Analyst warns striking ISIL will deteriorate fanaticism

Analysts are warning about the consequences of launching military strikes against ISIL terrorists.

In light of the growing fears in Europe and elsewhere over the possible new attacks by ISIL terrorists, analysts are again raising questions over who actually created this violent terrorist group and what would be the consequences of launching military strikes on them.

Michael Aydinian, a London-based political commentator, believes that the emergence of ISIL terrorists is murky, emphasizing that the terrorist group is the creation of the CIA and Mossad.

One reason that testifies this, Aydinian said, is the fact that ISIL has so far refused to attack Israel.

“They have never attacked Israel which is next door to Syria. So if ISIL is an Islamic terrorist organization then it's the first one that's deaf, dumb and blind. We can safely say ISIL is fighting the Syrian army which itself is receiving help. Therefore one is obliged to ask how is ISIL being serviced or more importantly, who is servicing this vast army of mercenary killers.”

Aydinian further emphasized that the Western countries have gradually found the excuse they needed to destroy what he described as “their own creation”.

“For well over a year, the ISIL fear factor was ramped up, finally giving the West the excuse they needed to bomb Syria. They had to fight the very terrorist threat that they had actually created,” he added.

He further warned that any military action against ISIL will lead to the creation of more terrorist fanatics.

“What do we expect when we destroy entire nations that have never caused us any harm? Of course this is a problem, but civil unrest I believe is something they're perfectly happy to see. This way the police can be given even more power, while our rights are further eroded.”

In response to a question regarding a potential military intervention in Syria by countries like Britain, Aydinian emphasized that Prime Minster David Cameron will have the lawmakers approve his plan to bomb the ISIL.

“Cameron's strategy will be the one he's always pursued - it's all about regime change in Syria - nothing else,” he said.

“I believe Cameron is hardly setting out a new strategy; rather a continuation of what he's set out to do from the outset. He said 'Assad must go.' He made this clear.”

Aydinian said Cameron has been pushing for military intervention in Syria on the back of several false claims including the 2013 chemical attack on Syrian civilians. However, he emphasized that the British public are more alert to political twists than 2003 when Tony Blair took the country to war in Iraq.

“This time the British people weren't buying it,” he said. “Of course in the past two years, while we've been allegedly fighting this war on terror, we're led to believe this new terrible terrorist threat ISIL, one even worse than Al Qaeda, had emerged out of nowhere.”