents and teachers on techniques to help children manage
their anger, such as using positive reinforcement and punishing when a child
fails to meet goals. (A: Well, maybe the child isn’t interested
in a social-political agenda, and that’s what the goals happen to be:
Training everyone to be standardized, and the same, giving them boring
nonsense, a lot of pablum like Mark Twain talked about, and to be good model
citizens and be well behaved in a situation where you shouldn’t be well
behaved. Think about it.)

A student at the
Center for Attention and Related Disorders camp in New Fairfield, Conn. that
provides structure for children who suffer from Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity. New guidelines say the diagnosis should be considered in
children as young as four. (A: So anyways, it goes on and on and
on. It says...). . .

ADHD is the most
common neurobehavioral disorder in children, occurring in about eight percent
of children and youth, according to the report. (A: That’s
pretty high.)

To be diagnosed with
ADHD, a child must show key symptoms in multiple environments such as at home,
at school and in relationships with their peers that are tracked over time and
persist.

For elementary
school children and adolescents, the group recommended both approved
medications and behaviour therapy.

Remember
too, you know, HG Wells talked about this back in the 1920s when he worked at
the Fabian Society. And he said, they
would use all these sciences on the youth, of course, to make sure that they
wouldn’t have problems down the road with people who would be against their
particular system. Many others spoke about the same thing
too. Bertrand Russell said it as well. He said, those children who show leadership qualities, actually, and intelligence, who can understand and think
beyond their schoolmates, would be brought in through scholarships.
He says, if they wouldn’t join the system
and leave their family and class system behind them, he says, they would have to be, he was talking
about physically, eliminated.
Because they would be opposing leaders, opposing leaders with a good
functioning brain. Well, they’re making sure that won’t happen in the
future. What they want is those who will join the crowd mentality, and go
and protest when they’re told to protest, even if they’re being usurped by
another organization at the top run by the same people who run both
sides.

Now,
another article too, is...

Obama administration

(A:
We already know about his bailouts of Solyndra, the big company that made the
solar projects, and he’s also…) 'bailed
out' GM salmon firm

(A:
...modified salmon. That’s a big company that’s trying to get modified
salmon into America.)

The Obama
administration awarded a coveted research grant to a financially strapped
company working to put genetically modified (GM) salmon on American dinner
tables, overlooking disclosures that the firm could run out of cash in early
2012, it has emerged.

Campaigners say the
$500,000 grant to AquaBounty amounts to a bail-out for the firm's main
investor, the business tycoon and former economics minister of Georgia, Kakha
Bendukidze. They are also comparing it to the Solyndra controversy, which saw a
solar company go bankrupt after receiving government loan guarantees. (A:
It’s not bad having connections at the top, hey? I mean, you get these
gifts to start your big multi-million dollar corporations. It’s pretty
good eh? It’s not bad. [Alan chuckles.] Ah, it’s good to have
friends.)

Now...

Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals

greeleygazette.com / Jack Minor • October 15, 2011

(A: I knew
that would happen because I mean, that’s obviously what they were going to
do. Well, you gave it to them, you
know, what’s wrong with us? That’s discrimination...
And we really jump back at certain words now, because we’re trained to recoil
at certain words, and discrimination is one of them.)

Using the same
tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar
status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different
than heterosexual or homosexuals.

Critics of the
homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify
homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation,
logically nothing would be off limits. “Gay” advocates have taken offense at
such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are
now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality
was redefined several years ago.

Now,
I went through the meetings that they’ve had with the various groups from the
psychiatric associations and so on before – they have them every other year –
to try to legalize pedophilia. So I’ll put this other article up tonight
and you can have a read through it. And you can actually see the progress
they’ve made throughout the years. And eventually, as I’ve said, pedophilia
will be gone from the dictionary because society is kaput now anyway.
It’s finished. I’ve watched it my whole life, the whole agenda, going down the
tubes. I mean it’s pretty bad when you have to go into the ex-Soviet
Union to see what’s been happening. I mean, they followed the whole Marxist
concepts that we are now following, and been taught in universities, by the
special, you know, specially planted and placed professors. It says
here...

