The Pixelmon Auction system has been launched which will bring a safe method of trading pixelmon for pokecoins.

This system will work directly with your PokeCoins ingame and works with the command /sell 1-6. Once you stored a pixelmon to sell on the pixelmon auction you can go to pixelmoncraft.com/auction to find the auction page. Here you can put your pixelmon up for auction on the Sell a Pixelmon page.

Before you can purchase or put up pixelmon for auction you have to confirm your ingame account with /confirm. And when you succesully purchased a pixelmon this pixelmon will become available directly in /claim. The minimum price of a pixelmon is 50pc and the auction fees are 10pc, you pay the fee if you buy a pixelmon or cancel an auction.

On your profile and other user's profile pages you can find a listening of pixelmon auctions per player.

This system works with a Terms of Service agreement which you will have to accept every time you make use of the pixelmon auction. pixelmoncraft.com/tos/

Thank you for your quick reply, Lemonita.
I have been thinking of a calculator, and did some experiments on Microsoft Office Excel.
I finally came up with a little calculator, though it requires a lot of manual input, and it favors untouched Pixelmon/Pixelmon with no EVs.
It's not accurate, but it does come out with decent values with my current calculation.
My current calculations:
A lvl 100 pikachu, with all IVs at maximum (Each stat has 31 IVs) and 0 EVs is worth 231,7 PC.
A lvl 1 pikachu, with al IVs at maximum (Each stat has 31 IVs) and 0 EVs is worth 202 PC
A lvl 100 pikachu with 0 IVs and 510 EVs is worth 100.2 PC.
A lvl 1 pikachu with 0 IVs and 510 EVs is worth 70.5 PC.
Why I didn't give any value to a fully EV Trained Pixelmon?
This is because it would be impossible to calculate the value of a Pixelmon EV trained in the right stats. If you would give any value to EV using my formula, the calculator would give the same value to a Pikachu having random EVs in certain stats as to a Pikachu being EV trained in the good stats. I am sure this would not be fair for players who actually EV train their pixelmon comparing to players who just randomly battle.
I also added an extra calculation giving more value if the Pixelmon is at a lower lvl. I named it "Stage Value"
Example:
Pikachu is a evolution stage 2 Pixelmon (First you got Pichu of course) and because it can learn more movesets while at a lower level, making EV training easier due to better moves and it gets more value making it ideal for EV training after the auction has been bought.
For example:
A lvl 1 pikachu would get a Stage Value of 20 PC.
A lvl 100 pikachu would only get a Stage Value of 0.5 EV
I added the minimum of 50 PC for an auction to my calculations, but as fee does not fall under value, the 25 PC are not calculated with it.
All formulas have been done using the cells in Excelm so no valued numbers have been written making the calculator automatically changing it's values.
Please contact me in any way (This topic/PM) to tell me if you would like to see my calculator (Excel 2007 file) or not.
Thank you,
Tomma

Why are the player names not on the main view?
Beauce its not important from who you buy the pixelmon. If you want to filter on player go to the player profile and hit the "Auction" tab. Like lemon said

The auction shows 2 poke for some sort of bug but actually the poke is only 1?

The poke got duped due to some auction bug?

Evs, ivs, natures, sizes, moves, shiny, genders, prices and the seller are exactly the same.. Too much of a coincidence :V

The first day the auction came out i've seen something like 10x enormous adamant rayquaza. I didn't check the seller and stats but.. 10x adamant enormous rayquaza, suddenly removed from the auction 10 minutes later, at the same price... seems too much of a coincidence too.. :) btw, i really didn't check, it could be a coincidence....

-----------------------------

And stonez, i guess it's not a bug.

All the math behind "numbers" in pokemon it's %, but the pokemon and the pixelmon games calculate it in a different way.

I could be wrong but i guess i'm not, this is what i think it's happened to your poke:

The base Special Defence of your poke is something like 42,9999999999. For pokemon it should be 42, for pixelmon it should be 43.

You did only 3 points ev training in special defence or maybe even 0 but the game can't understand why you have 43 instead of 42, probably becouse the formula used to calculate is a pokemon formula, not a pixelmon one. So, the game notice your poke should have 42 and thinks you did 4 ev trainings in sp. defence to reach the 43.

You can notice the same "problem" checking ivs. Many times i was checking ivs and ivs calculators told me "you can't have 25 in that specific stat.. its 24 or 26.. It happened to me many times so i though it could be a problem of rounding off.. It was proved leveling up my pokes. If you exactly have 31 ivs in a particular stat, it could be at lvl 100 to have 1 more point then the maximum for that poke.. I can't remember who, but someone told me: My adamant gliscor has 318 attack at lvl 100 and it's impossible.. gliscor can have at most 317 with 31 iv and 252 ev training. This happened becouse on pokemon game, gliscor has something like 317,xxxxxx and in pokemon becomes 317, in pixelmon becomes 318. Very simple ^^

Back to your problem, u probably trained your poke 255 and 255, special attack and speed but the game just cant understand why you have 1 more point then normal in special defence and it thought u trained your poke 4 ev points.. At the same time you can't have lesser then 252 and 252 in special attack and speed becouse of your sp.attack stat and speed stat and that's why it was forced to show 1 more ev training.

I can't still understand why it took 3 points from you ev speed training instead of taking both speed and sp. attack, showing 252, 4, 252.

Btw, as i told you, it could also be for other reasons, i'm sure about iv's and i just thought it could be the same problem for evs.

What, them all? No I have good shinies, legendaries and stuff there. I thought that coping and adding a page system to it like the one there is at buying browsing wouldn't be difficult. I assume I was wrong then...