Europe to destroy traditional family and sexual
identity

(A:
This is from Russia.)

english.pravda.ru / 10.10.2011

Traditional words
'father' and 'mother' will be replaced with official terms Parent 1 and Parent
2 in Britain. (A: They’ve also done away with BC, by the way, for
dating things. Because a particular group thought it was discriminatory;
they didn’t like it. They were offended by it and so they changed that as
well, the same in Australia.) The terms will be used in official
documents. The authorities decided to make such a "politically
correct" move to accommodate same-sex couples. Experts are sure, though,
that the matter is not about the requirements of certain social groups. The
decision is another step towards the destruction of traditional families.
(A: And that’s true. You have to go through the planks of the Communist
Manifesto, for those who still care about why things are happening today
and how they’re related to the past. And you have to go into that to find
out that pretty well they’ve finished all of it, they’ve completed all of the
planks of the Communist Manifesto. In fact, Bezmenov that came
over from the KGB and defected said that in the 80s. He says, they were delighted and shocked to find out
that their destabilization and destruction, through liberalism they
called it, techniques through universities,
had taken off so well and had been accomplished, in such a short time.)

The words 'father'
and 'mother' will be removed from British passport applications before December
2011. This became an achievement of Stonewall group, which defends the rights
of sex minorities. The US State Department tried to do the same before, but it
was eventually decided not to remove the two words from US passport
applications.

The subject about
novelties in the field of gender relations has been getting more and more
popular recently. Not so long ago, Pravda.Ru wrote about the kindergarten in
Sweden, which became world-famous after its administration decided to simply
abolish the use of 'he' and 'she' pronouns.

Last year, the
European Parliament published the brochure, which recommended not to use the
words 'Missus' and 'Miss', 'Mademoiselle', 'Seniora' and 'Seniorita'.
From the point of view of the European parliament, the use of such words was
discriminating against women because they directly indicated their sexual identity.
(A: There’s an awful lot of women who like the words because they like
their sexual identity. Believe it or not, there are women who actually
like their sexual identity.)

One does not have to
be an expert to realize that such novelties in various countries are not just a
coincidence. It is a trend, the goal of which is to change the public
perception of the role of the sexes in the society.

Pavel Parfentyev,
the chairman of the inter-regional public organization "For Family
Rights" also shares this point of view.

"Indeed, this
is a serious international trend. It started back in the seventies and the
eighties as a powerful movement to defend the rights of sexual minorities.
There were organizations that tried to defend even the rights of pedophiles,
who, as they believed, also had the rights for their own sexual preferences.

"The
organizations publicly said that their goal was to destroy family. Afterwards,
under the pressure of public opinion, many activists decided to refuse from the
openly sexual bias in their activities. They proceeded towards the protection
of human rights. This is how they approach children's rights today. They think
that children must be protected from the despotism of their parents - from any
forms of traditional upbringing, that is to say. In order to accomplish that, one
has to destroy the traditional family first and to make the family become a
form that enslaves and binds children," the expert said. (A:
That’s a fact. That’s being taught now in classes in sociology for those
going into child care and child welfare and so on: that parents are bad, they contaminate the
children with old-fashioned ideas. Of course, Russell talked about
that back in the 1930s because he’d experimented in ways to destroy all
that. Strange that a British Lord would do that, and he was given
permission by the Queen of England, eh? And you think it’s the far, far
left that’s just behind this? One group owns them both actually.
One group.)

In order to be more
efficient, representatives of such movements began to cooperate with large
international organizations such as the UN and the Council of Europe. This led
to the creation of a small, albeit a very strong lobby for the protection of
the rights of sexual minorities on the international level, Pavel Parfentyev
believes. The lobby intends to distort the perception of traditional family in
the modern society.

As a result,
European officials already try to avoid the use of the word 'family' in
top-level international documents. (A: Unless you’re talking about the
family of nations and stuff like that; that’s okay.) Instead, they
use "family in all of its forms" expression, which implies all forms
of cohabitation. As a matter of fact, they deliberately erode and expand the
notion of family. The family as we know it has virtually disappeared from the
new term.

"The lobby
prefers to move in small steps. At first they say that one should not
discriminate human beings on their gender rights and sexual orientation. It is
hard to argue with this indeed. In Russia, there is no discrimination of real
human rights on the base of sexual preferences. At the same time, they create
special, previously unseen "rights" and preferences for homosexuals
on the international level. As a result, they attach special importance to
sexual orientation, which distinguishes a person and makes them stand higher
than others," Pavel Parfentyev said. (A: In other words,
they elevate minorities above all the rest.)

The words indicating
the sexual identity of people gradually disappear from official speech and
documents. If they abolish 'he', 'she', 'father' and 'mother' they will not be
able to abolish the gender per se. However, it can be possible to undermine the
traditional perception of gender. (A: Another technique they’re
using, though, is they’re actually going through the United Nations and through
The Rights of The Child, and this is the latest attempt to get
intergenerational – or pedophilic – sex going. And you find that the child, if
a parent stops their child from having sex, with that old geezer, you know,
then the parent is actually interfering with the child’s right to choose.
That’s the tack; that’s the tack they’re using now, you see.)

"A family is
much more than a marital union of two people. It is a reproduction mechanism
for the whole society.

You
understand, now, the government wants to be in charge of everything that the
family used to do itself. That’s the whole idea of this world society,
this planned, organized, expert-run society, their taking place of the family
unit AND what was a real community – not the artificial things the Soviet
systems are putting up now, but a real community. Because people didn’t
need social agencies to come in and help them out, or the sick folk who were
just let out of hospital, the local folk looked after them
themselves. I remember that, when I was small; that’s what we used
to do. So anyway, this is a big step towards it too, is doing away
with... you don’t know what to call anybody anymore… I guess we’ll all
have titles, in the new super soviet. We’ll have titles, super titles and
things like that. Awfully trendy, eh? Now, here’s the music coming
in and I’ll go on with more topics when I come back from this break.

Hi
folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. If you’ve never read
Professor Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American
Establishment, to show you how the system works and who set it up, the
global agendas, the wars that they started even. That’s in their own
histories that they started wars off and blamed other people, and manipulated
whole countries, in fact continents into warfare, to achieve a world system
which they would dominate. You’ve got to read them because it’s the
Council on Foreign Relations I’m talking about and the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, who are the biggest players in the world today, across
the entire planet. They have their organizations and their Round Table
societies all working – working busily like little beavers, like the ones down
the road building the dams across my road here – and they’ve got what they
want. And they use all parties, all
sides; and that’s what Quigley said himself. He was the official
historian for the group and saw all the records, had access to it, and he
wasn’t opposed to it. He said, it’s a planned society, it’s a world society,
run by intelligentsia used through academia, a world managerial system to run
it all, and basically using all of the sciences to run the general populations.
And we’re right here folks. It’s happening right now. As I say,
they’ve always, from the very beginning, used wars, started, sparked wars off,
blamed somebody else, and got other people fighting each other, as they sat
back and waited for the results. Actually they guide the results.
So you got to read them.

And
people in America really don’t think they’re global yet. The only ones who haven’t told them are
their own leaders, or bosses. Even the USDA system is international, in
America.

Did you know the USDA Forest Service is working in 59
countries around the globe?

fs.fed.us

(A: Did you
know that?)

In fact, the Forest
Service partners internationally on a wide range of natural resource
management, policy and research issues. Many units of the Forest Service are
engaged in this work which advances sustainable forest management both overseas
and in the United States.

All branches of the
USDA Forest Service, which include National Forests, Research Stations and the
units that assist private landowners have dynamic international exchanges,
collaboration and projects around the globe. Strong partnerships with land
grant universities, environmental NGO's (A: That’s the new system,
folks; NGOs and private organizations, universities, and foundations, working
with government.) and the private sector make this work integrated and
comprehensive. (A: And they show you all the countries that they’re
working in, courtesy of the taxpayer of course, who’s not allowed to walk on
the forest back home. [Alan laughing.])

Isn’t
that just wonderful, eh? And they still think that they’ve got a
country. Still think they’ve got a country. They’ve gone so far
ahead that people haven’t even caught up halfway yet to what’s actually
happened so far. Another article I want to put up too, is to do with the
Mayo Clinic and others too.

New Discovery Shakes the Foundation of Cancer Research

By Dr. Mercola | mercola.com / October 15 2011

(A: They’ll
never give a treatment to the general public, you understand, that actually works.
And they do have them, higher up.)

In a scandal that
has reverberated around the world of cancer research, the Office of Research
Integrity at the U.S. Department of Health found that a Boston University
cancer scientist fabricated his findings. His work was published in two
journals in 2009, and he’s been ordered to retract them. But important studies
by other scientists like those at the Mayo Clinic, who based their work on his
findings, could now make 10 years of their studies worthless, according to
commentary in Gaia Health. (A: …it’s called.)

So
scientists are going to rule you? They’re the most corrupt people out
there, you know. I mean, there’s a whack of cash to come in from grants…
ruling your lives… with all kinds of weird and wacky ideas. And
neuroscientists, they’re all in on it too, everybody’s in on it, to dominate
you. You know, little old you… the guy at the bottom… if you let
’em.

From
Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or
your Gods GO with you. Remember, buy the books
and disks and donate as well, because I can’t live on fresh air, even if
I could get it these days, under all this spraying that we’re getting.